Fee Increases for Overtime Services, 59561-59568 [2015-25101]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372).
The environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact may be
viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site.
Copies of the environmental assessment
and finding of no significant impact are
also available for public inspection at
USDA, room 1141, South Building, 14th
Street and Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except holidays. Persons wishing to
inspect copies are requested to call
ahead on (202) 799–7039 to facilitate
entry into the reading room. In addition,
copies may be obtained by writing to the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this final rule,
which were filed under 0579–0431,
have been submitted for approval to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). When OMB notifies us of its
decision, if approval is denied, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of what action
we plan to take.
§ 319.37–1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance agreement. A written
agreement between APHIS and a person
(individual or corporate) engaged in the
production, processing, handling, or
moving of restricted articles imported
pursuant to this subpart, in which the
person agrees to comply with the
subpart and the terms and conditions
specified within the agreement itself.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 319.37–8 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (e), introductory text,
by removing the period after the entry
for ‘‘Schlumberga spp. from the
Netherlands and Denmark’’ and adding,
in alphabetical order, an entry for
‘‘Solanum lycopersicum from Mexico.’’.
■ b. By adding paragraph (e)(2)(xii).
■ c. By revising the OMB citation at the
end of the section.
The addition and revision read as
follows:
§ 319.37–8
Growing media.
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(xii) Plantlets of Solanum
lycopersicum from Mexico must also
meet the following conditions:
(A) The plantlets must be produced in
accordance with § 319.37–5(r)(3);
(B) The plantlets can only be
imported into the continental United
States, and may not be imported into
Hawaii or the territories of the United
States; and
(C) The plantlets must be imported
from Mexico directly into a greenhouse
in the continental United States, the
owner or owners of which have entered
into a compliance agreement with
APHIS. The required compliance
agreement will specify the conditions
under which the plants must enter and
be maintained within the greenhouse,
and will prohibit the plantlets from
being moved from the greenhouse
following importation, other than for the
appropriate disposal of dead plantlets.
(D) If all of the above requirements are
correctly complied with, then the
tomato fruit produced from the
imported greenhouse plantlets may be
shipped from the greenhouses for
commercial sale within the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control numbers 0579–0266
and 0579–0431)
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the EGovernment Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this final rule, please contact Ms.
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
2727.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 319 as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Section 319.37–1 is amended by
adding, in alphabetical order, a
definition for compliance agreement to
read as follows:
■
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
*
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59561
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
September 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–25100 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 354
9 CFR Parts 97 and 130
[Docket No. APHIS–2009–0047]
Fee Increases for Overtime Services
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are changing the hourly
rates charged for Sundays, holidays, or
other overtime work performed by
employees of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for
any person, firm, or corporation having
ownership, custody, or control of
regulated commodities or articles
subject to agricultural inspection,
laboratory testing, certification, or
quarantine under the regulations. We
are increasing these overtime rates for
each of the fiscal years 2016 through
2018 to reflect the anticipated costs
associated with providing these services
during each year. Establishing the
overtime rate changes in advance will
allow users of APHIS’ services to
incorporate the rates into their budget
planning. We are also clarifying the
regulations to indicate that agricultural
inspections performed by the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) may be billed in accordance with
DHS overtime regulations for services
performed outside of regular business
hours, as DHS rates may differ from
those charged by APHIS.
DATES: Effective November 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information concerning Plant Protection
and Quarantine program operations,
contact Ms. Diane L. Schuble, AQI User
Fee Coordinator, Office of the Executive
Director-Policy Management, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 131,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–
2338.
For information concerning
Veterinary Services program operations,
contact Ms. Carol Tuszynski, Director,
Planning, Finance, and Strategy Staff,
Program Support Services, VS, APHIS,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
59562
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
4700 River Road Unit 58, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231; (301) 851–3463.
For information concerning APHIS
overtime fee development, contact Ms.
Adelaide Feukam, Auditor, Review and
Analysis, Financial Management
Division, MRPBS, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 55, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851–2601.
For information concerning DHS
overtime fees, contact Mrs. Kara Welty,
Chief, Debt Management Branch,
Indianapolis, CBP, DHS, 6650 Telecom
Drive Suite 100, Indianapolis, IN
46278–2010; (317) 614–4614.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR chapter III
and 9 CFR chapter I, subchapters D and
G, require inspection, laboratory testing,
certification, or quarantine of certain
animals, poultry, animal byproducts,
germ plasm, organisms, vectors, plants,
plant products, or other regulated
commodities or articles intended for
importation into, or exportation from,
the United States. With some
exceptions, which are explained below,
when these services must be provided
by an Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) employee
on a Sunday or on a holiday, or at any
other time outside the APHIS
employee’s regular duty hours, the
Government charges an hourly overtime
fee for the services in accordance with
7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97.
Based on changes to the costs
associated with providing agricultural
inspection, laboratory testing,
certification, and quarantine services,
we determined that adjustments to the
overtime rates in 7 CFR part 354 and 9
CFR part 97 were necessary in order for
APHIS to recover the full cost of
providing these services. Therefore, we
proposed to set hourly overtime rates for
inspection, laboratory testing,
certification, and quarantine services
provided outside of an employee’s
normal tour of duty for fiscal years (FYs)
2014 through 2018. Our proposal was
published in the Federal Register on
April 25, 2014 (79 FR 22887–22895,
Docket No. APHIS–2009–0047).1 The
proposed overtime rates were based on
our costs of providing the services,
including direct labor costs, area
delivery costs, billing and collection
costs, program direction and support
costs, agency/management support
costs, central/departmental changes,
and a reserve component, plus
adjustments for inflation and
1 To
view the proposed rule and the comments
we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/#
!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
anticipated annual increases in the
salaries of employees who provide the
services.
We also proposed to include language
in 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, and 9 CFR
130.50 to clarify and inform the public
that any agricultural inspection
performed by an employee of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) on a Sunday, holiday,
or anytime outside of the employee’s
normal tour of duty may be billed in
accordance with the regulations in 5
CFR part 551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1,
9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR 24.16. Such
billing is necessary because the costs
associated with the DHS agricultural
inspections and incurred by DHS may
differ from those incurred by APHIS.
Therefore, varying overtime charges
may apply in such circumstances in
order for DHS to properly recover their
costs and adequately fund their program
operations.
We solicited comments concerning
our proposal for 60 days ending June 24,
2014. We received 43 comments by that
date. They were from producers,
importers, industry groups, and private
individuals. Two were supportive of the
proposed action. The remainder are
discussed below by topic.
Comments on Rate Calculation
Methodology
As previously stated, we proposed to
establish the hourly overtime rates for
FY 2014 through FY 2018. We note that,
as FYs 2014 and 2015 have ended, the
overtime rates covered by this final rule
are now only for FYs 2016 through
2018. The FY 2016 rates will become
effective 30 days after the date of
publication of this final rule; the FY
2017 and FY 2018 rates would become
effective on the first day of each of the
fiscal years, and the FY 2018 rates
would remain in effect until new rates
were established.
One commenter stated that our aim of
seeking set rates for anticipated costs
over a 5 year period is too speculative
and far too difficult to predict with
accuracy. The commenter suggested that
APHIS use a 5 year projection as a
planning tool only and constrain
specific overtime cost increases to a
shorter timeframe.
We disagree with the commenter’s
assessment. Based on our experience
with past overtime fee increases,
information regarding such increases
that covers a longer timeframe allows
users of APHIS’ services to incorporate
the rates into their budget planning. In
addition, we arrive at our projected
figures using those gross domestic
product (GDP) figures provided by the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in the Presidential budget, which
is the Government standard for such
fees and is not subject to rate instability.
Moreover, as explained above, the
actual timeframe of this rule will be
based on a shorter 3 year period since
it will only apply to FYs 2016 through
2018.
The commenter went on to assert that
our calculations should address not
only the cost of providing overtime
service, but also specify what steps are
being taken to reduce costs to the
Agency and thereby also reduce
customer costs.
While the main cost driver of
reimbursable overtime is the cost of
salaries and benefits, APHIS has taken
steps in recent years to achieve
efficiencies as part of United States
Department of Agriculture’s (USDA)
Blueprint for Stronger Service.2 For
example, APHIS centralized certain
services such as information technology,
customer service support,
telecommunications, and vehicle
inventory while also enacting additional
controls on purchases. APHIS continues
to look for opportunities to reduce
operating costs where possible while
maintaining the level of services needed
to carry out our mission of safeguarding
U.S. agriculture.
We calculated our overtime rates to
cover the full cost of providing
inspection, testing, certification, or
quarantine services at laboratories,
border ports, ocean ports, rail ports,
quarantine facilities, and airports
outside of the normal tour of duty of the
employee providing these services. The
cost of providing these services includes
direct and indirect costs. The direct
costs are an employee’s salary and
specific benefits, which are APHIS’
payment of the hospital insurance tax
and its contribution to the Federal
Insurance Contribution Act (FICA), and
the Agency’s costs for work performed
at night. The indirect costs are area
delivery costs, billing and collection
costs, program direction and support
costs, central/departmental charges, and
unfunded leave costs.
A number of commenters observed
that, in the calculation of overtime rates,
only the variable cost of providing the
additional service outside of regular
business hours should be included in
the assessment of the overall cost.
Specifically, the commenters stated that
there is no justification for the inclusion
of most of the components identified in
2 Information on this initiative is available on the
Internet at https://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/
usdahome?contentidonly=true&
contentid=blueprint_for_stronger_service.html.
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
area delivery, imputed costs, agency
level program delivery, agency level
administrative support, and central/
departmental charges.
We followed Federal guidance related
to fee setting and managerial cost
accounting in determining program
costs. Specifically, we followed OMB
Circular A–25: User Charges, which
provides guidance on setting fees in the
Federal Government, and SFAS No. 4,
which includes, among other things, a
definition of full cost. OMB Circular A–
25, which may be viewed at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars_default, establishes the
requirement that fees be set at full cost
to the Government, and provides a
definition and examples for full cost.
OMB Circular A–25 very specifically
defines full cost to include the costs
referenced by the commenters.
Another commenter asked to review
APHIS’s full revenue-costs statements as
well as the full economic impact
assessment. The commenter stated that
the information was not included with
the proposed rule.
Our full calculation of all aspects of
overtime fees, starting with direct labor
costs and including all indirect costs
and overhead elements, was included in
the proposed rule, which is available for
public review on the Internet at: https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047.
The regulatory impact analysis and
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
were also made available on
Regulations.gov along with the
proposed rule as part of the rule’s
supporting documents. We maintain
that this level of detail provides the
highest degree of transparency and
supports the required increase needed
in our rates.
As detailed above, APHIS calculates
its overtime fees based on a variety of
sources apart from employee salary
considerations. Per OMB Circular A–25,
the overtime program is a full cost
recovery program, which includes the
direct and indirect costs outlined
previously.
One commenter stated that APHIS
should reconsider its cost estimates
since the initial impetus for the
proposed rule was work done in 2010 at
the height of the financial crisis. The
commenter went on to say that, since
that time, the rate of importation and
export has increased significantly,
which would increase Agency funds
that might be used to cover these costs
instead.
We disagree with the commenter’s
assessment. While there are other
components involved, much of the cost
of overtime inspection is made up of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
inspector salaries. The APHIS budget
provides funding for inspectors working
within business hours, Monday through
Friday, except holidays. Any work
performed outside that timeframe is, by
definition, additional and irregular. As
detailed in OMB Circular A–25, Federal
agencies are charged to recoup their
costs in such instances via the
assessment of overtime fees. Any
additional funds that APHIS (or DHS for
that matter) may receive via any
increases in trade would remain in the
accounts used by the specific Agency
and programs that provide the services
and incur the costs.
Comments on Billing Procedures
Two commenters stated that most, if
not all, of the ports require that overtime
be requested and paid for in a minimum
of 4-hour blocks regardless of whether
those 4 hours are needed or used. The
commenters suggested that APHIS
change its overtime billing policy so
that importers would only be charged
for the time required to conduct the
requested inspection. The commenters
also suggested that, if an inspector is
called for overtime work in the 4 hour
block described above and the whole of
that time is not used, that inspector
should then remain onsite for the
remainder of the 4 hour time period in
order to deal with any other vessels or
cargoes that may arrive and require
immediate inspection.
In § 354.1, paragraph (a)(2) states that
a minimum charge of 2 hours will be
made for inspection services performed
by an APHIS employee outside of his or
her normal tour of duty on Saturdays,
holidays, weekdays, or Sundays. In
addition, overtime fees may include a
commuted traveltime period (CTT),
which is established by APHIS to cover
the time an employee spends reporting
to and returning from the place where
the requested overtime duties are
performed.3 We believe the 4-hour
minimum cited by the commenters
includes the minimum overtime work
time of 2 hours in addition to 2 hours
of CTT. Although CTT ranges from 1 to
12 hours, 2 hours is the allotted CTT at
many of our busiest ports. Regarding the
commenters’ second point concerning
inspectors remaining onsite to perform
other unexpected inspection; an
arrangement of this nature is not
precluded by the regulations. However,
APHIS leaves such administrative
details to the knowledge and discretion
of the individual ports. The actual
management of staffs, inspectors, hours,
staffing for arrival, and identification of
3 A full listing of CTT periods may be found in
§ 354.2 of the regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59563
risk and needs varies from port to port
and is best handled by port directors
equipped with the detailed information
necessary to make daily staffing
decisions.
Two commenters observed that, in
many instances, vessels and cargoes are
ready for inspection during normal
business hours only to find that DHS
inspectors are not available due to the
volume of inspections required for other
vessels. The commenters stated that
users should not be made to pay for
services rendered in overtime periods
that could have been conducted during
normal business hours had sufficient
personnel been available.
We have considered the commenters’
point and have received detailed
information from DHS regarding their
staffing policies at the ports. Overall,
DHS employs a rigorous, data-driven
methodology to identify staffing
requirements. It is composed of multiple
elements—some fixed, others variable—
that may be adjusted according to
changing priorities, risks, and threats. In
early 2014, a risk-based Agriculture
Resource Allocation Model was
finalized, which will serve as an
important component of DHS’s
methodology. The Agriculture Resource
Allocation Model will more accurately
calculate the number of agricultural
inspectors required to efficiently handle
workflow at the ports. DHS will
integrate the results of the Agriculture
Resource Allocation Model into its
existing methodology in order to
provide a more holistic view of DHS’s
staffing requirements. Generally
speaking, APHIS and DHS staffing
decisions for agricultural inspections
are continuously being reformulated
based on changing conditions so that
the ports may operate at a constantly
improving level of service.
Two commenters stated that the
regulations should stipulate that any
overtime fees collected should be
returned to the port where the services
are rendered. The commenters said that
this would ensure that sufficient funds
are available where needed, and the
Agencies would not be required to
utilize appropriated funds or cash
reserves to cover expenses associated
with overtime fees.
We disagree with the commenters. It
would be administratively burdensome
for APHIS (or DHS for that matter) to
maintain and track reimbursable
overtime collections for agricultural
inspection to a port-by-port level.
Because the application of reimbursable
overtime rates distinctively mirrors the
work the employees perform and are
paid for, there is no need to track
collections and costs to this level.
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
59564
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Program budgeters carefully consider
the amount of reimbursable overtime
work at their ports in providing budget
estimates from year to year. Finally,
APHIS and DHS overtime fee
collections are already tracked to the
agency level; those collections remain in
the appropriate accounts to fund each
Department’s respective overtime
operations.
Two commenters observed that both
APHIS and DHS must be able to provide
invoices for all overtime fees in a timely
manner. The commenters suggested that
the regulations stipulate that invoices
will be provided within 30 days of the
inspection date.
Comments referring to specific billing
practices are outside the scope of the
current rulemaking. Invoices are
generally provided simultaneous to
inspection; however the commenters
should contact the port director with
any questions or concerns about the
timeliness of billing.
Other commenters stated that it
would be possible for APHIS and DHS
to assess overtime fees at a lower rate if
industry were involved in negotiations
between those Agencies and the
inspectors’ union.
Any discussion of union contract
negotiation is outside the scope of the
current rulemaking.
A commenter observed that greater
responsiveness to current industry
practices is needed. The commenter
went on to state that, at the port in
Atlanta, GA, importers cannot request
weekend overtime after 3 p.m. on
Friday, however it is impossible to
determine with certainty by that time
how much overtime will be necessary.
The commenter is engaged in the
importation of plant cuttings or live
plants, which are perishable, and the
busiest importing days, based on
industry need and long-established
industry practice, include Saturdays
and Sundays.
Another commenter stated that the
port in Miami, FL, had recently
extended its weekday operational hours.
The commenter urged APHIS to
maintain those hours.
As previously stated, APHIS leaves
such administrative details as the
deadline for requesting weekend
overtime and the operational hours of
the ports to the knowledge and
discretion of those individual ports. If
the first commenter wishes to propose
an extension of the deadline for
requesting weekend overtime and the
second commenter would like to
maintain extended weekday hours of
operation they should contact their local
port directors.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
Comments on Proposed Costs
A number of commenters expressed
concern at the cost numbers supplied by
APHIS in the proposed rule.
Several commenters observed that the
proposed rule would increase the cost
for overtime services by 30 to 49 percent
(some commenters cited the increase as
45 to 55 percent); a number that
represents 3 to 5 times the rate of
inflation since the last increase in 2002.
Further, the commenters remarked that
the U.S. Department of Labor had
reported only a 10 percent increase in
the Consumer Price Index since 2002.
The commenters were troubled by the
difference between the inflation rate, the
Consumer Price Index rate, and the
proposed percentage increase to
overtime fees.
Overtime fees are not solely based on
either the rate of inflation or the
Consumer Price Index. As stated
previously, the cost of providing these
services includes direct and indirect
costs. The direct costs are an employee’s
salary and specific benefits, which are
APHIS’ payment of the hospital
insurance tax and its contribution to the
FICA, and the Agency’s costs for work
performed at night. The indirect costs
are area delivery costs, billing and
collection costs, program direction and
support costs, central/departmental
charges, and unfunded leave costs.
Another commenter suggested that
the cost increases should be made
incrementally over the next several
years to lessen the burden on producers
and exporters and help them maintain
their competitive position.
A phase-in of the proposed changes
would simply delay achieving the rule’s
objectives: To properly recover costs
and adequately fund program
operations. We would add that the
decision to request overtime services,
and therefore to incur additional costs,
is left to the importer and such
importers may realize price efficiencies
by scheduling inspections during
regular business hours.
Several commenters observed that the
increase in the overtime fees will come
in conjunction with a new fee of $375
per treatment for various types of
treatments currently offered at no
charge. The commenters asserted that
the cumulative effect of these cost
increases will have a chilling effect on
the perishable goods import/export
market in the United States.
The fee to which the commenters
refer was included in a proposal to add
new fee categories and adjust current
fees charged for certain agricultural
quarantine and inspection services
provided in connection with certain
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commercial vessels, commercial trucks,
commercial railroad cars, commercial
aircraft, and international passengers
arriving at ports in the customs territory
of the United States.4 While the fees
discussed in that rule are compulsory,
overtime fees represent the cost of
providing the additional service outside
of regular business hours. As stated
previously, the decision to request
overtime services, and therefore to incur
additional costs, is left to the importer.
Comments on Economic Impact
A number of commenters from
Florida stated that the proposed
increase in overtime fees would prove
detrimental to trade, commerce, and the
economy of that State.
We disagree with the commenters’
assessment. Based on the economic
assessment included with the proposal,
we estimate that the impact of this rule
will be minor. Further, the commenters
did not provide any economic data in
support of their claim for APHIS to
examine.
Another commenter observed that
Florida has successfully worked with
APHIS to implement the first ever cold
treatment pilot project for perishable
commodities. The commenter was
concerned that increased overtime fee
rates would prove economically
detrimental to the future of that project
both in Florida and other areas where
cold treatment is already permitted.
We disagree with the commenter’s
statement. APHIS’ agreement with the
shipping lines in the Florida cold
treatment pilot program requires that
cold treatment be completed before the
ship arrives at the port because there are
no approved cold treatment facilities
available in Florida. Since the cold
treatment must take place prior to
shipment arrival, any information
regarding application of cold treatment
may be transmitted to the ports during
regular business hours.
Comments on Comment Period
We received several requests for an
extension of the comment period on the
proposed rule. After careful
consideration, we determined to keep
the original deadline. While APHIS has
not updated its overtime fees since
2005, these increases remain a routine
cost-recovery measure for the Agency.
Comments on Agency Jurisdiction
Two commenters stated that, to the
extent APHIS and CBP are performing
the same inspection services, the
4 You may view the proposed rule at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2013-0021.
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
shipping community has a reasonable
right to expect that the rates charged
will be consistent across the agencies
and that any internal conflicts in pay
and rate schedules should be
transparent to the service recipient. The
commenters concluded that, to the
extent one agency is acting on behalf of
the other, it is imperative that the
agency which is incurring the costs
retains the appropriate percentage of the
revenues collected.
We agree with the commenters’
observations. Providing clarity while
allowing APHIS and DHS to recoup
inspection costs was our intent in
publishing this rule.
Finally, one commenter said that
there is confusion about which agencies
have responsibility for and jurisdiction
over various functions. The commenter
said that the rule should clearly
delineate which functions are
performed by APHIS and which are
performed on behalf of APHIS by DHS.
The commenter concluded that fees
should be listed only in the relevant
sections of the CFR, and there must be
no question that both APHIS and DHS
are not billing individually for the same
services.
Generally speaking, most of the
agricultural inspections discussed in
this rule are performed by DHS
pursuant to the Homeland Security Act.
Examples of agricultural inspections
performed by APHIS include those
associated with the importation of live
plants, which occur at designated plant
inspection stations, and APHIS
oversight of certain port of entry
treatments. As stated in the proposed
rule, DHS conducts billings of their
overtime charges in accordance with the
regulations in 5 CFR part 551, 7 CFR
354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19
CFR 24.16. The DHS fees for agricultural
inspection overtime work are not listed
in a specific section of the CFR as the
Homeland Security Act that first
established DHS did not provide any
new regulatory authority to DHS but
rather used the existing regulatory
authority of those agencies or programs
whose functions were transferred to
DHS. So APHIS’ regulatory authority is
used to enumerate or revise agricultural
inspection overtime rates.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, with a few, minor editorial
changes.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This final rule is subject to Executive
Order 12866. However, for this action,
the Office of Management and Budget
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
has waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we
have performed a final regulatory
flexibility analysis, which is
summarized below, regarding the
economic effects of this rule on small
entities. Copies of the full analysis are
available on the Regulations.gov Web
site (see footnote 1 in this document for
a link to Regulations.gov) or by
contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
APHIS charges hourly overtime rates
to individuals, firms, and corporations
requesting inspection, testing,
certification, or quarantine services at
laboratories, border ports, ocean ports,
rail ports, quarantine facilities, and
airports outside of the regularly
established hours of service. These
overtime rates are charged to the
individuals, firms, or corporations
requesting the services, and the fees
vary depending on the type of service
performed and when the service is
provided. This rule amends the fees for
reimbursable overtime to reflect
increased costs associated with
providing these services.
APHIS is updating these fees to take
into account the routine increases in the
cost of conducting business during
overtime hours. The cost to the import/
export program to provide these services
has increased year to year, and these
proposed increases are necessary to
more accurately provide the full cost
recovery of this Agency activity.
Currently, APHIS charges $51 per
hour per employee for inspection,
testing, certification, or quarantine of
animals or agricultural products outside
the employee’s regular tour of duty, and
$67 per hour per employee for
inspection, testing, certification, or
quarantine of animals or agricultural
products that is performed on Sundays
outside the employee’s regular tour of
duty. APHIS charges $41 per hour per
employee for commercial airline
inspection services that are performed
outside of the regularly established
hours of service on a holiday or any
other period and $55 per hour per
employee for commercial airline
inspection services that are performed
outside of the regularly established
hours of service on a Sunday. This rule
establishes hourly overtime rates for
each of the fiscal years 2016 through
2018. From FY 2016 through FY 2018,
these rates would increase by $24 for
inspection, testing, certification, or
quarantine of animals or agricultural
products outside the employee’s regular
tour of duty (Monday through Saturday
and holidays), by $33 for inspection,
testing, certification, or quarantine of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59565
animals or agricultural products that is
performed on Sundays outside the
employee’s regular tour of duty, by $24
for commercial airline inspection
services that are performed outside of
the regularly established hours of
service on a holiday or any other period,
and by $31 for commercial airline
inspection services that are performed
outside of the regularly established
hours of service on a Sunday.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 2 CFR
chapter IV.)
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts
all State and local laws and regulations
that are inconsistent with this rule; (2)
has no retroactive effect; and (3) does
not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 354
Animal diseases, Exports,
Government employees, Imports, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Travel and transportation
expenses.
9 CFR Part 97
Exports, Government employees,
Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry
products, Travel and transportation
expenses.
9 CFR Part 130
Animals, Birds, Diagnostic reagents,
Exports, Imports, Poultry and poultry
products, Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tests.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 354 and 9 CFR parts 97 and 130 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
59566
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Title 7—Agriculture
c. By revising the table in paragraph
(a)(1)(iii).
■ d. In paragraph (a)(2), by removing the
word ‘‘A’’ in the first sentence and
adding the words ‘‘Except as provided
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a’’ in
its place.
■ e. By adding paragraph (a)(3).
■ f. In paragraphs (a)(2), (b), (d)(1),
(d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(4),
and (f), by adding the words ‘‘or U.S.
Customs and Border Protection’’ after
the words ‘‘Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service’’ each time they
appear.
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
■
PART 354—OVERTIME SERVICES
RELATING TO IMPORTS AND
EXPORTS; AND USER FEES
1. The authority citation for part 354
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
2. Section 354.1 is amended as
follows:
■ a. By revising paragraph (a)(1)
introductory text, including the table.
■ b. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), by removing
the words ‘‘the Customs Service,
Immigration and Naturalization
Service’’ and adding the words ‘‘U.S.
Customs and Border Protection’’ in their
place.
■
§ 354.1 Overtime work at border ports, sea
ports, and airports.
(a)(1) Any person, firm, or corporation
having ownership, custody, or control of
plants, plant products, animals, animal
byproducts, or other commodities or
articles subject to inspection, laboratory
testing, certification, or quarantine
under this chapter and subchapter D of
chapter I, title 9 CFR, who requires the
services of an employee of the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service or
U.S. Customs and Border Protection on
a Sunday or holiday, or at any other
time outside the regular tour of duty of
that employee, shall sufficiently in
advance of the period of Sunday,
holiday, or overtime service request the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service or U.S. Customs and Border
Protection inspector in charge to furnish
the service during the overtime or
Sunday or holiday period, and shall pay
the Government at the rate listed in the
following table, except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii), and
(a)(3) of this section:
OVERTIME FOR INSPECTION, LABORATORY TESTING, CERTIFICATION, OR QUARANTINE OF PLANT, PLANT PRODUCTS,
ANIMALS, ANIMAL PRODUCTS OR OTHER REGULATED COMMODITIES
Overtime rates (per hour)
Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty
Nov. 2, 2015–
Sept. 30, 2016
Monday through Saturday and holidays ....................................................................
Sundays .....................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
Oct. 1, 2016–
Sept. 30, 2017
$75
99
Beginning
Oct. 1, 2017
$75
99
$75
100
(iii) * * *
OVERTIME FOR COMMERCIAL AIRLINE INSPECTION SERVICES 1
Overtime rates (per hour)
Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty
Nov. 2, 2015–
Sept. 30, 2016
Monday through Saturday and holidays ....................................................................
Sundays .....................................................................................................................
1 These
$64
85
Beginning
Oct. 1, 2017
$65
86
$65
86
charges exclude administrative overhead costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) The overtime rate and all other
charges, including minimum and
commute compensation charges, to be
billed for services provided by an
employee of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection shall be charged according to
the provisions of this section, 5 CFR
part 551, or 19 CFR 24.16.
*
*
*
*
*
Title 9—Animals and Animal Products
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Oct. 1, 2016–
Sept. 30, 2017
PART 97—OVERTIME SERVICES
RELATING TO IMPORTS AND
EXPORTS
3. The authority citation for part 97
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 49 U.S.C.
80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
4. Section 97.1 is amended as follows:
a. By revising paragraph (a)
introductory text, including the table.
■ b. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing the
words ‘‘the Customs Service,
Immigration and Naturalization
Service’’ and adding the words ‘‘U.S.
Customs and Border Protection’’ in their
place.
■ c. By revising the table in paragraph
(a)(3).
■ d. By adding paragraph (a)(4).
■ e. In paragraphs (b), (d)(1), (d)(2),
(d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(4), and (f),
by adding the words ‘‘or U.S. Customs
and Border Protection’’ after the words
‘‘Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service’’ each time they appear.
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 97.1 Overtime work at laboratories,
border ports, ocean ports, and airports.1
(a) Any person, firm, or corporation
having ownership, custody, or control of
animals, animal byproducts, or other
commodities or articles subject to
inspection, laboratory testing,
certification, or quarantine under this
subchapter and subchapter G of this
chapter, and who requires the services
of an employee of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service or U.S.
Customs and Border Protection on a
Sunday or holiday, or at any other time
outside the regular tour of duty of the
1 For designated ports of entry for certain animals,
animal semen, poultry, and hatching eggs, see
§§ 93.102, 93.203, 93.303, 93.403, 93.503, 93.703,
and 93.805 of this chapter. For designated ports of
entry for certain purebred animals see §§ 151.1
through 151.3 of this chapter.
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
59567
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
employee, shall sufficiently in advance
of the period of Sunday, holiday, or
overtime service request the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
inspector in charge to furnish the
service and shall pay the Government at
the rate listed in the following table,
except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of this section:
OVERTIME FOR INSPECTION, LABORATORY TESTING, CERTIFICATION, OR QUARANTINE OF PLANT, PLANT PRODUCTS,
ANIMALS, ANIMAL PRODUCTS OR OTHER REGULATED COMMODITIES
Overtime rates (per hour)
Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty
Nov. 2, 2015–
Sept. 30, 2016
Monday through Saturday and holidays ....................................................................
Sundays .....................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
Oct. 1, 2016–
Sept. 30, 2017
$75
99
Beginning
Oct. 1, 2017
$75
99
$75
100
(3) * * *
OVERTIME FOR COMMERCIAL AIRLINE INSPECTION SERVICES 1
Overtime rates (per hour)
Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty
Nov. 2, 2015–
Sept. 30, 2016
Monday through Saturday and holidays ....................................................................
Sundays .....................................................................................................................
1 These
Oct. 1, 2016–
Sept. 30, 2017
$64
85
Beginning
Oct. 1, 2017
$65
86
$65
86
charges exclude administrative overhead costs.
(4) The overtime rate and all other
charges, including minimum and
commute compensation charges, to be
billed for services provided by an
employee of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection shall be charged according to
the provisions of this section, 5 CFR
part 551, or 19 CFR 24.16.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 130—USER FEES
5. The authority citation for part 130
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5542; 7 U.S.C. 1622
and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31
U.S.C. 3701, 3716, 3717, 3719, and 3720A; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
6. Section 130.50 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory
text, by removing the words ‘‘or (ii)’’
■
and adding the words ‘‘, (ii), or (iii)’’ in
their place.
■ b. By revising the table in paragraph
(b)(3)(i).
■ c. By adding paragraph (b)(3)(iii).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
§ 130.50
Payment of user fees.
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * *
(3) * *
(i) * *
*
*
OVERTIME FOR FLAT RATE USER FEES 1 2
Overtime rates (per hour)
Outside of the employee’s
normal tour of duty
Rate for inspection, testing, certification or quarantine of animals, animal products or other commodities 3.
Rate for commercial airline inspection services 4 .......
Monday–Saturday and
holidays.
Sundays ...........................
Monday–Saturday and
holidays.
Sundays ...........................
Nov. 2, 2015–
Sept. 30, 2016
Oct. 1, 2016–
Sept. 30, 2017
Beginning
Oct. 1, 2017
$75
99
$75
99
$75
100
64
85
65
86
65
86
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1 Minimum charge of 2 hours, unless performed on the employee’s regular workday and performed in direct continuation of the regular workday
or begun within an hour of the regular workday.
2 When the 2-hour minimum applies, you may need to pay commuted travel time. (See § 97.1(b) of this chapter for specific information about
commuted travel time.)
3 See § 97.1(a) of this chapter or 7 CFR 354.3 for details.
4 See § 97.1(a)(3) of this chapter for details.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
59568
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) For information on rules
pertaining to the charges associated
with employees of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection performing
agricultural inspection services, please
see 7 CFR 354.1 and 9 CFR 97.1.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
September 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–25101 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0493; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–184–AD; Amendment
39–18283; AD 2015–20–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model
188 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by an evaluation by the
design approval holder (DAH)
indicating that the upper and lower
wing skin planks at the attachment of
the main landing gear (MLG) ribs at
certain wing-stations are subject to
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This
AD requires an inspection (for cracking)
and modification of the chordwise
fastener rows of the upper and lower
wing planks at the attachments to the
MLG ribs at certain wing-stations. We
are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue
cracking of the upper and lower wing
skin planks at the attachment of the
MLG ribs, which could result in failure
of the wing.
DATES: This AD is effective November 6,
2015.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of November 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Lockheed
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness
Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column
P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA
30063; telephone 770–494–5444; fax
770–494–5445; email ams.portal@
lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221. It is also available on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–0493.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0493; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–
474–5605; email: Carl.W.Gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model 188 series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on March 24, 2015 (80
FR 15525). The NPRM was prompted by
an evaluation by the DAH indicating
that the upper and lower wing skin
planks at the attachment of the MLG
ribs at certain wing-stations are subject
to WFD. The NPRM proposed to require
an inspection (for cracking) and
modification of the chordwise fastener
rows of the upper and lower wing
planks at the attachments to the MLG
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ribs at certain wing-stations. We are
issuing this AD to prevent fatigue
cracking of the upper and lower wing
skin planks at the attachment of the
MLG ribs, which could result in failure
of the wing.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (80
FR 15525, March 24, 2015) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
as proposed except for minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (80 FR
15525, March 24, 2015) for correcting
the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 15525,
March 24, 2015).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Lockheed Martin Electra
Service Bulletin 88/SB–721, dated April
30, 2014. This service information
describes procedures for doing a bolthole eddy current (BHEC) inspection for
cracking and repair of cracking. This
service information also describes
procedures for modification of the
chordwise fastener rows of the upper
and lower wing planks at the
attachments to the MLG ribs at wingstation (WS) 167 and WS 209 by
removing the original fasteners and
replacing them with new first oversize
fasteners of the same type or approved
substitute type for original fasteners.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section of
this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 4
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59561-59568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25101]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 354
9 CFR Parts 97 and 130
[Docket No. APHIS-2009-0047]
Fee Increases for Overtime Services
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are changing the hourly rates charged for Sundays,
holidays, or other overtime work performed by employees of the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for any person, firm, or
corporation having ownership, custody, or control of regulated
commodities or articles subject to agricultural inspection, laboratory
testing, certification, or quarantine under the regulations. We are
increasing these overtime rates for each of the fiscal years 2016
through 2018 to reflect the anticipated costs associated with providing
these services during each year. Establishing the overtime rate changes
in advance will allow users of APHIS' services to incorporate the rates
into their budget planning. We are also clarifying the regulations to
indicate that agricultural inspections performed by the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) may be billed in accordance with DHS overtime
regulations for services performed outside of regular business hours,
as DHS rates may differ from those charged by APHIS.
DATES: Effective November 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning Plant
Protection and Quarantine program operations, contact Ms. Diane L.
Schuble, AQI User Fee Coordinator, Office of the Executive Director-
Policy Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 131, Riverdale, MD
20737-1231; (301) 851-2338.
For information concerning Veterinary Services program operations,
contact Ms. Carol Tuszynski, Director, Planning, Finance, and Strategy
Staff, Program Support Services, VS, APHIS,
[[Page 59562]]
4700 River Road Unit 58, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-3463.
For information concerning APHIS overtime fee development, contact
Ms. Adelaide Feukam, Auditor, Review and Analysis, Financial Management
Division, MRPBS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 55, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851-2601.
For information concerning DHS overtime fees, contact Mrs. Kara
Welty, Chief, Debt Management Branch, Indianapolis, CBP, DHS, 6650
Telecom Drive Suite 100, Indianapolis, IN 46278-2010; (317) 614-4614.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR chapter III and 9 CFR chapter I,
subchapters D and G, require inspection, laboratory testing,
certification, or quarantine of certain animals, poultry, animal
byproducts, germ plasm, organisms, vectors, plants, plant products, or
other regulated commodities or articles intended for importation into,
or exportation from, the United States. With some exceptions, which are
explained below, when these services must be provided by an Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) employee on a Sunday or on a
holiday, or at any other time outside the APHIS employee's regular duty
hours, the Government charges an hourly overtime fee for the services
in accordance with 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97.
Based on changes to the costs associated with providing
agricultural inspection, laboratory testing, certification, and
quarantine services, we determined that adjustments to the overtime
rates in 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97 were necessary in order for
APHIS to recover the full cost of providing these services. Therefore,
we proposed to set hourly overtime rates for inspection, laboratory
testing, certification, and quarantine services provided outside of an
employee's normal tour of duty for fiscal years (FYs) 2014 through
2018. Our proposal was published in the Federal Register on April 25,
2014 (79 FR 22887-22895, Docket No. APHIS-2009-0047).\1\ The proposed
overtime rates were based on our costs of providing the services,
including direct labor costs, area delivery costs, billing and
collection costs, program direction and support costs, agency/
management support costs, central/departmental changes, and a reserve
component, plus adjustments for inflation and anticipated annual
increases in the salaries of employees who provide the services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go
to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We also proposed to include language in 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1,
and 9 CFR 130.50 to clarify and inform the public that any agricultural
inspection performed by an employee of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on a
Sunday, holiday, or anytime outside of the employee's normal tour of
duty may be billed in accordance with the regulations in 5 CFR part
551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR 24.16. Such
billing is necessary because the costs associated with the DHS
agricultural inspections and incurred by DHS may differ from those
incurred by APHIS. Therefore, varying overtime charges may apply in
such circumstances in order for DHS to properly recover their costs and
adequately fund their program operations.
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
June 24, 2014. We received 43 comments by that date. They were from
producers, importers, industry groups, and private individuals. Two
were supportive of the proposed action. The remainder are discussed
below by topic.
Comments on Rate Calculation Methodology
As previously stated, we proposed to establish the hourly overtime
rates for FY 2014 through FY 2018. We note that, as FYs 2014 and 2015
have ended, the overtime rates covered by this final rule are now only
for FYs 2016 through 2018. The FY 2016 rates will become effective 30
days after the date of publication of this final rule; the FY 2017 and
FY 2018 rates would become effective on the first day of each of the
fiscal years, and the FY 2018 rates would remain in effect until new
rates were established.
One commenter stated that our aim of seeking set rates for
anticipated costs over a 5 year period is too speculative and far too
difficult to predict with accuracy. The commenter suggested that APHIS
use a 5 year projection as a planning tool only and constrain specific
overtime cost increases to a shorter timeframe.
We disagree with the commenter's assessment. Based on our
experience with past overtime fee increases, information regarding such
increases that covers a longer timeframe allows users of APHIS'
services to incorporate the rates into their budget planning. In
addition, we arrive at our projected figures using those gross domestic
product (GDP) figures provided by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in the Presidential budget, which is the Government standard for
such fees and is not subject to rate instability. Moreover, as
explained above, the actual timeframe of this rule will be based on a
shorter 3 year period since it will only apply to FYs 2016 through
2018.
The commenter went on to assert that our calculations should
address not only the cost of providing overtime service, but also
specify what steps are being taken to reduce costs to the Agency and
thereby also reduce customer costs.
While the main cost driver of reimbursable overtime is the cost of
salaries and benefits, APHIS has taken steps in recent years to achieve
efficiencies as part of United States Department of Agriculture's
(USDA) Blueprint for Stronger Service.\2\ For example, APHIS
centralized certain services such as information technology, customer
service support, telecommunications, and vehicle inventory while also
enacting additional controls on purchases. APHIS continues to look for
opportunities to reduce operating costs where possible while
maintaining the level of services needed to carry out our mission of
safeguarding U.S. agriculture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Information on this initiative is available on the Internet
at https://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=blueprint_for_stronger_service.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We calculated our overtime rates to cover the full cost of
providing inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine services at
laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, rail ports, quarantine
facilities, and airports outside of the normal tour of duty of the
employee providing these services. The cost of providing these services
includes direct and indirect costs. The direct costs are an employee's
salary and specific benefits, which are APHIS' payment of the hospital
insurance tax and its contribution to the Federal Insurance
Contribution Act (FICA), and the Agency's costs for work performed at
night. The indirect costs are area delivery costs, billing and
collection costs, program direction and support costs, central/
departmental charges, and unfunded leave costs.
A number of commenters observed that, in the calculation of
overtime rates, only the variable cost of providing the additional
service outside of regular business hours should be included in the
assessment of the overall cost. Specifically, the commenters stated
that there is no justification for the inclusion of most of the
components identified in
[[Page 59563]]
area delivery, imputed costs, agency level program delivery, agency
level administrative support, and central/departmental charges.
We followed Federal guidance related to fee setting and managerial
cost accounting in determining program costs. Specifically, we followed
OMB Circular A-25: User Charges, which provides guidance on setting
fees in the Federal Government, and SFAS No. 4, which includes, among
other things, a definition of full cost. OMB Circular A-25, which may
be viewed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_default,
establishes the requirement that fees be set at full cost to the
Government, and provides a definition and examples for full cost. OMB
Circular A-25 very specifically defines full cost to include the costs
referenced by the commenters.
Another commenter asked to review APHIS's full revenue-costs
statements as well as the full economic impact assessment. The
commenter stated that the information was not included with the
proposed rule.
Our full calculation of all aspects of overtime fees, starting with
direct labor costs and including all indirect costs and overhead
elements, was included in the proposed rule, which is available for
public review on the Internet at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047. The regulatory impact analysis and
initial regulatory flexibility analysis were also made available on
Regulations.gov along with the proposed rule as part of the rule's
supporting documents. We maintain that this level of detail provides
the highest degree of transparency and supports the required increase
needed in our rates.
As detailed above, APHIS calculates its overtime fees based on a
variety of sources apart from employee salary considerations. Per OMB
Circular A-25, the overtime program is a full cost recovery program,
which includes the direct and indirect costs outlined previously.
One commenter stated that APHIS should reconsider its cost
estimates since the initial impetus for the proposed rule was work done
in 2010 at the height of the financial crisis. The commenter went on to
say that, since that time, the rate of importation and export has
increased significantly, which would increase Agency funds that might
be used to cover these costs instead.
We disagree with the commenter's assessment. While there are other
components involved, much of the cost of overtime inspection is made up
of inspector salaries. The APHIS budget provides funding for inspectors
working within business hours, Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Any work performed outside that timeframe is, by definition, additional
and irregular. As detailed in OMB Circular A-25, Federal agencies are
charged to recoup their costs in such instances via the assessment of
overtime fees. Any additional funds that APHIS (or DHS for that matter)
may receive via any increases in trade would remain in the accounts
used by the specific Agency and programs that provide the services and
incur the costs.
Comments on Billing Procedures
Two commenters stated that most, if not all, of the ports require
that overtime be requested and paid for in a minimum of 4-hour blocks
regardless of whether those 4 hours are needed or used. The commenters
suggested that APHIS change its overtime billing policy so that
importers would only be charged for the time required to conduct the
requested inspection. The commenters also suggested that, if an
inspector is called for overtime work in the 4 hour block described
above and the whole of that time is not used, that inspector should
then remain onsite for the remainder of the 4 hour time period in order
to deal with any other vessels or cargoes that may arrive and require
immediate inspection.
In Sec. 354.1, paragraph (a)(2) states that a minimum charge of 2
hours will be made for inspection services performed by an APHIS
employee outside of his or her normal tour of duty on Saturdays,
holidays, weekdays, or Sundays. In addition, overtime fees may include
a commuted traveltime period (CTT), which is established by APHIS to
cover the time an employee spends reporting to and returning from the
place where the requested overtime duties are performed.\3\ We believe
the 4-hour minimum cited by the commenters includes the minimum
overtime work time of 2 hours in addition to 2 hours of CTT. Although
CTT ranges from 1 to 12 hours, 2 hours is the allotted CTT at many of
our busiest ports. Regarding the commenters' second point concerning
inspectors remaining onsite to perform other unexpected inspection; an
arrangement of this nature is not precluded by the regulations.
However, APHIS leaves such administrative details to the knowledge and
discretion of the individual ports. The actual management of staffs,
inspectors, hours, staffing for arrival, and identification of risk and
needs varies from port to port and is best handled by port directors
equipped with the detailed information necessary to make daily staffing
decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A full listing of CTT periods may be found in Sec. 354.2 of
the regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two commenters observed that, in many instances, vessels and
cargoes are ready for inspection during normal business hours only to
find that DHS inspectors are not available due to the volume of
inspections required for other vessels. The commenters stated that
users should not be made to pay for services rendered in overtime
periods that could have been conducted during normal business hours had
sufficient personnel been available.
We have considered the commenters' point and have received detailed
information from DHS regarding their staffing policies at the ports.
Overall, DHS employs a rigorous, data-driven methodology to identify
staffing requirements. It is composed of multiple elements--some fixed,
others variable--that may be adjusted according to changing priorities,
risks, and threats. In early 2014, a risk-based Agriculture Resource
Allocation Model was finalized, which will serve as an important
component of DHS's methodology. The Agriculture Resource Allocation
Model will more accurately calculate the number of agricultural
inspectors required to efficiently handle workflow at the ports. DHS
will integrate the results of the Agriculture Resource Allocation Model
into its existing methodology in order to provide a more holistic view
of DHS's staffing requirements. Generally speaking, APHIS and DHS
staffing decisions for agricultural inspections are continuously being
reformulated based on changing conditions so that the ports may operate
at a constantly improving level of service.
Two commenters stated that the regulations should stipulate that
any overtime fees collected should be returned to the port where the
services are rendered. The commenters said that this would ensure that
sufficient funds are available where needed, and the Agencies would not
be required to utilize appropriated funds or cash reserves to cover
expenses associated with overtime fees.
We disagree with the commenters. It would be administratively
burdensome for APHIS (or DHS for that matter) to maintain and track
reimbursable overtime collections for agricultural inspection to a
port-by-port level. Because the application of reimbursable overtime
rates distinctively mirrors the work the employees perform and are paid
for, there is no need to track collections and costs to this level.
[[Page 59564]]
Program budgeters carefully consider the amount of reimbursable
overtime work at their ports in providing budget estimates from year to
year. Finally, APHIS and DHS overtime fee collections are already
tracked to the agency level; those collections remain in the
appropriate accounts to fund each Department's respective overtime
operations.
Two commenters observed that both APHIS and DHS must be able to
provide invoices for all overtime fees in a timely manner. The
commenters suggested that the regulations stipulate that invoices will
be provided within 30 days of the inspection date.
Comments referring to specific billing practices are outside the
scope of the current rulemaking. Invoices are generally provided
simultaneous to inspection; however the commenters should contact the
port director with any questions or concerns about the timeliness of
billing.
Other commenters stated that it would be possible for APHIS and DHS
to assess overtime fees at a lower rate if industry were involved in
negotiations between those Agencies and the inspectors' union.
Any discussion of union contract negotiation is outside the scope
of the current rulemaking.
A commenter observed that greater responsiveness to current
industry practices is needed. The commenter went on to state that, at
the port in Atlanta, GA, importers cannot request weekend overtime
after 3 p.m. on Friday, however it is impossible to determine with
certainty by that time how much overtime will be necessary. The
commenter is engaged in the importation of plant cuttings or live
plants, which are perishable, and the busiest importing days, based on
industry need and long-established industry practice, include Saturdays
and Sundays.
Another commenter stated that the port in Miami, FL, had recently
extended its weekday operational hours. The commenter urged APHIS to
maintain those hours.
As previously stated, APHIS leaves such administrative details as
the deadline for requesting weekend overtime and the operational hours
of the ports to the knowledge and discretion of those individual ports.
If the first commenter wishes to propose an extension of the deadline
for requesting weekend overtime and the second commenter would like to
maintain extended weekday hours of operation they should contact their
local port directors.
Comments on Proposed Costs
A number of commenters expressed concern at the cost numbers
supplied by APHIS in the proposed rule.
Several commenters observed that the proposed rule would increase
the cost for overtime services by 30 to 49 percent (some commenters
cited the increase as 45 to 55 percent); a number that represents 3 to
5 times the rate of inflation since the last increase in 2002. Further,
the commenters remarked that the U.S. Department of Labor had reported
only a 10 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index since 2002. The
commenters were troubled by the difference between the inflation rate,
the Consumer Price Index rate, and the proposed percentage increase to
overtime fees.
Overtime fees are not solely based on either the rate of inflation
or the Consumer Price Index. As stated previously, the cost of
providing these services includes direct and indirect costs. The direct
costs are an employee's salary and specific benefits, which are APHIS'
payment of the hospital insurance tax and its contribution to the FICA,
and the Agency's costs for work performed at night. The indirect costs
are area delivery costs, billing and collection costs, program
direction and support costs, central/departmental charges, and unfunded
leave costs.
Another commenter suggested that the cost increases should be made
incrementally over the next several years to lessen the burden on
producers and exporters and help them maintain their competitive
position.
A phase-in of the proposed changes would simply delay achieving the
rule's objectives: To properly recover costs and adequately fund
program operations. We would add that the decision to request overtime
services, and therefore to incur additional costs, is left to the
importer and such importers may realize price efficiencies by
scheduling inspections during regular business hours.
Several commenters observed that the increase in the overtime fees
will come in conjunction with a new fee of $375 per treatment for
various types of treatments currently offered at no charge. The
commenters asserted that the cumulative effect of these cost increases
will have a chilling effect on the perishable goods import/export
market in the United States.
The fee to which the commenters refer was included in a proposal to
add new fee categories and adjust current fees charged for certain
agricultural quarantine and inspection services provided in connection
with certain commercial vessels, commercial trucks, commercial railroad
cars, commercial aircraft, and international passengers arriving at
ports in the customs territory of the United States.\4\ While the fees
discussed in that rule are compulsory, overtime fees represent the cost
of providing the additional service outside of regular business hours.
As stated previously, the decision to request overtime services, and
therefore to incur additional costs, is left to the importer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ You may view the proposed rule at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on Economic Impact
A number of commenters from Florida stated that the proposed
increase in overtime fees would prove detrimental to trade, commerce,
and the economy of that State.
We disagree with the commenters' assessment. Based on the economic
assessment included with the proposal, we estimate that the impact of
this rule will be minor. Further, the commenters did not provide any
economic data in support of their claim for APHIS to examine.
Another commenter observed that Florida has successfully worked
with APHIS to implement the first ever cold treatment pilot project for
perishable commodities. The commenter was concerned that increased
overtime fee rates would prove economically detrimental to the future
of that project both in Florida and other areas where cold treatment is
already permitted.
We disagree with the commenter's statement. APHIS' agreement with
the shipping lines in the Florida cold treatment pilot program requires
that cold treatment be completed before the ship arrives at the port
because there are no approved cold treatment facilities available in
Florida. Since the cold treatment must take place prior to shipment
arrival, any information regarding application of cold treatment may be
transmitted to the ports during regular business hours.
Comments on Comment Period
We received several requests for an extension of the comment period
on the proposed rule. After careful consideration, we determined to
keep the original deadline. While APHIS has not updated its overtime
fees since 2005, these increases remain a routine cost-recovery measure
for the Agency.
Comments on Agency Jurisdiction
Two commenters stated that, to the extent APHIS and CBP are
performing the same inspection services, the
[[Page 59565]]
shipping community has a reasonable right to expect that the rates
charged will be consistent across the agencies and that any internal
conflicts in pay and rate schedules should be transparent to the
service recipient. The commenters concluded that, to the extent one
agency is acting on behalf of the other, it is imperative that the
agency which is incurring the costs retains the appropriate percentage
of the revenues collected.
We agree with the commenters' observations. Providing clarity while
allowing APHIS and DHS to recoup inspection costs was our intent in
publishing this rule.
Finally, one commenter said that there is confusion about which
agencies have responsibility for and jurisdiction over various
functions. The commenter said that the rule should clearly delineate
which functions are performed by APHIS and which are performed on
behalf of APHIS by DHS. The commenter concluded that fees should be
listed only in the relevant sections of the CFR, and there must be no
question that both APHIS and DHS are not billing individually for the
same services.
Generally speaking, most of the agricultural inspections discussed
in this rule are performed by DHS pursuant to the Homeland Security
Act. Examples of agricultural inspections performed by APHIS include
those associated with the importation of live plants, which occur at
designated plant inspection stations, and APHIS oversight of certain
port of entry treatments. As stated in the proposed rule, DHS conducts
billings of their overtime charges in accordance with the regulations
in 5 CFR part 551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR
24.16. The DHS fees for agricultural inspection overtime work are not
listed in a specific section of the CFR as the Homeland Security Act
that first established DHS did not provide any new regulatory authority
to DHS but rather used the existing regulatory authority of those
agencies or programs whose functions were transferred to DHS. So APHIS'
regulatory authority is used to enumerate or revise agricultural
inspection overtime rates.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with a
few, minor editorial changes.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule is subject to Executive Order 12866. However, for
this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review
under Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we have performed a final
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding
the economic effects of this rule on small entities. Copies of the full
analysis are available on the Regulations.gov Web site (see footnote 1
in this document for a link to Regulations.gov) or by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
APHIS charges hourly overtime rates to individuals, firms, and
corporations requesting inspection, testing, certification, or
quarantine services at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, rail
ports, quarantine facilities, and airports outside of the regularly
established hours of service. These overtime rates are charged to the
individuals, firms, or corporations requesting the services, and the
fees vary depending on the type of service performed and when the
service is provided. This rule amends the fees for reimbursable
overtime to reflect increased costs associated with providing these
services.
APHIS is updating these fees to take into account the routine
increases in the cost of conducting business during overtime hours. The
cost to the import/export program to provide these services has
increased year to year, and these proposed increases are necessary to
more accurately provide the full cost recovery of this Agency activity.
Currently, APHIS charges $51 per hour per employee for inspection,
testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural
products outside the employee's regular tour of duty, and $67 per hour
per employee for inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine of
animals or agricultural products that is performed on Sundays outside
the employee's regular tour of duty. APHIS charges $41 per hour per
employee for commercial airline inspection services that are performed
outside of the regularly established hours of service on a holiday or
any other period and $55 per hour per employee for commercial airline
inspection services that are performed outside of the regularly
established hours of service on a Sunday. This rule establishes hourly
overtime rates for each of the fiscal years 2016 through 2018. From FY
2016 through FY 2018, these rates would increase by $24 for inspection,
testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural
products outside the employee's regular tour of duty (Monday through
Saturday and holidays), by $33 for inspection, testing, certification,
or quarantine of animals or agricultural products that is performed on
Sundays outside the employee's regular tour of duty, by $24 for
commercial airline inspection services that are performed outside of
the regularly established hours of service on a holiday or any other
period, and by $31 for commercial airline inspection services that are
performed outside of the regularly established hours of service on a
Sunday.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 2 CFR chapter IV.)
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws
and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 354
Animal diseases, Exports, Government employees, Imports, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Travel and transportation expenses.
9 CFR Part 97
Exports, Government employees, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and
poultry products, Travel and transportation expenses.
9 CFR Part 130
Animals, Birds, Diagnostic reagents, Exports, Imports, Poultry and
poultry products, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Tests.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR parts 97 and
130 as follows:
[[Page 59566]]
Title 7--Agriculture
PART 354--OVERTIME SERVICES RELATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS; AND
USER FEES
0
1. The authority citation for part 354 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. Section 354.1 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, including the table.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), by removing the words ``the Customs Service,
Immigration and Naturalization Service'' and adding the words ``U.S.
Customs and Border Protection'' in their place.
0
c. By revising the table in paragraph (a)(1)(iii).
0
d. In paragraph (a)(2), by removing the word ``A'' in the first
sentence and adding the words ``Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section, a'' in its place.
0
e. By adding paragraph (a)(3).
0
f. In paragraphs (a)(2), (b), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(4), and (f), by adding the words ``or U.S. Customs and
Border Protection'' after the words ``Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service'' each time they appear.
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 354.1 Overtime work at border ports, sea ports, and airports.
(a)(1) Any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody,
or control of plants, plant products, animals, animal byproducts, or
other commodities or articles subject to inspection, laboratory
testing, certification, or quarantine under this chapter and subchapter
D of chapter I, title 9 CFR, who requires the services of an employee
of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and
Border Protection on a Sunday or holiday, or at any other time outside
the regular tour of duty of that employee, shall sufficiently in
advance of the period of Sunday, holiday, or overtime service request
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and
Border Protection inspector in charge to furnish the service during the
overtime or Sunday or holiday period, and shall pay the Government at
the rate listed in the following table, except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii), and (a)(3) of this section:
Overtime for Inspection, Laboratory Testing, Certification, or Quarantine of Plant, Plant Products, Animals,
Animal Products or Other Regulated Commodities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overtime rates (per hour)
--------------------------------------------------------
Outside the employee's normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015- Oct. 1, 2016-
Sept. 30, 2016 Sept. 30, 2017 Beginning Oct. 1,
2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays................... $75 $75 $75
Sundays................................................ 99 99 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
Overtime for Commercial Airline Inspection Services \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overtime rates (per hour)
--------------------------------------------------------
Outside the employee's normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015- Oct. 1, 2016-
Sept. 30, 2016 Sept. 30, 2017 Beginning Oct. 1,
2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays................... $64 $65 $65
Sundays................................................ 85 86 86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These charges exclude administrative overhead costs.
* * * * *
(3) The overtime rate and all other charges, including minimum and
commute compensation charges, to be billed for services provided by an
employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be charged
according to the provisions of this section, 5 CFR part 551, or 19 CFR
24.16.
* * * * *
Title 9--Animals and Animal Products
PART 97--OVERTIME SERVICES RELATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS
0
3. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301-8317; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
0
4. Section 97.1 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a) introductory text, including the table.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing the words ``the Customs Service,
Immigration and Naturalization Service'' and adding the words ``U.S.
Customs and Border Protection'' in their place.
0
c. By revising the table in paragraph (a)(3).
0
d. By adding paragraph (a)(4).
0
e. In paragraphs (b), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2),
(e)(4), and (f), by adding the words ``or U.S. Customs and Border
Protection'' after the words ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service'' each time they appear.
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 97.1 Overtime work at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports,
and airports.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For designated ports of entry for certain animals, animal
semen, poultry, and hatching eggs, see Sec. Sec. 93.102, 93.203,
93.303, 93.403, 93.503, 93.703, and 93.805 of this chapter. For
designated ports of entry for certain purebred animals see
Sec. Sec. 151.1 through 151.3 of this chapter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody, or
control of animals, animal byproducts, or other commodities or articles
subject to inspection, laboratory testing, certification, or quarantine
under this subchapter and subchapter G of this chapter, and who
requires the services of an employee of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection on a Sunday or
holiday, or at any other time outside the regular tour of duty of the
[[Page 59567]]
employee, shall sufficiently in advance of the period of Sunday,
holiday, or overtime service request the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspector in
charge to furnish the service and shall pay the Government at the rate
listed in the following table, except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of this section:
Overtime for Inspection, Laboratory Testing, Certification, or Quarantine of Plant, Plant Products, Animals,
Animal Products or Other Regulated Commodities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overtime rates (per hour)
--------------------------------------------------------
Outside the employee's normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015- Oct. 1, 2016-
Sept. 30, 2016 Sept. 30, 2017 Beginning Oct. 1,
2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays................... $75 $75 $75
Sundays................................................ 99 99 100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(3) * * *
Overtime for Commercial Airline Inspection Services \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overtime rates (per hour)
--------------------------------------------------------
Outside the employee's normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015- Oct. 1, 2016-
Sept. 30, 2016 Sept. 30, 2017 Beginning Oct. 1,
2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays................... $64 $65 $65
Sundays................................................ 85 86 86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These charges exclude administrative overhead costs.
(4) The overtime rate and all other charges, including minimum and
commute compensation charges, to be billed for services provided by an
employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be charged
according to the provisions of this section, 5 CFR part 551, or 19 CFR
24.16.
* * * * *
PART 130--USER FEES
0
5. The authority citation for part 130 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5542; 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 3701, 3716, 3717, 3719, and 3720A; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
0
6. Section 130.50 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, by removing the words ``or
(ii)'' and adding the words ``, (ii), or (iii)'' in their place.
0
b. By revising the table in paragraph (b)(3)(i).
0
c. By adding paragraph (b)(3)(iii).
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 130.50 Payment of user fees.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
Overtime for Flat Rate User Fees 1 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overtime rates (per hour)
Outside of the --------------------------------------------------------
employee's normal Nov. 2, 2015- Oct. 1, 2016-
tour of duty Sept. 30, 2016 Sept. 30, 2017 Beginning Oct. 1,
2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for inspection, testing, Monday-Saturday and $75 $75 $75
certification or quarantine of holidays. 99 99 100
animals, animal products or Sundays.............
other commodities \3\.
Rate for commercial airline Monday-Saturday and 64 65 65
inspection services \4\. holidays. 85 86 86
Sundays.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Minimum charge of 2 hours, unless performed on the employee's regular workday and performed in direct
continuation of the regular workday or begun within an hour of the regular workday.
\2\ When the 2-hour minimum applies, you may need to pay commuted travel time. (See Sec. 97.1(b) of this
chapter for specific information about commuted travel time.)
\3\ See Sec. 97.1(a) of this chapter or 7 CFR 354.3 for details.
\4\ See Sec. 97.1(a)(3) of this chapter for details.
[[Page 59568]]
* * * * *
(iii) For information on rules pertaining to the charges associated
with employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection performing
agricultural inspection services, please see 7 CFR 354.1 and 9 CFR
97.1.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of September 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-25101 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P