Fee Increases for Overtime Services, 59561-59568 [2015-25101]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372). The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact may be viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site. Copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact are also available for public inspection at USDA, room 1141, South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Persons wishing to inspect copies are requested to call ahead on (202) 799–7039 to facilitate entry into the reading room. In addition, copies may be obtained by writing to the individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements included in this final rule, which were filed under 0579–0431, have been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). When OMB notifies us of its decision, if approval is denied, we will publish a document in the Federal Register providing notice of what action we plan to take. § 319.37–1 Definitions. * * * * * Compliance agreement. A written agreement between APHIS and a person (individual or corporate) engaged in the production, processing, handling, or moving of restricted articles imported pursuant to this subpart, in which the person agrees to comply with the subpart and the terms and conditions specified within the agreement itself. * * * * * ■ 3. Section 319.37–8 is amended as follows: ■ a. In paragraph (e), introductory text, by removing the period after the entry for ‘‘Schlumberga spp. from the Netherlands and Denmark’’ and adding, in alphabetical order, an entry for ‘‘Solanum lycopersicum from Mexico.’’. ■ b. By adding paragraph (e)(2)(xii). ■ c. By revising the OMB citation at the end of the section. The addition and revision read as follows: § 319.37–8 Growing media. 1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows: * * * * (e) * * * (2) * * * (xii) Plantlets of Solanum lycopersicum from Mexico must also meet the following conditions: (A) The plantlets must be produced in accordance with § 319.37–5(r)(3); (B) The plantlets can only be imported into the continental United States, and may not be imported into Hawaii or the territories of the United States; and (C) The plantlets must be imported from Mexico directly into a greenhouse in the continental United States, the owner or owners of which have entered into a compliance agreement with APHIS. The required compliance agreement will specify the conditions under which the plants must enter and be maintained within the greenhouse, and will prohibit the plantlets from being moved from the greenhouse following importation, other than for the appropriate disposal of dead plantlets. (D) If all of the above requirements are correctly complied with, then the tomato fruit produced from the imported greenhouse plantlets may be shipped from the greenhouses for commercial sale within the United States. * * * * * Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and 7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579–0266 and 0579–0431) E-Government Act Compliance The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to compliance with the EGovernment Act to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act compliance related to this final rule, please contact Ms. Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851– 2727. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319 Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rice, Vegetables. Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows: asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES 2. Section 319.37–1 is amended by adding, in alphabetical order, a definition for compliance agreement to read as follows: ■ PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 * PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 59561 Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of September 2015. Kevin Shea, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2015–25100 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 7 CFR Part 354 9 CFR Parts 97 and 130 [Docket No. APHIS–2009–0047] Fee Increases for Overtime Services Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are changing the hourly rates charged for Sundays, holidays, or other overtime work performed by employees of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody, or control of regulated commodities or articles subject to agricultural inspection, laboratory testing, certification, or quarantine under the regulations. We are increasing these overtime rates for each of the fiscal years 2016 through 2018 to reflect the anticipated costs associated with providing these services during each year. Establishing the overtime rate changes in advance will allow users of APHIS’ services to incorporate the rates into their budget planning. We are also clarifying the regulations to indicate that agricultural inspections performed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may be billed in accordance with DHS overtime regulations for services performed outside of regular business hours, as DHS rates may differ from those charged by APHIS. DATES: Effective November 2, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning Plant Protection and Quarantine program operations, contact Ms. Diane L. Schuble, AQI User Fee Coordinator, Office of the Executive Director-Policy Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 131, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851– 2338. For information concerning Veterinary Services program operations, contact Ms. Carol Tuszynski, Director, Planning, Finance, and Strategy Staff, Program Support Services, VS, APHIS, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 59562 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES 4700 River Road Unit 58, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–3463. For information concerning APHIS overtime fee development, contact Ms. Adelaide Feukam, Auditor, Review and Analysis, Financial Management Division, MRPBS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 55, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851–2601. For information concerning DHS overtime fees, contact Mrs. Kara Welty, Chief, Debt Management Branch, Indianapolis, CBP, DHS, 6650 Telecom Drive Suite 100, Indianapolis, IN 46278–2010; (317) 614–4614. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The regulations in 7 CFR chapter III and 9 CFR chapter I, subchapters D and G, require inspection, laboratory testing, certification, or quarantine of certain animals, poultry, animal byproducts, germ plasm, organisms, vectors, plants, plant products, or other regulated commodities or articles intended for importation into, or exportation from, the United States. With some exceptions, which are explained below, when these services must be provided by an Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) employee on a Sunday or on a holiday, or at any other time outside the APHIS employee’s regular duty hours, the Government charges an hourly overtime fee for the services in accordance with 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97. Based on changes to the costs associated with providing agricultural inspection, laboratory testing, certification, and quarantine services, we determined that adjustments to the overtime rates in 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97 were necessary in order for APHIS to recover the full cost of providing these services. Therefore, we proposed to set hourly overtime rates for inspection, laboratory testing, certification, and quarantine services provided outside of an employee’s normal tour of duty for fiscal years (FYs) 2014 through 2018. Our proposal was published in the Federal Register on April 25, 2014 (79 FR 22887–22895, Docket No. APHIS–2009–0047).1 The proposed overtime rates were based on our costs of providing the services, including direct labor costs, area delivery costs, billing and collection costs, program direction and support costs, agency/management support costs, central/departmental changes, and a reserve component, plus adjustments for inflation and 1 To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 anticipated annual increases in the salaries of employees who provide the services. We also proposed to include language in 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, and 9 CFR 130.50 to clarify and inform the public that any agricultural inspection performed by an employee of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on a Sunday, holiday, or anytime outside of the employee’s normal tour of duty may be billed in accordance with the regulations in 5 CFR part 551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR 24.16. Such billing is necessary because the costs associated with the DHS agricultural inspections and incurred by DHS may differ from those incurred by APHIS. Therefore, varying overtime charges may apply in such circumstances in order for DHS to properly recover their costs and adequately fund their program operations. We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending June 24, 2014. We received 43 comments by that date. They were from producers, importers, industry groups, and private individuals. Two were supportive of the proposed action. The remainder are discussed below by topic. Comments on Rate Calculation Methodology As previously stated, we proposed to establish the hourly overtime rates for FY 2014 through FY 2018. We note that, as FYs 2014 and 2015 have ended, the overtime rates covered by this final rule are now only for FYs 2016 through 2018. The FY 2016 rates will become effective 30 days after the date of publication of this final rule; the FY 2017 and FY 2018 rates would become effective on the first day of each of the fiscal years, and the FY 2018 rates would remain in effect until new rates were established. One commenter stated that our aim of seeking set rates for anticipated costs over a 5 year period is too speculative and far too difficult to predict with accuracy. The commenter suggested that APHIS use a 5 year projection as a planning tool only and constrain specific overtime cost increases to a shorter timeframe. We disagree with the commenter’s assessment. Based on our experience with past overtime fee increases, information regarding such increases that covers a longer timeframe allows users of APHIS’ services to incorporate the rates into their budget planning. In addition, we arrive at our projected figures using those gross domestic product (GDP) figures provided by the PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the Presidential budget, which is the Government standard for such fees and is not subject to rate instability. Moreover, as explained above, the actual timeframe of this rule will be based on a shorter 3 year period since it will only apply to FYs 2016 through 2018. The commenter went on to assert that our calculations should address not only the cost of providing overtime service, but also specify what steps are being taken to reduce costs to the Agency and thereby also reduce customer costs. While the main cost driver of reimbursable overtime is the cost of salaries and benefits, APHIS has taken steps in recent years to achieve efficiencies as part of United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Blueprint for Stronger Service.2 For example, APHIS centralized certain services such as information technology, customer service support, telecommunications, and vehicle inventory while also enacting additional controls on purchases. APHIS continues to look for opportunities to reduce operating costs where possible while maintaining the level of services needed to carry out our mission of safeguarding U.S. agriculture. We calculated our overtime rates to cover the full cost of providing inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine services at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, rail ports, quarantine facilities, and airports outside of the normal tour of duty of the employee providing these services. The cost of providing these services includes direct and indirect costs. The direct costs are an employee’s salary and specific benefits, which are APHIS’ payment of the hospital insurance tax and its contribution to the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA), and the Agency’s costs for work performed at night. The indirect costs are area delivery costs, billing and collection costs, program direction and support costs, central/departmental charges, and unfunded leave costs. A number of commenters observed that, in the calculation of overtime rates, only the variable cost of providing the additional service outside of regular business hours should be included in the assessment of the overall cost. Specifically, the commenters stated that there is no justification for the inclusion of most of the components identified in 2 Information on this initiative is available on the Internet at https://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/ usdahome?contentidonly=true& contentid=blueprint_for_stronger_service.html. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations area delivery, imputed costs, agency level program delivery, agency level administrative support, and central/ departmental charges. We followed Federal guidance related to fee setting and managerial cost accounting in determining program costs. Specifically, we followed OMB Circular A–25: User Charges, which provides guidance on setting fees in the Federal Government, and SFAS No. 4, which includes, among other things, a definition of full cost. OMB Circular A– 25, which may be viewed at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ circulars_default, establishes the requirement that fees be set at full cost to the Government, and provides a definition and examples for full cost. OMB Circular A–25 very specifically defines full cost to include the costs referenced by the commenters. Another commenter asked to review APHIS’s full revenue-costs statements as well as the full economic impact assessment. The commenter stated that the information was not included with the proposed rule. Our full calculation of all aspects of overtime fees, starting with direct labor costs and including all indirect costs and overhead elements, was included in the proposed rule, which is available for public review on the Internet at: https:// www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047. The regulatory impact analysis and initial regulatory flexibility analysis were also made available on Regulations.gov along with the proposed rule as part of the rule’s supporting documents. We maintain that this level of detail provides the highest degree of transparency and supports the required increase needed in our rates. As detailed above, APHIS calculates its overtime fees based on a variety of sources apart from employee salary considerations. Per OMB Circular A–25, the overtime program is a full cost recovery program, which includes the direct and indirect costs outlined previously. One commenter stated that APHIS should reconsider its cost estimates since the initial impetus for the proposed rule was work done in 2010 at the height of the financial crisis. The commenter went on to say that, since that time, the rate of importation and export has increased significantly, which would increase Agency funds that might be used to cover these costs instead. We disagree with the commenter’s assessment. While there are other components involved, much of the cost of overtime inspection is made up of VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 inspector salaries. The APHIS budget provides funding for inspectors working within business hours, Monday through Friday, except holidays. Any work performed outside that timeframe is, by definition, additional and irregular. As detailed in OMB Circular A–25, Federal agencies are charged to recoup their costs in such instances via the assessment of overtime fees. Any additional funds that APHIS (or DHS for that matter) may receive via any increases in trade would remain in the accounts used by the specific Agency and programs that provide the services and incur the costs. Comments on Billing Procedures Two commenters stated that most, if not all, of the ports require that overtime be requested and paid for in a minimum of 4-hour blocks regardless of whether those 4 hours are needed or used. The commenters suggested that APHIS change its overtime billing policy so that importers would only be charged for the time required to conduct the requested inspection. The commenters also suggested that, if an inspector is called for overtime work in the 4 hour block described above and the whole of that time is not used, that inspector should then remain onsite for the remainder of the 4 hour time period in order to deal with any other vessels or cargoes that may arrive and require immediate inspection. In § 354.1, paragraph (a)(2) states that a minimum charge of 2 hours will be made for inspection services performed by an APHIS employee outside of his or her normal tour of duty on Saturdays, holidays, weekdays, or Sundays. In addition, overtime fees may include a commuted traveltime period (CTT), which is established by APHIS to cover the time an employee spends reporting to and returning from the place where the requested overtime duties are performed.3 We believe the 4-hour minimum cited by the commenters includes the minimum overtime work time of 2 hours in addition to 2 hours of CTT. Although CTT ranges from 1 to 12 hours, 2 hours is the allotted CTT at many of our busiest ports. Regarding the commenters’ second point concerning inspectors remaining onsite to perform other unexpected inspection; an arrangement of this nature is not precluded by the regulations. However, APHIS leaves such administrative details to the knowledge and discretion of the individual ports. The actual management of staffs, inspectors, hours, staffing for arrival, and identification of 3 A full listing of CTT periods may be found in § 354.2 of the regulations. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 59563 risk and needs varies from port to port and is best handled by port directors equipped with the detailed information necessary to make daily staffing decisions. Two commenters observed that, in many instances, vessels and cargoes are ready for inspection during normal business hours only to find that DHS inspectors are not available due to the volume of inspections required for other vessels. The commenters stated that users should not be made to pay for services rendered in overtime periods that could have been conducted during normal business hours had sufficient personnel been available. We have considered the commenters’ point and have received detailed information from DHS regarding their staffing policies at the ports. Overall, DHS employs a rigorous, data-driven methodology to identify staffing requirements. It is composed of multiple elements—some fixed, others variable— that may be adjusted according to changing priorities, risks, and threats. In early 2014, a risk-based Agriculture Resource Allocation Model was finalized, which will serve as an important component of DHS’s methodology. The Agriculture Resource Allocation Model will more accurately calculate the number of agricultural inspectors required to efficiently handle workflow at the ports. DHS will integrate the results of the Agriculture Resource Allocation Model into its existing methodology in order to provide a more holistic view of DHS’s staffing requirements. Generally speaking, APHIS and DHS staffing decisions for agricultural inspections are continuously being reformulated based on changing conditions so that the ports may operate at a constantly improving level of service. Two commenters stated that the regulations should stipulate that any overtime fees collected should be returned to the port where the services are rendered. The commenters said that this would ensure that sufficient funds are available where needed, and the Agencies would not be required to utilize appropriated funds or cash reserves to cover expenses associated with overtime fees. We disagree with the commenters. It would be administratively burdensome for APHIS (or DHS for that matter) to maintain and track reimbursable overtime collections for agricultural inspection to a port-by-port level. Because the application of reimbursable overtime rates distinctively mirrors the work the employees perform and are paid for, there is no need to track collections and costs to this level. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES 59564 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Program budgeters carefully consider the amount of reimbursable overtime work at their ports in providing budget estimates from year to year. Finally, APHIS and DHS overtime fee collections are already tracked to the agency level; those collections remain in the appropriate accounts to fund each Department’s respective overtime operations. Two commenters observed that both APHIS and DHS must be able to provide invoices for all overtime fees in a timely manner. The commenters suggested that the regulations stipulate that invoices will be provided within 30 days of the inspection date. Comments referring to specific billing practices are outside the scope of the current rulemaking. Invoices are generally provided simultaneous to inspection; however the commenters should contact the port director with any questions or concerns about the timeliness of billing. Other commenters stated that it would be possible for APHIS and DHS to assess overtime fees at a lower rate if industry were involved in negotiations between those Agencies and the inspectors’ union. Any discussion of union contract negotiation is outside the scope of the current rulemaking. A commenter observed that greater responsiveness to current industry practices is needed. The commenter went on to state that, at the port in Atlanta, GA, importers cannot request weekend overtime after 3 p.m. on Friday, however it is impossible to determine with certainty by that time how much overtime will be necessary. The commenter is engaged in the importation of plant cuttings or live plants, which are perishable, and the busiest importing days, based on industry need and long-established industry practice, include Saturdays and Sundays. Another commenter stated that the port in Miami, FL, had recently extended its weekday operational hours. The commenter urged APHIS to maintain those hours. As previously stated, APHIS leaves such administrative details as the deadline for requesting weekend overtime and the operational hours of the ports to the knowledge and discretion of those individual ports. If the first commenter wishes to propose an extension of the deadline for requesting weekend overtime and the second commenter would like to maintain extended weekday hours of operation they should contact their local port directors. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 Comments on Proposed Costs A number of commenters expressed concern at the cost numbers supplied by APHIS in the proposed rule. Several commenters observed that the proposed rule would increase the cost for overtime services by 30 to 49 percent (some commenters cited the increase as 45 to 55 percent); a number that represents 3 to 5 times the rate of inflation since the last increase in 2002. Further, the commenters remarked that the U.S. Department of Labor had reported only a 10 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index since 2002. The commenters were troubled by the difference between the inflation rate, the Consumer Price Index rate, and the proposed percentage increase to overtime fees. Overtime fees are not solely based on either the rate of inflation or the Consumer Price Index. As stated previously, the cost of providing these services includes direct and indirect costs. The direct costs are an employee’s salary and specific benefits, which are APHIS’ payment of the hospital insurance tax and its contribution to the FICA, and the Agency’s costs for work performed at night. The indirect costs are area delivery costs, billing and collection costs, program direction and support costs, central/departmental charges, and unfunded leave costs. Another commenter suggested that the cost increases should be made incrementally over the next several years to lessen the burden on producers and exporters and help them maintain their competitive position. A phase-in of the proposed changes would simply delay achieving the rule’s objectives: To properly recover costs and adequately fund program operations. We would add that the decision to request overtime services, and therefore to incur additional costs, is left to the importer and such importers may realize price efficiencies by scheduling inspections during regular business hours. Several commenters observed that the increase in the overtime fees will come in conjunction with a new fee of $375 per treatment for various types of treatments currently offered at no charge. The commenters asserted that the cumulative effect of these cost increases will have a chilling effect on the perishable goods import/export market in the United States. The fee to which the commenters refer was included in a proposal to add new fee categories and adjust current fees charged for certain agricultural quarantine and inspection services provided in connection with certain PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 commercial vessels, commercial trucks, commercial railroad cars, commercial aircraft, and international passengers arriving at ports in the customs territory of the United States.4 While the fees discussed in that rule are compulsory, overtime fees represent the cost of providing the additional service outside of regular business hours. As stated previously, the decision to request overtime services, and therefore to incur additional costs, is left to the importer. Comments on Economic Impact A number of commenters from Florida stated that the proposed increase in overtime fees would prove detrimental to trade, commerce, and the economy of that State. We disagree with the commenters’ assessment. Based on the economic assessment included with the proposal, we estimate that the impact of this rule will be minor. Further, the commenters did not provide any economic data in support of their claim for APHIS to examine. Another commenter observed that Florida has successfully worked with APHIS to implement the first ever cold treatment pilot project for perishable commodities. The commenter was concerned that increased overtime fee rates would prove economically detrimental to the future of that project both in Florida and other areas where cold treatment is already permitted. We disagree with the commenter’s statement. APHIS’ agreement with the shipping lines in the Florida cold treatment pilot program requires that cold treatment be completed before the ship arrives at the port because there are no approved cold treatment facilities available in Florida. Since the cold treatment must take place prior to shipment arrival, any information regarding application of cold treatment may be transmitted to the ports during regular business hours. Comments on Comment Period We received several requests for an extension of the comment period on the proposed rule. After careful consideration, we determined to keep the original deadline. While APHIS has not updated its overtime fees since 2005, these increases remain a routine cost-recovery measure for the Agency. Comments on Agency Jurisdiction Two commenters stated that, to the extent APHIS and CBP are performing the same inspection services, the 4 You may view the proposed rule at https:// www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2013-0021. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations shipping community has a reasonable right to expect that the rates charged will be consistent across the agencies and that any internal conflicts in pay and rate schedules should be transparent to the service recipient. The commenters concluded that, to the extent one agency is acting on behalf of the other, it is imperative that the agency which is incurring the costs retains the appropriate percentage of the revenues collected. We agree with the commenters’ observations. Providing clarity while allowing APHIS and DHS to recoup inspection costs was our intent in publishing this rule. Finally, one commenter said that there is confusion about which agencies have responsibility for and jurisdiction over various functions. The commenter said that the rule should clearly delineate which functions are performed by APHIS and which are performed on behalf of APHIS by DHS. The commenter concluded that fees should be listed only in the relevant sections of the CFR, and there must be no question that both APHIS and DHS are not billing individually for the same services. Generally speaking, most of the agricultural inspections discussed in this rule are performed by DHS pursuant to the Homeland Security Act. Examples of agricultural inspections performed by APHIS include those associated with the importation of live plants, which occur at designated plant inspection stations, and APHIS oversight of certain port of entry treatments. As stated in the proposed rule, DHS conducts billings of their overtime charges in accordance with the regulations in 5 CFR part 551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR 24.16. The DHS fees for agricultural inspection overtime work are not listed in a specific section of the CFR as the Homeland Security Act that first established DHS did not provide any new regulatory authority to DHS but rather used the existing regulatory authority of those agencies or programs whose functions were transferred to DHS. So APHIS’ regulatory authority is used to enumerate or revise agricultural inspection overtime rates. Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with a few, minor editorial changes. Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act This final rule is subject to Executive Order 12866. However, for this action, the Office of Management and Budget VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 has waived its review under Executive Order 12866. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we have performed a final regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding the economic effects of this rule on small entities. Copies of the full analysis are available on the Regulations.gov Web site (see footnote 1 in this document for a link to Regulations.gov) or by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. APHIS charges hourly overtime rates to individuals, firms, and corporations requesting inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine services at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, rail ports, quarantine facilities, and airports outside of the regularly established hours of service. These overtime rates are charged to the individuals, firms, or corporations requesting the services, and the fees vary depending on the type of service performed and when the service is provided. This rule amends the fees for reimbursable overtime to reflect increased costs associated with providing these services. APHIS is updating these fees to take into account the routine increases in the cost of conducting business during overtime hours. The cost to the import/ export program to provide these services has increased year to year, and these proposed increases are necessary to more accurately provide the full cost recovery of this Agency activity. Currently, APHIS charges $51 per hour per employee for inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural products outside the employee’s regular tour of duty, and $67 per hour per employee for inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural products that is performed on Sundays outside the employee’s regular tour of duty. APHIS charges $41 per hour per employee for commercial airline inspection services that are performed outside of the regularly established hours of service on a holiday or any other period and $55 per hour per employee for commercial airline inspection services that are performed outside of the regularly established hours of service on a Sunday. This rule establishes hourly overtime rates for each of the fiscal years 2016 through 2018. From FY 2016 through FY 2018, these rates would increase by $24 for inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural products outside the employee’s regular tour of duty (Monday through Saturday and holidays), by $33 for inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine of PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 59565 animals or agricultural products that is performed on Sundays outside the employee’s regular tour of duty, by $24 for commercial airline inspection services that are performed outside of the regularly established hours of service on a holiday or any other period, and by $31 for commercial airline inspection services that are performed outside of the regularly established hours of service on a Sunday. Executive Order 12372 This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. (See 2 CFR chapter IV.) Executive Order 12988 This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). List of Subjects 7 CFR Part 354 Animal diseases, Exports, Government employees, Imports, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Travel and transportation expenses. 9 CFR Part 97 Exports, Government employees, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products, Travel and transportation expenses. 9 CFR Part 130 Animals, Birds, Diagnostic reagents, Exports, Imports, Poultry and poultry products, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Tests. Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR parts 97 and 130 as follows: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 59566 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Title 7—Agriculture c. By revising the table in paragraph (a)(1)(iii). ■ d. In paragraph (a)(2), by removing the word ‘‘A’’ in the first sentence and adding the words ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, a’’ in its place. ■ e. By adding paragraph (a)(3). ■ f. In paragraphs (a)(2), (b), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(4), and (f), by adding the words ‘‘or U.S. Customs and Border Protection’’ after the words ‘‘Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’’ each time they appear. The addition and revisions read as follows: ■ PART 354—OVERTIME SERVICES RELATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS; AND USER FEES 1. The authority citation for part 354 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772, 7781– 7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. 2. Section 354.1 is amended as follows: ■ a. By revising paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, including the table. ■ b. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), by removing the words ‘‘the Customs Service, Immigration and Naturalization Service’’ and adding the words ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border Protection’’ in their place. ■ § 354.1 Overtime work at border ports, sea ports, and airports. (a)(1) Any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody, or control of plants, plant products, animals, animal byproducts, or other commodities or articles subject to inspection, laboratory testing, certification, or quarantine under this chapter and subchapter D of chapter I, title 9 CFR, who requires the services of an employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection on a Sunday or holiday, or at any other time outside the regular tour of duty of that employee, shall sufficiently in advance of the period of Sunday, holiday, or overtime service request the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspector in charge to furnish the service during the overtime or Sunday or holiday period, and shall pay the Government at the rate listed in the following table, except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii), and (a)(3) of this section: OVERTIME FOR INSPECTION, LABORATORY TESTING, CERTIFICATION, OR QUARANTINE OF PLANT, PLANT PRODUCTS, ANIMALS, ANIMAL PRODUCTS OR OTHER REGULATED COMMODITIES Overtime rates (per hour) Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015– Sept. 30, 2016 Monday through Saturday and holidays .................................................................... Sundays ..................................................................................................................... * * * * * Oct. 1, 2016– Sept. 30, 2017 $75 99 Beginning Oct. 1, 2017 $75 99 $75 100 (iii) * * * OVERTIME FOR COMMERCIAL AIRLINE INSPECTION SERVICES 1 Overtime rates (per hour) Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015– Sept. 30, 2016 Monday through Saturday and holidays .................................................................... Sundays ..................................................................................................................... 1 These $64 85 Beginning Oct. 1, 2017 $65 86 $65 86 charges exclude administrative overhead costs. * * * * * (3) The overtime rate and all other charges, including minimum and commute compensation charges, to be billed for services provided by an employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be charged according to the provisions of this section, 5 CFR part 551, or 19 CFR 24.16. * * * * * Title 9—Animals and Animal Products asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES Oct. 1, 2016– Sept. 30, 2017 PART 97—OVERTIME SERVICES RELATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS 3. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 4. Section 97.1 is amended as follows: a. By revising paragraph (a) introductory text, including the table. ■ b. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing the words ‘‘the Customs Service, Immigration and Naturalization Service’’ and adding the words ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border Protection’’ in their place. ■ c. By revising the table in paragraph (a)(3). ■ d. By adding paragraph (a)(4). ■ e. In paragraphs (b), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(4), and (f), by adding the words ‘‘or U.S. Customs and Border Protection’’ after the words ‘‘Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’’ each time they appear. The addition and revisions read as follows: ■ ■ PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 § 97.1 Overtime work at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, and airports.1 (a) Any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody, or control of animals, animal byproducts, or other commodities or articles subject to inspection, laboratory testing, certification, or quarantine under this subchapter and subchapter G of this chapter, and who requires the services of an employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection on a Sunday or holiday, or at any other time outside the regular tour of duty of the 1 For designated ports of entry for certain animals, animal semen, poultry, and hatching eggs, see §§ 93.102, 93.203, 93.303, 93.403, 93.503, 93.703, and 93.805 of this chapter. For designated ports of entry for certain purebred animals see §§ 151.1 through 151.3 of this chapter. E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 59567 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations employee, shall sufficiently in advance of the period of Sunday, holiday, or overtime service request the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspector in charge to furnish the service and shall pay the Government at the rate listed in the following table, except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of this section: OVERTIME FOR INSPECTION, LABORATORY TESTING, CERTIFICATION, OR QUARANTINE OF PLANT, PLANT PRODUCTS, ANIMALS, ANIMAL PRODUCTS OR OTHER REGULATED COMMODITIES Overtime rates (per hour) Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015– Sept. 30, 2016 Monday through Saturday and holidays .................................................................... Sundays ..................................................................................................................... * * * * * Oct. 1, 2016– Sept. 30, 2017 $75 99 Beginning Oct. 1, 2017 $75 99 $75 100 (3) * * * OVERTIME FOR COMMERCIAL AIRLINE INSPECTION SERVICES 1 Overtime rates (per hour) Outside the employee’s normal tour of duty Nov. 2, 2015– Sept. 30, 2016 Monday through Saturday and holidays .................................................................... Sundays ..................................................................................................................... 1 These Oct. 1, 2016– Sept. 30, 2017 $64 85 Beginning Oct. 1, 2017 $65 86 $65 86 charges exclude administrative overhead costs. (4) The overtime rate and all other charges, including minimum and commute compensation charges, to be billed for services provided by an employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be charged according to the provisions of this section, 5 CFR part 551, or 19 CFR 24.16. * * * * * PART 130—USER FEES 5. The authority citation for part 130 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5542; 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 3701, 3716, 3717, 3719, and 3720A; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4. 6. Section 130.50 is amended as follows: ■ a. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, by removing the words ‘‘or (ii)’’ ■ and adding the words ‘‘, (ii), or (iii)’’ in their place. ■ b. By revising the table in paragraph (b)(3)(i). ■ c. By adding paragraph (b)(3)(iii). The addition and revision read as follows: § 130.50 Payment of user fees. * * * * * * (b) * * (3) * * (i) * * * * OVERTIME FOR FLAT RATE USER FEES 1 2 Overtime rates (per hour) Outside of the employee’s normal tour of duty Rate for inspection, testing, certification or quarantine of animals, animal products or other commodities 3. Rate for commercial airline inspection services 4 ....... Monday–Saturday and holidays. Sundays ........................... Monday–Saturday and holidays. Sundays ........................... Nov. 2, 2015– Sept. 30, 2016 Oct. 1, 2016– Sept. 30, 2017 Beginning Oct. 1, 2017 $75 99 $75 99 $75 100 64 85 65 86 65 86 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES 1 Minimum charge of 2 hours, unless performed on the employee’s regular workday and performed in direct continuation of the regular workday or begun within an hour of the regular workday. 2 When the 2-hour minimum applies, you may need to pay commuted travel time. (See § 97.1(b) of this chapter for specific information about commuted travel time.) 3 See § 97.1(a) of this chapter or 7 CFR 354.3 for details. 4 See § 97.1(a)(3) of this chapter for details. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1 59568 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * (iii) For information on rules pertaining to the charges associated with employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection performing agricultural inspection services, please see 7 CFR 354.1 and 9 CFR 97.1. * * * * * Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of September 2015. Kevin Shea, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2015–25101 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2015–0493; Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–184–AD; Amendment 39–18283; AD 2015–20–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 188 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the upper and lower wing skin planks at the attachment of the main landing gear (MLG) ribs at certain wing-stations are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This AD requires an inspection (for cracking) and modification of the chordwise fastener rows of the upper and lower wing planks at the attachments to the MLG ribs at certain wing-stations. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the upper and lower wing skin planks at the attachment of the MLG ribs, which could result in failure of the wing. DATES: This AD is effective November 6, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 6, 2015. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Lockheed asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Oct 01, 2015 Jkt 238001 Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770–494–5444; fax 770–494–5445; email ams.portal@ lmco.com; Internet https:// www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/ TechPubs.html. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227– 1221. It is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–0493. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 0493; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404– 474–5605; email: Carl.W.Gray@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 188 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 24, 2015 (80 FR 15525). The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by the DAH indicating that the upper and lower wing skin planks at the attachment of the MLG ribs at certain wing-stations are subject to WFD. The NPRM proposed to require an inspection (for cracking) and modification of the chordwise fastener rows of the upper and lower wing planks at the attachments to the MLG PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ribs at certain wing-stations. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the upper and lower wing skin planks at the attachment of the MLG ribs, which could result in failure of the wing. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (80 FR 15525, March 24, 2015) or on the determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: • Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 15525, March 24, 2015) for correcting the unsafe condition; and • Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 15525, March 24, 2015). We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Lockheed Martin Electra Service Bulletin 88/SB–721, dated April 30, 2014. This service information describes procedures for doing a bolthole eddy current (BHEC) inspection for cracking and repair of cracking. This service information also describes procedures for modification of the chordwise fastener rows of the upper and lower wing planks at the attachments to the MLG ribs at wingstation (WS) 167 and WS 209 by removing the original fasteners and replacing them with new first oversize fasteners of the same type or approved substitute type for original fasteners. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this AD. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 4 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM 02OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59561-59568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Part 354

9 CFR Parts 97 and 130

[Docket No. APHIS-2009-0047]


Fee Increases for Overtime Services

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are changing the hourly rates charged for Sundays, 
holidays, or other overtime work performed by employees of the Animal 
and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) for any person, firm, or 
corporation having ownership, custody, or control of regulated 
commodities or articles subject to agricultural inspection, laboratory 
testing, certification, or quarantine under the regulations. We are 
increasing these overtime rates for each of the fiscal years 2016 
through 2018 to reflect the anticipated costs associated with providing 
these services during each year. Establishing the overtime rate changes 
in advance will allow users of APHIS' services to incorporate the rates 
into their budget planning. We are also clarifying the regulations to 
indicate that agricultural inspections performed by the Department of 
Homeland Security (DHS) may be billed in accordance with DHS overtime 
regulations for services performed outside of regular business hours, 
as DHS rates may differ from those charged by APHIS.

DATES: Effective November 2, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning Plant 
Protection and Quarantine program operations, contact Ms. Diane L. 
Schuble, AQI User Fee Coordinator, Office of the Executive Director-
Policy Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 131, Riverdale, MD 
20737-1231; (301) 851-2338.
    For information concerning Veterinary Services program operations, 
contact Ms. Carol Tuszynski, Director, Planning, Finance, and Strategy 
Staff, Program Support Services, VS, APHIS,

[[Page 59562]]

4700 River Road Unit 58, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-3463.
    For information concerning APHIS overtime fee development, contact 
Ms. Adelaide Feukam, Auditor, Review and Analysis, Financial Management 
Division, MRPBS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 55, Riverdale, MD 20737; 
(301) 851-2601.
    For information concerning DHS overtime fees, contact Mrs. Kara 
Welty, Chief, Debt Management Branch, Indianapolis, CBP, DHS, 6650 
Telecom Drive Suite 100, Indianapolis, IN 46278-2010; (317) 614-4614.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The regulations in 7 CFR chapter III and 9 CFR chapter I, 
subchapters D and G, require inspection, laboratory testing, 
certification, or quarantine of certain animals, poultry, animal 
byproducts, germ plasm, organisms, vectors, plants, plant products, or 
other regulated commodities or articles intended for importation into, 
or exportation from, the United States. With some exceptions, which are 
explained below, when these services must be provided by an Animal and 
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) employee on a Sunday or on a 
holiday, or at any other time outside the APHIS employee's regular duty 
hours, the Government charges an hourly overtime fee for the services 
in accordance with 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97.
    Based on changes to the costs associated with providing 
agricultural inspection, laboratory testing, certification, and 
quarantine services, we determined that adjustments to the overtime 
rates in 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR part 97 were necessary in order for 
APHIS to recover the full cost of providing these services. Therefore, 
we proposed to set hourly overtime rates for inspection, laboratory 
testing, certification, and quarantine services provided outside of an 
employee's normal tour of duty for fiscal years (FYs) 2014 through 
2018. Our proposal was published in the Federal Register on April 25, 
2014 (79 FR 22887-22895, Docket No. APHIS-2009-0047).\1\ The proposed 
overtime rates were based on our costs of providing the services, 
including direct labor costs, area delivery costs, billing and 
collection costs, program direction and support costs, agency/
management support costs, central/departmental changes, and a reserve 
component, plus adjustments for inflation and anticipated annual 
increases in the salaries of employees who provide the services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go 
to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We also proposed to include language in 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 
and 9 CFR 130.50 to clarify and inform the public that any agricultural 
inspection performed by an employee of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on a 
Sunday, holiday, or anytime outside of the employee's normal tour of 
duty may be billed in accordance with the regulations in 5 CFR part 
551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR 24.16. Such 
billing is necessary because the costs associated with the DHS 
agricultural inspections and incurred by DHS may differ from those 
incurred by APHIS. Therefore, varying overtime charges may apply in 
such circumstances in order for DHS to properly recover their costs and 
adequately fund their program operations.
    We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending 
June 24, 2014. We received 43 comments by that date. They were from 
producers, importers, industry groups, and private individuals. Two 
were supportive of the proposed action. The remainder are discussed 
below by topic.

Comments on Rate Calculation Methodology

    As previously stated, we proposed to establish the hourly overtime 
rates for FY 2014 through FY 2018. We note that, as FYs 2014 and 2015 
have ended, the overtime rates covered by this final rule are now only 
for FYs 2016 through 2018. The FY 2016 rates will become effective 30 
days after the date of publication of this final rule; the FY 2017 and 
FY 2018 rates would become effective on the first day of each of the 
fiscal years, and the FY 2018 rates would remain in effect until new 
rates were established.
    One commenter stated that our aim of seeking set rates for 
anticipated costs over a 5 year period is too speculative and far too 
difficult to predict with accuracy. The commenter suggested that APHIS 
use a 5 year projection as a planning tool only and constrain specific 
overtime cost increases to a shorter timeframe.
    We disagree with the commenter's assessment. Based on our 
experience with past overtime fee increases, information regarding such 
increases that covers a longer timeframe allows users of APHIS' 
services to incorporate the rates into their budget planning. In 
addition, we arrive at our projected figures using those gross domestic 
product (GDP) figures provided by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) in the Presidential budget, which is the Government standard for 
such fees and is not subject to rate instability. Moreover, as 
explained above, the actual timeframe of this rule will be based on a 
shorter 3 year period since it will only apply to FYs 2016 through 
2018.
    The commenter went on to assert that our calculations should 
address not only the cost of providing overtime service, but also 
specify what steps are being taken to reduce costs to the Agency and 
thereby also reduce customer costs.
    While the main cost driver of reimbursable overtime is the cost of 
salaries and benefits, APHIS has taken steps in recent years to achieve 
efficiencies as part of United States Department of Agriculture's 
(USDA) Blueprint for Stronger Service.\2\ For example, APHIS 
centralized certain services such as information technology, customer 
service support, telecommunications, and vehicle inventory while also 
enacting additional controls on purchases. APHIS continues to look for 
opportunities to reduce operating costs where possible while 
maintaining the level of services needed to carry out our mission of 
safeguarding U.S. agriculture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Information on this initiative is available on the Internet 
at https://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=blueprint_for_stronger_service.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We calculated our overtime rates to cover the full cost of 
providing inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine services at 
laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, rail ports, quarantine 
facilities, and airports outside of the normal tour of duty of the 
employee providing these services. The cost of providing these services 
includes direct and indirect costs. The direct costs are an employee's 
salary and specific benefits, which are APHIS' payment of the hospital 
insurance tax and its contribution to the Federal Insurance 
Contribution Act (FICA), and the Agency's costs for work performed at 
night. The indirect costs are area delivery costs, billing and 
collection costs, program direction and support costs, central/
departmental charges, and unfunded leave costs.
    A number of commenters observed that, in the calculation of 
overtime rates, only the variable cost of providing the additional 
service outside of regular business hours should be included in the 
assessment of the overall cost. Specifically, the commenters stated 
that there is no justification for the inclusion of most of the 
components identified in

[[Page 59563]]

area delivery, imputed costs, agency level program delivery, agency 
level administrative support, and central/departmental charges.
    We followed Federal guidance related to fee setting and managerial 
cost accounting in determining program costs. Specifically, we followed 
OMB Circular A-25: User Charges, which provides guidance on setting 
fees in the Federal Government, and SFAS No. 4, which includes, among 
other things, a definition of full cost. OMB Circular A-25, which may 
be viewed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_default, 
establishes the requirement that fees be set at full cost to the 
Government, and provides a definition and examples for full cost. OMB 
Circular A-25 very specifically defines full cost to include the costs 
referenced by the commenters.
    Another commenter asked to review APHIS's full revenue-costs 
statements as well as the full economic impact assessment. The 
commenter stated that the information was not included with the 
proposed rule.
    Our full calculation of all aspects of overtime fees, starting with 
direct labor costs and including all indirect costs and overhead 
elements, was included in the proposed rule, which is available for 
public review on the Internet at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2009-0047. The regulatory impact analysis and 
initial regulatory flexibility analysis were also made available on 
Regulations.gov along with the proposed rule as part of the rule's 
supporting documents. We maintain that this level of detail provides 
the highest degree of transparency and supports the required increase 
needed in our rates.
    As detailed above, APHIS calculates its overtime fees based on a 
variety of sources apart from employee salary considerations. Per OMB 
Circular A-25, the overtime program is a full cost recovery program, 
which includes the direct and indirect costs outlined previously.
    One commenter stated that APHIS should reconsider its cost 
estimates since the initial impetus for the proposed rule was work done 
in 2010 at the height of the financial crisis. The commenter went on to 
say that, since that time, the rate of importation and export has 
increased significantly, which would increase Agency funds that might 
be used to cover these costs instead.
    We disagree with the commenter's assessment. While there are other 
components involved, much of the cost of overtime inspection is made up 
of inspector salaries. The APHIS budget provides funding for inspectors 
working within business hours, Monday through Friday, except holidays. 
Any work performed outside that timeframe is, by definition, additional 
and irregular. As detailed in OMB Circular A-25, Federal agencies are 
charged to recoup their costs in such instances via the assessment of 
overtime fees. Any additional funds that APHIS (or DHS for that matter) 
may receive via any increases in trade would remain in the accounts 
used by the specific Agency and programs that provide the services and 
incur the costs.

Comments on Billing Procedures

    Two commenters stated that most, if not all, of the ports require 
that overtime be requested and paid for in a minimum of 4-hour blocks 
regardless of whether those 4 hours are needed or used. The commenters 
suggested that APHIS change its overtime billing policy so that 
importers would only be charged for the time required to conduct the 
requested inspection. The commenters also suggested that, if an 
inspector is called for overtime work in the 4 hour block described 
above and the whole of that time is not used, that inspector should 
then remain onsite for the remainder of the 4 hour time period in order 
to deal with any other vessels or cargoes that may arrive and require 
immediate inspection.
    In Sec.  354.1, paragraph (a)(2) states that a minimum charge of 2 
hours will be made for inspection services performed by an APHIS 
employee outside of his or her normal tour of duty on Saturdays, 
holidays, weekdays, or Sundays. In addition, overtime fees may include 
a commuted traveltime period (CTT), which is established by APHIS to 
cover the time an employee spends reporting to and returning from the 
place where the requested overtime duties are performed.\3\ We believe 
the 4-hour minimum cited by the commenters includes the minimum 
overtime work time of 2 hours in addition to 2 hours of CTT. Although 
CTT ranges from 1 to 12 hours, 2 hours is the allotted CTT at many of 
our busiest ports. Regarding the commenters' second point concerning 
inspectors remaining onsite to perform other unexpected inspection; an 
arrangement of this nature is not precluded by the regulations. 
However, APHIS leaves such administrative details to the knowledge and 
discretion of the individual ports. The actual management of staffs, 
inspectors, hours, staffing for arrival, and identification of risk and 
needs varies from port to port and is best handled by port directors 
equipped with the detailed information necessary to make daily staffing 
decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A full listing of CTT periods may be found in Sec.  354.2 of 
the regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two commenters observed that, in many instances, vessels and 
cargoes are ready for inspection during normal business hours only to 
find that DHS inspectors are not available due to the volume of 
inspections required for other vessels. The commenters stated that 
users should not be made to pay for services rendered in overtime 
periods that could have been conducted during normal business hours had 
sufficient personnel been available.
    We have considered the commenters' point and have received detailed 
information from DHS regarding their staffing policies at the ports. 
Overall, DHS employs a rigorous, data-driven methodology to identify 
staffing requirements. It is composed of multiple elements--some fixed, 
others variable--that may be adjusted according to changing priorities, 
risks, and threats. In early 2014, a risk-based Agriculture Resource 
Allocation Model was finalized, which will serve as an important 
component of DHS's methodology. The Agriculture Resource Allocation 
Model will more accurately calculate the number of agricultural 
inspectors required to efficiently handle workflow at the ports. DHS 
will integrate the results of the Agriculture Resource Allocation Model 
into its existing methodology in order to provide a more holistic view 
of DHS's staffing requirements. Generally speaking, APHIS and DHS 
staffing decisions for agricultural inspections are continuously being 
reformulated based on changing conditions so that the ports may operate 
at a constantly improving level of service.
    Two commenters stated that the regulations should stipulate that 
any overtime fees collected should be returned to the port where the 
services are rendered. The commenters said that this would ensure that 
sufficient funds are available where needed, and the Agencies would not 
be required to utilize appropriated funds or cash reserves to cover 
expenses associated with overtime fees.
    We disagree with the commenters. It would be administratively 
burdensome for APHIS (or DHS for that matter) to maintain and track 
reimbursable overtime collections for agricultural inspection to a 
port-by-port level. Because the application of reimbursable overtime 
rates distinctively mirrors the work the employees perform and are paid 
for, there is no need to track collections and costs to this level.

[[Page 59564]]

Program budgeters carefully consider the amount of reimbursable 
overtime work at their ports in providing budget estimates from year to 
year. Finally, APHIS and DHS overtime fee collections are already 
tracked to the agency level; those collections remain in the 
appropriate accounts to fund each Department's respective overtime 
operations.
    Two commenters observed that both APHIS and DHS must be able to 
provide invoices for all overtime fees in a timely manner. The 
commenters suggested that the regulations stipulate that invoices will 
be provided within 30 days of the inspection date.
    Comments referring to specific billing practices are outside the 
scope of the current rulemaking. Invoices are generally provided 
simultaneous to inspection; however the commenters should contact the 
port director with any questions or concerns about the timeliness of 
billing.
    Other commenters stated that it would be possible for APHIS and DHS 
to assess overtime fees at a lower rate if industry were involved in 
negotiations between those Agencies and the inspectors' union.
    Any discussion of union contract negotiation is outside the scope 
of the current rulemaking.
    A commenter observed that greater responsiveness to current 
industry practices is needed. The commenter went on to state that, at 
the port in Atlanta, GA, importers cannot request weekend overtime 
after 3 p.m. on Friday, however it is impossible to determine with 
certainty by that time how much overtime will be necessary. The 
commenter is engaged in the importation of plant cuttings or live 
plants, which are perishable, and the busiest importing days, based on 
industry need and long-established industry practice, include Saturdays 
and Sundays.
    Another commenter stated that the port in Miami, FL, had recently 
extended its weekday operational hours. The commenter urged APHIS to 
maintain those hours.
    As previously stated, APHIS leaves such administrative details as 
the deadline for requesting weekend overtime and the operational hours 
of the ports to the knowledge and discretion of those individual ports. 
If the first commenter wishes to propose an extension of the deadline 
for requesting weekend overtime and the second commenter would like to 
maintain extended weekday hours of operation they should contact their 
local port directors.

Comments on Proposed Costs

    A number of commenters expressed concern at the cost numbers 
supplied by APHIS in the proposed rule.
    Several commenters observed that the proposed rule would increase 
the cost for overtime services by 30 to 49 percent (some commenters 
cited the increase as 45 to 55 percent); a number that represents 3 to 
5 times the rate of inflation since the last increase in 2002. Further, 
the commenters remarked that the U.S. Department of Labor had reported 
only a 10 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index since 2002. The 
commenters were troubled by the difference between the inflation rate, 
the Consumer Price Index rate, and the proposed percentage increase to 
overtime fees.
    Overtime fees are not solely based on either the rate of inflation 
or the Consumer Price Index. As stated previously, the cost of 
providing these services includes direct and indirect costs. The direct 
costs are an employee's salary and specific benefits, which are APHIS' 
payment of the hospital insurance tax and its contribution to the FICA, 
and the Agency's costs for work performed at night. The indirect costs 
are area delivery costs, billing and collection costs, program 
direction and support costs, central/departmental charges, and unfunded 
leave costs.
    Another commenter suggested that the cost increases should be made 
incrementally over the next several years to lessen the burden on 
producers and exporters and help them maintain their competitive 
position.
    A phase-in of the proposed changes would simply delay achieving the 
rule's objectives: To properly recover costs and adequately fund 
program operations. We would add that the decision to request overtime 
services, and therefore to incur additional costs, is left to the 
importer and such importers may realize price efficiencies by 
scheduling inspections during regular business hours.
    Several commenters observed that the increase in the overtime fees 
will come in conjunction with a new fee of $375 per treatment for 
various types of treatments currently offered at no charge. The 
commenters asserted that the cumulative effect of these cost increases 
will have a chilling effect on the perishable goods import/export 
market in the United States.
    The fee to which the commenters refer was included in a proposal to 
add new fee categories and adjust current fees charged for certain 
agricultural quarantine and inspection services provided in connection 
with certain commercial vessels, commercial trucks, commercial railroad 
cars, commercial aircraft, and international passengers arriving at 
ports in the customs territory of the United States.\4\ While the fees 
discussed in that rule are compulsory, overtime fees represent the cost 
of providing the additional service outside of regular business hours. 
As stated previously, the decision to request overtime services, and 
therefore to incur additional costs, is left to the importer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ You may view the proposed rule at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments on Economic Impact

    A number of commenters from Florida stated that the proposed 
increase in overtime fees would prove detrimental to trade, commerce, 
and the economy of that State.
    We disagree with the commenters' assessment. Based on the economic 
assessment included with the proposal, we estimate that the impact of 
this rule will be minor. Further, the commenters did not provide any 
economic data in support of their claim for APHIS to examine.
    Another commenter observed that Florida has successfully worked 
with APHIS to implement the first ever cold treatment pilot project for 
perishable commodities. The commenter was concerned that increased 
overtime fee rates would prove economically detrimental to the future 
of that project both in Florida and other areas where cold treatment is 
already permitted.
    We disagree with the commenter's statement. APHIS' agreement with 
the shipping lines in the Florida cold treatment pilot program requires 
that cold treatment be completed before the ship arrives at the port 
because there are no approved cold treatment facilities available in 
Florida. Since the cold treatment must take place prior to shipment 
arrival, any information regarding application of cold treatment may be 
transmitted to the ports during regular business hours.

Comments on Comment Period

    We received several requests for an extension of the comment period 
on the proposed rule. After careful consideration, we determined to 
keep the original deadline. While APHIS has not updated its overtime 
fees since 2005, these increases remain a routine cost-recovery measure 
for the Agency.

Comments on Agency Jurisdiction

    Two commenters stated that, to the extent APHIS and CBP are 
performing the same inspection services, the

[[Page 59565]]

shipping community has a reasonable right to expect that the rates 
charged will be consistent across the agencies and that any internal 
conflicts in pay and rate schedules should be transparent to the 
service recipient. The commenters concluded that, to the extent one 
agency is acting on behalf of the other, it is imperative that the 
agency which is incurring the costs retains the appropriate percentage 
of the revenues collected.
    We agree with the commenters' observations. Providing clarity while 
allowing APHIS and DHS to recoup inspection costs was our intent in 
publishing this rule.
    Finally, one commenter said that there is confusion about which 
agencies have responsibility for and jurisdiction over various 
functions. The commenter said that the rule should clearly delineate 
which functions are performed by APHIS and which are performed on 
behalf of APHIS by DHS. The commenter concluded that fees should be 
listed only in the relevant sections of the CFR, and there must be no 
question that both APHIS and DHS are not billing individually for the 
same services.
    Generally speaking, most of the agricultural inspections discussed 
in this rule are performed by DHS pursuant to the Homeland Security 
Act. Examples of agricultural inspections performed by APHIS include 
those associated with the importation of live plants, which occur at 
designated plant inspection stations, and APHIS oversight of certain 
port of entry treatments. As stated in the proposed rule, DHS conducts 
billings of their overtime charges in accordance with the regulations 
in 5 CFR part 551, 7 CFR 354.1, 9 CFR 97.1, 9 CFR 130.50, or 19 CFR 
24.16. The DHS fees for agricultural inspection overtime work are not 
listed in a specific section of the CFR as the Homeland Security Act 
that first established DHS did not provide any new regulatory authority 
to DHS but rather used the existing regulatory authority of those 
agencies or programs whose functions were transferred to DHS. So APHIS' 
regulatory authority is used to enumerate or revise agricultural 
inspection overtime rates.
    Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this 
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with a 
few, minor editorial changes.

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This final rule is subject to Executive Order 12866. However, for 
this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review 
under Executive Order 12866.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we have performed a final 
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding 
the economic effects of this rule on small entities. Copies of the full 
analysis are available on the Regulations.gov Web site (see footnote 1 
in this document for a link to Regulations.gov) or by contacting the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    APHIS charges hourly overtime rates to individuals, firms, and 
corporations requesting inspection, testing, certification, or 
quarantine services at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, rail 
ports, quarantine facilities, and airports outside of the regularly 
established hours of service. These overtime rates are charged to the 
individuals, firms, or corporations requesting the services, and the 
fees vary depending on the type of service performed and when the 
service is provided. This rule amends the fees for reimbursable 
overtime to reflect increased costs associated with providing these 
services.
    APHIS is updating these fees to take into account the routine 
increases in the cost of conducting business during overtime hours. The 
cost to the import/export program to provide these services has 
increased year to year, and these proposed increases are necessary to 
more accurately provide the full cost recovery of this Agency activity.
    Currently, APHIS charges $51 per hour per employee for inspection, 
testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural 
products outside the employee's regular tour of duty, and $67 per hour 
per employee for inspection, testing, certification, or quarantine of 
animals or agricultural products that is performed on Sundays outside 
the employee's regular tour of duty. APHIS charges $41 per hour per 
employee for commercial airline inspection services that are performed 
outside of the regularly established hours of service on a holiday or 
any other period and $55 per hour per employee for commercial airline 
inspection services that are performed outside of the regularly 
established hours of service on a Sunday. This rule establishes hourly 
overtime rates for each of the fiscal years 2016 through 2018. From FY 
2016 through FY 2018, these rates would increase by $24 for inspection, 
testing, certification, or quarantine of animals or agricultural 
products outside the employee's regular tour of duty (Monday through 
Saturday and holidays), by $33 for inspection, testing, certification, 
or quarantine of animals or agricultural products that is performed on 
Sundays outside the employee's regular tour of duty, by $24 for 
commercial airline inspection services that are performed outside of 
the regularly established hours of service on a holiday or any other 
period, and by $31 for commercial airline inspection services that are 
performed outside of the regularly established hours of service on a 
Sunday.

Executive Order 12372

    This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, 
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local 
officials. (See 2 CFR chapter IV.)

Executive Order 12988

    This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws 
and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no 
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings 
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping 
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.).

List of Subjects

7 CFR Part 354

    Animal diseases, Exports, Government employees, Imports, Plant 
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Travel and transportation expenses.

9 CFR Part 97

    Exports, Government employees, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and 
poultry products, Travel and transportation expenses.

9 CFR Part 130

    Animals, Birds, Diagnostic reagents, Exports, Imports, Poultry and 
poultry products, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Tests.

    Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 354 and 9 CFR parts 97 and 
130 as follows:

[[Page 59566]]

Title 7--Agriculture

PART 354--OVERTIME SERVICES RELATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS; AND 
USER FEES

0
1. The authority citation for part 354 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21 
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.


0
2. Section 354.1 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a)(1) introductory text, including the table.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), by removing the words ``the Customs Service, 
Immigration and Naturalization Service'' and adding the words ``U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection'' in their place.
0
c. By revising the table in paragraph (a)(1)(iii).
0
d. In paragraph (a)(2), by removing the word ``A'' in the first 
sentence and adding the words ``Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3) 
of this section, a'' in its place.
0
e. By adding paragraph (a)(3).
0
f. In paragraphs (a)(2), (b), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), 
(e)(2), (e)(4), and (f), by adding the words ``or U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection'' after the words ``Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service'' each time they appear.
    The addition and revisions read as follows:


Sec.  354.1  Overtime work at border ports, sea ports, and airports.

    (a)(1) Any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody, 
or control of plants, plant products, animals, animal byproducts, or 
other commodities or articles subject to inspection, laboratory 
testing, certification, or quarantine under this chapter and subchapter 
D of chapter I, title 9 CFR, who requires the services of an employee 
of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection on a Sunday or holiday, or at any other time outside 
the regular tour of duty of that employee, shall sufficiently in 
advance of the period of Sunday, holiday, or overtime service request 
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection inspector in charge to furnish the service during the 
overtime or Sunday or holiday period, and shall pay the Government at 
the rate listed in the following table, except as provided in 
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii), and (a)(3) of this section:

  Overtime for Inspection, Laboratory Testing, Certification, or Quarantine of Plant, Plant Products, Animals,
                                 Animal Products or Other Regulated Commodities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Overtime rates (per hour)
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
       Outside the employee's normal tour of duty          Nov. 2, 2015-      Oct. 1, 2016-
                                                           Sept. 30, 2016     Sept. 30, 2017   Beginning Oct. 1,
                                                                                                      2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays...................                $75                $75                $75
Sundays................................................                 99                 99                100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (iii) * * *

                             Overtime for Commercial Airline Inspection Services \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Overtime rates (per hour)
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
       Outside the employee's normal tour of duty          Nov. 2, 2015-      Oct. 1, 2016-
                                                           Sept. 30, 2016     Sept. 30, 2017   Beginning Oct. 1,
                                                                                                      2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays...................                $64                $65                $65
Sundays................................................                 85                 86                 86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These charges exclude administrative overhead costs.

* * * * *
    (3) The overtime rate and all other charges, including minimum and 
commute compensation charges, to be billed for services provided by an 
employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be charged 
according to the provisions of this section, 5 CFR part 551, or 19 CFR 
24.16.
* * * * *

Title 9--Animals and Animal Products

PART 97--OVERTIME SERVICES RELATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS

0
3. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 8301-8317; 49 U.S.C. 80503; 7 CFR 2.22, 
2.80, and 371.4.


0
4. Section 97.1 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a) introductory text, including the table.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing the words ``the Customs Service, 
Immigration and Naturalization Service'' and adding the words ``U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection'' in their place.
0
c. By revising the table in paragraph (a)(3).
0
d. By adding paragraph (a)(4).
0
e. In paragraphs (b), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), (e)(1), (e)(2), 
(e)(4), and (f), by adding the words ``or U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection'' after the words ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
Service'' each time they appear.
    The addition and revisions read as follows:


Sec.  97.1  Overtime work at laboratories, border ports, ocean ports, 
and airports.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For designated ports of entry for certain animals, animal 
semen, poultry, and hatching eggs, see Sec. Sec.  93.102, 93.203, 
93.303, 93.403, 93.503, 93.703, and 93.805 of this chapter. For 
designated ports of entry for certain purebred animals see 
Sec. Sec.  151.1 through 151.3 of this chapter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) Any person, firm, or corporation having ownership, custody, or 
control of animals, animal byproducts, or other commodities or articles 
subject to inspection, laboratory testing, certification, or quarantine 
under this subchapter and subchapter G of this chapter, and who 
requires the services of an employee of the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection on a Sunday or 
holiday, or at any other time outside the regular tour of duty of the

[[Page 59567]]

employee, shall sufficiently in advance of the period of Sunday, 
holiday, or overtime service request the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service or U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspector in 
charge to furnish the service and shall pay the Government at the rate 
listed in the following table, except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1), 
(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of this section:

  Overtime for Inspection, Laboratory Testing, Certification, or Quarantine of Plant, Plant Products, Animals,
                                 Animal Products or Other Regulated Commodities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Overtime rates (per hour)
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
       Outside the employee's normal tour of duty          Nov. 2, 2015-      Oct. 1, 2016-
                                                           Sept. 30, 2016     Sept. 30, 2017   Beginning Oct. 1,
                                                                                                      2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays...................                $75                $75                $75
Sundays................................................                 99                 99                100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (3) * * *

                             Overtime for Commercial Airline Inspection Services \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Overtime rates (per hour)
                                                        --------------------------------------------------------
       Outside the employee's normal tour of duty          Nov. 2, 2015-      Oct. 1, 2016-
                                                           Sept. 30, 2016     Sept. 30, 2017   Beginning Oct. 1,
                                                                                                      2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday through Saturday and holidays...................                $64                $65                $65
Sundays................................................                 85                 86                 86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These charges exclude administrative overhead costs.

    (4) The overtime rate and all other charges, including minimum and 
commute compensation charges, to be billed for services provided by an 
employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall be charged 
according to the provisions of this section, 5 CFR part 551, or 19 CFR 
24.16.
* * * * *

PART 130--USER FEES

0
5. The authority citation for part 130 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 5542; 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 3701, 3716, 3717, 3719, and 3720A; 7 
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.


0
6. Section 130.50 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, by removing the words ``or 
(ii)'' and adding the words ``, (ii), or (iii)'' in their place.
0
b. By revising the table in paragraph (b)(3)(i).
0
c. By adding paragraph (b)(3)(iii).
    The addition and revision read as follows:


Sec.  130.50  Payment of user fees.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) * * *

                                      Overtime for Flat Rate User Fees 1 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Overtime rates (per hour)
                                      Outside of the    --------------------------------------------------------
                                     employee's normal     Nov. 2, 2015-      Oct. 1, 2016-
                                       tour of duty        Sept. 30, 2016     Sept. 30, 2017   Beginning Oct. 1,
                                                                                                      2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for inspection, testing,      Monday-Saturday and                 $75                $75                $75
 certification or quarantine of     holidays.                           99                 99                100
 animals, animal products or       Sundays.............
 other commodities \3\.
Rate for commercial airline        Monday-Saturday and                  64                 65                 65
 inspection services \4\.           holidays.                           85                 86                 86
                                   Sundays.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Minimum charge of 2 hours, unless performed on the employee's regular workday and performed in direct
  continuation of the regular workday or begun within an hour of the regular workday.
\2\ When the 2-hour minimum applies, you may need to pay commuted travel time. (See Sec.   97.1(b) of this
  chapter for specific information about commuted travel time.)
\3\ See Sec.   97.1(a) of this chapter or 7 CFR 354.3 for details.
\4\ See Sec.   97.1(a)(3) of this chapter for details.


[[Page 59568]]

* * * * *
    (iii) For information on rules pertaining to the charges associated 
with employees of U.S. Customs and Border Protection performing 
agricultural inspection services, please see 7 CFR 354.1 and 9 CFR 
97.1.
* * * * *

    Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of September 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-25101 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.