Importation of Citrus From Peru; Expansion of Citrus-Growing Area, 24838-24840 [2015-10199]
Download as PDF
24838
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 84
Friday, May 1, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2015–0005]
RIN 0579–AE09
Importation of Citrus From Peru;
Expansion of Citrus-Growing Area
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We are proposing to amend
the fruits and vegetable regulations to
allow citrus fruit from the entire country
of Peru into the continental United
States. Currently, the regulations allow
the importation of citrus fruit to the
United States from five approved citrusproducing zones in Peru, subject to a
systems approach. However, based on
the findings of a pest list and
commodity import evaluation
document, we have determined that this
systems approach also mitigates the
plant pest risk associated with citrus
fruit produced in all other areas of Peru.
This action would allow the importation
of citrus fruit from the entire country of
Peru while continuing to provide
protection against the introduction of
plant pests into the continental United
States.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before June 30,
2015.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docket
Detail;D=APHIS-2015-0005.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2015–0005, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
may be viewed at https://www.
regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
APHIS-2015-0005 or in our reading
room, which is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
´
Tony Roman, Senior Regulatory Policy
Specialist, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 851–2242.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ‘‘Subpart—Fruits
and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–1
through 319.56–71, referred to below as
the regulations) prohibit or restrict the
importation of fruits and vegetables into
the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction
and dissemination of plant pests within
the United States.
Under § 319.56–41, grapefruit (Citrus
paradisi), limes (C. aurantiifolia),
mandarins or tangerines (C. reticulata),
sweet oranges (C. sinensis), and tangelos
(C. tangelo) may be imported into the
United States from approved growing
areas in Peru under a systems approach
designed to mitigate the risk presented
by four species of fruit flies (Anastrepha
fracterculus, A. obliqua Macquart, A.
serpentina, and Ceratitis capitata) and a
Tortricid (Ecdytolopha aurantiana). The
systems approach requires the
following:
• The fruit must be accompanied by
a permit issued in accordance with
§ 319.56–3(b);
• The fruit may be imported in
commercial consignments only;
• The fruit must be grown in an
approved growing area (Zone I, Piura;
Zone II, Lambayeque; Zone III, Lima;
Zone IV, Ica; Zone V, Junin);
• The production site where the fruit
is grown must be registered for export
with the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of Peru, and the
producer must have signed an
agreement with the NPPO of Peru
whereby the producer agrees to
participate in and follow the fruit fly
management program established by the
NPPO of Peru;
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• The NPPO of Peru’s fruit fly
management program must be approved
by the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS), must
require participating citrus producers to
allow APHIS inspectors access to
production areas in order to monitor
compliance with the fruit fly
management program, and must follow
certain trapping, control, and
recordkeeping requirements;
• The fruit, except limes, must be
cold treated for fruit flies in accordance
with 7 CFR part 305;
• Each consignment of fruit must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru
stating that the fruit has been inspected
and found free of E. aurantiana; and
• Citrus fruits imported from Peru are
subject to inspection and sampling by
an inspector at the port of first arrival
into the United States in accordance
with § 319.56–3(d), and if a single living
fruit fly in any stage of development or
E. aurantiana is found, the consignment
will be held until an investigation is
completed and appropriate remedial
actions have been implemented.
The NPPO of Peru has requested that
APHIS amend the regulations to allow
citrus fruit from the entire country of
Peru to be imported into the continental
United States.
As part of our evaluation of Peru’s
request, we prepared a pest list, titled
‘‘Pest List for the Importation of Fresh
Commercial Citrus Fruit: Grapefruit
(Citrus x paradisi); Lime (C.
aurantiifolia); Mandarin Orange,
Tangerine, or Hybrids (C. reticulata);
Sweet Orange (C. sinensis); and Tangelo
(C. x tangelo) from Peru into the
Continental United States’’ (November
2012). The pest list examines the plant
pest risks associated with the
importation of citrus from the entire
country of Peru into the continental
United States. The pest list identified
the same four fruit flies and one
Tortricid identified in the 2003 pest risk
assessment for the importation of citrus
from the five zones in Peru as
potentially following the pathway of
citrus fruit from the entire country of
Peru to the United States.
Based on the pest list, we prepared a
commodity import evaluation document
(CIED), titled, ‘‘Expansion of Areas
Allowed to Export Fresh Commercial
Citrus Fruit Including Grapefruit (Citrus
x paradisi); Lime (C. aurantiifolia);
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Mandarin Orange, Tangerine, or Hybrids
(C. reticulata); Sweet Orange (C.
sinensis); and Tangelo (C. x tangelo)
from Peru into the Continental United
States’’ (November 2012), to assess the
risks associated with the importation of
citrus from the entire country of Peru
and recommend mitigation measures to
prevent the introduction and
dissemination of plant pests and
diseases of quarantine concern. The
CIED recommends applying the systems
approach in § 319.56–41 to citrus fruit
from the entire country of Peru.
Based on the conclusions of the pest
list and CIED, we are proposing to
amend the regulations to allow the
importation of citrus from the entire
country of Peru into the continental
United States under the systems
approach in § 319.56–41. Specifically,
we are proposing to remove paragraph
(c), which contains the list of approved
growing areas that are allowed to export
citrus to the United States, and
redesignate the subsequent paragraphs.
Currently, the regulations allow the
importation of citrus from Peru into the
United States, including Hawaii and the
U.S. Territories. Between 2006 and
2012, Peru shipped small consignments
to one U.S. Territory, Puerto Rico, but
has never exported citrus fruit to Hawaii
or the other U.S. territories. As a result,
in preparing this rule, we asked the
NPPO of Peru whether they intended to
ship to markets in Hawaii and the U.S.
Territories in the future. Peru indicated
that they do not intend to do so, and
that their request for market access
could be limited to the continental
United States. As a result, the pest list
and CIED prepared for this proposed
rule only evaluated the risk associated
with the importation of citrus from Peru
into the continental United States,
which excludes Hawaii and the U.S.
Territories. Therefore, we are proposing
to amend the introductory text of the
section to limit the importation of citrus
from Peru to the continental United
States.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we have analyzed the
potential economic effects of this action
on small entities. The analysis is
summarized below. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
Currently, the regulations allow the
importation of fresh grapefruit, lime,
mandarin, orange, tangerine or hybrids,
sweet orange, and tangelo from five
approved citrus-producing zones in
Peru to the United States. The proposed
rule would allow the importation of
these fruits from the entire country of
Peru into the continental United States
under the same conditions that are
currently in place. The proposed rule is
expected to increase the area in Peru
approved to produce citrus for export to
the United States to about 1,500
hectares over 3 years. Additional
volumes of citrus expected to be
shipped to the United States are 5,000
metric tons (MT) in the first year that
the rule is in effect, 6,500 MT in the
second year, and 8,000 MT in the third
year. These quantities are equivalent to
less than 1 percent of annual U.S. citrus
production or U.S. citrus imports.
The primary entities that may be
affected by the rule are citrus producers,
citrus importers, and support industries
such as packinghouses. Based on data
from the 2012 Census of Agriculture and
Small Business Administration smallentity standards, the majority of these
operations are small.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh
citrus to be imported from Peru into the
continental United States. If this
proposed rule is adopted, State and
local laws and regulations regarding
fresh citrus imported under this rule
would be preempted while the fruit is
in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are
generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign
commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign
commerce ceases in other cases must be
addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this
proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24839
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to Docket No. APHIS–2015–0005.
Please send a copy of your comments to:
(1) APHIS, using one of the methods
described under ADDRESSES at the
beginning of this document, and (2)
Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room
404–W, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
proposed rule.
APHIS is proposing to amend the
fruits and vegetables regulations to
allow the importation of fresh citrus
into the continental United States from
Peru. As a condition of entry, the fruit
would have to be produced in
accordance with a systems approach
that would include requirements for
fruit fly trapping and monitoring,
production sites, recordkeeping, and
inspections designed to exclude
quarantine pests. The fruit would also
be required to be imported in
commercial consignments and
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru
stating that the fruit has been inspected
and found free of E. aurantiana. At the
port of first arrival, an inspector will
sample and cut citrus fruits from each
consignment to detect pest infestation.
Allowing the importation of fresh
citrus into the continental United States
from Peru will require information
collection activities, including permit
applications to import plants or plant
products, registered production sites
and agreements, fruit fly trapping and
control, trapping records, and
phytosanitary certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
24840
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 2.6 hours per
response.
Respondents: NPPO of Peru,
producers/growers, and importers.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 67.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 14.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 912.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 2,334 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Ms. Kimberly
Hardy, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2727.
■
■
E-Government Act Compliance
SUMMARY:
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact Ms.
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
2727.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772 and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
§ 319.56–41
[Amended]
2. Section 319.56–41 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In the introductory text, by adding
the word ‘‘continental’’ between the
words ‘‘the’’ and ‘‘United States’’.
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
b. By removing paragraph (c).
c. By redesignating paragraphs (d)
through (h) as paragraphs (c) through
(g), respectively.
Done in Washington, DC, this 27th day of
April 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–10199 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 3
[Docket No. APHIS–2014–0098]
Petition To Develop Specific
Ethologically Appropriate Standards
for Nonhuman Primates in Research
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of petition.
AGENCY:
We are notifying the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has received a
petition requesting that we amend the
Animal Welfare Act regulations to
specify ethologically appropriate
standards that researchers must adhere
to in order to promote the psychological
well-being of nonhuman primates used
in research. We are making this petition
available to the public and soliciting
comments regarding the petition and
any issues raised by the petition that we
should take into account as we consider
this petition.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before June 30,
2015.
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docket
Detail;D=APHIS-2014-0098.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2014–0098, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2014-0098 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Carol Clarke, Research Program
Manager, USDA, APHIS, Animal Care,
4700 River Road Unit 84, Riverdale, MD
20737–1234; (301) 851–3751.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Animal Welfare Act (AWA, 7 U.S.C.
2131 et seq.), among other things,
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretary) to promulgate standards and
other requirements governing research
facilities. The Secretary has delegated
the responsibility for enforcing the
AWA to the Administrator of the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS). Within APHIS, the
responsibility for administering the
AWA has been delegated to the Deputy
Administrator for Animal Care.
Regulations and standards
promulgated under the AWA are
contained in Title 9 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, parts 1, 2, and 3
(referred to collectively below as the
AWA regulations). Part 3 of the AWA
regulations contains specific standards
regarding the humane handling, care,
treatment, and transportation of species
of animals covered under the AWA.
Within part 3 of the AWA regulations,
subpart D (§§ 3.75–3.92) contains
standards for the humane handling,
care, treatment, and transportation of
nonhuman primates.
Section 3.81 of the AWA regulations
requires research facilities that house
nonhuman primates to develop,
document, and follow an appropriate
plan for environmental enhancement
adequate to promote the psychological
well-being of nonhuman primates. The
section further specifies that the plan
must be in accordance with currently
accepted professional standards as cited
in appropriate professional journals or
reference guides, and as directed by the
attending veterinarian for the facility.
The plan must be available to APHIS
upon request, and in the case of
research facilities, it must also be
available to the funding agency. The
plan must address at a minimum: Social
grouping, environmental enrichment,
special considerations, and use of
restraint devices. Exemptions to the
plan can be made by the attending
veterinarian for the facility because of a
particular animal’s health or condition,
or in consideration of that animal’s
well-being. Additionally, the
Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee (IACUC), a committee
entrusted with ensuring the research
facility’s compliance with the AWA
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24838-24840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10199]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 24838]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2015-0005]
RIN 0579-AE09
Importation of Citrus From Peru; Expansion of Citrus-Growing Area
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the fruits and vegetable regulations
to allow citrus fruit from the entire country of Peru into the
continental United States. Currently, the regulations allow the
importation of citrus fruit to the United States from five approved
citrus-producing zones in Peru, subject to a systems approach. However,
based on the findings of a pest list and commodity import evaluation
document, we have determined that this systems approach also mitigates
the plant pest risk associated with citrus fruit produced in all other
areas of Peru. This action would allow the importation of citrus fruit
from the entire country of Peru while continuing to provide protection
against the introduction of plant pests into the continental United
States.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before June
30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0005.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2015-0005, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-
0005 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tony Rom[aacute]n, Senior
Regulatory Policy Specialist, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-2242.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR
319.56-1 through 319.56-71, referred to below as the regulations)
prohibit or restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the
United States from certain parts of the world to prevent the
introduction and dissemination of plant pests within the United States.
Under Sec. 319.56-41, grapefruit (Citrus paradisi), limes (C.
aurantiifolia), mandarins or tangerines (C. reticulata), sweet oranges
(C. sinensis), and tangelos (C. tangelo) may be imported into the
United States from approved growing areas in Peru under a systems
approach designed to mitigate the risk presented by four species of
fruit flies (Anastrepha fracterculus, A. obliqua Macquart, A.
serpentina, and Ceratitis capitata) and a Tortricid (Ecdytolopha
aurantiana). The systems approach requires the following:
The fruit must be accompanied by a permit issued in
accordance with Sec. 319.56-3(b);
The fruit may be imported in commercial consignments only;
The fruit must be grown in an approved growing area (Zone
I, Piura; Zone II, Lambayeque; Zone III, Lima; Zone IV, Ica; Zone V,
Junin);
The production site where the fruit is grown must be
registered for export with the national plant protection organization
(NPPO) of Peru, and the producer must have signed an agreement with the
NPPO of Peru whereby the producer agrees to participate in and follow
the fruit fly management program established by the NPPO of Peru;
The NPPO of Peru's fruit fly management program must be
approved by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS),
must require participating citrus producers to allow APHIS inspectors
access to production areas in order to monitor compliance with the
fruit fly management program, and must follow certain trapping,
control, and recordkeeping requirements;
The fruit, except limes, must be cold treated for fruit
flies in accordance with 7 CFR part 305;
Each consignment of fruit must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru stating that the
fruit has been inspected and found free of E. aurantiana; and
Citrus fruits imported from Peru are subject to inspection
and sampling by an inspector at the port of first arrival into the
United States in accordance with Sec. 319.56-3(d), and if a single
living fruit fly in any stage of development or E. aurantiana is found,
the consignment will be held until an investigation is completed and
appropriate remedial actions have been implemented.
The NPPO of Peru has requested that APHIS amend the regulations to
allow citrus fruit from the entire country of Peru to be imported into
the continental United States.
As part of our evaluation of Peru's request, we prepared a pest
list, titled ``Pest List for the Importation of Fresh Commercial Citrus
Fruit: Grapefruit (Citrus x paradisi); Lime (C. aurantiifolia);
Mandarin Orange, Tangerine, or Hybrids (C. reticulata); Sweet Orange
(C. sinensis); and Tangelo (C. x tangelo) from Peru into the
Continental United States'' (November 2012). The pest list examines the
plant pest risks associated with the importation of citrus from the
entire country of Peru into the continental United States. The pest
list identified the same four fruit flies and one Tortricid identified
in the 2003 pest risk assessment for the importation of citrus from the
five zones in Peru as potentially following the pathway of citrus fruit
from the entire country of Peru to the United States.
Based on the pest list, we prepared a commodity import evaluation
document (CIED), titled, ``Expansion of Areas Allowed to Export Fresh
Commercial Citrus Fruit Including Grapefruit (Citrus x paradisi); Lime
(C. aurantiifolia);
[[Page 24839]]
Mandarin Orange, Tangerine, or Hybrids (C. reticulata); Sweet Orange
(C. sinensis); and Tangelo (C. x tangelo) from Peru into the
Continental United States'' (November 2012), to assess the risks
associated with the importation of citrus from the entire country of
Peru and recommend mitigation measures to prevent the introduction and
dissemination of plant pests and diseases of quarantine concern. The
CIED recommends applying the systems approach in Sec. 319.56-41 to
citrus fruit from the entire country of Peru.
Based on the conclusions of the pest list and CIED, we are
proposing to amend the regulations to allow the importation of citrus
from the entire country of Peru into the continental United States
under the systems approach in Sec. 319.56-41. Specifically, we are
proposing to remove paragraph (c), which contains the list of approved
growing areas that are allowed to export citrus to the United States,
and redesignate the subsequent paragraphs.
Currently, the regulations allow the importation of citrus from
Peru into the United States, including Hawaii and the U.S. Territories.
Between 2006 and 2012, Peru shipped small consignments to one U.S.
Territory, Puerto Rico, but has never exported citrus fruit to Hawaii
or the other U.S. territories. As a result, in preparing this rule, we
asked the NPPO of Peru whether they intended to ship to markets in
Hawaii and the U.S. Territories in the future. Peru indicated that they
do not intend to do so, and that their request for market access could
be limited to the continental United States. As a result, the pest list
and CIED prepared for this proposed rule only evaluated the risk
associated with the importation of citrus from Peru into the
continental United States, which excludes Hawaii and the U.S.
Territories. Therefore, we are proposing to amend the introductory text
of the section to limit the importation of citrus from Peru to the
continental United States.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we have analyzed
the potential economic effects of this action on small entities. The
analysis is summarized below. Copies of the full analysis are available
by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see ADDRESSES above for
instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
Currently, the regulations allow the importation of fresh
grapefruit, lime, mandarin, orange, tangerine or hybrids, sweet orange,
and tangelo from five approved citrus-producing zones in Peru to the
United States. The proposed rule would allow the importation of these
fruits from the entire country of Peru into the continental United
States under the same conditions that are currently in place. The
proposed rule is expected to increase the area in Peru approved to
produce citrus for export to the United States to about 1,500 hectares
over 3 years. Additional volumes of citrus expected to be shipped to
the United States are 5,000 metric tons (MT) in the first year that the
rule is in effect, 6,500 MT in the second year, and 8,000 MT in the
third year. These quantities are equivalent to less than 1 percent of
annual U.S. citrus production or U.S. citrus imports.
The primary entities that may be affected by the rule are citrus
producers, citrus importers, and support industries such as
packinghouses. Based on data from the 2012 Census of Agriculture and
Small Business Administration small-entity standards, the majority of
these operations are small.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh citrus to be imported from
Peru into the continental United States. If this proposed rule is
adopted, State and local laws and regulations regarding fresh citrus
imported under this rule would be preempted while the fruit is in
foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming public and would remain in
foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The question of
when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be addressed on a
case-by-case basis. If this proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington,
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-
2015-0005. Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) APHIS, using one
of the methods described under ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
document, and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room 404-W, 14th
Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A comment to
OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within
30 days of publication of this proposed rule.
APHIS is proposing to amend the fruits and vegetables regulations
to allow the importation of fresh citrus into the continental United
States from Peru. As a condition of entry, the fruit would have to be
produced in accordance with a systems approach that would include
requirements for fruit fly trapping and monitoring, production sites,
recordkeeping, and inspections designed to exclude quarantine pests.
The fruit would also be required to be imported in commercial
consignments and accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the NPPO of Peru stating that the fruit has been inspected and found
free of E. aurantiana. At the port of first arrival, an inspector will
sample and cut citrus fruits from each consignment to detect pest
infestation.
Allowing the importation of fresh citrus into the continental
United States from Peru will require information collection activities,
including permit applications to import plants or plant products,
registered production sites and agreements, fruit fly trapping and
control, trapping records, and phytosanitary certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are
[[Page 24840]]
to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 2.6 hours per response.
Respondents: NPPO of Peru, producers/growers, and importers.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 67.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 14.
Estimated annual number of responses: 912.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 2,334 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Ms.
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
851-2727.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Ms. Kimberly
Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2727.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Sec. 319.56-41 [Amended]
0
2. Section 319.56-41 is amended as follows:
0
a. In the introductory text, by adding the word ``continental'' between
the words ``the'' and ``United States''.
0
b. By removing paragraph (c).
0
c. By redesignating paragraphs (d) through (h) as paragraphs (c)
through (g), respectively.
Done in Washington, DC, this 27th day of April 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-10199 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P