Notice of Availability of a Treatment Evaluation Document; Hot Water Treatment of Oversized Mangoes, 22702-22703 [2015-09468]
Download as PDF
22702
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2015–0006]
Notice of Availability of a Treatment
Evaluation Document; Hot Water
Treatment of Oversized Mangoes
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that we have determined that it is
necessary to amend hot water treatment
schedule T102-a in the Plant Protection
and Quarantine Treatment Manual to
extend the applicability of the treatment
to additional mango commodities. We
have prepared a treatment evaluation
document that describes the revised
treatment schedule and explains why
we have determined that it is effective
at neutralizing certain target pests. We
are making this treatment evaluation
document available to the public for
review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before June 22,
2015.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0006.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2015–0006, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0006 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Inder P.S. Gadh, Senior Risk Manager—
Treatments, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 851–2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
regulations in 7 CFR chapter III are
intended, among other things, to
prevent the introduction or
dissemination of plant pests and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Apr 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
noxious weeds into or within the United
States. Under the regulations, certain
plants, fruits, vegetables, and other
articles must be treated before they may
be moved into the United States or
interstate. The phytosanitary treatments
regulations contained in 7 CFR part 305
(referred to below as the regulations) set
out standards for treatments required in
7 CFR parts 301, 318, and 319 for fruits,
vegetables, and other articles.
In § 305.2, paragraph (b) states that
approved treatment schedules are set
out in the Plant Protection and
Quarantine (PPQ) Treatment Manual.1
Section 305.3 sets out the processes for
adding, revising, or removing treatment
schedules in the PPQ Treatment
Manual. In that section, paragraph (b)
sets out the process for adding, revising,
or removing treatment schedules when
there is an immediate need to make a
change. The circumstances in which an
immediate need exists are described in
§ 305.3(b)(1). They are:
• PPQ has determined that an
approved treatment schedule is
ineffective at neutralizing the targeted
plant pest(s).
• PPQ has determined that, in order
to neutralize the targeted plant pest(s),
the treatment schedule must be
administered using a different process
than was previously used.
• PPQ has determined that a new
treatment schedule is effective, based on
efficacy data, and that ongoing trade in
a commodity or commodities may be
adversely impacted unless the new
treatment schedule is approved for use.
• The use of a treatment schedule is
no longer authorized by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency or by
any other Federal entity.
A treatment currently listed in the
PPQ Treatment Manual (T102–a)
requires mango (Mangifera indica) to be
treated with hot water immersion to
prevent the introduction into the United
States of Ceratitis capitata
(Mediterranean fruit fly) and
Anastrepha spp. fruit flies, including A.
ludens (Mexican fruit fly). Historically,
the treatment schedules for T102–a
required the fruit to undergo different
immersion times based on the fruit’s
country of origin, shape, and size
(weight). While rounded mango
varieties weighing up to 900 grams were
authorized for importation from Mexico,
Central America (north of and including
Costa Rica), Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin
1 The PPQ Treatment Manual is available at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/
manuals/index.shtml or by contacting the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant
Protection and Quarantine, Manuals Unit, 92
Thomas Johnson Drive, Suite 200, Frederick, MD
21702.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Islands, and the West Indies excluding
islands of Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao,
Margarita, Tortuga, and Trinidad and
Tobago, the maximum allowable size of
rounded mango varieties that could be
treated with T102–a and imported into
the United States from Panama,
countries in South America, and the
West Indies islands of Aruba, Bonaire,
Curacao, Margarita, Tortuga, and
Trinidad and Tobago was only 650
grams.
In 2009, the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of Peru formally
requested that the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
amend the PPQ Treatment Manual to
allow the use of T102–a hot-water
immersion treatment as a phytosanitary
treatment to mitigate fruit fly risks in
mangoes weighing more than 650 grams.
A similar interest had previously been
expressed by other countries in South
America, namely Brazil, Ecuador, and
Venezuela. Based on research
conducted by the NPPO of Peru in
support of its request, APHIS has
concluded that the T102–a treatment
schedule of 110-minute fruit immersion
in a constant 70 °F (41.6 °C) hot-water
bath is an efficacious phytosanitary
treatment for eggs and larvae of C.
capitata and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies
in mangoes weighing 651 to 900 grams
and that the treatment is effective for
these over-sized mangoes regardless of
their country of origin.
In 2014, APHIS inspectors working in
Mexico and Brazil observed that
approximately 20 percent of the
treatments using the T102–a treatment
schedule involving ‘‘flat’’ or
‘‘elongated’’ mangoes weighing between
525 grams and 570 grams contained
fruit that did not reach the target pulp
temperature for mitigating the risk from
fruit flies at the end of treatment
duration. However, after conducting a
literature review, APHIS determined
that mango shape did not affect the
efficacy of the treatment. Therefore, as
an emergency measure, the treatment
was amended so that all would have to
undergo hot water immersion treatment
with treatment duration strictly
governed by weight class. Treatment
duration times were based on the
treatment duration times previously put
in place for rounded mangoes from
those countries. As an emergency
measure, this action was done
administratively and was not meant to
be permanent.
Based on Peru’s research validating
treatment efficacy on over-sized
mangoes and APHIS’ conclusion that
the 110-minute immersion at 70 °F
treatment covers mangoes weighing up
to 900 grams regardless of their country
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices
of origin, APHIS has determined that
restrictions associated with shape or
country of origin are no longer relevant.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 305.3(b)(2), we are providing notice
that we have determined that it is
necessary to amend treatment schedule
T102–a to specify the following weightbased dip times:
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of
April 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–09468 Filed 4–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
If the weight is
(grams):
Then the dip time (minutes) is:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Up to 375 ..............
376 to 500 ............
501 to 700 ............
701 to 900 ............
65
75
90
110
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
Valid if the fruit is not hydro-cooled within 30
minutes of removal from the hot-water immer- information under the provisions of the
sion tank. Alternatively, 10 minutes may be Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
added to the treatment duration to allow im- chapter 35).
mediate hydro-cooling.
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: Business Research &
In order to have minimum adverse
Development and Innovation Survey.
impact on the ongoing trade of this
OMB Control Number: 0607–0912.
commodity from mango exporting
Form Number(s): BRDI–1 and BRD–
countries, we are making these changes
1S.
effective immediately upon publication
Type of Request: Revision of a
of this notice.
currently approved collection.
Number of Respondents: 45,000.
The reasons for these revisions to the
Average Hours per Response: BRDI–
treatment manual are described in detail
1—14.85 hours; BRD–1(S)—.59 hours.
in the treatment evaluation document
Burden Hours: 126,500.
(TED) we have prepared to support this
Needs and Uses: Companies are the
action. The TED may be viewed on the
major performers of research and
Regulations.gov Web site or in our
development (R&D) in the United States
reading room (see ADDRESSES above for
(U.S.), accounting for over 70 percent of
instructions for accessing
total U.S. R&D outlays each year. A
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room). consistent business R&D information
base is essential to government officials
You may also request paper copies of
formulating public policy, industry
the TED by calling or writing to the
personnel involved in corporate
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. Please refer to the planning, and members of the academic
community conducting research. In
subject of the TED when requesting
order to develop policies designed to
copies.
promote and enhance science and
After reviewing the comments we
technology, past trends and the present
receive, we will announce our decision
status of R&D must be known and
regarding the revised treatment
analyzed. Without comprehensive
schedule described in the TED in a
business R&D statistics, it would be
subsequent notice, in accordance with
impossible to evaluate the health of
paragraph (b)(3) of § 305.3. If we do not
science and technology in the United
receive any comments, or the comments States or to make comparisons between
we receive do not change our
the technological progress of our
determination that the proposed
country and that of other nations.
changes are effective, we will affirm
The National Science Foundation Act
these changes to the PPQ Treatment
of 1950 as amended authorizes and
Manual and make available a new
directs National Science Foundation
version of the PPQ Treatment Manual
(NSF) ‘‘. . . to provide a central
reflecting these changes. If we receive
clearinghouse for the collection,
comments that cause us to determine
interpretation, and analysis of data on
that additional changes need to be made scientific and engineering resources and
to treatment schedule T102–a, we will
to provide a source of information for
make available a new version of the PPQ policy formulation by other agencies of
Treatment Manual that reflects the
the Federal government.’’ One of the
changes.
methods used by the NSF to fulfill this
mandate is The Business R&D and
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22,
Innovation Survey (BRDIS)—the
2.80, and 371.3.
primary federal source of information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Apr 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22703
on R&D in the business sector. The NSF
together with the Census Bureau, the
collecting and compiling agent, analyze
the data and publish the resulting
statistics.
The NSF has published annual R&D
statistics collected from the Survey of
Industrial Research and Development
(SIRD) (1953–2007) and BRDIS (2008–
2013) for 60 years. The results of the
survey are used to assess trends in R&D
expenditures by industry sector,
investigate productivity determinants,
formulate science and tax policy, and
compare individual company
performance with industry averages.
This survey is the Nation’s primary
source for international comparative
statistics on business R&D spending.
The BRDIS will continue to collect
the following types of information:
• R&D expense based on accounting
standards.
• Worldwide R&D of domestic
companies.
• Business segment detail.
• R&D related capital expenditures.
• Detailed data about the R&D
workforce.
• R&D strategy and data on the
potential impact of R&D on the market.
• R&D directed to application areas of
particular national interest.
• Data measuring innovation, and
intellectual property protection
activities.
The following changes were made to
the 2014 BRDIS from the 2013 BRDIS.
• Section 1: Moved foreign ownership
question up above ownership question.
Changed the EIN of owner to the
ownership question instead of the
foreign ownership question.
• Section 2: Added some questions to
gather data on monetary gifts to
academia.
• Section 6: Added a question on
revenue from sale of patents. Added two
questions in regards to how much the
company paid others to purchase
patents or license patents. Removed the
question on how many agreements
company entered into. Information from
the BRDIS will continue to support the
following initiatives:
Science of Science and Innovation
Policy (SciSIP), the NSF’s program to
foster the development of the
knowledge, theories, data, tools, and
human capital needed to underwrite
fundamental research that creates new
explanatory models and analytic tools
designed to inform the Nation’s public
and private sectors about the processes
through which investments in science
and engineering are transformed into
social and economic outcomes.
America Competes Act of 2007, which
calls for the doubling of funding for
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22702-22703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09468]
[[Page 22702]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2015-0006]
Notice of Availability of a Treatment Evaluation Document; Hot
Water Treatment of Oversized Mangoes
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that we have determined that it is
necessary to amend hot water treatment schedule T102-a in the Plant
Protection and Quarantine Treatment Manual to extend the applicability
of the treatment to additional mango commodities. We have prepared a
treatment evaluation document that describes the revised treatment
schedule and explains why we have determined that it is effective at
neutralizing certain target pests. We are making this treatment
evaluation document available to the public for review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before June
22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0006.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2015-0006, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-
0006 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Inder P.S. Gadh, Senior Risk
Manager--Treatments, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The regulations in 7 CFR chapter III are
intended, among other things, to prevent the introduction or
dissemination of plant pests and noxious weeds into or within the
United States. Under the regulations, certain plants, fruits,
vegetables, and other articles must be treated before they may be moved
into the United States or interstate. The phytosanitary treatments
regulations contained in 7 CFR part 305 (referred to below as the
regulations) set out standards for treatments required in 7 CFR parts
301, 318, and 319 for fruits, vegetables, and other articles.
In Sec. 305.2, paragraph (b) states that approved treatment
schedules are set out in the Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)
Treatment Manual.\1\ Section 305.3 sets out the processes for adding,
revising, or removing treatment schedules in the PPQ Treatment Manual.
In that section, paragraph (b) sets out the process for adding,
revising, or removing treatment schedules when there is an immediate
need to make a change. The circumstances in which an immediate need
exists are described in Sec. 305.3(b)(1). They are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The PPQ Treatment Manual is available at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/index.shtml or by
contacting the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant
Protection and Quarantine, Manuals Unit, 92 Thomas Johnson Drive,
Suite 200, Frederick, MD 21702.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PPQ has determined that an approved treatment schedule is
ineffective at neutralizing the targeted plant pest(s).
PPQ has determined that, in order to neutralize the
targeted plant pest(s), the treatment schedule must be administered
using a different process than was previously used.
PPQ has determined that a new treatment schedule is
effective, based on efficacy data, and that ongoing trade in a
commodity or commodities may be adversely impacted unless the new
treatment schedule is approved for use.
The use of a treatment schedule is no longer authorized by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or by any other Federal
entity.
A treatment currently listed in the PPQ Treatment Manual (T102-a)
requires mango (Mangifera indica) to be treated with hot water
immersion to prevent the introduction into the United States of
Ceratitis capitata (Mediterranean fruit fly) and Anastrepha spp. fruit
flies, including A. ludens (Mexican fruit fly). Historically, the
treatment schedules for T102-a required the fruit to undergo different
immersion times based on the fruit's country of origin, shape, and size
(weight). While rounded mango varieties weighing up to 900 grams were
authorized for importation from Mexico, Central America (north of and
including Costa Rica), Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the
West Indies excluding islands of Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, Margarita,
Tortuga, and Trinidad and Tobago, the maximum allowable size of rounded
mango varieties that could be treated with T102-a and imported into the
United States from Panama, countries in South America, and the West
Indies islands of Aruba, Bonaire, Curacao, Margarita, Tortuga, and
Trinidad and Tobago was only 650 grams.
In 2009, the national plant protection organization (NPPO) of Peru
formally requested that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) amend the PPQ Treatment Manual to allow the use of T102-a
hot[hyphen]water immersion treatment as a phytosanitary treatment to
mitigate fruit fly risks in mangoes weighing more than 650 grams. A
similar interest had previously been expressed by other countries in
South America, namely Brazil, Ecuador, and Venezuela. Based on research
conducted by the NPPO of Peru in support of its request, APHIS has
concluded that the T102-a treatment schedule of 110[hyphen]minute fruit
immersion in a constant 70 [deg]F (41.6 [deg]C) hot-water bath is an
efficacious phytosanitary treatment for eggs and larvae of C. capitata
and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies in mangoes weighing 651 to 900 grams
and that the treatment is effective for these over-sized mangoes
regardless of their country of origin.
In 2014, APHIS inspectors working in Mexico and Brazil observed
that approximately 20 percent of the treatments using the T102-a
treatment schedule involving ``flat'' or ``elongated'' mangoes weighing
between 525 grams and 570 grams contained fruit that did not reach the
target pulp temperature for mitigating the risk from fruit flies at the
end of treatment duration. However, after conducting a literature
review, APHIS determined that mango shape did not affect the efficacy
of the treatment. Therefore, as an emergency measure, the treatment was
amended so that all would have to undergo hot water immersion treatment
with treatment duration strictly governed by weight class. Treatment
duration times were based on the treatment duration times previously
put in place for rounded mangoes from those countries. As an emergency
measure, this action was done administratively and was not meant to be
permanent.
Based on Peru's research validating treatment efficacy on over-
sized mangoes and APHIS' conclusion that the 110-minute immersion at 70
[deg]F treatment covers mangoes weighing up to 900 grams regardless of
their country
[[Page 22703]]
of origin, APHIS has determined that restrictions associated with shape
or country of origin are no longer relevant. Therefore, in accordance
with Sec. 305.3(b)(2), we are providing notice that we have determined
that it is necessary to amend treatment schedule T102-a to specify the
following weight-based dip times:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the dip time
If the weight is (grams): (minutes) is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 375...................................... 65
376 to 500..................................... 75
501 to 700..................................... 90
701 to 900..................................... 110
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Valid if the fruit is not hydro-cooled within 30 minutes of removal from
the hot-water immersion tank. Alternatively, 10 minutes may be added
to the treatment duration to allow immediate hydro-cooling.
In order to have minimum adverse impact on the ongoing trade of
this commodity from mango exporting countries, we are making these
changes effective immediately upon publication of this notice.
The reasons for these revisions to the treatment manual are
described in detail in the treatment evaluation document (TED) we have
prepared to support this action. The TED may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site or in our reading room (see ADDRESSES above
for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room). You may also request paper
copies of the TED by calling or writing to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Please refer to the subject of the TED
when requesting copies.
After reviewing the comments we receive, we will announce our
decision regarding the revised treatment schedule described in the TED
in a subsequent notice, in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) of Sec.
305.3. If we do not receive any comments, or the comments we receive do
not change our determination that the proposed changes are effective,
we will affirm these changes to the PPQ Treatment Manual and make
available a new version of the PPQ Treatment Manual reflecting these
changes. If we receive comments that cause us to determine that
additional changes need to be made to treatment schedule T102-a, we
will make available a new version of the PPQ Treatment Manual that
reflects the changes.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of April 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-09468 Filed 4-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P