Mexican Hass Avocado Import Program, 8561-8564 [2015-03289]
Download as PDF
8561
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 32
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2014–0088]
RIN 0579–AE05
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Commercial consignments of
Hass avocado fruit are currently
authorized entry into the continental
United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico
´
from the Mexican State of Michoacan
under a systems approach to mitigate
against quarantine pests of concern. We
are proposing to amend the regulations
to allow the importation of fresh Hass
avocado fruit into the continental
United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico
from all of Mexico, provided individual
Mexican States meet the requirements
set out in the regulations and the
operational workplan. Initially, this
action would only apply to the Mexican
State of Jalisco. With the exception of a
clarification of the language concerning
when sealed, insect-proof containers
would be required to be used in
shipping and the removal of mandatory
fruit cutting at land and maritime
borders, the current systems approach
would not change. That systems
approach, which includes requirements
for orchard certification, limited
production area, trace back labeling,
pre-harvest orchard surveys, orchard
sanitation, post-harvest safeguards, fruit
cutting and inspection at the
packinghouse, port-of-arrival
inspection, and clearance activities,
would then be required for importation
of fresh Hass avocado fruit from all
approved areas of Mexico. The fruit
would also be required to be imported
in commercial consignments and
accompanied by a phytosanitary
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
17:51 Feb 17, 2015
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docket
Detail;D=APHIS-2014-0088.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2014–0088, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
APHIS-2014-0088 or in our reading
room, which is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming.
ADDRESSES:
Mexican Hass Avocado Import
Program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
certificate issued by the national plant
protection organization of Mexico with
an additional declaration stating that the
consignment was produced in
accordance with the systems approach
described in the operational workplan.
This action would allow for the
importation of fresh Hass avocado fruit
from Mexico while continuing to
provide protection against the
introduction of plant pests into the
continental United States, Hawaii, and
Puerto Rico.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before April 20,
2015.
Jkt 235001
Mr.
David B. Lamb, Senior Regulatory
Policy Specialist, RPM, PPQ, APHIS,
4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–2103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Under the regulations in ‘‘SubpartFruits and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56
through 319.56–71), the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
prohibits or restricts the importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being
introduced into and spread within the
United States. The requirements for
importing fresh Hass avocado fruit into
´
the United States from Michoacan,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Mexico, are described in § 319.56–30.
Those requirements include pest
surveys and pest risk-reducing
practices, treatment, packinghouse
procedures, inspection, and shipping
procedures.
The national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of Mexico has
requested that APHIS amend the
regulations in order to allow Hass
avocados to be imported from all of
Mexico into the continental United
States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. As part
of our evaluation of Mexico’s request,
we prepared a pest risk assessment
(PRA), ‘‘Importation of Fresh Fruit of
Avocado (Persea americana Mill. var.
‘Hass’) from Mexico into the Continental
United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico,
A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Pest
Risk Assessment’’ (January 2014), which
evaluated the risk of permitting the
importation of Mexican Hass avocados
from all of Mexico into the continental
United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.
We also prepared a commodity import
evaluation document (CIED) to
determine what phytosanitary measures
should be applied to mitigate the pest
risk associated with the importation of
Hass avocados from all of Mexico into
the continental United States, Hawaii,
and Puerto Rico. Copies of the PRA and
CIED may be obtained from the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for a link to
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room).
In the CIED, entitled, ‘‘Expansion of
areas allowed to import Fresh
Commercial Avocado Fruit (Persea
americana Mill. Var. ‘Hass’) from
Mexico into the Continental United
States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico,’’ (June
2014), we determined that because the
systems approach currently in place is
successful in mitigating the risks of
introducing quarantine pests associated
with the importation of fresh Hass
´
avocado fruit from Michoacan, Mexico,
into the continental United States,
Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, the current
systems approach will also adequately
mitigate the risks of introducing
quarantine pests from the other Mexican
States. We concluded that the
phytosanitary risks for insect pests
associated with the importation of Hass
avocados from all of Mexico into the
continental United States, Hawaii, and
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
8562
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Puerto Rico would be effectively
mitigated using nearly the same systems
approach as is currently used for the
importation of Hass avocados from
´
Michoacan, Mexico, as set forth in
§ 319.56–30. We are proposing to make
some minor changes to the systems
approach. Those proposed changes are
discussed below.
Based on the findings of the CIED and
the PRA, we are proposing to amend
§ 319.56–30 to allow commercial
shipments of Hass avocados from all
growing areas of Mexico to be imported
into the continental United States,
Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.
The first additional Mexican State
that would be expected to become
eligible to export Hass avocados under
this proposed expansion would be the
State of Jalisco. Currently, only Jalisco is
prepared to meet the requirements set
out in the regulations for eligibility to
ship fresh Hass avocado fruit into the
continental United States, Hawaii, and
Puerto Rico. Specifically, these
requirements are found in § 319.56–
30(c) and include orchard certification,
traceback labeling, pre-harvest orchard
surveys, orchard sanitation, post-harvest
safeguards, and fruit cutting and
inspection at the packinghouse. This
proposed rule would allow for future
importation of fresh Hass avocados from
other Mexican States provided those
States meet the APHIS requirements
contained in the regulations. Prior to
shipments beginning from any future
States, APHIS would work with the
NPPO of Mexico to ensure that they
meet the requirements of § 319.56–30(c).
Any additions to the review process for
approving new States will be added to
the operational workplan as mutually
negotiated and agreed on between
APHIS and the NPPO of Mexico.
Pests of Concern
Specific pests of concern associated
with fresh avocado fruit for which
mitigations are required are listed in
paragraphs (c)(1)(ii), (c)(2)(i), and (e) of
§ 319.56–30. They are:
• Conotrachelus aguacatae, a small
avocado seed weevil;
• Conotrachelus perseae, a small
avocado seed weevil;
• Copturus aguacatae, avocado stem
weevil;
• Heilipus lauri, large avocado seed
weevil; and
• Stenoma catenifer, avocado seed
moth.
We are proposing to remove
references to these specific pests from
the regulations. The pest list would
instead be maintained in the operational
workplan provided to APHIS for
approval by the NPPO of Mexico. An
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
operational workplan is an agreement
between APHIS’ Plant Protection and
Quarantine program, officials of the
NPPO of a foreign government, and,
when necessary, foreign commercial
entities, that specifies in detail the
phytosanitary measures that will
comply with our regulations governing
the import or export of a specific
commodity. Operational workplans
apply only to the signatory parties and
establish detailed procedures and
guidance for the day-to-day operations
of specific import/export programs.
Operational workplans also establish
how specific phytosanitary issues are
dealt with in the exporting country and
make clear who is responsible for
dealing with those issues. The existing
systems approach for importing fresh
Hass avocado fruit into the United
´
States from Michoacan, Mexico,
currently requires that an annual
workplan be developed. This change
would allow APHIS flexibility and
responsiveness in adding or removing
pests of concern from the list of
actionable pests. (The current
regulations refer to a ‘‘bilateral work
plan.’’ For the sake of consistency with
our other regulations, we would change
the term to ‘‘operational workplan’’ in
this rulemaking.)
Additionally, based on the findings of
the PRA, we would add eight pests to
the list of pests of concern to be
maintained in the operational workplan.
Of those, we would require field and
packinghouse surveys for Cryptaspasma
perseana, a tortricid moth, and
Conotrachelus serpentinus, a weevil,
but not for the other six pests listed
below, which were determined to pose
a medium or low chance of following
the importation pathway of fresh Hass
avocado fruit from Mexico. These pests,
which would be addressed through port
of entry inspection, are:
• Avocado sunblotch viroid;
• Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green),
pink hibiscus mealybug;
• Pseudophilothrips perseae
(Watson), a thrips;
• Scirtothrips aceri (Moulton), a
thrips;
• Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara, a
thrips; and
• Sphaceloma perseae Jenkins,
avocado scab.
We have determined that the existing
mitigations would be sufficient to
prevent these six pests from following
the pathway of importation, in
particular, packinghouse culling,
restriction of shipments to commercial
consignments only, and NPPO
inspection. The six pests listed above
produce symptoms on infested fruit that
are macroscopic in nature and thus
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
easily detectable upon surface
inspection. Further, commercially
produced fruit are grown and packed to
meet quality standards that are much
higher than non-commercially produced
fruit and are therefore less likely to
serve as hosts to pests of phytosanitary
concern. Interceptions of pests in
commercial shipments of fruit versus
passenger baggage indicate
commercially produced fruit represents
a much lower risk of carrying pests.
Fruit Covering Requirements
In § 319.56–30, paragraph (c)(3)(vii)
currently references the lid, insect-proof
mesh, or other material required to be
placed over the avocados prior to
leaving the packinghouse to protect
against fruit fly infestation. Paragraph
(c)(3)(viii) describes refrigerated transit
requirements for the avocado fruit
within Mexico. Recently, a maritime
shipment of fresh avocado fruit from
Mexico arrived in Port Manatee, FL, for
the first time. The avocados were in
uncovered trays inside sealed
refrigerated containers, and the
shipment was delayed because the
avocados were not covered with a lid,
insect-proof mesh, or other material. As
a result of this incident, we have
examined the requirements in
paragraphs (c)(3)(vii) and (c)(3)(viii) and
determined that we should clarify our
intentions regarding whether those lids,
insect-proof mesh, or other material
need to remain in place throughout the
entire shipping process.
Since the lids, insect-proof mesh, or
other material are intended to provide
phytosanitary protection against fruit
flies, and transport in refrigerated trucks
or containers provides the same
protection, we are proposing to amend
the regulations in order to stipulate that
those coverings would not be required
when the avocado fruit is inside a
refrigerated container or truck. Such
coverings would therefore not be
required to be applied at the
packinghouse, as the avocados are
transferred directly from inside the
packinghouse into refrigerated
containers or trucks, and all transit
within Mexico is required to be
completed in these containers or trucks.
If the avocado fruit is transferred to a
non-refrigerated container at an air or
maritime port in Mexico for shipment to
the United States, a covering would
have to be applied.
Port of Entry Fruit Cutting
Currently, Hass avocado fruit are
required to be biometrically sampled
and cut in the field, at the
packinghouse, and by an inspector at
the port of first entry into the United
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
States. We received a request from U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to
amend the port of entry requirement,
which is found in § 319.56–30(f), in
order to allow the fruit to be cut at the
discretion of the inspector. Given the
lack of quarantine pest interceptions in
shipments of avocado fruit from Mexico
at the ports of first entry for the period
from 1997 to 2014, we propose to
amend the requirement. This will allow
for operational flexibility. The other
cutting and sampling requirements
would remain unchanged.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The
proposed rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we
have performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, which is
summarized below, regarding the
economic effects of this proposed rule
on small entities. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
Based on the information we have,
there is no reason to conclude that
adoption of this proposed rule would
result in any significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities. However, we do not currently
have all of the data necessary for a
comprehensive analysis of the effects of
this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on
potential effects. In particular, we are
interested in determining the number
and kind of small entities that may
incur benefits or costs from the
implementation of this proposed rule.
Mexican officials have requested that
additional States in Mexico be allowed
to export Hass avocados to the United
States under the same systems approach
´
that was implemented for Michoacan,
Mexico, and has successfully kept pest
infestations associated with imported
avocados out of the United States. U.S.
imports of avocado from Mexico have
increased significantly over the years,
from 311 million pounds in 2003 to over
1.1 billion pounds in 2013. U.S.
avocado production over the 10 years
from the 2002/03 season through the
2011/12 season averaged 423 million
pounds per year, of which California
accounted for 87.5 percent or over 375
million pounds. Nearly all of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
California’s production is of the Hass
variety.
While APHIS does not have
information on the size distribution of
U.S. avocado producers, according to
the Census of Agriculture, there were a
total of 93,020 fruit and tree nut farms
in the United States in 2012. The
average value of agricultural products
sold by these farms was less than
$274,000, which is well below the
SBA’s small-entity standard of
$750,000. It is reasonable to assume that
most avocado farms qualify as small
entities. Between 2002 and 2012, the
number of avocado operations in
California grew by approximately 17
percent, from 4,801 to 5,602 operations.
Avocados produced in the State of
´
Jalisco, north of Michoacan, are
expected to be the first that would be
exported to the United States under this
rule. These imports would help meet
the increasing year-round U.S. demand
for avocados. Per capita avocado
consumption in the United States grew
from 1.1 pounds in 1989 to 4.5 pounds
in 2011. A growing Hispanic population
and greater awareness of the avocado’s
health benefits have helped to spur
demand.
In 2012, Jalisco produced about 90
million pounds of Hass avocados. Given
required phytosanitary safeguards, only
a fraction of this quantity is expected to
qualify for importation by the United
States. But even if all of Jalisco’s
avocado production were to meet the
requirements for U.S. entry, the total
quantity would be equivalent to less
than 8 percent of U.S. Hass avocado
imports in 2013 of over 1.2 billion
pounds. The proposed rule is therefore
not expected to have a large impact on
the U.S. avocado market or California
producers because of potential imports
solely from the Mexican State of Jalisco.
Any market effects are as likely to be
borne by other foreign suppliers, such as
Chile and Peru, as by U.S. producers.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh
Hass avocado fruit to be imported into
the United States from all of Mexico. If
this proposed rule is adopted, State and
local laws and regulations regarding
fresh Hass avocado fruit imported under
this rule would be preempted while the
fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits
and vegetables are generally imported
for immediate distribution and sale to
the consuming public and would
remain in foreign commerce until sold
to the ultimate consumer. The question
of when foreign commerce ceases in
other cases must be addressed on a caseby-case basis. If this proposed rule is
adopted, no retroactive effect will be
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8563
given to this rule, and this rule will not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. Section 319.56–30 is amended as
follows:
■ a. By revising the section heading.
■ b. In the introductory paragraph, by
removing the words ‘‘Michoacan,
Mexico,’’ and adding the word
‘‘Mexico’’ in their place.
■ c. By revising paragraph (c)
introductory text.
■ d. In paragraph (c)(1)(i), by removing
the words ‘‘bilateral work plan’’ and
adding the words ‘‘operational
workplan’’ in their place.
■ e. In paragraph (c)(1)(ii), by removing
the words ‘‘the large avocado seed
weevil Heilipus lauri, the avocado seed
moth Stenoma catenifer, and the small
avocado seed weevils Conotrachelus
aguacatae and C. perseae’’ and adding
the words ‘‘avocado pests listed in the
operational workplan’’ in their place.
■ f. In paragraph (c)(2) introductory text,
by removing the words ‘‘annual work
plan’’ and adding the words
‘‘operational workplan’’ in their place.
■ g. In paragraph (c)(2)(i), by removing
the words ‘‘the avocado stem weevil
Copturus aguacatae’’ and adding the
words ‘‘avocado pests listed in the
operational workplan’’ in their place.
■ h. In paragraph (c)(3) introductory
text, by removing the words ‘‘annual
work plan’’ and adding the words
‘‘operational workplan’’ in their place.
■ i. By revising paragraph (c)(3)(vii).
■ j. In paragraph (c)(3)(viii), by adding
two sentences at the end of the
paragraph.
■ k. In paragraph (e), by removing the
words ‘‘Heilipus lauri, Conotrachelus
■
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
8564
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
aguacatae, C. perseae, Copturus
aguacatae, or Stenoma catenifer’’ and
adding the words ‘‘listed in the
operational workplan’’ in their place.
■ l. In paragraph (f), by removing the
word ‘‘will’’ and adding the word
‘‘may’’ in its place.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 319.56–30
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0088; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–179–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Hass avocados from Mexico.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Safeguards in Mexico. The
avocados must have been grown in an
orchard located in a municipality that
meets the requirements of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section. The orchard in
which the avocados are grown must
meet the requirements of paragraph
(c)(2) of this section. The avocados must
be packed for export to the United
States in a packinghouse that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of this
section. The Mexican national plant
protection organization (NPPO) must
provide an annual operational workplan
to APHIS that details the activities that
the Mexican NPPO will, subject to
APHIS’ approval of the workplan, carry
out to meet the requirements of this
section; APHIS will be directly involved
with the Mexican NPPO in the
monitoring and supervision of those
activities. The personnel conducting the
trapping and pest surveys must be
hired, trained, and supervised by the
Mexican NPPO or by the State delegate
of the Mexican NPPO.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(vii) The avocados must be packed in
clean, new boxes or bulk shipping bins,
or in clean plastic reusable crates. The
boxes, bins, or crates must be clearly
marked with the identity of the grower,
packinghouse, and exporter.
(viii) * * * If, at the port of export for
consignments shipped by air or sea, the
packed avocados are transferred into a
non-refrigerated container, the boxes,
bins, or crates must be covered with a
lid, insect-proof mesh, or other material
to protect the avocados from fruit-fly
infestation prior to leaving the
packinghouse. Those safeguards must be
intact at the time the consignment
arrives in the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 11th day of
February 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–03289 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–100–1A10
(Challenger 300) airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by testing
of the spoiler electronic control unit
(SECU) software for an upgrade, which
revealed a timing error between the
command and monitor channels. This
proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance or inspection program to
incorporate repetitive operational tests
of the aileron disconnect system, and
corrective action if necessary. This
proposed AD would also require
modification and reidentification of the
SECU, which would terminate the
repetitive operational tests. We are
proposing this AD to prevent a timing
error in the SECU software, which, in
combination with failure of the roll
disconnect switch, could result in
complete loss of spoiler functionality
and consequent reduced controllability
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0088; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Service Branch, ANE–172,
FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone
516–228–7301; fax 516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–0088; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–179–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–24,
dated August 5, 2014 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–
E:\FR\FM\18FEP1.SGM
18FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8561-8564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03289]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 8561]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2014-0088]
RIN 0579-AE05
Mexican Hass Avocado Import Program
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Commercial consignments of Hass avocado fruit are currently
authorized entry into the continental United States, Hawaii, and Puerto
Rico from the Mexican State of Michoac[aacute]n under a systems
approach to mitigate against quarantine pests of concern. We are
proposing to amend the regulations to allow the importation of fresh
Hass avocado fruit into the continental United States, Hawaii, and
Puerto Rico from all of Mexico, provided individual Mexican States meet
the requirements set out in the regulations and the operational
workplan. Initially, this action would only apply to the Mexican State
of Jalisco. With the exception of a clarification of the language
concerning when sealed, insect-proof containers would be required to be
used in shipping and the removal of mandatory fruit cutting at land and
maritime borders, the current systems approach would not change. That
systems approach, which includes requirements for orchard
certification, limited production area, trace back labeling, pre-
harvest orchard surveys, orchard sanitation, post-harvest safeguards,
fruit cutting and inspection at the packinghouse, port-of-arrival
inspection, and clearance activities, would then be required for
importation of fresh Hass avocado fruit from all approved areas of
Mexico. The fruit would also be required to be imported in commercial
consignments and accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the national plant protection organization of Mexico with an additional
declaration stating that the consignment was produced in accordance
with the systems approach described in the operational workplan. This
action would allow for the importation of fresh Hass avocado fruit from
Mexico while continuing to provide protection against the introduction
of plant pests into the continental United States, Hawaii, and Puerto
Rico.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before April
20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2014-0088.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2014-0088, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2014-
0088 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David B. Lamb, Senior Regulatory
Policy Specialist, RPM, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-2103.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ``Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR
319.56 through 319.56-71), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) prohibits or restricts the importation of fruits and
vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being introduced into and spread within the
United States. The requirements for importing fresh Hass avocado fruit
into the United States from Michoac[aacute]n, Mexico, are described in
Sec. 319.56-30. Those requirements include pest surveys and pest risk-
reducing practices, treatment, packinghouse procedures, inspection, and
shipping procedures.
The national plant protection organization (NPPO) of Mexico has
requested that APHIS amend the regulations in order to allow Hass
avocados to be imported from all of Mexico into the continental United
States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. As part of our evaluation of Mexico's
request, we prepared a pest risk assessment (PRA), ``Importation of
Fresh Fruit of Avocado (Persea americana Mill. var. `Hass') from Mexico
into the Continental United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, A
Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Pest Risk Assessment'' (January 2014),
which evaluated the risk of permitting the importation of Mexican Hass
avocados from all of Mexico into the continental United States, Hawaii,
and Puerto Rico.
We also prepared a commodity import evaluation document (CIED) to
determine what phytosanitary measures should be applied to mitigate the
pest risk associated with the importation of Hass avocados from all of
Mexico into the continental United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.
Copies of the PRA and CIED may be obtained from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the Regulations.gov Web
site (see ADDRESSES above for a link to Regulations.gov and information
on the location and hours of the reading room).
In the CIED, entitled, ``Expansion of areas allowed to import Fresh
Commercial Avocado Fruit (Persea americana Mill. Var. `Hass') from
Mexico into the Continental United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico,''
(June 2014), we determined that because the systems approach currently
in place is successful in mitigating the risks of introducing
quarantine pests associated with the importation of fresh Hass avocado
fruit from Michoac[aacute]n, Mexico, into the continental United
States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico, the current systems approach will also
adequately mitigate the risks of introducing quarantine pests from the
other Mexican States. We concluded that the phytosanitary risks for
insect pests associated with the importation of Hass avocados from all
of Mexico into the continental United States, Hawaii, and
[[Page 8562]]
Puerto Rico would be effectively mitigated using nearly the same
systems approach as is currently used for the importation of Hass
avocados from Michoac[aacute]n, Mexico, as set forth in Sec. 319.56-
30. We are proposing to make some minor changes to the systems
approach. Those proposed changes are discussed below.
Based on the findings of the CIED and the PRA, we are proposing to
amend Sec. 319.56-30 to allow commercial shipments of Hass avocados
from all growing areas of Mexico to be imported into the continental
United States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.
The first additional Mexican State that would be expected to become
eligible to export Hass avocados under this proposed expansion would be
the State of Jalisco. Currently, only Jalisco is prepared to meet the
requirements set out in the regulations for eligibility to ship fresh
Hass avocado fruit into the continental United States, Hawaii, and
Puerto Rico. Specifically, these requirements are found in Sec.
319.56-30(c) and include orchard certification, traceback labeling,
pre-harvest orchard surveys, orchard sanitation, post-harvest
safeguards, and fruit cutting and inspection at the packinghouse. This
proposed rule would allow for future importation of fresh Hass avocados
from other Mexican States provided those States meet the APHIS
requirements contained in the regulations. Prior to shipments beginning
from any future States, APHIS would work with the NPPO of Mexico to
ensure that they meet the requirements of Sec. 319.56-30(c). Any
additions to the review process for approving new States will be added
to the operational workplan as mutually negotiated and agreed on
between APHIS and the NPPO of Mexico.
Pests of Concern
Specific pests of concern associated with fresh avocado fruit for
which mitigations are required are listed in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii),
(c)(2)(i), and (e) of Sec. 319.56-30. They are:
Conotrachelus aguacatae, a small avocado seed weevil;
Conotrachelus perseae, a small avocado seed weevil;
Copturus aguacatae, avocado stem weevil;
Heilipus lauri, large avocado seed weevil; and
Stenoma catenifer, avocado seed moth.
We are proposing to remove references to these specific pests from
the regulations. The pest list would instead be maintained in the
operational workplan provided to APHIS for approval by the NPPO of
Mexico. An operational workplan is an agreement between APHIS' Plant
Protection and Quarantine program, officials of the NPPO of a foreign
government, and, when necessary, foreign commercial entities, that
specifies in detail the phytosanitary measures that will comply with
our regulations governing the import or export of a specific commodity.
Operational workplans apply only to the signatory parties and establish
detailed procedures and guidance for the day-to-day operations of
specific import/export programs. Operational workplans also establish
how specific phytosanitary issues are dealt with in the exporting
country and make clear who is responsible for dealing with those
issues. The existing systems approach for importing fresh Hass avocado
fruit into the United States from Michoac[aacute]n, Mexico, currently
requires that an annual workplan be developed. This change would allow
APHIS flexibility and responsiveness in adding or removing pests of
concern from the list of actionable pests. (The current regulations
refer to a ``bilateral work plan.'' For the sake of consistency with
our other regulations, we would change the term to ``operational
workplan'' in this rulemaking.)
Additionally, based on the findings of the PRA, we would add eight
pests to the list of pests of concern to be maintained in the
operational workplan. Of those, we would require field and packinghouse
surveys for Cryptaspasma perseana, a tortricid moth, and Conotrachelus
serpentinus, a weevil, but not for the other six pests listed below,
which were determined to pose a medium or low chance of following the
importation pathway of fresh Hass avocado fruit from Mexico. These
pests, which would be addressed through port of entry inspection, are:
Avocado sunblotch viroid;
Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green), pink hibiscus mealybug;
Pseudophilothrips perseae (Watson), a thrips;
Scirtothrips aceri (Moulton), a thrips;
Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara, a thrips; and
Sphaceloma perseae Jenkins, avocado scab.
We have determined that the existing mitigations would be
sufficient to prevent these six pests from following the pathway of
importation, in particular, packinghouse culling, restriction of
shipments to commercial consignments only, and NPPO inspection. The six
pests listed above produce symptoms on infested fruit that are
macroscopic in nature and thus easily detectable upon surface
inspection. Further, commercially produced fruit are grown and packed
to meet quality standards that are much higher than non-commercially
produced fruit and are therefore less likely to serve as hosts to pests
of phytosanitary concern. Interceptions of pests in commercial
shipments of fruit versus passenger baggage indicate commercially
produced fruit represents a much lower risk of carrying pests.
Fruit Covering Requirements
In Sec. 319.56-30, paragraph (c)(3)(vii) currently references the
lid, insect-proof mesh, or other material required to be placed over
the avocados prior to leaving the packinghouse to protect against fruit
fly infestation. Paragraph (c)(3)(viii) describes refrigerated transit
requirements for the avocado fruit within Mexico. Recently, a maritime
shipment of fresh avocado fruit from Mexico arrived in Port Manatee,
FL, for the first time. The avocados were in uncovered trays inside
sealed refrigerated containers, and the shipment was delayed because
the avocados were not covered with a lid, insect-proof mesh, or other
material. As a result of this incident, we have examined the
requirements in paragraphs (c)(3)(vii) and (c)(3)(viii) and determined
that we should clarify our intentions regarding whether those lids,
insect-proof mesh, or other material need to remain in place throughout
the entire shipping process.
Since the lids, insect-proof mesh, or other material are intended
to provide phytosanitary protection against fruit flies, and transport
in refrigerated trucks or containers provides the same protection, we
are proposing to amend the regulations in order to stipulate that those
coverings would not be required when the avocado fruit is inside a
refrigerated container or truck. Such coverings would therefore not be
required to be applied at the packinghouse, as the avocados are
transferred directly from inside the packinghouse into refrigerated
containers or trucks, and all transit within Mexico is required to be
completed in these containers or trucks. If the avocado fruit is
transferred to a non-refrigerated container at an air or maritime port
in Mexico for shipment to the United States, a covering would have to
be applied.
Port of Entry Fruit Cutting
Currently, Hass avocado fruit are required to be biometrically
sampled and cut in the field, at the packinghouse, and by an inspector
at the port of first entry into the United
[[Page 8563]]
States. We received a request from U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to amend the port of entry requirement, which is found in Sec. 319.56-
30(f), in order to allow the fruit to be cut at the discretion of the
inspector. Given the lack of quarantine pest interceptions in shipments
of avocado fruit from Mexico at the ports of first entry for the period
from 1997 to 2014, we propose to amend the requirement. This will allow
for operational flexibility. The other cutting and sampling
requirements would remain unchanged.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
The proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding
the economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Copies of
the full analysis are available by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
Based on the information we have, there is no reason to conclude
that adoption of this proposed rule would result in any significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. However, we
do not currently have all of the data necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on potential effects. In
particular, we are interested in determining the number and kind of
small entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation
of this proposed rule.
Mexican officials have requested that additional States in Mexico
be allowed to export Hass avocados to the United States under the same
systems approach that was implemented for Michoac[aacute]n, Mexico, and
has successfully kept pest infestations associated with imported
avocados out of the United States. U.S. imports of avocado from Mexico
have increased significantly over the years, from 311 million pounds in
2003 to over 1.1 billion pounds in 2013. U.S. avocado production over
the 10 years from the 2002/03 season through the 2011/12 season
averaged 423 million pounds per year, of which California accounted for
87.5 percent or over 375 million pounds. Nearly all of California's
production is of the Hass variety.
While APHIS does not have information on the size distribution of
U.S. avocado producers, according to the Census of Agriculture, there
were a total of 93,020 fruit and tree nut farms in the United States in
2012. The average value of agricultural products sold by these farms
was less than $274,000, which is well below the SBA's small-entity
standard of $750,000. It is reasonable to assume that most avocado
farms qualify as small entities. Between 2002 and 2012, the number of
avocado operations in California grew by approximately 17 percent, from
4,801 to 5,602 operations.
Avocados produced in the State of Jalisco, north of
Michoac[aacute]n, are expected to be the first that would be exported
to the United States under this rule. These imports would help meet the
increasing year-round U.S. demand for avocados. Per capita avocado
consumption in the United States grew from 1.1 pounds in 1989 to 4.5
pounds in 2011. A growing Hispanic population and greater awareness of
the avocado's health benefits have helped to spur demand.
In 2012, Jalisco produced about 90 million pounds of Hass avocados.
Given required phytosanitary safeguards, only a fraction of this
quantity is expected to qualify for importation by the United States.
But even if all of Jalisco's avocado production were to meet the
requirements for U.S. entry, the total quantity would be equivalent to
less than 8 percent of U.S. Hass avocado imports in 2013 of over 1.2
billion pounds. The proposed rule is therefore not expected to have a
large impact on the U.S. avocado market or California producers because
of potential imports solely from the Mexican State of Jalisco. Any
market effects are as likely to be borne by other foreign suppliers,
such as Chile and Peru, as by U.S. producers.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh Hass avocado fruit to be
imported into the United States from all of Mexico. If this proposed
rule is adopted, State and local laws and regulations regarding fresh
Hass avocado fruit imported under this rule would be preempted while
the fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits and vegetables are
generally imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases
must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this proposed rule is
adopted, no retroactive effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative proceedings before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. Section 319.56-30 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising the section heading.
0
b. In the introductory paragraph, by removing the words ``Michoacan,
Mexico,'' and adding the word ``Mexico'' in their place.
0
c. By revising paragraph (c) introductory text.
0
d. In paragraph (c)(1)(i), by removing the words ``bilateral work
plan'' and adding the words ``operational workplan'' in their place.
0
e. In paragraph (c)(1)(ii), by removing the words ``the large avocado
seed weevil Heilipus lauri, the avocado seed moth Stenoma catenifer,
and the small avocado seed weevils Conotrachelus aguacatae and C.
perseae'' and adding the words ``avocado pests listed in the
operational workplan'' in their place.
0
f. In paragraph (c)(2) introductory text, by removing the words
``annual work plan'' and adding the words ``operational workplan'' in
their place.
0
g. In paragraph (c)(2)(i), by removing the words ``the avocado stem
weevil Copturus aguacatae'' and adding the words ``avocado pests listed
in the operational workplan'' in their place.
0
h. In paragraph (c)(3) introductory text, by removing the words
``annual work plan'' and adding the words ``operational workplan'' in
their place.
0
i. By revising paragraph (c)(3)(vii).
0
j. In paragraph (c)(3)(viii), by adding two sentences at the end of the
paragraph.
0
k. In paragraph (e), by removing the words ``Heilipus lauri,
Conotrachelus
[[Page 8564]]
aguacatae, C. perseae, Copturus aguacatae, or Stenoma catenifer'' and
adding the words ``listed in the operational workplan'' in their place.
0
l. In paragraph (f), by removing the word ``will'' and adding the word
``may'' in its place.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-30 Hass avocados from Mexico.
* * * * *
(c) Safeguards in Mexico. The avocados must have been grown in an
orchard located in a municipality that meets the requirements of
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The orchard in which the avocados are
grown must meet the requirements of paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
The avocados must be packed for export to the United States in a
packinghouse that meets the requirements of paragraph (c)(3) of this
section. The Mexican national plant protection organization (NPPO) must
provide an annual operational workplan to APHIS that details the
activities that the Mexican NPPO will, subject to APHIS' approval of
the workplan, carry out to meet the requirements of this section; APHIS
will be directly involved with the Mexican NPPO in the monitoring and
supervision of those activities. The personnel conducting the trapping
and pest surveys must be hired, trained, and supervised by the Mexican
NPPO or by the State delegate of the Mexican NPPO.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) The avocados must be packed in clean, new boxes or bulk
shipping bins, or in clean plastic reusable crates. The boxes, bins, or
crates must be clearly marked with the identity of the grower,
packinghouse, and exporter.
(viii) * * * If, at the port of export for consignments shipped by
air or sea, the packed avocados are transferred into a non-refrigerated
container, the boxes, bins, or crates must be covered with a lid,
insect-proof mesh, or other material to protect the avocados from
fruit-fly infestation prior to leaving the packinghouse. Those
safeguards must be intact at the time the consignment arrives in the
United States.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 11th day of February 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-03289 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P