U.S. Department of Agriculture Stakeholder Workshop on Coexistence, 5729-5731 [2015-02035]
Download as PDF
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Notices
document published in the Federal
Register.
The Republic of Croatia submitted a
request to APHIS to evaluate the CSF,
FMD, SVD, and rinderpest status of the
country. In response to this request,
APHIS conducted a qualitative risk
assessment to evaluate Croatia with
respect to these diseases. Based on this
evaluation, APHIS recognizes Croatia to
be free of FMD, SVD, and rinderpest,
and low risk for CSF. APHIS has also
determined that the surveillance,
prevention, and control measures
implemented by the European Union
(EU) and Croatia, an EU Member State,
are sufficient to minimize the likelihood
of introducing CSF, FMD, SVD, and
rinderpest into the United States via
imports of species or products
susceptible to these diseases. Our
determinations support adding Croatia
to the Web-based list of regions
comprising the APHIS-defined
European CSF region, which APHIS
considers to be low risk for CSF, and to
the respective Web-based lists of regions
APHIS considers free of FMD, SVD, and
rinderpest.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 92.2(e), we are announcing the
availability of our evaluation of the CSF,
FMD, SVD, and rinderpest status of
Croatia for public review and comment.
We are also announcing the availability
of an environmental assessment (EA)
and a finding of no significant impact
(FONSI) 2 which have been prepared in
accordance with: (1) The National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provision
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). The evaluation, EA, and FONSI
may be viewed on the Regulations.gov
Web site or in our reading room.
(Instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room
are provided under the heading
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
notice.) The documents are also
available by contacting the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Information submitted in support of
Croatia’s original request is available by
contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
2 The FONSI for Croatia incorporates by reference
an EA prepared for Slovakia that addresses the
potential environmental impacts of CSF, FMD,
SVD, and rinderpest for Slovakia and other EU
Member States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
After reviewing any comments we
receive, we will announce our decision
regarding the disease status of Croatia
under consideration with respect to
CSF, FMD, SVD, and rinderpest and the
import status of susceptible animals and
products of such animals in a
subsequent notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
January 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–02011 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0047]
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Stakeholder Workshop on Coexistence
Notice of workshop listening
session and request for comments.
ACTION:
We are advising the public
that the U.S. Department of Agriculture
is holding a 2-day, invitation-only
workshop on agricultural coexistence,
the concurrent cultivation of
conventional, organic, identitypreserved, and genetically engineered
crops consistent with farmer choices
and consumer preferences. The
objective of the workshop is to advance
an understanding of agricultural
coexistence and discuss how to make
coexistence achievable and a basic
consideration for all stakeholders.
Workshop participants will represent a
broad range of interests and experience
relating to agricultural coexistence. The
public is invited to listen to or watch
the workshop sessions via phone and/or
Webcast, after which they will have the
opportunity to provide comments on the
proposals discussed.
DATES: The workshop will be held on
March 12–13, 2015, from 8:30 a.m. to 6
p.m. Comments on the workshop will be
accepted from March 13, 2015, through
March 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Call-in and Webcast
information is available at the
agricultural coexistence workshop Web
page at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
wps/portal/aphis/newsroom/
stakeholder-info/!ut/p/a1/nVFNU4Mw
EP0tHjxmEkgk4Ug7foBKD9W25MJsk
yixFChEx_57gem1aN3bzr739u1b
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5729
LPEGywq-7Ds4W1dQDr0MchYL36fEj
8ULFyQi8zBZxCtC6E0Py
HoAOVMRGfnJ4sH3Zj3_fhnekjhd3T2
LJ04fZwFeY4mlqlzjCpxBU9guV3XlTOX
y0m5baI_XpIMctvWny8f52HcOdqaoS2
3ablBolNU4CxljRocaBYp6iC
nOkdAAiAPVEBiujQcnxxOWfrl4d
DyhkPATYCKUrPfAzy5JAry88KjkD3yH4eDjPq0h3y_Hd78M–5m_7oX9Ih
2b2mKZHb1A2VTHxo!/?1dmy&urile=
wcm%3apath%3a%2Faphis_content_
library%2Fsa_about_aphis%2Fsa_stake
holders%2Fct_coexistence_meeting.
You may submit comments following
the workshop by either of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docket
Detail;D=APHIS-2013-0047.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2013–0047, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Any comments we receive on this
docket may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=APHIS-2013-0047 or in our reading
room, which is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming.
Mr.
Michael Tadle, Program Analyst,
Planning, Evaluation, and Decision
Support, PPD, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 120, Riverdale, MD 20737, (301)
851–3140; Michael.A.Tadle@
aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Over the
past decade, the number of acres on
which American farmers are growing
genetically engineered (GE) plants has
increased significantly, and GE crop
production continues to rise in output
and variety. At the same time, farmers
across the United States are producing
greater quantities of identity-preserved
non-GE and organic crops to meet
growing consumer demand. As a result,
the interactions of GE and identitypreserved non-GE production chains are
becoming more significant for American
farmers and consumers, the agriculture
industry, and the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA or the
Department). USDA supports the
successful coexistence of these different
forms of agricultural production and
recognizes that each contributes to the
overall health of farming and rural
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5730
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Notices
communities throughout the United
States.
The USDA Advisory Committee of
Biotechnology and 21st Century
Agriculture (AC21) provides guidance to
the Department on issues relating to
agricultural coexistence, including
examining the long-term impacts of
biotechnology on the U.S. food and
agriculture system and recommending
how the Department might address
those impacts. In 2011, the AC21 was
tasked with recommending appropriate
compensation mechanisms, if any, for
addressing economic losses by farmers
resulting from the unintended presence
of GE materials in their crops,
determining how such mechanisms
would be implemented and how
compensable claims would be decided,
and identifying what other steps USDA
might take to bolster coexistence.
During its deliberations, the AC21
examined practices used within the
agricultural community for mitigating
the economic risk posed by gene flow
between different forms of production.
They also reviewed stewardship
practices, the importance of seed
quality, and ways to facilitate
communication and collaboration
among stakeholders on matters of
coexistence. In November 2012, they
presented a report 1 to the Secretary
recommending actions in five major
areas: Potential compensation
mechanisms, stewardship, education
and outreach, research, and seed
quality. The recommendations
reinforced the importance of
agricultural coexistence and the need to
educate farmers and other stakeholders
in the food and feed production chain
about coexistence and each
stakeholder’s role in its success.
Following the report, USDA also
assembled several cross-Agency
working groups to consider the
recommendations in depth. The results
of their work will be discussed at the
workshop.
Among the recommendations made
by the AC21 were the following:
• USDA should ‘‘spearhead and fund
a broad-based, comprehensive
education and outreach initiative to
strengthen understanding of coexistence
between diverse agricultural production
systems,’’ and
• USDA should ‘‘work with
agricultural stakeholders to develop a
package of specific mechanisms that: (1)
Foster good crop stewardship and
mitigate potential economic risks
1 ‘‘Enhancing
Coexistence: A Report of the AC21
to the Secretary of Agriculture.’’ The report can be
viewed at: https://www.usda.gov/documents/ac21_
report-enhancing-coexistence.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
derived from unintended gene flow
between crop varieties and unintended
presence in general; and (2) promote
and incentivize farmer adoption of
appropriate stewardship practices.’’
In response to these recommendations,
USDA solicited public input on ways
that it could further agricultural
coexistence by fostering better
communication and collaboration
among those involved in diverse
agricultural production systems. On
November 4, 2013, the Department
published a Request for Information 2 in
the Federal Register and invited public
comments. These comments were
considered by the cross-Agency working
groups that were established to address
the report recommendations.
Workshop Activities
USDA intends to host a 2-day,
invitation-only workshop on March 12–
13, 2015, to provide an opportunity to
learn from stakeholders representing a
wide range of interests with respect to
agricultural coexistence and to build
upon the Department’s leadership and
outreach efforts to promote coexistence.
The workshop will achieve these aims
by providing a forum for stakeholders to
discuss current and potential USDA
responses to the AC21
recommendations. USDA has organized
the workshop around three sessions: (1)
The current state of affairs of
coexistence; (2) knowledge gaps,
challenges, and USDA’s responses so far
to the AC21 recommendations; and (3)
additional steps USDA is considering to
respond to the challenges. During the
workshop, participants representing
industry, farmers, government, and
academia will have the chance to
expand their understanding of
coexistence-related issues and raise
questions, voice concerns, and share
their expertise and insights about
addressing the challenges of
coexistence. The public will have an
opportunity to listen to or watch the
workshop remotely and submit
comments, questions, and proposals
after the event. Details for accessing the
workshop and submitting comments are
provided below.
In the first session, presentations will
cover the current state of agricultural
coexistence in the United States,
including the science of GE crops, the
economic implications of coexistence,
and growing market demand for organic
2 78 FR 65960–65962. To view the Request for
Information, the comments we received, and a
USDA-prepared summary of those comments, go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0047.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and identity-preserved non-GE
products.
The second session will focus on
current challenges to agricultural
coexistence and what is being and can
be done to address these challenges.
This session will include discussion of
actions that USDA has already taken in
response to the AC21 report, insurance
options for organic growers, germplasm
purity, and reports on current
coexistence-related research projects.
The final session will focus on
looking ahead at what USDA intends to
do to promote agricultural coexistence.
Topics of discussion will include USDA
initiatives, including a stakeholder
outreach/communication plan, a survey
of organic producers on GE-related
economic losses, a study on the
economic implications of coexistence,
and the potential use of conservation
programs, when applicable, in support
of coexistence.
Due to time and space constraints, we
found it necessary to limit participation
in the workshop to invitation only. As
noted above, participants attending the
workshop have been selected from all
sectors of the agricultural community
and bring with them a diversity of
perspectives and experiences regarding
agricultural coexistence. We invite the
public to listen in and watch the
presentations and discussions during
both days of the workshop. Information
for accessing the workshop via phone
and Webcast is available on the
agricultural coexistence workshop Web
page (see link included above under
ADDRESSES). A full listing of workshop
activities can also be found there.
Persons interested in submitting
comments on any of the topics
presented during the workshop are
welcome to do so through either of the
methods listed above under ADDRESSES.
We will thoroughly review all
submissions and draw upon them as we
develop ways of promoting coexistence
that consider the needs of all types of
producers.
Several new USDA draft proposals
and products concerning coexistence
will also be made available for public
review via the agricultural coexistence
workshop Web page, including
resources for coexistence
communication and planning,
education on crop-specific stewardship
practices and agricultural contracting,
and other information on agricultural
production and associated governmental
programs, as well as earlier reports of
the AC21. Also available is information
about a new pilot program in which
entities that submit a petition to USDA
for a determination of nonregulated
status for certain regulated articles
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 22 / Tuesday, February 3, 2015 / Notices
under 7 CFR part 340 may voluntarily
submit a conflict analysis and
coexistence plan to advance agricultural
coexistence strategies.
Additional coexistence documents
will be made available in the weeks
prior to the March workshop. Workshop
presentations and summaries from
plenary sessions and working group
meetings will be made available after
the event. Documents can be found as
indicated above via the agricultural
coexistence workshop Web page.
Additional information regarding the
workshop may be obtained from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
January 2015.
Tom Vilsack,
Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2015–02035 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2014–0013]
Notice of Proposed Changes to
Section I of the Iowa, Minnesota, North
Dakota, and South Dakota State
Technical Guides
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed changes to the NRCS Statespecific Field Office Technical Guides
for review and comment; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
NRCS published a notice of
proposed changes to section I of the
State-specific technical guides for Iowa,
Minnesota, North Dakota, and South
Dakota on November 5, 2014, with a
comment period ending February 3,
2015. This document extends the
comment period.
DATES: The comment period for this
notice (79 FR 65615, November 5, 2014)
is hereby extended until February 20,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Comments should be
submitted for each specific State,
identified by Docket Number NRCS–
2014–0013, using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail or hand-delivery: Submit
State-specific comments to the
appropriate State contact. The contact
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
information for each State is shown
below.
• NRCS will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. Personal
information provided with comments
will be posted. If your comment
includes your address, phone number,
email, or other personal identifying
information, your comments, including
personal information, may be available
to the public. You may ask in your
comment that your personal identifying
information be withheld from public
view, but this cannot be guaranteed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
NRCS State Conservationist specific to
your response.
• Iowa, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Jay Mar, State
Conservationist, 210 Walnut Street,
Room 693, Des Moines, Iowa 50309–
2180; telephone: (515) 284–4769; email:
jay.mar@ia.usda.gove; Iowa Web site:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/site/ia/home/
• Minnesota, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Walter Albarran,
Acting State Conservationist, 375
Jackson Street, Suite 600, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55101–1854; telephone: (651)
602–7854; email: walter.albarran@
fl.usda.gov; Minnesota Web site: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
site/mn/home/
• North Dakota, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Mary Podoll,
State Conservationist, 220 East Rosser
Avenue, Room 278, Bismarck, North
Dakota 58502–1458; telephone: (701)
530–2003; email: mary.podoll@
nd.usda.gov, North Dakota Web site:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/site/nd/home/
• South Dakota, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Jeff Zimprich,
State Conservationist, 200 Fourth Street
SW., Room 203, Huron, South Dakota
57350; telephone: (605) 352–1200;
email: jeff.zimprich@sd.usda.gov; South
Dakota Web site: https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
site/sd/home/
Electronic copies of the proposed
revised offsite methods are available
through https://www.regulations.gov by
accessing Docket No. NRCS–2014–0013.
Alternatively, copies can be
downloaded or printed from the Statespecific Web site listed above. Requests
for paper versions or inquiries may be
directed to the specific State
Conservationist at the contact points
listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NRCS has
received a number of questions about
the proposed changes referred to in this
notice, including several requests for
additional time to complete detailed
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5731
reviews and comments. This action
extends the comment period to ensure
that the public has sufficient time to
review and comment on the proposed
changes.
Signed this 28th day of January, 2015, in
Washington, DC.
Jason A. Weller,
Chief, Natural Resources Conservation
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–02083 Filed 2–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2015–0001]
Notice of Proposed Changes to the
National Handbook of Conservation
Practices for the Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed changes in the NRCS National
Handbook of Conservation Practices for
public review and comment.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of the
intention of NRCS to issue a new
conservation practice standard in the
National Handbook of Conservation
Practices. This standard is High Tunnel
System (Code 325). NRCS State
Conservationists who choose to adopt
this practice for use within their States
will incorporate it into section IV of
their respective electronic Field Office
Technical Guide. This practice may be
used in conservation systems that treat
highly erodible land (HEL) or on land
determined to be a wetland. Section 343
of the Federal Agriculture Improvement
and Reform Act of 1996 requires NRCS
to make available for public review and
comment all proposed revisions to
conservation practice standards used to
carry out HEL and wetland provisions of
the law.
DATES: Effective Date: This is effective
February 3, 2015.
Comment Date: Submit comments on
or before March 5, 2015. Final versions
of this new conservation practice
standard will be adopted after the close
of the 30-day period and after
consideration of all comments.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
submitted and identified by Docket
Number NRCS–2015–0001, using any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5729-5731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02035]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2013-0047]
U.S. Department of Agriculture Stakeholder Workshop on
Coexistence
ACTION: Notice of workshop listening session and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the U.S. Department of
Agriculture is holding a 2-day, invitation-only workshop on
agricultural coexistence, the concurrent cultivation of conventional,
organic, identity-preserved, and genetically engineered crops
consistent with farmer choices and consumer preferences. The objective
of the workshop is to advance an understanding of agricultural
coexistence and discuss how to make coexistence achievable and a basic
consideration for all stakeholders. Workshop participants will
represent a broad range of interests and experience relating to
agricultural coexistence. The public is invited to listen to or watch
the workshop sessions via phone and/or Webcast, after which they will
have the opportunity to provide comments on the proposals discussed.
DATES: The workshop will be held on March 12-13, 2015, from 8:30 a.m.
to 6 p.m. Comments on the workshop will be accepted from March 13,
2015, through March 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Call-in and Webcast information is available at the
agricultural coexistence workshop Web page at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/newsroom/stakeholder-info/!ut/p/a1/nVFNU4MwEP0tHjxmEkgk4Ug7foBKD9W25MJskyixFChEx_57gem1aN3bzr739u1bLPEGywq-7Ds4W1dQDr0MchYL36fEj8ULFyQi8zBZxCtC6E0PyHoAOVMRGfnJ4sH3Zj3_fhnekjhd3T2LJ04fZwFeY4mlqlzjCpxBU9guV3XlTOXy0m5baI_XpIMctvWny8f52HcOdqaoS23ablBolNU4CxljRocaBYp6iCnOkdAAiAPVEBiujQcnxxOWfrl4dDyhkPATYCKUrPfAzy5JAry88KjkD3-yH4eDjPq0h3y_Hd78M-5m_7oX9Ih2b2mKZHb1A2VTHxo!/?1dmy&urile=wcm%3apath%3a%2Faphis_content_library%2Fsa_about_aphis%2Fsa_stakeholders%2Fct_coexistence_meeting.
You may submit comments following the workshop by either of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0047.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2013-0047, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Any comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0047 or in our reading
room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th
Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays.
To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 799-7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Tadle, Program Analyst,
Planning, Evaluation, and Decision Support, PPD, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 120, Riverdale, MD 20737, (301) 851-3140;
Michael.A.Tadle@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Over the past decade, the number of acres on
which American farmers are growing genetically engineered (GE) plants
has increased significantly, and GE crop production continues to rise
in output and variety. At the same time, farmers across the United
States are producing greater quantities of identity-preserved non-GE
and organic crops to meet growing consumer demand. As a result, the
interactions of GE and identity-preserved non-GE production chains are
becoming more significant for American farmers and consumers, the
agriculture industry, and the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA or the Department). USDA supports the successful coexistence of
these different forms of agricultural production and recognizes that
each contributes to the overall health of farming and rural
[[Page 5730]]
communities throughout the United States.
The USDA Advisory Committee of Biotechnology and 21st Century
Agriculture (AC21) provides guidance to the Department on issues
relating to agricultural coexistence, including examining the long-term
impacts of biotechnology on the U.S. food and agriculture system and
recommending how the Department might address those impacts. In 2011,
the AC21 was tasked with recommending appropriate compensation
mechanisms, if any, for addressing economic losses by farmers resulting
from the unintended presence of GE materials in their crops,
determining how such mechanisms would be implemented and how
compensable claims would be decided, and identifying what other steps
USDA might take to bolster coexistence.
During its deliberations, the AC21 examined practices used within
the agricultural community for mitigating the economic risk posed by
gene flow between different forms of production. They also reviewed
stewardship practices, the importance of seed quality, and ways to
facilitate communication and collaboration among stakeholders on
matters of coexistence. In November 2012, they presented a report \1\
to the Secretary recommending actions in five major areas: Potential
compensation mechanisms, stewardship, education and outreach, research,
and seed quality. The recommendations reinforced the importance of
agricultural coexistence and the need to educate farmers and other
stakeholders in the food and feed production chain about coexistence
and each stakeholder's role in its success. Following the report, USDA
also assembled several cross-Agency working groups to consider the
recommendations in depth. The results of their work will be discussed
at the workshop.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Enhancing Coexistence: A Report of the AC21 to the
Secretary of Agriculture.'' The report can be viewed at: https://www.usda.gov/documents/ac21_report-enhancing-coexistence.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Among the recommendations made by the AC21 were the following:
USDA should ``spearhead and fund a broad-based,
comprehensive education and outreach initiative to strengthen
understanding of coexistence between diverse agricultural production
systems,'' and
USDA should ``work with agricultural stakeholders to
develop a package of specific mechanisms that: (1) Foster good crop
stewardship and mitigate potential economic risks derived from
unintended gene flow between crop varieties and unintended presence in
general; and (2) promote and incentivize farmer adoption of appropriate
stewardship practices.''
In response to these recommendations, USDA solicited public input on
ways that it could further agricultural coexistence by fostering better
communication and collaboration among those involved in diverse
agricultural production systems. On November 4, 2013, the Department
published a Request for Information \2\ in the Federal Register and
invited public comments. These comments were considered by the cross-
Agency working groups that were established to address the report
recommendations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 78 FR 65960-65962. To view the Request for Information, the
comments we received, and a USDA-prepared summary of those comments,
go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0047.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Workshop Activities
USDA intends to host a 2-day, invitation-only workshop on March 12-
13, 2015, to provide an opportunity to learn from stakeholders
representing a wide range of interests with respect to agricultural
coexistence and to build upon the Department's leadership and outreach
efforts to promote coexistence. The workshop will achieve these aims by
providing a forum for stakeholders to discuss current and potential
USDA responses to the AC21 recommendations. USDA has organized the
workshop around three sessions: (1) The current state of affairs of
coexistence; (2) knowledge gaps, challenges, and USDA's responses so
far to the AC21 recommendations; and (3) additional steps USDA is
considering to respond to the challenges. During the workshop,
participants representing industry, farmers, government, and academia
will have the chance to expand their understanding of coexistence-
related issues and raise questions, voice concerns, and share their
expertise and insights about addressing the challenges of coexistence.
The public will have an opportunity to listen to or watch the workshop
remotely and submit comments, questions, and proposals after the event.
Details for accessing the workshop and submitting comments are provided
below.
In the first session, presentations will cover the current state of
agricultural coexistence in the United States, including the science of
GE crops, the economic implications of coexistence, and growing market
demand for organic and identity-preserved non-GE products.
The second session will focus on current challenges to agricultural
coexistence and what is being and can be done to address these
challenges. This session will include discussion of actions that USDA
has already taken in response to the AC21 report, insurance options for
organic growers, germplasm purity, and reports on current coexistence-
related research projects.
The final session will focus on looking ahead at what USDA intends
to do to promote agricultural coexistence. Topics of discussion will
include USDA initiatives, including a stakeholder outreach/
communication plan, a survey of organic producers on GE-related
economic losses, a study on the economic implications of coexistence,
and the potential use of conservation programs, when applicable, in
support of coexistence.
Due to time and space constraints, we found it necessary to limit
participation in the workshop to invitation only. As noted above,
participants attending the workshop have been selected from all sectors
of the agricultural community and bring with them a diversity of
perspectives and experiences regarding agricultural coexistence. We
invite the public to listen in and watch the presentations and
discussions during both days of the workshop. Information for accessing
the workshop via phone and Webcast is available on the agricultural
coexistence workshop Web page (see link included above under
ADDRESSES). A full listing of workshop activities can also be found
there. Persons interested in submitting comments on any of the topics
presented during the workshop are welcome to do so through either of
the methods listed above under ADDRESSES. We will thoroughly review all
submissions and draw upon them as we develop ways of promoting
coexistence that consider the needs of all types of producers.
Several new USDA draft proposals and products concerning
coexistence will also be made available for public review via the
agricultural coexistence workshop Web page, including resources for
coexistence communication and planning, education on crop-specific
stewardship practices and agricultural contracting, and other
information on agricultural production and associated governmental
programs, as well as earlier reports of the AC21. Also available is
information about a new pilot program in which entities that submit a
petition to USDA for a determination of nonregulated status for certain
regulated articles
[[Page 5731]]
under 7 CFR part 340 may voluntarily submit a conflict analysis and
coexistence plan to advance agricultural coexistence strategies.
Additional coexistence documents will be made available in the
weeks prior to the March workshop. Workshop presentations and summaries
from plenary sessions and working group meetings will be made available
after the event. Documents can be found as indicated above via the
agricultural coexistence workshop Web page.
Additional information regarding the workshop may be obtained from
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Done in Washington, DC, this 28th day of January 2015.
Tom Vilsack,
Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2015-02035 Filed 2-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P