Copyright Office Fees: Registration, Recordation, and Related Services; Special Services; Licensing Division Services; FOIA Services; Correction, 24334-24335 [2014-09822]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
24334
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 83 / Wednesday, April 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine
parade. An environmental analysis
checklist and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination were completed for this
event in previous years. Since this event
has remained materially unchanged
from the time of the prior
determinations, a new environmental
analysis checklist and Categorical
Exclusion Determination were not
completed for 2014. The previously
completed environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion
Determination can be found in docket
folder for USCG–2013–0052 at
www.regulations.gov. This rule is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary § 100.T07–0110 to
read as follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 100.T07–0110 Special Local Regulations;
Low Country Splash, Wando River, Cooper
River, and Charleston Harbor, Charleston,
SC.
(a) Regulated Areas. The following
regulated area is established as a special
local regulation. All waters within a
moving zone, beginning at Daniel Island
Pier in approximate position 32°51′20″
N, 079°54′06″ W, South along the coast
of Daniel Island, across the Wando River
to Hobcaw Yacht Club, in approximate
position 32°49′20″ N, 079°53′49″ W,
South along the coast of Mt. Pleasant,
S.C., to Charleston Harbor Resort
Marina, in approximate position
32°47′20″ N, 079°54′39″ W. There will
be a temporary Channel Closer from
0730 to 0815 on May 24, 2014 between
Wando River Terminal Buoy 3 (LLNR
3305), and Wando River Terminal Buoy
5 (LLNR 3315). The zone will at all
times extend 75 yards both in front of
the lead safety vessel preceding the first
race participants; 75 yards behind the
safety vessel trailing the last race
participants; and at all times extending
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Apr 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
100 yards on either side of participating
race and safety vessels. Information
regarding the identity of the lead safety
vessel and the last safety vessel will be
provided 2 days prior to the race via
broadcast notice to mariners and marine
safety information bulletins.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated areas
unless otherwise authorized by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated areas may
contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at 843–740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16 to seek
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated areas is granted by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such permission
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated areas through
advanced notice via broadcast notice to
mariners and by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective Date. This rule is
effective on May 24, 2014, and will be
enforced from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
Dated: April 14, 2014.
R.R. Rodriguez,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2014–09853 Filed 4–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2012–1]
Copyright Office Fees: Registration,
Recordation, and Related Services;
Special Services; Licensing Division
Services; FOIA Services; Correction
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule; correction.
On March 24, 2014, the
United States Copyright Office
published a final rule concerning fees
for Office services. The fee for a
particular service did not change, but
was inadvertently omitted from the
schedule of fees in the final rule. The
office hereby corrects that omission.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective on May 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline C. Charlesworth, General
Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights or Chris Weston, AttorneyAdvisor, Office of the General Counsel,
at the U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright
GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington,
DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8350.
On March
24, 2014, the Copyright Office published
a final rule in the Federal Register (79
FR 15910) replacing the current
Copyright Office fee schedule with a
new one to take effect on May 1, 2014.
Among other things, this rule revised 37
CFR 201.3(c)(9) so that the fee for
‘‘Registration of a correction or
amplification to a claim’’ increased from
$100 to $130. Although the existing fee
schedule applies the referenced fee to
both Forms CA and DC, the fee increase
applies only to Form CA; Form DC was
inadvertently omitted from the
schedule. This correction continues the
fee for Form DC of $100, adding it to the
new schedule as set forth in
§ 201.3(c)(9).
Accordingly, in the final rule FR Doc.
2014–6293 published on March 24,
2014 (79 FR 15910), the Office makes
the following correction. On page
15918, in the ‘‘Registration, recordation,
and related services’’ table, § 201.3(c)(9)
is corrected to read as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,
and related services, special services, and
services performed by the Licensing
Division.
*
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\30APR1.SGM
30APR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 83 / Wednesday, April 30, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
CFR 3050.14 requiring the production
and submission of an Alternate CRA
(Cost and Revenue Analysis Report) as
part of the Postal Service’s Annual
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance Report (ACR).2
(9) Registration of a correction or amRule 3050.14 establishes the format
plification to a claim.
for the CRA which reports costs,
(Form CA) .......................................
$130
(Form DC) .......................................
100 revenues, volumes, contribution, and
other information reflecting the
classification structure in the Mail
*
*
*
*
*
Classification Schedule (MCS). 39 CFR
3050.14. The rule also requires an
*
*
*
*
*
alternative, more disaggregated format
Dated: April 21, 2014.
(Alternate CRA) capable of reflecting the
Maria A. Pallante,
classification structure in effect prior to
Register of Copyrights.
the adoption of the Postal
Approved By:
Accountability and Enhancement Act
James H. Billington,
(PAEA). Id. The Postal Service proposes
striking the second sentence of rule
Librarian of Congress.
3050.14.
[FR Doc. 2014–09822 Filed 4–29–14; 8:45 am]
This order grants the Petition and,
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
accordingly, amends rule 3050.14.3
Registration, recordation and related
services
Fees
($)
II. Proposal
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2014–2; Order No. 2061]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is
eliminating a requirement that the
Postal Service prepare the annual cost
and revenue analysis report in an
alternative format. The reason for the
change is that the alternative format’s
usefulness as an analytical tool has been
overtaken by developments since
passage of postal reform legislation in
2006. Adoption of this change means
the Postal Service will prepare and
submit only one version of this report.
DATES: Effective May 30, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory History
73 FR 53324, September 15, 2008
74 FR 20834 May 5, 2009
78 FR 70904 November 27, 2013
Table of Contents
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Introduction
II. Proposal
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On November 21, 2013, the
Commission established this rulemaking
docket to evaluate the Postal Service’s
petition 1 to eliminate that part of 39
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Eliminate the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Apr 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
A. Postal Service Proposal
In support of its proposal, the Postal
Service states that since passage of the
PAEA, mail classifications have been
combined and data systems no longer
gather data for many of the Alternate
CRA categories. Current data systems
cannot always track data by the prePAEA categories, particularly cost data
for many categories in the Alternate
CRA. For example, the current
methodology does not separate FirstClass Package Service into Single-Piece
and Presort parcels. Revenue, Pieces,
and Weight (RPW) volumes are used
and unit costs are assumed to be
identical, which is not intuitive and not
supported by actual data. Petition at 3.
According to the Postal Service,
methods to estimate the data for the
Alternate CRA were developed by
disaggregating existing mail categories
in order to reassemble the pre-PAEA
classification results in estimation
methodologies that vary by category. Id.
As a result, the aggregation of cost data
may not always match those developed
via different estimation techniques, and
data for some categories may not exist
at all. Id. at 3–4.
Requirement for an Alternative Format CRA Report,
November 15, 2013, at 1 (Petition).
2 Order No. 1891, Notice of Petition for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Eliminate the
Alternative Format CRA Report, November 21, 2013
(Notice).
3 The Petition also requested a waiver of the
requirement to file the FY 2013 Alternate CRA
Report if the Commission anticipated that it might
not be able to complete the rulemaking prior to the
time by which preparation of the FY 2013 ACR was
to be finalized. On December 18, 2013, the
Commission granted the waiver request in order to
fully evaluate amendment of Rule 3050.14 and any
comments of interested persons. Order No. 1913,
Order Granting Waiver of Filing FY 2013 Alternate
CRA, December 18, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24335
The Postal Service further states that
public and non-public versions of the
Alternate CRA were filed initially, but
as more parts of products have shifted
to competitive products, of necessity
only a non-public version has been
filed. Id. at 2. Otherwise, a comparison
of the market dominant information in
the CRA with that in the Alternate CRA
would make it possible to derive
information about competitive products.
For instance, the revenue, costs, and
volume of First-Class Package Service
and Lightweight Parcel Select in the
Alternate CRA could be discerned when
returned to and combined with existing
data for First-Class Mail and Standard
Mail. Also, the Alternate CRA has
separate lines for negotiated service
agreements (NSAs) that isolate the NSA
data for First-Class Package Service. Id.
The Postal Service points out that the
Alternate CRA provided a bridge for
maintaining trend data through the
transition so that no pre-PAEA
categories were omitted and the
integrity of the data reporting was
maintained. Id. at 4. The Postal Service
asserts that usefulness of the Alternate
CRA is questionable because the
information reported is the result of
ratio analysis and guesstimates. Id. The
Postal Service argues that the report is
no longer relevant. Id.
The Postal Service also claims that the
burden to produce the Alternate CRA is
substantial and dependent on
completion of all other ACR work. Id. at
4–5. The Postal Service is concerned
that the relatively weak quality of the
Alternate CRA material may reflect
upon the quality of other ACR material.
Id. at 5.
B. Public Representative Comments
Only the Public Representative filed
comments.4 The Public Representative
points out that the CRA involves
separating the Postal Service’s accrued
costs reported in its general ledger into
cost segments which are further
segregated into cost pools and
distributed to products based on factors
derived from data collection systems.
PR Comments at 2–3. The Public
Representative asserts that the
Commission has noted the Alternate
CRA format provided a helpful
reference point as product lists were
frequently refined in the first few years
after passage of the PAEA. Id. at 3. As
products are combined or morphed into
new products, the link between
4 Initial Comments of the Public Representative,
January 7, 2014 (PR Comments). The order
establishing this rulemaking provided for comments
by interested parties no later than January 9, 2014
and reply comments no later than January 23, 2014.
Notice at 4. No reply comments were filed.
E:\FR\FM\30APR1.SGM
30APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 83 (Wednesday, April 30, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24334-24335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09822]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2012-1]
Copyright Office Fees: Registration, Recordation, and Related
Services; Special Services; Licensing Division Services; FOIA Services;
Correction
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 24, 2014, the United States Copyright Office
published a final rule concerning fees for Office services. The fee for
a particular service did not change, but was inadvertently omitted from
the schedule of fees in the final rule. The office hereby corrects that
omission.
DATES: Effective on May 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline C. Charlesworth, General
Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights or Chris Weston, Attorney-
Advisor, Office of the General Counsel, at the U.S. Copyright Office,
Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 24, 2014, the Copyright Office
published a final rule in the Federal Register (79 FR 15910) replacing
the current Copyright Office fee schedule with a new one to take effect
on May 1, 2014. Among other things, this rule revised 37 CFR
201.3(c)(9) so that the fee for ``Registration of a correction or
amplification to a claim'' increased from $100 to $130. Although the
existing fee schedule applies the referenced fee to both Forms CA and
DC, the fee increase applies only to Form CA; Form DC was inadvertently
omitted from the schedule. This correction continues the fee for Form
DC of $100, adding it to the new schedule as set forth in Sec.
201.3(c)(9).
Accordingly, in the final rule FR Doc. 2014-6293 published on March
24, 2014 (79 FR 15910), the Office makes the following correction. On
page 15918, in the ``Registration, recordation, and related services''
table, Sec. 201.3(c)(9) is corrected to read as follows:
Sec. 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, and related services,
special services, and services performed by the Licensing Division.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 24335]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fees
Registration, recordation and related services ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(9) Registration of a correction or amplification to a claim.
(Form CA)..................................................... $130
(Form DC)..................................................... 100
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: April 21, 2014.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved By:
James H. Billington,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2014-09822 Filed 4-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
