Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc.; Availability of Plant Pest Risk Assessment and Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status of Apples Genetically Engineered to Resist Browning, 67100-67101 [2013-26792]
Download as PDF
67100
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Notices
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agricultural Marketing Service
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Title: USDA Food Connect Web site.
OMB Control Number: 0581–0224.
Summary of Collection: The USDA
Food Connect Web site (previously
known as the USDA Food and
Commodity Connection Web site)
operates pursuant to the authority of
Section 32 of Public Law 320, Section
8 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42
U.S.C. 1777) and the National School
Lunch Program, 7 CFR part 210. It was
developed to assist the institutional
food service community across the
United States. The Web site focuses on
providing information to institutional
food service professions, as well as
providing a platform for processors and
brokers to post information about their
processed USDA supplied commodities
and other commercial food products
available for institutional food service
purchase. The USDA Food Connect Web
site provides food related associations a
location to provide information on
services and materials available from
the organization. The Web site is a
public Web site and the information
provided is considered as public
information.
Need and Use of the Information: The
USDA Food Connect Web site will
collect all information electronically at
one time upon registration. Each new
user must create their individual login
and password. There are four primary
types of users; institutional food service
professionals, processors, brokers and
food related associations. The Food
Connect Web site is designed as a
central location in which institutional
food service professionals, who provide
meals in institutional settings, can
locate processors who manufacture
foods utilizing USDA provided
commodities, brokers who represent the
processors, and food related
associations. No information is collected
from a user when they access the Web
site as a guest.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit; Farms; State, Local &
Tribal governments.
Number of Respondents: 1,215.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Other (One Time).
Total Burden Hours: 297.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–26793 Filed 11–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:08 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 232001
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0025]
Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc.;
Availability of Plant Pest Risk
Assessment and Environmental
Assessment for Determination of
Nonregulated Status of Apples
Genetically Engineered to Resist
Browning
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is making available
for public comment our plant pest risk
assessment and our draft environmental
assessment regarding a request from
Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc., seeking
a determination of nonregulated status
of apple events designated as events
GD743 and GS784, which have been
genetically engineered to resist
browning. We are soliciting comments
on whether these genetically engineered
apples are likely to pose a plant pest
risk.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before December
9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
# !documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0025.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2012–0025, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
# !docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0025 or
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1141 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
Supporting documents are also
available on the APHIS Web site at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
biotechnology/petitions_table_
pending.shtml under APHIS Petition
Number 10–161–01p.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Rebecca Stankiewicz Gabel, Chief,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Biotechnology Environmental Analysis
Branch, Environmental Risk Analysis
Programs, Biotechnology Regulatory
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301)
851–3927, email: rebecca.l.stankiewiczgabel@aphis.usda.gov. To obtain copies
of the supporting documents for this
petition, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at (301)
851–3892, email: cynthia.a.eck@
aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the authority of the plant pest
provisions of the Plant Protection Act (7
U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the regulations in
7 CFR Part 340, ‘‘Introduction of
Organisms and Products Altered or
Produced Through Genetic Engineering
Which Are Plant Pests or Which There
Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,’’
regulate, among other things, the
introduction (importation, interstate
movement, or release into the
environment) of organisms and products
altered or produced through genetic
engineering that are plant pests or that
there is reason to believe are plant pests.
Such genetically engineered (GE)
organisms and products are considered
‘‘regulated articles.’’
The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide
that any person may submit a petition
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR Part 340.
APHIS has received a petition (APHIS
Petition Number 10–161–01p) from
Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc.,
(Okanagan) of British Columbia,
Canada, seeking a determination of
nonregulated status of apples (Malus x
domestica) designated as events GD743
and GS784, which have been genetically
engineered to resist browning. The
petition stated that these apples are
unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and,
therefore, should not be a regulated
article under APHIS’ regulations in 7
CFR Part 340.
According to our process 1 for
soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determinations
of nonregulated status of GE organisms,
APHIS accepts written comments
regarding a petition once APHIS deems
it complete. In a notice 2 published in
1 On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 13258–13260, Docket No.
APHIS–2011–0129) a notice describing our public
review process for soliciting public comments and
information when considering petitions for
determinations of nonregulated status for GE
organisms. To view the notice, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=APHIS2011-0129.
2 To view the notice, the petition, and the
comments we received, go to https://
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2013 / Notices
the Federal Register on July 13, 2012,
(77 FR 41362–41363, Docket No.
APHIS–2012–0025), APHIS announced
the availability of the Okanagan petition
for public comment. APHIS solicited
comments on the petition for 60 days
ending on September 11, 2012, in order
to help identify potential environmental
and interrelated economic issues and
impacts that APHIS may determine
should be considered in our evaluation
of the petition.
APHIS received 1,939 comments on
the petition. Several of these comments
included electronic attachments
consisting of a consolidated document
of many identical or nearly identical
letters, for a total of 72,745 comments.
Issues raised during the comment
period include concerns regarding
marketing and economic impacts; crosspollination; and health, nutrition, and
food safety. APHIS has evaluated the
issues raised during the comment
period and, where appropriate, has
provided a discussion of these issues in
our environmental assessment (EA).
After public comments are received
on a completed petition, APHIS
evaluates those comments and then
provides a second opportunity for
public involvement in our
decisionmaking process. According to
our public review process (see footnote
1), the second opportunity for public
involvement follows one of two
approaches, as described below.
If APHIS decides, based on its review
of the petition and its evaluation and
analysis of comments received during
the 60-day public comment period on
the petition, that the petition involves a
GE organism that raises no substantive
new issues, APHIS will follow
Approach 1 for public involvement.
Under Approach 1, APHIS announces in
the Federal Register the availability of
APHIS’ preliminary regulatory
determination along with its EA,
preliminary finding of no significant
impact (FONSI), and its plant pest risk
assessment (PPRA) for a 30-day public
review period. APHIS will evaluate any
information received related to the
petition and its supporting documents
during the 30-day public review period.
Alternatively, if APHIS decides, based
on its review of the petition and its
evaluation and analysis of comments
received during the 60-day public
comment period on the petition, that the
petition involves a GE organism that
raises substantive new issues, APHIS
will follow Approach 2. Under
Approach 2, APHIS first solicits written
comments from the public on a draft EA
www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=APHIS2012-0025.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:08 Nov 07, 2013
Jkt 232001
and PPRA for a 30-day comment period
through the publication of a Federal
Register notice. Then, after reviewing
and evaluating the comments on the
draft EA and PPRA and other
information, APHIS will revise the
PPRA as necessary and prepare a final
EA and, based on the final EA, a
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) decision document (either a
FONSI or a notice of intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement).
For this petition, we are using Approach
2.
APHIS has prepared a PPRA to
determine if apple events GD743 and
GS784 are unlikely to pose a plant pest
risk. In section 403 of the Plant
Protection Act, ‘‘plant pest’’ is defined
as any living stage of any of the
following that can directly or indirectly
injure, cause damage to, or cause
disease in any plant or plant product: A
protozoan, a nonhuman animal, a
parasitic plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a
virus or viroid, an infectious agent or
other pathogen, or any article similar to
or allied with any of the foregoing.
APHIS has also prepared a draft EA in
which we present two alternatives based
on our analysis of data submitted by
Okanagan, a review of other scientific
data, field tests conducted under APHIS
oversight, and comments received on
the petition. APHIS is considering the
following alternatives: (1) Take no
action, i.e., APHIS would not change the
regulatory status of apple events GD743
and GS784 and they would continue to
be regulated articles, or (2) make a
determination of nonregulated status of
apple events GD743 and GS784.
The EA was prepared in accordance
with (1) NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR Part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR Part
372).
In accordance with our process for
soliciting public input when
considering petitions for determinations
of nonregulated status for GE organisms,
we are publishing this notice to inform
the public that APHIS will accept
written comments on our PPRA and
draft EA regarding the petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
from interested or affected persons for a
period of 30 days from the date of this
notice. Copies of the PPRA and draft
EA, as well as the previously published
petition, are available as indicated in
the ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT sections of this
notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67101
As noted previously, after the
comment period closes, APHIS will
review all written comments received
during the comment period and any
other relevant information. After
reviewing and evaluating the comments
on the draft EA and PPRA and other
information, APHIS will revise the
PPRA as necessary and prepare a final
EA. Based on the final EA, APHIS will
prepare a NEPA decision document
(either a FONSI or a notice of intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement).
If a FONSI is reached, APHIS will
furnish a response to the petitioner,
either approving or denying the
petition. APHIS will also publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing the regulatory status of the
GE organism and the availability of
APHIS’ final EA, PPRA, FONSI, and our
regulatory determination.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
November 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–26792 Filed 11–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
Notice of Request for Extension of a
Currently Approved Information
Collection
Rural Housing Service (RHS),
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed collection; Comments
requested.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Rural Housing
Service’s intention to request an
extension for a currently approved
information collection in support of the
Rural Community Development
Initiative (RCDI) grant program.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by January 7, 2014 to be
assured of consideration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Woolard, Loan Specialist,
Community Programs Division, RHS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Ave. SW.,
Mail Stop 0787, Washington, DC 20250–
0787, Telephone (202) 720–1506, Email
susan.woolard@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Notice of Funds Availability
(NOFA) Inviting Applications for the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67100-67101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26792]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0025]
Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc.; Availability of Plant Pest Risk
Assessment and Environmental Assessment for Determination of
Nonregulated Status of Apples Genetically Engineered to Resist Browning
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is making available for public comment our plant
pest risk assessment and our draft environmental assessment regarding a
request from Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc., seeking a determination
of nonregulated status of apple events designated as events GD743 and
GS784, which have been genetically engineered to resist browning. We
are soliciting comments on whether these genetically engineered apples
are likely to pose a plant pest risk.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
December 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/# !documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0025.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2012-0025, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-
0025 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
Supporting documents are also available on the APHIS Web site at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/petitions_table_pending.shtml
under APHIS Petition Number 10-161-01p.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Rebecca Stankiewicz Gabel, Chief,
Biotechnology Environmental Analysis Branch, Environmental Risk
Analysis Programs, Biotechnology Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 851-3927, email:
rebecca.l.stankiewicz-gabel@aphis.usda.gov. To obtain copies of the
supporting documents for this petition, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at (301)
851-3892, email: cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the authority of the plant pest provisions of the Plant
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the regulations in 7 CFR Part
340, ``Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced
Through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is
Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among other things, the
introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the
environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through
genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to
believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered (GE) organisms and
products are considered ``regulated articles.''
The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated
under 7 CFR Part 340. APHIS has received a petition (APHIS Petition
Number 10-161-01p) from Okanagan Specialty Fruits, Inc., (Okanagan) of
British Columbia, Canada, seeking a determination of nonregulated
status of apples (Malus x domestica) designated as events GD743 and
GS784, which have been genetically engineered to resist browning. The
petition stated that these apples are unlikely to pose a plant pest
risk and, therefore, should not be a regulated article under APHIS'
regulations in 7 CFR Part 340.
According to our process \1\ for soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determinations of nonregulated status of GE
organisms, APHIS accepts written comments regarding a petition once
APHIS deems it complete. In a notice \2\ published in
[[Page 67101]]
the Federal Register on July 13, 2012, (77 FR 41362-41363, Docket No.
APHIS-2012-0025), APHIS announced the availability of the Okanagan
petition for public comment. APHIS solicited comments on the petition
for 60 days ending on September 11, 2012, in order to help identify
potential environmental and interrelated economic issues and impacts
that APHIS may determine should be considered in our evaluation of the
petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the Federal Register
(77 FR 13258-13260, Docket No. APHIS-2011-0129) a notice describing
our public review process for soliciting public comments and
information when considering petitions for determinations of
nonregulated status for GE organisms. To view the notice, go to
https://www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0129.
\2\ To view the notice, the petition, and the comments we
received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=APHIS-
2012-0025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APHIS received 1,939 comments on the petition. Several of these
comments included electronic attachments consisting of a consolidated
document of many identical or nearly identical letters, for a total of
72,745 comments. Issues raised during the comment period include
concerns regarding marketing and economic impacts; cross-pollination;
and health, nutrition, and food safety. APHIS has evaluated the issues
raised during the comment period and, where appropriate, has provided a
discussion of these issues in our environmental assessment (EA).
After public comments are received on a completed petition, APHIS
evaluates those comments and then provides a second opportunity for
public involvement in our decisionmaking process. According to our
public review process (see footnote 1), the second opportunity for
public involvement follows one of two approaches, as described below.
If APHIS decides, based on its review of the petition and its
evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public
comment period on the petition, that the petition involves a GE
organism that raises no substantive new issues, APHIS will follow
Approach 1 for public involvement. Under Approach 1, APHIS announces in
the Federal Register the availability of APHIS' preliminary regulatory
determination along with its EA, preliminary finding of no significant
impact (FONSI), and its plant pest risk assessment (PPRA) for a 30-day
public review period. APHIS will evaluate any information received
related to the petition and its supporting documents during the 30-day
public review period.
Alternatively, if APHIS decides, based on its review of the
petition and its evaluation and analysis of comments received during
the 60-day public comment period on the petition, that the petition
involves a GE organism that raises substantive new issues, APHIS will
follow Approach 2. Under Approach 2, APHIS first solicits written
comments from the public on a draft EA and PPRA for a 30-day comment
period through the publication of a Federal Register notice. Then,
after reviewing and evaluating the comments on the draft EA and PPRA
and other information, APHIS will revise the PPRA as necessary and
prepare a final EA and, based on the final EA, a National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) decision document (either a FONSI or a notice of
intent to prepare an environmental impact statement). For this
petition, we are using Approach 2.
APHIS has prepared a PPRA to determine if apple events GD743 and
GS784 are unlikely to pose a plant pest risk. In section 403 of the
Plant Protection Act, ``plant pest'' is defined as any living stage of
any of the following that can directly or indirectly injure, cause
damage to, or cause disease in any plant or plant product: A protozoan,
a nonhuman animal, a parasitic plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a virus or
viroid, an infectious agent or other pathogen, or any article similar
to or allied with any of the foregoing.
APHIS has also prepared a draft EA in which we present two
alternatives based on our analysis of data submitted by Okanagan, a
review of other scientific data, field tests conducted under APHIS
oversight, and comments received on the petition. APHIS is considering
the following alternatives: (1) Take no action, i.e., APHIS would not
change the regulatory status of apple events GD743 and GS784 and they
would continue to be regulated articles, or (2) make a determination of
nonregulated status of apple events GD743 and GS784.
The EA was prepared in accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental
Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR Part
1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR Part 372).
In accordance with our process for soliciting public input when
considering petitions for determinations of nonregulated status for GE
organisms, we are publishing this notice to inform the public that
APHIS will accept written comments on our PPRA and draft EA regarding
the petition for a determination of nonregulated status from interested
or affected persons for a period of 30 days from the date of this
notice. Copies of the PPRA and draft EA, as well as the previously
published petition, are available as indicated in the ADDRESSES and FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT sections of this notice.
As noted previously, after the comment period closes, APHIS will
review all written comments received during the comment period and any
other relevant information. After reviewing and evaluating the comments
on the draft EA and PPRA and other information, APHIS will revise the
PPRA as necessary and prepare a final EA. Based on the final EA, APHIS
will prepare a NEPA decision document (either a FONSI or a notice of
intent to prepare an environmental impact statement).
If a FONSI is reached, APHIS will furnish a response to the
petitioner, either approving or denying the petition. APHIS will also
publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the regulatory
status of the GE organism and the availability of APHIS' final EA,
PPRA, FONSI, and our regulatory determination.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of November 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-26792 Filed 11-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P