Environmental Impact Statement; Animal Carcass Management, 63959-63960 [2013-25158]
Download as PDF
63959
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 207
Friday, October 25, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37
CFR 404.7.
Robert Griesbach,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–25169 Filed 10–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
Agricultural Research Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0044]
Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive
License
Environmental Impact Statement;
Animal Carcass Management
AGENCY:
Agricultural Research Service,
USDA.
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service, intends
to grant to EPG Technologies, Inc. of
Gainesville, Florida, an exclusive
license to U.S. Patent No. 8,004,292,
‘‘ELECTRICAL PENETRATION GRAPH
SYSTEM,’’ issued on August 23, 2011.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before November 25, 2013.
DATES:
Send comments to: USDA,
ARS, Office of Technology Transfer,
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4–1174,
Beltsville, Maryland 20705–5131.
ADDRESSES:
June
Blalock of the Office of Technology
Transfer at the Beltsville address given
above; telephone: 301–504–5989.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Federal Government’s patent rights in
this invention are assigned to the United
States of America, as represented by the
Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the
public interest to so license this
invention as EPG Technologies, Inc. of
Gainesville, Florida has submitted a
complete and sufficient application for
a license. The prospective exclusive
license will be royalty-bearing and will
comply with the terms and conditions
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The
prospective exclusive license may be
granted unless, within thirty (30) days
from the date of this published Notice,
the Agricultural Research Service
receives written evidence and argument
which establishes that the grant of the
license would not be consistent with the
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:55 Oct 24, 2013
Jkt 232001
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement and
proposed scope of study.
AGENCY:
We are announcing to the
public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service intends to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to
examine the potential environmental
effects of animal carcass management
options used throughout the United
States. This notice identifies potential
alternatives and environmental effects
that will be examined in the EIS and
requests that the public comment on
these proposed alternatives and
environmental effects and identify other
issues that could be examined in the
EIS.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before November
25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0044;0001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2013–0044, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0044 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions related to the carcass
management program, contact Ms. Lori
P. Miller, PE, Senior Staff Officer,
National Center for Animal Health
Emergency Management, VS, APHIS,
4700 River Road Unit 41, Riverdale, MD
20737; (301) 851–3512. For questions
related to the EIS, contact Ms. Samantha
Floyd, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Environmental and Risk
Analysis Services, PPD, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 149, Riverdale, MD
20737; (301) 851–3053.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Animal Health Protection Act (7
U.S.C. 8301 et seq.) authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to order the
destruction or removal of animals to
prevent the introduction and spread of
livestock pests or diseases. Large
numbers of animals and carcasses may
need to be disposed of or otherwise
managed during or after an animal
health emergency. Examples of an
animal health emergency include, but
are not limited to, an outbreak of a
foreign animal disease, a natural
disaster, or the introduction of a
chemical or radiological agent. As
carcasses begin to degrade, bodily
fluids, chemical and biological leachate
components, and hazardous gases such
as methane are released into the
environment, potentially impacting the
health and safety of surrounding
humans, livestock, and wildlife.
Therefore, the management of large
numbers of carcasses during an animal
health emergency must be timely, safe,
biosecure, aesthetically acceptable, and
environmentally responsible.
Current Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) regulations
regarding carcass management,
including those found in 9 CFR 53.4, are
based on World Organization for
Animal Health (OIE) recommendations
and sound science. APHIS regulations
specify that animals infected by or
exposed to foot-and mouth disease,
pleuropneumonia, rinderpest, and
certain other communicable diseases of
livestock or poultry are required to be
disposed of by burial or burning, unless
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
63960
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2013 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
otherwise specified by the APHIS
Administrator. Traditionally, burial has
involved placement of carcasses in
unlined pits or trenches, and burning
has involved open pyres (i.e.,
combustible heaps). APHIS may work in
conjunction with States to manage
animal carcasses during or after an
animal health emergency. However,
State regulations concerning carcass
management vary, and Federal and State
regulations are not always based on the
most current scientific information with
regard to impacts of such activities on
the environment and public health.
Environmental Impact Statement
To examine the potential
environmental effects of animal carcass
management options used throughout
the United States, APHIS is preparing
an environmental impact statement
(EIS). The EIS will analyze and compare
all major and readily available mass
carcass management options that may
be utilized during an animal health
emergency. APHIS is considering
classifying mass carcass management as
management of 50 tons or more of
biomass per premises. In the EIS, we
intend to compare unlined burial and
open-air burning disposal methods with
other available carcass management
options. These may include composting
(on- or off-site), rendering, landfills
compliant with the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
and other fixed facility options, such as
incinerators compliant with the Clean
Air Act, that could accommodate a large
volume of carcasses over a short period
of time.
The findings of the EIS will be used
for planning and decisionmaking and to
inform the public about the potential
environmental effects of currently
available carcass management options.
Additionally, when mass carcass
management options are utilized, sitespecific environmental documents may
be required. If such documents are
needed, APHIS may use information
presented and analyzed in the EIS,
which will help APHIS to promptly
fulfill its environmental compliance
obligations when an emergency
situation arises requiring immediate
action.
We are requesting public comment to
help us identify or confirm potential
alternatives and environmental effects,
as well as any other issues, that could
and should be examined in the EIS. The
EIS will be prepared in accordance
with: (1) The National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations
of the Council on Environmental
Quality for implementing the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:55 Oct 24, 2013
Jkt 232001
procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508), (3) USDA regulations
implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b),
and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing
Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of
October 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
Alternatives
[FR Doc. 2013–25158 Filed 10–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
We have identified the following
alternatives for further examination in
the EIS:
Take no action. Under the no action
alternative, existing APHIS regulations
that recommend unlined burial and
open-air burning will be used as the
baseline against which alternative
carcass management methods may be
compared. This action does not involve
changes to the current situation.
Alternative action. Under the
alternative action, APHIS is considering
alternatives in addition to unlined
burial and open-air burning as carcass
management options. Alternative
actions may include one or some
combination of the following:
Composting (on- or off-site), rendering,
RCRA-compliant landfills, and other
fixed facility options, such as
incinerators compliant with the Clean
Air Act.
Environmental Effects for
Consideration
We have identified the following
potential environmental effects for
examination in the EIS. We are
requesting that the public comment on
them during the scoping period:
• Effects on soil, air, and water
quality.
• Effects on humans:
• Health and safety.
• Agricultural lands.
• Industries and the economy.
• Public perception.
• Cultural and historic resources.
• Effects on wildlife populations,
including effects on federally listed
threatened and endangered species.
• Effects on plant populations,
including effects on federally listed
threatened and endangered species.
Comments that identify other issues
or alternatives that could be considered
for examination in the EIS would be
especially helpful. All comments
received during the scoping period will
be carefully considered in developing
the final scope of the EIS. Upon
completion of the draft EIS, a notice
announcing its availability and an
opportunity to comment on it will be
published in the Federal Register.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Notice of Intent To Request Revision
and Extension of a Currently Approved
Information Collection
National Agricultural Statistics
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the intention of the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) to request revision and
extension of a currently approved
information collection, the Agricultural
Surveys Program. Revision to burden
hours will be needed due to changes in
the size of the target population,
sampling design, and/or questionnaire
length.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by December 24, 2013 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number 0535–0213,
by any of the following methods:
• Email: ombofficer@nass.usda.gov.
Include docket number above in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 720–6396.
• Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD–
ROM submissions to: David Hancock,
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Room 5336
South Building, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
2024.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand
deliver to: David Hancock, NASS
Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 5336 South Building,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph T. Reilly, Associate
Administrator, National Agricultural
Statistics Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, (202) 720–4333. Copies of
this information collection and related
instructions can be obtained without
charge from David Hancock, NASS
Clearance Officer, at (202) 690–2388.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Agricultural Surveys Program.
OMB Control Number: 0535–0213.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63959-63960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25158]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2013-0044]
Environmental Impact Statement; Animal Carcass Management
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement
and proposed scope of study.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing to the public that the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service intends to prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to examine the potential environmental effects of
animal carcass management options used throughout the United States.
This notice identifies potential alternatives and environmental effects
that will be examined in the EIS and requests that the public comment
on these proposed alternatives and environmental effects and identify
other issues that could be examined in the EIS.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
November 25, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2013-0044-;0001.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2013-0044, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2013-
0044 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions related to the carcass
management program, contact Ms. Lori P. Miller, PE, Senior Staff
Officer, National Center for Animal Health Emergency Management, VS,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 41, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851-3512.
For questions related to the EIS, contact Ms. Samantha Floyd,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Environmental and Risk Analysis
Services, PPD, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 149, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851-3053.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.) authorizes
the Secretary of Agriculture to order the destruction or removal of
animals to prevent the introduction and spread of livestock pests or
diseases. Large numbers of animals and carcasses may need to be
disposed of or otherwise managed during or after an animal health
emergency. Examples of an animal health emergency include, but are not
limited to, an outbreak of a foreign animal disease, a natural
disaster, or the introduction of a chemical or radiological agent. As
carcasses begin to degrade, bodily fluids, chemical and biological
leachate components, and hazardous gases such as methane are released
into the environment, potentially impacting the health and safety of
surrounding humans, livestock, and wildlife. Therefore, the management
of large numbers of carcasses during an animal health emergency must be
timely, safe, biosecure, aesthetically acceptable, and environmentally
responsible.
Current Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
regulations regarding carcass management, including those found in 9
CFR 53.4, are based on World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)
recommendations and sound science. APHIS regulations specify that
animals infected by or exposed to foot-and mouth disease,
pleuropneumonia, rinderpest, and certain other communicable diseases of
livestock or poultry are required to be disposed of by burial or
burning, unless
[[Page 63960]]
otherwise specified by the APHIS Administrator. Traditionally, burial
has involved placement of carcasses in unlined pits or trenches, and
burning has involved open pyres (i.e., combustible heaps). APHIS may
work in conjunction with States to manage animal carcasses during or
after an animal health emergency. However, State regulations concerning
carcass management vary, and Federal and State regulations are not
always based on the most current scientific information with regard to
impacts of such activities on the environment and public health.
Environmental Impact Statement
To examine the potential environmental effects of animal carcass
management options used throughout the United States, APHIS is
preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS). The EIS will analyze
and compare all major and readily available mass carcass management
options that may be utilized during an animal health emergency. APHIS
is considering classifying mass carcass management as management of 50
tons or more of biomass per premises. In the EIS, we intend to compare
unlined burial and open-air burning disposal methods with other
available carcass management options. These may include composting (on-
or off-site), rendering, landfills compliant with the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and other fixed facility options,
such as incinerators compliant with the Clean Air Act, that could
accommodate a large volume of carcasses over a short period of time.
The findings of the EIS will be used for planning and
decisionmaking and to inform the public about the potential
environmental effects of currently available carcass management
options. Additionally, when mass carcass management options are
utilized, site-specific environmental documents may be required. If
such documents are needed, APHIS may use information presented and
analyzed in the EIS, which will help APHIS to promptly fulfill its
environmental compliance obligations when an emergency situation arises
requiring immediate action.
We are requesting public comment to help us identify or confirm
potential alternatives and environmental effects, as well as any other
issues, that could and should be examined in the EIS. The EIS will be
prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of
the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural
provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations
implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing
Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
Alternatives
We have identified the following alternatives for further
examination in the EIS:
Take no action. Under the no action alternative, existing APHIS
regulations that recommend unlined burial and open-air burning will be
used as the baseline against which alternative carcass management
methods may be compared. This action does not involve changes to the
current situation.
Alternative action. Under the alternative action, APHIS is
considering alternatives in addition to unlined burial and open-air
burning as carcass management options. Alternative actions may include
one or some combination of the following: Composting (on- or off-site),
rendering, RCRA-compliant landfills, and other fixed facility options,
such as incinerators compliant with the Clean Air Act.
Environmental Effects for Consideration
We have identified the following potential environmental effects
for examination in the EIS. We are requesting that the public comment
on them during the scoping period:
Effects on soil, air, and water quality.
Effects on humans:
Health and safety.
Agricultural lands.
Industries and the economy.
Public perception.
Cultural and historic resources.
Effects on wildlife populations, including effects on
federally listed threatened and endangered species.
Effects on plant populations, including effects on
federally listed threatened and endangered species.
Comments that identify other issues or alternatives that could be
considered for examination in the EIS would be especially helpful. All
comments received during the scoping period will be carefully
considered in developing the final scope of the EIS. Upon completion of
the draft EIS, a notice announcing its availability and an opportunity
to comment on it will be published in the Federal Register.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301-8317; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of October 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-25158 Filed 10-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P