Bayer CropScience LP; Determination of Nonregulated Status of Soybean Genetically Engineered for Herbicide Resistance, 51706-51707 [2013-20380]
Download as PDF
51706
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 162
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0029]
Bayer CropScience LP; Determination
of Nonregulated Status of Soybean
Genetically Engineered for Herbicide
Resistance
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our determination that a soybean line
developed by Bayer CropScience LP
(Bayer), designated as event FG72,
which has been genetically engineered
for resistance to the herbicides
glyphosate and isoxaflutole, is no longer
considered a regulated article under our
regulations governing the introduction
of certain genetically engineered
organisms. Our determination is based
on our evaluation of data submitted by
Bayer in its petition for a determination
of nonregulated status, our analysis of
available scientific data, and comments
received from the public in response to
our previous notice announcing the
availability of the petition for
nonregulated status and its associated
environmental assessment and plant
pest risk assessment. This notice also
announces the availability of our
written determination and finding of no
significant impact.
DATES: Effective Date: August 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may read the
documents referenced in this notice and
the comments we received in our
reading room. The reading room is
located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming. Those documents are also
available on the Internet at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/not_
reg.html under APHIS Petition Number
09–328–01p and are posted with the
previous notice and the comments we
received on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0029.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Rebecca Stankiewicz Gabel, Chief,
Biotechnology Environmental Analysis
Branch, Environmental Risk Analysis
Programs, Biotechnology Regulatory
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301)
851–3927, email: rebecca.l.stankiewiczgabel@aphis.usda.gov. To obtain copies
of the petition, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at
(301) 851–3892, email: cynthia.a.eck@
aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340,
‘‘Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through
Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant
Pests or Which There Is Reason to
Believe Are Plant Pests,’’ regulate,
among other things, the introduction
(importation, interstate movement, or
release into the environment) of
organisms and products altered or
produced through genetic engineering
that are plant pests or that there is
reason to believe are plant pests. Such
genetically engineered organisms and
products are considered ‘‘regulated
articles.’’
The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide
that any person may submit a petition
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR part 340.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6
describe the form that a petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must
be included in the petition.
APHIS received a petition (APHIS
Petition Number 09–328–01p) from
Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer), seeking a
determination of nonregulated status of
soybean designated as event FG72,
which has been genetically engineered
for resistance to the herbicides
glyphosate and isoxaflutole. The
petition states that this soybean is
unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
therefore, should not be a regulated
article under APHIS’ regulations in 7
CFR part 340.
In a notice 1 published in the Federal
Register on July 13, 2012 (77 FR 41358–
41359, Docket No. APHIS–2012–0029),
APHIS announced the availability of the
Bayer petition, a plant pest risk
assessment (PPRA), and a draft
environmental assessment (EA) for
public comment. APHIS solicited
comments on the petition, whether the
subject soybean is likely to pose a plant
pest risk, the draft EA, and the PPRA for
60 days ending on September 11, 2012.
APHIS received 80 comments during
the comment period. Several of these
comments included electronic
attachments consisting of a consolidated
document of many identical or nearly
identical letters, for a total of 5,096
comments. Issues raised during the
comment period include the potential
effects of FG72 on human health,
animals, and nontarget organisms;
herbicide use changes; and economic
costs of herbicide-resistant weeds.
APHIS has addressed the issues raised
during the comment period and has
provided responses to comments as an
attachment to the finding of no
significant impact.
National Environmental Policy Act
To provide the public with
documentation of APHIS’ review and
analysis of any potential environmental
impacts associated with the
determination of nonregulated status of
Bayer’s soybean event FG72, an EA has
been prepared. The EA was prepared in
accordance with: (1) The National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2)
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). Based on our EA, the response to
public comments, and other pertinent
scientific data, APHIS has reached a
finding of no significant impact with
regard to the preferred alternative
identified in the EA.
1 To view the notice, petition, draft EA, the PPRA,
and the comments we received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2012-0029.
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 / Notices
Determination
The meeting will be held
September 18, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
DATES:
Based on APHIS’ analysis of field and
laboratory data submitted by Bayer,
references provided in the petition,
peer-reviewed publications, information
analyzed in the EA, the PPRA,
comments provided by the public, and
information provided in APHIS’
response to those public comments,
APHIS has determined that Bayer’s
soybean event FG72 is unlikely to pose
a plant pest risk. We have, therefore,
determined that Bayer’s soybean event
FG72 is no longer subject to our
regulations governing the introduction
of certain genetically engineered
organisms.
Copies of the signed determination
document, as well as copies of the
petition, PPRA, EA, finding of no
significant impact, and response to
comments are available as indicated in
the ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT sections of this
notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
August 2013.
Michael Gregoire,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–20380 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
The meeting will be held at
the USDA Service Center, 3644 Avtech
Parkway, Redding, California; in
conference rooms A and B. Written
comments may be submitted as
described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at the USDA
Service Center, 3644 Avtech Parkway,
Redding, California. Please call ahead to
facilitate entry into the building to view
comments.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary St. John, RAC Assistant, at 530–
351–3154 or maryst.john@hotmail.com.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday. Please make requests in
advance for sign language interpreting,
assistive listening devices or other
reasonable accomodation for access to
the facility or procedings by contacting
the person listed For Further
Information.
The
meeting agenda is available at https://
www.fs.usda.gov/main/stnf/
workingtogether/advisorycommittees.
Anyone who would like to bring related
matters to the attention of the committee
may file written statements with the
committee staff before or after the
meeting. The agenda will include time
for people to make oral statements of
three minutes or less. Individuals
wishing to make an oral statement
should request in writing by September
2, 2013 to be scheduled on the agenda.
Written comments and requests for time
for oral comments must be sent to
Donna Harmon, USDA Service Center,
3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding,
California 96002 or by email to
dharmon@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to
530–226–2486.
A summary of the meeting will be
posted at the RAC Web site listed above
within 21 days of the meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shasta County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Shasta County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Redding, CA. The committee is
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343)
(the Act) and operates in compliance
with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act. The purpose of the committee is to
improve collaborative relationships and
to provide advice and recommendations
to the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with the title II
of the Act. The meeting is open to the
public. The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss the monitoring of past projects,
and to discuss and vote on
recommendations for the use of funds
from the Secure Rural Schools second
one-year extension to the 2008–2011
RAC authorization.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:29 Aug 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dated: August 15, 2013.
Donna F. Harmon,
Designated Federal Official, Shasta-Trinity
National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2013–20364 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51707
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–40–2013]
Foreign-Trade Zone 59—Lincoln,
Nebraska; Authorization of Production
Activity; CNH America, LLC; Subzone
59B (Agricultural Equipment
Production); Grand Island, Nebraska
On April 17, 2013, the LincolnForeign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ
59, submitted a notification of proposed
production activity to the Foreign-Trade
Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of CNH
America, LLC, within Subzone 59B, in
Grand Island, Nebraska.
The notification was processed in
accordance with the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including
notice in the Federal Register inviting
public comment (78 FR 27953, 05–13–
2013). The FTZ Board has determined
that no further review of the activity is
warranted at this time. The production
activity described in the notification is
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.14.
Dated: August 15, 2013.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–20445 Filed 8–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–839]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
the Republic of Korea: Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber (polyester staple
fiber) from the Republic of Korea
(Korea) for the period May 1, 2012,
through April 30, 2013, based on the
withdrawal of requests for review.
DATES: Effective Date: August 21, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Shuler, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51706-51707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20380]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 21, 2013 /
Notices
[[Page 51706]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0029]
Bayer CropScience LP; Determination of Nonregulated Status of
Soybean Genetically Engineered for Herbicide Resistance
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public of our determination that a soybean
line developed by Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer), designated as event
FG72, which has been genetically engineered for resistance to the
herbicides glyphosate and isoxaflutole, is no longer considered a
regulated article under our regulations governing the introduction of
certain genetically engineered organisms. Our determination is based on
our evaluation of data submitted by Bayer in its petition for a
determination of nonregulated status, our analysis of available
scientific data, and comments received from the public in response to
our previous notice announcing the availability of the petition for
nonregulated status and its associated environmental assessment and
plant pest risk assessment. This notice also announces the availability
of our written determination and finding of no significant impact.
DATES: Effective Date: August 21, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may read the documents referenced in this notice and the
comments we received in our reading room. The reading room is located
in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone
is there to help you, please call (202) 799-7039 before coming. Those
documents are also available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/not_reg.html under APHIS Petition
Number 09-328-01p and are posted with the previous notice and the
comments we received on the Regulations.gov Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0029.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Rebecca Stankiewicz Gabel, Chief,
Biotechnology Environmental Analysis Branch, Environmental Risk
Analysis Programs, Biotechnology Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 851-3927, email:
rebecca.l.stankiewicz-gabel@aphis.usda.gov. To obtain copies of the
petition, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at (301) 851-3892, email:
cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are
Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,''
regulate, among other things, the introduction (importation, interstate
movement, or release into the environment) of organisms and products
altered or produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or
that there is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically
engineered organisms and products are considered ``regulated
articles.''
The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated
under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 340.6 describe
the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must be included in the petition.
APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition Number 09-328-01p) from
Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer), seeking a determination of nonregulated
status of soybean designated as event FG72, which has been genetically
engineered for resistance to the herbicides glyphosate and
isoxaflutole. The petition states that this soybean is unlikely to pose
a plant pest risk and, therefore, should not be a regulated article
under APHIS' regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
In a notice \1\ published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2012
(77 FR 41358-41359, Docket No. APHIS-2012-0029), APHIS announced the
availability of the Bayer petition, a plant pest risk assessment
(PPRA), and a draft environmental assessment (EA) for public comment.
APHIS solicited comments on the petition, whether the subject soybean
is likely to pose a plant pest risk, the draft EA, and the PPRA for 60
days ending on September 11, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the notice, petition, draft EA, the PPRA, and the
comments we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0029.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APHIS received 80 comments during the comment period. Several of
these comments included electronic attachments consisting of a
consolidated document of many identical or nearly identical letters,
for a total of 5,096 comments. Issues raised during the comment period
include the potential effects of FG72 on human health, animals, and
nontarget organisms; herbicide use changes; and economic costs of
herbicide-resistant weeds. APHIS has addressed the issues raised during
the comment period and has provided responses to comments as an
attachment to the finding of no significant impact.
National Environmental Policy Act
To provide the public with documentation of APHIS' review and
analysis of any potential environmental impacts associated with the
determination of nonregulated status of Bayer's soybean event FG72, an
EA has been prepared. The EA was prepared in accordance with: (1) The
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-
1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4)
APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372). Based on our EA,
the response to public comments, and other pertinent scientific data,
APHIS has reached a finding of no significant impact with regard to the
preferred alternative identified in the EA.
[[Page 51707]]
Determination
Based on APHIS' analysis of field and laboratory data submitted by
Bayer, references provided in the petition, peer-reviewed publications,
information analyzed in the EA, the PPRA, comments provided by the
public, and information provided in APHIS' response to those public
comments, APHIS has determined that Bayer's soybean event FG72 is
unlikely to pose a plant pest risk. We have, therefore, determined that
Bayer's soybean event FG72 is no longer subject to our regulations
governing the introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms.
Copies of the signed determination document, as well as copies of
the petition, PPRA, EA, finding of no significant impact, and response
to comments are available as indicated in the ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT sections of this notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day of August 2013.
Michael Gregoire,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-20380 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P