Wildlife Services Policy on Wildlife Damage Management in Urban Areas, 49445-49446 [2013-19831]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
and West Virginia. Based on its finding
of no significant impact, the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has
determined that an environmental
impact statement need not be prepared.
Mr.
Richard Chipman, Rabies Program
Coordinator, Wildlife Services, APHIS,
59 Chennell Drive, Suite 7, Concord, NH
03301; (603) 223–9623. To obtain copies
of the supplement to the environmental
assessment or finding of no significant
impact, contact Ms. Beth Kabert,
Environmental Coordinator, Wildlife
Services, 140–C Locust Grove Road,
Pittstown, NJ 08867; (908) 735–5654, fax
(908) 735–0821, email:
beth.e.kabert@aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Wildlife Services (WS) program
of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) cooperates
with Federal agencies, State and local
governments, and private individuals to
research and implement the best
methods of managing conflicts between
wildlife and human health and safety,
agriculture, property, and natural
resources. Wildlife-borne diseases that
can affect domestic animals and humans
are among the types of conflicts that
APHIS–WS addresses. Wildlife is the
dominant reservoir of rabies in the
United States.
On August 16, 2012, APHIS–WS
published in the Federal Register (77
FR 49409–49410, Docket No. APHIS–
2012–0052) a notice 1 announcing the
availability of an environmental
assessment (EA) and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) pertaining to
the potential environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of a
field trial to test the safety and efficacy
of an experimental oral rabies vaccine
for wildlife in New Hampshire, New
York, Ohio, Vermont, and West
Virginia. Based on the FONSI, we
determined that an environmental
impact statement need not be prepared.
On June 5, 2013, we published in the
Federal Register (78 FR 33798–33799,
Docket No. APHIS–2013–0046) a
notice 2 in which we announced the
availability, for public review and
comment, of a supplement to the earlier
1 To view the notice, the EA and the comments
we received on it, and the FONSI, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012
-0052. The comments, and APHIS’ responses to the
comments, are presented in an appendix to the EA.
2 To view the June 2013 notice, the comment we
received on it, and the supplement to the EA, go
to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=APHIS-2013-0046.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
EA. Our objectives in issuing the
supplement to the EA were as follows:
• To examine the potential
environmental impacts of expanding the
geographic range of the field trial zone
in New York;
• To examine the potential
environmental impacts of the field trial
in relation to new information that has
become available from public
comments, research findings, and data
gathering since the issuance of the 2012
FONSI;
• To clearly communicate to the
public our analysis of the individual
and cumulative impacts of the field trial
since 2012; and
• To document our analysis of our
field-trial activities in New Hampshire,
New York, Ohio, Vermont, and West
Virginia since the 2012 FONSI was
issued to ensure that program activities
remain within the impact parameters
analyzed in the original EA.
We solicited comments on the
supplement to the EA for 30 days
ending July 5, 2013. We received one
comment by that date. It was from a
private citizen who had already
submitted five comments on the original
EA. The comment contained no new
information.
In this document, we are advising the
public of the availability of an updated
FONSI regarding the potential
environmental impact associated with
our oral rabies vaccine field trial. The
finding, which is based on the EA and
the supplement to the EA, reflects our
determination that the distribution of
this experimental wildlife rabies
vaccine will not have a significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment.
The supplement to the EA and the
updated FONSI may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see footnote
2) or in our reading room, which is
located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming.
This notice and the supplemental
environmental assessment are also
posted on the APHIS Web site at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/regulations/ws/ws_
nepa_environmental_documents.shtml.
In addition, copies may be obtained
from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
The supplement to the EA and FONSI
have been prepared in accordance with:
(1) The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49445
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); (2) regulations of
the Council on Environmental Quality
for implementing the procedural
provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–
1508); (3) USDA regulations
implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b);
and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing
Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
August 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–19835 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2013–0056]
Wildlife Services Policy on Wildlife
Damage Management in Urban Areas
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service’s Wildlife Services
(APHIS–WS) program is making a
policy decision on how to define ‘‘urban
rodent control,’’ as referred to in the Act
of December 22, 1987. This action is
necessary to make it clearer when
APHIS–WS may or may not conduct
activities and enter into agreements in
order to control nuisance rodent species
or those rodent species that are
reservoirs for zoonotic diseases.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
William H. Clay, Deputy Administrator,
Wildlife Services, APHIS, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, 20250; 202–799–7095.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Wildlife is a publicly owned natural
resource in the United States, and State
and Federal wildlife agencies have an
affirmative duty and responsibility to
administer, protect, manage and
conserve fish and wildlife. The mission
of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service’s Wildlife Services
(APHIS–WS) program is to provide
Federal leadership in managing
problems caused by wildlife. This
includes determining and implementing
both research of and methods for
controlling animal species that are
injurious to agriculture, horticulture,
forestry, animal husbandry, endangered
and threatened species, other natural
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49446
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 14, 2013 / Notices
resources, property, and that create a
risk to human health and safety. To this
end, APHIS–WS cooperates with
Federal agencies, State and local
governments, and private individuals to
research and implement the best
methods of managing conflicts between
wildlife and human health and safety,
agriculture, property, and natural
resources.
Under the Act of December 22, 1987
(7 U.S.C. 426c), APHIS–WS is
authorized, except for urban rodent
control, to conduct activities and enter
into agreements to control nuisance bird
and mammal species or those bird and
mammal species that are reservoirs of
zoonotic diseases. While the Act makes
an exception for urban rodent control, it
does not define the term. This has led
to confusion about when APHIS–WS
may provide wildlife damage control
assistance and has created an overlap in
services with private sector pest control
companies in urban and suburban areas.
The term ‘‘rodent’’ refers to the group
of mammals that includes rats, mice,
chipmunks, squirrels, porcupines, and
groundhogs, among other species.
Therefore, to maximize Federal
resources and reduce duplication of
services, we are considering ‘‘urban
rodent control,’’ for the purposes of
activities authorized by the Act of
December 22, 1987, to mean actions to
directly control mice, rats, voles,
squirrels, chipmunks, gophers, and
woodchucks/groundhogs in a city or
town with a population greater than
50,000 inhabitants, as well as the
urbanized area contiguous and adjacent
to such a city or town.
There are some categories of actions
for which APHIS will continue to
consider requests for operational
assistance. Specifically, actions
involving Federal agencies; government
entities engaged in a cooperative service
agreement with APHIS to provide direct
control of rodents as of October 1, 2013;
a State in which direct control of the
rodent species has been expressly
authorized by State law, rulemaking, or
a local jurisdiction’s ordinance
promulgated by public notice and an
opportunity for public comment or as
otherwise promulgated as required and
authorized by the respective State or
local law; and railways and airport air
sides areas are excluded from this
definition. Otherwise, APHIS will refer
all requests for operational assistance
with urban rodent control from private
entities such as home and business
owners and associations to private
sector pest control companies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Aug 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–19831 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Lyon-Mineral County Resource
Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Lyon-Mineral County
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
will meet in Yerrington, Nevada. The
RAC is meeting as authorized under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110–
343) and in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The RAC’s
purpose is to improve collaborative
relationships and to provide advice and
recommendations to the Forest Service
concerning projects and funding
consisent with Title II of the Act. The
meeting is open to the public. The
purpose of the meeting is to discuss the
reduced funding and possible
distribution for the 5th year Title II
projects.
DATES: The meetings will be held at
10:00 a.m. on the following dates:
• September 3rd, 2013
• September 11th, 2013
• September 25th, 2013
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the Commissioners Meeting Room, Lyon
County Administration Complex, 27
South Main Street, Yerington, Nevada.
Written comments may be submitted as
described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at https://
fs.usda.gov/goto/htnf/rac.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Crawley, RAC Designated Federal
Official, Bridgeport Ranger District,
760–932–7070.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday. Please make requests in
advance for sign language interpreting,
assistive listening devices, or other
reasonable accomodation for access to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the facility or procedings by contacting
the person listed FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following business will be conducted at
the meetings: (1) Discussion of reduced
5th year funding and possible
distribution for Title II projects; and (2)
Public Comments. Persons who wish to
bring related matters to the attention of
the Committee may file written
statements with the Committee staff
before or after the meeting. The agenda
will include time for people to make
oral statements of three minutes or less.
Individuals wishing to make an oral
statement should request in writing by
August 30th to be scheduled on the
agenda.
Written comments and requests for
time for oral comments must be sent to
Mike Crawley, RAC Designated Federal
Officer, Bridgeport Ranger District,
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, HC
62 Box 1000, Bridgeport, CA 93517, or
by email to mcrawley@fs.fed.us or via
facsimile to 760–932–5899.
Dated: August 5, 2013.
William A. Dunkelberger,
Forest Supervisor, Humboldt-Toiyabe
National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2013–19752 Filed 8–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Notice of Funds Availability for the
Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance
Program for Fiscal Year 2013
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This Notice announces the
funds available for loans and grants
under the Rural Microentrepreneur
Assistance Program (RMAP) pursuant to
7 CFR part 4280, subpart D for fiscal
year (FY) 2013.
SUMMARY:
Total Funding: $12,224,613.35
Technical Assistance (TA) Only Grants:
$300,000
Microlender TA Grants: $1,209,696.97
Loans: $10,714,916.38
The minimum loan amount a
Microenterprise Development
Organization (MDO) may borrow under
this program is $50,000. The maximum
loan any MDO may borrower in any
given year is $500,000. The maximum
amount of Technical Assistance (TA)only grants in FY 2013 is $30,000 per
grantee and total TA-only grants
funding will not exceed 10 percent of
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49445-49446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19831]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2013-0056]
Wildlife Services Policy on Wildlife Damage Management in Urban
Areas
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service's Wildlife Services (APHIS-WS) program is making a
policy decision on how to define ``urban rodent control,'' as referred
to in the Act of December 22, 1987. This action is necessary to make it
clearer when APHIS-WS may or may not conduct activities and enter into
agreements in order to control nuisance rodent species or those rodent
species that are reservoirs for zoonotic diseases.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William H. Clay, Deputy
Administrator, Wildlife Services, APHIS, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, 20250; 202-799-7095.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Wildlife is a publicly owned natural resource in the United States,
and State and Federal wildlife agencies have an affirmative duty and
responsibility to administer, protect, manage and conserve fish and
wildlife. The mission of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service's Wildlife Services (APHIS-WS) program is to provide Federal
leadership in managing problems caused by wildlife. This includes
determining and implementing both research of and methods for
controlling animal species that are injurious to agriculture,
horticulture, forestry, animal husbandry, endangered and threatened
species, other natural
[[Page 49446]]
resources, property, and that create a risk to human health and safety.
To this end, APHIS-WS cooperates with Federal agencies, State and local
governments, and private individuals to research and implement the best
methods of managing conflicts between wildlife and human health and
safety, agriculture, property, and natural resources.
Under the Act of December 22, 1987 (7 U.S.C. 426c), APHIS-WS is
authorized, except for urban rodent control, to conduct activities and
enter into agreements to control nuisance bird and mammal species or
those bird and mammal species that are reservoirs of zoonotic diseases.
While the Act makes an exception for urban rodent control, it does not
define the term. This has led to confusion about when APHIS-WS may
provide wildlife damage control assistance and has created an overlap
in services with private sector pest control companies in urban and
suburban areas.
The term ``rodent'' refers to the group of mammals that includes
rats, mice, chipmunks, squirrels, porcupines, and groundhogs, among
other species. Therefore, to maximize Federal resources and reduce
duplication of services, we are considering ``urban rodent control,''
for the purposes of activities authorized by the Act of December 22,
1987, to mean actions to directly control mice, rats, voles, squirrels,
chipmunks, gophers, and woodchucks/groundhogs in a city or town with a
population greater than 50,000 inhabitants, as well as the urbanized
area contiguous and adjacent to such a city or town.
There are some categories of actions for which APHIS will continue
to consider requests for operational assistance. Specifically, actions
involving Federal agencies; government entities engaged in a
cooperative service agreement with APHIS to provide direct control of
rodents as of October 1, 2013; a State in which direct control of the
rodent species has been expressly authorized by State law, rulemaking,
or a local jurisdiction's ordinance promulgated by public notice and an
opportunity for public comment or as otherwise promulgated as required
and authorized by the respective State or local law; and railways and
airport air sides areas are excluded from this definition. Otherwise,
APHIS will refer all requests for operational assistance with urban
rodent control from private entities such as home and business owners
and associations to private sector pest control companies.
Done in Washington, DC, this 12th day of 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-19831 Filed 8-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P