Importation of Papayas From Peru, 48628-48631 [2013-19314]
Download as PDF
48628
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 154
Friday, August 9, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0014]
RIN 0579–AD68
Importation of Papayas From Peru
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We are proposing to allow,
under certain conditions, the
importation of commercial
consignments of fresh papayas from
Peru into the continental United States.
The conditions for the importation of
papayas from Peru would include
requirements for approved production
locations; field sanitation; hot water
treatment; procedures for packing and
shipping the papayas; and fruit fly
trapping in papaya production areas.
This action would allow for the
importation of papayas from Peru while
continuing to provide protection against
the introduction of quarantine pests into
the continental United States.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before October 8,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-00140001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS-2012-0014, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0014 or
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1141 of the USDA South
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Dorothy Wayson, Senior Regulatory
Coordination Specialist, Regulatory
Coordination and Compliance, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–
2036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ‘‘Subpart–Fruits
and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–1
through 319.56–59, referred to below as
the regulations) prohibit or restrict the
importation of fruits and vegetables into
the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction
and dissemination of plant pests that are
new to or not widely distributed within
the United States. The national plant
protection organization (NPPO) of Peru
has requested that the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
amend the regulations to allow fresh
papayas (Carica papaya) to be imported
from Peru into the continental United
States.
As part of our evaluation of Peru’s
request, we have prepared a pest risk
assessment (PRA), titled ‘‘Importation of
Fresh Papaya, Carica papaya, from Peru
into the Continental United States’’
(March 2012). The PRA evaluates the
risks associated with the importation of
papaya into the continental United
States from Peru. Copies of the PRA may
be obtained by contacting the individual
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA identified two pests of
quarantine significance present in Peru
that could be introduced into the United
States through the importation of
papaya: The Mediterranean fruit fly
(Medfly), Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann,
and the South American fruit fly,
Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann).
Both of these pests were rated as posing
a high risk.
APHIS has determined that measures
beyond standard port of arrival
inspection are required to mitigate the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
risks posed by the plant pests associated
with papayas from Peru. Therefore, we
propose to require that the papayas be
subjected to a systems approach to pest
mitigation. This systems approach
would require that the papayas be
produced at places of production
registered with the NPPO of Peru,
would require packing procedures
designed to exclude quarantine pests,
and would require fruit fly trapping,
field sanitation, and hot water treatment
to remove pests of concern from the
pathway. Only commercial
consignments of papayas would be
allowed to be imported from Peru.
Consignments of papayas from Peru
would also be required to be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru
stating that the papayas were grown,
packed, and shipped in accordance with
the proposed requirements.
The proposed systems approach to
pest mitigation for the importation of
papayas from Peru has been used
successfully to mitigate the risk
associated with the importation of
papayas from Central America, Brazil,
Colombia, and Ecuador (§ 319.56–25).
The risk management document for
papayas from Peru evaluated the
effectiveness of these measures against
the quarantine pests identified in the
PRA and concluded that the provisions
in § 319.56–25, along with the general
requirements for the importation of
fruits and vegetables in the regulations,
will be sufficient to prevent the
introduction of those pests into the
continental United States. Therefore, we
propose to amend § 319.56–25 to allow
for the importation of papayas from
Peru. The mitigation measures for the
proposed systems approach are outlined
in greater detail below.
Commercial Consignments
The importation of fresh papayas from
Peru would be limited to commercial
consignments of papaya of cultivar Solo
only.
This condition would reduce the
likelihood that papayas will introduce
injurious plant pests into the
continental United States. Commercial
consignments are less likely to be
infested with plant pests than
noncommercial consignments.
Noncommercial consignments are more
prone to infestations because the
commodity is often ripe to overripe,
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules
may be of a variety with unknown
susceptibility to pests, and is often
grown with little or no pest control.
Commercial consignments, as defined in
§ 319.56–2, are consignments that an
inspector identifies as having been
imported for sale and distribution. Such
identification is based on a variety of
indicators, including, but not limited to:
Quantity of produce, type of packaging,
identification of grower or packinghouse
on the packaging, and documents
consigning the fruits or vegetables to a
wholesaler or retailer.
Papayas weighing 2 kilograms or less
are considered ‘‘Solo’’ papayas. The
limitation would ensure that the hot
water dip treatment discussed later in
this document is effective, as that
treatment has not been tested on larger
papayas.
Registered Growers
The papayas would have to be grown
by a grower registered with the NPPO of
Peru and packed for shipment to the
continental United States (including
Alaska) in Peru. This condition would
ensure that papayas intended for the
continental United States are grown in
places of production where fruit fly
traps are maintained and where the
other elements of the systems approach
described below are in place. In
addition, grower registration allows for
traceback and removal from the export
program of production sites with
confirmed pest problems, and the
papaya orchards would be monitored by
the NPPO to ensure that pest and
disease-excluding sanitary procedures
are employed.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Harvesting Procedures
Beginning at least 30 days before
harvest begins and continuing through
the completion of harvest, all trees in
the area where the papayas are grown
would have to be kept free of papayas
that are one-half or more ripe (more
than one-quarter of shell surface
yellow), and all culled and fallen fruit
would have to be buried, destroyed, or
removed from the farm at least twice a
week.
Although papayas are a potential host
for Medfly and South American fruit fly,
these fruit flies typically prefer ripe
fruits as well as culled or fallen
papayas. Therefore, requiring that only
green papayas (less than half ripe) be
present on the trees and that culled and
fallen fruit be buried, destroyed, or
removed from the farm would reduce
the populations of Medfly and South
American fruit fly in the fields where
papayas intended for importation into
the continental United States are grown.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:50 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Treatment
The papayas would have to be held
for 20 minutes in hot water at 48 °C
(118.4 °F). This treatment is currently
used to treat papayas imported from
Central America, Brazil, Colombia, and
Ecuador for fruit flies under the existing
regulations in § 319.56–25. Hot water
treatment mitigates the pest risk that
could result if fruit flies lay eggs in
papayas immediately before harvest.
This treatment, in conjunction with
other safeguards that would be required
by the regulations for papayas from
Peru, would reduce the likelihood that
papayas will introduce Medfly and
South American fruit fly into the
continental United States.
Packaging Procedures
When packed, the papayas would
have to be less than one-half ripe (shell
surface no more than one-quarter
yellow, surrounded by light green) and
appear to be free of all injurious insect
pests.
This condition would reduce the risk
of introduction of Medfly and South
American fruit fly into the continental
United States. Papayas that are less than
one-half ripe (green) are not preferred
hosts for fruit flies. Requiring papayas to
be less than one-half ripe when packed
thus reduces the risk of their infestation
with Medfly or South American fruit
fly.
The papayas would have to be
safeguarded from exposure to fruit flies
from harvest to export, including being
packaged to prevent access by fruit flies
or other injurious insect pests during
transit. The package containing the
papayas would not be allowed to
contain any other fruit, including
papayas not qualified for importation
into the continental United States.
These conditions would ensure that
papayas that have already been
inspected and packaged for shipment to
the continental United States are not at
risk for fruit fly infestation.
Fruit Fly Trapping
Beginning at least 1 year before
harvest begins and continuing through
the completion of harvest, fruit fly traps
would have to be maintained in the
field where the papayas were grown.
Fifty percent of the traps would have to
be of the McPhail type, and 50 percent
of the traps of the Jackson type. The
traps would have to be placed at the rate
of 1 trap per hectare and checked for
fruit flies at least once a week by plant
health officials of the NPPO. The NPPO
would have to keep records of the fruit
fly finds for each trap, updating the
records each time the traps are checked,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48629
and make the records available to
APHIS upon request. The records would
have to be maintained for at least 1 year.
This condition would ensure the earliest
possible detection of increasing
populations of fruit flies in and around
fields where papayas are grown.
If the average Jackson fruit fly trap
catch is greater than seven Medflies per
trap per week, measures would have to
be taken to control the Medfly
population in the production area. If the
average Jackson trap catch exceeds 14
Medflies per trap per week,
importations of papayas from that
production area would be halted until
the rate of capture drops to an average
of 7 or fewer Medflies per trap per week.
If the average McPhail trap catch is
greater than seven South American fruit
flies per trap per week, measures would
have to be taken to control the South
American fruit flies population in the
production area. If the average McPhail
trap catch exceeds 14 South American
fruit flies per trap per week,
importations of papayas from that
production area would be halted until
the rate of capture drops to an average
of 7 or fewer South American fruit flies
per trap per week.
These thresholds for Medfly and
South American fruit fly trapping would
help detect increasing populations of
these fruit flies in growing areas; as
such, this condition would help ensure
that these fruit flies are not associated
with imports of papayas into the
continental United States.
All activities would have to be
conducted under the supervision and
direction of plant health officials of the
NPPO of the exporting country to help
ensure that all activities required by the
regulations are properly carried out.
This requirement is found in paragraph
(h) of § 319.56–25, which currently
refers to the activities in paragraphs (a)
through (h) of the section. Since
paragraph (h) contains the supervision
requirement, we are proposing to correct
the reference to instead refer to
supervision of the activities described in
paragraphs (a) through (g) of § 319.56–
25.
Phytosanitary Certificate
All shipments of papayas would have
to be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru
stating that the papayas were grown,
packed, and shipped in accordance with
the proposed requirements. This
condition would help ensure that the
provisions of the regulations have been
met. In addition, as part of issuing the
phytosanitary certificate, the NPPO
would inspect the commodities and
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
48630
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules
certify that they are free of quarantine
pests.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we have analyzed the
potential economic effects of this action
on small entities. The analysis is
summarized below. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
This proposed rule would allow the
importation of fresh papaya fruit from
Peru into the continental United States.
Papaya is a relatively minor crop in the
United States that is primarily grown in
Hawaii, and to a lesser extent, in
Florida. Very small acreages are found
in Texas and California.
Peru is expected to ship up to 36
metric tons of fresh papaya to the
United States per year. This amount
would be equivalent to less than 0.03
percent of net imports of fresh papaya
by the United States in 2011. With U.S.
net imports estimated to be at least eight
times as large as U.S. fresh papaya
production, any market effects of such
a relatively negligible change in papaya
imports are as likely to impact foreign
suppliers as they are U.S. producers. In
addition, effects for the majority of U.S.
papaya producers, who are located in
Hawaii, would be further muted by the
proposed prohibition on entry of fresh
papaya from Peru into that State.
While most if not all U.S. papaya
farms are small entities, we expect this
proposed rule to have a very minor
impact regardless of the size of
operation.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow
papayas to be imported into the
continental United States from Peru. If
this proposed rule is adopted, State and
local laws and regulations regarding
papayas imported under this rule would
be preempted while the fruit is in
foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are
generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:50 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
public and would remain in foreign
commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign
commerce ceases in other cases must be
addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this
proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to Docket No. APHIS–2012–0014.
Please send a copy of your comments to:
(1) APHIS, using one of the methods
described under ADDRESSES at the
beginning of this document, and (2)
Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, Room
404–W, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
proposed rule.
Allowing the importation of papayas
into the continental United States from
Peru will require grower registration,
trapping records, and phytosanitary
certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 1.5 hours per
response.
Respondents: The NPPO of Peru and
growers.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 51.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 1.9.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 101.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 154 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact
Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS’
Information Collection Coordinator, at
(301) 851–2908.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
§ 319.56–25
[Amended]
2. Section 319.56–25 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (b), by removing the
words ‘‘or Ecuador’’ and adding the
words ‘‘, Ecuador, or Peru’’ in their
place.
■ b. In paragraph (g)(2), by adding the
word ‘‘Peru,’’ after the word ‘‘Ecuador,’’.
■ c. In paragraph (h), by removing the
citation ‘‘(h)’’ and adding the citation
‘‘(g)’’ in its place.
■
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of
August 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–19314 Filed 8–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 317
[Docket No. FSIS–2008–0017]
Descriptive Designation for Needle- or
Blade-Tenderized (Mechanically
Tenderized) Beef Products
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is extending
the comment period for the Federal
Register proposed rule, ‘‘Descriptive
Designation for Needle- or bladetenderized (Mechanically Tenderized)
Beef Products’’ until October 8, 2013.
The Agency is taking this action in
response to two requests made by trade
associations.
DATES: Comments are due by October 8,
2013.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites interested
persons to submit comments on this
notice. Comments may be submitted by
either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: This
Web site provides the ability to type
short comments directly into the
comment field on this Web page or
attach a file for lengthier comments. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow
the on-line instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Mail, including CD–ROMs: Send to
Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection
Service, Patriots Plaza 3, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Mailstop
3782, Room 8–163B, Washington, DC
20250–3700.
Hand- or courier-delivered submittals:
Deliver to Patriots Plaza 3, 355 E Street
SW., Room 8–163B, Washington, DC
20250–3700.
Instructions: All items submitted by
mail or electronic mail must include the
Agency name and docket number FSIS–
2007–0017. Comments received in
response to this docket will be made
available for public inspection and
posted without change, including any
personal information, to https://
www.regulations.gov.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:50 Aug 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Docket: For access to background
documents or to comments received, go
to the FSIS Docket Room at Patriots
Plaza 3, 355 E Street SW., Room 8–164,
Washington, DC 20250–3700 between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Edelstein, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Policy and
Program Development, Telephone: (202)
205–0495, or by Fax: (202) 720–2025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
10, 2013, FSIS published a proposed
rule in the Federal Register (78 FR
34589), ‘‘Descriptive Designation for
Needle- or blade-tenderized
(Mechanically Tenderized) Beef
Products.’’
In the rule, FSIS is proposing to
require the use of the descriptive
designation ‘‘mechanically tenderized’’
on the labels of raw or partially cooked
needle- or blade-tenderized beef
products, including beef products
injected with marinade or solution,
unless such products are destined to be
fully cooked at an official establishment.
FSIS is proposing that the product name
for such beef products include the
descriptive designation ‘‘mechanically
tenderized’’ and an accurate description
of the beef component. FSIS is also
proposing to require that the print for all
words in the product name appear in
the same style, color, and size and on a
single-color contrasting background. In
addition, FSIS is proposing to require
that labels of raw and partially cooked
needle- or blade-tenderized beef
products destined for household
consumers, hotels, restaurants, or
similar institutions include validated
cooking instructions that inform
consumers that these products need to
be cooked to a specified minimum
internal temperature, and whether they
need to be held at that minimum
temperature for a specified time before
consumption, i.e., dwell time or rest
time, to ensure that they are fully
cooked.
FSIS is also announcing that it has
posted on its Web site guidance for
developing validated cooking
instructions for mechanically tenderized
product.
Two trade associations addressed
letters to FSIS requesting an additional
120 days to comment on the proposed
rule and the guidance for validated
cooking instructions. Both letters stated
that additional time was needed to
submit comprehensive comments
because the Agency had asked for
comment on not only the proposed rule
and the guidance but also on numerous
related issues.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48631
For the reason given in these requests,
FSIS agrees to extend the comment
period. The Agency believes that an
additional 60-day extension is
sufficient. The comment period for the
proposed rule will now end on October
8, 2013.
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, gender,
religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family
status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s Target Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and TTY).
To file a written complaint of
discrimination, write USDA, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call
(202) 720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA
is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
Additional Public Notification
FSIS will announce this notice online
through the FSIS Web page located at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/
fsis/topics/regulations/federal-register/
federal-register-notices.
FSIS will also make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is
communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for
industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
available on the FSIS Web page. In
addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/
fsis/programs-and-services/emailsubscription-service. Options range from
recalls to export information to
regulations, directives, and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 154 (Friday, August 9, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48628-48631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19314]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 154 / Friday, August 9, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 48628]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0014]
RIN 0579-AD68
Importation of Papayas From Peru
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to allow, under certain conditions, the
importation of commercial consignments of fresh papayas from Peru into
the continental United States. The conditions for the importation of
papayas from Peru would include requirements for approved production
locations; field sanitation; hot water treatment; procedures for
packing and shipping the papayas; and fruit fly trapping in papaya
production areas. This action would allow for the importation of
papayas from Peru while continuing to provide protection against the
introduction of quarantine pests into the continental United States.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
October 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0014-0001.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2012-0014, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-
0014 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dorothy Wayson, Senior Regulatory
Coordination Specialist, Regulatory Coordination and Compliance, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-
2036.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ``Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR 319.56-
1 through 319.56-59, referred to below as the regulations) prohibit or
restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and
dissemination of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed
within the United States. The national plant protection organization
(NPPO) of Peru has requested that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) amend the regulations to allow fresh papayas
(Carica papaya) to be imported from Peru into the continental United
States.
As part of our evaluation of Peru's request, we have prepared a
pest risk assessment (PRA), titled ``Importation of Fresh Papaya,
Carica papaya, from Peru into the Continental United States'' (March
2012). The PRA evaluates the risks associated with the importation of
papaya into the continental United States from Peru. Copies of the PRA
may be obtained by contacting the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA identified two pests of quarantine significance present in
Peru that could be introduced into the United States through the
importation of papaya: The Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly), Ceratitis
capitata Wiedemann, and the South American fruit fly, Anastrepha
fraterculus (Wiedemann). Both of these pests were rated as posing a
high risk.
APHIS has determined that measures beyond standard port of arrival
inspection are required to mitigate the risks posed by the plant pests
associated with papayas from Peru. Therefore, we propose to require
that the papayas be subjected to a systems approach to pest mitigation.
This systems approach would require that the papayas be produced at
places of production registered with the NPPO of Peru, would require
packing procedures designed to exclude quarantine pests, and would
require fruit fly trapping, field sanitation, and hot water treatment
to remove pests of concern from the pathway. Only commercial
consignments of papayas would be allowed to be imported from Peru.
Consignments of papayas from Peru would also be required to be
accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru
stating that the papayas were grown, packed, and shipped in accordance
with the proposed requirements.
The proposed systems approach to pest mitigation for the
importation of papayas from Peru has been used successfully to mitigate
the risk associated with the importation of papayas from Central
America, Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador (Sec. 319.56-25). The risk
management document for papayas from Peru evaluated the effectiveness
of these measures against the quarantine pests identified in the PRA
and concluded that the provisions in Sec. 319.56-25, along with the
general requirements for the importation of fruits and vegetables in
the regulations, will be sufficient to prevent the introduction of
those pests into the continental United States. Therefore, we propose
to amend Sec. 319.56-25 to allow for the importation of papayas from
Peru. The mitigation measures for the proposed systems approach are
outlined in greater detail below.
Commercial Consignments
The importation of fresh papayas from Peru would be limited to
commercial consignments of papaya of cultivar Solo only.
This condition would reduce the likelihood that papayas will
introduce injurious plant pests into the continental United States.
Commercial consignments are less likely to be infested with plant pests
than noncommercial consignments. Noncommercial consignments are more
prone to infestations because the commodity is often ripe to overripe,
[[Page 48629]]
may be of a variety with unknown susceptibility to pests, and is often
grown with little or no pest control. Commercial consignments, as
defined in Sec. 319.56-2, are consignments that an inspector
identifies as having been imported for sale and distribution. Such
identification is based on a variety of indicators, including, but not
limited to: Quantity of produce, type of packaging, identification of
grower or packinghouse on the packaging, and documents consigning the
fruits or vegetables to a wholesaler or retailer.
Papayas weighing 2 kilograms or less are considered ``Solo''
papayas. The limitation would ensure that the hot water dip treatment
discussed later in this document is effective, as that treatment has
not been tested on larger papayas.
Registered Growers
The papayas would have to be grown by a grower registered with the
NPPO of Peru and packed for shipment to the continental United States
(including Alaska) in Peru. This condition would ensure that papayas
intended for the continental United States are grown in places of
production where fruit fly traps are maintained and where the other
elements of the systems approach described below are in place. In
addition, grower registration allows for traceback and removal from the
export program of production sites with confirmed pest problems, and
the papaya orchards would be monitored by the NPPO to ensure that pest
and disease-excluding sanitary procedures are employed.
Harvesting Procedures
Beginning at least 30 days before harvest begins and continuing
through the completion of harvest, all trees in the area where the
papayas are grown would have to be kept free of papayas that are one-
half or more ripe (more than one-quarter of shell surface yellow), and
all culled and fallen fruit would have to be buried, destroyed, or
removed from the farm at least twice a week.
Although papayas are a potential host for Medfly and South American
fruit fly, these fruit flies typically prefer ripe fruits as well as
culled or fallen papayas. Therefore, requiring that only green papayas
(less than half ripe) be present on the trees and that culled and
fallen fruit be buried, destroyed, or removed from the farm would
reduce the populations of Medfly and South American fruit fly in the
fields where papayas intended for importation into the continental
United States are grown.
Treatment
The papayas would have to be held for 20 minutes in hot water at 48
[deg]C (118.4 [deg]F). This treatment is currently used to treat
papayas imported from Central America, Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador
for fruit flies under the existing regulations in Sec. 319.56-25. Hot
water treatment mitigates the pest risk that could result if fruit
flies lay eggs in papayas immediately before harvest. This treatment,
in conjunction with other safeguards that would be required by the
regulations for papayas from Peru, would reduce the likelihood that
papayas will introduce Medfly and South American fruit fly into the
continental United States.
Packaging Procedures
When packed, the papayas would have to be less than one-half ripe
(shell surface no more than one-quarter yellow, surrounded by light
green) and appear to be free of all injurious insect pests.
This condition would reduce the risk of introduction of Medfly and
South American fruit fly into the continental United States. Papayas
that are less than one-half ripe (green) are not preferred hosts for
fruit flies. Requiring papayas to be less than one-half ripe when
packed thus reduces the risk of their infestation with Medfly or South
American fruit fly.
The papayas would have to be safeguarded from exposure to fruit
flies from harvest to export, including being packaged to prevent
access by fruit flies or other injurious insect pests during transit.
The package containing the papayas would not be allowed to contain any
other fruit, including papayas not qualified for importation into the
continental United States. These conditions would ensure that papayas
that have already been inspected and packaged for shipment to the
continental United States are not at risk for fruit fly infestation.
Fruit Fly Trapping
Beginning at least 1 year before harvest begins and continuing
through the completion of harvest, fruit fly traps would have to be
maintained in the field where the papayas were grown. Fifty percent of
the traps would have to be of the McPhail type, and 50 percent of the
traps of the Jackson type. The traps would have to be placed at the
rate of 1 trap per hectare and checked for fruit flies at least once a
week by plant health officials of the NPPO. The NPPO would have to keep
records of the fruit fly finds for each trap, updating the records each
time the traps are checked, and make the records available to APHIS
upon request. The records would have to be maintained for at least 1
year. This condition would ensure the earliest possible detection of
increasing populations of fruit flies in and around fields where
papayas are grown.
If the average Jackson fruit fly trap catch is greater than seven
Medflies per trap per week, measures would have to be taken to control
the Medfly population in the production area. If the average Jackson
trap catch exceeds 14 Medflies per trap per week, importations of
papayas from that production area would be halted until the rate of
capture drops to an average of 7 or fewer Medflies per trap per week.
If the average McPhail trap catch is greater than seven South
American fruit flies per trap per week, measures would have to be taken
to control the South American fruit flies population in the production
area. If the average McPhail trap catch exceeds 14 South American fruit
flies per trap per week, importations of papayas from that production
area would be halted until the rate of capture drops to an average of 7
or fewer South American fruit flies per trap per week.
These thresholds for Medfly and South American fruit fly trapping
would help detect increasing populations of these fruit flies in
growing areas; as such, this condition would help ensure that these
fruit flies are not associated with imports of papayas into the
continental United States.
All activities would have to be conducted under the supervision and
direction of plant health officials of the NPPO of the exporting
country to help ensure that all activities required by the regulations
are properly carried out. This requirement is found in paragraph (h) of
Sec. 319.56-25, which currently refers to the activities in paragraphs
(a) through (h) of the section. Since paragraph (h) contains the
supervision requirement, we are proposing to correct the reference to
instead refer to supervision of the activities described in paragraphs
(a) through (g) of Sec. 319.56-25.
Phytosanitary Certificate
All shipments of papayas would have to be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of Peru stating that the
papayas were grown, packed, and shipped in accordance with the proposed
requirements. This condition would help ensure that the provisions of
the regulations have been met. In addition, as part of issuing the
phytosanitary certificate, the NPPO would inspect the commodities and
[[Page 48630]]
certify that they are free of quarantine pests.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we have analyzed
the potential economic effects of this action on small entities. The
analysis is summarized below. Copies of the full analysis are available
by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see ADDRESSES above for
instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
This proposed rule would allow the importation of fresh papaya
fruit from Peru into the continental United States. Papaya is a
relatively minor crop in the United States that is primarily grown in
Hawaii, and to a lesser extent, in Florida. Very small acreages are
found in Texas and California.
Peru is expected to ship up to 36 metric tons of fresh papaya to
the United States per year. This amount would be equivalent to less
than 0.03 percent of net imports of fresh papaya by the United States
in 2011. With U.S. net imports estimated to be at least eight times as
large as U.S. fresh papaya production, any market effects of such a
relatively negligible change in papaya imports are as likely to impact
foreign suppliers as they are U.S. producers. In addition, effects for
the majority of U.S. papaya producers, who are located in Hawaii, would
be further muted by the proposed prohibition on entry of fresh papaya
from Peru into that State.
While most if not all U.S. papaya farms are small entities, we
expect this proposed rule to have a very minor impact regardless of the
size of operation.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow papayas to be imported into the
continental United States from Peru. If this proposed rule is adopted,
State and local laws and regulations regarding papayas imported under
this rule would be preempted while the fruit is in foreign commerce.
Fresh fruits are generally imported for immediate distribution and sale
to the consuming public and would remain in foreign commerce until sold
to the ultimate consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases
in other cases must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this
proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule, and this rule will not require administrative proceedings before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington,
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-
2012-0014. Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) APHIS, using one
of the methods described under ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
document, and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, Room 404-W, 14th
Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A comment to
OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within
30 days of publication of this proposed rule.
Allowing the importation of papayas into the continental United
States from Peru will require grower registration, trapping records,
and phytosanitary certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 1.5 hours per response.
Respondents: The NPPO of Peru and growers.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 51.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 1.9.
Estimated annual number of responses: 101.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 154 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
851-2908.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2908.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C.
136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Sec. 319.56-25 [Amended]
0
2. Section 319.56-25 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b), by removing the words ``or Ecuador'' and adding
the words ``, Ecuador, or Peru'' in their place.
0
b. In paragraph (g)(2), by adding the word ``Peru,'' after the word
``Ecuador,''.
0
c. In paragraph (h), by removing the citation ``(h)'' and adding the
citation ``(g)'' in its place.
[[Page 48631]]
Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of August 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-19314 Filed 8-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P