Cold Treatment for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables; MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, 27864-27866 [2013-11322]
Download as PDF
27864
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 92
Monday, May 13, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 305
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0089]
Cold Treatment for Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables; MidAmerica St. Louis
Airport, Mascoutah, IL
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to allow,
under certain conditions, the cold
treatment of imported fruits and
vegetables upon arrival at the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport,
Mascoutah, IL. We have determined that
there are biological barriers at this port
that, along with certain safeguards,
would prevent the introduction of fruit
flies and other insect pests into the
United States in the unlikely event that
they escape from shipments of fruits or
vegetables before the fruits or vegetables
undergo cold treatment. This action
would facilitate the importation of fruit
requiring cold treatment while
continuing to provide protection against
the introduction of fruit flies and other
insect pests into the United States.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before July 12,
2013.
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-00890001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2012–0089, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 May 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0089 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Inder P. S. Gadh, Senior Risk Manager—
Treatments, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1236; (301) 851–2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The phytosanitary treatments
regulations in 7 CFR part 305 set out
general requirements for certifying or
approving treatment facilities and for
performing treatments listed in the Plant
Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)
Treatment Manual 1 for fruits,
vegetables, and other articles to prevent
the introduction or dissemination of
plant pests or noxious weeds into or
through the United States. Within part
305, § 305.6 (referred to below as the
regulations) sets out requirements for
treatment procedures, monitoring,
facilities, and enclosures needed for
performing sustained refrigeration (cold
treatment) sufficient to kill certain
insect pests associated with imported
fruits and vegetables and with regulated
articles moved interstate from
quarantined areas within the United
States.
Most imported fruits or vegetables
that require cold treatment undergo that
treatment while in transit to the United
States. However, the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) also
allows imported fruits or vegetables to
undergo cold treatment at an approved
cold treatment facility in either the
country of origin or after arrival in the
United States at a cold storage
warehouse approved by the APHIS
Administrator.
In § 305.6, paragraph (b) limits cold
treatment facilities to those cold storage
warehouses approved by the
Administrator and located in the area
north of 39° latitude and east of 104°
longitude, or under special conditions at
one of the following ports, which are
1 The PPQ Treatment Manual is available at
(https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/
manuals/ports/downloads/treatment.pdf).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
outside the geographic area stipulated in
the regulations: The maritime ports of
Wilmington, NC; Seattle, WA; Corpus
Christi, TX; and Gulfport, MS; SeattleTacoma International Airport, Seattle,
WA; and Hartsfield-Atlanta
International Airport, Atlanta, GA. The
location restrictions serve as an
additional safeguard against the
possibility that fruit flies or other pests
could escape from imported articles
prior to treatment and become
established in the United States.
As stated previously, the regulations
do allow cold treatment facilities to be
located outside the geographical area
stipulated by the regulations. In order to
approve those locations, APHIS
conducts site-specific evaluations and
determines whether regulated articles
can be safely transported to cold
treatment facilities under special
conditions to mitigate the possible
escape of pests of concern.
Proposed Additional Port
APHIS has received a petition from
North Bay Produce, Inc., to designate
the MidAmerica St. Louis Airport,
Mascoutah, IL, as an approved location
for the cold treatment of imported fruits
or vegetables. In addition, some
importers of fruits and vegetables have
shown considerable interest in locating
cold treatment facilities in places that
are not currently allowed under the
regulations. Currently, no cold
treatment facilities are available near the
proposed location. An APHIS-approved
cold treatment facility in this location
would allow importers to treat fruits
and vegetables arriving from foreign
locations and requiring a treatment to
meet U.S. entry requirements.
In response to this request, we are
proposing to add the MidAmerica St.
Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, to the list
of ports that are designated as approved
locations for cold treatment of imported
fruits or vegetables. This proposal is
based on our determination that there
are biological barriers in the area of this
port that, along with certain safeguards,
would prevent the introduction of fruit
flies and other insect pests in the
unlikely event that they escape from
shipments of fruits or vegetables before
the fruits or vegetables undergo cold
treatment.
To support this action, we have
prepared a treatment evaluation
document (TED) entitled ‘‘Allowing a
new cold treatment facility at
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Mascoutah, Illinois, located outside the
area currently authorized.’’ Copies of
the TED may be obtained from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT and may be
viewed on the Internet on the
Regulations.gov Web site or in our
reading room (see ADDRESSES above for
instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov and the location and
hours of the reading room). In the TED,
we concluded that the pest risks posed
by the establishment of a cold treatment
facility at the MidAmerica St. Louis
Airport, Mascoutah, IL, outside of the
area north of 39° latitude and east of
104° longitude, can be adequately
managed through use of special
conditions to mitigate the possible
escape of pests of concern.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Special Conditions for the MidAmerica
St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL
In addition to the general
requirements in § 305.6(a) through (g) of
the regulations concerning cold
treatment, we are proposing to apply the
following requirements to cold
treatment conducted at the MidAmerica
St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL. These
requirements would be added to the
regulations as a new paragraph (h)(5) of
§ 305.6.
In paragraph (h)(5)(i) of § 305.6, we
are proposing that bulk and
containerized consignments of fruits or
vegetables arriving for cold treatment
would have to be cold treated within the
area over which the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security is assigned the
authority to accept entries of
merchandise, to collect duties, and to
enforce the various provisions of the
customs and navigation laws in force.
Under this proposal, paragraph
(h)(5)(ii) would lay out a number of
conditions that any proposed facility
would have to meet, which would be
agreed upon by the involved parties and
included in the facility compliance
agreement required under paragraph (f)
of § 305.6. These conditions, which are
described below, would be listed in
paragraphs (h)(5)(ii)(A) through
(h)(5)(ii)(F).
• The facility would only be certified
if APHIS determines that regulated
articles would be safely transported to
the facility from the port of arrival
without significant risk that plant pests
will escape in transit or while the
regulated articles are at the facility.
• Bulk consignments (those
consignments which are stowed and
unloaded by the case or bin) of fruit
would have to arrive in pest-proof
packaging that prevents the escape of
the pests of concern.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 May 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
• The facility would have to ensure
that the pest-proof cartons are off-loaded
from containers in a safeguarded
environment and at no time would the
articles be removed from the cartons
prior to treatment.
• Arrangements for treatment would
have to be made before the departure of
a consignment from its port of entry or
points of origin in the United States.
The cold treatment facility and APHIS
must agree in advance on the route by
which consignments are allowed to
move between the aircraft on which
they arrived at the airport and the cold
treatment facility. The movement of
consignments from aircraft to a cold
treatment facility will not be allowed
until an acceptable route has been
agreed upon.
• The facility would have to have
contingency plans, approved by the
APHIS Administrator, for safely
destroying or disposing of fruit.
• The facility would have to maintain
physical separation of treated articles
from untreated articles and apply all
required safeguards (e.g., larger
consignments are broken up into
smaller boxes following treatment and
those treated articles are required to be
packaged in pest-proof containers per an
agreement between the treatment
facility and the importer) before
releasing to local markets or for
movement to other States.
We believe that the mitigation
measures described above, which are
based on safeguards in place for other
cold treatment facilities, would prevent
the introduction of fruit flies and other
plant pests that may be in shipments of
fruits or vegetables arriving at the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport,
Mascoutah, IL, for cold treatment.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule is subject to
Executive Order 12866. However, for
this action, the Office of Management
and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we
have performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, which is
summarized below, regarding the
economic effects of this proposed rule
on small entities. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
Based on the information we have,
there is no reason to conclude that
adoption of this proposed rule would
result in any significant economic effect
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27865
on a substantial number of small
entities. However, we do not currently
have all of the data necessary for a
comprehensive analysis of the effects of
this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on
potential effects. In particular, we are
interested in determining the number
and kind of small entities that may
incur benefits or costs from the
implementation of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would amend the
regulations to allow a new cold
treatment facility to be located at
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport,
Mascoutah, Illinois. The facility is
expected to be used mainly to treat
imported blueberries. While most, if not
all, blueberry farms in the United States
are small entities, we do not expect the
rule to significantly affect the market for
blueberries because the proposed
facility is not projected to result in a
significant increase in the quantity of
blueberries imported into the United
States. The United States is the world’s
largest producer of blueberries and U.S.
blueberry exports exceed imports fourfold.
The proposed cold treatment facility
is expected to benefit the MidAmerica
St. Louis Airport and the local economy.
The facility is expected to result in at
least 800 flights of produce requiring
cold treatment per year, raising at least
$8 million in direct income for the
airport. MidAmerica St. Louis Airport is
classified as a small entity within the
NAICS category of Other Airport
Operations (NAICS 488119), for which
the small-entity standard is annual
revenue of not more than $30 million.
Our initial regulatory flexibility analysis
discusses the expected positive
economic effects of the rule for the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport and
related local businesses.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
27866
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 305
Irradiation, Phytosanitary treatment,
Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 305 as follows:
PART 305—PHYTOSANITARY
TREATMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 305
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.3.
2. Section 305.6 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (b), by adding the
words ‘‘MidAmerica St. Louis Airport,
Mascoutah, IL;’’ after the words
‘‘Seattle-Tacoma International Airport,
Seattle, WA;’’ and
■ b. By adding a new paragraph (h)(5) to
read as set forth below.
■
§ 305.6
Cold treatment requirements.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(5) Airport of Mascoutah, IL.
Consignments of fruits or vegetables
arriving at the MidAmerica St. Louis
Airport, Mascoutah, IL, for cold
treatment, in addition to meeting all
other applicable requirements of this
section, must meet the following special
conditions:
(i) Bulk and containerized
consignments of fruits or vegetables
arriving for cold treatment must be cold
treated within the area over which the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
is assigned the authority to accept
entries of merchandise, to collect duties,
and to enforce the various provisions of
the customs and navigation laws in
force.
(ii) APHIS will evaluate facility
safeguards in light of the plant health
risks involved and approve the
operation of a facility in that location
subject to the following conditions to be
agreed upon by the involved parties and
included in the compliance agreement
required in § 305.6(f):
(A) The facility will only be certified
if the Administrator determines that the
regulated articles could be safely
transported to the facility from the point
of entry or origin without significant
risk that plant pests will escape in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 May 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
transit to the facility or while the
regulated articles are at the facility.
(B) Bulk consignments (those
consignments which are stowed and
unloaded by the case or bin) of fruit
must arrive in pest-proof packaging that
prevents the escape of the pests of
concern.
(C) The facility must ensure that the
pest-proof cartons are off-loaded from
containers in a safeguarded
environment and at no time are the
articles to be removed from the cartons
prior to treatment.
(D) Arrangements for treatment must
be made before the departure of a
consignment from its port of entry or
points of origin in the United States.
The cold treatment facility and APHIS
must agree in advance on the route by
which consignments are allowed to
move between the aircraft on which
they arrived at the airport and the cold
treatment facility. The movement of
consignments from aircraft to a cold
treatment facility will not be allowed
until an acceptable route has been
agreed upon.
(E) The facility must have
contingency plans, approved by the
Administrator, for safely destroying or
disposing of fruits or vegetables.
(F) The facility must maintain
physical separation of treated articles
from untreated articles and apply all
required safeguards (e.g., larger
consignments are broken up into
smaller boxes following treatment and
those treated articles are required to be
packaged in pest-proof containers per an
agreement between the treatment
facility and the importer) before
releasing to local markets or for
movement to other States.
Done in Washington, DC, this May 8, 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–11322 Filed 5–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 429
[EERE–2013–BT–NOC–0023]
Appliance Standards and Rulemaking
Federal Advisory Committee: Notice of
Open Meeting for the Commercial
HVAC, WH, and Refrigeration
Certification Working Group
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: This notice announces an
open meeting of the Commercial
Heating, Ventilation, and Airconditioning (HVAC), Water Heating
(WH), and Refrigeration Certification
Working Group (Commercial
Certification Group). The purpose of the
Commercial Certification Group is to
undertake a negotiated rulemaking to
discuss and, if possible, reach
consensus on proposed certification and
compliance requirements for
commercial HVAC, WH, and
refrigeration equipment, as authorized
by the Energy Policy and Conservation
Act of 1975, as amended.
DATES: A two-day, open meeting will be
held on:
Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 10 a.m.–6 p.m.
(EDT) and
Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 8 a.m.–3
p.m. (EDT).
ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Energy,
Forrestal Building, Room 8E–089, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. Individuals will
also have the opportunity to participate
by webinar. To register for the webinar
and receive call-in information, please
register for Tuesday at https://www1.go
tomeeting.com/register/877431528 and
for Wednesday at https://www1.goto
meeting.com/register/300061736.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Cymbalsky, ASRAC Designated Federal
Officer, Supervisory Operations
Research Analyst, U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE), Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC,
20024. Email: asrac@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice and recommendations to the U.S.
Department of Energy on certification
and compliance requirements of
commercial HVAC, WH, and
refrigeration equipment under the
authority of the Negotiated Rulemaking
Act (5 U.S.C. 561–570, Pub. L. 104–320).
Tentative Agenda: (Subject to
change):
• Finalize and vote on Working
Group’s ground rules;
• Finalize and vote on Working
Group’s scope;
• Discuss Alternative Efficiency
Determination Methods (AEDM) for
commercial HVAC, WH, and
refrigeration equipment; and
• Discuss model groupings for
determination of ratings.
Public Participation: Members of the
public are welcome to observe the
business of the meeting and, if time
allows, may make oral statements
during the specified period for public
comment. To attend the meeting and/or
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27864-27866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11322]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2013 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 27864]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 305
[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0089]
Cold Treatment for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables; MidAmerica St.
Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to allow, under certain conditions, the cold
treatment of imported fruits and vegetables upon arrival at the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL. We have determined that
there are biological barriers at this port that, along with certain
safeguards, would prevent the introduction of fruit flies and other
insect pests into the United States in the unlikely event that they
escape from shipments of fruits or vegetables before the fruits or
vegetables undergo cold treatment. This action would facilitate the
importation of fruit requiring cold treatment while continuing to
provide protection against the introduction of fruit flies and other
insect pests into the United States.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before July
12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0089-0001.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2012-0089, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-
0089 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Inder P. S. Gadh, Senior Risk
Manager--Treatments, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737-1236; (301) 851-2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The phytosanitary treatments regulations in 7 CFR part 305 set out
general requirements for certifying or approving treatment facilities
and for performing treatments listed in the Plant Protection and
Quarantine (PPQ) Treatment Manual \1\ for fruits, vegetables, and other
articles to prevent the introduction or dissemination of plant pests or
noxious weeds into or through the United States. Within part 305, Sec.
305.6 (referred to below as the regulations) sets out requirements for
treatment procedures, monitoring, facilities, and enclosures needed for
performing sustained refrigeration (cold treatment) sufficient to kill
certain insect pests associated with imported fruits and vegetables and
with regulated articles moved interstate from quarantined areas within
the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The PPQ Treatment Manual is available at (https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/treatment.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most imported fruits or vegetables that require cold treatment
undergo that treatment while in transit to the United States. However,
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) also allows
imported fruits or vegetables to undergo cold treatment at an approved
cold treatment facility in either the country of origin or after
arrival in the United States at a cold storage warehouse approved by
the APHIS Administrator.
In Sec. 305.6, paragraph (b) limits cold treatment facilities to
those cold storage warehouses approved by the Administrator and located
in the area north of 39[deg] latitude and east of 104[deg] longitude,
or under special conditions at one of the following ports, which are
outside the geographic area stipulated in the regulations: The maritime
ports of Wilmington, NC; Seattle, WA; Corpus Christi, TX; and Gulfport,
MS; Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Seattle, WA; and Hartsfield-
Atlanta International Airport, Atlanta, GA. The location restrictions
serve as an additional safeguard against the possibility that fruit
flies or other pests could escape from imported articles prior to
treatment and become established in the United States.
As stated previously, the regulations do allow cold treatment
facilities to be located outside the geographical area stipulated by
the regulations. In order to approve those locations, APHIS conducts
site-specific evaluations and determines whether regulated articles can
be safely transported to cold treatment facilities under special
conditions to mitigate the possible escape of pests of concern.
Proposed Additional Port
APHIS has received a petition from North Bay Produce, Inc., to
designate the MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, as an
approved location for the cold treatment of imported fruits or
vegetables. In addition, some importers of fruits and vegetables have
shown considerable interest in locating cold treatment facilities in
places that are not currently allowed under the regulations. Currently,
no cold treatment facilities are available near the proposed location.
An APHIS-approved cold treatment facility in this location would allow
importers to treat fruits and vegetables arriving from foreign
locations and requiring a treatment to meet U.S. entry requirements.
In response to this request, we are proposing to add the MidAmerica
St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, to the list of ports that are
designated as approved locations for cold treatment of imported fruits
or vegetables. This proposal is based on our determination that there
are biological barriers in the area of this port that, along with
certain safeguards, would prevent the introduction of fruit flies and
other insect pests in the unlikely event that they escape from
shipments of fruits or vegetables before the fruits or vegetables
undergo cold treatment.
To support this action, we have prepared a treatment evaluation
document (TED) entitled ``Allowing a new cold treatment facility at
[[Page 27865]]
Mascoutah, Illinois, located outside the area currently authorized.''
Copies of the TED may be obtained from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and may be viewed on the Internet on the
Regulations.gov Web site or in our reading room (see ADDRESSES above
for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov and the location and
hours of the reading room). In the TED, we concluded that the pest
risks posed by the establishment of a cold treatment facility at the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, outside of the area north
of 39[deg] latitude and east of 104[deg] longitude, can be adequately
managed through use of special conditions to mitigate the possible
escape of pests of concern.
Special Conditions for the MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL
In addition to the general requirements in Sec. 305.6(a) through
(g) of the regulations concerning cold treatment, we are proposing to
apply the following requirements to cold treatment conducted at the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL. These requirements would
be added to the regulations as a new paragraph (h)(5) of Sec. 305.6.
In paragraph (h)(5)(i) of Sec. 305.6, we are proposing that bulk
and containerized consignments of fruits or vegetables arriving for
cold treatment would have to be cold treated within the area over which
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is assigned the authority to
accept entries of merchandise, to collect duties, and to enforce the
various provisions of the customs and navigation laws in force.
Under this proposal, paragraph (h)(5)(ii) would lay out a number of
conditions that any proposed facility would have to meet, which would
be agreed upon by the involved parties and included in the facility
compliance agreement required under paragraph (f) of Sec. 305.6. These
conditions, which are described below, would be listed in paragraphs
(h)(5)(ii)(A) through (h)(5)(ii)(F).
The facility would only be certified if APHIS determines
that regulated articles would be safely transported to the facility
from the port of arrival without significant risk that plant pests will
escape in transit or while the regulated articles are at the facility.
Bulk consignments (those consignments which are stowed and
unloaded by the case or bin) of fruit would have to arrive in pest-
proof packaging that prevents the escape of the pests of concern.
The facility would have to ensure that the pest-proof
cartons are off-loaded from containers in a safeguarded environment and
at no time would the articles be removed from the cartons prior to
treatment.
Arrangements for treatment would have to be made before
the departure of a consignment from its port of entry or points of
origin in the United States. The cold treatment facility and APHIS must
agree in advance on the route by which consignments are allowed to move
between the aircraft on which they arrived at the airport and the cold
treatment facility. The movement of consignments from aircraft to a
cold treatment facility will not be allowed until an acceptable route
has been agreed upon.
The facility would have to have contingency plans,
approved by the APHIS Administrator, for safely destroying or disposing
of fruit.
The facility would have to maintain physical separation of
treated articles from untreated articles and apply all required
safeguards (e.g., larger consignments are broken up into smaller boxes
following treatment and those treated articles are required to be
packaged in pest-proof containers per an agreement between the
treatment facility and the importer) before releasing to local markets
or for movement to other States.
We believe that the mitigation measures described above, which are
based on safeguards in place for other cold treatment facilities, would
prevent the introduction of fruit flies and other plant pests that may
be in shipments of fruits or vegetables arriving at the MidAmerica St.
Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, for cold treatment.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule is subject to Executive Order 12866. However,
for this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its
review under Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding
the economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Copies of
the full analysis are available by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
Based on the information we have, there is no reason to conclude
that adoption of this proposed rule would result in any significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. However, we
do not currently have all of the data necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on potential effects. In
particular, we are interested in determining the number and kind of
small entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation
of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would amend the regulations to allow a new cold
treatment facility to be located at MidAmerica St. Louis Airport,
Mascoutah, Illinois. The facility is expected to be used mainly to
treat imported blueberries. While most, if not all, blueberry farms in
the United States are small entities, we do not expect the rule to
significantly affect the market for blueberries because the proposed
facility is not projected to result in a significant increase in the
quantity of blueberries imported into the United States. The United
States is the world's largest producer of blueberries and U.S.
blueberry exports exceed imports four-fold.
The proposed cold treatment facility is expected to benefit the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport and the local economy. The facility is
expected to result in at least 800 flights of produce requiring cold
treatment per year, raising at least $8 million in direct income for
the airport. MidAmerica St. Louis Airport is classified as a small
entity within the NAICS category of Other Airport Operations (NAICS
488119), for which the small-entity standard is annual revenue of not
more than $30 million. Our initial regulatory flexibility analysis
discusses the expected positive economic effects of the rule for the
MidAmerica St. Louis Airport and related local businesses.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
[[Page 27866]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 305
Irradiation, Phytosanitary treatment, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 305 as follows:
PART 305--PHYTOSANITARY TREATMENTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 305 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. Section 305.6 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b), by adding the words ``MidAmerica St. Louis
Airport, Mascoutah, IL;'' after the words ``Seattle-Tacoma
International Airport, Seattle, WA;'' and
0
b. By adding a new paragraph (h)(5) to read as set forth below.
Sec. 305.6 Cold treatment requirements.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(5) Airport of Mascoutah, IL. Consignments of fruits or vegetables
arriving at the MidAmerica St. Louis Airport, Mascoutah, IL, for cold
treatment, in addition to meeting all other applicable requirements of
this section, must meet the following special conditions:
(i) Bulk and containerized consignments of fruits or vegetables
arriving for cold treatment must be cold treated within the area over
which the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is assigned the
authority to accept entries of merchandise, to collect duties, and to
enforce the various provisions of the customs and navigation laws in
force.
(ii) APHIS will evaluate facility safeguards in light of the plant
health risks involved and approve the operation of a facility in that
location subject to the following conditions to be agreed upon by the
involved parties and included in the compliance agreement required in
Sec. 305.6(f):
(A) The facility will only be certified if the Administrator
determines that the regulated articles could be safely transported to
the facility from the point of entry or origin without significant risk
that plant pests will escape in transit to the facility or while the
regulated articles are at the facility.
(B) Bulk consignments (those consignments which are stowed and
unloaded by the case or bin) of fruit must arrive in pest-proof
packaging that prevents the escape of the pests of concern.
(C) The facility must ensure that the pest-proof cartons are off-
loaded from containers in a safeguarded environment and at no time are
the articles to be removed from the cartons prior to treatment.
(D) Arrangements for treatment must be made before the departure of
a consignment from its port of entry or points of origin in the United
States. The cold treatment facility and APHIS must agree in advance on
the route by which consignments are allowed to move between the
aircraft on which they arrived at the airport and the cold treatment
facility. The movement of consignments from aircraft to a cold
treatment facility will not be allowed until an acceptable route has
been agreed upon.
(E) The facility must have contingency plans, approved by the
Administrator, for safely destroying or disposing of fruits or
vegetables.
(F) The facility must maintain physical separation of treated
articles from untreated articles and apply all required safeguards
(e.g., larger consignments are broken up into smaller boxes following
treatment and those treated articles are required to be packaged in
pest-proof containers per an agreement between the treatment facility
and the importer) before releasing to local markets or for movement to
other States.
Done in Washington, DC, this May 8, 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-11322 Filed 5-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P