Recordkeeping for Approved Livestock Facilities and Slaughtering and Rendering Establishments, 26486-26489 [2013-10825]
Download as PDF
26486
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
notwithstanding the exemption of that
section with respect to such rules.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
chapters 17A and 25, established
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
Under section 202 of the UMRA, RHS
generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with Federal mandates that may result
in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any 1 year. When such a statement
is needed for a rule, section 205 of the
UMRA generally requires RHS to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least costly, most costeffective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule. This rule contains no
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this rule is
not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The revisions in this rulemaking for
part 3575 are subject to the burden
package assigned OMB control number
0575–0137. No paperwork changes are
being proposed.
educational, or health care facilities are
also eligible.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 3575.25 to add paragraph
(j) to read as follows:
§ 3575.25
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The rule has been reviewed with
regard to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). Under Section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Agency has determined and
certified by signature of this document
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities since this
rulemaking action does not involve a
new or expanded program. Furthermore,
the program does not treat entities
differently based solely on their size.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an Environmental
Impact Statement is not required.
Community facilities, Guaranteed
loans, Loan programs.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The policies contained in the rule
does not have any substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor do the
rules impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments. Therefore, consultation
with the States is not required.
Implementation
It is the policy of this Agency that
rules relating to public property, loans,
grants, benefits, or contracts shall
comply with 5 U.S.C. 553,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs
This final rule is not subject to the
provisions of EO 12372, which require
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials, because this
rule provides general guidance on
something. Applications for Agency
programs will be reviewed individually
under EO 12372 as required by program
procedures.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Agency is committed to
complying with the E-Government Act,
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3575
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, chapter XXXV of subtitle B,
title 7, Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
CHAPTER XXXV—RURAL HOUSING
SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
PART 3575—GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 3575
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart A—Community Programs
Guaranteed Loans
2. Amend § 3575.24 to revise
paragraph (a)(1)(x) to read as follows:
■
§ 3575.24
Eligible loan purposes.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(x) Community parks, community
activity centers, and similar types of
facilities that are an integral part of the
orderly development of a community.
Recreational components, such as, but
not limited to, playground equipment of
an otherwise non-recreational eligible
community facility such as childcare,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Ineligible loan purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Golf courses, water parks, race
tracks or other recreational type
facilities inherently commercial in
nature.
Dated: February 22, 2013.
˜
Tammye Trevino,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–10783 Filed 5–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0039]
RIN 0579–AC61
Recordkeeping for Approved Livestock
Facilities and Slaughtering and
Rendering Establishments
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are amending the
regulations regarding the interstate
movement of livestock to require
approved livestock facilities and listed
slaughtering and rendering
establishments to maintain certain
records for 5 years. Currently, approved
livestock facilities are required to retain
certain records for 2 years, and there are
no record retention provisions that
apply to listed slaughtering and
rendering establishments. Requiring the
retention of certain records for 5 years
will allow us to trace the prior
movements of diseased livestock further
into the past than is currently possible,
thus providing the opportunity to locate
potentially infected or exposed livestock
that might otherwise remain
unidentified. We are also requiring the
operators of slaughtering and rendering
establishments to sign listing
agreements to document their agreement
to comply with the requirements of the
regulations for listed slaughtering and
rendering establishments. Such
agreements are currently required for
approved livestock facilities, but not for
slaughtering and rendering facilities.
This change will eliminate that
inconsistency.
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
DATES:
Effective Date: June 6, 2013.
Dr.
Debra C. Cox, Senior Staff Veterinarian,
National Surveillance Unit, Centers for
Epidemiology and Animal Health, VS,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 200,
Riverdale, MD 20737; 301–851–3504.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The regulations in subchapter C of
chapter I, title 9, of the Code of Federal
Regulations contain provisions designed
to prevent the dissemination of
livestock or poultry diseases in the
United States and to facilitate the
control and eradication of such diseases.
The regulations in 9 CFR part 71
(referred to below as the regulations)
include general prohibitions on the
interstate movement of animals that
could spread livestock or poultry
diseases.
The regulations in § 71.20 contain
provisions under which livestock
facilities may acquire and retain status
as an approved facility. To obtain
approval, facilities must enter into an
agreement with the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) in
which they agree to follow certain
procedures when handling livestock
entering the facility. Part of this
agreement states that documents such as
weight tickets, sales slips, and records
of origin, identification, and destination
that relate to livestock that are in, or that
have been in, the facility shall be
maintained by the facility for a period
of 2 years. Such records would be
critical in the event that APHIS or State
animal health officials needed to
conduct a disease traceback
investigation.
On July 7, 2008, we published in the
Federal Register a proposed rule 1 (73
FR 38343–38346, Docket No. APHIS–
2007–0039) to amend the regulations to
require approved livestock facilities and
listed slaughtering and rendering
establishments to maintain certain
records for 5 years. We also proposed to
require the operators of slaughtering and
rendering establishments to sign listing
agreements to document their agreement
to comply with the requirements of the
regulations for listed slaughtering and
rendering establishments.
We solicited comments for 60 days
ending September 5, 2008. We received
four comments by that date. They were
from two private citizens (one of whom
submitted two comments) and a
rendering industry association. Two of
the commenters expressed concerns
1 To view the proposed rule and the comments
we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2007-0039.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
about farm animal welfare and general
dissatisfaction with the United States
Department of Agriculture, but did not
address the specific provisions of the
proposed rule. The third commenter
raised a number of specific concerns
regarding the proposed rule. They are
discussed below.
The commenter stated that we were
incorrect to say that there are no
recordkeeping requirements for
rendering establishments, noting that
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) requires rendering establishments
to keep records. The commenter
questioned why rendering
establishments should be subject to
more stringent recordkeeping
requirements by APHIS than by FDA
and stated that the agencies should
better coordinate their recordkeeping
requirements.
The commenter is correct that the
FDA has recordkeeping requirements in
21 CFR part 589 that apply to rendering
establishments; however, those
regulations require records to be kept for
1 year only. In our proposed rule, we
noted that there are currently no APHIS
requirements for recordkeeping by
rendering establishments. APHIS
attempts to coordinate its recordkeeping
requirements with other agencies
whenever possible, and we do not
expect rendering establishments to keep
different categories of records from what
they already keep under FDA
requirements. However, some animal
diseases have incubation periods of
several years, and an animal disease
investigation may require tracing
animals that were exposed to an
infected animal several years before the
outbreak occurred. If exposed animals
have been slaughtered or died and been
sent to a rendering establishment, we
need to be able to confirm that they
reached these terminal points. For this
reason, we need the records to be kept
for longer than 1 year. We are making
no changes to the final rule in response
to this comment.
The same commenter stated that,
because of increased costs associated
with the 2008 FDA ruminant feed ban
rule, there may be an increased number
of carcasses disposed of illegally. The
commenter asked why APHIS has not
addressed the issue of carcass disposal.
In its final rule prohibiting the use of
certain cattle origin materials in the
food or feed of all animals, published in
the Federal Register on April 25, 2008
(73 FR 22720–22758, Docket No.
2002N–0273), FDA responded to
comments that expressed the same
concern regarding the impact the FDA
rule could have on the availability and
cost of disposal of cattle material
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26487
prohibited in animal feed and dead
stock cattle. In its response, FDA
acknowledged that carcass disposal
problems exist in certain States or
regions and that developing and
implementing adequate solutions to
these problems is challenging. On April
24, 2009, FDA published a document
confirming the effective date of the
April 2008 final rule (74 FR 18626–
18628, Docket No. FDA–2002–N–0031)
and announced that it would delay
compliance with the provisions of the
April 2008 final rule until October 26,
2009, stating that a delay in the
compliance date would allow the
significant number of stakeholders
affected by the April 2008 final rule
more time to comply with the new
regulations or adjust to the loss of
rendering service. In that notice, FDA
also acknowledged that it might be
particularly challenging to address such
disposal problems by the compliance
date. FDA issued a revision of the Small
Entities Compliance Guide for
Renderers on May 6, 2009, and has
stated its intent to engage in further
outreach to the rendering industry,
pertinent State agencies, and others
affected by the rule. APHIS has been
working and will continue to work with
FDA to address any animal disease
issues associated with implementation
of the feed ban rule, and will revisit the
issue of carcass disposal if necessary.
We are making no changes to the rule
in response to this comment.
The commenter stated that APHIS’s
animal disease traceability program
does not address animal identification
beyond death unless the animal is
slaughtered in a federally inspected
slaughter facility. The commenter
expressed concern that without stronger
identification requirements for animals
and carcasses, additional recordkeeping
requirements for renderers will have no
benefit for animal health.
The commenter is correct that APHIS’
animal disease traceability program
focuses on the identification of live
animals rather than of carcasses. We did
not propose to require renderers to keep
traceability information for carcasses
they collect, or to establish new
categories of records, but only to keep
the records they do have for a longer
period of time. We acknowledge that
there may be an animal disease risk
from products produced by rendering an
animal that has died of disease;
however, primary authority for
regulating rendered products falls to the
Food Safety and Inspection Service and
FDA. APHIS has worked and will
continue to work with these agencies to
ensure that any animal disease issues
associated with these products are
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
26488
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
addressed. We are making no changes in
response to this comment, however.
It is necessary for us to make a change
in this rule so that its provisions are
consistent with those of our final rule
on animal disease traceability (see 78 FR
2040–2075, Docket No. APHIS–2009–
0091). Specifically, in that final rule we
acknowledge, in responding to
comments, that the lifespans of poultry
and swine are relatively short compared
with those of other species of livestock,
and that records for those animals do
not, therefore, need to be kept as longs
as records for other animals. Hence, in
that final rule, we provided for the
retention of records for poultry and
swine to 2 years rather than 5. To be
consistent, this final rule keeps the
recordkeeping period for poultry and
swine at 2 years. Records for cattle,
bison, sheep, goats, cervids, and equines
will still be required to be kept for 5
years.
In addition, we are making a change
to § 71.20(a)(8) to add a reference to 9
CFR part 86 to the list of regulations
under which livestock must be
identified at the time of, or prior to,
entry into a livestock facility. This
change should have been included in
the animal disease traceability final rule
but was inadvertently omitted.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, with the changes discussed in this
document.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
We have prepared an economic
analysis for this rule. The economic
analysis provides a cost-benefit analysis,
as required by Executive Orders 12866
and 13563, which direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and equity). Executive Order
13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. The
economic analysis also examines the
potential economic effects of this rule
on small entities, as required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
economic analysis is summarized
below. Copies of the full analysis are
available on the Regulations.gov Web
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
site (see footnote 1 in this document for
a link to Regulations.gov) or by
contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This rule amends the regulations
regarding the interstate movement of
livestock to require approved livestock
facilities and listed slaughtering and
rendering establishments to maintain
certain records for 5 years. Currently,
approved livestock facilities are
required to retain certain records for 2
years. No record retention provisions
currently apply to listed slaughtering
and rendering establishments.
For some livestock diseases, the
incubation period (the time from when
an animal becomes infected until the
disease is evident) can last for years
before clinical or behavioral signs
become apparent. A prime example is
bovine tuberculosis, a contagious
disease of both animals and humans
caused by specific types of bacteria that
are part of the Mycobacterium group.
The incubation period for bovine
tuberculosis can range from months to
years. By requiring record retention for
5 years, the rule will benefit APHIS and
State animal health authorities, the
operators of livestock, slaughtering, and
rendering facilities, and livestock
producers, generally, in the event that a
traceback is required to locate the
source herd of an animal discovered to
have a disease such as bovine
tuberculosis.
The rule is not expected to result in
significant costs for the affected entities.
An analysis of similar recordkeeping
costs expected to be incurred in
connection with a May 2012 Food
Safety and Inspection Service
rulemaking (75 FR 14361–14368, Docket
No. FSIS–2008–0025) found the costs to
be minimal. For approved livestock
facilities that are already required to
retain records for 2 years, and rendering
facilities that are currently maintaining
relevant records per FDA’s
requirements, the costs will be smaller
still.
The alternative to the rule would be
to leave the regulations unchanged. In
doing so, possible reductions in losses
associated with animal diseases that
have long incubation periods would not
be realized. The rule is preferred to the
current regulations, given the relatively
minor recordkeeping costs that would
be incurred to achieve improved
traceback capabilities.
The benefits of the rule will justify its
costs. There were no comments received
on the economic analysis prepared for
the proposed rule, nor were other
significant economic issues raised.
While the majority of approved
livestock facilities, slaughtering
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
establishments, and rendering
establishments are small entities, costs
incurred because of the rule are also
expected to be small.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts
all State and local laws and regulations
that are in conflict with this rule; (2) has
no retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this final rule,
which were filed under 0579–0342,
have been submitted for approval to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). When OMB notifies us of its
decision, if approval is denied, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of what action
we plan to take.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 7, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 71
Animal diseases, Livestock, Poultry
and poultry products, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR
part 71 as follows:
PART 71—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
2. Section 71.20 is amended as
follows:
■ a. By revising paragraph (a)(7) to read
set forth below.
■ b. In paragraph (a)(8), by removing the
words ‘‘and 85’’ and adding the words
‘‘85, and 86’’ in their place.
■ c. In the OMB citation at the end of
the section, by removing the words
‘‘number 0579–0258’’ and adding the
words ‘‘numbers 0579–0258 and 0579–
0342’’ in their place.
■
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 71.20
facility under this section by signing a
listing agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The management of the
slaughtering or rendering establishment
agrees that weight tickets, sales slips,
and records of origin, identification, and
destination that relate to livestock that
are in, or have been in, the
establishment will be maintained by the
establishment. For poultry and swine,
such documents must be kept for at
least 2 years, and for cattle and bison,
sheep and goats, cervids, and equines,
for at least 5 years. APHIS, APHIS
contractors, and State animal health
representatives will be permitted to
review and copy or scan these
documents during normal business
hours.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
May 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–10825 Filed 5–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
Approval of livestock facilities.
(a) * * *
(7) Documents such as weight tickets,
sales slips, and records of origin,
identification, and destination that
related to livestock that are in, or that
have been in, the facility shall be
maintained by the facility. For poultry
and swine, such documents must be
kept for at least 2 years, and for cattle
and bison, sheep and goats, cervids, and
equines, for at least 5 years. APHIS
representatives and State
representatives shall be permitted to
review and copy those documents
during normal business hours.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 71.21 is amended as
follows:
■ a. By redesignating paragraphs (a)(l),
(a)(2), and (a)(3) as paragraphs (a)(2),
(a)(3), and (a)(4), respectively, and by
adding a new paragraph (a)(l) to read as
set forth below.
■ b. By adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to
read as set forth below.
■ c. In the OMB citation at the end of
the section, by removing the words
‘‘number 0579–0212’’ and adding the
words ‘‘numbers 0579–0212 and 0579–
0342’’ in their place.
§ 71.21 Tissue and blood testing at
slaughter.
(a) * * *
(1) The owner or operator of the
establishment must agree, in writing, to
meet the requirements for a listed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:22 May 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
12 CFR Part 1075
[Docket No. CFPB–2013–0011]
RIN 3170–AA38
Consumer Financial Civil Penalty Fund
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act or Act) establishes a
‘‘Consumer Financial Civil Penalty
Fund’’ (Civil Penalty Fund) into which
the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau (Bureau) must deposit any civil
penalty it obtains against any person in
any judicial or administrative action
under Federal consumer financial laws.
Under the Act, funds in the Civil
Penalty Fund may be used for payments
to the victims of activities for which
civil penalties have been imposed under
Federal consumer financial laws. In
addition, to the extent that such victims
cannot be located or such payments are
otherwise not practicable, the Bureau
may use funds in the Civil Penalty Fund
for the purpose of consumer education
and financial literacy programs. This
rule implements the relevant statutory
provisions by articulating the Bureau’s
interpretation of what kinds of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26489
payments to victims are appropriate and
by establishing procedures for allocating
funds for such payments to victims and
for consumer education and financial
literacy programs.
DATES: This rule is effective May 7,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Bateman, Attorney-Advisor,
Legal Division, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection, 1700 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20552, at (202) 435–
7821.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act
established the Bureau with a mandate
to regulate the offering and provision of
consumer financial products and
services under the Federal consumer
financial laws. Public Law 111–203,
§ 1011(a) (2010), codified at 12 U.S.C.
5491(a). The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes
the Bureau, among other things, to
enforce Federal consumer financial law
through judicial actions and
administrative adjudication
proceedings. 12 U.S.C. 5563, 5564. In
those actions and proceedings, a court
or the Bureau may require a party that
has violated the law to pay a civil
penalty. See, e.g., 12 U.S.C. 5565.
Section 1017(d)(1) of the Dodd-Frank
Act establishes a separate fund in the
Federal Reserve, the ‘‘Consumer
Financial Civil Penalty Fund’’ (Civil
Penalty Fund), into which the Bureau
must deposit civil penalties it collects
from any person in any judicial or
administrative action under Federal
consumer financial laws. 12 U.S.C.
5497(d)(1). Under the Act, amounts in
the Fund may be used ‘‘for payments to
the victims of activities for which civil
penalties have been imposed under the
Federal consumer financial laws.’’ 12
U.S.C. 5497(d)(2). In addition, ‘‘[t]o the
extent that such victims cannot be
located or such payments are otherwise
not practicable,’’ the Bureau may use
amounts in the Fund for consumer
education and financial literacy
programs. Id.
II. Summary of the Rule
This rule implements section
1017(d)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act, 12
U.S.C. 5497(d)(2), by specifying the
conditions under which victims will be
eligible for payment from the Civil
Penalty Fund and the amounts of the
payments that the Bureau may make to
them. In addition, the rule sets forth
procedures the Bureau will follow for
allocating and distributing funds from
the Civil Penalty Fund.
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26486-26489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. APHIS-2007-0039]
RIN 0579-AC61
Recordkeeping for Approved Livestock Facilities and Slaughtering
and Rendering Establishments
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the regulations regarding the interstate
movement of livestock to require approved livestock facilities and
listed slaughtering and rendering establishments to maintain certain
records for 5 years. Currently, approved livestock facilities are
required to retain certain records for 2 years, and there are no record
retention provisions that apply to listed slaughtering and rendering
establishments. Requiring the retention of certain records for 5 years
will allow us to trace the prior movements of diseased livestock
further into the past than is currently possible, thus providing the
opportunity to locate potentially infected or exposed livestock that
might otherwise remain unidentified. We are also requiring the
operators of slaughtering and rendering establishments to sign listing
agreements to document their agreement to comply with the requirements
of the regulations for listed slaughtering and rendering
establishments. Such agreements are currently required for approved
livestock facilities, but not for slaughtering and rendering
facilities. This change will eliminate that inconsistency.
[[Page 26487]]
DATES: Effective Date: June 6, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Debra C. Cox, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Surveillance Unit, Centers for Epidemiology and
Animal Health, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 200, Riverdale, MD
20737; 301-851-3504.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in subchapter C of chapter I, title 9, of the Code
of Federal Regulations contain provisions designed to prevent the
dissemination of livestock or poultry diseases in the United States and
to facilitate the control and eradication of such diseases. The
regulations in 9 CFR part 71 (referred to below as the regulations)
include general prohibitions on the interstate movement of animals that
could spread livestock or poultry diseases.
The regulations in Sec. 71.20 contain provisions under which
livestock facilities may acquire and retain status as an approved
facility. To obtain approval, facilities must enter into an agreement
with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) in which
they agree to follow certain procedures when handling livestock
entering the facility. Part of this agreement states that documents
such as weight tickets, sales slips, and records of origin,
identification, and destination that relate to livestock that are in,
or that have been in, the facility shall be maintained by the facility
for a period of 2 years. Such records would be critical in the event
that APHIS or State animal health officials needed to conduct a disease
traceback investigation.
On July 7, 2008, we published in the Federal Register a proposed
rule \1\ (73 FR 38343-38346, Docket No. APHIS-2007-0039) to amend the
regulations to require approved livestock facilities and listed
slaughtering and rendering establishments to maintain certain records
for 5 years. We also proposed to require the operators of slaughtering
and rendering establishments to sign listing agreements to document
their agreement to comply with the requirements of the regulations for
listed slaughtering and rendering establishments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go
to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2007-0039.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We solicited comments for 60 days ending September 5, 2008. We
received four comments by that date. They were from two private
citizens (one of whom submitted two comments) and a rendering industry
association. Two of the commenters expressed concerns about farm animal
welfare and general dissatisfaction with the United States Department
of Agriculture, but did not address the specific provisions of the
proposed rule. The third commenter raised a number of specific concerns
regarding the proposed rule. They are discussed below.
The commenter stated that we were incorrect to say that there are
no recordkeeping requirements for rendering establishments, noting that
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires rendering
establishments to keep records. The commenter questioned why rendering
establishments should be subject to more stringent recordkeeping
requirements by APHIS than by FDA and stated that the agencies should
better coordinate their recordkeeping requirements.
The commenter is correct that the FDA has recordkeeping
requirements in 21 CFR part 589 that apply to rendering establishments;
however, those regulations require records to be kept for 1 year only.
In our proposed rule, we noted that there are currently no APHIS
requirements for recordkeeping by rendering establishments. APHIS
attempts to coordinate its recordkeeping requirements with other
agencies whenever possible, and we do not expect rendering
establishments to keep different categories of records from what they
already keep under FDA requirements. However, some animal diseases have
incubation periods of several years, and an animal disease
investigation may require tracing animals that were exposed to an
infected animal several years before the outbreak occurred. If exposed
animals have been slaughtered or died and been sent to a rendering
establishment, we need to be able to confirm that they reached these
terminal points. For this reason, we need the records to be kept for
longer than 1 year. We are making no changes to the final rule in
response to this comment.
The same commenter stated that, because of increased costs
associated with the 2008 FDA ruminant feed ban rule, there may be an
increased number of carcasses disposed of illegally. The commenter
asked why APHIS has not addressed the issue of carcass disposal.
In its final rule prohibiting the use of certain cattle origin
materials in the food or feed of all animals, published in the Federal
Register on April 25, 2008 (73 FR 22720-22758, Docket No. 2002N-0273),
FDA responded to comments that expressed the same concern regarding the
impact the FDA rule could have on the availability and cost of disposal
of cattle material prohibited in animal feed and dead stock cattle. In
its response, FDA acknowledged that carcass disposal problems exist in
certain States or regions and that developing and implementing adequate
solutions to these problems is challenging. On April 24, 2009, FDA
published a document confirming the effective date of the April 2008
final rule (74 FR 18626-18628, Docket No. FDA-2002-N-0031) and
announced that it would delay compliance with the provisions of the
April 2008 final rule until October 26, 2009, stating that a delay in
the compliance date would allow the significant number of stakeholders
affected by the April 2008 final rule more time to comply with the new
regulations or adjust to the loss of rendering service. In that notice,
FDA also acknowledged that it might be particularly challenging to
address such disposal problems by the compliance date. FDA issued a
revision of the Small Entities Compliance Guide for Renderers on May 6,
2009, and has stated its intent to engage in further outreach to the
rendering industry, pertinent State agencies, and others affected by
the rule. APHIS has been working and will continue to work with FDA to
address any animal disease issues associated with implementation of the
feed ban rule, and will revisit the issue of carcass disposal if
necessary. We are making no changes to the rule in response to this
comment.
The commenter stated that APHIS's animal disease traceability
program does not address animal identification beyond death unless the
animal is slaughtered in a federally inspected slaughter facility. The
commenter expressed concern that without stronger identification
requirements for animals and carcasses, additional recordkeeping
requirements for renderers will have no benefit for animal health.
The commenter is correct that APHIS' animal disease traceability
program focuses on the identification of live animals rather than of
carcasses. We did not propose to require renderers to keep traceability
information for carcasses they collect, or to establish new categories
of records, but only to keep the records they do have for a longer
period of time. We acknowledge that there may be an animal disease risk
from products produced by rendering an animal that has died of disease;
however, primary authority for regulating rendered products falls to
the Food Safety and Inspection Service and FDA. APHIS has worked and
will continue to work with these agencies to ensure that any animal
disease issues associated with these products are
[[Page 26488]]
addressed. We are making no changes in response to this comment,
however.
It is necessary for us to make a change in this rule so that its
provisions are consistent with those of our final rule on animal
disease traceability (see 78 FR 2040-2075, Docket No. APHIS-2009-0091).
Specifically, in that final rule we acknowledge, in responding to
comments, that the lifespans of poultry and swine are relatively short
compared with those of other species of livestock, and that records for
those animals do not, therefore, need to be kept as longs as records
for other animals. Hence, in that final rule, we provided for the
retention of records for poultry and swine to 2 years rather than 5. To
be consistent, this final rule keeps the recordkeeping period for
poultry and swine at 2 years. Records for cattle, bison, sheep, goats,
cervids, and equines will still be required to be kept for 5 years.
In addition, we are making a change to Sec. 71.20(a)(8) to add a
reference to 9 CFR part 86 to the list of regulations under which
livestock must be identified at the time of, or prior to, entry into a
livestock facility. This change should have been included in the animal
disease traceability final rule but was inadvertently omitted.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the
changes discussed in this document.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget.
We have prepared an economic analysis for this rule. The economic
analysis provides a cost-benefit analysis, as required by Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563, which direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The economic analysis
also examines the potential economic effects of this rule on small
entities, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The economic
analysis is summarized below. Copies of the full analysis are available
on the Regulations.gov Web site (see footnote 1 in this document for a
link to Regulations.gov) or by contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
This rule amends the regulations regarding the interstate movement
of livestock to require approved livestock facilities and listed
slaughtering and rendering establishments to maintain certain records
for 5 years. Currently, approved livestock facilities are required to
retain certain records for 2 years. No record retention provisions
currently apply to listed slaughtering and rendering establishments.
For some livestock diseases, the incubation period (the time from
when an animal becomes infected until the disease is evident) can last
for years before clinical or behavioral signs become apparent. A prime
example is bovine tuberculosis, a contagious disease of both animals
and humans caused by specific types of bacteria that are part of the
Mycobacterium group. The incubation period for bovine tuberculosis can
range from months to years. By requiring record retention for 5 years,
the rule will benefit APHIS and State animal health authorities, the
operators of livestock, slaughtering, and rendering facilities, and
livestock producers, generally, in the event that a traceback is
required to locate the source herd of an animal discovered to have a
disease such as bovine tuberculosis.
The rule is not expected to result in significant costs for the
affected entities. An analysis of similar recordkeeping costs expected
to be incurred in connection with a May 2012 Food Safety and Inspection
Service rulemaking (75 FR 14361-14368, Docket No. FSIS-2008-0025) found
the costs to be minimal. For approved livestock facilities that are
already required to retain records for 2 years, and rendering
facilities that are currently maintaining relevant records per FDA's
requirements, the costs will be smaller still.
The alternative to the rule would be to leave the regulations
unchanged. In doing so, possible reductions in losses associated with
animal diseases that have long incubation periods would not be
realized. The rule is preferred to the current regulations, given the
relatively minor recordkeeping costs that would be incurred to achieve
improved traceback capabilities.
The benefits of the rule will justify its costs. There were no
comments received on the economic analysis prepared for the proposed
rule, nor were other significant economic issues raised. While the
majority of approved livestock facilities, slaughtering establishments,
and rendering establishments are small entities, costs incurred because
of the rule are also expected to be small.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws
and regulations that are in conflict with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that this regulation will not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this final rule, which were
filed under 0579-0342, have been submitted for approval to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB). When OMB notifies us of its decision,
if approval is denied, we will publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of what action we plan to take.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
[[Page 26489]]
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2908.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 71
Animal diseases, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301-8317; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
0
2. Section 71.20 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (a)(7) to read set forth below.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(8), by removing the words ``and 85'' and adding the
words ``85, and 86'' in their place.
0
c. In the OMB citation at the end of the section, by removing the words
``number 0579-0258'' and adding the words ``numbers 0579-0258 and 0579-
0342'' in their place.
Sec. 71.20 Approval of livestock facilities.
(a) * * *
(7) Documents such as weight tickets, sales slips, and records of
origin, identification, and destination that related to livestock that
are in, or that have been in, the facility shall be maintained by the
facility. For poultry and swine, such documents must be kept for at
least 2 years, and for cattle and bison, sheep and goats, cervids, and
equines, for at least 5 years. APHIS representatives and State
representatives shall be permitted to review and copy those documents
during normal business hours.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 71.21 is amended as follows:
0
a. By redesignating paragraphs (a)(l), (a)(2), and (a)(3) as paragraphs
(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4), respectively, and by adding a new paragraph
(a)(l) to read as set forth below.
0
b. By adding a new paragraph (a)(5) to read as set forth below.
0
c. In the OMB citation at the end of the section, by removing the words
``number 0579-0212'' and adding the words ``numbers 0579-0212 and 0579-
0342'' in their place.
Sec. 71.21 Tissue and blood testing at slaughter.
(a) * * *
(1) The owner or operator of the establishment must agree, in
writing, to meet the requirements for a listed facility under this
section by signing a listing agreement.
* * * * *
(5) The management of the slaughtering or rendering establishment
agrees that weight tickets, sales slips, and records of origin,
identification, and destination that relate to livestock that are in,
or have been in, the establishment will be maintained by the
establishment. For poultry and swine, such documents must be kept for
at least 2 years, and for cattle and bison, sheep and goats, cervids,
and equines, for at least 5 years. APHIS, APHIS contractors, and State
animal health representatives will be permitted to review and copy or
scan these documents during normal business hours.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of May 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-10825 Filed 5-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P