Changes to Scrapie Flock Certification Program, 25943-25945 [2013-10543]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2013 / Notices
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR part 340.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6
describe the form that a petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must
be included in the petition.
APHIS has received a petition (APHIS
Petition Number 13–022–01p) from the
J.R. Simplot Company (Simplot) of
Boise, ID, seeking a determination of
nonregulated status of potatoes
(Solanum tuberosum) designated as
InnateTM potatoes (events E12, E24, F10,
F37, J3, J55, J78, G11, H37, and H50),
which have been genetically engineered
for low acrylamide potential and
reduced black spot bruise. Acrylamide
is a human neurotoxicant and potential
carcinogen that may form in potatoes
and other starchy foods under certain
cooking conditions. The petition states
that these potatoes are unlikely to pose
a plant pest risk and, therefore, should
not be a regulated article under APHIS’
regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
As described in the petition, InnateTM
potatoes have been genetically
engineered through the insertion of
genetic elements from potato or wild
potato (a group of related plant species
that are sexually compatible with
potato) using Simplot’s InnateTM
technologies. Simplot’s InnateTM
technologies allow researchers to isolate
genetic elements from any plant
genome, rearrange them, or link them
together in desired permutations, and
introduce them back into the genome,
without incorporating anything other
than plant DNA. InnateTM potatoes are
currently regulated under 7 CFR part
340. Interstate movements and field
tests of InnateTM potatoes have been
conducted under notifications
acknowledged by APHIS.
Field tests conducted under APHIS
oversight allowed for evaluation in a
natural agricultural setting while
imposing measures to minimize the risk
of persistence in the environment after
completion of the tests. Data are
gathered on multiple parameters and
used by the applicant to evaluate
agronomic characteristics and product
performance. These and other data are
used by APHIS to determine if the new
variety poses a plant pest risk.
Paragraph (d) of § 340.6 provides that
APHIS will publish a notice in the
Federal Register providing 60 days for
public comment for petitions for a
determination of nonregulated status.
On March 6, 2012, we published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 13258–13260,
Docket No. APHIS–2011–0129) a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 May 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
notice 1 describing our process for
soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determinations
of nonregulated status for GE organisms.
In that notice we indicated that APHIS
would accept written comments
regarding a petition once APHIS
deemed it complete.
In accordance with § 340.6(d) of the
regulations and our process for
soliciting public input when
considering petitions for determinations
of nonregulated status for GE organisms,
we are publishing this notice to inform
the public that APHIS will accept
written comments regarding the petition
for a determination of nonregulated
status from interested or affected
persons for a period of 60 days from the
date of this notice. The petition is
available for public review, and copies
are available as indicated under
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT above. We are
interested in receiving comments
regarding potential environmental and
interrelated economic issues and
impacts that APHIS may determine
should be considered in our evaluation
of the petition. We are particularly
interested in receiving information
regarding the extent of true potato seed
use for planting in the United States as
compared to the use of asexually
propagated fragments of potato tubers.
We are also interested in receiving
comments regarding biological, cultural,
or ecological issues, and we encourage
the submission of scientific data,
studies, or research to support your
comments. We also request that, when
possible, commenters provide relevant
information regarding specific localities
or regions as potato growth, crop
management, and crop utilization may
vary considerably by geographic region.
After the comment period closes,
APHIS will review all written comments
received during the comment period
and any other relevant information. Any
substantive issues identified by APHIS
based on our review of the petition and
our evaluation and analysis of
comments will be considered in the
development of our decisionmaking
documents.
As part of our decisionmaking process
regarding a GE organism’s regulatory
status, APHIS prepares a plant pest risk
assessment to assess its plant pest risk
and the appropriate environmental
documentation—either an
environmental assessment (EA) or an
environmental impact statement (EIS)—
in accordance with the National
1 To view the notice, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS–
2011-0129.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25943
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to
provide the Agency with a review and
analysis of any potential environmental
impacts associated with the petition
request. For petitions for which APHIS
prepares an EA, APHIS will follow our
published process for soliciting public
comment (see footnote 1) and publish a
separate notice in the Federal Register
announcing the availability of APHIS’
EA and plant pest risk assessment.
Should APHIS determine that an EIS is
necessary, APHIS will complete the
NEPA EIS process in accordance with
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR part 1500–1508)
and APHIS’ NEPA implementing
regulations (7 CFR part 372).
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of
April 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–10504 Filed 5–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2012–0023]
Changes to Scrapie Flock Certification
Program
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are giving notice of
changes to the Scrapie Flock
Certification Program (SFCP), a
voluntary program for sheep and goat
flock owners who wish to reduce and/
or eliminate the risk of introducing
classical scrapie into their flocks. In
order to refocus the program’s risk
reduction strategy on animal sampling,
we plan to eliminate the Complete
Monitored category of the SFCP. This
will affect all ‘‘Complete Monitored’’
and ‘‘Certified’’ flocks. Flock owners
who are currently enrolled in the
Complete Monitored or Certified
category who wish to remain in the
SFCP will be allowed to enroll in either
the Select category or the Export
category. This change will allow us to
apply limited agency resources to areas
that most effectively contribute to
scrapie eradication, such as nationwide
surveillance activities for the disease in
sheep and goats.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
25944
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2013 / Notices
We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before June 3,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-00230001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2012–0023, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0023 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Alan Huddleston, Associate National
Scrapie Program Coordinator, National
Center for Animal Health Programs, VS,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–
3497.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scrapie is
a degenerative and ultimately fatal
disease affecting the central nervous
systems of sheep and goats. It belongs to
a group of diseases called transmissible
spongiform encephalopathies. The
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), administers a
National Scrapie Eradication Program
(NSEP) to eliminate classical scrapie
from the United States. The Scrapie
Flock Certification Program (SFCP),
described in regulations at 9 CFR part
54, is a voluntary program within the
broader NSEP. Producers who elect to
join the SFCP agree to follow a set of
requirements outlined in the ‘‘Scrapie
Flock Certification Program Standards’’
(program standards). We plan to revise
the program standards for the SFCP. The
SFCP program standards may be viewed
on the APHIS Web site at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/
animal_diseases/scrapie/. Printed
copies may be obtained from the person
listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Since APHIS established the SFCP as
part of the NSEP, SFCP participants
have received tangible benefits from the
program, including a reduced risk of
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 May 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
introducing scrapie into the flock and
an increased marketability of
participating animals. However, APHIS
has evaluated the effects of the SFCP on
scrapie eradication and concluded that
the SFCP does not support national
scrapie eradication as effectively as
other surveillance activities, such as the
Regulatory Scrapie Slaughter
Surveillance (RSSS) program,
distribution of free eartags to sheep and
goat producers, and disease
investigations and flock clean ups. Due
to budget reductions in fiscal year (FY)
2012 and anticipated reductions in
upcoming fiscal years, the NSEP needs
to focus resources on its most effective
components. APHIS has therefore
decided to revise the SFCP to focus
resources on other surveillance
activities. The revisions to the SFCP are
expected to both increase the program’s
contributions toward surveillance by
approximately 50 percent and to cut the
cost of the voluntary program roughly in
half, saving about $500,000 annually for
surveillance activities. The revised
SFCP will assist APHIS in continuing to
move efficiently toward scrapie
eradication.
Effects of the SFCP on Scrapie
Eradication
Our analysis of the effects of the SFCP
on scrapie eradication found:
• Participation in the SFCP is
voluntary, and participating flocks
represent only 1 percent of the total
number of U.S. sheep flocks and goat
herds
• Participation in the SFCP has
declined by about 25 percent since
2007
• More owners are using genotyping to
reduce a sheep flock’s risk of infection
than the voluntary flock certification
program
• The Complete Monitored category of
the SFCP does not efficiently detect
scrapie cases
Surveillance and disease response
activities are the most effective
components of the scrapie program with
regard to eradication. The ability to
detect clinically healthy but infected
animals and successfully trace them
back to their infected and source flocks
has decreased scrapie prevalence by 85
percent, from 0.2 percent in 2002–2003
to less than 0.03 percent at the end of
FY 2011. The most effective activities
include:
• The RSSS program
• The distribution of free official eartags
to sheep and goat producers
• Compliance enforcement at animal
concentration points
• Disease investigations
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Decreased funding for these elements
means that many of the remaining
scrapie-infected animals in the United
States may go undetected. This could
cost the sheep and goat industries
approximately $10 million to $20
million each year scrapie continues to
be present in our national sheep and
goat population.
The SFCP is a voluntary StateFederal-industry cooperative effort
established and maintained to monitor
flocks and certify the scrapie status of
the animals enrolled in the program.
Any sheep or goat owner or manager
may apply to participate in the SFCP.
There are three categories of enrollment.
The Selective Monitored category has
the lowest level of monitoring, and
flocks participating in this category
cannot become certified. The Complete
Monitored category has a higher level of
monitoring, and flocks can achieve
Certified status after 5 years. The Export
Monitored category has the highest level
of monitoring, and flocks can become
Export Certified after 7 years.
Approximately 94 percent of all
participating flocks are in the Complete
Monitored category. The most
significant cost of the SFCP is the
annual inspection, which is currently
required for every flock participating in
the program.
The revised SFCP will eliminate the
Complete Monitored category.
Participants in this category will have
the following options: (1) Join a revised
Selective Monitored category; (2) join
the Export Monitored category; or (3)
withdraw from the program. The
Selective Monitored category will be
renamed Select Monitored, to be
consistent with the common category
reference used by the sheep and goat
industry. The revised Select Monitored
category will no longer be subject to the
annual inspection of all animals
conducted by an APHIS or State
representative under the former
Selective Monitored category. We
expect that 40 percent to 60 percent of
current Complete Monitored category
participants will either join the Select
category or withdraw from the program,
and the remaining 40 to 60 percent will
join the Export Monitored category.
Because the revised Select Monitored
category would no longer require an
annual inspection, the cost of the SFCP
will be cut roughly in half, saving about
$500,000 annually for surveillance
activities. Additionally, the Select
Monitored category will have a new
sampling requirement; flocks that join
the Select Monitored and Export
Monitored categories will therefore
contribute a greater number of animals
for scrapie testing than in the current
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2013 / Notices
program. The reduced cost of the SFCP
and the increased surveillance achieved
through the revised program will allow
APHIS to continue to move efficiently
toward full scrapie eradication.
If a participant with a flock currently
in the Complete Monitored category
chooses to join the Export Monitored
category instead of the Select Monitored
category, the flock will become an
Export Monitored flock with the same
status date that it held on its conversion
date. If it is a Certified flock, it will
become an Export Monitored flock with
5 years of time in status. APHIS will list
the flock as both an Export Monitored
flock and a Certified flock on its Web
site for 3 years or until it achieves
Export Certified status. After 3 years,
flocks that have not achieved Export
Certified status would be listed only as
Export Monitored. Most former Certified
flocks that join should be able to
achieve Export Certified status within 2
years, since Certified status required 5
years of successful monitoring and
Export Certified status requires 7 years.
We welcome public comment on this
notice and the proposed revisions to the
SFCP program standards. If no
substantive changes to the revised SFCP
are deemed necessary by the APHIS
Administrator, the revised SFCP
program will come into effect 7 days
after the close of the comment period for
this notice. If substantive changes are
deemed necessary, we will publish an
additional document in the Federal
Register to discuss them; otherwise, the
final version of the revised SFCP
program standards will be announced
and made available on the APHIS Web
site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
animal_health/animal_diseases/
scrapie/.
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of
April 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–10543 Filed 5–2–13; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–891]
Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and
Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling
Pursuant to Court Decision
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 24, 2013, the United
States Court of International Trade (CIT)
sustained the Department of
Commerce’s (the Department’s) final
results of remand determination,
regarding the scope of the Hand Trucks
Order 1 excluding the WelCom Products
MCK Magna Cart pursuant to the CIT’s
remand order in WelCom Products, Inc.
v. United States, Court No. 11–00370,
Slip Op. 12–124 (September 27, 2012)
(WelCom). See Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Order, Court No. 11–00370, dated
December 20, 2012 (WelCom MCK
Magna Cart Remand Results). Consistent
with the decision of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(Federal Circuit) in Timken Co. v.
United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades), the Department
is notifying the public that the final
judgment in this case is not in harmony
with the Department’s final scope ruling
and is amending its final scope ruling
on WelCom Products’ MCK Magna Cart.
See the memorandum entitled ‘‘Hand
Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC):
Final Scope Ruling—WelCom Products
MC2 Magna Cart, MCI Magna Cart, and
MCK Magna Cart,’’ dated September 6,
2011 (Final Scope Ruling).
DATES: Effective Date: May 4, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration—International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
1 See
Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Hand
Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s
Republic of China, 69 FR 70122 (December 2, 2004)
(Hand Trucks Order).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 May 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25945
Background
On October 12, 2010, WelCom
Products (WelCom) submitted a request
inquiring whether three of its products,
the MC2 Magna Cart, MCI Magna Cart,
and MCK Magna Cart, are outside of the
scope of the Hand Trucks Order. In the
Final Scope Ruling, the Department
found the MC2 Magna Cart and the MCI
Magna Cart are not within the scope of
the hand trucks order, but the MCK
Magna Cart is within the scope of the
Hand Trucks Order. WelCom
challenged the Department’s final
determination with respect to the MCK
Magna Cart, and U.S. producer Gleason
Industries challenged the Department’s
final determination with respect to the
MC2 Magna Cart and the MCI Magna
Cart. The Court sustained the
Department’s ruling with respect to the
latter two products, but found the
Department’s decision regarding the
MCK Magna Cart to be unreasonable.
With respect to the MCK Magna Cart,
the Court found the Department had not
justified its conclusion in light of the
Department’s prior scope rulings, and,
therefore, the ruling must be set aside
and reconsidered. The Court ordered the
Department to reconsider its conclusion
that the entire telescoping portion of the
frame must be less than 5/8″ in diameter
in order for a product to meet scope
exclusion language in the order, and to
further consider the record developed in
the ITC injury determination. See
WelCom at 14. Pursuant to the Court’s
order in WelCom, in WelCom MCK
Magna Cart Remand Results we
determined that the MCK Magna Cart is
outside the scope of the Hand Trucks
Order.2 The CIT sustained the
Department’s remand redetermination
on April 24, 2013. See WelCom
Products, Inc. v. United States, Court
Number 11–0370, Slip Op. 1354, April
24, 2013.
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at
341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,
the Federal Circuit has held that,
pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the
Department must publish a notice of a
court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’
with a Department determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries
pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
The CIT’s April 24, 2013, judgment
sustaining the Department’s remand
redetermination construing the scope of
2 The Department noted that it was conducting
the remand respectfully under protest. See WelCom
MCK Magna Cart Remand Results at 2. See also
Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d 1371
(Fed. Cir. 2003).
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25943-25945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10543]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0023]
Changes to Scrapie Flock Certification Program
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are giving notice of changes to the Scrapie Flock
Certification Program (SFCP), a voluntary program for sheep and goat
flock owners who wish to reduce and/or eliminate the risk of
introducing classical scrapie into their flocks. In order to refocus
the program's risk reduction strategy on animal sampling, we plan to
eliminate the Complete Monitored category of the SFCP. This will affect
all ``Complete Monitored'' and ``Certified'' flocks. Flock owners who
are currently enrolled in the Complete Monitored or Certified category
who wish to remain in the SFCP will be allowed to enroll in either the
Select category or the Export category. This change will allow us to
apply limited agency resources to areas that most effectively
contribute to scrapie eradication, such as nationwide surveillance
activities for the disease in sheep and goats.
[[Page 25944]]
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before June
3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2012-0023-0001.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2012-0023, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2012-
0023 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Alan Huddleston, Associate
National Scrapie Program Coordinator, National Center for Animal Health
Programs, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231;
(301) 851-3497.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scrapie is a degenerative and ultimately
fatal disease affecting the central nervous systems of sheep and goats.
It belongs to a group of diseases called transmissible spongiform
encephalopathies. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), administers a National
Scrapie Eradication Program (NSEP) to eliminate classical scrapie from
the United States. The Scrapie Flock Certification Program (SFCP),
described in regulations at 9 CFR part 54, is a voluntary program
within the broader NSEP. Producers who elect to join the SFCP agree to
follow a set of requirements outlined in the ``Scrapie Flock
Certification Program Standards'' (program standards). We plan to
revise the program standards for the SFCP. The SFCP program standards
may be viewed on the APHIS Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/scrapie/. Printed copies may be
obtained from the person listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Since APHIS established the SFCP as part of the NSEP, SFCP
participants have received tangible benefits from the program,
including a reduced risk of introducing scrapie into the flock and an
increased marketability of participating animals. However, APHIS has
evaluated the effects of the SFCP on scrapie eradication and concluded
that the SFCP does not support national scrapie eradication as
effectively as other surveillance activities, such as the Regulatory
Scrapie Slaughter Surveillance (RSSS) program, distribution of free
eartags to sheep and goat producers, and disease investigations and
flock clean ups. Due to budget reductions in fiscal year (FY) 2012 and
anticipated reductions in upcoming fiscal years, the NSEP needs to
focus resources on its most effective components. APHIS has therefore
decided to revise the SFCP to focus resources on other surveillance
activities. The revisions to the SFCP are expected to both increase the
program's contributions toward surveillance by approximately 50 percent
and to cut the cost of the voluntary program roughly in half, saving
about $500,000 annually for surveillance activities. The revised SFCP
will assist APHIS in continuing to move efficiently toward scrapie
eradication.
Effects of the SFCP on Scrapie Eradication
Our analysis of the effects of the SFCP on scrapie eradication
found:
Participation in the SFCP is voluntary, and participating
flocks represent only 1 percent of the total number of U.S. sheep
flocks and goat herds
Participation in the SFCP has declined by about 25 percent
since 2007
More owners are using genotyping to reduce a sheep flock's
risk of infection than the voluntary flock certification program
The Complete Monitored category of the SFCP does not
efficiently detect scrapie cases
Surveillance and disease response activities are the most effective
components of the scrapie program with regard to eradication. The
ability to detect clinically healthy but infected animals and
successfully trace them back to their infected and source flocks has
decreased scrapie prevalence by 85 percent, from 0.2 percent in 2002-
2003 to less than 0.03 percent at the end of FY 2011. The most
effective activities include:
The RSSS program
The distribution of free official eartags to sheep and goat
producers
Compliance enforcement at animal concentration points
Disease investigations
Decreased funding for these elements means that many of the
remaining scrapie-infected animals in the United States may go
undetected. This could cost the sheep and goat industries approximately
$10 million to $20 million each year scrapie continues to be present in
our national sheep and goat population.
The SFCP is a voluntary State-Federal-industry cooperative effort
established and maintained to monitor flocks and certify the scrapie
status of the animals enrolled in the program. Any sheep or goat owner
or manager may apply to participate in the SFCP. There are three
categories of enrollment. The Selective Monitored category has the
lowest level of monitoring, and flocks participating in this category
cannot become certified. The Complete Monitored category has a higher
level of monitoring, and flocks can achieve Certified status after 5
years. The Export Monitored category has the highest level of
monitoring, and flocks can become Export Certified after 7 years.
Approximately 94 percent of all participating flocks are in the
Complete Monitored category. The most significant cost of the SFCP is
the annual inspection, which is currently required for every flock
participating in the program.
The revised SFCP will eliminate the Complete Monitored category.
Participants in this category will have the following options: (1) Join
a revised Selective Monitored category; (2) join the Export Monitored
category; or (3) withdraw from the program. The Selective Monitored
category will be renamed Select Monitored, to be consistent with the
common category reference used by the sheep and goat industry. The
revised Select Monitored category will no longer be subject to the
annual inspection of all animals conducted by an APHIS or State
representative under the former Selective Monitored category. We expect
that 40 percent to 60 percent of current Complete Monitored category
participants will either join the Select category or withdraw from the
program, and the remaining 40 to 60 percent will join the Export
Monitored category. Because the revised Select Monitored category would
no longer require an annual inspection, the cost of the SFCP will be
cut roughly in half, saving about $500,000 annually for surveillance
activities. Additionally, the Select Monitored category will have a new
sampling requirement; flocks that join the Select Monitored and Export
Monitored categories will therefore contribute a greater number of
animals for scrapie testing than in the current
[[Page 25945]]
program. The reduced cost of the SFCP and the increased surveillance
achieved through the revised program will allow APHIS to continue to
move efficiently toward full scrapie eradication.
If a participant with a flock currently in the Complete Monitored
category chooses to join the Export Monitored category instead of the
Select Monitored category, the flock will become an Export Monitored
flock with the same status date that it held on its conversion date. If
it is a Certified flock, it will become an Export Monitored flock with
5 years of time in status. APHIS will list the flock as both an Export
Monitored flock and a Certified flock on its Web site for 3 years or
until it achieves Export Certified status. After 3 years, flocks that
have not achieved Export Certified status would be listed only as
Export Monitored. Most former Certified flocks that join should be able
to achieve Export Certified status within 2 years, since Certified
status required 5 years of successful monitoring and Export Certified
status requires 7 years.
We welcome public comment on this notice and the proposed revisions
to the SFCP program standards. If no substantive changes to the revised
SFCP are deemed necessary by the APHIS Administrator, the revised SFCP
program will come into effect 7 days after the close of the comment
period for this notice. If substantive changes are deemed necessary, we
will publish an additional document in the Federal Register to discuss
them; otherwise, the final version of the revised SFCP program
standards will be announced and made available on the APHIS Web site at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/scrapie/.
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of April 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-10543 Filed 5-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P