Notice of Availability of a Swine Brucellosis and Pseudorabies Proposed Action Plan, 9028-9029 [2013-02772]
Download as PDF
9028
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2013 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2010–0086]
Notice of Availability of a Swine
Brucellosis and Pseudorabies
Proposed Action Plan
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
We are making a proposed
action plan describing a potential new
approach to managing swine brucellosis
and pseudorabies available for public
review and comment. Swine brucellosis
and pseudorabies have been eliminated
from commercial swine herds within
the United States, but potential sources
of introduction of these diseases exist
and we believe program modifications
are necessary to address these risks. The
proposed action plan presents our
current thinking about the program
modifications that we are considering.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before April 8,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=APHIS–2010–
0086–0001.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2010–0086, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS–2010–0086 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Troy Bigelow, National Center for
Animal Health Programs, VS, APHIS,
Federal Building Room 891, 210 Walnut
Street, Des Moines, IA 50309; (515) 284–
4121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Background
Brucellosis is a contagious disease,
caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Feb 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
that affects both animals and humans.
The disease mainly affects cattle, bison,
and swine. Swine brucellosis, caused by
Brucella suis, causes loss of young
through spontaneous abortion or birth of
weak offspring, reduced lactation, and
infertility. There is no economically
feasible treatment for brucellosis in
swine and other livestock. In humans,
brucellosis initially causes flu-like
symptoms, but the disease may develop
into a variety of chronic conditions,
including arthritis. Humans can be
treated for brucellosis with antibiotics.
Pseudorabies is a contagious,
communicable disease of livestock,
primarily swine, and other animals. The
disease, also known as Aujeszky’s
disease, is caused by a herpes virus. The
disease does not affect humans, and, for
livestock, several pseudorabies vaccines
exist.
The regulations contained in 9 CFR
part 78 (referred to below as the swine
brucellosis regulations) provide, among
other things, conditions under which
swine may be considered reactors for or
exposed to swine brucellosis, and
conditions under which the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
would validate a herd or State as free of
the disease. The swine brucellosis
regulations also specify requirements for
the interstate movement of breeding
swine. These requirements are
predicated on whether the swine
originate from a herd or a State
validated by APHIS as free of swine
brucellosis, and, if not, whether the
swine are brucellosis reactors or
brucellosis exposed.
The regulations in 9 CFR part 85
(referred to below as the pseudorabies
regulations) provide, among other
things, conditions under which swine
may be considered infected with or
exposed to pseudorabies. The
pseudorabies regulations also contain
requirements for the interstate
movement of swine that are known to be
infected with or exposed to
pseudorabies, requirements for the
interstate movement of swine
vaccinated for pseudorabies but not
known to be infected with or exposed to
the disease, and requirements for the
interstate movement of all other swine.
The regulations presuppose widespread
testing of commercial swine for
pseudorabies.
The swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies regulations are intended to
prevent the spread of swine brucellosis
and pseudorabies through the interstate
movement of diseased or exposed swine
or through their contact with unaffected
swine during or following movement
from their premises of origin. APHIS
established the swine brucellosis and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pseudorabies regulations when the
diseases were prevalent in the
commercial swine herd within the
United States.
This is no longer the case; both swine
brucellosis and pseudorabies have been
eliminated from commercial herds
within the United States. As a result, in
recent years, our swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies program activities have
placed an increased emphasis on
monitoring the risk that these diseases
will be introduced into swine herds.
These monitoring activities have
identified feral swine as reservoirs of
the two diseases. In recent years, APHIS
has identified several swine herds
throughout the United States that were
infected with swine brucellosis or
pseudorabies. In each case, it was
determined that the swine became
infected through contact with feral
swine at their premises.
Feral swine populations are known to
exist in at least 38 States. While the
exact distribution and density of each
population is unknown, the populations
are believed to be growing. In each State
in which feral swine are known to exist,
APHIS considers the commercial swine
within the State at risk of becoming
exposed to or infected with swine
brucellosis or pseudorabies. APHIS
considers States or Tribes that border or
obtain swine from States with feral
swine populations to face similar, but
lower, risks. The current swine
brucellosis and pseudorabies
regulations do not account for these
risks.
Accordingly, in this document,
APHIS announces the availability of a
proposed action plan for a new
approach for the swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies programs. The proposal,
titled ‘‘A New Approach for Managing
Swine Brucellosis and Swine
Pseudorabies Virus: Veterinary Services’
Proposed Action Plan,’’ may be viewed
on the Regulations.gov Web site or in
our reading room. (A link to
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room
are provided under the heading
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
notice.) In addition, copies may be
obtained by calling or writing to the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. The proposed
action plan is also available on APHIS’
Web site, at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
animal_health/animal_dis_spec/swine/.
While commenters are invited to
address any aspects of the plan in their
comments, we specifically request
comment regarding the following topics:
• Risk. The new approach outlined in
the plan considers feral swine to be
reservoirs of swine brucellosis and
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 26 / Thursday, February 7, 2013 / Notices
pseudorabies and to present a
significant risk of introducing the
diseases into commercial swine
populations. Does the plan accurately
present the risk that feral swine pose of
transmitting these diseases? Are there
other significant potential sources of
introduction that APHIS should
consider?
• Responsibility. The plan outlines an
approach in which States and Tribes
would play a significant role in
identifying and monitoring possible
sources of introduction of pseudorabies
or swine brucellosis into the
commercial swine herd in their State or
Tribe, with the ultimate goals of quickly
identifying and responding to outbreaks
and thereby preventing the spread of
swine brucellosis or pseudorabies
through the interstate movement of
commercial swine. What role should a
State or Tribe have for ensuring that
swine moved from the State or Tribe do
not spread these diseases? What role lies
with APHIS, or with the commercial
swine industry?
• Swine Health Plan. Would the
Swine Health Plan concept described in
the action plan be sufficient to prevent
the spread of swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies through the interstate
movement of diseased swine? If the plan
concept would be sufficient, do States
and Tribes currently have sufficient
personnel and resources to draft and
implement such a plan? How long is it
likely to take a State or Tribe to draft
such a plan and arrange resources as
specified in their plan?
• Program consolidation. The action
plan considers consolidating the swine
brucellosis and pseudorabies programs,
and the regulations pertaining to these
programs, into one domestic swine
health program. Does such a
consolidation make sense? If not, how
would the two regulatory programs need
to differ?
• Indemnity. The plan considers
consolidating the existing regulations
governing indemnity paid for swine
destroyed because they are known to be
infected with swine brucellosis with
those governing indemnity paid for
swine destroyed because they are
known to be infected with pseudorabies,
as well as streamlining certain
provisions of the regulations. Does such
a consolidation make sense?
We will consider all comments that
we receive as we continue to explore
potential new approaches to managing
swine brucellosis and pseudorabies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Feb 06, 2013
Jkt 229001
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
February 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–02772 Filed 2–6–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests;
ID; Clear Creek Integrated Restoration
Project
AGENCY:
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
ACTION:
This is a corrected notice.
This notice updates information about
proposed actions in the Clear Creek
Integrated Restoration Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
The DEIS will include two site-specific,
nonsignificant amendments of the Nez
Perce Forest Plan (1987). The proposed
amendments would clarify the Forest’s
interpretation of old growth standards
found in the Nez Perce Forest Plan, and
would adopt the Regional soils standard
for the Clear Creek Integrated
Restoration project area. The original
notice was published in the Federal
Register on January 6, 2012, pages 775
and 776. The Forest Service gives notice
of its intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Clear Creek Integrated Restoration
Project. The Proposed action would use
a combination of timber harvest, precommercial thinning, prescribed fire
and reforestation to achieve the desired
range of age classes, size classes,
vegetative species distributions, habitat
complexity (diversity) and landscape
patterns across the forested portions of
the project area. Road decommissioning,
culvert replacements and road
improvements are also proposed to
improve watershed health. The EIS will
analyze the effects of the proposed
action and alternatives. The Nez PerceClearwater Forest invites comments and
suggestions on the issues to be
addressed. The agency gives notice of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis and decision making
process on the proposal so interested
and affected members of the public may
participate and contribute to the final
decision.
SUMMARY:
The Draft Environmental Impact
Statement is expected in March 2013,
and will be followed by a 45-day public
comment period. The Final
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9029
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected in November 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send written or electronic
comments to Lois Hill, Interdisciplinary
Team Leader; Kamiah Ranger Station;
903 3rd Street; Kamiah, ID 83536; FAX
208–935–4257; Email commentsnorthern-nezperce-moosecreek@fs.fed.us. Include your name,
address, organization represented (if
any), and the name of the project for
which you are submitting comments.
Electronic comments will be accepted in
MS Word, Word Perfect, or Rich Text
formats. Comments received in response
to this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois
Hill, Interdisciplinary Team Leader,
(208) 935–4258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
objective of the Clear Creek Integrated
Restoration Project is to manage forest
vegetation to restore natural disturbance
patterns; improve long term resistance
and resilience at the landscape level;
reduce fuels; improve watershed
conditions; improve elk habitat
effectiveness; improve habitat for early
seral species; and maintain habitat
structure, function, and diversity.
Timber outputs from the proposed
action would be used to offset treatment
costs and support the economic
structure of local communities and
provide for regional and national needs.
Purpose and Need for the Proposal
Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat
Improvement
Purpose: Trend vegetation species
composition, structure, and
distributions toward desired conditions
described in the Forest Plan.
Need: There is a need to change tree
species composition by retaining and
planting early seral species, such as
ponderosa pine, western larch and
western white pine. The project area has
a high proportion of grand fir/Douglas
fir habitat. These habitats tend to be
more susceptible to insects and
diseases. Grand fir is unlikely to survive
a wildfire. There is a need to trend the
area toward a more diverse and resilient
forest structure by creating a range of
age classes, size classes, habitat
complexity (diversity) and disturbance
patterns that more closely emulate
natural mixed severity disturbance.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9028-9029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02772]
[[Page 9028]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0086]
Notice of Availability of a Swine Brucellosis and Pseudorabies
Proposed Action Plan
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are making a proposed action plan describing a potential
new approach to managing swine brucellosis and pseudorabies available
for public review and comment. Swine brucellosis and pseudorabies have
been eliminated from commercial swine herds within the United States,
but potential sources of introduction of these diseases exist and we
believe program modifications are necessary to address these risks. The
proposed action plan presents our current thinking about the program
modifications that we are considering.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before April
8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0086-0001.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2010-0086, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2010-
0086 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Troy Bigelow, National Center for
Animal Health Programs, VS, APHIS, Federal Building Room 891, 210
Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309; (515) 284-4121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Brucellosis is a contagious disease, caused by bacteria of the
genus Brucella, that affects both animals and humans. The disease
mainly affects cattle, bison, and swine. Swine brucellosis, caused by
Brucella suis, causes loss of young through spontaneous abortion or
birth of weak offspring, reduced lactation, and infertility. There is
no economically feasible treatment for brucellosis in swine and other
livestock. In humans, brucellosis initially causes flu-like symptoms,
but the disease may develop into a variety of chronic conditions,
including arthritis. Humans can be treated for brucellosis with
antibiotics.
Pseudorabies is a contagious, communicable disease of livestock,
primarily swine, and other animals. The disease, also known as
Aujeszky's disease, is caused by a herpes virus. The disease does not
affect humans, and, for livestock, several pseudorabies vaccines exist.
The regulations contained in 9 CFR part 78 (referred to below as
the swine brucellosis regulations) provide, among other things,
conditions under which swine may be considered reactors for or exposed
to swine brucellosis, and conditions under which the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) would validate a herd or State as
free of the disease. The swine brucellosis regulations also specify
requirements for the interstate movement of breeding swine. These
requirements are predicated on whether the swine originate from a herd
or a State validated by APHIS as free of swine brucellosis, and, if
not, whether the swine are brucellosis reactors or brucellosis exposed.
The regulations in 9 CFR part 85 (referred to below as the
pseudorabies regulations) provide, among other things, conditions under
which swine may be considered infected with or exposed to pseudorabies.
The pseudorabies regulations also contain requirements for the
interstate movement of swine that are known to be infected with or
exposed to pseudorabies, requirements for the interstate movement of
swine vaccinated for pseudorabies but not known to be infected with or
exposed to the disease, and requirements for the interstate movement of
all other swine. The regulations presuppose widespread testing of
commercial swine for pseudorabies.
The swine brucellosis and pseudorabies regulations are intended to
prevent the spread of swine brucellosis and pseudorabies through the
interstate movement of diseased or exposed swine or through their
contact with unaffected swine during or following movement from their
premises of origin. APHIS established the swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies regulations when the diseases were prevalent in the
commercial swine herd within the United States.
This is no longer the case; both swine brucellosis and pseudorabies
have been eliminated from commercial herds within the United States. As
a result, in recent years, our swine brucellosis and pseudorabies
program activities have placed an increased emphasis on monitoring the
risk that these diseases will be introduced into swine herds.
These monitoring activities have identified feral swine as
reservoirs of the two diseases. In recent years, APHIS has identified
several swine herds throughout the United States that were infected
with swine brucellosis or pseudorabies. In each case, it was determined
that the swine became infected through contact with feral swine at
their premises.
Feral swine populations are known to exist in at least 38 States.
While the exact distribution and density of each population is unknown,
the populations are believed to be growing. In each State in which
feral swine are known to exist, APHIS considers the commercial swine
within the State at risk of becoming exposed to or infected with swine
brucellosis or pseudorabies. APHIS considers States or Tribes that
border or obtain swine from States with feral swine populations to face
similar, but lower, risks. The current swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies regulations do not account for these risks.
Accordingly, in this document, APHIS announces the availability of
a proposed action plan for a new approach for the swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies programs. The proposal, titled ``A New Approach for
Managing Swine Brucellosis and Swine Pseudorabies Virus: Veterinary
Services' Proposed Action Plan,'' may be viewed on the Regulations.gov
Web site or in our reading room. (A link to Regulations.gov and
information on the location and hours of the reading room are provided
under the heading ADDRESSES at the beginning of this notice.) In
addition, copies may be obtained by calling or writing to the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The proposed
action plan is also available on APHIS' Web site, at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_dis_spec/swine/.
While commenters are invited to address any aspects of the plan in
their comments, we specifically request comment regarding the following
topics:
Risk. The new approach outlined in the plan considers
feral swine to be reservoirs of swine brucellosis and
[[Page 9029]]
pseudorabies and to present a significant risk of introducing the
diseases into commercial swine populations. Does the plan accurately
present the risk that feral swine pose of transmitting these diseases?
Are there other significant potential sources of introduction that
APHIS should consider?
Responsibility. The plan outlines an approach in which
States and Tribes would play a significant role in identifying and
monitoring possible sources of introduction of pseudorabies or swine
brucellosis into the commercial swine herd in their State or Tribe,
with the ultimate goals of quickly identifying and responding to
outbreaks and thereby preventing the spread of swine brucellosis or
pseudorabies through the interstate movement of commercial swine. What
role should a State or Tribe have for ensuring that swine moved from
the State or Tribe do not spread these diseases? What role lies with
APHIS, or with the commercial swine industry?
Swine Health Plan. Would the Swine Health Plan concept
described in the action plan be sufficient to prevent the spread of
swine brucellosis and pseudorabies through the interstate movement of
diseased swine? If the plan concept would be sufficient, do States and
Tribes currently have sufficient personnel and resources to draft and
implement such a plan? How long is it likely to take a State or Tribe
to draft such a plan and arrange resources as specified in their plan?
Program consolidation. The action plan considers
consolidating the swine brucellosis and pseudorabies programs, and the
regulations pertaining to these programs, into one domestic swine
health program. Does such a consolidation make sense? If not, how would
the two regulatory programs need to differ?
Indemnity. The plan considers consolidating the existing
regulations governing indemnity paid for swine destroyed because they
are known to be infected with swine brucellosis with those governing
indemnity paid for swine destroyed because they are known to be
infected with pseudorabies, as well as streamlining certain provisions
of the regulations. Does such a consolidation make sense?
We will consider all comments that we receive as we continue to
explore potential new approaches to managing swine brucellosis and
pseudorabies.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of February 2013.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-02772 Filed 2-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P