Bayer CropScience LP; Determination of Nonregulated Status for Cotton Genetically Engineered for Insect Resistance and Herbicide Tolerance, 63278-63279 [2011-26349]
Download as PDF
63278
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 197
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2010–0102]
Bayer CropScience LP; Determination
of Nonregulated Status for Cotton
Genetically Engineered for Insect
Resistance and Herbicide Tolerance
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our determination that a genetically
engineered cotton developed by Bayer
CropScience LP, designated as
TwinLinkTM cotton (events T304–40
and GHB119), which has been
genetically engineered to be tolerant to
the herbicide glufosinate and resistant
to several lepidopteran pests, is no
longer considered a regulated article
under our regulations governing the
introduction of certain genetically
engineered organisms. Our
determination is based on our
evaluation of data submitted by Bayer
CropScience LP in its petition for a
determination of nonregulated status,
our analysis of available scientific data,
and comments received from the public
in response to our previous notice
announcing the availability of the
petition for nonregulated status and its
associated environmental assessment
and plant pest risk assessment. This
notice also announces the availability of
our written determination and finding
of no significant impact.
DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may read the
documents referenced in this notice and
the comments we received in our
reading room. The reading room is
located in Room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 11, 2011
Jkt 226001
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming. Those documents are also
available on the Internet at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/
not_reg.html and are posted with the
previous notice and the comments we
received on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS–2010–0102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Evan Chestnut, Policy Analyst,
Biotechnology Regulatory Services,
APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 147,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301) 734–
0942, e-mail:
evan.a.chestnut@aphis.usda.gov. To
obtain copies of the documents
referenced in this notice, contact Ms.
Cindy Eck at (301) 734–0667, e-mail:
cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
that TwinLinkTM cotton is unlikely to
pose a plant pest risk and, therefore,
should not be a regulated article under
APHIS’ regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
In a notice1 published in the Federal
Register on June 28, 2011 (76 FR 37769–
37770, Docket No. APHIS–2010–0102),
APHIS announced the availability of the
Bayer petition, a plant pest risk
assessment (PPRA), and a draft
environmental assessment (EA) for
public comment. APHIS solicited
comments on the petition, whether the
subject cotton is likely to pose a plant
pest risk, the draft EA, and the PPRA for
60 days ending on August 29, 2011.
APHIS received two comments during
the comment period. The commenters
expressed general opposition to
genetically engineered crops but did not
provide any specific comments
regarding the petition, draft EA, or
PPRA.
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340,
‘‘Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through
Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant
Pests or Which There Is Reason to
Believe Are Plant Pests,’’ regulate,
among other things, the introduction
(importation, interstate movement, or
release into the environment) of
organisms and products altered or
produced through genetic engineering
that are plant pests or that there is
reason to believe are plant pests. Such
genetically engineered organisms and
products are considered ‘‘regulated
articles.’’
The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide
that any person may submit a petition
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR part 340.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6
describe the form that a petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must
be included in the petition.
APHIS received a petition (APHIS
Petition Number 08–340–01p) from
Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer), seeking a
determination of nonregulated status for
TwinLinkTM cotton (events T304–40
and GHB119), which has been
genetically engineered to be tolerant to
the herbicide glufosinate and resistant
to several lepidopteran pests, stating
To provide the public with
documentation of APHIS’ review and
analysis of any potential environmental
impacts associated with the
determination of nonregulated status for
Bayer’s TwinLinkTM cotton, an EA has
been prepared. The EA was prepared in
accordance with: (1) The National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). Based on our EA and other
pertinent scientific data, APHIS has
reached a finding of no significant
impact with regard to the preferred
alternative identified in the EA.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Environmental Policy Act
Determination
Based on APHIS’ analysis of field and
laboratory data submitted by Bayer,
references provided in the petition,
peer-reviewed publications, information
analyzed in the EA, the PPRA, and
comments provided by the public,
APHIS has determined that Bayer’s
TwinLinkTM cotton is unlikely to pose
a plant pest risk and therefore is no
1 To view the notice, petition, draft EA, the PPRA,
and the comments we received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2010-0102.
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2011 / Notices
longer subject to our regulations
governing the introduction of certain
genetically engineered organisms.
Copies of the signed determination
document, as well as copies of the
petition, PPRA, EA, and finding of no
significant impact are available as
indicated in the ADDRESSES and FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT sections
of this notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of
October 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–26349 Filed 10–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. APHIS–2011–0038]
Background
Monsanto Co.; Determination of
Nonregulated Status for Soybean
Genetically Engineered for Insect
Resistance
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our determination that a soybean line
developed by the Monsanto Co.,
designated as event MON 87701, which
has been genetically engineered for
insect resistance, is no longer
considered a regulated article under our
regulations governing the introduction
of certain genetically engineered
organisms. Our determination is based
on our evaluation of data submitted by
the Monsanto Company in its petition
for a determination of nonregulated
status, our analysis of available
scientific data, and comments received
from the public in response to our
previous notice announcing the
availability of the petition for
nonregulated status and its associated
environmental assessment and plant
pest risk assessment. This notice also
announces the availability of our
written determination and finding of no
significant impact.
DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may read the
documents referenced in this notice and
the comments we received in our
reading room. The reading room is
located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and
jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Oct 11, 2011
Jkt 226001
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming. Those documents are also
available on the Internet at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/
not_reg.html and are posted with the
previous notice and the comments we
received on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS–2011–0038.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Evan Chestnut, Policy Analyst,
Biotechnology Regulatory Services,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301) 734–
0942, e-mail:
evan.a.chestnut@aphis.usda.gov. To
obtain copies of the documents
referenced in this notice, contact Ms.
Cindy Eck at (301) 734–0667, e-mail:
cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov.
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340,
‘‘Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through
Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant
Pests or Which There Is Reason to
Believe Are Plant Pests,’’ regulate,
among other things, the introduction
(importation, interstate movement, or
release into the environment) of
organisms and products altered or
produced through genetic engineering
that are plant pests or that there is
reason to believe are plant pests. Such
genetically engineered organisms and
products are considered ‘‘regulated
articles.’’
The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide
that any person may submit a petition
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR part 340.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6
describe the form that a petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must
be included in the petition.
APHIS received a petition (APHIS
Petition Number 09–082–01p) from the
Monsanto Company (Monsanto) of St.
Louis, MO, seeking a determination of
nonregulated status for soybean (Glycine
max) designated as event MON 87701,
which has been genetically engineered
for insect resistance, stating that this
soybean is unlikely to pose a plant pest
risk and, therefore, should not be a
regulated article under APHIS’
regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63279
In a notice1 published in the Federal
Register on June 28, 2011 (76 FR 37770–
37771, Docket No. APHIS–2011–0038),
APHIS announced the availability of the
Monsanto petition, a plant pest risk
assessment (PPRA), and a draft
environmental assessment (EA) for
public comment. APHIS solicited
comments on the petition, whether the
subject soybeans are likely to pose a
plant pest risk, the draft EA, and the
PPRA for 60 days ending on August 29,
2011.
APHIS received four comments
during the comment period. Two
commenters referenced a different
soybean line. One commenter expressed
general opposition to genetically
engineered crops but did not provide
any specific comments on the petition,
draft EA, or PPRA. One commenter
suggested that APHIS should analyze
the impacts of MON 87701 on bees and
groundwater. APHIS has addressed the
issues raised by this commenter in an
attachment to the finding of no
significant impact, and impacts to nontarget insects and impacts on water are
both addressed in the EA.
National Environmental Policy Act
To provide the public with
documentation of APHIS’ review and
analysis of any potential environmental
impacts associated with the
determination of nonregulated status for
Monsanto’s soybean event MON 87701,
an EA has been prepared. The EA was
prepared in accordance with: (1) The
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). Based on our EA, the response to
public comments, and other pertinent
scientific data, APHIS has reached a
finding of no significant impact with
regard to the preferred alternative
identified in the EA.
Determination
Based on APHIS’ analysis of field and
laboratory data submitted by Monsanto,
references provided in the petition,
peer-reviewed publications, information
analyzed in the EA, the PPRA,
comments provided by the public, and
information provided in APHIS’
response to those public comments,
APHIS has determined that Monsanto’s
1 To view the notice, petition, draft EA, the PPRA,
and the comments we received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2011-0038.
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63278-63279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26349]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2011 /
Notices
[[Page 63278]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0102]
Bayer CropScience LP; Determination of Nonregulated Status for
Cotton Genetically Engineered for Insect Resistance and Herbicide
Tolerance
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public of our determination that a
genetically engineered cotton developed by Bayer CropScience LP,
designated as TwinLinkTM cotton (events T304-40 and GHB119),
which has been genetically engineered to be tolerant to the herbicide
glufosinate and resistant to several lepidopteran pests, is no longer
considered a regulated article under our regulations governing the
introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms. Our
determination is based on our evaluation of data submitted by Bayer
CropScience LP in its petition for a determination of nonregulated
status, our analysis of available scientific data, and comments
received from the public in response to our previous notice announcing
the availability of the petition for nonregulated status and its
associated environmental assessment and plant pest risk assessment.
This notice also announces the availability of our written
determination and finding of no significant impact.
DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may read the documents referenced in this notice and the
comments we received in our reading room. The reading room is located
in Room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone
is there to help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming. Those
documents are also available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/not_reg.html and are posted with the
previous notice and the comments we received on the Regulations.gov Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Evan Chestnut, Policy Analyst,
Biotechnology Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 147,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-0942, e-mail:
evan.a.chestnut@aphis.usda.gov. To obtain copies of the documents
referenced in this notice, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at (301) 734-0667, e-
mail: cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are
Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,''
regulate, among other things, the introduction (importation, interstate
movement, or release into the environment) of organisms and products
altered or produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or
that there is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically
engineered organisms and products are considered ``regulated
articles.''
The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated
under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 340.6 describe
the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must be included in the petition.
APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition Number 08-340-01p) from
Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer), seeking a determination of nonregulated
status for TwinLinkTM cotton (events T304-40 and GHB119),
which has been genetically engineered to be tolerant to the herbicide
glufosinate and resistant to several lepidopteran pests, stating that
TwinLinkTM cotton is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and,
therefore, should not be a regulated article under APHIS' regulations
in 7 CFR part 340.
In a notice\1\ published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2011
(76 FR 37769-37770, Docket No. APHIS-2010-0102), APHIS announced the
availability of the Bayer petition, a plant pest risk assessment
(PPRA), and a draft environmental assessment (EA) for public comment.
APHIS solicited comments on the petition, whether the subject cotton is
likely to pose a plant pest risk, the draft EA, and the PPRA for 60
days ending on August 29, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the notice, petition, draft EA, the PPRA, and the
comments we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2010-0102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APHIS received two comments during the comment period. The
commenters expressed general opposition to genetically engineered crops
but did not provide any specific comments regarding the petition, draft
EA, or PPRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
To provide the public with documentation of APHIS' review and
analysis of any potential environmental impacts associated with the
determination of nonregulated status for Bayer's TwinLinkTM
cotton, an EA has been prepared. The EA was prepared in accordance
with: (1) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of
NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR
part 372). Based on our EA and other pertinent scientific data, APHIS
has reached a finding of no significant impact with regard to the
preferred alternative identified in the EA.
Determination
Based on APHIS' analysis of field and laboratory data submitted by
Bayer, references provided in the petition, peer-reviewed publications,
information analyzed in the EA, the PPRA, and comments provided by the
public, APHIS has determined that Bayer's TwinLinkTM cotton
is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and therefore is no
[[Page 63279]]
longer subject to our regulations governing the introduction of certain
genetically engineered organisms.
Copies of the signed determination document, as well as copies of
the petition, PPRA, EA, and finding of no significant impact are
available as indicated in the ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT sections of this notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of October 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-26349 Filed 10-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P