Discontinuance of Form CO in Registration Practices, 60774-60777 [2011-25230]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
60774
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
class mail, within seven (7) working
days of the date on which the seller
discovers it cannot provide a refund by
the same method as payment was
tendered;
(2) Where a refund is made pursuant
to paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section, a
refund sent by any means at least as fast
and reliable as first class mail within
one (1) billing cycle from the date on
which the buyer’s right to refund vests
under the provisions of this part.
(c) Receipt of a properly completed
order shall mean, where the buyer
tenders full or partial payment in the
proper amount in the form of: cash,
check, or money order; authorization
from the buyer to charge an existing
charge account; or other payment
methods, the time at which the seller
receives both said payment and an order
from the buyer containing all of the
information needed by the seller to
process and ship the order. Provided,
however, that where the seller receives
notice that a payment by means other
than cash or credit as tendered by the
buyer has been dishonored or that the
buyer does not qualify for a credit sale,
receipt of a properly completed order
shall mean the time at which:
(1) The seller receives notice that a
payment by means other than cash or
credit in the proper amount tendered by
the buyer has been honored;
(2) The buyer tenders cash in the
proper amount; or
(3) The seller receives notice that the
buyer qualifies for a credit sale.
(d) Refund shall mean:
(1) Where the buyer tendered full
payment for the unshipped merchandise
in the form of cash, check, or money
order, a return of the amount tendered
in the form of cash, check, or money
order sent to the buyer;
(2) Where there is a credit sale:
(i) And the seller is a creditor, a copy
of a credit memorandum or the like or
an account statement sent to the buyer
reflecting the removal or absence of any
remaining charge incurred as a result of
the sale from the buyer’s account;
(ii) And a third party is the creditor,
an appropriate credit memorandum or
the like sent to the third party creditor
which will remove the charge from the
buyer’s account and a copy of the credit
memorandum or the like sent to the
buyer that includes the date that the
seller sent the credit memorandum or
the like to the third party creditor and
the amount of the charge to be removed,
or a statement from the seller sent to the
buyer acknowledging the cancellation of
the order and representing that it has
not taken any action regarding the order
which will result in a charge to the
buyer’s account with the third party;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Sep 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
(iii) And the buyer tendered partial
payment for the unshipped merchandise
in the form of cash, check, or money
order, a return of the amount tendered
in the form of cash, check, or money
order sent to the buyer.
(3) Where the buyer tendered
payment for the unshipped merchandise
by any means other than those
enumerated in paragraph (d)(1) or (2) of
this section:
(i) Instructions sent to the entity that
transferred payment to the seller
instructing that entity to return to the
buyer the amount tendered in the form
tendered and a statement sent to the
buyer setting forth the instructions sent
to the entity, including the date of the
instructions and the amount to be
returned to the buyer; or
(ii) A return of the amount tendered
in the form of cash, check, or money
order sent to the buyer; or
(iii) A statement from the seller sent
to the buyer acknowledging the
cancellation of the order and
representing that the seller has not taken
any action regarding the order which
will access any of the buyer’s funds.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 435.2 by revising the
introductory text of the section and the
introductory text of paragraph (a)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 435.2
Mail or telephone order sales.
In connection with mail, Internet, or
telephone order sales in or affecting
commerce, as ‘‘commerce’’ is defined in
the Federal Trade Commission Act, it
constitutes an unfair method of
competition, and an unfair or deceptive
act or practice for a seller:
(a)(1) To solicit any order for the sale
of merchandise to be ordered by the
buyer through the mail, via the Internet,
or by telephone unless, at the time of
the solicitation, the seller has a
reasonable basis to expect that it will be
able to ship any ordered merchandise to
the buyer:
*
*
*
*
*
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
reopening of comment period.
ACTION:
The purpose of this document
is to inform the public of an extension
of the comment period for proposed
rules of the Susquehanna River Basin
Commission (Commission) as published
in the Federal Register of July 13, 2011.
DATES: The deadline extension of the
public comment period is November 10,
2011. Comments on the proposed rule
published July 13, 2011 (76 FR 41154)
may be submitted to the Commission on
or before November 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments to
Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel,
Susquehanna River Basin Commission,
1721 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA
17102–2391 or by e-mail to
rcairo@srbc.net.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel,
telephone: (717) 238–0423, ext. 306; fax:
(717) 238–2436; e-mail: rcairo@srbc.net.
Also, for further information on the
proposed rules, visit the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.srbc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
public is hereby advised that, at its
regular business meeting on September
15, 2011, in Milford, New York, the
Commission extended to November 10,
2011, the written comment deadline for
proposed rules that appeared in 76 FR
41154–41157 July 13, 2011. This action
to extend the public comment period
and delay action on the proposed rules
is based on the level of public interest
indicated in the comments received
thus far by the Commission.
Authority: Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et
seq., 18 CFR Parts 806, 807, and 808.
Dated: September 20, 2011.
Thomas W. Beauduy,
Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–25159 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
[FR Doc. 2011–24354 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am]
37 CFR Parts 201 and 202
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
[Docket No. 2011–8]
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN
COMMISSION
18 CFR Part 806
Review and Approval of Projects
Susquehanna River Basin
Commission.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discontinuance of Form CO in
Registration Practices
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
and request for comments.
AGENCY:
The United States Copyright
Office is proposing to amend its
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
regulations to discontinue use of the
Form CO application as an option for
applying for copyright registration; and
remove the references to CON 1 and
CON 2 sheets. Form CO applications
comprise only a small percentage of all
applications submitted but they contain
a significant number of errors, thus
requiring a disproportionate amount of
the Office’s time, effort and resources to
process. The proposed amendments
would remove references to Form CO
and would instead allow applicants a
choice to file an application for
registration either by filing the
application electronically or by using
the appropriate printed application form
that relates to the subject matter of the
application (i.e., Form TX for
nondramatic literary works, Form PA
for works of the performing arts, Form
VA for works of visual art, Form SR for
sound recordings, and Form SE for
serials). Additionally, the proposed
amendment would remove the
references to CON 1 and CON 2 sheets,
which were never developed or made
available to the public, and would
instead refer only to the continuation
sheets currently available for applicants
filing paper applications.
DATES: Comments must be received in
the Office of the General Counsel of the
Copyright Office no later than
November 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The Copyright Office
strongly prefers that comments be
submitted electronically. A comment
submission page is posted on the
Copyright Office Web site at https://
www.copyright.gov/docs/formco/. The
Web site interface requires submitters to
complete a form specifying name and
other required information, and to
upload comments as an attachment. To
meet accessibility standards, all
comments must be uploaded in a single
file in either the Adobe Portable
Document File (PDF) format that
contains searchable, accessible text (not
an image); Microsoft Word;
WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or
ASCII text file format (not a scanned
document). The maximum file size is 6
megabytes (MB). The name of the
submitter and organization should
appear on both the form and the face of
the comments. All comments will be
posted publicly on the Copyright Office
Web site exactly as they are received,
along with names and organizations if
provided. If electronic submission of
comments is not feasible, please contact
the Copyright Office at (202) 707–8380
for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Sandros, Deputy General
Counsel, Copyright Office, GC/I&R, P.O.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Sep 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone: (202) 707–8380. Telefax:
(202) 707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2007,
the Copyright Office began an extensive
business process reengineering initiative
that had an impact on a variety of
registration-related activities. See 72 FR
36883 (July 6, 2007). As part of this
initiative, the Office promulgated
interim regulations regarding how the
public submits and the Office processes
copyright applications. Id. In these
interim regulations, the Office
announced four ways to file an
application for registration. At the time,
the Office used the term ‘‘Form CO’’
generically in its regulations to cover all
four approaches to registration. With the
implementation of the new electronic
registration practices, however, Form
CO was used to describe a specific form
that is filled out on a computer and that
uses barcodes to capture the information
entered by the claimant. This newer
incarnation of Form CO, first made
available in 2008, was intended to
simplify the application process and
replace the traditional paper forms
Forms TX, VA, PA, SR, and SE. See 72
FR at 36885; 37 CFR 202.3(b)(2)(ii).
However, following the implementation
of reengineering, it eventually became
clear (for reasons discussed below) that
Form CO did not live up to its
expectations because many users of the
form made entries on the form that were
not captured in the barcodes and
therefore were not carried over into the
Office’s registration records. Indeed,
experience of the past couple of years
has demonstrated that the costs to the
Office in offering and processing Form
CO far outweigh the benefits, and the
Office proposes to eliminate this
application option.
The regulations also referred to two
additional continuation sheets, CON 1
and CON 2, which the Office intended
to be used in connection with Form CO
and would have allowed applicants to
provide additional information that
would not fit within the bar codes to be
generated by Form CO. See 72 FR at
36886. However, the Office never
developed these new continuation
sheets and continued to accept the
traditional Form CON for providing
additional information. See https://
www.copyright.gov/forms/formcon.pdf.
For this reason, the Office proposes to
amend its regulations by removing
references to CON 1 and CON 2.
1. Issues with Form CO. Although
Form CO is not commonly used, it does
present a disproportionate number of
problems for the Office. For example,
sometimes after filling out Form CO
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60775
using the free Adobe Reader software,
printing the form and closing out the
program, the applicant would like to
provide additional information. As
many people are aware (and as the
product itself warns), the free Adobe
Reader software does not save the
content once the document is closed,
leaving the applicant with two choices
to make corrections: To fill out the form
again online or fill in the missing
elements by hand. Many applicants
have elected to fill in the additional
information by hand. Unfortunately,
writing on the form does not embed the
added information into the barcode and,
as a result, either additional time and
resources are required for the Office to
manually input this information into the
system, or it may be missed in the
ingestion process altogether.
The Office has also noted that some
applicants using the more expensive
Adobe Professional software work from
a previously submitted form when
preparing a new application for another
work. In this scenario, the applicant
prints out the original saved form
because it includes all the basic
information needed for registering the
new work except for perhaps the title
and the date of publication. The
applicant then proceeds to ‘‘white-out’’
the erroneous information and type in
or write in the new data associated with
the later work. The new data entered
manually on the form is not embedded
into the barcode.
Errors like these result in
discrepancies between the text on the
application and the information
embedded in the barcode. Because the
errors occur on a fairly regular basis,
Copyright Office staff are unsure
whether and when to rely on the
information that appears in the barcode
of the applications. In order to exercise
due diligence, staff instead undertake
time-consuming comparisons of the
printed text against the information
ingested through the barcode, a process
that defeats all the efficiencies promised
by this technology.
Human error is not the only concern.
The use of barcodes presents other
unique problems associated with the
technology. Barcodes can be
compromised and thus fail to function
properly. For example, the barcodes
may be torn on one or more pages of the
printed form or the applicant’s printer
may have distorted the barcode due to
a number of technical difficulties, e.g.,
low toner, making it impossible to scan
the data into the system. In these cases,
the information on a Form CO
application must be manually entered
into the online registration system.
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
60776
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
For these reasons, and because Form
CO represents a very small percentage of
applications received by the Office,
(e.g., approximately two percent of
applicants submitted since January 2011
have been submitted on Form CO), the
Office has concluded that the use of
Form CO should be discontinued.
Eliminating Form CO will simplify
the registration process for the
Copyright Office and leave applicants
with two options to register their works:
They may submit applications for
registration electronically or they may
use the traditional paper forms, e.g.,
Form TX, Form PA, Form VA, Form SR,
and Form SE. Applications submitted
electronically allow processing more
quickly. However, both methods will
lead to higher probability of accuracy
than using Form CO.
2. CON 1 and CON 2 Forms. Although
the regulations published in 2007
envisioned the creation and use of
specialized continuation sheets for use
with Form CO, the Copyright Office
never created these forms. In the
meantime, in circumstances when it is
necessary or desirable to provide
additional information, applicants
continue to use the existing
continuation sheet, Form CON. Because
the Office is proposing to discontinue
Form CO and never created the CON 1
and CON 2 forms that were to be used
with Form CO, the Office now proposes
to amend its regulations to remove
references to the CON 1 and CON 2
forms. Note, however, that those
applicants using paper applications may
continue to use existing Form CON See
https://www.copyright.gov/forms/
formcon.pdf.
Accordingly, the Office proposes to
amend its regulations to formally
discontinue use of Form CO, and to
eliminate references to CON 1 and CON
2. In lieu of these options, applicants
may use the online registration system
to file applications electronically (in
cases where electronic filing is
available) or use the existing paper
application forms. As a related point of
clarity, the Office also proposes to
amend §§ 202.3(b)(10)(iv)(D) and (v) of
the regulations, relating to group
registration of published photographs,
to clarify that the references therein to
‘‘special continuation sheet’’ are
references to Form GR/PPh/CON.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions
37 CFR Part 202
Copyright, Registration of claims to
copyright.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Sep 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Proposed Regulations
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Copyright Office proposes to amend
parts 201 and 202 of 37 CFR, as follows:
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
§ 201.3
[Amended]
2. Amend § 201.3(c) by removing the
line beginning ‘‘Form-D barcode
application properly completed online)
* * *’’ and ‘‘; and Form CO without
barcodes or incomplete information, or
information added after printing (paper
filing)’’ from item (1) of the fee chart
titled ‘‘Registration, Recordation and
Related Services.’’
PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND
REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO
COPYRIGHT
3. The authority citation for part 202
reads as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 409 and 702.
§ 202.3
[Amended]
4. Amend § 202.3(b) by revising
paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(3).
5. Amend § 202.3(b)(10) by adding
‘‘(Form GR/PPh/CON)’’ after the phrase
‘‘special continuation sheet’’ wherever it
appears.
6. Amend § 202.3(c)(2) by removing ‘‘,
electronically or in printed form, on the
appropriate form prescribed by the
Register of Copyrights under’’ and by
adding ‘‘by using one of the methods set
forth in’’ in its place.
7. In § 202.3 revise paragraphs
(b)(2)(i)–(ii) and (b)(3) to read as follows:
§ 202.3
Registration of copyright.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(2) Application for registration. For
purposes of registration, an applicant
may submit an application for
registration of individual works and
certain groups of works electronically
through the Copyright Office’s Web site,
or by using the printed forms prescribed
by the Register of Copyrights.
(i) An applicant may submit an
application electronically through the
Copyright Office Web site [https://
www.copyright.gov]. An online
submission requires a payment of the
application fee through an electronic
fund transfer, credit card, or through a
Copyright Office deposit account.
Deposit materials in support of the
online application may be submitted in
a digital format along with the
application and payment, or deposit
materials in physically tangible formats
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
may be separately mailed to the
Copyright Office, using a mailing label
generated during the online registration
process, or
(ii) (A) Alternatively, an applicant
may submit an application on one of the
printed forms prescribed by the Register
of Copyrights. Each printed form
corresponds to a class set forth in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section and is so
designated (‘‘Form TX’’; ‘‘Form PA’’;
‘‘Form VA’’; ‘‘Form SR’’; ‘‘Form SE’’;
and ‘‘Form SE/Group’’). Printed form
applications should be submitted in the
class most appropriate to the nature of
the authorship in which copyright is
claimed. In the case of contributions to
collective works, applications should be
submitted in the class representing the
copyrightable authorship in the
contribution. In the case of derivative
works, applications should be submitted
in the class most appropriately
representing the copyrightable
authorship involved in recasting,
transforming, adapting, or otherwise
modifying the preexisting work. In cases
where a work contains elements of
authorship in which copyright is
claimed which fall into two or more
classes, the application should be
submitted in the class most appropriate
to the type of authorship that
predominates in the work as a whole.
However, in any case where registration
is sought for a work consisting of or
including a sound recording in which
copyright is claimed the application
shall be submitted on Form SR. Copies
of the printed forms are available on the
Copyright Office’s Web site [https://
www.copyright.gov] and upon request to
the Copyright Public Information Office,
Library of Congress.
(B) Printed form applications may be
completed and submitted by completing
a printed version or using a PDF version
of the applicable Copyright Office
application form and mailing it together
with the other required elements, i.e.,
physically tangible deposit copies and/
or materials, and the required filing fee,
all elements being placed in the same
package and sent by mail or handdelivered to the Copyright Office.
(b)(3) Continuation sheets. A
continuation sheet is appropriate only
in the case when a printed form
application is used and where
additional space is needed by the
applicant to provide all relevant
information concerning a claim to
copyright. An application may include
more than one continuation sheet,
subject to the limitations in paragraphs
(b)(10)(v) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Dated: September 27, 2011.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2011–25230 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2010–0406; FRL–9473–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; North Dakota;
Regional Haze State Implementation
Plan; Federal Implementation Plan for
Interstate Transport of Pollution
Affecting Visibility and Regional Haze;
Correction of Public Hearing
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; Correction of
Public Hearing.
AGENCY:
EPA is changing the public
hearing arrangements for our proposed
action on North Dakota’s State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) addressing
regional haze and the interstate
transport of pollutants that interfere
with programs to protect visibility in
other states. We are making this change
in response to a letter that the Governor
of North Dakota submitted on
September 9, 2011.
DATES: Public hearings will be held
October 13–14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The public hearings will be
held at the North Dakota Department of
Health, Environmental Training Center,
2639 East Main Avenue, Bismarck, ND
58506.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail
Fallon, EPA Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO,
80202–1129, (303) 312–6281,
Fallon.Gail@epa.gov.
SUMMARY:
On
September 21, 2011 we published a
proposed rule partially approving and
partially disapproving a revision to the
North Dakota SIP addressing regional
haze and disapproving a revision to the
North Dakota SIP for interstate transport
of pollutants that interfere with
programs to protect visibility in other
states. See 76 FR 58570. To
accommodate the Governor of North
Dakota’s request submitted in a letter
dated September 9, 2011 for additional
hearing time, we have changed the
location to the North Dakota Department
of Health’s Environmental Training
Center, 2639 East Main Avenue,
Bismarck, ND 58506. We have changed
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Sep 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
the schedule to provide four different
hearing sessions. Public hearings will
now be held on Thursday, October 13,
2011 from 1 p.m. until 5 p.m., and again
from 7 p.m. until 9 p.m. A second day
of public hearings will be held on
Friday, October 14, 2011 from 8 a.m.
until 12 p.m., and again from 1 p.m.
until 5 p.m.
The public hearings will provide
interested parties the opportunity to
present information and opinions to
EPA concerning our proposal. Interested
parties may also submit written
comments, as discussed in the proposal.
Written statements and supporting
information submitted during the
comment period will be considered
with the same weight as any oral
comments and supporting information
presented at the public hearings. We
will not respond to comments during
the public hearings. When we publish
our final action, we will provide written
responses to all oral and written
comments received on our proposal.
At the public hearings, the hearing
officer may limit the time available for
each commenter to address the proposal
to 5 minutes or less if the hearing officer
determines it to be appropriate. The
limitation is to ensure that everyone
who wants to make a comment has the
opportunity to do so. We will not be
providing equipment for commenters to
show overhead slides or make
computerized slide presentations. Any
person may provide written or oral
comments and data pertaining to our
proposal at the public hearings.
Verbatim transcripts, in English, of the
hearings and written statements will be
included in the rulemaking docket.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: September 23, 2011.
James B. Martin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2011–25293 Filed 9–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60777
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–R04–SFUND–2011–0749; FRL–9472–
9]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion
of the Martin-Marietta/Sodyeco
Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 4 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the MartinMarietta/Sodyeco Superfund Site (Site),
which is a portion of the Clariant
Corporation property located at 11701
Mount Holly Road in Charlotte, North
Carolina, from the National Priorities
List (NPL) and requests comment on
this proposed action. The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA or Superfund) of 1980, as
amended, is an appendix of the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA, with the
concurrence of the State of North
Carolina, through the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR), has determined that all
appropriate response actions under
CERCLA, other than operation,
maintenance, and five-year reviews,
have been completed. However, this
deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund if deemed
necessary by EPA.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–R04–
SFUND–2011–0749, by one of the
following methods:
• Online: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: townsend.michael@epa.gov.
• Fax: 404 562–8788 Attention:
Michael Townsend.
• Mail: Michael Townsend, Remedial
Project Manager, Superfund Remedial
Section, Superfund Remedial Branch,
Superfund Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960.
• Hand delivery: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30SEP1.SGM
30SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60774-60777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25230]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 202
[Docket No. 2011-8]
Discontinuance of Form CO in Registration Practices
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Copyright Office is proposing to amend its
[[Page 60775]]
regulations to discontinue use of the Form CO application as an option
for applying for copyright registration; and remove the references to
CON 1 and CON 2 sheets. Form CO applications comprise only a small
percentage of all applications submitted but they contain a significant
number of errors, thus requiring a disproportionate amount of the
Office's time, effort and resources to process. The proposed amendments
would remove references to Form CO and would instead allow applicants a
choice to file an application for registration either by filing the
application electronically or by using the appropriate printed
application form that relates to the subject matter of the application
(i.e., Form TX for nondramatic literary works, Form PA for works of the
performing arts, Form VA for works of visual art, Form SR for sound
recordings, and Form SE for serials). Additionally, the proposed
amendment would remove the references to CON 1 and CON 2 sheets, which
were never developed or made available to the public, and would instead
refer only to the continuation sheets currently available for
applicants filing paper applications.
DATES: Comments must be received in the Office of the General Counsel
of the Copyright Office no later than November 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The Copyright Office strongly prefers that comments be
submitted electronically. A comment submission page is posted on the
Copyright Office Web site at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/formco/. The
Web site interface requires submitters to complete a form specifying
name and other required information, and to upload comments as an
attachment. To meet accessibility standards, all comments must be
uploaded in a single file in either the Adobe Portable Document File
(PDF) format that contains searchable, accessible text (not an image);
Microsoft Word; WordPerfect; Rich Text Format (RTF); or ASCII text file
format (not a scanned document). The maximum file size is 6 megabytes
(MB). The name of the submitter and organization should appear on both
the form and the face of the comments. All comments will be posted
publicly on the Copyright Office Web site exactly as they are received,
along with names and organizations if provided. If electronic
submission of comments is not feasible, please contact the Copyright
Office at (202) 707-8380 for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Sandros, Deputy General Counsel,
Copyright Office, GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone: (202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202) 707-8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2007, the Copyright Office began an
extensive business process reengineering initiative that had an impact
on a variety of registration-related activities. See 72 FR 36883 (July
6, 2007). As part of this initiative, the Office promulgated interim
regulations regarding how the public submits and the Office processes
copyright applications. Id. In these interim regulations, the Office
announced four ways to file an application for registration. At the
time, the Office used the term ``Form CO'' generically in its
regulations to cover all four approaches to registration. With the
implementation of the new electronic registration practices, however,
Form CO was used to describe a specific form that is filled out on a
computer and that uses barcodes to capture the information entered by
the claimant. This newer incarnation of Form CO, first made available
in 2008, was intended to simplify the application process and replace
the traditional paper forms Forms TX, VA, PA, SR, and SE. See 72 FR at
36885; 37 CFR 202.3(b)(2)(ii). However, following the implementation of
reengineering, it eventually became clear (for reasons discussed below)
that Form CO did not live up to its expectations because many users of
the form made entries on the form that were not captured in the
barcodes and therefore were not carried over into the Office's
registration records. Indeed, experience of the past couple of years
has demonstrated that the costs to the Office in offering and
processing Form CO far outweigh the benefits, and the Office proposes
to eliminate this application option.
The regulations also referred to two additional continuation
sheets, CON 1 and CON 2, which the Office intended to be used in
connection with Form CO and would have allowed applicants to provide
additional information that would not fit within the bar codes to be
generated by Form CO. See 72 FR at 36886. However, the Office never
developed these new continuation sheets and continued to accept the
traditional Form CON for providing additional information. See https://www.copyright.gov/forms/formcon.pdf. For this reason, the Office
proposes to amend its regulations by removing references to CON 1 and
CON 2.
1. Issues with Form CO. Although Form CO is not commonly used, it
does present a disproportionate number of problems for the Office. For
example, sometimes after filling out Form CO using the free Adobe
Reader software, printing the form and closing out the program, the
applicant would like to provide additional information. As many people
are aware (and as the product itself warns), the free Adobe Reader
software does not save the content once the document is closed, leaving
the applicant with two choices to make corrections: To fill out the
form again online or fill in the missing elements by hand. Many
applicants have elected to fill in the additional information by hand.
Unfortunately, writing on the form does not embed the added information
into the barcode and, as a result, either additional time and resources
are required for the Office to manually input this information into the
system, or it may be missed in the ingestion process altogether.
The Office has also noted that some applicants using the more
expensive Adobe Professional software work from a previously submitted
form when preparing a new application for another work. In this
scenario, the applicant prints out the original saved form because it
includes all the basic information needed for registering the new work
except for perhaps the title and the date of publication. The applicant
then proceeds to ``white-out'' the erroneous information and type in or
write in the new data associated with the later work. The new data
entered manually on the form is not embedded into the barcode.
Errors like these result in discrepancies between the text on the
application and the information embedded in the barcode. Because the
errors occur on a fairly regular basis, Copyright Office staff are
unsure whether and when to rely on the information that appears in the
barcode of the applications. In order to exercise due diligence, staff
instead undertake time-consuming comparisons of the printed text
against the information ingested through the barcode, a process that
defeats all the efficiencies promised by this technology.
Human error is not the only concern. The use of barcodes presents
other unique problems associated with the technology. Barcodes can be
compromised and thus fail to function properly. For example, the
barcodes may be torn on one or more pages of the printed form or the
applicant's printer may have distorted the barcode due to a number of
technical difficulties, e.g., low toner, making it impossible to scan
the data into the system. In these cases, the information on a Form CO
application must be manually entered into the online registration
system.
[[Page 60776]]
For these reasons, and because Form CO represents a very small
percentage of applications received by the Office, (e.g., approximately
two percent of applicants submitted since January 2011 have been
submitted on Form CO), the Office has concluded that the use of Form CO
should be discontinued.
Eliminating Form CO will simplify the registration process for the
Copyright Office and leave applicants with two options to register
their works: They may submit applications for registration
electronically or they may use the traditional paper forms, e.g., Form
TX, Form PA, Form VA, Form SR, and Form SE. Applications submitted
electronically allow processing more quickly. However, both methods
will lead to higher probability of accuracy than using Form CO.
2. CON 1 and CON 2 Forms. Although the regulations published in
2007 envisioned the creation and use of specialized continuation sheets
for use with Form CO, the Copyright Office never created these forms.
In the meantime, in circumstances when it is necessary or desirable to
provide additional information, applicants continue to use the existing
continuation sheet, Form CON. Because the Office is proposing to
discontinue Form CO and never created the CON 1 and CON 2 forms that
were to be used with Form CO, the Office now proposes to amend its
regulations to remove references to the CON 1 and CON 2 forms. Note,
however, that those applicants using paper applications may continue to
use existing Form CON See https://www.copyright.gov/forms/formcon.pdf.
Accordingly, the Office proposes to amend its regulations to
formally discontinue use of Form CO, and to eliminate references to CON
1 and CON 2. In lieu of these options, applicants may use the online
registration system to file applications electronically (in cases where
electronic filing is available) or use the existing paper application
forms. As a related point of clarity, the Office also proposes to amend
Sec. Sec. 202.3(b)(10)(iv)(D) and (v) of the regulations, relating to
group registration of published photographs, to clarify that the
references therein to ``special continuation sheet'' are references to
Form GR/PPh/CON.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions
37 CFR Part 202
Copyright, Registration of claims to copyright.
Proposed Regulations
In consideration of the foregoing, the Copyright Office proposes to
amend parts 201 and 202 of 37 CFR, as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
Sec. 201.3 [Amended]
2. Amend Sec. 201.3(c) by removing the line beginning ``Form-D
barcode application properly completed online) * * *'' and ``; and Form
CO without barcodes or incomplete information, or information added
after printing (paper filing)'' from item (1) of the fee chart titled
``Registration, Recordation and Related Services.''
PART 202--PREREGISTRATION AND REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
3. The authority citation for part 202 reads as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 409 and 702.
Sec. 202.3 [Amended]
4. Amend Sec. 202.3(b) by revising paragraph (b)(2) and (b)(3).
5. Amend Sec. 202.3(b)(10) by adding ``(Form GR/PPh/CON)'' after
the phrase ``special continuation sheet'' wherever it appears.
6. Amend Sec. 202.3(c)(2) by removing ``, electronically or in
printed form, on the appropriate form prescribed by the Register of
Copyrights under'' and by adding ``by using one of the methods set
forth in'' in its place.
7. In Sec. 202.3 revise paragraphs (b)(2)(i)-(ii) and (b)(3) to
read as follows:
Sec. 202.3 Registration of copyright.
* * * * *
(b)(2) Application for registration. For purposes of registration,
an applicant may submit an application for registration of individual
works and certain groups of works electronically through the Copyright
Office's Web site, or by using the printed forms prescribed by the
Register of Copyrights.
(i) An applicant may submit an application electronically through
the Copyright Office Web site [https://www.copyright.gov]. An online
submission requires a payment of the application fee through an
electronic fund transfer, credit card, or through a Copyright Office
deposit account. Deposit materials in support of the online application
may be submitted in a digital format along with the application and
payment, or deposit materials in physically tangible formats may be
separately mailed to the Copyright Office, using a mailing label
generated during the online registration process, or
(ii) (A) Alternatively, an applicant may submit an application on
one of the printed forms prescribed by the Register of Copyrights. Each
printed form corresponds to a class set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section and is so designated (``Form TX''; ``Form PA''; ``Form
VA''; ``Form SR''; ``Form SE''; and ``Form SE/Group''). Printed form
applications should be submitted in the class most appropriate to the
nature of the authorship in which copyright is claimed. In the case of
contributions to collective works, applications should be submitted in
the class representing the copyrightable authorship in the
contribution. In the case of derivative works, applications should be
submitted in the class most appropriately representing the
copyrightable authorship involved in recasting, transforming, adapting,
or otherwise modifying the preexisting work. In cases where a work
contains elements of authorship in which copyright is claimed which
fall into two or more classes, the application should be submitted in
the class most appropriate to the type of authorship that predominates
in the work as a whole. However, in any case where registration is
sought for a work consisting of or including a sound recording in which
copyright is claimed the application shall be submitted on Form SR.
Copies of the printed forms are available on the Copyright Office's Web
site [https://www.copyright.gov] and upon request to the Copyright
Public Information Office, Library of Congress.
(B) Printed form applications may be completed and submitted by
completing a printed version or using a PDF version of the applicable
Copyright Office application form and mailing it together with the
other required elements, i.e., physically tangible deposit copies and/
or materials, and the required filing fee, all elements being placed in
the same package and sent by mail or hand-delivered to the Copyright
Office.
(b)(3) Continuation sheets. A continuation sheet is appropriate
only in the case when a printed form application is used and where
additional space is needed by the applicant to provide all relevant
information concerning a claim to copyright. An application may include
more than one continuation sheet, subject to the limitations in
paragraphs (b)(10)(v) of this section.
* * * * *
[[Page 60777]]
Dated: September 27, 2011.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2011-25230 Filed 9-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P