Importation of Fresh Baby Kiwi From Chile Under a Systems Approach, 15225-15228 [2011-6492]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Parts 210 and 220
Incorporating the 2010 Dietary
Guidelines for Americans Into the
Proposed School Meal Patterns
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document informs the
public about a change in the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans that affects
the proposed rule ‘‘Nutrition Standards
in the National School Lunch and
School Breakfast Programs’’ issued by
the Department of Agriculture and
published in the Federal Register on
January 13, 2011. Members of the public
are asked to address this change when
writing comments on the above
referenced rule to assist the Department
in updating the school meal patterns
and nutrition standards according to the
latest dietary recommendations.
DATES: The public comment period for
the proposed rule closes on April 13,
2011.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be
submitted under the proposed rule,
‘‘Nutrition Standards in the National
School Lunch and School Breakfast
Programs,’’ (FNS–2007–0038), which is
posted at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Brewer, Chief, Policy and Program
Development Branch, Child Nutrition
Division, Food and Nutrition Service,
Department of Agriculture, 703–305–
2590, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
640, Alexandria, Virginia 22302–1594.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 9 of the Richard B. Russell
National School Lunch Act (NSLA), 42
U.S.C. 1758, requires that meals served
under the National School Lunch
Program and the School Breakfast
Program reflect the most recent Dietary
Guidelines for Americans (DGAs). The
DGAs are the federal government’s
evidence-based nutritional guidance to
promote health, reduce the risk of
chronic diseases, and reduce the
prevalence of overweight and obesity
through improved nutrition and
physical activity.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) published a proposed rule on
January 13, 2011 (76 FR 2494), to align
the school meal patterns and nutrition
standards with the 2005 DGAs, the most
current at the time of publication. On
January 31, 2011, USDA and the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Department of Health and Human
Services released the 2010 DGA
recommendations. The 2010 DGA
recommendations contain two changes
from the 2005 recommendations which
could affect the proposed school meal
patterns.
The 2010 DGAs include a new RedOrange vegetable subgroup, while the
proposed meal patterns include an
Orange vegetable subgroup and group
the Red vegetables under the category of
Other vegetables (consistent with the
2005 DGAs). However, the proposed
meal patterns do reflect the emphasis on
consuming a variety of vegetables,
which is a key recommendation of the
2005 and 2010 DGAs. Consuming a
variety of vegetables provides children
with a number of nutrients that are
under consumed in the United States,
including dietary fiber, folate,
magnesium, potassium, and vitamins A,
C, and K.
The 2010 DGAs also advise
consuming protein from a variety of
sources, and recommend weekly
amounts from three Protein foods
(formerly Lean meat and beans)
subgroups: (1) Seafood; (2) meat,
poultry, and eggs; and (3) nuts, seeds,
and soy products. The proposed meal
patterns contain weekly and daily
amounts of meats/meat alternates, but
do not specify amounts for subgroups
introduced by the 2010 DGAs.
Consumption of a balanced variety of
protein foods can contribute to
improved nutrient intake and health
benefits.
Therefore, this document requests the
public to:
1. Consider the impact of the new
Red-Orange vegetable subgroup and the
new protein foods subgroups on the
proposed school meal patterns,
2. Evaluate the need to revise the
proposed meal patterns to reflect the
new vegetable subgroup and protein
foods subgroups, and
3. Address how the new vegetable
subgroup and protein foods subgroups
may be incorporated into the proposed
meal patterns in a sound and practical
manner.
Individuals wishing to address the
effect of these changes, or any other
issues, on the proposed rule ‘‘Nutrition
Standards in the National School Lunch
and School Breakfast Programs’’ (76 FR
2494), may submit their comments
when providing comments on the
above-referenced proposed rule.
Dated: March 14, 2011.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–6403 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15225
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2010–0018]
RIN 0579–AD37
Importation of Fresh Baby Kiwi From
Chile Under a Systems Approach
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We are proposing to amend
the fruits and vegetables regulations to
allow the importation into the
continental United States of baby kiwi
fruit from Chile, subject to a systems
approach. Under this systems approach,
the fruit would have to be grown in a
place of production that is registered
with the Government of Chile and
certified as having a low prevalence of
Brevipalpus chilensis. The fruit would
have to undergo pre-harvest sampling at
the registered production site.
Following post-harvest processing, the
fruit would have to be inspected in
Chile at an approved inspection site.
Each consignment of fruit would have to
be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate with an additional
declaration stating that the fruit had
been found free of Brevipalpus chilensis
based on field and packinghouse
inspections. This proposed rule would
allow for the safe importation of fresh
baby kiwi from Chile using mitigation
measures other than fumigation with
methyl bromide.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before May 20,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2010-0018 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send one copy of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2010–0018,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2010–0018.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
15226
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David B. Lamb, Import Specialist,
Regulatory Coordination and
Compliance, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 734–0627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ‘‘Subpart-Fruits
and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–1
through 319.56–50, referred to below as
the regulations) prohibit or restrict the
importation of fruits and vegetables into
the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction
and dissemination of plant pests that are
new to or not widely distributed within
the United States.
Currently, the importation into the
United States of fresh baby kiwi
(Actinidia arguta) from Chile is allowed
if the fruit is fumigated with methyl
bromide. The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) also
received a request from the national
plant protection organization (NPPO) of
Chile to allow the fresh baby kiwi fruit
from Chile to be imported into the
continental United States (the lower 48
States, the District of Columbia, and
Alaska) without methyl bromide
fumigation, but subject instead to a
systems approach. As part of our
evaluation of Chile’s request, we
prepared a pest risk assessment (PRA)
and a risk management document.
Copies of the PRA and the risk
management document may be obtained
from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or
viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site
(see ADDRESSES above for instructions
for accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA, titled ‘‘Pest Risk Assessment
for Fresh Fruits of Baby Kiwi (Actinidia
arguta) from Chile Imported into the
Continental United States’’ (May 2008),
evaluates the risks associated with the
importation of baby kiwi into the
continental United States from Chile.
The risk management document lists the
phytosanitary measures necessary to
ensure the safe importation into the
United States of baby kiwi from Chile.
The PRA identifies one quarantine
pest that could be introduced into the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
United States in consignments of baby
kiwi from Chile: Brevipalpus chilensis
(false red mite). A quarantine pest is
defined in § 319.56–2 as ‘‘a pest of
potential economic importance to the
area endangered thereby and not yet
present there, or present but not widely
distributed and being officially
controlled.’’ In the PRA, the likelihood
and consequences of introducing this
pest to the United States are considered,
and B. chilensis is rated as having a
medium pest risk potential. Pests
receiving a rating within the medium
range may necessitate specific
phytosanitary measures in addition to
standard port-of-entry inspection of the
commodity being imported into the
United States.
Based on the findings of our PRA and
risk management document, we are
proposing to allow the importation of
fresh baby kiwi from Chile into the
continental United States, subject to a
systems approach. Under a systems
approach, a set of phytosanitary
conditions, at least two of which have
an independent effect in mitigating the
pest risk associated with the movement
of commodities, is specified, whereby
fruits and vegetables may be imported
into the United States from countries
that are not free of certain plant pests.
The systems approach for fresh baby
kiwi from Chile would require the fruit
to be grown in a place of production
that is registered with the NPPO of
Chile. The fruit would have to undergo
pre-harvest sampling at the registered
production site under the direction of
the NPPO of Chile and, once harvested,
placed in field cartons or containers
marked to allow for traceback to the
production site. The NPPO of Chile
would present a list of production sites
certified as having a low prevalence of
B. chilensis to APHIS. Following postharvest processing, the fruit would have
to be inspected in Chile at an APHISapproved inspection site under the
direction of APHIS inspectors in
coordination with the NPPO of Chile.
Each consignment of the fruit would
have to be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate with an
additional declaration stating that the
fruit had been found free of B. chilensis
based on field and packinghouse
inspections.
The mitigation measures in the
proposed systems approach are
discussed in greater detail below, as
well as in the risk management
document.
Production Site Registration
The production site where the fruit is
grown would have to be registered with
the NPPO of Chile. Harvested baby kiwi
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would have to be placed in field cartons
or containers that are marked to show
the official registration number of the
production site. Registration would
have to be renewed annually.
Registration of production sites with
the NPPO of Chile and marking of field
cartons or containers with the
registration numbers would allow
traceback to the production site if pest
problems were found on fruit shipped to
the United States. Problem production
sites could then be removed from the
program until further mitigation
measures were taken to reduce pest
populations.
Low-Prevalence Production Site
Certification
Between 1 and 30 days prior to
harvest, random samples of fruit would
have to be collected from each
registered production site under the
direction of the NPPO of Chile. These
samples would have to undergo a pest
detection and evaluation method as
follows: The fruit would have to be
washed using a flushing method, placed
in a 20-mesh sieve on top of a 200-mesh
sieve, sprinkled with a liquid soap and
water solution, washed with water at
high pressure, and washed with water at
low pressure. The process would then
be repeated. The contents of the 200mesh sieve would then be placed on a
petri dish and analyzed for the presence
of live B. chilensis mites. If a single live
B. chilensis mite were found, the
production site would not qualify for
certification as a low-prevalence
production site. Each production site
would have only one opportunity per
season to qualify as a low-prevalence
production site, and certification of low
prevalence would be valid for one
harvest season only. The NPPO of Chile
would be required to present a list of
certified production sites to APHIS.
Production site low-prevalence
certification would identify problem
production sites and prevent the
shipment of fruit with B. chilensis mites
from such sites. This mite sampling
method has been tested in Chile and
found to be successful in identifying
grape and citrus production areas with
high and low populations of mites.
Post-Harvest Processing
After harvest, all damaged or diseased
fruits would have to be culled at the
packinghouse, and the remaining fruit
would have to be packed into new,
clean boxes, crates, or other APHISapproved packing containers. Each
container would have to have a label
identifying the registered production
site where the fruit originated and the
packing shed where it was packed.
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Post-harvest processing procedures,
such as culling damaged fruit and
sampling for mites, would remove fruit
that could contain pests from
consignments being shipped to the
United States. Culling is a standard
procedure to produce quality fruit
without pests. Labeling of containers to
identify both production site and
packing shed would aid in traceback.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Phytosanitary Inspection
The fruit would have to be inspected
in Chile at an APHIS-approved
inspection site under the direction of
APHIS inspectors in coordination with
the NPPO of Chile following any postharvest processing. A biometric sample
would have to be drawn from each
consignment. In order to be eligible for
shipment to the continental United
States, the fruit in the consignment
would have to pass inspection by
meeting the following requirements:
• Fruit presented for inspection
would have to be identified in the
shipping documents accompanying
each lot of fruit to specify the
production site(s) where the fruit was
produced and the packing shed(s) where
the fruit was processed. This
identification would have to be
maintained until the fruit is released for
entry into the United States.
• The biometric sample, referred to
above, of the boxes, crates, or other
APHIS-approved packing containers
from each consignment would be
selected by the NPPO of Chile, and the
fruit from these boxes, crates, or other
APHIS-approved packing containers
would be visually inspected for
quarantine pests. A portion of the fruit
would have to be washed with soapy
water and the collected filtrate
microscopically examined for B.
chilensis. If a single live B. chilensis
mite were found during the inspection
process, the certified low-prevalence
production site where the fruit was
grown would lose its certification.
The proposed requirements for the
identification in shipping documents of
the baby kiwi to their production sites
and packing sheds would aid in
traceback if pests were found. The
proposed requirements for visual
inspection and biometric sampling of
the fruit would provide additional
layers of protection against the
possibility of baby kiwi infested with
quarantine pests being shipped from
Chile to the United States. These
methods have proved effective when
employed to inspect consignments of
citrus from Chile.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
15227
Phytosanitary Certificate
Executive Order 12988
Each consignment of fruit would have
to be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Chile
that contains an additional declaration
stating that the fruit in the consignment
was inspected and found free of B.
chilensis based on field and
packinghouse inspections.
Requiring a phytosanitary certificate
would ensure that the NPPO of Chile
has inspected the fruit and certified that
the fruit meets the conditions for export
to the United States.
This proposed rule would allow fresh
baby kiwi to be imported into the
continental United States from Chile,
subject to a systems approach. If this
proposed rule is adopted, State and
local laws and regulations regarding
fresh baby kiwi imported under this rule
would be preempted while the fruit is
in foreign commerce. Fresh baby kiwi
are generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign
commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign
commerce ceases in other cases must be
addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this
proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we have analyzed the
potential economic effects of this action
on small entities. The analysis is
summarized below. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
This proposed rule would allow the
importation into the continental United
States of baby kiwi fruit from Chile,
subject to a systems approach. The
systems approach would provide an
alternative to fumigation with methyl
bromide of baby kiwi imported from
Chile into the continental United States.
Domestic growers of fresh baby kiwi
fruit are the entities that could be
affected by this proposed rule. The
currently available information
indicates that almost all U.S. growers of
baby kiwi fruit are small in size, by the
standards of the Small Business
Administration.
The impact of fresh baby kiwi fruit
imports from Chile is expected to be
minimal for domestic producers due to
timing differences (baby kiwi would
likely be imported from Chile during the
off-season for U.S. producers) and the
small quantity expected to be imported.
Therefore, we do not expect the
proposed rule to have any significant
impact on U.S. baby kiwi fruit growers,
regardless of the size of operation.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to Docket No. APHIS–2010–0018.
Please send a copy of your comments to:
(1) Docket No. APHIS–2010–0018,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238, and (2) Clearance Officer,
OCIO, USDA, Room 404–W, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. A comment to
OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would allow the
importation into the continental United
States of baby kiwi fruit from Chile,
subject to a systems approach. For the
systems approach to work effectively,
certain information-collection activities
must be performed. These activities
include the registration of production
sites with the NPPO of Chile, the postharvest labeling of containers so that the
fruit can be identified back to the
registered production site, and the
completion of phytosanitary certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
15228
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.253434 hours
per response.
Respondents: Kiwi fruit production
sites, packinghouses, and the NPPO of
Chile.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 4.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 91.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 364.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 92.25 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact
Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS’
Information Collection Coordinator, at
(301) 851–2908.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:12 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. A new § 319.56–51 is added to read
as follows:
§ 319.56–51
Fresh baby kiwi from Chile.
Fresh baby kiwi (Actinidia arguta)
may be imported into the continental
United States from Chile under the
following conditions:
(a) Production site registration. The
production site where the fruit is grown
must be registered with the national
plant protection organization (NPPO) of
Chile. Harvested baby kiwi must be
placed in field cartons or containers that
are marked to show the official
registration number of the production
site. Registration must be renewed
annually.
(b) Low-prevalence production site
certification. The fruit must originate
from a low-prevalence production site
to be imported under the conditions in
this section. Between 1 and 30 days
prior to harvest, random samples of fruit
must be collected from each registered
production site under the direction of
the NPPO of Chile. These samples must
undergo a pest detection and evaluation
method as follows: The fruit must be
washed using a flushing method, placed
in a 20-mesh sieve on top of a 200-mesh
sieve, sprinkled with a liquid soap and
water solution, washed with water at
high pressure, and washed with water at
low pressure. The process must then be
repeated. The contents of the 200-mesh
sieve must then be placed on a petri
dish and analyzed for the presence of
live Brevipalpus chilensis mites. If a
single live B. chilensis mite is found, the
production site will not qualify for
certification as a low-prevalence
production site. Each production site
may have only one opportunity per
season to qualify as a low-prevalence
production site, and certification of low
prevalence will be valid for one harvest
season only. The NPPO of Chile will
present a list of certified production
sites to APHIS.
(c) Post-harvest processing. After
harvest, all damaged or diseased fruits
must be culled at the packinghouse and
must be packed into new, clean boxes,
crates, or other APHIS-approved
packing containers. Each container must
have a label identifying the registered
production site where the fruit
originated and the packing shed where
it was packed.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(d) Phytosanitary inspection. Fruit
must be inspected in Chile at an APHISapproved inspection site under the
direction of APHIS inspectors in
coordination with the NPPO of Chile
following any post-harvest processing.
A biometric sample must be drawn and
examined from each consignment. Baby
kiwi in any consignment may be
shipped to the continental United States
under the conditions of this section only
if the consignment passes inspection as
follows:
(1) Fruit presented for inspection
must be identified in the shipping
documents accompanying each lot of
fruit to specify the production site or
sites in which the fruit was produced
and the packing shed or sheds in which
the fruit was processed. This
identification must be maintained until
the fruit is released for entry into the
United States.
(2) A biometric sample of the boxes,
crates, or other APHIS-approved
packing containers from each
consignment will be selected by the
NPPO of Chile, and the fruit from these
boxes, crates, or other APHIS-approved
packing containers will be visually
inspected for quarantine pests. A
portion of the fruit must be washed with
soapy water and the collected filtrate
must be microscopically examined for
B. chilensis. If a single live B. chilensis
mite is found during the inspection
process, the certified low-prevalence
production site where the fruit was
grown will lose its certification.
(e) Phytosanitary certificate. Each
consignment of fresh baby kiwi must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of Chile
that contains an additional declaration
stating that the fruit in the consignment
was inspected and found free of
Brevipalpus chilensis based on field and
packinghouse inspections.
Done in Washington, DC, this 15th day of
March 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–6492 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
E:\FR\FM\21MRP1.SGM
21MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15225-15228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6492]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0018]
RIN 0579-AD37
Importation of Fresh Baby Kiwi From Chile Under a Systems
Approach
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the fruits and vegetables
regulations to allow the importation into the continental United States
of baby kiwi fruit from Chile, subject to a systems approach. Under
this systems approach, the fruit would have to be grown in a place of
production that is registered with the Government of Chile and
certified as having a low prevalence of Brevipalpus chilensis. The
fruit would have to undergo pre-harvest sampling at the registered
production site. Following post-harvest processing, the fruit would
have to be inspected in Chile at an approved inspection site. Each
consignment of fruit would have to be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate with an additional declaration stating that the fruit had
been found free of Brevipalpus chilensis based on field and
packinghouse inspections. This proposed rule would allow for the safe
importation of fresh baby kiwi from Chile using mitigation measures
other than fumigation with methyl bromide.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before May
20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2010-0018 to submit or view comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send one copy of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2010-0018, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2010-0018.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the
[[Page 15226]]
USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David B. Lamb, Import Specialist,
Regulatory Coordination and Compliance, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road,
Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-0627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ``Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR 319.56-
1 through 319.56-50, referred to below as the regulations) prohibit or
restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and
dissemination of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed
within the United States.
Currently, the importation into the United States of fresh baby
kiwi (Actinidia arguta) from Chile is allowed if the fruit is fumigated
with methyl bromide. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) also received a request from the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of Chile to allow the fresh baby kiwi fruit from
Chile to be imported into the continental United States (the lower 48
States, the District of Columbia, and Alaska) without methyl bromide
fumigation, but subject instead to a systems approach. As part of our
evaluation of Chile's request, we prepared a pest risk assessment (PRA)
and a risk management document. Copies of the PRA and the risk
management document may be obtained from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site
(see ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA, titled ``Pest Risk Assessment for Fresh Fruits of Baby
Kiwi (Actinidia arguta) from Chile Imported into the Continental United
States'' (May 2008), evaluates the risks associated with the
importation of baby kiwi into the continental United States from Chile.
The risk management document lists the phytosanitary measures necessary
to ensure the safe importation into the United States of baby kiwi from
Chile.
The PRA identifies one quarantine pest that could be introduced
into the United States in consignments of baby kiwi from Chile:
Brevipalpus chilensis (false red mite). A quarantine pest is defined in
Sec. 319.56-2 as ``a pest of potential economic importance to the area
endangered thereby and not yet present there, or present but not widely
distributed and being officially controlled.'' In the PRA, the
likelihood and consequences of introducing this pest to the United
States are considered, and B. chilensis is rated as having a medium
pest risk potential. Pests receiving a rating within the medium range
may necessitate specific phytosanitary measures in addition to standard
port-of-entry inspection of the commodity being imported into the
United States.
Based on the findings of our PRA and risk management document, we
are proposing to allow the importation of fresh baby kiwi from Chile
into the continental United States, subject to a systems approach.
Under a systems approach, a set of phytosanitary conditions, at least
two of which have an independent effect in mitigating the pest risk
associated with the movement of commodities, is specified, whereby
fruits and vegetables may be imported into the United States from
countries that are not free of certain plant pests. The systems
approach for fresh baby kiwi from Chile would require the fruit to be
grown in a place of production that is registered with the NPPO of
Chile. The fruit would have to undergo pre-harvest sampling at the
registered production site under the direction of the NPPO of Chile
and, once harvested, placed in field cartons or containers marked to
allow for traceback to the production site. The NPPO of Chile would
present a list of production sites certified as having a low prevalence
of B. chilensis to APHIS. Following post-harvest processing, the fruit
would have to be inspected in Chile at an APHIS-approved inspection
site under the direction of APHIS inspectors in coordination with the
NPPO of Chile. Each consignment of the fruit would have to be
accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with an additional
declaration stating that the fruit had been found free of B. chilensis
based on field and packinghouse inspections.
The mitigation measures in the proposed systems approach are
discussed in greater detail below, as well as in the risk management
document.
Production Site Registration
The production site where the fruit is grown would have to be
registered with the NPPO of Chile. Harvested baby kiwi would have to be
placed in field cartons or containers that are marked to show the
official registration number of the production site. Registration would
have to be renewed annually.
Registration of production sites with the NPPO of Chile and marking
of field cartons or containers with the registration numbers would
allow traceback to the production site if pest problems were found on
fruit shipped to the United States. Problem production sites could then
be removed from the program until further mitigation measures were
taken to reduce pest populations.
Low-Prevalence Production Site Certification
Between 1 and 30 days prior to harvest, random samples of fruit
would have to be collected from each registered production site under
the direction of the NPPO of Chile. These samples would have to undergo
a pest detection and evaluation method as follows: The fruit would have
to be washed using a flushing method, placed in a 20-mesh sieve on top
of a 200-mesh sieve, sprinkled with a liquid soap and water solution,
washed with water at high pressure, and washed with water at low
pressure. The process would then be repeated. The contents of the 200-
mesh sieve would then be placed on a petri dish and analyzed for the
presence of live B. chilensis mites. If a single live B. chilensis mite
were found, the production site would not qualify for certification as
a low-prevalence production site. Each production site would have only
one opportunity per season to qualify as a low-prevalence production
site, and certification of low prevalence would be valid for one
harvest season only. The NPPO of Chile would be required to present a
list of certified production sites to APHIS.
Production site low-prevalence certification would identify problem
production sites and prevent the shipment of fruit with B. chilensis
mites from such sites. This mite sampling method has been tested in
Chile and found to be successful in identifying grape and citrus
production areas with high and low populations of mites.
Post-Harvest Processing
After harvest, all damaged or diseased fruits would have to be
culled at the packinghouse, and the remaining fruit would have to be
packed into new, clean boxes, crates, or other APHIS-approved packing
containers. Each container would have to have a label identifying the
registered production site where the fruit originated and the packing
shed where it was packed.
[[Page 15227]]
Post-harvest processing procedures, such as culling damaged fruit
and sampling for mites, would remove fruit that could contain pests
from consignments being shipped to the United States. Culling is a
standard procedure to produce quality fruit without pests. Labeling of
containers to identify both production site and packing shed would aid
in traceback.
Phytosanitary Inspection
The fruit would have to be inspected in Chile at an APHIS-approved
inspection site under the direction of APHIS inspectors in coordination
with the NPPO of Chile following any post-harvest processing. A
biometric sample would have to be drawn from each consignment. In order
to be eligible for shipment to the continental United States, the fruit
in the consignment would have to pass inspection by meeting the
following requirements:
Fruit presented for inspection would have to be identified
in the shipping documents accompanying each lot of fruit to specify the
production site(s) where the fruit was produced and the packing shed(s)
where the fruit was processed. This identification would have to be
maintained until the fruit is released for entry into the United
States.
The biometric sample, referred to above, of the boxes,
crates, or other APHIS-approved packing containers from each
consignment would be selected by the NPPO of Chile, and the fruit from
these boxes, crates, or other APHIS-approved packing containers would
be visually inspected for quarantine pests. A portion of the fruit
would have to be washed with soapy water and the collected filtrate
microscopically examined for B. chilensis. If a single live B.
chilensis mite were found during the inspection process, the certified
low-prevalence production site where the fruit was grown would lose its
certification.
The proposed requirements for the identification in shipping
documents of the baby kiwi to their production sites and packing sheds
would aid in traceback if pests were found. The proposed requirements
for visual inspection and biometric sampling of the fruit would provide
additional layers of protection against the possibility of baby kiwi
infested with quarantine pests being shipped from Chile to the United
States. These methods have proved effective when employed to inspect
consignments of citrus from Chile.
Phytosanitary Certificate
Each consignment of fruit would have to be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of Chile that contains an
additional declaration stating that the fruit in the consignment was
inspected and found free of B. chilensis based on field and
packinghouse inspections.
Requiring a phytosanitary certificate would ensure that the NPPO of
Chile has inspected the fruit and certified that the fruit meets the
conditions for export to the United States.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we have analyzed
the potential economic effects of this action on small entities. The
analysis is summarized below. Copies of the full analysis are available
by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see ADDRESSES above for
instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
This proposed rule would allow the importation into the continental
United States of baby kiwi fruit from Chile, subject to a systems
approach. The systems approach would provide an alternative to
fumigation with methyl bromide of baby kiwi imported from Chile into
the continental United States.
Domestic growers of fresh baby kiwi fruit are the entities that
could be affected by this proposed rule. The currently available
information indicates that almost all U.S. growers of baby kiwi fruit
are small in size, by the standards of the Small Business
Administration.
The impact of fresh baby kiwi fruit imports from Chile is expected
to be minimal for domestic producers due to timing differences (baby
kiwi would likely be imported from Chile during the off-season for U.S.
producers) and the small quantity expected to be imported. Therefore,
we do not expect the proposed rule to have any significant impact on
U.S. baby kiwi fruit growers, regardless of the size of operation.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh baby kiwi to be imported into
the continental United States from Chile, subject to a systems
approach. If this proposed rule is adopted, State and local laws and
regulations regarding fresh baby kiwi imported under this rule would be
preempted while the fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh baby kiwi are
generally imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases
must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this proposed rule is
adopted, no retroactive effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative proceedings before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington,
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-
2010-0018. Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) Docket No.
APHIS-2010-0018, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS,
Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238,
and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, Room 404-W, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. A comment to OMB is
best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would allow the importation into the continental
United States of baby kiwi fruit from Chile, subject to a systems
approach. For the systems approach to work effectively, certain
information-collection activities must be performed. These activities
include the registration of production sites with the NPPO of Chile,
the post-harvest labeling of containers so that the fruit can be
identified back to the registered production site, and the completion
of phytosanitary certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
[[Page 15228]]
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency s functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 0.253434 hours per response.
Respondents: Kiwi fruit production sites, packinghouses, and the
NPPO of Chile.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 4.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 91.
Estimated annual number of responses: 364.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 92.25 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
851-2908.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2908.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C.
136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. A new Sec. 319.56-51 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-51 Fresh baby kiwi from Chile.
Fresh baby kiwi (Actinidia arguta) may be imported into the
continental United States from Chile under the following conditions:
(a) Production site registration. The production site where the
fruit is grown must be registered with the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of Chile. Harvested baby kiwi must be placed in
field cartons or containers that are marked to show the official
registration number of the production site. Registration must be
renewed annually.
(b) Low-prevalence production site certification. The fruit must
originate from a low-prevalence production site to be imported under
the conditions in this section. Between 1 and 30 days prior to harvest,
random samples of fruit must be collected from each registered
production site under the direction of the NPPO of Chile. These samples
must undergo a pest detection and evaluation method as follows: The
fruit must be washed using a flushing method, placed in a 20-mesh sieve
on top of a 200-mesh sieve, sprinkled with a liquid soap and water
solution, washed with water at high pressure, and washed with water at
low pressure. The process must then be repeated. The contents of the
200-mesh sieve must then be placed on a petri dish and analyzed for the
presence of live Brevipalpus chilensis mites. If a single live B.
chilensis mite is found, the production site will not qualify for
certification as a low-prevalence production site. Each production site
may have only one opportunity per season to qualify as a low-prevalence
production site, and certification of low prevalence will be valid for
one harvest season only. The NPPO of Chile will present a list of
certified production sites to APHIS.
(c) Post-harvest processing. After harvest, all damaged or diseased
fruits must be culled at the packinghouse and must be packed into new,
clean boxes, crates, or other APHIS-approved packing containers. Each
container must have a label identifying the registered production site
where the fruit originated and the packing shed where it was packed.
(d) Phytosanitary inspection. Fruit must be inspected in Chile at
an APHIS-approved inspection site under the direction of APHIS
inspectors in coordination with the NPPO of Chile following any post-
harvest processing. A biometric sample must be drawn and examined from
each consignment. Baby kiwi in any consignment may be shipped to the
continental United States under the conditions of this section only if
the consignment passes inspection as follows:
(1) Fruit presented for inspection must be identified in the
shipping documents accompanying each lot of fruit to specify the
production site or sites in which the fruit was produced and the
packing shed or sheds in which the fruit was processed. This
identification must be maintained until the fruit is released for entry
into the United States.
(2) A biometric sample of the boxes, crates, or other APHIS-
approved packing containers from each consignment will be selected by
the NPPO of Chile, and the fruit from these boxes, crates, or other
APHIS-approved packing containers will be visually inspected for
quarantine pests. A portion of the fruit must be washed with soapy
water and the collected filtrate must be microscopically examined for
B. chilensis. If a single live B. chilensis mite is found during the
inspection process, the certified low-prevalence production site where
the fruit was grown will lose its certification.
(e) Phytosanitary certificate. Each consignment of fresh baby kiwi
must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO
of Chile that contains an additional declaration stating that the fruit
in the consignment was inspected and found free of Brevipalpus
chilensis based on field and packinghouse inspections.
Done in Washington, DC, this 15th day of March 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-6492 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P