Change in Disease Status of the Republic of Korea With Regard to Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Rinderpest, 68478-68480 [E9-30668]
Download as PDF
68478
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 247 / Monday, December 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
received and acted upon prior to the
date.
Based on the above, DHS finds that
pre-promulgation notice and comment
for this rule would be impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest. For this same reason, good
cause exists to make this rule effective
immediately upon publication in the
Federal Register. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
B. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review)
This rule constitutes a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, and therefore has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget. Under Executive Order
12866, a significant regulatory action is
subject to an Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review and to the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Executive Order defines
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as one
that is likely to result in a rule that may
(1) have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; 3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights or obligations of recipients
thereof; or 4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
Because this rule eliminates the material
compliance date and is part of a
previously published rule that received
considerable public attention, this rule
raises novel policy issues and, thereby,
is subject to OMB review.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–121), requires Federal agencies
to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small businesses, small
governmental jurisdictions, and small
organizations during the development of
their rules. This final rule, however,
makes changes for which notice and
comment are not necessary.
Accordingly, DHS is not required to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
5 U.S.C. 603, 604.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:33 Dec 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Amendments
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
■
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
‘‘Federalism,’’ if it has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538), requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State,
local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. This final rule
will not result in such an expenditure.
G. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,’’
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Energy
Impact Analysis)
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.’’ We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that Order and is
not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. Therefore, it does not require
a Statement of Energy Effects under
Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 37
Document security, driver’s licenses,
identification cards, incorporation by
reference, motor vehicle
administrations, physical security.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For the reasons set forth above, the
Department of Homeland Security
amends 6 CFR part 37 as follows:
PART 37—REAL ID DRIVER’S
LICENSES AND IDENTIFICATION
CARDS
1. The authority citation for part 37
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30301 note; 6 U.S.C.
111, 112.
§ 37.51
[Amended]
2. In Section 37.51, paragraph (b) is
stayed from January 1, 2010 until
further notice.
■
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–30638 Filed 12–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9M–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0147]
Change in Disease Status of the
Republic of Korea With Regard to
Foot-and-Mouth Disease and
Rinderpest
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are amending the
regulations to add the Republic of Korea
to the list of regions that are considered
free of rinderpest and foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD). We are taking this action
because we have conducted an
evaluation and determined that the
Republic of Korea is free of rinderpest
and FMD. We are also adding the
Republic of Korea to the list of regions
that are subject to certain import
restrictions on meat and meat products
because of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest- or FMDaffected countries. These actions will
update the disease status of the
Republic of Korea with regard to
rinderpest and FMD while continuing to
protect the United States from an
introduction of those diseases by
providing additional requirements for
meat and other animal products
imported into the United States from the
Republic of Korea.
DATES: Effective Date: January 12, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Julia Punderson, Senior Staff
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 247 / Monday, December 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Veterinarian, Regionalization Evaluation
Services, National Center for Import and
Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231;
(301) 734-4356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94
(referred to below as the regulations)
govern the importation of certain
animals and animal products into the
United States in order to prevent the
introduction of various communicable
diseases, including rinderpest, foot-andmouth disease (FMD), African swine
fever, classical swine fever, and swine
vesicular disease. These are dangerous
and destructive communicable diseases
of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of
the regulations lists regions of the world
that are declared free of rinderpest or
free of both rinderpest and FMD.
Rinderpest or FMD is considered to
exist in all other parts of the world not
listed. Section 94.11 of the regulations
lists regions of the world that have been
determined to be free of rinderpest and
FMD, but are subject to certain
restrictions because of their proximity to
or trading relationships with rinderpest
or FMD-affected regions.
On March 30, 2009, we published in
the Federal Register a proposal1 (74 FR
14093–14097, Docket No. APHIS-20080147) to amend the regulations by
adding the Republic of Korea (South
Korea) to the list in § 94.1 of regions
declared free of FMD and rinderpest.
We also proposed to add the Republic
of Korea to the list in § 94.11 of regions
that are declared to be free of these
diseases, but that are subject to certain
restrictions because of their proximity to
or trading relationships with rinderpest
or FMD-affected regions. In addition, we
published a notice of availability of an
environmental assessment (74 FR
17115) on April 14, 2009 (see footnote
1).
We solicited comments concerning
our proposal for 60 days ending May 29,
2009. We did not receive any comments.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule, we are adopting the
proposed rule as a final rule, without
change.
Effective Date
This is a substantive rule that relieves
restrictions and, pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, may be made
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
This rule relieves certain rinderpest and
FMD-related restrictions on the
importation into the United States of
ruminants, or fresh (chilled or frozen)
meat or other products of ruminants,
from the Republic of Korea. We have
determined that approximately 2 weeks
are needed to ensure that APHIS and
Department of Homeland Security,
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection, personnel at ports of entry
receive official notice of this change in
the regulations. Therefore, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this rule should be
effective 15 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. For this action,
the Office of Management and Budget
has waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
This rule amends the regulations by
adding the Republic of Korea to the list
of regions considered to be free of
rinderpest and FMD. This action, which
was requested by the Republic of Korea,
follows a risk assessment conducted by
APHIS concluding that the Republic of
Korea is free of both diseases and has
the veterinary infrastructure in place to
detect and effectively eradicate the
diseases if necessary. The effect of the
rule will be to remove certain rinderpest
and FMD-related prohibitions and
restrictions on the importation into the
United States of ruminants, or fresh
(chilled or frozen) meat or other
products of ruminants, from the
Republic of Korea. APHIS imposes such
restrictions because an FMD or
rinderpest outbreak in the United States
has the potential for severe economic
consequences. Although imports of
swine and swine products typically
would be allowed under APHIS’ FMD
and rinderpest regulations, those
commodities are not eligible for
importation from the Republic of Korea
due to USDA regulations designed to
prevent the introduction of diseases
other than FMD and rinderpest.2
We do not anticipate that changing
the FMD and rinderpest status of the
Republic of Korea will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of U.S. entities, large or small,
because the volume of currently
prohibited/restricted animals and
APHIS’ risk evaluation states that the animal
health status of swine for diseases other than FMD
has not been evaluated. In the absence of a
favorable evaluation, live swine and swine-derived
products will not be eligible to be imported from
the Republic of Korea.
2
1 To view the proposed rule, the risk evaluation,
the environmental assessment and notice, and the
finding of no significant impact, go to (https://
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2008-0147).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
10:44 Dec 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68479
animal products imported into the
United States from the Republic of
Korea is likely to be very small relative
to overall U.S. supply of those
commodities (production and net
imports from all foreign sources). There
are several reasons for this. First, the
volume of U.S. imports from the
Republic of Korea prior to March 20,
2000 (the date the Republic of Korea
was removed from the list of regions
considered to be free of FMD and
rinderpest) was negligible. During the 3year period from 1997 to 1999, the
United States did not import any
reportable amounts of ruminants or
fresh (chilled or frozen) meat or other
products of ruminants from the
Republic of Korea, other than 1.3 metric
tons of dairy products in 1998.
Second, the Republic of Korea
produces less beef, milk, and pork than
it consumes, and is therefore a net
importer of these commodities. Given
this fact, there will likely not be a
significant volume of exports of those
commodities to the United States.
Finally, APHIS’ staff expects that
Hanwoo beef, a premium-priced
specialty meat produced from Korean
native cattle, is likely to be the Republic
of Korea’s primary export to the United
States. Because of its premium price, the
market for Hanwoo beef is limited; it is
likely to be sold to a niche market, such
as Korean restaurants in the United
States.
Importers, brokers, and others
interested in importing Hanwoo beef, as
well as restaurants intending to serve
that product, are the U.S. entities most
likely to be affected by the rule. They
stand to benefit from the increased
business activity. The number of these
entities is unknown but it is likely to be
very small, given the expected limited
market for Hanwoo beef in the United
States. The size of these entities is also
unknown, although it is reasonable to
assume that, as with U.S. businesses in
general, most are small under the
standards of the U.S. Small Business
Administration. Therefore, this action
should have no noticeable effect on U.S.
beef producers, given the expected
limited demand for Hanwoo beef.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Has no
retroactive effect and (2) does not
require administrative proceedings
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
68480
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 247 / Monday, December 28, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
National Environmental Policy Act
An environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact have
been prepared for this final rule. The
environmental assessment provides a
basis for the conclusion that the removal
of certain rinderpest and FMD-related
prohibitions and restrictions on the
importation into the United States of
ruminants, or fresh (chilled or frozen)
meat or other products of ruminants,
from the Republic of Korea will not
have a significant impact on the quality
of the human environment. Based on
the finding of no significant impact, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that an environmental
impact statement need not be prepared.
The environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact were
prepared in accordance with: (1) The
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372).
The environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact may be
viewed on the Regulations.gov Web
site.3 Copies of the environmental
assessment and finding of no significant
impact are also available for public
inspection at USDA, room 1141, South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between
8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. Persons
wishing to inspect copies are requested
to call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to
facilitate entry into the reading room. In
addition, copies may be obtained by
writing to the individual listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry
and poultry products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR
part 94 as follows:
3
See footnote 1.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
10:44 Dec 24, 2009
Jkt 220001
PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, EXOTIC
NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN
SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL SWINE
FEVER, SWINE VESICULAR DISEASE,
AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM
ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 77817786, and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
§ 94.1
[Amended]
2. In § 94.1, paragraph (a)(2) is
amended by adding the words
‘‘Republic of Korea,’’ after the word
‘‘Japan,’’.
■
§ 94.11
[Amended]
3. In § 94.11, paragraph (a) is amended
by adding the words ‘‘Republic of
Korea,’’ after the word ‘‘Japan,’’.
■
Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day
of December 2009.
Kevin Shea
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9–30668 Filed 12–24–09: 12:36
pm]
BILLING CODE: 3410–34–S
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
7 CFR Part 760
RIN 0560–AH90
Supplemental Revenue Assistance
Payments Program
Farm Service Agency, USDA.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule implements specific
requirements for the new Supplemental
Revenue Assistance Payments Program
(SURE) authorized by the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(the 2008 Farm Bill). SURE provides
disaster assistance to eligible
participants who have experienced
qualifying crop production losses, or
crop quality losses, or both, occurring in
crop year 2008 through September 30,
2011. All crops for which crop
insurance or noninsured crop disaster
assistance program (NAP) coverage is
available are eligible crops for SURE. To
be eligible for SURE payments,
participants must meet a risk
management purchase requirement,
with some exceptions, and have
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
suffered a qualifying loss due to
disaster. A qualifying loss is a loss of at
least 10 percent of a crop of economic
significance on a participant’s farm in a
disaster county (a county for which a
Secretarial disaster declaration has been
issued or a county contiguous to such a
county), or on a participant’s farm with
an overall loss greater than 50 percent
of normal production (expected revenue
for all crops on the farm) due to disaster.
This rule specifies how a qualifying loss
is determined, how SURE payments are
calculated, and how and when
participants may apply for payment.
DATES: Effective Date: December 22,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven J. Peterson, Branch Chief,
Disaster Assistance Branch, Production,
Emergencies, and Compliance Division;
Farm Service Agency; United States
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0517,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0517; telephone
(202) 720–5172; e-mail
Steve.Peterson@wdc.usda.gov. Persons
with disabilities who require alternative
means of communication (Braille, large
print, audio tape, etc.) should contact
the USDA Target Center at (202) 720–
2600 (voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This rule implements specific
requirements for the SURE program
authorized by the 2008 Farm Bill (Pub.
L. 110–246) and amendments to the
2008 Farm Bill contained in the
Consolidated Security, Disaster
Assistance, and Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110–
329), an Act to Amend the Commodity
Provisions of the Food, Conservation,
and Energy Act of 2008 and for other
purposes (Pub. L. 110–398), and the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–005, the
Recovery Act). The basic core of the
SURE program is specified in the 2008
Farm Bill. With the exception of the
Recovery Act, the subsequent
amendments were technical in nature;
the amendments are discussed below.
Sections 12033 and 15101 of the 2008
Farm Bill authorize the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretary) to provide
assistance to eligible participants with
certain crop losses. Under this
authority, FSA is establishing SURE, a
new permanent disaster assistance
program, providing payments to eligible
participants who suffered a qualifying
loss and who met the risk management
purchase requirement.
FSA will administer SURE using
funds from the Agricultural Disaster
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 247 (Monday, December 28, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68478-68480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-30668]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0147]
Change in Disease Status of the Republic of Korea With Regard to
Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Rinderpest
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the regulations to add the Republic of Korea
to the list of regions that are considered free of rinderpest and foot-
and-mouth disease (FMD). We are taking this action because we have
conducted an evaluation and determined that the Republic of Korea is
free of rinderpest and FMD. We are also adding the Republic of Korea to
the list of regions that are subject to certain import restrictions on
meat and meat products because of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest- or FMD-affected countries. These actions
will update the disease status of the Republic of Korea with regard to
rinderpest and FMD while continuing to protect the United States from
an introduction of those diseases by providing additional requirements
for meat and other animal products imported into the United States from
the Republic of Korea.
DATES: Effective Date: January 12, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Julia Punderson, Senior Staff
[[Page 68479]]
Veterinarian, Regionalization Evaluation Services, National Center for
Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
20737-1231; (301) 734-4356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the
regulations) govern the importation of certain animals and animal
products into the United States in order to prevent the introduction of
various communicable diseases, including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD), African swine fever, classical swine fever, and swine
vesicular disease. These are dangerous and destructive communicable
diseases of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of the regulations lists
regions of the world that are declared free of rinderpest or free of
both rinderpest and FMD. Rinderpest or FMD is considered to exist in
all other parts of the world not listed. Section 94.11 of the
regulations lists regions of the world that have been determined to be
free of rinderpest and FMD, but are subject to certain restrictions
because of their proximity to or trading relationships with rinderpest
or FMD-affected regions.
On March 30, 2009, we published in the Federal Register a
proposal\1\ (74 FR 14093-14097, Docket No. APHIS-2008-0147) to amend
the regulations by adding the Republic of Korea (South Korea) to the
list in Sec. 94.1 of regions declared free of FMD and rinderpest. We
also proposed to add the Republic of Korea to the list in Sec. 94.11
of regions that are declared to be free of these diseases, but that are
subject to certain restrictions because of their proximity to or
trading relationships with rinderpest or FMD-affected regions. In
addition, we published a notice of availability of an environmental
assessment (74 FR 17115) on April 14, 2009 (see footnote 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the proposed rule, the risk evaluation, the
environmental assessment and notice, and the finding of no
significant impact, go to (https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2008-0147).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
May 29, 2009. We did not receive any comments. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the proposed rule, we are adopting the proposed rule
as a final rule, without change.
Effective Date
This is a substantive rule that relieves restrictions and, pursuant
to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, may be made effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. This rule relieves
certain rinderpest and FMD-related restrictions on the importation into
the United States of ruminants, or fresh (chilled or frozen) meat or
other products of ruminants, from the Republic of Korea. We have
determined that approximately 2 weeks are needed to ensure that APHIS
and Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection, personnel at ports of entry receive official notice of this
change in the regulations. Therefore, the Administrator of the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this rule
should be effective 15 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
This rule amends the regulations by adding the Republic of Korea to
the list of regions considered to be free of rinderpest and FMD. This
action, which was requested by the Republic of Korea, follows a risk
assessment conducted by APHIS concluding that the Republic of Korea is
free of both diseases and has the veterinary infrastructure in place to
detect and effectively eradicate the diseases if necessary. The effect
of the rule will be to remove certain rinderpest and FMD-related
prohibitions and restrictions on the importation into the United States
of ruminants, or fresh (chilled or frozen) meat or other products of
ruminants, from the Republic of Korea. APHIS imposes such restrictions
because an FMD or rinderpest outbreak in the United States has the
potential for severe economic consequences. Although imports of swine
and swine products typically would be allowed under APHIS' FMD and
rinderpest regulations, those commodities are not eligible for
importation from the Republic of Korea due to USDA regulations designed
to prevent the introduction of diseases other than FMD and
rinderpest.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ APHIS' risk evaluation states that the animal health status
of swine for diseases other than FMD has not been evaluated. In the
absence of a favorable evaluation, live swine and swine-derived
products will not be eligible to be imported from the Republic of
Korea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We do not anticipate that changing the FMD and rinderpest status of
the Republic of Korea will have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of U.S. entities, large or small, because the volume
of currently prohibited/restricted animals and animal products imported
into the United States from the Republic of Korea is likely to be very
small relative to overall U.S. supply of those commodities (production
and net imports from all foreign sources). There are several reasons
for this. First, the volume of U.S. imports from the Republic of Korea
prior to March 20, 2000 (the date the Republic of Korea was removed
from the list of regions considered to be free of FMD and rinderpest)
was negligible. During the 3-year period from 1997 to 1999, the United
States did not import any reportable amounts of ruminants or fresh
(chilled or frozen) meat or other products of ruminants from the
Republic of Korea, other than 1.3 metric tons of dairy products in
1998.
Second, the Republic of Korea produces less beef, milk, and pork
than it consumes, and is therefore a net importer of these commodities.
Given this fact, there will likely not be a significant volume of
exports of those commodities to the United States.
Finally, APHIS' staff expects that Hanwoo beef, a premium-priced
specialty meat produced from Korean native cattle, is likely to be the
Republic of Korea's primary export to the United States. Because of its
premium price, the market for Hanwoo beef is limited; it is likely to
be sold to a niche market, such as Korean restaurants in the United
States.
Importers, brokers, and others interested in importing Hanwoo beef,
as well as restaurants intending to serve that product, are the U.S.
entities most likely to be affected by the rule. They stand to benefit
from the increased business activity. The number of these entities is
unknown but it is likely to be very small, given the expected limited
market for Hanwoo beef in the United States. The size of these entities
is also unknown, although it is reasonable to assume that, as with U.S.
businesses in general, most are small under the standards of the U.S.
Small Business Administration. Therefore, this action should have no
noticeable effect on U.S. beef producers, given the expected limited
demand for Hanwoo beef.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Has no retroactive effect and (2)
does not require administrative proceedings
[[Page 68480]]
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
National Environmental Policy Act
An environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
have been prepared for this final rule. The environmental assessment
provides a basis for the conclusion that the removal of certain
rinderpest and FMD-related prohibitions and restrictions on the
importation into the United States of ruminants, or fresh (chilled or
frozen) meat or other products of ruminants, from the Republic of Korea
will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human
environment. Based on the finding of no significant impact, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has
determined that an environmental impact statement need not be prepared.
The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
were prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2)
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing
the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA
regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
may be viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site.\3\ Copies of the
environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact are also
available for public inspection at USDA, room 1141, South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Persons wishing
to inspect copies are requested to call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to
facilitate entry into the reading room. In addition, copies may be
obtained by writing to the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See footnote 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk,
Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR part 94 as follows:
PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, EXOTIC NEWCASTLE
DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER, SWINE
VESICULAR DISEASE, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 94 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Sec. 94.1 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 94.1, paragraph (a)(2) is amended by adding the words
``Republic of Korea,'' after the word ``Japan,''.
Sec. 94.11 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 94.11, paragraph (a) is amended by adding the words
``Republic of Korea,'' after the word ``Japan,''.
Done in Washington, DC, this 16\th\ day of December 2009.
Kevin Shea
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9-30668 Filed 12-24-09: 12:36 pm]
BILLING CODE: 3410-34-S