National Aquatic Animal Health Plan for the United States; Notice of Availability, 42225-42227 [E9-19702]
Download as PDF
42225
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 161
Friday, August 21, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2008–0096]
National Aquatic Animal Health Plan
for the United States; Notice of
Availability
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA; National
Marine Fisheries Service, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, DOC; and Fish and
Wildlife Service, DOI.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
SUMMARY: We are advising the public
that a National Aquatic Animal Health
Plan (NAAHP) for the United States is
being made available for public review
and comment. The NAAHP was
developed by a Task Force led by the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) of the U.S. Department
Agriculture, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) of the U.S. Department of
the Interior, and the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration of the U.S. Department
of Commerce. It is anticipated that this
plan will provide a framework for how
APHIS, FWS, and NMFS should
develop programs for diseases that affect
the health of aquatic animals such as
finfish, crustaceans, and mollusks.
DATES: APHIS, FWS, and NMFS will
consider all comments received on or
before October 20, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Aug 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2008-0096 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information. The
agency will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2008–0096,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS
2008–0096.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on the
National Aquatic Animal Health Plan in
the APHIS reading room. The reading
room is located in Room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov. Additional
information about FWS is available on
the Internet at https://www.fws.gov.
Additional information about the NOAA
Aquaculture Program is available on the
Internet at https://aquaculture.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
APHIS: Dr. P. Gary Egrie, Veterinary
Medical Officer, Aquaculture, Swine,
Equine, and Poultry Health Programs,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 46,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301)
734–0695.
NMFS: Mr. Kevin Amos, National
Aquatic Animal Health Coordinator,
NOAA Aquaculture Program, 1315
East-West Hwy., SSMC#3 Rm. 13137,
Silver Spring, MD 20910; (360) 709–
9001.
FWS: Ray Brunson, Project Leader,
FWS, Olympia Fish Health Center,
3859 Martin Way E, Suite 101,
Olympia, WA 98506; 360–753–9046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Aquaculture, which includes the
managed production of aquatic animals,
is practiced throughout the United
States and its territories by private,
public, and tribal entities. Aquaculture
continues to grow as a major
agribusiness enterprise. The production
of aquatic animals is a critical economic
and environmental activity that
provides a source of healthy food,
employment, recreation, and
supplementation of wild fishery stocks
for harvest by commercial and tribal
harvesters, as well as protection and
restoration of aquatic animals that face
extinction.
Disease has the potential to pose a
great threat to the success of
aquaculture. Developing and
implementing a national aquatic animal
health plan has become urgent for two
reasons: The growing need to protect
our domestic commerce and resources,
and the advent of new health
regulations by foreign governments that
restrict the importation of live and
processed aquatic animals from the
United States.
In recent years, outbreaks of
infectious salmon anemia and spring
viremia of carp in private U.S.
aquaculture operations resulted in
losses of over $10 million. Also
recently, a new strain of viral
hemorrhagic septicemia has affected
several wild populations of fish in the
Great Lakes region of the United States.
If the United States maintains a limited
and disparate supporting infrastructure
to diagnose, report, educate, manage,
and develop surveillance and control
programs, the presence of these or the
discovery of other aquatic animal
pathogens in this country could lead to
restriction or elimination of
international commerce in some aquatic
animals for the United States.
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
42226
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
The National Aquatic Animal Health
Plan (NAAHP)
In 2001, the Joint Subcommittee on
Aquaculture (JSA), under the auspices
of the Executive Office of the President,
Office of Science and Technology
Policy, commissioned a national task
force to develop a national health plan
for aquatic animals. Three Federal
Departments with primary
responsibility for aquatic animal health
are leading the task force—the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA), the
U.S. Department of Commerce
(Commerce), and the U.S. Department of
the Interior (DOI). USDA’s Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
protects the health of U.S. agriculture,
thereby improving agricultural
productivity and competiveness and
contributing to the national economy
and public health. Commerce’s National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is
dedicated to the stewardship of living
marine resources through science-based
conservation and management, and the
promotion of healthy ecosystems. DOI’s
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) works
with others to conserve, protect, and
enhance fish, wildlife, and plants, and
their habitats for the continuing benefit
of the American people. The FWS’
Aquatic Animal Health Program strives
to conserve our nation’s fisheries and
aquatic resources.
Once the JSA commissioned the task
force to develop the NAAHP, the task
force recognized that the first outreach
activity would be to bring together all
interested parties, inform them of the
intent to develop a plan, and request
their recommendations regarding
content. The recommendations from
stakeholders shaped the mission and the
objectives for the NAAHP, which was
again vetted by interested parties and
reviewed by the JSA itself. The mission
of the NAAHP is to:
• Facilitate the legal movement of all
aquatic animals, their eggs, and their
products in interstate and international
commerce;
• Protect the health and thereby
improve the quality and productivity of
farmed and wild aquatic animals;
• Ensure the availability of
diagnostic, inspection, and certification
services; and
• Minimize the impacts of diseases
when they occur in farmed or wild
aquatic animals.
Following approval of the mission of
the NAAHP by the JSA, the task force
began soliciting information for the
contents of the chapters. Technical
group meetings were held, at which
information was solicited from industry,
State, tribal, Federal and academic
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Aug 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
partners. A total of 12 group meetings
were held between January 2003 and
November 2006. Many of the technical
groups focused on species-specific
disease issues with regard to
surveillance and disease management.
The task force’s technical team used
information from these groups and from
other meetings to draft the NAAHP’s
chapters.
The goal of the NAAHP is to provide
recommendations to industry, States,
tribes, Federal agencies, and other
stakeholders to meet the mission of the
Plan. These recommendations are not
necessarily in support of an overarching
regulatory program to be implemented
by the Federal Government. Rather, the
recommendations relate to activities for
consideration by all stakeholders to
meet the mission of the Plan.
Four principles have been used by the
task force to develop the NAAHP. They
are:
• Construct the Plan using
established scientific principles of fish
health management;
• Develop the Plan in an open and
visible process in which stakeholders
have opportunities to provide
information;
• Recognize that limited resources are
available; therefore the plan must be
affordable, make sense to stakeholders,
and be capable of implementation; and
• Develop standards that are
consistent with World Trade
Organization and World Organization
for Animal Health (OIE) guidelines and,
to the extent possible, are consistent
with Federal, State, and tribal
regulations already in existence in the
United States.
Recommendations and Implementation
While the NAAHP is not a regulation,
it provides general principles and
guidelines for how the U.S. Federal
Agencies with jurisdiction over aquatic
animal health (APHIS, NMFS, and FWS)
should take action to protect our farmed
and wild resources, facilitate safe
commerce, and make available
laboratory testing, training, and other
programs as needed to implement the
NAAHP. The key recommendations
made by the task force are related to the
following areas:
• Prevention of the introduction or
spread of program aquatic animal
pathogens (PAAPs);
• Response to PAAPs and reportable
aquatic animal pathogens (RAAPs);
• Health certification;
• Surveillance schemes for PAAPs
and RAAPs;
• Laboratories, standardized testing,
quality testing, and approved personnel;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Education and training.
In addition to the recommendation
areas listed, activities addressed in the
NAAHP include the following:
Definition of pathogens of national
concern; creation and implementation
of disease management zones;
identification of priority areas for
research and development in aquatic
animal health, including identification
of existing funding structures and
recommendations for leveraging
resources; description of strategies for
continued outreach and awareness
regarding national aquatic animal health
strategies and the NAAHP; and
implementation of the NAAHP.
Due to limited resources, the NAAHP
must be developed based on the
priorities and recommendations
identified within the Plan, and
implementation of these priorities will
be contingent upon funding. However,
continued stakeholder consultation is
necessary to ensure that the priorities
and recommendations in the Plan are
updated if necessary. Therefore, the
establishment of a National Advisory
Committee for Aquatic Animal Health is
of utmost importance to a successful
NAAHP.
Such a committee could be
established as a permanent advisory
committee—chartered under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA)—to
the Federal agencies responsible for
implementing programs related to the
NAAHP. Alternatively, it could be
created as a subcommittee of a currently
established FACA committee, such as
the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on
Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases
within the USDA. In either case, the
Advisory Committee structure can
provide information to agencies
regarding issues of importance and, in
an environment of fiscal conservation,
assist the Federal agencies in allocating
resources for aquatic animal health
issues appropriately. Such an advisory
committee should be large enough to
ensure broad stakeholder
representation, but small enough to
ensure its effectiveness.
The next step is for the Federal
agencies to take the recommendations
and suggested actions in the Plan and
make them into policies, guidelines, and
if appropriate, regulations. As with the
development of the NAAHP,
implementation must be a collaborative
process that includes information from
States, tribes, industry, and other
stakeholders, and the timeframe for
certain activities may be influenced by
available funding.
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 / Notices
Accessing and Commenting on the
NAAHP
We are making the NAAHP dated
October 2008 available to the public for
review and comment. We will consider
all comments that we receive on or
before the date listed under the heading
DATES at the beginning of this notice.
The NAAHP may be viewed on the
Federal eRulemaking Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov). You may
request paper copies of the draft
document by contacting the persons
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Please refer to the title of the
draft document when requesting copies.
The NAAHP may also be viewed at
APHIS’ Web site at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/
animal_dis_spec/aquaculture/, at FWS’
Web site at https://www.fws.gov/
fisheries/, or at NOAA’s aquaculture
Web site at https://aquaculture.noaa.gov.
The NAAHP is also available for review
in the APHIS reading room.
(Information on the location and hours
of the APHIS reading room is listed
under the heading ADDRESSES at the
beginning of this notice.)
Dated: August 11, 2009.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Dated: August 11, 2009.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–19702 Filed 8–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Basin Electric Power Cooperative;
Notice of Finding of No Significant
Impact
AGENCY:
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice of Finding of No
Significant Impact.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) has
made a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) with respect to a request from
Basin Electric Power Cooperative for
assistance to finance the construction,
operation, and maintenance of a 115.5
MW wind-powered electric generating
facility (the Proposal) in Ward County,
North Dakota.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:22 Aug 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
The FONSI is available for
public review at the USDA Rural
Utilities Service’s Web site—https://
www.usda.gov/rus/water/ees/ea.htm or
at 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Room 2244, Stop 1571, Washington, DC
20250–1571; and at Basin’s
headquarters office located at 1717 East
Interstate Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58503–
0564.
CONTACTS: To obtain copies of the
FONSI or for further information,
contact Dennis Rankin, Environmental
Protection Specialist, USDA, Rural
Utilities Service, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 1571 Washington,
DC 20250–1571, Telephone: (202) 720–
1953 or e-mail:
dennis.rankin@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Basin
Electric proposes to construct a new
115.5 MW wind generation facility in
north-central North Dakota. The project
will include seventy-seven (77) 1.5 MW
wind turbine generators and be located
approximately 15 miles south of Minot,
North Dakota. Tetra Tech, an
environmental consulting firm,
prepared an Environmental Report for
RUS. RUS conducted an independent
evaluation of the Environmental Report
and agreed that it accurately assessed
the impacts of the Proposal. RUS
accepted the document as its
Environmental Assessment and
published the document for a 30-day
public comment period. The applicant
is responsible for obtaining all permits
required to construct the Proposal.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1) of the
regulations (36 CFR Part 800)
implementing Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), 16 U.S.C. 470f, RUS made a
finding that this Proposal will not affect
historic properties. RUS received no
objection to this finding of effect from
the North Dakota State Historic
Preservation Office or other consulting
parties. RUS has determined this
finding of no historic properties affected
made pursuant to Section 106 of NHPA.
In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR 1500–1508), and RUS’
Environmental Policies and Procedures
(7 CFR Part 1794), RUS has determined
that the environmental impacts of the
Proposal have been adequately
addressed and that no significant
impacts to the quality of the human
environment would result from the
construction and operation of the
Proposal. Any final action by RUS
related to the Proposal will be subject
to, and contingent upon, compliance
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42227
with all relevant federal and state
environmental laws and regulations.
Since RUS’ action will not result in
significant impacts to the quality of the
human environment, the preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement
related to the proposed project is not
necessary.
Dated: August 14, 2009.
Nivin Elgohary,
Acting Assistant Administrator—Electric,
Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. E9–20076 Filed 8–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Notice of Meeting of the Agricultural
Air Quality Task Force
AGENCY: Natural Resources
Conservation Service, United States
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Air Quality
Task Force (AAQTF) will meet to
continue discussions on air quality
issues relating to agriculture.
DATES: The meeting will convene at 8
a.m. on Wednesday through Friday,
September 16–18, 2009, and conclude at
5 p.m. on Wednesday, 5 p.m. on
Thursday, and 12 noon on Friday,
respectively. A public comment period
will be held on Thursday, September
17, 2009. Individuals making oral
presentations should register at the
meeting site and bring 50 copies of
materials they would like distributed.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Embassy Suites on the River located
at 101 East Locust Street, Des Moines,
Iowa 50309; Telephone: (515) 244–1700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michele Laur, Designated Federal
Official, Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
6165 South Building, Washington, DC
20013; Telephone: (202) 720–1858; or email: michele.laur@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
this meeting is given under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
2. Additional information concerning
AAQTF may be viewed on the World
Wide Web at: https://
www.airquality.nrcs.usda.gov/AAQTF/.
Agenda
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
A. Welcome to Iowa
B. Discussion of Iowa Air Quality Issues
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 161 (Friday, August 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42225-42227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-19702]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 161 / Friday, August 21, 2009 /
Notices
[[Page 42225]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0096]
National Aquatic Animal Health Plan for the United States; Notice
of Availability
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA; National
Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, DOC; and Fish and Wildlife Service, DOI.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that a National Aquatic Animal
Health Plan (NAAHP) for the United States is being made available for
public review and comment. The NAAHP was developed by a Task Force led
by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U.S.
Department Agriculture, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) of the U.S.
Department of the Interior, and the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the
U.S. Department of Commerce. It is anticipated that this plan will
provide a framework for how APHIS, FWS, and NMFS should develop
programs for diseases that affect the health of aquatic animals such as
finfish, crustaceans, and mollusks.
DATES: APHIS, FWS, and NMFS will consider all comments received on or
before October 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2008-0096 to submit or view comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically. All
comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All personal
identifying information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information. The agency will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A''
in the required fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may
submit attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2008-0096, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS 2008-0096.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on the
National Aquatic Animal Health Plan in the APHIS reading room. The
reading room is located in Room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th
Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202)
690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
Additional information about FWS is available on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov. Additional information about the NOAA Aquaculture Program
is available on the Internet at https://aquaculture.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
APHIS: Dr. P. Gary Egrie, Veterinary Medical Officer, Aquaculture,
Swine, Equine, and Poultry Health Programs, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road,
Unit 46, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-0695.
NMFS: Mr. Kevin Amos, National Aquatic Animal Health Coordinator, NOAA
Aquaculture Program, 1315 East-West Hwy., SSMC3 Rm. 13137,
Silver Spring, MD 20910; (360) 709-9001.
FWS: Ray Brunson, Project Leader, FWS, Olympia Fish Health Center, 3859
Martin Way E, Suite 101, Olympia, WA 98506; 360-753-9046.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Aquaculture, which includes the managed production of aquatic
animals, is practiced throughout the United States and its territories
by private, public, and tribal entities. Aquaculture continues to grow
as a major agribusiness enterprise. The production of aquatic animals
is a critical economic and environmental activity that provides a
source of healthy food, employment, recreation, and supplementation of
wild fishery stocks for harvest by commercial and tribal harvesters, as
well as protection and restoration of aquatic animals that face
extinction.
Disease has the potential to pose a great threat to the success of
aquaculture. Developing and implementing a national aquatic animal
health plan has become urgent for two reasons: The growing need to
protect our domestic commerce and resources, and the advent of new
health regulations by foreign governments that restrict the importation
of live and processed aquatic animals from the United States.
In recent years, outbreaks of infectious salmon anemia and spring
viremia of carp in private U.S. aquaculture operations resulted in
losses of over $10 million. Also recently, a new strain of viral
hemorrhagic septicemia has affected several wild populations of fish in
the Great Lakes region of the United States. If the United States
maintains a limited and disparate supporting infrastructure to
diagnose, report, educate, manage, and develop surveillance and control
programs, the presence of these or the discovery of other aquatic
animal pathogens in this country could lead to restriction or
elimination of international commerce in some aquatic animals for the
United States.
[[Page 42226]]
The National Aquatic Animal Health Plan (NAAHP)
In 2001, the Joint Subcommittee on Aquaculture (JSA), under the
auspices of the Executive Office of the President, Office of Science
and Technology Policy, commissioned a national task force to develop a
national health plan for aquatic animals. Three Federal Departments
with primary responsibility for aquatic animal health are leading the
task force--the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Commerce), and the U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI). USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) protects the health of U.S. agriculture, thereby improving
agricultural productivity and competiveness and contributing to the
national economy and public health. Commerce's National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) is dedicated to the stewardship of living
marine resources through science-based conservation and management, and
the promotion of healthy ecosystems. DOI's Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) works with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish,
wildlife, and plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of
the American people. The FWS' Aquatic Animal Health Program strives to
conserve our nation's fisheries and aquatic resources.
Once the JSA commissioned the task force to develop the NAAHP, the
task force recognized that the first outreach activity would be to
bring together all interested parties, inform them of the intent to
develop a plan, and request their recommendations regarding content.
The recommendations from stakeholders shaped the mission and the
objectives for the NAAHP, which was again vetted by interested parties
and reviewed by the JSA itself. The mission of the NAAHP is to:
Facilitate the legal movement of all aquatic animals,
their eggs, and their products in interstate and international
commerce;
Protect the health and thereby improve the quality and
productivity of farmed and wild aquatic animals;
Ensure the availability of diagnostic, inspection, and
certification services; and
Minimize the impacts of diseases when they occur in farmed
or wild aquatic animals.
Following approval of the mission of the NAAHP by the JSA, the task
force began soliciting information for the contents of the chapters.
Technical group meetings were held, at which information was solicited
from industry, State, tribal, Federal and academic partners. A total of
12 group meetings were held between January 2003 and November 2006.
Many of the technical groups focused on species-specific disease issues
with regard to surveillance and disease management. The task force's
technical team used information from these groups and from other
meetings to draft the NAAHP's chapters.
The goal of the NAAHP is to provide recommendations to industry,
States, tribes, Federal agencies, and other stakeholders to meet the
mission of the Plan. These recommendations are not necessarily in
support of an overarching regulatory program to be implemented by the
Federal Government. Rather, the recommendations relate to activities
for consideration by all stakeholders to meet the mission of the Plan.
Four principles have been used by the task force to develop the
NAAHP. They are:
Construct the Plan using established scientific principles
of fish health management;
Develop the Plan in an open and visible process in which
stakeholders have opportunities to provide information;
Recognize that limited resources are available; therefore
the plan must be affordable, make sense to stakeholders, and be capable
of implementation; and
Develop standards that are consistent with World Trade
Organization and World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) guidelines
and, to the extent possible, are consistent with Federal, State, and
tribal regulations already in existence in the United States.
Recommendations and Implementation
While the NAAHP is not a regulation, it provides general principles
and guidelines for how the U.S. Federal Agencies with jurisdiction over
aquatic animal health (APHIS, NMFS, and FWS) should take action to
protect our farmed and wild resources, facilitate safe commerce, and
make available laboratory testing, training, and other programs as
needed to implement the NAAHP. The key recommendations made by the task
force are related to the following areas:
Prevention of the introduction or spread of program
aquatic animal pathogens (PAAPs);
Response to PAAPs and reportable aquatic animal pathogens
(RAAPs);
Health certification;
Surveillance schemes for PAAPs and RAAPs;
Laboratories, standardized testing, quality testing, and
approved personnel; and
Education and training.
In addition to the recommendation areas listed, activities
addressed in the NAAHP include the following: Definition of pathogens
of national concern; creation and implementation of disease management
zones; identification of priority areas for research and development in
aquatic animal health, including identification of existing funding
structures and recommendations for leveraging resources; description of
strategies for continued outreach and awareness regarding national
aquatic animal health strategies and the NAAHP; and implementation of
the NAAHP.
Due to limited resources, the NAAHP must be developed based on the
priorities and recommendations identified within the Plan, and
implementation of these priorities will be contingent upon funding.
However, continued stakeholder consultation is necessary to ensure that
the priorities and recommendations in the Plan are updated if
necessary. Therefore, the establishment of a National Advisory
Committee for Aquatic Animal Health is of utmost importance to a
successful NAAHP.
Such a committee could be established as a permanent advisory
committee--chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)--
to the Federal agencies responsible for implementing programs related
to the NAAHP. Alternatively, it could be created as a subcommittee of a
currently established FACA committee, such as the Secretary's Advisory
Committee on Foreign Animal and Poultry Diseases within the USDA. In
either case, the Advisory Committee structure can provide information
to agencies regarding issues of importance and, in an environment of
fiscal conservation, assist the Federal agencies in allocating
resources for aquatic animal health issues appropriately. Such an
advisory committee should be large enough to ensure broad stakeholder
representation, but small enough to ensure its effectiveness.
The next step is for the Federal agencies to take the
recommendations and suggested actions in the Plan and make them into
policies, guidelines, and if appropriate, regulations. As with the
development of the NAAHP, implementation must be a collaborative
process that includes information from States, tribes, industry, and
other stakeholders, and the timeframe for certain activities may be
influenced by available funding.
[[Page 42227]]
Accessing and Commenting on the NAAHP
We are making the NAAHP dated October 2008 available to the public
for review and comment. We will consider all comments that we receive
on or before the date listed under the heading DATES at the beginning
of this notice.
The NAAHP may be viewed on the Federal eRulemaking Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov). You
may request paper copies of the draft document by contacting the
persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Please refer to
the title of the draft document when requesting copies. The NAAHP may
also be viewed at APHIS' Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_dis_spec/aquaculture/, at FWS' Web site at https://www.fws.gov/fisheries/, or at NOAA's aquaculture Web site at https://aquaculture.noaa.gov. The NAAHP is also available for review in the
APHIS reading room. (Information on the location and hours of the APHIS
reading room is listed under the heading ADDRESSES at the beginning of
this notice.)
Dated: August 11, 2009.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Dated: August 11, 2009.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-19702 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P