Electronic Registration for Deposit Account Holders, 33930-33932 [E9-16664]
Download as PDF
33930
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules
43020, July 26, 2005) and adding the
following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2009–0636;
Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–031–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by August 28, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2005–15–08.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
100B SUD, –200B, –300, –400, and –400D
series airplanes, certificated in any category;
as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
53A2484, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2009.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from findings of
cracking in fuselage stringers 8L, 8R, 10L,
and 10R at body station 460, 480, and 500
frame locations. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking in the
specified fuselage stringers, which, if left
undetected, could result in fuselage skin
cracking that reduces the structural integrity
of the skin panel, and consequent rapid
depressurization of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Requirements of AD 2005–15–08
Inspection for Certain Airplanes Subject to
AD 2005–15–08 With New Service Bulletin
(g) For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2484, dated June
26, 2003, except airplanes identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD, do a detailed
inspection for cracking in fuselage stringers
8L, 8R, 10L, and 10R at body station 460,
480, and 500 frame locations, in accordance
with Part 1 of the Accomplishment
Instructions in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–53A2484, dated June 26, 2003; or Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–53A2484, Revision 1,
dated February 12, 2009. Do the inspections
at the applicable time specified in paragraph
(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 3,000 flight cycles until the
requirements of paragraph (l) of this AD are
accomplished. After the effective date of this
AD, use only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
53A2484, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2009.
(1) For airplanes with 19,000 total flight
cycles or less as of August 30, 2005 (the
effective date of AD 2005–15–08): Prior to the
accumulation of 8,000 total flight cycles, or
within 2,000 flight cycles after August 30,
2005, whichever is later, not to exceed 20,000
total flight cycles.
(2) For airplanes with more than 19,000
total flight cycles as of August 30, 2005:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jul 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
Within 1,000 flight cycles after August 30,
2005.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
New Requirements of This Ad
Inspection: Variable Number RS699
(h) For Model 747 airplane variable
number RS699, do a detailed inspection for
cracking in fuselage stringers 8L, 8R, 10L,
and 10R at body station 460, 480, and 500
frame locations, in accordance with Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–53A2484, Revision 1,
dated February 12, 2009, at the later of the
times specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD.
(1) Before the accumulation of 8,000 total
flight cycles.
(2) Within 2,000 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD.
(i) For Model 747 airplane variable number
RS699, repeat the inspection specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight cycles
until the actions specified in paragraph (k) or
(l) of this AD are accomplished.
Inspection: Group 4 Airplanes
(j) For Group 4 airplanes as identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2484,
Revision 1, dated February 12, 2009, do a
detailed inspection for cracking in fuselage
stringers 8L, 8R, 10L, and 10R at body station
460, 480, and 500 frame locations, within
1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of
this AD. Do the actions in accordance with
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2484,
Revision 1, dated February 12, 2009. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,500 flight cycles until the actions
specified in paragraph (k) or (l) of this AD are
accomplished.
Repair
(k) If cracking is found during any
inspection required by this AD: Before
further flight, repair the affected stringer in
accordance with Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2484, dated June
26, 2003; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
53A2484, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2009. After the effective date of this AD, use
only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2484,
Revision 1, dated February 12, 2009.
Accomplishment of the repair terminates the
repetitive inspections required by this AD for
that repaired stringer/frame location only.
Optional Terminating Action
(l) Installing new frame clips and new
doublers, and repairing as applicable, in
accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–53A2484, dated June
26, 2003; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
53A2484, Revision 1, dated February 12,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2009; terminates the repetitive inspections
required by this AD. After the effective date
of this AD, use only Boeing Service Bulletin
747–53A2484, Revision 1, dated February 12,
2009.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(m)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6437; fax (425) 917–6590; or e-mail
information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2005–15–08,
amendment 39–14197, are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of
this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 2,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–16575 Filed 7–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 202
[Docket No. 2009–4]
Electronic Registration for Deposit
Account Holders
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is
proposing to amend its regulations to
require that applications for registration
paid for by deposit account debits be
submitted electronically using the
E:\FR\FM\14JYP1.SGM
14JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
electronic Copyright Office (eCO)
registration system (eService). The
Copyright Office is also requesting
comment as to whether deposit
accounts offer sufficient efficiencies to
continue offering this service.
DATES: Written comments must be
received in the Office of the General
Counsel of the Copyright Office no later
than August 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: If hand delivered by a
private party, an original and five copies
of a comment or reply comment should
be brought to the Library of Congress,
U.S. Copyright Office, Room LM–401,
James Madison Building, 101
Independence Ave., SE, Washington, DC
20559, between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
The envelope should be addressed as
follows: Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Copyright Office.
If delivered by a commercial courier,
an original and five copies of a comment
or reply comment must be delivered to
the Congressional Courier Acceptance
Site (‘‘CCAS’’) located at 2nd and D
Streets, NE, Washington, DC between
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The envelope
should be addressed as follows: Office
of the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright
Office, LM–403, James Madison
Building, 101 Independence Avenue,
SE, Washington, DC 20559. Please note
that CCAS will not accept delivery by
means of overnight delivery services
such as Federal Express, United Parcel
Service or DHL. If sent by mail
(including overnight delivery using U.S.
Postal Service Express Mail), an original
and five copies of a comment or reply
comment should be addressed to U.S.
Copyright Office, Copyright GC/I&R,
P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Sandros, Deputy General Counsel
or, Chris Weston, Attorney Advisor.
Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 707–8380. Telefax: (202) 707–
8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Deposit Account Background
The Copyright Office maintains a
system of deposit accounts for those
who frequently use its services. An
individual or entity may establish a
deposit account, make advance deposits
into that account, and charge copyright
fees against the balance instead of
sending separate payments with
applications and other requests for
services. This process has been more
efficient and less expensive for both the
Office and the applicant than sending
separate payments to the Copyright
Office for each application for
registration or for other services.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jul 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
Proposed Change to Deposit Account
Regulations
Historically, there have been no
restrictions on registration practices
connected with using deposit accounts.
However, the Copyright Office is now
proposing to amend its rules to require
that, when an application for
registration is paid for by a deposit
account debit, the application form be
submitted electronically, using the
electronic Copyright Office (eCO)
registration system, known as eService.
The proposed change would ensure that
basic applications for registration will
be processed more efficiently and
Copyright Office administrative costs
will be reduced. The Office requests
comments from the public on this
proposal.
Under current practice, when there
are insufficient funds in the deposit
account being used for payment of a
paper application, the Copyright Office
suspends processing of the application
to notify the account holder that
replenishment of the account is needed,
and places the pending application and
associated deposit copies in temporary
storage. The suspended applications,
which may number 3000 or more at any
one time must be reviewed regularly by
Office staff to locate those that are
newly funded and reprocess them.
Thus, insufficient deposit account
funding at a minimum effectively
doubles the time Office staff must spend
examining and processing an
application, time that would otherwise
be more profitably spent on the current
backlog of unprocessed paper
applications.
On average, three to four percent of
paper applications for registration are
suspended each year due to lack of
sufficient funds in deposit accounts. In
fiscal 2007, between 16,000 and 22,000
applications were put on hold for this
reason, and the Office expended a
substantial amount of resources
managing the suspended applications
and deposits. While the Office assesses
additional fees for deposit account
overdrafts and dishonored deposit
account replenishment checks, see 37
CFR 201.3(d), these penalties do not
recover the costs or solve the
fundamental problems associated with
the additional handling and the delay in
processing. Consequently, the Office is
proposing to require deposit account
holders to file applications for
registration via eService [including
applications that require the submission
of physical copies of the deposit in
order to meet the Best Edition
requirement, see 37 CFR 202.20(b)(1)],
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33931
to ensure that the Office can collect the
fee at the time of filing.
eService, which was released on July
1, 2008, allows applications for
copyright registration to be filed
electronically and is available through
the Copyright Office website at
www.copyright.gov. An application for
registration made via eService cannot be
completed until the method of payment
is verified by, for example, ensuring that
sufficient funds are present in the
deposit account and payment has been
made. In contrast, paper applications
must be received by the Copyright
Office, opened and processed before the
validity of the proffered method of
payment can be ascertained.
Thus, the proposed change to require
that all applications for registration paid
for by deposit account debits be
submitted via eService will produce
significant efficiencies for the Office.
By guaranteeing payment at the time
of application, the proposal will reduce,
if not eliminate, the cost and delays
ascribable to suspending applications
lacking fees, storing suspended
applications and associated deposit
copies, notifying deposit account
holders of the need to replenish their
accounts, and retrieving and
reprocessing suspended applications
after fees are received. In addition, it
will eliminate converting data from a
paper application to digital information
for applications paid for by deposit
account debits. Electronic claims have
been demonstrated to cost the Office
only half as much as paper claims, even
those with no payment or other
complications. Among the reasons for
the lower cost is the avoidance of
virtually all work associated with
scanning and storing applications,
processing payments, converting data
from paper to digital form, and verifying
the transcribed data prior to issuing a
certificate. Moreover, the proposed
amendment is consistent with the
Office’s goal of maximizing use of the
electronic registration system through
eService. See, e.g., 73 FR 23990 (April
30, 2008) (Notice of proposed
rulemaking to require all group
registrations to be filed electronically).
From an applicant’s perspective,
using eService to submit applications
for registration would also be more
efficient. The effective date of
registration is typically established more
quickly for electronic applications
because, in many cases, the Copyright
Office receives all the required elements
as mandated by 17 U.S.C. 410(d) –
application, fee and deposit copy(ies) –
in acceptable form sooner than if sent in
physical form. In addition, applications
for registration filed through eService
E:\FR\FM\14JYP1.SGM
14JYP1
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
33932
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules
are processed faster than paper
applications, in part because processing
is not delayed by the deposit account
having insufficient funds. Currently,
90% of the applications submitted
through eService are processed within
six months and a third of these claims
are completed within three months.
Another advantage to applying for
copyright registration via eService is the
financial benefit to the filer. The fee for
filing a basic application for registration
online is $35 and the current fee for
filing a paper application is $45, which
will increase to $65 on August 1, 2009.
The lower fee applies to an online
submission even if the filer must send
physical deposits to fulfill the Library of
Congress’s best edition requirement.
Finally, there are features of the online
application that make it easier to
complete the application. For example,
the eService system offers the option of
a template feature that speeds the
process of completing applications by
automatically copying repeated
information, such as name and address,
from one application to the next.
The key reason, however, for the
proposed change is that the eService
system notifies an electronic applicant
at the point of payment when the
deposit account contains insufficient
funds to process the application, making
it possible for the deposit account
holder to replenish the account
immediately and avoid any delay in
establishing an effective date of
registration. If the applicant’s deposit
account does not have sufficient funds,
payment for the application in question
or replenishment of the deposit account
can be accomplished with a credit card
or through Pay.gov. Pay.gov is an
Internet system for credit card payments
and automatic clearing house debit
transactions (electronic checks)
managed by the U.S. Treasury
Department. Further information
concerning the payment options for
registering claims may be found on the
Copyright Office website at: https://
www.copyright.gov/eco/faq.html, under
the heading, ‘‘Paying fees in eCO.’’
It is also important to note that the
proposed change will not require a
deposit account holder to open a new
account. In order to begin filing
electronically, he or she will only need
to take the following steps: (1) register
with the eService system by creating a
user profile, (2) create an organization
account in eService, and (3) submit a
request to depositaccts@loc.gov to link
the existing deposit account to the
newly created eService organization
account. The email request should
include the deposit account number and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Jul 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
the name of the eService organization
account.
PART 202–REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS
TO COPYRIGHT
Inquiry Regarding Continued Use of
Deposit Accounts
3. The authority citation for part 202
continues to read as follows:
In considering the proposed rule
change, questions have arisen about the
continued need for deposit accounts.
Consequently, the Copyright Office is
also seeking public comment on
whether it should cease offering the use
of deposit accounts altogether. In an era
when paper applications and payment
via check were the norm, a separate,
simplified deposit account system
presented attractive efficiencies to
frequent applicants and to the Office.
However, in an era of electronic
registration and payment via corporate
or other credit cards, the administrative
costs of maintaining a separate deposit
account system are no longer clearly
offset by its advantages. The Office is
thus soliciting the views of current
deposit account users as to whether they
continue to find value in the deposit
account system, and what impact, if
any, the elimination of deposit accounts
would have on their copyright
registration activities in light of the new
online payment options.
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
Preregistration and registration of
claims to copyright.
4. Amend § 202.3 as follows:
a.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii) introductory
text, by removing ‘‘Application’’ in the
last sentence and adding in its place
‘‘Subject to the mandatory electronic
filing requirements for deposit account
holders in § 202.3(b)(2)(iii) of these
regulations, application’’;
b.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A), by
removing ‘‘electronically at the
Copyright Office website’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘using the electronic Copyright
Office (eCO) registration system
(eService) at the official Copyright
Office website’’;
c.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B), by
removing ‘‘electronically at the
Copyright Office website’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘using the electronic Copyright
Office (eCO) registration system
(eService) at the official Copyright
Office website’’;
d.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C), by
removing ‘‘check, money order, or
Copyright Office deposit account
charge; or,’’ and adding in its place
‘‘check or money order; or,’’;
e.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(D), by adding
‘‘in check or money order’’ after ‘‘the
required filing fee’’; and
f.Add a new paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
The revisions and additions to § 202.3
read as follows:
Proposed Regulations
§ 202.3
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Copyright Office proposes to amend
parts 201 and 202 of 37 CFR as follows:
*
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
37 CFR Part 202
PART 201–GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Section 201.6(b) is revised to read
as follows:
§ 201.6 Payment and refund of Copyright
Office fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Persons or firms having a
considerable amount of business with
the Copyright Office may prepay
copyright expenses by establishing a
Deposit Account. Pursuant to the
requirements of § 202.3(b)(2)(iii) of these
regulations, application forms for
registration paid for by deposit account
debits must be submitted electronically
using the electronic Copyright Office
(eCO) registration system (eService).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Registration of copyright.
*
*
*
*
(b)* * *
(2)* * *
(iii) When the fee required by § 201.3
of this section to file a basic application
for registration is paid for by a deposit
account debit, the application form shall
be submitted through the electronic
Copyright Office (eCO) registration
system (eService) that is available at
www.copyright.gov. If an applicant
submits a paper application form for
basic registration paid for by a deposit
account debit, the Copyright Office will
have the option – after processing the
application – of terminating that
applicant’s deposit account.
Termination will be effective 30 days
after notification to the deposit account
holder.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 8, 2009.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. E9–16664 Filed 7–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
E:\FR\FM\14JYP1.SGM
14JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 14, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33930-33932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-16664]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 202
[Docket No. 2009-4]
Electronic Registration for Deposit Account Holders
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is proposing to amend its regulations to
require that applications for registration paid for by deposit account
debits be submitted electronically using the
[[Page 33931]]
electronic Copyright Office (eCO) registration system (eService). The
Copyright Office is also requesting comment as to whether deposit
accounts offer sufficient efficiencies to continue offering this
service.
DATES: Written comments must be received in the Office of the General
Counsel of the Copyright Office no later than August 28, 2009.
ADDRESSES: If hand delivered by a private party, an original and five
copies of a comment or reply comment should be brought to the Library
of Congress, U.S. Copyright Office, Room LM-401, James Madison
Building, 101 Independence Ave., SE, Washington, DC 20559, between 8:30
a.m. and 5 p.m. The envelope should be addressed as follows: Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office.
If delivered by a commercial courier, an original and five copies
of a comment or reply comment must be delivered to the Congressional
Courier Acceptance Site (``CCAS'') located at 2nd and D Streets, NE,
Washington, DC between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The envelope should be
addressed as follows: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright
Office, LM-403, James Madison Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE,
Washington, DC 20559. Please note that CCAS will not accept delivery by
means of overnight delivery services such as Federal Express, United
Parcel Service or DHL. If sent by mail (including overnight delivery
using U.S. Postal Service Express Mail), an original and five copies of
a comment or reply comment should be addressed to U.S. Copyright
Office, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Sandros, Deputy General Counsel
or, Chris Weston, Attorney Advisor. Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202) 707-
8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Deposit Account Background
The Copyright Office maintains a system of deposit accounts for
those who frequently use its services. An individual or entity may
establish a deposit account, make advance deposits into that account,
and charge copyright fees against the balance instead of sending
separate payments with applications and other requests for services.
This process has been more efficient and less expensive for both the
Office and the applicant than sending separate payments to the
Copyright Office for each application for registration or for other
services.
Proposed Change to Deposit Account Regulations
Historically, there have been no restrictions on registration
practices connected with using deposit accounts. However, the Copyright
Office is now proposing to amend its rules to require that, when an
application for registration is paid for by a deposit account debit,
the application form be submitted electronically, using the electronic
Copyright Office (eCO) registration system, known as eService. The
proposed change would ensure that basic applications for registration
will be processed more efficiently and Copyright Office administrative
costs will be reduced. The Office requests comments from the public on
this proposal.
Under current practice, when there are insufficient funds in the
deposit account being used for payment of a paper application, the
Copyright Office suspends processing of the application to notify the
account holder that replenishment of the account is needed, and places
the pending application and associated deposit copies in temporary
storage. The suspended applications, which may number 3000 or more at
any one time must be reviewed regularly by Office staff to locate those
that are newly funded and reprocess them. Thus, insufficient deposit
account funding at a minimum effectively doubles the time Office staff
must spend examining and processing an application, time that would
otherwise be more profitably spent on the current backlog of
unprocessed paper applications.
On average, three to four percent of paper applications for
registration are suspended each year due to lack of sufficient funds in
deposit accounts. In fiscal 2007, between 16,000 and 22,000
applications were put on hold for this reason, and the Office expended
a substantial amount of resources managing the suspended applications
and deposits. While the Office assesses additional fees for deposit
account overdrafts and dishonored deposit account replenishment checks,
see 37 CFR 201.3(d), these penalties do not recover the costs or solve
the fundamental problems associated with the additional handling and
the delay in processing. Consequently, the Office is proposing to
require deposit account holders to file applications for registration
via eService [including applications that require the submission of
physical copies of the deposit in order to meet the Best Edition
requirement, see 37 CFR 202.20(b)(1)], to ensure that the Office can
collect the fee at the time of filing.
eService, which was released on July 1, 2008, allows applications
for copyright registration to be filed electronically and is available
through the Copyright Office website at www.copyright.gov. An
application for registration made via eService cannot be completed
until the method of payment is verified by, for example, ensuring that
sufficient funds are present in the deposit account and payment has
been made. In contrast, paper applications must be received by the
Copyright Office, opened and processed before the validity of the
proffered method of payment can be ascertained.
Thus, the proposed change to require that all applications for
registration paid for by deposit account debits be submitted via
eService will produce significant efficiencies for the Office.
By guaranteeing payment at the time of application, the proposal
will reduce, if not eliminate, the cost and delays ascribable to
suspending applications lacking fees, storing suspended applications
and associated deposit copies, notifying deposit account holders of the
need to replenish their accounts, and retrieving and reprocessing
suspended applications after fees are received. In addition, it will
eliminate converting data from a paper application to digital
information for applications paid for by deposit account debits.
Electronic claims have been demonstrated to cost the Office only half
as much as paper claims, even those with no payment or other
complications. Among the reasons for the lower cost is the avoidance of
virtually all work associated with scanning and storing applications,
processing payments, converting data from paper to digital form, and
verifying the transcribed data prior to issuing a certificate.
Moreover, the proposed amendment is consistent with the Office's goal
of maximizing use of the electronic registration system through
eService. See, e.g., 73 FR 23990 (April 30, 2008) (Notice of proposed
rulemaking to require all group registrations to be filed
electronically).
From an applicant's perspective, using eService to submit
applications for registration would also be more efficient. The
effective date of registration is typically established more quickly
for electronic applications because, in many cases, the Copyright
Office receives all the required elements as mandated by 17 U.S.C.
410(d) - application, fee and deposit copy(ies) - in acceptable form
sooner than if sent in physical form. In addition, applications for
registration filed through eService
[[Page 33932]]
are processed faster than paper applications, in part because
processing is not delayed by the deposit account having insufficient
funds. Currently, 90% of the applications submitted through eService
are processed within six months and a third of these claims are
completed within three months.
Another advantage to applying for copyright registration via
eService is the financial benefit to the filer. The fee for filing a
basic application for registration online is $35 and the current fee
for filing a paper application is $45, which will increase to $65 on
August 1, 2009. The lower fee applies to an online submission even if
the filer must send physical deposits to fulfill the Library of
Congress's best edition requirement. Finally, there are features of the
online application that make it easier to complete the application. For
example, the eService system offers the option of a template feature
that speeds the process of completing applications by automatically
copying repeated information, such as name and address, from one
application to the next.
The key reason, however, for the proposed change is that the
eService system notifies an electronic applicant at the point of
payment when the deposit account contains insufficient funds to process
the application, making it possible for the deposit account holder to
replenish the account immediately and avoid any delay in establishing
an effective date of registration. If the applicant's deposit account
does not have sufficient funds, payment for the application in question
or replenishment of the deposit account can be accomplished with a
credit card or through Pay.gov. Pay.gov is an Internet system for
credit card payments and automatic clearing house debit transactions
(electronic checks) managed by the U.S. Treasury Department. Further
information concerning the payment options for registering claims may
be found on the Copyright Office website at: https://www.copyright.gov/eco/faq.html, under the heading, ``Paying fees in eCO.''
It is also important to note that the proposed change will not
require a deposit account holder to open a new account. In order to
begin filing electronically, he or she will only need to take the
following steps: (1) register with the eService system by creating a
user profile, (2) create an organization account in eService, and (3)
submit a request to depositaccts@loc.gov to link the existing deposit
account to the newly created eService organization account. The email
request should include the deposit account number and the name of the
eService organization account.
Inquiry Regarding Continued Use of Deposit Accounts
In considering the proposed rule change, questions have arisen
about the continued need for deposit accounts. Consequently, the
Copyright Office is also seeking public comment on whether it should
cease offering the use of deposit accounts altogether. In an era when
paper applications and payment via check were the norm, a separate,
simplified deposit account system presented attractive efficiencies to
frequent applicants and to the Office. However, in an era of electronic
registration and payment via corporate or other credit cards, the
administrative costs of maintaining a separate deposit account system
are no longer clearly offset by its advantages. The Office is thus
soliciting the views of current deposit account users as to whether
they continue to find value in the deposit account system, and what
impact, if any, the elimination of deposit accounts would have on their
copyright registration activities in light of the new online payment
options.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
37 CFR Part 202
Preregistration and registration of claims to copyright.
Proposed Regulations
In consideration of the foregoing, the Copyright Office proposes to
amend parts 201 and 202 of 37 CFR as follows:
PART 201-GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Section 201.6(b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 201.6 Payment and refund of Copyright Office fees.
* * * * *
(b) Persons or firms having a considerable amount of business with
the Copyright Office may prepay copyright expenses by establishing a
Deposit Account. Pursuant to the requirements of Sec. 202.3(b)(2)(iii)
of these regulations, application forms for registration paid for by
deposit account debits must be submitted electronically using the
electronic Copyright Office (eCO) registration system (eService).
* * * * *
PART 202-REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
3. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
4. Amend Sec. 202.3 as follows:
a.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii) introductory text, by removing
``Application'' in the last sentence and adding in its place ``Subject
to the mandatory electronic filing requirements for deposit account
holders in Sec. 202.3(b)(2)(iii) of these regulations, application'';
b.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A), by removing ``electronically at the
Copyright Office website'' and adding in its place ``using the
electronic Copyright Office (eCO) registration system (eService) at the
official Copyright Office website'';
c.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B), by removing ``electronically at the
Copyright Office website'' and adding in its place ``using the
electronic Copyright Office (eCO) registration system (eService) at the
official Copyright Office website'';
d.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(C), by removing ``check, money order, or
Copyright Office deposit account charge; or,'' and adding in its place
``check or money order; or,'';
e.In paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(D), by adding ``in check or money order''
after ``the required filing fee''; and
f.Add a new paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
The revisions and additions to Sec. 202.3 read as follows:
Sec. 202.3 Registration of copyright.
* * * * *
(b)* * *
(2)* * *
(iii) When the fee required by Sec. 201.3 of this section to file
a basic application for registration is paid for by a deposit account
debit, the application form shall be submitted through the electronic
Copyright Office (eCO) registration system (eService) that is available
at www.copyright.gov. If an applicant submits a paper application form
for basic registration paid for by a deposit account debit, the
Copyright Office will have the option - after processing the
application - of terminating that applicant's deposit account.
Termination will be effective 30 days after notification to the deposit
account holder.
* * * * *
Dated: July 8, 2009.
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. E9-16664 Filed 7-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-S