Change in Disease Status of the Republic of Korea With Regard to Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Rinderpest, 14093-14097 [E9-7013]
Download as PDF
14093
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 59
Monday, March 30, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS–2008–0147]
Change in Disease Status of the
Republic of Korea With Regard to
Foot-and-Mouth Disease and
Rinderpest
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the regulations to add the Republic of
Korea to the list of regions that are
considered free of rinderpest and footand-mouth disease (FMD). We are
taking this action because we have
conducted an evaluation and
determined that the Republic of Korea is
free of rinderpest and FMD. We are also
proposing to add the Republic of Korea
to the list of regions that are subject to
certain import restrictions on meat and
meat products because of their
proximity to or trading relationships
with rinderpest- or FMD-affected
countries. These actions would update
the disease status of the Republic of
Korea with regard to rinderpest and
FMD while continuing to protect the
United States from an introduction of
those diseases by providing additional
requirements for meat and other animal
products imported into the United
States from the Republic of Korea.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before May 29,
2009.
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2008-0147 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2008–0147,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2008–0147.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence, Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Julia Punderson, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Regionalization Evaluation
Services, National Center for Import and
Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231;
(301) 734–4356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94
(referred to below as the regulations)
govern the importation of certain
animals and animal products into the
United States in order to prevent the
introduction of various communicable
diseases, including rinderpest, foot-andmouth disease (FMD), African swine
fever, classical swine fever, and swine
vesicular disease. These are dangerous
and destructive communicable diseases
of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of
the regulations lists regions of the world
that are declared free of rinderpest or
free of both rinderpest and FMD.
Rinderpest or FMD is considered to
exist in all other parts of the world not
listed. Section 94.11 of the regulations
lists regions of the world that have been
determined to be free of rinderpest and
FMD, but are subject to certain
restrictions because of their proximity to
or trading relationships with rinderpest
or FMD-affected regions.
On April 18, 2000, we published in
the Federal Register an interim rule (65
FR 20713–20714, Docket No. 00–033–1)
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
amending the regulations to remove the
Republic of Korea (South Korea) from
the list in § 94.1 of regions declared free
of FMD and rinderpest because of a
confirmed FMD diagnosis. That rule
was effective retroactively to March 20,
2000, which was the date when FMD
was initially detected. The rule also
removed the Republic of Korea from the
list of countries listed in § 94.11 that are
declared to be free of these diseases, but
that are subject to certain restrictions
because of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest or FMDaffected regions. As a result of the
interim rule, the importation into the
United States of any ruminant, or any
fresh (chilled or frozen) meat of any
ruminant that left the Republic of Korea
on or after March 20, 2000, was
prohibited or restricted.
The last FMD outbreaks in the
Republic of Korea in 2000 and 2002
were limited in scope and rapidly
controlled; no subsequent outbreaks
have occurred since 2002. As for
rinderpest, the Republic of Korea has
not had an outbreak of the disease since
1931. In 2007, the Government of the
Republic of Korea submitted
information to APHIS to support an
official request for recognition of its
FMD-free status. In response, APHIS
conducted a site visit to the Republic of
Korea in March 2008 to substantiate
information provided with the request
and obtain evidence firsthand. We
conducted a disease risk evaluation 1
and concluded the Republic of Korea is
free of FMD. We also concluded that the
surveillance, prevention, and control
measures implemented by the Republic
of Korea are sufficient to minimize the
likelihood of introducing FMD or
rinderpest into the United States via
imports of susceptible species or
products from such species.
In light of our conclusions, we
propose to add the Republic of Korea to
the list in § 94.1 of regions that have
been declared free of FMD and
rinderpest. We also propose to add the
Republic of Korea to the list in § 94.11
of regions that are declared to be free of
these diseases, but that are subject to
certain restrictions because of their
proximity to or trading relationships
1 APHIS Evaluation of the Status of the Republic
of Korea Regarding Foot-and-Mouth Disease and
Rinderpest. Riverdale, MD: USDA, APHIS,
Veterinary Services, October 2008.
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
14094
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
with rinderpest or FMD-affected
regions.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Risk Evaluation
Drawing on data submitted by the
Government of the Republic of Korea
and on observations from our site visit
to the country, we have evaluated the
animal health status of the Republic of
Korea relative to FMD and rinderpest.
Our evaluation was conducted
according to the 11 factors identified in
§ 92.2, ‘‘Application for recognition of
the animal health status of a region,’’
which are used to determine the level of
risk associated with importing animals
or animal products into the United
States from a given region. A summary
evaluation of each factor is discussed
below.
Veterinary Authority and
Infrastructure
All regulations related to the control
of FMD in the Republic of Korea are
based on that country’s Act on the
Prevention of Contagious Animal
Diseases. These regulations address
disease control and preventive
measures, including notification of
suspicious cases, stamping-out,
movement controls, disinfection,
vaccination, surveillance, importation
quarantine, disposal, and compensation.
Governmental veterinary services
responsible for implementing these
measures consist of the Animal Health
Division of the Republic of Korea
Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry
and Fisheries (MiFAFF), National
Veterinary Research and Quarantine
Service (NVRQS), and Provincial
Veterinary Services. NVRQS is an
executive agency within MiFAFF tasked
with the prevention and control of
major animal diseases. NVRQS
responsibilities include quarantine
inspection of animals and animal
products, livestock product safety,
veterinary research, and
epidemiological surveillance.
Each of the Republic of Korea’s nine
provinces and seven metropolitan cities
has its own animal health laboratory
and veterinary service responsible for
the prevention and control of major
animal diseases within their region.
They are also the primary diagnostic
laboratories for animal diseases.
Animal health officials in the
Republic of Korea have the legal
authority to enforce all pertinent
regulations pertaining to FMD and
maintain the necessary veterinary
infrastructure to carry out effective FMD
surveillance and control activities.
Governmental veterinary authorities,
industry and trade organizations, and
non-profit groups work together closely
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
and effectively to monitor livestock
health. These efforts minimize the risk
of FMD and rinderpest to livestock in
the United States via importation of
ruminants and ruminant products from
the Republic of Korea.
Disease Status in the Region
The Republic of Korea was free of
FMD from 1934 until March 2000, when
the disease was detected on a small
dairy farm in Kyonggi Province. Control
measures on the affected farm began
immediately. Extensive disease
surveillance was undertaken and by
mid-April the full extent of the outbreak
was confirmed on 11 additional farms.
Two of these farms were also in Kyonggi
Province, eight were in Chungnam
Province, and one was in Chungbuk
Province, 140 km southwest of the first
infected farm.
Protection zones with a radius of 10
km were set up around each infected
farm. Within these zones, animal
movements were restricted and
livestock markets and artificial
insemination were suspended. In
addition, a 20-km surveillance zone was
set up around the infected farms. In
both protection and surveillance zones,
veterinary authorities immediately
implemented testing, vaccination, and
surveillance. Epidemiologically linked
farms outside the zones were also
investigated and tested. All animals
found to be infected were cattle, with no
evidence of infection in pigs. Although
the last infected herd was identified in
April 2000, testing for FMD continued
through July. In all, a total of 17,831
animals on 4,782 farms were tested
during the outbreak. Both cattle and
swine were vaccinated and all
vaccinated animals were permanently
marked and subject to additional testing
and clinical examination.
In May 2002, Korean veterinary
authorities again confirmed the
presence of FMD, this time on pig farms
in Kyonggi and Chungbuk Provinces.
Governmental veterinary authorities
immediately implemented emergency
animal disease control and eradication
measures. FMD was found on 16 farms
in May and June 2002. Two of these
farms had mixed populations of
animals, but infection could only be
demonstrated in the swine. Control
zones were immediately established
around the infected farms, and an
immediate stamping-out policy was
implemented with movement controls,
quarantine, and culling of affected
animals. The last control zone was lifted
in August 2002.
In June 2002, the Republic of Korea
invited an International Epidemiology
Assessment Team consisting of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
members from Australia, New Zealand,
and the United States to assess its FMD
control measures. The team determined
that stamping-out and movement
restrictions were effective in containing
the spread of disease, as was the use of
pen-side diagnostic tests for rapid
detection of infected animals. They
concluded that the capability for early
diagnosis together with prompt
stamping-out of infected farms
significantly limited the number of FMD
cases. No evidence exists of any species
infected with FMD in the Republic of
Korea.
Disease Status of Adjacent Regions and
Separation Measures
The Republic of Korea shares its
northern border with the Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea (North
Korea). The two countries are separated
by the 2.5 mile wide fenced and
patrolled demilitarized zone (DMZ) that
runs the full length of the border,
making intentional or inadvertent entry
of animals from North Korea unlikely.
FMD must be considered to be endemic
in North Korea, which has sporadically
reported outbreaks to the World
Organization for Animal Health (OIE) as
recently as 2007. No commerce in
livestock takes place by land between
the Republic of Korea and North Korea.
Other close neighbors of the Republic
of Korea are China and Japan. The
Republic of Korea is separated from
these countries by the Yellow Sea and
the Sea of Japan. The last reported
outbreak of FMD in Japan occurred in
March and April 2000. China has
reported FMD outbreaks to OIE on a
nearly annual basis, but no evidence
exists that FMD has been transported
into the Republic of Korea from China
or other surrounding regions since
increased biosecurity and other disease
control measures were instituted after
the 2000 and 2002 outbreaks.
Disease Control Programs
The Republic of Korea does not
currently maintain an active disease
control program as there is no evidence
of FMD in the country and no outbreaks
have occurred since 2002. However, the
Republic of Korea has in place a
comprehensive surveillance system
with both active (seroepidemiologic)
and passive (clinical) components. In
addition to surveillance, the Korean
Government has instituted animal
movement controls, border inspection,
disinfection, and emergency plans to
prevent the incursion of FMD into the
country.
To promote reporting of possible
disease outbreaks, the Republic of Korea
has developed an indemnification
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
program encouraging farmers to report
suspect cases and to deter movement of
sick animals to slaughter or auction. The
Republic of Korea also provides
temporary subsistence funding as
needed, and livestock cooperatives
provide low interest loans and
assistance with feed and management.
An emergency hotline is available to
encourage reporting of suspicious cases,
as is a quarantine hotline to receive
emergency reports from ports of entry.
The Republic of Korea imposes
sanctions to discourage delays in
reporting suspect cases and provides
rewards for third-person reporting of
suspect cases as an incentive for early
disease identification.
The Republic of Korea also levies
penalties for cases of negligence related
to disease reporting. Penalties include
imprisonment for veterinarians or
farmers failing to report sick or dead
animals, importation of prohibited
items, or failure to submit goods to
quarantine inspection. Livestock owners
or transporters who violate rules related
to disease reporting and prevention face
imprisonment or fines. Fines can also be
levied on any person who refuses,
obstructs, or evades an epidemiological
investigation, violates animal import
requirements, or evades quarantine
inspections of mailed goods.
As part of its FMD disease prevention
efforts, the Republic of Korea has also
incorporated provisions governing
garbage control and swill feeding. By
law, swill or garbage is prohibited for
use in animal feed. Because of the
predominance of small farms, the
Republic of Korea’s training, education,
and outreach efforts to increase
awareness have targeted small-scale
farmers. Disease education programs are
organized through various agricultural
cooperatives that provide contact and
information for all farmers.
The Republic of Korea has an effective
system for detecting and investigating
suspect FMD cases. Frequent
monitoring of animal premises and
movements permits effective
surveillance and virus detection in
various FMD-susceptible species, and
incentive programs encourage reporting
of suspected cases. These efforts
effectively minimize the risk of
exposing livestock in the United States
to FMD through importation of Korean
cattle, beef, and related products.
Vaccination Status of the Region
Vaccination for FMD has not been
practiced in the Republic of Korea since
August 2000. During the 2002 FMD
outbreak, which affected primarily
swine, NVRQS decided not to vaccinate.
The International Epidemiology
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
14095
Assessment Team reviewed this
decision and concluded that, under the
circumstances of the outbreak,
vaccination would not have been
advantageous. The time required to
achieve immunity with vaccination in
pigs takes several weeks and it was
considered that many farms would
already have been infected when the
disease was first recognized; a program
of emergency vaccination would have
masked the presence of the virus and
delayed eradication efforts.
The Republic of Korea’s current
policy of not vaccinating for FMD is
scientifically sound and can help speed
the identification of clinical signs if an
FMD outbreak occurs again. The
Republic of Korea has strong
disincentives for non-reporting of
suspected cases, maintains a generous
indemnity program, and enforces
supporting animal health regulations,
making it likely that clinical signs of
FMD would be reported promptly.
The Republic of Korea does not
produce FMD vaccines but actively
maintains a vaccine reserve, with plans
for implementing emergency
vaccinations if needed.
disinfecting foot mats are placed at
passenger disembarkation gates, and
electronic message boards and posters
with information on FMD in several
languages are set up at passenger gates
and at customs.
Movement of animals within the
Republic of Korea primarily takes place
through local livestock cooperatives.
The Agricultural Cooperatives Act calls
for these cooperatives to work closely
with local veterinary authorities to
monitor movements of animals and
products. A national animal
identification database, piloted by the
national veterinary authorities, focuses
on improved recordkeeping for small
farms and will address movement
control of animals from these farms.
Farmers are required to keep track of all
transactions of livestock sales and
purchases, certificates of testing, and
vaccination history for program diseases
prior to movement. Movement
certificates are required for all trade and
are issued by the provincial veterinary
services.
Animal Movement Controls and
Biosecurity
Border controls are administered by
the NVRQS and Customs, Immigration
and Quarantine. Livestock and livestock
products may enter the country legally
at officially designated airports and
maritime ports where they are inspected
by animal quarantine officers.
Importation of cloven-hoofed live
animals, their meat, meat products, or
milk from countries or via areas affected
with FMD is prohibited. Importation of
live cloven-hoofed animals from FMDfree countries requires prior notification
and submission of a health certificate,
and all are inspected and quarantined
for a minimum of 15 days in the
quarantine facilities of the NVRQS.
Importation of genetic material requires
certification from the exporting country
that the material originated from
countries without FMD or rinderpest
and that these diseases have not been
reported in the exporting country. Other
movement requirements include the
treatment of international garbage prior
to incineration by a licensed company
and the treatment of imported hay for
feed or bedding.
Inspection of non-commercial items is
focused on passengers, cargo, and mail
arriving from regions or countries
considered to be high-risk. Detector
dogs are used to inspect cargo and mail
at major international ports; confiscated
items are bagged, disinfected, and
incinerated. At ports of entry,
The Republic of Korea produces less
than 50 percent of the beef it consumes;
in 2006, total beef consumption was
331,000 tons, of which 179,000 tons
were imported. The country’s cattle
population is approximately 2.6 million.
Low-density cattle production is
predominant in the Republic of Korea,
with more than 80 percent of farmers
owning fewer than 10 animals. Other
farmed FMD-susceptible species are
found in very small numbers.
Beef cattle raised in the Republic of
Korea consist primarily of traditional
Korean native cattle, or Hanwoo, with a
current national herd of around 2
million head. The most likely product to
be exported to the United States would
be specialized product, specifically the
Hanwoo beef produced from Korean
native cattle. Biosecurity measures and
controls at Korean beef production
facilities are effective in preventing
FMD outbreaks, and commercial cattle
operations do not constitute a
significant risk for introducing FMD
into the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Livestock Demographics and Marketing
Practices
Disease Surveillance Capability
The Republic of Korea conducts
extensive active and passive disease
surveillance of livestock. Active
surveillance incorporates statistical and
purposive (targeted) sampling; passive
surveillance includes reporting and
followup of suspect cases. Intensive
followup of suspicious samples is
conducted in conjunction with
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
14096
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
confirmatory testing, quarantine, and
other necessary controls.
Following the 2000 FMD outbreak,
the Republic of Korea expanded its
active surveillance program. As part of
this effort, clinical surveillance teams
were organized to make periodic farm
visits and examine all livestock on the
premises. The Republic of Korea also
conducts serological surveillance,
which includes collecting statistically
selected samples as well as samples
from targeted populations. The active
surveillance system also involves
slaughterhouse and breeding farm
surveillance and the use of a pen-side
test for rapid detection of FMD-infected
animals during an outbreak. Passive
surveillance is done for all clinical
suspects reported by farmers,
veterinarians, or other animal health
officials. All reports are investigated by
the provincial veterinary services, and
samples are collected for any suspicious
cases.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Diagnostic Laboratory Capability
The Republic of Korea maintains a
central national laboratory and
laboratories in each province as part of
the National FMD surveillance program.
The Republic of Korea has the
diagnostic capabilities to adequately test
samples for the presence of the FMD
virus with adequate quality control
activities, laboratory equipment, and
sufficient staffing.
Emergency Response Capability
The Republic of Korea has emergency
response plans in place for controlling
FMD should an outbreak of the disease
occur. FMD emergency control
guidelines describe standard operating
procedures to be used during an FMD
emergency. Contingency exercises are
held annually to evaluate staff
performance and update procedures as
needed. In the event of an FMD
outbreak, several governmental agencies
are tasked with implementing a
coordinated emergency response that
includes epidemiological investigations,
vaccine distribution, disinfection,
movement restrictions, stamping-out
operations, and public awareness and
guidance.
The above findings are detailed in the
evaluation document that may be
obtained by contacting the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The document may also be
viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site
(see ADDRESSES above for instructions
for accessing Regulations.gov). It
explains the factors that have led us to
conclude that the Republic of Korea is
free of rinderpest and FMD. It also
establishes that the Republic of Korea
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
has adequate veterinary infrastructures
in place to prevent, control, and manage
FMD and rinderpest outbreaks.
Therefore, we are proposing to
recognize the Republic of Korea as free
of rinderpest and FMD and add the
country to the list in § 94.1(a)(2) of
regions that are considered free of
rinderpest and FMD.
This proposed action would also
relieve certain restrictions due to FMD
and rinderpest on the importation into
the United States of certain live animals
and animal products from the Republic
of Korea. However, because the
Republic of Korea imports meat from
regions that APHIS does not consider to
be FMD free and from regions where
FMD status has not been reviewed, the
importation of meat and other products
from ruminants into the United States
from the Republic of Korea would
continue to be subject to certain
restrictions. For this reason, we are
proposing to add the Republic of Korea
to the list in § 94.11(a) of regions
declared free of rinderpest and FMD but
that are subject to special restrictions on
the importation of their meat and other
animal products into the United States.
The regions listed in § 94.11(a) are
subject to these special restrictions
because they: (1) Supplement their
national meat supply by importing fresh
(chilled or frozen) meat of ruminants or
swine from regions that are designated
in § 94.1(a) as regions where rinderpest
or FMD exists, (2) have a common land
border with regions where rinderpest or
FMD exists, or (3) import ruminants or
swine from regions where rinderpest or
FMD exists under conditions less
restrictive than would be acceptable for
importation into the United States.
Under § 94.11, meat and other animal
products of ruminants and swine,
including ship stores, airplane meals,
and baggage containing these meat or
animal products, may not be imported
into the United States except in
accordance with § 94.11 and the
applicable requirements of the USDA’s
Food Safety and Inspection Service at 9
CFR chapter III.
Section 94.11 generally requires that
the meat and other animal products of
ruminants and swine be: (1) Prepared in
an inspected establishment that is
eligible to have its products imported
into the United States under the Federal
Meat Inspection Act; and (2)
accompanied by an additional
certificate, issued by a full-time salaried
veterinary official of the national
government of the exporting region,
assuring that the meat or other animal
products have not been commingled
with or exposed to meat or other animal
products originating in, imported from,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
transported through, or that have
otherwise been in a region where
rinderpest or FMD exists.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and
Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
When an agency issues a rulemaking
proposal, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) requires the agency to prepare
and make available for public comment
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
that will describe the impact of the
proposed rule on small entities. In lieu
of preparing a regulatory flexibility
analysis, section 605 of the RFA allows
an agency to certify that the proposed
rulemaking will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The following
is a factual basis for certification of this
rule.
The proposed rule would amend the
regulations to add the Republic of Korea
to the list of regions considered to be
free of rinderpest and FMD. The
proposed action, which was requested
by the Republic of Korea, follows a risk
assessment conducted by APHIS
concluding that the Republic of Korea is
free of both diseases and has the
veterinary infrastructure in place to
detect and effectively eradicate the
diseases if necessary. The effect of the
rule would be to remove certain
rinderpest and FMD-related
prohibitions and restrictions on the
importation into the United States of
ruminants, or fresh (chilled or frozen)
meat or other products of ruminants,
from the Republic of Korea. APHIS
imposes such restrictions because an
FMD or rinderpest outbreak in the
United States has the potential for
severe economic consequences. Even
though imports of swine and swine
products would be allowed under
APHIS’ regulations related to FMD and
rinderpest, those commodities would
not be eligible for import from the
Republic of Korea, due to USDA
regulations designed to prevent the
introduction of diseases other than FMD
and rinderpest.2
We do not anticipate that changing
the FMD and rinderpest status of the
Republic of Korea would have a
significant economic impact on a
2 APHIS’ risk evaluation states that the animal
health status of swine for diseases other than FMD
has not been evaluated. In the absence of a
favorable evaluation, live swine and swine-derived
products will not be eligible to be imported from
the Republic of Korea, even with the proposed
changes in effect.
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
substantial number of U.S. entities, large
or small, because the volume of
currently prohibited/restricted animals
and animal products imported into the
United States from the Republic of
Korea is likely to be very small relative
to overall U.S. supply of those
commodities (production and net
imports from all foreign sources). There
are several reasons for this. First, the
volume of U.S. imports from the
Republic of Korea prior to March 20,
2000, when that country was considered
to be free of FMD and rinderpest, was
negligible.3 During the 3-year period
from 1997 to 1999, the United States did
not import any reportable amounts of
ruminants or fresh (chilled or frozen)
meat or other products of ruminants
from the Republic of Korea, other than
1.3 metric tons of dairy products in
1998.
Second, the Republic of Korea
produces less beef, milk, and pork than
it consumes, and is therefore a net
importer of these commodities. Given
this fact, there would not be a
significant volume of exports of those
commodities to the United States.
Finally, APHIS’ staff expects that
Hanwoo beef, a premium-priced
specialty meat produced from Korean
native cattle, is likely to be the Republic
of Korea’s primary export to the United
States if the proposed rule becomes
effective. Because of its premium price,
the market for Hanwoo beef would be
limited; it is likely to be sold to a niche
market, such as Korean restaurants in
the United States.
Importers, brokers, and others that
would import Hanwoo beef, and
restaurants that would serve that
product, are the U.S. entities most likely
to be affected by the rule. They stand to
benefit from the increased business
activity. The number of these entities is
unknown but it is likely to be very
small, given the expected limited
market for Hanwoo beef in the United
States. The size of these entities is also
unknown, although it is reasonable to
assume that, as with U.S. businesses in
general, most are small under the
standards of the U.S. Small Business
Administration. The proposed action
should have no noticeable effect on U.S.
beef producers, given the expected
limited demand for Hanwoo beef.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Federal Aviation Administration
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry
and poultry products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 94 as follows:
PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE
DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER,
CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER, AND
BOVINE SPONGIFORM
ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
§ 94.1
[Amended]
2. In § 94.1, paragraph (a)(2) is
amended by adding the words
‘‘Republic of Korea,’’ after the word
‘‘Japan,’’.
§ 94.11
[Amended]
3. In § 94.11, paragraph (a) is
amended by adding the words
‘‘Republic of Korea,’’ after the word
‘‘Japan,’’.
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
March 2009.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9–7013 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
3 Effective
March 20, 2000, APHIS removed the
Republic of Korea from the list of regions
considered to be free of both rinderpest and FMD.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
14097
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0284; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–016–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; DORNIER
LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models Dornier
228–100, Dornier 228–101, Dornier
228–200, Dornier 228–201, Dornier
228–202, and Dornier 228–212
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would
supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
The manufacturer reported findings of
missing primer on the internal of the elevator
and rudder of aircraft S/N 8200. The aircraft
S/N 8200 was with RUAG for maintenance
purposes. Investigation performed by RUAG
showed that the paint removal procedure for
the rudder and elevator was changed from a
paint stripping with brush and scraper to a
procedure where the parts were submerged
in a tank filled with hot liquid stripper. The
stripper is called TURCO 5669 from Henkel
Surface Technologies. The stripping process
is described in the Technical Process Bulletin
No. 238799 dated 09/01/1999. This paint
stripping process change was not
communicated to and not approved by the
TC-Holder.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 29, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14093-14097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7013]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 14093]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0147]
Change in Disease Status of the Republic of Korea With Regard to
Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Rinderpest
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations to add the Republic
of Korea to the list of regions that are considered free of rinderpest
and foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). We are taking this action because we
have conducted an evaluation and determined that the Republic of Korea
is free of rinderpest and FMD. We are also proposing to add the
Republic of Korea to the list of regions that are subject to certain
import restrictions on meat and meat products because of their
proximity to or trading relationships with rinderpest- or FMD-affected
countries. These actions would update the disease status of the
Republic of Korea with regard to rinderpest and FMD while continuing to
protect the United States from an introduction of those diseases by
providing additional requirements for meat and other animal products
imported into the United States from the Republic of Korea.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before May
29, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2008-0147 to submit or view comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2008-0147, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2008-0147.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence, Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Julia Punderson, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Regionalization Evaluation Services, National Center for
Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
20737-1231; (301) 734-4356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the
regulations) govern the importation of certain animals and animal
products into the United States in order to prevent the introduction of
various communicable diseases, including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD), African swine fever, classical swine fever, and swine
vesicular disease. These are dangerous and destructive communicable
diseases of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of the regulations lists
regions of the world that are declared free of rinderpest or free of
both rinderpest and FMD. Rinderpest or FMD is considered to exist in
all other parts of the world not listed. Section 94.11 of the
regulations lists regions of the world that have been determined to be
free of rinderpest and FMD, but are subject to certain restrictions
because of their proximity to or trading relationships with rinderpest
or FMD-affected regions.
On April 18, 2000, we published in the Federal Register an interim
rule (65 FR 20713-20714, Docket No. 00-033-1) amending the regulations
to remove the Republic of Korea (South Korea) from the list in Sec.
94.1 of regions declared free of FMD and rinderpest because of a
confirmed FMD diagnosis. That rule was effective retroactively to March
20, 2000, which was the date when FMD was initially detected. The rule
also removed the Republic of Korea from the list of countries listed in
Sec. 94.11 that are declared to be free of these diseases, but that
are subject to certain restrictions because of their proximity to or
trading relationships with rinderpest or FMD-affected regions. As a
result of the interim rule, the importation into the United States of
any ruminant, or any fresh (chilled or frozen) meat of any ruminant
that left the Republic of Korea on or after March 20, 2000, was
prohibited or restricted.
The last FMD outbreaks in the Republic of Korea in 2000 and 2002
were limited in scope and rapidly controlled; no subsequent outbreaks
have occurred since 2002. As for rinderpest, the Republic of Korea has
not had an outbreak of the disease since 1931. In 2007, the Government
of the Republic of Korea submitted information to APHIS to support an
official request for recognition of its FMD-free status. In response,
APHIS conducted a site visit to the Republic of Korea in March 2008 to
substantiate information provided with the request and obtain evidence
firsthand. We conducted a disease risk evaluation \1\ and concluded the
Republic of Korea is free of FMD. We also concluded that the
surveillance, prevention, and control measures implemented by the
Republic of Korea are sufficient to minimize the likelihood of
introducing FMD or rinderpest into the United States via imports of
susceptible species or products from such species.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ APHIS Evaluation of the Status of the Republic of Korea
Regarding Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Rinderpest. Riverdale, MD:
USDA, APHIS, Veterinary Services, October 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of our conclusions, we propose to add the Republic of
Korea to the list in Sec. 94.1 of regions that have been declared free
of FMD and rinderpest. We also propose to add the Republic of Korea to
the list in Sec. 94.11 of regions that are declared to be free of
these diseases, but that are subject to certain restrictions because of
their proximity to or trading relationships
[[Page 14094]]
with rinderpest or FMD-affected regions.
Risk Evaluation
Drawing on data submitted by the Government of the Republic of
Korea and on observations from our site visit to the country, we have
evaluated the animal health status of the Republic of Korea relative to
FMD and rinderpest. Our evaluation was conducted according to the 11
factors identified in Sec. 92.2, ``Application for recognition of the
animal health status of a region,'' which are used to determine the
level of risk associated with importing animals or animal products into
the United States from a given region. A summary evaluation of each
factor is discussed below.
Veterinary Authority and Infrastructure
All regulations related to the control of FMD in the Republic of
Korea are based on that country's Act on the Prevention of Contagious
Animal Diseases. These regulations address disease control and
preventive measures, including notification of suspicious cases,
stamping-out, movement controls, disinfection, vaccination,
surveillance, importation quarantine, disposal, and compensation.
Governmental veterinary services responsible for implementing these
measures consist of the Animal Health Division of the Republic of Korea
Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MiFAFF),
National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service (NVRQS), and
Provincial Veterinary Services. NVRQS is an executive agency within
MiFAFF tasked with the prevention and control of major animal diseases.
NVRQS responsibilities include quarantine inspection of animals and
animal products, livestock product safety, veterinary research, and
epidemiological surveillance.
Each of the Republic of Korea's nine provinces and seven
metropolitan cities has its own animal health laboratory and veterinary
service responsible for the prevention and control of major animal
diseases within their region. They are also the primary diagnostic
laboratories for animal diseases.
Animal health officials in the Republic of Korea have the legal
authority to enforce all pertinent regulations pertaining to FMD and
maintain the necessary veterinary infrastructure to carry out effective
FMD surveillance and control activities. Governmental veterinary
authorities, industry and trade organizations, and non-profit groups
work together closely and effectively to monitor livestock health.
These efforts minimize the risk of FMD and rinderpest to livestock in
the United States via importation of ruminants and ruminant products
from the Republic of Korea.
Disease Status in the Region
The Republic of Korea was free of FMD from 1934 until March 2000,
when the disease was detected on a small dairy farm in Kyonggi
Province. Control measures on the affected farm began immediately.
Extensive disease surveillance was undertaken and by mid-April the full
extent of the outbreak was confirmed on 11 additional farms. Two of
these farms were also in Kyonggi Province, eight were in Chungnam
Province, and one was in Chungbuk Province, 140 km southwest of the
first infected farm.
Protection zones with a radius of 10 km were set up around each
infected farm. Within these zones, animal movements were restricted and
livestock markets and artificial insemination were suspended. In
addition, a 20-km surveillance zone was set up around the infected
farms. In both protection and surveillance zones, veterinary
authorities immediately implemented testing, vaccination, and
surveillance. Epidemiologically linked farms outside the zones were
also investigated and tested. All animals found to be infected were
cattle, with no evidence of infection in pigs. Although the last
infected herd was identified in April 2000, testing for FMD continued
through July. In all, a total of 17,831 animals on 4,782 farms were
tested during the outbreak. Both cattle and swine were vaccinated and
all vaccinated animals were permanently marked and subject to
additional testing and clinical examination.
In May 2002, Korean veterinary authorities again confirmed the
presence of FMD, this time on pig farms in Kyonggi and Chungbuk
Provinces. Governmental veterinary authorities immediately implemented
emergency animal disease control and eradication measures. FMD was
found on 16 farms in May and June 2002. Two of these farms had mixed
populations of animals, but infection could only be demonstrated in the
swine. Control zones were immediately established around the infected
farms, and an immediate stamping-out policy was implemented with
movement controls, quarantine, and culling of affected animals. The
last control zone was lifted in August 2002.
In June 2002, the Republic of Korea invited an International
Epidemiology Assessment Team consisting of members from Australia, New
Zealand, and the United States to assess its FMD control measures. The
team determined that stamping-out and movement restrictions were
effective in containing the spread of disease, as was the use of pen-
side diagnostic tests for rapid detection of infected animals. They
concluded that the capability for early diagnosis together with prompt
stamping-out of infected farms significantly limited the number of FMD
cases. No evidence exists of any species infected with FMD in the
Republic of Korea.
Disease Status of Adjacent Regions and Separation Measures
The Republic of Korea shares its northern border with the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). The two countries
are separated by the 2.5 mile wide fenced and patrolled demilitarized
zone (DMZ) that runs the full length of the border, making intentional
or inadvertent entry of animals from North Korea unlikely. FMD must be
considered to be endemic in North Korea, which has sporadically
reported outbreaks to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) as
recently as 2007. No commerce in livestock takes place by land between
the Republic of Korea and North Korea.
Other close neighbors of the Republic of Korea are China and Japan.
The Republic of Korea is separated from these countries by the Yellow
Sea and the Sea of Japan. The last reported outbreak of FMD in Japan
occurred in March and April 2000. China has reported FMD outbreaks to
OIE on a nearly annual basis, but no evidence exists that FMD has been
transported into the Republic of Korea from China or other surrounding
regions since increased biosecurity and other disease control measures
were instituted after the 2000 and 2002 outbreaks.
Disease Control Programs
The Republic of Korea does not currently maintain an active disease
control program as there is no evidence of FMD in the country and no
outbreaks have occurred since 2002. However, the Republic of Korea has
in place a comprehensive surveillance system with both active
(seroepidemiologic) and passive (clinical) components. In addition to
surveillance, the Korean Government has instituted animal movement
controls, border inspection, disinfection, and emergency plans to
prevent the incursion of FMD into the country.
To promote reporting of possible disease outbreaks, the Republic of
Korea has developed an indemnification
[[Page 14095]]
program encouraging farmers to report suspect cases and to deter
movement of sick animals to slaughter or auction. The Republic of Korea
also provides temporary subsistence funding as needed, and livestock
cooperatives provide low interest loans and assistance with feed and
management. An emergency hotline is available to encourage reporting of
suspicious cases, as is a quarantine hotline to receive emergency
reports from ports of entry. The Republic of Korea imposes sanctions to
discourage delays in reporting suspect cases and provides rewards for
third-person reporting of suspect cases as an incentive for early
disease identification.
The Republic of Korea also levies penalties for cases of negligence
related to disease reporting. Penalties include imprisonment for
veterinarians or farmers failing to report sick or dead animals,
importation of prohibited items, or failure to submit goods to
quarantine inspection. Livestock owners or transporters who violate
rules related to disease reporting and prevention face imprisonment or
fines. Fines can also be levied on any person who refuses, obstructs,
or evades an epidemiological investigation, violates animal import
requirements, or evades quarantine inspections of mailed goods.
As part of its FMD disease prevention efforts, the Republic of
Korea has also incorporated provisions governing garbage control and
swill feeding. By law, swill or garbage is prohibited for use in animal
feed. Because of the predominance of small farms, the Republic of
Korea's training, education, and outreach efforts to increase awareness
have targeted small-scale farmers. Disease education programs are
organized through various agricultural cooperatives that provide
contact and information for all farmers.
The Republic of Korea has an effective system for detecting and
investigating suspect FMD cases. Frequent monitoring of animal premises
and movements permits effective surveillance and virus detection in
various FMD-susceptible species, and incentive programs encourage
reporting of suspected cases. These efforts effectively minimize the
risk of exposing livestock in the United States to FMD through
importation of Korean cattle, beef, and related products.
Vaccination Status of the Region
Vaccination for FMD has not been practiced in the Republic of Korea
since August 2000. During the 2002 FMD outbreak, which affected
primarily swine, NVRQS decided not to vaccinate. The International
Epidemiology Assessment Team reviewed this decision and concluded that,
under the circumstances of the outbreak, vaccination would not have
been advantageous. The time required to achieve immunity with
vaccination in pigs takes several weeks and it was considered that many
farms would already have been infected when the disease was first
recognized; a program of emergency vaccination would have masked the
presence of the virus and delayed eradication efforts.
The Republic of Korea's current policy of not vaccinating for FMD
is scientifically sound and can help speed the identification of
clinical signs if an FMD outbreak occurs again. The Republic of Korea
has strong disincentives for non-reporting of suspected cases,
maintains a generous indemnity program, and enforces supporting animal
health regulations, making it likely that clinical signs of FMD would
be reported promptly.
The Republic of Korea does not produce FMD vaccines but actively
maintains a vaccine reserve, with plans for implementing emergency
vaccinations if needed.
Animal Movement Controls and Biosecurity
Border controls are administered by the NVRQS and Customs,
Immigration and Quarantine. Livestock and livestock products may enter
the country legally at officially designated airports and maritime
ports where they are inspected by animal quarantine officers.
Importation of cloven-hoofed live animals, their meat, meat products,
or milk from countries or via areas affected with FMD is prohibited.
Importation of live cloven-hoofed animals from FMD-free countries
requires prior notification and submission of a health certificate, and
all are inspected and quarantined for a minimum of 15 days in the
quarantine facilities of the NVRQS. Importation of genetic material
requires certification from the exporting country that the material
originated from countries without FMD or rinderpest and that these
diseases have not been reported in the exporting country. Other
movement requirements include the treatment of international garbage
prior to incineration by a licensed company and the treatment of
imported hay for feed or bedding.
Inspection of non-commercial items is focused on passengers, cargo,
and mail arriving from regions or countries considered to be high-risk.
Detector dogs are used to inspect cargo and mail at major international
ports; confiscated items are bagged, disinfected, and incinerated. At
ports of entry, disinfecting foot mats are placed at passenger
disembarkation gates, and electronic message boards and posters with
information on FMD in several languages are set up at passenger gates
and at customs.
Movement of animals within the Republic of Korea primarily takes
place through local livestock cooperatives. The Agricultural
Cooperatives Act calls for these cooperatives to work closely with
local veterinary authorities to monitor movements of animals and
products. A national animal identification database, piloted by the
national veterinary authorities, focuses on improved recordkeeping for
small farms and will address movement control of animals from these
farms. Farmers are required to keep track of all transactions of
livestock sales and purchases, certificates of testing, and vaccination
history for program diseases prior to movement. Movement certificates
are required for all trade and are issued by the provincial veterinary
services.
Livestock Demographics and Marketing Practices
The Republic of Korea produces less than 50 percent of the beef it
consumes; in 2006, total beef consumption was 331,000 tons, of which
179,000 tons were imported. The country's cattle population is
approximately 2.6 million. Low-density cattle production is predominant
in the Republic of Korea, with more than 80 percent of farmers owning
fewer than 10 animals. Other farmed FMD-susceptible species are found
in very small numbers.
Beef cattle raised in the Republic of Korea consist primarily of
traditional Korean native cattle, or Hanwoo, with a current national
herd of around 2 million head. The most likely product to be exported
to the United States would be specialized product, specifically the
Hanwoo beef produced from Korean native cattle. Biosecurity measures
and controls at Korean beef production facilities are effective in
preventing FMD outbreaks, and commercial cattle operations do not
constitute a significant risk for introducing FMD into the United
States.
Disease Surveillance Capability
The Republic of Korea conducts extensive active and passive disease
surveillance of livestock. Active surveillance incorporates statistical
and purposive (targeted) sampling; passive surveillance includes
reporting and followup of suspect cases. Intensive followup of
suspicious samples is conducted in conjunction with
[[Page 14096]]
confirmatory testing, quarantine, and other necessary controls.
Following the 2000 FMD outbreak, the Republic of Korea expanded its
active surveillance program. As part of this effort, clinical
surveillance teams were organized to make periodic farm visits and
examine all livestock on the premises. The Republic of Korea also
conducts serological surveillance, which includes collecting
statistically selected samples as well as samples from targeted
populations. The active surveillance system also involves
slaughterhouse and breeding farm surveillance and the use of a pen-side
test for rapid detection of FMD-infected animals during an outbreak.
Passive surveillance is done for all clinical suspects reported by
farmers, veterinarians, or other animal health officials. All reports
are investigated by the provincial veterinary services, and samples are
collected for any suspicious cases.
Diagnostic Laboratory Capability
The Republic of Korea maintains a central national laboratory and
laboratories in each province as part of the National FMD surveillance
program. The Republic of Korea has the diagnostic capabilities to
adequately test samples for the presence of the FMD virus with adequate
quality control activities, laboratory equipment, and sufficient
staffing.
Emergency Response Capability
The Republic of Korea has emergency response plans in place for
controlling FMD should an outbreak of the disease occur. FMD emergency
control guidelines describe standard operating procedures to be used
during an FMD emergency. Contingency exercises are held annually to
evaluate staff performance and update procedures as needed. In the
event of an FMD outbreak, several governmental agencies are tasked with
implementing a coordinated emergency response that includes
epidemiological investigations, vaccine distribution, disinfection,
movement restrictions, stamping-out operations, and public awareness
and guidance.
The above findings are detailed in the evaluation document that may
be obtained by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. The document may also be viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov). It explains the factors that have led us to
conclude that the Republic of Korea is free of rinderpest and FMD. It
also establishes that the Republic of Korea has adequate veterinary
infrastructures in place to prevent, control, and manage FMD and
rinderpest outbreaks. Therefore, we are proposing to recognize the
Republic of Korea as free of rinderpest and FMD and add the country to
the list in Sec. 94.1(a)(2) of regions that are considered free of
rinderpest and FMD.
This proposed action would also relieve certain restrictions due to
FMD and rinderpest on the importation into the United States of certain
live animals and animal products from the Republic of Korea. However,
because the Republic of Korea imports meat from regions that APHIS does
not consider to be FMD free and from regions where FMD status has not
been reviewed, the importation of meat and other products from
ruminants into the United States from the Republic of Korea would
continue to be subject to certain restrictions. For this reason, we are
proposing to add the Republic of Korea to the list in Sec. 94.11(a) of
regions declared free of rinderpest and FMD but that are subject to
special restrictions on the importation of their meat and other animal
products into the United States. The regions listed in Sec. 94.11(a)
are subject to these special restrictions because they: (1) Supplement
their national meat supply by importing fresh (chilled or frozen) meat
of ruminants or swine from regions that are designated in Sec. 94.1(a)
as regions where rinderpest or FMD exists, (2) have a common land
border with regions where rinderpest or FMD exists, or (3) import
ruminants or swine from regions where rinderpest or FMD exists under
conditions less restrictive than would be acceptable for importation
into the United States.
Under Sec. 94.11, meat and other animal products of ruminants and
swine, including ship stores, airplane meals, and baggage containing
these meat or animal products, may not be imported into the United
States except in accordance with Sec. 94.11 and the applicable
requirements of the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service at 9 CFR
chapter III.
Section 94.11 generally requires that the meat and other animal
products of ruminants and swine be: (1) Prepared in an inspected
establishment that is eligible to have its products imported into the
United States under the Federal Meat Inspection Act; and (2)
accompanied by an additional certificate, issued by a full-time
salaried veterinary official of the national government of the
exporting region, assuring that the meat or other animal products have
not been commingled with or exposed to meat or other animal products
originating in, imported from, transported through, or that have
otherwise been in a region where rinderpest or FMD exists.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
For this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its
review under Executive Order 12866.
When an agency issues a rulemaking proposal, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires the agency to prepare and make available
for public comment an initial regulatory flexibility analysis that will
describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities. In lieu of
preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis, section 605 of the RFA
allows an agency to certify that the proposed rulemaking will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The following is a factual basis for certification of this
rule.
The proposed rule would amend the regulations to add the Republic
of Korea to the list of regions considered to be free of rinderpest and
FMD. The proposed action, which was requested by the Republic of Korea,
follows a risk assessment conducted by APHIS concluding that the
Republic of Korea is free of both diseases and has the veterinary
infrastructure in place to detect and effectively eradicate the
diseases if necessary. The effect of the rule would be to remove
certain rinderpest and FMD-related prohibitions and restrictions on the
importation into the United States of ruminants, or fresh (chilled or
frozen) meat or other products of ruminants, from the Republic of
Korea. APHIS imposes such restrictions because an FMD or rinderpest
outbreak in the United States has the potential for severe economic
consequences. Even though imports of swine and swine products would be
allowed under APHIS' regulations related to FMD and rinderpest, those
commodities would not be eligible for import from the Republic of
Korea, due to USDA regulations designed to prevent the introduction of
diseases other than FMD and rinderpest.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ APHIS' risk evaluation states that the animal health status
of swine for diseases other than FMD has not been evaluated. In the
absence of a favorable evaluation, live swine and swine-derived
products will not be eligible to be imported from the Republic of
Korea, even with the proposed changes in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We do not anticipate that changing the FMD and rinderpest status of
the Republic of Korea would have a significant economic impact on a
[[Page 14097]]
substantial number of U.S. entities, large or small, because the volume
of currently prohibited/restricted animals and animal products imported
into the United States from the Republic of Korea is likely to be very
small relative to overall U.S. supply of those commodities (production
and net imports from all foreign sources). There are several reasons
for this. First, the volume of U.S. imports from the Republic of Korea
prior to March 20, 2000, when that country was considered to be free of
FMD and rinderpest, was negligible.\3\ During the 3-year period from
1997 to 1999, the United States did not import any reportable amounts
of ruminants or fresh (chilled or frozen) meat or other products of
ruminants from the Republic of Korea, other than 1.3 metric tons of
dairy products in 1998.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Effective March 20, 2000, APHIS removed the Republic of
Korea from the list of regions considered to be free of both
rinderpest and FMD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Republic of Korea produces less beef, milk, and pork
than it consumes, and is therefore a net importer of these commodities.
Given this fact, there would not be a significant volume of exports of
those commodities to the United States.
Finally, APHIS' staff expects that Hanwoo beef, a premium-priced
specialty meat produced from Korean native cattle, is likely to be the
Republic of Korea's primary export to the United States if the proposed
rule becomes effective. Because of its premium price, the market for
Hanwoo beef would be limited; it is likely to be sold to a niche
market, such as Korean restaurants in the United States.
Importers, brokers, and others that would import Hanwoo beef, and
restaurants that would serve that product, are the U.S. entities most
likely to be affected by the rule. They stand to benefit from the
increased business activity. The number of these entities is unknown
but it is likely to be very small, given the expected limited market
for Hanwoo beef in the United States. The size of these entities is
also unknown, although it is reasonable to assume that, as with U.S.
businesses in general, most are small under the standards of the U.S.
Small Business Administration. The proposed action should have no
noticeable effect on U.S. beef producers, given the expected limited
demand for Hanwoo beef.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk,
Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 94 as follows:
PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL
SWINE FEVER, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND
RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Sec. 94.1 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 94.1, paragraph (a)(2) is amended by adding the words
``Republic of Korea,'' after the word ``Japan,''.
Sec. 94.11 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 94.11, paragraph (a) is amended by adding the words
``Republic of Korea,'' after the word ``Japan,''.
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of March 2009.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9-7013 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P