Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comments on the Topic of Facilitating Access to Copyrighted Works for the Blind or Persons With Other Disabilities; Notice of Public Meeting, 13268-13270 [E9-6637]
Download as PDF
13268
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices
for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
Donald G. Shalhoub, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2007 (72 FR 31160).
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 23,
2009.
Donald G. Shalhoub,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9–6733 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
Notice of Inquiry and Request for
Comments on the Topic of Facilitating
Access to Copyrighted Works for the
Blind or Persons With Other
Disabilities; Notice of Public Meeting
AGENCY: United States Copyright Office,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry and request for
comments; notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: The United States Copyright
Office (Copyright Office) and the United
States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) seek comment on the topic of
facilitating access to copyrighted works
for ‘‘blind or persons with other
disabilities’’ 1 in connection with a
forthcoming meeting of the Standing
Committee on Copyright and Related
Rights of the World Intellectual Property
Organization. Interested parties are
invited to submit comments on the
topics outlined in the supplementary
information section of this notice. The
Copyright Office and USPTO also
announce a public meeting on the same
topic.
DATES: Initial comments on the Notice
of Inquiry and Request for Comments
are due on April 21, 2009. Reply
comments are due on May 4, 2009. The
1 Various terms are used formally and informally
throughout the world. When inquiring about
experiences within the United States, the term used
in this Notice of Inquiry is that which appears in
U.S. copyright law. See 17 U.S.C. 121(d)(2). There,
the term ‘‘blind or persons with other disabilities’’
is defined to include individuals who are eligible
or who may qualify in accordance with the Act
entitled ‘‘An Act to provide books for the adult
blind,’’ approved March 3, 1931 (2 U.S.C. 135a; 46
Stat. 1487).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:28 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
public meeting will be held Monday,
May 18, 2009, from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30
p.m.
ADDRESSES:
Notice of Inquiry and Request for
Comments
If hand-delivered by a private party,
an original and five copies of a comment
or a reply comment should be brought
to the Library of Congress, U.S.
Copyright Office, Public Information
Office, Room LM–401, 101
Independence Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20559, between 8:30
a.m. and 5 p.m. The envelope should be
addressed as follows: Office of Policy
and International Affairs, U.S. Copyright
Office. If delivered by a commercial
courier, an original and five copies of a
comment or reply comment must be
delivered to the Congressional Courier
Acceptance Site (CCAS) located at 2nd
and D Streets, NE., Washington, DC,
between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The
envelope should be addressed as
follows: Office of Policy and
International Affairs, U.S. Copyright
Office, Room LM–403, James Madison
Building, 101 Independence Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20559. Please note
that CCAS will not accept delivery by
means of overnight delivery services
such as Fedex, United Parcel Service, or
DHL. If sent by mail (including
overnight delivery using U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail), an original and
five copies of a comment or reply
comment should be addressed to U.S.
Copyright Office, Office of Policy and
International Affairs, Copyright GC/I &
R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC
20024.
Public Meeting
The public meeting will be held in the
Montpelier Room of the Library of
Congress, James Madison Building, 6th
Floor, 101 Independence Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20559. The process for
submitting requests to attend and
observe or participate in the meeting, as
well as the agenda, will be published on
the Web site of the U.S. Copyright Office
no later than April 8, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Pallante, Associate Register,
Policy and International Affairs, or
Michele Woods, Senior Counsel for
Policy and International Affairs, by
telephone at 202–707–1027, by
facsimile at 202–707–8366 or by
electronic mail at mpall@loc.gov or
mwoo@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The United States is a Member State
of the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) and an active
member of the Standing Committee on
Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR). At
recent meetings of the SCCR, WIPO
facilitated discussions on the topic of
copyright limitations and exceptions,
including limitations and exceptions for
‘‘blind, visually impaired and other
reading-disabled persons.’’ 2 At its next
meeting (May 25–29, 2009), the SCCR
will continue to consider this topic,
among others, and will exchange
information and experiences in order to
deepen its collective understanding of
the issues. As part of the process, the
SCCR is looking to the copyright
limitations and exceptions that are
currently available for the benefit of the
blind, visually impaired and other
reading-disabled persons around the
world, and has invited Member States to
provide supplementary information
regarding their national laws and
experiences.
In preparation for the meeting, the
Copyright Office and the USPTO have
been gathering relevant information. To
date, the Copyright Office and USPTO
have participated in a series of informal
meetings and conference calls
(primarily with stakeholders from the
blind community, but also with
representatives of the library, book
publishing, software, motion picture,
and nonprofit sectors) in which
multiple specific issues have been
identified and a number of common
points have emerged.
On the basis of these preliminary
discussions, the Copyright Office and
the USPTO understand that blind and
other persons with disabilities in the
United States navigate many complex
challenges when it comes to accessing
copyrighted works. Common refrains
include delays in obtaining accessible
texts (with timeliness of accessible
materials a particular problem for
students at all levels), compatibility
problems between available formats and
the hardware devices employed by the
reader, and inconsistencies in the
quality and accuracy of the available,
reformatted works. At the international
level, the Copyright Office and the
USPTO were made aware of the existing
framework through which accessible
works move across borders (i.e. through
private agreement and interlibrary
2 This term appears in some relevant WIPO
documents. See e.g. ‘‘Conclusions of the SCCR,’’
November 5–7, 2008, at https://www.wipo.int/edocs/
mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/
sccr_17_www_112533.pdf (last visited on March 20,
2009).
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices
programs), as well as some of the
difficulties the framework presents.
and situations if they are illustrative of
a problem or success.
Possible Actions
A. Experiences of Persons Within the
United States With Respect To
Accessing U.S. Works or Sharing
Accessible Copies Within the United
States
In general, the Copyright Office and
the USPTO seek to learn more about the
experiences of the blind or persons with
other disabilities with respect to
accessing and sharing U.S. copyrighted
works within the United States. Please
reference any specific policies, practices
and projects that exist or are emerging
in the education, library and business
sectors while considering the questions
set forth below.
1. Applicable Statutory or Regulatory
Provisions: The United States has
relevant existing limitations on
exclusive rights in the Copyright Act.
Section 121 (the so-called ‘‘Chafee
Amendment’’) authorizes the
reproduction of copyrighted works for
blind or other persons with disabilities
under certain circumstances. Section
121(a) contains general language
providing that it is not copyright
infringement ‘‘for an authorized entity
to reproduce or to distribute copies or
phonorecords of a previously published,
nondramatic literary work if such copies
or phonorecords are produced or
distributed in specialized formats
exclusively for use by blind or other
persons with disabilities.’’ Section
121(c) provides a specific limitation
applicable to publishers of ‘‘print
instructional materials for use in
elementary or secondary schools’’ so
that they may create and distribute
electronic files consistent with the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA). 17 U.S.C. 21(c). Those
electronic files must use the National
Instructional Material Accessibility
Standard (NIMAS). Id. How have the
Chafee Amendment and related
statutory and regulatory provisions
worked in practice?
2. Private Sector Initiatives: The
Copyright Office and the USPTO are
aware that book publishers have been
involved in the development and
implementation of Section 121 and
other laws applicable to disabilities and
education. What are additional ways in
which the private sector facilitates, or
plans to facilitate, access to copyrighted
works? Please identify and describe in
detail any existing business models,
licensing schemes, or technological
innovations that are relevant, not only
for books but for other copyrighted
works, e.g., magazines, newspapers,
motion pictures, and software. To date,
what has been the result of these efforts
Through discussions with
stakeholders and previous meetings of
the SCCR, the Copyright Office and
USPTO are aware of some measures that
might be appropriate for action at the
national or international levels (through
Member States, WIPO or other
mechanisms). Such possible actions
include the following: (1) Developing
standardized accessibility formats and
other technical norms; (2) establishing
trusted intermediaries to coordinate
resources, eliminate unnecessary
duplication of accessible works, and
ensure best practices; (3) providing
technical assistance, coordination, and
educational outreach; (4) promoting
market-based solutions achieved
through private sector copyright
licenses or other agreements; and (5)
developing binding or non-binding
international instruments, including a
treaty that would establish minimum
requirements for limitations and
exceptions for blind, visually impaired
and other reading-disabled persons. The
Copyright Office and the USPTO are
interested in learning how these areas of
focus might address existing difficulties
with access to copyright works, whether
applied alone or in combination with
each other. Suggestions as to measures
not covered above are also welcome.
Please note that WIPO posts various
documents from its meetings on its Web
site, including reports and agendas
related to the consideration of copyright
limitations and exceptions. Documents
from SCCR meetings that included
consideration of this issue can be found
by starting at https://www.wipo.int/
meetings/en/topic.jsp?group_id=62 and
following the link to information for
each specific meeting. A study on
copyright limitations and exceptions for
the visually impaired can be found at
https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/
doc_details.jsp?doc_id=75696.
Subjects of Inquiry
At this time, in order to allow further
opportunity for interested persons to
provide their views, the Copyright
Office and the USPTO are seeking
comment on several focused topics
related to the provision of access to
copyrighted works for blind and other
persons with disabilities. Unless
otherwise specified, the focus of the
inquiry is the experiences of interested
parties residing or doing business in the
United States. Nevertheless, parties
should not feel constrained from
describing transnational experiences
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:28 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13269
in terms of achieving accessible
content? Do best practices exist?
Turning to the nonprofit sector, what
are the activities, business models, or
technology platforms that have emerged
and what has been the result to date?
What if any are the additional projects
under consideration?
3. Library Programs: Libraries play an
important role in providing access to
copyrighted works for the blind or
persons with other disabilities. The
Library of Congress, through its National
Library Service for the Blind and
Physically Handicapped, provides
Braille and audio materials (e.g., talking
books) to eligible borrowers through
cooperating libraries in the United
States. NLS also provides interlibrary
loan services to citizens of other
countries through qualified libraries or
other institutions in those countries.
Private organizations, such as
Bookshare, provide access to digital
materials through an online searchable
library. What other sorts of libraries or
library services currently facilitate
access to copyrighted works? What
physical and digital delivery methods
are being used? What initiatives have
libraries taken to develop new services
and to respond to evolving needs and
technologies? What coordination exists
among national and international library
services?
4. Standardized Formats, Programs
and Devices: In recent years,
entrepreneurs and other representatives
of the blind or persons with other
disabilities have made significant
progress in efforts to upgrade and
standardize the technical formats,
programs and devices that allow access
to books and other text. These include
the talking-book format of DAISY
(Digital Accessible Information System)
that is compatible with screen readers,
as well as stationary and portable
DAISY players that feature syntheticvoices, and various versions of scanand-read software. Paper-based Braille
has evolved into digital formats that
offer refreshable displays and nonlinear
search capabilities when used with
applicable devices. Are there additional
innovations in use or under
development today and, if so, what is
their focus? What are the impediments,
and possible solutions, for improving
existing standardized formats, programs
and devices, developing new ones, and/
or facilitating their interoperability?
5. Resources: To what degree is a lack
of sufficient resources a factor in
providing access to the blind or persons
with other disabilities? What
governmental, private sector, nonprofit,
or philanthropic resources exist? What
types of resources are most needed?
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
13270
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices
What approaches to expanding available
resources are most promising? What
objectives could be met and in what
time frame if additional resources were
available?
B. Experiences of Persons Within the
United States With Respect To
Accessing Foreign Works or Sharing
Accessible Copies of U.S. Works With
Foreign Persons
Please comment on the experiences of
the blind or persons with other
disabilities with respect to accessing
foreign works within the United States,
or sharing accessible copies of U.S.
works with similarly-situated persons
outside the United States. What kinds of
specific policies, practices and projects
exist or are emerging in the education,
library and business sectors? How do
existing laws create incentives or
constrain efforts? Please describe the
ways in which technology has
influenced or could assist in providing
access to foreign works or the sharing of
accessible copies. What are the legal or
practical impediments to transnational
access and how are they interrelated?
C. Other Comments on Facilitating and
Enhancing Access to Copyrighted Works
Please comment on the likely success
of measures identified above under the
subsection entitled ‘‘Possible Actions’’
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
How might the measures best be
leveraged, alone or in combination, to
enhance access for the blind or other
persons with disabilities? Are there
additional governmental or private
sector actions that might serve the
objective of enhancing access to
copyrighted works for the blind or
persons with other disabilities?
Dated: March 20, 2009.
Maria Pallante,
Associate Register for Policy & International
Affairs, U.S. Copyright Office.
[FR Doc. E9–6637 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
Meeting; Sunshine Act
March 20, 2009.
TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday,
March 26, 2009.
PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing
Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The
Commission will consider and act upon
the following in open session: Peter J.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:28 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Phillips v. A&S Construction Co.,
Docket No. WEST 2008–1057–DM.
(Issues include whether, under section
105(c)(2) of the Mine Act, an order of
temporary reinstatement remains in
effect after the Secretary of Labor has
determined, following her investigation,
that no unlawful discrimination has
occurred.)
Any person attending this meeting
who requires special accessibility
features and/or auxiliary aids, such as
sign language interpreters, must inform
the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3)
and § 2706.160(d).
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean
Ellen (202) 434–9950/(202) 708–9300
for TDD Relay/1–800–877–8339 for toll
free.
[FR Doc. E9–6843 Filed 3–24–09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection,
Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request clearance for this collection.
In accordance with the requirement of
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing
opportunity for public comment on this
action. After obtaining and considering
public comment, NSF will prepare the
submission requesting OMB clearance
of this collection for no longer than
three years.
Comments are invited on (a) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Written comments should be
received by May 26, 2009, to be assured
of consideration. Comments received
after that date will be considered to the
extent practicable.
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the information collection and
requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request should be
addressed to Suzanne Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 295, Arlington, VA 22230, or by
e-mail to splimpton@nsf.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Plimpton on (703) 292–7556 or
send e-mail to splimpton@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: DUE Project Data
Form.
OMB Control No.: 3145–0201.
Expiration Date of Approval: August
31, 2009.
Abstract: The Division of
Undergraduate Education (DUE) Project
Data Form is a component of all grant
proposals submitted to NSF’s Division
of Undergraduate Education. This form
collects information needed to direct
proposals to appropriate reviewers and
to report the estimated collective impact
of proposed projects on institutions,
students, and faculty members.
Requested information includes the
discipline of the proposed project,
collaborating organizations involved in
the project, the academic level on which
the project focuses (e.g., lower-level
undergraduate courses, upper-level
undergraduate courses), characteristics
of the organization submitting the
proposal, special audiences (if any) that
the project would target (e.g., women,
minorities, persons with disabilities),
strategic foci (if any) of the project (e.g.,
research on teaching and learning,
international activities, integration of
research and education), and the
number of students and faculty at
different educational levels who would
benefit from the project.
Respondents: Investigators who
submit proposals to NSF’s Division of
Undergraduate Education.
Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 2,500.
Burden on the Public: 20 minutes (per
response) for an annual total of 833
hours.
Dated: March 23, 2009.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. E9–6746 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13268-13270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6637]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comments on the Topic of
Facilitating Access to Copyrighted Works for the Blind or Persons With
Other Disabilities; Notice of Public Meeting
AGENCY: United States Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry and request for comments; notice of public
meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Copyright Office (Copyright Office) and the
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) seek comment on the
topic of facilitating access to copyrighted works for ``blind or
persons with other disabilities'' \1\ in connection with a forthcoming
meeting of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights of
the World Intellectual Property Organization. Interested parties are
invited to submit comments on the topics outlined in the supplementary
information section of this notice. The Copyright Office and USPTO also
announce a public meeting on the same topic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Various terms are used formally and informally throughout
the world. When inquiring about experiences within the United
States, the term used in this Notice of Inquiry is that which
appears in U.S. copyright law. See 17 U.S.C. 121(d)(2). There, the
term ``blind or persons with other disabilities'' is defined to
include individuals who are eligible or who may qualify in
accordance with the Act entitled ``An Act to provide books for the
adult blind,'' approved March 3, 1931 (2 U.S.C. 135a; 46 Stat.
1487).
DATES: Initial comments on the Notice of Inquiry and Request for
Comments are due on April 21, 2009. Reply comments are due on May 4,
2009. The public meeting will be held Monday, May 18, 2009, from 9:30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES:
Notice of Inquiry and Request for Comments
If hand-delivered by a private party, an original and five copies
of a comment or a reply comment should be brought to the Library of
Congress, U.S. Copyright Office, Public Information Office, Room LM-
401, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20559, between 8:30
a.m. and 5 p.m. The envelope should be addressed as follows: Office of
Policy and International Affairs, U.S. Copyright Office. If delivered
by a commercial courier, an original and five copies of a comment or
reply comment must be delivered to the Congressional Courier Acceptance
Site (CCAS) located at 2nd and D Streets, NE., Washington, DC, between
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The envelope should be addressed as follows:
Office of Policy and International Affairs, U.S. Copyright Office, Room
LM-403, James Madison Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20559. Please note that CCAS will not accept delivery by
means of overnight delivery services such as Fedex, United Parcel
Service, or DHL. If sent by mail (including overnight delivery using
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail), an original and five copies of a
comment or reply comment should be addressed to U.S. Copyright Office,
Office of Policy and International Affairs, Copyright GC/I & R, P.O.
Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
Public Meeting
The public meeting will be held in the Montpelier Room of the
Library of Congress, James Madison Building, 6th Floor, 101
Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20559. The process for
submitting requests to attend and observe or participate in the
meeting, as well as the agenda, will be published on the Web site of
the U.S. Copyright Office no later than April 8, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Pallante, Associate Register,
Policy and International Affairs, or Michele Woods, Senior Counsel for
Policy and International Affairs, by telephone at 202-707-1027, by
facsimile at 202-707-8366 or by electronic mail at mpall@loc.gov or
mwoo@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The United States is a Member State of the World Intellectual
Property Organization (WIPO) and an active member of the Standing
Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR). At recent meetings of
the SCCR, WIPO facilitated discussions on the topic of copyright
limitations and exceptions, including limitations and exceptions for
``blind, visually impaired and other reading-disabled persons.'' \2\ At
its next meeting (May 25-29, 2009), the SCCR will continue to consider
this topic, among others, and will exchange information and experiences
in order to deepen its collective understanding of the issues. As part
of the process, the SCCR is looking to the copyright limitations and
exceptions that are currently available for the benefit of the blind,
visually impaired and other reading-disabled persons around the world,
and has invited Member States to provide supplementary information
regarding their national laws and experiences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This term appears in some relevant WIPO documents. See e.g.
``Conclusions of the SCCR,'' November 5-7, 2008, at https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_17/sccr_17_www_112533.pdf (last visited on March 20, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In preparation for the meeting, the Copyright Office and the USPTO
have been gathering relevant information. To date, the Copyright Office
and USPTO have participated in a series of informal meetings and
conference calls (primarily with stakeholders from the blind community,
but also with representatives of the library, book publishing,
software, motion picture, and nonprofit sectors) in which multiple
specific issues have been identified and a number of common points have
emerged.
On the basis of these preliminary discussions, the Copyright Office
and the USPTO understand that blind and other persons with disabilities
in the United States navigate many complex challenges when it comes to
accessing copyrighted works. Common refrains include delays in
obtaining accessible texts (with timeliness of accessible materials a
particular problem for students at all levels), compatibility problems
between available formats and the hardware devices employed by the
reader, and inconsistencies in the quality and accuracy of the
available, reformatted works. At the international level, the Copyright
Office and the USPTO were made aware of the existing framework through
which accessible works move across borders (i.e. through private
agreement and interlibrary
[[Page 13269]]
programs), as well as some of the difficulties the framework presents.
Possible Actions
Through discussions with stakeholders and previous meetings of the
SCCR, the Copyright Office and USPTO are aware of some measures that
might be appropriate for action at the national or international levels
(through Member States, WIPO or other mechanisms). Such possible
actions include the following: (1) Developing standardized
accessibility formats and other technical norms; (2) establishing
trusted intermediaries to coordinate resources, eliminate unnecessary
duplication of accessible works, and ensure best practices; (3)
providing technical assistance, coordination, and educational outreach;
(4) promoting market-based solutions achieved through private sector
copyright licenses or other agreements; and (5) developing binding or
non-binding international instruments, including a treaty that would
establish minimum requirements for limitations and exceptions for
blind, visually impaired and other reading-disabled persons. The
Copyright Office and the USPTO are interested in learning how these
areas of focus might address existing difficulties with access to
copyright works, whether applied alone or in combination with each
other. Suggestions as to measures not covered above are also welcome.
Please note that WIPO posts various documents from its meetings on
its Web site, including reports and agendas related to the
consideration of copyright limitations and exceptions. Documents from
SCCR meetings that included consideration of this issue can be found by
starting at https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/topic.jsp?group_id=62 and
following the link to information for each specific meeting. A study on
copyright limitations and exceptions for the visually impaired can be
found at https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=75696.
Subjects of Inquiry
At this time, in order to allow further opportunity for interested
persons to provide their views, the Copyright Office and the USPTO are
seeking comment on several focused topics related to the provision of
access to copyrighted works for blind and other persons with
disabilities. Unless otherwise specified, the focus of the inquiry is
the experiences of interested parties residing or doing business in the
United States. Nevertheless, parties should not feel constrained from
describing transnational experiences and situations if they are
illustrative of a problem or success.
A. Experiences of Persons Within the United States With Respect To
Accessing U.S. Works or Sharing Accessible Copies Within the United
States
In general, the Copyright Office and the USPTO seek to learn more
about the experiences of the blind or persons with other disabilities
with respect to accessing and sharing U.S. copyrighted works within the
United States. Please reference any specific policies, practices and
projects that exist or are emerging in the education, library and
business sectors while considering the questions set forth below.
1. Applicable Statutory or Regulatory Provisions: The United States
has relevant existing limitations on exclusive rights in the Copyright
Act. Section 121 (the so-called ``Chafee Amendment'') authorizes the
reproduction of copyrighted works for blind or other persons with
disabilities under certain circumstances. Section 121(a) contains
general language providing that it is not copyright infringement ``for
an authorized entity to reproduce or to distribute copies or
phonorecords of a previously published, nondramatic literary work if
such copies or phonorecords are produced or distributed in specialized
formats exclusively for use by blind or other persons with
disabilities.'' Section 121(c) provides a specific limitation
applicable to publishers of ``print instructional materials for use in
elementary or secondary schools'' so that they may create and
distribute electronic files consistent with the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). 17 U.S.C. 21(c). Those electronic
files must use the National Instructional Material Accessibility
Standard (NIMAS). Id. How have the Chafee Amendment and related
statutory and regulatory provisions worked in practice?
2. Private Sector Initiatives: The Copyright Office and the USPTO
are aware that book publishers have been involved in the development
and implementation of Section 121 and other laws applicable to
disabilities and education. What are additional ways in which the
private sector facilitates, or plans to facilitate, access to
copyrighted works? Please identify and describe in detail any existing
business models, licensing schemes, or technological innovations that
are relevant, not only for books but for other copyrighted works, e.g.,
magazines, newspapers, motion pictures, and software. To date, what has
been the result of these efforts in terms of achieving accessible
content? Do best practices exist? Turning to the nonprofit sector, what
are the activities, business models, or technology platforms that have
emerged and what has been the result to date? What if any are the
additional projects under consideration?
3. Library Programs: Libraries play an important role in providing
access to copyrighted works for the blind or persons with other
disabilities. The Library of Congress, through its National Library
Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped, provides Braille and
audio materials (e.g., talking books) to eligible borrowers through
cooperating libraries in the United States. NLS also provides
interlibrary loan services to citizens of other countries through
qualified libraries or other institutions in those countries. Private
organizations, such as Bookshare, provide access to digital materials
through an online searchable library. What other sorts of libraries or
library services currently facilitate access to copyrighted works? What
physical and digital delivery methods are being used? What initiatives
have libraries taken to develop new services and to respond to evolving
needs and technologies? What coordination exists among national and
international library services?
4. Standardized Formats, Programs and Devices: In recent years,
entrepreneurs and other representatives of the blind or persons with
other disabilities have made significant progress in efforts to upgrade
and standardize the technical formats, programs and devices that allow
access to books and other text. These include the talking-book format
of DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System) that is compatible
with screen readers, as well as stationary and portable DAISY players
that feature synthetic-voices, and various versions of scan-and-read
software. Paper-based Braille has evolved into digital formats that
offer refreshable displays and nonlinear search capabilities when used
with applicable devices. Are there additional innovations in use or
under development today and, if so, what is their focus? What are the
impediments, and possible solutions, for improving existing
standardized formats, programs and devices, developing new ones, and/or
facilitating their interoperability?
5. Resources: To what degree is a lack of sufficient resources a
factor in providing access to the blind or persons with other
disabilities? What governmental, private sector, nonprofit, or
philanthropic resources exist? What types of resources are most needed?
[[Page 13270]]
What approaches to expanding available resources are most promising?
What objectives could be met and in what time frame if additional
resources were available?
B. Experiences of Persons Within the United States With Respect To
Accessing Foreign Works or Sharing Accessible Copies of U.S. Works With
Foreign Persons
Please comment on the experiences of the blind or persons with
other disabilities with respect to accessing foreign works within the
United States, or sharing accessible copies of U.S. works with
similarly-situated persons outside the United States. What kinds of
specific policies, practices and projects exist or are emerging in the
education, library and business sectors? How do existing laws create
incentives or constrain efforts? Please describe the ways in which
technology has influenced or could assist in providing access to
foreign works or the sharing of accessible copies. What are the legal
or practical impediments to transnational access and how are they
interrelated?
C. Other Comments on Facilitating and Enhancing Access to Copyrighted
Works
Please comment on the likely success of measures identified above
under the subsection entitled ``Possible Actions'' under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. How might the measures best be leveraged, alone or in
combination, to enhance access for the blind or other persons with
disabilities? Are there additional governmental or private sector
actions that might serve the objective of enhancing access to
copyrighted works for the blind or persons with other disabilities?
Dated: March 20, 2009.
Maria Pallante,
Associate Register for Policy & International Affairs, U.S. Copyright
Office.
[FR Doc. E9-6637 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P