Recordation of Notices of Termination of Transfers and Licenses; Clarifications, 12554-12556 [E9-6649]
Download as PDF
12554
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
temporary deviation for the Rock Island
Railroad and Highway Drawbridge, mile
482.9, at Rock Island, Illinois across the
Upper Mississippi to remain in the
closed to navigation position as the
drawbridge is part of the Annual Quad
Cities Heart Walk. The Rock Island
Railroad and Highway Drawbridge
currently operates in accordance with
33 CFR 117.5, which states the general
requirement that drawbridges shall open
promptly and fully for the passage of
vessels when a request to open is given
in accordance with the subpart. In order
to facilitate the annual event, the
drawbridge must be kept in the closedto-navigation position. This deviation
allows the bridge to remain in the
closed-to-navigation position for two
and one half hours from 8:30 a.m. until
10:30 a.m., May 16, 2009.
There are no alternate routes for
vessels transiting this section of the
Upper Mississippi River.
The Rock Island Railroad and
Highway Drawbridge, in the closed-tonavigation position, provides a vertical
clearance of 23.8 feet above normal
pool. Navigation on the waterway
consists primarily of commercial tows
and recreational watercraft. This
temporary deviation has been
coordinated with waterway users. No
objections were received.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge shall return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: March 10, 2009.
Roger K. Wiebusch,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–6686 Filed 3–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. RM 2008–1]
Recordation of Notices of Termination
of Transfers and Licenses;
Clarifications
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is
adopting amendments to its regulations
governing the recordation of notices of
termination and certain related
provisions.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
DATES:
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 25,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Pallante, Associate Register for
Policy and International Affairs,
Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024–0400.
Telephone (202) 707–8380. Fax (202)
707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in the Federal Register on
January 23, 2008 (73 FR 3898), seeking
public comment on five proposed
amendments to its regulations at
§ § 201.1, 201.3, 201.4 and 201.10 of
Chapter 37. These were: 1) an
amendment communicating the Office’s
practices as to its receipt of notices of
termination that are untimely; 2) an
amendment clarifying that recordation
of a notice of termination by the Office
does not necessarily mean that the
document is legally sufficient; 3) an
amendment updating the legibility
requirements for all recorded
documents, including notices of
termination; 4) an amendment making
minor explanatory edits to the fee
schedule for multiple titles within a
document (adding ‘‘e.g. a Notice of
Termination’’ as an example); and 5) an
amendment establishing a new mailing
address to which notices of termination
should be sent. (For ease of explanation
only, the amendments are herein
referred to as amendments one through
five.)
The Office received two comments,
each on February 22, 2008, from Law
Professor Daniel N. Ballard, University
of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law,
and from Terrie Bjorkland on behalf of
the American Federation of Television
and Radio Artists (AFTRA). Both
commentators questioned the basis for,
and the likely impact of, amendment
number two. Mr. Ballard first suggested
that there is no justification for the
proposed language, and second
suggested that rather than being neutral
on its face, the language, as worded,
might create ‘‘an improper bias against
the termination of copyright interests.’’
Ms. Bjorkland observed that the
proposal emphasizes the inconclusive
impact of the filing of a notice, doing
‘‘little to give artists a sense of comfort
that the Copyright Office is facilitating
the protection of their right of
termination.’’ In addition, she expressed
opposition to amendment number one,
questioning why the Office should make
a determination that a notice is
untimely, when ‘‘it is incumbent upon
the challenging party to contest the
validity of the notice, if appropriate.’’
After considering these comments, the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Office is adopting all of the
aforementioned amendments, but in
doing so is rephrasing amendment
number two.
Background
The Copyright Office is an office of
public record which receives and
records documents that pertain to
copyright, including, specifically,
notices of termination. Notices of
termination may be served by authors
(and certain heirs, beneficiaries or
representatives of authors who are
specified by statute) to extinguish the
exclusive or nonexclusive grants of
transfers or licenses of copyright or the
divisible rights thereunder. The
provisions have an equitable function:
they exist to allow authors or their heirs
a second opportunity to share in the
economic success of their works.
The termination provisions are set
forth in three sections of the law:
Sections 304(c), 304(d) and 203 of the
1976 Copyright Act, Title 17 of the
United States Code. The sections are
similar, though not identical, and they
govern distinct categories of works.
(None of the sections applies to
copyrights in works made for hire or
grants made by will.)
Section 304(c) governs any work in
which the copyright was subsisting in
its first or renewal term as of January 1,
1978, and provides for termination of
the exclusive or nonexclusive grant of a
transfer or license of the renewal
copyright (or any right under it)
executed before January 1, 1978.
Termination may be exercised at any
time during a five year period beginning
at the end of fifty–six years from the
date copyright was originally secured.
Section 304(d) provides a termination
right for a subset of works for which the
termination right under section 304(c)
expired (and was not exercised) on or
before the effective date (October 27,
1998) of the ‘‘Sonny Bono Copyright
Term Extension Act,’’ which extended
the copyright term by 20 years. It
provides for termination of the
exclusive or nonexclusive grant of a
transfer or license of the renewal
copyright (or any right under it) at any
time during a five year period beginning
at the end of 75 years from the date
copyright was originally secured.
Section 203 is limited to grants
executed by the author. It provides for
termination of the exclusive or
nonexclusive grant of copyright (or any
right under copyright) executed on or
after January 1, 1978 (regardless of
whether the copyright was secured prior
to 1978). Termination may be exercised
at any time during a period of five years
beginning at the end of thirty–five years
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
from the date of publication of the work
under the grant or at the end of forty
years from the date of execution of the
grant, whichever is earlier.
By all accounts, the termination
provisions are dense and formalistic,
particularly for a non–lawyer. In
summary, the author (or if the author is
deceased, the party specified by statute)
must serve the notice of termination in
writing on a grantee or the grantee’s
successor–in–title not less than two or
more than ten years before the effective
date, in a form and manner prescribed
by regulation.1
A copy of the notice of termination
must be recorded with the Copyright
Office before the effective date of
termination. 17 U.S.C. 304(c)(4)(A);
304(d)(1); 203(a)(4)(A). (Emphasis
added.) The particulars of the
recordation process are prescribed by
regulation. In short, the copy must be
legible and must include the following
elements: 1) either actual signatures or
reproductions of signatures 2) a
statement setting forth the date the
notice was served 3) an indication of the
manner of service and 4) submission of
the appropriate filing fee. 37 CFR
201.4(c)(3); 37 CFR 201.10(f).
A discussion of the amendments
follows.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Timeliness of Notices of Termination
The Copyright Office cannot accept a
notice of termination that is untimely
because, under the law, lateness is a
fatal mistake. (By contrast, see 37 CFR
201.10(e) for examples of forgivable,
harmless errors.) Thus, before the
Copyright Office records a notice, it
reviews for timeliness. Specifically, it
confirms that the notice has been served
within the relevant statutory time frame
(as derived from the facts stated in the
notice), and has been received by the
Office prior to the stated effective date
of termination.
In practice, if in the judgment of the
Office the document is untimely, the
1If the author executed the grant but is no longer
living, the termination interest is owned and may
be exercised by the author’s widow or widower and
any children or grandchildren on a per stirpes basis
(subject to certain conditions concerning the
disposition of partial interests of multiple authors
and heirs), or if the aforementioned are deceased,
by the author’ executor, administrator, personal
representative, or trustee. 17 U.S.C. 203(a)(1)–(2); 17
U.S.C. 304 (c)(1)–(2); 17 U.S.C. 304(d)(1). Moreover,
under Sections 304(c) and 304 (d), if the author is
no longer living and the grant has been executed by
one or more persons designated by statute,
termination may be exercised by the surviving
person or persons who executed it. 17 U.S.C. 304(c);
17U.S.C. 304(d); 17 U.S.C. 304(a)(1)(c). Note that
this is not true of Section 203, which applies only
to grants executed by authors. 17 U.S.C. 203(a).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Office will take one of two actions. If the
notice is premature, the Office will
return it with an explanation, so that the
serving party may resubmit the notice to
the Office at a later date (and, as
necessary, resubmit the notice to the
party being served). On the other hand,
if the document is tardy, the Office will
offer only to record and index the
document according to its general
recordation practices, as a ‘‘document
pertaining to copyright.’’ 17 U.S.C.
205(a); 37 CFR 201.4(a)(2). It will not
accept the document as a ‘‘notice of
termination,’’ meaning that it will not be
specially indexed as such. Whether
such general recordation by the
Copyright Office will be sufficient in
any particular instance to effect
termination as a matter of law is an
issue that only the courts may resolve.
Notwithstanding the objection
expressed by AFTRA with respect to
amendment one, the Office’s practice is
consistent with the statute. Moreover,
since the amendment restates the
longstanding practice of the Office (i.e.
it does not introduce a new practice),
the Office maintains that the
amendment is merely educative, and
may prove helpful to interested parties
who are looking for guidance.
Recordation as Distinguished from
Legal Sufficiency
Under amendment two, the Office
states a truism: the fact that the Office
has accepted a document and recorded
it as a notice of termination does not
mean, necessarily, that the notice is
sufficient to effect termination under the
law. As proposed in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the following
sentence would have been introduced at
the top of the paragraph: ‘‘The mere fact
that a notice of termination has been
recorded does not mean that it is legally
sufficient.’’ The remainder of the
paragraph would have followed and
remained unchanged: ‘‘Recordation of a
notice of termination by the Copyright
Office is without prejudice to any party
claiming that the legal and formal
requirements for issuing a valid notice
have not been met.’’
On this issue, the Office does not find
the stated concerns of the commentators
to be entirely plausible. Recordation is
a required act under the law but, once
completed, it carries no legal
presumption that termination has been
properly effected. If authors or their
representatives believe otherwise, it is
all the more important that this fact be
clearly and accurately stated. The reality
is that the Office, aside from its review
for timeliness (discussed above), does
not confirm the validity of the alleged
facts that are reported in each notice. To
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12555
do so would be an impossible exercise.
This means that the Office may accept
and record a notice of termination even
though any number of elements may
ultimately prove to be wrongly stated
and invalid under the law, from the
named authors, to the designation of
beneficiaries, to the date or
characterization of the grant. In
instances where termination has not
been perfected in the first place,
recordation of the notice is of no
consequence. The proposed amendment
would not have changed this result ––
– only confirmed it for clarity’s sake.
Nevertheless, the Office is not
wedded to the particular formulation of
the point as originally proposed. In his
comments, Mr. Ballard objected, in
particular, to use of the phrase ‘‘mere
fact,’’ which he saw as ‘‘loaded
language’’ that would, in practice,
undermine the termination process by
favoring grantees over authors. In
response, the Office has removed ‘‘mere
fact’’ and constructed a new
formulation, which in part repeats the
operative language of the statute. It
reads as follows: ‘‘A copy of the notice
of termination shall be recorded in the
Copyright Office before the effective
date of termination, as a condition to its
taking effect. However, the fact that the
Office has recorded the notice does not
mean that it is otherwise sufficient
under the law.’’ The existing sentence
will follow: ‘‘Recordation of a notice of
termination by the Copyright Office is
without prejudice to any party claiming
that the legal and formal requirements
for issuing a valid notice have not been
met.’’
Legibility of Notices of Termination and
Other Documents Pertaining to
Copyright
Amendment three is relatively minor,
but nonetheless underscores the mission
of the Copyright Office as an office of
public record. It updates the legibility
requirement by replacing the reference
to ‘‘microform copies’’ with a broader,
more flexible reference to technology.
As revised, a document must be ‘‘legible
and capable of being imaged or
otherwise reproduced in legible copies
by the technology employed by the
Office at the time of submission.’’
(Emphasis added.) The Office received
no objections to this revision.
Fee Requirements for Notices of
Termination
With respect to fees, it is the
Copyright Office’ experience that parties
who submit notices of termination for
recordation sometimes miscalculate the
amount due, especially where grants of
rights in multiple works are being
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
12556
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
terminated by virtue of one document.
Amendment four adds the notice of
termination as an express example in
the schedule of fees under section
201.3(c)(16), specifying that the basic
fee for recordation of a notice of
termination containing a single title is
$95, and the fee for recordation of a
notice of termination containing more
than one title is an additional $25 per
group of 10 titles. The Office received
no objections to this revision.
Mailing Address for Notices of
Termination
Finally, because notices of
termination are time–sensitive, a delay
in processing may have serious
consequences. Amendment five
officially activates the special post office
box at the Copyright Office, from which
notices of termination can more easily
be sorted and routed for recordation.
This revision also deletes the address
for the now–defunct Copyright
Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP). See
72 FR 45071 (August 10, 2007). The
Office received no objections to this
revision.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Final Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the
Copyright Office amends part 201 of
title 37 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 201 – GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2.Section 201.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 201.1 Communication with the
Copyright Office.
*
*
*
*
*
(b)* * *
(2)Notices of Termination. Notices of
termination submitted for recordation
should be mailed to Copyright Office,
Notices of Termination, P.O. Box 71537,
Washington, DC 20024–1537.
§ 201.3 [Amended]
3.Amend § 201.3(c)(16) by removing
the phrase, ‘‘Recordation of document,
including a Notice of Intent to Enforce
(NIE) (single title),’’ and adding in its
place the phrase ‘‘Recordation of
document (single title), e.g. a Notice of
Termination or a Notice of Intent to
Enforce (NIE)’’.
■ 4.Amend § 201.4 by revising
paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
§ 201.4 Recordation of transfers and
certain other documents.
*
*
*
*
*
(c)* * *
(3)To be recordable, the document
must be legible and capable of being
imaged or otherwise reproduced in
legible copies by the technology
employed by the Office at the time of
submission.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5.
follows:
a. By adding paragraph (f)(1)(iii);
b. By redesignating paragraph (f)(4) as
(f)(5);
c. By adding a new paragraph (f)(4);
d. By revising redesignated paragraph
(f)(5); and
e. By adding paragraph (f) (6).
The revisions and additions to
§ 201.10 read as follows:
§ 201.10 Notices of termination of
transfers and licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
(f)* * *
(1)* * *
(iii)The copy submitted for
recordation must be legible per the
requirements of § 201.4(c)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
(4)Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this section, the Copyright
Office reserves the right to refuse
recordation of a notice of termination if,
in the judgment of the Copyright Office,
such notice of termination is untimely.
If a document is submitted as a notice
of termination after the statutory
deadline has expired, the Office will
offer to record the document as a
‘‘document pertaining to copyright’’
pursuant to § 201.4(c)(3), but the Office
will not index the document as a notice
of termination. Whether a document so
recorded is sufficient in any instance to
effect termination as a matter of law
shall be determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction.
(5)A copy of the notice of termination
shall be recorded in the Copyright
Office before the effective date of
termination, as a condition to its taking
effect. However, the fact that the Office
has recorded the notice does not mean
that it is otherwise sufficient under the
law. Recordation of a notice of
termination by the Copyright Office is
without prejudice to any party claiming
that the legal and formal requirements
for issuing a valid notice have not been
met.
(6)Notices of termination should be
submitted to the address specified in
§ 201.1(b)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: March 16, 2009
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. E9–6649 Filed 3–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0058; FRL–8780–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plan;
Maryland; Reasonably Available
Control Technology Requirements for
Volatile Organic Compounds
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to
fully approve revisions to the Maryland
State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions pertain to Maryland’s major
source volatile organic compound
(VOC) reasonable available control
technology (RACT) regulation. EPA is
converting the conditional limited
approval status of Maryland’s VOC
RACT regulations to a full approval
because EPA has approved all of the
case-by-case RACT determinations
submitted by Maryland pursuant to the
generic provisions of its VOC RACT
regulation as well as all of the RACT
requirements for categories of VOC
sources submitted by Maryland in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on May 26,
2009 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse written comment by
April 24, 2009. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2009–0058 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0058,
Cristina Fernandez, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mail code 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12554-12556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6649]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. RM 2008-1]
Recordation of Notices of Termination of Transfers and Licenses;
Clarifications
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is adopting amendments to its regulations
governing the recordation of notices of termination and certain related
provisions.
DATES: EFFECTIVE DATE: March 25, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Pallante, Associate Register for
Policy and International Affairs, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024-0400. Telephone (202) 707-8380. Fax (202) 707-
8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in the Federal Register on January 23, 2008 (73 FR 3898),
seeking public comment on five proposed amendments to its regulations
at Sec. Sec. 201.1, 201.3, 201.4 and 201.10 of Chapter 37. These
were: 1) an amendment communicating the Office's practices as to its
receipt of notices of termination that are untimely; 2) an amendment
clarifying that recordation of a notice of termination by the Office
does not necessarily mean that the document is legally sufficient; 3)
an amendment updating the legibility requirements for all recorded
documents, including notices of termination; 4) an amendment making
minor explanatory edits to the fee schedule for multiple titles within
a document (adding ``e.g. a Notice of Termination'' as an example); and
5) an amendment establishing a new mailing address to which notices of
termination should be sent. (For ease of explanation only, the
amendments are herein referred to as amendments one through five.)
The Office received two comments, each on February 22, 2008, from
Law Professor Daniel N. Ballard, University of the Pacific McGeorge
School of Law, and from Terrie Bjorkland on behalf of the American
Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA). Both commentators
questioned the basis for, and the likely impact of, amendment number
two. Mr. Ballard first suggested that there is no justification for the
proposed language, and second suggested that rather than being neutral
on its face, the language, as worded, might create ``an improper bias
against the termination of copyright interests.'' Ms. Bjorkland
observed that the proposal emphasizes the inconclusive impact of the
filing of a notice, doing ``little to give artists a sense of comfort
that the Copyright Office is facilitating the protection of their right
of termination.'' In addition, she expressed opposition to amendment
number one, questioning why the Office should make a determination that
a notice is untimely, when ``it is incumbent upon the challenging party
to contest the validity of the notice, if appropriate.'' After
considering these comments, the Office is adopting all of the
aforementioned amendments, but in doing so is rephrasing amendment
number two.
Background
The Copyright Office is an office of public record which receives
and records documents that pertain to copyright, including,
specifically, notices of termination. Notices of termination may be
served by authors (and certain heirs, beneficiaries or representatives
of authors who are specified by statute) to extinguish the exclusive or
nonexclusive grants of transfers or licenses of copyright or the
divisible rights thereunder. The provisions have an equitable function:
they exist to allow authors or their heirs a second opportunity to
share in the economic success of their works.
The termination provisions are set forth in three sections of the
law: Sections 304(c), 304(d) and 203 of the 1976 Copyright Act, Title
17 of the United States Code. The sections are similar, though not
identical, and they govern distinct categories of works. (None of the
sections applies to copyrights in works made for hire or grants made by
will.)
Section 304(c) governs any work in which the copyright was
subsisting in its first or renewal term as of January 1, 1978, and
provides for termination of the exclusive or nonexclusive grant of a
transfer or license of the renewal copyright (or any right under it)
executed before January 1, 1978. Termination may be exercised at any
time during a five year period beginning at the end of fifty-six years
from the date copyright was originally secured.
Section 304(d) provides a termination right for a subset of works
for which the termination right under section 304(c) expired (and was
not exercised) on or before the effective date (October 27, 1998) of
the ``Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act,'' which extended the
copyright term by 20 years. It provides for termination of the
exclusive or nonexclusive grant of a transfer or license of the renewal
copyright (or any right under it) at any time during a five year period
beginning at the end of 75 years from the date copyright was originally
secured.
Section 203 is limited to grants executed by the author. It
provides for termination of the exclusive or nonexclusive grant of
copyright (or any right under copyright) executed on or after January
1, 1978 (regardless of whether the copyright was secured prior to
1978). Termination may be exercised at any time during a period of five
years beginning at the end of thirty-five years
[[Page 12555]]
from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end
of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever is
earlier.
By all accounts, the termination provisions are dense and
formalistic, particularly for a non-lawyer. In summary, the author (or
if the author is deceased, the party specified by statute) must serve
the notice of termination in writing on a grantee or the grantee's
successor-in-title not less than two or more than ten years before the
effective date, in a form and manner prescribed by regulation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\If the author executed the grant but is no longer living, the
termination interest is owned and may be exercised by the author's
widow or widower and any children or grandchildren on a per stirpes
basis (subject to certain conditions concerning the disposition of
partial interests of multiple authors and heirs), or if the
aforementioned are deceased, by the author' executor, administrator,
personal representative, or trustee. 17 U.S.C. 203(a)(1)-(2); 17
U.S.C. 304 (c)(1)-(2); 17 U.S.C. 304(d)(1). Moreover, under Sections
304(c) and 304 (d), if the author is no longer living and the grant
has been executed by one or more persons designated by statute,
termination may be exercised by the surviving person or persons who
executed it. 17 U.S.C. 304(c); 17U.S.C. 304(d); 17 U.S.C.
304(a)(1)(c). Note that this is not true of Section 203, which
applies only to grants executed by authors. 17 U.S.C. 203(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A copy of the notice of termination must be recorded with the
Copyright Office before the effective date of termination. 17 U.S.C.
304(c)(4)(A); 304(d)(1); 203(a)(4)(A). (Emphasis added.) The
particulars of the recordation process are prescribed by regulation. In
short, the copy must be legible and must include the following
elements: 1) either actual signatures or reproductions of signatures 2)
a statement setting forth the date the notice was served 3) an
indication of the manner of service and 4) submission of the
appropriate filing fee. 37 CFR 201.4(c)(3); 37 CFR 201.10(f).
A discussion of the amendments follows.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Timeliness of Notices of Termination
The Copyright Office cannot accept a notice of termination that is
untimely because, under the law, lateness is a fatal mistake. (By
contrast, see 37 CFR 201.10(e) for examples of forgivable, harmless
errors.) Thus, before the Copyright Office records a notice, it reviews
for timeliness. Specifically, it confirms that the notice has been
served within the relevant statutory time frame (as derived from the
facts stated in the notice), and has been received by the Office prior
to the stated effective date of termination.
In practice, if in the judgment of the Office the document is
untimely, the Office will take one of two actions. If the notice is
premature, the Office will return it with an explanation, so that the
serving party may resubmit the notice to the Office at a later date
(and, as necessary, resubmit the notice to the party being served). On
the other hand, if the document is tardy, the Office will offer only to
record and index the document according to its general recordation
practices, as a ``document pertaining to copyright.'' 17 U.S.C. 205(a);
37 CFR 201.4(a)(2). It will not accept the document as a ``notice of
termination,'' meaning that it will not be specially indexed as such.
Whether such general recordation by the Copyright Office will be
sufficient in any particular instance to effect termination as a matter
of law is an issue that only the courts may resolve.
Notwithstanding the objection expressed by AFTRA with respect to
amendment one, the Office's practice is consistent with the statute.
Moreover, since the amendment restates the longstanding practice of the
Office (i.e. it does not introduce a new practice), the Office
maintains that the amendment is merely educative, and may prove helpful
to interested parties who are looking for guidance.
Recordation as Distinguished from Legal Sufficiency
Under amendment two, the Office states a truism: the fact that the
Office has accepted a document and recorded it as a notice of
termination does not mean, necessarily, that the notice is sufficient
to effect termination under the law. As proposed in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, the following sentence would have been introduced
at the top of the paragraph: ``The mere fact that a notice of
termination has been recorded does not mean that it is legally
sufficient.'' The remainder of the paragraph would have followed and
remained unchanged: ``Recordation of a notice of termination by the
Copyright Office is without prejudice to any party claiming that the
legal and formal requirements for issuing a valid notice have not been
met.''
On this issue, the Office does not find the stated concerns of the
commentators to be entirely plausible. Recordation is a required act
under the law but, once completed, it carries no legal presumption that
termination has been properly effected. If authors or their
representatives believe otherwise, it is all the more important that
this fact be clearly and accurately stated. The reality is that the
Office, aside from its review for timeliness (discussed above), does
not confirm the validity of the alleged facts that are reported in each
notice. To do so would be an impossible exercise. This means that the
Office may accept and record a notice of termination even though any
number of elements may ultimately prove to be wrongly stated and
invalid under the law, from the named authors, to the designation of
beneficiaries, to the date or characterization of the grant. In
instances where termination has not been perfected in the first place,
recordation of the notice is of no consequence. The proposed amendment
would not have changed this result --- only confirmed it for clarity's
sake.
Nevertheless, the Office is not wedded to the particular
formulation of the point as originally proposed. In his comments, Mr.
Ballard objected, in particular, to use of the phrase ``mere fact,''
which he saw as ``loaded language'' that would, in practice, undermine
the termination process by favoring grantees over authors. In response,
the Office has removed ``mere fact'' and constructed a new formulation,
which in part repeats the operative language of the statute. It reads
as follows: ``A copy of the notice of termination shall be recorded in
the Copyright Office before the effective date of termination, as a
condition to its taking effect. However, the fact that the Office has
recorded the notice does not mean that it is otherwise sufficient under
the law.'' The existing sentence will follow: ``Recordation of a notice
of termination by the Copyright Office is without prejudice to any
party claiming that the legal and formal requirements for issuing a
valid notice have not been met.''
Legibility of Notices of Termination and Other Documents Pertaining to
Copyright
Amendment three is relatively minor, but nonetheless underscores
the mission of the Copyright Office as an office of public record. It
updates the legibility requirement by replacing the reference to
``microform copies'' with a broader, more flexible reference to
technology. As revised, a document must be ``legible and capable of
being imaged or otherwise reproduced in legible copies by the
technology employed by the Office at the time of submission.''
(Emphasis added.) The Office received no objections to this revision.
Fee Requirements for Notices of Termination
With respect to fees, it is the Copyright Office' experience that
parties who submit notices of termination for recordation sometimes
miscalculate the amount due, especially where grants of rights in
multiple works are being
[[Page 12556]]
terminated by virtue of one document. Amendment four adds the notice of
termination as an express example in the schedule of fees under section
201.3(c)(16), specifying that the basic fee for recordation of a notice
of termination containing a single title is $95, and the fee for
recordation of a notice of termination containing more than one title
is an additional $25 per group of 10 titles. The Office received no
objections to this revision.
Mailing Address for Notices of Termination
Finally, because notices of termination are time-sensitive, a delay
in processing may have serious consequences. Amendment five officially
activates the special post office box at the Copyright Office, from
which notices of termination can more easily be sorted and routed for
recordation. This revision also deletes the address for the now-defunct
Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP). See 72 FR 45071 (August 10,
2007). The Office received no objections to this revision.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Final Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, the Copyright Office amends part
201 of title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 201 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1.The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
2.Section 201.1 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 201.1 Communication with the Copyright Office.
* * * * *
(b)* * *
(2)Notices of Termination. Notices of termination submitted for
recordation should be mailed to Copyright Office, Notices of
Termination, P.O. Box 71537, Washington, DC 20024-1537.
Sec. 201.3 [Amended]
0
3.Amend Sec. 201.3(c)(16) by removing the phrase, ``Recordation of
document, including a Notice of Intent to Enforce (NIE) (single
title),'' and adding in its place the phrase ``Recordation of document
(single title), e.g. a Notice of Termination or a Notice of Intent to
Enforce (NIE)''.
0
4.Amend Sec. 201.4 by revising paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.4 Recordation of transfers and certain other documents.
* * * * *
(c)* * *
(3)To be recordable, the document must be legible and capable of
being imaged or otherwise reproduced in legible copies by the
technology employed by the Office at the time of submission.
* * * * *
0
5.
Section 201.10(f) is amended as follows:a. By adding paragraph
(f)(1)(iii);
b. By redesignating paragraph (f)(4) as (f)(5);
c. By adding a new paragraph (f)(4);
d. By revising redesignated paragraph (f)(5); and
e. By adding paragraph (f) (6).
The revisions and additions to Sec. 201.10 read as follows:
Sec. 201.10 Notices of termination of transfers and licenses.
* * * * *
(f)* * *
(1)* * *
(iii)The copy submitted for recordation must be legible per the
requirements of Sec. 201.4(c)(3).
* * * * *
(4)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section, the
Copyright Office reserves the right to refuse recordation of a notice
of termination if, in the judgment of the Copyright Office, such notice
of termination is untimely. If a document is submitted as a notice of
termination after the statutory deadline has expired, the Office will
offer to record the document as a ``document pertaining to copyright''
pursuant to Sec. 201.4(c)(3), but the Office will not index the
document as a notice of termination. Whether a document so recorded is
sufficient in any instance to effect termination as a matter of law
shall be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(5)A copy of the notice of termination shall be recorded in the
Copyright Office before the effective date of termination, as a
condition to its taking effect. However, the fact that the Office has
recorded the notice does not mean that it is otherwise sufficient under
the law. Recordation of a notice of termination by the Copyright Office
is without prejudice to any party claiming that the legal and formal
requirements for issuing a valid notice have not been met.
(6)Notices of termination should be submitted to the address
specified in Sec. 201.1(b)(2).
Dated: March 16, 2009
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
The Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. E9-6649 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-S