Office of Innovation and Improvement; Overview Information; Transition to Teaching Grant Program; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009, 67142-67148 [E8-26870]
Download as PDF
67142
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Innovation and Improvement;
Overview Information; Transition to
Teaching Grant Program; Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.350A, 84.350B, and
84.350C.
DATES:
Applications Available: November 13,
2008.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
December 15, 2008.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting:
December 4, 2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: January 21, 2009.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: March 23, 2009.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Transition to
Teaching program encourages (1) the
development and expansion of
alternative routes to full State teacher
certification, as well as (2) the
recruitment and retention of highly
qualified mid-career professionals,
recent college graduates who have not
majored in education, and highly
qualified paraprofessionals as teachers
in high-need schools operated by highneed local educational agencies (LEAs),
including charter schools that operate as
high-need LEAs.
Priorities: The Department has
established two competitive preference
priorities that are explained in the
following paragraphs. In accordance
with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv),
Competitive Preference Priority 1 is
from section 2313(c) of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965,
as amended (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6683(c)).
Competitive Preference Priority 2 is
from the notice of final priorities and
requirements for this program (NFP),
published in the Federal Register on
April 30, 2004 (69 FR 24002).
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2009 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award an
additional 5 points to an application
that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 1, and up to an additional 10
points to an application depending on
how well the application meets
Competitive Preference Priority 2.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1—
Partnerships or Consortia That Include
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
a High-need LEA or a High-need State
Educational Agency (SEA). This priority
supports projects that are designed and
implemented in active partnerships or
consortia that include at least one highneed LEA or high-need SEA.
Competitive Preference Priority 2—
District Projects To Streamline Teacher
Hiring Systems, Timelines, and
Processes. This priority supports
projects by one or more high-need LEAs
to streamline their hiring systems,
timelines, and processes. A
participating high-need LEA will need
to conduct both of the following
activities:
(a) Examine its current hiring system,
processes, and policies to identify the
critical barriers to hiring highly
qualified teachers. The lack of highly
qualified teachers in most urban and
rural LEAs has often been attributed to
their difficulty in recruiting interested
and qualified individuals. However,
recent research indicates that the
problem may not be one of recruitment
but may stem from inefficient and
untimely LEA hiring systems and
processes. This is especially true in
high-poverty LEAs and schools—the
very LEAs and schools the Transition to
Teaching program is targeted to serve.
Accordingly, each participating LEA
will need to examine its current hiring
processes and policies and, based upon
that examination, identify the critical
barriers to hiring highly qualified
teachers.
(b) Design and implement efforts to
remove the identified barriers and put
in place systems that streamline and
revamp the hiring process. In
conducting this activity, LEAs are
encouraged to create an efficient and
timely applicant hiring process with a
strong data tracking system and clear
hiring goals. These efforts also should
involve negotiating policy reforms that
remove critical barriers, such as delayed
notification of vacancies and seniority
and retirement rules.
Participating LEAs also will carry out
the requirements of the Transition to
Teaching program by recruiting
nontraditional candidates, using the
streamlined hiring system to hire these
individuals for teaching in high-need
schools, working with them to achieve
full State certification, and retaining
them for at least three years.
Note: While all applicants may address
Competitive Preference Priority 2, only
applicants that meet the eligibility
requirements of a high-need LEA, as
contained in this notice, may receive points
under this competitive preference priority. In
response to Competitive Preference Priority
2, applicants are encouraged (1) to identify
existing barriers to an efficient and timely
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
process of hiring new teachers and (2) to
describe a specific plan to address these
barriers that includes: (a) The active
engagement of LEA officials, teacher unions,
and other stakeholders in removing existing
barriers and implementing changes; (b) the
actions each participating LEA intends to
undertake to streamline teacher hiring
systems, timelines, and processes that will
result in early notification and hiring of new
teachers; (c) a timeline for major action steps;
(d) a strong data tracking system; and (e)
clear hiring goals, objectives, and
performance measures that provide evidence
of success in meeting the goals of hiring new
teachers supported through the Transition to
Teaching program.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6681–
6684.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice
of final priorities and requirements for
this program published in the Federal
Register on April 30, 2004 (69 FR
24002).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
(IHEs) only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: The
Administration has requested
$43,707,000 for this program for FY
2009, of which we intend to use an
estimated $7,000,000 for this
competition. The actual level of
funding, if any, depends on final
congressional action. However, we are
inviting applications to allow enough
time to complete the grant process if
Congress appropriates funds for this
program.
The Department has established
separate funding categories for projects
of different scope. These categories are:
(1) National/regional projects
(84.350C) that serve eligible high-need
LEAs in more than one State;
(2) Statewide projects (84.350B) that
serve eligible high-need LEAs statewide
or eligible high-need LEAs in more than
one area of a State; and
(3) Local projects (84.350A) that serve
one eligible high-need LEA or two or
more eligible high-need LEAs in a single
area of a State.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
2010 from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: National/
regional projects—$450,000–$750,000
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
per year; Statewide projects—$300,000–
$650,000 per year; and Local projects—
$150,000–$450,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
National/regional projects—$600,000
per year; Statewide projects—$440,000
per year; and Local projects—$300,000
per year.
Estimated Number of Awards:
National/regional projects—3; Statewide
projects—5; and Local projects—10.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: A State
educational agency (SEA); a high-need
LEA; a for-profit or nonprofit
organization that has a proven record of
effectively recruiting and retaining
highly qualified teachers, in partnership
with a high-need LEA or an SEA; an IHE
in partnership with a high-need LEA or
an SEA; a regional consortium of SEAs;
or a consortium of high-need LEAs.
Each application must identify
participating LEAs that meet the
definition of ‘‘high-need LEA’’ in
section 2102(3) of the ESEA.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: Section 2102(3) of the ESEA defines
a high-need LEA as an LEA—
(a) That serves not fewer than 10,000
children from families with incomes below
the poverty line (as that term is defined in
section 9101(33) of the ESEA), or for which
not less than 20 percent of the children
served by the LEA are from families with
incomes below the poverty line; and
(b) For which there is (1) a high percentage
of teachers not teaching in the academic
subjects or grade levels that the teachers were
trained to teach, or (2) a high percentage of
teachers with emergency, provisional, or
temporary certification or licensing.
The NFP describes how applicants
must demonstrate that a participating
LEA meets this statutory definition of
‘‘high-need LEA’’ (69 FR 24002, 24006).
Pursuant to the NFP, we provide the
following supplementary information
regarding the data an applicant uses to
demonstrate eligibility as a ‘‘high-need
LEA’’ under this competition:
As described in the NFP, absent a
showing of alternative LEA data that
reliably show the number of children
from families with incomes below the
poverty line that are served by the LEA,
the eligibility of an LEA as a ‘‘high-need
LEA’’ under component (a) of the
definition must be determined on the
basis of the most recent U.S. Census
Bureau data. The most recent U.S.
Census Bureau data can be found in the
charts on the Internet at: https://
www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/
district.html. The Department examines
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
the eligibility of any LEA not listed on
these charts on a case-by-case basis.
We understand that the U.S. Census
Bureau may release data for 2007 before
the closing date for applications under
this competition. If the U.S. Census
Bureau publishes 2007 poverty data
before the application due date, the
Department will consider U.S. Census
Bureau poverty data available for either
2005 or 2007 to be the most recent.
Hence, if the U.S. Census Bureau
releases its poverty data for 2007 prior
to the closing date of this competition,
we will consider an LEA to have the
requisite poverty needed to be a ‘‘highneed LEA’’ if the LEA had the requisite
level of poverty, based on the U.S.
Census Bureau data, in either 2005 or
2007. If the U.S. Census Bureau does not
release the 2007 poverty data, we will
rely on the U.S. Census Bureau’s
poverty data for 2005.
As discussed in the NFP, with respect
to component (b)(1) of the definition of
‘‘high-need LEA,’’ whether an LEA has
a ‘‘high percentage of teachers not
teaching in the academic subjects or
grade levels that the teachers were
trained to teach’’ is determined on a
case-by-case basis.
In addition, as noted in the NFP, with
respect to component (b)(2) of the
definition of ‘‘high-need LEA,’’ an LEA
has a ‘‘high percentage’’ of teachers with
emergency, provisional, or temporary
certification or licensing if the
percentage of teachers on waivers, as the
LEA reported to the State for purposes
of the State’s latest report to the
Secretary under section 207 of the
Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA),
was at least the national average
percentage of teachers on waivers of
State certification for all LEAs. As
outlined in the NFP, the Secretary
determines the national average
percentage of teachers on waivers based
on data contained in the most currently
available HEA section 207 State reports.
At the time of publication of this notice,
the Department has received all 2007
State HEA section 207 reports and those
reports reflect a national percentage of
teachers on waivers of State certification
in all LEAs of 1.5 percent.
Accordingly, an LEA will be
considered to have met component
(b)(2) of the definition if the data that it
provided to the State for purposes of the
State’s October 2007 HEA section 207
report demonstrate that at least 1.5
percent of its teachers were on waivers
of State certification requirements.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This
program involves supplement-not-
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67143
supplant funding requirements. In
accordance with section 2313(h)(2) of
the ESEA, funds made available under
this section shall be used to
supplement, and not supplant, State and
local public funds expended for teacher
recruitment and retention programs,
including programs to recruit teachers
through alternative routes to
certification.
3. Other: The NFP describes eligibility
restrictions for individuals participating
in this program.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: Education Publications Center
(ED Pubs), P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD
20794–1398. Telephone, toll free: 1–
877–433–7827. FAX: (301) 470–1244. If
you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), call, toll free: 1–877–
576–7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: https://www.ed.gov/pubs/
edpubs.html or at its e-mail address:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package
from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this
program or competition as follows:
CFDA number 84.350A, 84.350B, or
84.350C.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) by contacting the program
contact person or team listed under
Accessible Format in section VIII of this
notice.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition. Additional information
concerning application content
requirements is in the NFP.
Notice of Intent to Apply: December
15, 2008. The Department will be able
to develop a more efficient process for
reviewing grant applications if it has a
better understanding of the number of
entities that intend to apply for funding
under this competition. Therefore, the
Secretary strongly encourages each
potential applicant to notify the
Department by sending a short e-mail
message indicating the applicant’s
intent to submit an application for
funding. The e-mail need not include
information regarding the content of the
proposed application, only the
applicant’s intent to submit it. The
Secretary requests that this e-mail
notification be sent to Thelma
Leenhouts at:
transitiontoteaching@ed.gov.
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
67144
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
Applicants that fail to provide this email notification may still apply for
funding.
Page Limit: The application narrative
(Part III of the application) is where you,
the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate
your application. You must limit the
application narrative Part III to the
equivalent of no more than 50 pages,
using the following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, except titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial. An application submitted
in any other font (including Times
Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be
accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part
I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; Part IV, the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, or letters of support.
However, you must include all of the
application narrative in Part III.
Our reviewers will not read any pages
of your application that exceed the page
limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: November 13,
2008.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To
Apply: December 15, 2008.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting:
December 4, 2008, from 2:00 p.m. to
4:00 p.m. in the LBJ Auditorium at the
U.S. Department of Education
headquarters, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., in Washington, DC. The
Department is accessible by Metro on
the Blue, Orange, Green, and Yellow
lines at the 7th Street and Maryland
Avenue exit of the L’Enfant Plaza Metro
station. Please contact the U.S.
Department of Education contact
persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you have any
questions about the details of the preapplication meeting.
Individuals interested in attending
this pre-application meeting are
encouraged to pre-register by e-mailing
their name, organization, and contact
information to
transitiontoteaching@ed.gov. There is
no registration fee for this pre-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
application meeting. We encourage
attendance from those who will be
responsible for submitting the
application or otherwise providing
technical support for submitting the
application electronically using the
Grants.gov Apply site.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities at the Pre-Application
Meeting
The meeting site is accessible to
individuals with disabilities, and a sign
language interpreter will be available. If
you will need an auxiliary aid or service
other than a sign language interpreter in
order to participate in the meeting (e.g.,
other interpreting service such as oral,
cued speech, or tactile interpreter;
assistive listening device; or materials in
alternate format), notify the contact
person listed in this notice at least two
weeks before the scheduled meeting
date. Although we will attempt to meet
a request we receive after this date, we
may not be able to make available the
requested auxiliary aid or service
because of insufficient time to arrange
it.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: January 21, 2009.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, please refer to
section IV.6. Other Submission
Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII in this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: March 23, 2009.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice and in
the NFP.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications. Applications for grants
under the Transition to Teaching
Competition, CFDA number 84.350A,
84.350B, and 84.350C must be
submitted electronically using the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at https://www.Grants.gov. Through this
site, you will be able to download a
copy of the application package,
complete it offline, and then upload and
submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for Transition to Teaching at
https://www.Grants.gov. You must search
for the downloadable application
package for this competition by the
CFDA number. Do not include the
CFDA number’s alpha suffix in your
search (e.g., search for 84.350, not
84.350A).
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are date and time stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted, and must be date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not accept your
application if it is received—that is, date
and time stamped by the Grants.gov
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
system—after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at
https://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
• To submit your application via
Grants.gov, you must complete all steps
in the Grants.gov registration process
(see https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
get_registered.jsp). These steps include
(1) Registering your organization, a
multi-part process that includes
registration with the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR); (2) registering yourself
as an Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR); and (3) getting
authorized as an AOR by your
organization. Details on these steps are
outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see https://
www.grants.gov/section910/
Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf).
You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number
used with this registration. Please note
that the registration process may take
five or more business days to complete,
and you must have completed all
registration steps to allow you to submit
successfully an application via
Grants.gov. In addition you will need to
update your CCR registration on an
annual basis. This may take three or
more business days to complete.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
Please note that two of these forms—the
SF 424 and the Department of Education
Supplemental Information for SF 424—
have replaced the ED 424 (Application
for Federal Education Assistance).
• You must attach any narrative
sections of your application as files in
a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich text), or
.PDF (Portable Document) format. If you
upload a file type other than the three
file types specified in this paragraph or
submit a password-protected file, we
will not review that material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. (This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send a
second notification to you by e-mail.
This second notification indicates that
the Department has received your
application and has assigned your
application a PR/Award number (an EDspecified identifying number unique to
your application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67145
contact the person listed under FOR
in
section VII in this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a
determination is made on whether your
application will be accepted.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because—
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevent you from using the
Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Thelma Leenhouts, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Room 4W302,
Washington, DC 20202–5960. FAX:
(202) 401–8466.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail. If you qualify for an exception
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
67146
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the
U.S. Postal Service or a commercial
carrier) your application to the
Department. You must mail the original
and two copies of your application, on
or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following
address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.350A, 84.350B, or
84.350C), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20202–4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery. If you qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service)
may deliver your paper application to
the Department by hand. You must
deliver the original and two copies of
your application by hand, on or before
the application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.350A, 84.350B, or
84.350C), 550 12th Street, SW., Room
7041, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center accepts
hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time,
except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal
holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call
the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from the
statute for this program and § 75.210 of
EDGAR and are listed in this section.
The maximum score for all the selection
criteria is 100 points. The maximum
score for each criterion is indicated in
parentheses. Each criterion also
includes the factors that the reviewers
will consider in determining how well
an application meets the criterion. In
addressing each criterion, applicants are
encouraged to make explicit
connections to relevant aspects of
responses to other selection criteria.
The Notes we have included after
each criterion are guidance to assist
applicants in understanding the
criterion as they prepare their
applications and are not required by
statute or regulation.
A. Quality of the Project Design (35
points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the project design for the proposed
project by considering how well the
applicant describes a plan—
(1) To recruit and retain highly
qualified mid-career professionals
(including highly qualified
paraprofessionals) and recent graduates
of an IHE as teachers in high-need
schools operated by high-need LEAs;
and
(2) To enable individuals to become
eligible for teacher certification under
State-approved alternative routes to
certification programs within a reduced
period of time, relying on such factors
as experience, expertise, and academic
qualifications in lieu of traditional
course-work in education.
In considering the quality of the
project design and the applicant’s plan,
the Secretary considers the following
factors:
(a) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable.
(b) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project reflects up-to-date
knowledge from research and effective
practice.
(c) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project is appropriate to,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and will successfully address, the needs
of the target population or other
identified needs.
(d) The extent to which the proposed
project is designed to build capacity and
yield results that will extend beyond the
period of Federal financial assistance.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants
to address this criterion by discussing the
overall project design and its key
components, and the degree to which the
design’s key components are based on sound
research and practice. Applicants are also
encouraged to address this criterion by
connecting the project design to the needs of
the partner districts and identifying the
specific teacher-shortage areas faced by the
participating high-need LEAs on which their
proposed project would focus. Applicants
should understand that a project’s strategy
for helping participating high-need LEAs to
identify and hire highly qualified individuals
to fill teaching positions in high-need
subjects may rely on existing alternative
routes to certification, the expansion of
alternative routes to certification into new
areas, or the creation of wholly new
alternative routes.
Additionally, applicants are
encouraged to address such key
components of project design as:
(1) Recruitment and selection,
including identifying the target group(s)
on which the program will focus and
why and how the project is designed to
rigorously select participants with the
requisite content knowledge, skills, and
commitment to teach in high-need
schools in high-need LEAs. Recruitment
may include members of groups that are
traditionally underrepresented.
(2) Preparation, including how the
project provides a route to certification
that is accelerated, integrates
coursework and field experience, is
adapted to participants’ learning needs,
and will yield highly qualified teachers
who are prepared to teach in high-need
schools in high-need LEAs.
(3) Teacher placement, including
evidence that the proposed project will
meet the needs of high-need LEAs and
is developed in coordination with
appropriate partners, and that the
project includes a system of tracking to
meet statutory requirements.
(4) Support services, including
mentoring, that are designed to retain
participants and meet their needs in
terms of length, content, and means of
delivery in order to be successful in
high-need schools in high-need LEAs.
(5) Certification, including
consideration of how the timeline for
achieving certification will meet the
needs of participants, LEAs, and
partners, as well as the ‘‘Highly
Qualified Teacher’’ requirements
established in section 9101(23) of the
ESEA.
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
In addition, applicants are encouraged
to clarify the means by which the
project’s specified outcomes and
benefits may be sustained once Federal
funding has ended.
B. Quality of the Project Evaluation
(25 points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the
evaluation to be conducted, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
(1) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation include the use of
objective performance measures that are
clearly related to the intended outcomes
of the project and will produce
quantitative and qualitative data to the
extent possible.
(2) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation will provide performance
feedback and permit periodic
assessment of progress toward achieving
intended outcomes.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants
to address this criterion by including
benchmarks to monitor progress toward
specific and measurable program and project
objectives, as well as performance measures
to assess the impact on teaching and learning
or other important outcomes for project
participants. The Secretary encourages
applicants to consider the use of a logic
model in determining intended short-term,
intermediate, and long-term outcomes. (The
specific performance measures established
for the overall Transition to Teaching
program are discussed under Performance
Measures in section VI of this notice. Section
2314 of the ESEA also requires grantees to
submit both an interim evaluation of the first
three years of the grant and a final evaluation
at the end of the grant.)
With respect to the implementation of
the project and monitoring progress
toward achieving project objectives,
applicants are encouraged to describe
the following: (1) What types of data
will be collected; (2) when various types
of data will be collected; (3) what
methods will be used; (4) what
instruments will be developed and
when; (5) how the data will be analyzed;
(6) when reports of results and
outcomes will be available; and (7) how
the applicant will use the information
collected through the evaluation to
monitor progress and improve
implementation of the funded project
and to provide accountability
information about project success.
Applicants are encouraged to design an
evaluation that provides data for annual
as well as midpoint and final reporting.
Applicants are encouraged to devote an
appropriate level of resources to project
evaluation.
Finally, the Secretary encourages
applicants to identify the individual or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
organization that has agreed to serve as
the objective evaluator for the project
and describe the qualifications of that
evaluator.
C. Quality of Project Services (20
points).
In determining the quality of the
services to be provided by the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(1) The extent to which the services
to be provided by the proposed project
are appropriate to the needs of the
intended recipients or beneficiaries of
those services.
(2) The extent to which the training or
professional development services to be
provided by the proposed project are of
sufficient quality, intensity, and
duration to lead to improvements in
practice among the recipients of those
services.
(3) The extent to which the training or
professional development services to be
provided by the proposed project are
likely to alleviate the personnel
shortages that have been identified or
are the focus of the proposed project.
(4) The extent to which the services
to be provided by the proposed project
involve the collaboration of appropriate
partners for maximizing the
effectiveness of project services.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants
to address this criterion by discussing how
the proposed project services will meet the
needs of both the high-need LEAs identified
in the application and the project
participants they would recruit to become
teachers. Applicants are encouraged to
consult the list of authorized activities in
section 2313(g) of the ESEA in describing the
specific services to be delivered to recruit,
prepare, and retain participants that will
increase the number of highly qualified
teachers in high-need schools in high-need
LEAs. In addition, the Secretary encourages
applicants to consider carefully the breadth
of activities that section 2313(g) of the ESEA
authorizes and then to address how the
project will:
(1) Provide preparation that meets the
learning needs of the participants and
makes use of appropriate media (such as
face-to-face instruction, Web-based
instruction, and distance learning) to
provide them with the knowledge and
skills needed to be highly qualified and
effective teachers in the identified highneed subject areas and high-need
schools in high-need LEAs.
(2) Support project participants’
success in high-need schools in highneed LEAs during the period of their
service obligation, through individual
mentoring, support of participants as a
group, use of technology, or other
appropriate means.
(3) Encourage the participation of all
project partners, including school
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67147
leaders, in providing services related to
the recruitment, preparation, and
retention of project participants and
ensuring lasting benefits or outcomes.
Applicants are encouraged to clarify the
roles of partners in each phase of the
project and the extent of coordination
that will occur with similar efforts at the
State and district levels. In addition,
applicants are encouraged to consider
how they might demonstrate (e.g.,
through narrative discussion, letters of
support, or formal memoranda of
understanding) the commitment of
partners to the project, and the partners’
understanding of responsibilities they
have agreed to assume in service
delivery.
Applicants are encouraged to link
their description of project services to
be provided by the project to the overall
project design described in the Quality
of Project Design criterion.
D. Quality of the Management Plan
(20 points).
In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(1) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks.
(2) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
(3) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
principal investigator and other key
project personnel are appropriate and
adequate to meet the objectives of the
proposed project.
Note: Section 75.112 of EDGAR requires an
applicant for a multi-year grant to include a
narrative that describes how and when, in
each budget period of the project, the
applicant plans to meet each project
objective. The Secretary encourages
applicants to address this criterion by
including in this narrative a clear, well
thought-out implementation plan that
includes annual timelines, key project
milestones, and a schedule of activities with
sufficient time for developing an adequate
implementation plan, as well as specific
timelines for providing project participants
the direct support they need in their initial
year(s) as teachers.
Applicants are encouraged to provide
timelines that include benchmarks for
determining whether the project is
achieving its stated goals and objectives,
with strategies for monitoring progress
as well as making mid-project
corrections and adjustments, as
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
67148
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 220 / Thursday, November 13, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
appropriate. In addition, the Secretary
encourages applicants to further address
this criterion by providing specific
information, such as name, title,
responsibilities, and time commitment
of each key individual working to
implement the project’s goals and
objectives.
2. Review and Selection Process:
Additional factors we consider in
selecting an application for an award are
in the NFP.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notice (GAN).
We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section in
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: The Secretary requires
successful applicants to submit annual
performance reports and, after the last
year of the project, a final report. The
annual performance report documents
the grantee’s yearly progress toward
meeting expected programmatic and
project specific outcomes. These
outcomes must be based on measurable
performance objectives including, but
not limited to, the performance
measures described in paragraph 4 of
this section. These reports must
evaluate—
(1) The grantee’s progress in meeting
the application’s objectives;
(2) The project’s effectiveness in
meeting the purposes of the Transition
to Teaching program; and
(3) The project’s effect on the specific
LEAs the project serves.
Among other things, the Department
uses the annual performance reports to
determine whether a grantee has
demonstrated substantial progress in
meeting the goals and objectives (as
described in its approved application),
and thereby merits a continuation award
(for years 2–5). See § 75.118 of EDGAR.
Grantees also will be required to
submit a final performance report, due
no later than 90 days after the end of the
project period.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:13 Nov 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
In addition, section 2314 of the ESEA
requires grantees to submit to the
Department and to the Congress interim
and final evaluations at the end of the
third and fifth years of the grant period,
respectively. These evaluations must
describe the extent to which high-need
LEAs that received funds through the
grant have met their goals relating to
teacher recruitment and retention as
described in the project application.
Additional requirements pertaining to
these reports are in the NFP.
For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to https://
www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The
Secretary has established one
performance indicator for assessing the
effectiveness of the Transition to
Teaching program: the percentage of
new, highly qualified Transition to
Teaching teachers who teach in highneed schools in high-need LEAs for at
least three years. We will track this
indicator through the use of the
following three performance measures.
We will gather the data for these
measures from the grantees.
Measure One: The percentage of all
Transition to Teaching participants who
become teachers of record in high-need
schools in high-need LEAs. For this
measure we will collect data on the
number of participants and the number
of teachers of record in high-need
schools in high-need LEAs.
Measure Two: The percentage of
Transition to Teaching participants
receiving certification/licensure within
three years. For this measure, we will
collect data on the number of
participants who become certified
within three years.
Measure Three: The percentage of
Transition to Teaching teachers of
record who teach in high-need schools
in high-need LEAs for at least three
years. For this measure, we will collect
data on the number of participants who
become teachers of record who have
been teaching in high-need schools in
high-need LEAs for at least three years.
VII. Agency Contacts
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thelma Leenhouts, Patricia Barrett,
Beatriz Ceja, Anthony Sepulveda, or
Salimah Shabazz, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 4W320, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 260–0223 (Thelma
Leenhouts), (202) 260–7350 (Patricia
Barrett), (202) 205–5009 (Beatriz Ceja),
(202) 260–0464 (Anthony Sepulveda), or
(202) 260–2434 (Salimah Shabazz), or
by e-mail: transitiontoteaching@ed.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Douglas B. Mesecar,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
[FR Doc. E8–26870 Filed 11–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
Proposed Agency Information
Collection
U.S. Department of Energy.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) invites public comment on a
proposed collection of information that
DOE is developing for submission to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 220 (Thursday, November 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67142-67148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26870]
[[Page 67142]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Innovation and Improvement; Overview Information;
Transition to Teaching Grant Program; Notice Inviting Applications for
New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.350A,
84.350B, and 84.350C.
DATES: Applications Available: November 13, 2008.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: December 15, 2008.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting: December 4, 2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: January 21, 2009.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: March 23, 2009.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Transition to Teaching program encourages
(1) the development and expansion of alternative routes to full State
teacher certification, as well as (2) the recruitment and retention of
highly qualified mid-career professionals, recent college graduates who
have not majored in education, and highly qualified paraprofessionals
as teachers in high-need schools operated by high-need local
educational agencies (LEAs), including charter schools that operate as
high-need LEAs.
Priorities: The Department has established two competitive
preference priorities that are explained in the following paragraphs.
In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), Competitive Preference
Priority 1 is from section 2313(c) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6683(c)).
Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the notice of final
priorities and requirements for this program (NFP), published in the
Federal Register on April 30, 2004 (69 FR 24002).
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2009 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from
this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award an additional 5
points to an application that meets Competitive Preference Priority 1,
and up to an additional 10 points to an application depending on how
well the application meets Competitive Preference Priority 2.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Partnerships or Consortia That
Include a High-need LEA or a High-need State Educational Agency (SEA).
This priority supports projects that are designed and implemented in
active partnerships or consortia that include at least one high-need
LEA or high-need SEA.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--District Projects To Streamline
Teacher Hiring Systems, Timelines, and Processes. This priority
supports projects by one or more high-need LEAs to streamline their
hiring systems, timelines, and processes. A participating high-need LEA
will need to conduct both of the following activities:
(a) Examine its current hiring system, processes, and policies to
identify the critical barriers to hiring highly qualified teachers. The
lack of highly qualified teachers in most urban and rural LEAs has
often been attributed to their difficulty in recruiting interested and
qualified individuals. However, recent research indicates that the
problem may not be one of recruitment but may stem from inefficient and
untimely LEA hiring systems and processes. This is especially true in
high-poverty LEAs and schools--the very LEAs and schools the Transition
to Teaching program is targeted to serve. Accordingly, each
participating LEA will need to examine its current hiring processes and
policies and, based upon that examination, identify the critical
barriers to hiring highly qualified teachers.
(b) Design and implement efforts to remove the identified barriers
and put in place systems that streamline and revamp the hiring process.
In conducting this activity, LEAs are encouraged to create an efficient
and timely applicant hiring process with a strong data tracking system
and clear hiring goals. These efforts also should involve negotiating
policy reforms that remove critical barriers, such as delayed
notification of vacancies and seniority and retirement rules.
Participating LEAs also will carry out the requirements of the
Transition to Teaching program by recruiting nontraditional candidates,
using the streamlined hiring system to hire these individuals for
teaching in high-need schools, working with them to achieve full State
certification, and retaining them for at least three years.
Note: While all applicants may address Competitive Preference
Priority 2, only applicants that meet the eligibility requirements
of a high-need LEA, as contained in this notice, may receive points
under this competitive preference priority. In response to
Competitive Preference Priority 2, applicants are encouraged (1) to
identify existing barriers to an efficient and timely process of
hiring new teachers and (2) to describe a specific plan to address
these barriers that includes: (a) The active engagement of LEA
officials, teacher unions, and other stakeholders in removing
existing barriers and implementing changes; (b) the actions each
participating LEA intends to undertake to streamline teacher hiring
systems, timelines, and processes that will result in early
notification and hiring of new teachers; (c) a timeline for major
action steps; (d) a strong data tracking system; and (e) clear
hiring goals, objectives, and performance measures that provide
evidence of success in meeting the goals of hiring new teachers
supported through the Transition to Teaching program.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6681-6684.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80,
81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of final priorities
and requirements for this program published in the Federal Register on
April 30, 2004 (69 FR 24002).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education (IHEs) only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: The Administration has requested
$43,707,000 for this program for FY 2009, of which we intend to use an
estimated $7,000,000 for this competition. The actual level of funding,
if any, depends on final congressional action. However, we are inviting
applications to allow enough time to complete the grant process if
Congress appropriates funds for this program.
The Department has established separate funding categories for
projects of different scope. These categories are:
(1) National/regional projects (84.350C) that serve eligible high-
need LEAs in more than one State;
(2) Statewide projects (84.350B) that serve eligible high-need LEAs
statewide or eligible high-need LEAs in more than one area of a State;
and
(3) Local projects (84.350A) that serve one eligible high-need LEA
or two or more eligible high-need LEAs in a single area of a State.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2010 from the list of
unfunded applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: National/regional projects--$450,000-
$750,000
[[Page 67143]]
per year; Statewide projects--$300,000-$650,000 per year; and Local
projects--$150,000-$450,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: National/regional projects--
$600,000 per year; Statewide projects--$440,000 per year; and Local
projects--$300,000 per year.
Estimated Number of Awards: National/regional projects--3;
Statewide projects--5; and Local projects--10.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: A State educational agency (SEA); a high-
need LEA; a for-profit or nonprofit organization that has a proven
record of effectively recruiting and retaining highly qualified
teachers, in partnership with a high-need LEA or an SEA; an IHE in
partnership with a high-need LEA or an SEA; a regional consortium of
SEAs; or a consortium of high-need LEAs.
Each application must identify participating LEAs that meet the
definition of ``high-need LEA'' in section 2102(3) of the ESEA.
Note: Section 2102(3) of the ESEA defines a high-need LEA as an
LEA--
(a) That serves not fewer than 10,000 children from families
with incomes below the poverty line (as that term is defined in
section 9101(33) of the ESEA), or for which not less than 20 percent
of the children served by the LEA are from families with incomes
below the poverty line; and
(b) For which there is (1) a high percentage of teachers not
teaching in the academic subjects or grade levels that the teachers
were trained to teach, or (2) a high percentage of teachers with
emergency, provisional, or temporary certification or licensing.
The NFP describes how applicants must demonstrate that a
participating LEA meets this statutory definition of ``high-need LEA''
(69 FR 24002, 24006). Pursuant to the NFP, we provide the following
supplementary information regarding the data an applicant uses to
demonstrate eligibility as a ``high-need LEA'' under this competition:
As described in the NFP, absent a showing of alternative LEA data
that reliably show the number of children from families with incomes
below the poverty line that are served by the LEA, the eligibility of
an LEA as a ``high-need LEA'' under component (a) of the definition
must be determined on the basis of the most recent U.S. Census Bureau
data. The most recent U.S. Census Bureau data can be found in the
charts on the Internet at: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/
district.html. The Department examines the eligibility of any LEA not
listed on these charts on a case-by-case basis.
We understand that the U.S. Census Bureau may release data for 2007
before the closing date for applications under this competition. If the
U.S. Census Bureau publishes 2007 poverty data before the application
due date, the Department will consider U.S. Census Bureau poverty data
available for either 2005 or 2007 to be the most recent. Hence, if the
U.S. Census Bureau releases its poverty data for 2007 prior to the
closing date of this competition, we will consider an LEA to have the
requisite poverty needed to be a ``high-need LEA'' if the LEA had the
requisite level of poverty, based on the U.S. Census Bureau data, in
either 2005 or 2007. If the U.S. Census Bureau does not release the
2007 poverty data, we will rely on the U.S. Census Bureau's poverty
data for 2005.
As discussed in the NFP, with respect to component (b)(1) of the
definition of ``high-need LEA,'' whether an LEA has a ``high percentage
of teachers not teaching in the academic subjects or grade levels that
the teachers were trained to teach'' is determined on a case-by-case
basis.
In addition, as noted in the NFP, with respect to component (b)(2)
of the definition of ``high-need LEA,'' an LEA has a ``high
percentage'' of teachers with emergency, provisional, or temporary
certification or licensing if the percentage of teachers on waivers, as
the LEA reported to the State for purposes of the State's latest report
to the Secretary under section 207 of the Higher Education Act of 1965
(HEA), was at least the national average percentage of teachers on
waivers of State certification for all LEAs. As outlined in the NFP,
the Secretary determines the national average percentage of teachers on
waivers based on data contained in the most currently available HEA
section 207 State reports. At the time of publication of this notice,
the Department has received all 2007 State HEA section 207 reports and
those reports reflect a national percentage of teachers on waivers of
State certification in all LEAs of 1.5 percent.
Accordingly, an LEA will be considered to have met component (b)(2)
of the definition if the data that it provided to the State for
purposes of the State's October 2007 HEA section 207 report demonstrate
that at least 1.5 percent of its teachers were on waivers of State
certification requirements.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. In accordance with section 2313(h)(2) of
the ESEA, funds made available under this section shall be used to
supplement, and not supplant, State and local public funds expended for
teacher recruitment and retention programs, including programs to
recruit teachers through alternative routes to certification.
3. Other: The NFP describes eligibility restrictions for
individuals participating in this program.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs), P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Telephone, toll
free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (301) 470-1244. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call, toll free: 1-877-
576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: https://www.ed.gov/
pubs/edpubs.html or at its e-mail address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program or competition as follows: CFDA number 84.350A,
84.350B, or 84.350C.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or computer diskette) by contacting the program contact person or team
listed under Accessible Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Additional information concerning application content requirements is
in the NFP.
Notice of Intent to Apply: December 15, 2008. The Department will
be able to develop a more efficient process for reviewing grant
applications if it has a better understanding of the number of entities
that intend to apply for funding under this competition. Therefore, the
Secretary strongly encourages each potential applicant to notify the
Department by sending a short e-mail message indicating the applicant's
intent to submit an application for funding. The e-mail need not
include information regarding the content of the proposed application,
only the applicant's intent to submit it. The Secretary requests that
this e-mail notification be sent to Thelma Leenhouts at:
transitiontoteaching@ed.gov.
[[Page 67144]]
Applicants that fail to provide this e-mail notification may still
apply for funding.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application)
is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your application. You must limit the
application narrative Part III to the equivalent of no more than 50
pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, except titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font
(including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the
resumes, or letters of support. However, you must include all of the
application narrative in Part III.
Our reviewers will not read any pages of your application that
exceed the page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: November 13, 2008.
Deadline for Notice of Intent To Apply: December 15, 2008.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting: December 4, 2008, from 2:00 p.m.
to 4:00 p.m. in the LBJ Auditorium at the U.S. Department of Education
headquarters, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., in Washington, DC. The
Department is accessible by Metro on the Blue, Orange, Green, and
Yellow lines at the 7th Street and Maryland Avenue exit of the L'Enfant
Plaza Metro station. Please contact the U.S. Department of Education
contact persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you
have any questions about the details of the pre-application meeting.
Individuals interested in attending this pre-application meeting
are encouraged to pre-register by e-mailing their name, organization,
and contact information to transitiontoteaching@ed.gov. There is no
registration fee for this pre-application meeting. We encourage
attendance from those who will be responsible for submitting the
application or otherwise providing technical support for submitting the
application electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities at the Pre-Application
Meeting
The meeting site is accessible to individuals with disabilities,
and a sign language interpreter will be available. If you will need an
auxiliary aid or service other than a sign language interpreter in
order to participate in the meeting (e.g., other interpreting service
such as oral, cued speech, or tactile interpreter; assistive listening
device; or materials in alternate format), notify the contact person
listed in this notice at least two weeks before the scheduled meeting
date. Although we will attempt to meet a request we receive after this
date, we may not be able to make available the requested auxiliary aid
or service because of insufficient time to arrange it.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: January 21, 2009.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV.6. Other Submission
Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
in this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: March 23, 2009.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice and
in the NFP.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this competition must be submitted electronically unless you qualify
for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the
instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications. Applications for grants
under the Transition to Teaching Competition, CFDA number 84.350A,
84.350B, and 84.350C must be submitted electronically using the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at https://www.Grants.gov. Through
this site, you will be able to download a copy of the application
package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your
application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for Transition to
Teaching at https://www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable
application package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not
include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for
84.350, not 84.350A).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted, and
must be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
Except as otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your
application if it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the
Grants.gov
[[Page 67145]]
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at https://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
To submit your application via Grants.gov, you must
complete all steps in the Grants.gov registration process (see https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp). These steps include (1)
Registering your organization, a multi-part process that includes
registration with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR); (2)
registering yourself as an Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (3) getting authorized as an AOR by your organization.
Details on these steps are outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see https://www.grants.gov/section910/
Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf). You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number used with this registration. Please
note that the registration process may take five or more business days
to complete, and you must have completed all registration steps to
allow you to submit successfully an application via Grants.gov. In
addition you will need to update your CCR registration on an annual
basis. This may take three or more business days to complete.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms:
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications. Please note that two of these forms--the SF 424 and the
Department of Education Supplemental Information for SF 424--have
replaced the ED 424 (Application for Federal Education Assistance).
You must attach any narrative sections of your application
as files in a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF (Portable
Document) format. If you upload a file type other than the three file
types specified in this paragraph or submit a password-protected file,
we will not review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by e-mail. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Thelma Leenhouts, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 4W302,
Washington, DC 20202-5960. FAX: (202) 401-8466.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail. If you qualify for an
exception
[[Page 67146]]
to the electronic submission requirement, you may mail (through the
U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier) your application to the
Department. You must mail the original and two copies of your
application, on or before the application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.350A, 84.350B, or 84.350C), LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery. If you
qualify for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your paper application to the
Department by hand. You must deliver the original and two copies of
your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.350A, 84.350B, or 84.350C), 550 12th Street,
SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from the statute for this program and Sec. 75.210 of EDGAR and are
listed in this section. The maximum score for all the selection
criteria is 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is
indicated in parentheses. Each criterion also includes the factors that
the reviewers will consider in determining how well an application
meets the criterion. In addressing each criterion, applicants are
encouraged to make explicit connections to relevant aspects of
responses to other selection criteria.
The Notes we have included after each criterion are guidance to
assist applicants in understanding the criterion as they prepare their
applications and are not required by statute or regulation.
A. Quality of the Project Design (35 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the project design for the
proposed project by considering how well the applicant describes a
plan--
(1) To recruit and retain highly qualified mid-career professionals
(including highly qualified paraprofessionals) and recent graduates of
an IHE as teachers in high-need schools operated by high-need LEAs; and
(2) To enable individuals to become eligible for teacher
certification under State-approved alternative routes to certification
programs within a reduced period of time, relying on such factors as
experience, expertise, and academic qualifications in lieu of
traditional course-work in education.
In considering the quality of the project design and the
applicant's plan, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(b) The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice.
(c) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs.
(d) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of
Federal financial assistance.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants to address this
criterion by discussing the overall project design and its key
components, and the degree to which the design's key components are
based on sound research and practice. Applicants are also encouraged
to address this criterion by connecting the project design to the
needs of the partner districts and identifying the specific teacher-
shortage areas faced by the participating high-need LEAs on which
their proposed project would focus. Applicants should understand
that a project's strategy for helping participating high-need LEAs
to identify and hire highly qualified individuals to fill teaching
positions in high-need subjects may rely on existing alternative
routes to certification, the expansion of alternative routes to
certification into new areas, or the creation of wholly new
alternative routes.
Additionally, applicants are encouraged to address such key
components of project design as:
(1) Recruitment and selection, including identifying the target
group(s) on which the program will focus and why and how the project is
designed to rigorously select participants with the requisite content
knowledge, skills, and commitment to teach in high-need schools in
high-need LEAs. Recruitment may include members of groups that are
traditionally underrepresented.
(2) Preparation, including how the project provides a route to
certification that is accelerated, integrates coursework and field
experience, is adapted to participants' learning needs, and will yield
highly qualified teachers who are prepared to teach in high-need
schools in high-need LEAs.
(3) Teacher placement, including evidence that the proposed project
will meet the needs of high-need LEAs and is developed in coordination
with appropriate partners, and that the project includes a system of
tracking to meet statutory requirements.
(4) Support services, including mentoring, that are designed to
retain participants and meet their needs in terms of length, content,
and means of delivery in order to be successful in high-need schools in
high-need LEAs.
(5) Certification, including consideration of how the timeline for
achieving certification will meet the needs of participants, LEAs, and
partners, as well as the ``Highly Qualified Teacher'' requirements
established in section 9101(23) of the ESEA.
[[Page 67147]]
In addition, applicants are encouraged to clarify the means by
which the project's specified outcomes and benefits may be sustained
once Federal funding has ended.
B. Quality of the Project Evaluation (25 points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the evaluation to be conducted,
the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible.
(2) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants to address this
criterion by including benchmarks to monitor progress toward
specific and measurable program and project objectives, as well as
performance measures to assess the impact on teaching and learning
or other important outcomes for project participants. The Secretary
encourages applicants to consider the use of a logic model in
determining intended short-term, intermediate, and long-term
outcomes. (The specific performance measures established for the
overall Transition to Teaching program are discussed under
Performance Measures in section VI of this notice. Section 2314 of
the ESEA also requires grantees to submit both an interim evaluation
of the first three years of the grant and a final evaluation at the
end of the grant.)
With respect to the implementation of the project and monitoring
progress toward achieving project objectives, applicants are encouraged
to describe the following: (1) What types of data will be collected;
(2) when various types of data will be collected; (3) what methods will
be used; (4) what instruments will be developed and when; (5) how the
data will be analyzed; (6) when reports of results and outcomes will be
available; and (7) how the applicant will use the information collected
through the evaluation to monitor progress and improve implementation
of the funded project and to provide accountability information about
project success. Applicants are encouraged to design an evaluation that
provides data for annual as well as midpoint and final reporting.
Applicants are encouraged to devote an appropriate level of resources
to project evaluation.
Finally, the Secretary encourages applicants to identify the
individual or organization that has agreed to serve as the objective
evaluator for the project and describe the qualifications of that
evaluator.
C. Quality of Project Services (20 points).
In determining the quality of the services to be provided by the
proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project are appropriate to the needs of the intended recipients or
beneficiaries of those services.
(2) The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient
quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice
among the recipients of those services.
(3) The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are likely to alleviate
the personnel shortages that have been identified or are the focus of
the proposed project.
(4) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for
maximizing the effectiveness of project services.
Note: The Secretary encourages applicants to address this
criterion by discussing how the proposed project services will meet
the needs of both the high-need LEAs identified in the application
and the project participants they would recruit to become teachers.
Applicants are encouraged to consult the list of authorized
activities in section 2313(g) of the ESEA in describing the specific
services to be delivered to recruit, prepare, and retain
participants that will increase the number of highly qualified
teachers in high-need schools in high-need LEAs. In addition, the
Secretary encourages applicants to consider carefully the breadth of
activities that section 2313(g) of the ESEA authorizes and then to
address how the project will:
(1) Provide preparation that meets the learning needs of the
participants and makes use of appropriate media (such as face-to-face
instruction, Web-based instruction, and distance learning) to provide
them with the knowledge and skills needed to be highly qualified and
effective teachers in the identified high-need subject areas and high-
need schools in high-need LEAs.
(2) Support project participants' success in high-need schools in
high-need LEAs during the period of their service obligation, through
individual mentoring, support of participants as a group, use of
technology, or other appropriate means.
(3) Encourage the participation of all project partners, including
school leaders, in providing services related to the recruitment,
preparation, and retention of project participants and ensuring lasting
benefits or outcomes. Applicants are encouraged to clarify the roles of
partners in each phase of the project and the extent of coordination
that will occur with similar efforts at the State and district levels.
In addition, applicants are encouraged to consider how they might
demonstrate (e.g., through narrative discussion, letters of support, or
formal memoranda of understanding) the commitment of partners to the
project, and the partners' understanding of responsibilities they have
agreed to assume in service delivery.
Applicants are encouraged to link their description of project
services to be provided by the project to the overall project design
described in the Quality of Project Design criterion.
D. Quality of the Management Plan (20 points).
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
(2) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
(3) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project.
Note: Section 75.112 of EDGAR requires an applicant for a multi-
year grant to include a narrative that describes how and when, in
each budget period of the project, the applicant plans to meet each
project objective. The Secretary encourages applicants to address
this criterion by including in this narrative a clear, well thought-
out implementation plan that includes annual timelines, key project
milestones, and a schedule of activities with sufficient time for
developing an adequate implementation plan, as well as specific
timelines for providing project participants the direct support they
need in their initial year(s) as teachers.
Applicants are encouraged to provide timelines that include
benchmarks for determining whether the project is achieving its stated
goals and objectives, with strategies for monitoring progress as well
as making mid-project corrections and adjustments, as
[[Page 67148]]
appropriate. In addition, the Secretary encourages applicants to
further address this criterion by providing specific information, such
as name, title, responsibilities, and time commitment of each key
individual working to implement the project's goals and objectives.
2. Review and Selection Process: Additional factors we consider in
selecting an application for an award are in the NFP.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notice
(GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: The Secretary requires successful applicants to
submit annual performance reports and, after the last year of the
project, a final report. The annual performance report documents the
grantee's yearly progress toward meeting expected programmatic and
project specific outcomes. These outcomes must be based on measurable
performance objectives including, but not limited to, the performance
measures described in paragraph 4 of this section. These reports must
evaluate--
(1) The grantee's progress in meeting the application's objectives;
(2) The project's effectiveness in meeting the purposes of the
Transition to Teaching program; and
(3) The project's effect on the specific LEAs the project serves.
Among other things, the Department uses the annual performance
reports to determine whether a grantee has demonstrated substantial
progress in meeting the goals and objectives (as described in its
approved application), and thereby merits a continuation award (for
years 2-5). See Sec. 75.118 of EDGAR.
Grantees also will be required to submit a final performance
report, due no later than 90 days after the end of the project period.
In addition, section 2314 of the ESEA requires grantees to submit
to the Department and to the Congress interim and final evaluations at
the end of the third and fifth years of the grant period, respectively.
These evaluations must describe the extent to which high-need LEAs that
received funds through the grant have met their goals relating to
teacher recruitment and retention as described in the project
application. Additional requirements pertaining to these reports are in
the NFP.
For specific requirements on reporting, please go to https://
www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The Secretary has established one
performance indicator for assessing the effectiveness of the Transition
to Teaching program: the percentage of new, highly qualified Transition
to Teaching teachers who teach in high-need schools in high-need LEAs
for at least three years. We will track this indicator through the use
of the following three performance measures. We will gather the data
for these measures from the grantees.
Measure One: The percentage of all Transition to Teaching
participants who become teachers of record in high-need schools in
high-need LEAs. For this measure we will collect data on the number of
participants and the number of teachers of record in high-need schools
in high-need LEAs.
Measure Two: The percentage of Transition to Teaching participants
receiving certification/licensure within three years. For this measure,
we will collect data on the number of participants who become certified
within three years.
Measure Three: The percentage of Transition to Teaching teachers of
record who teach in high-need schools in high-need LEAs for at least
three years. For this measure, we will collect data on the number of
participants who become teachers of record who have been teaching in
high-need schools in high-need LEAs for at least three years.
VII. Agency Contacts
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thelma Leenhouts, Patricia Barrett,
Beatriz Ceja, Anthony Sepulveda, or Salimah Shabazz, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 4W320, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 260-0223 (Thelma Leenhouts), (202) 260-7350 (Patricia
Barrett), (202) 205-5009 (Beatriz Ceja), (202) 260-0464 (Anthony
Sepulveda), or (202) 260-2434 (Salimah Shabazz), or by e-mail:
transitiontoteaching@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
Douglas B. Mesecar,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E8-26870 Filed 11-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P