Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia; Interstate Movement and Import Restrictions on Certain Live Fish, 52173-52189 [E8-20852]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Colorado Area No. 3 potato industry and
all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May 8,
2008, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Colorado Area
No. 3 potato handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on July 25, 2008 (73 FR 43375).
Copies of the proposed rule were also
mailed or sent via facsimile to all
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 15-day comment period
ending August 11, 2008, was provided
for interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any
questions about the compliance guide
should be sent to Jay Guerber at the
previously mentioned address in the
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2008–2009 fiscal
period began on July 1, 2008, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal period apply
to all assessable potatoes handled
during such fiscal period; (2) the
northern Colorado potato shipping
season began in July; (3) the Committee
needs to have sufficient funds to pay for
expenses which are incurred on a
continuous basis; and (4) handlers are
aware of this action which was
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years. Also, a 15-day comment period
was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is amended as
follows:
PART 948—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN COLORADO
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 948 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In Part 948, the suspension of
§ 948.215 is lifted.
I
Dated: September 4, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–20853 Filed 9–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Parts 71, 83, and 93
[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0038]
RIN 0579–AC74
Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia;
Interstate Movement and Import
Restrictions on Certain Live Fish
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are establishing
regulations to restrict the interstate
movement and importation into the
United States of live fish that are
susceptible to viral hemorrhagic
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52173
septicemia, a highly contagious disease
of certain fresh and saltwater fish. In
2005 and 2006, viral hemorrhagic
septicemia was detected in freshwater
fish in several of the Great Lakes and
related tributaries. The disease has been
responsible for several large-scale dieoffs of wild fish in the Great Lakes
region. This action is necessary to
prevent further introductions into, and
dissemination within, the United States
of viral hemorrhagic septicemia.
Effective date: This interim rule
is effective November 10, 2008.
Comment dates: Comments on the
interim rule are due on or before
November 10, 2008. Comments on the
environmental assessment are due on or
before October 9, 2008.
DATES:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2007-0038 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2007–0038,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2007–0038.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
ADDRESSES:
Dr.
P. Gary Egrie, Senior Staff Veterinary
Medical Officer, National Center for
Animal Health Programs, VS, APHIS,
4700 River Road Unit 46, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231; (301) 734–0695; or Dr.
Peter L. Merrill, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Center for Import
and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 734–8364.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52174
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Background
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS) is
a highly contagious disease of certain
fresh and saltwater fish, caused by a
rhabdovirus. It is listed as a notifiable
disease by the World Organization for
Animal Health (OIE). The pathogen
produces variable clinical signs in fish
including lethargy, skin darkening,
exophthalmia, pale gills, a distended
abdomen, and external and internal
hemorrhaging. The development of the
disease in infected fish can result in
substantial mortality. Other infected fish
may not show any clinical signs or die,
but may be lifelong carriers and shed
the virus.
Four genotypes of VHS virus have
been identified, and appear to be
distributed geographically. Genotypes I,
II, and III are mainly found in Europe or
Asia and are highly pathogenic to
rainbow trout. The fourth genotype,
referred to as North American type IV,
has been found in wild fish from the
East and West coasts of North America
periodically since 1988. This genotype
is less virulent to commercially
important fish stocks than the
European/Asian VHS virus genotypes
because it results in less morbidity and
mortality than those genotypes.
In 2005 and 2006, VHS outbreaks
were reported in wild fish from the
Great Lakes in both Canada and the
United States. The mortality associated
with numerous individual outbreaks
ranged from just a few fish to many
thousands per outbreak.
The 2005 and 2006 VHS outbreaks
were the first freshwater isolations of
VHS virus in the United States. The
strain of VHS virus isolated from all of
these outbreaks, while similar to North
American type IV found in saltwater,
has been shown to be genetically
distinct from other known strains of
VHS virus, and is apparently capable of
causing substantial morbidity and
mortality in many native species of fish.
It is currently believed that the
saltwater-adapted type IV strain
mutated into a strain that is affecting
new host fish species in new
environments in both Canada and the
United States. The extent of VHS viral
distribution is not yet known; however,
reported epizootics attributable to VHS
since 2005 have been limited to wild
fish from the Great Lakes watershed.
The emerging strain (tentatively
called North American type IV(b) to
differentiate it from what will likely be
renamed type IV(a)) has caused a
number of mass mortalities in wild fish
populations, ranging up to many
thousands of fish. Some outbreaks were
reported to occur at temperatures that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
had not been previously associated with
the development of VHS disease. Virus
growth is generally inhibited when
water temperatures are above 15 °C;
however, this VHS virus appears to have
a much wider temperature range.
According to research conducted at the
U.S. Geological Survey, type IV(b), in
vitro, grows best at 15 °C and up to 20
°C where growth begins to decline. Type
IV(b) viral growth was inhibited at 25
°C. Additionally, all the species of fish
in the 2005 and 2006 North American
outbreaks had not previously been
known to be susceptible to VHS
infection and/or disease. The list of fish
species susceptible to VHS, as
determined by the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS),
currently includes 28 separate species.
These species include baitfish,
recreationally important fish, and food
fish such as salmonids and catfish.
Federal Order
The Animal Health Protection Act
(AHPA) authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture to prohibit or restrict the
importation or movement in interstate
commerce of any animal, article, or
means of conveyance if the Secretary
determines that the prohibition or
restriction is necessary to prevent the
introduction or dissemination of any
pest or disease of livestock into or
within the United States.
In response to recent outbreaks of
VHS in wild fish populations in the
Great Lakes, the Administrator
determined that it was necessary, in
order to prevent the spread of VHS into
aquaculture facilities, to prohibit or
restrict the interstate movement and
importation of VHS-regulated species of
live fish. Accordingly, on October 24,
2006, APHIS issued a Federal Order
prohibiting the importation of VHSsusceptible species of live fish from two
Canadian provinces (Ontario and
Quebec) into the United States and the
interstate movement of the same species
of live fish from the eight States
bordering the Great Lakes (Illinois,
Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New
York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and
Wisconsin).
At the time the Federal Order was
issued, only three States (Michigan,
New York, and Ohio) had been affected
by VHS within the jurisdictional
borders of their States. Epidemiologic
considerations such as the commonality
of the Great Lakes watershed influenced
APHIS’ decision to include all of the
States within the Great Lakes watershed
as ‘‘affected’’ or ‘‘at-risk.’’
In October 2006, APHIS held a 2-day
meeting with Federal, State, Tribal, and
industry representatives to discuss VHS
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the Federal Order, and to obtain
information regarding State regulations
and diagnostic testing programs related
to VHS. During this meeting, APHIS
received several recommendations from
participants regarding modifications to
the Federal Order that could be made to
alleviate impacts on industry and
related businesses in the Great Lakes
region while still protecting against the
spread of VHS.
APHIS also met with the Department
of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)
and the Canadian Food Inspection
Agency (CFIA) in November 2006. At
that time, Canada provided APHIS with
information about its VHS testing
program and requested that APHIS
amend the Federal Order to allow the
importation of fish that Canada certifies
as VHS-free.
Based on the information gathered at
these meetings, on November 14, 2006,
APHIS modified the Federal Order to
allow VHS-susceptible species of live
salmonid fish from the affected
Canadian provinces to be imported into
the United States if the shipment meets
the regulations of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) in 50 CFR
16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b). The FWS
regulations in 50 CFR 16.13(a)(3)
provide that live or dead uneviscerated
salmonid fish are prohibited entry into
the United States for any purpose except
by direct shipment accompanied by a
certification that: (1) The fish lots from
which the shipments originated have
been sampled; (2) viral assays have been
conducted on the samples according to
methods specified in the regulations;
and (3) certain pathogens, including the
virus causing VHS, have not been
detected in the fish stocks from which
the samples were taken. The FWS
regulations further provide that live
salmonid fish can be imported into the
United States only with the written
approval of the Director of FWS. The
regulations in 50 CFR 16.13(b) set out
the information that must be included
in the certification statement required in
§ 16.13(a)(3).
The modified Federal Order also
established conditions under which
VHS-susceptible species of live fish
could be moved from the eight States
bordering the Great Lakes. Specifically,
the Order provided that VHSsusceptible live fish may be moved
interstate for slaughter if the fish are: (1)
Intended for human consumption; (2)
transported to a State-inspected
slaughter facility that discharges waste
water into a municipal sewage system
that includes waste water disinfection,
or disposes of waste water in a nondischarging settling pond or a settling
pond that disinfects according to State
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
and Federal requirements, and renders
or composts offal, including carcasses;
and (3) accompanied by a valid VS
Form 1–27 issued by an APHIS area
office if not tested for VHS.
The Order also provided that VHSsusceptible fish may be moved interstate
to research and diagnostic laboratories
provided the fish are: (1) Accompanied
by a valid VS Form 1–27 issued by an
APHIS area office stating that the fish
are destined for a research or diagnostic
laboratory that has been approved by a
State, Tribal, or Federal competent
authority for aquatic animal health and
(2) received at a laboratory where waste
fluids and carcasses are considered
medical waste and disposed of
according to State and Federal
requirements. Finally, the Order
provided that VHS-susceptible fish may
be moved interstate for purposes other
than slaughter, research, or diagnostics
provided the fish are transported with
documentation from the appropriate
State, Tribal, or Federal competent
authority for aquatic animal health
stating that the fish have tested negative
for VHS virus under specific national
and international standards.
In January 2007, APHIS hosted public
meetings in Lakewood, CO; Memphis,
TN; Romulus, MI; and Coraopolis, PA.
The purpose of the meetings was to
present current information about the
outbreaks of VHS and actions taken to
prevent its spread, and to give interested
stakeholders an opportunity to present
data and views concerning the possible
regulation of VHS by the Agency.
On May 4, 2007, APHIS modified the
Federal Order to allow for the catchand-release of VHS-susceptible
regulated fish in waters that cross State
and international boundaries. These
activities include recreational fishing,
tournaments, competitions, fishing
derbies, or other types of contests where
individuals catch, compare, and release
live VHS-susceptible fish. However,
catch-and-release fishing activities do
not include the movement of VHSsusceptible fish intended to be used as
live bait. Catch and release fishing
activities are considered low risk for
spreading VHS virus because fish are
caught and released within the same
body of water and within a limited
geographic area over a limited time
period. In contrast, the use of live bait
is considered high risk for spreading
VHS virus because the bait is used for
fishing in multiple bodies of water over
a broader geographic area.
On November 8, 2007, APHIS
modified the Federal Order by revising
the list of VHS-susceptible species. We
removed 12 species and added 2 new
freshwater fish species that are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
susceptible to VHS. We also clarified
the scientific names of several species.
Currently, there are 28 separate species
of fish listed.
The original October 2006 Federal
Order listed 37 species of VHSsusceptible fish, including all species
listed by the OIE as susceptible to all
known strains of VHS. The updated list
includes only those species found in
freshwater environments in the United
States and Canada that have been
infected by VHS under natural (i.e.,
nonexperimental) conditions of
exposure and from which VHS virus has
been isolated by cell culture, with
confirmation of strain identity through
molecular detection. Anadromous fish
species 1 that have migrated into
freshwater and from which VHS strain
type IV(a) is isolated are excluded.
Finally, on April 2, 2008, APHIS
modified the Federal Order to allow
VHS-susceptible species of live nonsalmonid fish from affected Canadian
provinces to be imported into the
United States for direct slaughter if
accompanied by an APHIS permit.
The Federal Order was issued in
response to the rapid spread of VHS in
the Great Lakes region and was designed
to prevent the introduction of VHS into
aquaculture facilities by controlling the
movement of VHS-susceptible fish
species while APHIS gathered more
information about the disease and
developed a regulatory program that
would allow the interstate movement
and importation of VHS-susceptible fish
under certain conditions. Taking into
consideration the information provided
by States, Tribes, and other interested
stakeholders, APHIS has now developed
a regulatory framework for the interstate
movement and importation of VHSsusceptible fish species.
In the Federal Order, we used the
terms ‘‘VHS-susceptible species’’ and
‘‘VHS-affected or at-risk States or
regions;’’ however, for the purposes of
these regulations we will use the terms
‘‘VHS-regulated species’’ and ‘‘VHSregulated areas or regions.’’
Accordingly, we are amending the
interstate movement regulations in title
9, subchapter C, by adding a new part
83, ‘‘Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia’’
(§§ 83.1 through 83.7). We are also
amending 9 CFR part 71 to provide that
fish affected with VHS may be moved
interstate in accordance with part 83.
Finally, we are amending the animal
import regulations in 9 CFR part 93,
subpart I, ‘‘Aquatic Animal Species’’
(§§ 93.900 through 93.916). The new
1 We define anadromous fish as fish that are born
and spawn in freshwater, but which spend part of
their lifecycle in saltwater.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52175
interstate movement and importation
requirements are discussed in detail
below.
As stated previously in this
document, the AHPA authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to prohibit or
restrict the importation or movement in
interstate commerce of any animal,
article, or means of conveyance if the
Secretary determines that the
prohibition or restriction is necessary to
prevent the introduction or
dissemination of any pest or disease of
livestock into or within the United
States. Ballast water (i.e., water with its
suspended matter taken on board a ship
to control trim, list, draught, stability, or
stresses of a ship) can be taken onto a
ship in its port of origin and discharged
into the water body of the ship’s
destination port, making it a potential
pathway for VHS virus. APHIS has
neither the regulatory authority nor the
technical expertise to safely regulate
ballast water discharge. Therefore, we
do not address ballast water in this
interim rule. APHIS will assist the U.S.
Coast Guard, which has clear regulatory
authority for ballast water, in their
development of ballast water discharge
standards.
Definitions (§§ 83.1 and 93.900)
In §§ 83.1 and 93.900, we define the
terms used in the regulations. In § 83.1,
we set out the following standard terms
and definitions, which are found
throughout title 9, subchapter C:
Accredited veterinarian, Administrator,
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), APHIS representative,
Department, interstate, moved
(movement), person, State, and State
animal health official. These terms and
their definitions are set out in the
regulatory text at the end of this
document.
In both §§ 83.1 and 93.900, we define
terms that are specific to VHS and
aquatic animals. These terms are
anadromous fish, catch-and-release
fishing, cultured fish, secure water
source, VHS virus, and viral
hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS). These
terms are defined as follows:
Anadromous fish. Fish that are born
and spawn in freshwater, but which
spend part of their lifecycle in saltwater.
Catch-and-release fishing. Fishing for
pleasure or for recreational purposes,
including tournaments, organized
fishing competitions, fishing derbies, or
other types of contests where
individuals catch, compare, and release
live VHS-regulated fish. This term
excludes VHS-regulated fish used, or
intended to be used, as live bait.
Cultured fish. Fish of the same species
and age class, originating from the same
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
52176
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
broodstock and on the same water
supply, whose care is partly or totally
managed from the first life stage
onwards.
Secure water source. A biosecure
water supply that does not contain
pathogens or has not had the
opportunity to be contaminated with
pathogens. Biosecure water supplies
include well, spring, or borehole water;
surface water that does not contain fish
populations; or water that has been
treated to eliminate aquatic animal
pathogens.
VHS virus. Any North American (type
IV) strain of VHS virus, a rhabdovirus of
fish.
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS).
A disease caused by infection with VHS
virus.
Due to slight differences in
terminology and program requirements,
some VHS-specific terms are defined
differently in §§ 83.1 and 93.900. These
terms are approved laboratory,
competent authority, VHS-regulated
area, VHS-regulated region, and VHSregulated fish.
In § 83.1, approved laboratory is
defined as a laboratory authorized by a
State, Tribal, or Federal competent
authority for aquatic animal health to
perform assays for the detection of VHS
virus while, in § 93.900, approved
laboratory is defined as a laboratory
authorized by the competent authority
of a country for aquatic animal health to
perform assays for the detection of VHS
virus.
In § 83.1, we define competent
authority as the State, Tribal, or Federal
entity with the legal responsibility for
ensuring or supervising the
implementation of aquatic animal
health measures. This definition is
similar to the current definition for
competent authority in § 93.900, which
refers to the national veterinary services
or other authority of a country
responsible for aquatic animal health.
In § 83.1, VHS-regulated area is
defined as any State or portion of a State
listed in accordance with § 83.4. Section
93.900 defines VHS-regulated region as
any region listed in accordance with
§ 93.910.
In § 83.1, we define VHS-regulated
fish as any fish species listed in
accordance with § 83.4 while, in
§ 93.900, we define VHS-regulated fish
as any fish species listed in accordance
with § 93.910.
Finally, in § 83.1, we define the term
Interstate Certificate of Inspection (ICI).
This term is specific to the interstate
movement requirements in part 83 and
is defined as an official document
issued by an accredited veterinarian or
a State, Tribal, or Federal competent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
authority in the originating State that
certifies that the fish being moved
interstate originated from a facility that
has been found free of VHS virus.
Interstate Movement
General Restrictions; Conditions of
Movement (§§ 83.2 and 83.3)
Section 83.2 provides that live VHSregulated fish may not be moved
interstate from a VHS-regulated area
except in compliance with part 83.
Section 83.3 sets forth the conditions
under which live VHS-regulated fish
may be moved interstate.
Paragraph (a) of § 83.3 provides that,
apart from the exceptions provided in
paragraphs (b) through (e) of that
section, live VHS-regulated fish,
including fish moved to live fish
markets, may only be moved interstate
from a VHS-regulated area if the fish
originated from a facility that has been
found free of the VHS virus in
accordance with § 83.6 and the fish are
accompanied by an Interstate Certificate
of Inspection (ICI) issued by an
accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
for aquatic animal health.
Paragraph (b) of § 83.3 provides that
live VHS-regulated fish may be moved
interstate directly to a slaughtering
establishment provided the fish are
transported in a sealed conveyance and
accompanied by a VS Form 1–27. The
VS Form 1–27 is available through
APHIS’ Veterinary Services offices, and
can be issued by a State, Tribal, Federal,
or accredited veterinarian. The fish
must be moved to a slaughtering
establishment that discharges its waste
water to a municipal sewage system that
includes waste water disinfection
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus,
or to either a non-discharging settling
pond or a settling pond that disinfects,
according to all applicable local, State,
and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus. In addition,
any water used to transport the fish
must be disposed of to a municipal
sewage system that includes waste
water disinfection sufficient to
neutralize any VHS virus, or to either a
non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects, according
to all applicable local, State, and
Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus. These
requirements are necessary to ensure
that water waste discharged to the
environment (or to a public waterway)
does not contain any viable VHS virus.
Offal, including carcasses, from the
slaughtering establishment must be
either rendered or composted.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Paragraph (c) of this section extends
these same provisions to fish moved for
research or diagnostic purposes.
Paragraph (d) specifies that live VHSregulated fish may be moved interstate
during catch-and-release fishing.
Finally, paragraph (e) provides that
the Administrator may, on a case-bycase basis, permit the interstate
movement of fish whose movement is
not otherwise provided for in part 83,
under such conditions as the
Administrator may prescribe in each
case to prevent the introduction and
dissemination of VHS.
VHS-Regulated Fish and VHS-Regulated
Areas (§ 83.4)
Paragraph (a) of § 83.4 provides that
APHIS will list as a VHS-regulated fish
any fish species found in freshwater to
be susceptible to the North American
(type IV) strain of VHS virus under
natural (i.e., non-controlled) conditions
of exposure and from which VHS virus
has been isolated in cell culture or other
assay determined by the Administrator
to be adequate to detect VHS virus, with
confirmation of strain identity through
genetic sequencing. Anadromous fish
that have migrated into freshwater and
from which VHS strain type IV(a) has
been isolated will not be considered
VHS-regulated fish under this rule
because this strain appears to be less
pathogenic than type IV(b). Type IV(a)
has been in the United States since at
least 1988 and has not resulted in largescale fish mortalities across a broad
range of species such as those that were
associated with the outbreaks of type
IV(b) in the Great Lakes.
Paragraph (a) further provides that,
when APHIS determines that a species
meets the criteria of this paragraph and
should be added to the list of VHSregulated fish, APHIS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing that determination.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides
that APHIS will list as a VHS-regulated
area each State or portion of a State from
which VHS virus has been detected in
any VHS-regulated fish species (with or
without clinical signs of disease) in a
water source that is not a secure water
source, or which the Administrator
determines to be at risk of having VHS
based on criteria such as inadequate
surveillance or movement requirements,
or other epidemiologic information.
Paragraph (b) further provides that, if
the Administrator determines that a
State or portion of a State meets the
criteria for a VHS-regulated area, APHIS
will publish a notice of its decision in
the Federal Register and take comments
from the public. The designation as a
VHS-regulated area will become
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
effective upon publication of this notice.
After reviewing the comments, APHIS
will issue a second notice in the Federal
Register announcing its decision on
whether or not the designation as a
VHS-regulated area will remain in
effect.
Paragraph (c) provides that these lists
of VHS-regulated fish and VHSregulated areas will be maintained on
the APHIS aquaculture Web site at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
animal_health/animal_dis_spec/
aquaculture. The purpose of
maintaining the lists on the Web site is
to maintain the most accurate, up-todate list possible in a location where
affected parties can easily view recent
changes. The Web site list should be
particularly useful when a new area is
added to the list, which occurs
immediately after APHIS receives and
confirms reports of a new outbreak.
Changes to lists maintained in the
regulations typically take several weeks,
so maintaining the lists on the Web site
will allow APHIS to communicate new
developments and take prompt action as
soon as it confirms an outbreak or
identifies a new species of fish affected
by VHS.
Paragraph (c) also includes an address
from which the lists of VHS-regulated
fish and VHS-regulated areas may be
obtained from APHIS.
As of this rule’s effective date, the
following fish species and areas are
regulated because of VHS:
VHS-Regulated Areas
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
VHS-REGULATED FISH SPECIES
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Black crappie ......
Bluegill ................
Bluntnose minnow.
Brown bullhead ..
Brown trout .........
Burbot .................
Channel catfish ..
Chinook salmon
Emerald shiner ...
Freshwater drum
Gizzard shad ......
Lake whitefish ....
Largemouth bass
Muskellunge .......
Northern pike ......
Pumpkinseed ......
Rainbow trout .....
Rock bass ..........
Round goby ........
Shorthead
redhorse.
Silver redhorse ...
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Pomoxis nigromaculatus.
Lepomis macrochirus.
Pimephales notatus.
Ameiurus nebulosus.
Salmo trutta.
Lota lota.
Ictalurus punctatus.
Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha.
Notropis atherinoides.
Aplodinotus grunniens.
Dorosoma cepedianum.
Coregonus clupeaformis.
Micropterus salmoides.
Esox masquinongy.
Esox lucius.
Lepomis gibbosus.
Oncorhynchus mykiss.
Ambloplites rupestris.
Neogobius
melanostomus.
Moxostoma
macrolepidotum.
Moxostoma anisurum.
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
VHS-REGULATED FISH SPECIES—
Continued
Smallmouth bass
Spottail shiner ....
Trout-Perch ........
Walleye ...............
White bass .........
White perch ........
Yellow perch .......
Micropterus dolomieu.
Notropis hudsonius.
Percopsis omiscomaycus.
Sander vitreus.
Morone chrysops.
Morone americana.
Perca flavescens.
This interim rule does not provide a
process by which APHIS will remove
areas from the list of VHS-regulated
areas if the area petitions APHIS for a
reassessment of its disease status. As
discussed in more detail below under
the heading ‘‘Related Issues on Which
APHIS is Seeking Comment,’’ we
particularly invite comments on which
specific factors APHIS should consider
before removing an area from the list of
VHS-regulated areas.
Interstate Certificate of Inspection (ICI)
(§ 83.5)
Paragraph (a) of § 83.5 requires that
live VHS-regulated fish moved interstate
in accordance with § 83.3(a) be
accompanied by an ICI issued by an
accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
for aquatic animal health. This
paragraph further provides that an ICI
will be valid for 30 days from the date
of issuance.
Paragraph (b) of this section requires
that the ICI state that: (1) The live fish
were inspected by the accredited
veterinarian or a State, Tribal, or Federal
competent authority for aquatic animal
health within 72 hours prior to
shipment and found to be free of any
clinical signs of disease consistent with
VHS, and (2) the live fish covered by the
ICI originated in an area or facility that
has demonstrated freedom from VHS in
accordance with § 83.6.
In addition, the section specifies that
the ICI must contain the following
information:
• The name, address, and phone
number of the owner or owner’s agent.
• The name, address, and phone
number of the facility in which the fish
originated.
• The name, address, and phone
number of the person or facility who
will receive the fish; or the State or
other regulatory authority responsible
for oversight of the environment in
which the fish will be introduced.
• The name, address, and phone
number of the shipping or
transportation company.
• The species and number of the fish.
• The lot (or other) identification of
the shipment.
• The name, address, and phone
number of the approved laboratory that
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52177
performed the testing required by § 83.6
and the number of fish tested, the
assay(s) used for testing, and the test
results.
• The date the certificate was issued.
• The type of water source according
to § 83.6(c).
Requiring the issuance of an ICI will
ensure that appropriate testing
procedures were applied as well as
allow for traceback should an inspector
encounter a problem with or have
questions about a shipment.
Testing Requirements (§ 83.6)
Paragraph (a) of § 83.6 provides that a
facility can demonstrate freedom from
VHS through negative testing results
provided by an approved laboratory.
Paragraph (a) also specifies that such
testing must:
• Be conducted with a testing sample
size that provides for a 95 percent
confidence level of detecting a 2 percent
prevalence of infection in the facility.
• Include virus isolation or other
assay authorized by the Administrator,
using appropriate cell lines to detect
VHS virus, if present. All suspect VHS
cytopathic effects must be positively
identified as VHS through molecular
assays and/or genetic sequencing.
• Use proportional numbers of each
VHS-regulated fish species which might
be present in the facility.
• Be conducted at water temperatures
between 50 and 72 °F, or at other times
or under environmental conditions
when VHS is most likely to be detected,
if present.
Facilities with a history of negative
testing results for VHS are assumed to
have a lower risk of spreading VHS;
therefore, we will decrease the number
of fish required to be tested for such
facilities. Specifically, paragraph (a)(1)
of § 83.6 also provides that facilities
with cultured fish of VHS-regulated
species which can document a 2-year
history of negative testing for VHS virus
can conduct testing at a sampling level
to provide for a 95 percent confidence
level of detecting a 5 percent prevalence
of infection in the facility. Facilities
with cultured fish of VHS-regulated
species which can document a 4-year
history of negative testing for VHS virus
can conduct testing at a sampling level
to provide a 95 percent confidence level
of detecting a 10 percent prevalence of
infection in the fish facility. Such
facilities must be on a secure water
source, and testing must be conducted
twice a year, with at least 3 months
between tests. These facilities must also
document that any VHS-regulated
species in the facility that originated in
VHS-regulated States or Canadian
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52178
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
provinces originate from facilities of the
same or higher health status.
Because this is an emerging disease,
APHIS may update the list of VHSregulated fish species as our knowledge
of species susceptibility increases.
Paragraph (b) explains how facilities can
maintain VHS-free status when new
species are added to the list of VHSregulated fish species. Specifically,
paragraph (b) provides that, when a new
species is added to the list of VHSregulated fish, a facility that has been
determined to be free of VHS must
conduct additional testing on the newly
listed species, if present in the facility,
and the fish must be free of VHS virus
in order for the facility to retain its free
status. Paragraph (b) further provides
that VHS testing must be conducted on
each newly listed species with a sample
size that provides for a 95 percent
confidence level of detecting a 2 percent
prevalence of infection in the fish
facility in order to return the facility to
the same health status that existed prior
to the new listing of the VHS-regulated
species.
Paragraph (c) of this section specifies
that the test results for fish maintained
on a secure water source will be valid
for 6 months from the date of sample
collection provided no fish of a lesser or
unknown health status are introduced
into the facility. Test results for fish
held on a water source that is not a
secure water source will be valid for 30
days from the date of sample collection.
This will help to ensure that fish
qualified to move interstate by virtue of
a health certification program retain that
qualification for a reasonable length of
time while not compromising the health
status of those fish through the
introduction of additional fish of
unknown or lesser VHS status, or
introduction of VHS virus through the
water source.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Shipping Containers; Cleaning and
Disinfection (§ 83.7)
Paragraph (a) of § 83.7 requires that all
live VHS-regulated fish that are to be
moved interstate in accordance with
§ 83.3(a) must be moved in new
containers or containers that have been
cleaned and disinfected to neutralize
any VHS virus to which the shipping
containers may have been exposed.
Cleaning and disinfection must be
monitored by the accredited
veterinarian or State, Tribal, or Federal
competent authority for aquatic animal
health who issues the ICI. The cleaning
and disinfection protocols used must be
referenced in the ICI or in a separate
cleaning and disinfection certificate
accompanying the shipment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Import Restrictions
General Restrictions; Exceptions
(§ 93.910)
As previously discussed, the Federal
Order, as amended, allows VHSsusceptible species of live salmonid fish
from the affected Canadian provinces to
be imported into the United States if the
shipment meets the FWS regulations in
50 CFR 16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b). This
interim rule will continue to allow live
salmonid VHS-regulated fish to be
imported into the United States from
VHS-regulated regions in accordance
with the FWS regulations. In addition,
this rule establishes conditions under
which live non-salmonid VHS-regulated
fish species may be imported into the
United States from VHS-regulated
regions.
Specifically, paragraph (a) of § 93.910
provides that no live VHS-regulated
species of fish may be imported into the
United States from VHS-regulated
regions except in accordance with
subpart I or the regulations of the FWS
in 50 CFR 16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b). This
paragraph further provides that no such
live VHS-regulated fish may be moved
from the port of entry after arrival until
released by an APHIS representative or
FWS official. In addition, this paragraph
specifies that the Administrator may,
upon request in specific cases, allow the
importation of live VHS-regulated fish
into the United States under conditions
other than those specifically set forth in
the subpart when the Administrator
determines that such movement will not
result in the further introduction of VHS
into the United States.
Paragraph (b) of § 93.910 provides that
APHIS will list as a VHS-regulated fish
any fish species found in freshwater to
be susceptible to the North American
(type IV) strain of VHS virus under
natural (i.e., non-controlled) conditions
of exposure and from which VHS virus
has been isolated in cell culture or other
assay determined by the competent
authority to be adequate to detect VHS
virus, with confirmation of strain
identity through genetic sequencing. As
stated previously, anadromous fish that
have migrated into freshwater and from
which VHS strain type IV(a) has been
isolated are not considered VHSregulated fish under this rule. Paragraph
(b) further provides that, when APHIS
determines that a species meets the
criteria of this paragraph and should be
added to the list of VHS-regulated fish,
APHIS will publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing that
determination.
Paragraph (c) of this section provides
that APHIS will list as a VHS-regulated
region any region in which VHS virus
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
has been officially reported to the OIE
by the country’s competent authority for
aquatic animal health from any fish
species in a water source that is not a
secure water source, or which the
Administrator determines to be at risk of
having VHS based on criteria such as
inadequate surveillance, less restrictive
import requirements, or other
epidemiologic information.
Paragraph (c) further provides that, if
the Administrator determines that a
region meets the criteria for a VHSregulated region, APHIS will publish a
notice of its decision in the Federal
Register and take comments from the
public. The designation as a VHSregulated region will become effective
upon publication of this notice. After
reviewing the comments, APHIS will
issue a second notice in the Federal
Register announcing its decision on
whether or not the designation as a
VHS-regulated region will remain in
effect.
Paragraph (d) provides that these lists
will be maintained on the APHIS
aquaculture Web site at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/
animal_dis_spec/aquaculture. This
paragraph further provides an address
from which the lists of VHS-regulated
fish and VHS-regulated regions may be
obtained from APHIS.
As of this rule’s effective date, only
two Canadian Provinces (Ontario and
Quebec) are listed as VHS-regulated
regions. The current list of VHSregulated fish species is set out above
under the heading ‘‘VHS-regulated fish
and VHS-regulated areas (§ 83.4).’’
This interim rule does not provide a
process by which APHIS will remove
regions from the list of VHS-regulated
regions if the area petitions APHIS for
a reassessment of its disease status. As
discussed in more detail below under
the heading ‘‘Related Issues on Which
APHIS Is Seeking Comment,’’ we
particularly invite comments on which
specific factors APHIS should consider
before removing an area from the list of
VHS-regulated regions.
Paragraph (e) of § 93.910 provides that
other provisions of part 93 relating to
the importation of live VHS-regulated
fish shall not apply to shipments of
such fish imported from VHS-regulated
regions if they are imported in
accordance with the FWS regulations in
50 CFR 16.13. As previously discussed,
the FWS regulations pertain to live
salmonid fish species to be imported
into the United States. This paragraph
makes it clear that live salmonid VHSregulated fish to be imported into the
United States from VHS-regulated
regions will be exempt from the other
provisions in part 93 provided that the
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
fish are imported in accordance with the
FWS regulations.
Paragraph (f) of this section provides
that other provisions of part 93 relating
to the importation of live VHS-regulated
fish shall not apply to shipments of
such fish in transit through the United
States, if an import permit has been
obtained under § 93.912 and all
conditions of the permit are observed,
and if the live VHS-regulated fish
species are handled as follows:
• They are maintained under
continuous confinement while in transit
through the United States aboard an
aircraft, ocean vessel, or other means of
conveyance; or if they are unloaded in
the course of such transit, they are
placed in a holding facility that is
provided by the carrier or its agent and
has been approved by the Administrator
as adequate to prevent the spread within
the United States of any finfish
pathogen; they are maintained there
under continuous confinement until
loaded aboard a means of conveyance
for transportation from the United
States; and they are maintained under
continuous confinement aboard such
means of conveyance until it leaves the
United States.
• They are moved in accordance with
any additional conditions prescribed in
the permit that the Administrator has
determined to be necessary to ensure
that the fish do not introduce VHS into
the United States.
For a holding facility to be approved
by the Administrator, the following
conditions must be met:
• The holding facility must be
sufficiently isolated to prevent direct or
indirect contact of the live fish it
contains with any other live VHSregulated fish species in the United
States.
• The holding facility must be
constructed to provide adequate
protection against environmental
conditions and so that it can be
adequately cleaned, washed, and
disinfected.
• Provision must be made for
disposal of fish carcasses, shipping
water, effluent, waste, and any
associated shipping materials in a
manner that will prevent dissemination
of disease.
• Provision must be made for
adequate sources of feed and water and
for attendants for the care and feeding
of fish in the facility.
• The holding facility must comply
with all applicable local, State, and
Federal requirements for environmental
quality.
• The holding facility must comply
with any additional requirements that
the Administrator may impose on a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
particular shipment in order to prevent
the dissemination of VHS virus.
Paragraph (g) provides that the
provisions of the subpart relating to the
importation of live VHS-regulated fish
shall not apply to fish moved into the
United States from VHS-regulated
regions during catch-and-release fishing.
Ports Designated for the Importation of
Live VHS-Regulated Fish Species
(§ 93.911)
Section 93.911 designates ports
through which live VHS-regulated fish
from VHS-regulated regions may be
imported into the United States without
an import permit. To relieve some of the
paperwork burden associated with
import permits, we will allow VHSregulated fish species that have been
tested in accordance with § 93.913(b)
and found to be free of VHS virus to be
imported through certain Canadian
border ports without an import permit.
We consider those ports to have
adequate facilities and inspectors to
perform the necessary inspections of
shipments of live fish without advance
notification of the arrival of a shipment
that is associated with the application
for and issuance of an import permit. As
described later in this document in the
section titled ‘‘Declaration and other
documents (§ 93.914),’’ all importers
must submit a declaration to Customs.
The information included in the
declaration will parallel the information
required in an import permit, except
that importers must indicate the route of
travel in an import permit. APHIS asks
for notice of a shipment’s route of travel
in order to prevent transits of animals
through countries subject to import
restrictions because of certain animal
disease risks. We typically do not
require this information for shipments
coming through land border ports
because it is unlikely that a shipment
entering the United States at a land
border port would have traveled
through any other countries.
Paragraph (a) provides that VHSregulated fish species may be imported
into the following Canadian border
ports without an import permit:
Eastport, ID; Houlton and Jackman, ME;
Detroit, Port Huron, and Sault Ste.
Marie, MI; Baudette, MN; Opheim,
Raymond, and Sweetgrass, MT;
Alexandria Bay, Buffalo, and
Champlain, NY; Dunseith, Pembina, and
Portal, ND; Derby Line and Highgate
Springs, VT; and Oroville and Sumas,
WA.
Paragraph (b) provides that live VHSregulated fish may be imported into the
United States with an import permit
through the following ports: Anchorage,
AK; Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA;
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52179
Miami and Tampa, FL; Atlanta, GA;
Honolulu, HI; Chicago, IL; Boston, MA;
Newark, NJ; Jamaica and Newburgh,
NY; Portland, OR; Memphis, TN, DallasFt. Worth, TX; Seattle, WA; and San
Juan, PR.
Paragraph (c) of this section also
provides for other ports to be designated
by the Administrator in specific cases
with the concurrence of the Secretary of
the Department of Homeland Security.
Import Permits (§ 93.912)
Paragraph (a) of § 93.912 requires that
live VHS-regulated fish imported from
VHS-regulated regions through a limited
port listed in § 93.911(b) be
accompanied by an import permit
issued by APHIS and must be imported
within 30 days of the proposed arrival
date stated in the import permit.
Paragraph (b) provides the address
and APHIS Web site from which
prospective importers may request
import permit applications and to
which completed applications should
be sent. An application for an import
permit must be submitted for each
shipment of live VHS-regulated fish.
Paragraph (c) of this section specifies
the information that must be included
on an import permit application. It
states that the application must include
the name and address of the exporter;
the proposed date of shipment to the
United States; the name and address of
the importer; the species and number of
live VHS-regulated fish to be imported
into the United States; the purpose of
the importation; the port of
embarkation; the mode of
transportation; the route of travel,
including all carrier stops en route; the
port of entry in the United States; the
proposed date of arrival in the United
States; and the name and address of the
person to whom the live VHS-regulated
fish will be delivered in the United
States.
APHIS needs this information to
determine whether the live fish are
eligible for importation, to respond to an
applicant, to identify the shipment at
the port of entry, to ensure that
inspectors and facilities are available for
inspection in the United States, and to
contact appropriate persons if any
questions arise concerning the
importation.
Finally, paragraph (d) explains what
happens after we receive and review the
permit application. This paragraph
provides that, if following our review,
we determine that the live VHSregulated fish are eligible for
importation, we will issue an import
permit. This paragraph also specifies
that an import permit does not
guarantee that any live fish will be
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52180
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
allowed entry into the United States; the
VHS-regulated fish will be allowed to
enter the United States only if they meet
all applicable requirements of the
regulations.
Health Certificate (§ 93.913)
Paragraph (a) of § 93.913 requires that
all live VHS-regulated fish that are
imported from VHS-regulated regions
for other than immediate slaughter or
research or laboratory use be
accompanied by a health certificate. The
health certificate must be in English or
contain an English translation and must
be issued by a full-time salaried
veterinarian of the national government
of the exporting country, or issued by a
certifying official and endorsed by the
competent authority of that country.
The health certificate will be valid for
30 days from the date of issuance.
In addition, the health certificate must
state that the shipment was inspected by
the veterinarian or certifying official
who issued the certificate within 72
hours prior to shipment, and found to
be free of any clinical signs of disease
consistent with VHS; and the live fish
covered by the health certificate
originated in a region or facility that has
demonstrated freedom from VHS
through testing in accordance with
paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 93.913.
Paragraph (b) provides that a facility
can demonstrate freedom from VHS
through negative testing results by a
pathogen detection laboratory approved
for VHS viral assays by the competent
authority. All viral testing must meet
the following conditions:
• Be conducted with a testing sample
size that provides for a 95 percent
confidence level of detecting a 2 percent
prevalence of infection in the facility.
• Include virus isolation or other
assays authorized by the competent
authority, using appropriate cell lines to
detect VHS virus, if present. All suspect
VHS cytopathic effects must be
positively identified as VHS through
molecular assays and/or genetic
sequencing.
• Test proportional numbers of each
VHS-regulated fish species which might
be present in a shipment, if applicable.
• Be conducted at water temperatures
between 50 and 72 °F, or at other times
or under environmental conditions
when VHS virus is most likely to be
detected, if present.
As stated previously in this
document, facilities with a history of
negative testing results for VHS are
assumed to have a lower risk of
spreading VHS; therefore, we will
decrease the number of fish that are
required to be tested for such facilities.
Specifically, paragraph (b) of this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
section also allows facilities with
cultured fish of VHS-regulated species
which can document a 2-year negative
testing history for VHS virus to conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 5 percent prevalence of infection in
the facility and facilities with cultured
fish of VHS-regulated species which can
document a 4-year negative testing
history for VHS virus to conduct testing
at a sampling level to provide a 95
percent confidence level of detecting a
10 percent prevalence of infection in the
fish facility. Such facilities must be on
a secure water source, and testing must
be conducted twice a year, with at least
3 months between tests. The facilities
must also document that any VHSregulated species in the facility that
originated in VHS-regulated States or
Canadian provinces originate from
facilities of the same or higher health
status.
Paragraph (c) explains how facilities
can maintain VHS-free status when new
species are added to the list of VHSregulated fish species. Specifically,
paragraph (c) provides that when a new
species is added to the list of VHSregulated fish, a facility that has been
determined to be free of VHS must
conduct additional testing on fish of the
newly listed species, if present in the
facility, and the fish must be free of VHS
virus in order for the facility to retain its
free status. Paragraph (c) further
provides that VHS testing must be
conducted on each newly listed species
with a sample size that provides for a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 2 percent prevalence of infection in
the fish facility.
Paragraph (d) of this section requires
that, except as provided in § 93.910(e)
through (g), all live fish be shipped in
new containers or containers that have
been cleaned and disinfected to
neutralize any VHS virus to which the
shipping containers may have been
exposed. Cleaning and disinfection of
shipping containers must take place
under the supervision of the
veterinarian or certifying official who
issues the health certificate, and be
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus to
which shipping containers may have
been exposed. Cleaning and disinfection
protocols must be referenced in the
health certificate or in a separate
cleaning and disinfection certificate
accompanying the shipment to the U.S.
port of entry.
Declaration and Other Documents
(§ 93.914)
Section § 93.914 requires the importer
or his or her agent to submit the
following documents to the appropriate
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Customs and Border Protection officer
for use by the port veterinarians:
• All permits, certificates, or other
documentation required under
§§§ 93.912 and 93.913; and
• Two copies of a declaration that
lists the port of entry; the name and
address of the importer; the name and
address of the broker; the origin of the
live fish; the number, species, and the
purpose of the importation; the name of
the person to whom the fish will be
delivered; and the location of the place
to which such delivery will be made.
This information will allow for the
traceback of shipments should any
problems occur subsequent to entry into
the United States.
Inspection at the Port of Entry (§ 93.915)
Section 93.915 sets forth requirements
for port of entry inspections of
shipments of live fish. Paragraph (a)
provides that the shipments of live
VHS-regulated fish must be presented
for inspection at a port of entry
designated under § 93.911. This
paragraph also provides that the port
veterinarian must be notified at least 72
hours in advance of the arrival of the
shipment in the United States for live
fish of VHS-regulated species being
imported through a limited port listed
in § 93.911(c). It also provides that any
shipment that does not meet the
requirements of this subpart will be
refused entry (e.g., lacking appropriate
permits, declarations, and/or health
certificates or exhibiting clinical signs
consistent with VHS).
Paragraph (b) states that shipments
refused entry must be exported within
a time fixed in each case by the
Administrator, and in accordance with
other provisions he or she may require
in each case for their handling, or the
shipment will be disposed of as the
Administrator may direct.
Special Provisions (§ 93.916)
Section 93.916 sets forth requirements
for importation for slaughter or for
research or laboratory purposes.
Paragraph (a) provides that live VHSregulated fish from VHS-regulated
regions may be imported directly for
slaughter under the following
conditions:
• An import permit has been obtained
under § 93.912 and all conditions of the
permit are observed.
• An APHIS representative at the port
seals the means of conveyance with
official seals.
• The shipment is moved directly
from the port of entry to a slaughtering
establishment that discharges its waste
water to a municipal sewage system that
includes waste water disinfection
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus or
to either a non-discharging settling pond
or a settling pond that disinfects,
according to all applicable local, State,
and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus. Offal,
including carcasses, from the
slaughtering establishment is either
rendered or composted.
• An APHIS representative unseals
the vehicle upon arrival at the
slaughtering establishment.
• Any water used to transport the fish
is disposed to a municipal sewage
system that includes waste water
disinfection sufficient to neutralize any
VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that
disinfects, according to all applicable
local, State, and Federal regulations,
sufficiently to neutralize any VHS virus.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides
that live non-salmonid VHS-regulated
fish may be imported from a VHSregulated region for research or
laboratory use under the following
conditions:
• An import permit has been obtained
under § 93.912 and all conditions of the
permit are observed.
• The laboratory or research facility
disposes of effluent to a municipal
sewage system that includes waste
water disinfection sufficient to
neutralize any VHS virus or to either a
non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects, according
to all applicable local, State, and
Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
• Carcasses must be rendered or
composted.
• Any water used to transport the fish
is disposed to a municipal sewage
system that includes waste water
disinfection sufficient to neutralize any
VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that
disinfects, according to all applicable
local, State, and Federal regulations,
sufficiently to neutralize any VHS virus.
These measures will ensure that VHS
virus that may be present in such fish
is effectively neutralized or that the fish
are rendered incapable of infecting fish
in other waters of the United States.
the introduction of VHS and other fish
pathogens and may include such
changes in a subsequent rulemaking.
As discussed above, the new lists of
VHS-regulated areas and VHS-regulated
regions will be maintained on the
APHIS Web site, not in the regulations.
We do not however, provide criteria for
removing an area or region from those
lists. At present, VHS occurs only in
wild fish populations in the United
States and Canada, making the disease
difficult to contain and eradicate. For
that reason, we do not believe any areas
or regions that are currently on the lists
of VHS-regulated areas or VHSregulated regions will be eligible for
removal from those lists in the
immediate future. Further, APHIS is
still considering what information we
would use in reassessing an area’s or
region’s disease status and would find
public input valuable. Specifically,
APHIS seeks comments on what factors
should be considered when removing
areas and regions from the lists of VHSregulated areas and VHS-regulated
regions.
We recognize that gametes are a
potential pathway for the spread of VHS
due to the ability of the virus to survive
in ovarian fluid. While the disinfection
of salmonid eggs is common practice, no
standardized protocols exist for
disinfecting non-salmonid eggs. Further,
there is not sufficient documented
scientific evidence to support regulated
egg treatment protocols for nonsalmonid eggs. APHIS seeks comment
on what types of egg disinfection
protocols, if any, should be considered
for VHS-regulated non-salmonid
species.
Related Issues on Which APHIS Is
Seeking Comment
There are two additional issues
related to VHS for which we are seeking
public comment. This interim rule does
not make any of the possible changes
discussed below, because there are no
immediate risks associated with them
that would justify immediate action.
However, we believe the following
changes would improve the
effectiveness of our programs to prevent
Emergency Action
The Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has
determined that there is good cause for
publishing this interim rule without
prior opportunity for public comment.
Immediate action is necessary to
prevent the introduction of VHS into
aquaculture facilities by controlling the
movement of live fish at risk of
harboring VHS virus. Despite its current
VHS-free status for farmed fish, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
User Fees
APHIS user fees for processing permit
applications and for inspecting animals
at the port of entry will apply. The user
fees are set forth in 9 CFR part 130. User
fees for processing applications for
permits to import certain animals and
animal products are listed in the table
in § 130.4. User fees for inspection at the
port of entry and laboratory and facility
inspections are the hourly rates set forth
in § 130.30.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52181
United States remains unprotected from
continuing introductions of VHSinfected non-salmonid fish imported
from Canada, since there are a number
of exporters of VHS-regulated fish
species in VHS-regulated areas in
Canada, and pretesting of these fish is
not currently required. Additionally,
although VHS outbreaks have so far
been limited to States within the Great
Lakes watershed, there are no
standardized restrictions in place other
than those specified in the FWS
regulations in title 50 and the existing
APHIS Federal Order to prevent the
further spread of VHS into new
watersheds or areas by the transfer of
live salmonid or non-salmonid VHSregulated species. Therefore, it is
necessary to implement regulations that
will restrict such movements in as
timely a manner as possible.
We will consider comments we
receive during the comment periods for
this interim rule and the environmental
assessment (see DATES above). After the
comment period closes, we will publish
another document in the Federal
Register to notify the public of our
decision regarding the environmental
assessment. We will also publish a
document in the Federal Register that
will include a discussion of any
comments we receive and any
amendments we are making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. The rule has
been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
We have prepared an economic
analysis for this interim rule. It provides
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
which considers the potential economic
effects of this proposed rule on small
entities, as required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as well as a cost-benefit
analysis. The economic analysis is
summarized below. The full economic
analysis may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
document for instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov). You may request
paper copies of the economic analysis
by calling or writing to the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Please refer to Docket No.
APHIS–2007–0038 when requesting
copies. The economic analysis is also
available for review in our reading room
(information on the location and hours
of the reading room is listed under the
heading ADDRESSES at the beginning of
this document).
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52182
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Based upon available data and
expected effects, we believe that the
benefits of the interim rule, in terms of
disease prevention, will justify the costs
associated with restricting the
movement of live fish. Costs associated
with the interim rule will likely be
difficult to distinguish from those
already imposed by the amended
Federal Order. Also, several of the
States that will be regulated by the
interim rule have regulations in place
that compare closely with the interim
rule. Net impacts of the interim rule
therefore may be relatively small.
We first consider potential costs of the
rule for producers, allied industries, and
State, Federal, and Tribal authorities.
Possible benefits of the rule in terms of
preventing the spread of VHS virus are
then examined. Third, alternatives to
the rule are presented. Lastly, we
address expected impacts for small
entities.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Summary of Cost-Benefit Analysis
The interim rule will place
restrictions on the importation and
interstate movement of live VHSregulated fish species from States within
the Great Lakes Region where this
disease has been confirmed. The
potential impacts of the interim rule are
not known, given the lack of
information on aquaculture operations
and commercial fisheries in the
regulated areas. Additionally, little is
known about the potential impacts on
allied fishing industries and on
hatcheries operating under Federal,
State, or Tribal authority.
Benefits of the rule will accrue from
preventing the spread of an emerging
strain of VHS virus to aquaculture
facilities beyond the regulated States.
Five of these States have comprehensive
regulations in place to curb the spread
of the virus. Impacts of the interim rule
are likely to be largely already realized
because of the amended Federal Order,
and may be additionally diminished in
the five States that have adopted
movement restrictions consistent with
the interim rule.
Expected Costs of the Interim Rule
One industry that may be impacted is
the wild-caught segment of the baitfish
industry, to the extent that the
requirements of the interim rule are
more restrictive than the amended
Federal Order and the regulations of the
various States. However, we foresee any
incremental changes to be minimal. A
testing and certification protocol by
which movement will be allowed under
the rule is unlikely to be feasible for this
segment of the industry. In addition to
aquaculture and commercial fisheries,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
allied fishing industries such as bait
shops and marinas may also be affected
by the interim rule. Bait shops that sell
VHS-regulated species may face tighter
supplies on top of the certification
requirement for sales to unregulated
States.
State, Federal, and Tribal authorities
may also be affected by the interim rule.
Within the 8 regulated States, there are
7 Federal, 69 State, and at least 13
Tribal hatcheries. These hatcheries
produce and stock fish in streams,
rivers, and lakes throughout the eight
States and possibly in surrounding
States. The interim rule may limit
production and stocking by the
agencies, and therefore the availability
of broodstock in the regulated States
and possibly other States, depending on
the species stocked. Affected States may
also face a decline in the number of
fishing licenses sold due to reduced
stocking and a limited availability of
bait.
Overall, regulated aquaculture
facilities and commercial fisheries will
bear the costs of testing, cleaning, and
disinfection of containers, and fees
associated with inspections and the
issuance of permits. However, given the
regulatory response to VHS to date by
five of the eight regulated States, the
impact of the interim rule may be
muted. Many of the regulations in place
in Michigan, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are
closely aligned with the requirements in
the interim rule and in some cases may
be even more restrictive. In some
instances, effects of the interim rule are
already realized because of rules
implemented at the State level.
Additionally, the rule will codify
restrictions and procedures already in
place under the amended Federal Order.
Net impacts of the interim rule are
expected to be small because of the
existing State regulations and the
Federal Order.
Expected Benefits of the Interim Rule
The interim rule is expected to benefit
aquaculture facilities. The rule is
intended to curtail the introduction of
the VHS virus into areas outside of the
Great Lakes Region. Mississippi
dominates catfish farming in the United
States. Alabama and Arkansas also have
fairly large sales of cultured catfish.
Additionally, Arkansas boasts the
largest sales of cultured baitfish,
accounting for 53 percent of baitfish
aquaculture according to the 2005
Census of Aquaculture. Preventing VHS
from spreading to these areas will help
preserve the catfish and baitfish
industries, valued at almost $440
million.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Alternatives to the Interim Rule
APHIS considered three alternatives
for the interim rule. The first alternative
considered by the Agency would entail
regulations much broader in scope than
the provisions of the May 4, 2007,
amended Federal Order. This alternative
would restrict interstate movement of
VHS-regulated species for all States
where any VHS virus strain is detected,
and would restrict importation of VHSregulated species from all VHSregulated countries, including countries
in Europe, and also would regulate
additional commodities. APHIS
determined the interim rule will be less
costly and provide the same level of
protection as this alternative, based on
current knowledge of the status of the
two strains of VHS virus, type IV(a) and
type IV(b), in the United States and
Canada. VHS virus strain type IV(a) is
not known to exist anywhere other than
in marine environments and, thus, is
unlikely to be found in the Great Lakes
Region.
A second alternative considered by
the Agency would be to regulate areas
based on Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
level 2, or regional, definitions. APHIS
determined that regulating areas known
to have VHS virus type IV(b) based on
the HUC 2 definition could pose an
undue burden on entities within these
areas far removed from the specific
location of the VHS virus type IV(b)
confirmation.
Finally, APHIS considered a ‘‘no
action’’ alternative. In this instance,
APHIS would not implement
regulations covering the interstate
movement of VHS-regulated fish from
VHS-regulated areas or the importation
of VHS-regulated fish from VHSregulated regions. Under this
alternative, State agencies and Federal
agencies other than APHIS would
assume responsibility for preventing the
spread of the VHS virus. Compliance
with the various regulations could be
burdensome for aquaculture producers
and others who move fish interstate or
internationally.
Summary of the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we examined the
potential economic effects the interim
rule will have on small entities. The
interim rule may affect aquaculture
facilities, commercial harvesters,
marinas, and other allied fishing
industries in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Although
information concerning many of these
industries is sparse, it is likely that most
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
of the entities within these industries
are small as defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA)
guidelines.
While it is likely that the majority of
firms affected by the interim rule will be
small, the magnitude of the impacts is
unclear given the lack of data.
Aquaculture facilities in States not
regulated for VHS will benefit from the
interim rule because the likelihood that
fish in these facilities will be exposed to
this disease will be reduced. Facilities
located in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin will face
costs related to testing if they raise VHSregulated species for interstate
movement. In States that have enacted
their own regulations to prevent the
potential spread of VHS, impacts on
aquaculture facilities and commercial
fishing operations as a result of this
interim rule are likely to be dampened.
The interim rule will impose some
additional reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements. Live
VHS-regulated species of fish may be
imported and moved live from regulated
Provinces and States. Movement
requires testing and certification as
described in the interim rule. Firms
wishing to move live fish will be
responsible for ensuring that the fish
originate from a facility that has been
tested and found to be free of VHS virus.
Additionally, these firms will also be
responsible for obtaining the permits
needed to transport fish interstate, as
well as paying the user fees associated
with inspection of shipments.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
in conflict with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
National Environmental Policy Act
To provide the public with
documentation of APHIS’ review and
analysis of any potential environmental
impacts associated with this interim
rule, we have prepared an
environmental assessment. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
environmental assessment was prepared
in accordance with: (1) The National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). The environmental assessment
provides a basis for our determination
that implementation of this interim rule
will not have a significant impact on the
quality of the human environment.
We will accept comments on the
environmental assessment for 30 days.
To comment, follow the instructions
under ADDRESSES at the beginning of
this document. The environmental
assessment may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site or in our
reading room. (Instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room
are provided under the heading
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
interim rule.) In addition, copies may be
obtained by writing to the individual
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(j) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements included in this interim
rule have been submitted for emergency
approval to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). OMB has assigned
control number 0579–0340 to the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
We plan to request continuation of
that approval for 3 years. Please send
written comments on the 3-year
approval request to the following
addresses: (1) Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503; and (2) Docket No. APHIS–2007–
0038, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–
03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238. Please state
that your comments refer to Docket No.
APHIS–2007–0038 and send your
comments within 60 days of publication
of this rule.
This interim rule establishes
regulations to restrict the interstate
movement and importation into the
United States of live fish that are
susceptible to VHS. In order to be
moved interstate, live VHS-regulated
fish must originate from a facility that
has been found free of VHS virus
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52183
through testing specified in the
regulations and be accompanied by an
ICI issued by an accredited veterinarian
or a State, Tribal, or Federal competent
authority for aquatic animal health.
Live VHS-regulated fish to be
imported into the United States may
need to be accompanied by a permit and
must be accompanied by a declaration
and by a health certificate that states
that the live fish originated in a region
or facility that has demonstrated
freedom from VHS through testing in
accordance with the regulations. The
fish must be shipped in new containers
or containers that have been cleaned
and disinfected to neutralize any VHS
virus to which the shipping containers
may have been exposed. The cleaning
and disinfection protocols must be
referenced in the health certificate or in
a separate cleaning and disinfection
certificate accompanying the shipment
to the U.S. port of entry. Finally, live
fish imported for slaughter or for
research or diagnostic purposes must,
among other things, be accompanied by
a VS Form I–27, which will be issued
by the port veterinarian.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our information collection
and recordkeeping requirements. These
comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the information
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of our agency’s functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.2681871 hours
per response.
Respondents: Accredited
veterinarians, importers and exporters
of VHS-regulated live fish, shippers
moving VHS-regulated live fish
interstate, and States.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 515.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 16.601941.
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52184
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Estimated annual number of
responses: 8,550.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 2,293. (Due to averaging,
the total annual burden hours may not
equal the product of the annual number
of responses multiplied by the reporting
burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this interim rule, please contact Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS’ Information
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
2908.
List of Subjects
9 CFR Part 71
Animal diseases, Livestock, Poultry
and poultry products, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
9 CFR Part 83
Animal diseases, Livestock,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation.
9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 71—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
2. Section 71.3 is amended as follows:
a. In paragraph (a), in the list of
diseases which are endemic to the
United States, by adding the words
‘‘viral hemorrhagic septicemia,’’ after
‘‘chlamydiosis,’’.
I b. By adding a new paragraph (c)(5) to
read as set forth below.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
I
I
§ 71.3 Interstate movement of diseased
animals and poultry generally prohibited.
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
(c)(5) Fish affected with viral
hemorrhagic septicemia may be moved
interstate in accordance with part 83 of
this subchapter.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. A new part 83 is added to read as
follows:
PART 83—VIRAL HEMORRHAGIC
SEPTICEMIA
Sec.
83.1
83.2
83.3
Definitions.
General restrictions.
Interstate movement of live VHSregulated fish species from VHSregulated areas.
83.4 VHS-regulated fish and VHS-regulated
areas.
83.5 Interstate Certificate of Inspection
(ICI).
83.6 Testing requirements.
83.7 Shipping containers; cleaning and
disinfection.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
§ 83.1
Definitions.
Accredited veterinarian. A
veterinarian who is approved by the
Administrator, in accordance with part
161 of this chapter, to perform official
animal health work of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service
specified in subchapters A, B, C, and D
of this chapter; and to perform work
required by cooperative State-Federal
disease control and eradication
programs.
Administrator. The Administrator,
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, or any person authorized to act
for the Administrator.
Anadromous fish. Fish that are born
and spawn in freshwater, but which
spend part of their lifecycle in saltwater.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS). The Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service of the United
States Department of Agriculture.
APHIS representative. A veterinarian
or other individual employed by APHIS
who is authorized to perform the
services required by this part.
Approved laboratory. A laboratory
authorized by a State, Tribal, or Federal
competent authority for aquatic animal
health to perform assays for the
detection of VHS virus.
Catch-and-release fishing. Fishing for
pleasure or for recreational purposes,
including tournaments, organized
fishing competitions, fishing derbies, or
other types of contests where
individuals catch, compare, and release
live VHS-regulated fish. This term
excludes VHS-regulated fish used, or
intended to be used, as live bait.
Competent authority. The State,
Tribal, or Federal entity with the legal
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
responsibility for ensuring or
supervising the implementation of
aquatic animal health measures.
Cultured fish. Fish of the same species
and age class, originating from the same
broodstock and on the same water
supply, whose care is partly or totally
managed from the first life stage
onwards.
Department. The United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
Interstate. From one State into or
through any other State.
Interstate Certificate of Inspection
(ICI). An official document issued by an
accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
in the originating State that certifies that
the fish being moved interstate
originated from a facility that has been
found free of VHS virus.
Moved (movement). Shipped,
transported, delivered, or otherwise
aided, induced, or caused to be moved.
Person. Any individual, corporation,
company, association, firm, partnership,
society, or joint stock company, or other
legal entity.
Secure water source. A biosecure
water supply that does not contain
pathogens or has not had the
opportunity to be contaminated with
pathogens. Biosecure water supplies
include well, spring, or borehole water;
surface water that does not contain fish
populations; or water that has been
treated to eliminate aquatic animal
pathogens.
State. Any of the 50 States, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the District of Columbia, and
any territories and possessions of the
United States.
State animal health official. The State
official responsible for livestock, disease
control, and eradication programs.
VHS-regulated area. Any State or
portion of a State listed in accordance
with § 83.4.
VHS-regulated fish. Any fish species
listed in accordance with § 83.4.
VHS virus. Any North American (type
IV) strain of viral hemorrhagic
septicemia (VHS) virus, a rhabdovirus of
fish.
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS).
A disease caused by infection with VHS
virus.
§ 83.2
General restrictions.
Live VHS-regulated fish may not be
moved interstate from a VHS-regulated
area except in compliance with this
part.
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 83.3 Interstate movement of live VHSregulated fish species from VHS-regulated
areas.
(a) Except as provided in paragraphs
(b) through (e) of this section, live VHSregulated fish, including fish moved to
live fish markets, may only be moved
interstate from a VHS-regulated area if
the fish originated from a facility that
has been found free of the VHS virus in
accordance with § 83.6 and the fish are
accompanied by an Interstate Certificate
of Inspection (ICI) issued by an
accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
for aquatic animal health.
(b) Live VHS-regulated fish may be
moved interstate directly to a
slaughtering establishment provided
that:
(1) The fish are accompanied by a VS
Form 1–27;
(2) The fish are transported in sealed
conveyances;
(3) The slaughtering establishment
meets the following conditions:
(i) The slaughtering establishment
discharges its waste water to a
municipal sewage system that includes
waste water disinfection sufficient to
neutralize any VHS virus or to either a
non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects, according
to all applicable local, State, and
Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
(ii) Offal, including carcasses, from
the slaughtering establishment is either
rendered or composted.
(4) Any water used to transport the
fish is disposed of in a municipal
sewage system that includes waste
water disinfection sufficient to
neutralize any VHS virus or to either a
non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects, according
to all applicable local, State, and
Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
(c) Live VHS-regulated fish may be
moved interstate for research or
diagnostic purposes provided that:
(1) The fish are accompanied by a VS
Form 1–27;
(2) The fish are transported in sealed
conveyances;
(3) The facility that receives the fish
meets the following conditions:
(i) The facility discharges its waste
water to a municipal sewage system that
includes waste water disinfection
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus or
to either a non-discharging settling pond
or a settling pond that disinfects,
according to all applicable local, State,
and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
(ii) Offal, including carcasses, from
the facility is either rendered or
composted.
(4) Any water used to transport the
fish is disposed to a municipal sewage
system that includes waste water
disinfection sufficient to neutralize any
VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that
disinfects, according to all applicable
local, State, and Federal regulations,
sufficiently to neutralize any VHS virus.
(d) Live VHS-regulated fish may be
moved interstate during catch-andrelease fishing.
(e) The Administrator may, on a caseby-case basis, permit the interstate
movement of fish not otherwise
provided for in this part, under such
conditions as the Administrator may
prescribe in each case to prevent the
introduction and dissemination of VHS.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
§ 83.4 VHS-regulated fish and VHSregulated areas.
(a)(1) APHIS will list as a VHSregulated fish any fish species found in
freshwater to be susceptible to the North
American (type IV) strain of VHS virus
under natural (i.e., non-controlled)
conditions of exposure and from which
VHS virus has been isolated in cell
culture or other assay determined by the
Administrator to be adequate to detect
VHS virus, with confirmation of strain
identity through genetic sequencing.
Anadromous fish that have migrated
into freshwater and from which VHS
strain type IV(a) has been isolated will
not be considered VHS-regulated fish.
(2) If APHIS determines that, in
accordance with the criteria in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a species
should be added to the list of VHSregulated species, APHIS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing that determination.
(b)(1) APHIS will list as a VHSregulated area each State or portion of
a State from which VHS virus has been
detected in any VHS-regulated fish
species (with or without clinical signs of
disease) in a water source that is not a
secure water source, or which the
Administrator determines should be
regulated based on criteria such as
inadequate surveillance or movement
requirements, or other epidemiologic
information.
(2) If the Administrator determines
that a State or portion of a State meets
the criteria in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, APHIS will publish a notice of
its decision in the Federal Register and
take comments from the public. The
designation as a VHS-regulated area will
become effective upon publication of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52185
this notice. After reviewing the
comments, APHIS will issue a second
notice in the Federal Register
announcing its decision on whether or
not the designation as a VHS-regulated
area will remain in effect.
(c) APHIS maintains the lists of VHSregulated fish and VHS-regulated areas
on the APHIS aquaculture Web site at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal
_health/animal_dis_spec/aquaculture.
The lists may be obtained from the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, Veterinary Services, National
Aquaculture Program, 4700 River Road
Unit 46, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231.
§ 83.5
(ICI).
Interstate Certificate of Inspection
(a) Live VHS-regulated fish moved
interstate in accordance with § 83.3(a)
must be accompanied by an ICI issued
by an accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
for aquatic animal health. An ICI will be
valid for 30 days from the date of
issuance.
(b) The ICI must state that:
(1) The live fish were inspected by the
accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
for aquatic animal health within 72
hours prior to shipment, and were
found to be free of any clinical signs of
disease consistent with VHS.
(2) The live fish covered by the ICI
originated in an area or facility that has
demonstrated freedom from VHS in
accordance with § 83.6.
(c) The ICI must include the following
information:
(1) The name, address, and phone
number of the owner or owner’s agent.
(2) The name, address, and phone
number of the facility in which the fish
originated.
(3) The name, address, and phone
number of the person or facility who
will receive the fish; or the State or
other regulatory authority responsible
for oversight of the environment in
which the fish will be introduced.
(4) The name, address, and phone
number of the shipping or
transportation company.
(5) The species and number of the
fish.
(6) The lot (or other) identification of
the shipment.
(7) The name, address, and phone
number of the approved laboratory that
performed the testing required by § 83.6.
(i) The number of fish tested;
(ii) The assay(s) used for testing; and
(iii) The test results.
(8) The date the certificate was issued.
(9) The type of water source according
to § 83.6(c).
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52186
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 83.6
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Testing requirements.
(a) A facility can demonstrate freedom
from VHS through negative testing
results provided by an approved
laboratory. Testing must meet the
following conditions:
(1) Be conducted with a sample size
that provides for a 95 percent
confidence level of detecting a 2 percent
prevalence of infection in the facility.
(i) Facilities with cultured fish of
VHS-regulated species which can
document a 2-year history of negative
testing for VHS virus, can conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 5 percent prevalence of infection in
the facility. Such testing must be
conducted twice a year, with at least 3
months between tests.
(ii) Facilities with cultured fish of
VHS-regulated species which can
document a 4-year history of negative
testing for VHS virus can conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 10 percent prevalence of infection in
the facility. Such testing must be
conducted twice a year, with at least 3
months between tests.
(iii) Such facilities must be on a
secure water source, and document that
any VHS-regulated species in the
facility that originated in VHS-regulated
States or Canadian provinces originate
from facilities of the same or higher
health status.
(2) Include virus isolation or other
assays authorized by the Administrator,
using appropriate cell lines to detect
VHS virus, if present. All suspect VHS
cytopathic effects must be positively
identified as VHS through molecular
assays and/or genetic sequencing.
(3) Use proportional numbers of each
VHS-regulated fish species which might
be present in the facility.
(4) Be conducted at water
temperatures between 50 and 72 °F, or
at other times or under environmental
conditions when VHS is most likely to
be detected, if present.
(b) When APHIS adds a new species
to the list of VHS-regulated species after
a facility has been determined to be free
of VHS in accordance with paragraph (a)
of this section, the facility must conduct
additional testing on fish of the newly
listed species, if present in the facility,
and the fish must be free of VHS virus
for the facility to retain its free status.
VHS testing must be conducted on each
newly listed species with a sample size
that provides for a 95 percent
confidence level of detecting a 2 percent
prevalence of infection in the facility.
(c) For VHS-regulated fish maintained
on a secure water source, test results
will be valid for 6 months from the date
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
of sample collection provided that no
fish of a lesser or unknown health status
are introduced into the facility. Test
results for fish held on a water source
that is not a secure water source will be
valid for 30 days from the date of
sample collection.
§ 83.7 Shipping containers; cleaning and
disinfection.
(a) All live fish that are to be moved
interstate in accordance with § 83.3(a)
must be moved in new containers or in
containers that have been cleaned and
disinfected.
(1) Cleaning and disinfection of
shipping containers must be monitored
by the accredited veterinarian or State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority
for aquatic animal health who issues the
ICI.
(2) Cleaning and disinfection must be
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus to
which shipping containers may have
been exposed.
(3) The cleaning and disinfection
protocols used must be referenced in the
ICI or in a separate cleaning and
disinfection certificate accompanying
the shipment.
(b) [Reserved]
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND
POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL,
BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS;
REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
CONTAINERS
4. The authority citation for part 93
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
5. Section 93.900 is amended by
adding the following definitions in
alphabetical order to read as set forth
below.
I
§ 93.900
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
Anadromous fish. Fish that are born
and spawn in freshwater, but which
spend part of their lifecycle in saltwater.
*
*
*
*
*
Approved laboratory. A laboratory
authorized by the competent authority
of a country for aquatic animal health to
perform assays for the detection of VHS
virus.
Catch-and-release fishing. Fishing for
pleasure or for recreational purposes,
including tournaments, organized
fishing competitions, fishing derbies, or
other types of contests where
individuals catch, compare, and release
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
§§ 93.901 through 93.906
heading added]
Sfmt 4700
[Undesignated
6. Subpart I is amended by adding an
undesignated center heading, ‘‘General
Provisions for SVC-Regulated Fish
Species’’, preceding § 93.901.
I
§§ 93.907 through 93.909
[Reserved]
7. Sections 93.907 through 93.909 are
added and reserved.
I 8. An undesignated center heading
and new §§ 93.910 through 93.916 are
added to subpart I after the newly
reserved §§ 93.907 through 93.909 to
read as follows:
I
General Provisions for VHS-Regulated
Fish Species
§ 93.910
*
PO 00000
live VHS-regulated fish. This term
excludes VHS-regulated fish used, or
intended to be used, as live bait.
*
*
*
*
*
Cultured fish. Fish of the same species
and age class, originating from the same
broodstock and on the same water
supply, whose care is partly or totally
managed from the first life stage
onwards.
*
*
*
*
*
Secure water source. A biosecure
water supply that does not contain
pathogens or has not had the
opportunity to be contaminated with
pathogens. Biosecure water supplies
include well, spring, or borehole water;
surface water that does not contain fish
populations; or water that has been
treated to eliminate aquatic animal
pathogens.
*
*
*
*
*
VHS-regulated fish. Any fish species
listed in accordance with § 93.910.
VHS-regulated region. Any region
listed in accordance with § 93.910.
VHS virus. Any North American (type
IV) strain of VHS virus, a rhabdovirus of
fish.
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS).
A disease caused by infection with VHS
virus.
General restrictions; exceptions.
(a) No live VHS-regulated species of
fish may be imported into the United
States from VHS-regulated regions
except in accordance with this subpart
or the regulations of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) in 50 CFR
16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b), nor may such
live VHS-regulated fish be moved from
the port of entry after arrival until
released by an APHIS representative or
FWS official; Provided, that the
Administrator may, upon request in
specific cases, allow the importation of
live VHS-regulated fish into the United
States under conditions other than those
specifically set forth in this subpart
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
when the Administrator determines that
such movement will not result in the
further introduction of VHS into the
United States.
(b)(1) APHIS will list as a VHSregulated fish any fish species found in
freshwater to be susceptible to the North
American (type IV) strain of VHS virus
under natural (i.e., non-controlled)
conditions of exposure and from which
VHS virus has been isolated in cell
culture or other assay determined by the
competent authority to be adequate to
detect VHS virus, with confirmation of
strain identity through genetic
sequencing. Anadromous fish species
that have migrated into freshwater and
from which VHS strain type IV(a) has
been isolated will not be considered
VHS-regulated fish.
(2) If APHIS determines that, in
accordance with the criteria in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a
species should be added to the list of
VHS-regulated species, APHIS will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing that determination.
(c)(1) APHIS will list as a VHSregulated region any region in which
VHS virus has been officially reported
to the World Health Organization for
Animal Health by the country’s
competent authority for aquatic animal
health from any fish species in a water
source that is not a secure water source,
or which the Administrator determines
to be at risk of having VHS based on
criteria such as inadequate surveillance,
less restrictive import requirements, or
other epidemiologic information.
(2) If the Administrator determines
that a region meets the criteria in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, APHIS
will publish a notice of its decision in
the Federal Register and take comments
from the public. The designation as a
VHS-regulated region will become
effective upon publication of this notice.
After reviewing the comments, APHIS
will issue a second notice in the Federal
Register announcing its decision on
whether or not the designation as a
VHS-regulated region will remain in
effect.
(d) APHIS maintains the lists of VHSregulated fish and VHS-regulated
regions on the APHIS aquaculture Web
site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
animal_health/animal_dis_spec/
aquaculture. The lists may be obtained
from the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, Veterinary Services,
National Aquaculture Program, 4700
River Road Unit 46, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231.
(e) Other provisions of this subpart
relating to the importation of live VHSregulated fish shall not apply to
shipments of such fish imported from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
VHS-regulated regions if they are
imported in accordance with the FWS
regulations in 50 CFR 16.13.
(f) Other provisions of this subpart
relating to the importation of live VHSregulated fish shall not apply to
shipments of such fish in transit
through the United States, if an import
permit has been obtained under § 93.912
and all conditions of the permit are
observed, and if the live VHS-regulated
fish species are handled as follows:
(1) They are maintained under
continuous confinement while in transit
through the United States aboard an
aircraft, ocean vessel, or other means of
conveyance; or, if they are unloaded in
the course of such transit, they are
placed in a holding facility that is
provided by the carrier or its agent and
has been approved by the Administrator
as adequate to prevent the spread within
the United States of any finfish disease;
they are maintained there under
continuous confinement until loaded
aboard a means of conveyance for
transportation from the United States;
and they are maintained under
continuous confinement aboard such
means of conveyance until it leaves the
United States.
(2) They are moved in accordance
with any additional conditions
prescribed in the permit that the
Administrator has determined to be
necessary to ensure that the fish do not
introduce VHS into the United States.
(3) For a holding facility to be
approved by the Administrator, the
following conditions must be met:
(i) The holding facility must be
sufficiently isolated to prevent direct or
indirect contact of the live fish it
contains with any other live VHSregulated fish species in the United
States.
(ii) The holding facility must be
constructed to provide adequate
protection against environmental
conditions and so that it can be
adequately cleaned, washed, and
disinfected.
(iii) Provision must be made for
disposal of fish carcasses, shipping
water, effluent, waste, and any
associated shipping materials in a
manner that will prevent dissemination
of disease.
(iv) Provision must be made for
adequate sources of feed and water and
for attendants for the care and feeding
of fish in the facility.
(v) The holding facility must comply
with all applicable local, State, and
Federal requirements for environmental
quality.
(vi) The holding facility must comply
with any additional requirements that
the Administrator may impose on a
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52187
particular shipment in order to prevent
the dissemination of disease.
(g) Other provisions of this subpart
relating to the importation of live VHSregulated fish shall not apply to fish
moved into the United States from VHSregulated regions during catch-andrelease fishing.
§ 93.911 Ports designated for the
importation of live VHS-regulated fish
species.
(a) Live VHS-regulated fish from VHSregulated regions may be imported into
the United States without an import
permit through the following Canadian
border ports: Eastport, ID; Houlton and
Jackman, ME; Detroit, Port Huron, and
Sault Ste. Marie, MI; Baudette, MN;
Opheim, Raymond, and Sweetgrass,
MT; Alexandria Bay, Buffalo, and
Champlain, NY; Dunseith, Pembina, and
Portal, ND; Derby Line and Highgate
Springs, VT; and Oroville and Sumas,
WA.
(b) Live VHS-regulated fish may be
imported into the United States with an
import permit through the following
ports: Anchorage, AK; Los Angeles and
San Francisco, CA; Miami and Tampa,
FL; Atlanta, GA; Honolulu, HI; Chicago,
IL; Boston, MA; Newark, NJ; Jamaica
and Newburgh, NY; Portland, OR;
Memphis, TN; Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX;
Seattle, WA; and San Juan, PR.
(c) Designation of other ports. Other
ports may be designated by the
Administrator in specific cases with the
concurrence of the Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security.
§ 93.912
Import permits.
(a) Live VHS-regulated fish imported
from VHS-regulated regions through a
limited port as described in § 93.911(b)
must be accompanied by an import
permit issued by APHIS and must be
imported within 30 days of the
proposed arrival date stated in the
import permit.
(b) An application for an import
permit must be submitted for each
shipment of live VHS-regulated fish to
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, Veterinary Services, National
Center for Import and Export, 4700
River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231. Application forms for
import permits may be obtained from
this address. Applications may also be
obtained from the following APHIS Web
site: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ncie/
pdf/vs17-129.pdf.
(c) A completed application must
include the following information:
(1) The name and address of the
person intending to export live VHSregulated fish to the United States;
(2) The proposed date of shipment to
the United States;
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
52188
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The name and address of the
person intending to import live VHSregulated fish into the United States;
(4) The species and number of live
VHS-regulated fish to be imported into
the United States;
(5) The purpose of the importation;
(6) The port of embarkation;
(7) The mode of transportation;
(8) The route of travel, including all
carrier stops en route;
(9) The port of entry in the United
States;
(10) The proposed date of arrival in
the United States; and
(11) The name and address of the
person to whom the live VHS-regulated
fish will be delivered in the United
States.
(d) If APHIS determines that the live
VHS-regulated fish from VHS-regulated
regions are eligible for importation,
APHIS will issue an import permit
indicating the applicable conditions for
importation. An import permit does not
guarantee that any live VHS-regulated
fish will be allowed entry into the
United States; the VHS-regulated fish
will be allowed to enter the United
States only if they meet all applicable
requirements of the permit and
regulations.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 93.913
Health certificate.
(a) General. All live VHS-regulated
fish that are imported from VHSregulated regions for other than
immediate slaughter or research or
laboratory use must be accompanied by
a health certificate issued by a full-time
salaried veterinarian of the national
government of the exporting country, or
issued by a certifying official and
endorsed by the competent authority of
that country. The health certificate must
be written in English or contain an
English translation. The health
certificate will be valid for 30 days from
the date of issuance. The health
certificate for the live VHS-regulated
fish must state that:
(1) The live fish were inspected by the
veterinarian or certifying official who
issued the certificate within 72 hours
prior to shipment, and were found to be
free of any clinical signs of disease
consistent with VHS; and
(2) The live fish covered by the health
certificate originated in a region or
facility that has demonstrated freedom
from VHS through testing in accordance
with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section.
(b) Testing. A facility can demonstrate
freedom from VHS through negative
testing results by a pathogen detection
laboratory approved for VHS viral
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
assays by the competent authority of
that country. Testing must meet the
following conditions:
(1) Testing must be conducted with a
testing sample size that provides for a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 2 percent prevalence of infection in
the facility.
(i) Facilities with cultured fish of
VHS-regulated species which can
document a 2-year history of negative
testing for VHS virus can conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 5 percent prevalence of infection in
the facility. Such testing must be
conducted twice a year, with at least 3
months between tests.
(ii) Facilities with cultured fish of
VHS-regulated species which can
document a 4-year history of negative
testing for VHS virus can conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide a
95 percent confidence level of detecting
a 10 percent prevalence of infection in
the facility. Such testing must be
conducted twice a year, with at least 3
months between tests.
(iii) Such facilities must be on a
secure water source, and document that
any VHS-regulated species in the
facility that originated in VHS-regulated
States or Canadian provinces originate
from facilities of the same or higher
health status.
(2) Tests must include virus isolation
or other assays authorized by the
competent authority, using appropriate
cell lines to detect VHS virus, if present.
All suspect VHS cytopathic effects must
be positively identified as VHS through
molecular assays and/or genetic
sequencing.
(3) Proportional numbers of each
VHS-regulated fish species which might
be present in a shipment must be used
for testing, if applicable.
(4) Testing must be conducted at
water temperatures between 50 and 72
°F, or at other times or under
environmental conditions when VHS
virus is most likely to be detected, if
present.
(c) When APHIS adds a new species
to the list of VHS-regulated species after
a facility has been determined to be free
of VHS in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this section, the facility must
conduct additional testing on fish of the
newly listed species, if present in the
facility, and the fish must be free of VHS
virus for the facility to retain its free
status. VHS testing must be conducted
on each newly listed species with a
sample size that provides for a 95
percent confidence level of detecting a
2 percent prevalence of infection in the
fish facility.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(d) Shipping containers. Except as
provided in § 93.910(e)–(g), all live fish
that are to be shipped to the United
States must be shipped in new
containers or in containers that have
been cleaned and disinfected.
(1) Cleaning and disinfection of
shipping containers must be monitored
by the veterinarian or certifying official
who issues the health certificate.
(2) Cleaning and disinfection must be
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus to
which shipping containers may have
been exposed.
(3) The cleaning and disinfection
protocols used must be referenced in the
health certificate or in a separate
cleaning and disinfection certificate
accompanying the shipment to the U.S.
port of entry.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
§ 93.914
Declaration and other documents.
(a) For live VHS-regulated fish offered
for importation under this subpart, the
importer or his or her agent must submit
the following documents to the
appropriate Customs and Border
Protection officer for use by the port
veterinarians:
(1) All permits, certificates, or other
documentation required under
§§ 93.912 and 93.913; and
(2) Two copies of a declaration that
lists the port of entry; the name and
address of the importer; the name and
address of the broker; the origin of the
live fish; the number, species, and the
purpose of the importation; the name of
the person to whom the fish will be
delivered; and the location of the place
to which such delivery will be made.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
§ 93.915
Inspection at the port of entry.
(a) Shipments of live VHS-regulated
fish must be presented for inspection at
a port of entry designated under
§ 93.911. For live fish entering through
a limited port listed in § 93.911(c), the
APHIS port veterinarian must be
notified at least 72 hours in advance of
the arrival in the United States of the
shipment. Any shipment that does not
meet the requirements of this subpart
will be refused entry.
(b) Shipments refused entry must be
exported within a time fixed in each
case by the Administrator, and in
accordance with other provisions he or
she may require in each case for their
handling, or the shipment will be
disposed of as the Administrator may
direct.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0340)
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 93.916
Special provisions.
(a) Slaughter. Live VHS-regulated fish
from VHS-regulated regions may be
imported directly for slaughter under
the following conditions:
(1) An import permit has been
obtained under § 93.912 and all
conditions of the permit are observed.
(2) An APHIS representative at the
port seals the means of conveyance with
official seals.
(3) The shipment is moved directly
from the port of entry to a slaughtering
establishment that meets the following
conditions:
(i) The slaughtering establishment
discharges its waste water to a
municipal sewage system that includes
waste water disinfection sufficient to
neutralize any VHS virus or to either a
non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects, according
to all applicable local, State, and
Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
(ii) Offal, including carcasses, from
the slaughtering establishment is either
rendered or composted.
(4) An APHIS representative will
unseal the vehicle upon arrival at the
slaughtering establishment.
(5) Any water used to transport the
fish is disposed to a municipal sewage
system that includes waste water
disinfection sufficient to neutralize any
VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that
disinfects, according to all applicable
local, State, and Federal regulations,
sufficiently to neutralize any VHS virus.
(b) Research or laboratory use. Live
VHS-regulated fish may be imported
from a VHS-regulated region for
research or laboratory use under the
following conditions:
(1) An import permit has been
obtained under § 93.912 and all
conditions of the permit are observed.
(2) The laboratory or research facility
disposes of effluent to a municipal
sewage system that includes waste
water disinfection sufficient to
neutralize any VHS virus or to either a
non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects, according
to all applicable local, State, and
Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
(3) Carcasses must be rendered or
composted.
(4) Any water used to transport the
fish is disposed to a municipal sewage
system that includes waste water
disinfection sufficient to neutralize any
VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that
disinfects, according to all applicable
local, State, and Federal regulations,
sufficiently to neutralize any VHS virus.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 Sep 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
September 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–20852 Filed 9–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 317, 381, and 442
[Docket No. FSIS–2008–0015]
RIN # 0583–AD17
Determining Net Weight Compliance
for Meat and Poultry Products
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending
its regulations to reference the most
recent version of the National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Handbook 133 that contains standards
for determining the reasonable
variations allowed for the declared net
weight on labels of immediate
containers of meat and poultry
products; the procedures to be used to
determine the net weight and net weight
compliance of meat and poultry
products; and related definitions. The
Agency is also consolidating the
separate net weight regulations for meat
and poultry products in a new CFR part,
applicable to both meat and poultry
products.
This final rule does not incorporate by
reference sections in Handbook 133 that
concern the ‘‘wet tare’’ method for
determining net weight. The ‘‘wet tare’’
method does not include free-flowing
liquid as part of the product but as part
of the tare weight. The Agency regards
any solutions that are added to meat or
poultry to be part of the product and
considers free-flowing liquids to be an
integral component of these products,
and therefore uses the ‘‘dry tare’’, not
the ‘‘wet tare’’ method.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation is
effective October 9, 2008. The
incorporation by reference of the NIST
Handbook 133, Fourth Edition, is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of October 9, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Gioglio, Director, Labeling and
Program Delivery Division, Food Safety
and Inspection Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250–
3700; (202) 205–0010.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52189
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FSIS administers the Federal Meat
Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601–
695), the Poultry Products Inspection
Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451–470), and the
regulations that implement these Acts.
The FMIA and the PPIA require that
packages of meat and poultry products
bear an accurate statement of the
quantity of their contents in terms of
weight, measure, or numerical count (21
U.S.C. 601(n)(5) and 453(b)(5)). The
FMIA and PPIA also provide the
Secretary of Agriculture with the
authority to prescribe standards of fill of
containers for such articles (21 U.S.C.
607(c)(2), 457(b)(2)) that are not
inconsistent with any such standards
established under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301–
392). In implementing regulations, FSIS
has elected to adopt the relevant NIST
standards established for determining
compliance with the net weight
contents statement of packaged goods
that are enumerated in NIST Handbook
133. Consequently, FSIS has
incorporated by reference certain NIST
standards in the Federal meat and
poultry inspection regulations.
NIST was established by Congress in
1988 to assist industry in the
development of technology to improve
product quality, to modernize
manufacturing processes, to ensure
product reliability, and to facilitate
rapid commercialization of products
based on new scientific discoveries.
NIST’s basic functions include
developing, maintaining, and retaining
custody of the national standards of
measurement and providing the means
and methods for comparing standards
used in science, engineering,
manufacturing, commerce, industry,
and education with the standards
adopted or recognized by the Federal
Government.
NIST Handbook 133 is a procedural
guide for compliance testing of net
content statements on packaged goods.
FSIS has elected to make mandatory the
NIST standards in Handbook 133
regarding the determination of the
reasonable variations allowed from the
declared net weight on labels of
immediate containers of meat and
poultry products, the procedures to be
used to determine net weight and net
weight compliance for meat and poultry
products, and related definitions.
Consequently, FSIS currently
incorporates by reference the NIST
standards from Handbook 133 in its
meat and poultry regulations. The
Agency first incorporated NIST
Handbook 133 by reference in
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 9, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52173-52189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20852]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Parts 71, 83, and 93
[Docket No. APHIS-2007-0038]
RIN 0579-AC74
Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia; Interstate Movement and Import
Restrictions on Certain Live Fish
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are establishing regulations to restrict the interstate
movement and importation into the United States of live fish that are
susceptible to viral hemorrhagic septicemia, a highly contagious
disease of certain fresh and saltwater fish. In 2005 and 2006, viral
hemorrhagic septicemia was detected in freshwater fish in several of
the Great Lakes and related tributaries. The disease has been
responsible for several large-scale die-offs of wild fish in the Great
Lakes region. This action is necessary to prevent further introductions
into, and dissemination within, the United States of viral hemorrhagic
septicemia.
DATES: Effective date: This interim rule is effective November 10,
2008.
Comment dates: Comments on the interim rule are due on or before
November 10, 2008. Comments on the environmental assessment are due on
or before October 9, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2007-0038 to submit or view comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2007-0038, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2007-0038.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. P. Gary Egrie, Senior Staff
Veterinary Medical Officer, National Center for Animal Health Programs,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 46, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301)
734-0695; or Dr. Peter L. Merrill, Senior Staff Veterinarian, National
Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 52174]]
Background
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS) is a highly contagious disease
of certain fresh and saltwater fish, caused by a rhabdovirus. It is
listed as a notifiable disease by the World Organization for Animal
Health (OIE). The pathogen produces variable clinical signs in fish
including lethargy, skin darkening, exophthalmia, pale gills, a
distended abdomen, and external and internal hemorrhaging. The
development of the disease in infected fish can result in substantial
mortality. Other infected fish may not show any clinical signs or die,
but may be lifelong carriers and shed the virus.
Four genotypes of VHS virus have been identified, and appear to be
distributed geographically. Genotypes I, II, and III are mainly found
in Europe or Asia and are highly pathogenic to rainbow trout. The
fourth genotype, referred to as North American type IV, has been found
in wild fish from the East and West coasts of North America
periodically since 1988. This genotype is less virulent to commercially
important fish stocks than the European/Asian VHS virus genotypes
because it results in less morbidity and mortality than those
genotypes.
In 2005 and 2006, VHS outbreaks were reported in wild fish from the
Great Lakes in both Canada and the United States. The mortality
associated with numerous individual outbreaks ranged from just a few
fish to many thousands per outbreak.
The 2005 and 2006 VHS outbreaks were the first freshwater
isolations of VHS virus in the United States. The strain of VHS virus
isolated from all of these outbreaks, while similar to North American
type IV found in saltwater, has been shown to be genetically distinct
from other known strains of VHS virus, and is apparently capable of
causing substantial morbidity and mortality in many native species of
fish. It is currently believed that the saltwater-adapted type IV
strain mutated into a strain that is affecting new host fish species in
new environments in both Canada and the United States. The extent of
VHS viral distribution is not yet known; however, reported epizootics
attributable to VHS since 2005 have been limited to wild fish from the
Great Lakes watershed.
The emerging strain (tentatively called North American type IV(b)
to differentiate it from what will likely be renamed type IV(a)) has
caused a number of mass mortalities in wild fish populations, ranging
up to many thousands of fish. Some outbreaks were reported to occur at
temperatures that had not been previously associated with the
development of VHS disease. Virus growth is generally inhibited when
water temperatures are above 15 [deg]C; however, this VHS virus appears
to have a much wider temperature range. According to research conducted
at the U.S. Geological Survey, type IV(b), in vitro, grows best at 15
[deg]C and up to 20 [deg]C where growth begins to decline. Type IV(b)
viral growth was inhibited at 25 [deg]C. Additionally, all the species
of fish in the 2005 and 2006 North American outbreaks had not
previously been known to be susceptible to VHS infection and/or
disease. The list of fish species susceptible to VHS, as determined by
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), currently
includes 28 separate species. These species include baitfish,
recreationally important fish, and food fish such as salmonids and
catfish.
Federal Order
The Animal Health Protection Act (AHPA) authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture to prohibit or restrict the importation or movement in
interstate commerce of any animal, article, or means of conveyance if
the Secretary determines that the prohibition or restriction is
necessary to prevent the introduction or dissemination of any pest or
disease of livestock into or within the United States.
In response to recent outbreaks of VHS in wild fish populations in
the Great Lakes, the Administrator determined that it was necessary, in
order to prevent the spread of VHS into aquaculture facilities, to
prohibit or restrict the interstate movement and importation of VHS-
regulated species of live fish. Accordingly, on October 24, 2006, APHIS
issued a Federal Order prohibiting the importation of VHS-susceptible
species of live fish from two Canadian provinces (Ontario and Quebec)
into the United States and the interstate movement of the same species
of live fish from the eight States bordering the Great Lakes (Illinois,
Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and
Wisconsin).
At the time the Federal Order was issued, only three States
(Michigan, New York, and Ohio) had been affected by VHS within the
jurisdictional borders of their States. Epidemiologic considerations
such as the commonality of the Great Lakes watershed influenced APHIS'
decision to include all of the States within the Great Lakes watershed
as ``affected'' or ``at-risk.''
In October 2006, APHIS held a 2-day meeting with Federal, State,
Tribal, and industry representatives to discuss VHS and the Federal
Order, and to obtain information regarding State regulations and
diagnostic testing programs related to VHS. During this meeting, APHIS
received several recommendations from participants regarding
modifications to the Federal Order that could be made to alleviate
impacts on industry and related businesses in the Great Lakes region
while still protecting against the spread of VHS.
APHIS also met with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
(DFO) and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) in November 2006.
At that time, Canada provided APHIS with information about its VHS
testing program and requested that APHIS amend the Federal Order to
allow the importation of fish that Canada certifies as VHS-free.
Based on the information gathered at these meetings, on November
14, 2006, APHIS modified the Federal Order to allow VHS-susceptible
species of live salmonid fish from the affected Canadian provinces to
be imported into the United States if the shipment meets the
regulations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in 50 CFR
16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b). The FWS regulations in 50 CFR 16.13(a)(3)
provide that live or dead uneviscerated salmonid fish are prohibited
entry into the United States for any purpose except by direct shipment
accompanied by a certification that: (1) The fish lots from which the
shipments originated have been sampled; (2) viral assays have been
conducted on the samples according to methods specified in the
regulations; and (3) certain pathogens, including the virus causing
VHS, have not been detected in the fish stocks from which the samples
were taken. The FWS regulations further provide that live salmonid fish
can be imported into the United States only with the written approval
of the Director of FWS. The regulations in 50 CFR 16.13(b) set out the
information that must be included in the certification statement
required in Sec. 16.13(a)(3).
The modified Federal Order also established conditions under which
VHS-susceptible species of live fish could be moved from the eight
States bordering the Great Lakes. Specifically, the Order provided that
VHS-susceptible live fish may be moved interstate for slaughter if the
fish are: (1) Intended for human consumption; (2) transported to a
State-inspected slaughter facility that discharges waste water into a
municipal sewage system that includes waste water disinfection, or
disposes of waste water in a non-discharging settling pond or a
settling pond that disinfects according to State
[[Page 52175]]
and Federal requirements, and renders or composts offal, including
carcasses; and (3) accompanied by a valid VS Form 1-27 issued by an
APHIS area office if not tested for VHS.
The Order also provided that VHS-susceptible fish may be moved
interstate to research and diagnostic laboratories provided the fish
are: (1) Accompanied by a valid VS Form 1-27 issued by an APHIS area
office stating that the fish are destined for a research or diagnostic
laboratory that has been approved by a State, Tribal, or Federal
competent authority for aquatic animal health and (2) received at a
laboratory where waste fluids and carcasses are considered medical
waste and disposed of according to State and Federal requirements.
Finally, the Order provided that VHS-susceptible fish may be moved
interstate for purposes other than slaughter, research, or diagnostics
provided the fish are transported with documentation from the
appropriate State, Tribal, or Federal competent authority for aquatic
animal health stating that the fish have tested negative for VHS virus
under specific national and international standards.
In January 2007, APHIS hosted public meetings in Lakewood, CO;
Memphis, TN; Romulus, MI; and Coraopolis, PA. The purpose of the
meetings was to present current information about the outbreaks of VHS
and actions taken to prevent its spread, and to give interested
stakeholders an opportunity to present data and views concerning the
possible regulation of VHS by the Agency.
On May 4, 2007, APHIS modified the Federal Order to allow for the
catch-and-release of VHS-susceptible regulated fish in waters that
cross State and international boundaries. These activities include
recreational fishing, tournaments, competitions, fishing derbies, or
other types of contests where individuals catch, compare, and release
live VHS-susceptible fish. However, catch-and-release fishing
activities do not include the movement of VHS-susceptible fish intended
to be used as live bait. Catch and release fishing activities are
considered low risk for spreading VHS virus because fish are caught and
released within the same body of water and within a limited geographic
area over a limited time period. In contrast, the use of live bait is
considered high risk for spreading VHS virus because the bait is used
for fishing in multiple bodies of water over a broader geographic area.
On November 8, 2007, APHIS modified the Federal Order by revising
the list of VHS-susceptible species. We removed 12 species and added 2
new freshwater fish species that are susceptible to VHS. We also
clarified the scientific names of several species. Currently, there are
28 separate species of fish listed.
The original October 2006 Federal Order listed 37 species of VHS-
susceptible fish, including all species listed by the OIE as
susceptible to all known strains of VHS. The updated list includes only
those species found in freshwater environments in the United States and
Canada that have been infected by VHS under natural (i.e.,
nonexperimental) conditions of exposure and from which VHS virus has
been isolated by cell culture, with confirmation of strain identity
through molecular detection. Anadromous fish species \1\ that have
migrated into freshwater and from which VHS strain type IV(a) is
isolated are excluded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We define anadromous fish as fish that are born and spawn in
freshwater, but which spend part of their lifecycle in saltwater.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, on April 2, 2008, APHIS modified the Federal Order to
allow VHS-susceptible species of live non-salmonid fish from affected
Canadian provinces to be imported into the United States for direct
slaughter if accompanied by an APHIS permit.
The Federal Order was issued in response to the rapid spread of VHS
in the Great Lakes region and was designed to prevent the introduction
of VHS into aquaculture facilities by controlling the movement of VHS-
susceptible fish species while APHIS gathered more information about
the disease and developed a regulatory program that would allow the
interstate movement and importation of VHS-susceptible fish under
certain conditions. Taking into consideration the information provided
by States, Tribes, and other interested stakeholders, APHIS has now
developed a regulatory framework for the interstate movement and
importation of VHS-susceptible fish species.
In the Federal Order, we used the terms ``VHS-susceptible species''
and ``VHS-affected or at-risk States or regions;'' however, for the
purposes of these regulations we will use the terms ``VHS-regulated
species'' and ``VHS-regulated areas or regions.''
Accordingly, we are amending the interstate movement regulations in
title 9, subchapter C, by adding a new part 83, ``Viral Hemorrhagic
Septicemia'' (Sec. Sec. 83.1 through 83.7). We are also amending 9 CFR
part 71 to provide that fish affected with VHS may be moved interstate
in accordance with part 83. Finally, we are amending the animal import
regulations in 9 CFR part 93, subpart I, ``Aquatic Animal Species''
(Sec. Sec. 93.900 through 93.916). The new interstate movement and
importation requirements are discussed in detail below.
As stated previously in this document, the AHPA authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to prohibit or restrict the importation or
movement in interstate commerce of any animal, article, or means of
conveyance if the Secretary determines that the prohibition or
restriction is necessary to prevent the introduction or dissemination
of any pest or disease of livestock into or within the United States.
Ballast water (i.e., water with its suspended matter taken on board a
ship to control trim, list, draught, stability, or stresses of a ship)
can be taken onto a ship in its port of origin and discharged into the
water body of the ship's destination port, making it a potential
pathway for VHS virus. APHIS has neither the regulatory authority nor
the technical expertise to safely regulate ballast water discharge.
Therefore, we do not address ballast water in this interim rule. APHIS
will assist the U.S. Coast Guard, which has clear regulatory authority
for ballast water, in their development of ballast water discharge
standards.
Definitions (Sec. Sec. 83.1 and 93.900)
In Sec. Sec. 83.1 and 93.900, we define the terms used in the
regulations. In Sec. 83.1, we set out the following standard terms and
definitions, which are found throughout title 9, subchapter C:
Accredited veterinarian, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS), APHIS representative, Department,
interstate, moved (movement), person, State, and State animal health
official. These terms and their definitions are set out in the
regulatory text at the end of this document.
In both Sec. Sec. 83.1 and 93.900, we define terms that are
specific to VHS and aquatic animals. These terms are anadromous fish,
catch-and-release fishing, cultured fish, secure water source, VHS
virus, and viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS). These terms are defined
as follows:
Anadromous fish. Fish that are born and spawn in freshwater, but
which spend part of their lifecycle in saltwater.
Catch-and-release fishing. Fishing for pleasure or for recreational
purposes, including tournaments, organized fishing competitions,
fishing derbies, or other types of contests where individuals catch,
compare, and release live VHS-regulated fish. This term excludes VHS-
regulated fish used, or intended to be used, as live bait.
Cultured fish. Fish of the same species and age class, originating
from the same
[[Page 52176]]
broodstock and on the same water supply, whose care is partly or
totally managed from the first life stage onwards.
Secure water source. A biosecure water supply that does not contain
pathogens or has not had the opportunity to be contaminated with
pathogens. Biosecure water supplies include well, spring, or borehole
water; surface water that does not contain fish populations; or water
that has been treated to eliminate aquatic animal pathogens.
VHS virus. Any North American (type IV) strain of VHS virus, a
rhabdovirus of fish.
Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS). A disease caused by infection
with VHS virus.
Due to slight differences in terminology and program requirements,
some VHS-specific terms are defined differently in Sec. Sec. 83.1 and
93.900. These terms are approved laboratory, competent authority, VHS-
regulated area, VHS-regulated region, and VHS-regulated fish.
In Sec. 83.1, approved laboratory is defined as a laboratory
authorized by a State, Tribal, or Federal competent authority for
aquatic animal health to perform assays for the detection of VHS virus
while, in Sec. 93.900, approved laboratory is defined as a laboratory
authorized by the competent authority of a country for aquatic animal
health to perform assays for the detection of VHS virus.
In Sec. 83.1, we define competent authority as the State, Tribal,
or Federal entity with the legal responsibility for ensuring or
supervising the implementation of aquatic animal health measures. This
definition is similar to the current definition for competent authority
in Sec. 93.900, which refers to the national veterinary services or
other authority of a country responsible for aquatic animal health.
In Sec. 83.1, VHS-regulated area is defined as any State or
portion of a State listed in accordance with Sec. 83.4. Section 93.900
defines VHS-regulated region as any region listed in accordance with
Sec. 93.910.
In Sec. 83.1, we define VHS-regulated fish as any fish species
listed in accordance with Sec. 83.4 while, in Sec. 93.900, we define
VHS-regulated fish as any fish species listed in accordance with Sec.
93.910.
Finally, in Sec. 83.1, we define the term Interstate Certificate
of Inspection (ICI). This term is specific to the interstate movement
requirements in part 83 and is defined as an official document issued
by an accredited veterinarian or a State, Tribal, or Federal competent
authority in the originating State that certifies that the fish being
moved interstate originated from a facility that has been found free of
VHS virus.
Interstate Movement
General Restrictions; Conditions of Movement (Sec. Sec. 83.2 and 83.3)
Section 83.2 provides that live VHS-regulated fish may not be moved
interstate from a VHS-regulated area except in compliance with part 83.
Section 83.3 sets forth the conditions under which live VHS-regulated
fish may be moved interstate.
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 83.3 provides that, apart from the
exceptions provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of that section, live
VHS-regulated fish, including fish moved to live fish markets, may only
be moved interstate from a VHS-regulated area if the fish originated
from a facility that has been found free of the VHS virus in accordance
with Sec. 83.6 and the fish are accompanied by an Interstate
Certificate of Inspection (ICI) issued by an accredited veterinarian or
a State, Tribal, or Federal competent authority for aquatic animal
health.
Paragraph (b) of Sec. 83.3 provides that live VHS-regulated fish
may be moved interstate directly to a slaughtering establishment
provided the fish are transported in a sealed conveyance and
accompanied by a VS Form 1-27. The VS Form 1-27 is available through
APHIS' Veterinary Services offices, and can be issued by a State,
Tribal, Federal, or accredited veterinarian. The fish must be moved to
a slaughtering establishment that discharges its waste water to a
municipal sewage system that includes waste water disinfection
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus, or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that disinfects, according to all
applicable local, State, and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus. In addition, any water used to transport the
fish must be disposed of to a municipal sewage system that includes
waste water disinfection sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus, or to
either a non-discharging settling pond or a settling pond that
disinfects, according to all applicable local, State, and Federal
regulations, sufficiently to neutralize any VHS virus. These
requirements are necessary to ensure that water waste discharged to the
environment (or to a public waterway) does not contain any viable VHS
virus. Offal, including carcasses, from the slaughtering establishment
must be either rendered or composted.
Paragraph (c) of this section extends these same provisions to fish
moved for research or diagnostic purposes. Paragraph (d) specifies that
live VHS-regulated fish may be moved interstate during catch-and-
release fishing.
Finally, paragraph (e) provides that the Administrator may, on a
case-by-case basis, permit the interstate movement of fish whose
movement is not otherwise provided for in part 83, under such
conditions as the Administrator may prescribe in each case to prevent
the introduction and dissemination of VHS.
VHS-Regulated Fish and VHS-Regulated Areas (Sec. 83.4)
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 83.4 provides that APHIS will list as a VHS-
regulated fish any fish species found in freshwater to be susceptible
to the North American (type IV) strain of VHS virus under natural
(i.e., non-controlled) conditions of exposure and from which VHS virus
has been isolated in cell culture or other assay determined by the
Administrator to be adequate to detect VHS virus, with confirmation of
strain identity through genetic sequencing. Anadromous fish that have
migrated into freshwater and from which VHS strain type IV(a) has been
isolated will not be considered VHS-regulated fish under this rule
because this strain appears to be less pathogenic than type IV(b). Type
IV(a) has been in the United States since at least 1988 and has not
resulted in large-scale fish mortalities across a broad range of
species such as those that were associated with the outbreaks of type
IV(b) in the Great Lakes.
Paragraph (a) further provides that, when APHIS determines that a
species meets the criteria of this paragraph and should be added to the
list of VHS-regulated fish, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing that determination.
Paragraph (b) of this section provides that APHIS will list as a
VHS-regulated area each State or portion of a State from which VHS
virus has been detected in any VHS-regulated fish species (with or
without clinical signs of disease) in a water source that is not a
secure water source, or which the Administrator determines to be at
risk of having VHS based on criteria such as inadequate surveillance or
movement requirements, or other epidemiologic information.
Paragraph (b) further provides that, if the Administrator
determines that a State or portion of a State meets the criteria for a
VHS-regulated area, APHIS will publish a notice of its decision in the
Federal Register and take comments from the public. The designation as
a VHS-regulated area will become
[[Page 52177]]
effective upon publication of this notice. After reviewing the
comments, APHIS will issue a second notice in the Federal Register
announcing its decision on whether or not the designation as a VHS-
regulated area will remain in effect.
Paragraph (c) provides that these lists of VHS-regulated fish and
VHS-regulated areas will be maintained on the APHIS aquaculture Web
site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_dis_spec/
aquaculture. The purpose of maintaining the lists on the Web site is to
maintain the most accurate, up-to-date list possible in a location
where affected parties can easily view recent changes. The Web site
list should be particularly useful when a new area is added to the
list, which occurs immediately after APHIS receives and confirms
reports of a new outbreak. Changes to lists maintained in the
regulations typically take several weeks, so maintaining the lists on
the Web site will allow APHIS to communicate new developments and take
prompt action as soon as it confirms an outbreak or identifies a new
species of fish affected by VHS.
Paragraph (c) also includes an address from which the lists of VHS-
regulated fish and VHS-regulated areas may be obtained from APHIS.
As of this rule's effective date, the following fish species and
areas are regulated because of VHS:
VHS-Regulated Areas
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
VHS-Regulated Fish Species
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Black crappie......................... Pomoxis nigromaculatus.
Bluegill.............................. Lepomis macrochirus.
Bluntnose minnow...................... Pimephales notatus.
Brown bullhead........................ Ameiurus nebulosus.
Brown trout........................... Salmo trutta.
Burbot................................ Lota lota.
Channel catfish....................... Ictalurus punctatus.
Chinook salmon........................ Oncorhynchus tshawytscha.
Emerald shiner........................ Notropis atherinoides.
Freshwater drum....................... Aplodinotus grunniens.
Gizzard shad.......................... Dorosoma cepedianum.
Lake whitefish........................ Coregonus clupeaformis.
Largemouth bass....................... Micropterus salmoides.
Muskellunge........................... Esox masquinongy.
Northern pike......................... Esox lucius.
Pumpkinseed........................... Lepomis gibbosus.
Rainbow trout......................... Oncorhynchus mykiss.
Rock bass............................. Ambloplites rupestris.
Round goby............................ Neogobius melanostomus.
Shorthead redhorse.................... Moxostoma macrolepidotum.
Silver redhorse....................... Moxostoma anisurum.
Smallmouth bass....................... Micropterus dolomieu.
Spottail shiner....................... Notropis hudsonius.
Trout-Perch........................... Percopsis omiscomaycus.
Walleye............................... Sander vitreus.
White bass............................ Morone chrysops.
White perch........................... Morone americana.
Yellow perch.......................... Perca flavescens.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This interim rule does not provide a process by which APHIS will
remove areas from the list of VHS-regulated areas if the area petitions
APHIS for a reassessment of its disease status. As discussed in more
detail below under the heading ``Related Issues on Which APHIS is
Seeking Comment,'' we particularly invite comments on which specific
factors APHIS should consider before removing an area from the list of
VHS-regulated areas.
Interstate Certificate of Inspection (ICI) (Sec. 83.5)
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 83.5 requires that live VHS-regulated fish
moved interstate in accordance with Sec. 83.3(a) be accompanied by an
ICI issued by an accredited veterinarian or a State, Tribal, or Federal
competent authority for aquatic animal health. This paragraph further
provides that an ICI will be valid for 30 days from the date of
issuance.
Paragraph (b) of this section requires that the ICI state that: (1)
The live fish were inspected by the accredited veterinarian or a State,
Tribal, or Federal competent authority for aquatic animal health within
72 hours prior to shipment and found to be free of any clinical signs
of disease consistent with VHS, and (2) the live fish covered by the
ICI originated in an area or facility that has demonstrated freedom
from VHS in accordance with Sec. 83.6.
In addition, the section specifies that the ICI must contain the
following information:
The name, address, and phone number of the owner or
owner's agent.
The name, address, and phone number of the facility in
which the fish originated.
The name, address, and phone number of the person or
facility who will receive the fish; or the State or other regulatory
authority responsible for oversight of the environment in which the
fish will be introduced.
The name, address, and phone number of the shipping or
transportation company.
The species and number of the fish.
The lot (or other) identification of the shipment.
The name, address, and phone number of the approved
laboratory that performed the testing required by Sec. 83.6 and the
number of fish tested, the assay(s) used for testing, and the test
results.
The date the certificate was issued.
The type of water source according to Sec. 83.6(c).
Requiring the issuance of an ICI will ensure that appropriate
testing procedures were applied as well as allow for traceback should
an inspector encounter a problem with or have questions about a
shipment.
Testing Requirements (Sec. 83.6)
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 83.6 provides that a facility can
demonstrate freedom from VHS through negative testing results provided
by an approved laboratory. Paragraph (a) also specifies that such
testing must:
Be conducted with a testing sample size that provides for
a 95 percent confidence level of detecting a 2 percent prevalence of
infection in the facility.
Include virus isolation or other assay authorized by the
Administrator, using appropriate cell lines to detect VHS virus, if
present. All suspect VHS cytopathic effects must be positively
identified as VHS through molecular assays and/or genetic sequencing.
Use proportional numbers of each VHS-regulated fish
species which might be present in the facility.
Be conducted at water temperatures between 50 and 72
[deg]F, or at other times or under environmental conditions when VHS is
most likely to be detected, if present.
Facilities with a history of negative testing results for VHS are
assumed to have a lower risk of spreading VHS; therefore, we will
decrease the number of fish required to be tested for such facilities.
Specifically, paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 83.6 also provides that
facilities with cultured fish of VHS-regulated species which can
document a 2-year history of negative testing for VHS virus can conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide for a 95 percent confidence
level of detecting a 5 percent prevalence of infection in the facility.
Facilities with cultured fish of VHS-regulated species which can
document a 4-year history of negative testing for VHS virus can conduct
testing at a sampling level to provide a 95 percent confidence level of
detecting a 10 percent prevalence of infection in the fish facility.
Such facilities must be on a secure water source, and testing must be
conducted twice a year, with at least 3 months between tests. These
facilities must also document that any VHS-regulated species in the
facility that originated in VHS-regulated States or Canadian
[[Page 52178]]
provinces originate from facilities of the same or higher health
status.
Because this is an emerging disease, APHIS may update the list of
VHS-regulated fish species as our knowledge of species susceptibility
increases. Paragraph (b) explains how facilities can maintain VHS-free
status when new species are added to the list of VHS-regulated fish
species. Specifically, paragraph (b) provides that, when a new species
is added to the list of VHS-regulated fish, a facility that has been
determined to be free of VHS must conduct additional testing on the
newly listed species, if present in the facility, and the fish must be
free of VHS virus in order for the facility to retain its free status.
Paragraph (b) further provides that VHS testing must be conducted on
each newly listed species with a sample size that provides for a 95
percent confidence level of detecting a 2 percent prevalence of
infection in the fish facility in order to return the facility to the
same health status that existed prior to the new listing of the VHS-
regulated species.
Paragraph (c) of this section specifies that the test results for
fish maintained on a secure water source will be valid for 6 months
from the date of sample collection provided no fish of a lesser or
unknown health status are introduced into the facility. Test results
for fish held on a water source that is not a secure water source will
be valid for 30 days from the date of sample collection. This will help
to ensure that fish qualified to move interstate by virtue of a health
certification program retain that qualification for a reasonable length
of time while not compromising the health status of those fish through
the introduction of additional fish of unknown or lesser VHS status, or
introduction of VHS virus through the water source.
Shipping Containers; Cleaning and Disinfection (Sec. 83.7)
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 83.7 requires that all live VHS-regulated
fish that are to be moved interstate in accordance with Sec. 83.3(a)
must be moved in new containers or containers that have been cleaned
and disinfected to neutralize any VHS virus to which the shipping
containers may have been exposed. Cleaning and disinfection must be
monitored by the accredited veterinarian or State, Tribal, or Federal
competent authority for aquatic animal health who issues the ICI. The
cleaning and disinfection protocols used must be referenced in the ICI
or in a separate cleaning and disinfection certificate accompanying the
shipment.
Import Restrictions
General Restrictions; Exceptions (Sec. 93.910)
As previously discussed, the Federal Order, as amended, allows VHS-
susceptible species of live salmonid fish from the affected Canadian
provinces to be imported into the United States if the shipment meets
the FWS regulations in 50 CFR 16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b). This interim
rule will continue to allow live salmonid VHS-regulated fish to be
imported into the United States from VHS-regulated regions in
accordance with the FWS regulations. In addition, this rule establishes
conditions under which live non-salmonid VHS-regulated fish species may
be imported into the United States from VHS-regulated regions.
Specifically, paragraph (a) of Sec. 93.910 provides that no live
VHS-regulated species of fish may be imported into the United States
from VHS-regulated regions except in accordance with subpart I or the
regulations of the FWS in 50 CFR 16.13(a)(3) and 16.13(b). This
paragraph further provides that no such live VHS-regulated fish may be
moved from the port of entry after arrival until released by an APHIS
representative or FWS official. In addition, this paragraph specifies
that the Administrator may, upon request in specific cases, allow the
importation of live VHS-regulated fish into the United States under
conditions other than those specifically set forth in the subpart when
the Administrator determines that such movement will not result in the
further introduction of VHS into the United States.
Paragraph (b) of Sec. 93.910 provides that APHIS will list as a
VHS-regulated fish any fish species found in freshwater to be
susceptible to the North American (type IV) strain of VHS virus under
natural (i.e., non-controlled) conditions of exposure and from which
VHS virus has been isolated in cell culture or other assay determined
by the competent authority to be adequate to detect VHS virus, with
confirmation of strain identity through genetic sequencing. As stated
previously, anadromous fish that have migrated into freshwater and from
which VHS strain type IV(a) has been isolated are not considered VHS-
regulated fish under this rule. Paragraph (b) further provides that,
when APHIS determines that a species meets the criteria of this
paragraph and should be added to the list of VHS-regulated fish, APHIS
will publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing that
determination.
Paragraph (c) of this section provides that APHIS will list as a
VHS-regulated region any region in which VHS virus has been officially
reported to the OIE by the country's competent authority for aquatic
animal health from any fish species in a water source that is not a
secure water source, or which the Administrator determines to be at
risk of having VHS based on criteria such as inadequate surveillance,
less restrictive import requirements, or other epidemiologic
information.
Paragraph (c) further provides that, if the Administrator
determines that a region meets the criteria for a VHS-regulated region,
APHIS will publish a notice of its decision in the Federal Register and
take comments from the public. The designation as a VHS-regulated
region will become effective upon publication of this notice. After
reviewing the comments, APHIS will issue a second notice in the Federal
Register announcing its decision on whether or not the designation as a
VHS-regulated region will remain in effect.
Paragraph (d) provides that these lists will be maintained on the
APHIS aquaculture Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/
animal_dis_spec/aquaculture. This paragraph further provides an
address from which the lists of VHS-regulated fish and VHS-regulated
regions may be obtained from APHIS.
As of this rule's effective date, only two Canadian Provinces
(Ontario and Quebec) are listed as VHS-regulated regions. The current
list of VHS-regulated fish species is set out above under the heading
``VHS-regulated fish and VHS-regulated areas (Sec. 83.4).''
This interim rule does not provide a process by which APHIS will
remove regions from the list of VHS-regulated regions if the area
petitions APHIS for a reassessment of its disease status. As discussed
in more detail below under the heading ``Related Issues on Which APHIS
Is Seeking Comment,'' we particularly invite comments on which specific
factors APHIS should consider before removing an area from the list of
VHS-regulated regions.
Paragraph (e) of Sec. 93.910 provides that other provisions of
part 93 relating to the importation of live VHS-regulated fish shall
not apply to shipments of such fish imported from VHS-regulated regions
if they are imported in accordance with the FWS regulations in 50 CFR
16.13. As previously discussed, the FWS regulations pertain to live
salmonid fish species to be imported into the United States. This
paragraph makes it clear that live salmonid VHS-regulated fish to be
imported into the United States from VHS-regulated regions will be
exempt from the other provisions in part 93 provided that the
[[Page 52179]]
fish are imported in accordance with the FWS regulations.
Paragraph (f) of this section provides that other provisions of
part 93 relating to the importation of live VHS-regulated fish shall
not apply to shipments of such fish in transit through the United
States, if an import permit has been obtained under Sec. 93.912 and
all conditions of the permit are observed, and if the live VHS-
regulated fish species are handled as follows:
They are maintained under continuous confinement while in
transit through the United States aboard an aircraft, ocean vessel, or
other means of conveyance; or if they are unloaded in the course of
such transit, they are placed in a holding facility that is provided by
the carrier or its agent and has been approved by the Administrator as
adequate to prevent the spread within the United States of any finfish
pathogen; they are maintained there under continuous confinement until
loaded aboard a means of conveyance for transportation from the United
States; and they are maintained under continuous confinement aboard
such means of conveyance until it leaves the United States.
They are moved in accordance with any additional
conditions prescribed in the permit that the Administrator has
determined to be necessary to ensure that the fish do not introduce VHS
into the United States.
For a holding facility to be approved by the Administrator, the
following conditions must be met:
The holding facility must be sufficiently isolated to
prevent direct or indirect contact of the live fish it contains with
any other live VHS-regulated fish species in the United States.
The holding facility must be constructed to provide
adequate protection against environmental conditions and so that it can
be adequately cleaned, washed, and disinfected.
Provision must be made for disposal of fish carcasses,
shipping water, effluent, waste, and any associated shipping materials
in a manner that will prevent dissemination of disease.
Provision must be made for adequate sources of feed and
water and for attendants for the care and feeding of fish in the
facility.
The holding facility must comply with all applicable
local, State, and Federal requirements for environmental quality.
The holding facility must comply with any additional
requirements that the Administrator may impose on a particular shipment
in order to prevent the dissemination of VHS virus.
Paragraph (g) provides that the provisions of the subpart relating
to the importation of live VHS-regulated fish shall not apply to fish
moved into the United States from VHS-regulated regions during catch-
and-release fishing.
Ports Designated for the Importation of Live VHS-Regulated Fish Species
(Sec. 93.911)
Section 93.911 designates ports through which live VHS-regulated
fish from VHS-regulated regions may be imported into the United States
without an import permit. To relieve some of the paperwork burden
associated with import permits, we will allow VHS-regulated fish
species that have been tested in accordance with Sec. 93.913(b) and
found to be free of VHS virus to be imported through certain Canadian
border ports without an import permit. We consider those ports to have
adequate facilities and inspectors to perform the necessary inspections
of shipments of live fish without advance notification of the arrival
of a shipment that is associated with the application for and issuance
of an import permit. As described later in this document in the section
titled ``Declaration and other documents (Sec. 93.914),'' all
importers must submit a declaration to Customs. The information
included in the declaration will parallel the information required in
an import permit, except that importers must indicate the route of
travel in an import permit. APHIS asks for notice of a shipment's route
of travel in order to prevent transits of animals through countries
subject to import restrictions because of certain animal disease risks.
We typically do not require this information for shipments coming
through land border ports because it is unlikely that a shipment
entering the United States at a land border port would have traveled
through any other countries.
Paragraph (a) provides that VHS-regulated fish species may be
imported into the following Canadian border ports without an import
permit: Eastport, ID; Houlton and Jackman, ME; Detroit, Port Huron, and
Sault Ste. Marie, MI; Baudette, MN; Opheim, Raymond, and Sweetgrass,
MT; Alexandria Bay, Buffalo, and Champlain, NY; Dunseith, Pembina, and
Portal, ND; Derby Line and Highgate Springs, VT; and Oroville and
Sumas, WA.
Paragraph (b) provides that live VHS-regulated fish may be imported
into the United States with an import permit through the following
ports: Anchorage, AK; Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA; Miami and
Tampa, FL; Atlanta, GA; Honolulu, HI; Chicago, IL; Boston, MA; Newark,
NJ; Jamaica and Newburgh, NY; Portland, OR; Memphis, TN, Dallas-Ft.
Worth, TX; Seattle, WA; and San Juan, PR.
Paragraph (c) of this section also provides for other ports to be
designated by the Administrator in specific cases with the concurrence
of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Import Permits (Sec. 93.912)
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 93.912 requires that live VHS-regulated fish
imported from VHS-regulated regions through a limited port listed in
Sec. 93.911(b) be accompanied by an import permit issued by APHIS and
must be imported within 30 days of the proposed arrival date stated in
the import permit.
Paragraph (b) provides the address and APHIS Web site from which
prospective importers may request import permit applications and to
which completed applications should be sent. An application for an
import permit must be submitted for each shipment of live VHS-regulated
fish.
Paragraph (c) of this section specifies the information that must
be included on an import permit application. It states that the
application must include the name and address of the exporter; the
proposed date of shipment to the United States; the name and address of
the importer; the species and number of live VHS-regulated fish to be
imported into the United States; the purpose of the importation; the
port of embarkation; the mode of transportation; the route of travel,
including all carrier stops en route; the port of entry in the United
States; the proposed date of arrival in the United States; and the name
and address of the person to whom the live VHS-regulated fish will be
delivered in the United States.
APHIS needs this information to determine whether the live fish are
eligible for importation, to respond to an applicant, to identify the
shipment at the port of entry, to ensure that inspectors and facilities
are available for inspection in the United States, and to contact
appropriate persons if any questions arise concerning the importation.
Finally, paragraph (d) explains what happens after we receive and
review the permit application. This paragraph provides that, if
following our review, we determine that the live VHS-regulated fish are
eligible for importation, we will issue an import permit. This
paragraph also specifies that an import permit does not guarantee that
any live fish will be
[[Page 52180]]
allowed entry into the United States; the VHS-regulated fish will be
allowed to enter the United States only if they meet all applicable
requirements of the regulations.
Health Certificate (Sec. 93.913)
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 93.913 requires that all live VHS-regulated
fish that are imported from VHS-regulated regions for other than
immediate slaughter or research or laboratory use be accompanied by a
health certificate. The health certificate must be in English or
contain an English translation and must be issued by a full-time
salaried veterinarian of the national government of the exporting
country, or issued by a certifying official and endorsed by the
competent authority of that country. The health certificate will be
valid for 30 days from the date of issuance.
In addition, the health certificate must state that the shipment
was inspected by the veterinarian or certifying official who issued the
certificate within 72 hours prior to shipment, and found to be free of
any clinical signs of disease consistent with VHS; and the live fish
covered by the health certificate originated in a region or facility
that has demonstrated freedom from VHS through testing in accordance
with paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 93.913.
Paragraph (b) provides that a facility can demonstrate freedom from
VHS through negative testing results by a pathogen detection laboratory
approved for VHS viral assays by the competent authority. All viral
testing must meet the following conditions:
Be conducted with a testing sample size that provides for
a 95 percent confidence level of detecting a 2 percent prevalence of
infection in the facility.
Include virus isolation or other assays authorized by the
competent authority, using appropriate cell lines to detect VHS virus,
if present. All suspect VHS cytopathic effects must be positively
identified as VHS through molecular assays and/or genetic sequencing.
Test proportional numbers of each VHS-regulated fish
species which might be present in a shipment, if applicable.
Be conducted at water temperatures between 50 and 72
[deg]F, or at other times or under environmental conditions when VHS
virus is most likely to be detected, if present.
As stated previously in this document, facilities with a history of
negative testing results for VHS are assumed to have a lower risk of
spreading VHS; therefore, we will decrease the number of fish that are
required to be tested for such facilities. Specifically, paragraph (b)
of this section also allows facilities with cultured fish of VHS-
regulated species which can document a 2-year negative testing history
for VHS virus to conduct testing at a sampling level to provide a 95
percent confidence level of detecting a 5 percent prevalence of
infection in the facility and facilities with cultured fish of VHS-
regulated species which can document a 4-year negative testing history
for VHS virus to conduct testing at a sampling level to provide a 95
percent confidence level of detecting a 10 percent prevalence of
infection in the fish facility. Such facilities must be on a secure
water source, and testing must be conducted twice a year, with at least
3 months between tests. The facilities must also document that any VHS-
regulated species in the facility that originated in VHS-regulated
States or Canadian provinces originate from facilities of the same or
higher health status.
Paragraph (c) explains how facilities can maintain VHS-free status
when new species are added to the list of VHS-regulated fish species.
Specifically, paragraph (c) provides that when a new species is added
to the list of VHS-regulated fish, a facility that has been determined
to be free of VHS must conduct additional testing on fish of the newly
listed species, if present in the facility, and the fish must be free
of VHS virus in order for the facility to retain its free status.
Paragraph (c) further provides that VHS testing must be conducted on
each newly listed species with a sample size that provides for a 95
percent confidence level of detecting a 2 percent prevalence of
infection in the fish facility.
Paragraph (d) of this section requires that, except as provided in
Sec. 93.910(e) through (g), all live fish be shipped in new containers
or containers that have been cleaned and disinfected to neutralize any
VHS virus to which the shipping containers may have been exposed.
Cleaning and disinfection of shipping containers must take place under
the supervision of the veterinarian or certifying official who issues
the health certificate, and be sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus
to which shipping containers may have been exposed. Cleaning and
disinfection protocols must be referenced in the health certificate or
in a separate cleaning and disinfection certificate accompanying the
shipment to the U.S. port of entry.
Declaration and Other Documents (Sec. 93.914)
Section Sec. 93.914 requires the importer or his or her agent to
submit the following documents to the appropriate Customs and Border
Protection officer for use by the port veterinarians:
All permits, certificates, or other documentation required
under Sec. Sec. Sec. 93.912 and 93.913; and
Two copies of a declaration that lists the port of entry;
the name and address of the importer; the name and address of the
broker; the origin of the live fish; the number, species, and the
purpose of the importation; the name of the person to whom the fish
will be delivered; and the location of the place to which such delivery
will be made. This information will allow for the traceback of
shipments should any problems occur subsequent to entry into the United
States.
Inspection at the Port of Entry (Sec. 93.915)
Section 93.915 sets forth requirements for port of entry
inspections of shipments of live fish. Paragraph (a) provides that the
shipments of live VHS-regulated fish must be presented for inspection
at a port of entry designated under Sec. 93.911. This paragraph also
provides that the port veterinarian must be notified at least 72 hours
in advance of the arrival of the shipment in the United States for live
fish of VHS-regulated species being imported through a limited port
listed in Sec. 93.911(c). It also provides that any shipment that does
not meet the requirements of this subpart will be refused entry (e.g.,
lacking appropriate permits, declarations, and/or health certificates
or exhibiting clinical signs consistent with VHS).
Paragraph (b) states that shipments refused entry must be exported
within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator, and in
accordance with other provisions he or she may require in each case for
their handling, or the shipment will be disposed of as the
Administrator may direct.
Special Provisions (Sec. 93.916)
Section 93.916 sets forth requirements for importation for
slaughter or for research or laboratory purposes.
Paragraph (a) provides that live VHS-regulated fish from VHS-
regulated regions may be imported directly for slaughter under the
following conditions:
An import permit has been obtained under Sec. 93.912 and
all conditions of the permit are observed.
An APHIS representative at the port seals the means of
conveyance with official seals.
The shipment is moved directly from the port of entry to a
slaughtering establishment that discharges its waste water to a
municipal sewage system that includes waste water disinfection
[[Page 52181]]
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that disinfects, according to all
applicable local, State, and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus. Offal, including carcasses, from the
slaughtering establishment is either rendered or composted.
An APHIS representative unseals the vehicle upon arrival
at the slaughtering establishment.
Any water used to transport the fish is disposed to a
municipal sewage system that includes waste water disinfection
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that disinfects, according to all
applicable local, State, and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus. Paragraph (b) of this section provides that
live non-salmonid VHS-regulated fish may be imported from a VHS-
regulated region for research or laboratory use under the following
conditions:
An import permit has been obtained under Sec. 93.912 and
all conditions of the permit are observed.
The laboratory or research facility disposes of effluent
to a municipal sewage system that includes waste water disinfection
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that disinfects, according to all
applicable local, State, and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
Carcasses must be rendered or composted.
Any water used to transport the fish is disposed to a
municipal sewage system that includes waste water disinfection
sufficient to neutralize any VHS virus or to either a non-discharging
settling pond or a settling pond that disinfects, according to all
applicable local, State, and Federal regulations, sufficiently to
neutralize any VHS virus.
These measures will ensure that VHS virus that may be present in
such fish is effectively neutralized or that the fish are rendered
incapable of infecting fish in other waters of the United States.
Related Issues on Which APHIS Is Seeking Comment
There are two additional issues related to VHS for which we are
seeking public comment. This interim rule does not make any of the
possible changes discussed below, because there are no immediate risks
associated with them that would justify immediate action. However, we
believe the following changes would improve the effectiveness of our
programs to prevent the introduction of VHS and other fish pathogens
and may include such changes in a subsequent rulemaking.
As discussed above, the new lists of VHS-regulated areas and VHS-
regulated regions will be maintained on the APHIS Web site, not in the
regulations. We do not however, provide criteria for removing an area
or region from those lists. At present, VHS occurs only in wild fish
populations in the United States and Canada, making the disease
difficult to contain and eradicate. For that reason, we do not believe
any areas or regions that are currently on the lists of VHS-regulated
areas or VHS-regulated regions will be eligible for removal from those
lists in the immediate future. Further, APHIS is still considering what
information we would use in reassessing an area's or region's disease
status and would find public input valuable. Specifically, APHIS seeks
comments on what factors should be considered when removing areas and
regions from the lists of VHS-regulated areas and VHS-regulated
regions.
We recognize that gametes are a potential pathway for the spread of
VHS due to the ability of the virus to survive in ovarian fluid. While
the disinfection of salmonid eggs is common practice, no standardized
protocols exist for disinfecting non-salmonid eggs. Further, there is
not sufficient documented scientific evidence to support regulated egg
treatment protocols for non-salmonid eggs. APHIS seeks comment on what
types of egg disinfection protocols, if any, should be considered for
VHS-regulated non-salmonid species.
User Fees
APHIS user fees for processing permit applications and for
inspecting animals at the port of entry will apply. The user fees are
set forth in 9 CFR part 130. User fees for processing applications for
permits to import certain animals and animal products are listed in the
table in Sec. 130.4. User fees for inspection at the port of entry and
laboratory and facility inspections are the hourly rates set forth in
Sec. 130.30.
Emergency Action
The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
has determined that there is good cause for publishing this interim
rule without prior opportunity for public comment. Immediate action is
necessary to prevent the introduction of VHS into aquaculture
facilities by controlling the movement of live fish at risk of
harboring VHS virus. Despite its current VHS-free status for farmed
fish, the United States remains unprotected from continuing
introductions of VHS-infected non-salmonid fish imported from Canada,
since there are a number of exporters of VHS-regulated fish species in
VHS-regulated areas in Canada, and pretesting of these fish is not
currently required. Additionally, although VHS outbreaks have so far
been limited to States within the Great Lakes watershed, there are no
standardized restrictions in place other than those specified in the
FWS regulations in title 50 and the existing APHIS Federal Order to
prevent the further spread of VHS into new watersheds or areas by the
transfer of live salmonid or non-salmonid VHS-regulated species.
Therefore, it is necessary to implement regulations that will restrict
such movements in as timely a manner as possible.
We will consider comments we receive during the comment periods for
this interim rule and the environmental assessment (see DATES above).
After the comment period closes, we will publish another document in
the Federal Register to notify the public of our decision regarding the
environmental assessment. We will also publish a document in the
Federal Register that will include a discussion of any comments we
receive and any amendments we are making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
We have prepared an economic analysis for this interim rule. It
provides an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, which considers
the potential economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities,
as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as well as a cost-
benefit analysis. The economic analysis is summarized below. The full
economic analysis may be viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this document for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov). You may request paper copies of the
economic analysis by calling or writing to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Please refer to Docket No. APHIS-2007-0038
when requesting copies. The economic analysis is also available for
review in our reading room (information on the location and hours of
the reading room is listed under the heading ADDRESSES at the beginning
of this document).
[[Page 52182]]
Based upon available data and expected effects, we believe that the
benefits of the interim rule, in terms of disease prevention, will
justify the costs associated with restricting the movement of live
fish. Costs associated with the interim rule will likely be difficult
to distinguish from those already imposed by the amended Federal Order.
Also, several of the States that will be regulated by the interim rule
have regulations in place that compare closely with th