University of Florida; Availability of Petition and Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Papaya Genetically Engineered for Resistance to the Papaya Ringspot Virus, 51267-51268 [E8-20289]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices should submit a letter of interest (1–2 pages) that includes the following: (1) A short description of current active notifications and permits; and (2) A statement of the organization’s commitment to: • Develop and implement a BQMS program within their organization; • Attend all required training sessions on the development and implementation of a BQMS to be held by APHIS-BRS-Regulatory Operations Programs (ROP); • Establish methods and procedures for monitoring critical processes and procedures for the movement and field testing of regulated GE agriculture; • Provide required data and provide feedback to APHIS-BRS-ROP on how to improve the BQMS program standard and guidelines; • Participate in surveys after completing training modules; and • Submit to a third-party external verification audit. APHIS will accept letters of interest through October 1, 2008. APHIS will evaluate letters and notify all applicants of its final selections. You may submit participation letters of interest by mail or e-mail to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at the beginning of this notice. Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of August 2008. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E8–20285 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service [Docket No. APHIS–2008–0054] University of Florida; Availability of Petition and Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Papaya Genetically Engineered for Resistance to the Papaya Ringspot Virus Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice. erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has received a petition from the University of Florida seeking a determination of nonregulated status for papaya genetically engineered for resistance to the papaya ringspot virus derived from a transformation event designated as X17–2. The petition has been submitted in accordance with VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:40 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 our regulations concerning the introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms and products. In accordance with those regulations, we are soliciting comments on whether this genetically engineered papaya is or could be a plant pest. We are also making available for public comment a draft environmental assessment for the proposed determination of nonregulated status. We will consider all comments we receive on or before November 3, 2008. DATES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/ component/main?main=DocketDetail& d=APHIS=2008 =0054 to submit or view comments and to view supporting and related materials available electronically. • Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of your comment to Docket No. APHIS–2008–0054, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–1238. Please state that your comment refers to Docket No. APHIS– 2008–0054. Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 690–2817 before coming. Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov. ADDRESSES: 51267 Background The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ‘‘Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason To Believe Are Plant Pests,’’ regulate, among other things, the introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered organisms and products are considered ‘‘regulated articles.’’ The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide that any person may submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6 describe the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status must take and the information that must be included in the petition. On December 2, 2004, APHIS received a petition seeking a determination of nonregulated status (APHIS No. 04– 337–01p) from the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UFL–IFAS) of Homestead, FL, for papaya (Carica papaya L.) designated as transformation event X17– 2, which has been genetically engineered for resistance to the papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), stating that papaya line X17–2 does not present a plant pest risk and, therefore, should not be a regulated article under APHIS’ regulations in 7 CFR part 340. UFL– IFAS responded to APHIS’ subsequent requests for additional information and clarification and submitted revisions to their petition on January 12, 2007, and June 14, 2007. The petition is available for public review and comment. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Analysis SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As described in the petition, papaya transformation event X17–2 has been genetically engineered with a sequence from the PRSV. This sequence was derived from the PRSV coat protein (cp) gene and introduced into X17–2 papaya along with one plant-expressed selectable marker gene, nptII, via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The marker gene is commonly used and enables researchers to select those plant tissues that have been successfully transformed with the gene of interest. The resistance to PRSV appears to be conferred through post transcriptional gene silencing. Mr. John Cordts, Biotechnology Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301) 734–5531, e-mail: john.m.cordts@aphis.usda.gov. To obtain copies of the petition or the environmental assessment, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at (301) 734–0667, e-mail: cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov. The petition and the environmental assessment are also available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/ brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p.pdf and https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/ aphisdocs/04_33701p_ea.pdf. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES 51268 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices Transformation event X17–2 has been considered a regulated article under the regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it contains gene sequences from plant pathogens. X17–2 papaya has been field tested in the United States since 1999 under notifications authorized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). APHIS has presented two alternatives in the draft environmental assessment (EA) based on its analyses of data submitted by UFL–IFAS, a review of other scientific data, and field tests conducted under APHIS oversight. APHIS may: (1) Take no action (X17–2 papaya remains a regulated article); or (2) deregulate X17–2 papaya in whole (the preferred alternative). In section 403 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), ‘‘plant pest’’ is defined as any living stage of any of the following that can directly or indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause disease in any plant or plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal, a parasitic plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an infectious agent or other pathogen, or any article similar to or allied with any of the foregoing. APHIS views this definition broadly to cover direct or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to agricultural crops, but also to other plant parts and plant products whether natural, manufactured, or processed. X17–2 papaya is subject to regulation by other Federal agencies. Under the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for the regulation of pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.). FIFRA requires that all pesticides, including herbicides, be registered prior to distribution or sale, unless exempt by EPA regulation. In order to be registered as a pesticide under FIFRA, it must be demonstrated that when used with common practices, a pesticide will not cause unreasonable adverse effects in the environment. Because the use of Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIP), such as viral coat proteins, is considered pesticidal, the University of Florida has submitted a registration package to EPA for X17–2 papaya. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), pesticides added to (or contained in) raw agricultural commodities generally are considered to be unsafe unless a tolerance or exemption from tolerance has been established. Residue tolerances for pesticides are established by EPA under the FFDCA, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enforces the VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:40 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 tolerances set by EPA. EPA has previously granted a tolerance exemption for PRSV coat protein in papaya. The FDA policy statement concerning regulation of products derived from new plant varieties, including those genetically engineered, was published in the Federal Register on May 29, 1992, and appears at 57 FR 22984– 23005. Under this policy, FDA ensures that human food and animal feed, including those derived from bioengineered sources, are safe and wholesome. The University of Florida has submitted a food and feed safety and nutritional assessment summary to FDA for X17–2 papaya in 2007 that is currently under agency review. A draft EA has been prepared to provide the APHIS decisionmaker with a review and analysis of any potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed determination of nonregulated status for X17–2 papaya. The draft EA was prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372). In accordance with § 340.6(d) of the regulations, we are publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept written comments regarding the petition for a determination of nonregulated status from interested or affected persons for a period of 60 days from the date of this notice. We are also soliciting written comments from interested or affected persons on the draft EA prepared to examine any environmental impacts of the proposed determination for the deregulation of the subject papaya event. The petition, the draft EA, and any comments received are available for public review, and copies of the petitions and the draft EA are available as indicated under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above. After the comment period closes, APHIS will review all written comments received during the comment period and any other relevant information. After reviewing and evaluating the comments on the petition and the EA and other data and information, APHIS will furnish a response to the petitioner, either approving or denying the petition. APHIS will then publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the regulatory status of PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 UFL–IFAS PRSV-resistant papaya event X17–2 and the availability of APHIS’ written regulatory and environmental decision. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781– 7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of August 2008. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E8–20289 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration Designation for the Aberdeen, (SD), Decatur (IL), Hastings (NE), Fulton (IL), Missouri, and South Carolina Areas Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are announcing designation of the following organizations to provide official services under the United States Grain Standards Act, as amended (USGSA): Aberdeen Grain Inspection, Inc. (Aberdeen); Decatur Grain Inspection, Inc. (Decatur); Hastings Grain Inspection, Inc. (Hastings); John R. McCrea Agency, Inc. (McCrea); Missouri Department of Agriculture (Missouri); and South Carolina Department of Agriculture (South Carolina). DATES: Effective October 1, 2008. ADDRESSES: USDA, GIPSA, Karen Guagliardo, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, STOP 3604, Room 1647–S, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–3604. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Guagliardo at 202–720–7312, email Karen.W.Guagliardo@usda.gov. Read Applications: All applications and comments will be available for public inspection at the office above during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). In the March 3, 2008, Federal Register (73 FR 11387), we requested applications for designation to provide official services in the geographic areas assigned to the official agencies named above. Applications were due by April 2, 2008. Aberdeen, Decatur, Hastings, McCrea, Missouri, and South Carolina were the sole applicants for designation to provide official services in the entire area currently assigned to them, so SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51267-51268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054]


University of Florida; Availability of Petition and Environmental 
Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Papaya 
Genetically Engineered for Resistance to the Papaya Ringspot Virus

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service has received a petition from the University of 
Florida seeking a determination of nonregulated status for papaya 
genetically engineered for resistance to the papaya ringspot virus 
derived from a transformation event designated as X17-2. The petition 
has been submitted in accordance with our regulations concerning the 
introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms and products. 
In accordance with those regulations, we are soliciting comments on 
whether this genetically engineered papaya is or could be a plant pest. 
We are also making available for public comment a draft environmental 
assessment for the proposed determination of nonregulated status.

DATES: We will consider all comments we receive on or before November 
3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS=2008 =0054 to submit or view comments 
and to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
     Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of 
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054, Regulatory Analysis and 
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, 
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to 
Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054.
     Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this 
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of 
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to 
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
     Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its 
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Cordts, Biotechnology 
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 
20737-1236; (301) 734-5531, e-mail: john.m.cordts@aphis.usda.gov. To 
obtain copies of the petition or the environmental assessment, contact 
Ms. Cindy Eck at (301) 734-0667, e-mail: cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov. 
The petition and the environmental assessment are also available on the 
Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p.pdf and  
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p_ea.pdf.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Introduction of Organisms and 
Products Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are 
Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason To Believe Are Plant Pests,'' 
regulate, among other things, the introduction (importation, interstate 
movement, or release into the environment) of organisms and products 
altered or produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or 
that there is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically 
engineered organisms and products are considered ``regulated 
articles.''
    The regulations in Sec.  340.6(a) provide that any person may 
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated 
under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec.  340.6 describe 
the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status 
must take and the information that must be included in the petition.
    On December 2, 2004, APHIS received a petition seeking a 
determination of nonregulated status (APHIS No. 04-337-01p) from the 
University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences 
(UFL-IFAS) of Homestead, FL, for papaya (Carica papaya L.) designated 
as transformation event X17-2, which has been genetically engineered 
for resistance to the papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), stating that papaya 
line X17-2 does not present a plant pest risk and, therefore, should 
not be a regulated article under APHIS' regulations in 7 CFR part 340. 
UFL-IFAS responded to APHIS' subsequent requests for additional 
information and clarification and submitted revisions to their petition 
on January 12, 2007, and June 14, 2007. The petition is available for 
public review and comment.

Analysis

    As described in the petition, papaya transformation event X17-2 has 
been genetically engineered with a sequence from the PRSV. This 
sequence was derived from the PRSV coat protein (cp) gene and 
introduced into X17-2 papaya along with one plant-expressed selectable 
marker gene, nptII, via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The 
marker gene is commonly used and enables researchers to select those 
plant tissues that have been successfully transformed with the gene of 
interest. The resistance to PRSV appears to be conferred through post 
transcriptional gene silencing.

[[Page 51268]]

    Transformation event X17-2 has been considered a regulated article 
under the regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it contains gene 
sequences from plant pathogens. X17-2 papaya has been field tested in 
the United States since 1999 under notifications authorized by the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (USDA). APHIS has presented two alternatives 
in the draft environmental assessment (EA) based on its analyses of 
data submitted by UFL-IFAS, a review of other scientific data, and 
field tests conducted under APHIS oversight. APHIS may: (1) Take no 
action (X17-2 papaya remains a regulated article); or (2) deregulate 
X17-2 papaya in whole (the preferred alternative).
    In section 403 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), 
``plant pest'' is defined as any living stage of any of the following 
that can directly or indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause 
disease in any plant or plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal, 
a parasitic plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an 
infectious agent or other pathogen, or any article similar to or allied 
with any of the foregoing. APHIS views this definition broadly to cover 
direct or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to agricultural 
crops, but also to other plant parts and plant products whether 
natural, manufactured, or processed.
    X17-2 papaya is subject to regulation by other Federal agencies. 
Under the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology, 
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for the 
regulation of pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.). FIFRA 
requires that all pesticides, including herbicides, be registered prior 
to distribution or sale, unless exempt by EPA regulation. In order to 
be registered as a pesticide under FIFRA, it must be demonstrated that 
when used with common practices, a pesticide will not cause 
unreasonable adverse effects in the environment. Because the use of 
Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIP), such as viral coat proteins, is 
considered pesticidal, the University of Florida has submitted a 
registration package to EPA for X17-2 papaya.
    Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended 
(21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), pesticides added to (or contained in) raw 
agricultural commodities generally are considered to be unsafe unless a 
tolerance or exemption from tolerance has been established. Residue 
tolerances for pesticides are established by EPA under the FFDCA, and 
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enforces the tolerances set 
by EPA. EPA has previously granted a tolerance exemption for PRSV coat 
protein in papaya.
    The FDA policy statement concerning regulation of products derived 
from new plant varieties, including those genetically engineered, was 
published in the Federal Register on May 29, 1992, and appears at 57 FR 
22984-23005. Under this policy, FDA ensures that human food and animal 
feed, including those derived from bioengineered sources, are safe and 
wholesome. The University of Florida has submitted a food and feed 
safety and nutritional assessment summary to FDA for X17-2 papaya in 
2007 that is currently under agency review.
    A draft EA has been prepared to provide the APHIS decisionmaker 
with a review and analysis of any potential environmental impacts 
associated with the proposed determination of nonregulated status for 
X17-2 papaya. The draft EA was prepared in accordance with: (1) The 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality 
for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-
1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) 
APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
    In accordance with Sec.  340.6(d) of the regulations, we are 
publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept 
written comments regarding the petition for a determination of 
nonregulated status from interested or affected persons for a period of 
60 days from the date of this notice. We are also soliciting written 
comments from interested or affected persons on the draft EA prepared 
to examine any environmental impacts of the proposed determination for 
the deregulation of the subject papaya event. The petition, the draft 
EA, and any comments received are available for public review, and 
copies of the petitions and the draft EA are available as indicated 
under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above.
    After the comment period closes, APHIS will review all written 
comments received during the comment period and any other relevant 
information. After reviewing and evaluating the comments on the 
petition and the EA and other data and information, APHIS will furnish 
a response to the petitioner, either approving or denying the petition. 
APHIS will then publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the 
regulatory status of UFL-IFAS PRSV-resistant papaya event X17-2 and the 
availability of APHIS' written regulatory and environmental decision.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of August 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8-20289 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.