University of Florida; Availability of Petition and Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Papaya Genetically Engineered for Resistance to the Papaya Ringspot Virus, 51267-51268 [E8-20289]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices
should submit a letter of interest (1–2
pages) that includes the following:
(1) A short description of current
active notifications and permits; and
(2) A statement of the organization’s
commitment to:
• Develop and implement a BQMS
program within their organization;
• Attend all required training
sessions on the development and
implementation of a BQMS to be held
by APHIS-BRS-Regulatory Operations
Programs (ROP);
• Establish methods and procedures
for monitoring critical processes and
procedures for the movement and field
testing of regulated GE agriculture;
• Provide required data and provide
feedback to APHIS-BRS-ROP on how to
improve the BQMS program standard
and guidelines;
• Participate in surveys after
completing training modules; and
• Submit to a third-party external
verification audit.
APHIS will accept letters of interest
through October 1, 2008. APHIS will
evaluate letters and notify all applicants
of its final selections. You may submit
participation letters of interest by mail
or e-mail to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at the
beginning of this notice.
Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of
August 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–20285 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2008–0054]
University of Florida; Availability of
Petition and Environmental
Assessment for Determination of
Nonregulated Status for Papaya
Genetically Engineered for Resistance
to the Papaya Ringspot Virus
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has received a
petition from the University of Florida
seeking a determination of nonregulated
status for papaya genetically engineered
for resistance to the papaya ringspot
virus derived from a transformation
event designated as X17–2. The petition
has been submitted in accordance with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
our regulations concerning the
introduction of certain genetically
engineered organisms and products. In
accordance with those regulations, we
are soliciting comments on whether this
genetically engineered papaya is or
could be a plant pest. We are also
making available for public comment a
draft environmental assessment for the
proposed determination of nonregulated
status.
We will consider all comments
we receive on or before November 3,
2008.
DATES:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/main?main=DocketDetail&
d=APHIS=2008 =0054 to submit or view
comments and to view supporting and
related materials available
electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2008–0054,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2008–0054.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
ADDRESSES:
51267
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340,
‘‘Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through
Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant
Pests or Which There Is Reason To
Believe Are Plant Pests,’’ regulate,
among other things, the introduction
(importation, interstate movement, or
release into the environment) of
organisms and products altered or
produced through genetic engineering
that are plant pests or that there is
reason to believe are plant pests. Such
genetically engineered organisms and
products are considered ‘‘regulated
articles.’’
The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide
that any person may submit a petition
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR part 340.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6
describe the form that a petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must
be included in the petition.
On December 2, 2004, APHIS received
a petition seeking a determination of
nonregulated status (APHIS No. 04–
337–01p) from the University of Florida,
Institute of Food and Agricultural
Sciences (UFL–IFAS) of Homestead, FL,
for papaya (Carica papaya L.)
designated as transformation event X17–
2, which has been genetically
engineered for resistance to the papaya
ringspot virus (PRSV), stating that
papaya line X17–2 does not present a
plant pest risk and, therefore, should
not be a regulated article under APHIS’
regulations in 7 CFR part 340. UFL–
IFAS responded to APHIS’ subsequent
requests for additional information and
clarification and submitted revisions to
their petition on January 12, 2007, and
June 14, 2007. The petition is available
for public review and comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Analysis
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
As described in the petition, papaya
transformation event X17–2 has been
genetically engineered with a sequence
from the PRSV. This sequence was
derived from the PRSV coat protein (cp)
gene and introduced into X17–2 papaya
along with one plant-expressed
selectable marker gene, nptII, via
Agrobacterium-mediated
transformation. The marker gene is
commonly used and enables researchers
to select those plant tissues that have
been successfully transformed with the
gene of interest. The resistance to PRSV
appears to be conferred through post
transcriptional gene silencing.
Mr.
John Cordts, Biotechnology Regulatory
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301)
734–5531, e-mail:
john.m.cordts@aphis.usda.gov. To
obtain copies of the petition or the
environmental assessment, contact Ms.
Cindy Eck at (301) 734–0667, e-mail:
cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov. The
petition and the environmental
assessment are also available on the
Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p.pdf and
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/
aphisdocs/04_33701p_ea.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
51268
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices
Transformation event X17–2 has been
considered a regulated article under the
regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it
contains gene sequences from plant
pathogens. X17–2 papaya has been field
tested in the United States since 1999
under notifications authorized by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
APHIS has presented two alternatives in
the draft environmental assessment (EA)
based on its analyses of data submitted
by UFL–IFAS, a review of other
scientific data, and field tests conducted
under APHIS oversight. APHIS may: (1)
Take no action (X17–2 papaya remains
a regulated article); or (2) deregulate
X17–2 papaya in whole (the preferred
alternative).
In section 403 of the Plant Protection
Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), ‘‘plant pest’’
is defined as any living stage of any of
the following that can directly or
indirectly injure, cause damage to, or
cause disease in any plant or plant
product: A protozoan, a nonhuman
animal, a parasitic plant, a bacterium, a
fungus, a virus or viroid, an infectious
agent or other pathogen, or any article
similar to or allied with any of the
foregoing. APHIS views this definition
broadly to cover direct or indirect
injury, disease, or damage not just to
agricultural crops, but also to other
plant parts and plant products whether
natural, manufactured, or processed.
X17–2 papaya is subject to regulation
by other Federal agencies. Under the
Coordinated Framework for the
Regulation of Biotechnology, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is responsible for the regulation of
pesticides under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 136 et
seq.). FIFRA requires that all pesticides,
including herbicides, be registered prior
to distribution or sale, unless exempt by
EPA regulation. In order to be registered
as a pesticide under FIFRA, it must be
demonstrated that when used with
common practices, a pesticide will not
cause unreasonable adverse effects in
the environment. Because the use of
Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIP),
such as viral coat proteins, is considered
pesticidal, the University of Florida has
submitted a registration package to EPA
for X17–2 papaya.
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended (21
U.S.C. 301 et seq.), pesticides added to
(or contained in) raw agricultural
commodities generally are considered to
be unsafe unless a tolerance or
exemption from tolerance has been
established. Residue tolerances for
pesticides are established by EPA under
the FFDCA, and the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) enforces the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
tolerances set by EPA. EPA has
previously granted a tolerance
exemption for PRSV coat protein in
papaya.
The FDA policy statement concerning
regulation of products derived from new
plant varieties, including those
genetically engineered, was published
in the Federal Register on May 29,
1992, and appears at 57 FR 22984–
23005. Under this policy, FDA ensures
that human food and animal feed,
including those derived from
bioengineered sources, are safe and
wholesome. The University of Florida
has submitted a food and feed safety
and nutritional assessment summary to
FDA for X17–2 papaya in 2007 that is
currently under agency review.
A draft EA has been prepared to
provide the APHIS decisionmaker with
a review and analysis of any potential
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed determination of
nonregulated status for X17–2 papaya.
The draft EA was prepared in
accordance with: (1) The National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372).
In accordance with § 340.6(d) of the
regulations, we are publishing this
notice to inform the public that APHIS
will accept written comments regarding
the petition for a determination of
nonregulated status from interested or
affected persons for a period of 60 days
from the date of this notice. We are also
soliciting written comments from
interested or affected persons on the
draft EA prepared to examine any
environmental impacts of the proposed
determination for the deregulation of
the subject papaya event. The petition,
the draft EA, and any comments
received are available for public review,
and copies of the petitions and the draft
EA are available as indicated under
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT above.
After the comment period closes,
APHIS will review all written comments
received during the comment period
and any other relevant information.
After reviewing and evaluating the
comments on the petition and the EA
and other data and information, APHIS
will furnish a response to the petitioner,
either approving or denying the
petition. APHIS will then publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing the regulatory status of
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
UFL–IFAS PRSV-resistant papaya event
X17–2 and the availability of APHIS’
written regulatory and environmental
decision.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of
August 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–20289 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
Designation for the Aberdeen, (SD),
Decatur (IL), Hastings (NE), Fulton (IL),
Missouri, and South Carolina Areas
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing
designation of the following
organizations to provide official services
under the United States Grain Standards
Act, as amended (USGSA): Aberdeen
Grain Inspection, Inc. (Aberdeen);
Decatur Grain Inspection, Inc. (Decatur);
Hastings Grain Inspection, Inc.
(Hastings); John R. McCrea Agency, Inc.
(McCrea); Missouri Department of
Agriculture (Missouri); and South
Carolina Department of Agriculture
(South Carolina).
DATES: Effective October 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: USDA, GIPSA, Karen
Guagliardo, Chief, Review Branch,
Compliance Division, STOP 3604, Room
1647–S, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250–3604.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Guagliardo at 202–720–7312, email Karen.W.Guagliardo@usda.gov.
Read Applications: All applications
and comments will be available for
public inspection at the office above
during regular business hours (7 CFR
1.27(b)).
In the
March 3, 2008, Federal Register (73 FR
11387), we requested applications for
designation to provide official services
in the geographic areas assigned to the
official agencies named above.
Applications were due by April 2, 2008.
Aberdeen, Decatur, Hastings, McCrea,
Missouri, and South Carolina were the
sole applicants for designation to
provide official services in the entire
area currently assigned to them, so
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51267-51268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20289]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054]
University of Florida; Availability of Petition and Environmental
Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Papaya
Genetically Engineered for Resistance to the Papaya Ringspot Virus
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has received a petition from the University of
Florida seeking a determination of nonregulated status for papaya
genetically engineered for resistance to the papaya ringspot virus
derived from a transformation event designated as X17-2. The petition
has been submitted in accordance with our regulations concerning the
introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms and products.
In accordance with those regulations, we are soliciting comments on
whether this genetically engineered papaya is or could be a plant pest.
We are also making available for public comment a draft environmental
assessment for the proposed determination of nonregulated status.
DATES: We will consider all comments we receive on or before November
3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS=2008 =0054 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2008-0054.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Cordts, Biotechnology
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD
20737-1236; (301) 734-5531, e-mail: john.m.cordts@aphis.usda.gov. To
obtain copies of the petition or the environmental assessment, contact
Ms. Cindy Eck at (301) 734-0667, e-mail: cynthia.a.eck@aphis.usda.gov.
The petition and the environmental assessment are also available on the
Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p.pdf and
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/04_33701p_ea.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Introduction of Organisms and
Products Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are
Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason To Believe Are Plant Pests,''
regulate, among other things, the introduction (importation, interstate
movement, or release into the environment) of organisms and products
altered or produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or
that there is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically
engineered organisms and products are considered ``regulated
articles.''
The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated
under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 340.6 describe
the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must be included in the petition.
On December 2, 2004, APHIS received a petition seeking a
determination of nonregulated status (APHIS No. 04-337-01p) from the
University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
(UFL-IFAS) of Homestead, FL, for papaya (Carica papaya L.) designated
as transformation event X17-2, which has been genetically engineered
for resistance to the papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), stating that papaya
line X17-2 does not present a plant pest risk and, therefore, should
not be a regulated article under APHIS' regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
UFL-IFAS responded to APHIS' subsequent requests for additional
information and clarification and submitted revisions to their petition
on January 12, 2007, and June 14, 2007. The petition is available for
public review and comment.
Analysis
As described in the petition, papaya transformation event X17-2 has
been genetically engineered with a sequence from the PRSV. This
sequence was derived from the PRSV coat protein (cp) gene and
introduced into X17-2 papaya along with one plant-expressed selectable
marker gene, nptII, via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The
marker gene is commonly used and enables researchers to select those
plant tissues that have been successfully transformed with the gene of
interest. The resistance to PRSV appears to be conferred through post
transcriptional gene silencing.
[[Page 51268]]
Transformation event X17-2 has been considered a regulated article
under the regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it contains gene
sequences from plant pathogens. X17-2 papaya has been field tested in
the United States since 1999 under notifications authorized by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA). APHIS has presented two alternatives
in the draft environmental assessment (EA) based on its analyses of
data submitted by UFL-IFAS, a review of other scientific data, and
field tests conducted under APHIS oversight. APHIS may: (1) Take no
action (X17-2 papaya remains a regulated article); or (2) deregulate
X17-2 papaya in whole (the preferred alternative).
In section 403 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.),
``plant pest'' is defined as any living stage of any of the following
that can directly or indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause
disease in any plant or plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal,
a parasitic plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an
infectious agent or other pathogen, or any article similar to or allied
with any of the foregoing. APHIS views this definition broadly to cover
direct or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to agricultural
crops, but also to other plant parts and plant products whether
natural, manufactured, or processed.
X17-2 papaya is subject to regulation by other Federal agencies.
Under the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for the
regulation of pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.). FIFRA
requires that all pesticides, including herbicides, be registered prior
to distribution or sale, unless exempt by EPA regulation. In order to
be registered as a pesticide under FIFRA, it must be demonstrated that
when used with common practices, a pesticide will not cause
unreasonable adverse effects in the environment. Because the use of
Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIP), such as viral coat proteins, is
considered pesticidal, the University of Florida has submitted a
registration package to EPA for X17-2 papaya.
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended
(21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), pesticides added to (or contained in) raw
agricultural commodities generally are considered to be unsafe unless a
tolerance or exemption from tolerance has been established. Residue
tolerances for pesticides are established by EPA under the FFDCA, and
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enforces the tolerances set
by EPA. EPA has previously granted a tolerance exemption for PRSV coat
protein in papaya.
The FDA policy statement concerning regulation of products derived
from new plant varieties, including those genetically engineered, was
published in the Federal Register on May 29, 1992, and appears at 57 FR
22984-23005. Under this policy, FDA ensures that human food and animal
feed, including those derived from bioengineered sources, are safe and
wholesome. The University of Florida has submitted a food and feed
safety and nutritional assessment summary to FDA for X17-2 papaya in
2007 that is currently under agency review.
A draft EA has been prepared to provide the APHIS decisionmaker
with a review and analysis of any potential environmental impacts
associated with the proposed determination of nonregulated status for
X17-2 papaya. The draft EA was prepared in accordance with: (1) The
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality
for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-
1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4)
APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
In accordance with Sec. 340.6(d) of the regulations, we are
publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept
written comments regarding the petition for a determination of
nonregulated status from interested or affected persons for a period of
60 days from the date of this notice. We are also soliciting written
comments from interested or affected persons on the draft EA prepared
to examine any environmental impacts of the proposed determination for
the deregulation of the subject papaya event. The petition, the draft
EA, and any comments received are available for public review, and
copies of the petitions and the draft EA are available as indicated
under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above.
After the comment period closes, APHIS will review all written
comments received during the comment period and any other relevant
information. After reviewing and evaluating the comments on the
petition and the EA and other data and information, APHIS will furnish
a response to the petitioner, either approving or denying the petition.
APHIS will then publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the
regulatory status of UFL-IFAS PRSV-resistant papaya event X17-2 and the
availability of APHIS' written regulatory and environmental decision.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 26th day of August 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8-20289 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P