Tuberculosis; Require Approved Herd Plans Prior to Payment of Indemnity, 43171-43175 [E8-16949]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101–2118.
IMPORT ASSESSMENT TABLE—
Continued
(Raw Cotton Fiber)
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
HTS No.
Conv. fact.
6212200020
6212900030
6213201000
6213202000
6213901000
6214900010
6216000800
6216001720
6216003800
6216004100
6217109510
6217109530
6301300010
6301300020
6302100005
6302100008
6302100015
6302215010
6302215020
6302217010
6302217020
6302217050
6302219010
6302219020
6302219050
6302222010
6302222020
6302313010
6302313050
6302315050
6302317010
6302317020
6302317040
6302317050
6302319010
6302319040
6302319050
6302322020
6302322040
6302402010
6302511000
6302512000
6302513000
6302514000
6302600010
6302600020
6302600030
6302910005
6302910015
6302910025
6302910035
6302910045
6302910050
6302910060
6303910010
6303910020
6304111000
6304190500
6304191000
6304191500
6304192000
6304910020
6304920000
6505302070
6505901540
6505902060
6505902545
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
0.3014
0.1929
1.1809
1.0628
0.4724
0.9043
0.2351
0.6752
1.2058
1.2058
1.0182
0.2546
0.8766
0.8766
1.1689
1.1689
1.1689
0.8182
0.8182
1.1689
1.1689
1.1689
0.8182
0.8182
0.8182
0.4091
0.4091
0.8182
1.1689
0.8182
1.1689
1.1689
1.1689
1.1689
0.8182
0.8182
0.8182
0.4091
0.4091
0.9935
0.5844
0.8766
0.5844
0.8182
1.1689
1.052
1.052
1.052
1.1689
1.052
1.052
1.052
1.052
1.052
0.6429
0.6429
1.0629
1.052
1.1689
0.4091
0.4091
0.9351
0.9351
0.3113
0.181
0.9935
0.5844
*
Cents/kg.
0.2976
0.1905
1.1660
1.0494
0.4664
0.8929
0.2321
0.6667
1.1906
1.1906
1.0054
0.2514
0.8656
0.8656
1.1542
1.1542
1.1542
0.8079
0.8079
1.1542
1.1542
1.1542
0.8079
0.8079
0.8079
0.4039
0.4039
0.8079
1.1542
0.8079
1.1542
1.1542
1.1542
1.1542
0.8079
0.8079
0.8079
0.4039
0.4039
0.9810
0.5770
0.8656
0.5770
0.8079
1.1542
1.0387
1.0387
1.0387
1.1542
1.0387
1.0387
1.0387
1.0387
1.0387
0.6348
0.6348
1.0495
1.0387
1.1542
0.4039
0.4039
0.9233
0.9233
0.3074
0.1787
0.9810
0.5770
*
14:39 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: July 21, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–16957 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 50
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0193]
RIN 0579–AC65
Tuberculosis; Require Approved Herd
Plans Prior to Payment of Indemnity
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the regulations regarding the payment of
indemnity for animals destroyed
because of bovine tuberculosis to
provide that an approved herd plan
must be in place prior to the payment
of indemnity, and to provide that 10
percent of the gross indemnity payment
be withheld by the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service until the
conditions of an approved herd plan
have been implemented. We are also
proposing to amend the regulations to
deny payments of Federal indemnity for
a herd whose owner has failed to follow
the provisions of an approved herd
plan, or has violated the conditions of
an approved herd plan. We believe
these proposed changes would further
tuberculosis eradication efforts in the
United States and protect livestock not
affected with tuberculosis from the
disease.
We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before September
22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/main?main=Docket
Detail&d=APHIS-2006-0193 to submit
or view comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0193,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43171
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0193.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
C. William Hench, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Tuberculosis
Eradication Program, VS, APHIS, 2150
Centre Avenue, Building B, MS 3E20,
Ft. Collins, CO 80526; (970) 494–7378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Federal regulations implementing the
National Cooperative State/Federal
Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication
Program for bovine tuberculosis in
livestock are contained in 9 CFR part 77,
‘‘Tuberculosis,’’ and in the ‘‘Uniform
Methods and Rules—Bovine
Tuberculosis Eradication’’ (UMR),
January 22, 1999, edition, which is
incorporated by reference into the
regulations in part 77. Additionally, the
regulations in 9 CFR part 50 (referred to
below as the regulations) provide for the
payment of indemnity to owners of
certain animals destroyed because of
tuberculosis in order to encourage
destruction of animals that are infected
with, or at significant risk of being
infected with, the disease.
Since 1998, a total of 78 livestock
herds have become affected with
tuberculosis in the United States, and at
least 4 of these herds were on premises
where herds previously had been
affected with tuberculosis and had
either been depopulated and the herd
owners paid Federal and State
indemnity or undergone the approved
quarantine, test, and removal program.
Research has shown that there are ways
to mitigate the spread of infection from
wildlife to livestock, and herd plans
have been developed for numerous
herds specifying the mitigations that
owners must implement to prevent
reinfection.
In order to place more responsibility
on owners to adhere to prescribed
mitigation measures and protect their
herds from reinfection, we are
proposing to amend the regulations
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
43172
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Proposed Rules
regarding the payment of indemnity for
animals destroyed because of bovine
tuberculosis to provide that an approved
herd plan be in place prior to the
payment of indemnity, and to provide
that 10 percent of the gross indemnity
payment will be withheld by the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) until the conditions of
the herd plan have been implemented.
We are also proposing to amend the
regulations to deny payments of Federal
indemnity for herds whose owners have
failed to follow the provisions of an
approved herd plan, or have violated
the conditions of an approved herd
plan. We believe that by linking
implementation of an approved herd
plan and compliance with it to
eligibility for Federal indemnity, we
would further tuberculosis eradication
efforts in the United States and protect
livestock not affected with tuberculosis
from the disease.
Approved Herd Plans
An approved herd plan is a herd
management and testing plan based on
the disease history and movement
patterns of an individual herd, designed
by the herd owner and a State
representative or APHIS representative
to determine the disease status of
livestock in the herd and to eradicate
tuberculosis within the herd. The plan
must be jointly approved by the State
animal health official and the
Veterinarian in Charge. The herd plan
must include appropriate herd test
frequencies, tests to be employed, and
any additional disease management or
herd management practices deemed
necessary to eradicate tuberculosis from
the herd and prevent further spread of
infection in an efficient and effective
manner. Approved herd plans generally
require a change in herd management,
construction of barriers, pest control,
and, in some cases, additional
surveillance for tuberculosis on the
owner’s property. Thus, in most cases,
compliance with an approved herd plan
will be evident during a site visit and
would not require the owner to provide
any additional information or
documentation.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Approved Herd Plans Linked to
Indemnity
The existing regulations do not
require herd owners who have
tuberculosis-infected livestock to have
an approved herd plan, nor do the
regulations penalize owners whose
subsequent failure to follow an
approved herd plan results in
reinfection of the herd or the infection
of a replacement herd.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
For owners that agree to follow an
approved herd plan, the proposed rule
would not change the amount of
indemnity for which the herd owner is
eligible; it would merely provide that
only 90 percent of the gross indemnity
payment be made after a herd plan has
been approved and that 10 percent of
the gross indemnity payment be
withheld until the herd plan is
effectively implemented. This change
would provide owners with a strong
incentive for participation because
eligibility for Federal indemnity
payments would be linked to
participation in the program. This
change would also provide an incentive
for States to enforce approved herd
plans and take action if owners are not
adhering to them. The incentive to do so
comes from the indirect effect of not
having Federal indemnity available.
Under sec. 10407(d) of the Animal
Health Protection Act (AHPA) (7 U.S.C.
8306(d)), no payment of indemnity will
be made for ‘‘any animal, article,
facility, or means of conveyance that
becomes or has become affected with or
exposed to any pest or disease of
livestock because of a violation of an
agreement for the control and
eradication of diseases or pests [such as
an approved herd plan] or a violation of
this subtitle [i.e., the AHPA] by the
owner.’’ Accordingly, if a herd was to
become reinfected as a result of a herd
owner’s failure to follow an approved
herd plan and, pursuant to the AHPA,
the owner was denied Federal
indemnity, the affected State would
have to pay the costs of indemnity or
the herd would remain in place under
quarantine. If a sufficient number of
affected herds were detected and not
depopulated, it could ultimately result
in a downgrade of the State’s
tuberculosis status.
Similar Disease Programs
While these proposed changes would
be new to the tuberculosis eradication
program, similar strategies have been
used in other plant and animal disease
programs. Two such programs include
the cooperative infectious salmon
anemia (ISA) control program
administered by APHIS and the State of
Maine, and the voluntary control
programs for low pathogenicity H5 and
H7 avian influenza in poultry (LPAI).
These programs provide strong
incentives for participation because
eligibility for Federal indemnity
payments is linked to participation in
the programs.
Regulations in 9 CFR part 53 provide
that, in order for producers in the State
of Maine to receive indemnity for fish
destroyed because of ISA, claimants
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
must participate fully in the cooperative
ISA control program described in
§ 53.10(e). An economic analysis we
prepared in connection with the
rulemaking that established those
regulations cited several benefits that
flowed from those requirements,
including reduced costs to the Maine
salmon industry from animal mortality,
costs from possible State regulatory
actions, and trade restrictions on U.S.
salmon product exports. In addition, an
aggressive program early on, while the
number of known affected pens was
reasonably small, obviated the need for
higher future Federal costs to contain a
more widespread outbreak. As a result
of the ISA program, one-half of Maine’s
salmon industry (along the West Coast
of Cobscook Bay) avoided exposure to
ISA.
Similarly, the regulations for the
control of H5/H7 LPAI and a new
indemnity program (9 CFR parts 56,
146, and 147) as part of the National
Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP)
provide for the authority to pay
indemnity of 100 percent of eligible
costs associated with eradication of H5
and H7 LPAI for most participating
producers and provide for the
establishment of cooperative agreements
with participating States through which
States are eligible to receive 100 percent
of the costs covered under the
cooperative agreements. However, to
qualify for 100 percent compensation,
both the State and producers must
participate in the LPAI control program;
otherwise the compensation rate is only
25 percent. We believe that limiting
indemnity payments to only 25 percent
of associated costs serves as an
incentive for participation in the
voluntary control program for those few
commercial poultry producers and
States that do not participate in the
NPIP and for those breeding poultry
producers who participate in NPIP but
not in its LPAI programs. Thus, given
the expected participation rates among
commercial growers and States, nearly
all producers and States will qualify for
100 percent indemnification in an H5 or
H7 outbreak.
Payment to Owners for Animals
Destroyed
Section 50.3 of the regulations
provides that we will pay indemnity to
owners for cattle, bison, or captive
cervids destroyed because of bovine
tuberculosis, and sets a limit on the
amount of joint State-Federal indemnity
payment the owner receives when the
animals are slaughtered.
We propose to amend § 50.3 by
adding a new paragraph (c) that would
provide for the payment of 90 percent
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
43173
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Proposed Rules
of the gross indemnity amount for
which the herd owner is eligible after a
herd plan has been approved. APHIS
would withhold the remaining 10
percent of the gross indemnity until the
Veterinarian in Charge or official
designated by him has conducted a site
visit and has found that the herd owner
has implemented the approved herd
plan.
Claims for Indemnity
Section 50.12 includes provisions for
making a claim for indemnity for cattle,
bison, or captive cervids destroyed
because of tuberculosis. Currently, the
regulations provide that payment will
be made only if the APHIS indemnity
claim form has been approved by a
proper State official and if payment of
the claim has been recommended by the
appropriate Veterinarian in Charge or an
official designated by him. We would
amend this section by adding the
requirement that an approved herd plan
be jointly completed by the herd owner
and the State or Federal veterinarian as
required under § 50.3(c) before a
claimant may receive indemnity.
Claims Not Allowed
Section 50.14 provides that claims for
compensation for cattle, bison, or
captive cervids destroyed because of
tuberculosis will not be allowed under
certain specified conditions. For
instance, indemnity will not be allowed
if all cattle, bison, or captive cervids in
the claimant’s herd have not been tested
for tuberculosis, except under certain
specified conditions. Nor will claims be
paid if there is substantial evidence that
the owner of the animals has attempted
to obtain indemnity unlawfully or
improperly.
We are proposing to amend the
regulations in § 50.14 to ensure that
producers have in place, and comply
with the requirements of, an approved
herd plan in order to receive Federal
indemnity payments for livestock
destroyed because of tuberculosis. We
would add a new paragraph (h) to
provide that claims for compensation
will not be allowed unless an approved
herd plan is in place that has been
jointly approved by the herd owner(s)
and/or their representative(s) and a
State or Federal veterinarian as required
under § 50.3(c). We would also add a
new paragraph (i) to provide that claims
for indemnity for livestock that have
become reinfected with or exposed to
tuberculosis because the claimant has
failed to follow the provisions of an
approved herd plan or has otherwise
violated the conditions of an approved
herd plan will not be allowed.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be significant
for the purposes of Executive Order
12866 and, therefore, has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
We are proposing to amend the
regulations regarding the payment of
indemnity for animals destroyed
because of bovine tuberculosis to
provide that an approved herd plan
must be in place prior to the payment
of indemnity, and to provide that 10
percent of the gross indemnity amount
be held by APHIS until the conditions
of an approved herd plan have been
implemented. We are also proposing to
amend the regulations to deny payments
of Federal indemnity for a herd whose
owner has failed to follow an approved
herd plan, or has violated the conditions
of an approved herd plan. We believe
these proposed changes would further
tuberculosis eradication efforts in the
United States and protect livestock not
affected with tuberculosis from the
disease.
For this rule, we have prepared an
economic analysis. The analysis
considers the potential economic effects
of the proposed changes on small
entities, as required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, and provides a
discussion of the potential costs and
benefits, as required by Executive Order
12866.
The economic affects associated with
the proposed changes are likely to be
limited. There are about 1 million cattle
herds in the United States. Over the past
5 years, only about 1 out of every
100,000 cattle herds in the United States
have been affected by bovine
tuberculosis (table 1). Since 1998, there
have been 78 tuberculosis-infected
livestock herds in the United States. Of
the 78 infected herds, 4 were on
premises that had previously contained
tuberculosis-infected herds. Had the
provisions we are proposing in this
document been in place, these four
herds would have been denied Federal
indemnity only if the herd owners had
not followed specific requirements in
the herd plan intended to prevent
reinfection. Herd plans have been used
for many years in the tuberculosis
program. Because herd plans are
routinely used and because this
proposed rule would not change the
amount of the indemnity for which the
herd owner is eligible, the costs
associated with the proposed changes in
terms of forgone indemnity payments
are expected to be minimal.
TABLE 1.—NUMBER OF BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS (TB) CASES NOT OF FOREIGN ORIGIN PER YEAR AND PERCENTAGE OF
U.S. HERDS AFFECTED, FISCAL YEARS 2003–2007
Number of
positive TB
cases not of
foreign origin
Fiscal year
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................
11
14
13
2
9
Total number
of U.S. cattle
herds
Percentage of
U.S. cattle
herds affected
by TB 1
1,013,570
989,460
982,510
971,400
971,400
<
<
<
<
<
0.0011
0.0015
0.0014
0.0002
0.0010
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Source: Adapted from the table at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/tuberculosis/downloads/tb_erad.pdf.
1 Two or more positive tuberculosis cases may have the same herd of origin.
Since 2001, APHIS has paid $91
million in tuberculosis indemnities. The
amount paid out in indemnities
depends on a number of variables
specific to each individual herd.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Experience demonstrates that
reasonable estimates of indemnity
payments per animal range from $1,000
to $1,200 for beef cattle and from $2,100
to $2,300 for dairy cattle. Records show
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that over the last decade, the average
tuberculosis-affected dairy herd
contained about 2,150 animals, and the
average tuberculosis-affected beef herd
contained about 170 animals. Based on
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
43174
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Proposed Rules
these ranges for indemnity payments,
the depopulation of a single reinfected
beef herd of average size could cost the
Federal government between $170,000
and $200,000 in indemnities, and the
depopulation of a single reinfected dairy
herd of average size could cost between
$4.5 million and $4.9 million in
indemnities.
The four premises where reinfections
have occurred contained small numbers
of cattle; the herds were about half as
large as the average beef herd and less
than one-twenty-fifth as large as the
average dairy herd. A total of about
$250,000 in indemnities was paid for
the depopulation of reinfected herds on
these four premises. As noted
previously, these four herds would have
been denied Federal indemnity under
the provisions we are proposing if the
herd owners had not followed specific
requirements in the herd plan intended
to prevent reinfection. By linking
implementation of an approved herd
plan and compliance with it to
eligibility for Federal indemnity, we
will place more responsibility on
owners to adhere to prescribed
mitigation measures and protect their
herds from reinfection. We believe this
would further tuberculosis eradication
efforts in the United States and protect
livestock not affected with tuberculosis
from the disease.
According to Small Business
Administration (SBA) size standards for
beef cattle ranching and farming (North
American Industry Classification
System [NAICS] 112111) and for dairy
cattle and milk production (NAICS
112120), operations with not more than
$750,000 in annual sales are considered
small entities. Less than 4 percent of
farms in the United States have sales of
more than $500,000. Because most
farms in the United States are
considered small by SBA standards,
farm operations potentially affected by
the proposed changes are likely to be
small.
As noted previously, since 1998, there
have been 78 livestock herds infected
with tuberculosis in the United States.
This is a very small portion of the total
number of livestock herds. The
proposed changes would only affect
those premises that become reinfected
with tuberculosis and are found to have
not followed a herd plan to prevent
reinfection. For owners that do follow a
herd plan, the proposed rule would not
change the amount of indemnity for
which the herd owner would be eligible;
it would merely provide that 90 percent
of the gross indemnity payment be made
after the herd plan has been approved
and that 10 percent of the gross
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
indemnity payment be held until the
herd plan is implemented.
As an alternative to the proposed
changes, we considered maintaining the
status quo. Although the existing
regulations provide for the use of
approved herd plans as a post-exposure
management tool, those regulations do
not require the implementation of herd
plans in order for herd owners who
have tuberculosis-infected livestock to
qualify for indemnity payments, nor do
the regulations penalize owners whose
subsequent failure to follow an
approved herd plan results in
reinfection of the herd or the infection
of a replacement herd. Since 1998, a
total of 78 livestock herds have become
affected with tuberculosis in the United
States, and at least 4 of these herds were
on premises where herds previously had
been affected with tuberculosis and had
either been depopulated and the herd
owners paid Federal and State
indemnity or undergone the approved
quarantine, test, and removal program.
Therefore, leaving the regulations
unchanged would be unsatisfactory,
because it would perpetuate the current
situation, i.e., one in which premises
become re-infected because owners fail
to implement approved herd plans.
As another alternative to the proposed
changes, we considered a different set of
payment criteria than is proposed.
While it is possible to propose other
payment options to withhold a larger or
smaller percent of the Federal
indemnity until the herd plan is
implemented, APHIS seeks to strike a
reasonable balance between making
timely payment for herds that are
depopulated and providing an incentive
for herd owners to follow the provisions
of herd plans. As such, requiring that 10
percent of the gross indemnity payment
be withheld until the conditions of an
approved herd plan have been
implemented is a reasonable balance
that addresses both objectives.
Nevertheless, we invite public
comment on the proposed rule,
including any comment on the expected
impacts for small entities, and on how
the proposed rule could be modified to
reduce expected costs or burdens for
small entities consistent with its
objectives. Any comment suggesting
changes to the proposed criteria should
be supported with an explanation of
why the changes should be considered.
Given that a very small number of herd
owners would be affected and the
amount of indemnity would not change,
the changes we are proposing are not
likely to have any measurable economic
effects. They would, however, increase
the incentive for herd owners to comply
with herd plans and therefore would
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reduce the likelihood of reinfection,
which in turn would reduce the amount
of Federal funds paid in
indemnification. For producers
generally, the proposed changes would
help achieve the national goal of
tuberculosis eradication.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are in conflict with this
rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0193.
Please send a copy of your comments to:
(1) Docket No. APHIS–2006–0193,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238, and (2) Clearance Officer,
OCIO, USDA, room 404–W, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. A comment to
OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would require that
an approved herd plan must be in place
prior to the payment of indemnity for
animals destroyed because of bovine
tuberculosis, and to provide that 10
percent of the gross indemnity payment
be withheld by the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service until the
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 143 / Thursday, July 24, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
conditions of an approved herd plan
have been effectively implemented, and
the Veterinarian in Charge or official
designated by him has conducted a site
visit to attest that the herd owner is in
compliance with the approved herd
plan.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 25 hours per
response.
Respondents: Bovine herd owners and
State animal health officials.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 20.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 1.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 20.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 500 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:39 Jul 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS’
Information Collection Coordinator, at
(301) 851–2908.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 50
Animal diseases, Bison, Cattle, Hogs,
Indemnity payments, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Tuberculosis.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 50 as follows:
PART 50—ANIMALS DESTROYED
BECAUSE OF TUBERCULOSIS
1. The authority citation for part 50
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
43175
(h) The claimant does not have an
approved herd plan in place that has
been jointly approved by the herd
owner(s) and/or their representative(s)
and a State or Federal veterinarian as
required under § 50.3(c).
(i) The herd or replacement herd has
become reinfected with or exposed to
tuberculosis because the claimant has
failed to follow the provisions of an
approved herd plan or has otherwise
violated the conditions of an approved
herd plan.
§ 50.20
[Amended]
5. Section 50.20 is amended by
redesignating footnote 3 as footnote 2.
§ 50.3 Payment to owners for animals
destroyed.
Done in Washington, DC, this 18th day of
July 2008.
Bruce Knight,
Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory
Programs.
[FR Doc. E8–16949 Filed 7–23–08; 8:45 am]
*
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
2. Section 50.3 is amended by adding
a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) In each case, the herd owner must
cooperate with a State representative or
an APHIS representative in the
development of an approved herd plan
in order for the owner to be eligible to
receive indemnity for livestock
destroyed because of tuberculosis. Once
a herd plan is approved, the herd owner
will be eligible for a payment of 90
percent of the gross indemnity amount.
The Department will withhold the
remaining 10 percent of the gross
indemnity amount until the
Veterinarian in Charge or official
designated by him has conducted a site
visit 1 and has found that the herd
owner has implemented the approved
herd plan.
3. In § 50.12, the third sentence is
revised to read as follows:
§ 50.12
Claims for indemnity.
* * * Payment will be made only if
the APHIS indemnity claim form has
been approved by a proper State official,
if payment of the claim has been
recommended by the appropriate
Veterinarian in Charge or official
designated by him, and if a herd plan
has been jointly approved by the herd
owner(s) and/or their representative(s)
and a State or Federal veterinarian as
required under § 50.3(c). * * *
4. Section 50.14 is amended by
adding paragraphs (h) and (i) to read as
follows:
§ 50.14
*
Claims not allowed.
*
*
*
*
1 A herd owner may request a site visit conducted
by the Veterinarian in Charge. The location of the
Veterinarian in Charge may be obtained by writing
to National Center for Animal Health Program, VS,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 43, Riverdale, MD
20737, or by referring to the local telephone book.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 33
[Docket No. RM07–21–002]
Order Requesting Supplemental
Comments
Issued July 17, 2008.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Order Requesting Supplemental
Comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission)
requests supplemental comments on the
scope and form of the reporting
requirements under the expanded
blanket authorization established in
Order No. 708–A, which amends section
33.1(c)(12) of the Commission’s
regulations.
Comments are due September
22, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Urquhart (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE.,Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–8496.
Mosby Perrow (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, (202) 502–6498.
Andrew Mosier (Technical Information),
Office of Energy Market Regulation,
Federal Energy Regulatory
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24JYP1.SGM
24JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 143 (Thursday, July 24, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43171-43175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-16949]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 50
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0193]
RIN 0579-AC65
Tuberculosis; Require Approved Herd Plans Prior to Payment of
Indemnity
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations regarding the
payment of indemnity for animals destroyed because of bovine
tuberculosis to provide that an approved herd plan must be in place
prior to the payment of indemnity, and to provide that 10 percent of
the gross indemnity payment be withheld by the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service until the conditions of an approved herd plan have
been implemented. We are also proposing to amend the regulations to
deny payments of Federal indemnity for a herd whose owner has failed to
follow the provisions of an approved herd plan, or has violated the
conditions of an approved herd plan. We believe these proposed changes
would further tuberculosis eradication efforts in the United States and
protect livestock not affected with tuberculosis from the disease.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
September 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0193 to submit or view comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0193, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2006-0193.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. C. William Hench, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Tuberculosis Eradication Program, VS, APHIS,
2150 Centre Avenue, Building B, MS 3E20, Ft. Collins, CO 80526; (970)
494-7378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Federal regulations implementing the National Cooperative State/
Federal Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Program for bovine tuberculosis
in livestock are contained in 9 CFR part 77, ``Tuberculosis,'' and in
the ``Uniform Methods and Rules--Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication''
(UMR), January 22, 1999, edition, which is incorporated by reference
into the regulations in part 77. Additionally, the regulations in 9 CFR
part 50 (referred to below as the regulations) provide for the payment
of indemnity to owners of certain animals destroyed because of
tuberculosis in order to encourage destruction of animals that are
infected with, or at significant risk of being infected with, the
disease.
Since 1998, a total of 78 livestock herds have become affected with
tuberculosis in the United States, and at least 4 of these herds were
on premises where herds previously had been affected with tuberculosis
and had either been depopulated and the herd owners paid Federal and
State indemnity or undergone the approved quarantine, test, and removal
program. Research has shown that there are ways to mitigate the spread
of infection from wildlife to livestock, and herd plans have been
developed for numerous herds specifying the mitigations that owners
must implement to prevent reinfection.
In order to place more responsibility on owners to adhere to
prescribed mitigation measures and protect their herds from
reinfection, we are proposing to amend the regulations
[[Page 43172]]
regarding the payment of indemnity for animals destroyed because of
bovine tuberculosis to provide that an approved herd plan be in place
prior to the payment of indemnity, and to provide that 10 percent of
the gross indemnity payment will be withheld by the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) until the conditions of the herd plan
have been implemented. We are also proposing to amend the regulations
to deny payments of Federal indemnity for herds whose owners have
failed to follow the provisions of an approved herd plan, or have
violated the conditions of an approved herd plan. We believe that by
linking implementation of an approved herd plan and compliance with it
to eligibility for Federal indemnity, we would further tuberculosis
eradication efforts in the United States and protect livestock not
affected with tuberculosis from the disease.
Approved Herd Plans
An approved herd plan is a herd management and testing plan based
on the disease history and movement patterns of an individual herd,
designed by the herd owner and a State representative or APHIS
representative to determine the disease status of livestock in the herd
and to eradicate tuberculosis within the herd. The plan must be jointly
approved by the State animal health official and the Veterinarian in
Charge. The herd plan must include appropriate herd test frequencies,
tests to be employed, and any additional disease management or herd
management practices deemed necessary to eradicate tuberculosis from
the herd and prevent further spread of infection in an efficient and
effective manner. Approved herd plans generally require a change in
herd management, construction of barriers, pest control, and, in some
cases, additional surveillance for tuberculosis on the owner's
property. Thus, in most cases, compliance with an approved herd plan
will be evident during a site visit and would not require the owner to
provide any additional information or documentation.
Approved Herd Plans Linked to Indemnity
The existing regulations do not require herd owners who have
tuberculosis-infected livestock to have an approved herd plan, nor do
the regulations penalize owners whose subsequent failure to follow an
approved herd plan results in reinfection of the herd or the infection
of a replacement herd.
For owners that agree to follow an approved herd plan, the proposed
rule would not change the amount of indemnity for which the herd owner
is eligible; it would merely provide that only 90 percent of the gross
indemnity payment be made after a herd plan has been approved and that
10 percent of the gross indemnity payment be withheld until the herd
plan is effectively implemented. This change would provide owners with
a strong incentive for participation because eligibility for Federal
indemnity payments would be linked to participation in the program.
This change would also provide an incentive for States to enforce
approved herd plans and take action if owners are not adhering to them.
The incentive to do so comes from the indirect effect of not having
Federal indemnity available. Under sec. 10407(d) of the Animal Health
Protection Act (AHPA) (7 U.S.C. 8306(d)), no payment of indemnity will
be made for ``any animal, article, facility, or means of conveyance
that becomes or has become affected with or exposed to any pest or
disease of livestock because of a violation of an agreement for the
control and eradication of diseases or pests [such as an approved herd
plan] or a violation of this subtitle [i.e., the AHPA] by the owner.''
Accordingly, if a herd was to become reinfected as a result of a herd
owner's failure to follow an approved herd plan and, pursuant to the
AHPA, the owner was denied Federal indemnity, the affected State would
have to pay the costs of indemnity or the herd would remain in place
under quarantine. If a sufficient number of affected herds were
detected and not depopulated, it could ultimately result in a downgrade
of the State's tuberculosis status.
Similar Disease Programs
While these proposed changes would be new to the tuberculosis
eradication program, similar strategies have been used in other plant
and animal disease programs. Two such programs include the cooperative
infectious salmon anemia (ISA) control program administered by APHIS
and the State of Maine, and the voluntary control programs for low
pathogenicity H5 and H7 avian influenza in poultry (LPAI). These
programs provide strong incentives for participation because
eligibility for Federal indemnity payments is linked to participation
in the programs.
Regulations in 9 CFR part 53 provide that, in order for producers
in the State of Maine to receive indemnity for fish destroyed because
of ISA, claimants must participate fully in the cooperative ISA control
program described in Sec. 53.10(e). An economic analysis we prepared
in connection with the rulemaking that established those regulations
cited several benefits that flowed from those requirements, including
reduced costs to the Maine salmon industry from animal mortality, costs
from possible State regulatory actions, and trade restrictions on U.S.
salmon product exports. In addition, an aggressive program early on,
while the number of known affected pens was reasonably small, obviated
the need for higher future Federal costs to contain a more widespread
outbreak. As a result of the ISA program, one-half of Maine's salmon
industry (along the West Coast of Cobscook Bay) avoided exposure to
ISA.
Similarly, the regulations for the control of H5/H7 LPAI and a new
indemnity program (9 CFR parts 56, 146, and 147) as part of the
National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP) provide for the authority to
pay indemnity of 100 percent of eligible costs associated with
eradication of H5 and H7 LPAI for most participating producers and
provide for the establishment of cooperative agreements with
participating States through which States are eligible to receive 100
percent of the costs covered under the cooperative agreements. However,
to qualify for 100 percent compensation, both the State and producers
must participate in the LPAI control program; otherwise the
compensation rate is only 25 percent. We believe that limiting
indemnity payments to only 25 percent of associated costs serves as an
incentive for participation in the voluntary control program for those
few commercial poultry producers and States that do not participate in
the NPIP and for those breeding poultry producers who participate in
NPIP but not in its LPAI programs. Thus, given the expected
participation rates among commercial growers and States, nearly all
producers and States will qualify for 100 percent indemnification in an
H5 or H7 outbreak.
Payment to Owners for Animals Destroyed
Section 50.3 of the regulations provides that we will pay indemnity
to owners for cattle, bison, or captive cervids destroyed because of
bovine tuberculosis, and sets a limit on the amount of joint State-
Federal indemnity payment the owner receives when the animals are
slaughtered.
We propose to amend Sec. 50.3 by adding a new paragraph (c) that
would provide for the payment of 90 percent
[[Page 43173]]
of the gross indemnity amount for which the herd owner is eligible
after a herd plan has been approved. APHIS would withhold the remaining
10 percent of the gross indemnity until the Veterinarian in Charge or
official designated by him has conducted a site visit and has found
that the herd owner has implemented the approved herd plan.
Claims for Indemnity
Section 50.12 includes provisions for making a claim for indemnity
for cattle, bison, or captive cervids destroyed because of
tuberculosis. Currently, the regulations provide that payment will be
made only if the APHIS indemnity claim form has been approved by a
proper State official and if payment of the claim has been recommended
by the appropriate Veterinarian in Charge or an official designated by
him. We would amend this section by adding the requirement that an
approved herd plan be jointly completed by the herd owner and the State
or Federal veterinarian as required under Sec. 50.3(c) before a
claimant may receive indemnity.
Claims Not Allowed
Section 50.14 provides that claims for compensation for cattle,
bison, or captive cervids destroyed because of tuberculosis will not be
allowed under certain specified conditions. For instance, indemnity
will not be allowed if all cattle, bison, or captive cervids in the
claimant's herd have not been tested for tuberculosis, except under
certain specified conditions. Nor will claims be paid if there is
substantial evidence that the owner of the animals has attempted to
obtain indemnity unlawfully or improperly.
We are proposing to amend the regulations in Sec. 50.14 to ensure
that producers have in place, and comply with the requirements of, an
approved herd plan in order to receive Federal indemnity payments for
livestock destroyed because of tuberculosis. We would add a new
paragraph (h) to provide that claims for compensation will not be
allowed unless an approved herd plan is in place that has been jointly
approved by the herd owner(s) and/or their representative(s) and a
State or Federal veterinarian as required under Sec. 50.3(c). We would
also add a new paragraph (i) to provide that claims for indemnity for
livestock that have become reinfected with or exposed to tuberculosis
because the claimant has failed to follow the provisions of an approved
herd plan or has otherwise violated the conditions of an approved herd
plan will not be allowed.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
The rule has been determined to be significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
We are proposing to amend the regulations regarding the payment of
indemnity for animals destroyed because of bovine tuberculosis to
provide that an approved herd plan must be in place prior to the
payment of indemnity, and to provide that 10 percent of the gross
indemnity amount be held by APHIS until the conditions of an approved
herd plan have been implemented. We are also proposing to amend the
regulations to deny payments of Federal indemnity for a herd whose
owner has failed to follow an approved herd plan, or has violated the
conditions of an approved herd plan. We believe these proposed changes
would further tuberculosis eradication efforts in the United States and
protect livestock not affected with tuberculosis from the disease.
For this rule, we have prepared an economic analysis. The analysis
considers the potential economic effects of the proposed changes on
small entities, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and
provides a discussion of the potential costs and benefits, as required
by Executive Order 12866.
The economic affects associated with the proposed changes are
likely to be limited. There are about 1 million cattle herds in the
United States. Over the past 5 years, only about 1 out of every 100,000
cattle herds in the United States have been affected by bovine
tuberculosis (table 1). Since 1998, there have been 78 tuberculosis-
infected livestock herds in the United States. Of the 78 infected
herds, 4 were on premises that had previously contained tuberculosis-
infected herds. Had the provisions we are proposing in this document
been in place, these four herds would have been denied Federal
indemnity only if the herd owners had not followed specific
requirements in the herd plan intended to prevent reinfection. Herd
plans have been used for many years in the tuberculosis program.
Because herd plans are routinely used and because this proposed rule
would not change the amount of the indemnity for which the herd owner
is eligible, the costs associated with the proposed changes in terms of
forgone indemnity payments are expected to be minimal.
Table 1.--Number of Bovine Tuberculosis (TB) Cases Not of Foreign Origin Per Year and Percentage of U.S. Herds
Affected, Fiscal Years 2003-2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percentage of
positive TB Total number U.S. cattle
Fiscal year cases not of of U.S. cattle herds affected
foreign origin herds by TB \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003.......................................................... 11 1,013,570 < 0.0011
2004.......................................................... 14 989,460 < 0.0015
2005.......................................................... 13 982,510 < 0.0014
2006.......................................................... 2 971,400 < 0.0002
2007.......................................................... 9 971,400 < 0.0010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Adapted from the table at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/tuberculosis/
downloads/tb_erad.pdf.
\1\ Two or more positive tuberculosis cases may have the same herd of origin.
Since 2001, APHIS has paid $91 million in tuberculosis indemnities.
The amount paid out in indemnities depends on a number of variables
specific to each individual herd. Experience demonstrates that
reasonable estimates of indemnity payments per animal range from $1,000
to $1,200 for beef cattle and from $2,100 to $2,300 for dairy cattle.
Records show that over the last decade, the average tuberculosis-
affected dairy herd contained about 2,150 animals, and the average
tuberculosis-affected beef herd contained about 170 animals. Based on
[[Page 43174]]
these ranges for indemnity payments, the depopulation of a single
reinfected beef herd of average size could cost the Federal government
between $170,000 and $200,000 in indemnities, and the depopulation of a
single reinfected dairy herd of average size could cost between $4.5
million and $4.9 million in indemnities.
The four premises where reinfections have occurred contained small
numbers of cattle; the herds were about half as large as the average
beef herd and less than one-twenty-fifth as large as the average dairy
herd. A total of about $250,000 in indemnities was paid for the
depopulation of reinfected herds on these four premises. As noted
previously, these four herds would have been denied Federal indemnity
under the provisions we are proposing if the herd owners had not
followed specific requirements in the herd plan intended to prevent
reinfection. By linking implementation of an approved herd plan and
compliance with it to eligibility for Federal indemnity, we will place
more responsibility on owners to adhere to prescribed mitigation
measures and protect their herds from reinfection. We believe this
would further tuberculosis eradication efforts in the United States and
protect livestock not affected with tuberculosis from the disease.
According to Small Business Administration (SBA) size standards for
beef cattle ranching and farming (North American Industry
Classification System [NAICS] 112111) and for dairy cattle and milk
production (NAICS 112120), operations with not more than $750,000 in
annual sales are considered small entities. Less than 4 percent of
farms in the United States have sales of more than $500,000. Because
most farms in the United States are considered small by SBA standards,
farm operations potentially affected by the proposed changes are likely
to be small.
As noted previously, since 1998, there have been 78 livestock herds
infected with tuberculosis in the United States. This is a very small
portion of the total number of livestock herds. The proposed changes
would only affect those premises that become reinfected with
tuberculosis and are found to have not followed a herd plan to prevent
reinfection. For owners that do follow a herd plan, the proposed rule
would not change the amount of indemnity for which the herd owner would
be eligible; it would merely provide that 90 percent of the gross
indemnity payment be made after the herd plan has been approved and
that 10 percent of the gross indemnity payment be held until the herd
plan is implemented.
As an alternative to the proposed changes, we considered
maintaining the status quo. Although the existing regulations provide
for the use of approved herd plans as a post-exposure management tool,
those regulations do not require the implementation of herd plans in
order for herd owners who have tuberculosis-infected livestock to
qualify for indemnity payments, nor do the regulations penalize owners
whose subsequent failure to follow an approved herd plan results in
reinfection of the herd or the infection of a replacement herd. Since
1998, a total of 78 livestock herds have become affected with
tuberculosis in the United States, and at least 4 of these herds were
on premises where herds previously had been affected with tuberculosis
and had either been depopulated and the herd owners paid Federal and
State indemnity or undergone the approved quarantine, test, and removal
program. Therefore, leaving the regulations unchanged would be
unsatisfactory, because it would perpetuate the current situation,
i.e., one in which premises become re-infected because owners fail to
implement approved herd plans.
As another alternative to the proposed changes, we considered a
different set of payment criteria than is proposed. While it is
possible to propose other payment options to withhold a larger or
smaller percent of the Federal indemnity until the herd plan is
implemented, APHIS seeks to strike a reasonable balance between making
timely payment for herds that are depopulated and providing an
incentive for herd owners to follow the provisions of herd plans. As
such, requiring that 10 percent of the gross indemnity payment be
withheld until the conditions of an approved herd plan have been
implemented is a reasonable balance that addresses both objectives.
Nevertheless, we invite public comment on the proposed rule,
including any comment on the expected impacts for small entities, and
on how the proposed rule could be modified to reduce expected costs or
burdens for small entities consistent with its objectives. Any comment
suggesting changes to the proposed criteria should be supported with an
explanation of why the changes should be considered. Given that a very
small number of herd owners would be affected and the amount of
indemnity would not change, the changes we are proposing are not likely
to have any measurable economic effects. They would, however, increase
the incentive for herd owners to comply with herd plans and therefore
would reduce the likelihood of reinfection, which in turn would reduce
the amount of Federal funds paid in indemnification. For producers
generally, the proposed changes would help achieve the national goal of
tuberculosis eradication.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are in conflict with this rule will
be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and
(3) administrative proceedings will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington,
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-
2006-0193. Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) Docket No.
APHIS-2006-0193, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS,
Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238,
and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room 404-W, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. A comment to OMB is
best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would require that an approved herd plan must be
in place prior to the payment of indemnity for animals destroyed
because of bovine tuberculosis, and to provide that 10 percent of the
gross indemnity payment be withheld by the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service until the
[[Page 43175]]
conditions of an approved herd plan have been effectively implemented,
and the Veterinarian in Charge or official designated by him has
conducted a site visit to attest that the herd owner is in compliance
with the approved herd plan.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 25 hours per response.
Respondents: Bovine herd owners and State animal health officials.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 20.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 1.
Estimated annual number of responses: 20.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 500 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
851-2908.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2908.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 50
Animal diseases, Bison, Cattle, Hogs, Indemnity payments, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Tuberculosis.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 50 as follows:
PART 50--ANIMALS DESTROYED BECAUSE OF TUBERCULOSIS
1. The authority citation for part 50 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301-8317; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
2. Section 50.3 is amended by adding a new paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 50.3 Payment to owners for animals destroyed.
* * * * *
(c) In each case, the herd owner must cooperate with a State
representative or an APHIS representative in the development of an
approved herd plan in order for the owner to be eligible to receive
indemnity for livestock destroyed because of tuberculosis. Once a herd
plan is approved, the herd owner will be eligible for a payment of 90
percent of the gross indemnity amount. The Department will withhold the
remaining 10 percent of the gross indemnity amount until the
Veterinarian in Charge or official designated by him has conducted a
site visit \1\ and has found that the herd owner has implemented the
approved herd plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A herd owner may request a site visit conducted by the
Veterinarian in Charge. The location of the Veterinarian in Charge
may be obtained by writing to National Center for Animal Health
Program, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 43, Riverdale, MD 20737, or
by referring to the local telephone book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. In Sec. 50.12, the third sentence is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 50.12 Claims for indemnity.
* * * Payment will be made only if the APHIS indemnity claim form
has been approved by a proper State official, if payment of the claim
has been recommended by the appropriate Veterinarian in Charge or
official designated by him, and if a herd plan has been jointly
approved by the herd owner(s) and/or their representative(s) and a
State or Federal veterinarian as required under Sec. 50.3(c). * * *
4. Section 50.14 is amended by adding paragraphs (h) and (i) to
read as follows:
Sec. 50.14 Claims not allowed.
* * * * *
(h) The claimant does not have an approved herd plan in place that
has been jointly approved by the herd owner(s) and/or their
representative(s) and a State or Federal veterinarian as required under
Sec. 50.3(c).
(i) The herd or replacement herd has become reinfected with or
exposed to tuberculosis because the claimant has failed to follow the
provisions of an approved herd plan or has otherwise violated the
conditions of an approved herd plan.
Sec. 50.20 [Amended]
5. Section 50.20 is amended by redesignating footnote 3 as footnote
2.
Done in Washington, DC, this 18th day of July 2008.
Bruce Knight,
Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-16949 Filed 7-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P