Temporary Importation of Horses; Noncompetitive Entertainment Horses From Countries Affected With Contagious Equine Metritis, 31930-31937 [E8-12543]
Download as PDF
31930
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Within the quarantined area there are
approximately 20 small entities that
may be affected by this rule. These
include two grocery stores, three fruit
stands, four citrus producers, six truck
vendors, four nurseries, and one
recycling center. These 20 entities
comprise less than 1 percent of the total
number of similar entities operating in
the State of Texas. Additionally, these
small entities sell regulated articles
primarily for local intrastate, not
interstate movement, so the effect, if
any, of this regulation on these entities
appears to be minimal.
The effect on those few entities that
do move regulated articles interstate
will be minimized by the availability of
various treatments that, in most cases,
will allow these small entities to move
regulated articles interstate with very
little additional cost.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Section 301.75–15 issued under Sec. 204,
Title II, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501A–293; sections 301.75–15 and 301.75–
16 issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law
106–224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
I 2. In § 301.64–3, paragraph (c) is
amended by adding, in alphabetical
order, under the heading ‘‘Texas,’’ an
entry for Willacy County to read as
follows:
§ 301.64–3
*
Quarantined areas.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
Texas
*
*
*
*
*
Willacy County. That portion of the
county in the Raymondville/Lasara area
bounded by a line as follows: Beginning
at the intersection of FM 498 and FM
2845; then east on FM 498 to FM 2099;
then north on FM 2099 to FM 490; then
east on FM 490 to a point described as
latitude 26.45360 and longitude
¥97.69919; then north from that point
along an imaginary line to CR 3796;
then west on CR 3796 to Santa Margarita
Road; then north on Santa Margarita
Road to Riggin Road; then west on
Riggin Road to Cantu Road; then
northwest along an imaginary line to a
point described as latitude 26.57423 and
longitude ¥97.70461; then west from
that point along an imaginary line to the
Willacy County line; then south, east,
and south along the Willacy County line
to FM 1921; then east on FM 1921 to FM
2845; then south on FM 2845 to the
point of beginning.
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of
May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–12542 Filed 6–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 93
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
I Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 301 as follows:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0164]
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 301
continues to read as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
RIN 0579–AC35
Temporary Importation of Horses;
Noncompetitive Entertainment Horses
From Countries Affected With
Contagious Equine Metritis
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: We are amending the
regulations to allow noncompetitive
entertainment horses from countries
affected with contagious equine metritis
to be temporarily imported into the
United States under certain conditions.
The regulations currently provide for
the temporary importation of horses
from countries affected with contagious
equine metritis to compete in specified
events. In recent years it has become
evident that similar provisions are
needed for noncompetitive
entertainment horses. This action will
allow the temporary importation of
horses into the United States solely for
public exhibition and entertainment
purposes while continuing to protect
against the introduction and
dissemination of contagious equine
metritis.
DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Ellen M. Buck, Veterinary Medical
Officer, Import/Export Animals,
National Center for Import and Export,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 39,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 93
(referred to below as the regulations)
prohibit or restrict the importation of
certain animals into the United States to
prevent the introduction of
communicable diseases of livestock and
poultry. Subpart C—Horses, §§ 93.300
through 92.326 of the regulations,
pertains to the importation of horses
into the United States.
Section 93.301 of the regulations
contains specific provisions for the
quarantine and testing of horses from
regions affected with contagious equine
metritis (CEM), a highly contagious
bacterial venereal disease that affects
breeding and fertility. This section also
identifies regions where CEM exists and
regions that trade horses freely with
those where CEM exists without testing
for CEM.
To prevent the introduction of CEM
into the United States, § 93.301(c)(1)
prohibits the importation of horses into
the United States from listed regions
unless the horses are imported in
accordance with certain requirements.
To be eligible for importation, the
horses must fall into one of the
following categories:
• Wild (non-domesticated) species of
equidae if captured in the wild or
imported from a zoo or other facility
where it would be unlikely that the
animal would come in contact with
domesticated horses used for breeding;
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
• Geldings;
• Weanlings or yearlings whose age is
certified on the import health certificate
required under § 93.314(a);
• Horses imported in accordance with
conditions prescribed by the
Administrator as provided in
§ 93.301(a);
• Spanish Pure Breed horses
imported for permanent entry from
Spain or thoroughbred horses imported
for permanent entry from France,
Germany, Ireland, or the United
Kingdom as provided in § 93.301(d);
• Stallions or mares over 731 days of
age imported for permanent entry as
provided in § 93.301(e);
• Horses over 731 days of age
imported into the United States for no
more than 90 days to compete in
specified events as provided in
§ 93.301(f); and
• U.S. horses returning to the United
States as provided in § 93.301(g).
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) has used the
provisions in § 93.301(f), relating to the
temporary importation of horses for
competition, to allow the temporary
importation of noncompetitive
entertainment horses into the United
States. Several performance horse
groups have asked APHIS to extend the
90-day limit provided for in § 93.301(f)
so that they may exhibit and show their
horses in the United States for longer
periods of time. In addition, the United
States Animal Health Association has
recommended that APHIS amend the
regulations to establish a category for
noncompetitive entertainment horses.
Accordingly, on August 2, 2007, we
published in the Federal Register (72
FR 42318–42326, Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0164) a proposal1 to amend the
regulations in § 93.301 to establish
conditions under which noncompetitive
entertainment horses from CEM-affected
regions may be imported into the United
States for longer than 90 days solely for
public exhibition and entertainment
purposes. Because the conditions are
very similar to the conditions in
§ 93.301(f), which provides for the
temporary importation of horses to
compete in specified events, we
proposed that § 93.301(f) apply to both
types of imported horses. We also
proposed to amend the regulations
pertaining to import permits in § 93.304
to require the submission of additional
information with the application for an
import permit.
We solicited comments concerning
our proposal for 60 days ending October
1 To view the proposed rule and the comments
we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/
fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0164.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
1, 2007. We received four comments by
that date. The comments were from a
private citizen, State animal health
department, horse industry group, and a
horse entertainment company. These
comments are discussed below.
In the proposed rule we stated that,
‘‘[b]ecause CEM is a venereal disease
transmitted by sexual contact, there is
virtually no risk that a horse will
transmit the disease through casual
contact with other horses during a
performance, exhibition, or exercise.’’
One commenter stated that APHIS
should not lift the CEM restrictions
unless there is absolutely no risk of
spreading the disease. This commenter
suggested that APHIS reconsider the
proposed rule and tighten the CEM
restrictions instead.
We disagree. As discussed in the
proposed rule, APHIS has conducted a
risk assessment to evaluate the risk of
allowing the extended importation of
noncompetitive entertainment horses
from countries affected with CEM
without requiring CEM testing, and the
risk of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) losing track of these
horses during extended importation.
The risk assessment, titled ‘‘Assessment
of the Risk of Introduction of Contagious
Equine Metritis (CEM) through the
Extended Importation of
Noncompetitive Entertainment Horses
from CEM-affected countries,’’
concluded that the risk posed by
allowing the extended importation of
noncompetitive entertainment horses
from CEM-affected countries would be
extremely low, with the application of
the restrictions described in the rule. In
addition, the risk assessment concluded
that the risk of USDA losing track of the
animals was extremely low due to the
extensive supervision and involvement
of APHIS personnel and the accredited
veterinarian. The risk assessment is
supported by our experiences with the
importation of horses to compete in
specified events under conditions very
similar to those proposed for
noncompetitive entertainment horses.
Accordingly, we are making no changes
based on this comment.
Another commenter stated that the
regulations should protect the health of
U.S. horses from imported horses
regardless of the reason for their
importation. Therefore, the commenter
recommended that the health certificate
and testing requirements set forth in
proposed § 93.301(f)(3) for
noncompetitive entertainment horses
also be required for horses temporarily
imported for competition.
In the proposed rule, we proposed to
amend the regulations to require that, at
the time of importation, each horse
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31931
imported for competition or public
exhibition and entertainment purposes
be accompanied by an import permit in
accordance with § 93.304 and a health
certificate in accordance with § 93.314.
However, for noncompetitive
entertainment horses, we also proposed
to require that the health certificate
certify that cultures negative for CEM
have been collected on three separate
occasions within a 7-day period, with
the last within 30 days of exportation.
We proposed more stringent CEM
testing requirements for noncompetitive
entertainment horses because these
horses could be imported for long
periods of time, compared to horses
imported for competition. Currently,
§ 93.301(f) provides that horses may be
imported for competition for no more
than 90 days under certain conditions.
The requirement for CEM testing prior
to importation for noncompetitive
entertainment horses will help to ensure
that horses infected with CEM do not
enter this country and jeopardize the
health of the U.S. horse population. For
these reasons, we are making no change
in response to this comment.
The commenter also requested that
APHIS clarify that the average salary
used in the trust fund/costs is the salary
for APHIS personnel. Proposed
§ 93.301(f)(10) provides that the costs
associated with the supervision and
maintenance of the horse by an APHIS
representative be reimbursed by the
horse’s owner or importer through user
fees payable under 9 CFR part 130,
which lists the hourly rate and
minimum user fee for certain importrelated services provided by APHIS.
Proposed § 93.301(f)(11) set out the
requirements for trust fund agreements.
More specifically, that paragraph
provided that the horse’s owner or
importer deposit with APHIS an amount
equal to the estimated cost, as
determined by APHIS, for the APHIS
representative to inspect the premises at
which the horse will compete, perform,
or be exhibited and to conduct the
monitoring and supervision required by
the regulations. We do not believe that
additional clarification is needed. We
are making no change based on this
comment.
One commenter supported the
proposed rule but was concerned that
USDA may not be able to provide the
monitoring required by the regulations
over extended periods of time.
APHIS is committed to providing the
services specified in the proposed rule
and this final rule to prevent the
introduction of CEM into the United
States by noncompetitive entertainment
horses. As discussed in the proposed
rule, we would require noncompetitive
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
31932
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
entertainment horses to be imported and
maintained in the United States in
accordance with a trust fund agreement
executed by the horse’s owner or
importer. Such an agreement would
ensure that the government is
reimbursed for the services it provides
while the horses are in the United
States. We are making no change based
on this comment.
A commenter stated that proposed
§ 93.301(f)(5)(iv)(B), which provides that
horses must be kept on a premises that
is or contains a building, is too
restrictive. The commenter noted that
entertainment horse shows often use
stable installations, such as tents, that
may be set up and taken down in each
city. Thus, the commenter
recommended that the regulations be
amended to define the term ‘‘building’’
to include tent structures.
We agree that the regulations should
be flexible enough to cover buildings as
well as tent stables or other temporary
structures for housing horses. Therefore,
in this final rule, we are amending
§ 93.301(f)(5)(iv)(B) to provide that the
horse must be kept on a premises that
is or contains a building or temporary
structure in which the horse can be kept
in a stall that is separated from other
stalls that contain horses that are not
listed on the import permit, either by an
empty stall, by an open area across
which horses cannot touch each other,
or by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet
(2.4 meters) high. The horse may be kept
only on premises that have been
approved by an APHIS representative.
The commenter also recommended
amending § 93.301(f)(5)(iv)(B) to allow
APHIS to approve isolation measures
other than those set out in that
paragraph. Specifically, the commenter
recommended revising that paragraph to
read as follows: ‘‘Must be or contain a
building in which the horse can be kept
in a stall that is separated from other
stalls that contain horses that are not
listed on the import permit, either by an
empty stall, by an open area across from
which horses cannot touch each other,
by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4
meters) high, or by such other means
deemed appropriate by APHIS in the
circumstances.’’
As noted in the proposed rule, one of
the primary safeguards against the
horses transmitting CEM while in the
United States is the stringent measures
in the regulations to ensure that the
horses are kept apart from horses that
are not listed on the import permit. This
final rule provides several means by
which the necessary isolation from
horses that are not listed on the import
permit could be accomplished. We do
not believe that additional flexibility is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
needed. Accordingly, we are making no
change in response to this comment.
The same commenter recommended
that proposed § 93.301(f)(6) be amended
to allow last-minute changes to the
itinerary in an emergency. Section
93.301(f)(6) provides that, if an owner or
importer wishes to change the horse’s
itinerary or the methods by which the
horse is transported from those
specified on the import permit, the
owner or importer must make the
request for change in writing to the
Administrator at least 15 days before the
proposed date of change. The
commenter noted that touring inevitably
entails unforeseen changes of plans,
venues, dates, etc.
We agree that the regulations should
allow for changes to the itinerary or
methods of transportation in an
emergency. In this final rule, we are
adding a new paragraph to provide that
the horse’s itinerary or methods of
transportation may be changed, with the
prior approval of an APHIS
representative, in order to respond to an
emergency or other unforeseen
circumstances or events (e.g., weatherrelated transportation delays, vehicle
breakdown, medical emergencies, etc.).
Requests for such a change may be
submitted to APHIS by telephone,
postal mail, commercial delivery
service, fax, or e-mail. We may approve
the request for change orally or in
writing. If the approval is oral, it will be
confirmed in writing by the
Administrator as soon as possible.
These changes will provide greater
flexibility for a horse’s owner or
importer to respond to emergencies or
other unforeseen circumstances or
events.
In this final rule, we are also
amending paragraph (f)(6) to make it
clear that written requests for change
may be submitted via postal mail,
commercial delivery service, fax, or email. APHIS has always allowed such
written requests for change; however,
we are adding that provision to the
regulations to make it clear to the
public.
The commenter also recommended
that APHIS amend proposed
§ 93.301(f)(8) to provide the
Administrator the discretion to allow
horses to perform pending resolution of
an appeal of the cancellation of an
import permit, provided that such
performances would not pose a risk to
U.S. horses and the owner or importer
could demonstrate material harm from
the interruption of performances.
Proposed § 93.301(f)(7) provides that
the Administrator may cancel an import
permit whenever the Administrator
finds that the owner or importer of the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
horse has not complied with certain
provisions in the regulations or any
conditions imposed under those
provisions. Proposed § 93.301(f)(8)
provides that the horse is not permitted
to enter competition, perform, or be
exhibited from the date the owner or
importer receives the notice of
cancellation until the horse is moved
out of the United States or until
resolution of an appeal in favor of the
owner or importer. The potential
cancellation of an import permit for
noncompliance with the regulations
provides an incentive for a horse owner
or importer to remain in compliance
with the regulations; allowing the horse
to continue to perform or be exhibited
pending the resolution of an appeal
would be counterproductive.
Accordingly, we are making no change
based on this comment.
Finally, the commenter recommended
that proposed § 93.304(a)(1)(iii)(D)
through (H), relating to the proposed
length of stay and itinerary, be amended
to allow the applicant for an import
permit to provide some of this
information to APHIS at the time of
application and the rest at intervals to
be set by APHIS and the applicant.
In the proposed rule, we listed the
information that must be supplied to
APHIS by the owner or importer with
the application for an import permit. We
noted that the specified information
would allow APHIS to monitor the
location of the horse while it is in the
United States and to confirm
compliance with the required isolation
and handling procedures to ensure that
the horse does not transmit CEM to any
other horse while in this country. Given
the potential for long stays in the United
States for noncompetitive entertainment
horses and our need for current
information to monitor compliance with
the regulations, we also proposed to
require that, while in the United States,
the owner or importer apply for and
obtain from APHIS an import permit
each year prior to the anniversary date
of the horse’s arrival in the United
States. To accommodate changes to the
itinerary following importation, in
proposed § 93.301(f)(6), we also
established provisions by which a horse
owner or importer could request APHIS
approval of a change to the horse’s
itinerary or the methods of
transportation from those specified in
the application for an import permit. We
believe these provisions, in
combination, provide the flexibility that
the commenter is seeking. Accordingly,
we are making no change in response to
this comment.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule with the changes discussed in this
document.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
We are amending the regulations to
establish conditions under which
noncompetitive entertainment horses
(stallions and mares) over 731 days of
age from CEM-affected countries could
remain in the United States for longer
than 90 days for public exhibition and
entertainment purposes without
undergoing the CEM quarantine and
testing prescribed in the regulations.
The horse industry plays an important
role in the U.S. economy. According to
the 2002 Census of Agriculture, there
were 542,223 farms with 3.644 million
horses valued at $9.9 billion in the
United States in 2002. According to a
recent study done for the American
Horse Council, the number and value of
horses are much larger than those
reported in the 2002 Census of
Agriculture: 2 million people owning
9.2 million horses with direct value of
about $39 billion.1 Both sets of data
underscore the importance of the equine
industry. In addition, other agricultural
and nonagricultural sectors are
dependent on the horse industry for
their economic activity. Horses are a
highly valued asset, especially those
with a specific pedigree. Horses also
play an important role in U.S.
international trade. The value of U.S.
horse exports ($449 million) was more
than the combined export value of
cattle, hogs and sheep and goats ($65
million) between 2003 and 2005.2
The United States imported a total of
31,198 horses in 2005. Nearly 67
percent of horses imported were from
Canada and 7.6 percent were from
Mexico. Of the total imports, 25,564
were from non-CEM countries and the
remaining 5,634 were from CEM
countries. The proportion of horse
imports that are pure breeding horses is
small. Of the above total, 2,341 were
purebred breeding horses. Only 340
purebred breeding horses were imported
from CEM countries.3 However, horses
supplied by CEM-affected countries are
1 Deloitte Consulting LLP for American Horse
Council, National Economic Impact of the U.S.
Horse Industry, 2005.
2 Global Trade Information Services, World Trade
Atlas.
3 Id.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
generally highly valued. In 2005, for
example, the average value of purebred
breeding horses imported from CEMaffected regions was $41,220, whereas
the average value of purebred breeding
horses imported from countries not
affected by CEM was $17,180.
Although the disease does not result
in death, CEM can be economically
costly. The direct consequence may
include the closing of breeding
operations, production losses as a result
of abortion, and costs of disease control.
A CEM outbreak would result in the
quarantine of affected horse farms,
temporary cessation of breeding
operations, and restriction of both
intrastate and interstate movement. For
some breeders, this could mean the loss
of thousands or even millions of dollars
in stud fees and breeding losses. Other
consequences include trade restrictions
that may be imposed by international
trading partners.
The noncompetitive entertainment
horses that will be affected by this rule
will not be allowed to have direct
contact with horses outside those listed
on their permit and may not be used for
breeding purposes at any time while in
the United States, including breeding
with horses in the same show.
Additionally, these horses may not
undergo any genital examinations
(unless required for diagnosis and
treatment of a medical condition with
prior approval of an APHIS
representative), semen collection, or
artificial insemination. Furthermore,
since these are very specialized
performance animals, domestic breeders
will not be affected if this rule were to
increase the amount of time the
imported horses are in the United
States.
Horses arriving in the United States
from abroad are quarantined at a USDA
animal import center, generally for 3
days. Horses temporarily imported are
required to exit the United States and be
readmitted, following quarantine and
testing, every 90 days. Each entry after
90 days is considered a new entry into
the United States. The USDA charges a
minimum of $810 for the 3-day
quarantine. In addition to this facility
charge, user fees of $80 are charged for
blood testing, resulting in a total
quarantine and testing cost per horse of
$890. The final rule will allow imported
performance horses to stay in the United
States longer than 90 days without their
owners having again to pay USDA
import quarantine and testing costs.
This is a savings that accrues to the
importing entities and likely to
counterbalance their costs associated
with supervisory activities of APHIS
and/or an accredited veterinarian.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31933
The number of entities and horses
expected to be directly affected by this
rule is not large. We anticipate that
between 1 and 10 performing groups
varying in size from 5 to 40 horses (or
a total of between 5 and 400 horses) will
utilize the proposed exception each
year. Given that there are over 1 million
domestic show horses, even the upper
quantity represents a very small fraction
of the total supply (0.04 percent).
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) has established guidelines for
determining which types of firms are to
be considered small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. This rule
may affect operations such as zoological
parks (North American Industry
Classification System [NAICS] code
712130), and animal performances
including circuses, carnivals, and
amusement parks (NAICS code 711190).
SBA classifies these operations as small
entities if their annual receipts are not
more than $6.5 million. Of the
approximately 850 such establishments,
about 12.5 percent are considered to be
large. The subset of these entities that
temporarily import noncompetitive
entertainment horses from CEM
countries will benefit from the forgone
costs associated with the horses having
to exit and reenter the United States
every 90 days. On the other hand, they
will bear the cost of supervisory
activities by APHIS and/or an
accredited veterinarian. The overall
impact is expected to be insignificant,
given the relatively small number of
noncompetitive entertainment horses
imported from CEM countries.
Other operations that may remotely be
affected are domestic suppliers of
similar horses (NAICS code 112920).
According to the 2002 Census of
Agriculture, that year there were
542,223 horse farms with 3,644,278
horses in the United States, of which
124,596 farms sold 470,423 horses that
had a total value of over $1.13 billion.4
An unknown share of these farms
supply show horses that could be
comparable to the noncompetitive
entertainment horses imported
temporarily from CEM-affected
countries. SBA classifies horse farms as
small entities if their annual receipts are
4 As stated above, the census total is much less
than the total reported by the American Horse
Council Foundation. According to that report, there
were 9,222,847 horses in 2005 (Deloitte Consulting
LLP, National Economic Impact of the U.S. Horse
Industry). Of this total, 9 percent were racing, 30
percent showing, 42 percent recreation, and 19
percent other (https://www.horsecouncil.org/
statistics.htm).
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
31934
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
not more than $750,000;5 over 99
percent are considered to be small.
Entities that may be affected by the
rule are principally small businesses,
but the impact of the rule is not
expected to be significant. Because the
pool of noncompetitive entertainment
horses that are temporarily imported is
a small fraction of the total number of
show horses in the United States, any
effects of the rule on U.S. entities will
be very small.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts
all State and local laws and regulations
that are inconsistent with this rule; (2)
has no retroactive effect; and (3) does
not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB control number
0579–0324.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
5 SBA, Small Business Size Standards matched to
NAICS, Effective July 31, 2006; and U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 Economic Census: ManufacturingIndustries Series, Wholesale Trade-Subject Series
and Transportation and Warehousing-Subject
Series, Issued August, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR
part 93 as follows:
PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND
POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL,
BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS;
REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
CONTAINERS
1. The authority citation for part 93
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
2. Section 93.301 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (c)(2)(vii), by removing
the words ‘‘paragraph (f)’’ and adding
the words ‘‘paragraph (f)(1)’’ in their
place, and by removing the word ‘‘and’’
at the end of the sentence.
I b. By redesignating paragraph
(c)(2)(viii) as paragraph (c)(2)(ix) and
adding a new paragraph (c)(2)(viii) to
read as set forth below.
I c. In footnote 6, by removing the
words ‘‘Jefatura de Cria Caballar
Registro Matricula for Spain’’ and
adding the words ‘‘Asociacion National
de Criadores de Caballos de Pura Raza
Espanola for Spain’’ in their place.
I d. By revising paragraph (f) and the
Office of Management and Budget
citation at the end of the section to read
as set forth below.
I
§ 93.301
General prohibitions; exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Specific prohibitions regarding
contagious equine metritis; exceptions—
* * *
(2) * * *
(viii) Horses over 731 days of age
imported into the United States for
noncompetitive public exhibition and
entertainment purposes if the horses
meet the requirements of paragraph
(f)(2) of this section; and
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Special provisions for temporary
importation for competition or
entertainment purposes.
(1) Horses over 731 days of age may
be imported into the United States for
no more than 90 days to compete in
specified events provided that the
conditions in paragraphs (f)(3) through
(f)(12) of this section are met.
(2) Horses over 731 days of age may
be temporarily imported into the United
States solely for noncompetitive public
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
exhibition and entertainment purposes
provided that the conditions in
paragraphs (f)(3) through (f)(12) of this
section are met.
(3) At the time of importation, each
horse must be accompanied by an
import permit in accordance with
§ 93.304 and a health certificate issued
in accordance with § 93.314. For horses
imported in accordance with paragraph
(f)(2) of this section, the health
certificate must also certify that cultures
negative for CEM were obtained from
sets of specimens collected on three
separate occasions within a 7-day
period from the mucosal surfaces of the
clitoral fossa and the clitoral sinuses of
any female horses and from the surfaces
of the prepuce, the urethral sinus, and
the fossa glandis, including the
diverticulum of the fossa glandis, of any
male horses. For both female and male
horses, the sets of specimens must be
collected on days 1, 4, and 7 of the 7day period, and the last of these sets of
specimens must be collected within 30
days of exportation. All specimens
required by this paragraph must be
collected by a licensed veterinarian who
either is, or is acting in the presence of,
the veterinarian signing the certificate.
(4) Following the horse’s arrival in the
United States:
(i) A horse imported in accordance
with paragraph (f)(1) of this section may
remain in the United States for not more
than 90 days, except as provided in
paragraph (f)(9) of this section.
(ii) A horse imported in accordance
with paragraph (f)(2) of this section may
remain in the United States indefinitely,
except as provided in paragraph (f)(9) of
this section, as long as the conditions of
paragraphs (f)(3) through (f)(12) of this
section are met and the horse’s owner or
importer applies for and obtains from
APHIS an import permit, as provided
for in § 93.304, each year prior to the
anniversary date of the horse’s arrival in
the United States.
(5) While the horse is in the United
States, the following conditions must be
met:
(i) A horse imported in accordance
with paragraph (f)(2) of this section:
(A) Must not be entered in
competitions.
(B) Must be regularly used in
performances or exhibitions, unless sick
or injured. A horse that is no longer
performing or being exhibited must be
exported or made eligible for permanent
entry in accordance with paragraph
(f)(9) of this section.
(C) Must be kept with the other horses
listed on the import permit, unless
otherwise approved by an APHIS
representative.
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph
(f)(5)(viii) of this section, the horse must
be moved according to the itinerary and
methods of transport specified in the
import permit provided for in § 93.304.
(iii) The horse must be monitored by
an accredited veterinarian or APHIS
representative to ensure that the
provisions of paragraphs (f)(5)(ii),
(f)(5)(vi), and (f)(5)(vii) of this section
are met. If the monitoring is performed
by an accredited veterinarian, the
Veterinarian in Charge will ensure that
the accredited veterinarian is familiar
with the requirements of this section
and spot checks will be conducted by an
APHIS representative to ensure that the
requirements of this section are being
met. If an APHIS representative finds
that requirements are not being met, the
Administrator may require that all
remaining monitoring be conducted by
APHIS representatives to ensure
compliance.
(iv) Except when in transit, the horse
must be kept on a premises that has
been approved by an APHIS
representative. For horses imported in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this
section, such approval may be oral or in
writing. If the approval is oral, it will be
confirmed in writing by the
Administrator as soon as circumstances
permit. For horses imported in
accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this
section, the approval will be in writing.
To receive approval, the premises:
(A) Must not be a breeding premises;
and
(B) Must be or contain a building or
temporary structure in which the horse
can be kept in a stall that is separated
from other stalls that contain horses that
are not listed on the import permit,
either by an empty stall, by an open area
across which horses cannot touch each
other, or by a solid wall that is at least
8 feet (2.4 meters) high.
(v) While in transit, the horse must be
moved in either an aircraft or a sealed
van or trailer. If the horse is moved in
a sealed van or trailer, the seal may be
broken only by an APHIS representative
at the horse’s destination, except in
situations where the horse’s life is in
danger.
(vi) Except when actually competing,
performing, or being exhibited or
exercised, the horse must be kept in a
pasture approved by APHIS or in a stall
that is separated from other stalls
containing horses that are not listed on
the import permit, either by an empty
stall, by an open area across which
horses cannot touch each other, or by a
solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4
meters) high.
(vii) The horse may not be used for
breeding purposes (including artificial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
insemination or semen collection) and
may not have any other sexual contact
with other horses. The horse may not
undergo any genital examinations,
except that a horse imported in
accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this
section may undergo genital
examinations for diagnosis or treatment
of a medical condition with the prior
approval of an APHIS representative.
(viii) The horse may be moved for
diagnosis or treatment of a medical
condition with the prior approval of an
APHIS representative.
(ix) After the horse is transported
anywhere in the United States, any
vehicle in which the horse was
transported must be cleaned and
disinfected in the presence of an APHIS
representative, according to the
procedures specified in §§ 71.7 through
71.12 of this chapter, before any other
horse is transported in the vehicle.
(x) The cleaning and disinfection
specified in paragraph (f)(5)(ix) of this
section must be completed before the
vehicle is moved from the place where
the horse is unloaded. In those cases
where the facilities or equipment for
cleaning and disinfection are inadequate
at the place where the horse is
unloaded, the Administrator may allow
the vehicle to be moved to another
location for cleaning and disinfection
when the move will not pose a disease
risk to other horses in the United States.
(xi) The owner or importer of the
horse must comply with any other
provisions of this part applicable to him
or her.
(6) Except as provided in paragraph
(f)(7) of this section, if the owner or
importer wishes to change the horse’s
itinerary or the methods by which the
horse is transported from that which he
or she specified in the application for
the import permit, the owner or
importer must make the request for
change in writing to the Administrator.
Requests for change must be submitted
to APHIS no less than 15 days before the
proposed date of the change. Requests
may be submitted to APHIS by postal
mail, commercial delivery service, fax,
or e-mail. The change in itinerary or
method of transport may not be made
without the written approval of the
Administrator, who may grant the
request for change when he or she
determines that granting the request will
not endanger other horses in the United
States and that sufficient APHIS
personnel are available to provide the
services required by the owner or
importer.
(7) In response to an emergency or
other unforeseen circumstances or
events (e.g., weather-related
transportation delays, vehicle
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31935
breakdown, medical emergencies, etc.),
the horse’s itinerary or methods of
transportation may be changed, with the
prior approval of an APHIS
representative, from that which is
specified in the application for an
import permit. Requests for such a
change may be submitted to APHIS by
telephone, postal mail, commercial
delivery service, fax, or e-mail.
Approval may be oral or in writing. If
the approval is oral, it will be confirmed
in writing by the Administrator as soon
as circumstances permit.
(8) The Administrator may cancel,
orally or in writing, the import permit
provided for under § 93.304 whenever
the Administrator finds that the owner
or importer of the horse has not
complied with the provisions of
paragraphs (f)(3) through (f)(7) of this
section or any conditions imposed
under those provisions. If the
cancellation is oral, the Administrator
will confirm the cancellation and the
reasons for the cancellation in writing as
soon as circumstances permit. Any
person whose import permit is canceled
may appeal the decision in writing to
the Administrator within 10 days after
receiving oral or written notification of
the cancellation, whichever is earlier. If
the appeal is sent by mail, it must be
postmarked within 10 days after the
owner or importer receives oral or
written notification of the cancellation,
whichever is earlier. The appeal must
include all of the facts and reasons upon
which the person relies to show that the
import permit was wrongfully canceled.
The Administrator will grant or deny
the appeal in writing as promptly as
circumstances permit, stating the reason
for his or her decision. If there is a
conflict as to any material fact, a hearing
will be held to resolve the conflict.
Rules of practice concerning the hearing
will be adopted by the Administrator.
(9) Except in those cases where an
appeal is in process, any person whose
import permit is canceled must move
the horse identified in the import permit
out of the United States within 10 days
after receiving oral or written
notification of cancellation, whichever
is earlier. The horse is not permitted to
enter competition, perform, or be
exhibited from the date the owner or
importer receives the notice of
cancellation until the horse is moved
out of the United States or until
resolution of an appeal in favor of the
owner or importer. Except when being
exercised, the horse must be kept, at the
expense of the owner or importer, in a
stall on the premises where the horse is
located when the notice of cancellation
is received or, if the horse is in transit
when the notice of cancellation is
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
31936
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
received, on the premises where it is
next scheduled to compete, perform, or
be exhibited according to the import
permit. The stall in which the horse is
kept must be separated from other stalls
containing horses that are not listed on
the import permit, either by an empty
stall, by an open area across which
horses cannot touch each other, or by a
solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4
meters) high. In cases where the owners
of the above specified premises do not
permit the horse to be kept on those
premises, or when the Administrator
determines that keeping the horse on
the above specified premises will pose
a disease risk to horses in the United
States, the horse must be kept, at the
expense of the owner or importer, on an
alternative premises approved by the
Administrator.
(10) Stallions or mares over 731 days
of age that are imported in accordance
with paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
section may be eligible to remain in the
United States if the following is
completed:
(i) Following completion of the
itinerary specified in the import permit
provided for in § 93.304, the horse’s
owner or importer applies for and
receives a new import permit that
specifies that the stallion or mare will
be moved to an approved State listed in
paragraph (h)(6) or (h)(7) of this section;
and
(ii) The stallion or mare is transported
in a sealed vehicle that has been cleaned
and disinfected to an approved facility
in an approved State where it is
quarantined under State or Federal
supervision until the stallion or mare
has met the testing and treatment
requirements of paragraph (e)(3) or (e)(5)
of this section.
(11) All costs and charges associated
with the supervision and maintenance
of a horse imported under paragraphs
(f)(1) or (f)(2) of this section will be
borne by the horse’s owner or importer.
The costs associated with the
supervision and maintenance of the
horse by an APHIS representative at his
or her usual places of duty will be
reimbursed by the horse’s owner or
importer through user fees payable
under part 130 of this chapter.
(12) In the event that an APHIS
representative must be temporarily
detailed from his or her usual place of
duty in connection with the supervision
and maintenance of a horse imported
under this paragraph (f), the owner or
importer of the horse must execute a
trust fund agreement with APHIS to
reimburse all expenses (including travel
costs, salary, per diem or subsistence,
administrative expenses, and incidental
expenses) incurred by the Department
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
in connection with the temporary detail.
Under the trust fund agreement, the
horse’s owner or importer must deposit
with APHIS an amount equal to the
estimated cost, as determined by APHIS,
for the APHIS representative to inspect
the premises at which the horse will
compete, perform, or be exhibited; to
conduct the monitoring required by
paragraph (f)(5)(iii) of this section; and
to supervise the cleaning and
disinfection required by paragraph
(f)(5)(ix) of this section. The estimated
costs will be based on the following
factors:
(i) Number of hours needed for an
APHIS representative to conduct the
required inspection and monitoring;
(ii) For services provided during
regular business hours (8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Saturday, except
holidays), the average salary, per hour,
for an APHIS representative;
(iii) For services provided outside
regular business hours, the applicable
rate for overtime, night differential, or
Sunday or holiday pay, based on the
average salary, per hour, for an APHIS
representative;
(iv) Number of miles from the
premises at which the horse competes,
performs, or is exhibited to the APHIS
office or facility that is monitoring the
activities;
(v) Government rate per mile for
automobile travel or, if appropriate, cost
of other means of transportation
between the premises at which the
horse competes, performs, or is
exhibited and the APHIS office or
facility;
(vi) Number of trips between the
premises at which the horse competes,
performs, or is exhibited and the APHIS
office or facility that APHIS
representatives are required to make in
order to conduct the required inspection
and monitoring;
(vii) Number of days the APHIS
representative conducting the
inspection and monitoring must be in
‘‘travel status’’;
(viii) Applicable Government per
diem rate; and
(ix) Cost of related administrative
support services.
(13) If a trust fund agreement with
APHIS has been executed by the owner
or importer of a horse in accordance
with paragraph (f)(12) of this section
and APHIS determines, during the
horse’s stay in the United States, that
the amount deposited will be
insufficient to cover the services APHIS
is scheduled to provide during the
remainder of the horse’s stay, APHIS
will issue to the horse’s owner or
importer a bill to restore the deposited
amount to a level sufficient to cover the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
estimated cost to APHIS for the
remainder of the horse’s stay in the
United States. The horse’s owner or
importer must pay the amount billed
within 14 days after receiving the bill.
If the bill is not paid within 14 days
after its receipt, APHIS will cease to
perform the services provided for in
paragraph (f)(5) of this section until the
bill is paid. The Administrator will
inform the owner or importer of the
cessation of services orally or in writing.
If the notice of cessation is oral, the
Administrator will confirm, in writing,
the notice of cessation and the reason
for the cessation of services as soon as
circumstances permit. In such a case,
the horse must be kept, at the expense
of the owner or importer and until the
bill is paid, in a stall either on the
premises at which the horse is located
when the notice of cessation of services
is received or, if the horse is in transit
when the notice of cessation of services
is received, on the premises at which it
is next scheduled to compete, perform,
or be exhibited according to the import
permit. The stall in which the horse is
kept must be separated from other stalls
containing horses that are not listed on
the import permit, either by an empty
stall, by an open area across which
horses cannot touch each other, or by a
solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4
meters) high. In cases where the owners
of the premises where the horse would
be kept following a cessation of services
do not permit the horse to be kept on
those premises, or when the
Administrator determines that keeping
the horse on the premises will pose a
disease risk to other horses in the
United States, the horse must be kept,
at the expense of the owner or importer,
on an alternative premises approved by
the Administrator. Until the bill is paid,
the horse is not permitted to enter
competition, perform, or be exhibited.
Any amount deposited in excess of the
costs to APHIS to provide the required
services will be refunded to the horse’s
owner or importer.
*
*
*
*
*
(Approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under control numbers 0579–
0040, 0579–0165, and 0579–0324).
3. Section 93.304 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii), by removing
the citation ‘‘§ 93.301(f)’’ both times it
occurs and adding the citation
‘‘§ 93.301(f)(1)’’ in its place.
I b. By redesignating paragraph
(a)(1)(iii) as paragraph (a)(1)(iv) and
adding a new paragraph (a)(1)(iii) to
read as set forth below.
I
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
05JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
§ 93.304 Import permits for horses from
regions affected with CEM and for horse
specimens for diagnostic purposes;
reservation fees for space at quarantine
facilities maintained by APHIS.
(a) Application for permit; reservation
required. (1) * * *
(iii) Horses intended for importation
under § 93.301(f)(2) must meet the
permit requirements of paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section. Additionally, for
horses intended for importation under
§ 93.301(f)(2), the horse’s owner or
importer must include the following
information with the application for
permit that is required by paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section:
(A) The individual identifying
information required in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section for all horses to
be imported.
(B) The permanent electronic
identification of each horse to be
imported, if applicable. In the event that
a horse has permanent electronic
identification, the horse must be
accompanied by a compatible reader.
(C) Photographs (head and lateral
views) that are sufficient to identify
each horse on an electronic medium
approved by APHIS.
(D) The proposed total length of stay
in the United States.
(E) A description of the shows or
events in which the horse will perform
while in the United States.
(F) The names, dates, and locations of
the venues in which the horse will
perform while in the United States.
(G) The names and locations of the
premises on which the horse will be
kept while in the United States, and the
dates the horse will be kept on each
premises.
(H) The methods and routes by which
the horse will be transported while in
the United States.
(I) A written plan for handling sick or
injured horses that includes:
(1) The name, address, and phone
number of each accredited veterinarian
who will provide veterinary services in
the United States;
(2) The name, address, and phone
number of medical facilities to be used
to diagnose or treat sick or injured
horses while in the United States; and
(3) A plan to return sick or injured
horses to performance condition.
(J) An application for a trust fund or
escrow account agreement with APHIS
in accordance with § 93.301(f)(12).
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:00 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of
May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–12543 Filed 6–4–08; 8:45 am]
Rebecca S. Orlich, Senior Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, Farm
Credit Administration, McLean, VA
22102–5090, (703) 883–4420, TTY
(703) 883–4020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
c. By adding an Office of Management
and Budget citation at the end of the
section to read as set forth below.
I
(Approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under control numbers 0579–
0040 and 0579–0324).
31937
I. Purpose
Under section 8.32 of the Farm Credit
Act of 1971, as amended,1 the FCA
established the RBCST for Farmer Mac
in 2001. It is the Agency’s objective that
the RBCST continues to determine
regulatory capital requirements in a
manner consistent with statutory
requirements and constraints. The
purpose of this final rule is to revise the
risk-based capital regulations that apply
to Farmer Mac to more accurately reflect
changes in Farmer Mac’s operations and
business practices. The substantive
issues addressed in this final rule
include the treatment of program loan
volume with certain credit enhancement
features (e.g., Off-Balance Sheet
AgVantage volume, subordinated
interests, and program loan collateral
pledged in excess of Farmer Mac’s
guarantee obligation (hereafter,
‘‘overcollateral’’)), counterparty risk on
nonprogram investments, and the
carrying costs associated with the
funding of nonperforming loans. We
also describe minor formatting changes
to the structure of the Credit Loss
Module and the RBC model that are in
the nature of technical changes. The
preamble to the proposed rule, which
was published in the Federal Register
on September 13, 2007, contains a full
description of the proposed changes.
The proposed rule provided for a 45-day
comment period that ended on October
29, 2007.2 Below we discuss only those
provisions on which we received
comments.
The final rule (Version 3.0 of the RBC
model) is adopted with one revision
from the proposed rule. The revision
permits the Director of the Office of
Secondary Market Oversight to reduce
the haircut level applied to unrated
investments.
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 652
RIN 3052–AC36
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Corporation Funding and Fiscal
Affairs; Risk-Based Capital
Requirements
Farm Credit Administration.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Farm Credit
Administration (FCA, Agency, or we)
adopts a final rule that amends capital
regulations governing the Federal
Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
(Farmer Mac or the Corporation). The
final rule updates the Risk-Based
Capital Stress Test (RBCST, RBC model,
model) in response to recent changes in
Farmer Mac’s operations that are not
addressed in the current version
(Version 2.0). The final rule also amends
the current model’s assumption
regarding the carrying costs of
nonperforming loans to better reflect
Farmer Mac’s actual business practices.
In addition, the final rule adds a new
component to the model to recognize
counterparty risk on nonprogram
investments through application of
discounts or ‘‘haircuts’’ to the yields of
those investments and makes technical
amendments to the layout of the
model’s Credit Loss Module. The effect
of the rule is to update the model so that
it continues to appropriately reflect risk
in a manner consistent with statutory
requirements for calculating Farmer
Mac’s regulatory minimum capital level
under a risk-based capital stress test.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation
will be effective the later of 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
during which time either or both Houses
of Congress are in session, or June 30,
2008. We will publish a notice of the
effective date in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph T. Connor, Associate Director for
Policy and Analysis, Office of
Secondary Market Oversight, Farm
Credit Administration, McLean, VA
22102–5090, (703) 883–4280, TTY
(703) 883–4434;
or
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Background
Our analysis of the RBCST has
identified a need to update the model in
response to changing financial markets,
new business practices and the
evolution of the loan portfolio at Farmer
Mac, as well as continuing development
of industry best practices among leading
financial institutions. Our goal is to
ensure that the RBCST reflects changes
in the Corporation’s business structure
and loan portfolio that have occurred
1 12
2 72
E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM
U.S.C. 2279bb–1.
FR 52301 (Sept. 13, 2007).
05JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 109 (Thursday, June 5, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31930-31937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12543]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0164]
RIN 0579-AC35
Temporary Importation of Horses; Noncompetitive Entertainment
Horses From Countries Affected With Contagious Equine Metritis
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the regulations to allow noncompetitive
entertainment horses from countries affected with contagious equine
metritis to be temporarily imported into the United States under
certain conditions. The regulations currently provide for the temporary
importation of horses from countries affected with contagious equine
metritis to compete in specified events. In recent years it has become
evident that similar provisions are needed for noncompetitive
entertainment horses. This action will allow the temporary importation
of horses into the United States solely for public exhibition and
entertainment purposes while continuing to protect against the
introduction and dissemination of contagious equine metritis.
DATES: Effective Date: July 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ellen M. Buck, Veterinary Medical
Officer, Import/Export Animals, National Center for Import and Export,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301)
734-8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 93 (referred to below as the
regulations) prohibit or restrict the importation of certain animals
into the United States to prevent the introduction of communicable
diseases of livestock and poultry. Subpart C--Horses, Sec. Sec. 93.300
through 92.326 of the regulations, pertains to the importation of
horses into the United States.
Section 93.301 of the regulations contains specific provisions for
the quarantine and testing of horses from regions affected with
contagious equine metritis (CEM), a highly contagious bacterial
venereal disease that affects breeding and fertility. This section also
identifies regions where CEM exists and regions that trade horses
freely with those where CEM exists without testing for CEM.
To prevent the introduction of CEM into the United States, Sec.
93.301(c)(1) prohibits the importation of horses into the United States
from listed regions unless the horses are imported in accordance with
certain requirements. To be eligible for importation, the horses must
fall into one of the following categories:
Wild (non-domesticated) species of equidae if captured in
the wild or imported from a zoo or other facility where it would be
unlikely that the animal would come in contact with domesticated horses
used for breeding;
[[Page 31931]]
Geldings;
Weanlings or yearlings whose age is certified on the
import health certificate required under Sec. 93.314(a);
Horses imported in accordance with conditions prescribed
by the Administrator as provided in Sec. 93.301(a);
Spanish Pure Breed horses imported for permanent entry
from Spain or thoroughbred horses imported for permanent entry from
France, Germany, Ireland, or the United Kingdom as provided in Sec.
93.301(d);
Stallions or mares over 731 days of age imported for
permanent entry as provided in Sec. 93.301(e);
Horses over 731 days of age imported into the United
States for no more than 90 days to compete in specified events as
provided in Sec. 93.301(f); and
U.S. horses returning to the United States as provided in
Sec. 93.301(g).
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has used the
provisions in Sec. 93.301(f), relating to the temporary importation of
horses for competition, to allow the temporary importation of
noncompetitive entertainment horses into the United States. Several
performance horse groups have asked APHIS to extend the 90-day limit
provided for in Sec. 93.301(f) so that they may exhibit and show their
horses in the United States for longer periods of time. In addition,
the United States Animal Health Association has recommended that APHIS
amend the regulations to establish a category for noncompetitive
entertainment horses.
Accordingly, on August 2, 2007, we published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 42318-42326, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0164) a proposal\1\
to amend the regulations in Sec. 93.301 to establish conditions under
which noncompetitive entertainment horses from CEM-affected regions may
be imported into the United States for longer than 90 days solely for
public exhibition and entertainment purposes. Because the conditions
are very similar to the conditions in Sec. 93.301(f), which provides
for the temporary importation of horses to compete in specified events,
we proposed that Sec. 93.301(f) apply to both types of imported
horses. We also proposed to amend the regulations pertaining to import
permits in Sec. 93.304 to require the submission of additional
information with the application for an import permit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go
to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0164.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
October 1, 2007. We received four comments by that date. The comments
were from a private citizen, State animal health department, horse
industry group, and a horse entertainment company. These comments are
discussed below.
In the proposed rule we stated that, ``[b]ecause CEM is a venereal
disease transmitted by sexual contact, there is virtually no risk that
a horse will transmit the disease through casual contact with other
horses during a performance, exhibition, or exercise.'' One commenter
stated that APHIS should not lift the CEM restrictions unless there is
absolutely no risk of spreading the disease. This commenter suggested
that APHIS reconsider the proposed rule and tighten the CEM
restrictions instead.
We disagree. As discussed in the proposed rule, APHIS has conducted
a risk assessment to evaluate the risk of allowing the extended
importation of noncompetitive entertainment horses from countries
affected with CEM without requiring CEM testing, and the risk of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) losing track of these horses
during extended importation. The risk assessment, titled ``Assessment
of the Risk of Introduction of Contagious Equine Metritis (CEM) through
the Extended Importation of Noncompetitive Entertainment Horses from
CEM-affected countries,'' concluded that the risk posed by allowing the
extended importation of noncompetitive entertainment horses from CEM-
affected countries would be extremely low, with the application of the
restrictions described in the rule. In addition, the risk assessment
concluded that the risk of USDA losing track of the animals was
extremely low due to the extensive supervision and involvement of APHIS
personnel and the accredited veterinarian. The risk assessment is
supported by our experiences with the importation of horses to compete
in specified events under conditions very similar to those proposed for
noncompetitive entertainment horses. Accordingly, we are making no
changes based on this comment.
Another commenter stated that the regulations should protect the
health of U.S. horses from imported horses regardless of the reason for
their importation. Therefore, the commenter recommended that the health
certificate and testing requirements set forth in proposed Sec.
93.301(f)(3) for noncompetitive entertainment horses also be required
for horses temporarily imported for competition.
In the proposed rule, we proposed to amend the regulations to
require that, at the time of importation, each horse imported for
competition or public exhibition and entertainment purposes be
accompanied by an import permit in accordance with Sec. 93.304 and a
health certificate in accordance with Sec. 93.314. However, for
noncompetitive entertainment horses, we also proposed to require that
the health certificate certify that cultures negative for CEM have been
collected on three separate occasions within a 7-day period, with the
last within 30 days of exportation. We proposed more stringent CEM
testing requirements for noncompetitive entertainment horses because
these horses could be imported for long periods of time, compared to
horses imported for competition. Currently, Sec. 93.301(f) provides
that horses may be imported for competition for no more than 90 days
under certain conditions. The requirement for CEM testing prior to
importation for noncompetitive entertainment horses will help to ensure
that horses infected with CEM do not enter this country and jeopardize
the health of the U.S. horse population. For these reasons, we are
making no change in response to this comment.
The commenter also requested that APHIS clarify that the average
salary used in the trust fund/costs is the salary for APHIS personnel.
Proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(10) provides that the costs associated with
the supervision and maintenance of the horse by an APHIS representative
be reimbursed by the horse's owner or importer through user fees
payable under 9 CFR part 130, which lists the hourly rate and minimum
user fee for certain import-related services provided by APHIS.
Proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(11) set out the requirements for trust fund
agreements. More specifically, that paragraph provided that the horse's
owner or importer deposit with APHIS an amount equal to the estimated
cost, as determined by APHIS, for the APHIS representative to inspect
the premises at which the horse will compete, perform, or be exhibited
and to conduct the monitoring and supervision required by the
regulations. We do not believe that additional clarification is needed.
We are making no change based on this comment.
One commenter supported the proposed rule but was concerned that
USDA may not be able to provide the monitoring required by the
regulations over extended periods of time.
APHIS is committed to providing the services specified in the
proposed rule and this final rule to prevent the introduction of CEM
into the United States by noncompetitive entertainment horses. As
discussed in the proposed rule, we would require noncompetitive
[[Page 31932]]
entertainment horses to be imported and maintained in the United States
in accordance with a trust fund agreement executed by the horse's owner
or importer. Such an agreement would ensure that the government is
reimbursed for the services it provides while the horses are in the
United States. We are making no change based on this comment.
A commenter stated that proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(5)(iv)(B), which
provides that horses must be kept on a premises that is or contains a
building, is too restrictive. The commenter noted that entertainment
horse shows often use stable installations, such as tents, that may be
set up and taken down in each city. Thus, the commenter recommended
that the regulations be amended to define the term ``building'' to
include tent structures.
We agree that the regulations should be flexible enough to cover
buildings as well as tent stables or other temporary structures for
housing horses. Therefore, in this final rule, we are amending Sec.
93.301(f)(5)(iv)(B) to provide that the horse must be kept on a
premises that is or contains a building or temporary structure in which
the horse can be kept in a stall that is separated from other stalls
that contain horses that are not listed on the import permit, either by
an empty stall, by an open area across which horses cannot touch each
other, or by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4 meters) high.
The horse may be kept only on premises that have been approved by an
APHIS representative.
The commenter also recommended amending Sec. 93.301(f)(5)(iv)(B)
to allow APHIS to approve isolation measures other than those set out
in that paragraph. Specifically, the commenter recommended revising
that paragraph to read as follows: ``Must be or contain a building in
which the horse can be kept in a stall that is separated from other
stalls that contain horses that are not listed on the import permit,
either by an empty stall, by an open area across from which horses
cannot touch each other, by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4
meters) high, or by such other means deemed appropriate by APHIS in the
circumstances.''
As noted in the proposed rule, one of the primary safeguards
against the horses transmitting CEM while in the United States is the
stringent measures in the regulations to ensure that the horses are
kept apart from horses that are not listed on the import permit. This
final rule provides several means by which the necessary isolation from
horses that are not listed on the import permit could be accomplished.
We do not believe that additional flexibility is needed. Accordingly,
we are making no change in response to this comment.
The same commenter recommended that proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(6) be
amended to allow last-minute changes to the itinerary in an emergency.
Section 93.301(f)(6) provides that, if an owner or importer wishes to
change the horse's itinerary or the methods by which the horse is
transported from those specified on the import permit, the owner or
importer must make the request for change in writing to the
Administrator at least 15 days before the proposed date of change. The
commenter noted that touring inevitably entails unforeseen changes of
plans, venues, dates, etc.
We agree that the regulations should allow for changes to the
itinerary or methods of transportation in an emergency. In this final
rule, we are adding a new paragraph to provide that the horse's
itinerary or methods of transportation may be changed, with the prior
approval of an APHIS representative, in order to respond to an
emergency or other unforeseen circumstances or events (e.g., weather-
related transportation delays, vehicle breakdown, medical emergencies,
etc.). Requests for such a change may be submitted to APHIS by
telephone, postal mail, commercial delivery service, fax, or e-mail. We
may approve the request for change orally or in writing. If the
approval is oral, it will be confirmed in writing by the Administrator
as soon as possible. These changes will provide greater flexibility for
a horse's owner or importer to respond to emergencies or other
unforeseen circumstances or events.
In this final rule, we are also amending paragraph (f)(6) to make
it clear that written requests for change may be submitted via postal
mail, commercial delivery service, fax, or e-mail. APHIS has always
allowed such written requests for change; however, we are adding that
provision to the regulations to make it clear to the public.
The commenter also recommended that APHIS amend proposed Sec.
93.301(f)(8) to provide the Administrator the discretion to allow
horses to perform pending resolution of an appeal of the cancellation
of an import permit, provided that such performances would not pose a
risk to U.S. horses and the owner or importer could demonstrate
material harm from the interruption of performances.
Proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(7) provides that the Administrator may
cancel an import permit whenever the Administrator finds that the owner
or importer of the horse has not complied with certain provisions in
the regulations or any conditions imposed under those provisions.
Proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(8) provides that the horse is not permitted to
enter competition, perform, or be exhibited from the date the owner or
importer receives the notice of cancellation until the horse is moved
out of the United States or until resolution of an appeal in favor of
the owner or importer. The potential cancellation of an import permit
for noncompliance with the regulations provides an incentive for a
horse owner or importer to remain in compliance with the regulations;
allowing the horse to continue to perform or be exhibited pending the
resolution of an appeal would be counterproductive. Accordingly, we are
making no change based on this comment.
Finally, the commenter recommended that proposed Sec.
93.304(a)(1)(iii)(D) through (H), relating to the proposed length of
stay and itinerary, be amended to allow the applicant for an import
permit to provide some of this information to APHIS at the time of
application and the rest at intervals to be set by APHIS and the
applicant.
In the proposed rule, we listed the information that must be
supplied to APHIS by the owner or importer with the application for an
import permit. We noted that the specified information would allow
APHIS to monitor the location of the horse while it is in the United
States and to confirm compliance with the required isolation and
handling procedures to ensure that the horse does not transmit CEM to
any other horse while in this country. Given the potential for long
stays in the United States for noncompetitive entertainment horses and
our need for current information to monitor compliance with the
regulations, we also proposed to require that, while in the United
States, the owner or importer apply for and obtain from APHIS an import
permit each year prior to the anniversary date of the horse's arrival
in the United States. To accommodate changes to the itinerary following
importation, in proposed Sec. 93.301(f)(6), we also established
provisions by which a horse owner or importer could request APHIS
approval of a change to the horse's itinerary or the methods of
transportation from those specified in the application for an import
permit. We believe these provisions, in combination, provide the
flexibility that the commenter is seeking. Accordingly, we are making
no change in response to this comment.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we
[[Page 31933]]
are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule with the changes
discussed in this document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The
rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
We are amending the regulations to establish conditions under which
noncompetitive entertainment horses (stallions and mares) over 731 days
of age from CEM-affected countries could remain in the United States
for longer than 90 days for public exhibition and entertainment
purposes without undergoing the CEM quarantine and testing prescribed
in the regulations.
The horse industry plays an important role in the U.S. economy.
According to the 2002 Census of Agriculture, there were 542,223 farms
with 3.644 million horses valued at $9.9 billion in the United States
in 2002. According to a recent study done for the American Horse
Council, the number and value of horses are much larger than those
reported in the 2002 Census of Agriculture: 2 million people owning 9.2
million horses with direct value of about $39 billion.\1\ Both sets of
data underscore the importance of the equine industry. In addition,
other agricultural and nonagricultural sectors are dependent on the
horse industry for their economic activity. Horses are a highly valued
asset, especially those with a specific pedigree. Horses also play an
important role in U.S. international trade. The value of U.S. horse
exports ($449 million) was more than the combined export value of
cattle, hogs and sheep and goats ($65 million) between 2003 and
2005.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Deloitte Consulting LLP for American Horse Council, National
Economic Impact of the U.S. Horse Industry, 2005.
\2\ Global Trade Information Services, World Trade Atlas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States imported a total of 31,198 horses in 2005. Nearly
67 percent of horses imported were from Canada and 7.6 percent were
from Mexico. Of the total imports, 25,564 were from non-CEM countries
and the remaining 5,634 were from CEM countries. The proportion of
horse imports that are pure breeding horses is small. Of the above
total, 2,341 were purebred breeding horses. Only 340 purebred breeding
horses were imported from CEM countries.\3\ However, horses supplied by
CEM-affected countries are generally highly valued. In 2005, for
example, the average value of purebred breeding horses imported from
CEM-affected regions was $41,220, whereas the average value of purebred
breeding horses imported from countries not affected by CEM was
$17,180.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although the disease does not result in death, CEM can be
economically costly. The direct consequence may include the closing of
breeding operations, production losses as a result of abortion, and
costs of disease control. A CEM outbreak would result in the quarantine
of affected horse farms, temporary cessation of breeding operations,
and restriction of both intrastate and interstate movement. For some
breeders, this could mean the loss of thousands or even millions of
dollars in stud fees and breeding losses. Other consequences include
trade restrictions that may be imposed by international trading
partners.
The noncompetitive entertainment horses that will be affected by
this rule will not be allowed to have direct contact with horses
outside those listed on their permit and may not be used for breeding
purposes at any time while in the United States, including breeding
with horses in the same show. Additionally, these horses may not
undergo any genital examinations (unless required for diagnosis and
treatment of a medical condition with prior approval of an APHIS
representative), semen collection, or artificial insemination.
Furthermore, since these are very specialized performance animals,
domestic breeders will not be affected if this rule were to increase
the amount of time the imported horses are in the United States.
Horses arriving in the United States from abroad are quarantined at
a USDA animal import center, generally for 3 days. Horses temporarily
imported are required to exit the United States and be readmitted,
following quarantine and testing, every 90 days. Each entry after 90
days is considered a new entry into the United States. The USDA charges
a minimum of $810 for the 3-day quarantine. In addition to this
facility charge, user fees of $80 are charged for blood testing,
resulting in a total quarantine and testing cost per horse of $890. The
final rule will allow imported performance horses to stay in the United
States longer than 90 days without their owners having again to pay
USDA import quarantine and testing costs. This is a savings that
accrues to the importing entities and likely to counterbalance their
costs associated with supervisory activities of APHIS and/or an
accredited veterinarian.
The number of entities and horses expected to be directly affected
by this rule is not large. We anticipate that between 1 and 10
performing groups varying in size from 5 to 40 horses (or a total of
between 5 and 400 horses) will utilize the proposed exception each
year. Given that there are over 1 million domestic show horses, even
the upper quantity represents a very small fraction of the total supply
(0.04 percent).
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established guidelines
for determining which types of firms are to be considered small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This rule may affect
operations such as zoological parks (North American Industry
Classification System [NAICS] code 712130), and animal performances
including circuses, carnivals, and amusement parks (NAICS code 711190).
SBA classifies these operations as small entities if their annual
receipts are not more than $6.5 million. Of the approximately 850 such
establishments, about 12.5 percent are considered to be large. The
subset of these entities that temporarily import noncompetitive
entertainment horses from CEM countries will benefit from the forgone
costs associated with the horses having to exit and reenter the United
States every 90 days. On the other hand, they will bear the cost of
supervisory activities by APHIS and/or an accredited veterinarian. The
overall impact is expected to be insignificant, given the relatively
small number of noncompetitive entertainment horses imported from CEM
countries.
Other operations that may remotely be affected are domestic
suppliers of similar horses (NAICS code 112920). According to the 2002
Census of Agriculture, that year there were 542,223 horse farms with
3,644,278 horses in the United States, of which 124,596 farms sold
470,423 horses that had a total value of over $1.13 billion.\4\ An
unknown share of these farms supply show horses that could be
comparable to the noncompetitive entertainment horses imported
temporarily from CEM-affected countries. SBA classifies horse farms as
small entities if their annual receipts are
[[Page 31934]]
not more than $750,000;\5\ over 99 percent are considered to be small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As stated above, the census total is much less than the
total reported by the American Horse Council Foundation. According
to that report, there were 9,222,847 horses in 2005 (Deloitte
Consulting LLP, National Economic Impact of the U.S. Horse
Industry). Of this total, 9 percent were racing, 30 percent showing,
42 percent recreation, and 19 percent other (https://
www.horsecouncil.org/statistics.htm).
\5\ SBA, Small Business Size Standards matched to NAICS,
Effective July 31, 2006; and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic
Census: Manufacturing-Industries Series, Wholesale Trade-Subject
Series and Transportation and Warehousing-Subject Series, Issued
August, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entities that may be affected by the rule are principally small
businesses, but the impact of the rule is not expected to be
significant. Because the pool of noncompetitive entertainment horses
that are temporarily imported is a small fraction of the total number
of show horses in the United States, any effects of the rule on U.S.
entities will be very small.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws
and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements
included in this rule have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0579-0324.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles,
APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2908.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 9 CFR part 93 as follows:
PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND POULTRY,
AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR
MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a;
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
0
2. Section 93.301 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c)(2)(vii), by removing the words ``paragraph (f)''
and adding the words ``paragraph (f)(1)'' in their place, and by
removing the word ``and'' at the end of the sentence.
0
b. By redesignating paragraph (c)(2)(viii) as paragraph (c)(2)(ix) and
adding a new paragraph (c)(2)(viii) to read as set forth below.
0
c. In footnote 6, by removing the words ``Jefatura de Cria Caballar
Registro Matricula for Spain'' and adding the words ``Asociacion
National de Criadores de Caballos de Pura Raza Espanola for Spain'' in
their place.
0
d. By revising paragraph (f) and the Office of Management and Budget
citation at the end of the section to read as set forth below.
Sec. 93.301 General prohibitions; exceptions.
* * * * *
(c) Specific prohibitions regarding contagious equine metritis;
exceptions--
* * *
(2) * * *
(viii) Horses over 731 days of age imported into the United States
for noncompetitive public exhibition and entertainment purposes if the
horses meet the requirements of paragraph (f)(2) of this section; and
* * * * *
(f) Special provisions for temporary importation for competition or
entertainment purposes.
(1) Horses over 731 days of age may be imported into the United
States for no more than 90 days to compete in specified events provided
that the conditions in paragraphs (f)(3) through (f)(12) of this
section are met.
(2) Horses over 731 days of age may be temporarily imported into
the United States solely for noncompetitive public exhibition and
entertainment purposes provided that the conditions in paragraphs
(f)(3) through (f)(12) of this section are met.
(3) At the time of importation, each horse must be accompanied by
an import permit in accordance with Sec. 93.304 and a health
certificate issued in accordance with Sec. 93.314. For horses imported
in accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this section, the health
certificate must also certify that cultures negative for CEM were
obtained from sets of specimens collected on three separate occasions
within a 7-day period from the mucosal surfaces of the clitoral fossa
and the clitoral sinuses of any female horses and from the surfaces of
the prepuce, the urethral sinus, and the fossa glandis, including the
diverticulum of the fossa glandis, of any male horses. For both female
and male horses, the sets of specimens must be collected on days 1, 4,
and 7 of the 7-day period, and the last of these sets of specimens must
be collected within 30 days of exportation. All specimens required by
this paragraph must be collected by a licensed veterinarian who either
is, or is acting in the presence of, the veterinarian signing the
certificate.
(4) Following the horse's arrival in the United States:
(i) A horse imported in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this
section may remain in the United States for not more than 90 days,
except as provided in paragraph (f)(9) of this section.
(ii) A horse imported in accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this
section may remain in the United States indefinitely, except as
provided in paragraph (f)(9) of this section, as long as the conditions
of paragraphs (f)(3) through (f)(12) of this section are met and the
horse's owner or importer applies for and obtains from APHIS an import
permit, as provided for in Sec. 93.304, each year prior to the
anniversary date of the horse's arrival in the United States.
(5) While the horse is in the United States, the following
conditions must be met:
(i) A horse imported in accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this
section:
(A) Must not be entered in competitions.
(B) Must be regularly used in performances or exhibitions, unless
sick or injured. A horse that is no longer performing or being
exhibited must be exported or made eligible for permanent entry in
accordance with paragraph (f)(9) of this section.
(C) Must be kept with the other horses listed on the import permit,
unless otherwise approved by an APHIS representative.
[[Page 31935]]
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(5)(viii) of this section,
the horse must be moved according to the itinerary and methods of
transport specified in the import permit provided for in Sec. 93.304.
(iii) The horse must be monitored by an accredited veterinarian or
APHIS representative to ensure that the provisions of paragraphs
(f)(5)(ii), (f)(5)(vi), and (f)(5)(vii) of this section are met. If the
monitoring is performed by an accredited veterinarian, the Veterinarian
in Charge will ensure that the accredited veterinarian is familiar with
the requirements of this section and spot checks will be conducted by
an APHIS representative to ensure that the requirements of this section
are being met. If an APHIS representative finds that requirements are
not being met, the Administrator may require that all remaining
monitoring be conducted by APHIS representatives to ensure compliance.
(iv) Except when in transit, the horse must be kept on a premises
that has been approved by an APHIS representative. For horses imported
in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section, such approval may
be oral or in writing. If the approval is oral, it will be confirmed in
writing by the Administrator as soon as circumstances permit. For
horses imported in accordance with paragraph (f)(2) of this section,
the approval will be in writing. To receive approval, the premises:
(A) Must not be a breeding premises; and
(B) Must be or contain a building or temporary structure in which
the horse can be kept in a stall that is separated from other stalls
that contain horses that are not listed on the import permit, either by
an empty stall, by an open area across which horses cannot touch each
other, or by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4 meters) high.
(v) While in transit, the horse must be moved in either an aircraft
or a sealed van or trailer. If the horse is moved in a sealed van or
trailer, the seal may be broken only by an APHIS representative at the
horse's destination, except in situations where the horse's life is in
danger.
(vi) Except when actually competing, performing, or being exhibited
or exercised, the horse must be kept in a pasture approved by APHIS or
in a stall that is separated from other stalls containing horses that
are not listed on the import permit, either by an empty stall, by an
open area across which horses cannot touch each other, or by a solid
wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4 meters) high.
(vii) The horse may not be used for breeding purposes (including
artificial insemination or semen collection) and may not have any other
sexual contact with other horses. The horse may not undergo any genital
examinations, except that a horse imported in accordance with paragraph
(f)(2) of this section may undergo genital examinations for diagnosis
or treatment of a medical condition with the prior approval of an APHIS
representative.
(viii) The horse may be moved for diagnosis or treatment of a
medical condition with the prior approval of an APHIS representative.
(ix) After the horse is transported anywhere in the United States,
any vehicle in which the horse was transported must be cleaned and
disinfected in the presence of an APHIS representative, according to
the procedures specified in Sec. Sec. 71.7 through 71.12 of this
chapter, before any other horse is transported in the vehicle.
(x) The cleaning and disinfection specified in paragraph (f)(5)(ix)
of this section must be completed before the vehicle is moved from the
place where the horse is unloaded. In those cases where the facilities
or equipment for cleaning and disinfection are inadequate at the place
where the horse is unloaded, the Administrator may allow the vehicle to
be moved to another location for cleaning and disinfection when the
move will not pose a disease risk to other horses in the United States.
(xi) The owner or importer of the horse must comply with any other
provisions of this part applicable to him or her.
(6) Except as provided in paragraph (f)(7) of this section, if the
owner or importer wishes to change the horse's itinerary or the methods
by which the horse is transported from that which he or she specified
in the application for the import permit, the owner or importer must
make the request for change in writing to the Administrator. Requests
for change must be submitted to APHIS no less than 15 days before the
proposed date of the change. Requests may be submitted to APHIS by
postal mail, commercial delivery service, fax, or e-mail. The change in
itinerary or method of transport may not be made without the written
approval of the Administrator, who may grant the request for change
when he or she determines that granting the request will not endanger
other horses in the United States and that sufficient APHIS personnel
are available to provide the services required by the owner or
importer.
(7) In response to an emergency or other unforeseen circumstances
or events (e.g., weather-related transportation delays, vehicle
breakdown, medical emergencies, etc.), the horse's itinerary or methods
of transportation may be changed, with the prior approval of an APHIS
representative, from that which is specified in the application for an
import permit. Requests for such a change may be submitted to APHIS by
telephone, postal mail, commercial delivery service, fax, or e-mail.
Approval may be oral or in writing. If the approval is oral, it will be
confirmed in writing by the Administrator as soon as circumstances
permit.
(8) The Administrator may cancel, orally or in writing, the import
permit provided for under Sec. 93.304 whenever the Administrator finds
that the owner or importer of the horse has not complied with the
provisions of paragraphs (f)(3) through (f)(7) of this section or any
conditions imposed under those provisions. If the cancellation is oral,
the Administrator will confirm the cancellation and the reasons for the
cancellation in writing as soon as circumstances permit. Any person
whose import permit is canceled may appeal the decision in writing to
the Administrator within 10 days after receiving oral or written
notification of the cancellation, whichever is earlier. If the appeal
is sent by mail, it must be postmarked within 10 days after the owner
or importer receives oral or written notification of the cancellation,
whichever is earlier. The appeal must include all of the facts and
reasons upon which the person relies to show that the import permit was
wrongfully canceled. The Administrator will grant or deny the appeal in
writing as promptly as circumstances permit, stating the reason for his
or her decision. If there is a conflict as to any material fact, a
hearing will be held to resolve the conflict. Rules of practice
concerning the hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.
(9) Except in those cases where an appeal is in process, any person
whose import permit is canceled must move the horse identified in the
import permit out of the United States within 10 days after receiving
oral or written notification of cancellation, whichever is earlier. The
horse is not permitted to enter competition, perform, or be exhibited
from the date the owner or importer receives the notice of cancellation
until the horse is moved out of the United States or until resolution
of an appeal in favor of the owner or importer. Except when being
exercised, the horse must be kept, at the expense of the owner or
importer, in a stall on the premises where the horse is located when
the notice of cancellation is received or, if the horse is in transit
when the notice of cancellation is
[[Page 31936]]
received, on the premises where it is next scheduled to compete,
perform, or be exhibited according to the import permit. The stall in
which the horse is kept must be separated from other stalls containing
horses that are not listed on the import permit, either by an empty
stall, by an open area across which horses cannot touch each other, or
by a solid wall that is at least 8 feet (2.4 meters) high. In cases
where the owners of the above specified premises do not permit the
horse to be kept on those premises, or when the Administrator
determines that keeping the horse on the above specified premises will
pose a disease risk to horses in the United States, the horse must be
kept, at the expense of the owner or importer, on an alternative
premises approved by the Administrator.
(10) Stallions or mares over 731 days of age that are imported in
accordance with paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this section may be
eligible to remain in the United States if the following is completed:
(i) Following completion of the itinerary specified in the import
permit provided for in Sec. 93.304, the horse's owner or importer
applies for and receives a new import permit that specifies that the
stallion or mare will be moved to an approved State listed in paragraph
(h)(6) or (h)(7) of this section; and
(ii) The stallion or mare is transported in a sealed vehicle that
has been cleaned and disinfected to an approved facility in an approved
State where it is quarantined under State or Federal supervision until
the stallion or mare has met the testing and treatment requirements of
paragraph (e)(3) or (e)(5) of this section.
(11) All costs and charges associated with the supervision and
maintenance of a horse imported under paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(2) of
this section will be borne by the horse's owner or importer. The costs
associated with the supervision and maintenance of the horse by an
APHIS representative at his or her usual places of duty will be
reimbursed by the horse's owner or importer through user fees payable
under part 130 of this chapter.
(12) In the event that an APHIS representative must be temporarily
detailed from his or her usual place of duty in connection with the
supervision and maintenance of a horse imported under this paragraph
(f), the owner or importer of the horse must execute a trust fund
agreement with APHIS to reimburse all expenses (including travel costs,
salary, per diem or subsistence, administrative expenses, and
incidental expenses) incurred by the Department in connection with the
temporary detail. Under the trust fund agreement, the horse's owner or
importer must deposit with APHIS an amount equal to the estimated cost,
as determined by APHIS, for the APHIS representative to inspect the
premises at which the horse will compete, perform, or be exhibited; to
conduct the monitoring required by paragraph (f)(5)(iii) of this
section; and to supervise the cleaning and disinfection required by
paragraph (f)(5)(ix) of this section. The estimated costs will be based
on the following factors:
(i) Number of hours needed for an APHIS representative to conduct
the required inspection and monitoring;
(ii) For services provided during regular business hours (8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except holidays), the average
salary, per hour, for an APHIS representative;
(iii) For services provided outside regular business hours, the
applicable rate for overtime, night differential, or Sunday or holiday
pay, based on the average salary, per hour, for an APHIS
representative;
(iv) Number of miles from the premises at which the horse competes,
performs, or is exhibited to the APHIS office or facility that is
monitoring the activities;
(v) Government rate per mile for automobile travel or, if
appropriate, cost of other means of transportation between the premises
at which the horse competes, performs, or is exhibited and the APHIS
office or facility;
(vi) Number of trips between the premises at which the horse
competes, performs, or is exhibited and the APHIS office or facility
that APHIS representatives are required to make in order to conduct the
required inspection and monitoring;
(vii) Number of days the APHIS representative conducting the
inspection and monitoring must be in ``travel status'';
(viii) Applicable Government per diem rate; and
(ix) Cost of related administrative support services.
(13) If a trust fund agreement with APHIS has been executed by the
owner or importer of a horse in accordance with paragraph (f)(12) of
this section and APHIS determines, during the horse's stay in the
United States, that the amount deposited will be insufficient to cover
the services APHIS is scheduled to provide during the remainder of the
horse's stay, APHIS will issue to the horse's owner or importer a bill
to restore the deposited amount to a level sufficient to cover the
estimated cost to APHIS for the remainder of the horse's stay in the
United States. The horse's owner or importer must pay the amount billed
within 14 days after receiving the bill. If the bill is not paid within
14 days after its receipt, APHIS will cease to perform the services
provided for in paragraph (f)(5) of this section until the bill is
paid. The Administrator will inform the owner or importer of the
cessation of services orally or in writing. If the notice of cessation
is oral, the Administrator will confirm, in writing, the notice of
cessation and the reason for the cessation of services as soon as
circumstances permit. In such a case, the horse must be kept, at the
expense of the owner or importer and until the bill is paid, in a stall
either on the premises at which the horse is located when the notice of
cessation of services is received or, if the horse is in transit when
the notice of cessation of services is received, on the premises at
which it is next scheduled to compete, perform, or be exhibited
according to the import permit. The stall in which the horse is kept
must be separated from other stalls containing horses that are not
listed on the import permit, either by an empty stall, by an open area
across which horses cannot touch each other, or by a solid wall that is
at least 8 feet (2.4 meters) high. In cases where the owners of the
premises where the horse would be kept following a cessation of
services do not permit the horse to be kept on those premises, or when
the Administrator determines that keeping the horse on the premises
will pose a disease risk to other horses in the United States, the
horse must be kept, at the expense of the owner or importer, on an
alternative premises approved by the Administrator. Until the bill is
paid, the horse is not permitted to enter competition, perform, or be
exhibited. Any amount deposited in excess of the costs to APHIS to
provide the required services will be refunded to the horse's owner or
importer.
* * * * *
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
numbers 0579-0040, 0579-0165, and 0579-0324).
0
3. Section 93.304 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii), by removing the citation ``Sec.
93.301(f)'' both times it occurs and adding the citation ``Sec.
93.301(f)(1)'' in its place.
0
b. By redesignating paragraph (a)(1)(iii) as paragraph (a)(1)(iv) and
adding a new paragraph (a)(1)(iii) to read as set forth below.
[[Page 31937]]
0
c. By adding an Office of Management and Budget citation at the end of
the section to read as set forth below.
Sec. 93.304 Import permits for horses from regions affected with CEM
and for horse specimens for diagnostic purposes; reservation fees for
space at quarantine facilities maintained by APHIS.
(a) Application for permit; reservation required. (1) * * *
(iii) Horses intended for importation under Sec. 93.301(f)(2) must
meet the permit requirements of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
Additionally, for horses intended for importation under Sec.
93.301(f)(2), the horse's owner or importer must include the following
information with the application for permit that is required by
paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section:
(A) The individual identifying information required in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section for all horses to be imported.
(B) The permanent electronic identification of each horse to be
imported, if applicable. In the event that a horse has permanent
electronic identification, the horse must be accompanied by a
compatible reader.
(C) Photographs (head and lateral views) that are sufficient to
identify each horse on an electronic medium approved by APHIS.
(D) The proposed total length of stay in the United States.
(E) A description of the shows or events in which the horse will
perform while in the United States.
(F) The names, dates, and locations of the venues in which the
horse will perform while in the United States.
(G) The names and locations of the premises on which the horse will
be kept while in the United States, and the dates the horse will be
kept on each premises.
(H) The methods and routes by which the horse will be transported
while in the United States.
(I) A written plan for handling sick or injured horses that
includes:
(1) The name, address, and phone number of each accredited
veterinarian who will provide veterinary services in the United States;
(2) The name, address, and phone number of medical facilities to be
used to diagnose or treat sick or injured horses while in the United
States; and
(3) A plan to return sick or injured horses to performance
condition.
(J) An application for a trust fund or escrow account agreement
with APHIS in accordance with Sec. 93.301(f)(12).
* * * * *
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
numbers 0579-0040 and 0579-0324).
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8-12543 Filed 6-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P