Importation of Horses, Ruminants, Swine, and Dogs; Remove Panama From Lists of Regions Where Screwworm Is Considered To Exist, 28382-28385 [E8-10918]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
28382
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(2) The tomatoes may be shipped from
the Souss-Massa region of Morocco only
between December 1 and April 30,
inclusive;
(3) Beginning 2 months prior to the
start of the shipping season and
continuing through the end of the
shipping season, DPVCTRF must set
and maintain Mediterranean fruit fly
(Medfly) traps baited with trimedlure, or
other approved protein bait, inside the
greenhouses at a rate of 8 traps per
hectare, with a minimum of 4 traps in
each greenhouse. All traps must be
checked every 7 days;
(4) DPVCTRF must maintain records
of trap placement, checking of traps,
and any Medfly captures, and make the
records available to APHIS upon
request. DPVCTRF must maintain an
APHIS-approved quality control
program to monitor or audit the
trapping program. The trapping records
must be maintained for 1 year for APHIS
review;
(5) Capture of a single Medfly in a
registered greenhouse during the 2
months prior to export and continuing
through the duration of the harvest, or
detection of a Medfly in a consignment
which is traced back to a registered
greenhouse, will immediately result in
cancellation of exports from that
greenhouse until the source of the
infestation is determined, the Medfly
infestation has been eradicated, and
measures are taken to preclude any
future infestation. Exports will not be
reinstated until APHIS and DPVCTRF
mutually determine that risk mitigation
has been achieved;
(6) No shade trees are permitted
within 10 meters of the entry door of the
greenhouse or packinghouse, and no
Medfly host material is permitted
within 50 meters of the entry door of the
greenhouse or packinghouse. Ground
applications of an approved protein bait
spray pesticide for Medfly must be used
on all shade trees and host plants within
200 meters surrounding the greenhouses
as required by APHIS. Application must
occur every 6 to 10 days starting at least
30 days before and during harvest;
(7) The tomatoes must be packed
within 24 hours of harvest and must be
pink at the time of packing. They must
be safeguarded by an insect-proof mesh
screen or plastic tarpaulin while in
transit to the packinghouse and while
awaiting packing. They must be packed
in insect-proof cartons or containers, or
covered by insect-proof mesh or plastic
tarpaulin for transit to the airport or
ship and export to the United States.
These safeguards must be intact upon
arrival in the United States. Sea
containers must be kept closed if stored
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
within 20 meters of Medfly host
materials prior to loading; and
(8) DPVCTRF is responsible for export
certification inspection and issuance of
phytosanitary certificates. Each
consignment of tomatoes must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by DPVCTRF and
bearing the declaration, ‘‘These
tomatoes were grown in registered
greenhouses in El Jadida or Safi
Province, Morocco, and were pink at the
time of packing’’ or ‘‘These tomatoes
were grown in registered greenhouses in
the Souss-Massa region and were pink
at the time of packing.’’
Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–10923 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0141]
Importation of Horses, Ruminants,
Swine, and Dogs; Remove Panama
From Lists of Regions Where
Screwworm Is Considered To Exist
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the regulations regarding the
importation of live horses, ruminants,
swine, and dogs by removing Panama
from the lists of regions where
screwworm is considered to exist. We
are taking this action because the
eradication of screwworm from Panama
has been confirmed. This action would
relieve certain screwworm-related
certification and inspection
requirements for live animals imported
into the United States from Panama.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before July 15,
2008.
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2007-0141 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2007–0141,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2007–0141.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Julia Punderson, Regionalization
Evaluation Services—Import, Sanitary
Trade Issues Team, National Center for
Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231; (301) 734–0757.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 93
(referred to below as the regulations)
prohibit or restrict the importation of
certain animals into the United States to
prevent the introduction of pests and
diseases of livestock and poultry,
including New World screwworm
(Cochliomyia hominivorax).
Screwworm, a pest native to tropical
areas and currently found in South
America and the Caribbean, causes
extensive damage to livestock and other
warm-blooded animals. Subparts C, D,
E, and F of the regulations govern the
importation of horses, ruminants, swine,
and dogs, respectively, and include
provisions for the inspection and
treatment of these animals if imported
from any region of the world where
screwworm is considered to exist.
Sections 93.301, 93.405, 93.505, and
93.600 list all the regions of the world
where screwworm is considered to
exist.
The regulations include provisions
that the animals be inspected,
quarantined, and, if necessary, treated
for screwworms, and require that the
animals be accompanied to the United
States by a certificate signed by a fulltime salaried veterinary official of the
exporting region attesting that the above
conditions have been met. Additionally,
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
on arrival, horses must be quarantined
at an animal import center for a
minimum of 7 days and must be
examined prior to release from
quarantine.
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) of the
Unites States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) has responsibility for taking
actions to exclude, eradicate, and
control agricultural pests, such as
screwworm, in the United States.
Eradication of indigenous screwworm in
the United States using systematic
releases of sterile adult screwworm flies
was completed in 1966. Sporadic
screwworm outbreaks continued to
occur and, in 1972, a large outbreak
occurred in southwestern States as a
result of screwworms entering the
United States on livestock from Mexico.
This outbreak led to plans that were
then developed to progressively
eradicate screwworm in Mexico and
establish a biological barrier to prevent
incursion of screwworm into the United
States. In 1972, USDA began a
cooperative screwworm program to help
Mexico eradicate screwworm. This
program was later expanded with the
goal of covering the entire Central
American Isthmus and Panama,
eventually reaching the Darien Gap area
on Panama’s border with Colombia.
Successful cooperative screwworm
eradication programs were completed in
Mexico in 1991, Belize and Guatemala
in 1994, El Salvador in 1995, Honduras
in 1996, Nicaragua in 1999, and Costa
Rica in 2000.
USDA began a cooperative
screwworm eradication program in
Panama in 1994 and, in 2006, Panama
requested that APHIS evaluate the
animal disease status of Panama with
respect to screwworm and provided
information in support of that request in
accordance with 9 CFR part 92,
‘‘Importation of Animals and Animal
Products: Procedures for Requesting
Recognition of Regions.’’ Using
information submitted to us by the
Commission for the Eradication and
Prevention of Screwworm (COPEG),
Panama’s Ministry of Agriculture and
Livestock Development (MIDA), and
USDA, we have reviewed and analyzed
the animal health status of Panama with
respect to screwworm. Our
determinations concerning this request,
based on the information submitted to
us and the information we gathered, are
set forth below.
Risk Analysis
APHIS conducted a risk analysis to
examine the risk of introducing
screwworm into the United States from
the importation of live horses,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
28383
ruminants, swine, and dogs from
Panama. We summarize our findings for
each of the 11 factors in 9 CFR 92.2
below and summarize our risk
considerations of these findings
following our discussions of the factors.
serves to mitigate the risk of
reinfestation of Panama with
screwworm.
Authority, Organization, and Veterinary
Infrastructure
In Panama, the eradication and
prevention of screwworm has been
accomplished through the efforts of
COPEG, a cooperative program
involving MIDA and USDA. COPEG
serves as the veterinary authority, and
in this role directly controls the
specifics of the eradication and
prevention program, with the full
cooperation of Panama’s veterinary
infrastructure, as well as financial and
scientific support from USDA. COPEG
applied the preexisting infrastructure
and legal framework developed within
Panama for the eradication of foot-andmouth disease (FMD), and shares many
of the FMD program resources
developed under the Panama-U.S.
Commission for the Prevention of Footand-Mouth Disease (COPFA). APHIS
has determined that Panama has
available the necessary legal authority,
infrastructure, budget, and supporting
resources to carry out the program and
maintain its screwworm-free status.
As previously noted, the eradication
and prevention of screwworm in
Panama was the result of cooperative
efforts of USDA and Panama through
COPEG, and involved the use of the
sterile fly release method and the
establishment of a permanent biological
barrier between Central America and the
South American Continent. APHIS has
determined that Panama has an effective
prevention program in place based upon
Panama’s active disease control and
surveillance program and maintenance
of the permanent biological barrier with
continuous distribution of sterile
screwworm flies. These findings are
described in further detail in the risk
analysis.
Disease Status in the Region
The last reported native case of
screwworm outside the permanent
biological barrier in the area of the
Darien Gap occurred in 2001. The
continued, but extremely low, finding of
screwworm within the buffer area
adjoining the border with Colombia is
an expected occurrence. The established
permanent biological barrier and
continued intensive surveillance will
act to prevent the spread of screwworm
into the rest of Panama and Central
America. APHIS could not identify any
risks associated with this factor that
would pose an unacceptable risk to the
United States if trade with Panama in
live animals were to occur.
Disease Status of Adjacent Regions
Panama shares borders with Costa
Rica and Colombia. While screwworm
has been eradicated in Costa Rica,
Colombia is still considered to be
affected. The existence of a common
land border with a screwworm-affected
region presents a risk for reintroducing
screwworm into Panama from
Colombia. However, APHIS has
determined that Panama’s active disease
control and surveillance program and
maintenance of the permanent
biological barrier with continuous
distribution of sterile screwworm flies
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Extent of Active Disease Control
Program
Vaccination
Vaccination is not an applicable
control method for screwworm. Treating
wounds and spraying or dipping
animals with an approved product such
as organophosphates or other
insecticide will provide protection
against screwworm for up to 7 to 10
days. However, the most effective way
to control screwworm infestation
remains eradication.
Separation From Adjacent Regions of
Higher Risk
The Darien Province forms the border
between Panama and Colombia. This
border is characterized by mountainous
rainforest on the Panamanian side and
flat marsh and swamp on the Colombian
side of the border. This area is called the
Darien Gap and is roughly 100 miles
long and 30 miles wide. The land
supports very little agriculture and is
sparsely populated. There are no major
roads crossing the Darien Gap, which
limits land crossing from Central
America to South America. The natural
physical characteristics of the area
enhance its effectiveness as a biological
barrier. The remote nature of the Darien
Gap was first utilized over 40 years ago
in the eradication and control effort for
FMD because it serves as a natural
barrier to dissemination of infectious
diseases such as FMD.
APHIS finds that the natural and
biological barriers of the Darien Gap
limit the movement of fertile
screwworm flies or potentially affected
animal species from the South
American Continent into Panama,
effectively controlling the risk of
screwworm introduction into Panama
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28384
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
outside of the permanent biological
barrier.
Movement Controls
The movement controls established
previously as part of FMD legislation
continue to be implemented and
enforced by COPEG and MIDA officials.
These established movement controls
limit the illegal movement of livestock
from the inspection and control zones in
Darien Province and the Kuna Yala
region into the rest of Panama. The
continuous monitoring of the permanent
biological barrier in the Darien Gap is a
strong feature of the cooperative FMD
and screwworm eradication and
prevention programs. The system of
inspection posts and monitoring
throughout Panama significantly limits
the risk of introduction and spread of
screwworm in Panama. These findings
are described in further detail in the risk
analysis.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Livestock Demographics and Marketing
Practices
Panama has a total human population
of approximately 3 million, with 45
percent of the populations living in
rural areas. More than 70 percent of
Panamanian exports are agricultural
products; however, the vast majority of
these imports are plant products such as
sugar and bananas. Nonetheless,
livestock raising (cattle, pigs, and
poultry) is an important and longestablished economic activity in
Panama, and beef and hides are
exported. Panama has about 1.5 million
head of cattle on 40,000 holdings. Cattle
are primarily raised in the southwestern
´
provinces of Chiriquı, Los Santos, and
Veraguas. There are 300,000 swine on
28,000 holdings, located primarily in
the central and western provinces of
´
´
Panama, Los Santos, Chiriquı, and
Veraguas. Cattle are only allowed to be
raised in the control zone area of Darien
Province where the cattle population
density is low and involves roughly 8
percent of the province, with an
estimated 0.9 animals per hectare. In the
inspection zone area of Darien Province,
commercial cattle rearing is prohibited
and agricultural production is limited to
swine raised for local consumption.
The poultry population in Panama is
approximately 14 million chickens on
150,000 holdings located primarily in
´
´
the central provinces of Panama, Cocle
´
and Colon. There are an additional
200,000 turkeys, ducks, and geese on
20,000 holdings throughout Panama as
well as a small population of horses and
mules (135,000 head on 46,000
holdings), and sheep and goats (12,000
head on 1,000 holdings). Few
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
screwworm-susceptible live animals are
exported.
Currently, the exportation of live
animals is not a large part of Panama’s
agricultural economy. Screwworm
larvae are not able to survive in
nonviable tissue, so the importation of
meat or other animal products would
not pose a risk for introduction of
screwworm into the United States.
Disease Surveillance
The infrastructure developed for FMD
surveillance has been applied
effectively to the screwworm
eradication and control program. The
measures in place in the inspection and
control zones, which includes the
Darien Province and the Emera and
Kuna Yala indigenous comaracas, are
adequate to rapidly detect and eradicate
screwworm and prevent the
reintroduction of screwworm into the
rest of Panama. Sample submission from
all parts of Panama reflects both targeted
surveillance within the inspection and
control areas and surveillance in the
livestock production areas. APHIS finds
that the active surveillance program in
Panama is sufficient to detect the
presence of screwworm if it were to be
reintroduced into Panama.
Diagnostic Laboratory Capabilities
Laboratory diagnosis of screwworm in
Panama is the responsibility of the
central Laboratory for the Diagnosis of
Vesicular Disease in Toucaman. APHIS
considers Panama to have the diagnostic
capabilities to adequately diagnose the
presence of screwworm.
Emergency Response Capacity
Panama has in place a contingency
plan for screwworm outbreaks under the
supervision of COPEG. The contingency
plans are supplemented by official
instructions and guidelines detailing
procedures for disease notification and
confirmation, sampling methods, and
diagnostic procedures.
APHIS has determined that Panama
has in place the infrastructure and legal
authority to declare an emergency and
take appropriate action in case of a
screwworm outbreak. The emergency
response capability was proven to be
effective in 2003 following an accidental
release of fertile flies. The emergency
response plan is comprehensive and
allowed COPEG to respond rapidly with
extensive resources, utilizing the
cooperation of several government
agencies to rapidly contain and
eradicate the accidental infestation.
APHIS was unable to identify specific
limitations in this system that would
pose a risk to the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
These findings are described in
further detail in a risk analysis that may
be obtained from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT and may be viewed on the
Internet on the Regulations.gov Web
site. (A link to Regulations.gov is
provided under the heading ADDRESSES
at the beginning of this proposed rule.)
The evaluation documents the factors
that have led us to conclude that
Panama has successfully eradicated
screwworm. Therefore, we are
proposing to remove Panama from the
lists in §§ 93.301(j), 93.405(a)(3),
93.505(b), and 93.600(a) of regions
where screwworm is considered to
exist.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and
Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule would amend the
regulations regarding the importation of
live horses, ruminants, swine, and dogs
by removing Panama from the lists of
regions where screwworm is considered
to exist. We are taking this action
because the eradication of screwworm
from Panama has been confirmed. This
action would relieve certain
screwworm-related certification and
inspection requirements for live animals
imported into the United States from
Panama.
No significant change in program
operations is anticipated as a result of
this proposed rulemaking, nor will this
action affect other Federal agencies,
State governments, or local
governments. The cost of all technical
support activities, including
establishment of animal quarantine
control measures, treatment stations,
maintenance of livestock census,
screwworm surveillance, establishment
and maintenance of laboratory support,
and aerial dispersion of sterile
screwworm flies in Panama is provided
by COPEG and the cooperative
agreement funded by the USDA and
MIDA. When importing live animals
from a region where screwworm is
considered to exist, the cost of any
required testing (and treatment, if
needed) would be paid by the owner of
the animals being shipped. Our
proposal to remove Panama from the list
of regions where screwworm is
considered to exist would reduce the
cost for producers and others in Panama
to export ruminants, swine, horses, and
dogs to the United States.
The economic effects associated with
the proposed changes are likely to be
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
limited. This is because the amount of
live animals exported into the United
States from Panama is likely to remain
small. Trade statistics indicate that
since 2001, the United States has not
imported any ruminants, swine, or dogs
from Panama. Equine imports from
Panama over this period have numbered
only 163, which is approximately 0.06
percent of all horse imports.1
According to Small Business
Administration size standards for beef
cattle ranching and farming (North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) 112111), dairy cattle
and milk production (NAICS 112120),
hog and pig farming (NAICS 112210),
sheep farming (NAICS 112410), goat
farming (NAICS 112420), and horse and
other equine production (NAICS
112920), as well as the commercial
production of dogs, which is classified
under ‘‘all other animal production’’
(NAICS 112990),2 operations with not
more than $750,000 in annual sales are
considered small entities. We do not
expect that these producers, small or
otherwise, would be affected
significantly by the proposed change in
Panama’s screwworm status. This is
because, for the reasons discussed
above, live ruminants, swine, horses
and dogs from Panama do not play
much, if any, of a role in their
operations, and few susceptible live
animals are expected to be exported.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 93 as follows:
PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND
POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL,
BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS;
REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
CONTAINERS
1. The authority citation for part 93
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
§ 93.301
[Amended]
2. In § 93.301, paragraph (j) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
§ 93.405
[Amended]
3. In § 93.405, paragraph (a)(3) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
§ 93.505
[Amended]
[Amended]
5. In § 93.600, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–10918 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Paperwork Reduction Act
10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
This proposed rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
RIN 1991–AB77
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
1 Based
on U.S. Census Bureau data, as presented
by Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA: https://
www.fas.usda.gov/ustrade/
USTImHS10.asp?QI=online_trade_dataTRad.
2 The ‘‘all other animal production’’ classification
also includes the production of other animals, such
as adornment birds (swans, peacocks, flamingos),
alpacas, birds for sale, buffalos, cats, crickets, deer,
elk, laboratory animals, llamas, rattlesnakes, worms,
and breeding of pets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Department of Energy.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) is proposing to amend its
Assistance Regulations to make changes
to streamline and simplify its
procedures for soliciting, awarding, and
administering its financial assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Interested parties should submit
written comments on or before July 15,
2008.
ADDRESSES: This proposed rule is
available and comments may be
submitted online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments may
also be submitted electronically to
Jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
Comments may be mailed to: Jacqueline
Kniskern, Procurement Policy Analyst;
MA–61/Forrestal Building; U.S.
Department of Energy; 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. Electronic
submissions are encouraged to ensure
timely receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of
Procurement and Assistance Policy,
U.S. Department of Energy, at 202–287–
1342 or
Jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
DATES:
Sfmt 4702
I. Background
II. Explanation of Changes
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
of Energy
I. Background
Assistance Regulations
ACTION:
agreements. These changes are being
made to make technical corrections, to
revise sections affected by the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, and to further DOE’s
implementation of the Federal Financial
Assistance Management Improvement
Act of 1999. DOE is also proposing to
remove Part 1024, Procedures for
Financial Assistance Appeals, in its
entirety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
4. In § 93.505, paragraph (b) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
§ 93.600
28385
DOE has been actively engaged in the
government-wide effort to streamline
and simplify the application,
administrative and reporting procedures
for Federal financial assistance
programs pursuant to the Federal
Financial Assistance Management
Improvement Act of 1999, Public Law
No. 106–107.
As part of this initiative, DOE has
solicited comments and suggestions
from the grant community and made
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 96 (Friday, May 16, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28382-28385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10918]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. APHIS-2007-0141]
Importation of Horses, Ruminants, Swine, and Dogs; Remove Panama
From Lists of Regions Where Screwworm Is Considered To Exist
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations regarding the
importation of live horses, ruminants, swine, and dogs by removing
Panama from the lists of regions where screwworm is considered to
exist. We are taking this action because the eradication of screwworm
from Panama has been confirmed. This action would relieve certain
screwworm-related certification and inspection requirements for live
animals imported into the United States from Panama.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before July
15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2007-0141 to submit or view comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of
your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2007-0141, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2007-0141.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Julia Punderson, Regionalization
Evaluation Services--Import, Sanitary Trade Issues Team, National
Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 38,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-0757.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 93 (referred to below as the
regulations) prohibit or restrict the importation of certain animals
into the United States to prevent the introduction of pests and
diseases of livestock and poultry, including New World screwworm
(Cochliomyia hominivorax). Screwworm, a pest native to tropical areas
and currently found in South America and the Caribbean, causes
extensive damage to livestock and other warm-blooded animals. Subparts
C, D, E, and F of the regulations govern the importation of horses,
ruminants, swine, and dogs, respectively, and include provisions for
the inspection and treatment of these animals if imported from any
region of the world where screwworm is considered to exist. Sections
93.301, 93.405, 93.505, and 93.600 list all the regions of the world
where screwworm is considered to exist.
The regulations include provisions that the animals be inspected,
quarantined, and, if necessary, treated for screwworms, and require
that the animals be accompanied to the United States by a certificate
signed by a full-time salaried veterinary official of the exporting
region attesting that the above conditions have been met. Additionally,
[[Page 28383]]
on arrival, horses must be quarantined at an animal import center for a
minimum of 7 days and must be examined prior to release from
quarantine.
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the
Unites States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has responsibility for
taking actions to exclude, eradicate, and control agricultural pests,
such as screwworm, in the United States. Eradication of indigenous
screwworm in the United States using systematic releases of sterile
adult screwworm flies was completed in 1966. Sporadic screwworm
outbreaks continued to occur and, in 1972, a large outbreak occurred in
southwestern States as a result of screwworms entering the United
States on livestock from Mexico. This outbreak led to plans that were
then developed to progressively eradicate screwworm in Mexico and
establish a biological barrier to prevent incursion of screwworm into
the United States. In 1972, USDA began a cooperative screwworm program
to help Mexico eradicate screwworm. This program was later expanded
with the goal of covering the entire Central American Isthmus and
Panama, eventually reaching the Darien Gap area on Panama's border with
Colombia. Successful cooperative screwworm eradication programs were
completed in Mexico in 1991, Belize and Guatemala in 1994, El Salvador
in 1995, Honduras in 1996, Nicaragua in 1999, and Costa Rica in 2000.
USDA began a cooperative screwworm eradication program in Panama in
1994 and, in 2006, Panama requested that APHIS evaluate the animal
disease status of Panama with respect to screwworm and provided
information in support of that request in accordance with 9 CFR part
92, ``Importation of Animals and Animal Products: Procedures for
Requesting Recognition of Regions.'' Using information submitted to us
by the Commission for the Eradication and Prevention of Screwworm
(COPEG), Panama's Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development
(MIDA), and USDA, we have reviewed and analyzed the animal health
status of Panama with respect to screwworm. Our determinations
concerning this request, based on the information submitted to us and
the information we gathered, are set forth below.
Risk Analysis
APHIS conducted a risk analysis to examine the risk of introducing
screwworm into the United States from the importation of live horses,
ruminants, swine, and dogs from Panama. We summarize our findings for
each of the 11 factors in 9 CFR 92.2 below and summarize our risk
considerations of these findings following our discussions of the
factors.
Authority, Organization, and Veterinary Infrastructure
In Panama, the eradication and prevention of screwworm has been
accomplished through the efforts of COPEG, a cooperative program
involving MIDA and USDA. COPEG serves as the veterinary authority, and
in this role directly controls the specifics of the eradication and
prevention program, with the full cooperation of Panama's veterinary
infrastructure, as well as financial and scientific support from USDA.
COPEG applied the preexisting infrastructure and legal framework
developed within Panama for the eradication of foot-and-mouth disease
(FMD), and shares many of the FMD program resources developed under the
Panama-U.S. Commission for the Prevention of Foot-and-Mouth Disease
(COPFA). APHIS has determined that Panama has available the necessary
legal authority, infrastructure, budget, and supporting resources to
carry out the program and maintain its screwworm-free status.
Disease Status in the Region
The last reported native case of screwworm outside the permanent
biological barrier in the area of the Darien Gap occurred in 2001. The
continued, but extremely low, finding of screwworm within the buffer
area adjoining the border with Colombia is an expected occurrence. The
established permanent biological barrier and continued intensive
surveillance will act to prevent the spread of screwworm into the rest
of Panama and Central America. APHIS could not identify any risks
associated with this factor that would pose an unacceptable risk to the
United States if trade with Panama in live animals were to occur.
Disease Status of Adjacent Regions
Panama shares borders with Costa Rica and Colombia. While screwworm
has been eradicated in Costa Rica, Colombia is still considered to be
affected. The existence of a common land border with a screwworm-
affected region presents a risk for reintroducing screwworm into Panama
from Colombia. However, APHIS has determined that Panama's active
disease control and surveillance program and maintenance of the
permanent biological barrier with continuous distribution of sterile
screwworm flies serves to mitigate the risk of reinfestation of Panama
with screwworm.
Extent of Active Disease Control Program
As previously noted, the eradication and prevention of screwworm in
Panama was the result of cooperative efforts of USDA and Panama through
COPEG, and involved the use of the sterile fly release method and the
establishment of a permanent biological barrier between Central America
and the South American Continent. APHIS has determined that Panama has
an effective prevention program in place based upon Panama's active
disease control and surveillance program and maintenance of the
permanent biological barrier with continuous distribution of sterile
screwworm flies. These findings are described in further detail in the
risk analysis.
Vaccination
Vaccination is not an applicable control method for screwworm.
Treating wounds and spraying or dipping animals with an approved
product such as organophosphates or other insecticide will provide
protection against screwworm for up to 7 to 10 days. However, the most
effective way to control screwworm infestation remains eradication.
Separation From Adjacent Regions of Higher Risk
The Darien Province forms the border between Panama and Colombia.
This border is characterized by mountainous rainforest on the
Panamanian side and flat marsh and swamp on the Colombian side of the
border. This area is called the Darien Gap and is roughly 100 miles
long and 30 miles wide. The land supports very little agriculture and
is sparsely populated. There are no major roads crossing the Darien
Gap, which limits land crossing from Central America to South America.
The natural physical characteristics of the area enhance its
effectiveness as a biological barrier. The remote nature of the Darien
Gap was first utilized over 40 years ago in the eradication and control
effort for FMD because it serves as a natural barrier to dissemination
of infectious diseases such as FMD.
APHIS finds that the natural and biological barriers of the Darien
Gap limit the movement of fertile screwworm flies or potentially
affected animal species from the South American Continent into Panama,
effectively controlling the risk of screwworm introduction into Panama
[[Page 28384]]
outside of the permanent biological barrier.
Movement Controls
The movement controls established previously as part of FMD
legislation continue to be implemented and enforced by COPEG and MIDA
officials. These established movement controls limit the illegal
movement of livestock from the inspection and control zones in Darien
Province and the Kuna Yala region into the rest of Panama. The
continuous monitoring of the permanent biological barrier in the Darien
Gap is a strong feature of the cooperative FMD and screwworm
eradication and prevention programs. The system of inspection posts and
monitoring throughout Panama significantly limits the risk of
introduction and spread of screwworm in Panama. These findings are
described in further detail in the risk analysis.
Livestock Demographics and Marketing Practices
Panama has a total human population of approximately 3 million,
with 45 percent of the populations living in rural areas. More than 70
percent of Panamanian exports are agricultural products; however, the
vast majority of these imports are plant products such as sugar and
bananas. Nonetheless, livestock raising (cattle, pigs, and poultry) is
an important and long-established economic activity in Panama, and beef
and hides are exported. Panama has about 1.5 million head of cattle on
40,000 holdings. Cattle are primarily raised in the southwestern
provinces of Chiriqu[iacute], Los Santos, and Veraguas. There are
300,000 swine on 28,000 holdings, located primarily in the central and
western provinces of Panam[aacute], Los Santos, Chiriqu[iacute], and
Veraguas. Cattle are only allowed to be raised in the control zone area
of Darien Province where the cattle population density is low and
involves roughly 8 percent of the province, with an estimated 0.9
animals per hectare. In the inspection zone area of Darien Province,
commercial cattle rearing is prohibited and agricultural production is
limited to swine raised for local consumption.
The poultry population in Panama is approximately 14 million
chickens on 150,000 holdings located primarily in the central provinces
of Panam[aacute], Cocl[eacute] and Col[oacute]n. There are an
additional 200,000 turkeys, ducks, and geese on 20,000 holdings
throughout Panama as well as a small population of horses and mules
(135,000 head on 46,000 holdings), and sheep and goats (12,000 head on
1,000 holdings). Few screwworm-susceptible live animals are exported.
Currently, the exportation of live animals is not a large part of
Panama's agricultural economy. Screwworm larvae are not able to survive
in nonviable tissue, so the importation of meat or other animal
products would not pose a risk for introduction of screwworm into the
United States.
Disease Surveillance
The infrastructure developed for FMD surveillance has been applied
effectively to the screwworm eradication and control program. The
measures in place in the inspection and control zones, which includes
the Darien Province and the Emera and Kuna Yala indigenous comaracas,
are adequate to rapidly detect and eradicate screwworm and prevent the
reintroduction of screwworm into the rest of Panama. Sample submission
from all parts of Panama reflects both targeted surveillance within the
inspection and control areas and surveillance in the livestock
production areas. APHIS finds that the active surveillance program in
Panama is sufficient to detect the presence of screwworm if it were to
be reintroduced into Panama.
Diagnostic Laboratory Capabilities
Laboratory diagnosis of screwworm in Panama is the responsibility
of the central Laboratory for the Diagnosis of Vesicular Disease in
Toucaman. APHIS considers Panama to have the diagnostic capabilities to
adequately diagnose the presence of screwworm.
Emergency Response Capacity
Panama has in place a contingency plan for screwworm outbreaks
under the supervision of COPEG. The contingency plans are supplemented
by official instructions and guidelines detailing procedures for
disease notification and confirmation, sampling methods, and diagnostic
procedures.
APHIS has determined that Panama has in place the infrastructure
and legal authority to declare an emergency and take appropriate action
in case of a screwworm outbreak. The emergency response capability was
proven to be effective in 2003 following an accidental release of
fertile flies. The emergency response plan is comprehensive and allowed
COPEG to respond rapidly with extensive resources, utilizing the
cooperation of several government agencies to rapidly contain and
eradicate the accidental infestation. APHIS was unable to identify
specific limitations in this system that would pose a risk to the
United States.
These findings are described in further detail in a risk analysis
that may be obtained from the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT and may be viewed on the Internet on the
Regulations.gov Web site. (A link to Regulations.gov is provided under
the heading ADDRESSES at the beginning of this proposed rule.) The
evaluation documents the factors that have led us to conclude that
Panama has successfully eradicated screwworm. Therefore, we are
proposing to remove Panama from the lists in Sec. Sec. 93.301(j),
93.405(a)(3), 93.505(b), and 93.600(a) of regions where screwworm is
considered to exist.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
For this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its
review under Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule would amend the regulations regarding the
importation of live horses, ruminants, swine, and dogs by removing
Panama from the lists of regions where screwworm is considered to
exist. We are taking this action because the eradication of screwworm
from Panama has been confirmed. This action would relieve certain
screwworm-related certification and inspection requirements for live
animals imported into the United States from Panama.
No significant change in program operations is anticipated as a
result of this proposed rulemaking, nor will this action affect other
Federal agencies, State governments, or local governments. The cost of
all technical support activities, including establishment of animal
quarantine control measures, treatment stations, maintenance of
livestock census, screwworm surveillance, establishment and maintenance
of laboratory support, and aerial dispersion of sterile screwworm flies
in Panama is provided by COPEG and the cooperative agreement funded by
the USDA and MIDA. When importing live animals from a region where
screwworm is considered to exist, the cost of any required testing (and
treatment, if needed) would be paid by the owner of the animals being
shipped. Our proposal to remove Panama from the list of regions where
screwworm is considered to exist would reduce the cost for producers
and others in Panama to export ruminants, swine, horses, and dogs to
the United States.
The economic effects associated with the proposed changes are
likely to be
[[Page 28385]]
limited. This is because the amount of live animals exported into the
United States from Panama is likely to remain small. Trade statistics
indicate that since 2001, the United States has not imported any
ruminants, swine, or dogs from Panama. Equine imports from Panama over
this period have numbered only 163, which is approximately 0.06 percent
of all horse imports.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Based on U.S. Census Bureau data, as presented by Foreign
Agricultural Service, USDA: https://www.fas.usda.gov/ustrade/
USTImHS10.asp?QI=online_trade_dataTRad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to Small Business Administration size standards for beef
cattle ranching and farming (North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) 112111), dairy cattle and milk production (NAICS
112120), hog and pig farming (NAICS 112210), sheep farming (NAICS
112410), goat farming (NAICS 112420), and horse and other equine
production (NAICS 112920), as well as the commercial production of
dogs, which is classified under ``all other animal production'' (NAICS
112990),\2\ operations with not more than $750,000 in annual sales are
considered small entities. We do not expect that these producers, small
or otherwise, would be affected significantly by the proposed change in
Panama's screwworm status. This is because, for the reasons discussed
above, live ruminants, swine, horses and dogs from Panama do not play
much, if any, of a role in their operations, and few susceptible live
animals are expected to be exported.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The ``all other animal production'' classification also
includes the production of other animals, such as adornment birds
(swans, peacocks, flamingos), alpacas, birds for sale, buffalos,
cats, crickets, deer, elk, laboratory animals, llamas, rattlesnakes,
worms, and breeding of pets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 93 as follows:
PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND POULTRY,
AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR
MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
1. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a;
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Sec. 93.301 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 93.301, paragraph (j) is amended by removing the word
``Panama,''.
Sec. 93.405 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 93.405, paragraph (a)(3) is amended by removing the
word ``Panama,''.
Sec. 93.505 [Amended]
4. In Sec. 93.505, paragraph (b) is amended by removing the word
``Panama,''.
Sec. 93.600 [Amended]
5. In Sec. 93.600, paragraph (a) is amended by removing the word
``Panama,''.
Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8-10918 Filed 5-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P