Karnal Bunt Compensation, 22785-22786 [E8-9236]
Download as PDF
22785
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 82
Monday, April 28, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. 01–112–2]
RIN 0579–AB45
Karnal Bunt Compensation
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule
that amended the Karnal bunt
regulations to provide compensation for
certain growers and handlers of grain
and seed affected by Karnal bunt who
had not been eligible for compensation,
and for certain wheat grown outside the
regulated area that had been
commingled with wheat grown in
regulated areas in Texas. The
compensation provided by the interim
rule was necessary to encourage the
participation of, and obtain cooperation
from, affected individuals in our efforts
to contain and reduce the prevalence of
Karnal bunt.
DATES: Effective on April 28, 2008, we
are adopting as a final rule the interim
rule published at 67 FR 21561–21566 on
May 1, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Matthew Royer, Associate Director,
Emergency and Domestic Programs,
Plant Protection and Quarantine,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 137,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
7819.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of
wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum
wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
(Triticum aestivum X Secale cereale), a
hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is
caused by the fungus Tilletia indica
(Mitra) Mundkur and is spread
primarily through the planting of
infected seed. In the absence of
measures taken by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA) to prevent its
spread, the establishment of Karnal bunt
in the United States could have
significant consequences with regard to
the export of wheat to international
markets.
The regulations regarding Karnal bunt
are set forth in 7 CFR 301.89–1 through
301.89–16 (referred to below as the
regulations). Among other things, the
regulations define areas regulated for
Karnal bunt and restrict the movement
of certain regulated articles, including
wheat seed and grain, from the
regulated areas. The regulations also
provide for the payment of
compensation for certain growers,
handlers, seed companies, owners of
grain storage facilities, flour millers,
participants in the National Karnal Bunt
Survey, and custom harvesters and
owners or lessees of other equipment
who incurred losses and expenses
because of Karnal bunt during certain
years. These provisions are in § 301.89–
15, ‘‘Compensation for growers,
handlers, and seed companies in the
1999–2000 and subsequent crop
seasons,’’ and § 301.89–16,
‘‘Compensation for grain storage
facilities, flour millers, National Survey
participants, and certain custom
harvesters and equipment owners or
lessees for the 1999–2000 and
subsequent crop seasons.’’
In an interim rule effective and
published in the Federal Register on
May 1, 2002 (67 FR 21561–21566,
Docket No. 01–112–1), we amended the
Karnal bunt regulations to provide
compensation for certain growers and
handlers of grain and seed affected by
Karnal bunt who had not been eligible
for compensation, and for certain wheat
grown outside the regulated area that
had been commingled with wheat
grown in four counties in Texas that had
been added to the list of regulated areas.
In Archer, Baylor, Throckmorton, and
Young Counties, certain wheat growers,
handlers, and other parties covered by
the compensation regulations had
appeared to be ineligible to receive
compensation for grain or seed affected
by Karnal bunt due to restrictive
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
language in the regulations that did not
anticipate certain complications in the
harvest and storage of grain that arose
following the discovery of Karnal bunt
in those counties. Due to the need to
quickly declare these counties as
regulated areas, we had been unable to
modify the compensation regulations at
that time to address certain relevant
aspects of the way seed and grain were
moved, stored, and used in the newly
regulated areas.
The May 2002 interim rule amended
the compensation provisions of the
regulations to allow persons affected by
these complications in the harvest or
storage of grain to apply for
compensation. These cases represented
unanticipated circumstances applicable
only to the 2000–2001 growing season,
and we determined that the parties
affected should, in fairness, be eligible
for compensation. The situations
addressed by the interim rule primarily
affected growers and handlers in Texas,
and certain handlers who moved grain
from other States to Texas for storage.
We solicited comments on the interim
rule for 60 days ending on July 1, 2002.
We received 86 comments by that date,
from individual custom harvesters and
wheat growers and from boards and
associations of custom harvesters and
wheat growers and marketers. None of
these commenters objected to the
provisions of the interim rule.
Several commenters urged us to
provide compensation to custom
harvesters whose business was affected
by the addition of the four counties as
regulated areas. In response to these
comments, in an interim rule that was
effective and published in the Federal
Register on May 5, 2004 (69 FR 24909–
24016, Docket No. 03–052–1) and in a
subsequent final rule that was effective
and published in the Federal Register
on May 9, 2005 (70 FR 24297–24302,
Docket No. 03–052–3), we amended the
regulations in § 301.89–16 to provide for
the payment of compensation to custom
harvesters whose mechanized
harvesting equipment was used to
harvest Karnal bunt-infected host crops
in Archer, Baylor, Throckmorton, and
Young Counties, TX, during the 2000–
2001 crop season and was required to be
cleaned and disinfected prior to
movement from those counties. (A fuller
discussion of the comments we received
on this topic can be found in the May
2004 interim rule.) This compensation
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
22786
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
was intended to reimburse custom
harvesters for the cost of that cleaning
and disinfection.
The May 2004 interim rule also
provided for the payment of
compensation equivalent to the value of
one contract that an eligible custom
harvester lost due to the downtime
necessitated by cleaning and
disinfection. If an eligible custom
harvester did not lose a contract due to
this downtime, the interim rule
provided for the payment of
compensation for the fixed costs he or
she incurred during the time the
machine was being cleaned and
disinfected. The May 2004 interim rule
also provided for the payment of
compensation for the expenses
associated with the cleaning and
disinfection of other types of equipment
used in the four affected counties.
The other comments we received did
not address the situations addressed by
the interim rule. Instead, they addressed
the regulations in place before the
publication of the interim rule,
requesting that APHIS provide
additional compensation to parties
affected by the Karnal bunt quarantine
regulations. Specifically, commenters
stated that:
• APHIS should pay compensation
for wheat grown in quarantined areas;
• Compensation for wheat should be
based on the market in which the wheat
farmer being compensated is
accustomed to selling wheat;
• Compensation should be provided
for acreage within the quarantined areas
that would normally be planted with
wheat but is left fallow;
• APHIS should provide
compensation for more than 50 percent
of the cost of decontaminating grain
storage facilities and raise the $20,000
overall limit on such compensation; and
• APHIS should provide greater
compensation for seed, since seed prices
are 2 to 4 times higher than local grain
prices.
These comments are outside the scope
of the interim rule. The provisions of
the regulations addressed by these
commenters were added to the
regulations in a final rule published in
the Federal Register on August 6, 2001
(66 FR 40839–40843, Docket No. 96–
016–37) that established the
compensation levels for the 1999–2000
crop season and subsequent years and
made several other changes to the
compensation regulations. For the
reasons discussed in that final rule, we
have determined that the present
compensation provisions are
appropriate.
One commenter stated that APHIS
should provide compensation to seed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
companies and handlers that store
uncertified wheat seed that tests sporepositive for Karnal bunt.
The regulations in § 301.89–15
provide for compensation for handlers
and seed companies who sell wheat
grown in an area under the first
regulated crop season only if the wheat
was not tested by APHIS prior to
purchase by the handler or seed
company and found positive for Karnal
bunt after purchase by the handler or
seed company, as long as the price to be
paid is not contingent on the test
results. Compensation for such wheat
will equal the estimated market price for
the relevant class of wheat (meaning the
type of wheat, such as durum or hard
red winter), minus the actual price
received by the handler or seed
company. Further details are specified
in paragraph (a)(2) of § 301.89–15. These
provisions were in place during the
2000–2001 crop season, and thus it was
not necessary to amend the regulations
in the interim rule to accommodate this
situation.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule and in this document, we
are adopting the interim rule as a final
rule without change.
This action also affirms the
information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, this action has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
Accordingly, we are adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim
rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and
that was published at 67 FR 21561–
21566 on May 1, 2002.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of
April 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–9236 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 51, 52, and 100
[NRC–2008–0222]
RIN 3150–AI05
Limited Work Authorizations for
Nuclear Power Plants; Correction
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
final rule appearing in the Federal
Register on October 9, 2007 (72 FR
57415), that amended the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission’s (NRC)
regulations applicable to limited work
authorizations (LWAs). This document
is necessary to correct erroneous
language to the preamble and codified
language of the final rule.
DATES: The correction is effective April
28, 2008, and is applicable to November
8, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking,
Directives, and Editing Branch, Division
of Administrative Services, Office of
Administrative, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone 301–415–7163, e-mail
Michael.Lesar@nrc.gov.
This
document corrects erroneous language
to the preamble and codified language
of the final rule published on October 9,
2007 (72 FR 57415). Also, as published,
the final regulations contain errors
which may prove to be misleading and
need to be clarified. The following
corrects the preamble to the October 9,
2007, document.
1. On page 57427, third column, in
the first paragraph, the last line is
corrected to read as follows:
To ensure that the NRC has sufficient
information to perform the cumulative
impacts analysis in a timely fashion, the
final LWA rule includes a requirement,
in § 51.45(c), for the environmental
report submitted by an applicant for an
ESP, LWA, construction permit, or
combined license to include a
description of impacts of the applicant’s
preconstruction activities at the
proposed site (i.e., the activities listed in
a paragraph (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the
definition of construction contained in
§ 51.4), that are necessary to support the
construction and operation of the
facility which is the subject of the ESP,
LWA, construction permit, or combined
license application, and an analysis of
the cumulative impacts of the activities
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 82 (Monday, April 28, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22785-22786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9236]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 22785]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. 01-112-2]
RIN 0579-AB45
Karnal Bunt Compensation
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, without change, an interim
rule that amended the Karnal bunt regulations to provide compensation
for certain growers and handlers of grain and seed affected by Karnal
bunt who had not been eligible for compensation, and for certain wheat
grown outside the regulated area that had been commingled with wheat
grown in regulated areas in Texas. The compensation provided by the
interim rule was necessary to encourage the participation of, and
obtain cooperation from, affected individuals in our efforts to contain
and reduce the prevalence of Karnal bunt.
DATES: Effective on April 28, 2008, we are adopting as a final rule the
interim rule published at 67 FR 21561-21566 on May 1, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Matthew Royer, Associate Director,
Emergency and Domestic Programs, Plant Protection and Quarantine,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 137, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-
7819.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum
wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale (Triticum aestivum X Secale
cereale), a hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is caused by the
fungus Tilletia indica (Mitra) Mundkur and is spread primarily through
the planting of infected seed. In the absence of measures taken by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to prevent its spread, the
establishment of Karnal bunt in the United States could have
significant consequences with regard to the export of wheat to
international markets.
The regulations regarding Karnal bunt are set forth in 7 CFR
301.89-1 through 301.89-16 (referred to below as the regulations).
Among other things, the regulations define areas regulated for Karnal
bunt and restrict the movement of certain regulated articles, including
wheat seed and grain, from the regulated areas. The regulations also
provide for the payment of compensation for certain growers, handlers,
seed companies, owners of grain storage facilities, flour millers,
participants in the National Karnal Bunt Survey, and custom harvesters
and owners or lessees of other equipment who incurred losses and
expenses because of Karnal bunt during certain years. These provisions
are in Sec. 301.89-15, ``Compensation for growers, handlers, and seed
companies in the 1999-2000 and subsequent crop seasons,'' and Sec.
301.89-16, ``Compensation for grain storage facilities, flour millers,
National Survey participants, and certain custom harvesters and
equipment owners or lessees for the 1999-2000 and subsequent crop
seasons.''
In an interim rule effective and published in the Federal Register
on May 1, 2002 (67 FR 21561-21566, Docket No. 01-112-1), we amended the
Karnal bunt regulations to provide compensation for certain growers and
handlers of grain and seed affected by Karnal bunt who had not been
eligible for compensation, and for certain wheat grown outside the
regulated area that had been commingled with wheat grown in four
counties in Texas that had been added to the list of regulated areas.
In Archer, Baylor, Throckmorton, and Young Counties, certain wheat
growers, handlers, and other parties covered by the compensation
regulations had appeared to be ineligible to receive compensation for
grain or seed affected by Karnal bunt due to restrictive language in
the regulations that did not anticipate certain complications in the
harvest and storage of grain that arose following the discovery of
Karnal bunt in those counties. Due to the need to quickly declare these
counties as regulated areas, we had been unable to modify the
compensation regulations at that time to address certain relevant
aspects of the way seed and grain were moved, stored, and used in the
newly regulated areas.
The May 2002 interim rule amended the compensation provisions of
the regulations to allow persons affected by these complications in the
harvest or storage of grain to apply for compensation. These cases
represented unanticipated circumstances applicable only to the 2000-
2001 growing season, and we determined that the parties affected
should, in fairness, be eligible for compensation. The situations
addressed by the interim rule primarily affected growers and handlers
in Texas, and certain handlers who moved grain from other States to
Texas for storage.
We solicited comments on the interim rule for 60 days ending on
July 1, 2002. We received 86 comments by that date, from individual
custom harvesters and wheat growers and from boards and associations of
custom harvesters and wheat growers and marketers. None of these
commenters objected to the provisions of the interim rule.
Several commenters urged us to provide compensation to custom
harvesters whose business was affected by the addition of the four
counties as regulated areas. In response to these comments, in an
interim rule that was effective and published in the Federal Register
on May 5, 2004 (69 FR 24909-24016, Docket No. 03-052-1) and in a
subsequent final rule that was effective and published in the Federal
Register on May 9, 2005 (70 FR 24297-24302, Docket No. 03-052-3), we
amended the regulations in Sec. 301.89-16 to provide for the payment
of compensation to custom harvesters whose mechanized harvesting
equipment was used to harvest Karnal bunt-infected host crops in
Archer, Baylor, Throckmorton, and Young Counties, TX, during the 2000-
2001 crop season and was required to be cleaned and disinfected prior
to movement from those counties. (A fuller discussion of the comments
we received on this topic can be found in the May 2004 interim rule.)
This compensation
[[Page 22786]]
was intended to reimburse custom harvesters for the cost of that
cleaning and disinfection.
The May 2004 interim rule also provided for the payment of
compensation equivalent to the value of one contract that an eligible
custom harvester lost due to the downtime necessitated by cleaning and
disinfection. If an eligible custom harvester did not lose a contract
due to this downtime, the interim rule provided for the payment of
compensation for the fixed costs he or she incurred during the time the
machine was being cleaned and disinfected. The May 2004 interim rule
also provided for the payment of compensation for the expenses
associated with the cleaning and disinfection of other types of
equipment used in the four affected counties.
The other comments we received did not address the situations
addressed by the interim rule. Instead, they addressed the regulations
in place before the publication of the interim rule, requesting that
APHIS provide additional compensation to parties affected by the Karnal
bunt quarantine regulations. Specifically, commenters stated that:
APHIS should pay compensation for wheat grown in
quarantined areas;
Compensation for wheat should be based on the market in
which the wheat farmer being compensated is accustomed to selling
wheat;
Compensation should be provided for acreage within the
quarantined areas that would normally be planted with wheat but is left
fallow;
APHIS should provide compensation for more than 50 percent
of the cost of decontaminating grain storage facilities and raise the
$20,000 overall limit on such compensation; and
APHIS should provide greater compensation for seed, since
seed prices are 2 to 4 times higher than local grain prices.
These comments are outside the scope of the interim rule. The
provisions of the regulations addressed by these commenters were added
to the regulations in a final rule published in the Federal Register on
August 6, 2001 (66 FR 40839-40843, Docket No. 96-016-37) that
established the compensation levels for the 1999-2000 crop season and
subsequent years and made several other changes to the compensation
regulations. For the reasons discussed in that final rule, we have
determined that the present compensation provisions are appropriate.
One commenter stated that APHIS should provide compensation to seed
companies and handlers that store uncertified wheat seed that tests
spore-positive for Karnal bunt.
The regulations in Sec. 301.89-15 provide for compensation for
handlers and seed companies who sell wheat grown in an area under the
first regulated crop season only if the wheat was not tested by APHIS
prior to purchase by the handler or seed company and found positive for
Karnal bunt after purchase by the handler or seed company, as long as
the price to be paid is not contingent on the test results.
Compensation for such wheat will equal the estimated market price for
the relevant class of wheat (meaning the type of wheat, such as durum
or hard red winter), minus the actual price received by the handler or
seed company. Further details are specified in paragraph (a)(2) of
Sec. 301.89-15. These provisions were in place during the 2000-2001
crop season, and thus it was not necessary to amend the regulations in
the interim rule to accommodate this situation.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the interim rule and in this
document, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule without
change.
This action also affirms the information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, this action has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
Accordingly, we are adopting as a final rule, without change, the
interim rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and that was published at 67
FR 21561-21566 on May 1, 2002.
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of April 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8-9236 Filed 4-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P