Karnal Bunt; Removal of Regulated Areas in Texas, 18701-18703 [E8-7194]
Download as PDF
18701
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 67
Monday, April 7, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2007–0157]
Karnal Bunt; Removal of Regulated
Areas in Texas
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for
comments.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are amending the Karnal
bunt regulations to remove certain areas
or fields in Baylor, Knox,
Throckmorton, and Young Counties,
TX, from the list of regulated areas
based on our determination that those
fields or areas meet our criteria for
release from regulation. This action is
necessary to relieve restrictions that are
no longer necessary.
DATES: This interim rule is effective
April 7, 2008. We will consider all
comments that we receive on or before
June 6, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS2007-0157 to submit or view comments
and to view supporting and related
materials available electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2007–0157,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2007–0157.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:06 Apr 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Matthew H. Royer, Associate Director,
Emergency and Domestic Programs,
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 26,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301) 734–
7819.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of
wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum
wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale
(Triticum aestivum X Secale cereale), a
hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is
caused by the fungus Tilletia indica
(Mitra) Mundkur and is spread
primarily through the planting of
infected seed followed by very specific
environmental conditions matched
during specific stage of wheat growth.
Some countries in the international
wheat market regulate Karnal bunt as a
fungal disease requiring quarantine;
therefore, without measures taken by
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, United States Department of
Agriculture, to prevent its spread, the
presence of Karnal bunt in the United
States could have significant
consequences with regard to the export
of wheat to international markets.
Upon detection of Karnal bunt in
Arizona in March of 1996, Federal
quarantine and emergency actions were
imposed to prevent the interstate spread
of the disease to other wheat-producing
areas in the United States. The
quarantine continues in effect, although
it has since been modified, both in
terms of its physical boundaries and in
terms of its restrictions on the
production and movement of regulated
articles from regulated areas. The
regulations regarding Karnal bunt are set
forth in 7 CFR 301.89–1 through
301.89–16 (referred to below as the
regulations).
Under the regulations in § 301.89–3(f),
a field known to have been infected
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with Karnal bunt, as well as any
noninfected acreage surrounding the
field, will be released from regulation if:
• The field has been permanently
removed from crop production; or
• The field is tilled at least once per
year for a total of 5 years (the years need
not be consecutive). After tilling, the
field may be planted with a crop or left
fallow. If the field is planted with a host
crop, the harvested grain must test
negative, through the absence of bunted
kernels, for Karnal bunt.
The regulations in § 301.89–3(g)
describe the boundaries of the regulated
areas in Arizona, California, and Texas.
In this interim rule, we are amending
§ 301.89–3(g) by removing certain areas
or fields in Baylor, Knox,
Throckmorton, and Young Counties,
TX, from the list of regulated areas,
based on our determination that these
fields or areas are eligible for release
from regulation under the criteria in
§ 301.89–3(f). This action relieves
restrictions on fields within those areas
that are no longer necessary. With this
action, there are no longer any regulated
areas in Baylor or Knox Counties, TX,
and the size of the regulated areas in
each of the two remaining regulated
Texas counties is reduced.
Immediate Action
Immediate action is warranted to
relieve restrictions that are no longer
necessary. Under these circumstances,
the Administrator has determined that
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment are contrary to the public
interest and that there is good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553 for making this
action effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
We will consider comments we
receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above).
After the comment period closes, we
will publish another document in the
Federal Register. The document will
include a discussion of any comments
we receive and any amendments we are
making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. For this action,
the Office of Management and Budget
has waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
This rule modifies the Karnal bunt
regulations by removing certain areas in
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
18702
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 67 / Monday, April 7, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
wheat in 2006 was $4.55/bushel, for a
total value of production of over $152.8
million in Texas. In 2002, the most
recent year of the Census of Agriculture,
there were a total of 9,031 farms that
harvested wheat for grain in Texas. Of
those, the Census of Agriculture
recorded that there were 342 wheat
farms located in the four counties that
will be affected by the interim rule.5
TABLE 1.—LOCATION, ACREAGE, AND
This interim rule will allow producers
NUMBER OF FIELDS TO BE RE- in the deregulated area to freely move
LEASED FROM REGULATION, BY harvested wheat. As a result, it is
possible that these producers may have
COUNTY
a broader sales base and increased
Number of Number of marketing opportunities than prior to
County
acres
the implementation of the interim rule
fields
released
as they will be able to reacquire
Baylor ....................
20,404.13
281 domestic and international markets that
Knox ......................
11,522.39
117 may have been closed to them because
Throckmorton ........
4,040.25
43 of the quarantine. In addition, the
Young ...................
1,045.48
18 possibility of enhanced buyer
perceptions that the wheat is of higher
In both Throckmorton and Young
quality than when the area was under
counties there will still be portions that
quarantine may translate into higher
remain under quarantine for Karnal
prices received. That said, the benefits
bunt. Additionally, the quarantine
of this rule are still expected to be small
boundaries will remain the same in
for each producer. The requirement to
California and Arizona. In the areas
test grain for Karnal bunt, a prerequisite
released from regulation for Karnal
of movement from a regulated area, is
bunt, producers and other entities will
already performed free of charge.
no longer have to meet the restrictions
Removal of these areas from quarantine
that apply to regulated articles moved
represents more the eliminating of the
from quarantined areas.
inconvenience of testing rather than a
The affect of this rule will be to allow large financial gain.
affected landowners and businesses in
It is important to note that the effects
the previously quarantined areas to
of this rule, although beneficial, will not
resume normal operations since the
result in a significant impact on the
areas have met the criteria for removal
domestic market for wheat. As stated
from quarantine. The U.S. Small
earlier, Texas wheat production in 2006
Business Administration’s (SBA) size
totaled 33.6 million bushels, with the
standard for wheat farming is $750,000
value of production totaling over $152.8
or less in annual receipts.1 We believe
million. For that same year, U.S. wheat
the majority of affected entities will be
production totaled over 1.8 billion
small by SBA standards. There were a
bushels, with the value of production
total of 230,000 farms, including wheat
over $7.7 billion dollars.6 Therefore,
farms, in the State of Texas in 2006. Of
Texas represented only 1.86 percent of
the 230,000 farms, only 3,900 (1.7
total U.S. wheat production, and
percent) had sales of $500,000 or more.2 contributed 1.98 percent to the value of
Statewide, a total of 5.5 million allU.S. wheat production. Wheat
purpose acres were planted with wheat
production in the affected counties is a
in 2006, with most of it not harvested
small fraction of the Texas total, and
but used as forage.3 Of the 1.4 million
any benefits of the interim rule
wheat acres that were harvested, there
experienced by affected producers will
was an average yield of 24 bushels per
not have an impact on the price for
acre, for a total production of 33.6
wheat.
4 The average price for
million bushels.
To further illustrate the point, in 2002
Texas production of wheat for grain
1 Table of Size Standards based on NAICS 2002
totaled over 75.1 million bushels. In the
[Wheat farming: NAICS code 111140]. Washington,
four counties that are affected by this
DC: U.S. Small Business Administration, effective
October 1, 2007.
rule, production of wheat for grain
2 USDA–NASS, Quick Stats: U.S. & All States
totaled about 3.8 million bushels,
Data-Farm Numbers, Texas Data: Farm Numbers by
representing approximately a 5 percent
Economic Sales Classes. Washington, DC: National
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Texas from quarantine based on surveys
that indicate the areas meet our criteria
for release from regulation. In Texas,
four counties will be affected by this
change and a total of 37,012.25 acres
will be removed from quarantine. The
following table presents the acreage and
number of fields removed from
regulation by this rule:
Agricultural Statistics Service.
3 Wheat is planted for forage, grain, or a
combination of the two.
4 USDA–NASS, Texas State Agriculture
Overview—2006. Washington, DC: National
Agricultural Statistics Service.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:06 Apr 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
5 USDA–NASS, 2002 Census of Agriculture—
Texas County Data, Table 24. Washington, DC:
National Agricultural Statistics Service.
6 USDA–NASS, Quick Stats. Washington, DC:
National Agricultural Statistics Service.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
share of the State total. The 2002
percentage share of total U.S. wheat
production for the counties of Baylor,
Knox, Throckmorton, and Young,
combined, was limited to 0.24 percent.7
The interim rule will not have an
impact on the domestic market for
wheat. Table 2 presents the wheat
production data in 2002 for the four
counties affected by the interim rule.
TABLE 2.—FARM PRODUCTION DATA
OF HARVESTED WHEAT FOR GRAIN
FOR THE FOUR AFFECTED COUNTIES, 2002
Number of
farms
Bushels
harvested
Baylor ....................
Knox ......................
Throckmorton ........
Young ...................
68
150
59
65
636,391
2,195,982
694,079
309,121
Total ...............
342
3,835,573
County
Source: USDA–NASS, 2002 Census of Agriculture—Texas County Data, Table 24. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics
Service.
Wheat producers will not be the only
entities to benefit from the quarantine
removal. The quarantine regulations
require that all conveyances,
mechanized harvesting equipment, seed
conditioning equipment, grain elevators,
and structures used for storing and
handling wheat, durum wheat, or
triticale be cleaned by removing all soil
and plant debris. If disinfection is
required by an inspector in addition to
cleaning, the articles must be
disinfected by one of the methods
specified in § 301.89–12 of the
regulations. As with the affected wheat
producers, we expect that most if not all
of the independent operators of
harvesting equipment and other service
providers that operate in the areas
removed from quarantine by this rule
are small entities.8 They will benefit,
but the financial gains for them are not
expected to be significant.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
7 U.S. production of harvested wheat for grain in
2002 totaled over 1.5 billion bushels. USDA–NASS,
2002 Census of Agriculture—U.S. State Data, Table
23. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics
Service.
8 These entities are covered under NAICS
subsector code 115—Support Activities for
Agriculture and Forestry, where the SBA size
standard is $6.5 million or less in annual receipts.
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 67 / Monday, April 7, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
I Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 301 as follows:
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
to the line of latitude 33.1809° N; then
east along the line of latitude 33.1809°
N to the Throckmorton/Young County
line at the line of longitude ¥98.9527°
W; then north along the line of
longitude ¥98.9527° W to the line of
latitude 33.2836° N; then west along the
line of latitude 33.2836° N to the point
of beginning.
Young County. Beginning in the
northwestern portion of the county at
the line of longitude ¥98.9527° W and
the line of latitude 33.2836° N; then
south along the line of longitude
¥98.9527° W to the line of latitude
33.1809° N; then east along the line of
latitude 33.1809° N to the line of
longitude ¥98.8762° W; then north
along the line of longitude ¥98.8762° W
to the line of latitude 33.1946° N; then
east along the line of latitude 33.1946°
N to the line of longitude ¥98.8356° W;
then north along the line of longitude
¥98.8356° W to the line of latitude
33.2880° N; then west along the line of
latitude 33.2880° N to the line of
longitude ¥98.9430° W; then south
along the line of longitude ¥98.9430° W
to the line of latitude 33.2836° N; then
west along the line of latitude 33.2836°
N to the point of beginning.
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
April 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–7194 Filed 4–4–08; 8:45 am]
I
1. The authority citation for part 301
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Section 301.75–15 issued under Sec. 204,
Title II, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501A–293; sections 301.75–15 and 301.75–
16 issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law
106–224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
I 2. In § 301–89.3, paragraph (g) is
amended under the heading ‘‘Texas’’ by
removing the entries for Baylor County
and Knox County and by revising the
entries for Throckmorton County and
Young County to read as follows:
§ 301.89–3
*
Regulated areas.
*
*
(g) * * *
*
*
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Texas
Throckmorton County. Beginning in
the northeastern portion of the county at
the line of longitude ¥98.9921° W and
the line of latitude 33.2836° N; then
south along the line of longitude
¥98.9921° W to the line of latitude
33.2055° N; then east along the line of
latitude 33.2055° N to the line of
longitude ¥98.9891° W; then south
along the line of longitude ¥98.9891° W
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:14 Apr 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0095; FV07–983–
2 FR]
Pistachios Grown in California;
Change in Reporting Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule changes the current
reporting requirements prescribed under
the California pistachio marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of pistachios grown in California and is
administered locally by the
Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (committee). These changes
will modify one existing committee
form and add a new form to a currentlyapproved information collection. The
information collected will require
handlers to report production and
producer data, enabling the committee
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18703
to obtain better information for
preparing its annual marketing policy
statement and conducting committee
nominations and periodic referenda
under the order.
DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 983 (7 CFR part 983), regulating the
handling of pistachios grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\07APR1.SGM
07APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 67 (Monday, April 7, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18701-18703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7194]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 67 / Monday, April 7, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 18701]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS-2007-0157]
Karnal Bunt; Removal of Regulated Areas in Texas
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the Karnal bunt regulations to remove certain
areas or fields in Baylor, Knox, Throckmorton, and Young Counties, TX,
from the list of regulated areas based on our determination that those
fields or areas meet our criteria for release from regulation. This
action is necessary to relieve restrictions that are no longer
necessary.
DATES: This interim rule is effective April 7, 2008. We will consider
all comments that we receive on or before June 6, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/
fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2007-0157 to submit
or view comments and to view supporting and related materials available
electronically.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send two copies of your
comment to Docket No. APHIS-2007-0157, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. APHIS-2007-0157.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Matthew H. Royer, Associate
Director, Emergency and Domestic Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road,
Unit 26, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-7819.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Karnal bunt is a fungal disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum), durum
wheat (Triticum durum), and triticale (Triticum aestivum X Secale
cereale), a hybrid of wheat and rye. Karnal bunt is caused by the
fungus Tilletia indica (Mitra) Mundkur and is spread primarily through
the planting of infected seed followed by very specific environmental
conditions matched during specific stage of wheat growth. Some
countries in the international wheat market regulate Karnal bunt as a
fungal disease requiring quarantine; therefore, without measures taken
by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States
Department of Agriculture, to prevent its spread, the presence of
Karnal bunt in the United States could have significant consequences
with regard to the export of wheat to international markets.
Upon detection of Karnal bunt in Arizona in March of 1996, Federal
quarantine and emergency actions were imposed to prevent the interstate
spread of the disease to other wheat-producing areas in the United
States. The quarantine continues in effect, although it has since been
modified, both in terms of its physical boundaries and in terms of its
restrictions on the production and movement of regulated articles from
regulated areas. The regulations regarding Karnal bunt are set forth in
7 CFR 301.89-1 through 301.89-16 (referred to below as the
regulations).
Under the regulations in Sec. 301.89-3(f), a field known to have
been infected with Karnal bunt, as well as any noninfected acreage
surrounding the field, will be released from regulation if:
The field has been permanently removed from crop
production; or
The field is tilled at least once per year for a total of
5 years (the years need not be consecutive). After tilling, the field
may be planted with a crop or left fallow. If the field is planted with
a host crop, the harvested grain must test negative, through the
absence of bunted kernels, for Karnal bunt.
The regulations in Sec. 301.89-3(g) describe the boundaries of the
regulated areas in Arizona, California, and Texas. In this interim
rule, we are amending Sec. 301.89-3(g) by removing certain areas or
fields in Baylor, Knox, Throckmorton, and Young Counties, TX, from the
list of regulated areas, based on our determination that these fields
or areas are eligible for release from regulation under the criteria in
Sec. 301.89-3(f). This action relieves restrictions on fields within
those areas that are no longer necessary. With this action, there are
no longer any regulated areas in Baylor or Knox Counties, TX, and the
size of the regulated areas in each of the two remaining regulated
Texas counties is reduced.
Immediate Action
Immediate action is warranted to relieve restrictions that are no
longer necessary. Under these circumstances, the Administrator has
determined that prior notice and opportunity for public comment are
contrary to the public interest and that there is good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553 for making this action effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
We will consider comments we receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above). After the comment period closes,
we will publish another document in the Federal Register. The document
will include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments
we are making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
This rule modifies the Karnal bunt regulations by removing certain
areas in
[[Page 18702]]
Texas from quarantine based on surveys that indicate the areas meet our
criteria for release from regulation. In Texas, four counties will be
affected by this change and a total of 37,012.25 acres will be removed
from quarantine. The following table presents the acreage and number of
fields removed from regulation by this rule:
Table 1.--Location, Acreage, and Number of Fields To Be Released From
Regulation, by County
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
County acres Number of
released fields
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baylor.......................................... 20,404.13 281
Knox............................................ 11,522.39 117
Throckmorton.................................... 4,040.25 43
Young........................................... 1,045.48 18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In both Throckmorton and Young counties there will still be
portions that remain under quarantine for Karnal bunt. Additionally,
the quarantine boundaries will remain the same in California and
Arizona. In the areas released from regulation for Karnal bunt,
producers and other entities will no longer have to meet the
restrictions that apply to regulated articles moved from quarantined
areas.
The affect of this rule will be to allow affected landowners and
businesses in the previously quarantined areas to resume normal
operations since the areas have met the criteria for removal from
quarantine. The U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) size
standard for wheat farming is $750,000 or less in annual receipts.\1\
We believe the majority of affected entities will be small by SBA
standards. There were a total of 230,000 farms, including wheat farms,
in the State of Texas in 2006. Of the 230,000 farms, only 3,900 (1.7
percent) had sales of $500,000 or more.\2\ Statewide, a total of 5.5
million all-purpose acres were planted with wheat in 2006, with most of
it not harvested but used as forage.\3\ Of the 1.4 million wheat acres
that were harvested, there was an average yield of 24 bushels per acre,
for a total production of 33.6 million bushels.\4\ The average price
for wheat in 2006 was $4.55/bushel, for a total value of production of
over $152.8 million in Texas. In 2002, the most recent year of the
Census of Agriculture, there were a total of 9,031 farms that harvested
wheat for grain in Texas. Of those, the Census of Agriculture recorded
that there were 342 wheat farms located in the four counties that will
be affected by the interim rule.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table of Size Standards based on NAICS 2002 [Wheat farming:
NAICS code 111140]. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business
Administration, effective October 1, 2007.
\2\ USDA-NASS, Quick Stats: U.S. & All States Data-Farm Numbers,
Texas Data: Farm Numbers by Economic Sales Classes. Washington, DC:
National Agricultural Statistics Service.
\3\ Wheat is planted for forage, grain, or a combination of the
two.
\4\ USDA-NASS, Texas State Agriculture Overview--2006.
Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
\5\ USDA-NASS, 2002 Census of Agriculture--Texas County Data,
Table 24. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This interim rule will allow producers in the deregulated area to
freely move harvested wheat. As a result, it is possible that these
producers may have a broader sales base and increased marketing
opportunities than prior to the implementation of the interim rule as
they will be able to reacquire domestic and international markets that
may have been closed to them because of the quarantine. In addition,
the possibility of enhanced buyer perceptions that the wheat is of
higher quality than when the area was under quarantine may translate
into higher prices received. That said, the benefits of this rule are
still expected to be small for each producer. The requirement to test
grain for Karnal bunt, a prerequisite of movement from a regulated
area, is already performed free of charge. Removal of these areas from
quarantine represents more the eliminating of the inconvenience of
testing rather than a large financial gain.
It is important to note that the effects of this rule, although
beneficial, will not result in a significant impact on the domestic
market for wheat. As stated earlier, Texas wheat production in 2006
totaled 33.6 million bushels, with the value of production totaling
over $152.8 million. For that same year, U.S. wheat production totaled
over 1.8 billion bushels, with the value of production over $7.7
billion dollars.\6\ Therefore, Texas represented only 1.86 percent of
total U.S. wheat production, and contributed 1.98 percent to the value
of U.S. wheat production. Wheat production in the affected counties is
a small fraction of the Texas total, and any benefits of the interim
rule experienced by affected producers will not have an impact on the
price for wheat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ USDA-NASS, Quick Stats. Washington, DC: National
Agricultural Statistics Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To further illustrate the point, in 2002 Texas production of wheat
for grain totaled over 75.1 million bushels. In the four counties that
are affected by this rule, production of wheat for grain totaled about
3.8 million bushels, representing approximately a 5 percent share of
the State total. The 2002 percentage share of total U.S. wheat
production for the counties of Baylor, Knox, Throckmorton, and Young,
combined, was limited to 0.24 percent.\7\ The interim rule will not
have an impact on the domestic market for wheat. Table 2 presents the
wheat production data in 2002 for the four counties affected by the
interim rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ U.S. production of harvested wheat for grain in 2002 totaled
over 1.5 billion bushels. USDA-NASS, 2002 Census of Agriculture--
U.S. State Data, Table 23. Washington, DC: National Agricultural
Statistics Service.
Table 2.--Farm Production Data of Harvested Wheat for Grain for the Four
Affected Counties, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Bushels
County farms harvested
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baylor.......................................... 68 636,391
Knox............................................ 150 2,195,982
Throckmorton.................................... 59 694,079
Young........................................... 65 309,121
-----------------------
Total....................................... 342 3,835,573
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: USDA-NASS, 2002 Census of Agriculture--Texas County Data, Table
24. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
Wheat producers will not be the only entities to benefit from the
quarantine removal. The quarantine regulations require that all
conveyances, mechanized harvesting equipment, seed conditioning
equipment, grain elevators, and structures used for storing and
handling wheat, durum wheat, or triticale be cleaned by removing all
soil and plant debris. If disinfection is required by an inspector in
addition to cleaning, the articles must be disinfected by one of the
methods specified in Sec. 301.89-12 of the regulations. As with the
affected wheat producers, we expect that most if not all of the
independent operators of harvesting equipment and other service
providers that operate in the areas removed from quarantine by this
rule are small entities.\8\ They will benefit, but the financial gains
for them are not expected to be significant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ These entities are covered under NAICS subsector code 115--
Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry, where the SBA size
standard is $6.5 million or less in annual receipts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
[[Page 18703]]
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 301 as follows:
PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80,
and 371.3.
Section 301.75-15 issued under Sec. 204, Title II, Public Law
106-113, 113 Stat. 1501A-293; sections 301.75-15 and 301.75-16
issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law 106-224, 114 Stat. 400
(7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
0
2. In Sec. 301-89.3, paragraph (g) is amended under the heading
``Texas'' by removing the entries for Baylor County and Knox County and
by revising the entries for Throckmorton County and Young County to
read as follows:
Sec. 301.89-3 Regulated areas.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
Texas
Throckmorton County. Beginning in the northeastern portion of the
county at the line of longitude -98.9921[deg] W and the line of
latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then south along the line of longitude -
98.9921[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2055[deg] N; then east along
the line of latitude 33.2055[deg] N to the line of longitude -
98.9891[deg] W; then south along the line of longitude -98.9891[deg] W
to the line of latitude 33.1809[deg] N; then east along the line of
latitude 33.1809[deg] N to the Throckmorton/Young County line at the
line of longitude -98.9527[deg] W; then north along the line of
longitude -98.9527[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then
west along the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N to the point of
beginning.
Young County. Beginning in the northwestern portion of the county
at the line of longitude -98.9527[deg] W and the line of latitude
33.2836[deg] N; then south along the line of longitude -98.9527[deg] W
to the line of latitude 33.1809[deg] N; then east along the line of
latitude 33.1809[deg] N to the line of longitude -98.8762[deg] W; then
north along the line of longitude -98.8762[deg] W to the line of
latitude 33.1946[deg] N; then east along the line of latitude
33.1946[deg] N to the line of longitude -98.8356[deg] W; then north
along the line of longitude -98.8356[deg] W to the line of latitude
33.2880[deg] N; then west along the line of latitude 33.2880[deg] N to
the line of longitude -98.9430[deg] W; then south along the line of
longitude -98.9430[deg] W to the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N; then
west along the line of latitude 33.2836[deg] N to the point of
beginning.
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of April 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8-7194 Filed 4-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P