Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; Overview Information; Partnerships in Character Education Program; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, 9554-9559 [E8-3250]
Download as PDF
9554
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2008 / Notices
diskettes and books produced by the
grantee as part of the grant approved
activities are also acceptable as final
reports. The Secretary may also require
more frequent performance reports
under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993 (GPRA), the objective for the
International Research and Studies (IRS)
program is to conduct research and
support the development of materials in
less commonly taught languages and
area studies to inform international
education.
The Department will use the
following measures to evaluate the
program’s success in meeting this
objective.
IRS Performance Measure 1: Number
of outreach activities initiated by IRS
projects that are adopted or further
disseminated within a year, divided by
the total number of IRS projects
conducted in the current year.
IRS Performance Measure 2: Percent
of IRS projects judged to be successful
by the program officer, based on a
review of information provided in
annual performance reports.
The information provided by grantees
in their performance reports submitted
via the electronic International Resource
Information System (IRIS) performance
reporting tool will be the source of data
for these measures.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
VII. Agency Contact
Full Text of Announcement
Ed
McDermott, International Education
Programs Service, U.S. Department of
Education, 1990 K Street, NW., suite
6082, Washington, DC 20006–8521.
Telephone: (202) 502–7636 or by e-mail:
ed.mcdermott@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: Under this
program we support Federal grants to
design and implement character
education programs that can be
integrated into classroom instruction,
that are consistent with State academic
content standards. Such programs may
be carried out in conjunction with other
educational reform efforts, and must
take into consideration the views of
parents, students, students with
disabilities (including those with mental
or physical disabilities), and other
members of the community, including
members of private, nonprofit
organizations or entities, including
faith-based organizations and
community organizations.
Priorities: In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(iv), this priority is from
Title V, Part D, Subpart 3, Section 5431
of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended by
the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
(ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 7247).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2008 and
any subsequent years in which we make
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in
this notice Electronic Access to This
Document: You can view this
document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Feb 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: February 14, 2008.
Diane Auer Jones,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. E8–3261 Filed 2–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools;
Overview Information; Partnerships in
Character Education Program; Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.215S.
Dates:
Applications Available: February 21,
2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 31, 2008.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: May 30, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
The design and implementation of
character education programs that are
able to be—
(A) Integrated into classroom
instruction and consistent with State
academic content standards; and
(B) carried out in conjunction with
other educational reform efforts.
Competitive Preference Priority:
Within this absolute priority, we give
competitive preference to applications
that address the following priority. This
priority is from the notice of final
priorities for discretionary grant
programs, published in the Federal
Register on January 25, 2005 (70 FR
3585).
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we
award up to an additional 20 points to
an application, depending on how well
the application meets this priority.
When using the priority to give
competitive preference to an
application, the Secretary will review
applications using a two-stage process.
In the first stage, the application will be
reviewed without taking the priority
into account. In the second stage of
review, the applications rated highest in
stage one will be reviewed for
competitive preference.
This priority is:
The Secretary establishes a priority
for projects proposing an evaluation
plan that is based on rigorous
scientifically based research methods
used to assess the effectiveness of a
particular intervention. The Secretary
intends that this priority will allow
program participants and the
Department to determine whether the
project produces meaningful effects on
student achievement or teacher
performance.
Evaluation methods using an
experimental design are best for
determining project effectiveness. Thus,
when feasible, the project must use an
experimental design under which
participants—e.g., students, teachers,
classrooms, or schools—are randomly
assigned to participate in the project
activities being evaluated or to a control
group that does not participate in the
project activities being evaluated.
If random assignment is not feasible,
the project may use a quasiexperimental design with carefully
matched comparison conditions. This
alternative design attempts to
approximate a randomly assigned
control group by matching
participants—e.g., students, teachers,
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2008 / Notices
classrooms, orchools—with nonparticipants having similar pre-program
characteristics.
In cases where random assignment is
not possible and participation in the
intervention is determined by a
specified cutting point on a quantified
continuum of scores, regression
discontinuity designs may be employed.
For projects that are focused on
special populations in which sufficient
numbers of participants are not
available to support random assignment
or matched comparison group designs,
single-subject designs such as multiple
baseline or treatment-reversal or
interrupted time series that are capable
of demonstrating causal relationships
can be employed.
Proposed evaluation strategies that
use neither experimental designs with
random assignment nor quasiexperimental designs using a matched
comparison group nor regression
discontinuity designs will not be
considered responsive to the priority
when sufficient numbers of participants
are available to support these designs.
Evaluation strategies that involve too
small a number of participants to
support group designs must be capable
of demonstrating the causal effects of an
intervention or program on those
participants.
The proposed evaluation plan must
describe how the project evaluator will
collect—before the project intervention
commences and after it ends—valid and
reliable data that measure the impact of
participation in the program or in the
comparison group.
Points awarded under this priority
will be determined by the quality of the
proposed evaluation method. In
determining the quality of the
evaluation method, we will consider the
extent to which the applicant presents
a feasible, credible plan that includes
the following:
(1) The type of design to be used (that
is, random assignment or matched
comparison). If matched comparison,
include in the plan a discussion of why
random assignment is not feasible.
(2) Outcomes to be measured.
(3) A discussion of how the applicant
plans to assign students, teachers,
classrooms, or schools to the project and
control group or match them for
comparison with other students,
teachers, classrooms, or schools.
(4) A proposed evaluator, preferably
independent, with the necessary
background and technical expertise to
carry out the proposed evaluation. An
independent evaluator does not have
any authority over the project and is not
involved in its implementation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Feb 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
In general, depending on the
implemented program or project, under
a competitive preference priority,
random assignment evaluation methods
will receive more points than matched
comparison evaluation methods.
Definitions
As used in this notice—
Scientifically based research (section
9101(37) ESEA):
(A) Means research that involves the
application of rigorous, systematic, and
objective procedures to obtain reliable
and valid knowledge relevant to
education activities and programs; and
(B) Includes research that—
(i) Employs systematic, empirical
methods that draw on observation or
experiment;
(ii) Involves rigorous data analyses
that are adequate to test the stated
hypotheses and justify the general
conclusions drawn;
(iii) Relies on measurements or
observational methods that provide
reliable and valid data across evaluators
and observers, across multiple
measurements and observations, and
across studies by the same or different
investigators;
(iv) Is evaluated using experimental or
quasi-experimental designs in which
individuals entities, programs, or
activities are assigned to different
conditions and with appropriate
controls to evaluate the effects of the
condition of interest, with a preference
for random-assignment experiments, or
other designs to the extent that those
designs contain within-condition or
across-condition controls;
(v) Ensures that experimental studies
are presented in sufficient detail and
clarity to allow for replication or, at a
minimum, offer the opportunity to build
systematically on their findings; and
(vi) Has been accepted by a peerreviewed journal or approved by a panel
of independent experts through a
comparably rigorous, objective, and
scientific review.
Random assignment or experimental
design means random assignment of
students, teachers, classrooms, or
schools to participate in a project being
evaluated (treatment group) or not
participate in the project (control
group). The effect of the project is the
difference in outcomes between the
treatment and control groups.
Quasi-experimental designs include
several designs that attempt to
approximate a random assignment
design.
Carefully matched comparison groups
design means a quasi-experimental
design in which project participants are
matched with non-participants based on
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9555
key characteristics that are thought to be
related to the outcome.
Regression discontinuity design
means a quasi-experimental design that
closely approximates an experimental
design. In a regression discontinuity
design, participants are assigned to a
treatment or control group based on a
numerical rating or score of a variable
unrelated to the treatment such as the
rating of an application for funding.
Eligible students, teachers, classrooms,
or schools above a certain score (‘‘cut
score’’) are assigned to the treatment
group and those below the score are
assigned to the control group. In the
case of the scores of applicants’
proposals for funding, the ‘‘cut score’’ is
established at the point where the
program funds available are exhausted.
Single subject design means a design
that relies on the comparison of
treatment effects on a single subject or
group of single subjects. There is little
confidence that findings based on this
design would be the same for other
members of the population.
Treatment reversal design means a
single subject design in which a pretreatment or baseline outcome
measurement is compared with a posttreatment measure. Treatment would
then be stopped for a period of time, a
second baseline measure of the outcome
would be taken, followed by a second
application of the treatment or a
different treatment. For example, this
design might be used to evaluate a
behavior modification program for
disabled students with behavior
disorders.
Multiple baseline design means a
single subject design to address
concerns about the effects of normal
development, timing of the treatment,
and amount of the treatment with
treatment-reversal designs by using a
varying time schedule for introduction
of the treatment and/or treatments of
different lengths or intensity.
Interrupted time series design means
a quasi-experimental design in which
the outcome of interest is measured
multiple times before and after the
treatment for program participants only.
Note: Due to the very short time frame that
applicants have to select a proposed
evaluator for the required competitive
priority, we remind applicants that they can,
under 34 CFR 80.36, use informal procedures
to select a proposed contractor for this
purpose. For example, § 80.36 authorizes
simple informal procedures to select
contractors for contracts under the simplified
acquisition threshold of $100,000. 34 CFR
80.36(d)(1). The regulations only require that
you request offers from an adequate number
of sources.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
9556
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2008 / Notices
In addition, even if you expect that
the evaluation of your project would
cost more than $100,000, the regulations
recognize special cases where a
contractor must be selected within a
very limited time period. Again, you
need to request proposals from an
adequate number of qualified sources
and select the contractor whose
proposal is most advantageous to the
program, considering price and other
selection factors. In these situations, if
informal solicitation does not result in
an adequate number of proposals, you
may select a single bidder so long as you
document the facts that formed the basis
for your decision. 34 CFR 80.36(d)(1),
(3) & (4).
Invitational Priority: Within this
absolute priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that address
the following invitational priority.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not
give an application that meets this
invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applications.
This priority is:
Faith-based and Community
Organizations.
The Secretary is especially interested
in applications that propose to engage
faith-based and community
organizations in the planning and
development of character education
programs and the delivery of services
under this program.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7247.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
84, 85, 86, 97, 98, 99 and 299. (b) The
notice of final priority published in the
Federal Register on January 25, 2005
(70 FR 3585).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grant.
Estimated Available Funds:
$1,106,865.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
2009 and subsequent fiscal years from
the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: For State
educational agencies (SEAs), $500,000–
$750,000. For local educational agencies
(LEAs), $250,000–$500,000. We
anticipate that applicants who request
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Feb 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
funding at the higher end of these
ranges would respond to the
competitive preference priority to
implement experimental or quasiexperimental designs.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
For SEAs, $600,000 for each 12-month
budget period. For LEAs, $350,000 for
each 12-month budget period.
Minimum Award: Pursuant to Section
5431(a)(4) of the ESEA, SEAs must
propose a total budget that is $500,000
or more for a single budget period. This
restriction does not apply to
applications from LEAs.
Estimated Number of Awards: 2.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months, of
which no more than 12 months may be
used for planning and program design.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
(a)(1) An SEA in partnership with one
or more LEAs; or
(2) An SEA in partnership with one or
more LEAs and nonprofit organizations
or entities, including faith-based and
community organizations, and an
Institute of Higher Education (IHE); and
(b)(1) An LEA or consortium of LEAs;
or
(2) An LEA in partnership with one or
more nonprofit organizations or entities,
including faith-based and community
organizations, and an IHE. Charter
schools that are considered LEAs under
State law are also eligible to apply.
Participation by Private School
Children and Teachers.
Each eligible entity that receives a
grant under this section shall provide, to
the extent feasible and appropriate, for
the participation of programs and
activities under this section of students
and teachers in private elementary and
secondary schools.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: Sharon J. Burton, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 3E322, Washington,
DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 205–8122
or by e-mail: sharon.burton@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an alternative format (e.g., Braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
diskette) by contacting the program
contact person listed in this section.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: February 21,
2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 31, 2008.
Applications for grants under this
competition may be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov), or in paper
format by mail or hand delivery. For
information (including dates and times)
about how to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery, please refer to
section IV. 6. Other Submission
Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under For Further Information Contact
in section VII in this notice. If the
Department provides an accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability in connection with the
application process, the individual’s
application remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: May 30, 2008.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: An SEA may
use not more than three percent (3%) of
the total funds received in any fiscal
year for administrative purposes. This
does not apply to LEAs. We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
competition may be submitted
electronically or in paper format by mail
or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
To comply with the President’s
Management Agenda, we are
participating as a partner in the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2008 / Notices
The Partnerships in Character Education
Program, CFDA Number 84.215S, is
included in this project. We request
your participation in Grants.gov.
If you choose to submit your
application electronically, you must use
the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply
site at https://www.Grants.gov. Through
this site, you will be able to download
a copy of the application package,
complete it offline, and then upload and
submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the Partnerships in
Character Education Program at https://
www.Grants.gov. You must search for
the downloadable application package
for this competition by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA
number’s alpha suffix in your search
(e.g., search for 84.215, not 84.215S).
Please note the following:
• Your participation in Grants.gov is
voluntary.
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are date and time stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted and must be date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not consider your
application if it is date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system later
than 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. When we
retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are
rejecting your application because it
was date and time stamped by the
Grants.gov system after 4:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Feb 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
pertaining to Grants.gov at https://eGrants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
• To submit your application via
Grants.gov, you must complete all steps
in the Grants.gov registration process
(see https://www.grants.gov/applicants/
get_registered.jsp). These steps include
(1) registering your organization, a
multi-part process that includes
registration with the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR); (2) registering yourself
as an Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR); and (3) getting
authorized as an AOR by your
organization. Details on these steps are
outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see https://
www.grants.gov/section910/
Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf).
You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number
used with this registration. Please note
that the registration process may take
five or more business days to complete,
and you must have completed all
registration steps to allow you to submit
successfully an application via
Grants.gov In addition you will need to
update your CCR registration on an
annual basis. This may take three or
more business days to complete.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you submit your
application in paper format.
• If you submit your application
electronically, you must submit all
documents electronically, including all
information you typically provide on
the following forms: Application for
Federal Assistance (SF 424), the
Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs (ED 524), and all necessary
assurances and certifications. Please
note that two of these forms—the SF 424
and the Department of Education
Supplemental Information for SF 424—
have replaced the ED 424 (Application
for Federal Education Assistance).
• If you submit your application
electronically, you must attach any
narrative sections of your application as
files in a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich
text), or .PDF (Portable Document)
format. If you upload a file type other
than the three file types specified in this
paragraph or submit a passwordprotected file, we will not review that
material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9557
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. (This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send a
second notification to you by e-mail.
This second notification indicates that
the Department has received your
application and has assigned your
application a PR/Award number (an EDspecified identifying number unique to
your application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under For
Further Information Contact in section
VII in this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. The Department will contact you
after a determination is made on
whether your application will be
accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
9558
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2008 / Notices
If you submit your application in
paper format by mail (through the U.S.
Postal Service or a commercial carrier),
you must mail the original and two
copies of your application, on or before
the application deadline date, to the
Department at the applicable following
address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.215S),
400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260; or
By mail through a commercial carrier:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Stop
4260, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.215S), 7100 Old Landover Road,
Landover, MD 20785–1506.
Regardless of which address you use,
you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in
paper format by hand delivery, you (or
a courier service) must deliver the
original and two copies of your
application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215S), 550 12th
Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and
Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of
Paper Applications: If you mail or hand
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Feb 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
deliver your application to the
Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the
Department—in Item 11 of the SF 424
the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under
which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center
will mail to you a notification of receipt
of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15
business days from the application
deadline date, you should call the U.S.
Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245–6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR part 75.210 in EDGAR and are
listed in the application package.
2. Review and Selection Process:
Additional factors we consider in
selecting an application for an award are
included in 20 U.S.C. 7247. We will
ensure that, to the extent practicable,
the projects for which we provide
funding are equally distributed among
the geographic regions of the United
States, and among urban, suburban and
rural areas.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notice (GAN).
We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section in
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measure: Under the
Government Performance and Results
Act (GPRA), two performance indicators
have been established for the
Partnerships in Character Education
Program. The indicators are: the
percentage of Partnerships in Character
Education Program grantees that use an
experimental or quasi-experimental
design for their evaluation; and the
percentage of Partnerships in Character
Education Program grantees that use an
experimental or quasi-experimental
design for their evaluation that are
conducted successfully, and that yield
scientifically valid results.
Consequently, applicants for a grant
under this program are advised to give
careful consideration to these two
measures in conceptualizing the design,
implementation, and evaluation of their
proposed project. If funded, applicants
will be asked to report data in their
annual performance reports on
evaluation outcomes. The Secretary will
use this information to assess the overall
quality of performance data obtained
through rigorous evaluations conducted
by grantees, and to respond to reporting
requirements concerning this program
established in Section 5431(h) of the
ESEA.
VII. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact:
Sharon J. Burton, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3E322, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 205–8122 or by e-mail:
sharon.burton@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under For Further
Information Contact in section VII in
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 35 / Thursday, February 21, 2008 / Notices
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: February 15, 2008.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and DrugFree Schools.
[FR Doc. E8–3250 Filed 2–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. PP–305]
Notice of Availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement and
Public Hearings for the Proposed
Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. International
Transmission Line
U.S. Department of Energy.
Notice of availability and public
hearings.
AGENCY:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) and the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) as co-lead
agencies, with the Department of the
Interior’s Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) as a cooperating agency (together,
the ‘‘Agencies’’), announce the
availability of the ‘‘Federal Draft
Environmental Impact Statement and
the State of Montana Supplemental
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Montana Alberta Tie Ltd.
(MATL) 230–kV Transmission Line’’
(DOE/EIS–0399) for public review and
comment. The Agencies also announce
three public hearings on the Draft EIS.
The Draft EIS evaluates the
environmental impacts of DOE’s
proposed Federal action of issuing a
Presidential permit to MATL for the
construction, operation, maintenance,
and connection of a 230-kilovolt electric
transmission line that would cross the
U.S.-Canada border in the vicinity of
Cut Bank, Montana. The proposed DEQ
action is the issuance of a certificate of
compliance under the Montana Facility
Siting Act (MFSA) for construction of
the electric transmission line within the
State of Montana. BLM’s proposed
Federal action is issuance of a right-ofway grant to allow the transmission line
to cross Federal lands within BLM’s
management responsibility.
DATES: The Agencies invite interested
Members of Congress, state and local
governments, other Federal agencies,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Feb 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
American Indian tribal governments,
organizations, and members of the
public to provide comments on the Draft
EIS during the public comment period.
The public comment period started on
February 15, 2008, with the publication
in the Federal Register (73 FR 8869) by
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency of the Notice of Availability of
the Draft EIS, and will continue until
March 31, 2008. Written and oral
comments will be given equal weight
and all comments received or
postmarked by that date will be
considered by the Agencies in preparing
the Final EIS. Comments received or
postmarked after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
Dates for the public hearings are:
1. March 11, 2008, 6–9 p.m., Great
Falls, Montana.
2. March 12, 2008, 6–9 p.m., Cut
Bank, Montana.
3. March 13, 2008, 6–9 p.m., Conrad,
Montana.
Requests to speak at a specific public
hearing should be received by Mr. Tom
Ring as indicated in the ADDRESSES
section below on or before March 10,
2008. Requests to speak may also be
made at the time of registration for the
hearing(s). However, persons who have
submitted advance requests to speak
will be given priority if time should be
limited during the hearing.
ADDRESSES: Requests to speak at the
public hearings should be addressed to:
Mr. Tom Ring, Environmental
Sciences Specialist, Montana
Department of Environmental Quality,
P.O. Box 200901, Helena, MT 59620–
0901, or (406) 444–6785, or via
electronic mail at matl@mt.gov.
The locations of the public hearings
are:
1. Civic Center, Missouri Room, Great
Falls, Montana.
2. Voting Center, Cut Bank, Montana.
3. Blue Sky Villa, Norley Hall,
Conrad, Montana.
Written comments on the Draft EIS
may be addressed to Mr. Ring as
indicated in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have any questions about the
Presidential permit process, please
contact Mrs. Ellen Russell at U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability, Mail Stop OE–20, 1000
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20585, by telephone at 202–586–
9624, or by electronic mail at
Ellen.Russell@hq.doe.gov.
For general information on the DOE
NEPA process, contact Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9559
Policy and Compliance (GC–20), U.S.
Department of Energy 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, Phone: 202–
586–4600 or leave a message at 800–
472–2756; Facsimile: 202–586–7031.
If you have questions about the
Montana MFSA siting process, please
contact Mr. Ring at the address provided
above. For general information on the
State of Montana Environmental Policy
Act process contact Greg Hallsten,
Environmental Science Specialist, at the
same above address or by phone at 406–
444–3276.
Availability of the Draft EIS
Copies of the Draft EIS have been
distributed to appropriate Members of
Congress, state and local government
officials in Montana, American Indian
tribal governments, and other Federal
agencies, groups, and interested parties.
Printed copies of the document may be
obtained by contacting Mr. Ring at the
above address. Copies of the Draft EIS
and supporting documents are also
available for inspection in Montana at
the Conrad Public Library, Cut Bank
Public Library, Dutton Public Library,
Great Falls Public Library, and the
Montana State Library. The Draft EIS is
also available on the DOE NEPA Web
site at https://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa/
documentspub.html or on the State of
Montana project Web site at https://
www.deq.mt.gov/mfs/MATL.asp.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 15,
2008.
Ellen Russell,
Acting Director, Permitting and Siting, Office
of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. E8–3292 Filed 2–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
February 14, 2008.
The following notice of meeting is
published pursuant to section 3(a) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub.
L. 94–409), 5 U.S.C. 552b:
AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission.
DATE AND TIME: February 21, 2008, 10
a.m.
PLACE: Room 2C, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda
* Note—Items listed on the agenda
may be deleted without further notice.
E:\FR\FM\21FEN1.SGM
21FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 35 (Thursday, February 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9554-9559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3250]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; Overview Information;
Partnerships in Character Education Program; Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.215S.
Dates:
Applications Available: February 21, 2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 31, 2008.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: May 30, 2008.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: Under this program we support Federal grants to
design and implement character education programs that can be
integrated into classroom instruction, that are consistent with State
academic content standards. Such programs may be carried out in
conjunction with other educational reform efforts, and must take into
consideration the views of parents, students, students with
disabilities (including those with mental or physical disabilities),
and other members of the community, including members of private,
nonprofit organizations or entities, including faith-based
organizations and community organizations.
Priorities: In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), this
priority is from Title V, Part D, Subpart 3, Section 5431 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 7247).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2008 and any subsequent years in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition,
this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we
consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
The design and implementation of character education programs that
are able to be--
(A) Integrated into classroom instruction and consistent with State
academic content standards; and
(B) carried out in conjunction with other educational reform
efforts.
Competitive Preference Priority: Within this absolute priority, we
give competitive preference to applications that address the following
priority. This priority is from the notice of final priorities for
discretionary grant programs, published in the Federal Register on
January 25, 2005 (70 FR 3585).
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 20
points to an application, depending on how well the application meets
this priority. When using the priority to give competitive preference
to an application, the Secretary will review applications using a two-
stage process. In the first stage, the application will be reviewed
without taking the priority into account. In the second stage of
review, the applications rated highest in stage one will be reviewed
for competitive preference.
This priority is:
The Secretary establishes a priority for projects proposing an
evaluation plan that is based on rigorous scientifically based research
methods used to assess the effectiveness of a particular intervention.
The Secretary intends that this priority will allow program
participants and the Department to determine whether the project
produces meaningful effects on student achievement or teacher
performance.
Evaluation methods using an experimental design are best for
determining project effectiveness. Thus, when feasible, the project
must use an experimental design under which participants--e.g.,
students, teachers, classrooms, or schools--are randomly assigned to
participate in the project activities being evaluated or to a control
group that does not participate in the project activities being
evaluated.
If random assignment is not feasible, the project may use a quasi-
experimental design with carefully matched comparison conditions. This
alternative design attempts to approximate a randomly assigned control
group by matching participants--e.g., students, teachers,
[[Page 9555]]
classrooms, orchools--with non-participants having similar pre-program
characteristics.
In cases where random assignment is not possible and participation
in the intervention is determined by a specified cutting point on a
quantified continuum of scores, regression discontinuity designs may be
employed.
For projects that are focused on special populations in which
sufficient numbers of participants are not available to support random
assignment or matched comparison group designs, single-subject designs
such as multiple baseline or treatment-reversal or interrupted time
series that are capable of demonstrating causal relationships can be
employed.
Proposed evaluation strategies that use neither experimental
designs with random assignment nor quasi-experimental designs using a
matched comparison group nor regression discontinuity designs will not
be considered responsive to the priority when sufficient numbers of
participants are available to support these designs. Evaluation
strategies that involve too small a number of participants to support
group designs must be capable of demonstrating the causal effects of an
intervention or program on those participants.
The proposed evaluation plan must describe how the project
evaluator will collect--before the project intervention commences and
after it ends--valid and reliable data that measure the impact of
participation in the program or in the comparison group.
Points awarded under this priority will be determined by the
quality of the proposed evaluation method. In determining the quality
of the evaluation method, we will consider the extent to which the
applicant presents a feasible, credible plan that includes the
following:
(1) The type of design to be used (that is, random assignment or
matched comparison). If matched comparison, include in the plan a
discussion of why random assignment is not feasible.
(2) Outcomes to be measured.
(3) A discussion of how the applicant plans to assign students,
teachers, classrooms, or schools to the project and control group or
match them for comparison with other students, teachers, classrooms, or
schools.
(4) A proposed evaluator, preferably independent, with the
necessary background and technical expertise to carry out the proposed
evaluation. An independent evaluator does not have any authority over
the project and is not involved in its implementation.
In general, depending on the implemented program or project, under
a competitive preference priority, random assignment evaluation methods
will receive more points than matched comparison evaluation methods.
Definitions
As used in this notice--
Scientifically based research (section 9101(37) ESEA):
(A) Means research that involves the application of rigorous,
systematic, and objective procedures to obtain reliable and valid
knowledge relevant to education activities and programs; and
(B) Includes research that--
(i) Employs systematic, empirical methods that draw on observation
or experiment;
(ii) Involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the
stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn;
(iii) Relies on measurements or observational methods that provide
reliable and valid data across evaluators and observers, across
multiple measurements and observations, and across studies by the same
or different investigators;
(iv) Is evaluated using experimental or quasi-experimental designs
in which individuals entities, programs, or activities are assigned to
different conditions and with appropriate controls to evaluate the
effects of the condition of interest, with a preference for random-
assignment experiments, or other designs to the extent that those
designs contain within-condition or across-condition controls;
(v) Ensures that experimental studies are presented in sufficient
detail and clarity to allow for replication or, at a minimum, offer the
opportunity to build systematically on their findings; and
(vi) Has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a
panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective,
and scientific review.
Random assignment or experimental design means random assignment of
students, teachers, classrooms, or schools to participate in a project
being evaluated (treatment group) or not participate in the project
(control group). The effect of the project is the difference in
outcomes between the treatment and control groups.
Quasi-experimental designs include several designs that attempt to
approximate a random assignment design.
Carefully matched comparison groups design means a quasi-
experimental design in which project participants are matched with non-
participants based on key characteristics that are thought to be
related to the outcome.
Regression discontinuity design means a quasi-experimental design
that closely approximates an experimental design. In a regression
discontinuity design, participants are assigned to a treatment or
control group based on a numerical rating or score of a variable
unrelated to the treatment such as the rating of an application for
funding. Eligible students, teachers, classrooms, or schools above a
certain score (``cut score'') are assigned to the treatment group and
those below the score are assigned to the control group. In the case of
the scores of applicants' proposals for funding, the ``cut score'' is
established at the point where the program funds available are
exhausted.
Single subject design means a design that relies on the comparison
of treatment effects on a single subject or group of single subjects.
There is little confidence that findings based on this design would be
the same for other members of the population.
Treatment reversal design means a single subject design in which a
pre-treatment or baseline outcome measurement is compared with a post-
treatment measure. Treatment would then be stopped for a period of
time, a second baseline measure of the outcome would be taken, followed
by a second application of the treatment or a different treatment. For
example, this design might be used to evaluate a behavior modification
program for disabled students with behavior disorders.
Multiple baseline design means a single subject design to address
concerns about the effects of normal development, timing of the
treatment, and amount of the treatment with treatment-reversal designs
by using a varying time schedule for introduction of the treatment and/
or treatments of different lengths or intensity.
Interrupted time series design means a quasi-experimental design in
which the outcome of interest is measured multiple times before and
after the treatment for program participants only.
Note: Due to the very short time frame that applicants have to
select a proposed evaluator for the required competitive priority,
we remind applicants that they can, under 34 CFR 80.36, use informal
procedures to select a proposed contractor for this purpose. For
example, Sec. 80.36 authorizes simple informal procedures to select
contractors for contracts under the simplified acquisition threshold
of $100,000. 34 CFR 80.36(d)(1). The regulations only require that
you request offers from an adequate number of sources.
[[Page 9556]]
In addition, even if you expect that the evaluation of your project
would cost more than $100,000, the regulations recognize special cases
where a contractor must be selected within a very limited time period.
Again, you need to request proposals from an adequate number of
qualified sources and select the contractor whose proposal is most
advantageous to the program, considering price and other selection
factors. In these situations, if informal solicitation does not result
in an adequate number of proposals, you may select a single bidder so
long as you document the facts that formed the basis for your decision.
34 CFR 80.36(d)(1), (3) & (4).
Invitational Priority: Within this absolute priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that address the following
invitational priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not give an
application that meets this invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other applications.
This priority is:
Faith-based and Community Organizations.
The Secretary is especially interested in applications that propose
to engage faith-based and community organizations in the planning and
development of character education programs and the delivery of
services under this program.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7247.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80,
81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, 99 and 299. (b) The notice of final
priority published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2005 (70 FR
3585).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grant.
Estimated Available Funds: $1,106,865.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2009 and subsequent
fiscal years from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: For State educational agencies (SEAs),
$500,000-$750,000. For local educational agencies (LEAs), $250,000-
$500,000. We anticipate that applicants who request funding at the
higher end of these ranges would respond to the competitive preference
priority to implement experimental or quasi-experimental designs.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: For SEAs, $600,000 for each 12-
month budget period. For LEAs, $350,000 for each 12-month budget
period.
Minimum Award: Pursuant to Section 5431(a)(4) of the ESEA, SEAs
must propose a total budget that is $500,000 or more for a single
budget period. This restriction does not apply to applications from
LEAs.
Estimated Number of Awards: 2.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months, of which no more than 12 months
may be used for planning and program design.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
(a)(1) An SEA in partnership with one or more LEAs; or
(2) An SEA in partnership with one or more LEAs and nonprofit
organizations or entities, including faith-based and community
organizations, and an Institute of Higher Education (IHE); and
(b)(1) An LEA or consortium of LEAs; or
(2) An LEA in partnership with one or more nonprofit organizations
or entities, including faith-based and community organizations, and an
IHE. Charter schools that are considered LEAs under State law are also
eligible to apply.
Participation by Private School Children and Teachers.
Each eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall
provide, to the extent feasible and appropriate, for the participation
of programs and activities under this section of students and teachers
in private elementary and secondary schools.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: Sharon J. Burton, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E322,
Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 205-8122 or by e-mail:
sharon.burton@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the program contact
person listed in this section.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: February 21, 2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 31, 2008.
Applications for grants under this competition may be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov), or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery. For information (including dates
and times) about how to submit your application electronically, or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery, please refer to section IV. 6.
Other Submission Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under For Further Information Contact in section VII
in this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: May 30, 2008.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: An SEA may use not more than three percent
(3%) of the total funds received in any fiscal year for administrative
purposes. This does not apply to LEAs. We reference regulations
outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section in
this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this competition may be submitted electronically or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
To comply with the President's Management Agenda, we are
participating as a partner in the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site.
[[Page 9557]]
The Partnerships in Character Education Program, CFDA Number 84.215S,
is included in this project. We request your participation in
Grants.gov.
If you choose to submit your application electronically, you must
use the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at https://www.Grants.gov.
Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant application for the
Partnerships in Character Education Program at https://www.Grants.gov.
You must search for the downloadable application package for this
competition by the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha
suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.215, not 84.215S).
Please note the following:
Your participation in Grants.gov is voluntary.
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not consider your application
if it is date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. When we
retrieve your application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are
rejecting your application because it was date and time stamped by the
Grants.gov system after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at https://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
To submit your application via Grants.gov, you must
complete all steps in the Grants.gov registration process (see https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp). These steps include (1)
registering your organization, a multi-part process that includes
registration with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR); (2)
registering yourself as an Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (3) getting authorized as an AOR by your organization.
Details on these steps are outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see https://www.grants.gov/section910/
Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf). You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number used with this registration. Please
note that the registration process may take five or more business days
to complete, and you must have completed all registration steps to
allow you to submit successfully an application via Grants.gov In
addition you will need to update your CCR registration on an annual
basis. This may take three or more business days to complete.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you submit your application in paper format.
If you submit your application electronically, you must
submit all documents electronically, including all information you
typically provide on the following forms: Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs
(ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications. Please note
that two of these forms--the SF 424 and the Department of Education
Supplemental Information for SF 424--have replaced the ED 424
(Application for Federal Education Assistance).
If you submit your application electronically, you must
attach any narrative sections of your application as files in a .DOC
(document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF (Portable Document) format. If
you upload a file type other than the three file types specified in
this paragraph or submit a password-protected file, we will not review
that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by e-mail. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date, please contact the person listed
under For Further Information Contact in section VII in this notice and
provide an explanation of the technical problem you experienced with
Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number. We will
accept your application if we can confirm that a technical problem
occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that problem affected your
ability to submit your application by 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date. The Department will contact you after
a determination is made on whether your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
[[Page 9558]]
If you submit your application in paper format by mail (through the
U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier), you must mail the
original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the applicable
following address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.215S), 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260; or
By mail through a commercial carrier: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Stop 4260, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.215S), 7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD 20785-1506.
Regardless of which address you use, you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in paper format by hand delivery,
you (or a courier service) must deliver the original and two copies of
your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.215S), 550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail
or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the
Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification
of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the application deadline
date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR part 75.210 in EDGAR and are listed in the application
package.
2. Review and Selection Process: Additional factors we consider in
selecting an application for an award are included in 20 U.S.C. 7247.
We will ensure that, to the extent practicable, the projects for which
we provide funding are equally distributed among the geographic regions
of the United States, and among urban, suburban and rural areas.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notice
(GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your project period, you must submit a
final performance report, including financial information, as directed
by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an
annual performance report that provides the most current performance
and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements
on reporting, please go to https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
4. Performance Measure: Under the Government Performance and
Results Act (GPRA), two performance indicators have been established
for the Partnerships in Character Education Program. The indicators
are: the percentage of Partnerships in Character Education Program
grantees that use an experimental or quasi-experimental design for
their evaluation; and the percentage of Partnerships in Character
Education Program grantees that use an experimental or quasi-
experimental design for their evaluation that are conducted
successfully, and that yield scientifically valid results.
Consequently, applicants for a grant under this program are advised to
give careful consideration to these two measures in conceptualizing the
design, implementation, and evaluation of their proposed project. If
funded, applicants will be asked to report data in their annual
performance reports on evaluation outcomes. The Secretary will use this
information to assess the overall quality of performance data obtained
through rigorous evaluations conducted by grantees, and to respond to
reporting requirements concerning this program established in Section
5431(h) of the ESEA.
VII. Agency Contact
For Further Information Contact: Sharon J. Burton, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E322, Washington, DC
20202. Telephone: (202) 205-8122 or by e-mail: sharon.burton@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an alternative format
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person listed under For Further
Information Contact in section VII in this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government
[[Page 9559]]
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the
Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
Dated: February 15, 2008.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools.
[FR Doc. E8-3250 Filed 2-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P