Recordation of Notices of Termination of Transfers and Licenses; clarifications, 3898-3900 [E8-888]
Download as PDF
3898
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Paperwork Reduction Act
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 916
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507, et seq.).
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601, et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Jan 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: December 26, 2007.
Len Meier,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent
Region.
[FR Doc. E8–1113 Filed 1–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. RM 2008–1]
Recordation of Notices of Termination
of Transfers and Licenses;
clarifications
Copyright Office, Library of
Congress.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is
proposing to make clarifications to its
regulations governing the recordation of
notices of termination and certain
related provisions. This notice seeks
public comment on the proposed
amendments, which would
communicate the Office’s practices as to
notices of termination that are untimely
filed; clarify the fact that a notice of
termination is not legally sufficient
simply because it has been recorded;
update the legibility requirements for all
recorded documents, including notices
of termination; make minor explanatory
edits to the fee schedule for multiple
titles within a document (adding notices
of termination as an example); and
create a new mailing address to which
notices of termination should be sent.
DATES: Written comments are due
February 22, 2008. Reply comments are
due March 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: If hand delivered by a
private party, an original and five copies
of any comment should be brought to
Room LM–401 of the James Memorial
Building between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
and the envelope should be addressed
as follows: Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office, James
Madison Memorial Building, Room LM–
401, First and Independence Avenue,
SE, Washington, DC 20559–6000.
If hand delivered by a commercial
courier, an original and five copies of
any comment must be delivered to the
Congressional Courier Acceptance Site
located at Second and D Streets, NE,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and
4 p.m. The envelope should be
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
addressed as follows: Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office,
Room LM–403, James Madison
Memorial Building, First and
Independence Avenue, SE, Washington,
DC 20559–6000.
If sent by mail, an original and five
copies of any comment should be
addressed to: Copyright GC/I&R, P.O.
Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
Comments may not be delivered by
means of overnight delivery services
such as Federal Express, United Parcel
Service or DHL, due to delays in
processing receipt of such deliveries.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Pallante, Deputy General Counsel,
Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202)
707–8380. Fax (202) 707–8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In addition to its legal, regulatory and
policy responsibilities, the Copyright
Office is an office of public record
which receives and records documents
that pertain to copyright. Such
documents include notices of
termination, which may be served by
authors (and some heirs of authors) to
extinguish certain exclusive or
nonexclusive grants of transfers or
licenses of copyright or the divisible
rights thereunder.
The termination provisions are set
forth in Sections 304(c), 304(d) and 203
of the 1976 Copyright Act, Title 17 of
the United States Code. The provisions
have an equitable function; they exist to
allow authors or their heirs a second
opportunity to share in the economic
success of their works. The House
Report accompanying the 1976
Copyright Act states that the provisions
are ‘‘needed because of the unequal
bargaining position of authors, resulting
in part from the impossibility of
determining a work’s value until it has
been exploited.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476,
at 124 (1976). The law provides for
termination according to the time table
and prescription set forth in each
respective section, including
mandatory, timely recordation with the
Copyright Office.1
Section 304(c) governs any work in
which the copyright was subsisting in
its first or renewal term as of January 1,
1978, and provides for termination of a
grant at any time during a period of five
years beginning at the end of fifty–six
years from the date copyright was
originally secured. Section 304(d)
provides a termination right for a subset
of works for which the termination right
1The provisions exclude grants made by will and
works for hire.
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
expired on or before the effective date
(October 27, 1998) of the ‘‘Sonny Bono
Copyright Term Extension Act,’’ which
extended the copyright term by 20
years. Section 304(d) allows an author,
or certain heirs and successors, to
terminate the grant of a transfer or
license of the renewal copyright or any
right under it, at anytime during a five
year period beginning at the end of 75
years from the date copyright was
originally secured.2 Section 203 governs
works created on or after January 1,
1978. The author, or certain heirs and
successors, may terminate any grant
made on or after this date at any time
during a period of five years beginning
at the end of thirty–five years from the
date of publication of the work under
the grant or at the end of forty years
from the date of execution of the grant,
whichever term ends earlier. In contrast
to the provisions of Section 304,
termination under Section 203 is
possible only if the author executed the
grant.
The termination provisions are not
self–executing. On the contrary, they are
formalistic and include several
conditions precedent. For example, the
provisions require that the author (or if
the author is deceased, the author’s
widow, widower, children or other heirs
specified by statute) serve the notice of
termination in writing on a grantee or
the grantee’s successor in title prior to
the effective date of termination which,
as referenced above, must fall within a
five–year window prescribed by the
statutory section. Moreover, the notice
must state the effective date of the
termination and must be served not less
than two or more than ten years before
the effective date. And, as a condition
of the termination taking effect, a copy
of the notice of termination must be
recorded with the Copyright Office prior
to the effective date of termination. 17
U.S.C. 304(c)(4); 304(d)(1); 203(a)(4).
The process and other formal
requirements for submitting a copy of
the notice to the Copyright Office for
recordation are prescribed by regulation
and addressed herein. In short, the
regulations require the recording party
to submit a complete and exact
duplicate of the notice that he or she
served on the grantee or grantee’s
successor–in–title. The copy must
include either actual signatures or
reproductions of signatures, a statement
setting forth the date the notice was
served, an indication of the manner of
service, and submission of the
appropriate filing fee. The Copyright
2The provisions do not apply if the termination
right under Section 304(c) was previously
exercised.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Jan 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Office reviews for each of the above–
referenced elements and may refuse
recordation in the event any one
element is missing. 37 CFR 201.10(f).
The requirements of the Copyright
Office with respect to document
legibility, fee schedule and mailing
address are also prescribed by
regulation and addressed herein. 37 CFR
201.4(c)(3); 201.3; 201.1.
Summary of Proposed Amendments
Timeliness of Notices of Termination
Under the law, the failure to file a
notice of termination in a timely manner
is a fatal mistake that cannot be
construed as an immaterial, harmless
error. 37 CFR 201.10(e). Thus, before
recording a notice, the Copyright Office
looks for confirmation that the relevant
statutory deadlines have been met.
Because the Office’s practice in this
regard is not currently stated in the
regulations, the proposed amendments
would introduce a new, explanatory
paragraph.
In summary, if in the judgment of the
Office the document is untimely, the
Office will take one of two actions. If the
notice is premature, the Office will
return it with an explanation, so that it
may be resubmitted within the proper
statutory window. On the other hand, if
the document is late, the Office will
offer only to record and index the
document as a ‘‘document pertaining to
copyright.’’ 17 U.S.C. 205(a); 37 CFR
201.4(a)(2). It will not accept the
document as a ‘‘notice of termination,’’
meaning that it will not be specially
indexed as such. Whether such general
recordation by the Copyright Office will
be sufficient in any particular instance
to effect termination as a matter of law
is an issue that only the courts may
resolve.
Recordation as Distinguished from
Legal Sufficiency
By way of clarification, the fact that
the Office has recorded a document as
a notice of termination does not
necessarily mean that the notice is
legally sufficient to effect termination.
In fact, recordation is without prejudice
to any party claiming that the legal and
formal requirements for issuing a valid
notice have not been met. This
denotation already appears in the
regulations, but the proposed
amendment would rephrase the existing
language to provide greater clarity.
Legibility of Notices of Termination and
Other Documents Pertaining to
Copyright
With regard to legibility (an issue that
affects not only notices of termination
but all documents submitted for
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3899
recordation), the amendments would
make a change that is relatively minor
but which would nonetheless
underscore the mission of the Copyright
Office as an office of public record. The
current legibility requirement has two
prongs, one that applies to the content
of the original document and one that
applies to its technical quality: ‘‘a
document must be legible and capable
of being reproduced in legible
microform copies.’’ (Emphasis added.)
37 CFR 201.4(c)(3).
No change is proposed as to the first
prong. When the Office records a
document, it creates an index for the
public that reflects the nature of the
document and is searchable by certain
key information contained in the
document, e.g. the title of a work. If the
content is indecipherable or difficult to
read, the Office cannot create an
accurate index. In addition, with respect
to copyrighted works, a document that
is recorded in the Office provides
constructive notice as to the facts stated
in the recorded document, provided that
identification of the work is such that,
after the document is indexed by the
Office, it would be reasonably revealed
under the title or registration number of
the work; and provided that registration
has been made for the work. 17 U.S.C.
205(c). Again, if the facts of the
document are indecipherable, there can
be no accurate indexing, thus
preventing the possibility of
constructive notice, nor will an illegible
document prevail in the event of a
conflicting claim of transfer. 17 U.S.C.
205(d).
As to the second prong, the
amendment would make a small change
by deleting the outdated reference to
‘‘microform copies’’ and replacing it
with a broader, more flexible standard.
If a document is faded, faint, or
similarly difficult to see, the Office may
be unable to successfully reproduce it
for the public record. Thus, the
amended regulation would require that
documents be ‘‘legible and capable of
being imaged or otherwise reproduced
in legible copies by the technology
employed by the Office at the time of
submission.’’ (Emphasis added.)
Fee Requirements for Notices of
Termination
With respect to fees, it is the
Copyright Office’s experience that
parties who submit notices of
termination for recordation sometimes
miscalculate the amount due, especially
where grants of rights in multiple works
are being terminated by virtue of one
document. The proposed amendment
would add the notice of termination as
an express example in the schedule of
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
3900
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
fees under section 201.3(c)(16),
specifying that the basic fee for
recordation of a notice of termination
containing a single title is $95, and the
fee for recordation of a notice of
termination containing more than one
title is an additional $25 per group of 10
titles.
Mailing Address for Notices of
Termination
Finally, because notices of
termination are time–sensitive, a delay
in processing may have serious
consequences. The proposed
amendment would create a special post
office box at the Copyright Office, from
which notices of termination could
more easily be sorted and routed for
recordation. This revision would also
delete the address for the Copyright
Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP). All
CARP proceedings were terminated in
2007 and the reference is no longer
valid. 72 FR 45071 (August 10, 2007).
Conclusion
We hereby seek comment from the
public as to the issues identified herein
associated with certain requirements of
the Copyright Office under Sections
201.1, 201.3, 201.4 and 201.10 of
Chapter 37 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office proposes
to amend part 201 of title 37 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 201–GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Revise § 201.1(b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 201.1 Communication with the
Copyright Office.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Notices of Termination. Notices
of termination submitted for recordation
should be mailed to Copyright Office,
Notices of Termination, P.O. Box 71537,
Washington, DC 20024–1537.
ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with PROPOSALS
*
§ 201.3 [Amended]
3. Amend § 201.3(c)(16) by removing
the phrase, ‘‘Recordation of document,
including a Notice of Intention to
Enforce (NIE)(single title),’’ and adding
in its place the phrase ‘‘Recordation of
document (single title), e.g. a Notice of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Jan 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Termination or a Notice of Intent to
Enforce (NIE)’’.
4. Revise § 201.4(c)(3) to read as
follows:
Dated: January 14, 2008
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. E8–888 Filed 1–22–08; 8:45 am]
§ 201.4 Recordation of transfers and
certain other documents.
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) To be recordable, the document
must be legible and capable of being
imaged or otherwise reproduced in
legible copies by the technology
employed by the Office at the time of
submission.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 201.10(f) is amended as
follows:
a. By adding paragraph (f)(1)(iii);
b. By redesignating paragraph (f)(4)
as (f)(5);
c. By adding paragraph (f)(4);
d. By revising redesignated
paragraph (f)(5) and
e. By adding paragraph (f)(6).
The revisions and additions to
§ 201.10 read as follows:
§ 201.10 Notices of termination of
transfers and licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) The copy submitted for
recordation must be legible per the
requirements of § 201.4(c)(3) of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this section, the Copyright
Office reserves the right to refuse
recordation of a notice of termination if,
in the judgment of the Copyright Office,
such notice of termination is untimely.
If a document is submitted as a notice
of termination after the statutory
deadline has expired, the Office will
offer to record the document as a
‘‘document pertaining to copyright’’
pursuant to § 201.4(c)(3) of this part, but
the Office will not index the document
as a notice of termination. Whether a
document so recorded is sufficient in
any instance to effect termination as a
matter of law shall be determined by a
court of competent jurisdiction.
(5) The mere fact that a notice of
termination has been recorded does not
mean that it is legally sufficient.
Recordation of a notice of termination
by the Copyright Office is without
prejudice to any party claiming that the
legal and formal requirements for
issuing a valid notice have not been
met.
(6) Notices of termination should be
submitted to the address specified in
§ 201.1(b)(2) of this part.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R09–OAR–2007–1150; FRL–8518–9]
Disapproval of Plan of Nevada; Clean
Air Mercury Rule; Extension of
Comment Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is extending the
comment period for action proposed on
December 13, 2007 (72 FR 70812)
concerning disapproval of the Nevada
State Plan to address the requirements
of EPA’s Clean Air Mercury Rule
(CAMR).
Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by March 13, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2007–1150, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\23JAP1.SGM
23JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3898-3900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-888]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. RM 2008-1]
Recordation of Notices of Termination of Transfers and Licenses;
clarifications
AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is proposing to make clarifications to
its regulations governing the recordation of notices of termination and
certain related provisions. This notice seeks public comment on the
proposed amendments, which would communicate the Office's practices as
to notices of termination that are untimely filed; clarify the fact
that a notice of termination is not legally sufficient simply because
it has been recorded; update the legibility requirements for all
recorded documents, including notices of termination; make minor
explanatory edits to the fee schedule for multiple titles within a
document (adding notices of termination as an example); and create a
new mailing address to which notices of termination should be sent.
DATES: Written comments are due February 22, 2008. Reply comments are
due March 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: If hand delivered by a private party, an original and five
copies of any comment should be brought to Room LM-401 of the James
Memorial Building between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. and the envelope should
be addressed as follows: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright
Office, James Madison Memorial Building, Room LM-401, First and
Independence Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20559-6000.
If hand delivered by a commercial courier, an original and five
copies of any comment must be delivered to the Congressional Courier
Acceptance Site located at Second and D Streets, NE, Washington, DC,
between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The envelope should be addressed as
follows: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office, Room LM-
403, James Madison Memorial Building, First and Independence Avenue,
SE, Washington, DC 20559-6000.
If sent by mail, an original and five copies of any comment should
be addressed to: Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC
20024. Comments may not be delivered by means of overnight delivery
services such as Federal Express, United Parcel Service or DHL, due to
delays in processing receipt of such deliveries.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Pallante, Deputy General
Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone (202) 707-8380. Fax (202) 707-8366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In addition to its legal, regulatory and policy responsibilities,
the Copyright Office is an office of public record which receives and
records documents that pertain to copyright. Such documents include
notices of termination, which may be served by authors (and some heirs
of authors) to extinguish certain exclusive or nonexclusive grants of
transfers or licenses of copyright or the divisible rights thereunder.
The termination provisions are set forth in Sections 304(c), 304(d)
and 203 of the 1976 Copyright Act, Title 17 of the United States Code.
The provisions have an equitable function; they exist to allow authors
or their heirs a second opportunity to share in the economic success of
their works. The House Report accompanying the 1976 Copyright Act
states that the provisions are ``needed because of the unequal
bargaining position of authors, resulting in part from the
impossibility of determining a work's value until it has been
exploited.'' H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, at 124 (1976). The law provides for
termination according to the time table and prescription set forth in
each respective section, including mandatory, timely recordation with
the Copyright Office.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\The provisions exclude grants made by will and works for
hire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 304(c) governs any work in which the copyright was
subsisting in its first or renewal term as of January 1, 1978, and
provides for termination of a grant at any time during a period of five
years beginning at the end of fifty-six years from the date copyright
was originally secured. Section 304(d) provides a termination right for
a subset of works for which the termination right
[[Page 3899]]
expired on or before the effective date (October 27, 1998) of the
``Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act,'' which extended the
copyright term by 20 years. Section 304(d) allows an author, or certain
heirs and successors, to terminate the grant of a transfer or license
of the renewal copyright or any right under it, at anytime during a
five year period beginning at the end of 75 years from the date
copyright was originally secured.\2\ Section 203 governs works created
on or after January 1, 1978. The author, or certain heirs and
successors, may terminate any grant made on or after this date at any
time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five
years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at
the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant,
whichever term ends earlier. In contrast to the provisions of Section
304, termination under Section 203 is possible only if the author
executed the grant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\The provisions do not apply if the termination right under
Section 304(c) was previously exercised.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The termination provisions are not self-executing. On the contrary,
they are formalistic and include several conditions precedent. For
example, the provisions require that the author (or if the author is
deceased, the author's widow, widower, children or other heirs
specified by statute) serve the notice of termination in writing on a
grantee or the grantee's successor in title prior to the effective date
of termination which, as referenced above, must fall within a five-year
window prescribed by the statutory section. Moreover, the notice must
state the effective date of the termination and must be served not less
than two or more than ten years before the effective date. And, as a
condition of the termination taking effect, a copy of the notice of
termination must be recorded with the Copyright Office prior to the
effective date of termination. 17 U.S.C. 304(c)(4); 304(d)(1);
203(a)(4).
The process and other formal requirements for submitting a copy of
the notice to the Copyright Office for recordation are prescribed by
regulation and addressed herein. In short, the regulations require the
recording party to submit a complete and exact duplicate of the notice
that he or she served on the grantee or grantee's successor-in-title.
The copy must include either actual signatures or reproductions of
signatures, a statement setting forth the date the notice was served,
an indication of the manner of service, and submission of the
appropriate filing fee. The Copyright Office reviews for each of the
above-referenced elements and may refuse recordation in the event any
one element is missing. 37 CFR 201.10(f).
The requirements of the Copyright Office with respect to document
legibility, fee schedule and mailing address are also prescribed by
regulation and addressed herein. 37 CFR 201.4(c)(3); 201.3; 201.1.
Summary of Proposed Amendments
Timeliness of Notices of Termination
Under the law, the failure to file a notice of termination in a
timely manner is a fatal mistake that cannot be construed as an
immaterial, harmless error. 37 CFR 201.10(e). Thus, before recording a
notice, the Copyright Office looks for confirmation that the relevant
statutory deadlines have been met. Because the Office's practice in
this regard is not currently stated in the regulations, the proposed
amendments would introduce a new, explanatory paragraph.
In summary, if in the judgment of the Office the document is
untimely, the Office will take one of two actions. If the notice is
premature, the Office will return it with an explanation, so that it
may be resubmitted within the proper statutory window. On the other
hand, if the document is late, the Office will offer only to record and
index the document as a ``document pertaining to copyright.'' 17 U.S.C.
205(a); 37 CFR 201.4(a)(2). It will not accept the document as a
``notice of termination,'' meaning that it will not be specially
indexed as such. Whether such general recordation by the Copyright
Office will be sufficient in any particular instance to effect
termination as a matter of law is an issue that only the courts may
resolve.
Recordation as Distinguished from Legal Sufficiency
By way of clarification, the fact that the Office has recorded a
document as a notice of termination does not necessarily mean that the
notice is legally sufficient to effect termination. In fact,
recordation is without prejudice to any party claiming that the legal
and formal requirements for issuing a valid notice have not been met.
This denotation already appears in the regulations, but the proposed
amendment would rephrase the existing language to provide greater
clarity.
Legibility of Notices of Termination and Other Documents Pertaining to
Copyright
With regard to legibility (an issue that affects not only notices
of termination but all documents submitted for recordation), the
amendments would make a change that is relatively minor but which would
nonetheless underscore the mission of the Copyright Office as an office
of public record. The current legibility requirement has two prongs,
one that applies to the content of the original document and one that
applies to its technical quality: ``a document must be legible and
capable of being reproduced in legible microform copies.'' (Emphasis
added.) 37 CFR 201.4(c)(3).
No change is proposed as to the first prong. When the Office
records a document, it creates an index for the public that reflects
the nature of the document and is searchable by certain key information
contained in the document, e.g. the title of a work. If the content is
indecipherable or difficult to read, the Office cannot create an
accurate index. In addition, with respect to copyrighted works, a
document that is recorded in the Office provides constructive notice as
to the facts stated in the recorded document, provided that
identification of the work is such that, after the document is indexed
by the Office, it would be reasonably revealed under the title or
registration number of the work; and provided that registration has
been made for the work. 17 U.S.C. 205(c). Again, if the facts of the
document are indecipherable, there can be no accurate indexing, thus
preventing the possibility of constructive notice, nor will an
illegible document prevail in the event of a conflicting claim of
transfer. 17 U.S.C. 205(d).
As to the second prong, the amendment would make a small change by
deleting the outdated reference to ``microform copies'' and replacing
it with a broader, more flexible standard. If a document is faded,
faint, or similarly difficult to see, the Office may be unable to
successfully reproduce it for the public record. Thus, the amended
regulation would require that documents be ``legible and capable of
being imaged or otherwise reproduced in legible copies by the
technology employed by the Office at the time of submission.''
(Emphasis added.)
Fee Requirements for Notices of Termination
With respect to fees, it is the Copyright Office's experience that
parties who submit notices of termination for recordation sometimes
miscalculate the amount due, especially where grants of rights in
multiple works are being terminated by virtue of one document. The
proposed amendment would add the notice of termination as an express
example in the schedule of
[[Page 3900]]
fees under section 201.3(c)(16), specifying that the basic fee for
recordation of a notice of termination containing a single title is
$95, and the fee for recordation of a notice of termination containing
more than one title is an additional $25 per group of 10 titles.
Mailing Address for Notices of Termination
Finally, because notices of termination are time-sensitive, a delay
in processing may have serious consequences. The proposed amendment
would create a special post office box at the Copyright Office, from
which notices of termination could more easily be sorted and routed for
recordation. This revision would also delete the address for the
Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP). All CARP proceedings were
terminated in 2007 and the reference is no longer valid. 72 FR 45071
(August 10, 2007).
Conclusion
We hereby seek comment from the public as to the issues identified
herein associated with certain requirements of the Copyright Office
under Sections 201.1, 201.3, 201.4 and 201.10 of Chapter 37 of the Code
of Federal Regulations.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office
proposes to amend part 201 of title 37 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 201-GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Revise Sec. 201.1(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.1 Communication with the Copyright Office.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Notices of Termination. Notices of termination submitted for
recordation should be mailed to Copyright Office, Notices of
Termination, P.O. Box 71537, Washington, DC 20024-1537.
Sec. 201.3 [Amended]
3. Amend Sec. 201.3(c)(16) by removing the phrase, ``Recordation
of document, including a Notice of Intention to Enforce (NIE)(single
title),'' and adding in its place the phrase ``Recordation of document
(single title), e.g. a Notice of Termination or a Notice of Intent to
Enforce (NIE)''.
4. Revise Sec. 201.4(c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.4 Recordation of transfers and certain other documents.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) To be recordable, the document must be legible and capable of
being imaged or otherwise reproduced in legible copies by the
technology employed by the Office at the time of submission.
* * * * *
5. Section 201.10(f) is amended as follows:
a. By adding paragraph (f)(1)(iii);
b. By redesignating paragraph (f)(4) as (f)(5);
c. By adding paragraph (f)(4);
d. By revising redesignated paragraph (f)(5) and
e. By adding paragraph (f)(6).
The revisions and additions to Sec. 201.10 read as follows:
Sec. 201.10 Notices of termination of transfers and licenses.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) The copy submitted for recordation must be legible per the
requirements of Sec. 201.4(c)(3) of this part.
* * * * *
(4) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this section, the
Copyright Office reserves the right to refuse recordation of a notice
of termination if, in the judgment of the Copyright Office, such notice
of termination is untimely. If a document is submitted as a notice of
termination after the statutory deadline has expired, the Office will
offer to record the document as a ``document pertaining to copyright''
pursuant to Sec. 201.4(c)(3) of this part, but the Office will not
index the document as a notice of termination. Whether a document so
recorded is sufficient in any instance to effect termination as a
matter of law shall be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(5) The mere fact that a notice of termination has been recorded
does not mean that it is legally sufficient. Recordation of a notice of
termination by the Copyright Office is without prejudice to any party
claiming that the legal and formal requirements for issuing a valid
notice have not been met.
(6) Notices of termination should be submitted to the address
specified in Sec. 201.1(b)(2) of this part.
Dated: January 14, 2008
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. E8-888 Filed 1-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-S