Foot-and-Mouth Disease Status of Uruguay, 63796-63797 [E7-22091]
Download as PDF
63796
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
g. Amend paragraph (c) by:
1. Removing the words ‘‘school food
authority’’ wherever they appear and
adding in their place the words ‘‘local
educational agency’’; and
I 2. Removing the words ‘‘school food
authorities’’ wherever they appear and
adding in their place the words ‘‘local
educational agencies’’; and
I h. Amend paragraph (e) by removing
the words ‘‘School Food Authority’’
wherever they appear and adding in
their place the words ‘‘local educational
agency’’.
The addition reads as follows:
I
I
§ 245.6a
Verification requirements.
(a) * * *
(2) * * * Any communication with
households concerning verification
must be in an understandable and
uniform format and, to the maximum
extent practicable, in a language that
parents and guardians can understand.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
I 10. In § 245.7:
I a. Revise the heading; and
I b. Amend paragraph (a) by removing
the words ‘‘School Food Authority’’
wherever they appear and adding in
their place the words ‘‘local educational
agency’’;
The revision reads as follows:
§ 245.7 Hearing procedure for families and
local educational agencies.
*
*
§ 245.8
*
*
*
[Amended]
11. In § 245.8:
a. Amend the first sentence of the
introductory text by adding the words
‘‘and local educational agencies’’ after
the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’;
and
I b. Amend paragraph (e) by removing
the references ‘‘§ 210.10, § 210.15a,
§ 220.8 or § 215.2(1)’’ and adding in
their place the words ‘‘§ 210.10, § 220.8
or the definition of Milk in § 215.2’’.
I 12. Amend § 245.10 by:
I a. Revising the heading;
I b. Removing the words ‘‘School Food
Authority’’ wherever they appear and
adding in their place the words ‘‘local
educational agency’’;
I c. Removing the words ‘‘school food
authority’’ wherever they appear and
adding in their place the words ‘‘local
educational agency’’;
I d. Removing the words ‘‘School Food
Authority’s’’ wherever they appear and
adding in their place the words ‘‘local
educational agency’s’’; and
I e. Removing the words ‘‘school food
authorities’’ in the third sentence of
paragraph (a)(3) and adding in their
place the words ‘‘local educational
agencies’’.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
I
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:06 Nov 09, 2007
Jkt 214001
The revision reads as follows:
§ 245.10 Action by local educational
agencies.
*
*
§ 245.11
*
*
*
[Amended]
13. In 245.11:
a. Amend the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(1) by removing the words
‘‘school food authority’’ and adding in
their place the words ‘‘local educational
agency as defined in § 245.2’’;
I b. Amend paragraph (c) by removing
the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’
and adding in their place the words
‘‘local educational agencies’’;
I c. Amend paragraph (d) by removing
the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’
and adding in their place the words
‘‘local educational agencies’’;
I d. Amend paragraph (e) removing the
words ‘‘school food authority’’ and
adding in their place the words ‘‘local
educational agency’’;
I e. Amend paragraph (f) by removing
the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’
wherever they appear and adding in
their place the words ‘‘local educational
agencies’’;
I f. Amend paragraph (i) by removing
the words ‘‘school food authority’’
wherever they appear and adding in
their place the words ‘‘local educational
agency’’; and
I g. Amend the third sentence of
paragraph (i) by removing the words
‘‘school food authorities’’ and adding in
their place the words ‘‘local educational
agencies’’.
I
I
Dated: November 2, 2007.
Roberto Salazar,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E7–22053 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. 00–111–3]
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Status of
Uruguay
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final
rule, with one change, our July 2001
interim rule that amended the
regulations governing the importation of
certain animals, meat, and other animal
products by removing Uruguay from the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
list of areas considered free of
rinderpest and foot-and-mouth disease.
The interim rule also removed Uruguay
from the list of regions declared free of
those diseases, but that are subject to
certain restrictions because of their
proximity to or trading relations with
regions affected with rinderpest or footand-mouth disease. The interim rule
was necessary because the existence of
foot-and-mouth disease had been
confirmed in 18 Departments in
Uruguay. Because there have been no
occurrences of rinderpest in Uruguay,
this final rule adds Uruguay to the list
of regions considered free of that
disease.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Gary Colgrove, Director, Sanitary Trade
Issues Team, National Center for Import
and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 734–3276.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94
(referred to below as the regulations)
govern the importation of specified
animals and animal products into the
United States in order to prevent the
introduction of various animal diseases
including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD), African swine fever,
classical swine fever, swine vesicular
disease, and bovine spongiform
encephalopathy. These are dangerous
and destructive communicable diseases
of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of
the regulations lists regions of the world
that are declared free of rinderpest or
free of both rinderpest and FMD. Under
§ 94.11 of the regulations, some of those
regions are subject to additional
restrictions because of their proximity to
or trading relationships with rinderpest
and FMD-affected regions.
In an interim rule effective October 1,
2000, and published in the Federal
Register on December 13, 2000 (65 FR
77771–77773, Docket No. 00–111–1), we
amended the regulations by removing
Artigas, a region in northern Uruguay,
from the list of regions considered to be
free of rinderpest and FMD because
FMD had been confirmed there. Prior to
the effective date of that interim rule,
the entire country of Uruguay was listed
in §§ 94.1 and 94.11 as a region
considered free of rinderpest and FMD.
We solicited comments concerning
the interim rule for 60 days ending
February 12, 2001, and received two
comments by that date.
However, on April 23, 2001, FMD was
confirmed in the Uruguayan department
of Soriano. Subsequently, new
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
outbreaks of the disease were confirmed
in the departments of Artigas,
Canelones, Colonia, Duranzo, Flores,
Florida, Lavalleja, Maldonado,
Paysandu, Rio Negro, Rivera, Rocha,
Salto, San Jose, Tacuarembo, and
Treinta y Tres.
In response to the spread of FMD
within Uruguay, we issued an interim
rule effective April 2, 2001, and
published in the Federal Register on
July 13, 2001 (66 FR 36695–36697,
Docket No. 00–111–2), that amended the
regulations by removing Uruguay from
the list of regions considered free of
rinderpest and FMD and from the list of
regions that, although rinderpest and
FMD-free, are subject to certain
restrictions on the importation of meat
and other animal products.
Comments on the interim rule of July
13, 2001, were required to be received
on or before September 11, 2001. We
did not receive any comments.
Although we removed Uruguay from
the list of regions considered to be free
of rinderpest and FMD, we recognized
in that interim rule that Uruguay’s
Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture, and
Fisheries had responded immediately to
the detection of the disease by imposing
restrictions on the movements of
ruminants and swine from the affected
areas and by initiating several measures
to eradicate the disease. For this reason,
we stated that we intended to reassess
the situation in accordance with the
standards of the World Organization for
Animal Health (OIE) at a future date.
Since that time, we have undertaken
a reassessment of Uruguay’s disease
status. While we acknowledge the many
efforts Uruguay has made to control and
eradicate FMD within its departments
since the interim rule was published,
we have received no data suggesting
that our disease classification of the
country is in error, or supporting the
return of Uruguay to FMD-free status.
However, we note that while it was
necessary to remove Uruguay from the
list in § 94.1(a)(2) of regions that are
declared to be free of both FMD and
rinderpest, the disease situation that led
to that action involved only FMD.
Therefore, it is possible to include
Uruguay on the list of regions declared
to be free of rinderpest. Accordingly,
this final rule amends § 94.1(a)(3) by
adding Uruguay to the list of regions
declared to be free of rinderpest.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule and in this document, we
are adopting the interim rule as a final
rule, with the change discussed in this
document.
This final rule also affirms the
information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:06 Nov 09, 2007
Jkt 214001
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Executive Order 12988, and the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, for this action, the Office of
Management and Budget has waived its
review under Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry
and poultry products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 9 CFR part 94 that was
published at 66 FR 36695–36697 on July
13, 2001, is adopted as a final rule with
the following change:
PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE
DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER,
CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER, AND
BOVINE SPONGIFORM
ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, 371.4.
2. In § 94.1, paragraph (a)(3) is revised
to read as follows:
I
§ 94.1 Regions where rinderpest or footand-mouth disease exists; importations
prohibited.
(a) * * *
(3) The following regions are declared
to be free of rinderpest: Namibia, the
Republic of South Africa, and Uruguay.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
November 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–22091 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 21
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25877; Amendment
No. 21–91]
RIN 2120–AI78
Production and Airworthiness
Approvals, Part Marking, and
Miscellaneous Proposals
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63797
SUMMARY: The FAA is amending its
requirements to allow the issuance of
export airworthiness approvals for Class
II and III products located at facilities
outside the United States. The FAA
proposed this change in a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued on
October 5, 2006. That NPRM proposed
comprehensive changes to 14 CFR part
21 to standardize production and
airworthiness requirements for
production approval holders. This final
rule expedites the promulgation of a
simple and uncontroversial portion of
that rulemaking. The FAA intends to
issue a separate final rule on other
proposals in that NPRM.
DATES: This amendment becomes
effective January 14, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this final
rule, contact John Linsenmeyer,
Production Certification Branch, AIR–
220, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
493–5571; facsimile (202) 267–5580, email john.linsenmeyer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
Under the laws of the United States,
the Department of Transportation has
the responsibility to develop
transportation policies and programs
that contribute to providing fast, safe,
efficient, and convenient transportation
(49 U.S.C. 101). The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA or ‘‘we’’) is an
agency of the Department. The FAA has
general authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety, including
minimum standards for appliances and
for the design, material, construction,
quality of work, and performance of
aircraft, aircraft engines, and propellers
(49 U.S.C. 106(g) and 44701). We may
also prescribe regulations in the interest
of safety for registering and identifying
an aircraft engine, propeller, or
appliance (49 U.S.C. 44104).
The FAA may issue, among other
things, type certificates, production
certificates and airworthiness
certificates (49 U.S.C. 44702). We issue
a production certificate authorizing the
production of a duplicate of an aircraft,
aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance
for which a type certificate has been
issued when we find the duplicate will
conform to the certificate. We may
include in a production certificate terms
required in the interest of safety. We
issue an airworthiness certificate for an
aircraft when we find the aircraft
conforms to its type design and is in
condition for safe operation. We may
include in an airworthiness certificate
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63796-63797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22091]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. 00-111-3]
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Status of Uruguay
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, with one change, our July
2001 interim rule that amended the regulations governing the
importation of certain animals, meat, and other animal products by
removing Uruguay from the list of areas considered free of rinderpest
and foot-and-mouth disease. The interim rule also removed Uruguay from
the list of regions declared free of those diseases, but that are
subject to certain restrictions because of their proximity to or
trading relations with regions affected with rinderpest or foot-and-
mouth disease. The interim rule was necessary because the existence of
foot-and-mouth disease had been confirmed in 18 Departments in Uruguay.
Because there have been no occurrences of rinderpest in Uruguay, this
final rule adds Uruguay to the list of regions considered free of that
disease.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Colgrove, Director, Sanitary
Trade Issues Team, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS,
4700 River Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-3276.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the
regulations) govern the importation of specified animals and animal
products into the United States in order to prevent the introduction of
various animal diseases including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth disease
(FMD), African swine fever, classical swine fever, swine vesicular
disease, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. These are dangerous and
destructive communicable diseases of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1
of the regulations lists regions of the world that are declared free of
rinderpest or free of both rinderpest and FMD. Under Sec. 94.11 of the
regulations, some of those regions are subject to additional
restrictions because of their proximity to or trading relationships
with rinderpest and FMD-affected regions.
In an interim rule effective October 1, 2000, and published in the
Federal Register on December 13, 2000 (65 FR 77771-77773, Docket No.
00-111-1), we amended the regulations by removing Artigas, a region in
northern Uruguay, from the list of regions considered to be free of
rinderpest and FMD because FMD had been confirmed there. Prior to the
effective date of that interim rule, the entire country of Uruguay was
listed in Sec. Sec. 94.1 and 94.11 as a region considered free of
rinderpest and FMD.
We solicited comments concerning the interim rule for 60 days
ending February 12, 2001, and received two comments by that date.
However, on April 23, 2001, FMD was confirmed in the Uruguayan
department of Soriano. Subsequently, new
[[Page 63797]]
outbreaks of the disease were confirmed in the departments of Artigas,
Canelones, Colonia, Duranzo, Flores, Florida, Lavalleja, Maldonado,
Paysandu, Rio Negro, Rivera, Rocha, Salto, San Jose, Tacuarembo, and
Treinta y Tres.
In response to the spread of FMD within Uruguay, we issued an
interim rule effective April 2, 2001, and published in the Federal
Register on July 13, 2001 (66 FR 36695-36697, Docket No. 00-111-2),
that amended the regulations by removing Uruguay from the list of
regions considered free of rinderpest and FMD and from the list of
regions that, although rinderpest and FMD-free, are subject to certain
restrictions on the importation of meat and other animal products.
Comments on the interim rule of July 13, 2001, were required to be
received on or before September 11, 2001. We did not receive any
comments.
Although we removed Uruguay from the list of regions considered to
be free of rinderpest and FMD, we recognized in that interim rule that
Uruguay's Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture, and Fisheries had
responded immediately to the detection of the disease by imposing
restrictions on the movements of ruminants and swine from the affected
areas and by initiating several measures to eradicate the disease. For
this reason, we stated that we intended to reassess the situation in
accordance with the standards of the World Organization for Animal
Health (OIE) at a future date.
Since that time, we have undertaken a reassessment of Uruguay's
disease status. While we acknowledge the many efforts Uruguay has made
to control and eradicate FMD within its departments since the interim
rule was published, we have received no data suggesting that our
disease classification of the country is in error, or supporting the
return of Uruguay to FMD-free status.
However, we note that while it was necessary to remove Uruguay from
the list in Sec. 94.1(a)(2) of regions that are declared to be free of
both FMD and rinderpest, the disease situation that led to that action
involved only FMD. Therefore, it is possible to include Uruguay on the
list of regions declared to be free of rinderpest. Accordingly, this
final rule amends Sec. 94.1(a)(3) by adding Uruguay to the list of
regions declared to be free of rinderpest.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the interim rule and in this
document, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule, with the
change discussed in this document.
This final rule also affirms the information contained in the
interim rule concerning Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, Executive Order 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
Further, for this action, the Office of Management and Budget has
waived its review under Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk,
Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 9 CFR part 94 that was published
at 66 FR 36695-36697 on July 13, 2001, is adopted as a final rule with
the following change:
PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL
SWINE FEVER, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND
RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 94 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, 371.4.
0
2. In Sec. 94.1, paragraph (a)(3) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 94.1 Regions where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists;
importations prohibited.
(a) * * *
(3) The following regions are declared to be free of rinderpest:
Namibia, the Republic of South Africa, and Uruguay.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of November 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7-22091 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P