Foot-and-Mouth Disease Status of Uruguay, 63796-63797 [E7-22091]

Download as PDF 63796 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations g. Amend paragraph (c) by: 1. Removing the words ‘‘school food authority’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’; and I 2. Removing the words ‘‘school food authorities’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agencies’’; and I h. Amend paragraph (e) by removing the words ‘‘School Food Authority’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’. The addition reads as follows: I I § 245.6a Verification requirements. (a) * * * (2) * * * Any communication with households concerning verification must be in an understandable and uniform format and, to the maximum extent practicable, in a language that parents and guardians can understand. * * * * * * * * I 10. In § 245.7: I a. Revise the heading; and I b. Amend paragraph (a) by removing the words ‘‘School Food Authority’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’; The revision reads as follows: § 245.7 Hearing procedure for families and local educational agencies. * * § 245.8 * * * [Amended] 11. In § 245.8: a. Amend the first sentence of the introductory text by adding the words ‘‘and local educational agencies’’ after the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’; and I b. Amend paragraph (e) by removing the references ‘‘§ 210.10, § 210.15a, § 220.8 or § 215.2(1)’’ and adding in their place the words ‘‘§ 210.10, § 220.8 or the definition of Milk in § 215.2’’. I 12. Amend § 245.10 by: I a. Revising the heading; I b. Removing the words ‘‘School Food Authority’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’; I c. Removing the words ‘‘school food authority’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’; I d. Removing the words ‘‘School Food Authority’s’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’s’’; and I e. Removing the words ‘‘school food authorities’’ in the third sentence of paragraph (a)(3) and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agencies’’. rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES I I VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:06 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 The revision reads as follows: § 245.10 Action by local educational agencies. * * § 245.11 * * * [Amended] 13. In 245.11: a. Amend the first sentence of paragraph (a)(1) by removing the words ‘‘school food authority’’ and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency as defined in § 245.2’’; I b. Amend paragraph (c) by removing the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’ and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agencies’’; I c. Amend paragraph (d) by removing the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’ and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agencies’’; I d. Amend paragraph (e) removing the words ‘‘school food authority’’ and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’; I e. Amend paragraph (f) by removing the words ‘‘School Food Authorities’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agencies’’; I f. Amend paragraph (i) by removing the words ‘‘school food authority’’ wherever they appear and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agency’’; and I g. Amend the third sentence of paragraph (i) by removing the words ‘‘school food authorities’’ and adding in their place the words ‘‘local educational agencies’’. I I Dated: November 2, 2007. Roberto Salazar, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. E7–22053 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 9 CFR Part 94 [Docket No. 00–111–3] Foot-and-Mouth Disease Status of Uruguay Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, with one change, our July 2001 interim rule that amended the regulations governing the importation of certain animals, meat, and other animal products by removing Uruguay from the PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 list of areas considered free of rinderpest and foot-and-mouth disease. The interim rule also removed Uruguay from the list of regions declared free of those diseases, but that are subject to certain restrictions because of their proximity to or trading relations with regions affected with rinderpest or footand-mouth disease. The interim rule was necessary because the existence of foot-and-mouth disease had been confirmed in 18 Departments in Uruguay. Because there have been no occurrences of rinderpest in Uruguay, this final rule adds Uruguay to the list of regions considered free of that disease. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Colgrove, Director, Sanitary Trade Issues Team, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737– 1231; (301) 734–3276. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the regulations) govern the importation of specified animals and animal products into the United States in order to prevent the introduction of various animal diseases including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), African swine fever, classical swine fever, swine vesicular disease, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. These are dangerous and destructive communicable diseases of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of the regulations lists regions of the world that are declared free of rinderpest or free of both rinderpest and FMD. Under § 94.11 of the regulations, some of those regions are subject to additional restrictions because of their proximity to or trading relationships with rinderpest and FMD-affected regions. In an interim rule effective October 1, 2000, and published in the Federal Register on December 13, 2000 (65 FR 77771–77773, Docket No. 00–111–1), we amended the regulations by removing Artigas, a region in northern Uruguay, from the list of regions considered to be free of rinderpest and FMD because FMD had been confirmed there. Prior to the effective date of that interim rule, the entire country of Uruguay was listed in §§ 94.1 and 94.11 as a region considered free of rinderpest and FMD. We solicited comments concerning the interim rule for 60 days ending February 12, 2001, and received two comments by that date. However, on April 23, 2001, FMD was confirmed in the Uruguayan department of Soriano. Subsequently, new E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM 13NOR1 rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations outbreaks of the disease were confirmed in the departments of Artigas, Canelones, Colonia, Duranzo, Flores, Florida, Lavalleja, Maldonado, Paysandu, Rio Negro, Rivera, Rocha, Salto, San Jose, Tacuarembo, and Treinta y Tres. In response to the spread of FMD within Uruguay, we issued an interim rule effective April 2, 2001, and published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2001 (66 FR 36695–36697, Docket No. 00–111–2), that amended the regulations by removing Uruguay from the list of regions considered free of rinderpest and FMD and from the list of regions that, although rinderpest and FMD-free, are subject to certain restrictions on the importation of meat and other animal products. Comments on the interim rule of July 13, 2001, were required to be received on or before September 11, 2001. We did not receive any comments. Although we removed Uruguay from the list of regions considered to be free of rinderpest and FMD, we recognized in that interim rule that Uruguay’s Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture, and Fisheries had responded immediately to the detection of the disease by imposing restrictions on the movements of ruminants and swine from the affected areas and by initiating several measures to eradicate the disease. For this reason, we stated that we intended to reassess the situation in accordance with the standards of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) at a future date. Since that time, we have undertaken a reassessment of Uruguay’s disease status. While we acknowledge the many efforts Uruguay has made to control and eradicate FMD within its departments since the interim rule was published, we have received no data suggesting that our disease classification of the country is in error, or supporting the return of Uruguay to FMD-free status. However, we note that while it was necessary to remove Uruguay from the list in § 94.1(a)(2) of regions that are declared to be free of both FMD and rinderpest, the disease situation that led to that action involved only FMD. Therefore, it is possible to include Uruguay on the list of regions declared to be free of rinderpest. Accordingly, this final rule amends § 94.1(a)(3) by adding Uruguay to the list of regions declared to be free of rinderpest. Therefore, for the reasons given in the interim rule and in this document, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule, with the change discussed in this document. This final rule also affirms the information contained in the interim rule concerning Executive Order 12866 VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:06 Nov 09, 2007 Jkt 214001 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction Act. Further, for this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under Executive Order 12866. List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94 Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. I Accordingly, the interim rule amending 9 CFR part 94 that was published at 66 FR 36695–36697 on July 13, 2001, is adopted as a final rule with the following change: PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 94 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781– 7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, 371.4. 2. In § 94.1, paragraph (a)(3) is revised to read as follows: I § 94.1 Regions where rinderpest or footand-mouth disease exists; importations prohibited. (a) * * * (3) The following regions are declared to be free of rinderpest: Namibia, the Republic of South Africa, and Uruguay. * * * * * Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of November 2007. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E7–22091 Filed 11–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 21 [Docket No. FAA–2006–25877; Amendment No. 21–91] RIN 2120–AI78 Production and Airworthiness Approvals, Part Marking, and Miscellaneous Proposals Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 63797 SUMMARY: The FAA is amending its requirements to allow the issuance of export airworthiness approvals for Class II and III products located at facilities outside the United States. The FAA proposed this change in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued on October 5, 2006. That NPRM proposed comprehensive changes to 14 CFR part 21 to standardize production and airworthiness requirements for production approval holders. This final rule expedites the promulgation of a simple and uncontroversial portion of that rulemaking. The FAA intends to issue a separate final rule on other proposals in that NPRM. DATES: This amendment becomes effective January 14, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning this final rule, contact John Linsenmeyer, Production Certification Branch, AIR– 220, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 493–5571; facsimile (202) 267–5580, email john.linsenmeyer@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority for This Rulemaking Under the laws of the United States, the Department of Transportation has the responsibility to develop transportation policies and programs that contribute to providing fast, safe, efficient, and convenient transportation (49 U.S.C. 101). The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA or ‘‘we’’) is an agency of the Department. The FAA has general authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety, including minimum standards for appliances and for the design, material, construction, quality of work, and performance of aircraft, aircraft engines, and propellers (49 U.S.C. 106(g) and 44701). We may also prescribe regulations in the interest of safety for registering and identifying an aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance (49 U.S.C. 44104). The FAA may issue, among other things, type certificates, production certificates and airworthiness certificates (49 U.S.C. 44702). We issue a production certificate authorizing the production of a duplicate of an aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, or appliance for which a type certificate has been issued when we find the duplicate will conform to the certificate. We may include in a production certificate terms required in the interest of safety. We issue an airworthiness certificate for an aircraft when we find the aircraft conforms to its type design and is in condition for safe operation. We may include in an airworthiness certificate E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM 13NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63796-63797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 94

[Docket No. 00-111-3]


Foot-and-Mouth Disease Status of Uruguay

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, with one change, our July 
2001 interim rule that amended the regulations governing the 
importation of certain animals, meat, and other animal products by 
removing Uruguay from the list of areas considered free of rinderpest 
and foot-and-mouth disease. The interim rule also removed Uruguay from 
the list of regions declared free of those diseases, but that are 
subject to certain restrictions because of their proximity to or 
trading relations with regions affected with rinderpest or foot-and-
mouth disease. The interim rule was necessary because the existence of 
foot-and-mouth disease had been confirmed in 18 Departments in Uruguay. 
Because there have been no occurrences of rinderpest in Uruguay, this 
final rule adds Uruguay to the list of regions considered free of that 
disease.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 13, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Colgrove, Director, Sanitary 
Trade Issues Team, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 
4700 River Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-3276.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the 
regulations) govern the importation of specified animals and animal 
products into the United States in order to prevent the introduction of 
various animal diseases including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth disease 
(FMD), African swine fever, classical swine fever, swine vesicular 
disease, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy. These are dangerous and 
destructive communicable diseases of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 
of the regulations lists regions of the world that are declared free of 
rinderpest or free of both rinderpest and FMD. Under Sec.  94.11 of the 
regulations, some of those regions are subject to additional 
restrictions because of their proximity to or trading relationships 
with rinderpest and FMD-affected regions.
    In an interim rule effective October 1, 2000, and published in the 
Federal Register on December 13, 2000 (65 FR 77771-77773, Docket No. 
00-111-1), we amended the regulations by removing Artigas, a region in 
northern Uruguay, from the list of regions considered to be free of 
rinderpest and FMD because FMD had been confirmed there. Prior to the 
effective date of that interim rule, the entire country of Uruguay was 
listed in Sec. Sec.  94.1 and 94.11 as a region considered free of 
rinderpest and FMD.
    We solicited comments concerning the interim rule for 60 days 
ending February 12, 2001, and received two comments by that date.
    However, on April 23, 2001, FMD was confirmed in the Uruguayan 
department of Soriano. Subsequently, new

[[Page 63797]]

outbreaks of the disease were confirmed in the departments of Artigas, 
Canelones, Colonia, Duranzo, Flores, Florida, Lavalleja, Maldonado, 
Paysandu, Rio Negro, Rivera, Rocha, Salto, San Jose, Tacuarembo, and 
Treinta y Tres.
    In response to the spread of FMD within Uruguay, we issued an 
interim rule effective April 2, 2001, and published in the Federal 
Register on July 13, 2001 (66 FR 36695-36697, Docket No. 00-111-2), 
that amended the regulations by removing Uruguay from the list of 
regions considered free of rinderpest and FMD and from the list of 
regions that, although rinderpest and FMD-free, are subject to certain 
restrictions on the importation of meat and other animal products.
    Comments on the interim rule of July 13, 2001, were required to be 
received on or before September 11, 2001. We did not receive any 
comments.
    Although we removed Uruguay from the list of regions considered to 
be free of rinderpest and FMD, we recognized in that interim rule that 
Uruguay's Ministry of Livestock, Agriculture, and Fisheries had 
responded immediately to the detection of the disease by imposing 
restrictions on the movements of ruminants and swine from the affected 
areas and by initiating several measures to eradicate the disease. For 
this reason, we stated that we intended to reassess the situation in 
accordance with the standards of the World Organization for Animal 
Health (OIE) at a future date.
    Since that time, we have undertaken a reassessment of Uruguay's 
disease status. While we acknowledge the many efforts Uruguay has made 
to control and eradicate FMD within its departments since the interim 
rule was published, we have received no data suggesting that our 
disease classification of the country is in error, or supporting the 
return of Uruguay to FMD-free status.
    However, we note that while it was necessary to remove Uruguay from 
the list in Sec.  94.1(a)(2) of regions that are declared to be free of 
both FMD and rinderpest, the disease situation that led to that action 
involved only FMD. Therefore, it is possible to include Uruguay on the 
list of regions declared to be free of rinderpest. Accordingly, this 
final rule amends Sec.  94.1(a)(3) by adding Uruguay to the list of 
regions declared to be free of rinderpest.
    Therefore, for the reasons given in the interim rule and in this 
document, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule, with the 
change discussed in this document.
    This final rule also affirms the information contained in the 
interim rule concerning Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, Executive Order 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction 
Act.
    Further, for this action, the Office of Management and Budget has 
waived its review under Executive Order 12866.

List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94

    Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk, 
Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 9 CFR part 94 that was published 
at 66 FR 36695-36697 on July 13, 2001, is adopted as a final rule with 
the following change:

PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL 
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL 
SWINE FEVER, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND 
RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 94 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21 
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, 371.4.


0
2. In Sec.  94.1, paragraph (a)(3) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  94.1  Regions where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists; 
importations prohibited.

    (a) * * *
    (3) The following regions are declared to be free of rinderpest: 
Namibia, the Republic of South Africa, and Uruguay.
* * * * *

    Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of November 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-22091 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.