Importation of Unshu Oranges From the Republic of Korea Into Alaska, 60537-60541 [E7-21007]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Hollow Road; then north on Dark
Hollow Road to Tennessee Highway 30;
then northeast on Tennessee Highway
30 to the Warren/Van Buren County
line.
*
*
*
*
*
Williamson County. That portion of
the county lying northeast of a line
beginning at the intersection of the
Davidson/Williamson County line and
U.S. Highway 31; then southwest on
U.S. Highway 31 to U.S. Highway
Business 431; then southeast on U.S.
Highway Business 431 to Mack Hatcher
Parkway; then north on Mack Hatcher
Parkway to South Royal Oaks
Boulevard; then northeast on South
Royal Oaks Boulevard to Tennessee
Highway 96; then east on Tennessee
Highway 96 to Clovercroft Road; then
northeast on Clovercroft Road to Wilson
Pike; then north on Wilson Pike to
Clovercroft Road; then northeast on
Clovercroft Road to Rocky Fork Road;
then east on Rocky Fork Road to the
Rutherford/Williamson County line.
Also, that portion of the county
enclosed by a line beginning at the
intersection of the Maury/Williamson
County line and Tennessee Highway
246; then north on Tennessee Highway
246 to Thompson Station Road West;
then east on Thompson Station Road
West to Thompson Station Road East;
then east on Thompson Station Road
East to Interstate 65; then south on
Interstate 65 to the Williamson/Maury
County line.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
October 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–21003 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0133]
RIN 0579–AC20
Importation of Unshu Oranges From
the Republic of Korea Into Alaska
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are amending the
regulations governing the importation of
citrus fruit to allow fresh Unshu oranges
from the Republic of Korea to be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
imported into the State of Alaska under
certain conditions. As a condition of
entry, the oranges will have to be
prepared for shipping using
packinghouse procedures that include
culling of damaged or diseased fruit and
cleaning with high-pressure air or water
in combination with brushing. In
addition, the oranges will have to be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate with an additional
declaration stating that the oranges were
inspected and found free from
Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri and
Unaspis yanonensis. The individual
cartons or boxes in which the Unshu
oranges are shipped will also have to be
marked with a statement restricting
their importation and distribution to the
State of Alaska. This action will allow
for the importation of Unshu oranges
from the Republic of Korea into Alaska
while continuing to provide protection
against the introduction of quarantine
pests.
DATES: Effective Date: November 26,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Alex Belano, Import Specialist,
Commodity Import Analysis and
Operations, Plant Health Programs,
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
8765.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Citrus canker is a disease that affects
citrus and is caused by the infectious
bacterium Xanthomonas axonopodis
pv. citri (also known as Xanthomonas
campestris pv. citri and Xanthomonas
citri). Currently, the regulations in 7
CFR 319.28 (referred to below as the
regulations) allow the importation of
Unshu oranges (Citrus reticulata var.
unshu) from certain areas in the
Republic of Korea (South Korea) into
certain areas of the United States under
a permit and after the specified
safeguards of a preclearance program
have been met to prevent the
introduction of citrus canker. However,
the importation of Unshu oranges from
South Korea was administratively
suspended in 2002 due to the increased
number of interceptions of the causal
agent of citrus canker at various
packinghouses in South Korea.
In 2005, the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of South Korea
requested that the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
allow the shipment of Unshu oranges
into the State of Alaska until the pest
risk of citrus canker from South Korea
could be adequately mitigated for the
rest of the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60537
On December 4, 2006, we published
in the Federal Register (71 FR 70330–
70335, Docket No. APHIS–2006–0133) a
proposal 1 to allow the importation of
fresh Unshu oranges from the Republic
of Korea into the State of Alaska under
certain conditions. As a condition of
entry, we proposed that the oranges
would have to be prepared for shipping
using packinghouse procedures that
include culling of damaged or diseased
fruit and washing in a water bath. In
addition, we proposed that the oranges
would have to be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate with an
additional declaration stating that the
oranges were inspected and found free
from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri
and Unaspis yanonensis. The individual
cartons or boxes in which the Unshu
oranges are shipped would also have to
be marked with a statement restricting
their importation and distribution to the
State of Alaska. This action was
intended to allow for the importation of
Unshu oranges from the Republic of
Korea into Alaska while continuing to
provide protection against the
introduction of quarantine pests.
We solicited comments concerning
our proposal for 60 days ending
February 2, 2007. We received two
comments by that date, both from
domestic citrus industry groups. One of
the commenters expressed concern that
a pesticide not approved for use in the
United States could be imported on fruit
from South Korea. While the United
States does not have direct control over
pesticides that are used on food
commodities such as Unshu oranges in
other countries, there are regulations in
the United States concerning the
importation of food to ensure that
commodities do not enter the United
States containing illegal pesticide
residues. Through section 408 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has the authority to establish,
change, or cancel tolerances for food
commodities. These tolerances are the
maximum levels of pesticide residues
that have been determined, through
comprehensive safety evaluations, to be
safe for human consumption.
Tolerances apply to both food
commodities that are grown in the
United States and food commodities
that are grown in other countries and
imported into the United States. While
EPA has no authority in a foreign
country, the tolerance levels are
enforced once the commodity enters the
1 To view the proposed rule and the comments
we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/
fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0133.
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
60538
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
United States. Chemicals such as DDT
that are banned in the United States do
not have tolerances on food
commodities. Federal Government food
inspectors are responsible for
monitoring food commodities that enter
the United States to confirm that
tolerance levels are not exceeded and
that residues of pesticide chemicals that
are banned in the United States are not
present on the commodities. Tolerance
levels for all chemicals that are
acceptable for use on Unshu oranges
may be found in EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR 180.101 through180.2020.
Tolerance information can also be
obtained at https://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/food/viewtols.htm.
Both commenters expressed concern
that the systems approach developed by
South Korea was not stringent enough,
given the difficulty of eradicating X.
axonopodis pv. citri (citrus canker) and
the potential risks from asymptomatic
fruit. Concerns included the lack of
requirements for worker training,
equipment sanitation, and
establishment of buffer zones. In
particular, the commenters were
concerned that the proposed rule did
not mention inspection or sampling
rates for citrus canker. As stated in the
proposed rule, shipments of Unshu
oranges to Alaska present minimal risk
of introducing or disseminating citrus
canker due to the lack of host material
within Alaska and the lack of a suitable
climate for establishment of the disease.
For those reasons, and because visibly
infected fruit will be culled at the
packinghouse, we are not requiring a
sampling regime for Unshu oranges
within South Korea. In addition, fruit
exposed to, but asymptomatic for, citrus
canker is unlikely to have sufficient
levels of viable bacteria to cause
infection. However, a standard port of
entry inspection rate of 2 percent would
apply. APHIS has successfully operated
similar programs of low risk for tropical
fruit commodities imported into Alaska,
such as sand pears and apples from
Japan, avocados from Mexico, and sand
pears from South Korea.
Both commenters also stated that,
despite labeling restricting distribution
of the fruit to Alaska, it may
accidentally be redirected or sent
through first-class mail to a citrusproducing State. As stated in the risk
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
management document, in the past 10
years, over 24 million Unshu oranges
from South Korea have been imported
and only one air shipment of
misdirected fruit ended up in a citrusproducing State. That shipment was
immediately redirected to a non-citrusproducing State. In order for the fruit to
leave Alaska by ground transport, it
would have to travel by truck or car via
highway, and all agricultural shipments
are inspected at the U.S.-Canada border.
As citrus fruit is not grown in Canada
or Alaska, import restrictions for nonU.S. citrus fruit would apply. Further,
we consider the volume of fruit shipped
in first-class mail to be too small to
present a potential pest risk. The
probability of potentially infected citrus
fruit reaching areas where any disease
could spread is very low.
Both commenters further expressed
concern regarding the lack of a
requirement for sodium hypochlorite or
sodium orthophenyl phenol in the
required water bath and concern that
the water bath could contribute to the
spread of citrus canker. As stated above,
we believe shipments of Unshu oranges
to Alaska present a minimal risk of
introducing or disseminating citrus
canker due to the lack of host material
and the lack of a suitable climate for
establishment of the disease; therefore
requiring the use of a disinfectant wash
is not necessary. In addition, because
the water bath requirement is actually a
combination high-pressure water spray
and brushing intended to remove
external insect pests, there is no
standing water that can serve as a
medium for transmitting infection.
Alternately, forced air cleaning and
brushing may be used in place of the
water spray. We have amended the
regulatory text in § 319.28(c)(1) to make
that clear.
Finally, both commenters stated that
U.S. inspectors should be present to
oversee all aspects of South Korea’s
citrus export program. In a preclearance
program, U.S. inspectors are required to
be onsite in the country of export to
oversee shipments to the United States.
However, the program for importing
Unshu oranges to Alaska from South
Korea is not a preclearance program.
Therefore, the presence of U.S.
inspectors to oversee the program is not
required and, based on the reasons
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
given in the proposed rule, is not
necessary.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, with the change discussed in this
document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. The rule has
been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
The United States is not a commercial
producer of Unshu oranges (Citrus
reticulata var. unshui). The United
States does produce other mandarin
varieties of Citrus reticulata, such as
tangerines and Satsuma mandarins.
Effects of the final rule on U.S. entities
will depend on (1) the substitutability in
Alaska of Unshu oranges for these other
mandarin varieties, and (2) Alaska’s
share of the U.S. supply of the other
mandarin varieties. We address these
overriding issues before discussing
small entities that may be affected.
Unshu orange prices are higher than
the prices of U.S.-grown mandarin
varieties, indicating that they are not
close substitutes. Retail prices of Unshu
oranges are approximately $1.20 per
pound, whereas other mandarin
varieties, such as Satsuma, range from
$0.60 to $1 per pound depending on the
time of year.2
Clearly, the effects of the final rule
with respect to Alaska’s broadly defined
demand for all mandarin varieties are
most likely to be very limited. Rather,
we expect reestablished imports from
South Korea to compete for a share of
Alaska’s Unshu orange market.
Prior to the administrative suspension
in 2002, South Korea and Japan were
principal suppliers of Unshu oranges to
the United States. It is estimated that
Alaska consumes approximately 30
percent of the Unshu oranges imported
from Japan. Quantities of Unshu oranges
imported from South Korea and Japan,
1995 to 2005, are shown in table 1.
2 Information on retail prices of Unshu oranges
provided by Jerry Kraft of The Oppenheimer Group,
the sole importer of Unshu oranges from Japan.
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
60539
TABLE 1.—UNSHU ORANGE IMPORTS BY THE UNITED STATES FROM SOUTH KOREA AND JAPAN, 1995–2005
Year
South Korea
Japan
Metric tons
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
50
220
1,190
40
380
240
1,434
1,601
........................
........................
........................
231
160
143
223
342
106
291
(1)
275
271
256
Source: USDA, APHIS, International Services.
1 In 2002, we amended the regulations to allow Unshu oranges from Honshu Island, Japan, to be imported into the previously prohibited citrusproducing States of Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, and Texas. That same rule imposed a fumigation requirement for all Unshu
oranges from Honshu Island, which seriously curtailed the market for that fruit in non-citrus producing States. As a result, there were no exports
of Unshu oranges from Japan to the United States in 2002. We subsequently amended the regulations to apply the fumigation requirement only
to fruit bound for citrus-producing States, and exports resumed in 2003.
Unshu orange imports from Japan
between 1995 and 2005 averaged 238
metric tons per year.3 Average imports
of Unshu oranges from South Korea
between 1995 and 2002 were 644 metric
tons per year, with significant year-toyear fluctuations and the average for
2001 and 2002 jumping to 1,518 metric
tons. Imports of Unshu oranges from
Japan have maintained a more steady
supply, even in the more recent years
during which Unshu oranges from
South Korea have been administratively
suspended. From this data, it is not
apparent that South Korean supplies
will significantly displace Unshu orange
imports from Japan.
According to the pest risk assessment
prepared for this rulemaking, the
quantity of Unshu oranges that will be
imported from South Korea into Alaska
each year is estimated to be between 200
and 2,000 metric tons (440,925 and
4,409,245 pounds), based on projected
imports of between 10 and 100 standard
40–foot containers.4 The lower end of
this range of imports will be comparable
to recent import levels from Japan.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
3 This average does not include 2002, since it is
likely that Japan would have exported Unshu
oranges to the United States in that year if the
fumigation requirement described in footnote 1 of
table 1 had not been in place.
4 USDA, APHIS, PPQ–CHPST, ‘‘A Qualitative
Pest Risk Analysis for the Importation of Fresh
Unshu Orange Fruit (Citrus reticulata Blanco var.
unshu Swingle) from the Republic of Korea,’’ May
25, 2006, pg 33.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:10 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
Based upon the past shipments detailed
in table 1, we anticipate that imports of
Unshu oranges from South Korea will
not exceed 75 containers (1,500 metric
tons) per annum. The historical import
data detailed in table 1 suggest that
South Korean supplies will not
significantly displace Japanese Unshu
oranges on the Alaskan market.
Our expectation is that the final rule
will have little effect on U.S. producers
of mandarin varieties such as tangerines
and Satsumas. Any impact for these
producers will be small, given that the
various mandarin varieties do not
appear to be close substitutes for Unshu
oranges. Moreover, only sales to Alaska
will be affected. However, recognizing
that our information for determining
possible effects of the final rule is
incomplete, we present here data on
U.S. tangerine trade and production.
The United States is a net importer of
mandarins (including Satsumas and
tangerines). In 2005, the United States
imported 209.4 million pounds of
mandarins (including Satsumas and
tangerines) with approximately 91
percent arriving from Spain. In that
same year, the United States exported
approximately 48.1 million pounds of
mandarins (including Satsumas and
tangerines). Canada is the largest
importer of U.S. fresh mandarins,
accounting for 52 percent of U.S.
exports. The second and third largest
importers of U.S. mandarins are South
Korea and Japan, accounting for
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
approximately 38 and 6 percent of
exports, respectively.5 U.S. imports of
tangerines experienced an average
increase of 17.8 percent annually over
the last decade while exports have
increased an average of 5.9 percent.6
Domestic production accounted for
approximately 80 percent of domestic
fresh consumption in 2005.7 The United
States relies on imports of mandarins to
supplement domestic production in
satisfying domestic demand. Fresh
utilization of U.S. mandarin and
tangerine production only accounts, on
average, for 70 percent of total utilized
production annually.8 U.S. grower
revenue from fresh tangerine production
in 2004–05 was approximately $107.4
million.9
U.S. tangerine production, imports,
and domestic supplies are shown in
table 2. Net imports were 20 percent of
domestic supply in 2004 to 2005.
5 Source:
Global Trade Atlas.
USDA, FAS, PS&D Online. ‘‘Fresh
Tangerines: Production, Supply and Distribution in
selected Countries,’’ https://www.fas.usda.gov/
psdonline/psdDownload.aspx.
7 The proportion of domestic fresh consumption
attributed to U.S. production is production less
exports and processed utilization. Data Source:
USDA ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut
Yearbook, 2005.
8 USDA, ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut
Yearbook, 2005.
9 Florida Agricultural Statistics Service (FASS),
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
USDA, ‘‘Citrus Summary 2004–05,’’ February 2006.
6 Source:
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
60540
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2.—U.S. FRESH TANGERINE PRODUCTION AND IMPORTATION, SEASONS 1999–2000 THROUGH 2004–05
Production a
Year
Net imports b
Supply c
Metric tons
1999–00
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
298,464
266,712
296,649
289,392
295,742
254,919
68,185
85,728
37,261
69,164
72,753
63,944
366,649
352,440
333,910
358,556
368,495
318,863
Data Source: USDA/ERS Briefing Room,Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook, 2005.
a Excludes processed fruit.
b Net imports are imports minus exports.
c U.S. production (excluding processed utilization) plus net imports.
The small business size standard for
tangerine groves, as identified by the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
based upon the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
code 111320, is $750,000 or less in
annual receipts.10
While available data do not provide
the size distribution of U.S. tangerine
farms by annual receipts, it is
reasonable to assume that the majority
of the operations are small businesses
by SBA standards.11 According to the
2002 Census of Agriculture data, there
were a total of 1,731 tangerine
operations in the United States in
2002.12 It is estimated that
approximately 93 percent of all citrusproducing farms had annual sales in
2002 of $500,000 or less.
If Unshu oranges and U.S.-grown
mandarin varieties were close
substitutes, then U.S. entities could be
affected to the extent that Unshu orange
imports from South Korea would
displace sales in Alaska of the U.S.grown mandarin varieties. Small entities
would be affected, since they comprise
a substantial number of the producers of
mandarin varieties, as indicated by the
data on tangerine operations. However,
even if all Unshu orange imports from
South Korea were to directly replace
consumption of U.S.-grown tangerines
in Alaska, the effect on U.S. producers
will be very minor. Under such a
scenario, annual imports of Unshu
oranges from South Korea of 2,000
metric tons (the upper limit of the
projected range of imports) will displace
less than 1 percent of fresh tangerines
produced by U.S. operations in 2004–
05. We emphasize that even a small
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
10 Based
upon 2002 Census of Agriculture, State
Data and the ‘‘Small Business Size Standards by
NAICS Industry,’’ Code of Federal Regulations,
Title 13, Chapter 1.
11 Based upon 2002 Census of Agriculture, State
Data.
12 The number of tangerine farms in the United
States, as reported by the 2002 Census of
Agriculture, includes operations that produced
tangerines for processed utilization.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:10 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
impact for U.S. producers such as this
is highly unlikely.
We expect that any product
displacement that may occur as a result
of the changes will be borne by other
foreign suppliers of Unshu oranges, in
particular Japan’s exporters. However,
we do not expect any significant
product displacement as a result of
South Korean supplies. Alaska’s Unshu
orange consumers may benefit to the
extent that the competition results in
price declines.
An alternative to this final rule was to
continue with the 2002 administrative
suspension of the importation of Unshu
oranges from South Korea into all parts
of the United States, including Alaska.
Continuing the suspension of South
Korean Unshu orange imports into
Alaska is not a satisfactory alternative to
the final rule. The final rule’s specified
mitigation measures will ensure a low
risk of introduction of citrus canker and
Diaspidad scale into the United States.
Resumption of imports will reestablish
competition with Japanese suppliers,
benefitting U.S. consumers but with
little if any expected effect on U.S.
producers.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule allows fresh Unshu
oranges to be imported into the State of
Alaska from South Korea. State and
local laws and regulations regarding
Unshu oranges imported under this rule
will be preempted while the fruit is in
foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are
generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming
public, and remain in foreign commerce
until sold to the ultimate consumer. The
question of when foreign commerce
ceases in other cases must be addressed
on a case-by-case basis. No retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB control number
0579–0314.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 734–7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
I Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. Section 319.28 is amended as
follows:
I a. By redesignating paragraphs (c)
through (i) as paragraphs (d) through (j),
respectively.
I b. By adding a new paragraph (c) to
read as set forth below.
I c. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (f) to read as set forth below.
I
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 206 / Thursday, October 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 319.28
Notice of quarantine.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The prohibition does not apply to
Unshu oranges (Citrus reticulata Blanco
var. unshu, Swingle [Citrus unshiu
Marcovitch, Tanaka]), also known as
Satsuma mandarin, grown in the
Republic of Korea and imported under
permit into the State of Alaska under
the following conditions:
(1) The Unshu oranges must be
prepared for shipping using
packinghouse procedures that include
culling damaged or diseased fruit and
cleaning the fruit with high-pressure air
or water spray in combination with
brushing.
(2) Each shipment of Unshu oranges
must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate from the
national plant protection organization of
the Republic of Korea bearing the
following additional declaration: ‘‘These
oranges were inspected and are
considered to be free from citrus canker
(Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) and
arrowhead scale (Unaspis yanonensis).
(3) The individual boxes in which the
oranges are shipped must be marked
with the following: ‘‘These oranges may
not be shipped to or distributed in any
State other than Alaska.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Importations allowed in paragraphs
(b), (c), (d), and (e) of this section shall
be subject to the permit and other
requirements under the regulations in
Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables of this
part.
*
*
*
*
*
*
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 0579–0314)
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
October, 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–21007 Filed 10–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1206
[Docket No.: AMS–FV–07–0042; FV–07–702
FR]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Mango Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Amendment to
Term of Office Provision
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Oct 24, 2007
Jkt 214001
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule that modifies the term of office
provision of the Mango Promotion,
Research, and Information Order (Order)
so that the term of office and term limit
for the two wholesaler and/or retailer
positions of the National Mango Board
(Board) be the same as that of other
members. Specifically, the amendment
modifies the term of office from one
year to three years, and modifies the
term limit for these positions from a
maximum of three consecutive one-year
terms to a maximum of two consecutive
three-year terms in order to conform to
the requirements of the commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (Act).
DATES: Effective Date: October 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Coy, Marketing Specialist,
Research and Promotion Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, USDA, Stop 0244–
Room 0634–S, Washington, DC 20250–
0244; telephone (202) 720–9915 or (888)
720–9917 (toll free); or e-mail:
kimberly.coy@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under the Mango Promotion,
Research, and Information Order [7 CFR
Part 1206]. The Order is authorized
under the Commodity Promotion,
Research, and Information Act of 1996
(Act) [7 U.S.C. 7411–7425].
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. The rule is not intended to have
a retroactive effect and will not affect or
preempt any other State or Federal law
authorizing promotion or research
relating to an agricultural commodity.
The Act provides that any person
subject to an order may file a written
petition with the Department of
Agriculture (Department) if they believe
that the order, any provision of the
order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the order, is not
established in accordance with law. In
any petition, the person may request a
modification of the order or an
exemption from the order. The
petitioner is afforded the opportunity
for a hearing on the petition. After a
hearing, the Department would rule on
the petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the petitioner resides
or conducts business shall have the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60541
jurisdiction to review the Department’s
ruling on the petition, provided a
complaint is filed not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) [5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.], the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
impact of this rule on small entities and
has prepared this final regulatory
impact analysis on a substantial number
of small entities. The purpose of the
RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the
scale of business subject to such actions
in order that small businesses will not
be unduly or disproportionately
burdened.
The Small Business Administration
defines, in 13 CFR Part 121, small
agricultural producers as those having
annual receipts of no more than
$750,000 and small agricultural service
firms as having receipts of no more than
$6.5 million. First handlers, importers,
wholesalers, and retailers would be
considered agricultural service firms.
There are approximately 5 first handlers
and 55 importers subject to and assessed
under the Order. The majority of these
first handlers and importers would be
considered small businesses while
wholesalers and retailers would not.
First handlers and importers who
market or import less than 500,000
pounds of mangos annually are exempt
from the Order. Mangos that are
exported out of the United States also
are exempt from assessment. In
addition, domestic producers, foreign
producers, wholesalers, and retailers are
not subject to or assessed under the
Order, but such individuals are eligible
to serve on the Board along with
importers and first handlers.
The Mango Promotion, Research, and
Information Order, which became
effective November 4, 2004, is
authorized under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (Act) [7 U.S.C. 7411–7425].
Pursuant to Section 515(b) of the Act,
the Order provides for the establishment
of a Board comprised of eight importers,
one first handler, two domestic
producers, seven foreign producers, and
two non-voting wholesalers and/or
retailers. The Board is responsible for
carrying out promotion, research, and
information activities intended to
develop, maintain, and increase the
demand of mangos in the United States.
Appointments to the Board are made by
the Secretary of Agriculture from a slate
of nominated candidates.
Section 515(b)(5) of the Act provides
that members and alternates of a board
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 206 (Thursday, October 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60537-60541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-21007]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0133]
RIN 0579-AC20
Importation of Unshu Oranges From the Republic of Korea Into
Alaska
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the regulations governing the importation of
citrus fruit to allow fresh Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea to
be imported into the State of Alaska under certain conditions. As a
condition of entry, the oranges will have to be prepared for shipping
using packinghouse procedures that include culling of damaged or
diseased fruit and cleaning with high-pressure air or water in
combination with brushing. In addition, the oranges will have to be
accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with an additional
declaration stating that the oranges were inspected and found free from
Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri and Unaspis yanonensis. The individual
cartons or boxes in which the Unshu oranges are shipped will also have
to be marked with a statement restricting their importation and
distribution to the State of Alaska. This action will allow for the
importation of Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea into Alaska
while continuing to provide protection against the introduction of
quarantine pests.
DATES: Effective Date: November 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alex Belano, Import Specialist,
Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, Plant Health Programs, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-
8765.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Citrus canker is a disease that affects citrus and is caused by the
infectious bacterium Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (also known as
Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri and Xanthomonas citri). Currently, the
regulations in 7 CFR 319.28 (referred to below as the regulations)
allow the importation of Unshu oranges (Citrus reticulata var. unshu)
from certain areas in the Republic of Korea (South Korea) into certain
areas of the United States under a permit and after the specified
safeguards of a preclearance program have been met to prevent the
introduction of citrus canker. However, the importation of Unshu
oranges from South Korea was administratively suspended in 2002 due to
the increased number of interceptions of the causal agent of citrus
canker at various packinghouses in South Korea.
In 2005, the national plant protection organization (NPPO) of South
Korea requested that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) allow the shipment of Unshu oranges into the State of Alaska
until the pest risk of citrus canker from South Korea could be
adequately mitigated for the rest of the United States.
On December 4, 2006, we published in the Federal Register (71 FR
70330-70335, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0133) a proposal \1\ to allow the
importation of fresh Unshu oranges from the Republic of Korea into the
State of Alaska under certain conditions. As a condition of entry, we
proposed that the oranges would have to be prepared for shipping using
packinghouse procedures that include culling of damaged or diseased
fruit and washing in a water bath. In addition, we proposed that the
oranges would have to be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate
with an additional declaration stating that the oranges were inspected
and found free from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri and Unaspis
yanonensis. The individual cartons or boxes in which the Unshu oranges
are shipped would also have to be marked with a statement restricting
their importation and distribution to the State of Alaska. This action
was intended to allow for the importation of Unshu oranges from the
Republic of Korea into Alaska while continuing to provide protection
against the introduction of quarantine pests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the proposed rule and the comments we received, go
to https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/
main?main=DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0133.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
February 2, 2007. We received two comments by that date, both from
domestic citrus industry groups. One of the commenters expressed
concern that a pesticide not approved for use in the United States
could be imported on fruit from South Korea. While the United States
does not have direct control over pesticides that are used on food
commodities such as Unshu oranges in other countries, there are
regulations in the United States concerning the importation of food to
ensure that commodities do not enter the United States containing
illegal pesticide residues. Through section 408 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
the authority to establish, change, or cancel tolerances for food
commodities. These tolerances are the maximum levels of pesticide
residues that have been determined, through comprehensive safety
evaluations, to be safe for human consumption. Tolerances apply to both
food commodities that are grown in the United States and food
commodities that are grown in other countries and imported into the
United States. While EPA has no authority in a foreign country, the
tolerance levels are enforced once the commodity enters the
[[Page 60538]]
United States. Chemicals such as DDT that are banned in the United
States do not have tolerances on food commodities. Federal Government
food inspectors are responsible for monitoring food commodities that
enter the United States to confirm that tolerance levels are not
exceeded and that residues of pesticide chemicals that are banned in
the United States are not present on the commodities. Tolerance levels
for all chemicals that are acceptable for use on Unshu oranges may be
found in EPA's regulations in 40 CFR 180.101 through180.2020. Tolerance
information can also be obtained at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/food/
viewtols.htm.
Both commenters expressed concern that the systems approach
developed by South Korea was not stringent enough, given the difficulty
of eradicating X. axonopodis pv. citri (citrus canker) and the
potential risks from asymptomatic fruit. Concerns included the lack of
requirements for worker training, equipment sanitation, and
establishment of buffer zones. In particular, the commenters were
concerned that the proposed rule did not mention inspection or sampling
rates for citrus canker. As stated in the proposed rule, shipments of
Unshu oranges to Alaska present minimal risk of introducing or
disseminating citrus canker due to the lack of host material within
Alaska and the lack of a suitable climate for establishment of the
disease. For those reasons, and because visibly infected fruit will be
culled at the packinghouse, we are not requiring a sampling regime for
Unshu oranges within South Korea. In addition, fruit exposed to, but
asymptomatic for, citrus canker is unlikely to have sufficient levels
of viable bacteria to cause infection. However, a standard port of
entry inspection rate of 2 percent would apply. APHIS has successfully
operated similar programs of low risk for tropical fruit commodities
imported into Alaska, such as sand pears and apples from Japan,
avocados from Mexico, and sand pears from South Korea.
Both commenters also stated that, despite labeling restricting
distribution of the fruit to Alaska, it may accidentally be redirected
or sent through first-class mail to a citrus-producing State. As stated
in the risk management document, in the past 10 years, over 24 million
Unshu oranges from South Korea have been imported and only one air
shipment of misdirected fruit ended up in a citrus-producing State.
That shipment was immediately redirected to a non-citrus-producing
State. In order for the fruit to leave Alaska by ground transport, it
would have to travel by truck or car via highway, and all agricultural
shipments are inspected at the U.S.-Canada border. As citrus fruit is
not grown in Canada or Alaska, import restrictions for non-U.S. citrus
fruit would apply. Further, we consider the volume of fruit shipped in
first-class mail to be too small to present a potential pest risk. The
probability of potentially infected citrus fruit reaching areas where
any disease could spread is very low.
Both commenters further expressed concern regarding the lack of a
requirement for sodium hypochlorite or sodium orthophenyl phenol in the
required water bath and concern that the water bath could contribute to
the spread of citrus canker. As stated above, we believe shipments of
Unshu oranges to Alaska present a minimal risk of introducing or
disseminating citrus canker due to the lack of host material and the
lack of a suitable climate for establishment of the disease; therefore
requiring the use of a disinfectant wash is not necessary. In addition,
because the water bath requirement is actually a combination high-
pressure water spray and brushing intended to remove external insect
pests, there is no standing water that can serve as a medium for
transmitting infection. Alternately, forced air cleaning and brushing
may be used in place of the water spray. We have amended the regulatory
text in Sec. 319.28(c)(1) to make that clear.
Finally, both commenters stated that U.S. inspectors should be
present to oversee all aspects of South Korea's citrus export program.
In a preclearance program, U.S. inspectors are required to be onsite in
the country of export to oversee shipments to the United States.
However, the program for importing Unshu oranges to Alaska from South
Korea is not a preclearance program. Therefore, the presence of U.S.
inspectors to oversee the program is not required and, based on the
reasons given in the proposed rule, is not necessary.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the
change discussed in this document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
The United States is not a commercial producer of Unshu oranges
(Citrus reticulata var. unshui). The United States does produce other
mandarin varieties of Citrus reticulata, such as tangerines and Satsuma
mandarins. Effects of the final rule on U.S. entities will depend on
(1) the substitutability in Alaska of Unshu oranges for these other
mandarin varieties, and (2) Alaska's share of the U.S. supply of the
other mandarin varieties. We address these overriding issues before
discussing small entities that may be affected.
Unshu orange prices are higher than the prices of U.S.-grown
mandarin varieties, indicating that they are not close substitutes.
Retail prices of Unshu oranges are approximately $1.20 per pound,
whereas other mandarin varieties, such as Satsuma, range from $0.60 to
$1 per pound depending on the time of year.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Information on retail prices of Unshu oranges provided by
Jerry Kraft of The Oppenheimer Group, the sole importer of Unshu
oranges from Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, the effects of the final rule with respect to Alaska's
broadly defined demand for all mandarin varieties are most likely to be
very limited. Rather, we expect reestablished imports from South Korea
to compete for a share of Alaska's Unshu orange market.
Prior to the administrative suspension in 2002, South Korea and
Japan were principal suppliers of Unshu oranges to the United States.
It is estimated that Alaska consumes approximately 30 percent of the
Unshu oranges imported from Japan. Quantities of Unshu oranges imported
from South Korea and Japan, 1995 to 2005, are shown in table 1.
[[Page 60539]]
Table 1.--Unshu Orange Imports by the United States From South Korea and
Japan, 1995-2005
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year South Korea Japan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metric tons
-------------------------------
1995.................................... 50 231
1996.................................... 220 160
1997.................................... 1,190 143
1998.................................... 40 223
1999.................................... 380 342
2000.................................... 240 106
2001.................................... 1,434 291
2002.................................... 1,601 (\1\)
2003.................................... .............. 275
2004.................................... .............. 271
2005.................................... .............. 256
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: USDA, APHIS, International Services.
\1\ In 2002, we amended the regulations to allow Unshu oranges from
Honshu Island, Japan, to be imported into the previously prohibited
citrus-producing States of Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii,
Louisiana, and Texas. That same rule imposed a fumigation requirement
for all Unshu oranges from Honshu Island, which seriously curtailed
the market for that fruit in non-citrus producing States. As a result,
there were no exports of Unshu oranges from Japan to the United States
in 2002. We subsequently amended the regulations to apply the
fumigation requirement only to fruit bound for citrus-producing
States, and exports resumed in 2003.
Unshu orange imports from Japan between 1995 and 2005 averaged 238
metric tons per year.\3\ Average imports of Unshu oranges from South
Korea between 1995 and 2002 were 644 metric tons per year, with
significant year-to-year fluctuations and the average for 2001 and 2002
jumping to 1,518 metric tons. Imports of Unshu oranges from Japan have
maintained a more steady supply, even in the more recent years during
which Unshu oranges from South Korea have been administratively
suspended. From this data, it is not apparent that South Korean
supplies will significantly displace Unshu orange imports from Japan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This average does not include 2002, since it is likely that
Japan would have exported Unshu oranges to the United States in that
year if the fumigation requirement described in footnote 1 of table
1 had not been in place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the pest risk assessment prepared for this rulemaking,
the quantity of Unshu oranges that will be imported from South Korea
into Alaska each year is estimated to be between 200 and 2,000 metric
tons (440,925 and 4,409,245 pounds), based on projected imports of
between 10 and 100 standard 40-foot containers.\4\ The lower end of
this range of imports will be comparable to recent import levels from
Japan. Based upon the past shipments detailed in table 1, we anticipate
that imports of Unshu oranges from South Korea will not exceed 75
containers (1,500 metric tons) per annum. The historical import data
detailed in table 1 suggest that South Korean supplies will not
significantly displace Japanese Unshu oranges on the Alaskan market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ USDA, APHIS, PPQ-CHPST, ``A Qualitative Pest Risk Analysis
for the Importation of Fresh Unshu Orange Fruit (Citrus reticulata
Blanco var. unshu Swingle) from the Republic of Korea,'' May 25,
2006, pg 33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our expectation is that the final rule will have little effect on
U.S. producers of mandarin varieties such as tangerines and Satsumas.
Any impact for these producers will be small, given that the various
mandarin varieties do not appear to be close substitutes for Unshu
oranges. Moreover, only sales to Alaska will be affected. However,
recognizing that our information for determining possible effects of
the final rule is incomplete, we present here data on U.S. tangerine
trade and production.
The United States is a net importer of mandarins (including
Satsumas and tangerines). In 2005, the United States imported 209.4
million pounds of mandarins (including Satsumas and tangerines) with
approximately 91 percent arriving from Spain. In that same year, the
United States exported approximately 48.1 million pounds of mandarins
(including Satsumas and tangerines). Canada is the largest importer of
U.S. fresh mandarins, accounting for 52 percent of U.S. exports. The
second and third largest importers of U.S. mandarins are South Korea
and Japan, accounting for approximately 38 and 6 percent of exports,
respectively.\5\ U.S. imports of tangerines experienced an average
increase of 17.8 percent annually over the last decade while exports
have increased an average of 5.9 percent.\6\ Domestic production
accounted for approximately 80 percent of domestic fresh consumption in
2005.\7\ The United States relies on imports of mandarins to supplement
domestic production in satisfying domestic demand. Fresh utilization of
U.S. mandarin and tangerine production only accounts, on average, for
70 percent of total utilized production annually.\8\ U.S. grower
revenue from fresh tangerine production in 2004-05 was approximately
$107.4 million.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Source: Global Trade Atlas.
\6\ Source: USDA, FAS, PS&D Online. ``Fresh Tangerines:
Production, Supply and Distribution in selected Countries,'' https://
www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdDownload.aspx.
\7\ The proportion of domestic fresh consumption attributed to
U.S. production is production less exports and processed
utilization. Data Source: USDA ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut
Yearbook, 2005.
\8\ USDA, ERS Briefing Room, Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook, 2005.
\9\ Florida Agricultural Statistics Service (FASS), National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), USDA, ``Citrus Summary 2004-
05,'' February 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. tangerine production, imports, and domestic supplies are shown
in table 2. Net imports were 20 percent of domestic supply in 2004 to
2005.
[[Page 60540]]
Table 2.--U.S. Fresh Tangerine Production and Importation, Seasons 1999-2000 through 2004-05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net imports
Year Production \a\ \b\ Supply \c\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metric tons
-----------------------------------------------
1999-00......................................................... 298,464 68,185 366,649
2000-01......................................................... 266,712 85,728 352,440
2001-02......................................................... 296,649 37,261 333,910
2002-03......................................................... 289,392 69,164 358,556
2003-04......................................................... 295,742 72,753 368,495
2004-05......................................................... 254,919 63,944 318,863
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Source: USDA/ERS Briefing Room,Fruit and Tree Nut Yearbook, 2005.
\a\ Excludes processed fruit.
\b\ Net imports are imports minus exports.
\c\ U.S. production (excluding processed utilization) plus net imports.
The small business size standard for tangerine groves, as
identified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) based upon the
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 111320, is
$750,000 or less in annual receipts.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Based upon 2002 Census of Agriculture, State Data and the
``Small Business Size Standards by NAICS Industry,'' Code of Federal
Regulations, Title 13, Chapter 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While available data do not provide the size distribution of U.S.
tangerine farms by annual receipts, it is reasonable to assume that the
majority of the operations are small businesses by SBA standards.\11\
According to the 2002 Census of Agriculture data, there were a total of
1,731 tangerine operations in the United States in 2002.\12\ It is
estimated that approximately 93 percent of all citrus-producing farms
had annual sales in 2002 of $500,000 or less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Based upon 2002 Census of Agriculture, State Data.
\12\ The number of tangerine farms in the United States, as
reported by the 2002 Census of Agriculture, includes operations that
produced tangerines for processed utilization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Unshu oranges and U.S.-grown mandarin varieties were close
substitutes, then U.S. entities could be affected to the extent that
Unshu orange imports from South Korea would displace sales in Alaska of
the U.S.-grown mandarin varieties. Small entities would be affected,
since they comprise a substantial number of the producers of mandarin
varieties, as indicated by the data on tangerine operations. However,
even if all Unshu orange imports from South Korea were to directly
replace consumption of U.S.-grown tangerines in Alaska, the effect on
U.S. producers will be very minor. Under such a scenario, annual
imports of Unshu oranges from South Korea of 2,000 metric tons (the
upper limit of the projected range of imports) will displace less than
1 percent of fresh tangerines produced by U.S. operations in 2004-05.
We emphasize that even a small impact for U.S. producers such as this
is highly unlikely.
We expect that any product displacement that may occur as a result
of the changes will be borne by other foreign suppliers of Unshu
oranges, in particular Japan's exporters. However, we do not expect any
significant product displacement as a result of South Korean supplies.
Alaska's Unshu orange consumers may benefit to the extent that the
competition results in price declines.
An alternative to this final rule was to continue with the 2002
administrative suspension of the importation of Unshu oranges from
South Korea into all parts of the United States, including Alaska.
Continuing the suspension of South Korean Unshu orange imports into
Alaska is not a satisfactory alternative to the final rule. The final
rule's specified mitigation measures will ensure a low risk of
introduction of citrus canker and Diaspidad scale into the United
States. Resumption of imports will reestablish competition with
Japanese suppliers, benefitting U.S. consumers but with little if any
expected effect on U.S. producers.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule allows fresh Unshu oranges to be imported into the
State of Alaska from South Korea. State and local laws and regulations
regarding Unshu oranges imported under this rule will be preempted
while the fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are generally
imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public,
and remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The
question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be
addressed on a case-by-case basis. No retroactive effect will be given
to this rule, and this rule will not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements
included in this rule have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0579-0314.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles,
APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. Section 319.28 is amended as follows:
0
a. By redesignating paragraphs (c) through (i) as paragraphs (d)
through (j), respectively.
0
b. By adding a new paragraph (c) to read as set forth below.
0
c. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (f) to read as set forth
below.
[[Page 60541]]
Sec. 319.28 Notice of quarantine.
* * * * *
(c) The prohibition does not apply to Unshu oranges (Citrus
reticulata Blanco var. unshu, Swingle [Citrus unshiu Marcovitch,
Tanaka]), also known as Satsuma mandarin, grown in the Republic of
Korea and imported under permit into the State of Alaska under the
following conditions:
(1) The Unshu oranges must be prepared for shipping using
packinghouse procedures that include culling damaged or diseased fruit
and cleaning the fruit with high-pressure air or water spray in
combination with brushing.
(2) Each shipment of Unshu oranges must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate from the national plant protection
organization of the Republic of Korea bearing the following additional
declaration: ``These oranges were inspected and are considered to be
free from citrus canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) and
arrowhead scale (Unaspis yanonensis).
(3) The individual boxes in which the oranges are shipped must be
marked with the following: ``These oranges may not be shipped to or
distributed in any State other than Alaska.''
* * * * *
(f) Importations allowed in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e) of
this section shall be subject to the permit and other requirements
under the regulations in Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables of this part.
* * * * * *
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0314)
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of October, 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7-21007 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
