Office of Vocational and Adult Education; Overview Information; Ready for College: Adult Education Transitions Program Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, 41301-41307 [E7-14539]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
customers. The proposed design
involves raising the currently permitted
dam (embankment) by 61 feet, to a crest
elevation of 6,220 feet, using a
downstream raise concept. The final
dam is proposed to be a 196-foot-high
and 7,675-foot-long zoned earth
embankment.
The purpose for the enlarged reservoir
is to provide sufficient storage of Denver
Basin groundwater, and the associated
reuse water from initial Denver Basin
use, for selected South Metro Denver
area water providers, and to assist in
sustaining the Denver Basin aquifers.
The additional water to be stored in a
proposed expanded Rueter-Hess
Reservoir would come from existing
sources (i.e., Denver Basin groundwater
and associated reusable return flows).
The reservoir would be used to manage
supplies during off-peak times and use
this water during peak times to reduce
the need for instantaneous production
from Denver Basin wells. In addition to
the proposal to expand the reservoir,
new pipelines would be installed to
deliver the water to and from the new
Project Participants (Town of Castle
Rock, Castle Pines North Metropolitan
District and Stonegate Metropolitan
District).
In addition to the Proposed Action,
the Draft SEIS analyzes two alternatives:
(1) The Reduced-Capacity Reservoir
(47,000 AF) Alternative, and (2) the No
Action Alternative. The ReducedCapacity Reservoir Alternative dam
would be located along the same axis as
the Proposed Action, but would be
smaller in length (7,160 feet) and height
(179 feet). The reservoir would have a
surface area of 934 acres at normal pool.
The No Action Alternative assumes that
PWSD and the other Project Participants
would continue their current operations
of primarily providing water to their
customers with Denver Basin
groundwater by drilling additional wells
to meet peak summertime demands.
PWSD would construct the currently
permitted Rueter-Hess Reservoir (16,200
AF) to obtain firm annual yield for the
PWSD, focusing on meeting peak
summertime demands. Stonegate would
have some storage capacity (1,200 AF)
in the currently permitted reservoir.
Castle Rock and Castle Pines North
would not have surface water storage
available to meet their needs; therefore,
their ability to capture and reuse their
reusable return flows would be limited.
Castle Rock and Castle Pines North
would extract and use their reuse water
only as it is being generated from their
advanced wastewater treatment plants
and lawn irrigation.
Copies of the Draft SEIS will be
available for review at:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
1. Parker Library, 10851 South
Crossroads Drive, Parker, CO 80134.
2. Philip S. Miller Library, 100 S.
Wilcox, Castle Rock, CO 80104.
3. Parker Water and Sanitation
District, 19801 East Mainstreet, Parker,
CO 80138.
4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Denver Regulatory Office, 9307 S.
Wadsworth Boulevard, Littleton, CO
80128.
Copies may also be obtained from the
Corps’ third-party contractor, URS
Corporation, Attn: Paula Daukas, 8181
East Tufts Avenue, Denver, CO 80237;
303–740–3896; Fax 303–694–3946;
paula_daukas@urscorp.com.
Timothy T. Carey,
Chief, Denver Regulatory Office, Operations
Division, Omaha District.
[FR Doc. E7–14524 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–62–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Vocational and Adult
Education; Overview Information;
Ready for College: Adult Education
Transitions Program Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2006
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.191A.
Dates:
Applications Available: July 27, 2007.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
August 6, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 27, 2007.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 27, 2007.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of the Program: Section 243
of the Adult Education and Family
Literacy Act (Act), 20 U.S.C. 9253,
authorizes the Secretary to establish and
carry out a program of national
leadership activities to enhance the
quality of adult education and literacy
programs nationwide. Under the
authority of that section of the Act, the
Secretary plans to support State and
local efforts to increase the rate at which
adults, aged 18 to 24, successfully
complete adult secondary education
(ASE) and transition to postsecondary
education.
Background Information
The President’s American
Competitiveness Initiative (ACI)
recognizes that a high school diploma or
equivalency diploma is no longer
adequate for 21st century workforce
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41301
demands and that the bedrock of
America’s competitiveness is a welleducated and skilled workforce. Some
form of postsecondary education and
training is now critical for workers to
succeed in the new global economy.
Yet, in 2004, one in five 18- to 24-yearolds had not yet completed high school.
While about half of the students who
leave school early eventually obtain a
credential, millions never receive one.
Further, an estimated 3.8 million youth
between the ages of 18 and 24 are
neither employed nor in school. Young
adults with low levels of literacy and
educational attainment also have a
lower chance of escaping
unemployment. And those who do
become employed are often limited to
low-wage jobs. For America to continue
to prosper economically, educators and
others need to focus on ways to help
more out-of-school youth obtain high
school-level equivalency diplomas and
transition successfully to postsecondary
education.
Many State and local agencies have
developed a variety of interventions
designed to re-engage out-of-school
youth and help them obtain both a high
school equivalency credential and a
postsecondary certificate or degree.
While the Department is generally
aware of these efforts, there is little
documentation of either their specific
composition or their effectiveness. More
importantly, little investigation has been
conducted on why a particular practice
has positive results with out-of-school
youth. We are, therefore, using this
competition to support projects that will
identify and, when necessary, further
develop, strengthen, enhance, or expand
educational strategies (e.g., program
design elements such as scheduling,
educational counseling, supportive
services for students, and professional
development for staff; enhanced
curricula; or linkages with
postsecondary education programs)
already utilized in local ASE programs.
Because we want to begin documenting
the specific composition of the
educational strategies, the projects
funded under this competition will also
help local programs to establish
procedures for demonstrating,
documenting, and gathering data on the
effectiveness of their educational
strategies. This data will also help us
better understand why the educational
strategies facilitate the transition of outof-school youth to postsecondary
education. Further, descriptions of the
educational practices demonstrated to
be effective by the projects will be
packaged for national dissemination.
This competition is the first of several
activities the Department anticipates
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
41302
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
supporting to assist States in improving
the quality of ASE and building capacity
to increase the rate of out-of-school
youth successfully transitioning to
postsecondary education. By identifying
and documenting existing effective
educational practices of State and local
agencies, we will be better able to (1)
Disseminate effective models for other
States to adopt, and (2) plan next steps
for assisting States to improve the
quality of adult education services so
that more adults become ‘‘college
ready’’ and actually transition to
postsecondary education.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Application Requirements and Required
Project Activities
An application under this
competition must propose a project that
identifies, demonstrates, and documents
practices that improve ASE and that
facilitate the successful transition of
out-of-school youth to postsecondary
education. The project must—
(a) Identify, demonstrate, and
document, in at least four existing local
ASE programs funded under the Act,
educational strategies (e.g., program
design elements such as scheduling,
educational counseling, supportive
services for students, and professional
development for staff; enhanced
curricula; or linkages with
postsecondary education programs)
designed to improve the ability of outof-school youth to transition to
postsecondary education. The
educational strategies must be
authorized under the Act and must
currently be utilized in the local ASE
programs participating in a project
under this competition. An applicant
must describe in its application the
criteria and process it proposes to use to
identify and select educational
strategies to be demonstrated;
(b) Assist the local ASE programs
identified under paragraph (a) of this
section to—
(1) Further develop, strengthen,
enhance, or expand educational
strategies in order to improve the
capacity of the programs to increase the
percentage of out-of-school youth who
are ready for, and actually transition to,
postsecondary education;
(2) Establish procedures that help the
local ASE programs demonstrate,
document, and gather data on
educational strategies that improve ASE
and facilitate the transition of out-ofschool youth to postsecondary
education; and
(3) Offer opportunities for out-ofschool youth to participate in course
work and other activities that are
coordinated with, and make it easier for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
out-of-school youth to transition to,
postsecondary institutions;
(c) Periodically communicate with the
eligible agency, as defined under section
203(4) of the Act (20 U.S.C. 9202(4)), in
the State in which the project will
operate, regarding the planning,
development, and implementation of
the project;
(d) Use an independent evaluator to
gather data validating whether the
educational strategies demonstrated by
the local ASE programs actually—
(1) Enhance learning for participating
out-of-school youth;
(2) Improve ASE instruction in
participating local programs;
(3) Increase the percentage of
participating out-of-school youth who
transition to postsecondary education;
and
(4) Result in measurable college
readiness of out-of-school youth,
including by providing a description of
the standard the project used to define
college readiness;
(e) Package, for dissemination, a
description of the educational practices
demonstrated to be effective by the
project, including by documenting, to
the extent possible, the effectiveness of
the educational practices in improving
ASE and facilitating the transition of
out-of-school youth to postsecondary
education;
(f) Be coordinated with similar or
related efforts, and with other
appropriate community, State, and
Federal resources in order to increase
the likelihood that the project will result
in system change or improvement; and
(g) At the conclusion of the project,
propose the next steps that educators
and researchers should under take to
further validate the effectiveness of the
educational strategies demonstrated in
the project.
Priority: We are establishing this
priority for the FY 2006 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition, in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C.
1232(d)(1).
Competitive Preference Priority: This
priority is a competitive preference
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i),
we award up to an additional 20 points
to an application, depending on how
well the application meets the priority.
The points awarded under this priority
are in addition to any points the
application earns under the selection
criteria for this competition, provided
elsewhere in this notice.
The priority is:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Involvement of an Eligible Agency
Projects for which the eligible agency,
as defined under section 203(4) of the
Act (20 U.S.C. 9202(4)), in the State in
which the project will operate is
actively involved in the project (i.e., has
a clearly defined leadership role in
planning, developing, and
implementing the proposed
demonstration project) as evidenced by
clearly delineated responsibilities that
are described in the application and by
a letter from the eligible agency
committing to carry out the agreed upon
responsibilities.
Note: The definitions in section 203 of the
Act apply to this competition. (20 U.S.C.
9202).
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally
offers interested parties the opportunity
to comment on proposed non-statutory
requirements, priorities, and selection
criteria. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA,
however, allows the Secretary to exempt
from rulemaking requirements nonstatutory requirements, priorities, and
selection criteria governing the first
grant competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition under
section 243 of the Act and, therefore,
qualifies for this exemption. In order to
ensure timely grant awards, the
Secretary has decided to forgo public
comment on the non-statutory
requirements, priority, and selection
criteria under the authority of section
437(d)(1) of GEPA. The non-statutory
requirements, priority, and selection
criteria set forth in this notice will apply
to the FY 2006 competition and any
subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 9253.
Applicable Regulations: The
Education Department General.
Administrative Regulations: (EDGAR)
in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81,
82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, 99.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to the institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$2,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards: $500,000
to $1,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$750,000.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
Estimated Number of Awards: 2 to 4.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 24 months.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: The following
entities are eligible for a grant:
(a) A State educational agency.
(b) A local educational agency.
(c) A postsecondary educational
institution.
(d) Other public or private agencies,
organizations, and institutions.
(e) A consortium of eligible
applicants. Eligible applicants seeking
to apply as a consortium must comply
with the regulations in 34 CFR 75.127–
75.129, which address group
applications.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: Karen Lee, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 11047, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–7240.
Telephone: (202) 245–7720 or by e-mail:
karen.lee@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an alternative format (e.g., Braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) by contacting the program
contact person listed in this section.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The
Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing
grant applications if it has a better
understanding of the number of entities
that intend to apply for funding under
this competition. Therefore, the
Secretary strongly encourages each
potential applicant to notify the
Department by sending a short e-mail
message indicating the applicant’s
intent to submit an application for
funding. The e-mail should include only
the applicant’s intent to submit an
application; it does not need to include
information regarding the content of the
proposed application. This e-mail
notification should be sent 10 days after
the publication of this notice to Diane
DeMaio at: diane.demaio@ed.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
We will consider an application
submitted by the deadline date for
transmittal of applications even if the
applicant did not provide notice of its
intent to apply.
Page Limit: The application narrative
(Part III of the application) is where you,
the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate
your application. You must limit Part III
to the equivalent of no more than 25
pages, using the following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5 x 11, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is 12 point, doublespaced.
The page limit does not apply to Part
I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; Part IV, the assurances and
certifications; or the one page abstract,
the resumes, or the letters of support.
However, the page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative section
(Part III).
We will reject your application if:
• You apply these standards and
exceed the page limit; or
• You apply other standards and
exceed the equivalent of the page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: July 27, 2007.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
August 6, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 27, 2007.
Applications for grants under this
competition may be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov), or in paper
format by mail or hand delivery. For
information (including dates and times)
about how to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery, please refer to
section IV. 6. Other Submission
Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII in this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with disability in connection
with the application process, the
individual’s application remains subject
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41303
to all other requirements and limitations
in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 27, 2007.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS section in this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
competition may be submitted
electronically or in paper format by mail
or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
To comply with the President’s
Management Agenda, we are
participating as a partner in the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site.
Ready for College: Adult Education
Transitions, CFDA Number 84.191A, is
included in this project. We request
your participation in Grants.gov. If you
choose to submit your application
electronically, you must use the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at https://www.Grants.gov. Through this
site, you will be able to download a
copy of the application package,
complete it offline, and then upload and
submit your application. You may not
e-mail an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the Ready for College:
Adult Education Transitions Program at
https://www.Grants.gov. You must search
for the downloadable application
package for this program by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA
number’s alpha suffix in your search
(e.g., search for 84.191, not 84.191A).
Please note the following:
• Your participation in Grants.gov is
voluntary.
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are date and time stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted and must be date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not consider your
application if it is date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system later
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
41304
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
than 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. When we
retrieve an application from Grants.gov,
we will notify you if we are rejecting
your application because it was date
and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at
https://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
• To submit your application via
Grants.gov, you must complete all steps
in the Grants.gov registration process
(see https://www.grants.gov/
applicants/get_registered.jsp). These
steps include (1) Registering your
organization, a multi-part process that
includes registration with the Central
Contractor Registry (CCR); (2) registering
yourself as an Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR); and (3) getting
authorized as an AOR by your
organization. Details on these steps are
outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see
https://www.grants.gov/section910/
Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf.
You also must provide on your
application the same D–U–N–S Number
used with this registration. Please note
that the registration process may take
five or more business days to complete,
and you must have completed all
registration steps to allow you to submit
successfully an application via
Grants.gov. In addition, you will need to
update the CCR registration on an
annual basis. This may take three or
more business days to complete.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you, if you submit your
application in paper format.
• If you submit your application
electronically, you must submit all
documents electronically, including all
information you typically provide on
the following forms: Application for
Federal Assistance (SF 424), the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget
Information—Non-Construction
Programs (ED 524), and all necessary
assurances and certifications. Please
note that two of these forms—the SF 424
and the Department of Education
Supplemental information for SF 424—
have replaced the ED 424 (Application
for Federal Education Assistance).
• If you submit your application
electronically, you must attach any
narrative sections of your application as
files in a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich
text), or .PDF (Portable Document)
format. If you upload a file type other
than the three file types specified in this
paragraph, or submit a passwordprotected file, we will not review that
material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. (This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send a
second notification to you by e-mail.
This second notification indicates that
the Department has received your
application and has assigned your
application a PR/Award number (an EDspecified identifying number unique to
your application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting the
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section VII in this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. The Department will contact you
after a determination is made on
whether your application will be
accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you submit your application in
paper format by mail (through the U.S.
Postal Service or a commercial carrier),
you must mail the original and two
copies of your application, on or before
the application deadline date, to the
Department at the applicable following
address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.191A),
400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260; or
By mail through a commercial carrier:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Stop
4260, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.191A), 7100 Old Landover Road,
Landover, MD 20785–1506.
Regardless of which address you use,
you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in
paper format by hand delivery, you (or
a courier service) must deliver the
original and two copies of your
application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.191A), 550 12th
Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and
Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call
the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The Secretary
uses the following program criteria to
evaluate an application. The maximum
score for each criterion is indicated in
parentheses. The maximum score for all
of these criteria is 110 points.
(a) Significance. (20 points) In
determining the significance of the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which—
(i) The proposed project will identify,
demonstrate, and document, in at least
four existing local ASE programs funded
under the Act, educational strategies
(e.g., program design elements such as
scheduling, educational counseling,
supportive services for students, and
professional development for staff;
enhanced curricula; or linkages with
postsecondary education programs)
designed to improve the ability of outof-school youth to transition to
postsecondary education. The
educational strategies must be
authorized under the Act and must
currently be utilized in the local ASE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
programs participating in a project
under this competition;
(ii) The applicant describes the
criteria and process it proposes to use to
identify and select educational
strategies to be demonstrated; and
(iii) The proposed project will assist
the local ASE programs to—
(A) Further develop, strengthen,
enhance, or expand educational
strategies in order to improve the
capacity of the programs to increase the
percentage of out-of-school youth who
are ready for, and actually transition to,
postsecondary education;
(B) Establish procedures that help the
local ASE programs demonstrate,
document, and gather data on
educational strategies that improve ASE
and facilitate the transition of out-ofschool youth to postsecondary
education; and
(C) Offer opportunities for out-ofschool youth to participate in course
work and other activities that are
coordinated with, and make it easier for
out-of-school youth to transition to,
postsecondary institutions.
(2) The extent to which specific gaps
or weaknesses in ASE curricula or
program designs have been identified
and will be addressed by the proposed
project, including the nature and
magnitude of those gaps or weaknesses.
(b) Quality of the project design. (45
points) In determining the quality of the
design of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
(1) The extent to which clearly
specified and measurable goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are aligned with
the activities described in the
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND REQUIRED
PROJECT ACTIVITIES section in this notice.
(2) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project reflects up-to-date
knowledge from research and effective
practices.
(3) The extent to which the applicant
describes effective strategies to—
(i) Improve program completion rates;
(ii) Increase the percentage of out-ofschool youth who obtain a General
Educational Development or high
school equivalency credential;
(iii) Increase the percentage of out-ofschool youth who demonstrate college
readiness; and
(iv) Increase the percentage of out-ofschool youth who successfully
transition to postsecondary education.
(4) The extent to which the proposed
project will periodically communicate
with the eligible agency, as defined
under section 203(4) of the Act (20
U.S.C. 9202(4)), in the State in which
the project will operate, regarding the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41305
planning, development, and
implementation the project.
(5) The extent to which the design
will result in replicable educational
strategies that can be packaged for
dissemination nationally.
(6) The extent to which the proposed
project will package, for dissemination,
a description of the educational
practices demonstrated to be effective
by the project, including by
documenting, to the extent possible, the
effectiveness of the educational
practices in improving ASE and
facilitating the transition of out-ofschool youth to postsecondary
education.
(7) The extent to which the proposed
project will be coordinated with similar
or related efforts, and with other
appropriate community, State, and
Federal resources in order to increase
the likelihood that the project will result
in system change or improvement.
(8) The extent to which, at the
conclusion of the proposed project, the
project will propose the next steps that
educators and researchers should
undertake to further validate the
effectiveness of the educational
strategies demonstrated in the project.
(c) Quality of project personnel. (5
Points) In determining the quality of
project personnel, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the applicant
encourages applications for employment
from persons who are members of
groups that traditionally have been
underrepresented based on race, color,
national origin, gender, age, or
disability.
(2) The extent to which the
qualifications, including relevant
training and experience, of the project
director, key personnel, and
subcontractors match the requirements
of the project.
(d) Quality of the management plan.
(20 points) In determining the quality of
the management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(1) The extent to which the
management plan is designed to achieve
the objectives of the proposed project on
time and within budget, including
clearly defined responsibilities,
timelines, and milestones for
accomplishing project tasks.
(2) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the
objectives of the proposed project.
(3) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
41306
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
(e) Quality of the project evaluation.
(20 points) In determining the quality of
the evaluation, the Secretary considers
the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and
appropriate to the goals, objectives, and
outcomes of the proposed project.
(2) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation include the use of
objective performance measures that are
clearly related to the intended outcomes
of the project and to the performance
measures discussed in Section VI. 4.
Performance Measures in this notice
and the extent to which the methods of
evaluation will produce valid and
reliable quantitative and qualitative
data.
(3) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation provide a coordinated
strategy for examining the effectiveness
of project implementation strategies
across multiple programs within a State.
(4) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation will provide performance
feedback.
(5) The extent to which the proposed
project will use an independent
evaluator to gather data validating
whether the educational strategies
demonstrated by the local ASE
programs actually—
(i) Enhance learning for participating
out-of-school youth;
(ii) Improve ASE instruction in
participating local programs;
(iii) Increase the percentage of
participating out-of-school youth who
transition to postsecondary education;
and
(iv) Result in measurable college
readiness of out-of-school youth,
including by providing a description of
the standard the project used to define
college readiness.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notice (GAN).
We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section in
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates the approved
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
application as part of the binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting. (a) At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
(b) In addition, grantees under this
competition must submit—
(1) An interim report six months after
the grant is awarded;
(2) An evaluation report that—
(i) Reports on the effectiveness of the
project;
(ii) Reports on the effectiveness of
practices demonstrated during the
project, including whether educational
strategies actually—
(A) Enhanced learning for out-ofschool youth;
(B) Improved ASE programs;
(C) Improved States’ capacity to
increase the percentage of out-of-school
youth who transition to postsecondary
education; and
(D) Resulted in, or contributed to,
measurable college readiness of out-ofschool youth, including by providing a
description of the standard the project
used to define college readiness;
(iii) Contains recommendations on
how to further evaluate the effectiveness
of practices demonstrated during the
project; and
(iv) Reports on the percentage of outof-school youth enrolled in the project
who were retained during the project
period and who demonstrated
measurable college readiness; and
(3) An annual report on the GPRA
measures identified in the Performance
Measures section of this notice.
4. Performance Measures: Under the
Government Performance Results Act of
1993, Federal departments and agencies
must clearly describe the goals and
objectives of programs, identify
resources and actions needed to
accomplish goals and objectives,
develop a means of measuring progress
made, and regularly report on
achievement. One important source of
program information on successes and
lessons learned is the project evaluation
conducted under individual grants. In
evaluating the overall effectiveness of
projects funded under this competition,
grantees must also be prepared to
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
measure and report on the following
measures of effectiveness:
a. The percentage of out-of-school
youth served by the project whose goal
is to complete high school, and who
earn a high school diploma or
recognized equivalent.
b. The percentage of out-of-school
youth served by the project whose goal
is to enter postsecondary education and
who enroll in a postsecondary
education program.
c. The percentage of out-of-school
youth served by the project who
demonstrate measurable college
readiness.
d. The percentage of out-of-school
youth served by the project who
demonstrate improved literacy and
mathematics skills using pre- and posttests that are approved for use in the
National Reporting System for Adult
Education and that are identified in the
assessment policy of the State in which
the project will operate.
VII. Agency Contacts
For Further Information Contact:
Diane DeMaio or Ursula Lord, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 11002, Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–
6121. Telephone: (202) 245–7841 or
(202) 245–7734, respectively, or by
e-mail: diane.demaio@ed.gov or
ursula.lord@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 144 / Friday, July 27, 2007 / Notices
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Troy R. Justesen,
Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult
Education.
[FR Doc. E7–14539 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Bonneville Power Administration
Long-Term Regional Dialogue Policy
Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of availability of a
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Record of Decision (ROD).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of the NEPA ROD for BPA’s
adoption of a policy for its power
supply role after fiscal year 2011. This
policy is intended to provide BPA’s
customers with greater clarity about
their Federal power supply so they can
effectively plan for the future and, if
they choose, make capital investments
in long-term electricity infrastructure.
Each of the issues in this Long-Term
Regional Dialogue Policy that were
found to have any environmental effects
were determined to be within the scope
of the Market-Driven Alternative
adopted in the Business Plan ROD.
Thus, this NEPA ROD is consistent with
and tiered to the Business Plan
Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/
EIS–0183, June 1995) and the Business
Plan ROD (August 15, 1995). The Policy,
which is the result of a Regional
Dialogue process that began in 2002, is
described more fully in a separately
issued Administrator’s ROD that
addresses the legal and policy rationale
supporting the administrative decisions
in the Regional Dialogue.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the following
documents may be obtained by calling
BPA’s toll-free document request line,
1–800–622–4520, or by visiting the Web
site at: https://www.efw.bpa.gov: the
NEPA ROD for the Long-Term Regional
Dialogue Policy; the Administrator’s
ROD on the policy; and the Business
Plan EIS and ROD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Katherine S. Pierce, Bonneville Power
Administration KEC–4, P.O. Box 3621,
Portland, Oregon, 97208–3621; toll-free
telephone number 1–800–282–3713; fax
number 503–230–5699; or e-mail
kspierce@bpa.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Jul 26, 2007
Jkt 211001
The
Business Plan EIS and ROD to which
this NEPA ROD is tiered were prepared
to support a number of decisions
including the products and services
BPA will market, rates for BPA’s
products and services, policy direction
for BPA’s sale of power products to
customers, contract terms BPA will offer
for power sales, and plans for BPA’s
resource acquisitions and power
purchase contracts. Each of the issues in
this Long-Term Regional Dialogue
Policy has been evaluated for
environmental effects. Some of the
policy issues do not have the potential
to result in environmental effects; others
are a continuation of the status quo. For
the remaining issues, any environmental
effects have already been addressed in
the Business Plan EIS.
41307
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Open house public scoping
meetings will be held August 21, 22,
and 23, 2007, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. The
public scoping period starts with
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register and will continue through
August 31, 2007. To be assured
consideration, all comments or
suggestions regarding the appropriate
scope of the EIS must be received by the
close of the scoping period.
ADDRESSES: Open-house public scoping
meetings will be held at the following
locations:
1. August 21, 2007, Selby Opera
House, 3409 Main Street, Selby, SD
57472.
2. August 22, 2007, Phoenix Center,
117 South Main Street, Onida, SD
57564.
3. August 23, 2007, Woonsocket
Community Center, Dumont Avenue,
Woonsocket, SD 57385.
Written comments on the scope of the
EIS should be addressed to:
Ms. Catherine Cunningham, Western
Area Power Administration, P.O. Box
281213, Lakewood, CO 80228, fax (720)
962–7269, e-mail:
NextGenEIS@wapa.gov.
Western Area Power Administration
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Portland, Oregon, on July 19,
2007.
Stephen J. Wright,
Administrator and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–14529 Filed 7–26–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Construction and Operation of the
Proposed NextGen Energy Facility,
South Dakota
Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
Conduct Scoping Meetings; Notice of
Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power
Administration (Western), an agency of
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
intends to prepare an environmental
impact statement (EIS) for the
construction and operation of the
proposed NextGen Energy Facility
(Project) in South Dakota. Basin Electric
Power Cooperative (Basin Electric) has
applied to interconnect the proposed
Project to Western’s electric power
transmission system. The EIS will
address the construction and operation
of the proposed Project, which includes
a 500 to 700 megawatt (MW) (net) coalfired generation facility and ancillary
equipment and facilities east of the
Missouri River in South Dakota.
Portions of the proposed Project may
affect floodplains and wetlands in the
area. Western will hold public scoping
meetings near the Project area during
the public scoping period to share
information and receive comments and
suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DATES:
Ms.
Catherine Cunningham, Western Area
Power Administration, P.O. Box 281213,
Lakewood, CO 80228, telephone (720)
962–7000, fax (720) 962–7269, e-mail:
NextGenEIS@wapa.gov. For general
information on DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
review procedures or status of a NEPA
review, contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom,
Director of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC–20, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, telephone
(202) 586–4600 or (800) 472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western,
an agency within DOE, markets Federal
hydro-electric power to preference
customers, as specified by law.
These customers include
municipalities, cooperatives, public
utilities, irrigation districts, Federal and
State agencies, and Native American
tribes in 15 western states, including
South Dakota. Western owns and
operates about 17,000 miles of
transmission line.
Basin Electric is a regional wholesale
electric generation and transmission
cooperative owned and controlled by its
member cooperatives. Basin Electric
serves approximately 2.5 million
customers covering 430,000 square
miles in portions of Colorado, Iowa,
Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New
Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota,
and Wyoming.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 144 (Friday, July 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41301-41307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-14539]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Vocational and Adult Education; Overview Information;
Ready for College: Adult Education Transitions Program Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2006
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.191A.
Dates:
Applications Available: July 27, 2007.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: August 6, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 27, 2007.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 27, 2007.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of the Program: Section 243 of the Adult Education and
Family Literacy Act (Act), 20 U.S.C. 9253, authorizes the Secretary to
establish and carry out a program of national leadership activities to
enhance the quality of adult education and literacy programs
nationwide. Under the authority of that section of the Act, the
Secretary plans to support State and local efforts to increase the rate
at which adults, aged 18 to 24, successfully complete adult secondary
education (ASE) and transition to postsecondary education.
Background Information
The President's American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI)
recognizes that a high school diploma or equivalency diploma is no
longer adequate for 21st century workforce demands and that the bedrock
of America's competitiveness is a well-educated and skilled workforce.
Some form of postsecondary education and training is now critical for
workers to succeed in the new global economy. Yet, in 2004, one in five
18- to 24-year-olds had not yet completed high school. While about half
of the students who leave school early eventually obtain a credential,
millions never receive one. Further, an estimated 3.8 million youth
between the ages of 18 and 24 are neither employed nor in school. Young
adults with low levels of literacy and educational attainment also have
a lower chance of escaping unemployment. And those who do become
employed are often limited to low-wage jobs. For America to continue to
prosper economically, educators and others need to focus on ways to
help more out-of-school youth obtain high school-level equivalency
diplomas and transition successfully to postsecondary education.
Many State and local agencies have developed a variety of
interventions designed to re-engage out-of-school youth and help them
obtain both a high school equivalency credential and a postsecondary
certificate or degree. While the Department is generally aware of these
efforts, there is little documentation of either their specific
composition or their effectiveness. More importantly, little
investigation has been conducted on why a particular practice has
positive results with out-of-school youth. We are, therefore, using
this competition to support projects that will identify and, when
necessary, further develop, strengthen, enhance, or expand educational
strategies (e.g., program design elements such as scheduling,
educational counseling, supportive services for students, and
professional development for staff; enhanced curricula; or linkages
with postsecondary education programs) already utilized in local ASE
programs. Because we want to begin documenting the specific composition
of the educational strategies, the projects funded under this
competition will also help local programs to establish procedures for
demonstrating, documenting, and gathering data on the effectiveness of
their educational strategies. This data will also help us better
understand why the educational strategies facilitate the transition of
out-of-school youth to postsecondary education. Further, descriptions
of the educational practices demonstrated to be effective by the
projects will be packaged for national dissemination.
This competition is the first of several activities the Department
anticipates
[[Page 41302]]
supporting to assist States in improving the quality of ASE and
building capacity to increase the rate of out-of-school youth
successfully transitioning to postsecondary education. By identifying
and documenting existing effective educational practices of State and
local agencies, we will be better able to (1) Disseminate effective
models for other States to adopt, and (2) plan next steps for assisting
States to improve the quality of adult education services so that more
adults become ``college ready'' and actually transition to
postsecondary education.
Application Requirements and Required Project Activities
An application under this competition must propose a project that
identifies, demonstrates, and documents practices that improve ASE and
that facilitate the successful transition of out-of-school youth to
postsecondary education. The project must--
(a) Identify, demonstrate, and document, in at least four existing
local ASE programs funded under the Act, educational strategies (e.g.,
program design elements such as scheduling, educational counseling,
supportive services for students, and professional development for
staff; enhanced curricula; or linkages with postsecondary education
programs) designed to improve the ability of out-of-school youth to
transition to postsecondary education. The educational strategies must
be authorized under the Act and must currently be utilized in the local
ASE programs participating in a project under this competition. An
applicant must describe in its application the criteria and process it
proposes to use to identify and select educational strategies to be
demonstrated;
(b) Assist the local ASE programs identified under paragraph (a) of
this section to--
(1) Further develop, strengthen, enhance, or expand educational
strategies in order to improve the capacity of the programs to increase
the percentage of out-of-school youth who are ready for, and actually
transition to, postsecondary education;
(2) Establish procedures that help the local ASE programs
demonstrate, document, and gather data on educational strategies that
improve ASE and facilitate the transition of out-of-school youth to
postsecondary education; and
(3) Offer opportunities for out-of-school youth to participate in
course work and other activities that are coordinated with, and make it
easier for out-of-school youth to transition to, postsecondary
institutions;
(c) Periodically communicate with the eligible agency, as defined
under section 203(4) of the Act (20 U.S.C. 9202(4)), in the State in
which the project will operate, regarding the planning, development,
and implementation of the project;
(d) Use an independent evaluator to gather data validating whether
the educational strategies demonstrated by the local ASE programs
actually--
(1) Enhance learning for participating out-of-school youth;
(2) Improve ASE instruction in participating local programs;
(3) Increase the percentage of participating out-of-school youth
who transition to postsecondary education; and
(4) Result in measurable college readiness of out-of-school youth,
including by providing a description of the standard the project used
to define college readiness;
(e) Package, for dissemination, a description of the educational
practices demonstrated to be effective by the project, including by
documenting, to the extent possible, the effectiveness of the
educational practices in improving ASE and facilitating the transition
of out-of-school youth to postsecondary education;
(f) Be coordinated with similar or related efforts, and with other
appropriate community, State, and Federal resources in order to
increase the likelihood that the project will result in system change
or improvement; and
(g) At the conclusion of the project, propose the next steps that
educators and researchers should under take to further validate the
effectiveness of the educational strategies demonstrated in the
project.
Priority: We are establishing this priority for the FY 2006 grant
competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the
list of unfunded applicants from this competition, in accordance with
section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20
U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Competitive Preference Priority: This priority is a competitive
preference priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an
additional 20 points to an application, depending on how well the
application meets the priority. The points awarded under this priority
are in addition to any points the application earns under the selection
criteria for this competition, provided elsewhere in this notice.
The priority is:
Involvement of an Eligible Agency
Projects for which the eligible agency, as defined under section
203(4) of the Act (20 U.S.C. 9202(4)), in the State in which the
project will operate is actively involved in the project (i.e., has a
clearly defined leadership role in planning, developing, and
implementing the proposed demonstration project) as evidenced by
clearly delineated responsibilities that are described in the
application and by a letter from the eligible agency committing to
carry out the agreed upon responsibilities.
Note: The definitions in section 203 of the Act apply to this
competition. (20 U.S.C. 9202).
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed non-statutory requirements,
priorities, and selection criteria. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however,
allows the Secretary to exempt from rulemaking requirements non-
statutory requirements, priorities, and selection criteria governing
the first grant competition under a new or substantially revised
program authority. This is the first grant competition under section
243 of the Act and, therefore, qualifies for this exemption. In order
to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forgo
public comment on the non-statutory requirements, priority, and
selection criteria under the authority of section 437(d)(1) of GEPA.
The non-statutory requirements, priority, and selection criteria set
forth in this notice will apply to the FY 2006 competition and any
subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 9253.
Applicable Regulations: The Education Department General.
Administrative Regulations: (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79,
80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, 99.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to the
institutions of higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $2,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards: $500,000 to $1,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $750,000.
[[Page 41303]]
Estimated Number of Awards: 2 to 4.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 24 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: The following entities are eligible for a
grant:
(a) A State educational agency.
(b) A local educational agency.
(c) A postsecondary educational institution.
(d) Other public or private agencies, organizations, and
institutions.
(e) A consortium of eligible applicants. Eligible applicants
seeking to apply as a consortium must comply with the regulations in 34
CFR 75.127-75.129, which address group applications.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: Karen Lee, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 11047, Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-7240. Telephone: (202) 245-7720 or
by e-mail: karen.lee@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the program contact
person listed in this section.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it has a
better understanding of the number of entities that intend to apply for
funding under this competition. Therefore, the Secretary strongly
encourages each potential applicant to notify the Department by sending
a short e-mail message indicating the applicant's intent to submit an
application for funding. The e-mail should include only the applicant's
intent to submit an application; it does not need to include
information regarding the content of the proposed application. This e-
mail notification should be sent 10 days after the publication of this
notice to Diane DeMaio at: diane.demaio@ed.gov.
We will consider an application submitted by the deadline date for
transmittal of applications even if the applicant did not provide
notice of its intent to apply.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application)
is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your application. You must limit Part III to
the equivalent of no more than 25 pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5 x 11, on one side only, with 1'' margins
at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is 12 point, double-spaced.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one page abstract, the
resumes, or the letters of support. However, the page limit does apply
to all of the application narrative section (Part III).
We will reject your application if:
You apply these standards and exceed the page limit; or
You apply other standards and exceed the equivalent of the
page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: July 27, 2007.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: August 6, 2007.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 27, 2007.
Applications for grants under this competition may be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov), or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery. For information (including dates
and times) about how to submit your application electronically, or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery, please refer to section IV. 6.
Other Submission Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
in this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 27, 2007.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this competition may be submitted electronically or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
To comply with the President's Management Agenda, we are
participating as a partner in the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site.
Ready for College: Adult Education Transitions, CFDA Number 84.191A, is
included in this project. We request your participation in Grants.gov.
If you choose to submit your application electronically, you must use
the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at https://www.Grants.gov.
Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Ready for
College: Adult Education Transitions Program at https://www.Grants.gov.
You must search for the downloadable application package for this
program by the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha
suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.191, not 84.191A).
Please note the following:
Your participation in Grants.gov is voluntary.
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not consider your application
if it is date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system later
[[Page 41304]]
than 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
When we retrieve an application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if
we are rejecting your application because it was date and time stamped
by the Grants.gov system after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at https://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
To submit your application via Grants.gov, you must
complete all steps in the Grants.gov registration process (see https://
www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp). These steps include
(1) Registering your organization, a multi-part process that includes
registration with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR); (2)
registering yourself as an Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (3) getting authorized as an AOR by your organization.
Details on these steps are outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see https://www.grants.gov/section910/
Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf. You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number used with this registration. Please
note that the registration process may take five or more business days
to complete, and you must have completed all registration steps to
allow you to submit successfully an application via Grants.gov. In
addition, you will need to update the CCR registration on an annual
basis. This may take three or more business days to complete.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you,
if you submit your application in paper format.
If you submit your application electronically, you must
submit all documents electronically, including all information you
typically provide on the following forms: Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs
(ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications. Please note
that two of these forms--the SF 424 and the Department of Education
Supplemental information for SF 424--have replaced the ED 424
(Application for Federal Education Assistance).
If you submit your application electronically, you must
attach any narrative sections of your application as files in a .DOC
(document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF (Portable Document) format. If
you upload a file type other than the three file types specified in
this paragraph, or submit a password-protected file, we will not review
that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by e-mail. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
the application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date, please contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in this notice and
provide an explanation of the technical problem you experienced with
Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number. We will
accept your application if we can confirm that a technical problem
occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that problem affected your
ability to submit your application by 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date. The Department will contact you after
a determination is made on whether your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you submit your application in paper format by mail (through the
U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier), you must mail the
original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the applicable
following address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.191A), 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260; or
By mail through a commercial carrier: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Stop 4260, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.191A), 7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD 20785-1506.
Regardless of which address you use, you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
[[Page 41305]]
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in paper format by hand delivery,
you (or a courier service) must deliver the original and two copies of
your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.191A), 550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The Secretary uses the following program
criteria to evaluate an application. The maximum score for each
criterion is indicated in parentheses. The maximum score for all of
these criteria is 110 points.
(a) Significance. (20 points) In determining the significance of
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which--
(i) The proposed project will identify, demonstrate, and document,
in at least four existing local ASE programs funded under the Act,
educational strategies (e.g., program design elements such as
scheduling, educational counseling, supportive services for students,
and professional development for staff; enhanced curricula; or linkages
with postsecondary education programs) designed to improve the ability
of out-of-school youth to transition to postsecondary education. The
educational strategies must be authorized under the Act and must
currently be utilized in the local ASE programs participating in a
project under this competition;
(ii) The applicant describes the criteria and process it proposes
to use to identify and select educational strategies to be
demonstrated; and
(iii) The proposed project will assist the local ASE programs to--
(A) Further develop, strengthen, enhance, or expand educational
strategies in order to improve the capacity of the programs to increase
the percentage of out-of-school youth who are ready for, and actually
transition to, postsecondary education;
(B) Establish procedures that help the local ASE programs
demonstrate, document, and gather data on educational strategies that
improve ASE and facilitate the transition of out-of-school youth to
postsecondary education; and
(C) Offer opportunities for out-of-school youth to participate in
course work and other activities that are coordinated with, and make it
easier for out-of-school youth to transition to, postsecondary
institutions.
(2) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in ASE
curricula or program designs have been identified and will be addressed
by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude of those
gaps or weaknesses.
(b) Quality of the project design. (45 points) In determining the
quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers
the following factors:
(1) The extent to which clearly specified and measurable goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are
aligned with the activities described in the Application Requirements
and Required Project Activities section in this notice.
(2) The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practices.
(3) The extent to which the applicant describes effective
strategies to--
(i) Improve program completion rates;
(ii) Increase the percentage of out-of-school youth who obtain a
General Educational Development or high school equivalency credential;
(iii) Increase the percentage of out-of-school youth who
demonstrate college readiness; and
(iv) Increase the percentage of out-of-school youth who
successfully transition to postsecondary education.
(4) The extent to which the proposed project will periodically
communicate with the eligible agency, as defined under section 203(4)
of the Act (20 U.S.C. 9202(4)), in the State in which the project will
operate, regarding the planning, development, and implementation the
project.
(5) The extent to which the design will result in replicable
educational strategies that can be packaged for dissemination
nationally.
(6) The extent to which the proposed project will package, for
dissemination, a description of the educational practices demonstrated
to be effective by the project, including by documenting, to the extent
possible, the effectiveness of the educational practices in improving
ASE and facilitating the transition of out-of-school youth to
postsecondary education.
(7) The extent to which the proposed project will be coordinated
with similar or related efforts, and with other appropriate community,
State, and Federal resources in order to increase the likelihood that
the project will result in system change or improvement.
(8) The extent to which, at the conclusion of the proposed project,
the project will propose the next steps that educators and researchers
should undertake to further validate the effectiveness of the
educational strategies demonstrated in the project.
(c) Quality of project personnel. (5 Points) In determining the
quality of project personnel, the Secretary considers the following
factors:
(1) The extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that traditionally
have been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(2) The extent to which the qualifications, including relevant
training and experience, of the project director, key personnel, and
subcontractors match the requirements of the project.
(d) Quality of the management plan. (20 points) In determining the
quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the management plan is designed to achieve
the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget,
including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones
for accomplishing project tasks.
(2) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate
to meet the objectives of the proposed project.
(3) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
[[Page 41306]]
(e) Quality of the project evaluation. (20 points) In determining
the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary considers the following
factors:
(1) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project.
(2) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and to the performance measures
discussed in Section VI. 4. Performance Measures in this notice and the
extent to which the methods of evaluation will produce valid and
reliable quantitative and qualitative data.
(3) The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide a
coordinated strategy for examining the effectiveness of project
implementation strategies across multiple programs within a State.
(4) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback.
(5) The extent to which the proposed project will use an
independent evaluator to gather data validating whether the educational
strategies demonstrated by the local ASE programs actually--
(i) Enhance learning for participating out-of-school youth;
(ii) Improve ASE instruction in participating local programs;
(iii) Increase the percentage of participating out-of-school youth
who transition to postsecondary education; and
(iv) Result in measurable college readiness of out-of-school youth,
including by providing a description of the standard the project used
to define college readiness.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notice
(GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates the approved application as part of the binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting. (a) At the end of your project period, you must
submit a final performance report, including financial information, as
directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must
submit an annual performance report that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the
Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/
apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(b) In addition, grantees under this competition must submit--
(1) An interim report six months after the grant is awarded;
(2) An evaluation report that--
(i) Reports on the effectiveness of the project;
(ii) Reports on the effectiveness of practices demonstrated during
the project, including whether educational strategies actually--
(A) Enhanced learning for out-of-school youth;
(B) Improved ASE programs;
(C) Improved States' capacity to increase the percentage of out-of-
school youth who transition to postsecondary education; and
(D) Resulted in, or contributed to, measurable college readiness of
out-of-school youth, including by providing a description of the
standard the project used to define college readiness;
(iii) Contains recommendations on how to further evaluate the
effectiveness of practices demonstrated during the project; and
(iv) Reports on the percentage of out-of-school youth enrolled in
the project who were retained during the project period and who
demonstrated measurable college readiness; and
(3) An annual report on the GPRA measures identified in the
Performance Measures section of this notice.
4. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance Results
Act of 1993, Federal departments and agencies must clearly describe the
goals and objectives of programs, identify resources and actions needed
to accomplish goals and objectives, develop a means of measuring
progress made, and regularly report on achievement. One important
source of program information on successes and lessons learned is the
project evaluation conducted under individual grants. In evaluating the
overall effectiveness of projects funded under this competition,
grantees must also be prepared to measure and report on the following
measures of effectiveness:
a. The percentage of out-of-school youth served by the project
whose goal is to complete high school, and who earn a high school
diploma or recognized equivalent.
b. The percentage of out-of-school youth served by the project
whose goal is to enter postsecondary education and who enroll in a
postsecondary education program.
c. The percentage of out-of-school youth served by the project who
demonstrate measurable college readiness.
d. The percentage of out-of-school youth served by the project who
demonstrate improved literacy and mathematics skills using pre- and
post-tests that are approved for use in the National Reporting System
for Adult Education and that are identified in the assessment policy of
the State in which the project will operate.
VII. Agency Contacts
For Further Information Contact: Diane DeMaio or Ursula Lord, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 11002, Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-6121. Telephone: (202) 245-7841 or
(202) 245-7734, respectively, or by e-mail: diane.demaio@ed.gov or
ursula.lord@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an alternative format
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO
[[Page 41307]]
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: July 24, 2007.
Troy R. Justesen,
Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education.
[FR Doc. E7-14539 Filed 7-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P