Pine Shoot Beetle; Additions to Quarantined Areas, 1912-1913 [E7-505]
Download as PDF
1912
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
PART 890—FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
§ 890.806 When can former spouses
change enrollment or reenroll and what are
the effective dates?
1. The authority citation for part 890
continues to read as follows:
*
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; § 890.303 also
issued under 50 U.S.C. 403p, 22 U.S.C. 4069c
and 4069c–1; subpart L also issued under
sec. 599 C of Pub. L 101–513, 104 Stat. 2064,
as amended; § 890.102 also issued under
sections 11202(f), 11232(e), and 11246(b) and
(c) of Pub. L. 105–33, 111 Stat. 251; and
section 721 of Pub. L. 105–261, 112 Stat.
2061 unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 890.301 add new paragraph
(i)(4)(iv) to read as follows:
I
§ 890.301 Opportunities for employees
who are not participants in premium
conversion to enroll or change enrollment;
effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, an employee must change
the enrollment within 60 days of the
disaster, as announced by OPM. If an
employee does not change the
enrollment within the time frame
announced by OPM, the employee will
be considered to be enrolled in the
standard option of the Blue Cross and
Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan. The
effective date of enrollment changes
under this provision will be set by OPM
when it makes the announcement
allowing such changes.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 890.306 add new paragraph
(1)(4)(v) to read as follows:
I
§ 890.306 When can annuitants or survivor
annuitants change enrollment or reenroll
and what are the effective dates?
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(1) * * *
(4) * * *
(v) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, an annuitant must change
the enrollment within 60 days of the
disaster, as announced by OPM. If an
annuitant does not change the
enrollment within the time frame
announced by OPM, the annuitant will
be considered to be enrolled in the
standard option of the Blue Cross and
Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan. The
effective date of enrollment changes
under this provision will be set by OPM
when it makes the announcement
allowing such changes.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 890.806 add new paragraph
(j)(4)(iv) to read as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:05 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, the former spouse must
change the enrollment within 60 days of
the disaster, as announced by OPM. If
the former spouse does not change the
enrollment within the time frame
announced by OPM, the former spouse
will be considered to be enrolled in the
standard option of the Blue Cross and
Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan. The
effective date of enrollment changes
under this provision will be set by OPM
when it makes the announcement
allowing such changes.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 890.1108 add new paragraph
(h)(4)(iv) to read as follows:
§ 890.1108 Opportunities to change
enrollment; effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, the enrollee must change
the enrollment within 60 days of the
disaster, as announced by OPM. If the
enrollee does not change the enrollment
within the time frame announced by
OPM, the enrollee will be considered to
be enrolled in the standard option of the
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Service
Benefit Plan. The effective date of
enrollment changes under this provision
will be set by OPM when it makes the
announcement allowing such changes.
*
*
*
*
*
regulations by adding counties in
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, New Jersey, New
York, and Ohio to the list of quarantined
areas and by designating the States of
Michigan, Minnesota, and
Pennsylvania, in their entirety, as
quarantined areas based on their
decision not to enforce intrastate
movement restrictions. The interim rule
also added the States of Connecticut and
Rhode Island, in their entirety, to the
list of quarantined areas based on
projections of the natural spread of pine
shoot beetle that make it reasonable to
believe that the pest is present in those
States. The interim rule was necessary
to prevent the spread of pine shoot
beetle, a pest of pine trees, into
noninfested areas of the United States.
DATES: Effective on January 17, 2007, we
are adopting as a final rule the interim
rule published at 71 FR 58243–58246 on
October 3, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Weyman Fussell, Program Manager, Pest
Detection and Management Programs,
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 134,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
5705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
AGENCY:
The regulations in 7 CFR 301.50
through 301.50–10 (referred to below as
the regulations) restrict the interstate
movement of certain regulated articles
from quarantined areas in order to
prevent the spread of pine shoot beetle
(PSB) into noninfested areas of the
United States.
In an interim rule 1 effective and
published in the Federal Register on
October 3, 2006 (71 FR 58243–58246,
Docket No. APHIS–2006–0117), we
amended the regulations by adding Jo
Daviess and Stark Counties, IL;
Dearborn County, IN; Dubuque and
Scott Counties, IA; Bergen, Hunterdon,
Passaic, Sussex, and Warren Counties,
NJ; Columbia, Orange, and Ulster
Counties, NY; and Highland, Jackson,
Ross, and Scioto Counties, OH, to the
list of quarantined areas in § 301.50–
3(c). In addition, we designated the
States of Michigan, Minnesota, and
Pennsylvania, in their entirety, as
quarantined areas based on their
decision not to enforce intrastate
movement restrictions. Finally, we
added the States of Connecticut and
Rhode Island, in their entirety, to the
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule
that amended the pine shoot beetle
1 To view the interim rule, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, click on the ‘‘Advanced
Search’’ tab, and select ‘‘Docket Search.’’ In the
Docket ID field, enter APHIS–2006–0117, then click
‘‘Submit.’’ Clicking on the Docket ID link in the
search results page will produce a list of all
documents in the docket.
[FR Doc. E7–533 Filed 1–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0117]
Pine Shoot Beetle; Additions to
Quarantined Areas
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
list of quarantined areas based on
projections of the natural spread of PSB
that make it reasonable to believe that
the pest is present in those States.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
December 4, 2006. We did not receive
any comments. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim rule, we are
adopting the interim rule as a final rule.
This action also affirms the
information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, for this action, the Office of
Management and Budget has waived its
review under Executive Order 12866.
these services under the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (AMA).
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information concerning program
operations, contact John Giler, Deputy
Director, Field Management Division, at
his E-mail address:
john.c.giler@usda.gov or by telephone
(202) 720–0228. For information
concerning fee development contact,
contact Ms. Patricia Donohue-Galvin,
Director, Budget and Planning Staff, at
her E-mail address: patricia.donohuegalvin@usda.gov or by telephone (202)
690–0231.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
The AMA authorizes official
inspection and weighing services, on a
user-fee basis, of rice (7 U.S.C. 1622(h)).
The AMA provides that reasonable fees
be collected from the users of the
services to cover, as nearly as
practicable, the costs of the services
rendered.
The regulations in 7 CFR 868 list user
fees for inspection and weighing
services provided by the Grain
Inspection, Packers and Stockyards
Administration (GIPSA or Agency). This
final rule amends the schedule for fees
and charges for inspection and weighing
services that GIPSA provides to the rice
industry to reflect the costs necessary to
operate the program.
GIPSA receives no directly
appropriated funds to provide
inspection and weighing services. Our
ability to provide these services
depends on user fees.
For our user fees to cover our costs so
that we can continue to provide services
and to inform our customers of user fees
in time for advance planning, we
proposed to set user fees for our
inspection and weighing services for
fiscal years 2007 through 2010.
GIPSA regularly reviews its user fee
programs to determine if the fees are
adequate. While GIPSA continues to
search for opportunities to reduce its
costs, the existing fee schedule will not
generate sufficient revenues to cover
program costs while maintaining the
Agency 3-month operating reserve.
The cost of operating the rice program
was $4.4 million during fiscal year 2006
and will increase to approximately $4.8
million by fiscal year 2010. These cost
increases are due to estimated annual
cost of living adjustments for employee
salaries and benefits, equipment
replacement, and information
technology upgrades. Replacing aging
rice inspection equipment will cost
approximately $50,000. An information
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
Accordingly, we are adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim
rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and
that was published at 71 FR 58243–
58246 on October 3, 2006.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 10th day of
January 2007.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–505 Filed 1–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
7 CFR Part 868
RIN 0580–AA92
Fees for Rice Inspection Services
Grain Inspection Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule revises the
regulations governing the sampling,
inspection, weighing, and certification
for rice by increasing certain fees
charged for the services by
approximately 18 percent. Further, the
rice fees increase an additional 3
percent each year through fiscal year
2010 and establish a stowage
examination fee. These revisions are
necessary in order to recover, as nearly
as practicable, the costs of performing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:05 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Background
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1913
technology upgrade to improve
certification efficiency and program
management will cost approximately
$300,000. The estimated costs
incorporate plans to introduce program
changes that will better control
increases in long-term costs.
We designed the revised fee structure
to fund the rice program this fiscal year
and future fiscal years to avoid a
continued program deficit. The
combination of the initial 18 percent
increase and the subsequent annual 3
percent increases will ultimately cover
the program’s operating cost and
replenish the 3-month retained earnings
balance.
We are also establishing a new fee for
stowage examination services that we
will provide as a service upon request.
In the April 11, 2006 Federal Register
(71 FR 18231–18236), we invited
comments on our proposed rule
identifying changes to the user fees we
charge for rice inspection and weighing
services. We solicited comments
concerning our proposal for 60 days
ending June 12, 2006. By the close of the
comment period, we received two
comments; one from representatives of a
rice mill and one from a rice industry
organization. Both commenters opposed
the fee increases. The issues raised in
these comments are discussed below.
The comments, one from a rice
industry trade organization and one
from a rice mill, both opposed the fee
increases. The trade organization stated
that the fee increase was excessive and
would lead to a reduction in service
requested from the industry, resulting in
a continuing cycle of fee increases. It
also said that the fee increase was
preemptive and premature considering
the continuing nature of discussion on
privatization.
The trade organization indicated that
GIPSA should eliminate costs, redesign
its delivery system in certain locations,
and it offered to work with GIPSA to
evaluate options.
The rice mill stated that the fees
charged by GIPSA were much higher
than private industry and that the
increase would force the industry to
look for alternatives. The mill also
questioned a statement in the proposed
rule concerning the voluntary nature of
the inspection service, because GIPSA is
the only agency issuing USDA Rice
Inspection Certificates.
We disagree with these comments.
The rice inspection program is
authorized under the AMA of 1946 and
funded by user fees. The rice fees were
last revised in 2003. Since that time,
costs have increased and retained
earnings have been depleted. Without
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1912-1913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-505]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0117]
Pine Shoot Beetle; Additions to Quarantined Areas
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, without change, an interim
rule that amended the pine shoot beetle regulations by adding counties
in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio to the list
of quarantined areas and by designating the States of Michigan,
Minnesota, and Pennsylvania, in their entirety, as quarantined areas
based on their decision not to enforce intrastate movement
restrictions. The interim rule also added the States of Connecticut and
Rhode Island, in their entirety, to the list of quarantined areas based
on projections of the natural spread of pine shoot beetle that make it
reasonable to believe that the pest is present in those States. The
interim rule was necessary to prevent the spread of pine shoot beetle,
a pest of pine trees, into noninfested areas of the United States.
DATES: Effective on January 17, 2007, we are adopting as a final rule
the interim rule published at 71 FR 58243-58246 on October 3, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Weyman Fussell, Program Manager,
Pest Detection and Management Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-5705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 7 CFR 301.50 through 301.50-10 (referred to
below as the regulations) restrict the interstate movement of certain
regulated articles from quarantined areas in order to prevent the
spread of pine shoot beetle (PSB) into noninfested areas of the United
States.
In an interim rule \1\ effective and published in the Federal
Register on October 3, 2006 (71 FR 58243-58246, Docket No. APHIS-2006-
0117), we amended the regulations by adding Jo Daviess and Stark
Counties, IL; Dearborn County, IN; Dubuque and Scott Counties, IA;
Bergen, Hunterdon, Passaic, Sussex, and Warren Counties, NJ; Columbia,
Orange, and Ulster Counties, NY; and Highland, Jackson, Ross, and
Scioto Counties, OH, to the list of quarantined areas in Sec. 301.50-
3(c). In addition, we designated the States of Michigan, Minnesota, and
Pennsylvania, in their entirety, as quarantined areas based on their
decision not to enforce intrastate movement restrictions. Finally, we
added the States of Connecticut and Rhode Island, in their entirety, to
the
[[Page 1913]]
list of quarantined areas based on projections of the natural spread of
PSB that make it reasonable to believe that the pest is present in
those States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the interim rule, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``Advanced Search'' tab, and select ``Docket Search.''
In the Docket ID field, enter APHIS-2006-0117, then click
``Submit.'' Clicking on the Docket ID link in the search results
page will produce a list of all documents in the docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before December 4, 2006. We did not receive any comments. Therefore,
for the reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim
rule as a final rule.
This action also affirms the information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, for this action, the Office of Management and Budget has
waived its review under Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
Accordingly, we are adopting as a final rule, without change, the
interim rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and that was published at 71
FR 58243-58246 on October 3, 2006.
Done in Washington, DC, this 10th day of January 2007.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7-505 Filed 1-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P