Evaluating the Invasive Potential of Imported Plants; Electronic Public Discussion, 66156-66157 [E6-18768]
Download as PDF
66156
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 218
Monday, November 13, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0078]
Evaluating the Invasive Potential of
Imported Plants; Electronic Public
Discussion
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of electronic public
discussion.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) is hosting an
electronic public discussion on methods
that can be used to evaluate the
potential of imported plants to become
invasive species if they are introduced
into the United States. Any interested
person can register for the electronic
discussion, which will allow
participants to upload files and interact
with other participants and with APHIS
staff.
DATES: The electronic public discussion
will be held from November 27, 2006 to
January 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Polly Lehtonen, Senior Staff Officer,
Commodity Import Analysis and
Operations, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1236; (301) 734–8758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
Under the Plant Protection Act (7
U.S.C. 7701–7772 et seq.), noxious weed
is defined as: ‘‘Any plant or plant
product that can directly or indirectly
injure or cause damage to crops
(including nursery stock or plant
products), livestock, poultry, or other
interests of agriculture, irrigation,
navigation, the natural resources of the
United States, the public health, or the
environment.’’ The Plant Protection Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Nov 09, 2006
Jkt 211001
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
to undertake such actions as may be
necessary to prevent the introduction
and spread of plant pests and noxious
weeds within the United States. The
Secretary has delegated this
responsibility to the Administrator of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS).
The regulations in 7 CFR part 360,
‘‘Noxious Weed Regulations,’’ contain
restrictions on the movement of noxious
weed plants or plant products listed in
that part into or through the United
States and interstate. To add a plant to
the list of noxious weeds in part 360, or
to remove a plant from that list, APHIS
conducts a pest risk analysis. One part
of this analysis is an evaluation of the
potential of the plant to become an
invasive species. (The term invasive
species is defined by Executive Order
13112 as a species that is: (1) Non-native
(or alien) to the ecosystem under
consideration and (2) whose
introduction causes or is likely to cause
economic or environmental harm or
harm to human health. The first part of
this definition includes all imported
plants that are not present in the United
States; the second part is consistent
with the definition of noxious weed in
the Plant Protection Act, as quoted
above. Accordingly, we make a
determination regarding a plant’s
potential for invasiveness when
determining whether to add the plant to
the noxious weed list in part 360.) If the
pest risk analysis indicates that a change
should be made to the regulations, we
undertake rulemaking to do so.
Since it is impossible to determine
definitively whether a plant that is not
present in the United States will become
invasive when introduced to the United
States without actually introducing the
plant, APHIS uses other types of
scientific information to help make
judgments about whether a plant, if
imported, would be likely to be
invasive. Several years ago, APHIS
commissioned an evaluation of the state
of scientific knowledge about biological
invasions and the state of our ability to
reliably predict the outcome of
accidental or intentional introductions
of nonindigenous species. The National
Research Council established the
Committee on the Scientific Basis for
Predicting the Invasive Potential of
Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests in
the United States to complete this
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
evaluation. The resulting study,
published in 2002, concluded that the
record of a plant’s invasiveness in other
geographical areas is currently the most
reliable predictor of the plant’s ability to
establish itself and become invasive
when introduced into the United
States.1
The study further concluded that
there are currently no known broad
scientific principles or reliable
procedures for evaluating the invasive
potential of plants in geographic ranges
where they are not present, but that a
conceptual basis for understanding
invasions exists, and this conceptual
basis could be developed into principles
for predicting invasiveness. The study
recommended that the framework
APHIS uses to evaluate imported plants
for potential release as forage, crops, soil
reclamation, and ornamental
landscaping should be expanded to
include evaluation of the hazards these
species might pose. The study also
recommended that controlled
experimental field screening for
potentially invasive species be pursued
for species whose features are associated
with establishment and rapid spread
without cultivation and whose history
of introduction into the United States is
unknown.
To follow up on these
recommendations, we are requesting an
exchange of ideas and information about
methods to evaluate plants for potential
invasiveness. The information will be
helpful for both the APHIS noxious
weed program and the revision of the
nursery stock quarantine regulations in
7 CFR part 319 (§§ 319.37 through
319.37–14). (The revision of the nursery
stock regulations was discussed in
general terms in an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking published in the
Federal Register on December 10, 2004
[69 FR 71736–71744, Docket No. 03–
069–1].) As part of the revision of the
nursery stock regulations, we anticipate
publishing a proposed rule at some
point following this electronic
discussion that will solicit public
comment on establishing a category of
plants whose importation is not
authorized pending pest risk analysis
based on other scientific evidence that
indicates invasive potential. Because we
would be performing pest risk analyses
to remove plants from that category and
1 The study is available for purchase through the
Internet at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10259.html.
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
either allow their importation or add
them to the list of prohibited noxious
weeds, we would like to ensure that our
pest risk analysis process for potentially
invasive plants is able to evaluate the
risk posed by these plants as thoroughly
and rigorously as possible.
Members of the APHIS Weed Team
will participate in the electronic
discussion. We will share all data and
opinions offered during the discussion
with other groups that are interested in
methods to predict invasiveness for both
plants and animals, such as the National
Invasive Species Council Pathways
Work Team and the North American
Plant Protection Organization Invasive
Species Panel.
Questions for Discussion
We would like participants in the
electronic discussion to specifically
address the following six questions,
although general comments on the issue
of evaluating invasiveness will be
accepted as well.
1. What criteria, other than whether
the plant has a history of invasiveness
elsewhere, are most useful to determine
the invasiveness of a plant introduced
into the United States for the first time?
2. When there is little or no existing
scientific literature or other information
describing the invasiveness of a plant
species, how much should we
extrapolate from information on
congeners (other species within the
same genus)?
3. What specific scientific
experiments should be conducted to
best evaluate a plant’s invasive
potential? Should these experiments be
conducted in a foreign area, in the
United States, or both?
4. How should the results of such
experiments be interpreted?
Specifically, what results should be
interpreted as providing conclusive
information for a regulatory decision?
5. If field trials are necessary to
determine the invasive potential of a
plant, under what conditions should the
research be conducted to prevent the
escape of the plant into the
environment?
6. What models or techniques are
being used by the nursery industry,
weed scientists, seed companies,
botanical gardens, and others to screen
plants that have not yet been widely
introduced into the United States for
invasiveness? What species have been
rejected by these evaluators as a result
of the use of these evaluation methods?
Accessing the Electronic Discussion
The electronic public discussion will
be held from November 27, 2006 to
January 26, 2007. We are beginning the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Nov 09, 2006
Jkt 211001
discussion 2 weeks after this notice is
published in the Federal Register to
give participants time to consider the
questions and assemble any relevant
information.
While anyone can access the
discussion and read the comments,
registration is required in order to
participate in the discussion. You will
be asked to register at the time you post
your comment. The discussion will be
accessible through a link on Plant
Protection and Quarantine’s Web page
for the nursery stock revision, https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/Q37/
revision.html. Participants will be
required to enter their name and e-mail
address. Affiliation and mailing address
are optional. Only the participant names
will be publicly displayed; the other
information will allow us to contact you
to resolve technical difficulties or
request additional information or
clarification. When the discussion
begins, there will be a link to access the
discussion itself on the nursery stock
revision Web page.
The discussion will be convened
using IBM Domino software, which
allows participants to upload and view
files as well as make posts in the
discussion. The IBM Domino software
supports Microsoft Internet Explorer
and other major Web browsers for both
Windows and Macintosh systems.
Technical support will be available
during the discussion. There is no cost
to participate in the discussion.
Because APHIS staff will review posts
as they are submitted, there may be
some delay between the submission of
a post and its availability in the public
discussion. Multiple APHIS staff
members will be monitoring the
discussion, and we will try to minimize
any delays.
If you wish to submit comments or
other information on the topics
described in this notice, but you do not
wish to be part of the electronic
discussion, you may send your
comments via postal mail or commercial
delivery to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at the
beginning of this notice.
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
November 2006.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6–18768 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66157
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
Domestic Sugar Program—Final 2005Crop and Initial 2006-Crop Cane Sugar
and Sugar Beet Marketing Allotments
and Company Allocations
Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the final
2005-crop and initial 2006-crop cane
state allotments and company
allocations to sugarcane and sugar beet
processors. The 2005-crop year runs
from October 1, 2005, through
September 30, 2006 (fiscal year (FY)
2006). The 2006-crop (FY 2007) cane
state allotments and company
allocations are based on an 8.750
million short tons, raw value (STRV)
overall allotment quantity (OAQ) of
domestic sugar. These actions apply to
all domestic sugar marketed for human
consumption in the United States from
October 1, 2006, through September 30,
2007. Although CCC already has
announced all of the information in this
notice, CCC is statutorily required to
publish in the Federal Register
determinations establishing, adjusting,
or suspending sugar marketing
allotments.
ADDRESSES: Barbara Fecso, Dairy and
Sweeteners Analysis Group, Economic
Policy and Analysis Staff, Farm Service
Agency, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0516, Washington,
DC 20250–0516; telephone (202) 720–
4146; FAX (202) 690–1480; e-mail:
barbara.fecso@wdc.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Fecso at (202) 720–4146.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Final FY 2006 State Allotments and
Company Allocations
Section 359e(b) of the Agricultural
Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, (7
U.S.C. 1359ee(b) requires the Secretary
to reassign allocation to imports if it is
determined that processors will be
unable to market their allocations and
there is no CCC inventory. In a July 27,
2006 news release, CCC announced that
the agency had determined that the
domestic sugar supply would be unable
to fill 246,000 STRV of the OAQ and, in
accordance with the statute, reassigned
this deficit to imports. Hence, state
allotments and company allocations
were adjusted downward to reflect each
company’s and each state’s ability to
market its allocation and allotment.
The final 2005-crop (FY 2006) beet
and cane sugar marketing allotments
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66156-66157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18768]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 /
Notices
[[Page 66156]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0078]
Evaluating the Invasive Potential of Imported Plants; Electronic
Public Discussion
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of electronic public discussion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) is hosting an electronic public discussion
on methods that can be used to evaluate the potential of imported
plants to become invasive species if they are introduced into the
United States. Any interested person can register for the electronic
discussion, which will allow participants to upload files and interact
with other participants and with APHIS staff.
DATES: The electronic public discussion will be held from November 27,
2006 to January 26, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Polly Lehtonen, Senior Staff
Officer, Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-8758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 et seq.),
noxious weed is defined as: ``Any plant or plant product that can
directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including
nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other
interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources
of the United States, the public health, or the environment.'' The
Plant Protection Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to
undertake such actions as may be necessary to prevent the introduction
and spread of plant pests and noxious weeds within the United States.
The Secretary has delegated this responsibility to the Administrator of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
The regulations in 7 CFR part 360, ``Noxious Weed Regulations,''
contain restrictions on the movement of noxious weed plants or plant
products listed in that part into or through the United States and
interstate. To add a plant to the list of noxious weeds in part 360, or
to remove a plant from that list, APHIS conducts a pest risk analysis.
One part of this analysis is an evaluation of the potential of the
plant to become an invasive species. (The term invasive species is
defined by Executive Order 13112 as a species that is: (1) Non-native
(or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and (2) whose
introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental
harm or harm to human health. The first part of this definition
includes all imported plants that are not present in the United States;
the second part is consistent with the definition of noxious weed in
the Plant Protection Act, as quoted above. Accordingly, we make a
determination regarding a plant's potential for invasiveness when
determining whether to add the plant to the noxious weed list in part
360.) If the pest risk analysis indicates that a change should be made
to the regulations, we undertake rulemaking to do so.
Since it is impossible to determine definitively whether a plant
that is not present in the United States will become invasive when
introduced to the United States without actually introducing the plant,
APHIS uses other types of scientific information to help make judgments
about whether a plant, if imported, would be likely to be invasive.
Several years ago, APHIS commissioned an evaluation of the state of
scientific knowledge about biological invasions and the state of our
ability to reliably predict the outcome of accidental or intentional
introductions of nonindigenous species. The National Research Council
established the Committee on the Scientific Basis for Predicting the
Invasive Potential of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests in the
United States to complete this evaluation. The resulting study,
published in 2002, concluded that the record of a plant's invasiveness
in other geographical areas is currently the most reliable predictor of
the plant's ability to establish itself and become invasive when
introduced into the United States.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The study is available for purchase through the Internet at
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10259.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The study further concluded that there are currently no known broad
scientific principles or reliable procedures for evaluating the
invasive potential of plants in geographic ranges where they are not
present, but that a conceptual basis for understanding invasions
exists, and this conceptual basis could be developed into principles
for predicting invasiveness. The study recommended that the framework
APHIS uses to evaluate imported plants for potential release as forage,
crops, soil reclamation, and ornamental landscaping should be expanded
to include evaluation of the hazards these species might pose. The
study also recommended that controlled experimental field screening for
potentially invasive species be pursued for species whose features are
associated with establishment and rapid spread without cultivation and
whose history of introduction into the United States is unknown.
To follow up on these recommendations, we are requesting an
exchange of ideas and information about methods to evaluate plants for
potential invasiveness. The information will be helpful for both the
APHIS noxious weed program and the revision of the nursery stock
quarantine regulations in 7 CFR part 319 (Sec. Sec. 319.37 through
319.37-14). (The revision of the nursery stock regulations was
discussed in general terms in an advance notice of proposed rulemaking
published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2004 [69 FR 71736-
71744, Docket No. 03-069-1].) As part of the revision of the nursery
stock regulations, we anticipate publishing a proposed rule at some
point following this electronic discussion that will solicit public
comment on establishing a category of plants whose importation is not
authorized pending pest risk analysis based on other scientific
evidence that indicates invasive potential. Because we would be
performing pest risk analyses to remove plants from that category and
[[Page 66157]]
either allow their importation or add them to the list of prohibited
noxious weeds, we would like to ensure that our pest risk analysis
process for potentially invasive plants is able to evaluate the risk
posed by these plants as thoroughly and rigorously as possible.
Members of the APHIS Weed Team will participate in the electronic
discussion. We will share all data and opinions offered during the
discussion with other groups that are interested in methods to predict
invasiveness for both plants and animals, such as the National Invasive
Species Council Pathways Work Team and the North American Plant
Protection Organization Invasive Species Panel.
Questions for Discussion
We would like participants in the electronic discussion to
specifically address the following six questions, although general
comments on the issue of evaluating invasiveness will be accepted as
well.
1. What criteria, other than whether the plant has a history of
invasiveness elsewhere, are most useful to determine the invasiveness
of a plant introduced into the United States for the first time?
2. When there is little or no existing scientific literature or
other information describing the invasiveness of a plant species, how
much should we extrapolate from information on congeners (other species
within the same genus)?
3. What specific scientific experiments should be conducted to best
evaluate a plant's invasive potential? Should these experiments be
conducted in a foreign area, in the United States, or both?
4. How should the results of such experiments be interpreted?
Specifically, what results should be interpreted as providing
conclusive information for a regulatory decision?
5. If field trials are necessary to determine the invasive
potential of a plant, under what conditions should the research be
conducted to prevent the escape of the plant into the environment?
6. What models or techniques are being used by the nursery
industry, weed scientists, seed companies, botanical gardens, and
others to screen plants that have not yet been widely introduced into
the United States for invasiveness? What species have been rejected by
these evaluators as a result of the use of these evaluation methods?
Accessing the Electronic Discussion
The electronic public discussion will be held from November 27,
2006 to January 26, 2007. We are beginning the discussion 2 weeks after
this notice is published in the Federal Register to give participants
time to consider the questions and assemble any relevant information.
While anyone can access the discussion and read the comments,
registration is required in order to participate in the discussion. You
will be asked to register at the time you post your comment. The
discussion will be accessible through a link on Plant Protection and
Quarantine's Web page for the nursery stock revision, https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/Q37/revision.html. Participants will be required
to enter their name and e-mail address. Affiliation and mailing address
are optional. Only the participant names will be publicly displayed;
the other information will allow us to contact you to resolve technical
difficulties or request additional information or clarification. When
the discussion begins, there will be a link to access the discussion
itself on the nursery stock revision Web page.
The discussion will be convened using IBM Domino software, which
allows participants to upload and view files as well as make posts in
the discussion. The IBM Domino software supports Microsoft Internet
Explorer and other major Web browsers for both Windows and Macintosh
systems. Technical support will be available during the discussion.
There is no cost to participate in the discussion.
Because APHIS staff will review posts as they are submitted, there
may be some delay between the submission of a post and its availability
in the public discussion. Multiple APHIS staff members will be
monitoring the discussion, and we will try to minimize any delays.
If you wish to submit comments or other information on the topics
described in this notice, but you do not wish to be part of the
electronic discussion, you may send your comments via postal mail or
commercial delivery to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT at the beginning of this notice.
Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of November 2006.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6-18768 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P