Evaluating the Invasive Potential of Imported Plants; Electronic Public Discussion, 66156-66157 [E6-18768]

Download as PDF 66156 Notices Federal Register Vol. 71, No. 218 Monday, November 13, 2006 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service [Docket No. APHIS–2006–0078] Evaluating the Invasive Potential of Imported Plants; Electronic Public Discussion Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of electronic public discussion. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is hosting an electronic public discussion on methods that can be used to evaluate the potential of imported plants to become invasive species if they are introduced into the United States. Any interested person can register for the electronic discussion, which will allow participants to upload files and interact with other participants and with APHIS staff. DATES: The electronic public discussion will be held from November 27, 2006 to January 26, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Polly Lehtonen, Senior Staff Officer, Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737– 1236; (301) 734–8758. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Background Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 et seq.), noxious weed is defined as: ‘‘Any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment.’’ The Plant Protection Act VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:22 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 211001 authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to undertake such actions as may be necessary to prevent the introduction and spread of plant pests and noxious weeds within the United States. The Secretary has delegated this responsibility to the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). The regulations in 7 CFR part 360, ‘‘Noxious Weed Regulations,’’ contain restrictions on the movement of noxious weed plants or plant products listed in that part into or through the United States and interstate. To add a plant to the list of noxious weeds in part 360, or to remove a plant from that list, APHIS conducts a pest risk analysis. One part of this analysis is an evaluation of the potential of the plant to become an invasive species. (The term invasive species is defined by Executive Order 13112 as a species that is: (1) Non-native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and (2) whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health. The first part of this definition includes all imported plants that are not present in the United States; the second part is consistent with the definition of noxious weed in the Plant Protection Act, as quoted above. Accordingly, we make a determination regarding a plant’s potential for invasiveness when determining whether to add the plant to the noxious weed list in part 360.) If the pest risk analysis indicates that a change should be made to the regulations, we undertake rulemaking to do so. Since it is impossible to determine definitively whether a plant that is not present in the United States will become invasive when introduced to the United States without actually introducing the plant, APHIS uses other types of scientific information to help make judgments about whether a plant, if imported, would be likely to be invasive. Several years ago, APHIS commissioned an evaluation of the state of scientific knowledge about biological invasions and the state of our ability to reliably predict the outcome of accidental or intentional introductions of nonindigenous species. The National Research Council established the Committee on the Scientific Basis for Predicting the Invasive Potential of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests in the United States to complete this PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 evaluation. The resulting study, published in 2002, concluded that the record of a plant’s invasiveness in other geographical areas is currently the most reliable predictor of the plant’s ability to establish itself and become invasive when introduced into the United States.1 The study further concluded that there are currently no known broad scientific principles or reliable procedures for evaluating the invasive potential of plants in geographic ranges where they are not present, but that a conceptual basis for understanding invasions exists, and this conceptual basis could be developed into principles for predicting invasiveness. The study recommended that the framework APHIS uses to evaluate imported plants for potential release as forage, crops, soil reclamation, and ornamental landscaping should be expanded to include evaluation of the hazards these species might pose. The study also recommended that controlled experimental field screening for potentially invasive species be pursued for species whose features are associated with establishment and rapid spread without cultivation and whose history of introduction into the United States is unknown. To follow up on these recommendations, we are requesting an exchange of ideas and information about methods to evaluate plants for potential invasiveness. The information will be helpful for both the APHIS noxious weed program and the revision of the nursery stock quarantine regulations in 7 CFR part 319 (§§ 319.37 through 319.37–14). (The revision of the nursery stock regulations was discussed in general terms in an advance notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2004 [69 FR 71736–71744, Docket No. 03– 069–1].) As part of the revision of the nursery stock regulations, we anticipate publishing a proposed rule at some point following this electronic discussion that will solicit public comment on establishing a category of plants whose importation is not authorized pending pest risk analysis based on other scientific evidence that indicates invasive potential. Because we would be performing pest risk analyses to remove plants from that category and 1 The study is available for purchase through the Internet at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10259.html. E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / Notices cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES either allow their importation or add them to the list of prohibited noxious weeds, we would like to ensure that our pest risk analysis process for potentially invasive plants is able to evaluate the risk posed by these plants as thoroughly and rigorously as possible. Members of the APHIS Weed Team will participate in the electronic discussion. We will share all data and opinions offered during the discussion with other groups that are interested in methods to predict invasiveness for both plants and animals, such as the National Invasive Species Council Pathways Work Team and the North American Plant Protection Organization Invasive Species Panel. Questions for Discussion We would like participants in the electronic discussion to specifically address the following six questions, although general comments on the issue of evaluating invasiveness will be accepted as well. 1. What criteria, other than whether the plant has a history of invasiveness elsewhere, are most useful to determine the invasiveness of a plant introduced into the United States for the first time? 2. When there is little or no existing scientific literature or other information describing the invasiveness of a plant species, how much should we extrapolate from information on congeners (other species within the same genus)? 3. What specific scientific experiments should be conducted to best evaluate a plant’s invasive potential? Should these experiments be conducted in a foreign area, in the United States, or both? 4. How should the results of such experiments be interpreted? Specifically, what results should be interpreted as providing conclusive information for a regulatory decision? 5. If field trials are necessary to determine the invasive potential of a plant, under what conditions should the research be conducted to prevent the escape of the plant into the environment? 6. What models or techniques are being used by the nursery industry, weed scientists, seed companies, botanical gardens, and others to screen plants that have not yet been widely introduced into the United States for invasiveness? What species have been rejected by these evaluators as a result of the use of these evaluation methods? Accessing the Electronic Discussion The electronic public discussion will be held from November 27, 2006 to January 26, 2007. We are beginning the VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:22 Nov 09, 2006 Jkt 211001 discussion 2 weeks after this notice is published in the Federal Register to give participants time to consider the questions and assemble any relevant information. While anyone can access the discussion and read the comments, registration is required in order to participate in the discussion. You will be asked to register at the time you post your comment. The discussion will be accessible through a link on Plant Protection and Quarantine’s Web page for the nursery stock revision, https:// www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/Q37/ revision.html. Participants will be required to enter their name and e-mail address. Affiliation and mailing address are optional. Only the participant names will be publicly displayed; the other information will allow us to contact you to resolve technical difficulties or request additional information or clarification. When the discussion begins, there will be a link to access the discussion itself on the nursery stock revision Web page. The discussion will be convened using IBM Domino software, which allows participants to upload and view files as well as make posts in the discussion. The IBM Domino software supports Microsoft Internet Explorer and other major Web browsers for both Windows and Macintosh systems. Technical support will be available during the discussion. There is no cost to participate in the discussion. Because APHIS staff will review posts as they are submitted, there may be some delay between the submission of a post and its availability in the public discussion. Multiple APHIS staff members will be monitoring the discussion, and we will try to minimize any delays. If you wish to submit comments or other information on the topics described in this notice, but you do not wish to be part of the electronic discussion, you may send your comments via postal mail or commercial delivery to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT at the beginning of this notice. Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of November 2006. W. Ron DeHaven, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E6–18768 Filed 11–9–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 66157 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Commodity Credit Corporation Domestic Sugar Program—Final 2005Crop and Initial 2006-Crop Cane Sugar and Sugar Beet Marketing Allotments and Company Allocations Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the final 2005-crop and initial 2006-crop cane state allotments and company allocations to sugarcane and sugar beet processors. The 2005-crop year runs from October 1, 2005, through September 30, 2006 (fiscal year (FY) 2006). The 2006-crop (FY 2007) cane state allotments and company allocations are based on an 8.750 million short tons, raw value (STRV) overall allotment quantity (OAQ) of domestic sugar. These actions apply to all domestic sugar marketed for human consumption in the United States from October 1, 2006, through September 30, 2007. Although CCC already has announced all of the information in this notice, CCC is statutorily required to publish in the Federal Register determinations establishing, adjusting, or suspending sugar marketing allotments. ADDRESSES: Barbara Fecso, Dairy and Sweeteners Analysis Group, Economic Policy and Analysis Staff, Farm Service Agency, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0516, Washington, DC 20250–0516; telephone (202) 720– 4146; FAX (202) 690–1480; e-mail: barbara.fecso@wdc.usda.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Fecso at (202) 720–4146. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Final FY 2006 State Allotments and Company Allocations Section 359e(b) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, (7 U.S.C. 1359ee(b) requires the Secretary to reassign allocation to imports if it is determined that processors will be unable to market their allocations and there is no CCC inventory. In a July 27, 2006 news release, CCC announced that the agency had determined that the domestic sugar supply would be unable to fill 246,000 STRV of the OAQ and, in accordance with the statute, reassigned this deficit to imports. Hence, state allotments and company allocations were adjusted downward to reflect each company’s and each state’s ability to market its allocation and allotment. The final 2005-crop (FY 2006) beet and cane sugar marketing allotments E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 218 (Monday, November 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66156-66157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-18768]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 218 / Monday, November 13, 2006 / 
Notices

[[Page 66156]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0078]


Evaluating the Invasive Potential of Imported Plants; Electronic 
Public Discussion

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of electronic public discussion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service (APHIS) is hosting an electronic public discussion 
on methods that can be used to evaluate the potential of imported 
plants to become invasive species if they are introduced into the 
United States. Any interested person can register for the electronic 
discussion, which will allow participants to upload files and interact 
with other participants and with APHIS staff.

DATES: The electronic public discussion will be held from November 27, 
2006 to January 26, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Polly Lehtonen, Senior Staff 
Officer, Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 
River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-8758.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 et seq.), 
noxious weed is defined as: ``Any plant or plant product that can 
directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including 
nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other 
interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources 
of the United States, the public health, or the environment.'' The 
Plant Protection Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to 
undertake such actions as may be necessary to prevent the introduction 
and spread of plant pests and noxious weeds within the United States. 
The Secretary has delegated this responsibility to the Administrator of 
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
    The regulations in 7 CFR part 360, ``Noxious Weed Regulations,'' 
contain restrictions on the movement of noxious weed plants or plant 
products listed in that part into or through the United States and 
interstate. To add a plant to the list of noxious weeds in part 360, or 
to remove a plant from that list, APHIS conducts a pest risk analysis. 
One part of this analysis is an evaluation of the potential of the 
plant to become an invasive species. (The term invasive species is 
defined by Executive Order 13112 as a species that is: (1) Non-native 
(or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and (2) whose 
introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental 
harm or harm to human health. The first part of this definition 
includes all imported plants that are not present in the United States; 
the second part is consistent with the definition of noxious weed in 
the Plant Protection Act, as quoted above. Accordingly, we make a 
determination regarding a plant's potential for invasiveness when 
determining whether to add the plant to the noxious weed list in part 
360.) If the pest risk analysis indicates that a change should be made 
to the regulations, we undertake rulemaking to do so.
    Since it is impossible to determine definitively whether a plant 
that is not present in the United States will become invasive when 
introduced to the United States without actually introducing the plant, 
APHIS uses other types of scientific information to help make judgments 
about whether a plant, if imported, would be likely to be invasive. 
Several years ago, APHIS commissioned an evaluation of the state of 
scientific knowledge about biological invasions and the state of our 
ability to reliably predict the outcome of accidental or intentional 
introductions of nonindigenous species. The National Research Council 
established the Committee on the Scientific Basis for Predicting the 
Invasive Potential of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests in the 
United States to complete this evaluation. The resulting study, 
published in 2002, concluded that the record of a plant's invasiveness 
in other geographical areas is currently the most reliable predictor of 
the plant's ability to establish itself and become invasive when 
introduced into the United States.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The study is available for purchase through the Internet at 
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10259.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The study further concluded that there are currently no known broad 
scientific principles or reliable procedures for evaluating the 
invasive potential of plants in geographic ranges where they are not 
present, but that a conceptual basis for understanding invasions 
exists, and this conceptual basis could be developed into principles 
for predicting invasiveness. The study recommended that the framework 
APHIS uses to evaluate imported plants for potential release as forage, 
crops, soil reclamation, and ornamental landscaping should be expanded 
to include evaluation of the hazards these species might pose. The 
study also recommended that controlled experimental field screening for 
potentially invasive species be pursued for species whose features are 
associated with establishment and rapid spread without cultivation and 
whose history of introduction into the United States is unknown.
    To follow up on these recommendations, we are requesting an 
exchange of ideas and information about methods to evaluate plants for 
potential invasiveness. The information will be helpful for both the 
APHIS noxious weed program and the revision of the nursery stock 
quarantine regulations in 7 CFR part 319 (Sec. Sec.  319.37 through 
319.37-14). (The revision of the nursery stock regulations was 
discussed in general terms in an advance notice of proposed rulemaking 
published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2004 [69 FR 71736-
71744, Docket No. 03-069-1].) As part of the revision of the nursery 
stock regulations, we anticipate publishing a proposed rule at some 
point following this electronic discussion that will solicit public 
comment on establishing a category of plants whose importation is not 
authorized pending pest risk analysis based on other scientific 
evidence that indicates invasive potential. Because we would be 
performing pest risk analyses to remove plants from that category and

[[Page 66157]]

either allow their importation or add them to the list of prohibited 
noxious weeds, we would like to ensure that our pest risk analysis 
process for potentially invasive plants is able to evaluate the risk 
posed by these plants as thoroughly and rigorously as possible.
    Members of the APHIS Weed Team will participate in the electronic 
discussion. We will share all data and opinions offered during the 
discussion with other groups that are interested in methods to predict 
invasiveness for both plants and animals, such as the National Invasive 
Species Council Pathways Work Team and the North American Plant 
Protection Organization Invasive Species Panel.

Questions for Discussion

    We would like participants in the electronic discussion to 
specifically address the following six questions, although general 
comments on the issue of evaluating invasiveness will be accepted as 
well.
    1. What criteria, other than whether the plant has a history of 
invasiveness elsewhere, are most useful to determine the invasiveness 
of a plant introduced into the United States for the first time?
    2. When there is little or no existing scientific literature or 
other information describing the invasiveness of a plant species, how 
much should we extrapolate from information on congeners (other species 
within the same genus)?
    3. What specific scientific experiments should be conducted to best 
evaluate a plant's invasive potential? Should these experiments be 
conducted in a foreign area, in the United States, or both?
    4. How should the results of such experiments be interpreted? 
Specifically, what results should be interpreted as providing 
conclusive information for a regulatory decision?
    5. If field trials are necessary to determine the invasive 
potential of a plant, under what conditions should the research be 
conducted to prevent the escape of the plant into the environment?
    6. What models or techniques are being used by the nursery 
industry, weed scientists, seed companies, botanical gardens, and 
others to screen plants that have not yet been widely introduced into 
the United States for invasiveness? What species have been rejected by 
these evaluators as a result of the use of these evaluation methods?

Accessing the Electronic Discussion

    The electronic public discussion will be held from November 27, 
2006 to January 26, 2007. We are beginning the discussion 2 weeks after 
this notice is published in the Federal Register to give participants 
time to consider the questions and assemble any relevant information.
    While anyone can access the discussion and read the comments, 
registration is required in order to participate in the discussion. You 
will be asked to register at the time you post your comment. The 
discussion will be accessible through a link on Plant Protection and 
Quarantine's Web page for the nursery stock revision, https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/Q37/revision.html. Participants will be required 
to enter their name and e-mail address. Affiliation and mailing address 
are optional. Only the participant names will be publicly displayed; 
the other information will allow us to contact you to resolve technical 
difficulties or request additional information or clarification. When 
the discussion begins, there will be a link to access the discussion 
itself on the nursery stock revision Web page.
    The discussion will be convened using IBM Domino software, which 
allows participants to upload and view files as well as make posts in 
the discussion. The IBM Domino software supports Microsoft Internet 
Explorer and other major Web browsers for both Windows and Macintosh 
systems. Technical support will be available during the discussion. 
There is no cost to participate in the discussion.
    Because APHIS staff will review posts as they are submitted, there 
may be some delay between the submission of a post and its availability 
in the public discussion. Multiple APHIS staff members will be 
monitoring the discussion, and we will try to minimize any delays.
    If you wish to submit comments or other information on the topics 
described in this notice, but you do not wish to be part of the 
electronic discussion, you may send your comments via postal mail or 
commercial delivery to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT at the beginning of this notice.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of November 2006.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
 [FR Doc. E6-18768 Filed 11-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.