Emerald Ash Borer; Quarantined Areas; Michigan, 57871-57873 [06-8424]
Download as PDF
57871
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 190
Monday, October 2, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0131]
Emerald Ash Borer; Quarantined
Areas; Michigan
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for
comments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are amending the emerald
ash borer regulations by adding areas in
Michigan to the list of areas quarantined
because of emerald ash borer. As a
result of this action, the interstate
movement of regulated articles from
those areas is restricted. This action is
necessary to prevent the artificial spread
of the emerald ash borer from infested
areas in the State of Michigan into
noninfested areas of the United States.
DATES: This interim rule became
effective September 25, 2006. We will
consider all comments that we receive
on or before December 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select
‘‘Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service’’ from the agency drop-down
menu, then click ‘‘Submit.’’ In the
Docket ID column, select APHIS–2006–
0131 to submit or view public
comments and to view supporting and
related materials available
electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions
for accessing documents, submitting
comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is
available through the site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:26 Sep 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
comment (an original and three copies)
to APHIS–2006–0131, Regulatory
Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700 River
Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1238. Please state that your comment
refers to APHIS–2006–0131.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah McPartlan, Operations Officer,
Pest Detection and Management
Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1236; (301) 734–4387.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus
planipennis) is a destructive woodboring insect that attacks ash trees
(Fraxinus spp., including green ash,
white ash, black ash, and several
horticultural varieties of ash). The
insect, which is indigenous to Asia and
known to occur in China, Korea, Japan,
Mongolia, the Russian Far East, Taiwan,
and Canada, eventually kills healthy ash
trees after it bores beneath their bark
and disrupts their vascular tissues.
Quarantined Areas
The EAB regulations in 7 CFR 301.53–
1 through 301.53–9 (referred to below as
the regulations) restrict the interstate
movement of regulated articles from
quarantined areas to prevent the
artificial spread of EAB to noninfested
areas of the United States. Portions of
the States of Indiana, Michigan, and
Ohio are already designated as
quarantined areas.
Recent surveys conducted by
inspectors of State, county, and city
agencies and by inspectors of the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) have revealed that spot
infestations of EAB have occurred
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
outside the quarantined areas in
Michigan. Specifically, spot infestations
of EAB have been found to be prevalent
throughout the Lower Peninsula of
Michigan. Officials of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) and
officials of State, county, and city
agencies in Michigan are conducting
intensive survey and eradication
programs in the infested areas. Michigan
has quarantined the infested areas and
has restricted the intrastate movement
of regulated articles from the
quarantined areas to prevent the spread
of EAB to noninfested areas in the
Upper Peninsula of Michigan. However,
Federal regulations are necessary to
restrict the interstate movement of
regulated articles from the quarantined
areas to prevent the spread of EAB to
other States.
The regulations in § 301.53–3(a)
provide that the Administrator of APHIS
will list as a quarantined area each
State, or each portion of a State, where
EAB has been found by an inspector,
where the Administrator has reason to
believe that EAB is present, or where
the Administrator considers regulation
necessary because of its inseparability
for quarantine enforcement purposes
from localities where EAB has been
found.
Less than an entire State will be
designated as a quarantined area only
under certain conditions. Such a
designation may be made if the
Administrator determines that: (1) The
State has adopted and is enforcing
restrictions on the intrastate movement
of regulated articles that are equivalent
to those imposed by the regulations on
the interstate movement of regulated
articles; and (2) the designation of less
than an entire State as a quarantined
area will be adequate to prevent the
artificial spread of the EAB.
In accordance with these criteria and
the recent EAB findings described
above, we are amending § 301.53–3(c) to
add the areas in the Lower Peninsula of
Michigan that had not previously been
quarantined to the list of quarantined
areas. A list of the counties in Michigan
that have been designated as
quarantined areas can be found in the
regulatory text at the end of this
document.
Emergency Action
This rulemaking is necessary on an
emergency basis to help prevent the
spread of EAB to noninfested areas of
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
57872
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the United States. Under these
circumstances, the Administrator has
determined that prior notice and
opportunity for public comment are
contrary to the public interest and that
there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
We will consider comments we
receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above).
After the comment period closes, we
will publish another document in the
Federal Register. The document will
include a discussion of any comments
we receive and any amendments we are
making to the rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. For this action,
the Office of Management and Budget
has waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
We are amending the EAB regulations
by adding areas in Michigan to the list
of quarantined areas. As a result of this
action, the interstate movement of
regulated articles from those areas is
restricted. This action is necessary to
prevent the artificial spread of this plant
pest into noninfested areas of the United
States.
Ash trees are valuable to the
commercial timber industry and are
commonly planted in urban areas.
According to the Forest Inventory and
Analysis data collected by the USDA’s
Forest Service, there are approximately
850 million ash trees in Michigan
forests that are at risk. These quantities
do not include the millions of ash trees
extensively planted in communities, in
yards, and along public rights-of-way. 1
If EAB were to spread from infested
areas to the surrounding forests of the
northeastern United States, where
nursery, landscaping, and timber
industries and forest-based recreation
and tourism industries play a vital
economic role, the economic impact
would be severe. In addition, the cost to
Federal and State agencies for EAB
eradication programs would increase
significantly.
This interim rule will affect business
entities located within the newly
quarantined areas of Michigan.
Although more than 7,000 nursery
operations are located within the
quarantined areas of Michigan, the rule
only affects the movement of nursery
1 McPartlan, Deborah, USDA, APHIS, PPQ,
‘‘Eradication of emerald ash borer in Michigan,
Ohio, and Indiana: Implementation of the Strategic
Plan.’’ April 2003.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
23:26 Sep 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
stock composed of deciduous shade
trees of an ash species. It is also
estimated that approximately 5,000 to
6,000 sawmills and firewood dealers are
located within or near quarantined areas
of the State. The Michigan EAB survey
program is currently a statewide effort.
Estimates indicate that as many as
15,000 firms and businesses located in
quarantined areas may be affected. We
do not have information on the exact
number of operations that will be
regulated in the areas in Michigan that
will be newly quarantined for EAB,
although we can estimate that there
were around 481 nurseries in those
areas in 2002.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) has established size criteria based
on the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) for
determining which economic entities
meet the definition of a small firm. The
SBA classifies nursery and tree
production businesses (NAICS category
111421) as small entities if their annual
sales receipts are $750,000 or less. The
SBA classifies forest nursery and
gathering of forest products businesses
(NAICS category 113210) as small
entities if their annual sales receipts are
$6.5 million or less. The SBA classifies
logging operations (NAICS category
113310) and sawmills (NAICS category
321113) as small entities if they employ
500 or fewer persons.
The exact number and size of newly
affected entities is unknown. The
Michigan Department of Agriculture
estimates that more than 90 percent of
nursery operations located in
Michigan’s Lower Peninsula counties
are small operations with annual
receipts of less than $750,000 (including
nursery operations that sell deciduous
shade trees).2 It is reasonable to assume
that nearly all sawmills and logging
operations have 500 or fewer
employees, since more than 80 percent
of the sawmills located in Michigan
have fewer than 20 employees, with an
average of 14–15 employees per
operation.3
The percentage of annual revenue
attributable to ash species alone for
affected entities is unknown. However,
by way of comparison, we estimate that
only about 10 to 20 of the nurseries in
the original quarantined area in
Michigan (6 counties), or 0.2 to 0.5
percent of all nurseries in those
counties, were expected to be affected
by the rule that quarantined that area. It
2 Personal communication, Tom Rose, Plant and
Pest Management, Michigan Department of
Agriculture.
3 ‘‘2002 Economic Census: Manufacturing’’ U.S.
Census Bureau, July 2005 (Michigan Geographical
report).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is possible that a similarly small
percentage of nurseries will be affected
in the areas quarantined under this rule.
Under the regulations, regulated
articles may be moved interstate from a
quarantined area into or through an area
that is not quarantined only if they are
accompanied by a certificate or limited
permit. An inspector or a person
operating under a compliance
agreement will issue a certificate for
interstate movement of a regulated
article if certain conditions are met,
including that the regulated article is
determined to be apparently free of
EAB.
Businesses could be affected by the
regulations in two ways. First, if a
business wishes to move regulated
articles interstate from a quarantined
area, that business must either: (1) Enter
into a compliance agreement with
APHIS for the inspection and
certification of regulated articles to be
moved interstate from the quarantined
area; or (2) present its regulated articles
for inspection by an inspector and
obtain a certificate or a limited permit,
issued by the inspector, for the
interstate movement of regulated
articles. The inspections may be
inconvenient, but they should not be
costly in most cases, even for businesses
operating under a compliance
agreement who would perform the
inspections themselves. For those
businesses that elect not to enter into a
compliance agreement, APHIS would
provide the services of the inspector
without cost. There is also no cost for
the compliance agreement, certificate, or
limited permit for the interstate
movement of regulated articles.
Second, there is a possibility that,
upon inspection, a regulated article
could be determined by the inspector to
be potentially infested with EAB, and,
as a result, the article would be
ineligible for interstate movement under
a certificate. In such a case, the entity’s
ability to move regulated articles
interstate would be restricted. However,
the affected entity could conceivably
obtain a limited permit under the
conditions of § 301.53–5(b).
Our experience with administering
the EAB regulations and the regulations
for other pests, such as the Asian
longhorned beetle, that impose
essentially the same conditions on the
interstate movement of regulated
articles lead us to believe that any
economic effects on affected small
entities will be small and are
outweighed by the benefits associated
with preventing the spread of EAB into
noninfested areas of the United States.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
I Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 301 as follows:
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 301
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
along an imaginary line to the Bay
Mills/Superior Township line; then
north and east along the Bay Mills/
Superior Township line to the Lake
Superior shoreline; then east along the
Lake Superior shoreline to the Bay
Mills/Soo Township line; then south on
the Bay Mills/Soo Township line to the
intersection of the Dafter and Superior
Township lines at 6 Mile Road; then
south along the Dafter/Superior
Township line to Forrest Road; then
south on Forrest Road to Michigan
Route 28; then west on Michigan Route
28 to the point of beginning. [Note: This
quarantined area includes tribal land of
the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Movement of regulated articles on those
lands is subject to tribal jurisdiction.]
Lower Peninsula: All counties, in
their entirety (i.e., Alcona, Allegan,
Alpena, Antrim, Arenac, Barry, Bay,
Benzie, Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass,
Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Clare, Clinton,
Crawford, Eaton, Emmet, Genesee,
Gladwin, Grand Traverse, Gratiot,
Hillsdale, Huron, Ingham, Ionia, Iosco,
Isabella, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Kalkaska,
Kent, Lake, Lapeer, Leelanau, Lenawee,
Livingston, Macomb, Manistee, Mason,
Mecosta, Midland, Missaukee, Monroe,
Montcalm, Montmorency, Muskegon,
Newaygo, Oakland, Oceana, Ogemaw,
Osceola, Oscoda, Otsego, Ottawa,
Presque Isle, Roscommon, Saginaw
Sanilac, St. Clair, St. Joseph,
Shiawassee, Tuscola, Van Buren,
Washtenaw, Wayne, and Wexford
Counties).
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
September 2006.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 06–8424 Filed 9–29–06; 8:45 am]
Section 301.75–15 issued under Sec. 204,
Title II, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501A–293; sections 301.75–15 and 301.75–
16 issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law
106–224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
I 2. In § 301.53–3, paragraph (c), the
entry for Michigan is revised to read as
follows:
8 CFR Part 1003
§ 301.53–3
RIN 1125–AA47
*
Quarantined areas.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
[EOIR Docket No. 143F; AG Order No. 2838–
2006]
Review of Custody Determinations
Executive Office for
Immigration Review, Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Michigan
Upper Peninsula: Chippewa County.
Brimley area. That portion of the county
bounded by a line drawn as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of
Michigan Route 28 and Crawford Street;
then north on Crawford Street to Irish
Line Road; then north on Irish Line
Road to its end and continuing north
VerDate Aug<31>2005
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
23:26 Sep 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: This rule adopts, with
changes, an interim rule published in
the Federal Register on October 31,
2001, by the Department of Justice,
pertaining to the review of custody
decisions by the Executive Office for
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57873
Immigration Review (EOIR) with respect
to aliens being detained by the
Immigration and Naturalization Service
(INS), now the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). This rule retains the
existing regulatory provision for DHS to
invoke a temporary automatic stay of an
immigration judge’s decision ordering
an alien’s release in any case in which
a DHS official has ordered that the alien
be held without bond or has set a bond
of $10,000 or more, in order to maintain
the status quo while DHS seeks
expedited review of the custody order
by the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board) or the Attorney General.
However, this rule clarifies the basis on
which DHS may invoke the automatic
stay provision, and limits the duration
of the automatic stay.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
MaryBeth Keller, General Counsel,
Executive Office for Immigration
Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600,
Falls Church, Virginia 22041, telephone
(703) 305–0470.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On October 31, 2001, the Attorney
General published an interim rule to
amend the regulations relating to review
of custody determinations by
immigration judges. The interim rule
expanded a preexisting provision first
adopted in 1998 for a temporary
automatic stay of an immigration judge’s
decision ordering the release of an alien
in certain cases where the INS had
determined that no conditions of release
were appropriate for an alien or had set
an initial bond of $10,000 or more. 66
FR 54909 (Oct. 31, 2001). The purpose
of the 2001 interim rule was to provide
a means for the INS to maintain the
status quo in those cases where it chose
to invoke the automatic stay while it
was seeking an expedited review of the
custody order by the Board. The 2001
interim rule also provided for a
temporary automatic stay in those cases
where the Commissioner of INS, within
five days of the Board’s decision, refers
a custody decision by the Board to the
Attorney General for review.
The Department explained when the
interim rule was published that ‘‘This
stay is a limited measure and is limited
in time—it only applies where the
Service determines that it is necessary
to invoke the special stay procedure
pending appeal, and the stay only
remains in place until the Board has had
the opportunity to consider the matter.’’
66 FR at 54910. The Department at that
time also explained that it was merely
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 190 (Monday, October 2, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57871-57873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-8424]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 190 / Monday, October 2, 2006 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 57871]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0131]
Emerald Ash Borer; Quarantined Areas; Michigan
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the emerald ash borer regulations by adding
areas in Michigan to the list of areas quarantined because of emerald
ash borer. As a result of this action, the interstate movement of
regulated articles from those areas is restricted. This action is
necessary to prevent the artificial spread of the emerald ash borer
from infested areas in the State of Michigan into noninfested areas of
the United States.
DATES: This interim rule became effective September 25, 2006. We will
consider all comments that we receive on or before December 1, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service'' from the agency drop-down menu, then click ``Submit.'' In the
Docket ID column, select APHIS-2006-0131 to submit or view public
comments and to view supporting and related materials available
electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing
the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through
the site's ``User Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to APHIS-2006-0131,
Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700
River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your
comment refers to APHIS-2006-0131.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah McPartlan, Operations
Officer, Pest Detection and Management Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-4387.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The emerald ash borer (EAB) (Agrilus planipennis) is a destructive
wood-boring insect that attacks ash trees (Fraxinus spp., including
green ash, white ash, black ash, and several horticultural varieties of
ash). The insect, which is indigenous to Asia and known to occur in
China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, the Russian Far East, Taiwan, and
Canada, eventually kills healthy ash trees after it bores beneath their
bark and disrupts their vascular tissues.
Quarantined Areas
The EAB regulations in 7 CFR 301.53-1 through 301.53-9 (referred to
below as the regulations) restrict the interstate movement of regulated
articles from quarantined areas to prevent the artificial spread of EAB
to noninfested areas of the United States. Portions of the States of
Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio are already designated as quarantined
areas.
Recent surveys conducted by inspectors of State, county, and city
agencies and by inspectors of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) have revealed that spot infestations of EAB have
occurred outside the quarantined areas in Michigan. Specifically, spot
infestations of EAB have been found to be prevalent throughout the
Lower Peninsula of Michigan. Officials of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) and officials of State, county, and city agencies in
Michigan are conducting intensive survey and eradication programs in
the infested areas. Michigan has quarantined the infested areas and has
restricted the intrastate movement of regulated articles from the
quarantined areas to prevent the spread of EAB to noninfested areas in
the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. However, Federal regulations are
necessary to restrict the interstate movement of regulated articles
from the quarantined areas to prevent the spread of EAB to other
States.
The regulations in Sec. 301.53-3(a) provide that the Administrator
of APHIS will list as a quarantined area each State, or each portion of
a State, where EAB has been found by an inspector, where the
Administrator has reason to believe that EAB is present, or where the
Administrator considers regulation necessary because of its
inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from localities
where EAB has been found.
Less than an entire State will be designated as a quarantined area
only under certain conditions. Such a designation may be made if the
Administrator determines that: (1) The State has adopted and is
enforcing restrictions on the intrastate movement of regulated articles
that are equivalent to those imposed by the regulations on the
interstate movement of regulated articles; and (2) the designation of
less than an entire State as a quarantined area will be adequate to
prevent the artificial spread of the EAB.
In accordance with these criteria and the recent EAB findings
described above, we are amending Sec. 301.53-3(c) to add the areas in
the Lower Peninsula of Michigan that had not previously been
quarantined to the list of quarantined areas. A list of the counties in
Michigan that have been designated as quarantined areas can be found in
the regulatory text at the end of this document.
Emergency Action
This rulemaking is necessary on an emergency basis to help prevent
the spread of EAB to noninfested areas of
[[Page 57872]]
the United States. Under these circumstances, the Administrator has
determined that prior notice and opportunity for public comment are
contrary to the public interest and that there is good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553 for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
We will consider comments we receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above). After the comment period closes,
we will publish another document in the Federal Register. The document
will include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments
we are making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
We are amending the EAB regulations by adding areas in Michigan to
the list of quarantined areas. As a result of this action, the
interstate movement of regulated articles from those areas is
restricted. This action is necessary to prevent the artificial spread
of this plant pest into noninfested areas of the United States.
Ash trees are valuable to the commercial timber industry and are
commonly planted in urban areas. According to the Forest Inventory and
Analysis data collected by the USDA's Forest Service, there are
approximately 850 million ash trees in Michigan forests that are at
risk. These quantities do not include the millions of ash trees
extensively planted in communities, in yards, and along public rights-
of-way. \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ McPartlan, Deborah, USDA, APHIS, PPQ, ``Eradication of
emerald ash borer in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana: Implementation of
the Strategic Plan.'' April 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If EAB were to spread from infested areas to the surrounding
forests of the northeastern United States, where nursery, landscaping,
and timber industries and forest-based recreation and tourism
industries play a vital economic role, the economic impact would be
severe. In addition, the cost to Federal and State agencies for EAB
eradication programs would increase significantly.
This interim rule will affect business entities located within the
newly quarantined areas of Michigan.
Although more than 7,000 nursery operations are located within the
quarantined areas of Michigan, the rule only affects the movement of
nursery stock composed of deciduous shade trees of an ash species. It
is also estimated that approximately 5,000 to 6,000 sawmills and
firewood dealers are located within or near quarantined areas of the
State. The Michigan EAB survey program is currently a statewide effort.
Estimates indicate that as many as 15,000 firms and businesses located
in quarantined areas may be affected. We do not have information on the
exact number of operations that will be regulated in the areas in
Michigan that will be newly quarantined for EAB, although we can
estimate that there were around 481 nurseries in those areas in 2002.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size
criteria based on the North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) for determining which economic entities meet the definition of
a small firm. The SBA classifies nursery and tree production businesses
(NAICS category 111421) as small entities if their annual sales
receipts are $750,000 or less. The SBA classifies forest nursery and
gathering of forest products businesses (NAICS category 113210) as
small entities if their annual sales receipts are $6.5 million or less.
The SBA classifies logging operations (NAICS category 113310) and
sawmills (NAICS category 321113) as small entities if they employ 500
or fewer persons.
The exact number and size of newly affected entities is unknown.
The Michigan Department of Agriculture estimates that more than 90
percent of nursery operations located in Michigan's Lower Peninsula
counties are small operations with annual receipts of less than
$750,000 (including nursery operations that sell deciduous shade
trees).\2\ It is reasonable to assume that nearly all sawmills and
logging operations have 500 or fewer employees, since more than 80
percent of the sawmills located in Michigan have fewer than 20
employees, with an average of 14-15 employees per operation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Personal communication, Tom Rose, Plant and Pest Management,
Michigan Department of Agriculture.
\3\ ``2002 Economic Census: Manufacturing'' U.S. Census Bureau,
July 2005 (Michigan Geographical report).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The percentage of annual revenue attributable to ash species alone
for affected entities is unknown. However, by way of comparison, we
estimate that only about 10 to 20 of the nurseries in the original
quarantined area in Michigan (6 counties), or 0.2 to 0.5 percent of all
nurseries in those counties, were expected to be affected by the rule
that quarantined that area. It is possible that a similarly small
percentage of nurseries will be affected in the areas quarantined under
this rule.
Under the regulations, regulated articles may be moved interstate
from a quarantined area into or through an area that is not quarantined
only if they are accompanied by a certificate or limited permit. An
inspector or a person operating under a compliance agreement will issue
a certificate for interstate movement of a regulated article if certain
conditions are met, including that the regulated article is determined
to be apparently free of EAB.
Businesses could be affected by the regulations in two ways. First,
if a business wishes to move regulated articles interstate from a
quarantined area, that business must either: (1) Enter into a
compliance agreement with APHIS for the inspection and certification of
regulated articles to be moved interstate from the quarantined area; or
(2) present its regulated articles for inspection by an inspector and
obtain a certificate or a limited permit, issued by the inspector, for
the interstate movement of regulated articles. The inspections may be
inconvenient, but they should not be costly in most cases, even for
businesses operating under a compliance agreement who would perform the
inspections themselves. For those businesses that elect not to enter
into a compliance agreement, APHIS would provide the services of the
inspector without cost. There is also no cost for the compliance
agreement, certificate, or limited permit for the interstate movement
of regulated articles.
Second, there is a possibility that, upon inspection, a regulated
article could be determined by the inspector to be potentially infested
with EAB, and, as a result, the article would be ineligible for
interstate movement under a certificate. In such a case, the entity's
ability to move regulated articles interstate would be restricted.
However, the affected entity could conceivably obtain a limited permit
under the conditions of Sec. 301.53-5(b).
Our experience with administering the EAB regulations and the
regulations for other pests, such as the Asian longhorned beetle, that
impose essentially the same conditions on the interstate movement of
regulated articles lead us to believe that any economic effects on
affected small entities will be small and are outweighed by the
benefits associated with preventing the spread of EAB into noninfested
areas of the United States.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant
[[Page 57873]]
Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This interim rule contains no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 301 as follows:
PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80,
and 371.3.
Section 301.75-15 issued under Sec. 204, Title II, Public Law
106-113, 113 Stat. 1501A-293; sections 301.75-15 and 301.75-16
issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law 106-224, 114 Stat. 400
(7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
0
2. In Sec. 301.53-3, paragraph (c), the entry for Michigan is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 301.53-3 Quarantined areas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Michigan
Upper Peninsula: Chippewa County. Brimley area. That portion of the
county bounded by a line drawn as follows: Beginning at the
intersection of Michigan Route 28 and Crawford Street; then north on
Crawford Street to Irish Line Road; then north on Irish Line Road to
its end and continuing north along an imaginary line to the Bay Mills/
Superior Township line; then north and east along the Bay Mills/
Superior Township line to the Lake Superior shoreline; then east along
the Lake Superior shoreline to the Bay Mills/Soo Township line; then
south on the Bay Mills/Soo Township line to the intersection of the
Dafter and Superior Township lines at 6 Mile Road; then south along the
Dafter/Superior Township line to Forrest Road; then south on Forrest
Road to Michigan Route 28; then west on Michigan Route 28 to the point
of beginning. [Note: This quarantined area includes tribal land of the
Bay Mills Indian Community. Movement of regulated articles on those
lands is subject to tribal jurisdiction.]
Lower Peninsula: All counties, in their entirety (i.e., Alcona,
Allegan, Alpena, Antrim, Arenac, Barry, Bay, Benzie, Berrien, Branch,
Calhoun, Cass, Charlevoix, Cheboygan, Clare, Clinton, Crawford, Eaton,
Emmet, Genesee, Gladwin, Grand Traverse, Gratiot, Hillsdale, Huron,
Ingham, Ionia, Iosco, Isabella, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Kalkaska, Kent,
Lake, Lapeer, Leelanau, Lenawee, Livingston, Macomb, Manistee, Mason,
Mecosta, Midland, Missaukee, Monroe, Montcalm, Montmorency, Muskegon,
Newaygo, Oakland,Oceana, Ogemaw, Osceola, Oscoda, Otsego, Ottawa,
Presque Isle, Roscommon, Saginaw Sanilac, St. Clair, St. Joseph,
Shiawassee, Tuscola, Van Buren, Washtenaw, Wayne, and Wexford
Counties).
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of September 2006.
W. Ron DeHaven,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 06-8424 Filed 9-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P