Importation of Sheep and Goat Semen, 45444-45447 [E6-12934]
Download as PDF
45444
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
PART 95—SANITARY CONTROL OF
ANIMAL BYPRODUCTS (EXCEPT
CASINGS), AND HAY AND STRAW,
OFFERED FOR ENTRY INTO THE
UNITED STATES
Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
August 2006.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6–12944 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
8. The authority citation for part 95
would continue to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C.
136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
9. Section 95.4 would be amended as
follows:
a. Paragraph (c)(2) would be revised to
read as set forth below.
b. Paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(7)
would be redesignated as paragraphs
(c)(4) through (c)(8), respectively.
c. A new paragraph (c)(3) would be
added to read as set forth below.
d. Newly designated paragraph (c)(7)
would be revised to read as set forth
below.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 95.4 Restrictions on the importation of
processed animal protein, offal, tankage,
fat, glands, certain tallow other than tallow
derivatives, and serum due to bovine
spongiform encephalopathy.
(c) * * *
(2) Except for material processed or
stored in regions listed in § 94.18(a)(3)
of this subchapter, all steps of
processing and storing the material are
carried out in a facility that has not been
used for the processing and storage of
materials derived from ruminants that
have been in any region listed in
§ 94.18(a) of this subchapter.
(3) For material processed or stored in
regions listed in § 94.18(a)(3) of this
subchapter, all steps of processing and
storing the material are carried out in a
facility that has not been used for the
processing and storage of materials
derived from ruminants that have been
in any region listed in § 94.18(a)(1) or
(a)(2) of this subchapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Each shipment to the United States
is accompanied by an original certificate
signed by a full-time, salaried
veterinarian of the government agency
responsible for animal health in the
region of export certifying that the
conditions of paragraphs (c)(1) through
(c)(4) of this section have been met;
except that, for shipments of animal
feed from a region listed in § 94.18(a)(3)
of this subchapter, the certificate may be
signed by a person authorized to issue
such certificates by the veterinary
services of the national government of
the region of origin.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 98
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0120]
Importation of Sheep and Goat Semen
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the regulations regarding the
importation of animal germplasm by
removing specific restrictions on sheep
semen from regions where scrapie exists
and requiring the inclusion of
additional information on the
international health certificate
accompanying sheep and goat semen.
Experience and research have
convinced us that sheep and goat semen
pose a minimal risk of transmitting
scrapie. This action would relieve
restrictions on imported sheep semen
while continuing to provide safeguards
against the introduction and
dissemination of scrapie.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before October 10,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and, in the
lower ‘‘Search Regulations and Federal
Actions’’ box, select ‘‘Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service’’ from the
agency drop-down menu, then click on
‘‘Submit.’’ In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS–2006–0120 to submit or
view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically. Information on
using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the
docket after the close of the comment
period, is available through the site’s
‘‘User Tips’’ link.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
comment (an original and three copies)
to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0120,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0120.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Arnaldo Vaquer, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Technical Trade Services,
National Center for Import and Export,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
8074.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 98
govern the importation of animal
germplasm to prevent the introduction
of contagious diseases of livestock and
poultry into the United States. Subparts
A and B of part 98 apply to animal
embryos, and subpart C (§§ 98.30
through 98.38, referred to below as the
regulations) applies to animal semen.
Currently, the regulations in § 98.37
restrict, due to scrapie concerns, the
importation of sheep semen into the
United States from any region of the
world other than Australia, Canada, and
New Zealand. These restrictions include
provisions that the semen must be
transferred only to females in a U.S.
flock that is participating in the
voluntary Scrapie Flock Certification
Program (SFCP), that the semen must
originate from a donor animal
participating in a program equivalent to
the SFCP or the SFCP flock status must
be lowered, and that the semen must be
accompanied by a certificate attesting to
the above conditions. The importer is
also required to provide the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
with information concerning control
programs, surveillance, and disease
incidence in the exporting region, as
well as information concerning the
health status of other ruminants in the
region.
The regulations in § 98.35 deal with
declarations, health certificates, and
other documents required for the
importation of all animal semen into the
United States. All animal semen
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
intended for importation to the United
States must be accompanied by a health
certificate that provides certain specific
information about the origin and
handling of the semen. Paragraph (e)
lists additional requirements for the
health certificate accompanying sheep
and goat semen, which must include an
attestation that the semen donor has not
been in any flock or herd nor had
contact with sheep or goats which have
been in any flock or herd where scrapie
has been diagnosed or suspected during
the 5 years prior to the date of collection
of the semen, that the semen donor
showed no evidence of scrapie at the
time of collection, and that the parents
of the semen donor are not, nor were
not, affected with scrapie.
These requirements are more
restrictive than those recommended by
the World Organization for Animal
Health (OIE) in Chapter 2.4.8, Article
2.4.8.8 of the Terrestrial Animal Health
Code. The OIE standards for importing
sheep and goat semen from a region not
free from scrapie state that importing
countries should require an
international veterinary certificate
attesting that in the region of origin,
scrapie is compulsorily notifiable, a
surveillance and monitoring system is
in place, affected sheep and goats are
slaughtered and completely destroyed,
and the feeding of sheep and goats with
meat-and-bone meal or greaves
potentially contaminated with an
animal transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy (TSE) has been banned
and the ban effectively enforced in the
whole region. The certificate should
also attest that donor animals are
permanently identified to enable
traceback to their establishment of
origin, have been kept since birth in
establishments in which no case of
scrapie has been confirmed during their
residency, and showed no clinical sign
of scrapie at the time of semen
collection.
Experience and research have
convinced APHIS that sheep semen
poses a minimal risk of transmitting and
disseminating scrapie in the United
States. Through the SFCP, flocks using
imported semen from scrapie-affected
regions have been monitored and no
first generation (F1) progeny resulting
from the imported semen have been
implicated in scrapie outbreaks.
Furthermore, research studies, though
limited in scope, have not revealed
transmission through semen or detected
the infective agent in semen, testes, or
seminal vesicles of affected rams.1
1 See L.A. Detwiler and M. Baylis, ‘‘The
Epidemiology of Scrapie,’’ Rev. sci. tech. Off. int.
Epiz. 2003, 22 (1), 131.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Therefore, we are proposing to ease
the restrictions on the importation of
sheep semen by removing the
provisions of § 98.37 from our
regulations. In lieu of these regulations,
we would amend § 98.35(e) to require
that imported sheep or goat semen be
accompanied by an international
veterinary certificate consistent with the
OIE standards describe above. In
§ 98.35, paragraph (e) already contains
some certificate requirements for
imported sheep and goat semen; the
changes we are proposing would bring
them further into alignment with
international standards.
Specifically, we would amend
§ 98.35(e) to require imported sheep and
goat semen to be accompanied by an
international veterinary certificate
attesting that in the region where the
semen originates certain conditions are
met. These conditions would include
that scrapie is a compulsorily notifiable
disease and that there is an effective
surveillance and monitoring system for
scrapie in the region where the semen
originates. In addition, the region where
the semen originates would have to
require that affected sheep and goats are
slaughtered and completely destroyed.
The region where the semen originates
must also enforce a ruminant-toruminant feed ban; that is, the feeding
of sheep and goats with meat-and-bone
meal or greaves derived from ruminants
must also be banned and the ban
effectively enforced in the whole region.
The certificate would have to attest that
the donor animals are permanently
identified to enable traceback to their
premises of origin, have been kept since
birth on premises in which no case of
scrapie had been confirmed during their
residency, showed no clinical sign of
scrapie at the time of semen collection,
and did not subsequently develop
scrapie between the time of collection
and the time the semen was exported to
the United States. The certificate would
also have to attest that donor animals
were not the offspring of scrapieaffected dams.
This certificate would be required for
all sheep and goat semen imported into
the United States. In addition, the
distribution of imported semen within
the United States could be limited,
depending on the status of the region of
origin of the semen. Semen from regions
free of scrapie could be distributed
throughout the United States, but semen
from regions not scrapie free could only
be distributed to a flock that is listed as
a flock/herd premises in the Scrapie
National Database as part of either the
regulatory or voluntary flock
certification scrapie programs described
in 9 CFR part 79 and 9 CFR part 54
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45445
subpart B, respectively. Flock owners
would also be required to sign a written
agreement that all first generation (F1)
progeny resulting from imported semen
from a region that is not free of scrapie
would be identified with a permanent
official identification consistent with
the provisions in § 79.2, and records of
any sale of F1 progeny, including the
name and address of the buyer, would
be kept for a period of 5 years. This
would ease some restrictions on where
imported semen may be used while still
enabling traceback of the progeny
resulting from the imported semen.
While the risk of scrapie transmission
from sheep semen is believed to be
minimal, no studies have been done
regarding the transmissibility through
semen of other animal TSEs and certain
other diseases in small ruminants. For
this reason, traceback of progeny is
essential.
Under the proposed rule, we would
recognize Australia and New Zealand as
regions free of scrapie. The regulations
in § 98.37 currently allow imported
sheep semen from Australia, Canada,
and New Zealand to be distributed to
any flock in the United States. When
these regulations were established in
1996, Canada was included in the list of
regions from which semen could be
imported without additional restrictions
even though Canada is not scrapie free.
At that time, Canada had a scrapie
control program equivalent to the one in
the United States, and it was
determined to be unlikely that new
strains of scrapie would be spread into
the United States from Canada. In 2001,
the United States went from a control
program to an eradication program,
which is now in full implementation.
However, Canada’s scrapie program has
not advanced at the same speed as the
one in the United States. For these
reasons, under the proposed rule semen
imported from Canada would be subject
to the same restrictions as semen from
all other regions except Australia and
New Zealand, i.e, it could be distributed
only to females in a flock that is listed
as a flock/herd premises in the Scrapie
National Database, as described above.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
The regulations in § 98.37 restrict the
importation of sheep semen from
regions other than Australia, Canada,
and New Zealand due to scrapie
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
45446
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
concerns. These restrictions include
provisions requiring the semen to be
transferred only to females in a United
States flock that participates in the
SFCP, the semen originates from a
donor animal participating in a program
equivalent to the United States SFCP,
and that the semen is accompanied by
a certificate attesting to the above
conditions. Additionally, the
regulations require the importer to
provide APHIS with information
regarding control programs,
surveillance, and disease incidence in
the exporting region, as well as
information on the health status of other
ruminants in the region in order to
export sheep semen to the United
States.
All of these restrictions on imports of
sheep and goat semen were put in place
due to scrapie concerns and with the
goal of preventing the spread of scrapie
in domestic animals. However, further
scientific research, as well as
experience, has demonstrated to APHIS
that sheep and goat semen pose a
minimal risk of transmitting scrapie.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
eliminate restrictions on sheep semen
being imported from regions other than
Australia, Canada, and New Zealand by
removing the provisions of § 98.37 from
our regulations. In their place, we
would require that sheep or goat semen
from scrapie-affected regions be
accompanied by an international
veterinary certificate as recommended
in OIE’s Terrestrial Animal Health Code.
Consequently, this proposed rule would
bring the United States’ import
standards for sheep semen in harmony
with recognized international standards,
while still protecting against scrapie
introduction to the United States.
These proposed changes in the
regulations would have a direct effect
on importers of sheep semen and those
businesses involved in support
activities for animal production, which
includes, among other activities,
establishments providing breeding
services. The number of establishments
engaged in support activities for animal
production is tracked by the U.S.
Census Bureau. In 2001, the latest
available year, there were 3,999
establishments in the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
subsector 1152, which comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
performing support activities related to
raising livestock.2 The annual payroll
for these 3,999 establishments was
$452.3 million, which translates into an
2 Statistics of U.S. Businesses: 2001: Support
Activities for Animal Production—United States.
Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
average annual payroll per
establishment of $113,106. The U.S.
Small Business Administration’s (SBA)
size standard for this particular sector is
$6 million or less in annual receipts.3
Unfortunately, the Census data do not
include annual receipts for these
establishments; however, based on the
average annual payroll per
establishment, it is reasonable to
conclude that the majority of these
businesses would be considered small
by SBA definitions.
A variety of animal production
support activities other than artificial
insemination for sheep are included in
NAICS subsector 1152. APHIS does not
have specific information on the
number or size of businesses providing
artificial insemination services. Based
on the data for all NAICS 1152
businesses, we believe they are
primarily small entities with annual
receipts of not more than $6 million.
APHIS welcomes public comment that
would support or contradict this
understanding.
Additionally, it is possible the
proposed rule may indirectly affect
domestic sheep and goat producers. The
Census of Agriculture for 2002, the most
recent year for which we have data,
estimated that there were 43,891 farms
engaged in sheep and goat farming.4 The
SBA size standard for sheep and goat
farming (NAICS subsector 1124) is
$750,000 or less in annual receipts. The
2002 Census estimates the total market
value of all agricultural products sold by
domestic sheep and goat farmers to be
over $445 million, which translates into
an average of $10,147 per farm. When
combined with government payments,
the average per farm market value of
agricultural products sold is $10,815.5
Only 114 farms are classified as having
$500,000 or more in market value of
agricultural products sold and
government payments. So, at least
43,777, or 99 percent, of farms engaged
in sheep and goat farming would be
considered small by SBA standards.
Foreign exporters of sheep semen
from countries other than Australia,
Canada, and New Zealand might also
benefit from the removal of import
restrictions on sheep semen. However,
as non-U.S. entities, they lie outside the
scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
3 Table of Size Standards based on NAICS 2002.
Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business
Administration, 2004.
4 USDA, 2002 Census of Agriculture-United States
Data, Table 50. Washington, DC: National
Agricultural Statistics Service.
5 USDA, 2002 Census of Agriculture, Table 59,
under column heading ‘‘Sheep and Goat Farming
(1124).’’
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and are not considered in this economic
analysis.
As this proposed rule would lift some
of the import restrictions on imported
semen from regions that are not
considered scrapie-free, there would be
a reduction in compliance requirements.
In place of current requirements,
imported sheep or goat semen would
have to be accompanied by an
international veterinary certificate
consistent with OIE standards. This
certificate would have to be completed
by a veterinary officer prior to being
exported to the United States, and as
such would not pose any compliance
requirements for domestic entities.
Benefits
Importers of sheep semen, as well as
firms engaged in agricultural support
activities, specifically those providing
artificial insemination services, could
possibly benefit from the proposed
changes. Imports of sheep semen are not
tracked as a separate line item by
USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service.
However, Veterinary Services of APHIS
tracks raw data and estimates there were
2,491 straws of sheep semen imported
in 2004 and only 1 straw in 2003, with
Australia being the primary exporter.6 It
is possible that the proposed changes
would encourage exports of sheep and
goat semen to the United States in
response to reduced import restrictions.
Laws of supply and demand dictate that
increased supply will result in lower
prices. However, if this happens, it
would be over the long run because
currently there is not a large demand for
sheep semen in the United States, as is
evidenced by the number of imports. In
fact, domestic sheep and goat producers
rarely rely on artificial insemination as
a means for breeding animals, as it is too
expensive. Artificial insemination
technology is primarily practiced by the
seedstock industry. Thus, the market for
imported sheep semen is small,
consisting primarily of producers that
raise less common breeds and desire
imported semen to improve and
diversify their genetics.7
Costs
It is possible the proposed changes
could have an indirect effect on
domestic sheep and goat breeders over
the long run. However, a variety of
conditions would have to be met for this
6 Elizabeth
McKenna, Data Manager (APHIS).
Schoenian, Area Agent, Sheep & Goats
Western Maryland Research & Education Center,
University of Maryland Cooperative Extension; via
e-mail communication and article ‘‘An Update on
Sheep A.I.’’ Maryland Small Ruminant page. https://
www.sheepandgoat.com/articles/ai.html, Maryland
Sheep News, 1999.
7 Susan
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
situation to materialize. These
conditions include, but are not limited
to, artificial insemination technology
becoming a more cost-effective
approach to sheep and goat production
versus using breeding animals.
Essentially, the only way sheep and goat
breeders would be affected over the long
run is if the process of artificial
insemination becomes cheaper than
purchasing or maintaining replacement
breeding animals. As of January 1, 2005,
there were inventories of 4.53 million
head of breeding sheep and 2.1 million
head of breeding goats in the United
States. Thus, it is possible that, as the
process of artificial insemination
becomes more cost-effective and as
imported sheep semen becomes more
readily available and technologies
improve, sheep and goat producers will
substitute away from buying
replacement breeding animals and use
artificial insemination instead.
However, as stated previously, this
situation is long-term in nature and
highly conditional.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 98
Animal diseases, Imports.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 98 as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
PART 98—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMAL EMBRYOS AND ANIMAL
SEMEN
1. The authority citation for part 98
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
45447
2. In § 98.35, paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2),
and (e)(3) would be revised to read as
follows:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
§ 98.35 Declaration, health certificate, and
other documents for animal semen.
14 CFR Part 39
*
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25554; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–123–AD]
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) The donor animals:
(i) Are permanently identified, to
enable trace back to their establishment
of origin; and
(ii) Have been kept since birth in
establishments in which no case of
scrapie had been confirmed during their
residency; and
(iii) Neither showed clinical signs of
scrapie at the time of semen collection
nor developed scrapie between the time
of semen collection and export of the
semen to the United States; and
(iv) The dam of the semen donor is
not, nor was not, affected with scrapie.
(2) In the region where the semen
originates:
(i) Scrapie is a compulsorily notifiable
disease; and
(ii) An effective surveillance and
monitoring system for scrapie is in
place; and
(iii) Affected sheep and goats are
slaughtered and completely destroyed;
and
(iv) The feeding of sheep and goats
with meat-and-bone meal or greaves
derived from ruminants has been
banned and the ban effectively enforced
in the whole region; and
(3) Semen originating in regions other
than Australia and New Zealand is to be
transferred to females in a flock that is
listed as a flock/herd premises in the
Scrapie National Database as part of the
Scrapie Program in the United States,
and the flock owner has agreed, in
writing, that:
(i) All first generation (F1) progeny
resulting from imported semen will be
identified with a permanent official
identification consistent with the
provisions in § 79.2 of this chapter; and
(ii) Records of any sale of F1 progeny,
including the name and address of the
buyer, will be kept for a period of 5
years.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 98.37
[Removed and reserved]
3. Section 98.37 would be removed
and reserved.
Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
August 2006.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6–12934 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
Model L–1011 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Lockheed Model L–1011 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require a one-time detailed inspection of
the C112 harness clamp assembly for
proper installation, a one-time detailed
inspection of the C112 and C162
harness assemblies for damage, and
corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD results from a report of
electrical arcing of the essential bus
feeder cables behind hinged circuit
breaker panel CB3 P–K. We are
proposing this AD to prevent arcing of
essential bus feeder cables due to
improper installation of the harness
C112 clamp assembly, which could
result in loss of electrical systems and
smoke and/or fire behind the CB3 P–K
hinged circuit breaker panel in the flight
compartment.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 25,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Lockheed Martin Aircraft &
Logistics Center, 120 Orion Street,
Greenville, South Carolina 29605, for
the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45444-45447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12934]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 98
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0120]
Importation of Sheep and Goat Semen
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations regarding the
importation of animal germplasm by removing specific restrictions on
sheep semen from regions where scrapie exists and requiring the
inclusion of additional information on the international health
certificate accompanying sheep and goat semen. Experience and research
have convinced us that sheep and goat semen pose a minimal risk of
transmitting scrapie. This action would relieve restrictions on
imported sheep semen while continuing to provide safeguards against the
introduction and dissemination of scrapie.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
October 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and, in the lower ``Search Regulations and Federal
Actions'' box, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service''
from the agency drop-down menu, then click on ``Submit.'' In the Docket
ID column, select APHIS-2006-0120 to submit or view public comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is available through the site's ``User
Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. APHIS-
2006-0120, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-
03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state
that your comment refers to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0120.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Arnaldo Vaquer, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Technical Trade Services, National Center for Import and
Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231;
(301) 734-8074.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 98 govern the importation of animal
germplasm to prevent the introduction of contagious diseases of
livestock and poultry into the United States. Subparts A and B of part
98 apply to animal embryos, and subpart C (Sec. Sec. 98.30 through
98.38, referred to below as the regulations) applies to animal semen.
Currently, the regulations in Sec. 98.37 restrict, due to scrapie
concerns, the importation of sheep semen into the United States from
any region of the world other than Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
These restrictions include provisions that the semen must be
transferred only to females in a U.S. flock that is participating in
the voluntary Scrapie Flock Certification Program (SFCP), that the
semen must originate from a donor animal participating in a program
equivalent to the SFCP or the SFCP flock status must be lowered, and
that the semen must be accompanied by a certificate attesting to the
above conditions. The importer is also required to provide the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) with information concerning
control programs, surveillance, and disease incidence in the exporting
region, as well as information concerning the health status of other
ruminants in the region.
The regulations in Sec. 98.35 deal with declarations, health
certificates, and other documents required for the importation of all
animal semen into the United States. All animal semen
[[Page 45445]]
intended for importation to the United States must be accompanied by a
health certificate that provides certain specific information about the
origin and handling of the semen. Paragraph (e) lists additional
requirements for the health certificate accompanying sheep and goat
semen, which must include an attestation that the semen donor has not
been in any flock or herd nor had contact with sheep or goats which
have been in any flock or herd where scrapie has been diagnosed or
suspected during the 5 years prior to the date of collection of the
semen, that the semen donor showed no evidence of scrapie at the time
of collection, and that the parents of the semen donor are not, nor
were not, affected with scrapie.
These requirements are more restrictive than those recommended by
the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) in Chapter 2.4.8,
Article 2.4.8.8 of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code. The OIE
standards for importing sheep and goat semen from a region not free
from scrapie state that importing countries should require an
international veterinary certificate attesting that in the region of
origin, scrapie is compulsorily notifiable, a surveillance and
monitoring system is in place, affected sheep and goats are slaughtered
and completely destroyed, and the feeding of sheep and goats with meat-
and-bone meal or greaves potentially contaminated with an animal
transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) has been banned and the
ban effectively enforced in the whole region. The certificate should
also attest that donor animals are permanently identified to enable
traceback to their establishment of origin, have been kept since birth
in establishments in which no case of scrapie has been confirmed during
their residency, and showed no clinical sign of scrapie at the time of
semen collection.
Experience and research have convinced APHIS that sheep semen poses
a minimal risk of transmitting and disseminating scrapie in the United
States. Through the SFCP, flocks using imported semen from scrapie-
affected regions have been monitored and no first generation (F1)
progeny resulting from the imported semen have been implicated in
scrapie outbreaks. Furthermore, research studies, though limited in
scope, have not revealed transmission through semen or detected the
infective agent in semen, testes, or seminal vesicles of affected
rams.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See L.A. Detwiler and M. Baylis, ``The Epidemiology of
Scrapie,'' Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz. 2003, 22 (1), 131.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, we are proposing to ease the restrictions on the
importation of sheep semen by removing the provisions of Sec. 98.37
from our regulations. In lieu of these regulations, we would amend
Sec. 98.35(e) to require that imported sheep or goat semen be
accompanied by an international veterinary certificate consistent with
the OIE standards describe above. In Sec. 98.35, paragraph (e) already
contains some certificate requirements for imported sheep and goat
semen; the changes we are proposing would bring them further into
alignment with international standards.
Specifically, we would amend Sec. 98.35(e) to require imported
sheep and goat semen to be accompanied by an international veterinary
certificate attesting that in the region where the semen originates
certain conditions are met. These conditions would include that scrapie
is a compulsorily notifiable disease and that there is an effective
surveillance and monitoring system for scrapie in the region where the
semen originates. In addition, the region where the semen originates
would have to require that affected sheep and goats are slaughtered and
completely destroyed. The region where the semen originates must also
enforce a ruminant-to-ruminant feed ban; that is, the feeding of sheep
and goats with meat-and-bone meal or greaves derived from ruminants
must also be banned and the ban effectively enforced in the whole
region. The certificate would have to attest that the donor animals are
permanently identified to enable traceback to their premises of origin,
have been kept since birth on premises in which no case of scrapie had
been confirmed during their residency, showed no clinical sign of
scrapie at the time of semen collection, and did not subsequently
develop scrapie between the time of collection and the time the semen
was exported to the United States. The certificate would also have to
attest that donor animals were not the offspring of scrapie-affected
dams.
This certificate would be required for all sheep and goat semen
imported into the United States. In addition, the distribution of
imported semen within the United States could be limited, depending on
the status of the region of origin of the semen. Semen from regions
free of scrapie could be distributed throughout the United States, but
semen from regions not scrapie free could only be distributed to a
flock that is listed as a flock/herd premises in the Scrapie National
Database as part of either the regulatory or voluntary flock
certification scrapie programs described in 9 CFR part 79 and 9 CFR
part 54 subpart B, respectively. Flock owners would also be required to
sign a written agreement that all first generation (F1) progeny
resulting from imported semen from a region that is not free of scrapie
would be identified with a permanent official identification consistent
with the provisions in Sec. 79.2, and records of any sale of F1
progeny, including the name and address of the buyer, would be kept for
a period of 5 years. This would ease some restrictions on where
imported semen may be used while still enabling traceback of the
progeny resulting from the imported semen. While the risk of scrapie
transmission from sheep semen is believed to be minimal, no studies
have been done regarding the transmissibility through semen of other
animal TSEs and certain other diseases in small ruminants. For this
reason, traceback of progeny is essential.
Under the proposed rule, we would recognize Australia and New
Zealand as regions free of scrapie. The regulations in Sec. 98.37
currently allow imported sheep semen from Australia, Canada, and New
Zealand to be distributed to any flock in the United States. When these
regulations were established in 1996, Canada was included in the list
of regions from which semen could be imported without additional
restrictions even though Canada is not scrapie free. At that time,
Canada had a scrapie control program equivalent to the one in the
United States, and it was determined to be unlikely that new strains of
scrapie would be spread into the United States from Canada. In 2001,
the United States went from a control program to an eradication
program, which is now in full implementation. However, Canada's scrapie
program has not advanced at the same speed as the one in the United
States. For these reasons, under the proposed rule semen imported from
Canada would be subject to the same restrictions as semen from all
other regions except Australia and New Zealand, i.e, it could be
distributed only to females in a flock that is listed as a flock/herd
premises in the Scrapie National Database, as described above.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
The rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
The regulations in Sec. 98.37 restrict the importation of sheep
semen from regions other than Australia, Canada, and New Zealand due to
scrapie
[[Page 45446]]
concerns. These restrictions include provisions requiring the semen to
be transferred only to females in a United States flock that
participates in the SFCP, the semen originates from a donor animal
participating in a program equivalent to the United States SFCP, and
that the semen is accompanied by a certificate attesting to the above
conditions. Additionally, the regulations require the importer to
provide APHIS with information regarding control programs,
surveillance, and disease incidence in the exporting region, as well as
information on the health status of other ruminants in the region in
order to export sheep semen to the United States.
All of these restrictions on imports of sheep and goat semen were
put in place due to scrapie concerns and with the goal of preventing
the spread of scrapie in domestic animals. However, further scientific
research, as well as experience, has demonstrated to APHIS that sheep
and goat semen pose a minimal risk of transmitting scrapie. Therefore,
this proposed rule would eliminate restrictions on sheep semen being
imported from regions other than Australia, Canada, and New Zealand by
removing the provisions of Sec. 98.37 from our regulations. In their
place, we would require that sheep or goat semen from scrapie-affected
regions be accompanied by an international veterinary certificate as
recommended in OIE's Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Consequently, this
proposed rule would bring the United States' import standards for sheep
semen in harmony with recognized international standards, while still
protecting against scrapie introduction to the United States.
These proposed changes in the regulations would have a direct
effect on importers of sheep semen and those businesses involved in
support activities for animal production, which includes, among other
activities, establishments providing breeding services. The number of
establishments engaged in support activities for animal production is
tracked by the U.S. Census Bureau. In 2001, the latest available year,
there were 3,999 establishments in the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) subsector 1152, which comprises
establishments primarily engaged in performing support activities
related to raising livestock.\2\ The annual payroll for these 3,999
establishments was $452.3 million, which translates into an average
annual payroll per establishment of $113,106. The U.S. Small Business
Administration's (SBA) size standard for this particular sector is $6
million or less in annual receipts.\3\ Unfortunately, the Census data
do not include annual receipts for these establishments; however, based
on the average annual payroll per establishment, it is reasonable to
conclude that the majority of these businesses would be considered
small by SBA definitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Statistics of U.S. Businesses: 2001: Support Activities for
Animal Production--United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Census
Bureau.
\3\ Table of Size Standards based on NAICS 2002. Washington, DC:
U.S. Small Business Administration, 2004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A variety of animal production support activities other than
artificial insemination for sheep are included in NAICS subsector 1152.
APHIS does not have specific information on the number or size of
businesses providing artificial insemination services. Based on the
data for all NAICS 1152 businesses, we believe they are primarily small
entities with annual receipts of not more than $6 million. APHIS
welcomes public comment that would support or contradict this
understanding.
Additionally, it is possible the proposed rule may indirectly
affect domestic sheep and goat producers. The Census of Agriculture for
2002, the most recent year for which we have data, estimated that there
were 43,891 farms engaged in sheep and goat farming.\4\ The SBA size
standard for sheep and goat farming (NAICS subsector 1124) is $750,000
or less in annual receipts. The 2002 Census estimates the total market
value of all agricultural products sold by domestic sheep and goat
farmers to be over $445 million, which translates into an average of
$10,147 per farm. When combined with government payments, the average
per farm market value of agricultural products sold is $10,815.\5\ Only
114 farms are classified as having $500,000 or more in market value of
agricultural products sold and government payments. So, at least
43,777, or 99 percent, of farms engaged in sheep and goat farming would
be considered small by SBA standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ USDA, 2002 Census of Agriculture-United States Data, Table
50. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
\5\ USDA, 2002 Census of Agriculture, Table 59, under column
heading ``Sheep and Goat Farming (1124).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign exporters of sheep semen from countries other than
Australia, Canada, and New Zealand might also benefit from the removal
of import restrictions on sheep semen. However, as non-U.S. entities,
they lie outside the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and are
not considered in this economic analysis.
As this proposed rule would lift some of the import restrictions on
imported semen from regions that are not considered scrapie-free, there
would be a reduction in compliance requirements. In place of current
requirements, imported sheep or goat semen would have to be accompanied
by an international veterinary certificate consistent with OIE
standards. This certificate would have to be completed by a veterinary
officer prior to being exported to the United States, and as such would
not pose any compliance requirements for domestic entities.
Benefits
Importers of sheep semen, as well as firms engaged in agricultural
support activities, specifically those providing artificial
insemination services, could possibly benefit from the proposed
changes. Imports of sheep semen are not tracked as a separate line item
by USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service. However, Veterinary Services of
APHIS tracks raw data and estimates there were 2,491 straws of sheep
semen imported in 2004 and only 1 straw in 2003, with Australia being
the primary exporter.\6\ It is possible that the proposed changes would
encourage exports of sheep and goat semen to the United States in
response to reduced import restrictions. Laws of supply and demand
dictate that increased supply will result in lower prices. However, if
this happens, it would be over the long run because currently there is
not a large demand for sheep semen in the United States, as is
evidenced by the number of imports. In fact, domestic sheep and goat
producers rarely rely on artificial insemination as a means for
breeding animals, as it is too expensive. Artificial insemination
technology is primarily practiced by the seedstock industry. Thus, the
market for imported sheep semen is small, consisting primarily of
producers that raise less common breeds and desire imported semen to
improve and diversify their genetics.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Elizabeth McKenna, Data Manager (APHIS).
\7\ Susan Schoenian, Area Agent, Sheep & Goats Western Maryland
Research & Education Center, University of Maryland Cooperative
Extension; via e-mail communication and article ``An Update on Sheep
A.I.'' Maryland Small Ruminant page. https://www.sheepandgoat.com/
articles/ai.html, Maryland Sheep News, 1999.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs
It is possible the proposed changes could have an indirect effect
on domestic sheep and goat breeders over the long run. However, a
variety of conditions would have to be met for this
[[Page 45447]]
situation to materialize. These conditions include, but are not limited
to, artificial insemination technology becoming a more cost-effective
approach to sheep and goat production versus using breeding animals.
Essentially, the only way sheep and goat breeders would be affected
over the long run is if the process of artificial insemination becomes
cheaper than purchasing or maintaining replacement breeding animals. As
of January 1, 2005, there were inventories of 4.53 million head of
breeding sheep and 2.1 million head of breeding goats in the United
States. Thus, it is possible that, as the process of artificial
insemination becomes more cost-effective and as imported sheep semen
becomes more readily available and technologies improve, sheep and goat
producers will substitute away from buying replacement breeding animals
and use artificial insemination instead. However, as stated previously,
this situation is long-term in nature and highly conditional.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 98
Animal diseases, Imports.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 98 as follows:
PART 98--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMAL EMBRYOS AND ANIMAL SEMEN
1. The authority citation for part 98 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a;
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
2. In Sec. 98.35, paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and (e)(3) would be
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 98.35 Declaration, health certificate, and other documents for
animal semen.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) The donor animals:
(i) Are permanently identified, to enable trace back to their
establishment of origin; and
(ii) Have been kept since birth in establishments in which no case
of scrapie had been confirmed during their residency; and
(iii) Neither showed clinical signs of scrapie at the time of semen
collection nor developed scrapie between the time of semen collection
and export of the semen to the United States; and
(iv) The dam of the semen donor is not, nor was not, affected with
scrapie.
(2) In the region where the semen originates:
(i) Scrapie is a compulsorily notifiable disease; and
(ii) An effective surveillance and monitoring system for scrapie is
in place; and
(iii) Affected sheep and goats are slaughtered and completely
destroyed; and
(iv) The feeding of sheep and goats with meat-and-bone meal or
greaves derived from ruminants has been banned and the ban effectively
enforced in the whole region; and
(3) Semen originating in regions other than Australia and New
Zealand is to be transferred to females in a flock that is listed as a
flock/herd premises in the Scrapie National Database as part of the
Scrapie Program in the United States, and the flock owner has agreed,
in writing, that:
(i) All first generation (F1) progeny resulting from imported semen
will be identified with a permanent official identification consistent
with the provisions in Sec. 79.2 of this chapter; and
(ii) Records of any sale of F1 progeny, including the name and
address of the buyer, will be kept for a period of 5 years.
* * * * *
Sec. 98.37 [Removed and reserved]
3. Section 98.37 would be removed and reserved.
Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of August 2006.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6-12934 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P