Importation of Shelled Garden Peas From Kenya, 38302-38304 [E6-10551]
Download as PDF
38302
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 129
Thursday, July 6, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0073]
Importation of Shelled Garden Peas
From Kenya
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the fruits and vegetables regulations to
allow the importation of shelled garden
peas from Kenya into the continental
United States. In order to be eligible for
importation, the peas would have to be
shelled, washed, and inspected and
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the Kenya Plant
Health Inspectorate Service. This action
would allow for the importation of
shelled peas from Kenya into the
continental United States while
continuing to protect against the
introduction of quarantine pests.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before September
5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and, in the
lower ‘‘Search Regulations and Federal
Actions’’ box, select ‘‘Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service’’ from the
agency drop-down menu, then click on
‘‘Submit.’’ In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS–2006–0073 to submit or
view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically. Information on
using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the
docket after the close of the comment
period, is available through the site’s
‘‘User Tips’’ link.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
comment (an original and three copies)
to APHIS–2006–0073, Regulatory
Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700 River
Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1238. Please state that your comment
refers to APHIS–2006–0073.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Sharon Porsche, Import Specialist,
Commodity Import Analysis and
Operations, Plant Health Programs,
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
8758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ‘‘Subpart—Fruits
and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56 through
319.56–8, referred to below as the
regulations) prohibit or restrict the
importation of fruits and vegetables into
the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction
and dissemination of plant pests that are
new to or not widely distributed within
the United States.
The Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate
Service (KEPHIS) has requested that the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) amend the regulations
to allow shelled garden peas from Kenya
to be imported into the United States.
As part of our evaluation of Kenya’s
request, we prepared a pest risk
assessment (PRA) and a risk
management document. Copies of the
PRA and risk management document
may be obtained from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instruction for
accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA, titled ‘‘Importation of
Garden Peas, Shelled Pisum sativum L.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
from Kenya into the Continental United
States, a Qualitative Pathway-Initiated
Risk Assessment’’ (May 2006), evaluates
the risks associated with the
importation of shelled garden peas into
the continental United States (the lower
48 States and Alaska) from Kenya. The
PRA identified 13 pests of quarantine
significance present in garden peas
(Pisum sativum) in Kenya: The weevils
Callosobruchus analis, C. chinensis, C.
maculates, and C. phaseoli; the borers
Crocidosema aporema, Leucinodes
orbonalis, and Maruca vitrata; the
grasshopper Diabolocatantops axillaris;
the bollworm Helicoverpa armigera; the
caterpillar Lampides boeticus; the
leafworm Spodoptera littoralis; the
flower thrips Thrips flavus; and the
looper Thysanoplusia orichalcea.
However, the assessment took into
account the post-harvest handling that
the peas would be subjected to in Kenya
and further determined that none of the
13 quarantine significant pests
identified may be reasonably expected
to follow the pathway of shelled garden
pea shipments from Kenya. As a result
of these findings, the 13 pests of
quarantine significance were listed as
not following the pathway, and,
therefore, were not analyzed further.
The specific post-harvest processing
procedures suggested by KEPHIS that
were considered in the PRA and that
would be required under this proposed
rule are described in the following
paragraphs.
The imports of garden peas would be
limited to peas that have been removed
from their shell. Shelling allows for
visual inspection and removes most of
the larval pests that may be feeding on
the pods and exposes pests that feed on
the pea. These pests are highly visible
and easily detected during the shelling
process.
The shelled peas would then have to
be washed in a disinfectant wash in
water at 3 to 5 °C containing 50 ppm of
chlorine. The washing of the shelled
peas further aids in the removal of any
insects that might feed on individual
peas.
In addition, we would require that
KEPHIS inspect the shelled peas and
issue a phytosanitary certificate for each
consignment of peas. The phytosanitary
certificate would have to bear an
additional declaration confirming that
the required post-harvest shelling and
washing procedures have been
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
followed, as well as a statement
confirming that the peas have been
inspected and found free of pests.
We have determined that these
proposed measures would prevent the
introduction of plant pests into the
United States. The proposed conditions
described above for the importation of
shelled garden peas from Kenya into the
United States would be added to the
fruits and vegetables regulations as a
new § 319.56–2ss.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
We are proposing to amend the fruits
and vegetables regulations to allow the
importation of shelled garden peas from
Kenya into the continental United
States. In order to be eligible for
importation, the peas would have to be
shelled, washed, and inspected and
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by KEPHIS. This
action would allow for the importation
of shelled peas from Kenya into the
continental United States while
continuing to protect against the
introduction of quarantine pests.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to consider the
economic impact of their regulations on
small entities and to use flexibility to
provide regulatory relief when
regulations create economic disparities
between differently sized entities. In
accordance with the Act, APHIS has
performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis regarding the
economic effects of this proposed rule
on small entities. We do not have all the
data necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the effects of this proposed
rule on small entities that may incur
benefits or costs from the
implementation of this proposed rule.
However, based on the information we
do have, we believe that most, if not all,
of the businesses affected by the
proposed rule would be small, and there
is no reason to conclude that adoption
of this proposed rule would result in
any significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities.
The United States is the third largest
producer of garden peas after India and
China. However, less than 1 percent of
U.S. production goes into the fresh
market, the reason being that fresh
garden peas require harvesting by hand,
whereas peas destined for processing
can be machine-harvested. The cost of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
farm labor is considerably higher in the
United States than in many other
countries.
According to industry sources, fresh
garden peas grown in the United States
are mainly produced in California (more
than 85 percent), with the rest grown
mainly in Florida. Published data on
domestic production of fresh garden
peas exist only for two counties in
California, San Luis Obispo County and
Santa Barbara County.1 Based on the
2000–2004 data for these two counties,
California snow pea production
declined over that 5-year period, while
green pea production has expanded.
The value of pea production in those
two counties in 2004 was $29 million.
The United States is a net importer of
fresh/chilled peas, and our major
foreign supplier of fresh garden peas in
2005 was Guatemala, with a 45 percent
share (by value) of U.S. imports,
followed by Peru (29 percent) and
Mexico (24 percent). Nearly all U.S.
fresh pea exports go to Canada.
Our reported domestic supply of fresh
garden peas (California production plus
net U.S. imports) in 2004 totaled about
39,700 metric tons, valued at $42.7
million. These totals exclude U.S.
production that may have taken place
outside of San Luis Obispo and Santa
Barbara Counties.
If we include the 15 percent of
unreported U.S. production of fresh
garden peas thought to occur outside of
the two California counties, then the
2004 domestic supply would total about
42,800 metric tons, with roughly 65
percent imported and 35 percent
supplied by U.S. producers.
U.S. entities that could be affected by
the proposed rule are domestic
producers of fresh garden peas and
wholesalers who import fresh garden
peas. Businesses producing green peas
and snow peas are classified in the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) within the category of
Other Vegetable (except Potato) and
Melon Farming (NAICS code 111219).
The Small Business Administration’s
(SBA) small entity definition for these
producers is annual receipts of not more
than $750,000. Firms that would import
fresh, shelled garden peas from Kenya
are defined as small entities if they have
100 or fewer employees (NAICS code
424480, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable
Merchant Wholesalers).2
1Annual County Agricultural Commissioner
Report Data (Sacramento: California Department of
Food and Agriculture, 2000–2004).
2 The wholesale sector comprises two types of
wholesalers: Those that sell goods on their own
account and those that arrange sales and purchases
for others for a commission or fee. Importers are
included in both cases.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38303
In general, firms engaged in
production or importation of
agricultural commodities are
predominantly small. We believe that
most if not all of the businesses affected
by the proposed rule would be small.
We do not know the number of U.S.
producers of fresh garden peas.
According to the 2002 Census of
Agriculture for California Counties,
there were 327 vegetable farms in San
Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara
Counties, the two counties for which
there are published fresh garden pea
production data. We do not know how
many of these vegetable farms produce
fresh garden peas. Also, we do not know
their size, but in general, such entities
are predominantly small. We welcome
information that the fresh vegetable
industry or general public may provide
on the number and size of entities that
could be affected by the proposed rule.
Alternatives
An alternative to the proposed rule
would be to require that a different set
of phytosanitary measures be satisfied.
Risk assessment and risk management
documents prepared by APHIS identify
13 quarantine pests for fresh garden
peas from Kenya. For the current
proposed rule, the commodity would be
subject to certain risk mitigations,
including removal of the seeds from the
pod, washing of the shelled peas in
water at 3 to 5 °C containing 50 ppm
chlorine, phytosanitary certification by
KEPHIS, and U.S. port-of-entry
inspection. These conditions are
expected to successfully mitigate risks
posed to U.S. agriculture. Import
requirements less or more stringent than
those proposed would, respectively,
either not provide an appropriate level
of phytosanitary protection or impose
unduly burdensome measures.
We would appreciate any comments
on the potential economic effects of
allowing the importation into the
continental United States of garden peas
from Kenya, and on how the proposed
rule could be modified to reduce
expected costs or burdens for small
entities consistent with its objectives.
This proposed rule contains certain
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements (see ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ below).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow
shelled garden peas to be imported into
the continental United States from
Kenya. If this proposed rule is adopted,
State and local laws and regulations
regarding shelled garden peas imported
under this rule would be preempted
while the fruit is in foreign commerce.
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
38304
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Fresh fruits and vegetables are generally
imported for immediate distribution and
sale to the consuming public and would
remain in foreign commerce until sold
to the ultimate consumer. The question
of when foreign commerce ceases in
other cases must be addressed on a caseby-case basis. If this proposed rule is
adopted, no retroactive effect will be
given to this rule, and this rule will not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to APHIS–2006–0073. Please send
a copy of your comments to: (1) APHIS–
2006–0073, Regulatory Analysis and
Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–
03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238, and (2)
Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room
404–W, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250. A
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule would amend the
fruits and vegetables regulations to
allow the importation of shelled garden
peas from Kenya into the continental
United States. In order to be eligible for
importation, the peas would have to be
shelled, washed, and inspected and
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by KEPHIS. The
phytosanitary certificate would have to
bear an additional declaration stating
that the peas had been shelled and
washed in accordance with the
proposed requirements and had been
inspected and found free of pests.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Jul 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.15 hour per
response.
Respondents: Importers of peas,
KEPHIS.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 2.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 20.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 40.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 6 hours. (Due to averaging,
the total annual burden hours may not
equal the product of the annual number
of responses multiplied by the reporting
burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 734–7477.
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA),
which requires Government agencies in
general to provide the public the option
of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible. For information
pertinent to GPEA compliance related to
this proposed rule, please contact Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS’ Information
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734–
7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. A new § 319.56–2ss would be
added to read as follows:
§ 319.56–2ss Conditions governing the
entry of shelled garden peas from Kenya.
Garden peas (Pisum sativum) may be
imported into the continental United
States from Kenya only under the
following conditions:
(a) The peas must be shelled from the
pod.
(b) The peas must be washed in
disinfectant water at 3 to 5 °C
containing 50 ppm chlorine.
(c) Each shipment of peas must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate of inspection issued by the
national plant protection organization of
Kenya bearing the following additional
declaration: ‘‘These peas have been
shelled and washed in accordance with
7 CFR 319.56–2ss and have been
inspected and found free of pests.’’
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of
June 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6–10551 Filed 7–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20351; Directorate
Identifier 2003–NM–269–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 767 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Boeing Model 767 airplanes. The
original NPRM would have required an
inspection of each main tank fuel boost
pump for the presence of a pump shaft
flame arrestor, and if the flame arrestor
is missing, replacement of that pump
with a pump having a pump shaft flame
arrestor. The original NPRM would also
have required repetitive measurements
of the flame arrestor’s position in the
pump, and corrective actions if
necessary. The original NPRM resulted
from reports that certain fuel boost
pumps may not have flame arrestors
installed in the pump shaft and reports
E:\FR\FM\06JYP1.SGM
06JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 129 (Thursday, July 6, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38302-38304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-10551]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 129 / Thursday, July 6, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 38302]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0073]
Importation of Shelled Garden Peas From Kenya
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the fruits and vegetables
regulations to allow the importation of shelled garden peas from Kenya
into the continental United States. In order to be eligible for
importation, the peas would have to be shelled, washed, and inspected
and accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the Kenya
Plant Health Inspectorate Service. This action would allow for the
importation of shelled peas from Kenya into the continental United
States while continuing to protect against the introduction of
quarantine pests.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
September 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and, in the lower ``Search Regulations and Federal
Actions'' box, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service''
from the agency drop-down menu, then click on ``Submit.'' In the Docket
ID column, select APHIS-2006-0073 to submit or view public comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is available through the site's ``User
Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to APHIS-2006-0073,
Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your
comment refers to APHIS-2006-0073.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sharon Porsche, Import Specialist,
Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, Plant Health Programs, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-
8758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR 319.56
through 319.56-8, referred to below as the regulations) prohibit or
restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and
dissemination of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed
within the United States.
The Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Service (KEPHIS) has requested
that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) amend the
regulations to allow shelled garden peas from Kenya to be imported into
the United States. As part of our evaluation of Kenya's request, we
prepared a pest risk assessment (PRA) and a risk management document.
Copies of the PRA and risk management document may be obtained from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see ADDRESSES above for instruction for
accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA, titled ``Importation of Garden Peas, Shelled Pisum sativum
L. from Kenya into the Continental United States, a Qualitative
Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment'' (May 2006), evaluates the risks
associated with the importation of shelled garden peas into the
continental United States (the lower 48 States and Alaska) from Kenya.
The PRA identified 13 pests of quarantine significance present in
garden peas (Pisum sativum) in Kenya: The weevils Callosobruchus
analis, C. chinensis, C. maculates, and C. phaseoli; the borers
Crocidosema aporema, Leucinodes orbonalis, and Maruca vitrata; the
grasshopper Diabolocatantops axillaris; the bollworm Helicoverpa
armigera; the caterpillar Lampides boeticus; the leafworm Spodoptera
littoralis; the flower thrips Thrips flavus; and the looper
Thysanoplusia orichalcea.
However, the assessment took into account the post-harvest handling
that the peas would be subjected to in Kenya and further determined
that none of the 13 quarantine significant pests identified may be
reasonably expected to follow the pathway of shelled garden pea
shipments from Kenya. As a result of these findings, the 13 pests of
quarantine significance were listed as not following the pathway, and,
therefore, were not analyzed further.
The specific post-harvest processing procedures suggested by KEPHIS
that were considered in the PRA and that would be required under this
proposed rule are described in the following paragraphs.
The imports of garden peas would be limited to peas that have been
removed from their shell. Shelling allows for visual inspection and
removes most of the larval pests that may be feeding on the pods and
exposes pests that feed on the pea. These pests are highly visible and
easily detected during the shelling process.
The shelled peas would then have to be washed in a disinfectant
wash in water at 3 to 5 [deg]C containing 50 ppm of chlorine. The
washing of the shelled peas further aids in the removal of any insects
that might feed on individual peas.
In addition, we would require that KEPHIS inspect the shelled peas
and issue a phytosanitary certificate for each consignment of peas. The
phytosanitary certificate would have to bear an additional declaration
confirming that the required post-harvest shelling and washing
procedures have been
[[Page 38303]]
followed, as well as a statement confirming that the peas have been
inspected and found free of pests.
We have determined that these proposed measures would prevent the
introduction of plant pests into the United States. The proposed
conditions described above for the importation of shelled garden peas
from Kenya into the United States would be added to the fruits and
vegetables regulations as a new Sec. 319.56-2ss.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
The rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
We are proposing to amend the fruits and vegetables regulations to
allow the importation of shelled garden peas from Kenya into the
continental United States. In order to be eligible for importation, the
peas would have to be shelled, washed, and inspected and accompanied by
a phytosanitary certificate issued by KEPHIS. This action would allow
for the importation of shelled peas from Kenya into the continental
United States while continuing to protect against the introduction of
quarantine pests.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to consider the
economic impact of their regulations on small entities and to use
flexibility to provide regulatory relief when regulations create
economic disparities between differently sized entities. In accordance
with the Act, APHIS has performed an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis regarding the economic effects of this proposed rule on small
entities. We do not have all the data necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities that
may incur benefits or costs from the implementation of this proposed
rule. However, based on the information we do have, we believe that
most, if not all, of the businesses affected by the proposed rule would
be small, and there is no reason to conclude that adoption of this
proposed rule would result in any significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities.
The United States is the third largest producer of garden peas
after India and China. However, less than 1 percent of U.S. production
goes into the fresh market, the reason being that fresh garden peas
require harvesting by hand, whereas peas destined for processing can be
machine-harvested. The cost of farm labor is considerably higher in the
United States than in many other countries.
According to industry sources, fresh garden peas grown in the
United States are mainly produced in California (more than 85 percent),
with the rest grown mainly in Florida. Published data on domestic
production of fresh garden peas exist only for two counties in
California, San Luis Obispo County and Santa Barbara County.\1\ Based
on the 2000-2004 data for these two counties, California snow pea
production declined over that 5-year period, while green pea production
has expanded. The value of pea production in those two counties in 2004
was $29 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Annual County Agricultural Commissioner Report Data
(Sacramento: California Department of Food and Agriculture, 2000-
2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is a net importer of fresh/chilled peas, and our
major foreign supplier of fresh garden peas in 2005 was Guatemala, with
a 45 percent share (by value) of U.S. imports, followed by Peru (29
percent) and Mexico (24 percent). Nearly all U.S. fresh pea exports go
to Canada.
Our reported domestic supply of fresh garden peas (California
production plus net U.S. imports) in 2004 totaled about 39,700 metric
tons, valued at $42.7 million. These totals exclude U.S. production
that may have taken place outside of San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara
Counties.
If we include the 15 percent of unreported U.S. production of fresh
garden peas thought to occur outside of the two California counties,
then the 2004 domestic supply would total about 42,800 metric tons,
with roughly 65 percent imported and 35 percent supplied by U.S.
producers.
U.S. entities that could be affected by the proposed rule are
domestic producers of fresh garden peas and wholesalers who import
fresh garden peas. Businesses producing green peas and snow peas are
classified in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
within the category of Other Vegetable (except Potato) and Melon
Farming (NAICS code 111219). The Small Business Administration's (SBA)
small entity definition for these producers is annual receipts of not
more than $750,000. Firms that would import fresh, shelled garden peas
from Kenya are defined as small entities if they have 100 or fewer
employees (NAICS code 424480, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Merchant
Wholesalers).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The wholesale sector comprises two types of wholesalers:
Those that sell goods on their own account and those that arrange
sales and purchases for others for a commission or fee. Importers
are included in both cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In general, firms engaged in production or importation of
agricultural commodities are predominantly small. We believe that most
if not all of the businesses affected by the proposed rule would be
small.
We do not know the number of U.S. producers of fresh garden peas.
According to the 2002 Census of Agriculture for California Counties,
there were 327 vegetable farms in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara
Counties, the two counties for which there are published fresh garden
pea production data. We do not know how many of these vegetable farms
produce fresh garden peas. Also, we do not know their size, but in
general, such entities are predominantly small. We welcome information
that the fresh vegetable industry or general public may provide on the
number and size of entities that could be affected by the proposed
rule.
Alternatives
An alternative to the proposed rule would be to require that a
different set of phytosanitary measures be satisfied. Risk assessment
and risk management documents prepared by APHIS identify 13 quarantine
pests for fresh garden peas from Kenya. For the current proposed rule,
the commodity would be subject to certain risk mitigations, including
removal of the seeds from the pod, washing of the shelled peas in water
at 3 to 5 [deg]C containing 50 ppm chlorine, phytosanitary
certification by KEPHIS, and U.S. port-of-entry inspection. These
conditions are expected to successfully mitigate risks posed to U.S.
agriculture. Import requirements less or more stringent than those
proposed would, respectively, either not provide an appropriate level
of phytosanitary protection or impose unduly burdensome measures.
We would appreciate any comments on the potential economic effects
of allowing the importation into the continental United States of
garden peas from Kenya, and on how the proposed rule could be modified
to reduce expected costs or burdens for small entities consistent with
its objectives.
This proposed rule contains certain reporting and recordkeeping
requirements (see ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' below).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow shelled garden peas to be imported
into the continental United States from Kenya. If this proposed rule is
adopted, State and local laws and regulations regarding shelled garden
peas imported under this rule would be preempted while the fruit is in
foreign commerce.
[[Page 38304]]
Fresh fruits and vegetables are generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming public and would remain in
foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The question of
when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be addressed on a
case-by-case basis. If this proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington,
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to APHIS-2006-0073.
Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) APHIS-2006-0073, Regulatory
Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road
Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238, and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO,
USDA, room 404-W, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20250. A comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if
OMB receives it within 30 days of publication of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would amend the fruits and vegetables
regulations to allow the importation of shelled garden peas from Kenya
into the continental United States. In order to be eligible for
importation, the peas would have to be shelled, washed, and inspected
and accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by KEPHIS. The
phytosanitary certificate would have to bear an additional declaration
stating that the peas had been shelled and washed in accordance with
the proposed requirements and had been inspected and found free of
pests.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 0.15 hour per response.
Respondents: Importers of peas, KEPHIS.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 2.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 20.
Estimated annual number of responses: 40.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 6 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
734-7477.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), which
requires Government agencies in general to provide the public the
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically
to the maximum extent possible. For information pertinent to GPEA
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. A new Sec. 319.56-2ss would be added to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-2ss Conditions governing the entry of shelled garden peas
from Kenya.
Garden peas (Pisum sativum) may be imported into the continental
United States from Kenya only under the following conditions:
(a) The peas must be shelled from the pod.
(b) The peas must be washed in disinfectant water at 3 to 5 [deg]C
containing 50 ppm chlorine.
(c) Each shipment of peas must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate of inspection issued by the national plant protection
organization of Kenya bearing the following additional declaration:
``These peas have been shelled and washed in accordance with 7 CFR
319.56-2ss and have been inspected and found free of pests.''
Done in Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6-10551 Filed 7-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P