Noxious Weeds; South African Ragwort and Madagascar Ragwort, 35378-35381 [E6-9665]
Download as PDF
35378
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(b) For wage surveys involving the
specialized Federal industry ‘‘Artillery
and Combat Vehicles’’ in paragraph (a)
of this section, the lead agency must
limit special job coverage for industries
in NAICS codes 2211, 2212, 32732, 484,
4862, 5621, 492, 5171, 5172, and 5173
to automotive mechanic, diesel engine
mechanic, and heavy mobile equipment
mechanic.
(c) For nonappropriated fund wage
surveys, the lead agency must use
NAICS codes 71111, 7221, 7222, 72231,
72232, and 7224 (eating and drinking
places) when it determines a wage
schedule for a specialized industry.
[FR Doc. E6–9667 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
Foreign Quarantine Notices
CFR Correction
In Title 7 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, parts 300 to 399, revised as
of January 1, 2006, in § 319.56–2j
paragraph (a)(2)(i) is corrected to read as
follows:
§ 319.56–2j Conditions governing the entry
of apples and pears from Australia
(including Tasmania) and New Zealand.
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Chamber: 1
11⁄2 lb for 2 hours at 80–89 °F.
2 lb for 2 hours at 70°–79 °F.
21⁄2 lb for 2 hours at 60–69 °F.
3 lb for 2 hours at 50–59 °F.
4 lb for 2 hours at 40–49 °F.
MB at NAP
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–55521 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Parts 360 and 361
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0019]
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Noxious Weeds; South African
Ragwort and Madagascar Ragwort
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
AGENCY:
1 MB=methyl bromide; NAP=normal atmospheric
pressure.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
Interim rule and request for
comments.
ACTION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We are amending the noxious
weed and imported seed regulations by
adding South African ragwort (Senecio
inaequidens DC.) and Madagascar
ragwort (Senecio madagascariensis
Poir.) to the list of terrestrial noxious
weeds and to the list of seeds with no
tolerances applicable to their
introduction. This action is necessary to
prevent the artificial spread of these
noxious weeds into the United States.
DATES: This interim rule is effective
June 14, 2006. We will consider all
comments that we receive on or before
August 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www/regulations.gov and, in the
lower ‘‘Search Regulations and Federal
Actions’’ box, select ‘‘Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service’’ from the
agency drop-down menu, then click on
‘‘Submit.’’ In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS–2006–0019 to submit or
view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically. Information on
using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the
docket after the close of the comment
period, is available through the site’s
‘‘User Tips’’ link.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
comment (an original and three copies)
to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0019,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0019.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Alan V. Tasker, Noxious Weeds Program
Coordinator, Invasive Species and Pest
Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1237; (301) 734–5225.
Background
The Plant Protection Act (PPA, 7
U.S.C. 7701 et seq.) authorizes the
Secretary of Agriculture to prohibit or
restrict the importation, entry,
exportation, or movement in interstate
commerce of any plant, plant product,
biological control organism, noxious
weed, article, or means of conveyance if
the Secretary determines that the
prohibition or restriction is necessary to
prevent the introduction of a plant pest
or noxious weed into the United States
or the dissemination of a plant pest or
noxious weed within the United States.
The PPA defines ‘‘noxious weed’’ as
‘‘any plant or plant product that can
directly or indirectly injure or cause
damage to crops (including nursery
stock or plant products), livestock,
poultry or other interests of agriculture,
irrigation, navigation, the natural
resources of the United States, the
public health, or the environment.’’ The
PPA also provides that the Secretary
may publish, by regulation, a list of
noxious weeds that are prohibited or
restricted from entering the United
States or that are subject to restrictions
on interstate movement within the
United States. Under this authority, the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) administers the
noxious weeds regulations in 7 CFR part
360, which prohibit or restrict the
importation and interstate movement of
those plants that are designated as
noxious weeds in § 360.200.
Under the authority of the Federal
Seed Act (FSA) of 1939, as amended (7
U.S.C. 1551 et seq.), the U.S.
Department of Agriculture regulates the
importation and interstate movement of
certain agricultural and vegetable seeds
and screenings. Title III of the FSA,
‘‘Foreign Commerce,’’ requires
shipments of imported agricultural and
vegetable seeds to be labeled correctly
and to be tested for the presence of the
seeds of certain noxious weeds as a
condition of entry into the United
States. APHIS’ regulations
implementing the provisions of title III
of the FSA are found in 7 CFR part 361.
A list of noxious weed seeds is
contained in § 361.6. Paragraph (a)(1) of
§ 361.6 lists species of noxious weed
seeds with no tolerances applicable to
their introduction into the United
States.
APHIS lists in its regulations only
those weeds that meet the international
definition of a quarantine pests, i.e., ‘‘a
pest of potential economic importance
to the area endangered thereby and not
yet present there, or present but not
widely distributed and being officially
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
controlled.’’ This practice is consistent
with the International Plant Protection
Convention (IPPC), to which the United
States is a signatory. Under the IPPC, a
country may prohibit or restrict
importation of quarantine pests or, in
the case of contaminants in plants for
planting, regulated nonquarantine pests.
This practice is also consistent with
sections 414 and 415 of the PPA, which
authorize the Secretary to take general
remedial measures or to declare an
extraordinary emergency if necessary to
prevent the introduction or spread of
plant pests or noxious weeds that are
new to or not known to be prevalent or
distributed widely within and
throughout the United States.
In this document, we are amending
the regulations by adding South African
ragwort (Senecio inaequidens DC.) and
Madagascar ragwort (Senecio
madagascariensis Poir.) to the list in
§ 360.200(c) of terrestrial noxious weeds
and to the list in § 361.6(a)(1) of seeds
with no tolerances applicable to their
introduction. We are taking this action
based on information, discussed below,
that strongly suggests that S.
inaequidens and S. madagascariensis
pose a serious threat to U.S. agriculture
and the natural resources of the United
States.
This information is also available in
the weed risk assessment document,
which may be obtained from the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
S. inaequidens is a perennial plant
with narrow leaves and bright yellow
flowers that is native to the Transvaal
and Natal provinces of South Africa. It
also occurs in Botswana, Lesotho,
Mozambique, Namibia, and Swaziland,
though it is unclear whether it is native
to those areas. Because it is considered
an invasive species even in its native
habitat, it is possible that it has spread
to other areas in southern Africa in
recent years.
It is estimated that S. inaequidens
produces more than 10,000 seeds per
plant per year and seeds may remain
viable in the soil for months or years.
There are numerous pathways of
dispersal, including by wind, in soil, in
seed, and as a hitchhiker on containers,
vehicles, agricultural machinery,
agricultural products such as wool and
hay, and on animals. S. inaequidens was
accidentally introduced to Europe with
imports of wool as early as 1889. It now
occupies a wide range of habitats within
Europe, including along roads, railways,
riverbanks, forest clearings, croplands,
mountain slopes, vineyards, grasslands,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
wetlands, tree plantations, pastures, and
areas disturbed by fire. S. inaequidens is
also present in Mexico. It is highly
adaptable and able to withstand hot, dry
summers and overwinter in areas where
temperatures reach ¥15 °C (5 °F).
Like S. inaequidens, S.
madagascariensis is an invasive
perennial plant native to South Africa
with yellow flowers and a highly
branched stem. In addition, it may also
be capable of producing over 10,000
seeds per plant per year, which are
easily dispersed by the wind or may
hitchhike on other surfaces and objects.
These seeds may remain viable in the
soil for up to 10 years. Recent studies
suggest S. inaequidens and S.
madagascariensis may represent one
species; however, a formal taxonomic
study has not been conducted to resolve
this issue. Therefore, we have evaluated
the two taxa as separate, but similar
species.
S. madagascariensis now occupies
parts of Argentina, Hawaii, Japan, and
many coastal regions in Australia. The
earliest record of S. madagascariensis in
Australia is in 1918, when it was
probably introduced in ballast. In the
1980s it was introduced to the island of
Hawaii, where it is considered a State
noxious weed and is under official
control. Since its introduction, it has
spread to the islands of Kauai, Maui,
Oahu, and Kahoolawe, invading
pastures, yards, roadsides, natural areas,
abandoned fields, and newly developed
lots from sea level to as high as 7,000
feet in elevation.
Both S. inaequidens and S.
madagascariensis produce toxic
alkaloids. Although livestock may not
typically eat S. inaequidens or S.
madagascariensis due to their bitter
taste, young plants growing intermixed
with other pasture species may be
inadvertently ingested. S.
madagascariensis has been shown to
retard the growth and development of
cattle if eaten, and in some acute cases,
can cause livestock mortality. In Africa,
S. inaequidens alkaloids have been
found in milk and bread and may have
resulted in some lethal poisoning of
humans. If either species were to
become established in the United States,
the United States may experience a loss
in domestic and foreign grain, cattle,
hay, and dairy markets due to toxic
alkaloid contamination.
Because it forms dense populations of
5 to 15 plants per square meter
(approximately 11 square feet), S.
inaequidens can exert competitive
pressure on native species, primarily
through shading. Evidence suggests that
it outcompetes some herbs. Therefore, it
may have a negative impact on
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35379
biodiversity, although this has not yet
been tested.
The United States contains dozens of
native species of Senecio, two of which
are federally listed as threatened. These
native species live in a variety of
habitats, including those favorable to
the establishment of S. inaequidens and
S. madagascariensis. If S. inaequidens
or S. madagascariensis become
established in the United States, they
would likely invade these habitats,
threatening the existence of those
species through competition or
indirectly through hybridization. Many
species of Senecio freely interbreed if
they come in contact with each other.
Although mechanical and chemical
control measures are available, they may
not be easy to apply due to the often
inaccessible habitats S. inaequidens and
S. madagascariensis can occupy. In
addition, such control measures are
likely to be costly. In 1995, it is
estimated that S. madagascariensis cost
the Australian dairy industry AU $10
million per year in control and
production costs.
The United States imports many
commodities, such as uncleaned wool,
on which seeds of S. inaequidens or S.
madagascariensis could hitch-hike from
countries in which these species are
known to exist. It is highly likely that
some contaminated shipments have
already entered the United States given
that the infestations of S.
madagascariensis in Hawaii resulted
from contaminated hydromulch that
traveled through the Los Angeles ports
from Australia. APHIS has not kept
records of any interception of these
species because neither species is listed
as a Federal noxious weed. This is a
concern for the agency because APHIS
has no way of knowing how many
shipments contaminated with S
inaequidens or S. madagascariensis
may have already entered the United
States. Once the species do enter the
United States, it is not clear how
quickly they can acclimate to their new
environment. If either S. inaequidens or
S. madagascariensis were introduced
into the United States in the near future,
it could take a few years before the
plants begin to spread far enough to be
detected at which point the invasive
species will already be established.
In addition, as S. madagascariensis is
capable of interbreeding with S.
inaequidens and some studies suggest
that they may represent the same
species, we have determined that S.
madagascariensis poses as high of a risk
of introduction into the United States as
S. inaequidens. The introduction and
establishment of S. inaequidens or S.
madagascariensis in the United States
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
35380
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
could lead to adverse impacts, such as
reduced crop and livestock yield, lower
commodity values, loss of foreign
markets due to the presence of a
quarantine pest, and costly chemical
control programs. Therefore, we have
determined that it is necessary, on an
emergency basis, to amend the
regulations in §§ 360.200 and 361.6 to
list S. inaequidens and S.
madagascariensis as noxious weeds in
order to help prevent their artificial
spread into the United States.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Emergency Action
This rulemaking is necessary on an
emergency basis to prevent the
introduction of S. inaequidens and S.
madagascariensis into the United
States. Under these circumstances, the
Administrator has determined that prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment are contrary to the public
interest and that there is good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553 for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
We will consider comments we
receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above).
After the comment period closes, we
will publish another document in the
Federal Register. The document will
include a discussion of any comments
we receive and any amendments we are
making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. For this action,
the Office of Management and Budget
has waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
We are amending the noxious weed
and imported seed regulations by
adding S. inaequidens (South African
ragwort) and S. madagascariensis
(Madagascar ragwort) to the list of
terrestrial noxious weeds and to the list
of seeds with no tolerances applicable to
their introduction. This action which is
necessary to prevent the artificial spread
of these noxious weeds into the United
States, is expected to have only minor,
if any, economic effects on U.S. entities.
Neither South African ragwort nor
Madagascar ragwort is used for
ornamental, medicinal, or other
purposes. As such, the introduction of
either weed would provide no benefit to
U.S. agriculture or other industries. The
European and Mediterranean Plant
Protection Organization has identified
wool and wildflower seed mixes as
potential pathways for the
dissemination of Senecio spp. seeds.
This interim rule, therefore, may result
in additional costs for importers whose
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
shipments of wildflower mixes are
seized or whose wool shipments must
be decontaminated due to
contamination with S. inaequidens or S.
madagascariensis seeds.
Importers of wool and wildflowers are
classified as part of the wholesale trade
sector in the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS). The
wholesale trade sector is an integral part
in the process of trading because it is an
intermediate step in the distribution of
merchandise. Both merchant
wholesalers and import/export agents or
brokers are classified in this sector.
The size distribution of merchant
wholesalers that may be affected by the
rule is unknown. However, it is
reasonable to assume that most are
small in size according to the U.S. Small
Business Administration’s standards.
The small business size standard for
entities classified under NAICS code
424590 (Other Farm Product Raw
Material Merchant Wholesalers) is 100
or fewer employees. There are 43 raw
wool wholesale trading establishments
in the United States, for which trade of
wool, wool tops, and mohair account for
73.3 percent of their total sales.
Although no clear data exist to verify
that these firms are small entities, the
total average number of employees per
establishment of other farm product raw
material merchant wholesalers in 2002
was seven employees per firm. In 2004,
the United States imported
approximately 22.7 million pounds of
wool, primarily from New Zealand and
Australia. Madagascar ragwort is
prevalent in Australia, where it has led
to higher costs of production in the
dairy, beef, and horse production
sectors. Although the United States is a
net importer of wool, imports declined
by 10 percent in 2005, while exports
increased by 17 percent, suggesting that
domestic demand for wool has
decreased from previous years.
The small business size standard for
entities classified under NAICS code
424930 (Flower, Nursery Stock, and
Florists’ Supplies Merchant
Wholesalers) is 100 or fewer employees.
There are 4,816 flower, nursery stock,
and florists’ supplies wholesale trading
establishments in the United States for
which trade of flowers, nursery stock,
and florists’ supplies accounts for 100
percent of total sales. As with wool, no
clear data exist to verify that these firms
are small entities; however, the total
average number of employees per
establishment in this classification in
2002 was 12 employees per firm. In
2004, the United States imported
approximately $700 million in fresh cut
flowers and flower buds. The primary
exporters of fresh cut flowers and flower
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
buds to the United States were
Colombia and Ecuador, while Mexico
supplied approximately 4 percent of the
United States’ imports. The United
States is a net importer of fresh cut
flowers and flower buds. Imports
increased by 16.4 percent in 2004, while
exports declined by 19 percent.
While it is anticipated that the cost to
some importers of wool and wildflowers
may increase as a result of this interim
rule, additional costs would be incurred
if a shipment was found to be
contaminated with South African
ragwort or Madagascar ragwort. In the
extreme, a shipment may have to be
reexported or destroyed due to the
presence of South African ragwort or
Madagascar ragwort. The benefits of
preventing the introduction and spread
of either weed in the United States,
however, are expected to outweigh any
additional costs to importers.
Furthermore, protecting against the
introduction into and artificial spread
within the United States of South
African ragwort and Madagascar ragwort
will positively affect small entities in
the livestock, field crop, and nursery
industries by preventing the need for
costly chemical or other controls.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 360
Imports, Plants (Agriculture),
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation, Weeds.
7 CFR Part 361
Agricultural commodities, Imports,
Labeling, Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Seeds,
Vegetables, Weeds.
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 118 / Tuesday, June 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
parts 360 and 361 as follows:
I
PART 360—NOXIOUS WEED
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 360
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
§ 360.200
[Amended]
2. In § 360.200, paragraph (c) is
amended by adding, in alphabetical
order, entries for ‘‘Senecio inaequidens
DC. (South African ragwort)’’ and
‘‘Senecio madagascariensis Poir.
(Madagascar ragwort)’’.
I
PART 361—IMPORTATION OF SEED
AND SCREENINGS UNDER THE
FEDERAL SEED ACT
3. The authority citation for part 361
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1581–1610; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.3.
§ 361.6
[Amended]
4. In § 361.6, paragraph (a)(1) is
amended by adding, in alphabetical
order, entries for ‘‘Senecio inaequidens
DC.’’ and ‘‘Senecio madagascariensis
Poir.’’
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of
June 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6–9665 Filed 6–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20689; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–197–AD; Amendment
39–14655; AD 2006–13–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 757 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 757 airplanes. This AD
requires, for certain airplanes,
reworking the spar bonding path and
reapplying sealant; and, for certain other
airplanes, testing the electrical bond
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Jun 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
between the engine fuel feed hose and
the wing front spar and, if applicable,
reworking the spar bonding path and
reapplying sealant. This AD also
requires, for all airplanes, an inspection
to ensure the electrical bonding jumper
is installed between the engine fuel feed
tube and the adjacent wing station. This
AD also requires operators that may
have installed an incorrect O-ring to
install the correct part and do a re-test.
This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer.
We are issuing this AD to prevent arcing
or sparking at the interface between the
bulkhead fittings of the engine fuel feed
tube and the front spar during a
lightning strike, which could provide a
possible ignition source for the fuel
vapor inside the fuel tank and result in
a fuel tank explosion.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
25, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the AD
as of July 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC.
Contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207, for service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Thorson, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6508;
fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the street
address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
The FAA issued a supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an
AD that would apply to certain Boeing
Model 757 airplanes. That supplemental
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on April 4, 2006 (71 FR 16721).
That supplemental NPRM proposed to
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35381
require, for certain airplanes, reworking
the spar bonding path and reapplying
sealant; and, for certain other airplanes,
testing the electrical bond between the
engine fuel feed hose and the wing front
spar and, if applicable, reworking the
spar bonding path and reapplying
sealant. That supplemental NPRM also
proposed to require, for all airplanes, an
inspection to ensure the electrical
bonding jumper is installed between the
engine fuel feed tube and the adjacent
wing station. That supplemental NPRM
also proposed to require operators that
may have installed an incorrect O-ring
to install the correct part and do a retest.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments received.
Request To Give Additional Credit for
Original Issues of Service Bulletins
Boeing points out that the
supplemental NPRM gives credit only
for the actions in paragraph (h)(1) to
operators who did the work in
accordance with the original issue of
Boeing Service Bulletins 757–28A0076
and 757–28A0077. (Boeing Service
Bulletins 757–28A0076 and 757–
28A0077, Revision 1, both dated
October 20, 2005, were referenced as the
appropriate source of service
information for accomplishing the
required actions.) Boeing states that the
original issues of the service bulletins
are also acceptable for compliance with
the actions in paragraphs (g), (h)(2), and
(i) of the supplemental NPRM. Boeing
states that referring to paragraphs (g),
(h)(2), and (i) would give credit for
previous rework of the spar bonding
path between the end fitting of the fuel
hose and the front spar to meet the
bonding resistance requirements and
application of sealant to the end fitting
of the fuel feed hose on the forward and
aft sides of the front spar, and to the
fitting and tube coupling on both sides
of the dry bay wall, and previous
inspection for installation of a bonding
jumper in the tank.
We agree. The actions in paragraph
(g), (h)(2), and (i) of the supplemental
NPRM may be accomplished in
accordance with the original issues of
the service bulletins. We have revised
paragraph (l) of the final rule to add a
reference to paragraphs (g), (h)(2), and
(i). In addition, the FAA notes that the
actions in paragraph (j) of the final rule
are still required to be done in
accordance with Revision 1 of Boeing
Service Bulletins 757–28A0076 and
757–28A0077.
E:\FR\FM\20JNR1.SGM
20JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 20, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35378-35381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-9665]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Parts 360 and 361
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0019]
Noxious Weeds; South African Ragwort and Madagascar Ragwort
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the noxious weed and imported seed regulations
by adding South African ragwort (Senecio inaequidens DC.) and
Madagascar ragwort (Senecio madagascariensis Poir.) to the list of
terrestrial noxious weeds and to the list of seeds with no tolerances
applicable to their introduction. This action is necessary to prevent
the artificial spread of these noxious weeds into the United States.
DATES: This interim rule is effective June 14, 2006. We will consider
all comments that we receive on or before August 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www/
regulations.gov and, in the lower ``Search Regulations and Federal
Actions'' box, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service''
from the agency drop-down menu, then click on ``Submit.'' In the Docket
ID column, select APHIS-2006-0019 to submit or view public comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is available through the site's ``User
Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. APHIS-
2006-0019, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-
03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state
that your comment refers to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0019.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Alan V. Tasker, Noxious Weeds
Program Coordinator, Invasive Species and Pest Management, PPQ, APHIS,
4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1237; (301) 734-5225.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Plant Protection Act (PPA, 7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.) authorizes
the Secretary of Agriculture to prohibit or restrict the importation,
entry, exportation, or movement in interstate commerce of any plant,
plant product, biological control organism, noxious weed, article, or
means of conveyance if the Secretary determines that the prohibition or
restriction is necessary to prevent the introduction of a plant pest or
noxious weed into the United States or the dissemination of a plant
pest or noxious weed within the United States.
The PPA defines ``noxious weed'' as ``any plant or plant product
that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops
(including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry or
other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural
resources of the United States, the public health, or the
environment.'' The PPA also provides that the Secretary may publish, by
regulation, a list of noxious weeds that are prohibited or restricted
from entering the United States or that are subject to restrictions on
interstate movement within the United States. Under this authority, the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) administers the
noxious weeds regulations in 7 CFR part 360, which prohibit or restrict
the importation and interstate movement of those plants that are
designated as noxious weeds in Sec. 360.200.
Under the authority of the Federal Seed Act (FSA) of 1939, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 1551 et seq.), the U.S. Department of Agriculture
regulates the importation and interstate movement of certain
agricultural and vegetable seeds and screenings. Title III of the FSA,
``Foreign Commerce,'' requires shipments of imported agricultural and
vegetable seeds to be labeled correctly and to be tested for the
presence of the seeds of certain noxious weeds as a condition of entry
into the United States. APHIS' regulations implementing the provisions
of title III of the FSA are found in 7 CFR part 361. A list of noxious
weed seeds is contained in Sec. 361.6. Paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 361.6
lists species of noxious weed seeds with no tolerances applicable to
their introduction into the United States.
APHIS lists in its regulations only those weeds that meet the
international definition of a quarantine pests, i.e., ``a pest of
potential economic importance to the area endangered thereby and not
yet present there, or present but not widely distributed and being
officially
[[Page 35379]]
controlled.'' This practice is consistent with the International Plant
Protection Convention (IPPC), to which the United States is a
signatory. Under the IPPC, a country may prohibit or restrict
importation of quarantine pests or, in the case of contaminants in
plants for planting, regulated nonquarantine pests. This practice is
also consistent with sections 414 and 415 of the PPA, which authorize
the Secretary to take general remedial measures or to declare an
extraordinary emergency if necessary to prevent the introduction or
spread of plant pests or noxious weeds that are new to or not known to
be prevalent or distributed widely within and throughout the United
States.
In this document, we are amending the regulations by adding South
African ragwort (Senecio inaequidens DC.) and Madagascar ragwort
(Senecio madagascariensis Poir.) to the list in Sec. 360.200(c) of
terrestrial noxious weeds and to the list in Sec. 361.6(a)(1) of seeds
with no tolerances applicable to their introduction. We are taking this
action based on information, discussed below, that strongly suggests
that S. inaequidens and S. madagascariensis pose a serious threat to
U.S. agriculture and the natural resources of the United States.
This information is also available in the weed risk assessment
document, which may be obtained from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the Regulations.gov Web site
(see ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
S. inaequidens is a perennial plant with narrow leaves and bright
yellow flowers that is native to the Transvaal and Natal provinces of
South Africa. It also occurs in Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia,
and Swaziland, though it is unclear whether it is native to those
areas. Because it is considered an invasive species even in its native
habitat, it is possible that it has spread to other areas in southern
Africa in recent years.
It is estimated that S. inaequidens produces more than 10,000 seeds
per plant per year and seeds may remain viable in the soil for months
or years. There are numerous pathways of dispersal, including by wind,
in soil, in seed, and as a hitchhiker on containers, vehicles,
agricultural machinery, agricultural products such as wool and hay, and
on animals. S. inaequidens was accidentally introduced to Europe with
imports of wool as early as 1889. It now occupies a wide range of
habitats within Europe, including along roads, railways, riverbanks,
forest clearings, croplands, mountain slopes, vineyards, grasslands,
wetlands, tree plantations, pastures, and areas disturbed by fire. S.
inaequidens is also present in Mexico. It is highly adaptable and able
to withstand hot, dry summers and overwinter in areas where
temperatures reach -15 [deg]C (5 [deg]F).
Like S. inaequidens, S. madagascariensis is an invasive perennial
plant native to South Africa with yellow flowers and a highly branched
stem. In addition, it may also be capable of producing over 10,000
seeds per plant per year, which are easily dispersed by the wind or may
hitchhike on other surfaces and objects. These seeds may remain viable
in the soil for up to 10 years. Recent studies suggest S. inaequidens
and S. madagascariensis may represent one species; however, a formal
taxonomic study has not been conducted to resolve this issue.
Therefore, we have evaluated the two taxa as separate, but similar
species.
S. madagascariensis now occupies parts of Argentina, Hawaii, Japan,
and many coastal regions in Australia. The earliest record of S.
madagascariensis in Australia is in 1918, when it was probably
introduced in ballast. In the 1980s it was introduced to the island of
Hawaii, where it is considered a State noxious weed and is under
official control. Since its introduction, it has spread to the islands
of Kauai, Maui, Oahu, and Kahoolawe, invading pastures, yards,
roadsides, natural areas, abandoned fields, and newly developed lots
from sea level to as high as 7,000 feet in elevation.
Both S. inaequidens and S. madagascariensis produce toxic
alkaloids. Although livestock may not typically eat S. inaequidens or
S. madagascariensis due to their bitter taste, young plants growing
intermixed with other pasture species may be inadvertently ingested. S.
madagascariensis has been shown to retard the growth and development of
cattle if eaten, and in some acute cases, can cause livestock
mortality. In Africa, S. inaequidens alkaloids have been found in milk
and bread and may have resulted in some lethal poisoning of humans. If
either species were to become established in the United States, the
United States may experience a loss in domestic and foreign grain,
cattle, hay, and dairy markets due to toxic alkaloid contamination.
Because it forms dense populations of 5 to 15 plants per square
meter (approximately 11 square feet), S. inaequidens can exert
competitive pressure on native species, primarily through shading.
Evidence suggests that it outcompetes some herbs. Therefore, it may
have a negative impact on biodiversity, although this has not yet been
tested.
The United States contains dozens of native species of Senecio, two
of which are federally listed as threatened. These native species live
in a variety of habitats, including those favorable to the
establishment of S. inaequidens and S. madagascariensis. If S.
inaequidens or S. madagascariensis become established in the United
States, they would likely invade these habitats, threatening the
existence of those species through competition or indirectly through
hybridization. Many species of Senecio freely interbreed if they come
in contact with each other.
Although mechanical and chemical control measures are available,
they may not be easy to apply due to the often inaccessible habitats S.
inaequidens and S. madagascariensis can occupy. In addition, such
control measures are likely to be costly. In 1995, it is estimated that
S. madagascariensis cost the Australian dairy industry AU $10 million
per year in control and production costs.
The United States imports many commodities, such as uncleaned wool,
on which seeds of S. inaequidens or S. madagascariensis could hitch-
hike from countries in which these species are known to exist. It is
highly likely that some contaminated shipments have already entered the
United States given that the infestations of S. madagascariensis in
Hawaii resulted from contaminated hydromulch that traveled through the
Los Angeles ports from Australia. APHIS has not kept records of any
interception of these species because neither species is listed as a
Federal noxious weed. This is a concern for the agency because APHIS
has no way of knowing how many shipments contaminated with S
inaequidens or S. madagascariensis may have already entered the United
States. Once the species do enter the United States, it is not clear
how quickly they can acclimate to their new environment. If either S.
inaequidens or S. madagascariensis were introduced into the United
States in the near future, it could take a few years before the plants
begin to spread far enough to be detected at which point the invasive
species will already be established.
In addition, as S. madagascariensis is capable of interbreeding
with S. inaequidens and some studies suggest that they may represent
the same species, we have determined that S. madagascariensis poses as
high of a risk of introduction into the United States as S.
inaequidens. The introduction and establishment of S. inaequidens or S.
madagascariensis in the United States
[[Page 35380]]
could lead to adverse impacts, such as reduced crop and livestock
yield, lower commodity values, loss of foreign markets due to the
presence of a quarantine pest, and costly chemical control programs.
Therefore, we have determined that it is necessary, on an emergency
basis, to amend the regulations in Sec. Sec. 360.200 and 361.6 to list
S. inaequidens and S. madagascariensis as noxious weeds in order to
help prevent their artificial spread into the United States.
Emergency Action
This rulemaking is necessary on an emergency basis to prevent the
introduction of S. inaequidens and S. madagascariensis into the United
States. Under these circumstances, the Administrator has determined
that prior notice and opportunity for public comment are contrary to
the public interest and that there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553 for
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
We will consider comments we receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above). After the comment period closes,
we will publish another document in the Federal Register. The document
will include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments
we are making to the rule.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
We are amending the noxious weed and imported seed regulations by
adding S. inaequidens (South African ragwort) and S. madagascariensis
(Madagascar ragwort) to the list of terrestrial noxious weeds and to
the list of seeds with no tolerances applicable to their introduction.
This action which is necessary to prevent the artificial spread of
these noxious weeds into the United States, is expected to have only
minor, if any, economic effects on U.S. entities.
Neither South African ragwort nor Madagascar ragwort is used for
ornamental, medicinal, or other purposes. As such, the introduction of
either weed would provide no benefit to U.S. agriculture or other
industries. The European and Mediterranean Plant Protection
Organization has identified wool and wildflower seed mixes as potential
pathways for the dissemination of Senecio spp. seeds. This interim
rule, therefore, may result in additional costs for importers whose
shipments of wildflower mixes are seized or whose wool shipments must
be decontaminated due to contamination with S. inaequidens or S.
madagascariensis seeds.
Importers of wool and wildflowers are classified as part of the
wholesale trade sector in the North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS). The wholesale trade sector is an integral part in the
process of trading because it is an intermediate step in the
distribution of merchandise. Both merchant wholesalers and import/
export agents or brokers are classified in this sector.
The size distribution of merchant wholesalers that may be affected
by the rule is unknown. However, it is reasonable to assume that most
are small in size according to the U.S. Small Business Administration's
standards. The small business size standard for entities classified
under NAICS code 424590 (Other Farm Product Raw Material Merchant
Wholesalers) is 100 or fewer employees. There are 43 raw wool wholesale
trading establishments in the United States, for which trade of wool,
wool tops, and mohair account for 73.3 percent of their total sales.
Although no clear data exist to verify that these firms are small
entities, the total average number of employees per establishment of
other farm product raw material merchant wholesalers in 2002 was seven
employees per firm. In 2004, the United States imported approximately
22.7 million pounds of wool, primarily from New Zealand and Australia.
Madagascar ragwort is prevalent in Australia, where it has led to
higher costs of production in the dairy, beef, and horse production
sectors. Although the United States is a net importer of wool, imports
declined by 10 percent in 2005, while exports increased by 17 percent,
suggesting that domestic demand for wool has decreased from previous
years.
The small business size standard for entities classified under
NAICS code 424930 (Flower, Nursery Stock, and Florists' Supplies
Merchant Wholesalers) is 100 or fewer employees. There are 4,816
flower, nursery stock, and florists' supplies wholesale trading
establishments in the United States for which trade of flowers, nursery
stock, and florists' supplies accounts for 100 percent of total sales.
As with wool, no clear data exist to verify that these firms are small
entities; however, the total average number of employees per
establishment in this classification in 2002 was 12 employees per firm.
In 2004, the United States imported approximately $700 million in fresh
cut flowers and flower buds. The primary exporters of fresh cut flowers
and flower buds to the United States were Colombia and Ecuador, while
Mexico supplied approximately 4 percent of the United States' imports.
The United States is a net importer of fresh cut flowers and flower
buds. Imports increased by 16.4 percent in 2004, while exports declined
by 19 percent.
While it is anticipated that the cost to some importers of wool and
wildflowers may increase as a result of this interim rule, additional
costs would be incurred if a shipment was found to be contaminated with
South African ragwort or Madagascar ragwort. In the extreme, a shipment
may have to be reexported or destroyed due to the presence of South
African ragwort or Madagascar ragwort. The benefits of preventing the
introduction and spread of either weed in the United States, however,
are expected to outweigh any additional costs to importers.
Furthermore, protecting against the introduction into and artificial
spread within the United States of South African ragwort and Madagascar
ragwort will positively affect small entities in the livestock, field
crop, and nursery industries by preventing the need for costly chemical
or other controls.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 360
Imports, Plants (Agriculture), Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Transportation, Weeds.
7 CFR Part 361
Agricultural commodities, Imports, Labeling, Quarantine, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Seeds, Vegetables, Weeds.
[[Page 35381]]
0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR parts 360 and 361 as follows:
PART 360--NOXIOUS WEED REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 360 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80,
and 371.3.
Sec. 360.200 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 360.200, paragraph (c) is amended by adding, in
alphabetical order, entries for ``Senecio inaequidens DC. (South
African ragwort)'' and ``Senecio madagascariensis Poir. (Madagascar
ragwort)''.
PART 361--IMPORTATION OF SEED AND SCREENINGS UNDER THE FEDERAL SEED
ACT
0
3. The authority citation for part 361 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1581-1610; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Sec. 361.6 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 361.6, paragraph (a)(1) is amended by adding, in
alphabetical order, entries for ``Senecio inaequidens DC.'' and
``Senecio madagascariensis Poir.''
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of June 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E6-9665 Filed 6-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P