Change in Disease Status of Namibia With Regard to Foot-and-Mouth Disease and Rinderpest, 34537-34549 [06-5440]
Download as PDF
34537
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 115
Thursday, June 15, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0037]
Change in Disease Status of Namibia
With Regard to Foot-and-Mouth
Disease and Rinderpest
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the regulations to add Namibia, except
the portion of the country north of the
Veterinary Cordon Fence (VCF), to the
list of regions that are considered free of
foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), and to
add the entire country to the list of
regions that are considered free of
rinderpest. We are taking this action
because we have determined that the
region in Namibia south of the VCF is
now free of FMD and the entire country
is free of rinderpest. We are also
proposing to add Namibia, except the
region north of the VCF, to the list of
FMD- and rinderpest-free regions that
are subject to certain import restrictions
on meat and other animal products
because of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest- or FMDaffected regions. This proposed action
would relieve certain restrictions due to
FMD and rinderpest on the importation
into the United States of certain live
animals and animal products from all
regions of Namibia except the region
north of the VCF. However, because we
consider Namibia to be affected with
African swine fever, classical swine
fever, and swine vesicular disease, the
importation of live swine and pork and
pork products would continue to be
restricted. In addition, because we
consider Namibia to be affected with
other animal diseases that are exotic to
the United States, the importation of
live ruminants and germplasm would
also continue to be restricted. These
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
actions would update the disease status
of Namibia with regard to FMD and
rinderpest while continuing to protect
the United States from an introduction
of those diseases by providing
additional requirements for any meat
and meat products imported into the
United States from Namibia.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before August 14,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and, in the
lower ‘‘Search Regulations and Federal
Actions’’ box, select ‘‘Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service’’ from the
agency drop-down menu, then click on
‘‘Submit.’’ In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS–2006–0037 to submit or
view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically. Information on
using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the
docket after the close of the comment
period, is available through the site’s
‘‘User Tips’’ link.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
comment (an original and three copies)
to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0037,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0037.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Javier Vargas, Animal Scientist,
Regionalization Evaluation Services
Staff, National Center for Import and
Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231;
(301) 734–0756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94
(referred to below as the regulations)
govern the importation of certain
animals and animal products into the
United States in order to prevent the
introduction of various diseases,
including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth
disease (FMD), African swine fever,
classical swine fever, and swine
vesicular disease. These are dangerous
and destructive communicable diseases
of ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of
the regulations lists regions of the world
that are declared free of rinderpest or
free of both rinderpest and FMD.
Rinderpest or FMD exists in all other
parts of the world not listed. Section
94.11 of the regulations lists regions of
the world that have been determined to
be free of rinderpest and FMD, but that
are subject to certain restrictions
because of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest- or FMDaffected regions.
In February 2001, the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
received a request from Namibia’s
Government to recognize Namibia as
free from rinderpest. Because rinderpest
has not been diagnosed in Namibia
since 1907, we are proposing to
recognize the entire country of Namibia
as free of rinderpest.
The Namibian Government also
requested that APHIS recognize the
region of Namibia south of the
Veterinary Cordon Fence (VCF), which
is described in more detail in the
‘‘Degree of Separation from Adjacent
Regions,’’ as free of FMD. The
regulations define the term region, in
part, as ‘‘any defined geographic land
area identifiable by geological, political,
or surveyed boundaries.’’ Namibian
veterinary officials define four zones for
purposes of FMD control in Namibia:
Infected, buffer, surveillance, and free.
The infected zone is north of the VCF
and includes eastern and western
Caprivi, where FMD outbreaks have
occurred and free-roaming wild buffalo
are present. FMD vaccinations are
conducted in this zone. The buffer zone,
which abuts high-risk areas in
neighboring countries, is also located
north of the VCF. This area is
considered affected with contagious
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34538
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) and
does not have as stringent animal
movement controls as the FMD-free
area. FMD vaccinations are conducted
in certain areas of this zone. The
surveillance zone borders the VCF in
the FMD-free area and is at least two
farms wide. FMD vaccination does not
occur in this area so that the animals
can serve as sentinels. Finally, the free
zone consists of the commercial farming
area and communal areas south of the
surveillance zone.
In response to the Namibian
Government’s request, and based on our
review of supporting documentation
accompanying the request and
information obtained during a site visit,
we are proposing to recognize the entire
country of Namibia as rinderpest-free
and all of Namibia except the region
north of the VCF as free of FMD.
Finally, we are also proposing to add
Namibia, except the region north of the
VCF, to the list of regions that are
subject to certain import restrictions on
meat and other animal products because
of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest-or FMDaffected regions.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Risk Analysis
Based on the information submitted to
us by the Government of Namibia, as
well as information gathered during a
site visit by APHIS staff to Namibia in
June 2003, we have reviewed and
analyzed the animal health status of
Namibia relative to FMD. Our review
and analysis were conducted in light of
the factors identified in 9 CFR 92.2,
‘‘Application for recognition of the
animal health status of a region,’’ which
are used to determine the level of risk
associated with importing animals or
animal products into the United States
from a given region. Based on the
information submitted to us and
gathered during the June 2003 site visit,
we have concluded the following:
Veterinary Infrastructure
The authority for veterinary
infrastructure and control in Namibia
rests with the Directorate of Veterinary
Services (DVS) in the Ministry of
Agriculture, Water, and Rural
Development. This authority is derived
from several laws, including the
Undesirable Residue in Meat Act, the
Stock Brands Act, the Government
Notice on the Prohibition of Certain
Farm Feeds, and the Animal Disease
and Parasites Act, No. 13, of 1956; this
last act is the primary source of
authority for Namibia’s animal health,
disease control, and animal movement
control activities. The overall structure
of DVS includes a central headquarters
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
and State veterinary offices throughout
Namibia, both of which are described
below.
DVS headquarters is located in
Windhoek, where DVS officials develop
all polices, laws, and regulations
relating to animal health issues. The
relationship between DVS headquarters
and the State offices is close and
information is shared regularly. The
State offices are formally audited to
review the offices’ performance on
trade-related issues, such as traceability,
bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE) surveillance, and monitoring farm
feeds for ruminant protein. During the
site visit, APHIS staff found the State
office they visited to be structured,
effective, and organized.
DVS animal health officials
participate in training activities on a
regular basis, including teaching
community members how to recognize
disease symptoms. The central office
sets criteria for FMD-free countries and
assigns disease status to countries.
Permits are issued according to a
country’s disease status and, if a disease
outbreak occurs in a previously free
country, DVS cancels the permits for
affected articles from that country and
alerts State veterinarians at the ports of
arrival that those permits have been
canceled.
Support for DVS in Namibian farming
and producer groups and local
communities is strong. This support is
demonstrated by high involvement in
programs such as participation and
enforcement of vaccination schedules
and community participation in
education, outreach, and meetings. DVS
works with various farming
organizations in Namibia, such as the
National Agricultural Union, which
consists mainly of commercial farmers,
and the Namibia National Farmers’
Union, which is comprised of mostly
communal farmers. DVS also works
with the Namibian Meat Board, which
is an industry group focusing on
developing and improving livestock
product markets. The Meat Board
administers the Farm Assured Namibian
Meat Scheme, a quality assurance
program for meat, and operates the
Brand Registry, which contains the
registration of every meat producer’s
brand mark. Finally, DVS partners with
the Namibian police force to ensure that
all vehicles entering the proposed free
zone through VCF checkpoints are
inspected and that emergency
roadblocks can be put into place if
necessary.
The site visit team visited the Walvis
Bay Veterinary Services Office, a State
veterinary office located at a port on the
central coast of Namibia. The premises
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
included the State veterinarian’s office
and a quarantine facility used for small
animals, such as dogs, birds, and cats.
For each animal product entering
Namibia, the State veterinarian keeps
records of a description of the product,
as well as the product’s date of entry,
permit number, origin, and quantity.
The office is also responsible for
performing field duties, such as annual
farm inspections and inspections of cold
storage facilities. The State veterinarians
can hold a shipment until paperwork
can be completed, but do not open
sealed containers until all documents
are present.
The State office receives faxes from
the central office to alert the State
veterinarian of any arriving shipments
that will need inspection. During an
inspection, the State veterinarian checks
the expiration and product dates, the
endorsement of the permit, and the
physical appearance of the shipment.
Satisfactory shipments are released to
the owner, while unsatisfactory
shipments must either be destroyed or
returned to the country of origin. If the
product is destroyed, the State
veterinarian, municipal police, Port
Control, and Customs are involved.
Although no beef or lamb has been
confiscated, a shipment of chicken was
destroyed by being mixed with sand and
buried in a 5 meter hole at the
municipal dump. At the port visited by
the APHIS team, the harbor is
completely fenced off and guards man
the port gate. If a shipment does not
have stamped release papers, the guards
will stop the shipment so that it cannot
leave the harbor.
DVS also supplements its workforce
through Community Animal Health
Workers (CAHWs) who work in the
communal areas to assist DVS’ disease
surveillance and to provide a more
comprehensive and accurate animal
disease treatment, surveillance, and
reporting system. Although the CAHWs
are not government employees or
certified, they receive government
training in animal husbandry, handling,
animal diseases, and health
maintenance and are members of the
community in which they work. The
CAHWs then can establish private
businesses that provide very basic
veterinary care along with a limited
veterinary pharmacy.
One concern about DVS raised during
the site visit was the mandatory or
voluntary retirement for several senior
DVS officials in the upcoming year with
no apparent plans for overlapping by
replacements. This process could create
a loss of institutional memory and result
in a weakening or failure of the current
disease control system, which requires
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
consistent application and reassessment
to prevent FMD from entering Namibia.
In addition, highly trained personnel are
spread very thin over a wide range of
duties and qualified recruits are lacking
due to either a lack of funding or
training. DVS acknowledged these
issues during the site visit and stated
that field personnel are being moved to
headquarters to receive training and
become familiar with operations at the
headquarters level. In addition, DVS
advertised posts to fill vacancies prior to
the officials’ departure to ensure a
smooth transition. Also, DVS stated that
the restructuring was designed to
strengthen surveillance, reporting, and
case follow-up.
However, in July 2004, Namibia’s
Cabinet approved a new structure for
DVS, which is designed to strengthen
the central competent authority and
allow for closer supervision and
decentralization of services. The
Directorate remains under the
supervision of a Chief Veterinary Officer
and consists of four divisions: Animal
Disease Control (Animal Health);
Veterinary Public Health; Epidemiology,
Import/Export and Training; and
Diagnostic Services and Research. Each
of these divisions will be headed by a
Deputy Chief Veterinary Officer who
oversees a variety of supporting staff.
Recruitment to fill positions has begun
and progress in filling positions had
been made as of January 2006. The effort
to fill all positions is ongoing.
Under the new restructuring, Namibia
is divided into four regions: South,
North-east, North-west, and Central.
With regard to Animal Health, each of
the four regions will have a Chief
Veterinarian, who reports directly to the
Deputy Chief Veterinary Officer of the
Animal Health division at headquarters.
Each Chief Veterinarian will operate as
a supervisor of a number of State
veterinary officers (up to four each) and
be responsible for training, control,
monitoring, and guiding field
veterinarians. Six additional field
veterinarian posts will be added in the
northern communal areas. In addition,
the number of animal health technician
(AHT) posts (agricultural diploma level)
will be increased from 79 to 95, with a
plan to phase out Stock Inspection
Assistants over time.
The Veterinary Public Health division
will consist of a Chief Veterinarian, a
Control Veterinary Hygiene Inspector,
chief hygiene inspectors, and a
Veterinary Public Health Specialist.
Chief Hygiene Inspector positions have
been created to enhance supervision on
the slaughter floor of abattoirs. The
Epidemiology, Import/Export, and
Training Division will also have a Chief
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
Veterinarian, who will assist the Deputy
with administrative issues, a veterinary
specialist in epidemiology, and two
additional veterinarians. One of these
veterinarians will be responsible for the
livestock identification and tracing
system. There will also be a veterinarian
in charge of import/export control, a
chief veterinary technician, and
additional technicians. There will also
be 20 posts for veterinary officials who
will be stationed at the main entry
points. These posts have been approved
and DVS hopes to fill them soon. The
veterinary port officials will oversee
compliance with import requirements
and notification of arrival of animals
and animal products.
The results of our evaluation indicate
that animal health officials in Namibia
have the legal authority to enforce
Federal and State regulations pertaining
to FMD and the necessary veterinary
infrastructure to carry out FMD
surveillance and control activities.
Disease History and Surveillance
The last outbreak of FMD in the
surveillance and free zones (i.e., the
region under consideration for FMD-free
status) was in 1965. In the buffer zone,
the last FMD outbreak occurred in 1992.
However, in the infected zone, an FMD
outbreak occurred on August 18, 2002.
In this outbreak, six cattle were found
to have FMD lesions that were South
African type (SAT) positive. DVS
controlled the outbreak through
movement control and vaccination,
vaccinating all animals in the
immediate vicinity of the outbreak twice
and all animals in the remainder of the
infected zone once. After 6 months of
not detecting another FMD-infected
animal, the outbreak was declared over
on March 31, 2003.
Active Surveillance
Most of Namibia’s active surveillance
occurs through inspections. In the
surveillance zone, DVS inspects for
FMD every 3 months, while inspections
in the area north of the VCF occur
biannually. In the free zone, inspections
occur on an annual basis. During the
inspections, the veterinarians and AHTs
conduct census and disease reporting
activities. Farmers in the free zone
receive 1-month’s notice and are
required to present at least 80 percent of
their stock for inspection. If a farmer
does not comply, movement and
marketing restrictions are put into place.
Surveillance data are also collected from
inspections required for movement
permits, auctions, and upon arrival at
abattoirs. During an inspection, a DVS
official walks through a herd of animals
rather than conducting individual
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34539
exams for each animal. However,
inspectors will individually check sick
or injured animals and will take lick
and feed samples from the animals.
For each premises, inspectors
complete a farm visit form that includes
animal health information such as
vaccinations used, parasite treatment,
mortality, diseases in stock and game,
lick supplement status, and farm name,
number, and district. The inspection
team did note that brand marks were not
included on the form; DVS stated the
next reprint of forms will include a
space for this information. Until that
time, animal health technicians have to
check for brand marks as part of the
inspection protocol. If animals on a farm
are not properly branded in accordance
with the Stock Brands Act, the farm is
closed. DVS also visits premises for
reasons other than the scheduled
inspections. For example, because there
are so few private veterinarians in most
areas of Namibia, DVS frequently
responds to any disease or sickness
reports for livestock.
As for wild game, no FMD serological
surveys have been conducted in the free
zone. However, in 1996, DVS conducted
serological surveys of sable antelopes
and free-roaming buffalo in the buffer
zone. The herd of buffalo tested negative
for antibodies to SAT 1, SAT 2, and
SAT 3 both in 1996 and when retested
in 2002. Any captured wild game are
certified clinically free of disease before
movement. The Department of Natural
Resources within the Ministry of
Environment and Tourism is the
responsible body for managing game
capture and movement. The site visit
team visited the Etosha game park,
which is north of the VCF, and found a
minimal risk for FMD introduction
based on the observation of double
fences separating wild game from
domestic livestock, the lack of Cape
Buffalo species, and the low likelihood
of visitors with FMD-susceptible
animals or animal products.
Passive Surveillance
FMD surveillance in the buffer and
free zones is typically accomplished
through more passive surveillance
means because of the inaccessibility of
diagnostic services in remote locations.
DVS and the Meat Board of Namibia
have an extensive outreach education
program for livestock owners that
includes placing pamphlets and posters
in community centers, churches, and
gathering places. Radio announcements
and weekly programs are widely used to
disseminate information, especially in
areas that are not accessible via
telephone, Internet, or television.
Veterinarians and AHTs also interact
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34540
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
with farmers on a regular basis. In the
northern communal area, CAHWs and
pharmaceutical retailers participate in 1
to 2 week training sessions endorsed by
DVS to learn to detect suspicious signs
of foreign animal diseases and have a
mandatory responsibility to notify DVS
of any suspicion of FMD.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Diagnostic Capabilities
The Central Veterinary Laboratory
(CVL) is an accredited biosecurity level
2 laboratory located in Windhoek. The
CVL is not structured to test for all
diseases listed by OIE (Office
International des Epizooties, or World
Organization for Animal Health), but
does perform residue testing of meat
destined for export and tests for
vesicular diseases including bovine
viral disease, infectious bovine
rhinotracheitis, bluetongue, and orf.
Although the CVL may acquire a
diagnostic enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit for antibody
detection of FMD, FMD testing occurs
either at the Botswana Vaccine Institute,
which is an OIE reference laboratory for
FMD, or the Onderstepoort Veterinary
Institute in the Republic of South
Africa. The site team visited the latter
facility and determined that the Institute
was an adequate testing facility that had
facilities designated for FMD vaccine
production and exotic disease diagnosis.
The tests used for FMD at the Institute
meet OIE guidelines and the laboratory’s
records showed that three diagnostic
investigations were submitted from
Namibia between 2000 and 2003 to rule
out FMD.
Given the information above, Namibia
appears to have adequate disease
control authority, programs, and animal
health management to diagnose FMD.
Vaccination Status
The vaccination status in Namibia
varies throughout the country. FMD
vaccinations are not performed on any
animal in either the surveillance or free
zones, and only cattle are vaccinated in
the infected zone and in certain areas of
the buffer zone. The remaining
unvaccinated cattle in the buffer zone
serve as sentinels of FMD. FMD
symptoms in these areas would likely be
reported due to community education
by DVS, the cultural importance of
livestock health, and the frequent
interactions of AHTs and CAHWs with
local producers. Small stock are not
vaccinated for FMD anywhere in
Namibia.
In the buffer zone, which is FMD free
with vaccination, vaccination coverage
is 80 percent. FMD vaccinations are free
and administered by DVS personnel.
Only cattle in the Kavango, the area
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
proximate to the infected area, and the
north central area, a strip of land
approximately 50 kilometers wide
adjacent to Angola, are vaccinated
annually. These cattle are vaccinated
with an oil adjuvant bivalent (SAT 1
and SAT 2) FMD vaccine combined
with a CBPP vaccine. In the infected
zone, cattle in the eastern portion of
Caprivi are vaccinated twice a year with
a trivalent SAT 1, 2, and 3 vaccine,
while the cattle in the western portion
of Caprivi are vaccinated only once a
year. Before vaccination, serological
tests for FMD are not performed, which
may result in the vaccination masking
any FMD already present in the animals.
However, due to the open range herd
management style of the buffer zone, the
vaccinated cattle are exposed to
unvaccinated cattle that would likely
serve as sentinels should the virus
become present.
Any cattle entering Namibia from
Angola are vaccinated at the border post
of entry and branded with an ‘‘A’’ for
identification. The cattle are also
branded with an arrow that tells DVS
officials the year in which the cattle
were vaccinated. These cattle are
prohibited from moving south of the
VCF.
Vaccinations performed by DVS are
recorded and maintained by State
veterinary personnel for each herd
owner. In order to facilitate
vaccinations, DVS administers
vaccinations at specific gathering places
so that communal owners from the
vicinity can bring their animals to the
site. Vaccinated cattle are identified
with an arrow brand, which indicates
the year of vaccination. At the time of
vaccination, the herd owner must
present a stock card identifying the
animals’ vaccinations, census, and
movements, which is then updated to
reflect the most recent vaccination.
These stock cards, which are
maintained for both small stock and
cattle, are kept by the owner, who must
update the cards any time a movement,
sale, slaughter, vaccination, or other
significant event occurs. If a herd owner
does not comply with vaccination
requirements, the infraction is reported
to the ‘‘induna’’ (chief or head person of
the area) who alerts the water committee
to deny water to the offending herd
owner’s livestock. Access is denied
until the herd owner contacts the State
veterinary office and schedules the
cattle’s vaccination.
FMD vaccine for Namibia is produced
at the Botswana Vaccine Institute or the
Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, both
of which are discussed in more detail
under the ‘‘Diagnostic Capabilities’’
section above. The Onderstepoort
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Veterinary Institute produces vaccines
containing prevalent FMD serotypes
found in Africa, including SAT 1, SAT
2, and SAT 3. The Institute is also
equipped to make autogenous FMD
vaccines upon request. Namibia
annually uses about 500,000 doses of
bivalent/trivalent vaccines.
Disease Status of Adjacent Regions
Namibia is bordered to the north by
Angola and Zambia, to the east by
Botswana, and to the south and east by
the Republic of South Africa. Zambia’s
border with Namibia abuts Namibia’s
infected zone and therefore is not
assessed further in this document.
Angola’s border abuts Namibia’s buffer
zone. Angola experienced an FMD
outbreak in 2001 and its veterinary
disease control situation is unclear.
Although Angola may represent a risk
for FMD introduction into Namibia,
Namibia’s veterinary infrastructure and
border controls likely would detect it.
Botswana experienced FMD outbreaks
in 2002 and 2003; however, the
southern portion of Botswana, which
abuts Namibia’s proposed free zone, is
recognized by the OIE and Namibia as
FMD-free. The border between
Botswana and Namibia consists of a
game- and stock-proof fence. However,
approximately 10 kilometers of the
northern part of Botswana lies adjacent
to the surveillance zone of Namibia.
This portion of the surveillance zone,
referred to as the ‘‘Gam area,’’ is
separated by four fences (double gameand stock-proof fences). Although the
Republic of South Africa has had FMD
outbreaks in 2001 and 2003, these
outbreaks have mostly occurred in the
eastern portion of the country that is not
near Namibia.
In addition to neighboring countries,
the proposed region to be declared
FMD-free is bordered by the buffer zone
as described in the ‘‘Background’’
section. Information on this zone’s FMD
status can be found in the ‘‘Disease
History and Surveillance’’ section
above.
Because Namibia shares borders with
and trades with countries that have
experienced recent FMD outbreaks or
that are not recognized as FMD-free by
the United States and because FMD
exists in some portions of Namibia,
APHIS proposes to add Namibia
(excluding the region north of the VCF)
to the list of regions in § 94.11. The
regions in § 94.11, although declared
free of FMD and rinderpest, supplement
their national meat supply by the
importation of fresh (chilled or frozen)
meat of ruminants or swine from regions
that are designated in § 94.1(a) to be
infected with rinderpest or FMD; or
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
have a common land border with
regions designated as infected with
rinderpest or FMD; or import ruminants
or swine from regions designated as
infected with rinderpest or FMD under
conditions less restrictive than would be
acceptable for importation into the
United States. Therefore, all meat of
ruminants or swine or other animal
products would have to meet the
certification requirements in § 94.11 to
be eligible for importation into the
United States. These certification
requirements are explained later in this
document under the heading
‘‘Certification Requirements.’’
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Degree of Separation From Adjacent
Regions
Borders With Other Countries
The border between Namibia and the
Republic of South Africa consists of the
Kalahari Desert adjacent to the Orange
River and a stock-proof fence.
Approximately 10 kilometers of the
northern part of Botswana lies adjacent
to the surveillance zone in Namibia and
is separated from Namibia by double
game- and stock-proof fences for a total
of four fences. The rest of the border
between Botswana and Namibia consists
of a game- and stock-proof fence, which
appeared to be in good shape during the
APHIS site visit. However, there was
evidence of warthogs digging under the
fence on both sides. Namibia’s border
with Angola did not have an adequate
fence present between the two
countries. However, a task force is
currently in place to reestablish a fence
along this border and Namibia has
initiated its 10-year plan to erect a
complete fence on the border with
Angola with specific areas for animal
entry. Namibia’s long-term goal is to
move the VCF to the Angolan border
with the intention that the entire
country, except the infected zone of
eastern Caprivi, would be included in
the FMD-free region. DVS feels that
disease control in the country is assisted
by the sparse human and animal
population coupled with the long
distances between settlements. The
nearest part of the infected zone to the
free zone is more than 200 kilometers
(124 miles) away.
DVS has a permanent fence team that
patrols and repairs damage to the
fences. The teams are in the field for
two weeks every month. Security agents
also patrol the border fence and report
fence breaches. In addition, every 6
months there is a joint inspection along
the entire border by Namibian and
Batswana officials.
For animals that originate from
Angola, there are border entry points. At
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
these entry points DVS examines the
animals and cattle re vaccinated for
CBPP and FMD prior to entry. The cattle
are also branded as originating from
Angola. Animals imported from Angola
are mainly used for local slaughter or
enter Namibia for seasonal grazing and
then return to Angola. If the cattle are
slaughtered in the buffer zone, the meat
must stay in the buffer zone and cannot
enter the free zone. In addition, these
cattle cannot cross the VCF into the free
zone.
Borders Within Namibia
The surveillance and free zones in
Namibia are bounded by natural and
man-made borders. The western coast of
Namibia consists of Atlantic coastline
and a very harsh desert that effectively
prevents all animal movement. As
discussed above in the ‘‘Background’’
section above, within Namibia the
surveillance and free areas are separated
from the buffer and infected zones by
the Veterinary Cordon Fence (VCF).
This fence is designed to prohibit
cloven-hoofed domestic and wild
animals from moving into the FMD-free
zone from the north; this movement
restriction also stops any CBPP spread
from north to south Namibia. In past
years, Namibian officials have moved
the VCF progressively northward,
leaving old portions of the fence in
place to control movements of animals
and animal products in the event of an
outbreak for a total of about 2,200
kilometers of old and current fence.
DVS is aware that APHIS must be
notified of any further plans for
northward movement of the fence so
that APHIS may reevaluate the region’s
risk.
Namibia treats the VCF as if it were
an international border for livestock
purposes. The only way to pass through
the VCF is through gateposts that have
a roadblock at which vehicles are
inspected. On major roads, the gateposts
allow traffic movement, but are
monitored 24 hours a day by veterinary
and police personnel who perform
inspections to ensure that prohibited
animals, meat, or meat products are not
being brought into the free zone. The
VCF consists of a northern fence, which
is a 17- to 21-wire game-proof fence 2.4
meters in height, and a southern fence,
which is an 8-wire stock-proof fence 1.4
meters in height. These fences are
separated by 10 meters of dead space.
The site visit team observed many
kilometers of the fence and found it in
good repair and of adequate structure to
stop most animals. The site team did
notice that warthogs could burrow
under the fence, but this is likely not a
major concern, as these animals are
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34541
likely to be localized to the vicinity of
the fence. However, as stated above, the
fence is maintained by full-time repair
crews that patrol the fence in search of
damage from animals or humans.
From 2000–2003, DVS recorded a
number of breaches to the VCF, which
included cuts made to the fence, cuts
made for the movement of stolen
vehicles, and smuggling of animals and
animal products. Each of the cuts
reported were repaired by patrol teams.
Seven of the breaches involved
individuals attempting to smuggle
various animals or animal products,
such as live cattle, goat meat, and cattle
hides, through the fence. In each of
these cases, appropriate remedial and
enforcement action was taken.
Namibia is adequately separated from
other countries and regions by
maintained game-proof fences, road
blocks, and physical barriers such as
deserts and rivers. These boundaries
appear to be adequate as long as DVS
maintains active control of border posts
and continues maintenance of the stockand game-proof fences.
Movement Controls and Biological
Security
In order to control cattle movement,
an animal identification system has
been put into place to identify and track
all cattle in Namibia from farm to
processing. Under the Stock Brands Act
of 1995, each cattle owner has an
individual brand mark and must brand
all cattle 6 months of age and older with
a registered brand that identifies the
cattle’s ownership and location.
Livestock owners also must brand all
purchased cattle within 30 days of
procurement. Brands must be legible
and are recorded on a movement permit
as described below. Permits are required
for various types of cattle movement,
and any movement or sale of cattle
requires rebranding and recording the
event on stock cards and in DVS
records. Through branding, stock cards,
DVS records, and bar codes assigned to
meat from slaughter to processing,
Namibia can trace back animals. Under
the current version of the Stock Brands
Act, which was amended on March 29,
2004, and enacted on April 14, 2004, all
small stock on all farms in Namibia
must be identifiable by means of a
readable tattoo and/or metal eartag
bearing the registered brand mark of the
owner when they reach 3 months of age
or earlier if removed from the farm.
Import Controls
Namibia imports fresh beef, mutton,
pork, processed meat, and other animal
products from various countries,
including the Republic of South Africa.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34542
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
In order to import animals and animal
products into Namibia, a veterinary
import permit and a health certificate
are required. The permits are issued by
the Deputy Director of Epidemiology
and require that transport trucks or
containers importing animal products
and certain live animals be sealed.
Namibia does not import domestic
animals or animal products from FMDor BSE-affected regions and does not
permit animals vaccinated against FMD
or certain products from these animals
to enter the country.
DVS currently has a registry system in
place to track all imported animals from
arrival to death and plans to add a
component to this system that would
ensure that each animal’s cause of death
is recorded. DVS also has plans to
identify imported cattle, sheep, goats,
and ostriches with unique identification
eartags and brands and to institute a
plan to ensure that imported cattle are
tested for BSE after death. Animals or
animal products entering Namibia from
Windhoek International Airport without
a permit are either destroyed or returned
to the country of origin. DVS is
currently creating a system to record
these entry denials.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Export Controls
Namibia has abattoirs that prepare
and export meat and meat products.
These abattoirs are supervised directly
by government veterinary officials who
are responsible for export certification.
After arrival at the abattoir, cattle are
examined for clinical signs of illness by
veterinary staff. All animals also
undergo an antemortem inspection
during which they are specifically
checked for signs or lesions suggestive
of FMD and a postmortem inspection
during which the feet and tongues are
checked for FMD lesions. DVS receives
monthly condemnation statements and
summaries from export slaughter
abattoirs. For more details on the
slaughter process for exportable meat
and meat products, see the section
entitled ‘‘Livestock Demographics and
Marketing’’ below.
Within Namibia
DVS is authorized to control animal
movements between farms, from farm to
slaughter, and from farm to auction. If
movement controls are not complied
with, farmers’ market access may be
restricted. The State police work with
DVS to enforce road blocks, control
livestock movement, and, if needed,
guard and isolate an infected area after
an outbreak.
In order to control animal movement,
DVS requires the use of a veterinary
movement permit when animals are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
moved between premises. Copies of
these movement permits are kept in the
veterinary office at the region of origin,
with the owner, and with the
consignment. A fourth copy is also sent
to the veterinary office at the shipment’s
destination, which alerts the State
veterinarian of the shipment. Each State
veterinary office keeps movement
records for each producer and summary
statistics are compiled electronically at
DVS headquarters. Also, any animals
moved from the surveillance zone must
have a ‘‘red cross’’ movement permit in
addition to a 3-week quarantine at the
destination farm. A red cross permit is
a movement permit with a large red
watermark to distinguish it from a
regular movement permit. These
permits are used when DVS needs to
alert officials of certain conditions
existing in the permit, such as
quarantine at the destination farm or a
sealed vehicle requirement for
transportation.
Animals in Namibia can be moved via
livehaul conveyances, which are
allowed free movement through the VCF
gateposts and have no requirement for
cleaning or disinfection prior to entry
south of the VCF or into quarantine
camps. This lack of requirements
generally does not pose a risk much of
the year because steel truck beds and
the extremely hot and dry climate
would likely eliminate the FMD virus.
However, in the rainy season or in the
presence of manure, the trucks could
become a mechanical vector for FMD.
The site visit team expressed its concern
about this possibility, and in November
2004, DVS introduced a system for
disinfecting trucks used for the
transport of cattle into and out of
quarantine camps in the areas north of
the VCF. In areas south of the VCF, a
system of registration of livestock
transports has been introduced. Trucks
transporting livestock to export abattoirs
must be cleaned and disinfected before
animals are loaded.
Given this information, APHIS did
not identify any significant risk
pathways to consider Namibian animals
or animal products as a likely source for
introducing FMD into the United States.
Movement Across Borders
Borders With Other Countries
Animals moving into Namibia are
primarily imported from the Republic of
South Africa; most of the imported
cloven-hoofed game originates from the
portion of the Republic of South Africa
identified by the OIE as FMD-free.
Namibia and the Republic of South
Africa originally had a bilateral
agreement allowing the importation of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
animals into Namibia under a Master
Import Permit system, which resulted in
DVS having incomplete records of
animal and animal products movement
from the Republic of South Africa
during this time. However, this system
was abandoned after the FMD outbreak
in the Republic of South Africa in 2000
and all cloven-hoofed animals and their
products being imported into Namibia
were required to have import permits.
After the outbreak was controlled,
permits for low-risk products, such as
dairy products and processed/cooked
meats, were waived. Since the APHIS
site team visit, DVS has finalized the
system for issuing import permits for
animals and animal products from the
Republic of South Africa.
Currently, for meat originating from
the Republic of South Africa, officials
may ask for a certificate verifying that
the meat is entering the country in
accordance with the agreement between
Namibia and the Republic of South
Africa. This agreement provides that the
requirement for a permit varies with the
amount of meat being imported. For
example, shipments of meat less than 25
kilograms are allowed without a permit
or health certificate if it is for home
consumption, while shipments over 500
kilograms must have both an import
permit and a health certificate.
Animals from Angola primarily are
brought into Namibia for slaughter,
seasonal grazing, or breeding. Namibia’s
border with Angola has three entry
points for individuals importing
animals into Namibia: Oshikango,
Ruacana, and Mahenene. At these
points, DVS examines and vaccinates
the cattle for CBPP and FMD before
entry. After vaccination, the cattle from
Angola are hot branded with an ‘‘A’’
and an arrow that indicates the year of
the animal’s vaccination. Although
animals imported from Angola are not
quarantined, they remain in the buffer
zone and are not permitted to cross into
the free zone; they can be returned to
Angola and later reenter Namibia. If
cattle are slaughtered in the buffer zone,
the meat must remain in that zone.
Small stock animals are not identified
as originating from Angola and can
easily mix with local animals and
potentially move from the buffer zone to
the areas south of the VCF. However,
small stock from the buffer zone not
going directly to slaughter would have
to undergo two 3-week quarantines, one
in the buffer zone and one at their
destination, before entering the market
in the free zone. In addition, with the
placement of sentinels at quarantine
stations, APHIS considers that any FMD
concerns regarding Angolan small stock
animals that may be sent south of the
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
VCF would be addressed. Also, as
described in ‘‘Movement Controls,’’
Namibia requires identification for
small stock, which will further mitigate
the risk of infected small stock from
Angola being moved south of the VCF.
For imports from other countries,
Namibia requires a permit for all
animals and animal products. Namibia
does not allow the importation of
animals or animal products from regions
under FMD restriction and cattle
vaccinated against FMD are not
imported. All imported cattle are
permanently branded and not accepted
for slaughter at export slaughter
facilities. Cattle may be imported under
a veterinary permit. At the time of the
site visit, the only recent imports of live
sheep, goats, and pigs into the free zone
were from the area of Botswana that
Namibia considers to be FMD-free.
These animals once belonged to
Namibians who were residing in
Botswana before Namibia obtained
independence and before the country
required import permits and veterinary
health certificates. There is also an
import permit for game animals from
Botswana.
The site visit team also observed a
vehicle inspection at the Oshivello
gatepost, which is staffed 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week. At Oshivello,
individuals carrying meat products
must cook it or dispose of it before
entering Namibia. The gatepost
personnel keep logbooks of contraband
seizures and livestock movement.
One land border post, the
Transkalahari Customs post in Buitepos
on the border of Botswana, was visited
by the site team. The officials were
aware and knowledgable of DVS
requirements for animals and animal
products entering Namibia. Permits and
health certificates must be presented to
officials for meat. Goods are declared
voluntarily, but vehicles and luggage are
searched if they are suspected of
carrying contraband. Also, livestock and
animal product conveyances are
inspected and drivers are required to
show movement permits.
Game prizes and trophies must have
an import permit. Customs officials
stated that meat is confiscated, on
average, about once a month and
destroyed at a burn pit adjacent to the
facility. For live animals, customs
officials check the import permit, ensure
that the vehicle seals are intact, and
attempt to ensure that the animals meet
the condition on the permit, although
this inspection can be difficult as the
animals are in the sealed vehicles.
Customs officials are permitted to
contact DVS to offload animals, but
more often they unload the animals
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
themselves and then replace the DVS
seal with a Customs seal, if necessary.
The site team also visited the
Windhoek International Airport, which
has incoming flights from Frankfurt,
Munich, Capetown, Angola,
Johannesburg, and Botswana. While
there, they interviewed a Customs
official who was not familiar with the
duties of Namibian Customs. Although
the official was aware that certain plant
products must be confiscated, he lacked
knowledge of animal products that
should be confiscated or not allowed
entry. In addition, the airport did not
have signs displaying warning or
guidance on animal products that were
permitted or prohibited to enter
Namibia. There were also no checks on
the garbage offloaded from planes. Due
to the disparity of knowledge between
customs officers, DVS became involved
in the training of customs officials on
the requirements for the importation of
animals and animal products. In
addition, to further enhance the
awareness of the import of animals and
animal products, DVS advised State
veterinarians, among other personnel,
that attention should be given to
departure airstrips from places such as
lodges to ensure that people who are
departing the area are acquainted with
the danger and restrictions of
transporting animal and animal
products to the FMD-free zone. In
addition, DVS received approval to
establish 20 posts that will be staffed by
veterinary port officials. These posts
would be at main entry points. These
veterinary port officials will oversee
compliance with import requirements
and notification of arrival of animals
and products. Also, upon verification by
DVS, the site visit team found that at the
international airport in Windhoek,
waste is either burned or dumped in a
general dump at the airport complex.
Private contractors are responsible for
disposing of waste from planes, buses,
and trains in Windhoek.
Finally, as for sea ports, the site visit
team inspected Walvis Bay on the
Atlantic Ocean. Customs currently
evaluates imports using a guideline
called ‘‘Consolidated List of Prohibited
and Restricted Imports,’’ which was
originally created by Republic of South
Africa officials, but hopes to have
Namibian-specific guidelines in place
soon. Namibian-specific guidelines have
been developed and stakeholders are
being provided the opportunity to
comment prior to their implementation.
Customs officials here check the
waybills and manifests to ensure that
the shipment matches information
provided by the documents and to
identify which ministry is responsible
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34543
for the commodity’s permit. Customs
will also notify State veterinarian offices
of any shipments that must be examined
and will check before the shipment
leaves the office that the State
veterinarian has released the item. The
port also processes skins received from
north of the VCF in sealed containers,
which the State veterinarian checks for
intact seals and completed paperwork.
Passenger ships mainly arrive from
November to April; luggage is spot
checked for animal and plant materials.
International garbage entering
Namibia is collected for disposal at
various ports, including the Walvis Bay
office described above. At Walvis Bay,
a private company is contracted to
collect the garbage and remove it to
municipal dumps. It was not clear how
or whether garbage was treated prior to
disposal. The site visit team received
conflicting reports about the handling of
international food garbage and
uncertainty existed about whether
garbage was taken directly to the dump
or if it was diverted to a pig farmer. As
a result, the site team asked for a
clarification of how international
garbage is handled at Walvis Bay
because of concerns that FMD could be
introduced into the food chain in
Namibia by animals scavenging
unmonitored garbage dumps. DVS
stated that international garbage
disposal and removal is completed by
an independent contractor who dumps
the refuse in the municipal dump and
then covers it with soil, which DVS and
the Ministry of Health monitor.
Due to the information above, a risk
of animal disease incursion may exist in
Namibia due to a lack of consistency at
points of entry into Namibia regarding
the entry of animal products. However,
in 2003 DVS issued a letter to the
Director of Customs and Excise
regarding animal and animal product
control at international points of entry.
DVS advised Customs officials of
disparities on how animal products are
handled and that a DVS official has
been appointed to visit various entry
points, evaluate control measures, and
discuss relevant issues with all
authorities to ensure compliance with
Namibia’s veterinary import
requirements. DVS will also have the
State veterinary staff visit entry points
in their designated districts and become
involved in the training of Customs
officials. Also, as a result of the new
structure for DVS, 20 veterinary port
officials will be stationed at main entry
points to enhance oversight of
compliance with the importation
requirements for animals and animal
products.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
34544
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Borders Between Zones Within Namibia
As discussed above in the
‘‘Background’’ section, we are proposing
to declare a certain region of Namibia,
the area south of the VCF, as FMD-free.
Cloven-hoofed animals moving from the
infected zone to the buffer zone must
undergo serological tests for FMD, test
negative for the disease, and be
quarantined for 3 weeks before entering
the buffer zone. Police checkpoints exist
throughout Namibia to check permits
and papers, including those of livestock
trucks, to ensure validity.
For animals moving from the buffer
zone into the free zone, various
requirements are in place to prevent the
spread of FMD south of the VCF. Live
cattle are not permitted to be moved
from the buffer zone to the free zone;
game animals are permitted to move
only after a 21-day quarantine. Cattle
that are slaughtered in the buffer zone
are inspected both ante- and postmortem for FMD lesions. Beef from
these animals is matured 24 hours and
the pH must be below 6.0; the beef is
then hard frozen. Carcasses are deboned
and the lymphatics are removed. Meat
must be produced at an approved
abattoir and remain at the facility for 3
weeks in case of an undetected outbreak
in the production area, especially in
northern Namibia where no fences exist
between Namibia and Angola. Meat
products are then moved in sealed
vehicles from the buffer zone to the free
zone for local consumption or to the
Republic of South Africa under permit.
Beef sent to the free zone may be further
processed, but each box of meat must
have bar code identification so that
traceback to the slaughterhouse and
herd of origin can occur.
More than 3,000 small stock, such as
sheep and goats, were moved from the
buffer zone to the free zone each year
from 2000 to 2002. As of June 2003,
1,178 animals had been moved. Small
stock animals originate from areas
where cattle are not vaccinated for FMD
and are quarantined in one of four
quarantine stations in the buffer zone
for 3 weeks and then examined for signs
of FMD. The site visit team visited one
of these quarantine stations and found
there was adequate isolation for the
animals. Upon entry and exit of the
station, the animals’ mouths are
inspected for signs of vesicular disease
and observed for other FMD symptoms.
However, the station contained much
large, brushy vegetation, which may
make the observation of mild FMD
symptoms more difficult as such signs
could be attributed to damage caused by
the vegetation or missed. Small stock
animals are not vaccinated or tested for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
FMD prior to movement, which may
create a risk in moving an FMD-positive
animal into the free zone. However, in
December 2003, DVS began using
sentinel cattle during quarantine of
small stock. Small stock are penned
with seronegative cattle that are retested
after 21 days. Small stock are only
released when test results are negative.
Small stock that have completed the
minimum 21-day quarantine and that
are not destined for immediate slaughter
are not released for an additional 90
days. The animals may be held at
official quarantine facilities or at
approved facilities at the farm of
destination for the remainder of the
quarantine period.
At the farm of destination, a State
veterinarian inspects the isolation
facilities for the quarantined animals
and then breaks the transport seals. For
animals being quarantined on the farm
of destination, quarantine must take
place in a double-fenced quarantine
facility or the entire farm is quarantined
with the small stock restricted to an
inside enclosure. Transport vehicles are
cleaned and disinfected at the VCF and
after unloading.
Game animal products, such as
elephant ears and hides, buffalo skulls
and horns, hyena skins, and lion capes,
are allowed to move south of the VCF
under certain conditions. Untreated
hides from quarantine abattoirs in
Oshakati (buffer zone) and Katima
Mulili (infected zone) can be moved
into the free zone. However, untreated
hides from any other locations must be
dried and quarantined under veterinary
supervision for 3 months before moving
south of the VCF. In order to be
transported into the VCF, hides must be
accompanied by a permit and a red
cross permit, travel in a sealed truck,
and be packed in airtight containers
sealed under veterinary supervision.
After loading, untreated hides must
proceed immediately to an approved
tannery for supervised unloading and a
State veterinary officer must be notified
of their arrival. At the tannery, the seals
are broken by the State veterinarian,
who must ensure that the hides enter
the tanning process, which deactivates
any FMD. Treated hides must also be
accompanied by movement and red
cross permits and must be treated
through a 3 month quarantine or a
sodium carbonate treatment with a 1
month quarantine. Treated hides and
skins from Angola may only be taken to
approved tanneries in Okapuka (free
zone) or Nakara, but treated products
from Namibia may move anywhere in
the country after crossing into the free
zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The site team visited one of the
quarantine facilities, the Bergvlug farm,
as a representative quarantine facility.
The quarantine manager lives just
outside the facility’s gate with his
family, allowing for close supervision of
the facility. Animals entering the facility
are recorded by permit number, date of
arrival, owner address, species, number
of animals, period of quarantine, tariff,
amount, and country of origin. Electric
fences surround areas that hold small
stock to prevent predator entry. The
premises also has a laboratory for
research animals and postmortem
exams, an incinerator, and cleaning and
disinfection equipment.
Officials in Namibia have the
authority, procedures, and
infrastructure to enforce effectively the
system of permits, inspection,
quarantines, and treatments that the
country has in place to control animals
and animal products. APHIS did not
identify any specific limitations in the
system that might pose an FMD risk to
the United States.
Livestock Demographics and Marketing
Practices
DVS conducts an annual census of all
livestock in Namibia. The numbers of
FMD-susceptible livestock in 2004 are
listed in table 1.
TABLE 1.—FMD-SUSCEPTIBLE
LIVESTOCK, 2004
Type of livestock
Cattle ........................................
Sheep .......................................
Goats ........................................
Swine ........................................
Number
2,349,700
2,619,363
1,997,172
52,624
Source: Namibian Government.
In Northern Namibia, cattle farming is
predominant, while in southern
Namibia sheep farming is more
common. In the free zone, livestock are
maintained on privately owned farms
except for a communal range area in the
western part of the Omaruru State
Veterinary district. In the buffer zone,
livestock graze on communal land.
Communal farming is largely used for
sustenance.
Swine production in commercial
facilities in Namibia is small because
feed must be imported from the
Republic of South Africa. Due to the
presence of African swine fever in
Namibia, these facilities must be double
fenced to decrease contact with
warthogs that may be infected with that
disease. These facilities are inspected
annually by an animal health inspector.
Namibian law prohibits feeding swineorigin material to swine and commercial
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
facilities do not feed swill to pigs. A
small number of people purchase
fattening pigs for Christmas for their
own consumption. Although these
individuals do not have to double fence
their fattening pigs, they must slaughter
the pigs by a certain date and obtain a
permit to move the pigs to their
premises. Wild game animals are
prevalent in all regions of Namibia and
are believed to be free of FMD as
discussed in the ‘‘Disease History and
Surveillance’’ section above.
The site visit team observed two farms
in Namibia: A cattle/game farm and a
sheep/game farm. At the cattle/game
farm, the owner maintained monthly
records on the number of deaths, births,
and animals sent to slaughter as well as
a head count. This farm had
approximately 1,600 head of cattle. The
farm owner receives educational
material on FMD from the farmers
association and knew the procedure for
contacting the State veterinarian and
animal health inspectors. As for
movement permits, the owner knew to
request movement permits for cattle.
The farm also holds game hunts in
which trophies may be taken and the
meat, which is dressed outside of the
pasture area, is made into biltong for
farm workers, family, and guests. All
game for this farm is purchased from an
area south of the VCF and any
movement of these animals requires
capture and movement permits, which
are overseen by the Nature Conservancy.
The game on this farm was not
restocked and the population is
controlled with hunting and sicknesses,
such as plant poisoning.
On the sheep/game farm, the owner
had 1,500 Dorper sheep including lambs
that are kept in fields year round. Lambs
are kept for up to 5 months before being
sent to slaughter. The game at this farm
included springbuck, oryx, and blue
wildebeest. The farm’s owner works
closely with the Nature Conservancy
with regard to the movement of animals,
game censuses, culling, and night
culling, which the farm uses to
depopulate springbuck. Game animals
are slaughtered at a mobile facility
outside the pasture area where the head,
legs, and intestines are removed from
each animal. The animal is then stored
and shipped in a cooling truck to an
abattoir, where the hide is removed and
the carcasses are prepared. The owner at
this facility also kept detailed records of
animal movement permits and all
animal deaths of which he was aware;
however, he usually finds only skeletal
remains. The owner performs autopsies
on any animal that dies on his premises.
Livestock in Namibia can be sold at
livestock auctions. Larger auction
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
facilities are registered with the Animal
Health Department. If an auction
involves selling animals from more than
one source, DVS will attend the auction,
inspect the animals, issue movement
permits, and collects permits, checking
them for endorsements, brand marks,
and animals in corrals. If any game
animals are present at the auction, the
Nature Conservancy must be present to
oversee any sales. Auctions in the
communal area can take place anywhere
in the area as long as DVS is notified
ahead of time to be present to inspect
animal transactions and issue permits
for animal movement. In addition,
animal owners must present their stock
card to DVS so DVS can record the
ownership change and movement. DVS
is not present for animal sales from
personal property, but most buyers will
travel to the State office to obtain a
movement permit for the purchased
animal.
Some slaughterhouses in Namibia
have feedlots, which are areas in which
cattle can be held before they enter a
slaughter line. These feedlots help
ensure a steady slaughter line of
animals. The APHIS team visited the
Okapuka feedlot, which is owned by a
Meatco abattoir. The feedlot purchases
cattle ranging from 8 to 12 months of
age from farmers, communal areas
through permittees, and auctions all of
which are located south of the VCF. The
cattle generally remain on the premises
for 3 months with each feedlot operating
on an all-in, all-out policy. Upon
arriving at the feedlot, all cattle are
branded, eartagged, dipped, dewormed,
and vaccinated for anthrax, several
clostridial diseases, pasteurella, and
infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. The
cattle are also checked every day for
signs of sickness; sick cattle are
removed from the herd. Fifteen to
twenty percent of the cattle at the lot are
female. Cattle are pen fed on a mixedration diet that is completely vegetarian
with no fish, poultry, or mammalian
byproducts. The feedlot maintains
records of arrival, departure, disease
diagnosis, and death of each cattle.
The site visit team also observed two
abattoirs: The Farmer’s Meat Packers
and Meatco. Both of these facilities
operate under the Hazard Analysis
Critical Control Point System. The
Farmer’s Meat Packers facility
slaughters goats, lamb, sheep, and small
game with a maximum capacity of 1,500
sheep, 400 game animals, and 250
deboning of lamb and game animals per
day. The facility slaughters
approximately 1,200 sheep per day and
only receives animals from farms that
DVS annually inspects.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34545
All livestock animals entering the
facility are already marked with
identification indicating the preceding
owners; this information is added to the
arrival sheet. Upon entry, the animals
are checked by the veterinary health
inspector for symptoms or lesions and
any difficulties are referred to the State
veterinarian. All live animals are tagged
with a scan tag, and animals that arrive
dead or die after arrival are taken to the
dump site, burned, and buried under
the veterinary health inspector’s
supervision. If an animal dies after
arrival under suspicious circumstances,
tests are performed and the abattoir’s
veterinarian performs a necropsy,
calling the State veterinarian if the
cause of death could be contagious.
Sheep from the same owner are marked.
Paint marks are used if there is no other
identifier on animal. After slaughter,
tags (colored) are used to mark where
new ownership begins and animals are
tagged with a scan tag. The person who
scans has a list of owners and the
number of animals. The facility also has
a high incidence form, which is
completed when a large shipment has a
5 percent incidence or a small shipment
has 10 percent incident of listed
conditions. The site visit team noticed
that the form did not include vesicular
diseases. Livestock animal carcasses are
kept in chillers at 4 °C for 24 hours and
have a pH of about 5.4 to 5.5, which is
only checked if the importing country
requires it. A representative from the
Namibian Meat Board grades the meat.
As for game animals, the facility does
not slaughter live animals, but instead
deals with carcasses after they have
been culled at the ranch in origin. A
separate cooler, exam area, and
offloading area exist for game and the
pH is not measured unless required by
the importing country. Trucks leaving
the facility are cleaned and washed
prior to departure.
Sheep and game are dressed
separately on the same slaughter line. In
between uses of game or sheep, the
equipment is cleaned and checked by
the VHI to ensure there was no mixed
slaughtering. During work hours,
individuals working in the clean area
are not permitted to mix with the
employees responsible for slaughter.
These two groups have separate
facilities, including during outdoor
breaks. The surfaces of the slaughter
line are cleaned between every 15
carcasses, and every day 50 samples are
sent to the central laboratory for
salmonella testing. The knives are
changed constantly and sterilized before
use. Condemned trimmings are taken to
the facility’s dump site for burning.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
34546
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Meatco, another abattoir visited by the
site visit team, has four abattoirs: Two
in the free zone, one in the buffer zone,
and one in the infected zone. Meatco
slaughters cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs.
Ninety-nine percent of source farms,
which are located south of the VCF, are
on contract procurement from Meatco.
Of the ovines slaughtered, 90 percent
are lambs and 10 percent are older
sheep.
When a truck arrives at the facility,
the truck is checked for a valid animal
movement permit before offloading its
animals. Once the animals are
offloaded, inspectors examine the
animals, collect movement permits, and
enter data on the slaughter animal
arrival record. For cattle, antemortem
inspections take place in specially built
pens with adequate room for cattle to be
moved for a thorough examination. The
running chute leading up to the holding
pens also allowed for adequate animal
inspection. After unloading, the trucks
are washed to remove solid matter,
which is verified by a guard who keeps
a written record, but are not disinfected.
Each month the facility sends four
heads to the central laboratory for brain
sampling. At the time of the site visit,
no neurological conditions have been
diagnosed by the abattoir. After
beheading each carcass, matching tags
are placed on the head and carcass of
the animal, which stay in place until the
carcass is graded. The tags are then
removed and a bar code tag is placed on
the carcass by which the bar code tag
can be traced from incoming shipment
to end-product boxes. A pallet tracing
system is used to ensure consignments
are shipped correctly and only two
people have access to the tracking and
loading system to ensure integrity.
Carcasses are held in chillers at 7 °C for
48 hours before they are deboned.
Random pH tests in compliance with
European Union requirements are
performed on carcasses with a
calibrated pH meter, which is calibrated
before testing each carcass. For cattle,
the pH is taken in two places, the
forequarter and hindquarter, due to a
possible 0.2 to 0.4 difference; the
average pH is 5.4 to 5.7. Sheep carcasses
are also tested for pH levels. A
veterinarian verifies the pH and
temperature prior to movement out of
the chiller and also inspects for any
dark meat, which indicates stress, poor
bleeding, or fever. If necessary,
carcasses are rejected from export and
used in the local market instead.
In addition to commercial abattoirs,
some villages in Namibia have bush
abattoirs, some of which slaughter only
one to two animals per day. These
abattoirs can be sources of surveillance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
information. DVS was in the process of
training personnel at these abattoirs.
APHIS did not identify any factors in
this category that might pose a risk to
the United States if animals or animal
products are imported from Namibia.
Detection and Eradication of Disease
If an FMD outbreak does occur, DVS
has an emergency response plan in
place that includes notifying a reporting
list, which includes trading partners,
within 24 hours of an outbreak. The
plan stresses early detection and
reporting and includes training for both
farmers and DVS staff so that an
outbreak can be detected in its early
phases. The plan also includes protocols
for sampling and diagnostic
submissions as well as disinfection and
biosecurity and a public awareness
strategy to quickly communicate
restrictions and stoppages of all animals
and animal products. Emergency
equipment is stored in the Otjiwarango
office, which is centrally located, and
State veterinarians have instructions to
establish animal movement restrictions,
disease containment, quarantines, road
blocks, and buffer and surveillance
zones around the outbreak. In addition,
contingency funding plans for the
immediate mobilization of 300 military
personnel have been approved by the
Ministry.
Given the geography of the free zone,
which includes limited roadways with
almost uniform division of the area by
game and stock fences, the authority for
compulsory vehicle stoppage at
roadblocks, the strong public awareness
of FMD, mandatory reporting, and
routine field inspections, APHIS
concluded that an FMD outbreak likely
would be detected and responded to
quickly. A recent FMD outbreak in the
infected zone was quickly controlled by
DVS using the system above. Namibia
has a well planned, documented, and
readily implemented emergency
response system to rapidly identify and
respond to an FMD outbreak. Based on
the above factors, APHIS considers the
likelihood of an FMD outbreak
occurring in Namibia to be low.
Certification Requirements
We are proposing to add Namibia,
excluding the region north of the VCF,
to the list in § 94.11(a) of regions
declared free of rinderpest and FMD but
that are subject to special restrictions on
the importation of their meat and other
animal products into the United States.
The regions listed in § 94.11(a) are
subject to these special restrictions
because they: (1) Supplement their
national meat supply by importing fresh
(chilled or frozen) meat of ruminants or
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
swine from regions that are designated
in § 94.1(a) as regions where rinderpest
or FMD exists, (2) have a common land
border with regions where rinderpest or
FMD exists, or (3) import ruminants or
swine from regions where rinderpest or
FMD exists under conditions less
restrictive than would be acceptable for
importation into the United States.
As previously noted, Namibia shares
land borders with Botswana, Angola,
and the Republic of South Africa, all of
which have experienced recent FMD
outbreaks. A portion of Namibia, the
infected zone, is also considered
affected with FMD. In addition, from
2000–2002, Namibia imported fresh
beef, mutton, and pork from several
countries the United States considers
affected with FMD. Namibia also
imported cooked and uncooked
processed meat from the Republic of
South Africa under the condition that
the meat be cooked to a core
temperature of 70 °C for 30 minutes,
which is not as long as the time required
in § 94.4 of the regulations for cooked
meat from regions where FMD exists.
Namibia also imports unprocessed hides
and skins of ungulates or parts thereof,
trophies, wool, and hair, all of which
must be treated in accordance with the
veterinary health certificate
requirements. Namibia trades these
items with countries the United States
considers affected with FMD and some
of the treatment requirements are not as
restrictive as those of the United States.
Finally, Namibia also imports milk and
milk-based products from regions the
United States does not consider as FMDfree. Thus, even though we are
proposing to declare a region of Namibia
free of FMD, there is a risk that animals
or animal products originating in that
region of Namibia may be commingled
with animals or animal products
originating in an FMD-affected region.
This action would relieve certain
restrictions due to FMD and rinderpest
on the importation of live animals,
germplasm, and animal products from
the region of Namibia south of the VCF.
However, because we consider Namibia
to be affected with other animal diseases
that are exotic to the United States, the
importation of live ruminants and
germplasm would continue to be
restricted. In addition, because we
consider Namibia as affected with
African swine fever, classical swine
fever, and swine vesicular disease, the
importation of live swine and pork and
pork products would continue to be
restricted. All other meat and meat
products imported into the United
States from Namibia would be required
to meet the requirements of § 94.11.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Under § 94.11, meat and other animal
products of ruminants and swine,
including ship stores, airplane meals,
and baggage containing these meat or
animal products, may not be imported
into the United States except in
accordance with § 94.11 and the
applicable requirements of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety
and Inspection Service at 9 CFR chapter
III.
Section 94.11 generally requires that
the meat and other animal products of
ruminants and swine be: (1) Prepared in
an inspected establishment that is
eligible to have its products imported
into the United States under the Federal
Meat Inspection Act; and (2)
accompanied by an additional
certificate, issued by a full-time salaried
veterinary official of the national
government of the exporting region,
assuring that the meat or other animal
products have not been commingled
with or exposed to meat or other animal
products originating in, imported from,
transported through, or that have
otherwise been in a region where
rinderpest or FMD exists.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Conclusion
We have concluded that the Namibian
Government has the laws, policies, and
infrastructure to detect, respond to, and
eliminate any reoccurrence of FMD.
These findings are described in further
detail in a risk analysis that may be
obtained from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and
may be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/ncie/regrequest.html by following the link for
‘‘Information previously submitted by
Regions requesting export approval and
their supporting documentation.’’ The
objective of the risk analysis is to
evaluate the likelihood of introducing
FMD virus into the United States
through the importation of FMDsusceptible species and products.
APHIS could identify no risk factors
currently applicable to Namibia that
would justify keeping the region of
Namibia south of the VCF from the list
of regions APHIS considers as FMD free.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule would amend the
regulations in § 94.1 to list Namibia as
a region free of rinderpest and the
region of Namibia south of the VCF as
a region free of FMD. However, since
Namibia borders on and trades with
regions that the United States does not
recognize as free of FMD and because its
importation standards are less stringent
than those of the United States, we are
also proposing to list the region of
Namibia south of the VCF in § 94.11 as
a region subject to the additional
certification requirements of that
section.
It should be noted that Namibia is not
currently eligible to export ruminant
meat products to the United States
under the FSIS regulations cited earlier
in this document; there would,
therefore, be no economic effects on
U.S. entities until establishments in
Namibia were approved to export
ruminant meat and other products to the
United States. The following analysis
examines the potential economic
impacts of the proposed changes in the
regulations that could occur if this
proposed rule were implemented and
establishments in Namibia were
approved to export under the FSIS
regulations.
Namibia produces and internationally
trades in beef, sheep, goat, and game
meat. Namibia produced 134 million
pounds of beef in 2004 and exported an
average of 59.2 million pounds of beef
and veal per year between 1994 and
2003. The country has established
trading relationships with the Republic
of South Africa and several western
European countries. Namibia also
produced 29.6 million pounds of
mutton, lamb, and goat meat in 2003
and exported an average of 5.73 million
pounds per year between 1994 and
2003, with most exports going to the
Republic of South Africa. Namibia
produced 8.8 million pounds of game
meat in 2003.
Namibia’s agricultural trade with the
United States is small. In 2003, Namibia
exported agricultural products worth a
total $199,000, of which $21,000 was for
hides and skins, and imported $5.443
million worth of agricultural products,
of which $40,000 was for beef and veal.
(Sources: FAO, FAOSTAT, 2004; UN/
FAO, FAOSTAT Data, 2004; Hilda
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34547
Hampweya, April 2005, personal
communication, Namibia Division of
Trade and Statistics.)
Possible economic effects of imports
from Namibia would differ for beef and
for sheep and goat meat imports. For
beef imports, approximately 22 million
pounds of beef may be imported
annually from Namibia as a result of the
proposed rule, based on data collected
from the Central Bureau of StatisticsTrade Statistics Division of Namibia.
Based on 10-year average U.S. domestic
supply, an import of about 22 million
pounds of beef would result in a price
decrease of less than $0.002 per pound
at the wholesale level. If 50 percent of
Namibia’s 10-year average beef exports
(29.6 million pounds) were diverted to
the U.S. market, the result would be a
price decline of only $0.0024 per pound
(Table 2).
As for sheep and goats, the estimated
potential exports to the United States of
these meats are about 15.43 million
pounds per year according to data
collected from the Central Bureau of
Statistics-Trade Statistics Division of
Namibia. If this supply were realized,
U.S. sheep and goat meat prices could
decline and sheep producers could be
negatively affected, as the above figure
represents about 4.35 percent of U.S.
domestic supply. This could result in a
price decline of $0.07 per pound (Table
2). However, it is questionable whether
Namibia would have the capacity to
export this amount and maintain its
trade with its established South African
and European markets. Although several
markets in the European Union are
accessible to Namibia, the Republic of
South Africa continues to be its major
trading partner. Namibia exported 15.66
million pounds of sheep and goat meat
to all countries in 2003, so to meet this
goal of 15.43 million pounds exported
to the United States, nearly all of the
current exports would have to be
diverted. Between 1994 and 2003,
Namibian exports of sheep and goats
have fluctuated, with a negative export
growth rate in every year except for
four: 1995, 1998, 1999, and 2001. The
impact is not as large when based on the
10-year average quantity exported of
5.73 million pounds. Assuming this
level of export to the United States, the
estimated decline in price is between
$0.02 and $0.03 per pound.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34548
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2.—THE IMPACT OF THE IMPORTATION OF BEEF, SHEEP, AND GOAT MEAT FROM NAMIBIA TO THE UNITED STATES
Beef
Percentage diverted to
the U.S. market 1
Million
pounds
10 .................................
20 .................................
40 .................................
50 .................................
Designated ...................
1 The
Change in
price
(%)
Sheep and goat meat
Decline in
price
(cents/
pound)
¥0.0291
¥0.0582
¥0.1164
¥0.1454
¥0.1083
5.92
11.84
23.68
29.6
222.05
Domestic
producer
loss
(millions of
$)
¥0.0483
¥0.0966
¥0.1932
¥0.2414
¥0.1799
Change in
price
(%)
Million
pounds
¥11.902
¥23.795
¥47.586
¥59.479
¥44.309
Decline in
price
(cents/
pound)
¥0.231
¥0.461
¥0.922
¥1.153
¥6.209
0.573
1.146
2.293
2.865
215.43
Domestic
producer
loss
(millions (%)
¥0.261
¥0.521
¥1.042
¥1.303
¥7.016
¥0.435
¥0.871
¥1.742
¥2.177
¥11.725
percentages are based on the 10-year average exports: 59.2 million pounds for beef and 5.73 million pounds for sheep and goat meat.
the estimated amount indicated by Namibian Agricultural specialists and the industry as being available for export to the United
2 Denotes
States.
The impacts depicted in Table 2 are
further considered in terms of effects for
large and small entities in Table 3 (beef
producers) and Table 4 (sheep and goat
producers). In each case, impacts at
various import levels are apportioned
between large and small establishments
by inventory share, according to the
2002 Census of Agriculture. Average
for U.S. small entities would be about
$28. Similarly, if 15.43 million pounds
of sheep and goat meat exports per year
were diverted to the United States, as
projected by Namibia, the average
annual decline in revenue for U.S. small
entities would be about $108.
effects per establishment are calculated
based on numbers of large and small
establishments with reported sales
(2002 Census of Agriculture). As shown
in Table 3, if Namibia were to divert to
the United States 22.05 million pounds
of beef exports per year, as projected by
that country’s agricultural specialists,
the average annual decline in revenue
TABLE 3.—POTENTIAL EFFECTS FOR LARGE AND SMALL BEEF CATTLE PRODUCERS
Large 2
U.S. producer
revenue loss
(millions of $)
Percentage diverted to the U.S. market 1
Revenue loss
(millions of $)
¥11.902
¥23.795
¥47.586
¥59.479
¥44.309
¥5.571
¥11.138
¥22.275
¥27.642
¥20.741
10 .........................................................................................
20 .........................................................................................
40 .........................................................................................
50 .........................................................................................
Designated ...........................................................................
Small 2
Average revenue loss ($)
¥860
¥1,719
¥3,437
¥4,265
¥3,200
Revenue loss
(millions of $)
Average revenue loss ($)
¥6.331
¥12.657
¥25.311
¥31.637
¥23.568
¥8
¥15
¥30
¥38
¥28
1 The
percentages are based on the 10-year average exports: 59.2 million pounds for beef and 5.73 million pounds for sheep and goat meat.
losses to large and small establishments are distributed according to inventory share (46.81 percent for large and 53.19 percent for
small establishments). Averaged revenue losses are calculated by dividing by the number of establishments (845,490 and 6,481 for small and
large establishments, respectively).
2 Revenue
TABLE 4.—POTENTIAL EFFECTS FOR LARGE AND SMALL SHEEP AND GOAT PRODUCERS
Large 2
U.S. producer
revenue loss
(millions of $)
Percentage diverted to the U.S. market 1
Revenue loss
(millions of $)
¥0.435
¥0.871
¥1.742
¥2.177
¥11.725
¥0.114
¥0.229
¥0.458
¥0.573
¥3.084
10 .........................................................................................
20 .........................................................................................
40 .........................................................................................
50 .........................................................................................
Designated ...........................................................................
Small 2
Average revenue loss ($)
¥765
1,537
¥3,074
¥3,846
¥20,698
Revenue loss
(millions of $)
¥0.321
¥0.642
¥1.284
¥1.604
¥8.641
Average revenue loss ($)
¥4
¥8
¥16
¥20
¥108
1 The
percentages are based on the 10-year average exports: 59.2 million pounds for beef and 5.73 million pounds for sheep and goat meat.
losses to large and small establishments are distributed according to inventory share (26.3 percent for large and 73.7 percent for
small establishments). Average revenue losses are calculated by dividing by the number of establishments (80,443 and 149 for small and large
establishments, respectively).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
2 Revenue
According to the size standards
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) for livestock and
animal specialties, producers of cattle
and calves (North American Industry
Classification System [NAICS] code
112111), game animal (NAICS 112990),
sheep (NAICS 112410) and goat (NAICS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
112420) producers with not more than
$750,000 annual sales qualify as small
entities. Based on data from the 2002
Census of Agriculture, 851,971
operations in the U.S. raised and sold 73
million cattle and calves in 2002. Small
operations (over 99 percent of the farms)
had an average of 68 cattle and an
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
average income of $24,067, well below
the SBA criterion of $750,000 in annual
sales for businesses primarily engaged
in cattle farming. Large operations had
an annual income of $3,821,440.
Similarly, over 99 percent of sheep and
goat producers (80,443) are small. Small
sheep and lamb producers had an
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 / Proposed Rules
average income of $7,520, while large
ones had an average income of $1.042
million.
Meat packing establishments (NAICS
311611), and meat and meat product
wholesale traders (NAICS 422470)
might be affected (Source: U.S. Census
Bureau, 1997 Economic Census,
Wholesale Trade-Subject Series, August
2000). Under SBA standards, meat
packing establishments with no more
than 500 employees and meat and meat
product wholesale traders with no more
than 100 employees are considered
small. In 1997, there were 1,393
companies in the United States that
processed and sold meat. More than 95
percent of these establishments are
considered to be small entities and had
average sales of $9.7 million, while large
meat packers had average sales of $603
million. In 1997, there were total of
3,150 meat and meat product wholesale
traders in the United States (Source:
SBA and 1997 Economic Census). Of
these establishments, 3,084 (97.9
percent) employed not more than 100
employees and are, thus, considered
small by SBA standards. Small
wholesalers had average sales of $8.85
million, while large entities had average
sales of $348 million. Thus,
predominant numbers of producers,
packers and wholesale traders are
considered to be small by SBA
standards. Average sales of even the
smallest packers and wholesalers are
large compared to the quantities
expected to be imported from Namibia.
Furthermore, any impact on these
entities would likely be positive since
imports would increase the supply.
We have only limited information
with regard to the production, demand,
price, trade of game meat, or the number
of small entities involved in these
businesses. We welcome any
information that the public may offer in
this area.
The only alternative to the proposed
rule would involve not changing the
current regulations regarding the
importation of beef, sheep, and goat
meat and game meat from Namibia. This
alternative would not meet the needs of
importers who are attempting to
establish a new source of supply for red
meat and would deny both businesses
and consumers the benefits of widened
choices. The proposed rule provides the
safeguarding measures appropriate to
the risk associated with importation of
this type of animal product. The
proposed rule also enhances a positive
trade environment between Namibia
and the United States. We note again
that Namibia is not currently eligible to
export ruminant meat products to the
United States under the FSIS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Jun 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
regulations cited earlier in this
document; there would, therefore, be no
economic effects on U.S. entities until
establishments in Namibia were
approved to export ruminant meat and
other products to the United States.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
§ 94.11
Executive Order 12988
34549
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry
and poultry products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 94 as follows:
PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE
DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER,
CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER, AND
BOVINE SPONGIFORM
ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
§ 94.1
[Amended]
2. Section 94.1 would be amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (a)(2), by adding the
words ‘‘Namibia (excluding the region
north of the Veterinary Cordon Fence),’’
after the word ‘‘Mexico,’’.
b. In paragraph (a)(3), by removing the
words ‘‘The Republic’’ and adding the
words ‘‘Namibia and the Republic’’ in
their place.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Amended]
3. In § 94.11, paragraph (a) would be
amended by adding the words ‘‘Namibia
(excluding the region north of the
Veterinary Cordon Fence),’’ before the
words ‘‘The Netherlands’’.
Done in Washington, DC, this 8th day of
June 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 06–5440 Filed 6–13–06; 8:45 am]
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 611, 612, 613, and 614
RIN 3052–AC15
Organization; Standards of Conduct
and Referral of Known or Suspected
Criminal Violations; Eligibility and
Scope of Financing; Loan Policies and
Operations; Regulatory Burden
Farm Credit Administration.
Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Farm Credit
Administration (FCA) Board reopens the
comment period on the proposed rule
intended to reduce regulatory burden on
the Farm Credit System (FCS or
System), so that interested parties will
have additional time to provide
comments.
Please send your comments to us
by July 17, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent by
electronic mail to reg-comm@fca.gov,
through the Pending Regulations section
of our Web site at https://www.fca.gov or
through the Government-wide https://
www.regulations.gov portal. You may
also send written comments to Gary K.
Van Meter, Deputy Director, Office of
Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit
Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive,
McLean, Virginia 22102–5090 or by fax
to (703) 734–5784.
You may review copies of comments
we received at our office in McLean,
Virginia, or from our Web site at
https://www.fca.gov. Once you are in the
Web site, select ‘‘Legal Info,’’ and then
select ‘‘Public Comments.’’ We will
show your comments as submitted, but
for technical reasons we may omit items
such as logos and special characters.
Identifying information you may
provide, such as phone numbers and
addresses, will be publicly available.
However, we will attempt to remove
electronic-mail addresses to help reduce
Internet spam.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 115 (Thursday, June 15, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34537-34549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-5440]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 115 / Thursday, June 15, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 34537]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0037]
Change in Disease Status of Namibia With Regard to Foot-and-Mouth
Disease and Rinderpest
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations to add Namibia,
except the portion of the country north of the Veterinary Cordon Fence
(VCF), to the list of regions that are considered free of foot-and-
mouth disease (FMD), and to add the entire country to the list of
regions that are considered free of rinderpest. We are taking this
action because we have determined that the region in Namibia south of
the VCF is now free of FMD and the entire country is free of
rinderpest. We are also proposing to add Namibia, except the region
north of the VCF, to the list of FMD- and rinderpest-free regions that
are subject to certain import restrictions on meat and other animal
products because of their proximity to or trading relationships with
rinderpest- or FMD-affected regions. This proposed action would relieve
certain restrictions due to FMD and rinderpest on the importation into
the United States of certain live animals and animal products from all
regions of Namibia except the region north of the VCF. However, because
we consider Namibia to be affected with African swine fever, classical
swine fever, and swine vesicular disease, the importation of live swine
and pork and pork products would continue to be restricted. In
addition, because we consider Namibia to be affected with other animal
diseases that are exotic to the United States, the importation of live
ruminants and germplasm would also continue to be restricted. These
actions would update the disease status of Namibia with regard to FMD
and rinderpest while continuing to protect the United States from an
introduction of those diseases by providing additional requirements for
any meat and meat products imported into the United States from
Namibia.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
August 14, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and, in the lower ``Search Regulations and Federal
Actions'' box, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service''
from the agency drop-down menu, then click on ``Submit.'' In the Docket
ID column, select APHIS-2006-0037 to submit or view public comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is available through the site's ``User
Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. APHIS-
2006-0037, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-
03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state
that your comment refers to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0037.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Javier Vargas, Animal Scientist,
Regionalization Evaluation Services Staff, National Center for Import
and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1231; (301) 734-0756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the
regulations) govern the importation of certain animals and animal
products into the United States in order to prevent the introduction of
various diseases, including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth disease (FMD),
African swine fever, classical swine fever, and swine vesicular
disease. These are dangerous and destructive communicable diseases of
ruminants and swine. Section 94.1 of the regulations lists regions of
the world that are declared free of rinderpest or free of both
rinderpest and FMD. Rinderpest or FMD exists in all other parts of the
world not listed. Section 94.11 of the regulations lists regions of the
world that have been determined to be free of rinderpest and FMD, but
that are subject to certain restrictions because of their proximity to
or trading relationships with rinderpest- or FMD-affected regions.
In February 2001, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) received a request from Namibia's Government to recognize
Namibia as free from rinderpest. Because rinderpest has not been
diagnosed in Namibia since 1907, we are proposing to recognize the
entire country of Namibia as free of rinderpest.
The Namibian Government also requested that APHIS recognize the
region of Namibia south of the Veterinary Cordon Fence (VCF), which is
described in more detail in the ``Degree of Separation from Adjacent
Regions,'' as free of FMD. The regulations define the term region, in
part, as ``any defined geographic land area identifiable by geological,
political, or surveyed boundaries.'' Namibian veterinary officials
define four zones for purposes of FMD control in Namibia: Infected,
buffer, surveillance, and free. The infected zone is north of the VCF
and includes eastern and western Caprivi, where FMD outbreaks have
occurred and free-roaming wild buffalo are present. FMD vaccinations
are conducted in this zone. The buffer zone, which abuts high-risk
areas in neighboring countries, is also located north of the VCF. This
area is considered affected with contagious
[[Page 34538]]
bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) and does not have as stringent animal
movement controls as the FMD-free area. FMD vaccinations are conducted
in certain areas of this zone. The surveillance zone borders the VCF in
the FMD-free area and is at least two farms wide. FMD vaccination does
not occur in this area so that the animals can serve as sentinels.
Finally, the free zone consists of the commercial farming area and
communal areas south of the surveillance zone.
In response to the Namibian Government's request, and based on our
review of supporting documentation accompanying the request and
information obtained during a site visit, we are proposing to recognize
the entire country of Namibia as rinderpest-free and all of Namibia
except the region north of the VCF as free of FMD. Finally, we are also
proposing to add Namibia, except the region north of the VCF, to the
list of regions that are subject to certain import restrictions on meat
and other animal products because of their proximity to or trading
relationships with rinderpest-or FMD-affected regions.
Risk Analysis
Based on the information submitted to us by the Government of
Namibia, as well as information gathered during a site visit by APHIS
staff to Namibia in June 2003, we have reviewed and analyzed the animal
health status of Namibia relative to FMD. Our review and analysis were
conducted in light of the factors identified in 9 CFR 92.2,
``Application for recognition of the animal health status of a
region,'' which are used to determine the level of risk associated with
importing animals or animal products into the United States from a
given region. Based on the information submitted to us and gathered
during the June 2003 site visit, we have concluded the following:
Veterinary Infrastructure
The authority for veterinary infrastructure and control in Namibia
rests with the Directorate of Veterinary Services (DVS) in the Ministry
of Agriculture, Water, and Rural Development. This authority is derived
from several laws, including the Undesirable Residue in Meat Act, the
Stock Brands Act, the Government Notice on the Prohibition of Certain
Farm Feeds, and the Animal Disease and Parasites Act, No. 13, of 1956;
this last act is the primary source of authority for Namibia's animal
health, disease control, and animal movement control activities. The
overall structure of DVS includes a central headquarters and State
veterinary offices throughout Namibia, both of which are described
below.
DVS headquarters is located in Windhoek, where DVS officials
develop all polices, laws, and regulations relating to animal health
issues. The relationship between DVS headquarters and the State offices
is close and information is shared regularly. The State offices are
formally audited to review the offices' performance on trade-related
issues, such as traceability, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)
surveillance, and monitoring farm feeds for ruminant protein. During
the site visit, APHIS staff found the State office they visited to be
structured, effective, and organized.
DVS animal health officials participate in training activities on a
regular basis, including teaching community members how to recognize
disease symptoms. The central office sets criteria for FMD-free
countries and assigns disease status to countries. Permits are issued
according to a country's disease status and, if a disease outbreak
occurs in a previously free country, DVS cancels the permits for
affected articles from that country and alerts State veterinarians at
the ports of arrival that those permits have been canceled.
Support for DVS in Namibian farming and producer groups and local
communities is strong. This support is demonstrated by high involvement
in programs such as participation and enforcement of vaccination
schedules and community participation in education, outreach, and
meetings. DVS works with various farming organizations in Namibia, such
as the National Agricultural Union, which consists mainly of commercial
farmers, and the Namibia National Farmers' Union, which is comprised of
mostly communal farmers. DVS also works with the Namibian Meat Board,
which is an industry group focusing on developing and improving
livestock product markets. The Meat Board administers the Farm Assured
Namibian Meat Scheme, a quality assurance program for meat, and
operates the Brand Registry, which contains the registration of every
meat producer's brand mark. Finally, DVS partners with the Namibian
police force to ensure that all vehicles entering the proposed free
zone through VCF checkpoints are inspected and that emergency
roadblocks can be put into place if necessary.
The site visit team visited the Walvis Bay Veterinary Services
Office, a State veterinary office located at a port on the central
coast of Namibia. The premises included the State veterinarian's office
and a quarantine facility used for small animals, such as dogs, birds,
and cats. For each animal product entering Namibia, the State
veterinarian keeps records of a description of the product, as well as
the product's date of entry, permit number, origin, and quantity. The
office is also responsible for performing field duties, such as annual
farm inspections and inspections of cold storage facilities. The State
veterinarians can hold a shipment until paperwork can be completed, but
do not open sealed containers until all documents are present.
The State office receives faxes from the central office to alert
the State veterinarian of any arriving shipments that will need
inspection. During an inspection, the State veterinarian checks the
expiration and product dates, the endorsement of the permit, and the
physical appearance of the shipment. Satisfactory shipments are
released to the owner, while unsatisfactory shipments must either be
destroyed or returned to the country of origin. If the product is
destroyed, the State veterinarian, municipal police, Port Control, and
Customs are involved. Although no beef or lamb has been confiscated, a
shipment of chicken was destroyed by being mixed with sand and buried
in a 5 meter hole at the municipal dump. At the port visited by the
APHIS team, the harbor is completely fenced off and guards man the port
gate. If a shipment does not have stamped release papers, the guards
will stop the shipment so that it cannot leave the harbor.
DVS also supplements its workforce through Community Animal Health
Workers (CAHWs) who work in the communal areas to assist DVS' disease
surveillance and to provide a more comprehensive and accurate animal
disease treatment, surveillance, and reporting system. Although the
CAHWs are not government employees or certified, they receive
government training in animal husbandry, handling, animal diseases, and
health maintenance and are members of the community in which they work.
The CAHWs then can establish private businesses that provide very basic
veterinary care along with a limited veterinary pharmacy.
One concern about DVS raised during the site visit was the
mandatory or voluntary retirement for several senior DVS officials in
the upcoming year with no apparent plans for overlapping by
replacements. This process could create a loss of institutional memory
and result in a weakening or failure of the current disease control
system, which requires
[[Page 34539]]
consistent application and reassessment to prevent FMD from entering
Namibia. In addition, highly trained personnel are spread very thin
over a wide range of duties and qualified recruits are lacking due to
either a lack of funding or training. DVS acknowledged these issues
during the site visit and stated that field personnel are being moved
to headquarters to receive training and become familiar with operations
at the headquarters level. In addition, DVS advertised posts to fill
vacancies prior to the officials' departure to ensure a smooth
transition. Also, DVS stated that the restructuring was designed to
strengthen surveillance, reporting, and case follow-up.
However, in July 2004, Namibia's Cabinet approved a new structure
for DVS, which is designed to strengthen the central competent
authority and allow for closer supervision and decentralization of
services. The Directorate remains under the supervision of a Chief
Veterinary Officer and consists of four divisions: Animal Disease
Control (Animal Health); Veterinary Public Health; Epidemiology,
Import/Export and Training; and Diagnostic Services and Research. Each
of these divisions will be headed by a Deputy Chief Veterinary Officer
who oversees a variety of supporting staff. Recruitment to fill
positions has begun and progress in filling positions had been made as
of January 2006. The effort to fill all positions is ongoing.
Under the new restructuring, Namibia is divided into four regions:
South, North-east, North-west, and Central. With regard to Animal
Health, each of the four regions will have a Chief Veterinarian, who
reports directly to the Deputy Chief Veterinary Officer of the Animal
Health division at headquarters. Each Chief Veterinarian will operate
as a supervisor of a number of State veterinary officers (up to four
each) and be responsible for training, control, monitoring, and guiding
field veterinarians. Six additional field veterinarian posts will be
added in the northern communal areas. In addition, the number of animal
health technician (AHT) posts (agricultural diploma level) will be
increased from 79 to 95, with a plan to phase out Stock Inspection
Assistants over time.
The Veterinary Public Health division will consist of a Chief
Veterinarian, a Control Veterinary Hygiene Inspector, chief hygiene
inspectors, and a Veterinary Public Health Specialist. Chief Hygiene
Inspector positions have been created to enhance supervision on the
slaughter floor of abattoirs. The Epidemiology, Import/Export, and
Training Division will also have a Chief Veterinarian, who will assist
the Deputy with administrative issues, a veterinary specialist in
epidemiology, and two additional veterinarians. One of these
veterinarians will be responsible for the livestock identification and
tracing system. There will also be a veterinarian in charge of import/
export control, a chief veterinary technician, and additional
technicians. There will also be 20 posts for veterinary officials who
will be stationed at the main entry points. These posts have been
approved and DVS hopes to fill them soon. The veterinary port officials
will oversee compliance with import requirements and notification of
arrival of animals and animal products.
The results of our evaluation indicate that animal health officials
in Namibia have the legal authority to enforce Federal and State
regulations pertaining to FMD and the necessary veterinary
infrastructure to carry out FMD surveillance and control activities.
Disease History and Surveillance
The last outbreak of FMD in the surveillance and free zones (i.e.,
the region under consideration for FMD-free status) was in 1965. In the
buffer zone, the last FMD outbreak occurred in 1992. However, in the
infected zone, an FMD outbreak occurred on August 18, 2002. In this
outbreak, six cattle were found to have FMD lesions that were South
African type (SAT) positive. DVS controlled the outbreak through
movement control and vaccination, vaccinating all animals in the
immediate vicinity of the outbreak twice and all animals in the
remainder of the infected zone once. After 6 months of not detecting
another FMD-infected animal, the outbreak was declared over on March
31, 2003.
Active Surveillance
Most of Namibia's active surveillance occurs through inspections.
In the surveillance zone, DVS inspects for FMD every 3 months, while
inspections in the area north of the VCF occur biannually. In the free
zone, inspections occur on an annual basis. During the inspections, the
veterinarians and AHTs conduct census and disease reporting activities.
Farmers in the free zone receive 1-month's notice and are required to
present at least 80 percent of their stock for inspection. If a farmer
does not comply, movement and marketing restrictions are put into
place. Surveillance data are also collected from inspections required
for movement permits, auctions, and upon arrival at abattoirs. During
an inspection, a DVS official walks through a herd of animals rather
than conducting individual exams for each animal. However, inspectors
will individually check sick or injured animals and will take lick and
feed samples from the animals.
For each premises, inspectors complete a farm visit form that
includes animal health information such as vaccinations used, parasite
treatment, mortality, diseases in stock and game, lick supplement
status, and farm name, number, and district. The inspection team did
note that brand marks were not included on the form; DVS stated the
next reprint of forms will include a space for this information. Until
that time, animal health technicians have to check for brand marks as
part of the inspection protocol. If animals on a farm are not properly
branded in accordance with the Stock Brands Act, the farm is closed.
DVS also visits premises for reasons other than the scheduled
inspections. For example, because there are so few private
veterinarians in most areas of Namibia, DVS frequently responds to any
disease or sickness reports for livestock.
As for wild game, no FMD serological surveys have been conducted in
the free zone. However, in 1996, DVS conducted serological surveys of
sable antelopes and free-roaming buffalo in the buffer zone. The herd
of buffalo tested negative for antibodies to SAT 1, SAT 2, and SAT 3
both in 1996 and when retested in 2002. Any captured wild game are
certified clinically free of disease before movement. The Department of
Natural Resources within the Ministry of Environment and Tourism is the
responsible body for managing game capture and movement. The site visit
team visited the Etosha game park, which is north of the VCF, and found
a minimal risk for FMD introduction based on the observation of double
fences separating wild game from domestic livestock, the lack of Cape
Buffalo species, and the low likelihood of visitors with FMD-
susceptible animals or animal products.
Passive Surveillance
FMD surveillance in the buffer and free zones is typically
accomplished through more passive surveillance means because of the
inaccessibility of diagnostic services in remote locations. DVS and the
Meat Board of Namibia have an extensive outreach education program for
livestock owners that includes placing pamphlets and posters in
community centers, churches, and gathering places. Radio announcements
and weekly programs are widely used to disseminate information,
especially in areas that are not accessible via telephone, Internet, or
television. Veterinarians and AHTs also interact
[[Page 34540]]
with farmers on a regular basis. In the northern communal area, CAHWs
and pharmaceutical retailers participate in 1 to 2 week training
sessions endorsed by DVS to learn to detect suspicious signs of foreign
animal diseases and have a mandatory responsibility to notify DVS of
any suspicion of FMD.
Diagnostic Capabilities
The Central Veterinary Laboratory (CVL) is an accredited
biosecurity level 2 laboratory located in Windhoek. The CVL is not
structured to test for all diseases listed by OIE (Office International
des Epizooties, or World Organization for Animal Health), but does
perform residue testing of meat destined for export and tests for
vesicular diseases including bovine viral disease, infectious bovine
rhinotracheitis, bluetongue, and orf. Although the CVL may acquire a
diagnostic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for antibody detection
of FMD, FMD testing occurs either at the Botswana Vaccine Institute,
which is an OIE reference laboratory for FMD, or the Onderstepoort
Veterinary Institute in the Republic of South Africa. The site team
visited the latter facility and determined that the Institute was an
adequate testing facility that had facilities designated for FMD
vaccine production and exotic disease diagnosis. The tests used for FMD
at the Institute meet OIE guidelines and the laboratory's records
showed that three diagnostic investigations were submitted from Namibia
between 2000 and 2003 to rule out FMD.
Given the information above, Namibia appears to have adequate
disease control authority, programs, and animal health management to
diagnose FMD.
Vaccination Status
The vaccination status in Namibia varies throughout the country.
FMD vaccinations are not performed on any animal in either the
surveillance or free zones, and only cattle are vaccinated in the
infected zone and in certain areas of the buffer zone. The remaining
unvaccinated cattle in the buffer zone serve as sentinels of FMD. FMD
symptoms in these areas would likely be reported due to community
education by DVS, the cultural importance of livestock health, and the
frequent interactions of AHTs and CAHWs with local producers. Small
stock are not vaccinated for FMD anywhere in Namibia.
In the buffer zone, which is FMD free with vaccination, vaccination
coverage is 80 percent. FMD vaccinations are free and administered by
DVS personnel. Only cattle in the Kavango, the area proximate to the
infected area, and the north central area, a strip of land
approximately 50 kilometers wide adjacent to Angola, are vaccinated
annually. These cattle are vaccinated with an oil adjuvant bivalent
(SAT 1 and SAT 2) FMD vaccine combined with a CBPP vaccine. In the
infected zone, cattle in the eastern portion of Caprivi are vaccinated
twice a year with a trivalent SAT 1, 2, and 3 vaccine, while the cattle
in the western portion of Caprivi are vaccinated only once a year.
Before vaccination, serological tests for FMD are not performed, which
may result in the vaccination masking any FMD already present in the
animals. However, due to the open range herd management style of the
buffer zone, the vaccinated cattle are exposed to unvaccinated cattle
that would likely serve as sentinels should the virus become present.
Any cattle entering Namibia from Angola are vaccinated at the
border post of entry and branded with an ``A'' for identification. The
cattle are also branded with an arrow that tells DVS officials the year
in which the cattle were vaccinated. These cattle are prohibited from
moving south of the VCF.
Vaccinations performed by DVS are recorded and maintained by State
veterinary personnel for each herd owner. In order to facilitate
vaccinations, DVS administers vaccinations at specific gathering places
so that communal owners from the vicinity can bring their animals to
the site. Vaccinated cattle are identified with an arrow brand, which
indicates the year of vaccination. At the time of vaccination, the herd
owner must present a stock card identifying the animals' vaccinations,
census, and movements, which is then updated to reflect the most recent
vaccination. These stock cards, which are maintained for both small
stock and cattle, are kept by the owner, who must update the cards any
time a movement, sale, slaughter, vaccination, or other significant
event occurs. If a herd owner does not comply with vaccination
requirements, the infraction is reported to the ``induna'' (chief or
head person of the area) who alerts the water committee to deny water
to the offending herd owner's livestock. Access is denied until the
herd owner contacts the State veterinary office and schedules the
cattle's vaccination.
FMD vaccine for Namibia is produced at the Botswana Vaccine
Institute or the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, both of which are
discussed in more detail under the ``Diagnostic Capabilities'' section
above. The Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute produces vaccines
containing prevalent FMD serotypes found in Africa, including SAT 1,
SAT 2, and SAT 3. The Institute is also equipped to make autogenous FMD
vaccines upon request. Namibia annually uses about 500,000 doses of
bivalent/trivalent vaccines.
Disease Status of Adjacent Regions
Namibia is bordered to the north by Angola and Zambia, to the east
by Botswana, and to the south and east by the Republic of South Africa.
Zambia's border with Namibia abuts Namibia's infected zone and
therefore is not assessed further in this document. Angola's border
abuts Namibia's buffer zone. Angola experienced an FMD outbreak in 2001
and its veterinary disease control situation is unclear. Although
Angola may represent a risk for FMD introduction into Namibia,
Namibia's veterinary infrastructure and border controls likely would
detect it.
Botswana experienced FMD outbreaks in 2002 and 2003; however, the
southern portion of Botswana, which abuts Namibia's proposed free zone,
is recognized by the OIE and Namibia as FMD-free. The border between
Botswana and Namibia consists of a game- and stock-proof fence.
However, approximately 10 kilometers of the northern part of Botswana
lies adjacent to the surveillance zone of Namibia. This portion of the
surveillance zone, referred to as the ``Gam area,'' is separated by
four fences (double game- and stock-proof fences). Although the
Republic of South Africa has had FMD outbreaks in 2001 and 2003, these
outbreaks have mostly occurred in the eastern portion of the country
that is not near Namibia.
In addition to neighboring countries, the proposed region to be
declared FMD-free is bordered by the buffer zone as described in the
``Background'' section. Information on this zone's FMD status can be
found in the ``Disease History and Surveillance'' section above.
Because Namibia shares borders with and trades with countries that
have experienced recent FMD outbreaks or that are not recognized as
FMD-free by the United States and because FMD exists in some portions
of Namibia, APHIS proposes to add Namibia (excluding the region north
of the VCF) to the list of regions in Sec. 94.11. The regions in Sec.
94.11, although declared free of FMD and rinderpest, supplement their
national meat supply by the importation of fresh (chilled or frozen)
meat of ruminants or swine from regions that are designated in Sec.
94.1(a) to be infected with rinderpest or FMD; or
[[Page 34541]]
have a common land border with regions designated as infected with
rinderpest or FMD; or import ruminants or swine from regions designated
as infected with rinderpest or FMD under conditions less restrictive
than would be acceptable for importation into the United States.
Therefore, all meat of ruminants or swine or other animal products
would have to meet the certification requirements in Sec. 94.11 to be
eligible for importation into the United States. These certification
requirements are explained later in this document under the heading
``Certification Requirements.''
Degree of Separation From Adjacent Regions
Borders With Other Countries
The border between Namibia and the Republic of South Africa
consists of the Kalahari Desert adjacent to the Orange River and a
stock-proof fence. Approximately 10 kilometers of the northern part of
Botswana lies adjacent to the surveillance zone in Namibia and is
separated from Namibia by double game- and stock-proof fences for a
total of four fences. The rest of the border between Botswana and
Namibia consists of a game- and stock-proof fence, which appeared to be
in good shape during the APHIS site visit. However, there was evidence
of warthogs digging under the fence on both sides. Namibia's border
with Angola did not have an adequate fence present between the two
countries. However, a task force is currently in place to reestablish a
fence along this border and Namibia has initiated its 10-year plan to
erect a complete fence on the border with Angola with specific areas
for animal entry. Namibia's long-term goal is to move the VCF to the
Angolan border with the intention that the entire country, except the
infected zone of eastern Caprivi, would be included in the FMD-free
region. DVS feels that disease control in the country is assisted by
the sparse human and animal population coupled with the long distances
between settlements. The nearest part of the infected zone to the free
zone is more than 200 kilometers (124 miles) away.
DVS has a permanent fence team that patrols and repairs damage to
the fences. The teams are in the field for two weeks every month.
Security agents also patrol the border fence and report fence breaches.
In addition, every 6 months there is a joint inspection along the
entire border by Namibian and Batswana officials.
For animals that originate from Angola, there are border entry
points. At these entry points DVS examines the animals and cattle re
vaccinated for CBPP and FMD prior to entry. The cattle are also branded
as originating from Angola. Animals imported from Angola are mainly
used for local slaughter or enter Namibia for seasonal grazing and then
return to Angola. If the cattle are slaughtered in the buffer zone, the
meat must stay in the buffer zone and cannot enter the free zone. In
addition, these cattle cannot cross the VCF into the free zone.
Borders Within Namibia
The surveillance and free zones in Namibia are bounded by natural
and man-made borders. The western coast of Namibia consists of Atlantic
coastline and a very harsh desert that effectively prevents all animal
movement. As discussed above in the ``Background'' section above,
within Namibia the surveillance and free areas are separated from the
buffer and infected zones by the Veterinary Cordon Fence (VCF). This
fence is designed to prohibit cloven-hoofed domestic and wild animals
from moving into the FMD-free zone from the north; this movement
restriction also stops any CBPP spread from north to south Namibia. In
past years, Namibian officials have moved the VCF progressively
northward, leaving old portions of the fence in place to control
movements of animals and animal products in the event of an outbreak
for a total of about 2,200 kilometers of old and current fence. DVS is
aware that APHIS must be notified of any further plans for northward
movement of the fence so that APHIS may reevaluate the region's risk.
Namibia treats the VCF as if it were an international border for
livestock purposes. The only way to pass through the VCF is through
gateposts that have a roadblock at which vehicles are inspected. On
major roads, the gateposts allow traffic movement, but are monitored 24
hours a day by veterinary and police personnel who perform inspections
to ensure that prohibited animals, meat, or meat products are not being
brought into the free zone. The VCF consists of a northern fence, which
is a 17- to 21-wire game-proof fence 2.4 meters in height, and a
southern fence, which is an 8-wire stock-proof fence 1.4 meters in
height. These fences are separated by 10 meters of dead space. The site
visit team observed many kilometers of the fence and found it in good
repair and of adequate structure to stop most animals. The site team
did notice that warthogs could burrow under the fence, but this is
likely not a major concern, as these animals are likely to be localized
to the vicinity of the fence. However, as stated above, the fence is
maintained by full-time repair crews that patrol the fence in search of
damage from animals or humans.
From 2000-2003, DVS recorded a number of breaches to the VCF, which
included cuts made to the fence, cuts made for the movement of stolen
vehicles, and smuggling of animals and animal products. Each of the
cuts reported were repaired by patrol teams. Seven of the breaches
involved individuals attempting to smuggle various animals or animal
products, such as live cattle, goat meat, and cattle hides, through the
fence. In each of these cases, appropriate remedial and enforcement
action was taken.
Namibia is adequately separated from other countries and regions by
maintained game-proof fences, road blocks, and physical barriers such
as deserts and rivers. These boundaries appear to be adequate as long
as DVS maintains active control of border posts and continues
maintenance of the stock- and game-proof fences.
Movement Controls and Biological Security
In order to control cattle movement, an animal identification
system has been put into place to identify and track all cattle in
Namibia from farm to processing. Under the Stock Brands Act of 1995,
each cattle owner has an individual brand mark and must brand all
cattle 6 months of age and older with a registered brand that
identifies the cattle's ownership and location. Livestock owners also
must brand all purchased cattle within 30 days of procurement. Brands
must be legible and are recorded on a movement permit as described
below. Permits are required for various types of cattle movement, and
any movement or sale of cattle requires rebranding and recording the
event on stock cards and in DVS records. Through branding, stock cards,
DVS records, and bar codes assigned to meat from slaughter to
processing, Namibia can trace back animals. Under the current version
of the Stock Brands Act, which was amended on March 29, 2004, and
enacted on April 14, 2004, all small stock on all farms in Namibia must
be identifiable by means of a readable tattoo and/or metal eartag
bearing the registered brand mark of the owner when they reach 3 months
of age or earlier if removed from the farm.
Import Controls
Namibia imports fresh beef, mutton, pork, processed meat, and other
animal products from various countries, including the Republic of South
Africa.
[[Page 34542]]
In order to import animals and animal products into Namibia, a
veterinary import permit and a health certificate are required. The
permits are issued by the Deputy Director of Epidemiology and require
that transport trucks or containers importing animal products and
certain live animals be sealed. Namibia does not import domestic
animals or animal products from FMD-or BSE-affected regions and does
not permit animals vaccinated against FMD or certain products from
these animals to enter the country.
DVS currently has a registry system in place to track all imported
animals from arrival to death and plans to add a component to this
system that would ensure that each animal's cause of death is recorded.
DVS also has plans to identify imported cattle, sheep, goats, and
ostriches with unique identification eartags and brands and to
institute a plan to ensure that imported cattle are tested for BSE
after death. Animals or animal products entering Namibia from Windhoek
International Airport without a permit are either destroyed or returned
to the country of origin. DVS is currently creating a system to record
these entry denials.
Export Controls
Namibia has abattoirs that prepare and export meat and meat
products. These abattoirs are supervised directly by government
veterinary officials who are responsible for export certification.
After arrival at the abattoir, cattle are examined for clinical signs
of illness by veterinary staff. All animals also undergo an antemortem
inspection during which they are specifically checked for signs or
lesions suggestive of FMD and a postmortem inspection during which the
feet and tongues are checked for FMD lesions. DVS receives monthly
condemnation statements and summaries from export slaughter abattoirs.
For more details on the slaughter process for exportable meat and meat
products, see the section entitled ``Livestock Demographics and
Marketing'' below.
Within Namibia
DVS is authorized to control animal movements between farms, from
farm to slaughter, and from farm to auction. If movement controls are
not complied with, farmers' market access may be restricted. The State
police work with DVS to enforce road blocks, control livestock
movement, and, if needed, guard and isolate an infected area after an
outbreak.
In order to control animal movement, DVS requires the use of a
veterinary movement permit when animals are moved between premises.
Copies of these movement permits are kept in the veterinary office at
the region of origin, with the owner, and with the consignment. A
fourth copy is also sent to the veterinary office at the shipment's
destination, which alerts the State veterinarian of the shipment. Each
State veterinary office keeps movement records for each producer and
summary statistics are compiled electronically at DVS headquarters.
Also, any animals moved from the surveillance zone must have a ``red
cross'' movement permit in addition to a 3-week quarantine at the
destination farm. A red cross permit is a movement permit with a large
red watermark to distinguish it from a regular movement permit. These
permits are used when DVS needs to alert officials of certain
conditions existing in the permit, such as quarantine at the
destination farm or a sealed vehicle requirement for transportation.
Animals in Namibia can be moved via livehaul conveyances, which are
allowed free movement through the VCF gateposts and have no requirement
for cleaning or disinfection prior to entry south of the VCF or into
quarantine camps. This lack of requirements generally does not pose a
risk much of the year because steel truck beds and the extremely hot
and dry climate would likely eliminate the FMD virus. However, in the
rainy season or in the presence of manure, the trucks could become a
mechanical vector for FMD. The site visit team expressed its concern
about this possibility, and in November 2004, DVS introduced a system
for disinfecting trucks used for the transport of cattle into and out
of quarantine camps in the areas north of the VCF. In areas south of
the VCF, a system of registration of livestock transports has been
introduced. Trucks transporting livestock to export abattoirs must be
cleaned and disinfected before animals are loaded.
Given this information, APHIS did not identify any significant risk
pathways to consider Namibian animals or animal products as a likely
source for introducing FMD into the United States.
Movement Across Borders
Borders With Other Countries
Animals moving into Namibia are primarily imported from the
Republic of South Africa; most of the imported cloven-hoofed game
originates from the portion of the Republic of South Africa identified
by the OIE as FMD-free. Namibia and the Republic of South Africa
originally had a bilateral agreement allowing the importation of
animals into Namibia under a Master Import Permit system, which
resulted in DVS having incomplete records of animal and animal products
movement from the Republic of South Africa during this time. However,
this system was abandoned after the FMD outbreak in the Republic of
South Africa in 2000 and all cloven-hoofed animals and their products
being imported into Namibia were required to have import permits. After
the outbreak was controlled, permits for low-risk products, such as
dairy products and processed/cooked meats, were waived. Since the APHIS
site team visit, DVS has finalized the system for issuing import
permits for animals and animal products from the Republic of South
Africa.
Currently, for meat originating from the Republic of South Africa,
officials may ask for a certificate verifying that the meat is entering
the country in accordance with the agreement between Namibia and the
Republic of South Africa. This agreement provides that the requirement
for a permit varies with the amount of meat being imported. For
example, shipments of meat less than 25 kilograms are allowed without a
permit or health certificate if it is for home consumption, while
shipments over 500 kilograms must have both an import permit and a
health certificate.
Animals from Angola primarily are brought into Namibia for
slaughter, seasonal grazing, or breeding. Namibia's border with Angola
has three entry points for individuals importing animals into Namibia:
Oshikango, Ruacana, and Mahenene. At these points, DVS examines and
vaccinates the cattle for CBPP and FMD before entry. After vaccination,
the cattle from Angola are hot branded with an ``A'' and an arrow that
indicates the year of the animal's vaccination. Although animals
imported from Angola are not quarantined, they remain in the buffer
zone and are not permitted to cross into the free zone; they can be
returned to Angola and later reenter Namibia. If cattle are slaughtered
in the buffer zone, the meat must remain in that zone.
Small stock animals are not identified as originating from Angola
and can easily mix with local animals and potentially move from the
buffer zone to the areas south of the VCF. However, small stock from
the buffer zone not going directly to slaughter would have to undergo
two 3-week quarantines, one in the buffer zone and one at their
destination, before entering the market in the free zone. In addition,
with the placement of sentinels at quarantine stations, APHIS considers
that any FMD concerns regarding Angolan small stock animals that may be
sent south of the
[[Page 34543]]
VCF would be addressed. Also, as described in ``Movement Controls,''
Namibia requires identification for small stock, which will further
mitigate the risk of infected small stock from Angola being moved south
of the VCF.
For imports from other countries, Namibia requires a permit for all
animals and animal products. Namibia does not allow the importation of
animals or animal products from regions under FMD restriction and
cattle vaccinated against FMD are not imported. All imported cattle are
permanently branded and not accepted for slaughter at export slaughter
facilities. Cattle may be imported under a veterinary permit. At the
time of the site visit, the only recent imports of live sheep, goats,
and pigs into the free zone were from the area of Botswana that Namibia
considers to be FMD-free. These animals once belonged to Namibians who
were residing in Botswana before Namibia obtained independence and
before the country required import permits and veterinary health
certificates. There is also an import permit for game animals from
Botswana.
The site visit team also observed a vehicle inspection at the
Oshivello gatepost, which is staffed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. At
Oshivello, individuals carrying meat products must cook it or dispose
of it before entering Namibia. The gatepost personnel keep logbooks of
contraband seizures and livestock movement.
One land border post, the Transkalahari Customs post in Buitepos on
the border of Botswana, was visited by the site team. The officials
were aware and knowledgable of DVS requirements for animals and animal
products entering Namibia. Permits and health certificates must be
presented to officials for meat. Goods are declared voluntarily, but
vehicles and luggage are searched if they are suspected of carrying
contraband. Also, livestock and animal product conveyances are
inspected and drivers are required to show movement permits.
Game prizes and trophies must have an import permit. Customs
officials stated that meat is confiscated, on average, about once a
month and destroyed at a burn pit adjacent to the facility. For live
animals, customs officials check the import permit, ensure that the
vehicle seals are intact, and attempt to ensure that the animals meet
the condition on the permit, although this inspection can be difficult
as the animals are in the sealed vehicles. Customs officials are
permitted to contact DVS to offload animals, but more often they unload
the animals themselves and then replace the DVS seal with a Customs
seal, if necessary.
The site team also visited the Windhoek International Airport,
which has incoming flights from Frankfurt, Munich, Capetown, Angola,
Johannesburg, and Botswana. While there, they interviewed a Customs
official who was not familiar with the duties of Namibian Customs.
Although the official was aware that certain plant products must be
confiscated, he lacked knowledge of animal products that should be
confiscated or not allowed entry. In addition, the airport did not have
signs displaying warning or guidance on animal products that were
permitted or prohibited to enter Namibia. There were also no checks on
the garbage offloaded from planes. Due to the disparity of knowledge
between customs officers, DVS became involved in the training of
customs officials on the requirements for the importation of animals
and animal products. In addition, to further enhance the awareness of
the import of animals and animal products, DVS advised State
veterinarians, among other personnel, that attention should be given to
departure airstrips from places such as lodges to ensure that people
who are departing the area are acquainted with the danger and
restrictions of transporting animal and animal products to the FMD-free
zone. In addition, DVS received approval to establish 20 posts that
will be staffed by veterinary port officials. These posts would be at
main entry points. These veterinary port officials will oversee
compliance with import requirements and notification of arrival of
animals and products. Also, upon verification by DVS, the site visit
team found that at the international airport in Windhoek, waste is
either burned or dumped in a general dump at the airport complex.
Private contractors are responsible for disposing of waste from planes,
buses, and trains in Windhoek.
Finally, as for sea ports, the site visit team inspected Walvis Bay
on the Atlantic Ocean. Customs currently evaluates imports using a
guideline called ``Consolidated List of Prohibited and Restricted
Imports,'' which was originally created by Republic of South Africa
officials, but hopes to have Namibian-specific guidelines in place
soon. Namibian-specific guidelines have been developed and stakeholders
are being provided the opportunity to comment prior to their
implementation. Customs officials here check the waybills and manifests
to ensure that the shipment matches information provided by the
documents and to identify which ministry is responsible for the
commodity's permit. Customs will also notify State veterinarian offices
of any shipments that must be examined and will check before the
shipment leaves the office that the State veterinarian has released the
item. The port also processes skins received from north of the VCF in
sealed containers, which the State veterinarian checks for intact seals
and completed paperwork. Passenger ships mainly arrive from November to
April; luggage is spot checked for animal and plant materials.
International garbage entering Namibia is collected for disposal at
various ports, including the Walvis Bay office described above. At
Walvis Bay, a private company is contracted to collect the garbage and
remove it to municipal dumps. It was not clear how or whether garbage
was treated prior to disposal. The site visit team received conflicting
reports about the handling of international food garbage and
uncertainty existed about whether garbage was taken directly to the
dump or if it was diverted to a pig farmer. As a result, the site team
asked for a clarification of how international garbage is handled at
Walvis Bay because of concerns that FMD could be introduced into the
food chain in Namibia by animals scavenging unmonitored garbage dumps.
DVS stated that international garbage disposal and removal is completed
by an independent contractor who dumps the refuse in the municipal dump
and then covers it with soil, which DVS and the Ministry of Health
monitor.
Due to the information above, a risk of animal disease incursion
may exist in Namibia due to a lack of consistency at points of entry
into Namibia regarding the entry of animal products. However, in 2003
DVS issued a letter to the Director of Customs and Excise regarding
animal and animal product control at international points of entry. DVS
advised Customs officials of disparities on how animal products are
handled and that a DVS official has been appointed to visit various
entry points, evaluate control measures, and discuss relevant issues
with all authorities to ensure compliance with Namibia's veterinary
import requirements. DVS will also have the State veterinary staff
visit entry points in their designated districts and become involved in
the training of Customs officials. Also, as a result of the new
structure for DVS, 20 veterinary port officials will be stationed at
main entry points to enhance oversight of compliance with the
importation requirements for animals and animal products.
[[Page 34544]]
Borders Between Zones Within Namibia
As discussed above in the ``Background'' section, we are proposing
to declare a certain region of Namibia, the area south of the VCF, as
FMD-free. Cloven-hoofed animals moving from the infected zone to the
buffer zone must undergo serological tests for FMD, test negative for
the disease, and be quarantined for 3 weeks before entering the buffer
zone. Police checkpoints exist throughout Namibia to check permits and
papers, including those of livestock trucks, to ensure validity.
For animals moving from the buffer zone into the free zone, various
requirements are in place to prevent the spread of FMD south of the
VCF. Live cattle are not permitted to be moved from the buffer zone to
the free zone; game animals are permitted to move only after a 21-day
quarantine. Cattle that are slaughtered in the buffer zone are
inspected both ante- and post-mortem for FMD lesions. Beef from these
animals is matured 24 hours and the pH must be below 6.0; the beef is
then hard frozen. Carcasses are deboned and the lymphatics are removed.
Meat must be produced at an approved abattoir and remain at the
facility for 3 weeks in case of an undetected outbreak in the
production area, especially in northern Namibia where no fences exist
between Namibia and Angola. Meat products are then moved in sealed
vehicles from the buffer zone to the free zone for local consumption or
to the Republic of South Africa under permit. Beef sent to the free
zone may be further processed, but each box of meat must have bar code
identification so that traceback to the slaughterhouse and herd of
origin can occur.
More than 3,000 small stock, such as sheep and goats, were moved
from the buffer zone to the free zone each year from 2000 to 2002. As
of June 2003, 1,178 animals had been moved. Small stock animals
originate from areas where cattle are not vaccinated for FMD and are
quarantined in one of four quarantine stations in the buffer zone for 3
weeks and then examined for signs of FMD. The site visit team visited
one of these quarantine stations and found there was adequate isolation
for the animals. Upon entry and exit of the station, the animals'
mouths are inspected for signs of vesicular disease and observed for
other FMD symptoms. However, the station contained much large, brushy
vegetation, which may make the observation of mild FMD symptoms more
difficult as such signs could be attributed to damage caused by the
vegetation or missed. Small stock animals are not vaccinated or tested
for FMD prior to movement, which may create a risk in moving an FMD-
positive animal into the free zone. However, in December 2003, DVS
began using sentinel cattle during quarantine of small stock. Small
stock are penned with seronegative cattle that are retested after 21
days. Small stock are only released when test results are negative.
Small stock that have completed the minimum 21-day quarantine and that
are not destined for immediate slaughter are not released for an
additional 90 days. The animals may be held at official quarantine
facilities or at approved facilities at the farm of destination for the
remainder of the quarantine period.
At the farm of destination, a State veterinarian inspects the
isolation facilities for the quarantined animals and then breaks the
transport seals. For animals being quarantined on the farm of
destination, quarantine must take place in a double-fenced quarantine
facility or the entire farm is quarantined with the small stock
restricted to an inside enclosure. Transport vehicles are cleaned and
disinfected at the VCF and after unloading.
Game animal products, such as elephant ears and hides, buffalo
skulls and horns, hyena skins, and lion capes, are allowed to move
south of the VCF under certain conditions. Untreated hides from
quarantine abattoirs in Oshakati (buffer zone) and Katima Mulili
(infected zone) can be moved into the free zone. However, untreated
hides from any other locations must be dried and quarantined under
veterinary supervision for 3 months before moving south of the VCF. In
order to be transported into the VCF, hides must be accompanied by a
permit and a red cross permit, travel in a sealed truck, and be packed
in airtight containers sealed under veterinary supervision. After
loading, untreated hides must proceed immediately to an approved
tannery for supervised unloading and a State veterinary officer must be
notified of their arrival. At the tannery, the seals are broken by the
State veterinarian, who must ensure that the hides enter the tanning
process, which deactivates any FMD. Treated hides must also be
accompanied by movement and red cross permits and must be treated
through a 3 month quarantine or a sodium carbonate treatment with a 1
month quarantine. Treated hides and skins from Angola may only be taken
to approved tanneries in Okapuka (free zone) or Nakara, but treated
products from Namibia may move anywhere in the country after crossing
into the free zone.
The site team visited one of the quarantine facilities, the
Bergvlug farm, as a representative quarantine facility. The quarantine
manager lives just outside the facility's gate with his family,
allowing for close supervision of the facility. Animals entering the
facility are recorded by permit number, date of arrival, owner address,
species, number of animals, period of quarantine, tariff, amount, and
country of origin. Electric fences surround areas that hold small stock
to prevent predator entry. The premises also has a laboratory for
research animals and postmortem exams, an incinerator, and cleaning and
disinfection equipment.
Officials in Namibia have the authority, procedures, and
infrastructure to enforce effectively the system of permits,
inspection, quarantines, and treatments that the country has in place
to control animals and animal products. APHIS did not identify any
specific limitations in the system that might pose an FMD risk to the
United States.
Livestock Demographics and Marketing Practices
DVS conducts an annual census of all livestock in Namibia. The
numbers of FMD-susceptible livestock in 2004 are listed in table 1.
Table 1.--FMD-Susceptible Livestock, 2004
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of livestock Number
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cattle..................................................... 2,349,700
Sheep...................................................... 2,619,363
Goats...................................................... 1,997,172
Swine...................................................... 52,624
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Namibian Government.
In Northern Namibia, cattle farming is predominant, while in
southern Namibia sheep farming is more common. In the free zone,
livestock are maintained on privately owned farms except for a communal
range area in the western part of the Omaruru State Veterinary
district. In the buffer zone, livestock graze on communal land.
Communal farming is largely used for sustenance.
Swine production in commercial facilities in Namibia is small
because feed must be imported from the Republic of South Africa. Due to
the presence of African swine fever in Namibia, these facilities must
be double fenced to decrease contact with warthogs that may be infected
with that disease. These facilities are inspected annually by an animal
health inspector. Namibian law prohibits feeding swine-origin material
to swine and commercial
[[Page 34545]]
facilities do not feed swill to pigs. A small number of people purchase
fattening pigs for Christmas for their own consumption. Although these
individuals do not have to double fence their fattening pigs, they must
slaughter the pigs by a certain date and obtain a permit to move the
pigs to their premises. Wild game animals are prevalent in all regions
of Namibia and are believed to be free of FMD as discussed in the
``Disease History and Surveillance'' section above.
The site visit team observed two farms in Namibia: A cattle/game
farm and a sheep/game farm. At the cattle/game farm, the owner
maintained monthly records on the number of deaths, births, and animals
sent to slaughter as well as a head count. This farm had approximately
1,600 head of cattle. The farm owner receives educational material on
FMD from the farmers association and knew the procedure for contacting
the State veterinarian and animal health inspectors. As for movement
permits, the owner knew to request movement permits for cattle. The
farm also holds game hunts in which trophies may be taken and the meat,
which is dressed outside of the pasture area, is made into biltong for
farm workers, family, and guests. All game for this farm is purchased
from an area south of the VCF and any movement of these animals
requires capture and movement permits, which are overseen by the Nature
Conservancy. The game on this farm was not restocked and the population
is controlled with hunting and sicknesses, such as plant poisoning.
On the sheep/game farm, the owner had 1,500 Dorper sheep including
lambs that are kept in fields year round. Lambs are kept for up to 5
months before being sent to slaughter. The game at this farm included
springbuck, oryx, and blue wildebeest. The farm's owner works closely
with the Nature Conservancy with regard to the movement of animals,
game censuses, culling, and night culling, which the farm uses to
depopulate springbuck. Game animals are slaughtered at a mobile
facility outside the pasture area where the head, legs, and intestines
are removed from each animal. The animal is then stored and shipped in
a cooling truck to an abattoir, where the hide is removed and the
carcasses are prepared. The owner at this facility also kept detailed
records of animal movement permits and all animal deaths of which he
was aware; however, he usually finds only skeletal remains. The owner
performs autopsies on any animal that dies on his premises.
Livestock in Namibia can be sold at livestock auctions. Larger
auction facilities are registered with the Animal Health Department. If
an auction involves selling animals from more than one source, DVS will
attend the auction, inspect the animals, issue movement permits, and
collects permits, checking them for endorsements, brand marks, and
animals in corrals. If any game animals are present at the auction, the
Nature Conservancy must be present to oversee any sales. Auctions in
the communal area can take place anywhere in the area as long as DVS is
notified ahead of time to be present to inspect animal transactions and
issue permits for animal movement. In addition, animal owners must
present their stock card to DVS so DVS can record the ownership change
and movement. DVS is not present for animal sales from personal
property, but most buyers will travel to the State office to obtain a
movement permit for the purchased animal.
Some slaughterhouses in Namibia have feedlots, which are areas in
which cattle can be held before they enter a slaughter line. These
feedlots help ensure a steady slaughter line of animals. The APHIS team
visited the Okapuka feedlot, which is owned by a Meatco abattoir. The
feedlot purchases cattle ranging from 8 to 12 months of age from
farmers, communal areas through permittees, and auctions all of which
are located south of the VCF. The cattle generally remain on the
premises for 3 months with each feedlot operating on an all-in, all-out
policy. Upon arriving at the feedlot, all cattle are branded,
eartagged, dipped, dewormed, and vaccinated for anthrax, several
clostridial diseases, pasteurella, and infectious bovine
rhinotracheitis. The cattle are also checked every day for signs of
sickness; sick cattle are removed from the herd. Fifteen to twenty
percent of the cattle at the lot are female. Cattle are pen fed on a
mixed-ration diet that is completely vegetarian with no fish, poultry,
or mammalian byproducts. The feedlot maintains records of arrival,
departure, disease diagnosis, and death of each cattle.
The site visit team also observed two abattoirs: The Farmer's Meat
Packers and Meatco. Both of these facilities operate under the Hazard
Analysis Critical Control Point System. The Farmer's Meat Packers
facility slaughters goats, lamb, sheep, and small game with a maximum
capacity of 1,500 sheep, 400 game animals, and 250 deboning of lamb and
game animals per day. The facility slaughters approximately 1,200 sheep
per day and only receives animals from farms that DVS annually
inspects.
All livestock an