States Approved To Receive Stallions and Mares From CEM-Affected Regions; Indiana, 24806-24808 [06-3985]
Download as PDF
24806
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the testing laboratory as ‘‘M. bovis
positive’’ on the BTB test,’’.
I f. In the definition for suspect, by
removing the words ‘‘, or that is
classified by the testing laboratory as
equivocal on the BTB test,’’.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 77.20
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Official tuberculosis test. Any of the
following tests for bovine tuberculosis
in captive cervids, applied and reported
in accordance with this part:
(1) The single cervical tuberculin
(SCT) test.
(2) The comparative cervical
tuberculin test (CCT) test.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 77.33
[Amended]
3. Section 77.33 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
by removing the words ‘‘in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a)(2)’’ and adding the words
‘‘in paragraph (a)(1)’’ in their place.
I b. By removing and reserving
paragraphs (a)(2), (b)(2), (d)(2), and
(e)(3).
I
§ 77.34
[Amended]
4. Section 77.34 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing the
words ‘‘either the CCT test or the BTB
test’’ and adding the words ‘‘the CCT
test’’ in their place.
I b. By removing paragraph (c).
I 5. Section 77.35 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (a)(1), by removing the
word ‘‘three’’ in the first sentence and
adding the word ‘‘two’’ in its place.
I b. By revising paragraph (d) to read as
set forth below.
I
§ 77.35 Interstate movement from
accredited herds.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Maintenance of accredited herd
status. To maintain status as an
accredited herd, the herd must test
negative to an official tuberculosis test
within 33–39 months from the
anniversary date of the second
consecutive test with no evidence of
tuberculosis disclosed (that is, the test
on which the herd was recognized as
accredited or the accrediting test). Each
time the herd is tested for
reaccreditation, it must be tested 33–39
months from the anniversary date of the
accrediting test, not from the last date of
reaccreditation (for example, if a herd is
accredited on January 1 of a given year,
the anniversary date will be January 1
of every third year). Accredited herd
status is valid for 36 months (1,095
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:39 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
days) from the anniversary date of the
accrediting test. If the herd is tested
between 36 and 39 months after the
anniversary date, its accredited herd
status will be suspended for the interim
between the anniversary date and the
reaccreditation test. During the
suspension period, the herd will be
considered ‘‘unclassified’’ and captive
cervids may be moved interstate from
the herd only in accordance with the
movement requirements for the State or
zone in which the herd is located.
§ 77.37
[Amended]
6. In § 77.37, paragraph (a)(2), footnote
3 is redesignated as footnote 2.
I
7. In § 77.39, paragraph (a) is amended
as follows:
I a. In paragraph (a)(1)(i) introductory
text, by removing the words ‘‘or the BTB
test’’.
I b. By removing and reserving
paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B).
I c. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii) introductory
text, by removing the words ‘‘or the first
BTB test’’.
I d. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(A), by
removing the word ‘‘; or’’ and adding a
period in its place.
I e. By removing and reserving
paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B).
I f. In paragraph (e) introductory text,
by removing the fourth sentence after
the paragraph heading and revising the
last two sentences of the paragraph to
read as set forth below.
I
§ 77.39
Other interstate movements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Herds that have received captive
cervids from an affected herd. * * *
Any exposed captive cervid that
responds to the SCT test must be
classified as a reactor and must be
slaughter inspected or necropsied. Any
exposed captive cervid that tests
negative to the SCT test will be
considered as part of the affected herd
of origin for purposes of testing,
quarantine, and the five annual whole
herd tests required for affected herds in
paragraph (d) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of
April 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3984 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0020]
States Approved To Receive Stallions
and Mares From CEM-Affected
Regions; Indiana
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are amending the animal
importation regulations by adding
Indiana to the lists of States approved to
receive certain stallions and mares
imported into the United States from
regions affected with contagious equine
metritis (CEM). We are taking this action
because Indiana has entered into an
agreement with the Administrator of the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service to enforce its State laws and
regulations to control CEM and to
require inspection, treatment, and
testing of horses, as required by Federal
regulations, to further ensure the horses’
freedom from CEM. This action relieves
unnecessary restrictions on the
importation of mares and stallions from
regions where CEM exists.
DATES: This rule will be effective on
June 26, 2006, unless we receive written
adverse comments or written notice of
intent to submit adverse comments on
or before May 30, 2006. If we receive
written adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse
comments, we will publish a document
in the Federal Register withdrawing
this rule before the effective date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and, in the
lower ‘‘Search Regulations and Federal
Actions’’ box, select ‘‘Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service’’ from the
agency drop-down menu, then click on
‘‘Submit.’’ In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS–2006–0020 to submit or
view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically. Information on
using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the
docket after the close of the comment
period, is available through the site’s
‘‘User Tips’’ link.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
comment (an original and three copies)
to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0020,
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0020.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Freeda E. Isaac, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Center for Import
and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River
Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 734–8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The animal importation regulations in
9 CFR part 93 (referred to below as the
regulations), among other things,
prohibit or restrict the importation of
certain animals, including horses, into
the United States to protect U.S.
livestock from communicable diseases.
In § 93.301, paragraph (c)(1) prohibits
the importation of horses into the
United States from certain regions
where contagious equine metritis (CEM)
exists. Paragraph (c)(2) lists categories of
horses that are excepted from this
prohibition, including, in
§ 93.301(c)(2)(vi), horses over 731 days
of age imported for permanent entry if
the horses meet the requirements of
§ 93.301(e).
One of the requirements in § 93.301(e)
is that mares and stallions over 731 days
old imported for permanent entry from
regions where CEM exists must be
consigned to States listed in
§ 93.301(h)(6), for stallions, or in
§ 93.301(h)(7), for mares. The
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has
approved these States to receive
stallions or mares over 731 days of age
from regions where CEM exists because
each State has entered into a written
agreement with the Administrator to
enforce State laws and regulations to
control CEM, and each State has agreed
to quarantine, test, and treat stallions
and mares over 731 days of age from any
region where CEM exists in accordance
with § 93.301(e).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:39 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
Indiana has entered into a written
agreement with the Administrator of
APHIS and has agreed to comply with
all of the requirements in § 93.301(e) for
importing stallions and mares over 731
days old from regions where CEM
exists. Therefore, this direct final rule
will add Indiana to the lists of States in
§ 93.301(h)(6) and (h)(7) approved to
receive certain stallions and mares
imported into the United States from
regions where CEM exists.
Dates
We are publishing this rule without a
prior proposal because we view this
action as noncontroversial and
anticipate no adverse public comments.
This rule will be effective, as published
in this document, on June 26, 2006,
unless we receive written adverse
comments or written notice of intent to
submit adverse comments by May 30,
2006.
Adverse comments are comments that
suggest the rule should not be adopted
or that suggest the rule should be
changed.
If we receive written adverse
comments or written notice of intent to
submit adverse comments, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register withdrawing this rule before
the effective date. We will then publish
a proposed rule for public comment.
As discussed above, if we receive no
written adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse
comments within 30 days of publication
of this direct final rule, this direct final
rule will become effective 60 days
following its publication. We will
publish a document in the Federal
Register before the effective date of this
direct final rule, confirming that it is
effective on the date indicated in this
document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. For this action,
the Office of Management and Budget
has waived its review under Executive
Order 12866.
We are amending the animal
importation regulations by adding
Indiana to the lists of States approved to
receive certain stallions and mares
imported into the United States from
regions affected with CEM. We are
taking this action because Indiana has
entered into an agreement with the
Administrator of APHIS to enforce its
State laws and regulations to control
CEM and to require inspection,
treatment, and testing of horses, as
required by Federal regulations, to
further ensure the horses’ freedom from
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24807
CEM. This action relieves unnecessary
restrictions on the importation of mares
and stallions from regions where CEM
exists.
The United States imported a total of
41,065 horses in 2004. Nearly 82
percent of horses imported were from
Canada (76 percent) and Mexico (6
percent). Of the total imports, 35,372
were from non-CEM countries and the
remaining 5,693 were from CEM
countries. The proportion of pure-bred
horses was much smaller than other
horses. Of the above total, 2,297 were
purebred breeding horses. Only 265
purebred breeding horses were imported
from CEM-affected countries. However,
horses supplied by CEM-affected
countries are generally highly valued. In
2004, for example, the average value of
a purebred breeding horse imported
from a CEM-affected region was
$42,600, whereas the average value of a
purebred breeding horse imported from
non-CEM countries was $4,720.
The rule will allow Indiana horse
operations to import stallions and mares
directly from CEM-affected regions,
whereas at present they must be
imported and undergo post-entry testing
and treatment in another, currently
approved State. There are now 21 States
approved to receive stallions and mares
from CEM-affected regions. Thus,
Indiana would join those 21 States as a
potential destination for purebred
breeding horses imported from CEMaffected regions. This rule would affect
operations raising horses and other
equines (North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code
112920) and operations owning
racehorses (NAICS code 711219). The
main effect would be on those entities
importing horses from CEM-affected
regions. It is not known how many such
firms there may be, but it is reasonable
to assume that at least some of them
may be small entities. The Small
Business Administration classifies
operations engaged in raising horses and
other equines as small entities if their
annual receipts are not more than
$750,000. Operations owning race
horses are considered small if annual
gross receipts are less than $6.5 million.
According to the 2002 Census of
Agriculture, there were 14,500 horse
farms in Indiana that year, 3,492 of
which sold 12,397 horses that had a
total value of $34 million. About 5
percent are owners of racehorses. These
data imply an average income per farm
from horse sales of about $2,750. Over
99 percent of operations raising horses
and owning racehorses are considered
to be small. Entities that may be affected
by the rule are principally small
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
24808
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 81 / Thursday, April 27, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
businesses, but the impact will not be
significant.
This rule is expected to benefit small
and large horse entities in Indiana
through trade opportunities already
provided to States currently approved to
receive horses from CEM-affected
regions. Horses from CEM-affected
regions will be allowed to be moved
directly into Indiana, thereby benefitting
Indiana importers through lower
transport costs and reduced paperwork
burdens. Mainly, breeding horse
importers in Indiana would benefit from
this rule. Because the pool of imported
horses is a very small fraction of the
domestic total and Indiana importers are
expected to compete with importers in
21 other States, any net beneficial
impact would be very small, especially
when compared to the value of the
imported horses.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I Accordingly, 9 CFR part 93 is
amended as follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMALS, BIRDS, AND POULTRY,
AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND
POULTRY PRODUCTS;
REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
CONTAINERS
1. The authority citation for part 93
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:39 Apr 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
§ 93.301
[Amended]
2. Section 93.301 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (h)(6), by adding, in
alphabetical order, ‘‘The State of
Indiana’’.
I b. In paragraph (h)(7), by adding, in
alphabetical order, ‘‘The State of
Indiana’’.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of
April 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3985 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM316, Special Conditions No.
25–315–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A380–800 Airplane; Discrete Gust
Requirements
confusion, a new Special Condition No.,
25–315–SC, has been assigned to
‘‘Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A380–800 Airplane, Discrete Gust
Requirements.’’
Since no other part of the regulatory
information has been changed, the
Special Conditions are not being
republished.
Correction
In Final Special Conditions document
[FR Doc. 06–598, Filed 1–23–06; 8:45]
and published on January 24, 2006 (71
FR 3753), make the following
correction:
1. On page 3753, in the first column
in the Headings section, correct
‘‘Special Conditions No. 25–312–SC’’ to
read ‘‘Special Conditions No. 25–315–
SC.’’
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 6,
2006.
Kevin Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–3947 Filed 4–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions;
correction.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This document corrects an
error that appeared in Docket No.
NM316, Special Conditions No. 25–
312–SC, which were published in the
Federal Register on January 24, 2006
(71 FR 3753). The error is in the Special
Conditions No. and is being corrected
herein.
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24518; Directorate
Identifier 2006–SW–10–AD; Amendment 39–
14569; AD 2006–08–12]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: The effective date
of this correction is April 6, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeleine Kolb, FAA, Standardization
Branch, ANM–113, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certifications
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, WA 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 227–2799; facsimile (425) 227–
1149.
DATES:
The
document designated as ‘‘Docket No.
NM316, Special Conditions No. 25–
312–SC’’ was published in the Federal
Register on January 24, 2006 (71 FR
3753). The document issued special
conditions pertaining to discrete gust
requirements for the Airbus Model
A380–800 airplane.
As published, the document
contained an error in that the Special
Conditions No. was shown as 25–312–
SC, which is the number of a different
set of special conditions. To avoid
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; MD
Helicopters, Inc. Model 600N
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes
an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI)
Model 600N helicopters, that currently
requires inspecting both upper tailboom
attachment fittings, nut plates and both
angles for a crack or thread damage, and
repairing or replacing any cracked or
damaged part. That AD also requires
replacing the upper right tailboom
attachment bolt with a new attachment
bolt, and if the upper right attachment
bolt is broken, replacing the three
remaining attachment bolts with
airworthy bolts. Adding a washer to
each bolt and modifying both access
covers is also required. Thereafter,
inspecting the upper tailboom
attachments and repairing or replacing
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24806-24808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0020]
States Approved To Receive Stallions and Mares From CEM-Affected
Regions; Indiana
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the animal importation regulations by adding
Indiana to the lists of States approved to receive certain stallions
and mares imported into the United States from regions affected with
contagious equine metritis (CEM). We are taking this action because
Indiana has entered into an agreement with the Administrator of the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to enforce its State laws
and regulations to control CEM and to require inspection, treatment,
and testing of horses, as required by Federal regulations, to further
ensure the horses' freedom from CEM. This action relieves unnecessary
restrictions on the importation of mares and stallions from regions
where CEM exists.
DATES: This rule will be effective on June 26, 2006, unless we receive
written adverse comments or written notice of intent to submit adverse
comments on or before May 30, 2006. If we receive written adverse
comments or written notice of intent to submit adverse comments, we
will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule
before the effective date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and, in the lower ``Search Regulations and Federal
Actions'' box, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service''
from the agency drop-down menu, then click on ``Submit.'' In the Docket
ID column, select APHIS-2006-0020 to submit or view public comments and
to view supporting and related materials available electronically.
Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for
accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after
the close of the comment period, is available through the site's ``User
Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. APHIS-
2006-0020,
[[Page 24807]]
Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0020.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Freeda E. Isaac, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The animal importation regulations in 9 CFR part 93 (referred to
below as the regulations), among other things, prohibit or restrict the
importation of certain animals, including horses, into the United
States to protect U.S. livestock from communicable diseases.
In Sec. 93.301, paragraph (c)(1) prohibits the importation of
horses into the United States from certain regions where contagious
equine metritis (CEM) exists. Paragraph (c)(2) lists categories of
horses that are excepted from this prohibition, including, in Sec.
93.301(c)(2)(vi), horses over 731 days of age imported for permanent
entry if the horses meet the requirements of Sec. 93.301(e).
One of the requirements in Sec. 93.301(e) is that mares and
stallions over 731 days old imported for permanent entry from regions
where CEM exists must be consigned to States listed in Sec.
93.301(h)(6), for stallions, or in Sec. 93.301(h)(7), for mares. The
Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
has approved these States to receive stallions or mares over 731 days
of age from regions where CEM exists because each State has entered
into a written agreement with the Administrator to enforce State laws
and regulations to control CEM, and each State has agreed to
quarantine, test, and treat stallions and mares over 731 days of age
from any region where CEM exists in accordance with Sec. 93.301(e).
Indiana has entered into a written agreement with the Administrator
of APHIS and has agreed to comply with all of the requirements in Sec.
93.301(e) for importing stallions and mares over 731 days old from
regions where CEM exists. Therefore, this direct final rule will add
Indiana to the lists of States in Sec. 93.301(h)(6) and (h)(7)
approved to receive certain stallions and mares imported into the
United States from regions where CEM exists.
Dates
We are publishing this rule without a prior proposal because we
view this action as noncontroversial and anticipate no adverse public
comments. This rule will be effective, as published in this document,
on June 26, 2006, unless we receive written adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse comments by May 30, 2006.
Adverse comments are comments that suggest the rule should not be
adopted or that suggest the rule should be changed.
If we receive written adverse comments or written notice of intent
to submit adverse comments, we will publish a document in the Federal
Register withdrawing this rule before the effective date. We will then
publish a proposed rule for public comment.
As discussed above, if we receive no written adverse comments or
written notice of intent to submit adverse comments within 30 days of
publication of this direct final rule, this direct final rule will
become effective 60 days following its publication. We will publish a
document in the Federal Register before the effective date of this
direct final rule, confirming that it is effective on the date
indicated in this document.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this
action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
We are amending the animal importation regulations by adding
Indiana to the lists of States approved to receive certain stallions
and mares imported into the United States from regions affected with
CEM. We are taking this action because Indiana has entered into an
agreement with the Administrator of APHIS to enforce its State laws and
regulations to control CEM and to require inspection, treatment, and
testing of horses, as required by Federal regulations, to further
ensure the horses' freedom from CEM. This action relieves unnecessary
restrictions on the importation of mares and stallions from regions
where CEM exists.
The United States imported a total of 41,065 horses in 2004. Nearly
82 percent of horses imported were from Canada (76 percent) and Mexico
(6 percent). Of the total imports, 35,372 were from non-CEM countries
and the remaining 5,693 were from CEM countries. The proportion of
pure-bred horses was much smaller than other horses. Of the above
total, 2,297 were purebred breeding horses. Only 265 purebred breeding
horses were imported from CEM-affected countries. However, horses
supplied by CEM-affected countries are generally highly valued. In
2004, for example, the average value of a purebred breeding horse
imported from a CEM-affected region was $42,600, whereas the average
value of a purebred breeding horse imported from non-CEM countries was
$4,720.
The rule will allow Indiana horse operations to import stallions
and mares directly from CEM-affected regions, whereas at present they
must be imported and undergo post-entry testing and treatment in
another, currently approved State. There are now 21 States approved to
receive stallions and mares from CEM-affected regions. Thus, Indiana
would join those 21 States as a potential destination for purebred
breeding horses imported from CEM-affected regions. This rule would
affect operations raising horses and other equines (North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 112920) and operations
owning racehorses (NAICS code 711219). The main effect would be on
those entities importing horses from CEM-affected regions. It is not
known how many such firms there may be, but it is reasonable to assume
that at least some of them may be small entities. The Small Business
Administration classifies operations engaged in raising horses and
other equines as small entities if their annual receipts are not more
than $750,000. Operations owning race horses are considered small if
annual gross receipts are less than $6.5 million. According to the 2002
Census of Agriculture, there were 14,500 horse farms in Indiana that
year, 3,492 of which sold 12,397 horses that had a total value of $34
million. About 5 percent are owners of racehorses. These data imply an
average income per farm from horse sales of about $2,750. Over 99
percent of operations raising horses and owning racehorses are
considered to be small. Entities that may be affected by the rule are
principally small
[[Page 24808]]
businesses, but the impact will not be significant.
This rule is expected to benefit small and large horse entities in
Indiana through trade opportunities already provided to States
currently approved to receive horses from CEM-affected regions. Horses
from CEM-affected regions will be allowed to be moved directly into
Indiana, thereby benefitting Indiana importers through lower transport
costs and reduced paperwork burdens. Mainly, breeding horse importers
in Indiana would benefit from this rule. Because the pool of imported
horses is a very small fraction of the domestic total and Indiana
importers are expected to compete with importers in 21 other States,
any net beneficial impact would be very small, especially when compared
to the value of the imported horses.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, 9 CFR part 93 is amended as follows:
PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, AND POULTRY, AND
CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS
OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a;
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Sec. 93.301 [Amended]
0
2. Section 93.301 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (h)(6), by adding, in alphabetical order, ``The State
of Indiana''.
0
b. In paragraph (h)(7), by adding, in alphabetical order, ``The State
of Indiana''.
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of April 2006.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 06-3985 Filed 4-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P