Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; Overview Information; Smaller Learning Communities Program; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards Using Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Funds, 24656-24663 [06-3928]
Download as PDF
24656
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
[FR Doc. E6–6243 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Department minimize the burden of this
collection on the respondents, including
through the use of information
technology.
Dated: April 19, 2006.
Jeanne Van Vlandren,
Director, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Planning, Evaluation and
Policy Development
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests
Type of Review: New.
Title: Data Collection for the
Evaluation of the Improving Literacy
Through School Libraries Program.
Frequency: One time.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 800.
Burden Hours: 600.
Abstract: This submission requests
approval for an evaluation of the
Improving Literacy through School
Libraries Program (LSL). LSL,
established under the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), is designed
to improve the literacy skills and
academic achievement of students by
providing them with access to up-todate school library materials,
technologically advanced school library
media centers, and professionally
certified school library media
specialists. The evaluation of this
program is authorized by NCLB Title I,
Part B, Subpart 4.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov,
by selecting the ‘‘Browse Pending
Collections’’ link and by clicking on
link number 3066. When you access the
information collection, click on
‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington,
DC 20202–4700. Requests may also be
electronically mailed to IC
DocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202–245–
6623. Please specify the complete title
of the information collection when
making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be electronically mailed to IC
DocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The Director, Regulatory
Information Management Services,
Office of Management, invites
comments on the proposed information
collection requests as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 26,
2006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Director,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management,
publishes that notice containing
proposed information collection
requests prior to submission of these
requests to OMB. Each proposed
information collection, grouped by
office, contains the following: (1) Type
of review requested, e.g. new, revision,
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and
proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites
public comment.
The Department of Education is
especially interested in public comment
addressing the following issues: (1) Is
this collection necessary to the proper
functions of the Department; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
Department enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
[FR Doc. E6–6244 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education; Overview Information;
Smaller Learning Communities
Program; Notice Inviting Applications
for New Awards Using Fiscal Year (FY)
2005 Funds
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.215L.
Dates:
Applications Available: April 26,
2006.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to
Apply: May 26, 2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 26, 2006.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 24, 2006.
Eligible Applicants: Local educational
agencies (LEAs), including educational
service agencies and schools funded by
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA),
applying on behalf of large public high
schools, are eligible to apply for a grant.
Additional eligibility requirements
are listed elsewhere in this notice under
section III. Eligibility Information.
Estimated Available Funds:
$86,954,000. The Department assumes
that funds will be sufficient to provide
the first 3 years of funding (36 months)
for each grantee from funds available for
this compeition. Funding to cover the
remaining 24 months will be contingent
on the availability of funds and each
grantee’s substantial progress toward
accomplishing the goals and objectives
of the project as described in its
approved application. Contingent upon
the availability of funds and quality of
applications, we may make additional
awards in a subsequent fiscal year,
using FY 2006 funds, based on the list
of unfunded applicants from this
competition. Additional information
regarding awards and budgets is
provided elsewhere in this notice under
section II. Award Information.
Estimated Range of Awards: See
section II. Award Information,
elsewhere in this notice.
Estimated Size of Award: See section
II. Award Information, elsewhere in this
notice.
Maximum Award: See section II.
Award Information, elsewhere in this
notice.
Estimated Number of Awards: 72.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: Authorized
under title V, part D, subpart 4, section
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
5441 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA), the purpose of the Smaller
Learning Communities (SLC) program is
to promote academic achievement
through the creation or expansion of
small, safe, and successful learning
environments in large public high
schools to help ensure that all students
graduate with the knowledge and skills
necessary to make successful transitions
to college and careers.
Priority: This priority is from the
notice of final priority, requirements,
definitions, and selection criteria (NFP)
for this program, published in the
Federal Register on April 28, 2005 (70
FR 22233).
Absolute Priority: For this
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards based on the list
of unfunded applicants from this
competition, this priority is an absolute
priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we
consider only applications that meet
this priority.
This priority is:
Helping All Students to Succeed in
Rigorous Academic Courses.
This priority supports projects to
create or expand SLCs that will
implement a coherent set of strategies
and interventions that are designed to
ensure that all students who enter high
school with reading/language arts and
mathematics skills that are significantly
below grade level ‘‘catch up’’ quickly so
that, by no later than the end of the 10th
grade, they have acquired the reading/
language arts and mathematics skills
they need to participate successfully in
rigorous academic courses that will
equip them with the knowledge and
skills necessary to transition
successfully to postsecondary
education, apprenticeships, or advanced
training.
These accelerated learning strategies
and interventions must—
(1) Be grounded in the findings of
scientifically based and other rigorous
research;
(2) Include the use of age-appropriate
instructional materials and teaching and
learning strategies;
(3) Provide additional instruction and
academic support during the regular
school day, which may be
supplemented by instruction that is
provided before or after school, on
weekends, and at other times when
school is not in session; and
(4) Provide sustained professional
development and ongoing support for
teachers and other personnel who are
responsible for delivering instruction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
24657
Application Requirements
In the NFP, published in the Federal
Register on April 28, 2005 (70 FR
22233), we established application
requirements in the following areas for
competitions conducted under this
program: Eligibility; School Report
Cards; Types of Grants; Consortium
Applications and Educational Service
Agencies; Student Placement; Including
All Students; Budget Information for
Determination of Award; Performance
Indicators; Evaluation; High-Risk Status
and Other Enforcement Mechanisms;
Required Meetings Sponsored by the
Department; and Previous Grantees.
These requirements are in addition to
the content that all SLC grant applicants
must include in their applications as
required by the program statute in title
V, part D, subpart 4, section 5441(b) of
the ESEA.
In this competition, we will not be
using the Types of Grants requirement.
We have incorporated the terms of the
remaining requirements under
appropriate sections of this notice (e.g.,
the Eligibility requirement is listed in
section III. Eligibility Information,
elsewhere in this notice).
that funds will be sufficient to provide
the first 3 years of funding (36 months)
for each grantee from funds available for
this compeition. Funding to cover the
remaining 24 months will be contingent
on the availability of funds and each
grantee’s substantial progress toward
accomplishing the goals and objectives
of the project as described in its
approved application. Contingent upon
the availability of funds and quality of
applications, we may make additional
awards in a subsequent year, using FY
2006 funds, based on the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $650,000
to $11,750,000. The following chart
provides the ranges of awards per high
school size for 60-month SLC grants:
Definitions
In addition to the definitions in the
authorizing statute and 34 CFR 77.1, the
following definitions also apply to this
program:
BIA School means a school operated
or supported by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs.
Large High School means a public
school that includes grades 11 and 12
and has an enrollment of 1,000 or more
students in grades 9 and above.
Smaller Learning Community (SLC)
means an environment in which a core
group of teachers and other adults
within the school knows the needs,
interests, and aspirations of each
student well, closely monitors each
student’s progress, and provides the
academic and other support each
student needs to succeed.
Estimated Size of Award: LEAs may
receive, on behalf of a single school, up
to $1,175,000, depending upon the size
of the school. This award is for the full
60-month project period. LEAs applying
on behalf of a group of eligible schools
could receive up to $11,750,000 per
grant. To ensure that sufficient funds are
available to support SLC activities,
LEAs may not include more than 10
schools in a single application for a
grant. The actual size of awards will be
based on a number of factors. These
factors include the scope, quality, and
comprehensiveness of the proposed
project and the range of awards
indicated in the application.
Maximum Award: Applications that
request more funds than the maximum
amounts specified (in the chart) for any
school or for the total grant will not be
read as part of the regular application
process. However, if, after the Secretary
selects applications to be funded, it
appears that additional funds remain
available, the Secretary may choose to
read those additional applications that
requested funds exceeding the
maximum amounts specified. If the
Secretary chooses to fund any of those
additional applications, applicants will
be required to work with the
Department to revise their proposed
budgets to fit within the appropriate
funding range.
Estimated Number of Awards: 72.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7249.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84,
85, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The NFP
published in the Federal Register on
April 28, 2005 (70 FR 22233).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$86,954,000. The Department assumes
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SLC GRANT AWARD RANGES
Student enrollment
1,000–2,000 Students
2,001–3,000 Students
3,001–4,000 Students
4,001 and Up ............
Award ranges per
school
$650,000–$800,000
650,000–925,000
650,000–1,050,000
650,000–1,175,000
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
24658
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
III. Eligibility Information
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
competition does not involve cost
sharing or matching.
1. Eligible Applicants: Local
educational agencies (LEAs), including
educational service agencies and
schools funded by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA), applying on behalf of large
public high schools, are eligible to apply
for a grant.
An LEA that was awarded an
implementation grant on behalf of a
school under the original SLC program
competition held in 2000 (Cohort 1),
under the second competition held in
2002 (Cohort 2), or under the third
competition held in 2003 (Cohort 3)
may apply on behalf of the school for a
second SLC grant under the terms
contained in the NFP. LEAs would not
be able to apply for funding on behalf
of schools that received an SLC
implementation grant under the
competitions held in 2004 (Cohort 4)
and 2005 (Cohort 5).
To be considered for funding, LEAs
must identify in their applications the
name or names of the eligible large high
school or schools and the number of
students enrolled in each school. A
large high school is defined as one
having grades 11 and 12, with 1,000 or
more students enrolled in grades 9 and
above. Enrollment figures must be based
upon data from the current school year
or data from the most recently
completed school year. We will not
accept applications from LEAs applying
on behalf of schools that are being
constructed and do not have an active
student enrollment at the time of
application. LEAs may apply on behalf
of no more than 10 schools.
In an effort to encourage systemic,
district-level reform efforts, we permit
an individual LEA to submit only one
grant application in a competition,
specifying in each application which
high schools the LEA intends to fund.
In addition, we require that an LEA
applying for a grant under this
competition apply only on behalf of a
high school or high schools for which it
has governing authority, unless the LEA
is an educational service agency that
includes in its application evidence that
the entity that has governing authority
over the eligible high school supports
the application. An LEA, however, may
form a consortium with another LEA
and submit a joint application for funds.
The consortium must follow the
procedures for group applications
described in 34 CFR 75.127 through
75.129 in EDGAR.
An LEA is eligible for only one grant
whether the LEA applies independently
or as part of a consortium.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package: You may obtain an application
package via the Internet or from the
Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs). To obtain a copy via the Internet
use the following addresses: https://
www.grants.gov or https://www.ed.gov/
programs/slcp/applicant.html. To
obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write or
call the following: ED Pubs, P.O. Box
1398, Jessup, MD 20794–1398.
Telephone (toll free): 1–877–433–7827.
Fax: (301) 470–1244. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), you may call (toll free): 1–877–
576–7734.
You may also contact ED Pubs at its
Web site: https://www.ed.gov/pubs/
edpubs.html or you may contact ED
Pubs at its e-mail address:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED
Pubs, be sure to identify this
competition as follows: CFDA number
84.215L.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain a copy of the application package
in an alternative format (e.g., Braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) by contacting Deborah
Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3W241, Washington, DC 20202–
6200. Telephone: (202) 205–3783 or by
e-mail: deborah.williams@ed.gov.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: All SLC grant applicants
must include in their applications the
information required by the program
statute in title V, part D, subpart 4,
section 5441(b) of the ESEA. Applicants
also must meet the following
requirements:
(a) School Report Cards. We require
that LEAs provide, for each school
included in the application, the most
recent ‘‘report card’’ produced by the
State or the LEA to inform the public
about the characteristics of the school
and its students, including information
about student academic achievement
and other student outcomes. These
‘‘report cards’’ must include, at a
minimum, the following information
that LEAs are required to report for each
school under section 1111(h)(2)(B)(ii) of
the ESEA: (1) Whether the school has
been identified for school improvement;
and (2) information that shows how the
academic assessments and other
indicators of adequate yearly progress
compare to those indicators for students
in the LEA as a whole and also shows
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the performance of the school’s students
on statewide assessments.
(b) Student Placement. We require
applicants for SLC grants to include a
description of how students will be
selected or placed in an SLC and an
assurance that students will not be
placed according to ability or any other
measure, but will be placed at random
or by student/parent choice and not
pursuant to testing or other judgments.
(c) Including All Students. We require
applicants for grants to create or expand
an SLC project that will include every
student within the school by no later
than the end of the fifth school year of
implementation. Elsewhere in this
notice, we define an SLC as an
environment in which a group of
teachers and other adults within the
school knows the needs, interests, and
aspirations of each student well, closely
monitors each student’s progress, and
provides the academic and other
support each student needs to succeed.
(d) Performance Indicators. We
require applicants to identify in their
application specific performance
indicators and annual performance
objectives for each of these indicators.
Specifically, we require applicants to
use the following performance
indicators to measure the progress of
each school:
(1) The percentage of students who
score at the proficient and advanced
levels on the reading/language arts and
mathematics assessments used by the
State to determine whether a school has
made adequate yearly progress under
part A of title I of the ESEA, as well as
these percentages disaggregated by
subject matter and the following
subgroups:
(A) Major racial and ethnic groups.
(B) Students with disabilities.
(C) Students with limited English
proficiency.
(D) Economically disadvantaged
students.
(2) The school’s graduation rate, as
defined in the State’s approved
accountability plan for part A of title I
of the ESEA.
(3) The percentage of graduates who
enroll in postsecondary education,
apprenticeships, or advanced training
for the semester following graduation.
(4) The percentage of graduates who
are employed by the end of the first
quarter after they graduate (e.g., for
students who graduate in May or June,
this would be September 30).
(5) Other appropriate indicators the
LEA may choose to identify in its
application, such as rates of average
daily attendance and year-to-year
retention; achievement and gains in
English proficiency of limited English
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
proficient students; the incidence of
school violence, drug and alcohol use,
and disciplinary actions; or the
percentage of students completing
advanced placement courses and the
rate of passing advanced placement tests
(such as Advanced Placement and
International Baccalaureate) and courses
for college credit.
Applicants are required to include in
their applications baseline data for each
of these indicators and identify
performance objectives for each year of
the project period. We further require
recipients of grants to report annually
on the extent to which each school
achieves its performance objectives for
each indicator during the preceding
school year. We require grantees to
report comparable data, if available, for
the preceding three school years so that
trends in performance will be more
apparent.
Grantees must submit this additional
data using the Department’s SLC
electronic reporting Web site within
three months after awards are made.
(e) Evaluation. We require each
applicant to provide assurances that it
will support an evaluation of the project
that provides information to the project
director and school personnel, and that
will be useful in gauging the project’s
progress and in identifying areas for
improvement. Each evaluation must
include an annual report for each of the
first four years of the project period and
a final report that would be completed
at the end of the fifth year of
implementation and that will include
information on implementation during
the fifth year as well as information on
the implementation of the project across
the entire project period. We require
grantees to submit each of these reports
to the Department.
In addition, we require that the
evaluation be conducted by an
independent third party, selected by the
applicant, whose role in the project is
limited to conducting the evaluation.
(f) Required Meetings Sponsored by
the Department. Applicants must set
aside adequate funds within their
proposed budget to send their project
director to a two-day project directors’
meeting in Washington, DC, and to send
a team of five key staff members,
including their external evaluator, to
attend a two-and-a-half-day Regional
Institute. The Department will host both
meetings. We anticipate that the
meetings will be held in the first year of
the grant period.
(g) Additional Requirements.
Additional requirements concerning the
content of an application for this
program, together with the forms you
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
must submit, also are in the application
package for this competition.
Page limit: The application narrative
is where you, the applicant, address the
selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We
encourage you to limit the narrative to
the equivalent of no more than 25 pages
and suggest that you use the following
standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5 x 11, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
The suggested page limit does not
apply to the forms, budget section,
budget justification, assurances and
certifications, one-page abstract,
endnotes, school report cards, or
resumes. However, you must include all
of the application narrative in the
narrative section.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: April 26,
2006.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to
Apply: May 26, 2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 26, 2006.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically or by mail or hand
delivery if you qualify for an exception
to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV.6.
Other Submission Requirements in this
notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 24, 2006.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24659
competition must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for grants under the
Smaller Learning Communities
Program-CFDA Number 84.215L must
be submitted electronically using the
Grants.gov Apply site at: https://
www.grants.gov. Through this site, you
will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline,
and then upload and submit your
application. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirements and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the Smaller Learning
Communities Program at: https://
www.grants.gov. You must search for
the downloadable application package
for this program by the CFDA number.
Do not include the CFDA number s
alpha suffix in your search.
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are time and date stamped. Your
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted, and must be date/time
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
later than 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date.
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, we will not consider your
application if it is date/time stamped by
the Grants.gov system later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. When we
retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are
rejecting your application because it
was date/time stamped by the
Grants.gov system after 4:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
24660
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at https://eGrants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
• To submit your application via
Grants.gov, you must complete all of the
steps in the Grants.gov registration
process (see https://www.Grants.gov/
GetStarted). These steps include (1)
registering your organization, (2)
registering yourself as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR), and
(3) getting authorized as an AOR by
your organization. Details on these steps
are outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see https://
www.grants.gov/assets/
GrantsgovCoBrandBrochure8X11.pdf).
You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number
used with this registration. Please note
that the registration process may take
five or more business days to complete,
and you must have completed all
registration steps to allow you to submit
an application successfully via
Grants.gov.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
typically included on the Application
for Federal Education Assistance (ED
424), Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
You must attach any narrative sections
of your application as files in a .DOC
(document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF
(Portable Document) format. If you
upload a file type other than the three
file types specified above or submit a
password protected file, we will not
review that material.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgement from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The Department will
retrieve your application from
Grants.gov and send you a second
confirmation by e-mail that will include
a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your
application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are prevented
from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically, or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions as described elsewhere in
this notice. If you submit an application
after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the deadline date, please contact the
person listed elsewhere in this notice
under For Further Information Contact,
and provide an explanation of the
technical problem you experienced with
Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov
Support Desk Case Number (if
available). We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date. The Department will contact you
after a determination is made on
whether your application will be
accepted.
Note: Extensions referred to in this section
apply only to the unavailability of or
technical problems with the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the deadline
date and time or if the technical problem you
experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov
system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because—
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevent you from using the
Internet to submit your application. If
you mail your written statement to the
Department, it must be postmarked no
later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Deborah Williams, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., room 3W241,
Washington, DC 20202–6200. Fax: (202)
260–8969.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier), your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the applicable following
address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal
Service: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215L), 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202–
4260,
or
By mail through a commercial carrier:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Cente—Stop 4260,
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.215L),
7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD
20785–1506.
Regardless of which address you use,
you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark,
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service,
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier, or
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark, or
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215L), 550 12th
Street SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center accepts
hand deliveries daily between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time,
except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal
holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of
Paper Applications: If you mail or hand
deliver your application to the
Department:
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the
Department—in Item 4 of the ED 424 the
CFDA number—and suffix letter, if
any—of the competition under which
you are submitting your application.
(2) The Application Control Center
will mail a grant application receipt
acknowledgment to you. If you do not
receive the grant application receipt
acknowledgment within 15 business
days from the application deadline date,
you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at
(202) 245–6288.
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The following
selection criteria will be used to
evaluate applications for new grants
under this program. These selection
criteria are from the NFP, published in
the Federal Register on April 28, 2005
(70 FR 22233).
Note: The maximum score for a grant
under this program is 100 points. The points
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
or weights assigned to each criterion and subcriterion are indicated in parentheses.
Need for the Project (10 Points)
In determining the need for the
proposed project, we consider the extent
to which the applicant will—
Assist schools that have the greatest
need for assistance, as indicated by,
relative to other high schools within the
State, one or more of the factors below:
(A) Student performance on the
academic assessments in reading/
language arts and mathematics
administered by the State under part A,
title I of the ESEA, including gaps in the
performance of all students and that of
student subgroups, such as
economically disadvantaged students,
students from major racial and ethnic
groups, students with disabilities, or
students with limited English
proficiency.
(B) The school’s dropout rate and gaps
in the graduation rate between all
students and student subgroups.
(C) Disciplinary actions.
(D) The percentage of graduates who
enroll in postsecondary education,
apprenticeships, or advanced training in
the semester following graduation, and
gaps between all students and student
subgroups.
Foundation for Implementation (20
Points)
In determining the quality of the
implementation plan for the proposed
project, we consider the extent to
which—
(1) (5 points) Teachers and
administrators within each school
support the proposed project and have
been and will continue to be involved
in its planning and development,
including, particularly, those teachers
who will be directly affected by the
proposed project;
(2) (5 points) Parents, students, and
other community stakeholders support
the proposed project and have been and
will continue to be involved in its
planning and development;
(3) (5 points) The proposed project is
consistent with, and will advance, State
and local initiatives to increase student
achievement and narrow gaps in
achievement between all students and
student subgroups; and
(4) (5 points) The applicant
demonstrates that it has carried out
sufficient planning and preparatory
activities to enable it to begin to
implement the proposed project at the
beginning of the school year
immediately following receipt of an
award.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24661
Quality of the Project Design (30 Points)
In determining the quality of the
project design for the SLC project, we
consider the extent to which—
(1) (5 points) The applicant will
implement or expand strategies, new
organizational structures, or other
changes in practice that are likely to
create an environment in which a core
group of teachers and other adults
within the school knows the needs,
interests, and aspirations of each
student well, closely monitors each
student’s progress, and provides the
academic and other support each
student needs to succeed;
(2) (5 points) The applicant proposes
research-based strategies that are likely
to improve overall student achievement
and other outcomes (including
graduation rates and enrollment in
postsecondary education), narrow any
gaps in achievement between all
students and student subgroups, and
address the particular needs identified
by the school under the paragraph titled
Need for the Project, such as—
(A) More rigorous academic
curriculum for all students and the
provision of academic support to
struggling students who need assistance
to master more challenging academic
content;
(B) More intensive and individualized
educational counseling and career and
college guidance, provided through
mentoring, teacher advisories, adult
advocates, or other means;
(C) Strategies designed to increase
average daily attendance, increase the
percentage of students who transition
from the 9th to 10th grade, and improve
the graduation rate; and
(D) Expanding opportunities for
students to participate in advanced
placement courses and other academic
and technical courses that offer both
high school and postsecondary credit;
(3) (5 points) The applicant will
implement accelerated learning
strategies and interventions that will
assist students who enter the school
with reading/language or mathematics
skills that are significantly below grade
level and that—
(A) Are designed to equip
participating students with grade-level
reading/language arts and mathematics
skills by no later than the end of the
10th grade;
(B) Are grounded in scientifically
based research;
(C) Include the use of age-appropriate
instructional materials and teaching and
learning strategies;
(D) Provide additional instructional
and academic support during the
regular school day, which may be
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
24662
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
supplemented by instruction that is
provided before or after school, on
weekends, and at other times when
school is not in session;
(E) Will be delivered with sufficient
intensity to improve the reading/
language arts or math skills, as
appropriate, of participating students;
and
(F) Include sustained professional
development and ongoing support for
teachers and other personnel who are
responsible for delivering instruction;
(4) (5 points) The applicant will
provide high-quality professional
development throughout the project
period that advances the understanding
of teachers, administrators, and other
school staff of effective, research-based
instructional strategies for improving
the academic achievement of students,
including, particularly, students with
academic skills that are significantly
below grade level, and provide the
knowledge and skills those staff need to
participate effectively in the
development, expansion, or
implementation of an SLC;
(5) (5 points) The proposed project fits
into a comprehensive district high
school improvement strategy to increase
the academic achievement of all district
high school students, reduce gaps
between the achievement of all students
and student subgroups, and prepare
students to enter postsecondary
education or the workforce; and
(6) (5 points) The proposed project is
part of a cohesive plan that uses funds
provided under the ESEA, the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Technical
Education Act, or other Federal
programs, as well as local, State, and
private funds sufficient to ensure
continuation of efforts after Federal
support ends.
Quality of the Management Plan (20
Points)
In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, we consider the following
factors:
(1) (5 points) The adequacy of the
proposed management plan to achieve
the objectives of the proposed project on
time and within budget, including
clearly defined responsibilities and
detailed timelines and milestones for
accomplishing project tasks.
(2) (5 points) The extent to which
time commitments of the project
director and other key personnel are
appropriate and adequate to implement
the SLC project effectively.
(3) (5 points) The qualifications,
including relevant training and
experience, of the project director and
other key personnel.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
(4) (5 points) The adequacy of
resources, including the extent to which
the budget is adequate and costs are
directly related to the objectives and
SLC activities.
Quality of the SLC Project Evaluation
(20 Points)
In determining the quality of the
proposed project evaluation conducted
by an independent, third-party
evaluator, we consider the following
factors:
(1) (5 points) The extent to which the
methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals,
objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed SLC project.
(2) (5 points) The extent to which the
evaluation will collect and report
accurate qualitative and quantitative
data that will be useful in assessing the
success and progress of implementation,
including, at a minimum—
(A) Measures of student academic
achievement that provide data for the
performance indicators identified in the
application, including results that are
disaggregated for economically
disadvantaged students, students from
major racial and ethnic groups, students
with disabilities, students with limited
English proficiency, and other
subgroups identified by the applicant;
and
(B) Other measures identified by the
applicant in the application as
performance indicators.
(3) (5 points) The extent to which the
methods of evaluation will provide
timely and regular feedback to the LEA
and the school on the success and
progress of implementation and identify
areas for needed improvement.
(4) (5 points) The qualifications and
relevant training and experience of the
independent evaluator.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may also notify you
informally.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
Note: Requirements listed in the NFP are
material requirements. Failure to comply
with any requirement or with any elements
of the grantee’s application would subject the
grantee to administrative action including,
but not limited to, designation as a ‘‘highrisk’’ grantee, the imposition of special
conditions, or termination of the grant.
Circumstances that might cause the
Department to take this action include, but
are not limited to—the grantee showing a
decline in student achievement after two
years of implementation of the grant; the
grantee’s failure to make substantial progress
in completing the milestones outlined in the
management plan included in the
application; and the grantee’s expenditure of
funds in a manner that is inconsistent with
the budget as submitted in the application.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as specified by
the Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118.
Additional reporting requirements are
described elsewhere in this notice under
section IV. Application and Submission
Information, 2. Content and Form of
Application Submission.
4. Performance Measures: The
application requirements and other
information related to performance
indicators and objectives are described
elsewhere in this notice under section
IV. Application and Submission
Information, 2. Content and Form of
Application Submission.
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3W241, Washington, DC 20202–
6200. Telephone: (202) 205–3783 or by
e-mail: deborah.williams@ed.gov
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person
listed in this section.
VIII. Other Information
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 2006 / Notices
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html
Dated: April 21, 2006.
Henry L. Johnson,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 06–3928 Filed 4–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; Overview
Information; State Vocational
Rehabilitation Unit In-Service Training;
Notice Inviting Applications for New
Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2006
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.265A
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Dates
Applications Available: April 26,
2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: May 26, 2006.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: July 25, 2006.
Eligible Applicants: Only State
agencies listed in the chart under
Estimated Available Funds and
designated under a State plan for
vocational rehabilitation (VR) services
under section 101(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
are eligible to receive an award under
this competition. These applicants did
not apply for an in-service training
award during FY 2005 when quality
awards were offered and, therefore, are
not eligible to apply for quality awards.
Consequently, this notice invites
applications for new basic awards only
for FY 2006. Other State agencies
received five-year in-service training
awards in FY 2005.
Estimated Available Funds: $228,942.
A listing, by State agency, of estimated
available funds for basic awards is as
follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:58 Apr 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Estimated
Available
Funds for
Basic Awards
State
24663
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Only State
agencies listed in the chart under
Estimated Available Funds and
designated under a State plan for VR
Total ...............................
228,942 services under section 101(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
Estimated Range of Basic Awards:
are eligible to receive an award under
$19,218–$171,288.
this competition. These applicants did
Estimated Number of Basic Awards: 4. not apply for an in-service training
award during FY 2005 when quality
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
awards were offered and, therefore, are
not eligible to apply for quality awards.
Project Period: Up to 48 months.
Consequently, this notice invites
applications for new basic awards only
Full Text of Announcement
for FY 2006. Other State agencies
I. Funding Opportunity Description
received five-year in-service training
Purpose of Program: This program is
awards in FY 2005.
designed to support projects for training
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Grantees
State VR agency personnel in program
under the State VR Unit In-Service
areas essential to the effective
Training program must provide at least
management of the agency’s program of
10 percent of the total cost of the project
VR services or in skill areas that will
(34 CFR 388.30(a)), except that under 34
enable personnel to improve their
CFR 388.30(b), grantees designated to
ability to provide VR services leading to receive a minimum share of one third of
employment outcomes for individuals
one percent of the sums made available
with disabilities.
for the fiscal year ($5,765,661) are
required to provide at least 4 percent of
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 772(g)(3).
the total costs of the project.
Applicable Regulations: a) The
Accordingly, Puerto Rico is required to
Education Department General
provide at least 10 percent of the total
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in cost of the project, while the Virgin
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
Islands, Guam, and American Samoa are
84, 85, 86, and 99. (b) The regulations
required to provide at least 4 percent.
for this program in 34 CFR parts 385
Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562(c), an indirect
and 388.
Puerto Rico ...........................
Virgin Islands ........................
Guam ....................................
American Samoa ..................
$171,288
19,218
19,218
19,218
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $228,942.
A listing, by State agency, of estimated
available funds for basic awards is as
follows:
Estimated
Available
Funds for
Basic Awards
State
Puerto Rico ...........................
Virgin Islands ........................
Guam ....................................
American Samoa ..................
$171,288
19,218
19,218
19,218
Total ...............................
228,942
Estimated Range of Basic Awards:
$19,218–$171,288.
Estimated Number of Basic Awards: 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cost reimbursement on a training grant is
limited to the recipient’s actual indirect
costs, as determined by its negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement, or eight percent
of a modified total direct cost base,
whichever amount is less. Indirect costs in
excess of the eight percent limit may not be
charged directly, used to satisfy matching or
cost-sharing requirements, or charged to
another Federal award.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: Education Publications Center
(ED Pubs), P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD
20794–1398. Telephone (toll free): 1–
877–433–7827. FAX: (301) 470–1244. If
you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), you may call (toll
free): 1–877–576–7734.
You may also contact ED Pubs at its
Web site: https://www.ed.gov/pubs/
edpubs.html or you may contact ED
Pubs at its e-mail address:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED
Pubs, be sure to identify this
competition as follows: CFDA number
84.265A.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24656-24663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-3928]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; Overview
Information; Smaller Learning Communities Program; Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards Using Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Funds
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.215L.
Dates:
Applications Available: April 26, 2006.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: May 26, 2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 26, 2006.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 24, 2006.
Eligible Applicants: Local educational agencies (LEAs), including
educational service agencies and schools funded by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA), applying on behalf of large public high schools, are
eligible to apply for a grant.
Additional eligibility requirements are listed elsewhere in this
notice under section III. Eligibility Information.
Estimated Available Funds: $86,954,000. The Department assumes that
funds will be sufficient to provide the first 3 years of funding (36
months) for each grantee from funds available for this compeition.
Funding to cover the remaining 24 months will be contingent on the
availability of funds and each grantee's substantial progress toward
accomplishing the goals and objectives of the project as described in
its approved application. Contingent upon the availability of funds and
quality of applications, we may make additional awards in a subsequent
fiscal year, using FY 2006 funds, based on the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition. Additional information regarding
awards and budgets is provided elsewhere in this notice under section
II. Award Information.
Estimated Range of Awards: See section II. Award Information,
elsewhere in this notice.
Estimated Size of Award: See section II. Award Information,
elsewhere in this notice.
Maximum Award: See section II. Award Information, elsewhere in this
notice.
Estimated Number of Awards: 72.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: Authorized under title V, part D, subpart 4,
section
[[Page 24657]]
5441 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA), the purpose of the Smaller Learning Communities (SLC) program
is to promote academic achievement through the creation or expansion of
small, safe, and successful learning environments in large public high
schools to help ensure that all students graduate with the knowledge
and skills necessary to make successful transitions to college and
careers.
Priority: This priority is from the notice of final priority,
requirements, definitions, and selection criteria (NFP) for this
program, published in the Federal Register on April 28, 2005 (70 FR
22233).
Absolute Priority: For this competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards based on the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Helping All Students to Succeed in Rigorous Academic Courses.
This priority supports projects to create or expand SLCs that will
implement a coherent set of strategies and interventions that are
designed to ensure that all students who enter high school with
reading/language arts and mathematics skills that are significantly
below grade level ``catch up'' quickly so that, by no later than the
end of the 10th grade, they have acquired the reading/language arts and
mathematics skills they need to participate successfully in rigorous
academic courses that will equip them with the knowledge and skills
necessary to transition successfully to postsecondary education,
apprenticeships, or advanced training.
These accelerated learning strategies and interventions must--
(1) Be grounded in the findings of scientifically based and other
rigorous research;
(2) Include the use of age-appropriate instructional materials and
teaching and learning strategies;
(3) Provide additional instruction and academic support during the
regular school day, which may be supplemented by instruction that is
provided before or after school, on weekends, and at other times when
school is not in session; and
(4) Provide sustained professional development and ongoing support
for teachers and other personnel who are responsible for delivering
instruction.
Application Requirements
In the NFP, published in the Federal Register on April 28, 2005 (70
FR 22233), we established application requirements in the following
areas for competitions conducted under this program: Eligibility;
School Report Cards; Types of Grants; Consortium Applications and
Educational Service Agencies; Student Placement; Including All
Students; Budget Information for Determination of Award; Performance
Indicators; Evaluation; High-Risk Status and Other Enforcement
Mechanisms; Required Meetings Sponsored by the Department; and Previous
Grantees.
These requirements are in addition to the content that all SLC
grant applicants must include in their applications as required by the
program statute in title V, part D, subpart 4, section 5441(b) of the
ESEA.
In this competition, we will not be using the Types of Grants
requirement. We have incorporated the terms of the remaining
requirements under appropriate sections of this notice (e.g., the
Eligibility requirement is listed in section III. Eligibility
Information, elsewhere in this notice).
Definitions
In addition to the definitions in the authorizing statute and 34
CFR 77.1, the following definitions also apply to this program:
BIA School means a school operated or supported by the Bureau of
Indian Affairs.
Large High School means a public school that includes grades 11 and
12 and has an enrollment of 1,000 or more students in grades 9 and
above.
Smaller Learning Community (SLC) means an environment in which a
core group of teachers and other adults within the school knows the
needs, interests, and aspirations of each student well, closely
monitors each student's progress, and provides the academic and other
support each student needs to succeed.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7249.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81,
82, 84, 85, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The NFP published in the Federal
Register on April 28, 2005 (70 FR 22233).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $86,954,000. The Department assumes that
funds will be sufficient to provide the first 3 years of funding (36
months) for each grantee from funds available for this compeition.
Funding to cover the remaining 24 months will be contingent on the
availability of funds and each grantee's substantial progress toward
accomplishing the goals and objectives of the project as described in
its approved application. Contingent upon the availability of funds and
quality of applications, we may make additional awards in a subsequent
year, using FY 2006 funds, based on the list of unfunded applicants
from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $650,000 to $11,750,000. The following
chart provides the ranges of awards per high school size for 60-month
SLC grants:
SLC Grant Award Ranges
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Award ranges per
Student enrollment school
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,000-2,000 Students.............................. $650,000-$800,000
2,001-3,000 Students.............................. 650,000-925,000
3,001-4,000 Students.............................. 650,000-1,050,000
4,001 and Up...................................... 650,000-1,175,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Size of Award: LEAs may receive, on behalf of a single
school, up to $1,175,000, depending upon the size of the school. This
award is for the full 60-month project period. LEAs applying on behalf
of a group of eligible schools could receive up to $11,750,000 per
grant. To ensure that sufficient funds are available to support SLC
activities, LEAs may not include more than 10 schools in a single
application for a grant. The actual size of awards will be based on a
number of factors. These factors include the scope, quality, and
comprehensiveness of the proposed project and the range of awards
indicated in the application.
Maximum Award: Applications that request more funds than the
maximum amounts specified (in the chart) for any school or for the
total grant will not be read as part of the regular application
process. However, if, after the Secretary selects applications to be
funded, it appears that additional funds remain available, the
Secretary may choose to read those additional applications that
requested funds exceeding the maximum amounts specified. If the
Secretary chooses to fund any of those additional applications,
applicants will be required to work with the Department to revise their
proposed budgets to fit within the appropriate funding range.
Estimated Number of Awards: 72.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
[[Page 24658]]
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Local educational agencies (LEAs),
including educational service agencies and schools funded by the Bureau
of Indian Affairs (BIA), applying on behalf of large public high
schools, are eligible to apply for a grant.
An LEA that was awarded an implementation grant on behalf of a
school under the original SLC program competition held in 2000 (Cohort
1), under the second competition held in 2002 (Cohort 2), or under the
third competition held in 2003 (Cohort 3) may apply on behalf of the
school for a second SLC grant under the terms contained in the NFP.
LEAs would not be able to apply for funding on behalf of schools that
received an SLC implementation grant under the competitions held in
2004 (Cohort 4) and 2005 (Cohort 5).
To be considered for funding, LEAs must identify in their
applications the name or names of the eligible large high school or
schools and the number of students enrolled in each school. A large
high school is defined as one having grades 11 and 12, with 1,000 or
more students enrolled in grades 9 and above. Enrollment figures must
be based upon data from the current school year or data from the most
recently completed school year. We will not accept applications from
LEAs applying on behalf of schools that are being constructed and do
not have an active student enrollment at the time of application. LEAs
may apply on behalf of no more than 10 schools.
In an effort to encourage systemic, district-level reform efforts,
we permit an individual LEA to submit only one grant application in a
competition, specifying in each application which high schools the LEA
intends to fund.
In addition, we require that an LEA applying for a grant under this
competition apply only on behalf of a high school or high schools for
which it has governing authority, unless the LEA is an educational
service agency that includes in its application evidence that the
entity that has governing authority over the eligible high school
supports the application. An LEA, however, may form a consortium with
another LEA and submit a joint application for funds. The consortium
must follow the procedures for group applications described in 34 CFR
75.127 through 75.129 in EDGAR.
An LEA is eligible for only one grant whether the LEA applies
independently or as part of a consortium.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not involve cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package: You may obtain an
application package via the Internet or from the Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs). To obtain a copy via the Internet use the following
addresses: https://www.grants.gov or https://www.ed.gov/programs/slcp/
applicant.html. To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write or call the
following: ED Pubs, P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Telephone
(toll free): 1-877-433-7827. Fax: (301) 470-1244. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call (toll free):
1-877-576-7734.
You may also contact ED Pubs at its Web site: https://www.ed.gov/
pubs/edpubs.html or you may contact ED Pubs at its e-mail address:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED Pubs, be sure to identify
this competition as follows: CFDA number 84.215L.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain a copy of the application
package in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting Deborah Williams, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3W241,
Washington, DC 20202-6200. Telephone: (202) 205-3783 or by e-mail:
deborah.williams@ed.gov.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: All SLC grant
applicants must include in their applications the information required
by the program statute in title V, part D, subpart 4, section 5441(b)
of the ESEA. Applicants also must meet the following requirements:
(a) School Report Cards. We require that LEAs provide, for each
school included in the application, the most recent ``report card''
produced by the State or the LEA to inform the public about the
characteristics of the school and its students, including information
about student academic achievement and other student outcomes. These
``report cards'' must include, at a minimum, the following information
that LEAs are required to report for each school under section
1111(h)(2)(B)(ii) of the ESEA: (1) Whether the school has been
identified for school improvement; and (2) information that shows how
the academic assessments and other indicators of adequate yearly
progress compare to those indicators for students in the LEA as a whole
and also shows the performance of the school's students on statewide
assessments.
(b) Student Placement. We require applicants for SLC grants to
include a description of how students will be selected or placed in an
SLC and an assurance that students will not be placed according to
ability or any other measure, but will be placed at random or by
student/parent choice and not pursuant to testing or other judgments.
(c) Including All Students. We require applicants for grants to
create or expand an SLC project that will include every student within
the school by no later than the end of the fifth school year of
implementation. Elsewhere in this notice, we define an SLC as an
environment in which a group of teachers and other adults within the
school knows the needs, interests, and aspirations of each student
well, closely monitors each student's progress, and provides the
academic and other support each student needs to succeed.
(d) Performance Indicators. We require applicants to identify in
their application specific performance indicators and annual
performance objectives for each of these indicators. Specifically, we
require applicants to use the following performance indicators to
measure the progress of each school:
(1) The percentage of students who score at the proficient and
advanced levels on the reading/language arts and mathematics
assessments used by the State to determine whether a school has made
adequate yearly progress under part A of title I of the ESEA, as well
as these percentages disaggregated by subject matter and the following
subgroups:
(A) Major racial and ethnic groups.
(B) Students with disabilities.
(C) Students with limited English proficiency.
(D) Economically disadvantaged students.
(2) The school's graduation rate, as defined in the State's
approved accountability plan for part A of title I of the ESEA.
(3) The percentage of graduates who enroll in postsecondary
education, apprenticeships, or advanced training for the semester
following graduation.
(4) The percentage of graduates who are employed by the end of the
first quarter after they graduate (e.g., for students who graduate in
May or June, this would be September 30).
(5) Other appropriate indicators the LEA may choose to identify in
its application, such as rates of average daily attendance and year-to-
year retention; achievement and gains in English proficiency of limited
English
[[Page 24659]]
proficient students; the incidence of school violence, drug and alcohol
use, and disciplinary actions; or the percentage of students completing
advanced placement courses and the rate of passing advanced placement
tests (such as Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate) and
courses for college credit.
Applicants are required to include in their applications baseline
data for each of these indicators and identify performance objectives
for each year of the project period. We further require recipients of
grants to report annually on the extent to which each school achieves
its performance objectives for each indicator during the preceding
school year. We require grantees to report comparable data, if
available, for the preceding three school years so that trends in
performance will be more apparent.
Grantees must submit this additional data using the Department's
SLC electronic reporting Web site within three months after awards are
made.
(e) Evaluation. We require each applicant to provide assurances
that it will support an evaluation of the project that provides
information to the project director and school personnel, and that will
be useful in gauging the project's progress and in identifying areas
for improvement. Each evaluation must include an annual report for each
of the first four years of the project period and a final report that
would be completed at the end of the fifth year of implementation and
that will include information on implementation during the fifth year
as well as information on the implementation of the project across the
entire project period. We require grantees to submit each of these
reports to the Department.
In addition, we require that the evaluation be conducted by an
independent third party, selected by the applicant, whose role in the
project is limited to conducting the evaluation.
(f) Required Meetings Sponsored by the Department. Applicants must
set aside adequate funds within their proposed budget to send their
project director to a two-day project directors' meeting in Washington,
DC, and to send a team of five key staff members, including their
external evaluator, to attend a two-and-a-half-day Regional Institute.
The Department will host both meetings. We anticipate that the meetings
will be held in the first year of the grant period.
(g) Additional Requirements. Additional requirements concerning the
content of an application for this program, together with the forms you
must submit, also are in the application package for this competition.
Page limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We encourage you to limit the narrative to the equivalent
of no more than 25 pages and suggest that you use the following
standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5 x 11, on one side only, with
1 margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
The suggested page limit does not apply to the forms, budget
section, budget justification, assurances and certifications, one-page
abstract, endnotes, school report cards, or resumes. However, you must
include all of the application narrative in the narrative section.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: April 26, 2006.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: May 26, 2006.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 26, 2006.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically or by mail or hand delivery if you qualify
for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, please refer
to section IV.6. Other Submission Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 24, 2006.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this competition must be submitted electronically unless you qualify
for an exception to this requirement in accordance with the
instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under the Smaller Learning Communities
Program-CFDA Number 84.215L must be submitted electronically using the
Grants.gov Apply site at: https://www.grants.gov. Through this site, you
will be able to download a copy of the application package, complete it
offline, and then upload and submit your application. You may not e-
mail an electronic copy of a grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirements and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Smaller
Learning Communities Program at: https://www.grants.gov. You must search
for the downloadable application package for this program by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA number s alpha suffix in your search.
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are time and date
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted, and
must be date/time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not consider your application
if it is date/time stamped by the Grants.gov system later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. When we
retrieve your application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are
rejecting your application because it was date/time stamped by the
Grants.gov system after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date.
[[Page 24660]]
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at https://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/
GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
To submit your application via Grants.gov, you must
complete all of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process (see
https://www.Grants.gov/GetStarted). These steps include (1) registering
your organization, (2) registering yourself as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR), and (3) getting authorized as an AOR
by your organization. Details on these steps are outlined in the
Grants.gov 3-Step Registration Guide (see https://www.grants.gov/assets/
GrantsgovCoBrandBrochure8X11.pdf). You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number used with this registration. Please
note that the registration process may take five or more business days
to complete, and you must have completed all registration steps to
allow you to submit an application successfully via Grants.gov.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information typically included on the Application for Federal
Education Assistance (ED 424), Budget Information--Non-Construction
Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications. You
must attach any narrative sections of your application as files in a
.DOC (document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF (Portable Document) format.
If you upload a file type other than the three file types specified
above or submit a password protected file, we will not review that
material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgement from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The Department will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send you a second confirmation by e-
mail that will include a PR/Award number (an ED-specified identifying
number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are prevented from electronically
submitting your application on the application deadline date because of
technical problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an
extension until 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business
day to enable you to transmit your application electronically, or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your application by following the
mailing instructions as described elsewhere in this notice. If you
submit an application after 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
deadline date, please contact the person listed elsewhere in this
notice under For Further Information Contact, and provide an
explanation of the technical problem you experienced with Grants.gov,
along with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number (if available). We
will accept your application if we can confirm that a technical problem
occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that problem affected your
ability to submit your application by 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date. The Department will contact you after
a determination is made on whether your application will be accepted.
Note: Extensions referred to in this section apply only to the
unavailability of or technical problems with the Grants.gov system.
We will not grant you an extension if you failed to fully register
to submit your application to Grants.gov before the deadline date
and time or if the technical problem you experienced is unrelated to
the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application. If you
mail your written statement to the Department, it must be postmarked no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Deborah Williams, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3W241,
Washington, DC 20202-6200. Fax: (202) 260-8969.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier), your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the applicable
following address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number
84.215L), 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260,
or
By mail through a commercial carrier: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Cente--Stop 4260, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.215L),
7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD 20785-1506.
Regardless of which address you use, you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark,
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service,
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier, or
[[Page 24661]]
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark, or
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.215L), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily between 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays, and
Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail
or hand deliver your application to the Department:
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the
Department--in Item 4 of the ED 424 the CFDA number--and suffix letter,
if any--of the competition under which you are submitting your
application.
(2) The Application Control Center will mail a grant application
receipt acknowledgment to you. If you do not receive the grant
application receipt acknowledgment within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The following selection criteria will be used
to evaluate applications for new grants under this program. These
selection criteria are from the NFP, published in the Federal Register
on April 28, 2005 (70 FR 22233).
Note: The maximum score for a grant under this program is 100
points. The points or weights assigned to each criterion and sub-
criterion are indicated in parentheses.
Need for the Project (10 Points)
In determining the need for the proposed project, we consider the
extent to which the applicant will--
Assist schools that have the greatest need for assistance, as
indicated by, relative to other high schools within the State, one or
more of the factors below:
(A) Student performance on the academic assessments in reading/
language arts and mathematics administered by the State under part A,
title I of the ESEA, including gaps in the performance of all students
and that of student subgroups, such as economically disadvantaged
students, students from major racial and ethnic groups, students with
disabilities, or students with limited English proficiency.
(B) The school's dropout rate and gaps in the graduation rate
between all students and student subgroups.
(C) Disciplinary actions.
(D) The percentage of graduates who enroll in postsecondary
education, apprenticeships, or advanced training in the semester
following graduation, and gaps between all students and student
subgroups.
Foundation for Implementation (20 Points)
In determining the quality of the implementation plan for the
proposed project, we consider the extent to which--
(1) (5 points) Teachers and administrators within each school
support the proposed project and have been and will continue to be
involved in its planning and development, including, particularly,
those teachers who will be directly affected by the proposed project;
(2) (5 points) Parents, students, and other community stakeholders
support the proposed project and have been and will continue to be
involved in its planning and development;
(3) (5 points) The proposed project is consistent with, and will
advance, State and local initiatives to increase student achievement
and narrow gaps in achievement between all students and student
subgroups; and
(4) (5 points) The applicant demonstrates that it has carried out
sufficient planning and preparatory activities to enable it to begin to
implement the proposed project at the beginning of the school year
immediately following receipt of an award.
Quality of the Project Design (30 Points)
In determining the quality of the project design for the SLC
project, we consider the extent to which--
(1) (5 points) The applicant will implement or expand strategies,
new organizational structures, or other changes in practice that are
likely to create an environment in which a core group of teachers and
other adults within the school knows the needs, interests, and
aspirations of each student well, closely monitors each student's
progress, and provides the academic and other support each student
needs to succeed;
(2) (5 points) The applicant proposes research-based strategies
that are likely to improve overall student achievement and other
outcomes (including graduation rates and enrollment in postsecondary
education), narrow any gaps in achievement between all students and
student subgroups, and address the particular needs identified by the
school under the paragraph titled Need for the Project, such as--
(A) More rigorous academic curriculum for all students and the
provision of academic support to struggling students who need
assistance to master more challenging academic content;
(B) More intensive and individualized educational counseling and
career and college guidance, provided through mentoring, teacher
advisories, adult advocates, or other means;
(C) Strategies designed to increase average daily attendance,
increase the percentage of students who transition from the 9th to 10th
grade, and improve the graduation rate; and
(D) Expanding opportunities for students to participate in advanced
placement courses and other academic and technical courses that offer
both high school and postsecondary credit;
(3) (5 points) The applicant will implement accelerated learning
strategies and interventions that will assist students who enter the
school with reading/language or mathematics skills that are
significantly below grade level and that--
(A) Are designed to equip participating students with grade-level
reading/language arts and mathematics skills by no later than the end
of the 10th grade;
(B) Are grounded in scientifically based research;
(C) Include the use of age-appropriate instructional materials and
teaching and learning strategies;
(D) Provide additional instructional and academic support during
the regular school day, which may be
[[Page 24662]]
supplemented by instruction that is provided before or after school, on
weekends, and at other times when school is not in session;
(E) Will be delivered with sufficient intensity to improve the
reading/language arts or math skills, as appropriate, of participating
students; and
(F) Include sustained professional development and ongoing support
for teachers and other personnel who are responsible for delivering
instruction;
(4) (5 points) The applicant will provide high-quality professional
development throughout the project period that advances the
understanding of teachers, administrators, and other school staff of
effective, research-based instructional strategies for improving the
academic achievement of students, including, particularly, students
with academic skills that are significantly below grade level, and
provide the knowledge and skills those staff need to participate
effectively in the development, expansion, or implementation of an SLC;
(5) (5 points) The proposed project fits into a comprehensive
district high school improvement strategy to increase the academic
achievement of all district high school students, reduce gaps between
the achievement of all students and student subgroups, and prepare
students to enter postsecondary education or the workforce; and
(6) (5 points) The proposed project is part of a cohesive plan that
uses funds provided under the ESEA, the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and
Technical Education Act, or other Federal programs, as well as local,
State, and private funds sufficient to ensure continuation of efforts
after Federal support ends.
Quality of the Management Plan (20 Points)
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed
project, we consider the following factors:
(1) (5 points) The adequacy of the proposed management plan to
achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined responsibilities and detailed
timelines and milestones for accomplishing project tasks.
(2) (5 points) The extent to which time commitments of the project
director and other key personnel are appropriate and adequate to
implement the SLC project effectively.
(3) (5 points) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of the project director and other key personnel.
(4) (5 points) The adequacy of resources, including the extent to
which the budget is adequate and costs are directly related to the
objectives and SLC activities.
Quality of the SLC Project Evaluation (20 Points)
In determining the quality of the proposed project evaluation
conducted by an independent, third-party evaluator, we consider the
following factors:
(1) (5 points) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are
thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and
outcomes of the proposed SLC project.
(2) (5 points) The extent to which the evaluation will collect and
report accurate qualitative and quantitative data that will be useful
in assessing the success and progress of implementation, including, at
a minimum--
(A) Measures of student academic achievement that provide data for
the performance indicators identified in the application, including
results that are disaggregated for economically disadvantaged students,
students from major racial and ethnic groups, students with
disabilities, students with limited English proficiency, and other
subgroups identified by the applicant; and
(B) Other measures identified by the applicant in the application
as performance indicators.
(3) (5 points) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will
provide timely and regular feedback to the LEA and the school on the
success and progress of implementation and identify areas for needed
improvement.
(4) (5 points) The qualifications and relevant training and
experience of the independent evaluator.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN). We may also notify you informally.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
Note: Requirements listed in the NFP are material requirements.
Failure to comply with any requirement or with any elements of the
grantee's application would subject the grantee to administrative
action including, but not limited to, designation as a ``high-risk''
grantee, the imposition of special conditions, or termination of the
grant. Circumstances that might cause the Department to take this
action include, but are not limited to--the grantee showing a
decline in student achievement after two years of implementation of
the grant; the grantee's failure to make substantial progress in
completing the milestones outlined in the management plan included
in the application; and the grantee's expenditure of funds in a
manner that is inconsistent with the budget as submitted in the
application.
3. Reporting: At the end of your project period, you must submit a
final performance report, including financial information, as directed
by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an
annual performance report that provides the most current performance
and financial expenditure information as specified by the Secretary in
34 CFR 75.118. Additional reporting requirements are described
elsewhere in this notice under section IV. Application and Submission
Information, 2. Content and Form of Application Submission.
4. Performance Measures: The application requirements and other
information related to performance indicators and objectives are
described elsewhere in this notice under section IV. Application and
Submission Information, 2. Content and Form of Application Submission.
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3W241, Washington, DC 20202-
6200. Telephone: (202) 205-3783 or by e-mail: deborah.williams@ed.gov
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the program contact person listed in this
section.
VIII. Other Information
Electronic Access to This Document: You may view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in
[[Page 24663]]
text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/
Dated: April 21, 2006.
Henry L. Johnson,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 06-3928 Filed 4-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P