Importation of Fruits and Vegetables, 72881-72892 [05-23790]
Download as PDF
72881
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 235
Thursday, December 8, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Parts 305 and 319
[Docket No. 03–048–2]
Importation of Fruits and Vegetables
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are amending the fruits
and vegetables regulations to list a
number of fruits and vegetables from
certain parts of the world as eligible,
under specified conditions, for
importation into the United States.
Many of these fruits and vegetables have
been eligible for importation under
permit, but were not specifically listed
in the regulations. All of the fruits and
vegetables, as a condition of entry, will
be inspected and subject to treatment at
the port of first arrival as may be
required by an inspector. In addition,
some of the fruits and vegetables will be
required to be treated or meet other
special conditions. We are also
recognizing areas in several countries as
free from certain fruit flies; adding,
modifying, or removing certain
definitions; modifying existing
treatment requirements for specified
commodities; and making other
miscellaneous changes. These actions
will improve the transparency of our
regulations while continuing to protect
against the introduction of quarantine
pests through imported fruits and
vegetables.
December 8, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Donna L. West, Senior Import
Specialist, Commodity Import Analysis
and Operations, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD
20737–1228; (301) 734–8758.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ‘‘Subpart—Fruits
and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56 through
319.56–8, referred to below as the
regulations) prohibit or restrict the
importation of fruits and vegetables into
the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction
and spread of plant pests that are new
to or not widely distributed within the
United States.
On March 31, 2005, we published in
the Federal Register (70 FR 16431–
16445, Docket No. 03–048–1) a proposal
to amend the regulations to list a
number of fruits and vegetables from
certain parts of the world as eligible,
under specified conditions, for
importation into the United States.
Many of these fruits and vegetables have
been eligible for importation under
permit, but were not specifically listed
in the regulations. We also proposed to
recognize areas in several countries as
free from certain fruit flies; add an
alternative treatment for specified
commodities; provide for the
importation of untreated citrus from
Mexico for processing under certain
conditions; eliminate or modify existing
treatment requirements for specified
commodities; and to add, modify, or
remove certain definitions and make
other miscellaneous changes.
We solicited comments concerning
our proposal for 60 days ending May 31,
2005. We received 29 comments by that
date. They were from representatives of
State governments, industry
organizations, importers and exporters,
producers, scientists, and individuals.
Eight of the commenters wrote
specifically to support the addition of
two new areas of Brazil to the list of
localities eligible to export papayas to
the United States, and a ninth
commenter supported the proposed rule
in general. Another commenter wrote to
oppose the proposed rule in general, but
offered no specific information for our
consideration. The remaining comments
are discussed below by topic.
Untreated Citrus From Mexico
Several of the commenters raised
concerns regarding the proposed
provisions that would have allowed the
importation of untreated citrus from
Mexico into the United States for
processing. In order to give us
additional time to consider the issues
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
raised by the commenters regarding
untreated Mexican citrus without
delaying final action on the other
aspects of the proposed rule, we will not
be finalizing the provisions regarding
the importation of untreated citrus from
Mexico into the United States for
processing in this final rule. We will
issue another document in the Federal
Register in the future regarding the
importation of untreated citrus from
Mexico into the United States for
processing.
Blueberries From South America
Under the regulations in § 319.56–2x,
blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) from
Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru
may be imported into the United States
provided that they are treated with
methyl bromide or irradiation to
mitigate the risk presented by the
Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly,
Ceratitis capitata).
We proposed to remove the treatment
requirement for blueberries from those
countries based on research and reports
indicating that blueberries were not a
host for Medfly in South America. In
addition, we proposed to add Colombia,
a country where Medfly is present, to
the list of countries eligible to export
blueberries to the United States. The
pest risk assessment we prepared with
regard to the importation of blueberries
from Colombia concluded that there are
no quarantine pests associated with
blueberries from Colombia that are
likely to follow the import pathway
(although Medfly is present in
Colombia, the pest risk assessment
reflected the research and reports
indicating that blueberries were not a
host for Medfly in South America).
Therefore, we proposed to allow
blueberries to be imported from
Colombia without treatment.
In response to our proposed rule, we
received several comments indicating
that there is a credible possibility that
blueberries are in fact a host for Medfly
in South America. Among the
commenters were several South
American blueberry producers who
urged us to delay final action regarding
the Medfly host status of blueberries
until additional research can be
conducted. These commenters stated
they wished to avoid the market
disruptions that would occur if
blueberries were imported into the
United States without treatment and
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
72882
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
subsequently found to be infested with
Medfly.
Based on these comments, we have
decided not to finalize our proposed
removal of the treatment requirement
for blueberries from Argentina, Bolivia,
Ecuador, and Peru. With respect to
blueberries from Colombia, this final
rule will authorize their importation
under § 319.56–2x (i.e., as a commodity
enterable with treatment) rather than
under § 319.56–2t as we had proposed.
We believe that the pest risk assessment
prepared for blueberries from Colombia
still provides a basis for allowing their
entry; however, our change in approach
with respect to the Medfly host status of
blueberries necessitates that the fruit be
treated as a condition of entry. The
treatment for blueberries from Colombia
will be the same as for blueberries from
Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru,
i.e., fumigation with methyl bromide or
irradiation; this final rule also amends
the list of treatments in § 305.2(h)(2)(i)
of the phytosanitary treatments
regulations to indicate the applicability
of those treatments.
We intend to work with the
Department’s Agricultural Research
Service on studies that will allow us to
determine with greater certainty the
Medfly host status of blueberries in
South America as well as research into
the efficacy of alternatives, such as cold
treatment, to methyl bromide
fumigation and irradiation.
One commenter stated he was
interested in knowing which data
sources were used to determine the pest
status of blueberries in Colombia and
whether or not that information will be
considered prior to these blueberries
entering the United States.
As mentioned previously, we did
prepare a pest risk assessment relative
to the importation of blueberries from
Colombia. That risk assessment, titled
‘‘Importation of Fresh Blueberry
(Vaccinium spp.) into the Continental
United States from Colombia,’’ was
made available to the public in the
proposed rule. The pest risk assessment
cites the sources of the data used in the
document and was, as noted above,
considered in the preparation of the
proposed rule and this final rule.
Root Crops From Mexico and China
We proposed to add Swiss chard
(Beta vulgaris var. cicla) from Mexico
and ginger root (Zingiber officinale)
from China to the list in § 319.56–2t of
fruits and vegetables that may be
imported into the United States in
accordance with the inspection and
disinfection requirements of § 319.56–6
and all other applicable requirements of
the regulations. The proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
admissible plants parts were ‘‘whole
plant’’ for Swiss chard from Mexico and
‘‘root’’ for ginger root from China. We
noted that both of these commodities
have been imported into the United
States under permit since before 1992
and that their addition to the list in
§ 319.56–2t would serve to improve the
transparency of our regulations.
One commenter stated that the potato
pathotype of the false root-knot
nematode (Nacobbus aberrans) is of
concern with regard to Swiss chard
imported from Mexico. The false rootknot nematode is a quarantine pest
present in Mexico and is known to
infest Swiss chard.
In response to this comment, this final
rule provides that the admissible plant
parts of Swiss chard from Mexico will
be leaves and stem, rather than the
whole plant as we proposed. Since the
false root-knot nematode only infests
the roots of Swiss chard and other
plants and is not known to be carried in
either the leaves or stem in trade or
transport, this measure will be sufficient
to prevent the introduction of false rootknot nematode in shipments of Swiss
chard from Mexico.
The same commenter further stated
that ginger root from China is an
excellent host of the burrowing
nematode (Radopholus similis) and
root-knot nematodes of the genus
Meloidogyne, and that root-knot
nematode species that attack citrus are
present in China and may infest ginger
root as well. The commenter stated that
evidence of infestation by such
nematodes is more difficult to detect
than evidence of arthropod infestation.
A review of our port interception
records for the past 20 years reveals
seven interceptions of root-knot
nematodes in ginger root. Those
interceptions were made in shipments
from Jamaica, Haiti, Thailand, and
Korea. There have been no interceptions
of root-knot nematodes in ginger root
from China.
Furthermore, both the burrowing
nematode and root-knot nematodes
exhibit symptoms that are macroscopic
and detectable upon visual inspection.
Specifically:
• Infestation by burrowing nematodes
is evidenced by small, shallow, sunken,
water-soaked lesions on the root.
• Root-knot nematodes cause galling
of the root system which is often
accompanied by a proliferation of small
roots at the site of the gall.
Our interception records coupled
with these macroscopic symptoms of
infestation lead us to believe that port
of entry inspection is adequate to
mitigate the risk posed by burrowing
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
nematode and root-knot nematodes in
ginger root from China.
Finally, the commenter recommended
that a complete risk analysis be
conducted with regard to the possible
introduction of these nematodes with
commodities from Mexico and China.
As noted previously and in the
proposed rule, both of these
commodities have been enterable under
permit since before 1992. Before those
permits were issued, APHIS staff
assessed the risk associated with each
commodity and documented the results
of that assessment in a decision sheet,1
which was the reporting tool we used
before we began routinely preparing
pest risk assessments according to the
guidelines provided by the Food and
Agriculture Organization and the North
American Plant Protection Organization.
Given that we have already assessed the
risks associated with the two
commodities and numerous subsequent
inspections of consignments of those
commodities from Mexico and China
have yielded no interceptions of
quarantine pests, we do not believe an
additional risk analysis is necessary.
Papaya From Brazil and Nicaragua
The regulations in § 319.56–2w
provide that papayas from certain areas
in Central America and Brazil may be
imported into the United States if they
are grown, treated, packed, labeled, and
shipped according to certain
specifications to prevent the
introduction of fruit flies into the
United States. Papayas from those areas
listed in § 319.56–2w(a) may be
imported into the United States only if
they meet a series of 10 conditions
which we have determined to be
sufficient to prevent the introduction of
fruit flies into the United States (those
conditions can be found in paragraphs
(b) through (k) of § 319.56–2w). We
proposed to amend § 319.56–2w(a) by
adding two new areas of Brazil and one
new area of Nicaragua to the list of
localities eligible to export papayas to
the United States.
One commenter stated that Medfly
and South American fruit fly
(Anastrepha fraterculus) are present in
Brazil and Medfly is present in
Nicaragua, and that both pests are
known to attack papaya. The commenter
stated that before he could endorse the
proposal to allow papaya from Brazil
and Nicaragua to be imported into the
United States, he would like the
opportunity to review the 10 conditions
1 Decision sheets contain relatively the same
information that is contained in modern pest risk
assessments, but without the standardized format.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
under which fruit will be acceptable as
uninfested.
As noted above and in the proposed
rule, the 10 conditions can be found in
paragraphs (b) through (k) of the
regulations § 319.56–2w. Those
provisions were added to the
regulations in March 1998 and have
been successfully used since that time
to provide for the importation of
papayas from various countries in
Central America and South America.
Citrus From the Dominican Republic
We proposed to add several citrus
fruits (grapefruit, lemon, orange, sour
lime, and tangerine) from the
Dominican Republic to the list in
§ 319.56–2t of fruits and vegetables that
may be imported into the United States
in accordance with the inspection and
disinfection requirements of § 319.56–6
and all other applicable requirements of
the regulations. As is the case with the
Swiss chard and ginger discussed earlier
in this final rule, those citrus fruits have
been imported into the United States
under permit since before 1992 and
their addition to the list in § 319.56–2t
would serve to improve the
transparency of our regulations.
One commenter noted that the State
of California maintains an exterior
quarantine and an ongoing detection
program for Caribbean fruit fly
(Anastrepha suspensa), a pest known to
occur in the Dominican Republic. The
commenter noted that an approved and
certified treatment is necessary to
prevent host fruit infested with
Caribbean fruit fly from entering
California and asked that APHIS
recognize this special local need when
developing its final rule.
Under the International Plant
Protection Convention (IPPC), to which
the United States is a signatory, and our
regulations in § 319.56, a quarantine
pest is defined as ‘‘a pest of potential
economic importance to the area
endangered thereby and not yet present
there, or present but not widely
distributed and being officially
controlled.’’ Caribbean fruit fly is
present in Florida, where a State
protocol provides for the establishment
of specific A. suspensa controlled areas
(designated areas) from which fresh
fruits may be certified for export.
However, that protocol is not currently
regarded as an official control program
and APHIS does not consider Caribbean
fruit fly to be a quarantine pest.
Therefore, we do not regulate imports of
citrus from the Dominican Republic to
protect against entry of this pest.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
Medfly-Free Area in Argentina
We proposed to recognize the
Patagonia region of Argentina as free of
Medfly and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies.
The Patagonia region includes those
areas along the valleys of the Rio
Colorado and Rio Negro rivers and
includes the provinces of Neuquen, Rio
Negro, Chubut, Santa Cruz, and Tierra
del Fuego.
One commenter, apparently believing
that this aspect of the proposal was
limited to recognizing only Medfly-free
areas, asked if the Patagonia region was
also free of South American fruit fly
(Anastrepha fraterculus). The
commenter stated that if this has not
been verified, he would recommend that
this aspect of the proposal not be
finalized.
In the proposed rule, we explained
that Argentina had provided us with
fruit fly survey data that demonstrates
that the Patagonia region meets the
criteria of § 319.56–2(f) for area freedom
from Medfly and other fruit flies (i.e.,
Anastrepha spp. fruit flies). Those
survey data were made available for
review in the proposed rule. We also
explained that, through site visits by
APHIS officials, we had successfully
verified this area’s status as a fruit flyfree zone. In response to the
commenter’s specific question, we have
verified that the Patagonia region of
Argentina is free of South American
fruit fly.
On the same subject, another
commenter stated that carving out a
Medfly-free area within a pest-infested
area is questionable, given that pests do
not read signs nor do they understand
boundaries. The commenter further
maintained that the Argentine
Government has a history of not
reporting pests or disease issues in a
timely manner.
As noted above, the fruit fly-free
status of the Patagonia region was
demonstrated through survey data
provided by the Argentine Government
and verified during site visits by APHIS
officials. Through those means, we
determined that the Patagonia region of
Argentina meets the criteria of § 319.56–
2(f) for area freedom from Medfly and
Anastrepha spp. fruit flies. Under
§ 319.56–2(f), the Administrator
determines that an area is free of a pest
or pests in accordance with the criteria
for establishing freedom found in
International Standard for Phytosanitary
Measures Publication No. 4,
‘‘Requirements for the Establishment of
Pest Free Areas.’’ That international
standard was established by the IPPC
and is incorporated by reference into
our regulations. APHIS must approve
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72883
the survey protocol used to determine
pest-free status, and pest-free areas are
subject to audit by APHIS to verify their
status. We would hope that the active
involvement of APHIS in approving
survey protocols and auditing pest-free
areas would allay the commenter’s
misgivings about the Argentine
Government’s reporting history.
Inspection Capabilities
Two commenters raised concerns
related to the transfer of port inspection
responsibilities from APHIS to the
Department of Homeland Security’s
(DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection (CBP). These commenters
stated that staffing levels for pest
exclusion programs were too low, that
there had not been sufficient pest
exclusion training provided for those
CBP personnel who came from agencies
other than APHIS, and that CBP
inspectors are more focused on security
issues than phytosanitary inspection.
The commenters stated that these issues
must be addressed before APHIS issues
new regulations that could overwhelm
what they perceive to be an already
weakened system.
With respect to staffing levels, there
was an initial drop in the number of
inspectors following the transfer of port
inspection responsibilities from APHIS
to DHS in June 2003: APHIS transferred
1,507 agriculture inspectors to DHS, but
by October 2004, the number of
inspectors had decreased to 1,452.
However, the loss of those 55 inspectors
was more than offset by February 2005,
at which time 109 new agricultural
specialists had completed New Officer
Training and were working at ports of
entry. In addition, DHS has approved 14
training classes for new officers which
began in the summer of 2004 and will
continue through January 2006. DHS
estimates that these training classes will
result in a total of 720 new officers.
With respect to training, there was a
need to provide pest exclusion training
to those Immigration and Naturalization
Service, U.S. Border Patrol, and U.S.
Customs Service personnel who were
transferred to CBP, just as the mission
of CBP dictated the need to provide
cross-training in other specialties to
those APHIS personnel who were
transferred to CBP. Planning and
delivering training for all these
personnel necessarily had to be
accomplished over time, but all CBP
inspection personnel have now been
fully and satisfactorily trained in pest
exclusion.
Finally, security issues are certainly a
focus for CBP personnel, but that does
not come at the expense of
phytosanitary inspections. While CBP
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
72884
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
conducts a majority of inspections of
agricultural commodities at the ports of
first arrival, inspectors follow
established and effective APHIS
protocols regarding inspection rates and
procedures. APHIS continues to work
with CBP to ensure that the United
States is protected against pests of
concern that may be associated with
agricultural imports.
Market Access
One commenter stated that APHIS
must do more to provide market access
to developing nations. To that end, the
commenter suggested that APHIS
should create pre-approval locations
overseas, which the commenter stated
CBP has already done, and allow
returning travelers to bring pre-screened
fruits and vegetables back to the United
States with them. APHIS could then
approve or discard the items and issue
permits on the spot, which the
commenter stated CBP is already doing.
It appears that the commenter is
unclear regarding the respective roles of
APHIS and CBP in the scenario he
describes. CBP has the primary
responsibility for agricultural
inspections at ports of entry, not APHIS,
and it appears that the commenter is
satisfied with CBP’s approach to
travelers returning to the United States
with fruits or vegetables. There is no
need—nor is there any authority—for
APHIS to establish a parallel system.
The same commenter stated that
APHIS should guarantee market access
to fruit and vegetable producers in
developing countries.
We cannot guarantee blanket access to
the U.S. market to producers in any
country. In order to maintain the
safeguards necessary to protect
American agriculture, we must first
assess the phytosanitary risks associated
with the importation of a particular fruit
or vegetable from a potential exporting
country. Only after such an assessment
would we be able to make a decision to
allow the importation of that
commodity.
Other Changes in This Final Rule
We proposed to remove the specific
treatment schedules presented in
§§ 319.56–2k(d), 319.56–2m(b), and
319.56–2n(b) and replace them with
references to the Plant Protection and
Quarantine (PPQ) Treatment Manual.
Those schedules were found in both the
regulations and the PPQ Treatment
Manual, so our proposed changes were
intended to eliminate that duplicative
presentation. Since the proposed rule
was published, however, we have
moved those treatment schedules out of
the PPQ Treatment Manual and into the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
regulations in 7 CFR part 305.
Therefore, where the proposed rule
would have added a reference to the
PPQ Treatment Manual, this final rule
adds a reference to 7 CFR part 305.
In § 319.56–2x, the entries we
proposed to add under Argentina all
included the statement ‘‘Treatment for
Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly) not
required if fruit is grown in a Medflyfree area (see § 319.56–2(j)).’’ As
indicated in the table of treatments in
§ 305.2(h)(2)(i), the fruits we proposed
to add are treated for species of
Anastrepha (other than A. ludens) in
addition to Medfly. As discussed earlier
in this document, we are amending
§ 319.56–2(j) to recognize the Patagonia
region of Argentina as free of Medfly
and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies.
Therefore, in § 319.56–2x in this final
rule, the entries we are adding under
Argentina include the more accurate
statement ‘‘Treatment for Anastrepha
spp. fruit flies and Medfly not required
if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free area
(see § 319.56–2(j)).’’ Because we will not
be removing the entry for blueberries
from Argentina from § 319.56–2x as we
had proposed, we have amended that
entry to include a statement that
treatment for Medfly is not required if
the fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free area
listed in § 319.56–2(j).
Also in § 319.56–2x, in the entry for
Israel, we proposed to change the
common name for ‘‘cactus’’ to ‘‘tuna.’’
The proposed new entry for tuna
included a statement that treatment for
Medfly is not required if the fruit is
grown in a Medfly-free area listed in
§ 319.56–2(j). However, there are no
Medfly-free areas of Israel listed in
§ 319.56–2(j), so that statement does not
appear in this final rule.
We proposed to amend § 319.56–2c by
removing a reference to the Deputy
Administrator of PPQ and adding a
reference to the Administrator in its
place. After the proposed rule was
published, § 319.56–2c was revised by
another rule and the change we had
proposed is no longer necessary.
Finally, the additional restrictions in
§ 319.56–2t(b)(1)(ii) have referred to
Medfly-free areas listed in § 319.56–2(j).
Because this rule amends § 319.56–2(j)
to list areas of Argentina that are free of
both Medfly and Anastrepha spp. fruit
flies, we have amended paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) in § 319.56–2t so that it uses
the more generic term ‘‘fruit-fly free
areas.’’
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
proposed rule and in this document, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, with the changes discussed in this
document.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Effective Date
This is a substantive rule that relieves
restrictions and, pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, may be made
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
This rule relieves restrictions on the
importation of certain fruits and
vegetables from certain countries while
continuing to protect against the
introduction of plant pests into the
United States. Immediate
implementation of this rule is necessary
to provide relief to those persons who
are adversely affected by restrictions we
no longer find warranted. Making this
rule effective immediately will allow
interested producers, importers,
shippers, and others to benefit
immediately from the relieved
restrictions. Therefore, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this rule should be
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12866. The rule has
been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we
have performed a final regulatory
flexibility analysis, which is set out
below, regarding the economic effects of
this rule on small entities.
This final rule amends the fruits and
vegetables regulations to list a number
of fruits and vegetables from certain
parts of the world as eligible, under
specified conditions, for importation
into the United States. Many of these
fruits and vegetables have been eligible
for importation under permit, but were
not specifically listed in the regulations.
This final rule also recognizes areas in
several countries as free from certain
fruit flies; adds, modifies, or removes
certain definitions; modifies existing
treatment requirements for specified
commodities; and makes other
miscellaneous changes.
We have used all available data to
estimate the potential economic effects
of allowing the fruits and vegetables
specified in this rule to be imported into
the United States. However, some of the
data we believe would be helpful in
making this determination have not
been available. Specifically, data are not
available on: (1) The quantity of certain
fruits and vegetables produced
domestically; (2) the quantity of
potential imports; and (3) the degree to
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
which imported fruits and vegetables
will displace existing imported or
domestic products. In our proposed
rule, we asked the public to provide
such data for specific commodities. In
addition, we invited the public to
comment on the potential effects of the
proposed rule on small entities, in
particular the number and kind of small
entities that may incur benefits or costs
from the implementation of the
proposed rule. However, we did not
receive any additional information or
data in response to those requests.
Effects on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to consider the
economic impact of their regulations on
small entities and to use flexibility to
provide regulatory relief when
regulations create economic disparities
between differently sized entities. Data
on the number and size of U.S.
producers of the various commodities
proposed for importation into the
United States in this document are not
available. However, since most fruit and
vegetable farms are small by Small
Business Administration standards, it is
likely that the majority of U.S. farms
producing the commodities listed below
are small.
As discussed in the proposed rule and
in this final rule, many of the
commodities listed in this document
may currently enter the United States
under permit. Therefore, we do not
expect the amount of commodities
submitted for importation to increase
beyond current levels. Additionally, in
many cases, importation of certain
commodities is necessary given that the
commodities are not grown extensively
in the United States (e.g., bananas,
breadfruits, cassavas, chicory, dasheens,
genip, kiwis, papayas, pineapples,
jicama, and tomatillos). In other
instances, importation augments
domestic supplies that are not sufficient
to meet consumer demand (e.g., apples,
blackberries, blueberries, carrots,
cherries, cucumbers, garlic, onions,
pears, raspberries, and strawberries). We
believe that the economic effects of this
rule in general will be small, and that
the benefits that will accrue to
consumers from greater trade will
outweigh the costs to domestic
producers.
With respect to those articles for
which we have specific data, the
potential economic effects of this final
rule are discussed below by commodity
and country of origin.
Blueberries from Colombia. The
United States is the world’s largest
producer of blueberries, supplying more
than half of the world’s production.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
Maine and Michigan account for more
than half of all U.S. domestic blueberry
production. According to the 1997
Census of Agriculture, there were 637
farms in Maine and 623 farms in
Michigan harvesting blueberries. (The
2002 Census of Agriculture does not
provide information on the number or
location of blueberry farms.) Average
annual U.S. production, imports, and
exports of blueberries for the period
2000–2003 were 123,832 metric tons
(MT), 20,820 MT, and 18,933 MT,
respectively (https://faostat.fao.org).
Demand for blueberries in the United
States has generally been on the rise: Per
capita fresh blueberry consumption
averaged 0.20 pound annually during
the early 1990s and increased to 0.34
pound during 2000–2003. Imports have
provided U.S. consumers access to fresh
blueberries at retail grocery stores
during the domestic off-season.
There are no official data available on
blueberry production or trade by
Colombia. Colombia has never exported
blueberries to the United States before.
However, a prospective Colombian
exporter has projected blueberry exports
to the United States over the next 6
years (table 1). Based on these numbers,
Colombia could export 10.2 metric tons
of blueberries to the United States in
2006, an amount equal to 0.05 percent
of average annual U.S. imports during
the period 2000–2003 of 20,820 MT.
The same set of projections indicates
that blueberry imports from Colombia
could increase to about 251 MT per year
by 2011, which would represent 1.2
percent of U.S. annual imports, 2000–
2003. We do not expect that the
economic effects resulting from imports
at those levels would be substantial.
72885
the United States from the Departments
of Carazo, Granada, Managua, Masaya,
and Rivas.
Papaya production levels in the
United States are small, with a majority
of papaya production occurring in
Florida. Between 2000 and 2003, Brazil
represented, on average, 9 percent of the
total U.S. imports of papayas. The
addition of two more Brazilian States to
the list of areas eligible for export is
expected to increase the Brazilian share
in the U.S. market for imported papayas.
Brazil is a major producer of papayas,
however only 1.6 percent of its
production is exported. The rest is
reserved for domestic consumption.
The United States imports four times
the amount of papayas produced
domestically, while, as stated
previously, the amount of Brazilian
papayas imported into the United States
accounts for, on average, 9 percent of
the total U.S. imports of papayas. Even
if Brazil greatly increases its exports to
the United States, it is more likely to
displace other countries’ shares of total
U.S. imports than to affect the overall
level of U.S. consumption. The
economic impact resulting from this
change will not be substantial.
There are no official production data
available for papayas produced in
Nicaragua. However, the existing trade
data show that Nicaragua has
historically exported papayas very
sporadically. For example, between
1997 and 2001, Nicaragua did not
export any papayas. In 2002, 203 metric
tons were exported to the world; the
following year, 18 metric tons were
exported. Nicaragua did not export any
papayas to the United States over that
time period despite the fact that there
are five approved exporting regions in
Nicaragua. Therefore, the addition of
TABLE 1.—PROJECTED COLOMBIAN one more eligible exporting area to the
EXPORTS OF BLUEBERRIES TO THE list should not have any substantial
UNITED STATES
impact on the U.S. papaya market.
Fruit Fly Free Areas. We are allowing
Year
Volume
fruits to be imported into the United
States from a new Medfly-free area in
2006 ............................................
10.20 MT
2007 ............................................
30.00 MT Argentina. We have determined that the
2008 ............................................
60.00 MT Patagonia region of Argentina is free of
2009 ............................................ 102.00 MT those pests. The Patagonia region
2010 ............................................ 135.00 MT includes those areas along the valleys of
2011 ............................................ 250.80 MT the Rio Colorado and Rio Negro rivers
and includes the provinces of Neuquen,
Papayas from Brazil and Central
Rio Negro, Chubut, Santa Cruz, and
America. We are listing two additional
Tierra del Fuego.
growing areas in Brazil (the States of
Fruits from Argentina (apple, apricot,
Bahia and Rio Grande del Norte) and
cherry, kiwi, nectarine, peach, pear,
one additional area in Nicaragua (the
plum, pomegranate, and quince) are
Department of Leon) as eligible to
already admissible into the United
export papayas into the United States.
States under permit from Argentina. The
Brazil is currently eligible to export
creation of a Medfly-free area would
papayas into the United States from the
lessen certain treatment requirements,
State of Espirito Santo. Nicaragua is
thus lowering the cost for exporters.
currently eligible to export papayas into This may, in turn, result in a lower cost
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
72886
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB control number
0579–0264.
for consumers. Further, as a country in
the Southern Hemisphere, Argentina’s
growing seasons are the opposite of
those in the United States. An increased
supply of Argentine fruit supplements
the U.S. winter fruit market. However,
we do not anticipate that this
potentially increased supply will be
large enough to have any substantial
impact on small entities.
This rule contains various
recordkeeping requirements, which
were described in our proposed rule,
and which have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (see
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ below).
7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
parts 305 and 319 as follows:
I
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA),
which requires Government agencies in
general to provide the public the option
of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible. For information
pertinent to GPEA compliance related to
this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 734–7477.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule allows certain fruits
and vegetables to be imported into the
United States from certain parts of the
world. State and local laws and
regulations regarding the importation of
fruits and vegetables under this rule will
be preempted while the fruit is in
foreign commerce. Fresh fruits and
vegetables are generally imported for
immediate distribution and sale to the
consuming public, and remain in
foreign commerce until sold to the
ultimate consumer. No retroactive effect
will be given to this rule, and this rule
will not require administrative
PART 305—PHYTOSANITARY
TREATMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 305
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.3.
2. In § 305.2, the table in paragraph
(h)(2)(i) is amended by adding, under
Colombia, an entry for blueberry, in
alphabetical order, to read as follows.
I
§ 305.2
*
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 305
Irradiation, Phytosanitary treatment,
Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Location
Commodity
*
*
*
Approved treatments.
*
*
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
*
*
Treatment
schedule1
Pest
*
*
*
*
Colombia
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Blueberry ............................................... Ceratitis capitata ....................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
MB T101–i–1–1.
*
1 Treatment
by irradiation in accordance with § 305.31 may be substituted for other approved treatments for the mango seed weevil
Sternochetus mangiferae (Fabricus) or for one or more of the following 11 species of fruit flies: Anastrepha fraterculus, A. ludens, A. obliqua, A.
serpentina, A. suspensa, Bactrocera cucurbitae, B. dorsalis, B. tryoni, B. jarvisi, B. latifrons, and Ceratitis capitata.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
3. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
§ 319.56
[Amended]
4. Section 319.56 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (c), by removing the
words ‘‘Deputy Administrator of the
Plant Protection and Quarantine
Programs’’ and adding the word
‘‘Administrator’’ in their place.
I b. By removing paragraphs (d) and (e).
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
5. Section 319.56–1 is amended as
follows:
I a. By removing the definitions for
Deputy Administrator, fresh fruits and
vegetables, and plants or portions of
plants.
I b. By adding, in alphabetical order,
new definitions for Administrator,
APHIS, fruits and vegetables, import
and importation, plant debris and
United States to read as set forth below.
I c. By revising the definitions for
cucurbits, inspector, and port of first
arrival to read as set forth below.
I
Jkt 208001
§ 319.56–1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Administrator. The Administrator of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service, United States Department of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Agriculture, or any employee of the
United States Department of Agriculture
delegated to act in his or her stead.
APHIS. The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, United States
Department of Agriculture.
*
*
*
*
*
Cucurbits. Any plants in the family
Cucurbitaceae.
*
*
*
*
*
Fruits and vegetables. A commodity
class for fresh parts of plants intended
for consumption or processing and not
for planting.
*
*
*
*
*
Import and importation. To move
into, or the act of movement into, the
territorial limits of the United States.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Inspector. Any individual authorized
by the Administrator of APHIS or the
Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security, to enforce the
regulations in this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
Plant debris. Detached leaves, twigs,
or other portions of plants, or plant litter
or rubbish as distinguished from
approved parts of clean fruits and
vegetables, or other commercial articles.
Port of first arrival. The first point of
entry into the United States where the
consignment is offered for entry.
*
*
*
*
*
United States. All of the States of the
United States, the Commonwealth of
Northern Mariana Islands, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin
Islands of the United States, and any
other territory or possession of the
United States.
I 6. Section 319.56–2 is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraph (a), by removing the
words ‘‘plants or portions of plants’’and
adding the words ‘‘plant debris’’ in their
place.
I b. By revising paragraph (g) to read as
set forth below.
I c. By revising paragraph (j) to read as
set forth below.
§ 319.56–2 Restrictions on entry of fruits
and vegetables.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Each box of fruit or vegetables
imported into the United States in
accordance with paragraphs (e) or (f) of
this section must be safeguarded from
infestation while in transit to the United
States through any area that has not
been designated as free from quarantine
pests that attack the fruit or vegetable.
Each box of fruit or vegetables imported
into the United States in accordance
with paragraphs (e)(3) or (4) and (f) of
this section must be clearly labeled
with:
(1) The name of the orchard or grove
of origin, or the name of the grower, and
(2) The name of the municipality and
State in which it was produced, and
(3) The type and amount of fruit it
contains.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) The Administrator has determined
that all Districts in Belize, all provinces
in Chile except Arica, and the
´
Department of Peten in Guatamala meet
the criteria of paragraphs (e) and (f) of
this section with regard to the insect
pest Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly)
(Ceratitis capitata [Wiedemann]). Also,
the Patagonia region of Argentina,
including those areas along the valleys
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
of the Rio Colorado and Rio Negro rivers
and also including the provinces of
Neuquen, Rio Negro, Chubut, Santa
Cruz, and Tierra del Fuego, has been
determined to meet the criteria of
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section
with regard to Medfly and Anastrepha
spp. fruit flies. Fruits and vegetables
otherwise eligible for importation under
this subpart may be imported from these
areas without treatment for the specified
pests.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 319.56–2d
[Amended]
7. Section 319.56–2d is amended as
follows:
I a. In paragraphs (b)(5)(v)(F),
(b)(5)(vi)(G), and (b)(5)(vii)(K), by
removing the word ‘‘Deputy’’.
I b. In paragraphs (b)(7)(i) and (c), by
removing the words ‘‘Deputy
Administrator of the Plant Protection
and Quarantine Programs’’ and adding
the word ‘‘Administrator’’ in their place.
I
§ 319.56–2g
[Amended]
8. In § 319.56–2g, the introductory
text of paragraph (b)(1) is amended by
removing the words ‘‘Deputy
Administrator of the Plant Protection
and Quarantine Programs’’ and adding
the word ‘‘Administrator’’ in their place.
I 9. In § 319.56–2j, footnote 4 is revised
to read as follows:
I
§ 319.56–2j Conditions governing the entry
of apples and pears from Australia
(including Tasmania) and New Zealand.4
10. Section 319.56–2k is amended as
follows:
I a. By revising the introductory text of
the section to read as set forth below.
I b. By revising paragraph (a) to read as
set forth below.
I c. In paragraph (d), by removing the
words ‘‘the following fumigation
schedule:’’ and adding the words ‘‘part
305 of this chapter.’’ in their place, and
by removing the subsequent table.
I d. In paragraph (g), by removing the
words ‘‘The treatment prescribed in
paragraph (d) of this section is’’ and
adding the words ‘‘The treatments
prescribed in part 305 of this chapter
are’’ in their place.
I
§ 319.56–2k Administrative instructions
prescribing method of fumigation of fieldgrown grapes from specified countries.
Approved fumigation with methyl
bromide at normal atmospheric
pressure, in accordance with part 305 of
4Apples and pears from Australia (excluding
Tasmania) where certain tropical fruit flies occur
are also subject to the irradiation requirements of
part 305 of this chapter or the cold treatment
requirements of § 319.56–2d.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72887
this chapter, is hereby prescribed as a
condition of entry under permit for all
shipments of field-grown grapes from
the continental countries of Asia,
Europe, North Africa, and the Near East
listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
This fumigation shall be in addition to
other conditions of entry for field-grown
grapes from the areas named.
(a) Continental countries of Asia,
Europe, North Africa, and the Near East.
The term ‘‘continental countries of Asia,
Europe, North Africa, and the Near
East’’ means Algeria, Armenia, Austria,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus,
Egypt, Estonia, France, Georgia,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Libya,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Portugal,
Republic of Moldova, Russian
Federation, Spain, Switzerland, Syria,
Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and
Uzbekistan.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 319.56–2l
[Amended]
I 11. In § 319.56–2l, paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
is amended by removing the words
‘‘Deputy Administrator of the Plant
Protection and Quarantine Programs’’
both times they appear and adding the
word ‘‘Administrator’’ in their place.
§ 319.56–2m
[Amended]
12. Section 319.56–2m is amended as
follows:
I a. In the introductory text of the
section, by removing the words ‘‘the
following procedure’’ and adding the
words ‘‘part 305 of this chapter’’ in their
place.
I b. In paragraph (b), by removing the
words ‘‘the following schedule:’’ and
adding the words ‘‘part 305 of this
chapter.’’ in their place, and by
removing the subsequent table.
I c. In paragraph (e), by removing the
words ‘‘paragraph (b) of this section’’
and adding the words ‘‘part 305 of this
chapter’’ in their place.
I
§ 319.56–2n
[Amended]
13. Section 319.56–2n is amended as
follows:
I a. In the introductory text of the
section, by removing the words ‘‘the
procedures described in this section’’
and adding the words ‘‘part 305 of this
chapter’’ in their place.
I b. In the introductory text of
paragraph (b), by removing the words
‘‘the following table:’’ and adding the
words ‘‘part 305 of this chapter.’’ in
their place and by removing the
subsequent table.
I c. By removing paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2).
I
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
72888
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 319.56–2p
[Amended]
I 14. In § 319.56–2p, paragraph (b)(7) is
amended by removing the words
‘‘Deputy Administrator of the Plant
Protection and Quarantine Programs’’
and adding the word ‘‘Administrator’’ in
their place.
I 15. Section 319.56–2t is amended as
follows:
I a. In the table in paragraph (a), by
revising the entry for jicama from
Mexico and by adding, in alphabetical
order, entries for the following fruits
and vegetables to read as set forth
below: Under Argentina, for allium,
apple, apricot, cherry, kiwi, nectarine,
peach, pear, plum, pomegranate, and
quince; under Belgium, for cichorium;
under Belize, for pepper; under Chile,
for apple, asparagus, avocado,
blackberry, cherry, pear, and raspberry;
under China, for ginger root; under
Colombia, for banana; under Costa Rica,
for banana, carrot, and cucurbit; under
Dominican Republic, for avocado,
banana, breadfruit, cassava, celeriac,
citrus, cucurbit, dasheen, genip, papaya,
pepper, and pineapple; under Ecuador,
for pineapple; under Guatemala, for
banana, cichorium, cucurbit, and okra;
under Honduras, for cucurbit and okra;
under Israel, for basil; under Jamaica,
for cucurbit and papaya; under Mexico,
for artichoke, globe; artichoke,
Jerusalem; basil, blackberry, celery,
cichorium, dill, lettuce, oregano,
pepper, raspberry, spinach, strawberry,
Swiss chard, and tomatillo; under
Netherlands, for cichorium, cucurbit,
and eggplant; under Nicaragua, for
banana and dasheen; under Panama, for
cucurbit; under Peru, for banana; under
Spain, for cucurbit and lemon; and
under Trinidad and Tobago, for
cucurbit.
I b. By adding to the table in paragraph
(a) new entries for ‘‘Brazil’’ and
‘‘Venezuela’’ read as set forth below.
I c. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), by removing
the words ‘‘Medfly-free’’ both times they
appear and adding the words ‘‘fruit-fly
free’’ in their place.
I d. By adding a new paragraph (b)(6) to
read as set forth below.
I e. By revising the OMB citation at the
end of the section to read as set forth
below.
§ 319.56–2t Administrative instructions:
conditions governing the entry of certain
fruits and vegetables.
*
*
*
*
*
Additional restrictions
(See paragraph (b)
of this section.)
Country/locality
Common name
Botanical name
Plant part(s)
Argentina ................
Allium ...................
Apple ...................
Apricot .................
Allium spp ..........................................
Malus domestica ...............................
Prunus americana .............................
Whole plant.
Fruit ...................................................
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Cherry ..................
*
*
Prunus avirum, P. cerasus ................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Kiwi ......................
*
*
Actinidia deliciosa ..............................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Nectarine .............
*
*
Prunus persica var. nucipersica ........
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Peach ..................
Pear .....................
Plum ....................
Pomegranate .......
Quince .................
*
*
Prunus persica var. persica ..............
Pyrus communis ................................
Prunus domestica subsp. domestica
Punica granatum ...............................
Cydonia oblonga ...............................
Fruit
Fruit
Fruit
Fruit
Fruit
*
*
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
(b)(1)(ii)
(b)(1)(ii)
(b)(1)(ii)
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Cichorium ............
*
*
Cichorium spp ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
(b)(6)(i)
*
*
*
*
*
Belgium ..................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Belize
*
*
Pepper .................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
*
Dasheen ..............
Ginger root ..........
*
*
Colocasia esculenta ..........................
Zingiber officinale ..............................
*
Whole plant.
Root.
*
Apple ...................
Asparagus ...........
Avocado ...............
*
*
Malus domestica ...............................
Asparagus officinalis .........................
Persea americana .............................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
Whole plant.
Fruit ...................................................
*
Blackberry ............
Cherry ..................
*
*
Rubus spp .........................................
Prunus avium, P. cerasus .................
*
*
Fruit.
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Pear .....................
*
*
Pyrus communis ................................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(1)(ii)
*
Raspberry ............
*
Brazil ......................
*
*
Capsicum spp ....................................
*
*
*
Rubus spp .........................................
Fruit.
(b)(6)(ii)
*
*
Chile
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
*
08DER1
*
(b)(1)(ii)
(b)(1)(ii)
*
*
*
72889
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Country/locality
*
Common name
*
Botanical name
*
Additional restrictions
(See paragraph (b)
of this section.)
Plant part(s)
*
*
*
*
China
*
*
*
Zingiber officinale ..............................
Musa spp ...........................................
*
Root.
Leaf and fruit.
*
*
Colombia ................
*
Ginger root ..........
Banana ................
*
Costa Rica .............
*
Banana ................
*
*
Musa spp ...........................................
*
Leaf and fruit.
*
*
*
*
Carrot ...................
*
*
Daucus carota ssp sativus ................
*
Whole plant.
*
*
*
*
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
*
Dominican Republic
*
Avocado ...............
*
*
Persea americana .............................
Fruit.
*
*
Banana ................
Breadfruit .............
Cassava ...............
Celeriac ...............
Citrus ...................
Cucurbit ...............
Dasheen ..............
*
*
Musa spp ...........................................
Artocarpus altilis ................................
Manihot esculenta .............................
Apium graveolens var. dulce .............
Citrus spp ..........................................
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
Colocasia esculenta ..........................
*
*
Fruit.
Fruit.
Root.
Whole plant.
Fruit ...................................................
Above ground parts ...........................
Whole plant.
*
Genip ...................
Papaya ................
Pepper .................
Pineapple .............
*
*
Melicoccus bijugatus .........................
Carica papaya ...................................
Capsicum spp ....................................
Ananas comosus ...............................
*
*
Fruit.
Fruit ...................................................
Fruit.
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(2)(iii)
*
Pineapple .............
*
*
Ananas comosus ...............................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
(b)(2)(iii)
*
*
*
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
*
*
(b)(6)(iii)
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
(b)(2)(iii)
Ecuador
*
*
Guatemala
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Banana ................
*
*
Musa spp ...........................................
*
Leaf and fruit.
*
*
Cichorium ............
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
Cichorium spp ...................................
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
Above ground parts ...........................
*
*
Okra .....................
*
*
Abelmoschus esculentus ...................
Pod.
*
Honduras
*
*
*
(b)(6)(i)
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
*
*
Okra .....................
*
*
Abelmoschus esculentus ...................
Pod.
*
*
*
*
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Israel
*
*
Basil .....................
*
*
Ocimum spp ......................................
*
Above ground parts
*
Jamaica ..................
*
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
*
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
*
Papaya ................
*
*
Carica papaya ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
*
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
72890
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Country/locality
*
Common name
*
Botanical name
*
Additional restrictions
(See paragraph (b)
of this section.)
Plant part(s)
*
*
*
*
Mexico
*
*
Artichoke, globe ...
Artichoke, Jerusalem.
*
*
Cynara scolymus ...............................
Helianthus tubersus ...........................
*
Immature flower head.
Whole plant.
*
*
*
*
Basil .....................
*
*
Ocimum spp ......................................
*
Above ground parts.
*
*
*
*
Blackberry ............
*
*
Rubus spp .........................................
*
*
*
Fruit.
*
Celery ..................
Cichorium ............
*
*
Apium graveolens var. dulce .............
Cichorium spp ...................................
*
*
Whole plant.
Above ground parts ...........................
*
*
Dill ........................
*
*
Anethum graveolens .........................
*
Above ground parts.
*
*
*
*
Jicama or yam
bean.
*
*
Pachyrhizus tuberosus, P. erosus ....
*
*
*
Root.
*
*
Lettuce .................
*
*
Lactuca sativa ...................................
*
Whole plant.
*
*
*
*
Oregano ...............
*
*
Origanum spp ....................................
*
Above ground parts.
*
*
*
*
Pepper .................
*
*
Capsicum spp ....................................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
*
Raspberry ............
*
*
Rubus spp .........................................
*
*
*
Fruit.
*
*
Spinach ................
Strawberry ...........
Swiss chard .........
*
*
Spinacia oleracea ..............................
Fragaria spp ......................................
Beta vulgaris var. cicla ......................
*
Whole plant.
Fruit.
Above ground parts.
*
*
*
*
Tomatillo ..............
*
*
Physalis ixocarpa ..............................
*
Whole plant.
*
*
*
Netherlands ............
*
Cichorium ............
Cucurbit ...............
Eggplant ..............
*
*
Cichorium spp ...................................
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
Solanum melongena .........................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
Above ground parts ...........................
Fruit.
*
Nicaragua ...............
*
Banana ................
*
*
Musa spp ...........................................
*
Leaf and fruit.
*
*
Dasheen ..............
*
*
Colocasia esculenta ..........................
Tuber.
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b)(6)(i)
*
(b)(6)(ii)
*
(b)(6)(i)
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Panama
*
*
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
*
*
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
*
*
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
*
*
*
Peru
*
*
Banana ................
*
*
Musa spp ...........................................
*
Leaf and fruit.
*
Spain ......................
*
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
*
(b)(3)
72891
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Additional restrictions
(See paragraph (b)
of this section.)
Country/locality
Common name
Botanical name
Plant part(s)
*
*
Lemon ..................
*
*
Citrus limon .......................................
*
*
Fruit ...................................................
*
(b)(3), (b)(6)(iv)
*
Trinidad and Tobago.
*
Cucurbit ...............
*
*
Cucurbitaceae ...................................
*
*
Above ground parts ...........................
*
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
*
Venezuela ..............
*
Banana ................
*
*
Musa spp ...........................................
Fruit.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(6) Plant types.
(i) Chicory (Cichorium intybus) and
endive (Cichorium endiva) only.
(ii) Rocoto pepper or chamburoto
(Capsicum pubescens) prohibited.
(iii) Grapefruit (Citrus paradisi),
lemon (Citrus limon), orange (Citrus
sinensis), sour lime (Citrus
aurantiifolia), and tangerine (Citrus
reticulata) only.
(iv) Smooth skinned variety only.
(Approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under control numbers
0579–0049, 0579–0236, and 0579–
0264.)
16. Section 319.56–2v is amended as
follows:
I a. In the introductory text of
paragraph (a), by removing the word
‘‘Dacus’’ and adding the word
‘‘Bactrocera’’ in its place.
I b. In paragraph (c), by removing the
word ‘‘Dacus’’ and adding the word
‘‘Bactrocera’’ in its place and by adding
a new sentence after the last sentence to
read as set forth below.
I
§ 319.56–2v Conditions governing the
entry of citrus from Australia.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * Irradiation treatments found
at part 305 of this chapter may be used
as an alternative to the cold treatment
described in this paragraph.
I 17. Section 319.56–2w is amended as
follows:
I a. By revising paragraph (a)(1) to read
as set forth below.
I b. In paragraph (a)(6), by adding the
word ‘‘Leon,’’ after the word
‘‘Granada,’’.
I c. In paragraph (c), by removing the
words ‘‘49 °C (120.2 °F)’’ and adding the
words ‘‘48 °C (118.4 °F)’’ in their place.
§ 319.56–2w Administrative instruction;
conditions governing the entry of papayas
from Central America and Brazil.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) Brazil: State of Espirito Santo; all
areas in the State of Bahia that are
between the Jequitinhonha River and
the border with the State of Espirito
Santo and all areas in the State of Rio
Grande del Norte that contain the
following municipalities: Touros,
Pureza, Rio do Fogo, Barra de
Maxaranguape, Taipu, Ceara Mirim,
Extremoz, Ielmon Marinho, Sao Goncalo
do Amarante, Natal, Maciaba,
Parnamirim, Veracruz, Sao Jose de
Mipibu, Nizia Floresta, Monte Aletre,
Areas, Senador Georgino Avelino,
Espirito Santo, Goianinha, Tibau do Sul,
Vila Flor, and Canguaretama e Baia
Formosa.
*
*
*
*
*
I 18. In § 319.56–2x, paragraph (a), the
table is amended as follows:
I a. Under Argentina, by revising the
entries for blueberry and kiwi and
adding, in alphabetical order, entries for
apple, apricot, cherry, nectarine, peach,
pear, plum, pomegranate, and quince to
read as set forth below.
I b. Under Chile, by adding, in
alphabetical order, entries for apple,
avocado, cherry, and pear to read as set
forth below.
I c. Under Colombia, by adding, in
alphabetical order, an entry for
blueberry to read as set forth below.
I d. Under Israel, by removing the entry
for cactus and adding, in alphabetical
order, an entry for tuna to read as set
forth below.
§ 319.56–2x Administrative instructions;
conditions governing the entry of certain
fruits and vegetables for which treatment is
required.
*
*
*
*
*
Country/locality
Common name
Botanical name
Plant part(s)
Argentina ............................
Apple ..................................
Malus domestica ................
Apricot ................................
Prunus armeniaca ..............
Blueberry ............................
Vaccinium spp. ..................
Cherry ................................
Prunus avium, P. cerasus
Kiwi ....................................
Actinidia deliciosa ..............
Nectarine ............................
Prunus persica var.
nucipersica.
Peach .................................
Prunus persica var. persica
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Medfly not required if fruit is
grown in a fruit fly-free area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
72892
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Country/locality
Common name
Prunus domestica spp.
domestica.
Pomegranate .....................
Punica granatum ................
Quince ...............................
Cydonia oblonga ................
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free
area (see § 319.56–2(j)).
*
*
Apple ..................................
*
Malus domestica ................
Avocado .............................
Persea americana ..............
Cherry ................................
Prunus avium, P. cerasus
*
*
Pear ...................................
*
Colombia ............................
Pyrus communis ................
Plum ...................................
*
Plant part(s)
Pear ...................................
*
Chile ...................................
Botanical name
*
Pyrus communis ................
*
*
*
Fruit. (Treatment for Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly) not
required if fruit is grown in a Medfly-free area (see
§ 319.56–2(j)).
*
*
Blueberry ............................
*
Vaccinium spp. ..................
*
Fruit.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Tuna ...................................
*
*
*
Fruit. (Treatment for
required if fruit is
§ 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for
required if fruit is
§ 319.56–2(j)).
Fruit. (Treatment for
required if fruit is
§ 319.56–2(j)).
*
*
Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly) not
grown in a Medfly-free area (see
Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly) not
grown in a Medfly-free area (see
Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly) not
grown in a Medfly-free area (see
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Israel
*
*
*
§ 319.56–2gg
*
*
Opuntia spp. ......................
*
*
[Amended]
19. In § 319.56–2gg, paragraph (d) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Deputy’’.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
December 2005.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05–23790 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
*
*
Fruit.
*
SUMMARY: This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
Walnut Marketing Board (Board) for the
2005–06 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0094 to $0.0096 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board locally administers
the marketing order which regulates the
handling of walnuts grown in
California. Assessments upon walnut
handlers are used by the Board to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The marketing year began
August 1 and ends July 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
Agricultural Marketing Service
DATES:
7 CFR Part 984
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Docket No. FV05–984–2 FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
Effective Date: December 9, 2005.
Shereen Marino, Marketing Specialist,
California Marketing Field Office, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938. Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 984, both as amended (7
CFR part 984), regulating the handling
of walnuts grown in California,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 235 (Thursday, December 8, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72881-72892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23790]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 72881]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Parts 305 and 319
[Docket No. 03-048-2]
Importation of Fruits and Vegetables
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are amending the fruits and vegetables regulations to list
a number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the world as
eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the United
States. Many of these fruits and vegetables have been eligible for
importation under permit, but were not specifically listed in the
regulations. All of the fruits and vegetables, as a condition of entry,
will be inspected and subject to treatment at the port of first arrival
as may be required by an inspector. In addition, some of the fruits and
vegetables will be required to be treated or meet other special
conditions. We are also recognizing areas in several countries as free
from certain fruit flies; adding, modifying, or removing certain
definitions; modifying existing treatment requirements for specified
commodities; and making other miscellaneous changes. These actions will
improve the transparency of our regulations while continuing to protect
against the introduction of quarantine pests through imported fruits
and vegetables.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 8, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna L. West, Senior Import
Specialist, Commodity Import Analysis and Operations, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1228; (301) 734-8758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR 319.56
through 319.56-8, referred to below as the regulations) prohibit or
restrict the importation of fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to prevent the introduction and
spread of plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed within
the United States.
On March 31, 2005, we published in the Federal Register (70 FR
16431-16445, Docket No. 03-048-1) a proposal to amend the regulations
to list a number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the
world as eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the
United States. Many of these fruits and vegetables have been eligible
for importation under permit, but were not specifically listed in the
regulations. We also proposed to recognize areas in several countries
as free from certain fruit flies; add an alternative treatment for
specified commodities; provide for the importation of untreated citrus
from Mexico for processing under certain conditions; eliminate or
modify existing treatment requirements for specified commodities; and
to add, modify, or remove certain definitions and make other
miscellaneous changes.
We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending
May 31, 2005. We received 29 comments by that date. They were from
representatives of State governments, industry organizations, importers
and exporters, producers, scientists, and individuals. Eight of the
commenters wrote specifically to support the addition of two new areas
of Brazil to the list of localities eligible to export papayas to the
United States, and a ninth commenter supported the proposed rule in
general. Another commenter wrote to oppose the proposed rule in
general, but offered no specific information for our consideration. The
remaining comments are discussed below by topic.
Untreated Citrus From Mexico
Several of the commenters raised concerns regarding the proposed
provisions that would have allowed the importation of untreated citrus
from Mexico into the United States for processing. In order to give us
additional time to consider the issues raised by the commenters
regarding untreated Mexican citrus without delaying final action on the
other aspects of the proposed rule, we will not be finalizing the
provisions regarding the importation of untreated citrus from Mexico
into the United States for processing in this final rule. We will issue
another document in the Federal Register in the future regarding the
importation of untreated citrus from Mexico into the United States for
processing.
Blueberries From South America
Under the regulations in Sec. 319.56-2x, blueberries (Vaccinium
spp.) from Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru may be imported into
the United States provided that they are treated with methyl bromide or
irradiation to mitigate the risk presented by the Mediterranean fruit
fly (Medfly, Ceratitis capitata).
We proposed to remove the treatment requirement for blueberries
from those countries based on research and reports indicating that
blueberries were not a host for Medfly in South America. In addition,
we proposed to add Colombia, a country where Medfly is present, to the
list of countries eligible to export blueberries to the United States.
The pest risk assessment we prepared with regard to the importation of
blueberries from Colombia concluded that there are no quarantine pests
associated with blueberries from Colombia that are likely to follow the
import pathway (although Medfly is present in Colombia, the pest risk
assessment reflected the research and reports indicating that
blueberries were not a host for Medfly in South America). Therefore, we
proposed to allow blueberries to be imported from Colombia without
treatment.
In response to our proposed rule, we received several comments
indicating that there is a credible possibility that blueberries are in
fact a host for Medfly in South America. Among the commenters were
several South American blueberry producers who urged us to delay final
action regarding the Medfly host status of blueberries until additional
research can be conducted. These commenters stated they wished to avoid
the market disruptions that would occur if blueberries were imported
into the United States without treatment and
[[Page 72882]]
subsequently found to be infested with Medfly.
Based on these comments, we have decided not to finalize our
proposed removal of the treatment requirement for blueberries from
Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. With respect to blueberries from
Colombia, this final rule will authorize their importation under Sec.
319.56-2x (i.e., as a commodity enterable with treatment) rather than
under Sec. 319.56-2t as we had proposed. We believe that the pest risk
assessment prepared for blueberries from Colombia still provides a
basis for allowing their entry; however, our change in approach with
respect to the Medfly host status of blueberries necessitates that the
fruit be treated as a condition of entry. The treatment for blueberries
from Colombia will be the same as for blueberries from Argentina,
Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru, i.e., fumigation with methyl bromide or
irradiation; this final rule also amends the list of treatments in
Sec. 305.2(h)(2)(i) of the phytosanitary treatments regulations to
indicate the applicability of those treatments.
We intend to work with the Department's Agricultural Research
Service on studies that will allow us to determine with greater
certainty the Medfly host status of blueberries in South America as
well as research into the efficacy of alternatives, such as cold
treatment, to methyl bromide fumigation and irradiation.
One commenter stated he was interested in knowing which data
sources were used to determine the pest status of blueberries in
Colombia and whether or not that information will be considered prior
to these blueberries entering the United States.
As mentioned previously, we did prepare a pest risk assessment
relative to the importation of blueberries from Colombia. That risk
assessment, titled ``Importation of Fresh Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.)
into the Continental United States from Colombia,'' was made available
to the public in the proposed rule. The pest risk assessment cites the
sources of the data used in the document and was, as noted above,
considered in the preparation of the proposed rule and this final rule.
Root Crops From Mexico and China
We proposed to add Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris var. cicla) from
Mexico and ginger root (Zingiber officinale) from China to the list in
Sec. 319.56-2t of fruits and vegetables that may be imported into the
United States in accordance with the inspection and disinfection
requirements of Sec. 319.56-6 and all other applicable requirements of
the regulations. The proposed admissible plants parts were ``whole
plant'' for Swiss chard from Mexico and ``root'' for ginger root from
China. We noted that both of these commodities have been imported into
the United States under permit since before 1992 and that their
addition to the list in Sec. 319.56-2t would serve to improve the
transparency of our regulations.
One commenter stated that the potato pathotype of the false root-
knot nematode (Nacobbus aberrans) is of concern with regard to Swiss
chard imported from Mexico. The false root-knot nematode is a
quarantine pest present in Mexico and is known to infest Swiss chard.
In response to this comment, this final rule provides that the
admissible plant parts of Swiss chard from Mexico will be leaves and
stem, rather than the whole plant as we proposed. Since the false root-
knot nematode only infests the roots of Swiss chard and other plants
and is not known to be carried in either the leaves or stem in trade or
transport, this measure will be sufficient to prevent the introduction
of false root-knot nematode in shipments of Swiss chard from Mexico.
The same commenter further stated that ginger root from China is an
excellent host of the burrowing nematode (Radopholus similis) and root-
knot nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne, and that root-knot nematode
species that attack citrus are present in China and may infest ginger
root as well. The commenter stated that evidence of infestation by such
nematodes is more difficult to detect than evidence of arthropod
infestation.
A review of our port interception records for the past 20 years
reveals seven interceptions of root-knot nematodes in ginger root.
Those interceptions were made in shipments from Jamaica, Haiti,
Thailand, and Korea. There have been no interceptions of root-knot
nematodes in ginger root from China.
Furthermore, both the burrowing nematode and root-knot nematodes
exhibit symptoms that are macroscopic and detectable upon visual
inspection. Specifically:
Infestation by burrowing nematodes is evidenced by small,
shallow, sunken, water-soaked lesions on the root.
Root-knot nematodes cause galling of the root system which
is often accompanied by a proliferation of small roots at the site of
the gall.
Our interception records coupled with these macroscopic symptoms of
infestation lead us to believe that port of entry inspection is
adequate to mitigate the risk posed by burrowing nematode and root-knot
nematodes in ginger root from China.
Finally, the commenter recommended that a complete risk analysis be
conducted with regard to the possible introduction of these nematodes
with commodities from Mexico and China.
As noted previously and in the proposed rule, both of these
commodities have been enterable under permit since before 1992. Before
those permits were issued, APHIS staff assessed the risk associated
with each commodity and documented the results of that assessment in a
decision sheet,\1\ which was the reporting tool we used before we began
routinely preparing pest risk assessments according to the guidelines
provided by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the North
American Plant Protection Organization. Given that we have already
assessed the risks associated with the two commodities and numerous
subsequent inspections of consignments of those commodities from Mexico
and China have yielded no interceptions of quarantine pests, we do not
believe an additional risk analysis is necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Decision sheets contain relatively the same information that
is contained in modern pest risk assessments, but without the
standardized format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Papaya From Brazil and Nicaragua
The regulations in Sec. 319.56-2w provide that papayas from
certain areas in Central America and Brazil may be imported into the
United States if they are grown, treated, packed, labeled, and shipped
according to certain specifications to prevent the introduction of
fruit flies into the United States. Papayas from those areas listed in
Sec. 319.56-2w(a) may be imported into the United States only if they
meet a series of 10 conditions which we have determined to be
sufficient to prevent the introduction of fruit flies into the United
States (those conditions can be found in paragraphs (b) through (k) of
Sec. 319.56-2w). We proposed to amend Sec. 319.56-2w(a) by adding two
new areas of Brazil and one new area of Nicaragua to the list of
localities eligible to export papayas to the United States.
One commenter stated that Medfly and South American fruit fly
(Anastrepha fraterculus) are present in Brazil and Medfly is present in
Nicaragua, and that both pests are known to attack papaya. The
commenter stated that before he could endorse the proposal to allow
papaya from Brazil and Nicaragua to be imported into the United States,
he would like the opportunity to review the 10 conditions
[[Page 72883]]
under which fruit will be acceptable as uninfested.
As noted above and in the proposed rule, the 10 conditions can be
found in paragraphs (b) through (k) of the regulations Sec. 319.56-2w.
Those provisions were added to the regulations in March 1998 and have
been successfully used since that time to provide for the importation
of papayas from various countries in Central America and South America.
Citrus From the Dominican Republic
We proposed to add several citrus fruits (grapefruit, lemon,
orange, sour lime, and tangerine) from the Dominican Republic to the
list in Sec. 319.56-2t of fruits and vegetables that may be imported
into the United States in accordance with the inspection and
disinfection requirements of Sec. 319.56-6 and all other applicable
requirements of the regulations. As is the case with the Swiss chard
and ginger discussed earlier in this final rule, those citrus fruits
have been imported into the United States under permit since before
1992 and their addition to the list in Sec. 319.56-2t would serve to
improve the transparency of our regulations.
One commenter noted that the State of California maintains an
exterior quarantine and an ongoing detection program for Caribbean
fruit fly (Anastrepha suspensa), a pest known to occur in the Dominican
Republic. The commenter noted that an approved and certified treatment
is necessary to prevent host fruit infested with Caribbean fruit fly
from entering California and asked that APHIS recognize this special
local need when developing its final rule.
Under the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC), to
which the United States is a signatory, and our regulations in Sec.
319.56, a quarantine pest is defined as ``a pest of potential economic
importance to the area endangered thereby and not yet present there, or
present but not widely distributed and being officially controlled.''
Caribbean fruit fly is present in Florida, where a State protocol
provides for the establishment of specific A. suspensa controlled areas
(designated areas) from which fresh fruits may be certified for export.
However, that protocol is not currently regarded as an official control
program and APHIS does not consider Caribbean fruit fly to be a
quarantine pest. Therefore, we do not regulate imports of citrus from
the Dominican Republic to protect against entry of this pest.
Medfly-Free Area in Argentina
We proposed to recognize the Patagonia region of Argentina as free
of Medfly and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies. The Patagonia region
includes those areas along the valleys of the Rio Colorado and Rio
Negro rivers and includes the provinces of Neuquen, Rio Negro, Chubut,
Santa Cruz, and Tierra del Fuego.
One commenter, apparently believing that this aspect of the
proposal was limited to recognizing only Medfly-free areas, asked if
the Patagonia region was also free of South American fruit fly
(Anastrepha fraterculus). The commenter stated that if this has not
been verified, he would recommend that this aspect of the proposal not
be finalized.
In the proposed rule, we explained that Argentina had provided us
with fruit fly survey data that demonstrates that the Patagonia region
meets the criteria of Sec. 319.56-2(f) for area freedom from Medfly
and other fruit flies (i.e., Anastrepha spp. fruit flies). Those survey
data were made available for review in the proposed rule. We also
explained that, through site visits by APHIS officials, we had
successfully verified this area's status as a fruit fly-free zone. In
response to the commenter's specific question, we have verified that
the Patagonia region of Argentina is free of South American fruit fly.
On the same subject, another commenter stated that carving out a
Medfly-free area within a pest-infested area is questionable, given
that pests do not read signs nor do they understand boundaries. The
commenter further maintained that the Argentine Government has a
history of not reporting pests or disease issues in a timely manner.
As noted above, the fruit fly-free status of the Patagonia region
was demonstrated through survey data provided by the Argentine
Government and verified during site visits by APHIS officials. Through
those means, we determined that the Patagonia region of Argentina meets
the criteria of Sec. 319.56-2(f) for area freedom from Medfly and
Anastrepha spp. fruit flies. Under Sec. 319.56-2(f), the Administrator
determines that an area is free of a pest or pests in accordance with
the criteria for establishing freedom found in International Standard
for Phytosanitary Measures Publication No. 4, ``Requirements for the
Establishment of Pest Free Areas.'' That international standard was
established by the IPPC and is incorporated by reference into our
regulations. APHIS must approve the survey protocol used to determine
pest-free status, and pest-free areas are subject to audit by APHIS to
verify their status. We would hope that the active involvement of APHIS
in approving survey protocols and auditing pest-free areas would allay
the commenter's misgivings about the Argentine Government's reporting
history.
Inspection Capabilities
Two commenters raised concerns related to the transfer of port
inspection responsibilities from APHIS to the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP). These
commenters stated that staffing levels for pest exclusion programs were
too low, that there had not been sufficient pest exclusion training
provided for those CBP personnel who came from agencies other than
APHIS, and that CBP inspectors are more focused on security issues than
phytosanitary inspection. The commenters stated that these issues must
be addressed before APHIS issues new regulations that could overwhelm
what they perceive to be an already weakened system.
With respect to staffing levels, there was an initial drop in the
number of inspectors following the transfer of port inspection
responsibilities from APHIS to DHS in June 2003: APHIS transferred
1,507 agriculture inspectors to DHS, but by October 2004, the number of
inspectors had decreased to 1,452. However, the loss of those 55
inspectors was more than offset by February 2005, at which time 109 new
agricultural specialists had completed New Officer Training and were
working at ports of entry. In addition, DHS has approved 14 training
classes for new officers which began in the summer of 2004 and will
continue through January 2006. DHS estimates that these training
classes will result in a total of 720 new officers.
With respect to training, there was a need to provide pest
exclusion training to those Immigration and Naturalization Service,
U.S. Border Patrol, and U.S. Customs Service personnel who were
transferred to CBP, just as the mission of CBP dictated the need to
provide cross-training in other specialties to those APHIS personnel
who were transferred to CBP. Planning and delivering training for all
these personnel necessarily had to be accomplished over time, but all
CBP inspection personnel have now been fully and satisfactorily trained
in pest exclusion.
Finally, security issues are certainly a focus for CBP personnel,
but that does not come at the expense of phytosanitary inspections.
While CBP
[[Page 72884]]
conducts a majority of inspections of agricultural commodities at the
ports of first arrival, inspectors follow established and effective
APHIS protocols regarding inspection rates and procedures. APHIS
continues to work with CBP to ensure that the United States is
protected against pests of concern that may be associated with
agricultural imports.
Market Access
One commenter stated that APHIS must do more to provide market
access to developing nations. To that end, the commenter suggested that
APHIS should create pre-approval locations overseas, which the
commenter stated CBP has already done, and allow returning travelers to
bring pre-screened fruits and vegetables back to the United States with
them. APHIS could then approve or discard the items and issue permits
on the spot, which the commenter stated CBP is already doing.
It appears that the commenter is unclear regarding the respective
roles of APHIS and CBP in the scenario he describes. CBP has the
primary responsibility for agricultural inspections at ports of entry,
not APHIS, and it appears that the commenter is satisfied with CBP's
approach to travelers returning to the United States with fruits or
vegetables. There is no need--nor is there any authority--for APHIS to
establish a parallel system.
The same commenter stated that APHIS should guarantee market access
to fruit and vegetable producers in developing countries.
We cannot guarantee blanket access to the U.S. market to producers
in any country. In order to maintain the safeguards necessary to
protect American agriculture, we must first assess the phytosanitary
risks associated with the importation of a particular fruit or
vegetable from a potential exporting country. Only after such an
assessment would we be able to make a decision to allow the importation
of that commodity.
Other Changes in This Final Rule
We proposed to remove the specific treatment schedules presented in
Sec. Sec. 319.56-2k(d), 319.56-2m(b), and 319.56-2n(b) and replace
them with references to the Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)
Treatment Manual. Those schedules were found in both the regulations
and the PPQ Treatment Manual, so our proposed changes were intended to
eliminate that duplicative presentation. Since the proposed rule was
published, however, we have moved those treatment schedules out of the
PPQ Treatment Manual and into the regulations in 7 CFR part 305.
Therefore, where the proposed rule would have added a reference to the
PPQ Treatment Manual, this final rule adds a reference to 7 CFR part
305.
In Sec. 319.56-2x, the entries we proposed to add under Argentina
all included the statement ``Treatment for Mediterranean fruit fly
(Medfly) not required if fruit is grown in a Medfly-free area (see
Sec. 319.56-2(j)).'' As indicated in the table of treatments in Sec.
305.2(h)(2)(i), the fruits we proposed to add are treated for species
of Anastrepha (other than A. ludens) in addition to Medfly. As
discussed earlier in this document, we are amending Sec. 319.56-2(j)
to recognize the Patagonia region of Argentina as free of Medfly and
Anastrepha spp. fruit flies. Therefore, in Sec. 319.56-2x in this
final rule, the entries we are adding under Argentina include the more
accurate statement ``Treatment for Anastrepha spp. fruit flies and
Medfly not required if fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free area (see
Sec. 319.56-2(j)).'' Because we will not be removing the entry for
blueberries from Argentina from Sec. 319.56-2x as we had proposed, we
have amended that entry to include a statement that treatment for
Medfly is not required if the fruit is grown in a fruit fly-free area
listed in Sec. 319.56-2(j).
Also in Sec. 319.56-2x, in the entry for Israel, we proposed to
change the common name for ``cactus'' to ``tuna.'' The proposed new
entry for tuna included a statement that treatment for Medfly is not
required if the fruit is grown in a Medfly-free area listed in Sec.
319.56-2(j). However, there are no Medfly-free areas of Israel listed
in Sec. 319.56-2(j), so that statement does not appear in this final
rule.
We proposed to amend Sec. 319.56-2c by removing a reference to the
Deputy Administrator of PPQ and adding a reference to the Administrator
in its place. After the proposed rule was published, Sec. 319.56-2c
was revised by another rule and the change we had proposed is no longer
necessary.
Finally, the additional restrictions in Sec. 319.56-2t(b)(1)(ii)
have referred to Medfly-free areas listed in Sec. 319.56-2(j). Because
this rule amends Sec. 319.56-2(j) to list areas of Argentina that are
free of both Medfly and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies, we have amended
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) in Sec. 319.56-2t so that it uses the more
generic term ``fruit-fly free areas.''
Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this
document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, with the
changes discussed in this document.
Effective Date
This is a substantive rule that relieves restrictions and, pursuant
to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, may be made effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register.
This rule relieves restrictions on the importation of certain
fruits and vegetables from certain countries while continuing to
protect against the introduction of plant pests into the United States.
Immediate implementation of this rule is necessary to provide relief to
those persons who are adversely affected by restrictions we no longer
find warranted. Making this rule effective immediately will allow
interested producers, importers, shippers, and others to benefit
immediately from the relieved restrictions. Therefore, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has
determined that this rule should be effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 604, we have performed a final
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is set out below, regarding the
economic effects of this rule on small entities.
This final rule amends the fruits and vegetables regulations to
list a number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the world
as eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the
United States. Many of these fruits and vegetables have been eligible
for importation under permit, but were not specifically listed in the
regulations. This final rule also recognizes areas in several countries
as free from certain fruit flies; adds, modifies, or removes certain
definitions; modifies existing treatment requirements for specified
commodities; and makes other miscellaneous changes.
We have used all available data to estimate the potential economic
effects of allowing the fruits and vegetables specified in this rule to
be imported into the United States. However, some of the data we
believe would be helpful in making this determination have not been
available. Specifically, data are not available on: (1) The quantity of
certain fruits and vegetables produced domestically; (2) the quantity
of potential imports; and (3) the degree to
[[Page 72885]]
which imported fruits and vegetables will displace existing imported or
domestic products. In our proposed rule, we asked the public to provide
such data for specific commodities. In addition, we invited the public
to comment on the potential effects of the proposed rule on small
entities, in particular the number and kind of small entities that may
incur benefits or costs from the implementation of the proposed rule.
However, we did not receive any additional information or data in
response to those requests.
Effects on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to consider the
economic impact of their regulations on small entities and to use
flexibility to provide regulatory relief when regulations create
economic disparities between differently sized entities. Data on the
number and size of U.S. producers of the various commodities proposed
for importation into the United States in this document are not
available. However, since most fruit and vegetable farms are small by
Small Business Administration standards, it is likely that the majority
of U.S. farms producing the commodities listed below are small.
As discussed in the proposed rule and in this final rule, many of
the commodities listed in this document may currently enter the United
States under permit. Therefore, we do not expect the amount of
commodities submitted for importation to increase beyond current
levels. Additionally, in many cases, importation of certain commodities
is necessary given that the commodities are not grown extensively in
the United States (e.g., bananas, breadfruits, cassavas, chicory,
dasheens, genip, kiwis, papayas, pineapples, jicama, and tomatillos).
In other instances, importation augments domestic supplies that are not
sufficient to meet consumer demand (e.g., apples, blackberries,
blueberries, carrots, cherries, cucumbers, garlic, onions, pears,
raspberries, and strawberries). We believe that the economic effects of
this rule in general will be small, and that the benefits that will
accrue to consumers from greater trade will outweigh the costs to
domestic producers.
With respect to those articles for which we have specific data, the
potential economic effects of this final rule are discussed below by
commodity and country of origin.
Blueberries from Colombia. The United States is the world's largest
producer of blueberries, supplying more than half of the world's
production. Maine and Michigan account for more than half of all U.S.
domestic blueberry production. According to the 1997 Census of
Agriculture, there were 637 farms in Maine and 623 farms in Michigan
harvesting blueberries. (The 2002 Census of Agriculture does not
provide information on the number or location of blueberry farms.)
Average annual U.S. production, imports, and exports of blueberries for
the period 2000-2003 were 123,832 metric tons (MT), 20,820 MT, and
18,933 MT, respectively (https://faostat.fao.org).
Demand for blueberries in the United States has generally been on
the rise: Per capita fresh blueberry consumption averaged 0.20 pound
annually during the early 1990s and increased to 0.34 pound during
2000-2003. Imports have provided U.S. consumers access to fresh
blueberries at retail grocery stores during the domestic off-season.
There are no official data available on blueberry production or
trade by Colombia. Colombia has never exported blueberries to the
United States before. However, a prospective Colombian exporter has
projected blueberry exports to the United States over the next 6 years
(table 1). Based on these numbers, Colombia could export 10.2 metric
tons of blueberries to the United States in 2006, an amount equal to
0.05 percent of average annual U.S. imports during the period 2000-2003
of 20,820 MT. The same set of projections indicates that blueberry
imports from Colombia could increase to about 251 MT per year by 2011,
which would represent 1.2 percent of U.S. annual imports, 2000-2003. We
do not expect that the economic effects resulting from imports at those
levels would be substantial.
Table 1.--Projected Colombian Exports of Blueberries to the United
States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Volume
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006........................................................ 10.20 MT
2007........................................................ 30.00 MT
2008........................................................ 60.00 MT
2009........................................................ 102.00 MT
2010........................................................ 135.00 MT
2011........................................................ 250.80 MT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Papayas from Brazil and Central America. We are listing two
additional growing areas in Brazil (the States of Bahia and Rio Grande
del Norte) and one additional area in Nicaragua (the Department of
Leon) as eligible to export papayas into the United States. Brazil is
currently eligible to export papayas into the United States from the
State of Espirito Santo. Nicaragua is currently eligible to export
papayas into the United States from the Departments of Carazo, Granada,
Managua, Masaya, and Rivas.
Papaya production levels in the United States are small, with a
majority of papaya production occurring in Florida. Between 2000 and
2003, Brazil represented, on average, 9 percent of the total U.S.
imports of papayas. The addition of two more Brazilian States to the
list of areas eligible for export is expected to increase the Brazilian
share in the U.S. market for imported papayas. Brazil is a major
producer of papayas, however only 1.6 percent of its production is
exported. The rest is reserved for domestic consumption.
The United States imports four times the amount of papayas produced
domestically, while, as stated previously, the amount of Brazilian
papayas imported into the United States accounts for, on average, 9
percent of the total U.S. imports of papayas. Even if Brazil greatly
increases its exports to the United States, it is more likely to
displace other countries' shares of total U.S. imports than to affect
the overall level of U.S. consumption. The economic impact resulting
from this change will not be substantial.
There are no official production data available for papayas
produced in Nicaragua. However, the existing trade data show that
Nicaragua has historically exported papayas very sporadically. For
example, between 1997 and 2001, Nicaragua did not export any papayas.
In 2002, 203 metric tons were exported to the world; the following
year, 18 metric tons were exported. Nicaragua did not export any
papayas to the United States over that time period despite the fact
that there are five approved exporting regions in Nicaragua. Therefore,
the addition of one more eligible exporting area to the list should not
have any substantial impact on the U.S. papaya market.
Fruit Fly Free Areas. We are allowing fruits to be imported into
the United States from a new Medfly-free area in Argentina. We have
determined that the Patagonia region of Argentina is free of those
pests. The Patagonia region includes those areas along the valleys of
the Rio Colorado and Rio Negro rivers and includes the provinces of
Neuquen, Rio Negro, Chubut, Santa Cruz, and Tierra del Fuego.
Fruits from Argentina (apple, apricot, cherry, kiwi, nectarine,
peach, pear, plum, pomegranate, and quince) are already admissible into
the United States under permit from Argentina. The creation of a
Medfly-free area would lessen certain treatment requirements, thus
lowering the cost for exporters. This may, in turn, result in a lower
cost
[[Page 72886]]
for consumers. Further, as a country in the Southern Hemisphere,
Argentina's growing seasons are the opposite of those in the United
States. An increased supply of Argentine fruit supplements the U.S.
winter fruit market. However, we do not anticipate that this
potentially increased supply will be large enough to have any
substantial impact on small entities.
This rule contains various recordkeeping requirements, which were
described in our proposed rule, and which have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (see ``Paperwork Reduction Act''
below).
Executive Order 12988
This final rule allows certain fruits and vegetables to be imported
into the United States from certain parts of the world. State and local
laws and regulations regarding the importation of fruits and vegetables
under this rule will be preempted while the fruit is in foreign
commerce. Fresh fruits and vegetables are generally imported for
immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public, and remain in
foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. No retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping requirements
included in this rule have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0579-0264.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), which
requires Government agencies in general to provide the public the
option of submitting information or transacting business electronically
to the maximum extent possible. For information pertinent to GPEA
compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles,
APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 305
Irradiation, Phytosanitary treatment, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR parts 305 and 319 as follows:
PART 305--PHYTOSANITARY TREATMENTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 305 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. In Sec. 305.2, the table in paragraph (h)(2)(i) is amended by
adding, under Colombia, an entry for blueberry, in alphabetical order,
to read as follows.
Sec. 305.2 Approved treatments.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Commodity Pest Treatment schedule\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Colombia
* * * * * * *
Blueberry............. Ceratitis capitata.... MB T101-i-1-1.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Treatment by irradiation in accordance with Sec. 305.31 may be substituted for other approved treatments
for the mango seed weevil Sternochetus mangiferae (Fabricus) or for one or more of the following 11 species of
fruit flies: Anastrepha fraterculus, A. ludens, A. obliqua, A. serpentina, A. suspensa, Bactrocera cucurbitae,
B. dorsalis, B. tryoni, B. jarvisi, B. latifrons, and Ceratitis capitata.
* * * * *
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
3. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Sec. 319.56 [Amended]
0
4. Section 319.56 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c), by removing the words ``Deputy Administrator of
the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs'' and adding the word
``Administrator'' in their place.
0
b. By removing paragraphs (d) and (e).
0
5. Section 319.56-1 is amended as follows:
0
a. By removing the definitions for Deputy Administrator, fresh fruits
and vegetables, and plants or portions of plants.
0
b. By adding, in alphabetical order, new definitions for Administrator,
APHIS, fruits and vegetables, import and importation, plant debris and
United States to read as set forth below.
0
c. By revising the definitions for cucurbits, inspector, and port of
first arrival to read as set forth below.
Sec. 319.56-1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Administrator. The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, or any
employee of the United States Department of Agriculture delegated to
act in his or her stead.
APHIS. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United
States Department of Agriculture.
* * * * *
Cucurbits. Any plants in the family Cucurbitaceae.
* * * * *
Fruits and vegetables. A commodity class for fresh parts of plants
intended for consumption or processing and not for planting.
* * * * *
Import and importation. To move into, or the act of movement into,
the territorial limits of the United States.
[[Page 72887]]
Inspector. Any individual authorized by the Administrator of APHIS
or the Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security, to enforce the regulations in this
subpart.
* * * * *
Plant debris. Detached leaves, twigs, or other portions of plants,
or plant litter or rubbish as distinguished from approved parts of
clean fruits and vegetables, or other commercial articles.
Port of first arrival. The first point of entry into the United
States where the consignment is offered for entry.
* * * * *
United States. All of the States of the United States, the
Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United
States, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
0
6. Section 319.56-2 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a), by removing the words ``plants or portions of
plants''and adding the words ``plant debris'' in their place.
0
b. By revising paragraph (g) to read as set forth below.
0
c. By revising paragraph (j) to read as set forth below.
Sec. 319.56-2 Restrictions on entry of fruits and vegetables.
* * * * *
(g) Each box of fruit or vegetables imported into the United States
in accordance with paragraphs (e) or (f) of this section must be
safeguarded from infestation while in transit to the United States
through any area that has not been designated as free from quarantine
pests that attack the fruit or vegetable. Each box of fruit or
vegetables imported into the United States in accordance with
paragraphs (e)(3) or (4) and (f) of this section must be clearly
labeled with:
(1) The name of the orchard or grove of origin, or the name of the
grower, and
(2) The name of the municipality and State in which it was
produced, and
(3) The type and amount of fruit it contains.
* * * * *
(j) The Administrator has determined that all Districts in Belize,
all provinces in Chile except Arica, and the Department of Pet[eacute]n
in Guatamala meet the criteria of paragraphs (e) and (f) of this
section with regard to the insect pest Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly)
(Ceratitis capitata [Wiedemann]). Also, the Patagonia region of
Argentina, including those areas along the valleys of the Rio Colorado
and Rio Negro rivers and also including the provinces of Neuquen, Rio
Negro, Chubut, Santa Cruz, and Tierra del Fuego, has been determined to
meet the criteria of paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section with regard
to Medfly and Anastrepha spp. fruit flies. Fruits and vegetables
otherwise eligible for importation under this subpart may be imported
from these areas without treatment for the specified pests.
* * * * *
Sec. 319.56-2d [Amended]
0
7. Section 319.56-2d is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraphs (b)(5)(v)(F), (b)(5)(vi)(G), and (b)(5)(vii)(K), by
removing the word ``Deputy''.
0
b. In paragraphs (b)(7)(i) and (c), by removing the words ``Deputy
Administrator of the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs'' and
adding the word ``Administrator'' in their place.
Sec. 319.56-2g [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 319.56-2g, the introductory text of paragraph (b)(1) is
amended by removing the words ``Deputy Administrator of the Plant
Protection and Quarantine Programs'' and adding the word
``Administrator'' in their place.
0
9. In Sec. 319.56-2j, footnote 4 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-2j Conditions governing the entry of apples and pears
from Australia (including Tasmania) and New Zealand.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\Apples and pears from Australia (excluding Tasmania) where
certain tropical fruit flies occur are also subject to the
irradiation requirements of part 305 of this chapter or the cold
treatment requirements of Sec. 319.56-2d.
0
10. Section 319.56-2k is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising the introductory text of the section to read as set
forth below.
0
b. By revising paragraph (a) to read as set forth below.
0
c. In paragraph (d), by removing the words ``the following fumigation
schedule:'' and adding the words ``part 305 of this chapter.'' in their
place, and by removing the subsequent table.
0
d. In paragraph (g), by removing the words ``The treatment prescribed
in paragraph (d) of this section is'' and adding the words ``The
treatments prescribed in part 305 of this chapter are'' in their place.
Sec. 319.56-2k Administrative instructions prescribing method of
fumigation of field-grown grapes from specified countries.
Approved fumigation with methyl bromide at normal atmospheric
pressure, in accordance with part 305 of this chapter, is hereby
prescribed as a condition of entry under permit for all shipments of
field-grown grapes from the continental countries of Asia, Europe,
North Africa, and the Near East listed in paragraph (a) of this
section. This fumigation shall be in addition to other conditions of
entry for field-grown grapes from the areas named.
(a) Continental countries of Asia, Europe, North Africa, and the
Near East. The term ``continental countries of Asia, Europe, North
Africa, and the Near East'' means Algeria, Armenia, Austria,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Egypt, Estonia, France, Georgia,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Latvia, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Portugal, Republic of Moldova,
Russian Federation, Spain, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
* * * * *
Sec. 319.56-2l [Amended]
0
11. In Sec. 319.56-2l, paragraph (b)(2)(ii) is amended by removing the
words ``Deputy Administrator of the Plant Protection and Quarantine
Programs'' both times they appear and adding the word ``Administrator''
in their place.
Sec. 319.56-2m [Amended]
0
12. Section 319.56-2m is amended as follows:
0
a. In the introductory text of the section, by removing the words ``the
following procedure'' and adding the words ``part 305 of this chapter''
in their place.
0
b. In paragraph (b), by removing the words ``the following schedule:''
and adding the words ``part 305 of this chapter.'' in their place, and
by removing the subsequent table.
0
c. In paragraph (e), by removing the words ``paragraph (b) of this
section'' and adding the words ``part 305 of this chapter'' in their
place.
Sec. 319.56-2n [Amended]
0
13. Section 319.56-2n is amended as follows:
0
a. In the introductory text of the section, by removing the words ``the
procedures described in this section'' and adding the words ``part 305
of this chapter'' in their place.
0
b. In the introductory text of paragraph (b), by removing the words
``the following table:'' and adding the words ``part 305 of this
chapter.'' in their place and by removing the subsequent table.
0
c. By removing paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2).
[[Page 72888]]
Sec. 319.56-2p [Amended]
0
14. In Sec. 319.56-2p, paragraph (b)(7) is amended by removing the
words ``Deputy Administrator of the Plant Protection and Quarantine
Programs'' and adding the word ``Administrator'' in their place.
0
15. Section 319.56-2t is amended as follows:
0
a. In the table in paragraph (a), by revising the entry for jicama from
Mexico and by adding, in alphabetical order, entries for the following
fruits and vegetables to read as set forth below: Under Argentina, for
allium, apple, apricot, cherry, kiwi, nectarine, peach, pear, plum,
pomegranate, and quince; under Belgium, for cichorium; under Belize,
for pepper; under Chile, for apple, asparagus, avocado, blackberry,
cherry, pear, and raspberry; under China, for ginger root; under
Colombia, for banana; under Costa Rica, for banana, carrot, and
cucurbit; under Dominican Republic, for avocado, banana, breadfruit,
cassava, celeriac, citrus, cucurbit, dasheen, genip, papaya, pepper,
and pineapple; under Ecuador, for pineapple; under Guatemala, for
banana, cichorium, cucurbit, and okra; under Honduras, for cucurbit and
okra; under Israel, for basil; under Jamaica, for cucurbit and papaya;
under Mexico, for artichoke, globe; artichoke, Jerusalem; basil,
blackberry, celery, cichorium, dill, lettuce, oregano, pepper,
raspberry, spinach, strawberry, Swiss chard, and tomatillo; under
Netherlands, for cichorium, cucurbit, and eggplant; under Nicaragua,
for banana and dasheen; under Panama, for cucurbit; under Peru, for
banana; under Spain, for cucurbit and lemon; and under Trinidad and
Tobago, for cucurbit.
0
b. By adding to the table in paragraph (a) new entries for ``Brazil''
and ``Venezuela'' read as set forth below.
0
c. In paragraph (b)(1)(ii), by removing the words ``Medfly-free'' both
times they appear and adding the words ``fruit-fly free'' in their
place.
0
d. By adding a new paragraph (b)(6) to read as set forth below.
0
e. By revising the OMB citation at the end of the section to read as
set forth below.
Sec. 319.56-2t Administrative instructions: conditions governing the
entry of certain fruits and vegetables.
* * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional restrictions (See
Country/locality Common name Botanical name Plant part(s) paragraph (b) of this section.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Argentina.......................... Allium................ Allium spp................. Whole plant................
Apple................. Malus domestica............ Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
Apricot............... Prunus americana........... Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Cherry................ Prunus avirum, P. cerasus.. Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Kiwi.................. Actinidia deliciosa........ Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Nectarine............. Prunus persica var. Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
nucipersica.
* * * * * * *
Peach................. Prunus persica var. persica Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
Pear.................. Pyrus communis............. Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
Plum.................. Prunus domestica subsp. Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
domestica.
Pomegranate........... Punica granatum............ Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
Quince................ Cydonia oblonga............ Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Belgium............................ Cichorium............. Cichorium spp.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(6)(i)
* * * * * * *
Belize
* * * * * * *
Pepper................ Capsicum spp............... Fruit...................... (b)(6)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Brazil............................. Dasheen............... Colocasia esculenta........ Whole plant.
Ginger root........... Zingiber officinale........ Root.
Chile
* * * * * * *
Apple................. Malus domestica............ Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
Asparagus............. Asparagus officinalis...... Whole plant.
Avocado............... Persea americana........... Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Blackberry............ Rubus spp.................. Fruit.
Cherry................ Prunus avium, P. cerasus... Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Pear.................. Pyrus communis............. Fruit...................... (b)(1)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Raspberry............. Rubus spp.................. Fruit.
[[Page 72889]]
* * * * * * *
China
* * * * * * *
Ginger root........... Zingiber officinale........ Root.
Colombia........................... Banana................ Musa spp................... Leaf and fruit.
* * * * * * *
Costa Rica......................... Banana................ Musa spp................... Leaf and fruit.
* * * * * * *
Carrot................ Daucus carota ssp sativus.. Whole plant.
* * * * * * *
Cucurbit.............. Cucurbitaceae.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
* * * * * * *
Dominican Republic................. Avocado............... Persea americana........... Fruit.
* * * * * * *
Banana................ Musa spp................... Fruit.
Breadfruit............ Artocarpus altilis......... Fruit.
Cassava............... Manihot esculenta.......... Root.
Celeriac.............. Apium graveolens var. dulce Whole plant.
Citrus................ Citrus spp................. Fruit...................... (b)(6)(iii)
Cucurbit.............. Cucurbitaceae.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
Dasheen............... Colocasia esculenta........ Whole plant.
* * * * * * *
Genip................. Melicoccus bijugatus....... Fruit.
Papaya................ Carica papaya.............. Fruit...................... (b)(2)(iii)
Pepper................ Capsicum spp............... Fruit.
Pineapple............. Ananas comosus............. Fruit...................... (b)(2)(iii)
Ecuador
* * * * * * *
Pineapple............. Ananas comosus............. Fruit...................... (b)(2)(iii)
* * * * * * *
Guatemala
* * * * * * *
Banana................ Musa spp................... Leaf and fruit.
* * * * * * *
Cichorium............. Cichorium spp.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(6)(i)
Cucurbit.............. Cucurbitaceae.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
* * * * * * *
Okra.................. Abelmoschus esculentus..... Pod.
* * * * * * *
Honduras
* * * * * * *
Cucurbit.............. Cucurbitaceae.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
* * * * * * *
Okra.................. Abelmoschus esculentus..... Pod.
* * * * * * *
Israel
* * * * * * *
Basil................. Ocimum spp................. Above ground parts
* * * * * * *
Jamaica............................ Cucurbit.............. Cucurbitaceae.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
* * * * * * *
Papaya................ Carica papaya.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(2)(iii), (b)(3)
[[Page 72890]]
* * * * * * *
Mexico
* * * * * * *
Artichoke, globe...... Cynara scolymus............ Immature flower head.
Artichoke, Jerusalem.. Helianthus tubersus........ Whole plant.
* * * * * * *
Basil................. Ocimum spp................. Above ground parts.
* * * * * * *
Blackberry............ Rubus spp.................. Fruit.
* * * * * * *
Celery................ Apium graveolens var. dulce Whole plant.
Cichorium............. Cichorium spp.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(6)(i)
* * * * * * *
Dill.................. Anethum graveolens......... Above ground parts.
* * * * * * *
Jicama or yam bean.... Pachyrhizus tuberosus, P. Root.
erosus.
* * * * * * *
Lettuce............... Lactuca sativa............. Whole plant.
* * * * * * *
Oregano............... Origanum spp............... Above ground parts.
* * * * * * *
Pepper................ Capsicum spp............... Fruit...................... (b)(6)(ii)
* * * * * * *
Raspberry............. Rubus spp.................. Fruit.
* * * * * * *
Spinach............... Spinacia oleracea.......... Whole plant.
Strawberry............ Fragaria spp............... Fruit.
Swiss chard........... Beta vulgaris var. cicla... Above ground parts.........
* * * * * * *
Tomatillo............. Physalis ixocarpa.......... Whole plant.
* * * * * * *
Netherlands........................ Cichorium............. Cichorium spp.............. Above ground parts......... (b)(6)(i)
Cucurbit.............. Cucurbitaceae......