Importation of Meat That Originates in an FMD Region and Is Cured or Cooked in Another Region, 61578-61580 [05-21306]
Download as PDF
61578
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 205
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. 02–083–1]
Importation of Meat That Originates in
an FMD Region and Is Cured or
Cooked in Another Region
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend
the animal and animal product import
regulations by adding provisions for the
importation of cured or cooked shelfstable meat derived from ruminants or
swine that originate in a region where
rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease
exists if the meat is cured or cooked in
another region. This action would
provide for the importation of these
commodities while continuing to
protect the U.S. ruminant and swine
populations against incursions of
rinderpest and foot-and-mouth disease.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before December
27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and, in the
‘‘Search for Open Regulations’’ box,
select ‘‘Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service’’ from the agency
drop-down menu, then click on
‘‘Submit.’’ In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS–2005–0087 to submit or
view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically. After the close
of the comment period, the docket can
be viewed using the ‘‘Advanced Search’’
function in Regulations.gov.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send four copies of your
comment (an original and three copies)
to Docket No. 02–083–1, Regulatory
Analysis and Development, PPD,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
APHIS, Station 3C71, 4700 River Road
Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Please state that your comment refers to
Docket No. 02–083–1.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Masoud Malik, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Technical Trade Services,
National Center for Import and Export,
VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 40,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1231; (301) 734–
3277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94
(referred to below as the regulations)
govern the importation of specified
animals and animal products to prevent
the introduction into the United States
of various animal diseases, including
rinderpest, foot-and-mouth disease
(FMD), bovine spongiform
encephalopathy, swine vesicular
disease, classical swine fever, and
African swine fever. These are
dangerous and destructive
communicable diseases of ruminants
and swine.
Section 94.4 sets out conditions under
which cured or cooked meat derived
from ruminants or swine originating in
regions where rinderpest or FMD exists
may be imported into the United States.
Paragraph (a) contains requirements for
cured meat, and paragraph (b), for
cooked meat.
Currently, the regulations in § 94.4 do
not specifically address the issue of
cured or cooked shelf-stable meat that
originates in a region with FMD or
rinderpest but is cured or cooked in
another region. Current § 94.4(a)(4)
states that the certificate that must
accompany imported cured meat
originating in a region with FMD or
rinderpest must be issued by an official
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of the national government of the region
of origin. Similarly, current § 94.4(b)(8)
states that the certificate that must
accompany imported cooked meat
originating in a region with FMD or
rinderpest must be issued by an official
of the national government of the region
of origin. No provision is made for the
issuance of certificates by governments
other than those where the products
originate. We are proposing to amend
§ 94.4(a) and (b) to add such provisions,
while maintaining existing safeguards
against incursions of rinderpest and
FMD. While it is our primary objective
in this rulemaking to provide for the
importation of meat that originates in a
region affected by FMD or rinderpest
but is then cured or cooked in a region
recognized as free of those diseases, the
changes we are proposing would also
allow the importation of shelf-stable
meat that originates in an FMD- or
rinderpest-affected region and is then
cured or cooked according to the
regulations in another region where
FMD or rinderpest is present. It is our
view that cured or cooked shelf-stable
meat originating in a region with FMD
or rinderpest may be safely imported
into the United States, regardless of
where it is cured or cooked, if the curing
or cooking is done in accordance with
the regulations in § 94.4.
Currently, the introductory text of
§ 94.4(a) prohibits the importation of
cured meat derived from any ruminants
or swine that originate in a region where
rinderpest or FMD exists unless the
meat is prepared in accordance with the
conditions specified in the ensuing
paragraphs ((a)(1) through (a)(4)). We
would amend that introductory text to
indicate that the same restrictions also
apply when meat derived from any
ruminant or swine that originates in a
region where rinderpest or FMD exists
is cured in another region.
We are proposing to amend
§ 94.4(a)(4) in a similar manner. Current
paragraph (a)(4) stipulates that cured
meat imported from regions with
rinderpest or FMD must be
accompanied by a certificate issued by
an official of the national government of
the region of origin who is authorized to
issue the foreign meat inspection
certificate required by 9 CFR 327.4,
stating that the meat has been prepared
in accordance with § 94.4(a)(1), (a)(2),
and (a)(3)(i). The certificate must be
presented to an authorized inspector at
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the port of arrival in the United States.
We would amend paragraph (a)(4) to
indicate that the certificate may either
be issued by an authorized official of the
national government of the region of
origin or, if the meat was cured in
another region, by an authorized official
of the national government of the region
in which the meat was cured.
Conditions for the importation of
cooked meat derived from any
ruminants or swine that originate in a
region where rinderpest or FMD exists
are provided in § 94.4(b). Current
paragraph (b)(3) provides a blanket
exemption from these requirements for
canned meat, which is defined, in part,
in the regulations of the Food Safety and
Inspection Service of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 9
CFR 318.300(d) as a ‘‘meat food product
with a water activity above 0.85 which
receives a thermal process either before
or after being packed in a hermetically
sealed container.’’
Paralleling our changes to the
provisions for imported cured meat in
proposed § 94.4(a), we are proposing to
amend § 94.4(b)(3) to provide for the
importation into the United States of
shelf-stable canned meat that is derived
from any ruminants or swine originating
in an FMD-or rinderpest-affected region
and is then cooked and sealed in
another region. Additionally, we would
amend § 94.4(b)(3) to be more specific
regarding cooking and sealing
requirements for canned meat.
Specifically, proposed § 94.4(b)(3)
would state that such meat, whether
cooked and sealed in the region of
origin or in another region, is exempt
from the requirements of § 94.4 if the
meat or meat product has been fully
cooked by a commercial method in a
container hermetically sealed promptly
after filling but before such cooking, so
that such cooking and sealing produce
a fully sterilized product that is shelfstable without refrigeration.1 In
specifying that only shelf-stable canned
meats that are prepared in this manner
would be exempt from the other
requirements of § 94.4, our proposal
would offer greater protection to the
U.S. ruminant and swine populations
against the introduction of rinderpest or
FMD than do the current regulations.
Certification requirements for cooked
meat imported into the United States
from regions where rinderpest or FMD
exists are contained in current
paragraph (b)(8). Such meat must be
accompanied by a certificate issued by
an official of the national government of
the region of origin who is authorized to
issue the required foreign meat
inspection certificate, stating that the
cooked meat satisfies the requirements
of § 94.4(b). The certificate must be
presented to an inspector at the port of
arrival in the United States. We would
amend this paragraph so that it would
reflect our proposed changes to
§ 94.4(b)(3). Under our proposed
§ 94.4(b)(8), the certificate could either
be issued by an authorized official of the
national government of the region of
61579
origin or, if the meat being imported is
shelf-stable canned meat that was
cooked in accordance with § 94.4(b)(3)
in another region, by an authorized
official of the national government of
the region in which the meat was
cooked.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not
significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
This proposed rule would amend the
regulations by adding provisions in
§ 94.4 for the importation of cured or
cooked shelf-stable meat derived from
any ruminants or swine that originate in
a region with rinderpest or FMD if the
meat is then cured or cooked in another
region.
As shown in table 1, the amount of
processed red meat (beef, veal, and
pork) imported into the United States in
2003 accounted for 2.4 percent of the
total of U.S. red meat imports and was
equivalent to less than 1 percent of U.S.
production of red meat. We do not
anticipate that the amount of processed
red meat imported into the United
States would increase significantly as a
result of the proposed changes.
Therefore, the proposed action is not
likely to have any significant economic
effect on any U.S. entities.
TABLE 1.—U.S. PRODUCTION AND U.S. IMPORTS OF RED MEAT IN 2003 (HS 4-DIGIT)
U.S. production of red meat
U.S. imports of all red meat
(fresh and processed)
21,038,527.2 metric tons ...................................
2,024,907.0 metric tons ....................................
U.S. imports of processed red meat
47,697.4 metric tons.
Source: USDA, Economic Research Service, Livestock, Dairy, & Poultry Outlook/ LDP–M–135/September 16, 2005, and USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service, HS–4 digit imports (https://www.fas.usda.gov/ustrdscripts).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires that agencies consider the
economic impact of their rules on small
entities. Among the small entities that
could be affected by this proposed rule
are beef cattle ranchers, dairy cattle
producers, and processors of red meat.
Beef cattle ranchers and dairy cattle
producers are considered small entities,
according to the criteria of the Small
Business Administration, as long as
their annual sales are less than or equal
to $750,000. Producers of cattle on
feedlots are considered small entities if
their annual revenues are less than or
equal to $1.5 million. According to the
U.S. Agricultural Census, in 1997, 99
percent of beef cattle ranchers, dairy
cattle producers, and cattle producers
on feedlots qualified as small entities.
For the reasons discussed earlier,
however, we do not expect that this
proposed rule would have any
significant economic effect on any of
these entities or on any other U.S.
entities, small or large.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
1 While this process is relatively standardized,
other cooking processes described in § 94.4(b) are
very specific and complicated, requiring USDA
inspection and verification in the region in which
the meats are cooked. Therefore, this proposed rule
does not extend to those other cooking processes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
61580
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Meat and meat products, Milk, Poultry
and poultry products, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 94 as follows:
PART 94—RINDERPEST, FOOT-ANDMOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE
DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER,
CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER, AND
BOVINE SPONGIFORM
ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED
AND RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, 7781–
7786, and 8301–8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.4.
2. In § 94.4, the introductory text of
paragraph (a), paragraph (a)(4),
paragraph (b)(3), and paragraph (b)(8)(i)
would be revised to read as follows:
§ 94.4 Cured or cooked meat originating in
regions where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth
disease exists.
(a) Whether the meat is cured in the
region of origin or in another region, the
importation of cured meats derived from
any ruminant or swine that originates in
a region where rinderpest or foot-andmouth disease exists, as designated in
§ 94.1, is prohibited unless the
following conditions have been
fulfilled:
*
*
*
*
*
(4) The cured meat shall be
accompanied by a certificate stating that
such meat has been prepared in
accordance with paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(2), and (a)(3)(i) of this section. The
certificate shall be issued by an official
of the national government of the region
of origin or, if the meat was cured in
another region, by an official of the
national government of the region in
which the meat was cured, who is
authorized to issue the foreign meat
inspection certificate required by
§ 327.4 of this title. Upon arrival of the
cured meat in the United States, the
certificate must be presented to an
authorized inspector at the port of
arrival.
(b) * * *
(3) Shelf-stable canned meat. Shelfstable canned meat, whether cooked and
sealed in the region of origin or in
another region, is exempt from the
requirements of this section if cooked
and sealed in the following manner: The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Oct 24, 2005
Jkt 208001
meat or meat product has been fully
cooked by a commercial method in a
container hermetically sealed promptly
after filling but before such cooking, so
that such cooking and sealing produce
a fully sterilized product that is shelfstable without refrigeration.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * * (i) The cooked meat must be
accompanied by a certificate stating:
‘‘This cooked meat produced for export
to the United States meets the
requirements of title 9, Code of Federal
Regulations, § 94.4(b).’’ The certificate
must be issued by an official of the
national government of the region of
origin or, if the meat is shelf-stable
canned meat that was cooked and sealed
in accordance with § 94.4(b)(3) in
another region, by an official of the
national government of the region in
which the meat was cooked and sealed,
who is authorized to issue the foreign
meat inspection certificate required by
§ 327.4 of this title. Upon arrival of the
cooked meat in the United States, the
certificate must be presented to an
authorized inspector at the port of
arrival.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
October 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05–21306 Filed 10–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20970; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–53–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Model 500, 501, 550, S550, 551, and 560
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Cessna Model 500, 501, 550,
S550, 551, and 560 airplanes. The
original NPRM would have required
revising the airplane flight manual
(AFM) to prohibit use of the wing fuel
boost pumps for defueling under certain
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
conditions; installing a placard; doing
other specified investigative and
corrective actions as necessary; and
modifying the boost pumps. The
original NPRM also would have
required the subsequent removal of the
AFM revision and placard. The original
NPRM resulted from a report of a chafed
electrical wiring harness, which was
arcing inside the fuel tank. This action
revises the original NPRM by
identifying certain service information
not identified in the original NPRM. We
are proposing this supplemental NPRM
to prevent potential fuel vapor ignition
in a fuel tank, which could result in
explosion and loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by November
21, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
supplemental NPRM.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Cessna
Aircraft Co., P.O. Box 7706, Wichita,
Kansas 67277.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Easterwood, Aerospace Engineer,
Electrical Systems and Avionics Branch,
ACE–119W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road,
room 100, Mid-Continent Airport,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)
946–4132; fax (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this supplemental NPRM.
Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include
the docket number ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–20970; Directorate Identifier
2004–NM–53–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this supplemental NPRM. We
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 25, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61578-61580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-21306]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 61578]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 94
[Docket No. 02-083-1]
Importation of Meat That Originates in an FMD Region and Is Cured
or Cooked in Another Region
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the animal and animal product import
regulations by adding provisions for the importation of cured or cooked
shelf-stable meat derived from ruminants or swine that originate in a
region where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists if the meat is
cured or cooked in another region. This action would provide for the
importation of these commodities while continuing to protect the U.S.
ruminant and swine populations against incursions of rinderpest and
foot-and-mouth disease.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
December 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and, in the ``Search for Open Regulations'' box,
select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service'' from the agency
drop-down menu, then click on ``Submit.'' In the Docket ID column,
select APHIS-2005-0087 to submit or view public comments and to view
supporting and related materials available electronically. After the
close of the comment period, the docket can be viewed using the
``Advanced Search'' function in Regulations.gov.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. 02-083-1,
Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3C71, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. 02-083-1.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Masoud Malik, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Technical Trade Services, National Center for Import and
Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 40, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231;
(301) 734-3277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 94 (referred to below as the
regulations) govern the importation of specified animals and animal
products to prevent the introduction into the United States of various
animal diseases, including rinderpest, foot-and-mouth disease (FMD),
bovine spongiform encephalopathy, swine vesicular disease, classical
swine fever, and African swine fever. These are dangerous and
destructive communicable diseases of ruminants and swine.
Section 94.4 sets out conditions under which cured or cooked meat
derived from ruminants or swine originating in regions where rinderpest
or FMD exists may be imported into the United States. Paragraph (a)
contains requirements for cured meat, and paragraph (b), for cooked
meat.
Currently, the regulations in Sec. 94.4 do not specifically
address the issue of cured or cooked shelf-stable meat that originates
in a region with FMD or rinderpest but is cured or cooked in another
region. Current Sec. 94.4(a)(4) states that the certificate that must
accompany imported cured meat originating in a region with FMD or
rinderpest must be issued by an official of the national government of
the region of origin. Similarly, current Sec. 94.4(b)(8) states that
the certificate that must accompany imported cooked meat originating in
a region with FMD or rinderpest must be issued by an official of the
national government of the region of origin. No provision is made for
the issuance of certificates by governments other than those where the
products originate. We are proposing to amend Sec. 94.4(a) and (b) to
add such provisions, while maintaining existing safeguards against
incursions of rinderpest and FMD. While it is our primary objective in
this rulemaking to provide for the importation of meat that originates
in a region affected by FMD or rinderpest but is then cured or cooked
in a region recognized as free of those diseases, the changes we are
proposing would also allow the importation of shelf-stable meat that
originates in an FMD- or rinderpest-affected region and is then cured
or cooked according to the regulations in another region where FMD or
rinderpest is present. It is our view that cured or cooked shelf-stable
meat originating in a region with FMD or rinderpest may be safely
imported into the United States, regardless of where it is cured or
cooked, if the curing or cooking is done in accordance with the
regulations in Sec. 94.4.
Currently, the introductory text of Sec. 94.4(a) prohibits the
importation of cured meat derived from any ruminants or swine that
originate in a region where rinderpest or FMD exists unless the meat is
prepared in accordance with the conditions specified in the ensuing
paragraphs ((a)(1) through (a)(4)). We would amend that introductory
text to indicate that the same restrictions also apply when meat
derived from any ruminant or swine that originates in a region where
rinderpest or FMD exists is cured in another region.
We are proposing to amend Sec. 94.4(a)(4) in a similar manner.
Current paragraph (a)(4) stipulates that cured meat imported from
regions with rinderpest or FMD must be accompanied by a certificate
issued by an official of the national government of the region of
origin who is authorized to issue the foreign meat inspection
certificate required by 9 CFR 327.4, stating that the meat has been
prepared in accordance with Sec. 94.4(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3)(i).
The certificate must be presented to an authorized inspector at
[[Page 61579]]
the port of arrival in the United States. We would amend paragraph
(a)(4) to indicate that the certificate may either be issued by an
authorized official of the national government of the region of origin
or, if the meat was cured in another region, by an authorized official
of the national government of the region in which the meat was cured.
Conditions for the importation of cooked meat derived from any
ruminants or swine that originate in a region where rinderpest or FMD
exists are provided in Sec. 94.4(b). Current paragraph (b)(3) provides
a blanket exemption from these requirements for canned meat, which is
defined, in part, in the regulations of the Food Safety and Inspection
Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 9 CFR
318.300(d) as a ``meat food product with a water activity above 0.85
which receives a thermal process either before or after being packed in
a hermetically sealed container.''
Paralleling our changes to the provisions for imported cured meat
in proposed Sec. 94.4(a), we are proposing to amend Sec. 94.4(b)(3)
to provide for the importation into the United States of shelf-stable
canned meat that is derived from any ruminants or swine originating in
an FMD-or rinderpest-affected region and is then cooked and sealed in
another region. Additionally, we would amend Sec. 94.4(b)(3) to be
more specific regarding cooking and sealing requirements for canned
meat. Specifically, proposed Sec. 94.4(b)(3) would state that such
meat, whether cooked and sealed in the region of origin or in another
region, is exempt from the requirements of Sec. 94.4 if the meat or
meat product has been fully cooked by a commercial method in a
container hermetically sealed promptly after filling but before such
cooking, so that such cooking and sealing produce a fully sterilized
product that is shelf-stable without refrigeration.\1\ In specifying
that only shelf-stable canned meats that are prepared in this manner
would be exempt from the other requirements of Sec. 94.4, our proposal
would offer greater protection to the U.S. ruminant and swine
populations against the introduction of rinderpest or FMD than do the
current regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ While this process is relatively standardized, other cooking
processes described in Sec. 94.4(b) are very specific and
complicated, requiring USDA inspection and verification in the
region in which the meats are cooked. Therefore, this proposed rule
does not extend to those other cooking processes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification requirements for cooked meat imported into the United
States from regions where rinderpest or FMD exists are contained in
current paragraph (b)(8). Such meat must be accompanied by a
certificate issued by an official of the national government of the
region of origin who is authorized to issue the required foreign meat
inspection certificate, stating that the cooked meat satisfies the
requirements of Sec. 94.4(b). The certificate must be presented to an
inspector at the port of arrival in the United States. We would amend
this paragraph so that it would reflect our proposed changes to Sec.
94.4(b)(3). Under our proposed Sec. 94.4(b)(8), the certificate could
either be issued by an authorized official of the national government
of the region of origin or, if the meat being imported is shelf-stable
canned meat that was cooked in accordance with Sec. 94.4(b)(3) in
another region, by an authorized official of the national government of
the region in which the meat was cooked.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
The rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
This proposed rule would amend the regulations by adding provisions
in Sec. 94.4 for the importation of cured or cooked shelf-stable meat
derived from any ruminants or swine that originate in a region with
rinderpest or FMD if the meat is then cured or cooked in another
region.
As shown in table 1, the amount of processed red meat (beef, veal,
and pork) imported into the United States in 2003 accounted for 2.4
percent of the total of U.S. red meat imports and was equivalent to
less than 1 percent of U.S. production of red meat. We do not
anticipate that the amount of processed red meat imported into the
United States would increase significantly as a result of the proposed
changes. Therefore, the proposed action is not likely to have any
significant economic effect on any U.S. entities.
Table 1.--U.S. Production and U.S. Imports of Red Meat in 2003 (HS 4-
Digit)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. imports of
all red meat U.S. imports of
U.S. production of red meat (fresh and processed red meat
processed)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21,038,527.2 metric tons....... 2,024,907.0 metric 47,697.4 metric
tons. tons.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: USDA, Economic Research Service, Livestock, Dairy, & Poultry
Outlook/ LDP-M-135/September 16, 2005, and USDA, Foreign Agricultural
Service, HS-4 digit imports (https://www.fas.usda.gov/ustrdscripts).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires that agencies consider the
economic impact of their rules on small entities. Among the small
entities that could be affected by this proposed rule are beef cattle
ranchers, dairy cattle producers, and processors of red meat. Beef
cattle ranchers and dairy cattle producers are considered small
entities, according to the criteria of the Small Business
Administration, as long as their annual sales are less than or equal to
$750,000. Producers of cattle on feedlots are considered small entities
if their annual revenues are less than or equal to $1.5 million.
According to the U.S. Agricultural Census, in 1997, 99 percent of beef
cattle ranchers, dairy cattle producers, and cattle producers on
feedlots qualified as small entities. For the reasons discussed
earlier, however, we do not expect that this proposed rule would have
any significant economic effect on any of these entities or on any
other U.S. entities, small or large.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork
[[Page 61580]]
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 94
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk,
Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 94 as follows:
PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL
PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, CLASSICAL
SWINE FEVER, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND
RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 94 would continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, 7781-7786, and 8301-8317; 21
U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
2. In Sec. 94.4, the introductory text of paragraph (a), paragraph
(a)(4), paragraph (b)(3), and paragraph (b)(8)(i) would be revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 94.4 Cured or cooked meat originating in regions where
rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists.
(a) Whether the meat is cured in the region of origin or in another
region, the importation of cured meats derived from any ruminant or
swine that originates in a region where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth
disease exists, as designated in Sec. 94.1, is prohibited unless the
following conditions have been fulfilled:
* * * * *
(4) The cured meat shall be accompanied by a certificate stating
that such meat has been prepared in accordance with paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(2), and (a)(3)(i) of this section. The certificate shall be issued
by an official of the national government of the region of origin or,
if the meat was cured in another region, by an official of the national
government of the region in which the meat was cured, who is authorized
to issue the foreign meat inspection certificate required by Sec.
327.4 of this title. Upon arrival of the cured meat in the United
States, the certificate must be presented to an authorized inspector at
the port of arrival.
(b) * * *
(3) Shelf-stable canned meat. Shelf-stable canned meat, whether
cooked and sealed in the region of origin or in another region, is
exempt from the requirements of this section if cooked and sealed in
the following manner: The meat or meat product has been fully cooked by
a commercial method in a container hermetically sealed promptly after
filling but before such cooking, so that such cooking and sealing
produce a fully sterilized product that is shelf-stable without
refrigeration.
* * * * *
(8) * * * (i) The cooked meat must be accompanied by a certificate
stating: ``This cooked meat produced for export to the United States
meets the requirements of title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, Sec.
94.4(b).'' The certificate must be issued by an official of the
national government of the region of origin or, if the meat is shelf-
stable canned meat that was cooked and sealed in accordance with Sec.
94.4(b)(3) in another region, by an official of the national government
of the region in which the meat was cooked and sealed, who is
authorized to issue the foreign meat inspection certificate required by
Sec. 327.4 of this title. Upon arrival of the cooked meat in the
United States, the certificate must be presented to an authorized
inspector at the port of arrival.
* * * * *
Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of October 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05-21306 Filed 10-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P