Stall Reservations at Import Quarantine Facilities, 57486-57487 [05-19689]
Download as PDF
57486
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart B—Business and Industry
Loans
2. Section 4279.107 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 4279.107
Guarantee fees.
For all new loans there are two types
of non-refundable guarantee fees to be
paid by the lender. The fees may be
passed on to the borrower. The fees may
be forwarded to the Agency through an
electronic funds transfer system or, at
the Agency’s discretion, by a check
payable to USDA using a USDAapproved form.
(a) Initial guarantee fee. The initial fee
is paid at the time the Loan Note
Guarantee is issued. The fee may be
included as an eligible loan purpose in
the guaranteed loan. The fee will be the
rate (a specified percentage not to
exceed 2 percent) multiplied by the
principal loan amount, multiplied by
the percent of guarantee. Subject to
specified annual limits set by the
Agency, the initial guarantee fee may be
reduced to 1 percent if the borrower’s
business supports value-added
agriculture and results in farmers
benefiting financially, or
(1) Is a high impact business
development investment in accordance
with § 4279.155(b)(5), and
(2) Is located in a rural community
that:
(i) Is experiencing long-term
population decline and job
deterioration, or
(ii) Has remained persistently poor
over the last 60 years, or
(iii) Is experiencing trauma as a result
of natural disaster, or
(iv) Is experiencing fundamental
structural changes in its economic base.
(b) Annual renewal fee. The annual
renewal fee is paid once a year and is
required to maintain the enforceability
of the guarantee as to the lender.
(1) The rate of the annual renewal fee
(a specified percentage) is established
by Rural Development in an annual
notice published in the Federal
Register, multiplied by the outstanding
principal loan balance as of December
31 of each year, multiplied by the
percent of guarantee. The rate is the rate
in effect at the time the loan is
obligated, and will remain in effect for
the life of the loan.
(2) Annual renewal fees are due on
January 31. Payments not received by
April 1 are considered delinquent and,
at the Agency’s discretion, may result in
cancellation of the guarantee to the
lender. Holders’ rights will continue in
effect as specified in the Loan Note
Guarantee and Assignment Guarantee
Agreement. Any delinquent annual
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:53 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 208001
renewal fees will bear interest at the
note rate and will be deducted from any
loss payment due the lender. For loans
where the Loan Note Guarantee is
issued between October 1 and December
31, the first annual renewal fee payment
will be due January 31 of the second
year following the date the Loan Note
Guarantee was issued.
DATES:
PART 4287—SERVICING
In an interim rule effective and
published in the Federal Register on
December 9, 2002 (67 FR 72827–72830,
Docket No. 02–024–1), we amended the
regulations in 9 CFR part 93 regarding
the importation of horses into the
United States by requiring persons who
cancel reservations for stall space at
import quarantine facilities to notify us
earlier and by increasing the fee for
canceling reservations. Under the new
fee structure, persons who cancel a
reservation 30 business days or more
prior to the reservation date will be
charged 25 percent of the reservation
fee; persons who cancel a reservation 15
to 29 business days prior to the
reservation date will be charged 50
percent of the reservation fee; and
persons who cancel a reservation less
than 15 business days prior to the
reservation date will forfeit 100 percent
of the reservation fee. We took that
action to discourage importers from
reserving space that they may not use
and canceling when it is too late for
others to use the space and to recover
the fixed cost associated with operating
quarantine facilities when stall space
goes unused. This interim rule was
intended to improve the occupancy rate
of stall space, and, therefore, the
efficiency of import quarantine
facilities.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
February 7, 2003. We received three
comments by that date. The comments
were from a horse industry group, a
transportation association, and a
transport company. We have carefully
considered all of the comments we
received. They are discussed below.
3. The authority citation for part 4287
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart B—Servicing Business and
Industry Guaranteed Loans
§ 4287.107
[Amended]
4. Section 4287.107(a) is revised to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Lender reports and annual renewal
fee. The lender must report the
outstanding principal and interest
balance on each guaranteed loan
semiannually using a USDA-approved
status report or other approved format.
The lender will transmit the annual
renewal fee to the Agency
simultaneously with the December 31
semiannual status report in accordance
with 7 CFR part 4279, subpart B,
§ 4279.107.
*
*
*
*
*
I
Dated: September 27, 2005.
Thomas C. Dorr,
Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 05–19722 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. 02–024–2]
Stall Reservations at Import
Quarantine Facilities
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule
that amended the regulations regarding
the importation of horses into the
United States by requiring persons who
cancel reservations for stall space at
import quarantine facilities to notify us
earlier and by increasing the fee for
canceling reservations.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The interim rule became
effective on December 9, 2002.
Dr.
Freeda Isaac, Senior Staff Veterinarian,
Technical Trade Services, VS, APHIS,
4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD
20737–1231; (301) 734–8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Note: In the ‘‘Background’’ section of the
interim rule, we stated that brokers are
required to have certain diagnostic tests
performed on their horses and that these tests
must be processed at National Veterinary
Services Laboratories (NVSL). Some
commenters interpreted this statement to
mean that we were requiring that horses be
pretested for the diseases dourine, glanders,
piroplasmosis, and infectious equine anemia
and that this pretesting be performed at
NVSL. That perception is incorrect.
Pretesting is not a requirement but may be
done at the discretion of the importer or
agent. If pretesting is done, importers may
utilize NVSL. the Animal and Plant Health
E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM
03OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 190 / Monday, October 3, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Inspection Service (APHIS) will conduct its
own tests during quarantine.
Two commenters said that the new
cancellation policy unnecessarily
penalizes those who reserve stall space
early and are then required to make
legitimate alterations to their bookings.
The commenters asked that we consider
implementing a small administrative fee
for changes made more than 30 days
prior to the reservation date.
The purpose of the interim rule was
to discourage horse brokers from making
several reservations and simply
forfeiting the $40 cancellation fees if a
client is not found to fill those reserved
spaces. This situation had led some
brokers to complain that the potential
loss of a $40 cancellation fee is not an
effective deterrent to prevent brokers
from reserving stall space before a client
is found. Since the publication of our
December 2002 interim rule, the
problem of late cancellations has been
eliminated. We believe that instituting
the suggested small fee for canceled
reservations would result in a situation
similar to the one that existed prior to
publication of the interim rule.
All three commenters stated that a
policy should be enacted wherein stall
space in a horse quarantine facility may
be formally transferred from one party
to another within 15 days of arrival.
Shipments arriving at quarantine
facilities are comprised of horses from
several different brokers. As such, the
suggested formal transfer policy would
require a continual monitoring policy,
along with the accompanying
paperwork. Such an approach
potentially involves a great amount of
time, personnel, and expense for all
affected parties. As such, this method is
not cost effective, nor would it eliminate
the practice of speculative reservation.
Two commenters said that the grace
period within which shipments may
arrive without incurring cancellation
fees should be extended from 24 to 48
hours.
Under the regulations in effect prior
to the December 2002 interim rule, we
required 5 business days’ notice for
cancellations in order for importers to
avoid forfeiture of the total reservation
fee. As a result of the interim rule, we,
among other things, established a
graduated fee schedule for
cancellations. Importers or their agents
are now required to present for entry,
within 24 hours following the
designated time of arrival, the horse for
which the reservation was made. In our
opinion, increasing the time period
within which importers must present
their horses would lead to a
reintroduction of past speculative
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Sep 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
reservation practices. The regulations in
§ 93.304(a)(3)(iv) provide for the return
of reservation fees to importers in
certain cases when unforseen
circumstances arise that prevent an
importer from presenting a horse for
entry within the required time period.
One commenter said that the
forfeiture amounts as established in the
graduated fee schedule set for
cancellations are too high.
Prior to publication of the interim
rule, we carefully considered a fee
schedule that we thought to be
appropriate and effective in eliminating
the practice of speculative reservations.
The USDA quarantine facilities in
Florida and New York each lost
approximately $300,000 to $470,000
yearly in forgone user fees. While we
recognize that increasing cancellation
fees and the time period required for
cancellation affects both horse owners
and brokers, the forfeiture amounts
must necessarily be set at a level that
will serve as a meaningful deterrent to
speculative reservation-making and
allow APHIS to recover the fixed cost
associated with operating quarantine
facilities when stall space goes unused.
Two commenters stated that there is
a need to specifically create a set of
circumstances under which a full
refund of the reservation fee would be
granted, suggesting that a refund would
be appropriate in cases where an airline
cancels a flight or a horse is injured
during loading.
The regulations already describe the
circumstances under which a full
refund may be granted. As stated
previously, under the regulations at
§ 93.304(a)(3)(iv), a reservation fee will
not be forfeited if the Administrator
determines that certain essential
services were not available at the
necessary time as a result of unforseen
circumstances. These circumstances
include, but are not limited to, the
closing of an airport due to inclement
weather or the unavailability of the
reserved space due to the extension of
another quarantine. We believe it is
appropriate and necessary to limit
refunds to the circumstances relating to
services, other than those provided by
carriers, necessary for the importation of
the horses within the required period
that are unavailable because of
unforeseen circumstances as determined
by the Administrator.
Likewise, the issuance of refunds, as
may be necessary in the situations
described above, is based somewhat on
the Administrator’s discretion. As such,
we believe that any attempt to list all
instances where a refund would be
granted would unnecessarily limit the
Administrator’s ability to make
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57487
determinations in a wide variety of
circumstances. It is necessary to leave
the exception as written in order to
preserve the flexibility of the
regulations.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule and in this document, we
are adopting the interim rule as a final
rule without change.
This action also affirms the
information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Executive Order 12988, and the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, this action has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMALS, BIRDS, AND POULTRY,
AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND
POULTRY PRODUCTS;
REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
CONTAINERS
Accordingly, we are adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim
rule that amended 9 CFR part 93 and
that was published at 67 FR 72827–
72830 on December 9, 2002.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 27th day of
September 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05–19689 Filed 9–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–U
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22534; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NE–27–AD; Amendment 39–
14305; AD 2005–20–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Corporation (RRC) (formerly Allison
Engine Company, Allison Gas Turbine
Division, and Detroit Diesel Allison)
Models 250–C28, –C28B, and –C28C
Turboshaft Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM
03OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57486-57487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-19689]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 93
[Docket No. 02-024-2]
Stall Reservations at Import Quarantine Facilities
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final rule, without change, an interim
rule that amended the regulations regarding the importation of horses
into the United States by requiring persons who cancel reservations for
stall space at import quarantine facilities to notify us earlier and by
increasing the fee for canceling reservations.
DATES: The interim rule became effective on December 9, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Freeda Isaac, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Technical Trade Services, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-8364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In an interim rule effective and published in the Federal Register
on December 9, 2002 (67 FR 72827-72830, Docket No. 02-024-1), we
amended the regulations in 9 CFR part 93 regarding the importation of
horses into the United States by requiring persons who cancel
reservations for stall space at import quarantine facilities to notify
us earlier and by increasing the fee for canceling reservations. Under
the new fee structure, persons who cancel a reservation 30 business
days or more prior to the reservation date will be charged 25 percent
of the reservation fee; persons who cancel a reservation 15 to 29
business days prior to the reservation date will be charged 50 percent
of the reservation fee; and persons who cancel a reservation less than
15 business days prior to the reservation date will forfeit 100 percent
of the reservation fee. We took that action to discourage importers
from reserving space that they may not use and canceling when it is too
late for others to use the space and to recover the fixed cost
associated with operating quarantine facilities when stall space goes
unused. This interim rule was intended to improve the occupancy rate of
stall space, and, therefore, the efficiency of import quarantine
facilities.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before February 7, 2003. We received three comments by that date. The
comments were from a horse industry group, a transportation
association, and a transport company. We have carefully considered all
of the comments we received. They are discussed below.
Note: In the ``Background'' section of the interim rule, we
stated that brokers are required to have certain diagnostic tests
performed on their horses and that these tests must be processed at
National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL). Some commenters
interpreted this statement to mean that we were requiring that
horses be pretested for the diseases dourine, glanders,
piroplasmosis, and infectious equine anemia and that this pretesting
be performed at NVSL. That perception is incorrect. Pretesting is
not a requirement but may be done at the discretion of the importer
or agent. If pretesting is done, importers may utilize NVSL. the
Animal and Plant Health
[[Page 57487]]
Inspection Service (APHIS) will conduct its own tests during
quarantine.
Two commenters said that the new cancellation policy unnecessarily
penalizes those who reserve stall space early and are then required to
make legitimate alterations to their bookings. The commenters asked
that we consider implementing a small administrative fee for changes
made more than 30 days prior to the reservation date.
The purpose of the interim rule was to discourage horse brokers
from making several reservations and simply forfeiting the $40
cancellation fees if a client is not found to fill those reserved
spaces. This situation had led some brokers to complain that the
potential loss of a $40 cancellation fee is not an effective deterrent
to prevent brokers from reserving stall space before a client is found.
Since the publication of our December 2002 interim rule, the problem of
late cancellations has been eliminated. We believe that instituting the
suggested small fee for canceled reservations would result in a
situation similar to the one that existed prior to publication of the
interim rule.
All three commenters stated that a policy should be enacted wherein
stall space in a horse quarantine facility may be formally transferred
from one party to another within 15 days of arrival.
Shipments arriving at quarantine facilities are comprised of horses
from several different brokers. As such, the suggested formal transfer
policy would require a continual monitoring policy, along with the
accompanying paperwork. Such an approach potentially involves a great
amount of time, personnel, and expense for all affected parties. As
such, this method is not cost effective, nor would it eliminate the
practice of speculative reservation.
Two commenters said that the grace period within which shipments
may arrive without incurring cancellation fees should be extended from
24 to 48 hours.
Under the regulations in effect prior to the December 2002 interim
rule, we required 5 business days' notice for cancellations in order
for importers to avoid forfeiture of the total reservation fee. As a
result of the interim rule, we, among other things, established a
graduated fee schedule for cancellations. Importers or their agents are
now required to present for entry, within 24 hours following the
designated time of arrival, the horse for which the reservation was
made. In our opinion, increasing the time period within which importers
must present their horses would lead to a reintroduction of past
speculative reservation practices. The regulations in Sec.
93.304(a)(3)(iv) provide for the return of reservation fees to
importers in certain cases when unforseen circumstances arise that
prevent an importer from presenting a horse for entry within the
required time period.
One commenter said that the forfeiture amounts as established in
the graduated fee schedule set for cancellations are too high.
Prior to publication of the interim rule, we carefully considered a
fee schedule that we thought to be appropriate and effective in
eliminating the practice of speculative reservations. The USDA
quarantine facilities in Florida and New York each lost approximately
$300,000 to $470,000 yearly in forgone user fees. While we recognize
that increasing cancellation fees and the time period required for
cancellation affects both horse owners and brokers, the forfeiture
amounts must necessarily be set at a level that will serve as a
meaningful deterrent to speculative reservation-making and allow APHIS
to recover the fixed cost associated with operating quarantine
facilities when stall space goes unused.
Two commenters stated that there is a need to specifically create a
set of circumstances under which a full refund of the reservation fee
would be granted, suggesting that a refund would be appropriate in
cases where an airline cancels a flight or a horse is injured during
loading.
The regulations already describe the circumstances under which a
full refund may be granted. As stated previously, under the regulations
at Sec. 93.304(a)(3)(iv), a reservation fee will not be forfeited if
the Administrator determines that certain essential services were not
available at the necessary time as a result of unforseen circumstances.
These circumstances include, but are not limited to, the closing of an
airport due to inclement weather or the unavailability of the reserved
space due to the extension of another quarantine. We believe it is
appropriate and necessary to limit refunds to the circumstances
relating to services, other than those provided by carriers, necessary
for the importation of the horses within the required period that are
unavailable because of unforeseen circumstances as determined by the
Administrator.
Likewise, the issuance of refunds, as may be necessary in the
situations described above, is based somewhat on the Administrator's
discretion. As such, we believe that any attempt to list all instances
where a refund would be granted would unnecessarily limit the
Administrator's ability to make determinations in a wide variety of
circumstances. It is necessary to leave the exception as written in
order to preserve the flexibility of the regulations.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the interim rule and in this
document, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule without
change.
This action also affirms the information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, Executive Order 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, this action has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, AND POULTRY, AND
CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS
OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
0
Accordingly, we are adopting as a final rule, without change, the
interim rule that amended 9 CFR part 93 and that was published at 67 FR
72827-72830 on December 9, 2002.
Done in Washington, DC, this 27th day of September 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 05-19689 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-U