Monsanto Company; Availability of Petition and Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Corn Genetically Engineered To Express High Lysine Levels, 56441-56443 [E5-5178]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Notices displays a currently valid OMB control number. Rural Business Service Title: 7 CFR 4279–B, Guaranteed Loan Making—Business and Industry Loans. OMB Control Number: 0570–0017. Summary of Collection: The Business and Industry (B&I) program was legislated in 1972 under Section 310B of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended. The purpose of the program is to improve, develop, or finance businesses, industries, and employment and improve the economic and environmental climate in rural communities. This purpose is achieved through bolstering the existing private credit structure through the guaranteeing of quality loans made by lending institutions, thereby providing lasting community benefits. The B&I program is administered by the Rural Business Service (RBS) through Rural Development State and sub-State offices serving each State. Need and Use of the Information: RBS will collect information to determine a lender and borrower eligibility and creditworthiness. The information is used by RBS loan officers and approval officials to determine program eligibility and for program monitoring. Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit; State, Local or Tribal Government. Number of Respondents: 8,544. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: On occasion. Total Burden Hours: 19,761. Charlene Parker, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 05–19219 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XT–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service National Agricultural Library; Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Collect Information National Agricultural Library, Agricultural Research Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations, this notice announces the National Agricultural Library’s intent to request an extension of currently approved information collection form related to the Animal VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:52 Sep 26, 2005 Jkt 205001 Welfare Information Center’s (AWIC) workshop, Meeting the Information Requirements of the Animal Welfare Act. This workshop registration form requests the following information from participants: contact information, affiliation, and database searching experience. Participants include principal investigators, members of Institutional Animal Care and Use committees, animal care technicians, facility managers, veterinarians, and administrators of animal use programs. DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by December 1, 2005 to be assured of consideration. ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to Sandra Ball, Program Support Assistant, USDA, ARS, NAL Animal Welfare Information Center, 10301 Baltimore Avenue, Room #410, Beltsville, MD 20705–2351. Submit electronic comments to: sball@nal.usda.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Ball, Program Support Assistant. Phone: 301–504–6212 or Fax: 301 504 7125. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Workshop Registration, Meeting the Information Requirements of the Animal Welfare Act. OMB Number: 0518–033. Expiration Date: 02/28/2006. Type of Request: To extend currently approved data collection form. Abstract: This Web-based form collects information to register respondents in the workshop, Meeting the Information Requirements of the Animal Welfare Act. Information collected includes the following: preference of workshop date, signature, name, title, organization name, mailing address, phone and fax numbers, and email address. Five questions are asked regarding: database searching experience, membership on an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and goals for attending the workshop. Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per response. Respondents: Principal investigators, members of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees, animal care personnel, veterinarians, information providers, and administrators of animal use programs. Estimated number of Respondents: 100 per year. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 8.33 hours. Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed collection of information PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56441 is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and the assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technology. Comments should be sent to the address in the preamble. All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Dated: September 8, 2005. Edward B. Knipling, Administrator, ARS. [FR Doc. 05–19197 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–03–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service [Docket No. 04–112–1] Monsanto Company; Availability of Petition and Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Corn Genetically Engineered To Express High Lysine Levels Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has received a petition from Monsanto Company, seeking a determination of nonregulated status for corn designated as transformation event LY038, which has been genetically engineered to express a lysine-insensitive dihydrodipicolinate synthase (cDHDPS) enzyme, which allows for the accumulation of higher levels of lysine in the germ of the seed. Corn-soybean meal based diets formulated for poultry and swine are characteristically deficient in lysine and require the addition of supplemental lysine for optimal animal growth and production. This corn product may provide an alternative to supplementation of feed with lysine. The petition has been submitted in accordance with our regulations E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1 56442 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Notices concerning the introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms and products. In accordance with those regulations, we are soliciting public comments on whether this corn presents a plant pest risk. We are also making available for public comment an environmental assessment for the proposed determination of nonregulated status. DATES: We will consider all comments we receive on or before November 28, 2005. You may submit comments by either of the following methods: • EDOCKET: Go to https:// www.epa.gov/feddocket to submit or view public comments. Once you have entered EDOCKET, click on the ‘‘View Open APHIS Dockets’’ link to locate this document. • Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. 04–112–1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3C71, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737–1238. Please state that your comment refers to Docket No. 04–112–1. Reading Room: You may read the petition, the environmental assessment, and any comments that we receive on this docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202) 690–2817 before coming. ADDRESSES: Dr. Levis Handley, Biotechnology Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737– 1236; (301) 734–5721. To obtain copies of the petition or the environmental assessment (EA), contact Ms. Ingrid Berlanger at (301) 734–4885; e-mail: ingrid.e.berlanger@aphis.usda.gov. The petition and the EA are also available on the Internet at https:// www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/ 04_22901p.pdf and https:// www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/ 04_22901p.ea.pdf. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ‘‘Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,’’ regulate, among other things, the introduction (importation, interstate movement, or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:52 Sep 26, 2005 Jkt 205001 release into the environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered organisms and products are considered ‘‘regulated articles.’’ The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide that any person may submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6 describe the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status must take and the information that must be included in the petition. On August 16, 2004, APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition Number 04– 229–01p) from Monsanto Company (Monsanto) of St. Louis, MO, on behalf of Renessen LLC of Deerfield, IL, requesting a determination of nonregulated status under 7 CFR part 340 for corn (Zea mays L.) designated as transformation event LY038 which has been genetically engineered to produce higher levels of lysine in the seed than is typically found in corn. The Monsanto petition states that the subject corn should not be regulated by APHIS because it does not present a plant pest risk. As described in the petition, the LY038 corn has been genetically modified to express the cordapA gene from Cornybacterium glutamicum. This gene encodes for lysine-insensitive dihydrodipicolinate synthase (cDHDPS) enzyme. The expression of cordapA is under the control of the maize Glb1 promoter, which directs cDHDPS expression predominately in the germ of the seed, resulting in accumulation of lysine in the grain. Corn-soybean meal based diets formulated for poultry and swine are characteristically deficient in lysine and require the addition of supplemental lysine for optimal animal growth and production. Development of LY038 corn may provide an alternative to direct addition of supplemental lysine to poultry and swine diets. Event LY038 has been considered a regulated article under the regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it was originally engineered with regulatory sequences derived from plant pathogens. This corn event has been field tested since 2000 in the United States under APHIS notifications. In the process of reviewing the notifications for field trials of the subject corn, APHIS determined that the vectors and other elements were disarmed and that the trials, which were conducted under conditions of reproductive and physical PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 confinement or isolation, would not present a risk of plant pest introduction or dissemination. In section 403 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7702), plant pest is defined as any living stage of any of the following that can directly or indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause disease in any plant or plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal, a parasitic plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an infectious agent or other pathogen, or any article similar to or allied with any of the foregoing. APHIS views this definition very broadly. The definition covers direct or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to agricultural crops, but also to plants in general, for example, native species, as well as to organisms that may be beneficial to plants, for example, honeybees, rhizobia, etc. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a statement of policy on foods derived from new plant varieties in the Federal Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22984–23005). The FDA statement of policy includes a discussion of FDA’s authority for ensuring food safety under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and provides guidance to industry on the scientific considerations associated with the development of foods derived from new plant varieties, including those plants developed through the techniques of genetic engineering. Monsanto is consulting with FDA on the subject corn event. To provide the public with documentation of APHIS’ review and analysis of the environmental impacts and plant pest risk associated with a proposed determination of nonregulated status for Monsanto’s event LY038 corn, an environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared. The EA was prepared in accordance with (1) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372). In accordance with § 340.6(d) of the regulations, we are publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept written comments regarding the petition for a determination of nonregulated status from interested persons for a period of 60 days from the date of this notice. We are also soliciting written comments from interested persons on the environmental assessment prepared to examine any E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 27, 2005 / Notices environmental impacts of the proposed determination for the subject corn event. The petition and the environmental assessment and any comments received are available for public review, and copies of the petitions and the environmental assessment are available as indicated in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice. After the comment period closes, APHIS will review the data submitted by the petitioner, all written comments received during the comment period, and any other relevant information. After reviewing and evaluating the comments on the petition and the environmental assessment and other data and information, APHIS will furnish a response to the petitioner, either approving the petition in whole or in part, or denying the petition. APHIS will then publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the regulatory status of Monsanto’s high lysine corn event LY038 and the availability of APHIS’ written decision. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622n and 7701–7772; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of September 2005. Elizabeth E. Gaston, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E5–5178 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Mendocino Resource Advisory Committee Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee will meet October 21, 2005, (RAC) in Willits, California. Agenda items to be covered included: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-committees (4) Discussion—items of interest (5) Next agenda and meeting date. DATES: The meeting will be held on October 21, 2005, from 9 a.m. until 12 noon. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, located at 400 E. Commercial St. Willits, California. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983– 8503; e-mail rhurt@fs.fed.us. VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:52 Sep 26, 2005 Jkt 205001 The meeting is open to the public. Persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff by October 13, 2005. Public comment will have the opportunity to address the committee at the meeting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: September 21, 2005. Blaine Baker, Designated Federal Official. [FR Doc. 05–19240 Filed 9–26–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–601, A–583–603] Top–of-the–Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on top–ofthe–stove stainless steel cooking ware (‘‘cooking ware’’) from the Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’) and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). The Department conducted expedited (120– day) sunset reviews of these orders. As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are identified in the Final Results of Reviews section of this notice. EFFECTIVE DATE: September 27, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4114. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On March 1, 2005, the Department published the notice of initiation of the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on cooking ware from Korea and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 70 FR 9919 (March 1, 2005). The Department received the Notice of PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56443 Intent to Participate from Regal Ware, Inc.; Vita Craft Corporation; and Paper Allied Industrial Chemical & Energy Workers (Local 7–0850) (collectively ‘‘the domestic interested parties’’), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) (‘‘Sunset Regulations’’). The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act, as manufacturers of a domestic–like product in the United States, and unions whose workers are engaged in the production of a domestic–like product in the United States. We received complete substantive responses from the domestic interested parties within the 30–day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no responses from respondent interested parties with respect to any of the orders covered by these sunset reviews. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited (120–day) sunset reviews of these orders for Korea and Taiwan. Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to these antidumping orders is cooking ware from Korea and Taiwan. The subject merchandise is all non–electric cooking ware of stainless steel which may have one or more layers of aluminum, copper or carbon steel for more even heat distribution. The subject merchandise includes skillets, frying pans, omelette pans, saucepans, double boilers, stock pots, dutch ovens, casseroles, steamers, and other stainless steel vessels, all for cooking on stove top burners, except tea kettles and fish poachers. Excluded from the scope of the orders are stainless steel oven ware and stainless steel kitchen ware. The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers 7323.93.00 and 9604.00.00. The HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and Customs purposes only. The written description remains dispositive. The Department has issued several scope clarifications for these orders. The Department found that ‘‘universal pan lids’’ are not within the scope of the orders (57 FR 57420 (December 4, 1992)) and Max Burton’s StoveTop Smoker is within the scope of the orders (60 FR 36782 (July 18, 1995)). Certain stainless steel pasta and steamer inserts (63 FR 41545 (August 4, 1998)), certain stainless steel eight–cup coffee percolators (58 FR 11209, February 24, 1993), and certain stainless steel stock pots and covers are within the scope of E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 186 (Tuesday, September 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56441-56443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. 04-112-1]


Monsanto Company; Availability of Petition and Environmental 
Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Corn 
Genetically Engineered To Express High Lysine Levels

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service has received a petition from Monsanto Company, 
seeking a determination of nonregulated status for corn designated as 
transformation event LY038, which has been genetically engineered to 
express a lysine-insensitive dihydrodipicolinate synthase (cDHDPS) 
enzyme, which allows for the accumulation of higher levels of lysine in 
the germ of the seed. Corn-soybean meal based diets formulated for 
poultry and swine are characteristically deficient in lysine and 
require the addition of supplemental lysine for optimal animal growth 
and production. This corn product may provide an alternative to 
supplementation of feed with lysine. The petition has been submitted in 
accordance with our regulations

[[Page 56442]]

concerning the introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms 
and products. In accordance with those regulations, we are soliciting 
public comments on whether this corn presents a plant pest risk. We are 
also making available for public comment an environmental assessment 
for the proposed determination of nonregulated status.

DATES: We will consider all comments we receive on or before November 
28, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
     EDOCKET: Go to https://www.epa.gov/feddocket to submit or 
view public comments. Once you have entered EDOCKET, click on the 
``View Open APHIS Dockets'' link to locate this document.
     Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies 
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. 04-112-1, 
Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3C71, 4700 
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your 
comment refers to Docket No. 04-112-1.
    Reading Room: You may read the petition, the environmental 
assessment, and any comments that we receive on this docket in our 
reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of the USDA 
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, 
please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Levis Handley, Biotechnology 
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 
20737-1236; (301) 734-5721. To obtain copies of the petition or the 
environmental assessment (EA), contact Ms. Ingrid Berlanger at (301) 
734-4885; e-mail: ingrid.e.berlanger@aphis.usda.gov. The petition and 
the EA are also available on the Internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
brs/aphisdocs/04_22901p.pdf and https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/
aphisdocs/04_22901p.ea.pdf.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The regulations in 7 CFR part 340, 
``Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced Through 
Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is Reason to 
Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among other things, the 
introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the 
environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through 
genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to 
believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered organisms and 
products are considered ``regulated articles.''
    The regulations in Sec.  340.6(a) provide that any person may 
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated 
under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec.  340.6 describe 
the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status 
must take and the information that must be included in the petition.
    On August 16, 2004, APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition 
Number 04-229-01p) from Monsanto Company (Monsanto) of St. Louis, MO, 
on behalf of Renessen LLC of Deerfield, IL, requesting a determination 
of nonregulated status under 7 CFR part 340 for corn (Zea mays L.) 
designated as transformation event LY038 which has been genetically 
engineered to produce higher levels of lysine in the seed than is 
typically found in corn. The Monsanto petition states that the subject 
corn should not be regulated by APHIS because it does not present a 
plant pest risk.
    As described in the petition, the LY038 corn has been genetically 
modified to express the cordapA gene from Cornybacterium glutamicum. 
This gene encodes for lysine-insensitive dihydrodipicolinate synthase 
(cDHDPS) enzyme. The expression of cordapA is under the control of the 
maize Glb1 promoter, which directs cDHDPS expression predominately in 
the germ of the seed, resulting in accumulation of lysine in the grain. 
Corn-soybean meal based diets formulated for poultry and swine are 
characteristically deficient in lysine and require the addition of 
supplemental lysine for optimal animal growth and production. 
Development of LY038 corn may provide an alternative to direct addition 
of supplemental lysine to poultry and swine diets.
    Event LY038 has been considered a regulated article under the 
regulations in 7 CFR part 340 because it was originally engineered with 
regulatory sequences derived from plant pathogens. This corn event has 
been field tested since 2000 in the United States under APHIS 
notifications. In the process of reviewing the notifications for field 
trials of the subject corn, APHIS determined that the vectors and other 
elements were disarmed and that the trials, which were conducted under 
conditions of reproductive and physical confinement or isolation, would 
not present a risk of plant pest introduction or dissemination.
    In section 403 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7702), plant 
pest is defined as any living stage of any of the following that can 
directly or indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause disease in any 
plant or plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal, a parasitic 
plant, a bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an infectious agent or 
other pathogen, or any article similar to or allied with any of the 
foregoing. APHIS views this definition very broadly. The definition 
covers direct or indirect injury, disease, or damage not just to 
agricultural crops, but also to plants in general, for example, native 
species, as well as to organisms that may be beneficial to plants, for 
example, honeybees, rhizobia, etc.
    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a statement of 
policy on foods derived from new plant varieties in the Federal 
Register on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22984-23005). The FDA statement of 
policy includes a discussion of FDA's authority for ensuring food 
safety under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and provides 
guidance to industry on the scientific considerations associated with 
the development of foods derived from new plant varieties, including 
those plants developed through the techniques of genetic engineering. 
Monsanto is consulting with FDA on the subject corn event.
    To provide the public with documentation of APHIS' review and 
analysis of the environmental impacts and plant pest risk associated 
with a proposed determination of nonregulated status for Monsanto's 
event LY038 corn, an environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared. 
The EA was prepared in accordance with (1) The National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) 
regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing 
the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA 
regulations implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA 
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
    In accordance with Sec.  340.6(d) of the regulations, we are 
publishing this notice to inform the public that APHIS will accept 
written comments regarding the petition for a determination of 
nonregulated status from interested persons for a period of 60 days 
from the date of this notice. We are also soliciting written comments 
from interested persons on the environmental assessment prepared to 
examine any

[[Page 56443]]

environmental impacts of the proposed determination for the subject 
corn event. The petition and the environmental assessment and any 
comments received are available for public review, and copies of the 
petitions and the environmental assessment are available as indicated 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice.
    After the comment period closes, APHIS will review the data 
submitted by the petitioner, all written comments received during the 
comment period, and any other relevant information. After reviewing and 
evaluating the comments on the petition and the environmental 
assessment and other data and information, APHIS will furnish a 
response to the petitioner, either approving the petition in whole or 
in part, or denying the petition. APHIS will then publish a notice in 
the Federal Register announcing the regulatory status of Monsanto's 
high lysine corn event LY038 and the availability of APHIS' written 
decision.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622n and 7701-7772; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of September 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
 [FR Doc. E5-5178 Filed 9-26-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.